Next Article in Journal
Performance Enhancement for Indium-Free Metal Oxide Thin-Film Transistors with Double-Active-Layers by Magnetron Sputtering at Room Temperature
Next Article in Special Issue
Tunable Broadband-Narrowband and Dual-Broadband Terahertz Absorber Based on a Hybrid Metamaterial Vanadium Dioxide and Graphene
Previous Article in Journal
Four-Port Dual-Band Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Dielectric Resonator Antenna for Sub-6 GHz 5G Communication Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Terahertz Enhanced Sensing of Uric Acid Based on Metallic Slot Array Metamaterial
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Reprogrammable Metasurface Controlled by 2D Thermal Fields

College of Electronics and Information Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, No. 2588 Changyang Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200090, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2022, 13(11), 2023; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13112023
Submission received: 23 October 2022 / Revised: 12 November 2022 / Accepted: 14 November 2022 / Published: 19 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Terahertz and Infrared Metamaterial Devices)

Abstract

:
The combination of thermal field sensing and microwave operation is an innovative topic in metamaterials. Although there exists research on modulating electromagnetic waves by controlling each column of the metasurface elements for programmable metasurfaces, the regulation is not flexible. In view of this, this paper proposes a metasurface based on distributed thermal sensing that can be independently modulated by each element. In this paper, the metasurface adopts a 1-bit coding metasurface, which is combined with PIN diodes to modulate the phase response. The voltage control circuit feeds back the change in the thermistors to the switching state of the PIN diode. Each metasurface unit contains thermistors, which are used to sense thermal stimulation and can be independently modulated. The metasurface composed of these elements can feel the field generated via heat energy. We can control electromagnetic waves by controlling this field. In order to prove the feasibility of this scheme, a metasurface sample of 8 × 8 elements was designed. Three patterns were used for the design, fabrication, and measurement of the samples. Meanwhile, printed circuit board (PCB) technology was applied. The results show that the simulated results are highly consistent with the experimental results, which verifies that this scheme is practicable.

1. Introduction

Metamaterials are artificially designed composite materials that possess an excellent ability to modulate electromagnetic waves [1]. Since they have excellent properties that do not exist in nature, such as negative refraction and a zero refractive index, metamaterials have attracted extensive research and a plethora of applications, including optical lenses [2], cloaks [3,4], and imaging systems [5,6,7]. Metasurfaces are 2D versions of metamaterials, which are ultra-thin planes of subwavelength metal or dielectric cells with specific electromagnetic wave modification capabilities, such as phase and amplitude modulation. Compared to metamaterials, metasurfaces have the advantages of low profile, low loss, and easy processing.
The notion of the reprogrammable metasurface is proposed to meet the needs of many practical applications [8,9,10,11,12,13]. For example, it is applied to high-sensitivity optical sensors, miniaturized image sensors, consumer electronics, and sophisticated medical equipment that require strict packaging [14,15,16,17]. The combination of reprogrammable metasurfaces with adjustable components [18,19], such as positive-intrinsic-negative (PIN) diodes and varactors [20,21], increases the degree of freedom of phase control over the metasurface to achieve dynamically modulating electromagnetic waves [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. By integrating sensing components onto reprogrammable metasurfaces [30,31], reprogrammable sensing metasurfaces connect distinct physical and electromagnetic fields [32], broadening the idea of regulating multiphysical fields like light control [33,34,35] and thermal regulation [36,37,38]. However, most previously proposed metasurface research on thermal control has focused on engineering the manipulation of absorption qualities or thermal emissions or the phase modulation in columns, although the accurate phase regulation within units has not been presented or researched.
In this paper, we propose a reprogrammable metasurface controlled by 2D thermal fields; the minimum regulated unit is the element. We first connect each metamaterial unit with the microcircuit to form a closed circuit, where the thermally-sensitive resistance senses the thermal stimulus, and the PIN diode outputs different voltage values. Secondly, the elements are arranged into 2D planes, and the microcircuits and the metasurface are integrated into the PCB to modulate the phase distribution of the metasurface. In order to verify our idea, we designed three different coding patterns for the simulation and fabrication of the metasurface for experimental testing. The experimental test results were highly consistent with the simulation results. We envisage this work as a new way of carrying out thermal sensing and microwave manipulation.

