Next Article in Journal
Cryo-Electron Microscopy Studies of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
Previous Article in Journal
Editorial for the Special Issue on Integrated Photonics and Optoelectronics
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Development and Progress of the UWB Physical Layer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Proton-Irradiation Effects and Reliability on GaN-Based MIS-HEMTs

1
China Aerospace Science & Industry Corp Defense Technology R&T Center, Beijing 1000854, China
2
Laboratory of Solid State Optoelectronics Information Technology, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2024, 15(9), 1091; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15091091
Submission received: 14 July 2024 / Revised: 25 August 2024 / Accepted: 26 August 2024 / Published: 29 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Progress in 2D Semiconductor Materials and Devices)

Abstract

:
A comprehensive study of proton irradiation reliability on a bilayer dielectrics SiNx/Al2O3 MIS-HEMT, the common Schottky gate HEMT, and a single dielectric layer MIS-HEMT with SiNx and with Al2O3 for comparison is conducted in this paper. Combining the higher displacement threshold energy of Al2O3 with the better surface passivation of the SiNx layer, the bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT presents much smaller degradation of structural materials and of device electrical performance after proton irradiation. Firstly, the least of the defects caused by irradiation suggesting the smallest structural material degradation is observed in the bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT through simulations. Then, DC and RF electrical performance of four kinds of devices before and after proton irradiation are studied through simulation and experiments. The smallest threshold voltage degradation rate, the smallest maximum on-current degradation and Gm degradation, the largest cut-off frequency, and the lowest cut-off frequency degradation are found in the bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT among four kinds of devices. The degradation results of both structural materials and electrical performance reveal that the bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT performs best after irradiation and had better radiation resilience.

1. Introduction

Gallium nitride-based high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) have great potential in high-frequency, high-power, and microwave applications thanks to its wide bandgap, high breakdown electric field, high carrier density, and high carrier mobility at the hetero-interface [1,2,3,4,5]. However, the traps at the surface decrease the 2-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) density and lead to frequency characteristics degradation [6,7]. Moreover, the gate leakage is another problem limiting the current driving of GaN-based HEMTs. GaN-based metal–insulator–semiconductor (MIS)-HEMTs have been proposed to reduce traps and leakage [8].
For devices in space applications, more attention needs to be paid to the radiation effect, which will deteriorate the DC and RF performance of the device. Devices working in space are exposed to both particle and electromagnetic radiation, such as electrons, protons, neutrons, gamma rays, and alpha particles [9,10]. Irradiation can cause ionization radiation effects and displacement damage, which has been proven to be more severe in previous studies on GaN-based devices [11]. Therefore, we mainly concentrate on understanding and characterizing the displacement damage caused by proton radiation [10]. Typically, GaN HEMTs show the shift in threshold voltage; the degradation of cut-off frequency, saturation drain current, and extrinsic trans-conductance; and the increase in gate leakage after proton irradiation [12,13,14]. The magnitude of the degradation depends on the proton energy and fluence [12]. In recent years, research groups have conducted some research on proton irradiation effects on the common Schottky gate HEMT structure and single dielectric MIS-HEMT structure [15,16,17,18]. The bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT has emerged as a potential candidate taking advantage of the benefits of each layer in recent years. Comparative study on characteristics of AlGaN/GaN MIS HEMTs has been reported without proton irradiation [19] and with a certain fluence of proton irradiation [15]. However, the degradation of structural materials and frequency characteristics after proton irradiation are not reported in research about MIS-HEMT using the same bilayer structure [15,19]. Moreover, the influence of different proton fluence on GaN HEMTs needs to be explored. Therefore, it is necessary to study the proton irradiation effects on a bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT comprehensively.
Focusing on the problems mentioned above, four different proton fluences are adopted for a bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT and a single-dielectric-layer MIS-HEMT with SiNx and with Al2O3, respectively, and the common Schottky gate HEMT for comparison in this paper. The degradation of structural materials and the degradation of device electrical performance are both explored through simulation and experiments. The results reveal that the bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT performs best after all four different irradiation fluences.

2. Device Structures

Figure 1 shows the cross-section of the Schottky gate HEMT and MIS-HEMTs. Except for the dielectric layer, the Schottky gate HEMT and MIS-HEMTs are in the same structure. The device structure was grown on a sapphire substrate by a metal–organic chemical vapor deposition [19]. The epitaxial structure consists of a 25 nm AlGaN barrier layer and a 1.6 μm GaN buffer layer [19]. For the single dielectric MIS-HEMT, the insulator used in devices is SiNx (10 nm) and Al2O3 (5 nm) separately [19]. For the bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMs, a 10 nm SiNx is deposited first, followed by a 5 nm Al2O3 layer. The SiNx and Al2O3 layers are deposited by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) and by atomic layer deposition (ALD) separately. The gate electrode is Ni/Au metals. The ohmic contacts (Ti/Al/Ni/Au) were formed through a rapid thermal annealing at 850 °C. The Lg, Lgs, and Lgd of the devices are 3 μm, 3 μm, and 18 μm, respectively [19].
The 2DEG densities and equivalent mobility(@Vgs = 0 V) of four fabricated devices are listed in the Table 1. The contact resistance is 0.54 Ωmm, which is measured through TLM.
Particle incidents may damage the material lattice, resulting in displacements, which will cause vacancies as well as other defects and influence device characteristics, so the degradation of structural material after proton irradiation was studied to start.
To explore the degradation of structural material, firstly, we observed the surface morphology of the device structural material before and after proton irradiation, and found that surface morphology became rougher and more particles appeared, as shown in Figure 2.
Then, we calculated total dislocations, vacancies, and collisions in different structural materials through Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter (SRIM) simulation. Low-energy proton irradiation (3 MeV) was injected into the structural materials of the four different devices, and more total vacancies could be found in the common Schottky gate HEMT, as shown in Figure 3a. Fewer defects in MIS-HEMTs were displayed than in the common Schottky gate HEMT. To further explore the vacancies in the other three kinds of devices, proton irradiation with higher energy (10 MeV) was adopted. The total replacement, total vacancy, and replacement collision were calculated, and the results are exhibited in Figure 3b and Table 2. The least of the three defects was displayed in the bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT according to the simulation results, which suggests that the bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT can reduce structural material degradation.
Two-dimensional device simulation was used to explore the electrical performance of four kinds of devices. Polarization models, the Shockley–Read–Hall model, the Auger model, and the concentration-independent mobility model were used in the simulation [20]. The devices structures are the same as that described in Figure 1. The simulation results fit well with the experimental results [15], as shown in Figure 4.

3. Results and Discussion

On-current degradation in different structures after the 3 MeV proton irradiation fluence of 1014 is listed in Table 3. The maximum on-current degradation in the bilayer MIS-HEMT degraded the least, while the maximum on-current in the common HEMT showed the largest degradation. This may be related to the degradation of the carrier density and mobility. The degradation of the carrier density and mobility of the bilayer MIS-HEMT was 1.04% and 1.05%, while the degradation of the carrier density and mobility of the common HEMT was 14.94% and 45.43%.
The threshold voltages of four devices were studied, and the threshold voltage shift (△Vth) of different devices before and after different fluences of proton irradiation were compared in our simulations. The results of degradation rate of Vth (△Vth/Vth0) are shown in the Table 4. The degradation rate of threshold voltage in four devices increased as the proton irradiation fluence grew, which may be attributed to the defects induced by proton irradiation. The smallest degradation rates were found in the bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT regardless of proton irradiation fluence. Moreover, the change in degradation rate of Vth in the bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT was also smaller than that in the common Schottky gate HEMT. The degradation rate of the common Schottky gate HEMT grew from 15.1%@1011/cm−2 to 50.3%@1014/cm−2, while that in the bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT showed the smallest degradation rate and degradation rate change, from 10.6%@1011/cm−2 to 37.2%@1014/cm−2. Compared with the common Schottky gate HEMT, all three MIS-HEMT devices showed lower degradation rates of Vth. Since the active region in the common Schottky gate HEMT structure is closer to the surface, it is more vulnerable than in the MIS-HEMTs, so the degradation of the common Schottky gate HEMT structure is more serious. Among the three MIS-HEMT devices, the improvement in the threshold voltage shift of the bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT device was the most obvious, which strongly proves the effectiveness of the bilayer dielectrics layers. The higher displacement threshold energy of the upper Al2O3 decreased defects induced by particle incidence, and the lower SiNx layer provided better surface passivation, reducing the generation of the secondary defects.
The Vth degradation rate of four kinds of devices was explored through experiments, and the bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT showed the lowest degradation rate, as seen in Figure 5, which is in accordance with the simulation results, strongly supporting the effectiveness of the simulation. The higher degradation in the other three devices may have been caused by the Ga-O bond and other dangling bonds at the interface induced during the manufacturing process, which may cause deep interface states [21]. These native defects may transfer into more defects after proton irradiation, leading to more severe degradation.
The shift in C-V curves of Cgs and Cgd for different irradiation cases was also studied through simulations, and the results are shown in Figure 6. The C-V curves of all four kinds of devices changed slightly when the fluence was below 1013. When the fluence reached 1013, the C-V curves of the bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT still changed little, while the other three devices showed a clear shift, which means that the bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT takes effect at higher fluence, which is attributed to its stronger surface protection due to the higher displacement threshold energy of Al2O3. When the fluence grew to 1014, all devices showed a great shift, which may be attributed to the formation of trapped charges and greater lattice damages in the devices [22]. Similar results have also been reported [17]. The shift in the experimental Cgs results in four devices was 0.54 V, 0.41 V, 0.44 V, and 0.47 V, respectively, in the common Schottky gate HEMT, the single SiNx MIS-HEMT, the bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT, and the single Al2O3 MIS-HEMT at the proton fluence of 1014. The larger shift in the single Al2O3 MIS-HEMT in the experimental results than in the simulation results may contribute to the defects introduced in the fabrication process.
The Gmmax degradation of four kinds of devices is explored in Figure 7. The Gm decreased largely in both the common Schottky gate HEMT and the MIS-HEMT with Al2O3, while the Gm decreased mildly in the MIS-HEMT with SiNx and the MIS-HEMT with bilayers. The results of the Gm degradation rate (△Gm/Gm0) are shown in Table 5. The Gm degradation rates of the MIS-HEMT with SiNx and the MIS-HEMT with bilayers were relatively smaller, at 9.7% and 12.28%w while the degradation rates in the other two devices were larger, especially in the common Schottky gate HEMT, reaching as high as 34.58%. This means that the gate control capability of the MIS-HEMT with SiNx and the MIS-HEMT with bilayers degraded less than the other two devices. This difference in Gm degradation may be because SiNx can passivate the traps in the device surface and interface. Fewer traps may generate fewer defects after proton irradiation in the device, causing smaller damage to the region under the gate, which can influence the gate control capability.
What is more, the cutoff frequency (fT) at Vds = 6 V under different fluences was compared in four devices, as shown in Figure 8. The bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT ranked first at a different fluence, higher than that of the single-dielectric-layer MIS HEMT with a SiNx layer and with an Al2O3 layer, whereas the lowest cutoff frequency occurred in the common Schottky gate HEMT. As the proton fluence increased, the cutoff frequencies of the four devices were reduced, suggesting that particle irradiation will deteriorate the frequency characteristics of the devices. Nevertheless, the reduction in fT at different fluence in the bilayer dielectric MIS-HEMT was lower than the other devices. It has been reported that the high-frequency performance of GaN-based devices will be degraded when charge trapping occurs in these devices [15,23,24]. The cutoff frequency degradation rate (△fT/f0) of the four devices was also calculated with the simulation results and is listed in the Table 6. The smaller degradation in the bilayer dielectric MIS-HEMT suggests that the frequency characteristic of the bilayer dielectric MIS-HEMT was more stable when the proton fluence increased. Higher fT and lower reduction in fT at different fluence in MIS-HEMTs indicate the charge trapping has been suppressed [24], thereby improving the performance degradation of the device. The MIS-HEMT, especially with bilayer dielectrics, is therefore more suitable for microwave applications [24]. This agrees with the defects simulation of structural material. The fewer the defects, the smaller the degradation. The experimental results of the threshold voltages and C-V curves were consistent with the simulation results, suggesting that the bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT has better irradiation reliability.
It can be seen from the simulation and experimental results above that the bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT showed better radiation resilience. This may be related to the effect of the upper Al2O3 and the lower SiNx layer. The higher displacement threshold energy of Al2O3 decreased defects induced by particle incidence, and the lower SiNx layer provided better surface passivation. The combined effect resulted in better performance after irradiation.

4. Conclusions

This paper investigates the proton radiation effects on the bilayer dielectrics SiNx/Al2O3 MIS-HEMT, the common Schottky gate HEMT, and single dielectric layer MIS-HEMT with SiNx and with Al2O3. Different proton particle fluences are adopted in our simulations and experiments, and the degradation of structural material and electrical performance of the common Schottky gate HEMT and three different kinds of MIS-HEMTs are explored. Simulation and experimental results of structural material degradation and electrical performance degradation reveal that the bilayer dielectrics MIS-HEMT performs best after irradiation and has better radiation resilience.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Z. and C.F.; methodology, Z.Z.; validation, Z.Z.; formal analysis, Z.Z.; investigation, Z.Z.; resources, H.X., L.J. and W.L.; data curation, Z.Z.; writing, Z.Z.; project administration, Z.Z.; funding acquisition, L.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research (grant No. YSBR-064).

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank China Aerospace Science & Industry Corp Defense Technology R&T Center youth fund.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kumar, V.; Lu, W.; Schwindt, R.; Kuliev, A.; Adesida, I. AlGaN/GaN HEMTs on SiC with fT of over 120 GHz. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2002, 23, 455–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Palacios, T.; Chakraborty, A.; Rajan, S.; Poblenz, C.; Keller, S.; DenBaars, S.; Speck, J.; Mishra, U. High-power AlGaN/GaN HEMTs for Ka-band applications. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2005, 26, 781–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ikeda, N.; Niiyama, Y.; Kambayashi, H.; Sato, Y.; Nomura, T.; Kato, S.; Yoshida, S. GaN power transistors on Si substrates for switching applications. Proc. IEEE 2010, 98, 1151–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dong-Seok, K.; Jun-Hyeok, L.; Sunmog, Y.; Jung-Hee, L. Proton Irradiation Effects on AlGaN/GaN HEMTs with Different Isolation Methods. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2018, 65, 579–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Martin-Horcajo, S.; Wang, A.; Romero, M.-F.; Tadjer, M.J.; Calle, F. Simple and accurate method to estimate channel temperature and thermal resistance in AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2013, 60, 4105–4111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Turuvekere, S.; Rawal, D.S.; DasGupta, A.; DasGupta, N. Evidence of Fowler–Nordheim tunneling in gate leakage current of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs at room temperature. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2014, 61, 4291–4294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Killat, N.; Bajo, M.M.; Paskova, T.; Evans, K.R.; Leach, J.; Li, X.; Özgür, Ü.; Morkoç, H.; Chabak, K.D.; Crespo, A.; et al. Reliability of AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistors on low dislocation density bulk GaN substrate: Implications of surface step edges. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 193507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, J.-H.; Kim, D.-S.; Kim, J.-G.; Ahn, W.-H.; Bae, Y.; Lee, J.-H. Effect of gate dielectrics on characteristics of high-energy proton-irradiated AlGaN/GaN MISHEMTs. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2021, 184, 109473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lv, L.; Ma, J.G.; Cao, Y.R.; Zhang, J.C.; Zhang, W.; Li, L.; Xu, S.R.; Ma, X.H.; Ren, X.T.; Hao, Y. Study of proton irradiation effects on AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistors. Microelectron. Reliab. 2011, 51, 2168–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tang, J.; Liu, G.; Zhao, G.; Xing, S.A.; Malik, S.A. Effect of proton irradiation on the mobility of two-dimensional electron in AlGaN/AlN/GaN high electron mobility transistors at low temperature. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2020, 38, 023202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aktas, O.; Kuliev, A.; Kumar, V.; Schwindt, R.; Toshkov, S.; Costescu, D.; Stubbins, J.; Adesida, I. 60Co gamma radiation effects on DC, RF, and pulsed I–V characteristics of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. Solid. State Electron. 2004, 48, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Levinshtein, M.E.; Rumyantsev, S.L.; Shur, M.S. Properties of Advanced Semiconductor Materials: GaN, AIN, InN, BN, SiC, SiGe; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yoon, Y.J.; Lee, J.S.; Kang, I.M.; Lee, E.J.; Kim, D.-S. Impact of process-dependent SiNx passivation on proton-induced degradation in GaN MIS-HEMTs. Results Phys. 2021, 31, 105013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, L.; Hwang, Y.-H.; Xi, Y.; Ren, F.; Craciun, V.; Pearton, S.J.; Yang, G.; Kim, H.-Y.; Kim, J. Study on the effects of proton irradiation on the dc characteristics of AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistors with source field plate. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2014, 32, 022202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhen, Z.; Xiao, H.; Jiang, L.; Xu, J.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Feng, C. Effect of Double Insulators on the Performance Improvement of 3-MeV Proton-Irradiated AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs. ECS J. Solid. State Sci. Technol. 2023, 12, 035004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ahn, S.; Dong, C.; Zhu, W.; Kim, B.-J.; Hwang, Y.-H.; Ren, F.; Pearton, S.J.; Yang, G.; Kim, J.; Patrick, E.; et al. Effect of proton irradiation energy on AlGaN/GaN metal-oxide semiconductor high electron mobility transistors. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Nanotechnol. Microelectron. Mater. Process. Meas. Phenom. 2015, 33, 051208. [Google Scholar]
  17. Keum, D.; Kim, H. Energy-Dependent Degradation Characteristics of AlGaN/GaN MISHEMTs with 1, 1.5, and 2 MeV Proton Irradiation. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2018, 7, Q159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. ares, C.; Ren, F.; Pearton, S.J.; Yang, G.; Kim, J.; Lo, C.-F.; Johnson, J.W. Effect of proton irradiation energy on SiNx/AlGaN/GaN metal-insulator semiconductor high electron mobility transistors. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Nanotechnol. Microelectron. Mater. Process. Meas. Phenom. 2018, 36, 052202. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhen, Z.; Wang, Q.; Qin, Y.; Chen, C.; Xu, J.; Jiang, L.; Xiao, H.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Tan, M.; et al. Comparative Study on Characteristics of AlGaN/GaN Metal–Insulator–Semiconductor High-Electron-Mobility Transistors. Phys. Status Solidi (A) 2022, 219, 2200010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Strauss, S.; Erlebach, A.; Cilento, T.; Marcon, D.; Bakeroot, B. TCAD methodology for simulation of GaN-HEMT power devices. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & Ics, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 15–19 June 2014. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tan, X.; Lü, Y.; Gu, G.; Wang, L.; Dun, S.; Song, X.; Guo, H.; Yin, J.; Cai, S.; Feng, Z. High performance AlGaN/GaN HEMTs with AlN/SiN_x passivation. J. Semicond. 2015, 36, 074008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Carey, P.H.; Ren, F.; Bae, J.; Kim, J.; Pearton, S.J. Proton Irradiation of High Aluminum Content AlGaN Polarization Doped Field Effect Transistors. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2020, 9, 025003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yamaguchi, Y.; Oishi, T.; Otsuka, H.; Nanjo, T.; Koyama, H.; Kamo, Y.; Yamanaka, K. Modeling of frequency dispersion at low frequency for GaN HEMT. In Proceedings of the Microwave Conference, Paris, France, 7–10 September 2015. [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen, K.M.; Lin, C.J.; Nagarajan, V.; Chang, E.Y.; Huang, G.W. Analysis of High-Frequency Behavior of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs and MIS-HEMTs under UV Illumination. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2021, 10, 055004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cross-sectional schematic of (a) the Schottky gate HEMT and (b) MIS-HEMT.
Figure 1. Cross-sectional schematic of (a) the Schottky gate HEMT and (b) MIS-HEMT.
Micromachines 15 01091 g001
Figure 2. Experimental results of (a) surface morphology before irradiation and (b) surface morphology after irradiation.
Figure 2. Experimental results of (a) surface morphology before irradiation and (b) surface morphology after irradiation.
Micromachines 15 01091 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of defects (simulation) generated after proton irradiation of the common Schottky gate HEMT, single-dielectric layer MIS-HEMTs and bilayer layer MIS-HEMT: (a) low energy and (b) high energy.
Figure 3. Comparison of defects (simulation) generated after proton irradiation of the common Schottky gate HEMT, single-dielectric layer MIS-HEMTs and bilayer layer MIS-HEMT: (a) low energy and (b) high energy.
Micromachines 15 01091 g003
Figure 4. The transfer curves of the simulation and experimental results.
Figure 4. The transfer curves of the simulation and experimental results.
Micromachines 15 01091 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of simulated and measured threshold voltage degradation rates.
Figure 5. Comparison of simulated and measured threshold voltage degradation rates.
Micromachines 15 01091 g005
Figure 6. Capacitance degradation of simulation with irradiation fluence in different devices after proton irradiation.
Figure 6. Capacitance degradation of simulation with irradiation fluence in different devices after proton irradiation.
Micromachines 15 01091 g006
Figure 7. Simulation results of Gmmax degradation with irradiation fluence in different devices after proton irradiation.
Figure 7. Simulation results of Gmmax degradation with irradiation fluence in different devices after proton irradiation.
Micromachines 15 01091 g007
Figure 8. Simulation results of frequency degradation with irradiation fluence in different devices after proton irradiation.
Figure 8. Simulation results of frequency degradation with irradiation fluence in different devices after proton irradiation.
Micromachines 15 01091 g008
Table 1. Basic electrical results (experimental) in different devices.
Table 1. Basic electrical results (experimental) in different devices.
Different DevicesThe Measured 2DEG Density ns (cm−2)The Calculated Equivalent Mobility μ (cm2/Vs)
Common8.41 × 1012130.99
SiNx6.02 × 1012140.00
Bilayer4.99 × 1012251.61
Al2O36.88 × 1012160.55
Table 2. SRIM simulation results in different structural materials.
Table 2. SRIM simulation results in different structural materials.
DefectsSiNxAl2O3Bilayer
Total replacement292/ion285/ion139/ion
Total vacancy282.3/ion295/ion142/ion
Replacement collision10/ion10/ion3/ion
Table 3. Experimental degradation results in different devices after the irradiation fluence of 1014.
Table 3. Experimental degradation results in different devices after the irradiation fluence of 1014.
Different DevicesDegradation of the Maximum On-Current
Common78.5%
SiNx18.8%
Bilayer7.5%
Al2O338.0%
Table 4. Simulation results of degradation rate of Vth.
Table 4. Simulation results of degradation rate of Vth.
FluenceDegradation Rate of Vth (%)
CommonSiNxBilayerAl2O3
1 × 101116.311.46.711.0
1 × 101220.514.910.314.3
1 × 101325.519.815.519.5
1 × 101444.835.932.635.2
Table 5. Results of degradation of Gm after the irradiation fluence of 1014.
Table 5. Results of degradation of Gm after the irradiation fluence of 1014.
Different DevicesDegradation of Gmmax (Simulation)Degradation of Gmmax (Experiment)
Common34.58%9.6%
SiNx12.28%6.0%
Bilayer9.7%5.6%
Al2O319.87%6.3%
Table 6. Simulation results of degradation of cutoff frequency after the irradiation fluence of 1014.
Table 6. Simulation results of degradation of cutoff frequency after the irradiation fluence of 1014.
Different DevicesDegradation of Cutoff Frequency
Common33.7%
SiNx12.4%
Bilayer9.5%
Al2O318.9%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhen, Z.; Feng, C.; Xiao, H.; Jiang, L.; Li, W. Proton-Irradiation Effects and Reliability on GaN-Based MIS-HEMTs. Micromachines 2024, 15, 1091. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15091091

AMA Style

Zhen Z, Feng C, Xiao H, Jiang L, Li W. Proton-Irradiation Effects and Reliability on GaN-Based MIS-HEMTs. Micromachines. 2024; 15(9):1091. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15091091

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhen, Zixin, Chun Feng, Hongling Xiao, Lijuan Jiang, and Wei Li. 2024. "Proton-Irradiation Effects and Reliability on GaN-Based MIS-HEMTs" Micromachines 15, no. 9: 1091. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15091091

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop