Next Article in Journal
Phononic-Crystal-Based Particle Sieving in Continuous Flow: Numerical Simulations
Next Article in Special Issue
Design and Fabrication of Compact, Multiband, High Gain, High Isolation, Metamaterial-Based MIMO Antennas for Wireless Communication Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Failure Mechanism of pHEMT in Navigation LNA under UWB EMP
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Compact Wideband Self-Decoupled MIMO Antenna for 5G Communications

Micromachines 2022, 13(12), 2180; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122180
by Qian Li 1,*, Chencheng Wan 1,* and Gangxiong Wu 2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Micromachines 2022, 13(12), 2180; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122180
Submission received: 10 November 2022 / Revised: 3 December 2022 / Accepted: 7 December 2022 / Published: 8 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Antenna System: Structural Analysis, Design and Application)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This manuscript presents a wideband MIMO antenna which achieve a good performance. The CMA is applied to analyzed the working modes and the high isolation is achieved with the suitable feeding structure. In this reviewer’s opinion, the antenna performance is acceptable. However, some minor revisions should be made as follows.

 

1. The slot structure is a decoupling method which might be applied in this manuscript. Thus, [Ref A-Ref B] should be added in the literature review.

[Ref A] Y. Wang, Zhengwei Du, “A Wideband Quad-Antenna System for Mobile Terminals,” AWPL, 2014.

[Ref B] ] S. Zhang, B. K. Lau, Y. Tan, Z. Ying, and S. He, “Mutual coupling reduction of two PIFAs with a T-shape slot impedance transformer for MIMO mobile terminals,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Mar. 2012.

 

2. Color bar should be added in Fig. 4 and Fig. 6.

 

3. It seems that the -10 dB impedance bandwidth is wide in Fig. 5. So, the simulated and measured frequency band should be wider than 3-6 GHz.

 

4. How about the antenna efficiency? It is suggested to calculate the ECC from the radiation patterns in Fig. 8.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors should consider the following comments:

1- In Page 6, better to list the antenna dimensions in a Table.
2- It is not clear, how the antenna dimensions are obtained. The author should explain this carefully.
3- Figure 1 is cited after Figure 4. The author should manage the figures presentation in a sequence.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop