Next Article in Journal
BrnQ Branched-Chain Amino Acid Transporters Influence Toxin Production by, but Not Growth of, Clostridium perfringens Type A Strain ATCC3624
Previous Article in Journal
Bite First, Bleed Later: How Philippine Trimeresurus Pit Viper Venoms Hijack Blood Clotting
Previous Article in Special Issue
A 15-Year Retrospective Review of Ciguatera in the Madeira Islands (North-East Atlantic, Portugal)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pacific Ciguatoxin-1 (P-CTX-1) in a Moray eel (Gymnothorax javanicus) Responsible for Ciguatera in Khanh Hoa Province, Viet Nam

1
Institute of Oceanography, Viet Nam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST), 01 Cau Da, Nha Trang 650000, Khanh Hoa, Vietnam
2
Center for High Technology Research and Development, Viet Nam Academy of Science and Technology. 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Ha Noi 100000, Vietnam
3
State Key Laboratory of Marine Pollution and Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2025, 17(4), 186; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17040186
Submission received: 10 March 2025 / Revised: 3 April 2025 / Accepted: 4 April 2025 / Published: 7 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Collection Ciguatoxin)

Abstract

:
On 5 November 2020, a poisoning event involving four people by the consumption of moray eel occurred in Khanh Hoa Province, Viet Nam, with signs indicative of ciguatera. The remaining moray portion was confiscated for identification of causative species and responsible toxins. The phylogenetic study based on COX1 identified the moray as Gymnothorax javanicus Bleeker (1859). Out of 17 marine lipophilic toxins (MLPs) that were analyzed using LC-MS/MS, only Pacific ciguatoxin-1 (P-CTX-1) was detected in the moray’s flesh at 1.30 ± 0.004 ng/g ww, while no toxin was found in the skin. The N2a assay’s ciguatoxicities in the skin and flesh were 0.69 ± 0.075 and 2.49 ± 0.216 ng P-CTX-1/g ww equivalent, respectively. In the N2a assay, the P-CTX-1 amount in the moray flesh was 1.9 times greater than that determined by LC-MS/MS, indicating the presence of additional sodium channel activators or a matrix effect. The P-CTX-1 amount in the moray flesh was at a level that generates major ciguatera poisoning (CP) symptoms in humans (1.0 ng/g P-CTX-1), makes sense given that four consumers experienced the onset of poisoning symptoms. This study is significant for the management of seafood safety since it is the first scientific report on the species and toxin in a moray causing ciguatera in Viet Nam.
Key Contribution: This paper provides definitive evidence of the presence of P-CTX-1 in a moray implicated in a ciguatera fish poisoning incident in Viet Nam.

1. Introduction

Ciguatera poisoning (CP) causes gastrointestinal, neurological, and cardiovascular poisoning symptoms in humans who eat contaminated fish [1,2]. It is known that toxic benthic dinoflagellates, such as Gambierdiscus and Fukuyoa species, are the source of lipid-soluble polycyclic ether compounds called ciguatoxins (CTXs), which can accumulate in fish [3] and biomagnify along food chains [4]. As one of the top carnivorous predators, morays have been reported to collect larger levels of CTXs than other fish species [5,6,7]. Several tropical and subtropical fish species are known to possess CTXs. In some nations, including Japan, Hong Kong, and Kiribati, they are regarded as ciguateric fish [6,7,8,9].
In addition to two CP cases by the consumption of red snapper Lutjanus bohar in 2014 and 2016 that were documented [10], there are also suspected CP incidents involving the consumption of morays, mostly along the central coast of Viet Nam (Dao, unpublished data). In our previous investigation, it was found that four common moray species randomly collected from coastal locations where suspected CP cases have occurred had certain amounts of Pacific-ciguatoxin-1 (P-CTX-1), also referred to as ciguatoxin-1B (CTX-1B) [11]. In Viet Nam, it was proposed that these marine species might pose a health concern to humans. However, because there are not enough implicated samples, the toxins that cause these poisonings haven’t been confirmed. Furthermore, poisonous materials were typically cooked, processed, and partially consumed; as a result, it was unable to identify the causative species by morphological characteristics.
A poisoning event involving four people who ate a moray occurred in Khanh Hoa Province on 5 November 2020 (https://baokhanhhoa.vn/xa-hoi/yte-suckhoe/202011/bi-ngo-doc-nghi-do-an-ca-chinh-8192412/ (accessed on 8 November 2020)). This study presents the results of toxin analysis and species identification using a leftover piece of moray that was confiscated from this poisoning incident. Additionally, ciguatoxicity results in a mouse neuroblastoma (N2a) assay were documented. This study is significant for the management of seafood safety since it is the first scientific report on the causative species and responsible toxin in a moray that causes ciguatera in Viet Nam.

2. Results

2.1. Ciguatera Case

A 26-year-old man from Nha Trang city, Khanh Hoa Province, purchased a large moray (about 4.0 kg of body weight) at a local fish market. In order to share the moray with his relative family in Van Ninh District, Khanh Hoa Province, he split it in half. He kept part of the half to prepare his dinner at home. Following his meals, symptoms such as diarrhea, vomiting, and tingling in the limbs appeared; these were accompanied by ciguatera symptoms [12,13]. His health did not improve the next morning, so he was taken to Khanh Hoa General Hospital for medical treatment. Three of his family members who consumed the other half of the moray were also hospitalized after experiencing similar poisoning symptoms.

2.2. Species Identification

The resulting COX1 alignment was 586 bp long and comprised 21 sequences, of which 155 (26.5%) were parsimony informative sites, 197 (33.6%) were variable sites, 43 (7.2%) were singletons, and 389 bp (66.4%) were conserved sites. The recently collected specimens from Viet Nam were placed into the clade composed of Gymnothorax javanicus Bleeker (1859) species with complete support, 100% and 1.0 bootstrap value and posterior probability, respectively, by phylogenetic analyses using ML and BI (Figure 1, Table A1). Sequence divergence values within the species G. javanicus varied from 0% (0 bp) to 2.2% (13 bp). Samples taken in the Philippines and Viet Nam do not differ in nucleotides. According to our COX1-based molecular analysis, the Vietnamese specimen is G. javanicus.

2.3. Toxin

Among the 17 marine lipophilic phytotoxins (MLPs), only P-CTX-1 was detected in the moray flesh sample at 1.30 ± 0.004 ng/g ww by setting the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions as m/z 1128.4 > 1057.5, 1128.4 > 1075.5, and 1128.4 > 1093.5. Nevertheless, the skin sample did not contain any toxins. The MRM LC-MS/MS chromatogram of the P-CTX standards and flesh sample from G. javanicus are shown in Figure 2.
The ciguatoxicities in the skin and meat samples were determined in the N2a assay to be 0.69 ± 0.075 and 2.49 ± 0.216 ng P-CTX-1/g ww equivalent, respectively (Table 1).

3. Discussion

The results show that P-CTX-1 is dominant in Viet Nam, which is consistent with our earlier findings on the toxin in the red snapper Lutjanus bohar [10] and some moray species [11] found in Vietnamese coastal waters. The accumulation of CTXs in fish originating from toxic benthic dinoflagellates is well documented [6,14]. A number of possible CTX-producing dinoflagellates, such as Gambierdiscus species, were reported in Viet Nam [15] and have since been updated [16]. To better understand the mechanism of the CTXs pathway in marine ecosystems, research is being performed on the presence of CTXs in morays with the distribution of toxic dinoflagellates, Gambierdiscus spp.
The P-CTX-1 amount of 1.30 ± 0.004 ng/g found in the flesh of G. javanicus in the present study was lower than the 4.07 ng/g found in a specimen of this species from Spratly Islands in 2018 [11]. Only P-CTX-1 was detected by LC-MS/MS in our study, even though numerous P-CTXs were found in different samples. According to an earlier study, P-CTX-2 is the main P-CTX in herbivorous and omnivorous fish, while P-CTX-1 is the dominating P-CTX in top predators like moray eels [17]. Given their perhaps lower quantities in the sample and the strong matrix effects that can obstruct the detection procedure, the absence of P-CTX-2/3 in the chromatogram may be explained.
According to Chan et al. [6], ciguatoxicity in morays can vary up to 10,000 times between species and localities. Additionally, it was discovered that, although it was still unclear for many species, the concentration of CTXs correlated well with the moray’s body weight [6,18]. Due to the limitation of sample size and sampling sites, more work on CTX research is required to obtain a comprehensive picture of the prevalence of ciguatera in Viet Nam. The amount of P-CTX-1 in this study was beyond the EFSA-recommended level of 10 pg/g P-CTX-1 equivalent, even at a dose that induces notable CP symptoms in people [4]. The outcome makes sense given that four people who consumed this moray experienced the onset of poisoning symptoms.
The moray, G. javanicus, is known to accumulate high CTX levels, and with their large body sizes, they have the potential to cause mass ciguatera poisoning and even deaths in several countries [2,4,19,20,21,22]. This species’ extensive range has led to a number of incidents in the Atlantic and Indo-Pacific ocean regions [23]. In Viet Nam, G. javanicus is a common moray species [24,25] that is frequently consumed by both locals and foreign visitors. Together with our previous result [11], this one warns that moray G. javanicus represents a ciguatera threat in Viet Nam. In order to protect human health, there should be a stronger public awareness campaign and updated regulations on the consumption of this marine species in Viet Nam.
Complex biological matrices can affect measurement accuracy and dependability, frequently producing false-negative results in instrumental analysis and false-positive results in bioactivity analysis. In the present study, the corresponding P-CTX-1 level in the flesh sample of G. javanicus in the N2a assay was 1.9 times greater than the LC-MS/MS measurement. This outcome is in line with the previous study [26]. This discrepancy could be caused by matrix effects in the sample, additional sodium channel activators, or unknown toxins. Instrumental methods are unable to quantify these unknown toxins.
The residual fish oil content is probably the cause of matrix effects in the LC-MS/MS detection of CTXs. For instance, compared to pure methanol, fish flesh extracts can reduce the P-CTX-1 standard response by 34–40% [26]. Likewise, compared to fish flesh extracts, matrix effects were much diminished in fish blood extracts [27]. These suggested that one of the key causes of matrix effects is the residual fish oil concentration. The skin sample from the current study showed clear matrix interference, and the high lipid content in the LC-MS/MS analysis was blamed for signal suppression. Improvements in clean-up procedures for CTX detection are necessary in Viet Nam in order to manage fisheries resources for CFP control and assess threats to human health.
Since CTXs preferentially accumulated in fatty tissues, most recent investigations on their content concentrated on the fish’s meat and viscera. Limited research has been performed on other fish tissues. Using mouse bioassay, it was discovered that ciguatoxin is present in the gonads, gills, heart, skin, blood, flesh, and bones of Caribbean fish, and that the toxin concentration in the flesh was comparable to that in the skin [28]. Using the N2a assay, Roué et al. [29] discovered that the ciguatoxicity in gigantic clams occurred in the following order: viscera > flesh > mantle. In the present study, the skin of G. javanicus has a lower level of N2a ciguatoxicity than the flesh. More research is necessary to understand the relationship between the ciguatoxicity of this species’ flesh and skin because of the small sample size. Additionally, more research is needed to determine the tissue distribution of ciguatoxicity in the moray G. javanicus for application in public health and fisheries management.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Sample Collection

A portion of moray (Figure A1) was taken from the victim’s residence in Nha Trang city, Khanh Hoa province, and brought to the laboratory in a cool state. In order to identify the species using molecular techniques, approximately 5 g of wet weight (ww) flesh was gathered. The remaining moray sample was divided into sub-samples of flesh (296 g) and skin (110 g). These subsamples were subsequently stored in the refrigerator (2–10 °C) for toxin analysis after being lyophilized to the final 89 g and 68 g of freeze-dried materials, respectively.

4.2. Reagents and Chemicals

DNeasy® Blood & Tissue were commercial products sourced from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany); acetate and EDTA were sourced from Sigma-Aldrich (Hamburg, Germany); Midori Green Advance was sourced from Nippon Genetics Europe GmbH (Düren, Germany); GenElute™. PCRClean-Up kit was sourced from SigmaAldrich (St. Louis, MN, USA); Tris base was sourced from Merck (Frankfurt, Germany); GeneRuler DNA Ladders were sourced from Thermo Fisher-Scientific (Bremen, Germany).
A total of 17 typical marine lipophilic phycotoxin (MLP) standards (azaspiracids 1–3; brevetoxins-2, -3, and -9; gymnodimine; spirolide 1; okadaic acid; dinophysistoxins 1–2; pectenotoxin 2; yessotoxins (YTX) and the YTX derivative homoYTX; P-CTX-1; P-CTX-2; and P-CTX-3) were mixed and diluted for constructing a calibration curve with 80% aqueous methanol. Milli-Q water from a Milli-Q water-purification system (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) was used throughout the experiment. HPLC-grade methanol and acetonitrile were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Pesticide-grade n-hexane was purchased from Anaqua Chemicals Supply (Wilmington, NC, USA). Acetic acid (99.9%) was purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries (Osaka, Japan). AR-grade chloroform was obtained from LabScan (Bangkok, Thailand). AR-grade formic acid (98–100%), ammonia formate (98–100%), and ammonia solution (25%) were supplied from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

4.3. Species Identification

As mentioned above, since the poisonous sample could not be identifiable by morphological characters, molecular techniques were applied in this study for species identification.
Following the manufacturer’s instructions, 100 mg of flesh tissue from two different parts was extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit, Qiagen (Germantown, MD, USA). The regions selected for PCR amplification were portions of the cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COX1). We used the primer pairs of FishF1/FishR1 [30] to obtain the length of 650 bp under the PCR amplification protocols of Weigt et al. [31]. The GenEluteTM PCR Clean-Up kit (SigmaAldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA) was used to clean PCR products. 1ST BASE (Selangor, Malaysia) conducted direct Sanger sequencing of PCR products in both directions. The consensus sequences were assembled in Clone Manager 9 (Sci-Ed, Cary, NC, USA). Alignments were cut at the 5′ and 3′ ends prior to divergence analysis in order to remove missing data. The internet program Blast, located at https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi (accessed on 15 March 2024), was used to compare the consensus sequences determined in this work to GenBank.

4.4. Phylogenetics

Two consensus sequences obtained in this study were compared to COX1 sequences, eighteen sequences of known Gymnothorax species, and one sequence from members Strophidon (out-group) retrieved from GenBank (Table A1) for forming the final COI alignment. The datasets were aligned by the MAFFT algorithm with the selection of the q-insi option. jModelTest v.2.1.6 [32] and the corrected AIC (Akaike information criterion) were used to find the best evolutionary model for each alignment. The phylogenetic analyses were carried out using Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML). A General Time Reversible model and 1000 bootstrap replicates were used to perform ML using RAxML v.8.1 [29]. MrBayes v.3.2.2 [30] was used to conduct BI analyses, utilizing the same model as before. Two parallel runs with four chains each (three heated and one cold) were carried out in the BI, sampling a tree every 100 generations.

4.5. Toxin Extraction and Clean-Up

Targeted MLPs in moray samples were extracted and cleaned up using the procedures outlined by Zhu et al. [17]. Briefly, 1 g of freeze-dried flesh (corresponding to 3.32 g ww) and 0.5 g of freeze-dried skin (corresponding to 0.81 g ww) were mixed with diatomaceous earth and extracted using the ASE 200 system (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The extract was concentrated and then dissolved in 25% aqueous methanol. Each crude extract was loaded on a C18 SPE cartridge (Agilent BondElut, Santa Clara, CA, USA; 500 mg, 6 mL) and the analytes were eluted by 4 mL of methanol and 4 mL of methanol containing 0.3% ammonia solution. The eluent was washed with n-hexane and further extracted with chloroform. The chloroform layer was concentrated and dissolved in 5% methanol in chloroform. The analyte was passed through a silica cartridge (Waters Sep-Pak, Milford, MA, USA; 500 mg, 6 mL). All the target analytes, excluding YTX, were eluted using 10% methanol in chloroform. YTX was then eluted using 8 mL of 30% methanol in chloroform. The eluent was dried under N2 and was resuspended with 100 μL of 80% methanol/water before LC-MS/MS injection.

4.6. LC-MS/MS Analysis

MLP concentrations were determined by an Agilent 1290 Infinity ultra-performance liquid chromatograph (UPLC) (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA) interfaced with a 5500 QTRAP system (AB Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA) in both positive and negative ions. All the target analytes were detected in multiple-reaction-monitoring mode. Quantitation and confirmation mass transitions of each MLP showed in Table 2. A Phenomenex Kinetex C18 LC column (100 × 2.1 mm i.d., particle size 1.7 μm) was used for the separation. The injection volume was 5 μL. The electrospray ionization parameters were set as follows: positive ion-spray voltage, 5500 V; negative ion-spray voltage, −4500 V; GS1, 30 psi; GS2, 40 psi; curtain gas, 10 psi; ion source temperature, 400 °C; collision gas, medium. Gradient elution was performed at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min with (A) Milli-Q water containing 0.1% formic acid and 2 mM ammonium formate and (B) 95% acetonitrile in Milli-Q water containing 0.1% formic acid and 2 mM ammonium formate. The gradient program started at 20% B and was maintained for 1 min. It was then increased to 80% B in 5 min and maintained for 2 min. After increasing to 100% B in 2 min and maintaining it for 4 min, it then returned to 20% B in 0.1 min. The column was equilibrated with 20% B for 4.9 min before the next run. The quality assurance of the method was assessed by spiking 0.1 ng MLPs into 0.5 g of flesh (dry weight) of nontoxic mangrove red snappers purchased from the market (n = 3). The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were defined based on an instrumental signal-to-noise ratio of 3:1 and 10:1, respectively. In this method, the LOD of P-CTX-1 was 0.078 ng/g, and the LOQ was 0.31 ng/g.

4.7. Mouse Neuroblastoma (N2a) Assay

The ciguatoxicities of moray flesh and skin samples were also determined by the N2a assay [26]. The final extracts for LC-MS/MS analysis were diluted five times using 20% methanol in PBS and then applied to N2a cells. An N2a cell cytotoxicity assay was carried out using previously published techniques [6,33]. N2a cells (CCL131; ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and 2 g/L of Na2CO3 at 37 °C in 5% CO2. N2a cells were seeded into 96-well culture plates at a cell density of 2.5 × 105 cells/mL with 200 μL of the medium. After incubating for 24 h, the medium was renewed with complete RPMI-1640 (including 0.1 mM ouabain and 0.01 mM veratridine). A total of 10 µL/well P-CTX-1 standards were added to the cells at 08 concentrations ranging from 4.88 pg/mL to 312 pg/mL in 06 replicates. Sample extracts dissolved in 20% methanol in PBS were diluted and tested in triplicate. After incubating for 18 h, the cell proliferation was measured by MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium). A microplate reader with a reference wavelength of 655 nm was used to measure absorbance at 595 nm. The optical density obtained from each well was normalized by MTT blank. Ciguatoxicity values of the moray samples were determined from the standard curve. The assay was performed twice, and the ciguatoxicity values are reported as mean P-CTX-1 equivalents between the two assays. The LOQ of this assay was 9.75 pg/g ww.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.V.D., T.N.N. and L.L.C.; methodology, H.V.D., H.H.K.L., X.-V.N. and J.W.; software, J.Z.; validation, X.-V.N. and X.-T.T.N.; formal analysis, H.H.K.L., V.B.P., A.P.N., T.T.D., N.-T.N.N., X.-T.T.N. and J.Z.; Investigation, H.H.K.L., K.X.P., V.B.P., T.T.D., N.-T.N.N. and X.-T.T.N.; data curation, K.X.P., A.P.N. and J.W.; writing—original draft, K.X.P., V.B.P., A.P.N., X.-V.N. and J.Z.; writing—review and editing, H.V.D., T.N.N. and J.W.; visualization, L.L.C.; supervision, L.L.C.; project administration, H.V.D.; funding acquisition, H.V.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Viet Nam Academy of Science and Technology (project grant number TĐĐTB0.03/24-26).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed at the corresponding author(s).

Acknowledgments

This paper serves as a celebration of the Viet Nam Academy of Science and Technology’s 50th anniversary. Under the auspices of the IOC/WESTPAC Regional Research and Training Centers, the study was conducted in cooperation with the General Research Fund of the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (grant number CityU11104821).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Moray specimen that caused the poisoning incident in Khanh Hoa Province, Viet Nam, in 2020 (photo was provided by the victim’s family).
Figure A1. Moray specimen that caused the poisoning incident in Khanh Hoa Province, Viet Nam, in 2020 (photo was provided by the victim’s family).
Toxins 17 00186 g0a1
Table A1. List of taxa and GenBank accession numbers of Gymnothorax spp. used in this present study. Samples produced in this study are written in bold; na, = not available; -/-, as above.
Table A1. List of taxa and GenBank accession numbers of Gymnothorax spp. used in this present study. Samples produced in this study are written in bold; na, = not available; -/-, as above.
TaxaVoucher NumberLocalityGenBank AccessionsReferences
Gymnothorax emmaenaChinaOQ825095Direct submission
Gymnothorax flavimarginatusnanaGU175476[34]
Gymnothorax flavimarginatusGAM-190French PolynesiaMK658227[35]
Gymnothorax javanicusVMO-CH1AViet Nam This present study
Gymnothorax javanicusVMO-CH1BViet Nam This present study
Gymnothorax javanicusPHI-153PhilippinesOQ386700Direct submission
Gymnothorax javanicusSIAR056PhilippinesOQ179512-/-
Gymnothorax javanicusCYO-32PhilippinesKC970476-/-
Gymnothorax javanicusM139ChinaMW034013-/-
Gymnothorax javanicusSCIL077French PolynesiaMK657369[35]
Gymnothorax javanicusSCIL301French PolynesiaMK657917-/-
Gymnothorax javanicusMBIO1603.4French PolynesiaJQ431805[36]
Gymnothorax javanicusnaUSAHQ122462Direct submission
Gymnothorax javanicusNBE0304MadagascarJQ350036[36]
Gymnothorax muciferDOS06266TaiwanMH400956[37]
Gymnothorax nubilusP44076New ZealandHM422352Direct submission
Gymnothorax pseudokidakoNMMB-P34697TaiwanMW354731[38]
Gymnothorax reevesiinaChinaMW539055Direct submission
Gymnothorax reticularisnaChinaOQ675586-/-
Gymnothorax richardsoniinaChinaOQ675585-/-
Strophidon dorsalisBW-A9085IndonesiaHQ564522-/-

References

  1. Campora, C.E.; Dierking, J.; Tamaru, C.S.; Hokama, Y.; Vincent, D. Detection of ciguatoxin in fish tissue using sandwich ELISA and neuroblastoma cell bioassay. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2008, 22, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lehane, L.; Lewis, R.J. Ciguatera: Recent advances but the risk remains. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2000, 61, 91–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Caillaud, A.; De la Iglesia, P.; Darius, H.T.; Pauillac, S.; Aligizaki, K.; Fraga, S.; Chinain, M.; Diogène, J. Update on Methodologies Available for Ciguatoxin Determination: Perspectives to Confront the Onset of Ciguatera Fish Poisoning in Europe. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 1838–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain. Scientific Opinion on marine biotoxins in shellfish—Emerging toxins: Ciguatoxin group. EFSA J. 2010, 8, 1627–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chinain, M.; Darius, H.T.; Ung, A.; Fouc, M.T.; Revel, T.; Cruchet, P.; Pauillac, S.; Laurent, D. Ciguatera risk management in French Polynesia: The case study of Raivavae Island (Australes Archipelago). Toxicon 2010, 56, 674–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chan, W.H.; Mak, Y.L.; Wu, J.J.; Jin, L.; Sit, W.H.; Lam, J.C.W.; Sadovy de Mitcheson, Y.; Chan, L.L.; Lam, P.K.S.; Murphy, M.B. Spatial distribution of ciguateric fish in the Republic of Kiribati. Chemosphere 2011, 84, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhu, J.; Lee, W.-H.; Wu, J.; Zhou, S.; Yip, K.-C.; Liu, X.; Kirata, T.; Chan, L.-L. The Occurrence, Distribution, and Toxicity of High-Risk Ciguatera Fish Species (Grouper and Snapper) in Kiritimati Island and Marakei Island of the Republic of Kiribati. Toxins 2022, 14, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Oshiro, N.; Yogi, K.; Asato, S.; Sasaki, T.; Tamanaha, K.; Hirama, M.; Yasumoto, T.; Inafuku, Y. Ciguatera incidence and fish toxicity in Okinawa, Japan. Toxicon 2010, 56, 656–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, N.; Huan, Q.; Du, K.; Hu, R.; Jiang, T.-J. Ciguatera toxins in wild coral reef fish along the southern coast of China. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2015, 66, 1168–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ha, D.V.; Uesugi, A.; Uchida, H.; Ky, P.X.; Minh, D.Q.; Watanabe, R.; Matsushima, R.; Oikawa, H.; Nagai, S.; Iwataki, M.; et al. Identification of Causative Ciguatoxins in Red Snappers Lutjanus bohar Implicated in Ciguatera Fish Poisonings in Vietnam. Toxins 2018, 10, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dao, H.V.; Le, H.H.K.; Le, T.T.T.; Pham, K.X.; Bui, M.Q.; Chan, L.L. Ciguatoxin in moray eels raising the risk for seafood safety in Viet Nam. Fish. Sci. 2022, 88, 821–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lewis, R.J. The changing face of ciguatera. Toxicon 2001, 39, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Vilariño, N.; Louzao, M.C.; Abal, P.; Cagide, E.; Carrera, C.; Vieytes, M.R.; Botana, L.M. Human Poisoning from Marine Toxins: Unknowns for Optimal Consumer Protection. Toxins 2018, 10, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dickey, R.W. Ciguatera Toxins: Chemistry, Toxicology, and Detection. In Seafood and Freshwater Toxin; Botana, L.M., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008; pp. 477–500. [Google Scholar]
  15. Roeder, K.; Erler, K.; Kibler, S.; Tester, P.; Van The, H.; Nguyen-Ngoc, L.; Gerdts, G.; Luckas, B. Characteristic profiles of Ciguatera toxins in different strains of Gambierdiscus spp. Toxicon 2010, 56, 731–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nguyen-Ngoc, L.; Larsen, J.; Doan-Nhu, H.; Nguyen, X.-V.; Chomérat, N.; Lundholm, N.; Phan-Tan, L.; Dao, H.V.; Nguyen, N.-L.; Nguyen, H.-H.; et al. Gambierdiscus (Gonyaulacales, Dinophyceae) diversity in Vietnamese waters with description of G. vietnamensis sp. nov. J. Phycol. 2023, 59, 496–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhu, J.; Li, J.; Wu, J.; Liu, X.; Lin, Y.; Deng, H.; Qin, X.; Wong, M.H.; Chan, L.L. The Prevalence of Marine Lipophilic Phycotoxins Causes Potential Risks in a Tropical Small Island Developing State. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 9815–9827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Olsen, D.A.; Nellis, D.W.; Wood, R.S. Ciguatera in the Eastern Caribbean. Mar. Fish. Rev. 1984, 46, 13–18. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chan, T.Y.K. Characteristic Features and Contributory Factors in Fatal Ciguatera Fish Poisoning—Implications for Prevention and Public Education. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2016, 94, 704–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lewis, R.J. Ciguatera: Australian perspectives on a global problem. Toxicon 2006, 48, 799–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Friedman, M.A.; Fernandez, M.; Backer, L.C.; Dickey, R.W.; Bernstein, J.; Schrank, K.; Kibler, S.; Stephan, W.; Gribble, M.O.; Bienfang, P.; et al. An Updated Review of Ciguatera Fish Poisoning: Clinical, Epidemiological, Environmental, and Public Health Management. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Radke, E.G.; Reich, A.; Morris, J.G. Epidemiology of Ciguatera in Florida. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015, 93, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Glaziou, P.; Legrand, A.-M. The epidemiology of ciguatera fish poisoning. Toxicon 1994, 32, 863–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Phung, N.H. Fauna of Viet Nam; Publish House of Science and Technology: Ha Noi, Vietnam, 2001; Volume 10, 330p. (In Vietnamese) [Google Scholar]
  25. Phung, N.H.; Thi, N.N. List of Vietnamese Marine Fish; Publish House of Science and Technology: Ha Noi, Vietnam, 1994; Volume 2, 269p. (In Vietnamese) [Google Scholar]
  26. Wu, J.J.; Mak, Y.L.; Murphy, M.B.; Lam, J.C.W.; Chan, W.H.; Wang, M.; Chan, L.L.; Lam, P.K.S. Validation of an accelerated solvent extraction liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for Pacific ciguatoxin-1 in fish flesh and comparison with the mouse neuroblastoma assay. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2011, 400, 3165–3175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mak, Y.L.; Wu, J.J.; Chan, W.H.; Murphy, M.B.; Lam, J.C.W.; Chan, L.L.; Lam, P.K.S. Simultaneous quantification of Pacific ciguatoxins in fish blood using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405, 3331–3340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vernoux, J.P.; Lahlou, N.; Abbad el Andaloussi, S.; Riyeche, N.; Magras, L.P. A study of the distribution of ciguatoxin in individual Caribbean fish. Acta Trop. 1985, 42, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Roué, M.; Darius, H.T.; Ung, A.; Viallon, J.; Sibat, M.; Hess, P.; Amzil, Z.; Chinain, M. Tissue Distribution and Elimination of Ciguatoxins in Tridacna maxima (Tridacnidae, Bivalvia) Fed Gambierdiscus polynesiensis. Toxins 2018, 10, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ward, R.D. FISH-BOL, A Case Study for DNA Barcodes. In DNA Barcodes: Methods and Protocols; Kress, W.J., Erickson, D.L., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 423–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Weigt, L.A.; Driskell, A.C.; Baldwin, C.C.; Ormos, A. DNA Barcoding Fishes. In DNA Barcodes: Methods and Protocols; Kress, W.J., Erickson, D.L., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 109–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Darriba, D.; Taboada, G.L.; Doallo, R.; Posada, D. jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Catania, D.; Richlen, M.L.; Mak, Y.L.; Morton, S.L.; Laban, E.H.; Xu, Y.; Anderson, D.M.; Chan, L.L.; Berumen, M.L. The prevalence of benthic dinoflagellates associated with ciguatera fish poisoning in the central Red Sea. Harmful. Algae 2017, 68, 206–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Reece, J.S.; Bowen, B.W.; Joshi, K.; Goz, V.; Larson, A. Phylogeography of Two Moray Eels Indicates High Dispersal Throughout the Indo-Pacific. J. Hered. 2010, 101, 391–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Delrieu-Trottin, E.; Williams, J.T.; Pitassy, D.; Driskell, A.; Hubert, N.; Viviani, J.; Cribb, T.H.; Espiau, B.; Galzin, R.; Kulbicki, M.; et al. A DNA barcode reference library of French Polynesian shore fishes. Sci. Data 2019, 6, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hubert, N.; Meyer, C.P.; Bruggemann, H.J.; Guérin, F.; Komeno, R.J.L.; Espiau, B.; Causse, R.; Williams, J.T.; Planes, S. Cryptic Diversity in Indo-Pacific Coral-Reef Fishes Revealed by DNA-Barcoding Provides New Support to the Centre-of-Overlap Hypothesis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e28987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Huang, W.C.; Chen, H.M.; Liao, T.Y. Revalidation of a moray eel, Gymnothorax mucifer Snyder, 1904 (Teleostei: Anguilliformes: Muraenidae), with a revised distribution. Zootaxa 2019, 4559, 151–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Huang, W.-C.; Smith, D.; Loh, K.-H.; Liao, T.-Y. Two New Moray Eels of Genera Diaphenchelys and Gymnothorax (Anguilliformes: Muraenidae) from Taiwan and the Philippines. Zool. Stud. 2021, 60, e24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. COX1 phylogeny of members of Gymnothorax inferred from Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML). Samples collected from Viet Nam were in bold letters. Strophidon dorsalis was used as an out-group. Posterior probability and bootstrap values of each method are shown at each node: (right) BI and (left) ML; * denotes full support (ML = 100%, BI = 1.0).
Figure 1. COX1 phylogeny of members of Gymnothorax inferred from Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML). Samples collected from Viet Nam were in bold letters. Strophidon dorsalis was used as an out-group. Posterior probability and bootstrap values of each method are shown at each node: (right) BI and (left) ML; * denotes full support (ML = 100%, BI = 1.0).
Toxins 17 00186 g001
Figure 2. MRM LC-MS/MS extracted ion chromatograms of P-CTX standards and flesh of Gymnothorax javanicus specimen collected in the poisoning incident in Khanh Hoa Province, Viet Nam, in 2020 (P-CTX-1 detected at m/z 1128.4 > 1075.7, 1128.4 > 1057.5 and P-CTX-2/3 detected at m/z 1112.7 > 1077.8 and 1112.7 > 1059.8 for 3.125 ppb).
Figure 2. MRM LC-MS/MS extracted ion chromatograms of P-CTX standards and flesh of Gymnothorax javanicus specimen collected in the poisoning incident in Khanh Hoa Province, Viet Nam, in 2020 (P-CTX-1 detected at m/z 1128.4 > 1075.7, 1128.4 > 1057.5 and P-CTX-2/3 detected at m/z 1112.7 > 1077.8 and 1112.7 > 1059.8 for 3.125 ppb).
Toxins 17 00186 g002
Table 1. The ciguatoxicities determined in N2a assay of Gymnothorax javanicus specimen collected from the poisoning incident in Khanh Hoa Province, Viet Nam, in 2020.
Table 1. The ciguatoxicities determined in N2a assay of Gymnothorax javanicus specimen collected from the poisoning incident in Khanh Hoa Province, Viet Nam, in 2020.
SampleDry Weight
(g)
Wet Weight
(g)
Toxicity
(pg/g ww P-CTX-1 eq.)
Flesh13.322.49 ± 0.216
Skin0.50.810.69 ± 0.075
Table 2. Mass transitions for the 17 MLPs.
Table 2. Mass transitions for the 17 MLPs.
Toxin IDQuantitation Mass
Transitions (m/z)
Confirmation Mass
Transitions (m/z)
P-CTX-11128.4 > 1075.51128.4 > 1093.5
1128.4 > 1057.5
P-CTX-21112.7 > 1077.81112.7 > 1059.8
1112.7 > 1041.8
P-CTX-31112.7 > 1077.81112.7 > 1059.8
1112.7 > 1041.8
Azaspiracid-1842.5 > 806.4842.5 > 824.6
Azaspiracid-2856.4 > 820.6856.4 > 838.6
Azaspiracid-3828.4 > 792.5828.4 > 810.5
Gymnodimine508.4 > 120.2508.4 > 490.3
Spirolide-1692.4 > 444.4692.4 > 674.3
Pectenotoxin-2876.5 > 823.5876.5 > 805.5
Brevetoxin-2912.4 > 895.4912.4 > 877.4
Brevetoxin-3897.5 > 725.5897.5 > 879.7
Brevetoxin-9899.6 > 881.5899.6 > 863.6
Okadaic acid803.6 > 255.0803.6 > 113.1
Dinophysistoxin-1817.4 > 255.0817.4 > 113.0
Dinophysistoxin-2803.6 > 255.0803.6 > 113.1
Yessotoxin1141.5 > 855.21141.5 > 713.2
Homo yessotoxin1155.6 > 1075.61155.6 > 869.6
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dao, H.V.; Le, H.H.K.; Pham, K.X.; Phan, V.B.; Nguyen, A.P.; Doan, T.T.; Nguyen, X.-V.; Nguyen, N.-T.N.; Nguyen, X.-T.T.; Nguyen, T.N.; et al. Pacific Ciguatoxin-1 (P-CTX-1) in a Moray eel (Gymnothorax javanicus) Responsible for Ciguatera in Khanh Hoa Province, Viet Nam. Toxins 2025, 17, 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17040186

AMA Style

Dao HV, Le HHK, Pham KX, Phan VB, Nguyen AP, Doan TT, Nguyen X-V, Nguyen N-TN, Nguyen X-TT, Nguyen TN, et al. Pacific Ciguatoxin-1 (P-CTX-1) in a Moray eel (Gymnothorax javanicus) Responsible for Ciguatera in Khanh Hoa Province, Viet Nam. Toxins. 2025; 17(4):186. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17040186

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dao, Ha Viet, Hy Ho Khanh Le, Ky Xuan Pham, Vy Bao Phan, Anh Phuong Nguyen, Thiet Thi Doan, Xuan-Vy Nguyen, Nhu-Thuy Nhat Nguyen, Xuan-Thuy Thi Nguyen, Tung Ngoc Nguyen, and et al. 2025. "Pacific Ciguatoxin-1 (P-CTX-1) in a Moray eel (Gymnothorax javanicus) Responsible for Ciguatera in Khanh Hoa Province, Viet Nam" Toxins 17, no. 4: 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17040186

APA Style

Dao, H. V., Le, H. H. K., Pham, K. X., Phan, V. B., Nguyen, A. P., Doan, T. T., Nguyen, X.-V., Nguyen, N.-T. N., Nguyen, X.-T. T., Nguyen, T. N., Wu, J., Zhu, J., & Lai Chan, L. (2025). Pacific Ciguatoxin-1 (P-CTX-1) in a Moray eel (Gymnothorax javanicus) Responsible for Ciguatera in Khanh Hoa Province, Viet Nam. Toxins, 17(4), 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17040186

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop