Next Article in Journal
Experimental Research on the Supply of Working Fluid for Fixed Diamond Wire Slicing Based on Ultrasonic Capillary Effect
Next Article in Special Issue
Prediction of Geometric Characteristics of Laser Cladding Layer Based on Least Squares Support Vector Regression and Crested Porcupine Optimization
Previous Article in Journal
Upscaled Production of Satellite-Free Droplets: Step Emulsification with Deterministic Lateral Displacement
Previous Article in Special Issue
A 3.2 kW Single Stage Narrow Linewidth Fiber Amplifier Emitting at 1050 nm
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Accurate Detection and Analysis of Pore Defects in Laser Powder Bed Fusion WE43 Magnesium Alloys

1
Chengdu Aeronautic Polytechnic,Aviation Equipment Manufacturing Industry College, Chengdu 610100, China
2
College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
3
Chongqing Key Laboratory of Metal Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing), Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2024, 15(7), 909; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15070909
Submission received: 27 May 2024 / Revised: 5 July 2024 / Accepted: 10 July 2024 / Published: 12 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optical and Laser Material Processing)

Abstract

To explore the size, morphology, and distribution patterns of internal pore defects in WE43 magnesium alloy formed by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), as well as their impact on its mechanical properties, computer tomography (CT), metallographic microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy were used to observe the material’s microstructure and the morphology of tensile test fractures. The study revealed that a large number of randomly distributed non-circular pore defects exist internally in the LPBF-formed WE43 magnesium alloy, with a defect volume fraction of 0.16%. Approximately 80% of the defects had equivalent diameters concentrated in the range of 10∼40 μm, and 56.2% of the defects had sphericity values between 0.65∼0.7 μm, with the maximum defect equivalent diameter being 122 μm. There were a few spherical pores around 20 μm in diameter in the specimens, and unfused powder particles were found in pore defects near the edges of the parts. Under the test conditions, the fusion pool structure of LPBF-formed WE43 magnesium alloy resembled a semi-elliptical shape with a height of around 66 μm, capable of fusion three layers of powder material in a single pass. Columnar grains formed at the edge of individual fusion pools, while the central area exhibited equiaxed grains. The “scale-like pattern” formed by overlapping fusion pool structures resulted in the microstructure of LPBF-formed WE43 magnesium alloy mainly consisting of fine equiaxed grains with a size of 2.5 μm and columnar grains distributed in a band-like manner.
Keywords: laser powder bed fusion; porosity defects; sphericity; WE43 magnesium alloy laser powder bed fusion; porosity defects; sphericity; WE43 magnesium alloy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Men, Z.; Wang, L.; Gao, X.; Chen, W.; Ji, C.; Li, Z.; Li, K. Accurate Detection and Analysis of Pore Defects in Laser Powder Bed Fusion WE43 Magnesium Alloys. Micromachines 2024, 15, 909. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15070909

AMA Style

Men Z, Wang L, Gao X, Chen W, Ji C, Li Z, Li K. Accurate Detection and Analysis of Pore Defects in Laser Powder Bed Fusion WE43 Magnesium Alloys. Micromachines. 2024; 15(7):909. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15070909

Chicago/Turabian Style

Men, Zhengxing, Liang Wang, Xi Gao, Wen Chen, Chen Ji, Ziche Li, and Kun Li. 2024. "Accurate Detection and Analysis of Pore Defects in Laser Powder Bed Fusion WE43 Magnesium Alloys" Micromachines 15, no. 7: 909. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15070909

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop