Next Article in Journal
Polishing Performance and Removal Mechanism of Core-Shell Structured Diamond/SiO2 Abrasives on Sapphire Wafer
Next Article in Special Issue
Design, Simulation, and Fabrication of a New Three-Axis Inertial Switch with a Triangular Movable Electrode Structure
Previous Article in Journal
Ring-Core Fluxgate Sensor for High Operation Temperatures up to 220 °C
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Design and Fabrication of a MEMS Electronic Calibration Chip
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

High-Precision Wafer Bonding Alignment Mark Using Moiré Fringes and Digital Grating

Micromachines 2022, 13(12), 2159; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122159
by Jianhan Fan 1, Sen Lu 2, Jianxiao Zou 1,3, Kaiming Yang 2,*, Yu Zhu 2 and Kaiji Liao 4
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Micromachines 2022, 13(12), 2159; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122159
Submission received: 17 November 2022 / Revised: 4 December 2022 / Accepted: 5 December 2022 / Published: 7 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue NEMS/MEMS Devices and Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper provided a Moiré-based mark for high-precision wafer bonding alignment. And through practical experiments designed the rationality and practicability of the mark. Using grating marks and digital gratings based on moiré fringes can significantly improve the accuracy of calculating the deviation of the upper and lower wafers in the alignment process, and control the estimated error to within 10 nm. More improvements should be addressed as follows:

1.      In section 3.1:In recent years, Moiré fringes have been widely used to measure displacement, de- formation, and other fields.Could you provide some references on the measurements of displacement and deformation using Moiré fringes?

2.      The estimated error was finally controlled within 10 nm. What is the main reason for the current error between your results or current method with commercial calculation?

3.      For experimental verification, is the comparison of x-direction displacement data or y-direction displacement data the only standard for the error evaluation? Is there any other method or index?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors need to address the below issues before publication.

1.       Please carefully review the manuscript and correct the wrong words, phrases or sentences before re-submission.

2.       Please combine figures 2, 3 and 4 together.

3.       Please combine figures 5 and 6 together.

4.       The title of 3.4 and 3.5 same?

5.       In figure 12(b), X direction should be Y direction?

6.       Please combine figures 16, 17 and 18 together.

7.       Error bars for figures 16, 17, 18 and 19.

8.       More references are required.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Please see the attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

No further comments.

Back to TopTop