2. Principle and Results

Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of the proposed thermal-sensing metasurface, which combines the 1-bit programmable metasurface embedded with the PIN diodes and thermistors. The metasurface element embedded with the PIN diodes is used to modulate the reflection phase response and can reflect various scattering fields under different thermal stimuli. Each unit cell of the metasurface can be regulated because each element contains a thermistor to sense the thermal stimulation. The metasurface, which is composed of such units, can sense the field generated by thermal energy. We control this field to regulate electromagnetic waves. At the same time, the control of the thermal field can be achieved by regulating the arbitrary elements of the metasurface. In this way, the thermal field and electromagnetic wave are combined to realize the deflection of the different beams on the metasurface. The thermistor can sense the variation of external temperature, and the resistance value change with the change of temperature. This change in electrical characteristics will be reflected in the voltage control module, thus affecting the bias voltage of the PIN diodes. At this time, the related elements will switch the reflected phase response, resulting in various abnormal reflections on the metasurface.
The metasurface element used is illustrated in Figure 2a–c. The top and bottom layers are metal layers, and the middle is a 3 mm dielectric substrate (F4B) with a dielectric constant of 3.0 and a loss tangent of 0.002. Two symmetrical metal patches bridged by a PIN diode (Skyworks SMP1320, skyworks solutions inc., Shenzhen, China.) are embedded at both ends of the top metal layer. The PIN diode is regarded as an RLC model during the simulation, and the switching time is 1 μs. There are “via” holes on the metal patches at both ends, which are used to provide a DC bias to control the on/off state of the diode. For more effective modulation, we use the numerical simulation software CST Microwave Studio (CST Microwave Studio, version 2020, accessed on 14 July 2022) to optimize the structure. The period of the metasurface element is a = 30 mm, and the geometric dimensions of the metal patches were selected as follows: w = 27.5 mm, c = 12.9 mm, and d = 12 mm. The Linear y-polarized normal incidence plane was used in the experiment. Meanwhile, the element with the diode was encoded as “0” in the OFF state and “1” in the ON state.
Figure 2f,g show the simulation results of the reflected EM response when different voltages were applied to the PIN diode. The numeric states “0” and “1” are marked in purple and blue, respectively. By changing the geometric parameters (w, w1, c, and d) of the metal patch, better electromagnetic characteristics were obtained on the premise that the phase difference is 180°. The simulated phase response shows that the phase difference (of 180°) is achieved at 3 GHz, and the correlation amplitude is −0.11 dB and −0.73 dB, respectively. The proposed metasurface structure is shown in Figure 2d, and the equivalent diagram of the PIN diode is shown in Figure 2e.
To realizing effective regulation and modulation according to temperature changes, we have meticulously designed a manufactured sample with a five-layer structure. The top layer is a metal patch, the third layer is metal ground, the bottom layer is a microcircuit layer, and the remaining two layers are dielectric layers. The role of the “via” hole is to connect each layer as a bridge. The metal patches at both ends of the metasurface element output different voltage values as the input to the microcircuit. Each cell on the metasurface contains thermistors, which can sense thermal stimulation and achieve the function whereby every point can be modulated. Note that the diode was regarded as an RLC model in the simulation. The variation in thermal resistance will cause the corresponding change in the PIN diode voltage, which makes the PIN diodes switch between the on and off states, thus causing the working state of the metasurface to change, leading to the metasurface engender distinct phase response. As illustrated in Figure 3a, in the specific microcircuit, the feedback network of the DC converter (tps62240, Shenzhen Smach Technology Co., LTD, Shenzhen, China.) has two electric resistances which are used to alter the output voltage. The thermistor marked in red adopts a negative temperature coefficient (NTC) with a B value of 4250, and its resistance changes with temperature. As shown in Figure 3b,c, when the temperature rises from 25 °C to 100 °C, the resistance can be observed to drop from 100 KΩ to about 5 KΩ. If the temperature rises above 40 °C, the diode will turn off, and the metasurface will work in the “0” state at this time. Another fixed resistance value is 100 KΩ. The metasurface is encoded by the same number of coding elements, 8 × 8 (8 elements along the x-axis), with 64 diodes integrated. Each unit cell shares the same bias voltage and has the same phase response.
As shown in Figure 4a,d,g, we encode the metasurface into the following three patterns. In pattern one, the metasurface array coding sequence is “00011100”. The horizontal coding and vertical coding sequences in pattern two and pattern three are also the same. Pattern two is “00011100”, while pattern three is “00001111”. Under the plane wave incidence, diverse beam deflection phenomena will appear on the metasurface with various patterns. As indicated in Figure 4b,c, pattern one reflects the incident wave into a dual-beam with the deflection angle θ = ± 30° at 3 GHz, and the energy is mainly concentrated into the two side beams. In Figure 4e,f,h,i, patterns 2 and 3 reflect the incident wave into four beams at 3 GHz, respectively. By comparing the simulated scattering field results of the three patterns, it can be seen that most of the energy is concentrated into the side beam, and from pattern one to pattern three, the deflection angle becomes smaller and smaller.
In this experimental demonstration, the far-field measurement of the three design patterns was carried out in a standard microwave chamber room. The experimental configuration is illustrated in Figure 5. A broadband horn antenna at a certain distance from the metasurface sample was used as the feed source and was fixed onto the workbench together with the metasurface specimen. Another broadband horn antenna was placed 10 m away from the metasurface sample as a receiver. With the rotation of the metasurface specimen on the workbench, the two-dimensional far-field data can be measured.
The details of the metasurface sample are shown in Figure 6a. The sample is composed of 8 × 8 elements and is integrated with 64 PIN diodes. The entire metasurface board is made up of 4 identical 4 × 4 submodules, and one submodule is shown here for circuit soldering and distribution. The structure formed by these submodules can be applied to electromagnetic imaging and stealth scenes based on thermal perception and has great prospects for radar detection. Thermistors are embedded in each metasurface element to ensure that each unit cell can be modulated. In order to isolate the RF energy, RF chokes are used, and the bias hole is connected to the voltage drive module through two RF chokes. At the same time, distinct thermal distributions are obtained by using small metal plates with electric heaters inside. The soldering and circuit distribution of the microcircuit are shown in Figure 6b. Figure 6c also shows the top structure of the metacell.
To facilitate the comparison between the simulation results and the experimental results, we used blue and red lines to represent the far-field results of the simulation and experiment of three patterns at 3 GHz, respectively. From Figure 6d–f, we can clearly observe that the line trends of the two colors are roughly the same, which proves that the simulated results are highly consistent with the experimental results. In addition, we can observe the metasurface array coding “00011100” reflects the incident wave into a dual-beam, and the chessboard metasurface horizontal coding “00011100” and “00001111” reflects the incident wave into a quadruple-beam with different reflection angles. There are minor errors in the results, mainly due to the following two aspects: (1) the PIN diode is regarded as an RLC model in the simulation, which is not completely consistent with the equivalent model in the experiment; (2) there are manual errors and manufacturing errors in the experiment; (3) the nonideal excitation of the horn antenna since it is not an ideal plane-wave.

3. Conclusions

A programmable metasurface integrated with PIN diodes and thermistors is presented. Each metasurface unit cell is embedded with a thermistor, which can sense the heat distribution independently. We can modulate the electromagnetic wave by controlling the arbitrary metasurface elements and realizing the distinct beam deflection on the metasurface under diverse coding sequences. In order to verify the performance of the metasurface, three different patterns were designed, and their far-field results were simulated and measured under specific thermal distribution. Through comparison, the results of the simulation and experiment are in good agreement. This work enables the metasurface to modulate electromagnetic waves with more flexibility, and the metasurface has the characteristics of low cost and high performance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Z. and H.T.; methodology, M.Z.; software, F.Y.; validation, S.L., F.Y. and H.T.; formal analysis, M.Z.; investigation, H.C.; writing—original draft preparation, H.T.; writing—review and editing, H.C.; visualization, S.L.; project administration, M.Z.; funding acquisition, L.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 11404207, 52177185, SHIEP Foundation, grant number K2014-054, Z2015-086, and the Local Colleges and Universities Capacity Building Program of the Shanghai Science and Technology Committee, China, grant number 15110500900.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lee, S.; Baek, S.; Kim, T.T.; Cho, H.; Lee, S.; Kang, J.H.; Min, B. Metamaterials for enhanced optical responses and their application to active control of terahertz waves. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2000250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ma, Q.; Shi, C.B.; Chen, T.Y.; Qi, M.Q.; Li, Y.B.; Cui, T.J. Broadband metamaterial lens antennas with special properties by controlling both refractive-index distribution and feed directivity. J. Opt. 2018, 20, 045101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Qian, C.; Zheng, B.; Shen, Y.; Jing, L.; Li, E.; Shen, L.; Chen, H. Deep-learning-enabled self-adaptive microwave cloak without human intervention. Nat. Photonics 2020, 14, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ma, Q.; Mei, Z.L.; Zhu, S.K.; Jin, T.Y.; Cui, T.J. Experiments on active cloaking and illusion for Laplace equation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 111, 173901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gu, Z.; Ma, Q.; Liu, C.; Xiao, Q.; Gao, X.; Yan, T.; Miao, L.; Li, L.; Cui, T.J. High-Resolution Programmable Metasurface Imager Based on Multilayer Perceptron Network. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2022, 10, 2200619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, X.; Duan, G.; Wu, K.; Anderson, S.W.; Zhang, X. Intelligent metamaterials based on nonlinearity for magnetic resonance imaging. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1905461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, L.; Ruan, H.; Liu, C.; Li, Y.; Shuang, Y.; Alù, A.; Qiu, C.-W.; Cui, T.J. Machine-learning reprogrammable metasurface imager. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Cui, T.J.; Qi, M.Q.; Wan, X.; Zhao, J.; Cheng, Q. Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and programmable metamaterials. Light Sci. Appl. 2014, 3, e218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ma, Q.; Xiao, Q.; Hong, Q.R.; Gao, X.; Galdi, V.; Cui, T.J. Digital Coding Metasurfaces: From Theory to Applications. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2022, 54, 96–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Reichel, K.S.; Lozada-Smith, N.; Joshipura, I.D.; Ma, J.; Shrestha, R.; Mendis, R.; Dickey, M.D.; Mittleman, D.M. Electrically reconfigurable terahertz signal processing devices using liquid metal components. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ma, Q.; Cui, T.J. Information metamaterials: Bridging the physical world and digital world. PhotoniX 2020, 1, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ma, Q.; Liu, C.; Xiao, Q.; Gu, Z.; Gao, X.; Li, L.; Cui, T.J. Information metasurfaces and intelligent metasurfaces. Photonics Insights 2022, 1, R01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, Y.; Li, B.; Zheng, Q.; Genin, G.M.; Chen, C. Programmable and robust static topological solitons in mechanical metamaterials. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Zhan, A.; Colburn, S.; Trivedi, R.; Fryett, T.K.; Dodson, C.M.; Majumdar, A. Low-contrast dielectric metasurface optics. ACS Photonics 2016, 3, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Conteduca, D.; Brunetti, G.; Pitruzzello, G.; Tragni, F.; Dholakia, K.; Krauss, T.F.; Ciminelli, C. Exploring the limit of multiplexed near-field optical trapping. ACS Photonics 2021, 8, 2060–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, Y.; Kravchenko, I.I.; Briggs, D.P.; Valentine, J. All-dielectric metasurface analogue of electromagnetically induced transparency. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Chu, C.H.; Tseng, M.L.; Chen, J.; Wu, P.C.; Chen, Y.H.; Wang, H.C.; Chen, T.Y.; Hsieh, W.T.; Wu, H.J.; Sun, G. Active dielectric metasurface based on phase-change medium (Laser Photonics Rev. 10 (6)/2016). Laser Photonics Rev. 2016, 10, 1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, L.; Ma, Q.; Jing, H.B.; Cui, H.Y.; Liu, Y.; Cui, T.J. Space-Energy Digital-Coding Metasurface Based on an Active Amplifier. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019, 11, 6. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, L.; Ma, Q.; Nie, Q.F.; Hong, Q.R.; Cui, H.Y.; Ruan, Y.; Cui, T.J. Dual-polarization programmable metasurface modulator for near-field information encoding and transmission. Photonics Res. 2021, 9, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gao, X.; Zhang, J.; Luo, Y.; Ma, Q.; Bai, G.D.; Zhang, H.C.; Cui, T.J. Reconfigurable Parametric Amplifications of Spoof Surface Plasmons. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, e2100795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gao, X.; Zhang, J.; Ma, Q.; Cui, W.Y.; Ren, Y.; Luo, Y.; Cui, T.J. Nonmagnetic Spoof Plasmonic Isolator Based on Parametric Amplification. Laser Photonics Rev. 2022, 16, 2100578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, C.; Ma, Q.; Luo, Z.J.; Hong, Q.R.; Xiao, Q.; Zhang, H.C.; Miao, L.; Yu, W.M.; Cheng, Q.; Li, L.; et al. A programmable diffractive deep neural network based on a digital-coding metasurface array. Nat. Electron. 2022, 5, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ma, Q.; Gao, W.; Xiao, Q.; Ding, L.; Gao, T.; Zhou, Y.; Gao, X.; Yan, T.; Liu, C.; Gu, Z.; et al. Directly wireless communication of human minds via non-invasive brain-computer-metasurface platform. eLight 2022, 2, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. You, J.W.; Ma, Q.; Lan, Z.; Xiao, Q.; Panoiu, N.C.; Cui, T.J. Reprogrammable plasmonic topological insulators with ultrafast control. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ma, Q.; Hong, Q.R.; Bai, G.D.; Jing, H.B.; Wu, R.Y.; Bao, L.; Cheng, Q.; Cui, T.J. Editing Arbitrarily Linear Polarizations Using Programmable Metasurface. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2020, 13, 021003. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, L.; Ma, Q.; Luo, S.S.; Ye, F.J.; Cui, H.Y.; Cui, T.J. Touch-Programmable Metasurface for Various Electromagnetic Manipulations and Encryptions. Small 2022, 18, e2203871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fang, H.; Chu, S.-C.A.; Xia, Y.; Wang, K.-W. Programmable Self-Locking Origami Mechanical Metamaterials. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ma, Q.; Hong, Q.R.; Gao, X.; Xiao, Q.; Chen, L.; Cui, T.J. Highly integrated programmable metasurface for multifunctions in reflections and transmissions. APL Mater. 2022, 10, 061113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, N.; Zhang, M.; Zhu, R.; Niu, X.-D. Modular metamaterials composed of foldable obelisk-like units with reprogrammable mechanical behaviors based on multistability. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ma, Q.; Bai, G.D.; Jing, H.B.; Yang, C.; Li, L.; Cui, T.J. Smart metasurface with self-adaptively reprogrammable functions. Light-Sci. Appl. 2019, 8, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ma, Q.; Hong, Q.R.; Gao, X.X.; Jing, H.B.; Liu, C.; Bai, G.D.; Cheng, Q.; Cui, T.J. Smart sensing metasurface with self-defined functions in dual polarizations. Nanophotonics 2020, 9, 3271–3278. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tian, X.; Lee, P.M.; Tan, Y.J.; Wu, T.L.Y.; Yao, H.; Zhangl, M.; Li, Z.; Ng, K.A.; Tee, B.C.K.; Ho, J.S. Wireless body sensor networks based on metamaterial textiles. Nat. Electron. 2019, 2, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, X.G.; Jiang, W.X.; Jiang, H.L.; Wang, Q.; Tian, H.W.; Bai, L.; Luo, Z.J.; Sun, S.; Luo, Y.; Qiu, C.-W.; et al. An optically driven digital metasurface for programming electromagnetic functions. Nat. Electron. 2020, 3, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, X.G.; Tang, W.X.; Jiang, W.X.; Bai, G.D.; Tang, J.; Bai, L.; Qiu, C.-W.; Cui, T.J. Light-Controllable Digital Coding Metasurfaces. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1801028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Knipper, R.; Kopecky, V., Jr.; Huebner, U.; Popp, J.; Mayerhoefer, T.G. Slit-Enhanced Chiral- and Broadband Infrared Ultra-Sensing. Acs Photonics 2018, 5, 3238–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guddala, S.; Kumar, R.; Ramakrishna, S.A. Thermally induced nonlinear optical absorption in metamaterial perfect absorbers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 111901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Jeong, H.; Park, J.-H.; Moon, Y.-H.; Baek, C.-W.; Lim, S. Thermal frequency reconfigurable electromagnetic absorber using phase change material. Sensors 2018, 18, 3506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Phoenix, A.A.; Wilson, E. Adaptive Thermal Conductivity Metamaterials: Enabling Active and Passive Thermal Control. J. Therm. Sci. Eng. Appl. 2018, 10, 051020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of a temperature-sensitive metasurface. When a metasurface containing a thermistor experiences an external thermal stimulus, its reflection phase pattern is reprogrammed, resulting in anomalous reflection fields.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of a temperature-sensitive metasurface. When a metasurface containing a thermistor experiences an external thermal stimulus, its reflection phase pattern is reprogrammed, resulting in anomalous reflection fields.
Micromachines 13 02023 g001
Figure 2. Illustration of the element used for wavefront manipulation and electromagnetic response, and the schematic diagram of metasurface structure. (a) Three-dimensional perspective view of the element; (b) back view of the element; (c) side view of the element; (d) schematic diagram of the five-layer structure of the fabricated sample; (e) equivalent circuit of PIN diode in OFF/ON state; (f) magnitude response of the element; (g) phase response of the element.
Figure 2. Illustration of the element used for wavefront manipulation and electromagnetic response, and the schematic diagram of metasurface structure. (a) Three-dimensional perspective view of the element; (b) back view of the element; (c) side view of the element; (d) schematic diagram of the five-layer structure of the fabricated sample; (e) equivalent circuit of PIN diode in OFF/ON state; (f) magnitude response of the element; (g) phase response of the element.
Micromachines 13 02023 g002
Figure 3. The design diagram of microcircuit, and a graphic of resistance value and bias voltage changing with temperature. (a) Specific voltage control module diagram; (b,c) show the schematic diagram of the change in thermistor and bias voltage with temperature.
Figure 3. The design diagram of microcircuit, and a graphic of resistance value and bias voltage changing with temperature. (a) Specific voltage control module diagram; (b,c) show the schematic diagram of the change in thermistor and bias voltage with temperature.
Micromachines 13 02023 g003
Figure 4. Three coding patterns of the metasurface and simulated far-field results at 3 GHz. (a) The coding sequence of pattern one is “00011100”; (d) pattern two has the horizontal coding sequence “00011100”, and (g) the horizontal coding sequence of pattern three is “00001111”; (b,c,e,f,h,i) are the simulated far-field results corresponding to the three patterns.
Figure 4. Three coding patterns of the metasurface and simulated far-field results at 3 GHz. (a) The coding sequence of pattern one is “00011100”; (d) pattern two has the horizontal coding sequence “00011100”, and (g) the horizontal coding sequence of pattern three is “00001111”; (b,c,e,f,h,i) are the simulated far-field results corresponding to the three patterns.
Micromachines 13 02023 g004
Figure 5. The experimental environment of the far-field test.
Figure 5. The experimental environment of the far-field test.
Micromachines 13 02023 g005
Figure 6. The details of the metasurface sample and the far-filed results. (a) A photograph of the sample shows the details of the fabricated metasurface sample, and the components distributed on it; (b) the soldering and circuit distribution of the microcircuit; (c) the top view of the sample meta-cell; (df) comparison of the simulated and measured far-field results of the metasurfaces for the three coding patterns.
Figure 6. The details of the metasurface sample and the far-filed results. (a) A photograph of the sample shows the details of the fabricated metasurface sample, and the components distributed on it; (b) the soldering and circuit distribution of the microcircuit; (c) the top view of the sample meta-cell; (df) comparison of the simulated and measured far-field results of the metasurfaces for the three coding patterns.
Micromachines 13 02023 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, M.; Ye, F.; Tan, H.; Luo, S.; Cui, H.; Chen, L. Reprogrammable Metasurface Controlled by 2D Thermal Fields. Micromachines 2022, 13, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13112023

AMA Style

Zhang M, Ye F, Tan H, Luo S, Cui H, Chen L. Reprogrammable Metasurface Controlled by 2D Thermal Fields. Micromachines. 2022; 13(11):2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13112023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Ming, Fuju Ye, Hongrui Tan, Sisi Luo, Haoyang Cui, and Lei Chen. 2022. "Reprogrammable Metasurface Controlled by 2D Thermal Fields" Micromachines 13, no. 11: 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13112023

APA Style

Zhang, M., Ye, F., Tan, H., Luo, S., Cui, H., & Chen, L. (2022). Reprogrammable Metasurface Controlled by 2D Thermal Fields. Micromachines, 13(11), 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13112023

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop