Next Article in Journal
A Novel Mechanomyography (MMG) Sensor Based on Piezo-Resistance Principle and with a Pyramidic Microarray
Next Article in Special Issue
Simulation and Experimental Study on the Precision Molding of Irregular Vehicle Glass Components
Previous Article in Journal
Integration of Inkjet Printed Graphene as a Hole Transport Layer in Organic Solar Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel Approach for Dry Cutting Inconel 718 in a More Sustainable and Low-Cost Way by Actively and Purposely Utilizing the Built-Up Layer
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Design and Analysis of Ultra-Precision Smart Cutting Tool for In-Process Force Measurement and Tool Nanopositioning in Ultra-High-Precision Single-Point Diamond Turning

Micromachines 2023, 14(10), 1857; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14101857
by Shahrokh Hatefi * and Farouk Smith *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Micromachines 2023, 14(10), 1857; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14101857
Submission received: 4 September 2023 / Revised: 19 September 2023 / Accepted: 25 September 2023 / Published: 28 September 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper presents a practical smart cutting tool for in-process force measurement, and it can be used in SPDT platforms. The work has industrial relevance, is innovative, and has a good application prospect. The following factors need to be addressed for publication:

1. The abstract section's background is overwhelming and requires modification.

2. In the Introduction section, some scholars' research results are cited, but there is a lack of detailed data. Specific data need to be given for comparison with this paper.

3. Please list the performance characteristics of the PSZ used in the manuscript.

4. In the attached pictures of Table 2, some of the size labels are unclear due to color distortion. Please edit them for clarity.

5.  In Section 3.3, It is recommended to list the BOM.

6 . In Section 3.4, Please give the mesh, and boundary condition information used.

7. In Figures 11-16, the stress data analyzed is not clearly expressed. Please use a partial view to show the stress data.

8. The measurement data may be affected by the screw connection and contact with the holder and should be analyzed accordingly.

 

Author Response

Please see attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The results of the paper are reasonable and acceptable. I suggest minor revision.

1. How have the authors contributed differently from other research groups?

2. Figure 4 (B) lacks a description in the text.

3. Figures 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 require enhancements. The text within these figures is too small for legibility in the printed version.

4. Piezo hysteresis is observed in Figure 4 (A). How did the authors address or correct this phenomenon?

Author Response

Please see attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop