Next Article in Journal
Does Risk-Adapted Proton Beam Therapy Have a Role as a Complementary or Alternative Therapeutic Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma?
Next Article in Special Issue
Mutated Rnf43 Aggravates Helicobacter Pylori-Induced Gastric Pathology
Previous Article in Journal
The Value of Histological Algorithms to Predict the Malignancy Potential of Pheochromocytomas and Abdominal Paragangliomas—A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Literature
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vonoprazan-Based Third-Line Therapy Has a Higher Eradication Rate against Sitafloxacin-Resistant Helicobacter pylori
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/cancers11020229
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Vitro Activity of 3-Bromopyruvate, an Anticancer Compound, Against Antibiotic-Susceptible and Antibiotic-Resistant Helicobacter pylori Strains

by
Paweł Krzyżek
1,*,
Roman Franiczek
1,
Barbara Krzyżanowska
1,
Łukasz Łaczmański
2,
Paweł Migdał
3 and
Grażyna Gościniak
1
1
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw 50-368, Poland
2
Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wroclaw 53-114, Poland
3
Department of Environment, Hygiene and Animal Welfare, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wroclaw 51-630, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2019, 11(2), 229; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020229
Submission received: 15 January 2019 / Revised: 5 February 2019 / Accepted: 12 February 2019 / Published: 15 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Helicobacter pylori Associated Cancer)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a bacterium capable of inducing chronic active gastritis, which in some people, develops into gastric cancers. One of the substances that may be useful in the eradication of this microorganism is 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP), an anticancer compound with antimicrobial properties. The aim of this article was to determine the activity of 3-BP against antibiotic-susceptible and antibiotic-resistant H. pylori strains. The antimicrobial activity was determined using a disk-diffusion method, broth microdilution method, time-killing assay, and checkerboard assay. The research was extended by observations using light, fluorescence, and scanning electron microscopy. The growth inhibition zones produced by 2 mg/disk with 3-BP counted for 16–32.5 mm. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranged from 32 to 128 μg/mL, while the minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) for all tested strains had values of 128 μg/mL. The time-killing assay demonstrated the concentration-dependent and time-dependent bactericidal activity of 3-BP. The decrease in culturability below the detection threshold (<100 CFU/mL) was demonstrated after 6 h, 4 h, and 2 h of incubation for MIC, 2× MIC, and 4× MIC, respectively. Bacteria treated with 3-BP had a several times reduced mean green/red fluorescence ratio compared to the control samples, suggesting bactericidal activity, which was independent from an induction of coccoid forms. The checkerboard assay showed the existence of a synergistic/additive interaction of 3-BP with amoxicillin, tetracycline, and clarithromycin. Based on the presented results, it is suggested that 3-BP may be an interesting anti-H. pylori compound.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Helicobacter pylori is a Gram-negative, flagellated, spiral-shaped rod inhabiting the human gastric mucosa [1]. It has been estimated that nearly 4.4 billion (over 60%) of people in the world are colonized with this bacterium, of which the highest prevalence was recorded in Africa (70.1%) and the lowest in Oceania (24.4%) [2]. This pathogen spreads from person to person, leading to the persistent stomach colonization and the development of chronic active gastritis [3]. As a result of this colonization, lasting for many decades, some people may develop a sequence of histopathological gastric changes promoting the formation of tumors [4,5]. Due to the ability of H. pylori to induce carcinogenesis, this bacterium was classified in 1994 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as a group I carcinogen [6].
Gastric cancers are the fifth most common cancers and the third most frequent cause of cancer-dependent deaths in the world [7,8]. The development of gastric cancers is a complex, multistep process that leads to a series of genetic and epigenetic changes within signaling factors, cell cycle regulators, and tumor suppressor genes. Despite its multifactorial nature, it is estimated that in about 80% of cases, H. pylori is responsible for the formation of gastric cancers [9]. Therefore, the eradication of this bacterium before the appearance of significant and irreversible changes in the gastric mucosa may protect against the development of gastric cancer [10,11,12].
One of the main challenges in anti-H. pylori therapies is the growing resistance of this bacterium to antibiotics [3]. The level of antibiotic resistance has reached alarming levels around the world. Primary and secondary resistance to clarithromycin (CLR), metronidazole (MTZ), and levofloxacin exceeded the value of ≥15% in virtually all areas within the World Health Organization (WHO) framework, which currently makes them unable to be use in empirical therapies. Double, secondary resistance to both CLR and MTZ also reached a worrying level, exceeding 10% in the Eastern Mediterranean region, the Western Pacific region, and Europe, with the highest recorded prevalence in Europe (18%) [13]. Due to the increasing antibiotic resistance of many microorganisms around the world, in 2017, WHO published a list of highest priority bacteria that need searching for new antimicrobial substances, among which CLR-resistant H. pylori was mentioned [14]. One of such substances that may be useful in the future in the eradication of drug-resistant H. pylori is 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP).
3-BP is a chemically synthesized halogen pyruvic acid analogue [15,16]. High interest in this substance is associated with anti-oncogenic activity directed against various types of cancer cells [16]. The first report on the anticancer properties of 3-BP was published in 2001 [17], which contributed to the appearance of many scientific reports indicating the selective action of 3-BP against various cancer cells [16], including in vitro [18] and in vivo [19] studies targeting gastric cancer. The cytotoxic activity against cancer cells is associated with the promotion of metabolic catastrophe, leading to interference with the activity of glycolytic enzymes and mitochondrial respiration proteins, the limitation of intracellular ATP and the induction of oxidative stress [15,16]. Additionally, antimicrobial activity of 3-BP directed against protozoa [20,21], fungi [22,23], microalgae [24], and bacteria [25,26] has also been demonstrated.
Due to the numerous beneficial therapeutic properties of 3-BP, the aim of this article was to determine the activity of this compound against antibiotic-susceptible and antibiotic-resistant H. pylori strains, both alone and in combination with the most commonly used antibiotics. The study was also extended to assess the effect of 3-BP on the H. pylori morphology.

2. Results

2.1. Disk-Diffusion Method

The first stage of research was a screening test of the 3-BP activity against H. pylori strains using the disk-diffusion method. The sizes of growth inhibition zones were concentration-dependent and counted for 16–32.5 mm, 10–28.5 mm, and 6–19 mm for 2000 μg/disk, 1000 μg/disk, and 200 μg/disk, respectively (Table 1). The antibiotic resistance profile of tested H. pylori strains had no significant effect on the size of the growth inhibition zones (p > 0.05, Tables S1–S4). Despite the high activity of 3-BP at the highest concentration used (zones of inhibition ˃ 15 mm), these values were much lower than those obtained for amoxicillin (AMX), which were in the range of 58.5–70.5 mm.

2.2. Determination of MICs and MBCs

To determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) values of 3-BP, ten H. pylori strains with different antibiotic resistance profiles were selected (Table 2). The lowest MICs were observed in antibiotic-susceptible clinical H. pylori strains and corresponded to concentrations of 32–64 μg/mL. The highest MICs were recorded against the reference and double-resistant clinical strains (128 μg/mL). For MTZ-resistant and CLR-resistant strains, the MICs were 32–128 μg/mL and 64–128 μg/mL, respectively. For all H. pylori strains tested, the MBCs counted for 128 μg/mL, whereas the MBC/MIC ratios were ≤4, indicating a bactericidal 3-BP activity against H. pylori strains (Table 2). Besides, the differences in the 3-BP activity between H. pylori strains were independent of the antibiotic resistance profile (p > 0.05). Moreover, it was shown that the activity of 3-BP against two reference H. pylori strains (Tx30a and J99) was pH-independent and that both MICs and MBCs had values of 128 μg/mL.

2.3. Time-Killing Assay

The next step of the study was designated to determine the morphology, culturability, and viability of the two reference H. pylori strains (Tx30a and J99) during the incubation with 3-BP. There were no statistically significant differences in the tested parameters between these strains (p > 0.05). For both, the concentration-dependent and time-dependent activity of 3-BP was demonstrated (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
For both strains, a decrease in the culturability below the detection threshold (˂100 CFU/mL) was demonstrated after 6 h, 4 h, and 2 h for MIC, 2× MIC, and 4× MIC of 3-BP, respectively (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The steep decline in bacterial counts at 2× MIC and 4× MIC has been observed. For MIC, there was a linear, slow decrease in the first 2 h incubation (reduction in log10 CFU/mL < 1), with a dynamic reduction in the bacterial counts between 2 h and 4 h, i.e., from 106.13 to 102.54 (H. pylori Tx30a) and from 106.65 to 103.14 (H. pylori J99) (Tables S5 and S6). The dynamics of the decrease in the culturability of tested strains treated with MIC-4× MIC of 3-BP were significantly different in comparison to both the control (Tx30a: p < 0.0005 at all concentrations; J99: p < 0.0005 for 2× MIC and 4× MIC and p < 0.005 for MIC) and ½× MIC (Tx30a and J99: p < 0.005 for 2× MIC and 4× MIC and p < 0.05 for MIC).
The reduction of bacterial culturability was accompanied by a decrease in the number of spiral forms with an inversely proportional increase in the number of coccoid forms (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3). No differences were observed in the dynamics of the decrease in spiral forms between the tested H. pylori strains at any time point (p > 0.05). For both strains, a linear decrease in the number of spiral forms over time was observed for each 3-BP concentration tested. Differences in the number of spiral forms between the control and samples treated with 3-BP were statistically significant in a 1 h incubation (p < 0.05) and highly significant for all time points starting from the 2 h incubation (p < 0.0000). Both H. pylori strains after the one-day cultivation period occurred mainly in the spiral form (>90%). This morphotype was practically unobservable for bacteria treated with MIC-4× MIC of 3-BP. For the Tx30a strain, the average number of cells with the spiral morphology in a 24 h incubation counted for 2.5%, 6%, and 8% for 4× MIC, 2× MIC, and MIC, respectively (Figure 1 and Table S7), whereas for J99 strain, the average amount of these morphological forms was 2%, 3%, and 10%, respectively (Figure 2 and Table S8). The morphological variability of H. pylori strains exposed to 3-BP was also documented by a scanning electron microscopy. At a 72 h incubation, in MIC-4× MIC treated samples, both strains were practically exclusively spherical (Figure 4C–J). However, differences in the amount of exopolysaccharide, an important component of biofilm, were noticed. The exopolysaccharide matrix was present in a great amount in the case of H. pylori J99 treated with 3-BP and practically absent during the observation of H. pylori Tx30a. In the control samples not treated with 3-BP, both strains occurred mainly in the spiral form (Figure 4A,B).
The confirmation of bactericidal, concentration-dependent, and time-dependent activity of 3-BP against H. pylori strains was performed using fluorescence microscopy (Figure 5). In the case of H. pylori Tx30a, statistically significant differences were found in the mean green/red fluorescence ratio between tested samples after 1 h incubation (p < 0.05), with an observable increase in statistical significance for all time points starting from 2 h of incubation (p < 0.0000). After a one-day incubation period, the mean green/red fluorescence ratio for the control sample was 12-fold, 7-fold, and 4.5-fold higher than in the samples treated with 4× MIC, 2× MIC, and MIC of 3-BP, respectively (Figure 6 and Table S9). A similar tendency was observed for H. pylori J99, although in this case, differences between the tested samples were highly significant starting from 1 h after incubation (p < 0.0000). After 24 h of incubation, the mean green/red fluorescence ratio for this strain in the control sample was over 4–5 times higher than in MIC-4× MIC of 3-BP (Figure 7 and Table S10). The analysis of the differences in the mean green/red fluorescence ratio within a given concentration of 3-BP at various time points showed a statistically significant decrease in green fluorescence intensity over time for all tested 3-BP concentrations for H. pylori Tx30a (p < 0.0000) and MIC-4× MIC for H. pylori J99 (p < 0.0000). For the H. pylori J99, there were no significant changes in the green/red fluorescence intensity during the incubation of this strain with ½× MIC of 3-BP (p > 0.05).

2.4. Checkerboard Assay

The next stage of the study was to determine the interaction of 3-BP with the most commonly used antibiotics in H. pylori therapy, i.e., AMX, TET, CLR, and MTZ. For H. pylori Tx30a, the synergistic activity of 3-BP with CLR (FIC = 0.5) was demonstrated, which was accompanied by a 4-fold reduction in concentration of both substances (from 128 μg/mL to 32 μg/mL and from 0.05 μg/mL to 0.0125 μg/mL, respectively) while maintaining antimicrobial activity against the tested strain (Figure 8A). In addition, an additive interaction of 3-BP with AMX (FIC = 0.75) and TET (FIC = 1) was found (Figure 9A and Figure 10A). On the other hand, no interaction between 3-BP and MTZ was observed (FIC = 2) (Figure 11A). Similar results were obtained for the H. pylori 7143 strain. For AMX (FIC = 1) and TET (FIC = 0.75), the presence of additive interaction with 3-BP was shown (Figure 9B and Figure 10B). The combination of CLR and 3-BP also indicated an additive interaction (FIC = 0.75), whereas the presence of 3-BP, similar to the Tx30a strain, resulted in a 4-fold decrease in the MIC of CLR (from 256 μg/mL to 64 μg/mL) (Figure 8B). Besides, for the H. pylori 7143 strain, no interaction between 3-BP and MTZ was observed (FIC = 2) (Figure 11B).
The checkerboard assay was additionally expanded to analyze the morphology of H. pylori treated with 3-BP and the four antibiotics mentioned above (Table S11–S18). It was found that in the MICs of all tested substances, H. pylori underwent a morphological transformation into a coccoid form (˃85% in the sample tested). The treatment of H. pylori cells with sublethal concentrations of 3-BP conditioned the presence of a higher average number of spiral forms than in MICs, i.e., 58.75% and 77.5% (H. pylori Tx30a) and 55.25% and 75% (H. pylori 7143) for ½× MIC and ¼× MIC, respectively (Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11). Among the tested antibiotics, the strongest inducer of H. pylori morphological changes was amoxicillin (at ½× MIC, 26.75% and 41.25% of spiral forms were observed for H. pylori Tx30a and 7143 strain, respectively), while the weakest inducers were MTZ relative to H. pylori Tx30a (74.25% and ≥90% spiral forms for ½× MIC and ¼× MIC, respectively) and CLR relative to H. pylori 7143 (78.5% and ≥90% spiral forms for ½× MIC and ¼× MIC, respectively) (Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11). A similar mechanism of the coccoid form stimulation was noticed with the MICs of the 3-BP and each of the tested antibiotics combination. Lowering the concentration of one or both substances contributed to the gradual, inversely proportional to the substance concentration increase in the amount of H. pylori spiral forms (Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11).

3. Discussion

H. pylori is an example of a microorganism that relatively often becomes resistant to antibiotics, which is most often obtained through point mutations in the target sites of antibiotics [27,28]. There is a strong dependence between the primary resistance of this bacterium and the level of consumption of specific antibiotics groups in the studied populations [29]. Primary resistance to CLR is associated with the use of this antimicrobial compound during lower respiratory tract infections, while primary resistance to MTZ is most often determined by the use of this antibiotic in urogenital and dental infections [28]. The secondary resistance to antibiotics is generated by the reinfection of H. pylori in people who have already had eradication therapy directed against this bacterium [30]. In the meta-analysis carried out by Savoldi et al. [13], it was estimated that the risk of therapeutic failure, regardless of the type of H. pylori resistance, increases 7-fold and 2.5-fold for the CLR-resistant and MTZ-resistant strains, respectively. This observation confirms the validity of searching for new antimicrobial substances with activity directed against the CLR-resistant H. pylori strains [14].
The present article determines the activity of 3-BP against antibiotic-susceptible and antibiotic-resistant H. pylori strains. It has been noticed that the resistance of this bacterium to antibiotics does not translate into the efficacy of this compound. This is consistent with the observations of other researchers, pointing to the lack of dependence between the resistance profile of this bacterium and the antimicrobial activity of nonantibiotic substances [31,32,33,34]. In H. pylori strains, the MICs of 3-BP were found to be in the range of 32–128 μg/mL, while in all tested strains, the MBCs counted for 128 μg/mL. The obtained MICs are slightly higher while in the similar range (20–80 μg/mL) as in Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) strains, against which the 3-BP activity was tested [26]. The authors of this article suggested the selective 3-BP activity directed against staphylococci because in the remaining tested bacteria (Enterococcus, Enterobacter, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Acinetobacter baumannii), MICs were higher than 320 μg/mL [26]. The results in our article, therefore, indicate additional, selective activity against H. pylori. Furthermore, the MBC values of 3-BP against H. pylori strains, being 128 μg/mL (~0.77 mM), are achievable in vivo without inducing a toxic effect on eukaryotic cells because the threshold concentration was considered as 1.75 mM [35,36]. The study of Kunjithapatham et al. has shown that 3-BP has the ability to interact with serum proteins, which, according to the authors, is most likely responsible for the lack of cytotoxicity when the compound is administered systemically at a dose of ≤1.75 mM. Additionally, it was found that 3-BP does not cross the blood–brain barrier, which limits its neurotoxic potential [36]. It is believed that the reason for the high selectivity of 3-BP in the destruction of cancer cells is caused by the high expression of monocarboxylic acid transporters (MCTs), which the function of is to transport lactate molecules. Due to structural homology, 3-BP can also be transported by them. In physiologically functioning cells, the level of MCTs expression is low, which reduces the level of 3-BP transport to their interior and thus decreases the toxicity of 3-BP relative to them [16]. However, more research is still needed to finally determine safe dosages for the use of 3-BP in therapies.
During the tests determining MICs and MBCs of 3-BP against H. pylori strains, the MBC/MIC ratios ≤4 were obtained, indicating the bactericidal effect of this compound [37]. The time-killing assay confirmed the results and demonstrated the concentration-dependent and time-dependent activity of 3-BP against H. pylori strains. This antimicrobial mechanism of 3-BP activity has also been demonstrated against protozoa [20,21], fungi [22,23], and microalgae [24], as well as against clinical and laboratory S. aureus strains [26]. Microscopic observations of H. pylori treated with 3-BP indicated a decrease in the number of spiral forms with an inversely proportional increase in the amount of coccoid forms during the incubation. Morphological variability in response to unfavorable environmental conditions is typical for many Gram-negative rods, including H. pylori [38]. This microorganism, in response to stressful conditions, most often undergoes a morphological transformation into spherical forms, for which increased survivability and participation in the failure of antimicrobial therapies are suggested [39,40,41]. In many studies defining the antibacterial activity of substances, the mechanism of H. pylori morphological conversion from the spiral to coccoid form was noticed [42,43,44]. Therefore, it seems that an important stage of research seeking new, alternative antibacterial substances is the determination of viability, not culturability, of this bacterium [45]. In this current study, during the time-killing assay, the viability of H. pylori strains was determined using fluorescence microscopy. It was observed that after the one-day incubation of H. pylori with 3-BP, these bacteria have a low, reduced mean green/red fluorescence ratio, suggesting the bactericidal activity of this compound is independent from the induction of spherical forms. Although the mechanism of bactericidal activity of 3-BP has not been recognized, it is suggested that in microbial cells, similar changes as in cancer cells treated with this compound may occur [23,24,26]. The induction of metabolic catastrophe depending on interference with enzyme activity, the limitation of intracellular ATP, and the generation of free oxygen radicals may be determinants of the strong 3-BP antimicrobial activity [15,16].
The final stage of this present study was to determine the interaction between 3-BP and the most commonly used antibiotics in therapies directed against H. pylori, i.e., AMX, CLR, TET, and MTZ. A synergistic/additive interaction has been demonstrated with three tested antibiotics (AMX, CLR, and TET). These observations coincide with the results obtained by other researchers [24,26]. The checkerboard assay showed the existence of a synergistic/additive interaction of 3-BP with amphotericin B against the microalgae [24] and with ampicillin against S. aureus [26]. Similarly, the current study demonstrated this type of relationship between 3-BP and AMX. It seems that the reason for this phenomenon is the ability of amphotericin B [46] and aminopenicillins [47] to interfere with the integrity of the cellular structures and a disintegration-dependent increase in uptake of 3-BP into microbial cells. An analogous mechanism of sensitizing bacterial cells to antibiotics has been proven against methicillin-resistant S. aureus exposed to electroporation [48]. In the Visca et al. [26] study, the existence of an additive interaction of 3-BP with TET and chloramphenicol against S. aureus has also been demonstrated. These results confirm again the observations made in this present study, including the additive interaction of 3-BP with TET and CLR, an antibiotic acting similarly to chloramphenicol on the 50s ribosomal subunit. Inhibitors of protein synthesis, such as the aforementioned antibiotics, can affect the production of key proteins responsible for the defense reactions, including stress proteins [49]. It seems that this type of activity may sensitize bacteria to the bactericidal action of 3-BP and inhibit mechanisms aimed at eliminating the harmful effects that occur after exposure to this compound. This hypothesis, however, requires research verification in the future.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions

The study was conducted using 52 H. pylori strains (50 clinical strains, isolated during previous studies [50,51], and two reference strains, Tx30a (ATCC 51932) and J99 (ATCC 700824)) (Table 1). The strains were categorized as susceptible or resistant to antibiotics based on the EUCAST recommendations, i.e., amoxicillin (AMX, R > 0.125 μg/mL), clarithromycin (CLR, R > 0.5 μg/mL), tetracycline (TET, R > 1 μg/mL), and metronidazole (MTZ, > 8 μg/mL) [52]. Bacterial strains were kept in a Trypticase soy broth (TSB) (Oxoid, Le Pont de Claix, France) with the addition of 15% glycerol at −70 °C until testing [41]. After thawing, the bacteria were plated on Columbia agar (Difco, Lublin, Poland) with 7% hemolysed horse blood (CA+HB) and incubated for 3 days under microaerophilic conditions (Genbox microaer kits, BioMerieux, Marcy I’Etoile, France) at 37 °C. The grown bacteria were passaged on CA+HB and again incubated in the aforementioned conditions for the next 3 days [41].

4.2. Disk-Diffusion Method

The activity of 3-BP (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) using the disk-diffusion method was determined against 52 H. pylori strains. A suspension of the bacterial strain tested with an optical density equivalent to 4 McFarland standard (~108 CFU/mL) was prepared in Brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (Oxoid) with 7% foetal calf serum (Gibco, Paisley, Scotland) (BHI+FCS) and swabbed on the surface of a freshly prepared CA+HB agar, thus obtaining a final bacterial density of approx. 5 × 106 CFU/mL [53,54] with minor modifications. Three sterile paper discs (6 mm) were placed evenly on the agar surface, and 20 μL of different 3-BP solutions, corresponding to concentrations of 100 mg/mL (2000 μg/disk), 50 mg/mL (1000 μg/disk), and 10 mg/mL (200 μg/disk), were dropped on them. 3-BP was dissolved in DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich) and diluted to the final concentration not exceeding 1% (v/v). The positive and negative controls of the experiment were discs with AMX (Oxoid, 25 μg/disk) and 1% DMSO, respectively. All culture plates with sown bacteria were incubated for 3 days under microaerophilic conditions at 37 °C, and then the growth inhibition zones were measured. The experiment was carried out in duplicate.

4.3. MIC/MBC Determination

The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) were determined against 10 selected H. pylori strains (two reference strains, Tx30a and J99, and 8 clinical isolates: two susceptible to antibiotics, two MTZ-resistant, two CLR-resistant, and two with resistance to both antibiotics) (Table 2). The study was carried out using the microdilution method in 12-well titration plates (Bionovo, Legnica, Poland) [55]. For each H. pylori strain, a suspension with an optical density of 4 McFarland units (approx. 108 CFU/mL) in BHI+FCS broth was prepared and then 0.1 mL of the bacterial suspension was transferred to each well with 0.9 mL of BHI+FCS and a 3-BP concentration gradient (8–512 μg/mL), thereby obtaining 1 mL of a bacterial suspension with a final density of approx. 107 CFU/mL. The microdilution plates were incubated for 3 days under microaerophilic conditions at 37 °C with shaking (100 rpm). The positive control was BHI+FCS broth alone and BHI+FCS broth with 1% DMSO (v/v), both with tested bacteria, while the negative control was BHI+FCS without bacteria. The experiment was carried out in duplicate. The MIC was traced as the lowest concentration in which no bacterial growth was observed [56]. To determine the MBC, 10 μL from each well of the microtiter plate was dropped on CA+HB agar and incubated for 3 days at 37 °C and microaerophilic conditions. The MBC was considered as the lowest concentration in which no bacterial growth was observed on the agar plate [56].
The determination of the 3-BP activity in an environment with different pH values was performed using two reference H. pylori strains (Tx30a and J99). For this purpose, BHI+FCS broths with different pH values (5, 6, 7, and 8) were prepared, which was obtained with 1 M HCl and NaOH solutions. The culture conditions, culture media, and bacterial optical density were identical to those used in the MIC/MBC determination. The experiment was carried out in duplicate.

4.4. Checkerboard Assay

The existence of synergism in the antimicrobial activity of 3-BP with AMX (Sigma-Aldrich), MTZ (Sigma-Aldrich), TET (Sigma-Aldrich), and CLR (Sigma-Aldrich) was determined against two H. pylori strains (antibiotic-susceptible reference strain (Tx30a) and double-resistant clinical strain (7143)) using the checkerboard assay [57,58,59]. A concentration gradient used for the 3-BP was similar as previously (i.e., 8–512 μg/mL). The ranges of antibiotic concentrations were chosen based on the study by Hirschl et al. [57], with modifications made during experimental studies, and they counted for 0.00188–0.12 μg/mL, 0.00625–0.4 μg/mL, 0.00313–0.2 μg/mL, and 0.125–8 μg/mL for the Tx30a strain and 0.00313–0.2 μg/mL, 0.025–1.6 μg/mL, 8–512 μg/mL, and 8–512 μg/mL for the 7143 strain for AMX, TET, CLR, and MTZ, respectively.
The concentration gradients of the antimicrobial substances were prepared in test tubes in a way to obtain twice as high concentrations when testing the activity of 3-BP or selected antibiotics alone and four times higher concentrations when testing the combination of 3-BP and a chosen antibiotic. The experiment was carried out using six 12-well titration plates forming a total of 72-well panels. The external wells of the 12-well plates of the x- and y-axes had a concentration gradient of 3-BP and the antibiotic, respectively. To each of these wells, 0.5 mL of BHI+FCS with the tested, doubled 3-BP or antibiotic concentration, 0.4 mL of BHI+FCS, and 0.1 mL of BHI+FCS with a 4 McFarland bacterial suspension were added, thus obtaining the desired concentrations of antimicrobials and final bacterial density of approx. 107 CFU/mL. To the remaining wells, in which the interactions in the antimicrobial activity were determined, 0.25 mL of BHI+FCS with a tested, four-fold 3-BP concentration, 0.25 mL of BHI+FCS with a tested four-fold antibiotic concentration, 0.4 mL of BHI+FCS, and 0.1 mL of BHI+FCS with a 4 McFarland bacterial suspension were added, thus obtaining the desired concentrations of antimicrobial substances and final bacterial density of approx. 107 CFU/mL. The plates were incubated for 3 days at 37 °C in microaerophilic conditions. Each tested panel was performed in duplicate.
On the basis of the obtained results, the MICs for 3-BP, antibiotic, and the combination of both substances were determined. The interaction between the tested antimicrobial agents was determined by calculating the FIC index (MIC of substance A in combination/MIC of substance A alone + MIC of substance B in combination/MIC of substance B alone). The values of the FIC index were interpreted as ≤0.5 = synergistic, ˃0.5 to ≤1 = additive, ˃1 to ˂4 = neutral, and ≥4 = antagonistic [57,58,59].

4.5. Time-Killing Assay

The determination of the culturability during exposure to 3-BP over time was performed against two reference H. pylori strains (Tx30a and J99) based on the study by Brown et al. [60] with minor modifications. The culture conditions, culture media, and bacterial optical density were identical to those used in the MIC/MBC determination, with the exception being the use of a 2 mL culture volume in each well of the 12-well titrate plate (instead of 1 mL). At each time point (0 h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, and 24 h), 0.1 mL of cultures without the 3-BP presence (control) and cultures from each tested 3-BP concentration, i.e., 4× MIC (512 μg/mL), 2× MIC (256 μg/mL), MIC (128 μg/mL), and ½× MIC (64 μg/mL), were taken and a set of culture dilutions in BHI+FCS broths were made. The 0.1 mL of appropriate dilutions (Control: 10−3, 10−4, and 10−5 for all time points. ½× MIC: 10−3, 10−4, and 10−5 (0 h); 10−2, 10−3, and 10−4 (1 h, 2 h, and 4 h); and 10−1, 10−2, and 10−3 (6 h, 8 h, and 24 h). MIC-4× MIC: 10−3, 10−4, and 10−5 (0 h); 10−1, 10−2, and 10−3 (1 h, 2 h, and 4 h); and 10−1 and 10−2 (6 h, 8 h, and 24 h)) were seeded on CA+HB agars and incubated for 3 days at 37 °C in microaerophilic conditions. The amount of grown H. pylori colonies was counted and presented as log10 CFU/mL. The experiment was carried out in duplicate.

4.6. Light Microscopy

In the checkerboard and time-killing assays, the bacterial morphology was determined based on the study by Krzyżek et al. [41] with minor modifications. The slides were covered with 50 μL of bacterial suspension from each tested antimicrobial concentration and stained using the Gram’s method. In the checkerboard assay, from each tested antimicrobial concentration, two preparations were made in each repetition and the morphology of 100 cells/preparation was determined (n = 400). In wells in which the number of spiral forms counted for ≤15% or ≥90%, the exact number of these morphological forms was not determined. In the time-killing assay, in each repetition, one preparation from each concentration and time point was made and the morphology of 100 cells/preparation was determined (n = 200). The exception was the 0 h time point, where one preparation was made from each concentration tested, determining the morphology of 100 cells/preparation and presenting this value as the average number of spiral forms at the beginning of the experiment (n = 500). The study was performed under the Olympus BX50 microscope (Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan), using an oil-immersion ×100 lens with a numerical aperture of 1.3.

4.7. Fluorescence Microscopy

To determine the viability of H. pylori strains during the time-killing assay, the study was extended by fluorescence analysis using BacLight Live/Dead staining kit (L7012, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). This kit consists of two components: SYTO9 (green fluorescent dye), which stains all bacteria, and propidium iodide (PI, red fluorescent dye), staining only bacteria with damaged cell membranes. The test was carried out in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 0.1 mL of culture from each concentration and time point was taken and centrifuged for 15 min at 10,000 g. The supernatant was removed, and the resulting bacterial pellet was resuspended in 1 mL 0.85% NaCl solution and subjected to 10,000 g centrifugation for 15 min. This procedure was performed twice. Then, the supernatant was collected, and the bacterial pellet was resuspended in 0.2 mL 0.85% NaCl solution. The 0.6 μL mixture of propidium iodide and SYTO9 (1:1 ratio) was added to the bacterial suspension and incubated for 15 min in the dark. The positive control consisted of bacteria from 0 h incubation, while the negative control was obtained by an 1 h incubation of the bacterial pellet from 0 h incubation in 70% ethanol (Chempur, Piekary Śląskie, Poland). The preparations were made by dropping 10 μL of bacterial suspensions and covering with coverslips.
The microscopic examination was performed on the basis of studies by Chou et al. and Marchesini et al. [61,62] with modifications. The preparations were examined under the Olympus BX51 microscope (Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan) using a ×10 lens with a numerical aperture of 0.3. Using the ImageJ software, the intensity of the green and red fluorescence from each preparation was counted for 25 regions of interests (ROIs) (50 ROIs/tested sample) that included single bacterial cells or small bacterial aggregates. The fluorescence intensities of SYTO9 and propidium iodide were measured at an emission of 530 nm and 640 nm, respectively. The fluorescence intensity of the tested samples was presented as the mean of the green/red fluorescence ratio.

4.8. Scanning Electron Microscopy

The bacterial morphology using scanning electron microscopy was determined based on the study by Krzyżek et al. [41] with minor modifications. Centrifuged bacterial suspensions were fixed for 24 h in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer at physiological pH. The material was then dehydrated in the growing alcoholic series (10% > 30% > 50% > 70% > 90% > 99.8%). Samples were spotted on aluminum tables, dried, dusted with carbon (15 nm), and placed in the scanning chamber electron microscope (Auriga 60, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The analysis of the bacterial morphology was carried out at the beam voltage equal to 2 kV and the working distance of 5 mm.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

The Kruskal–Wallis test and the Mann–Whitney U test were used in the statistical analysis of the differences in the 3-BP activity between H. pylori strains during the disk-diffusion method and broth microdilution method, respectively. The effect of 3-BP on the culturability of H. pylori was analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier method and the Wilcoxon test. The statistical significance of a categorical data was assessed using the chi-square Pearson test. The significance level was set to be 5%.

5. Conclusions

To the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first survey focusing on the activity of 3-BP (alone or in the combination with antibiotics) against H. pylori strains. The results shown in the present in vitro study indicate a high bactericidal activity of 3-BP against antibiotic-susceptible and antibiotic-resistant H. pylori strains. In addition, a synergistic/additive interaction of this compound with AMX, TET, and CLR has been demonstrated. These observations indicate the potential for using 3-BP as a promising antimicrobial agent in therapies directed against H. pylori. For this reason, future research should focus on determining the in vivo activity of this substance.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/11/2/229/s1: Table S1: The zones of inhibition (mm) of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) against antibiotic-susceptible H. pylori strains, Table S2: The zones of inhibition (mm) of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) against metronidazole-resistant H. pylori strains, Table S3: The zones of inhibition (mm) of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) against clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori strains, Table S4: The zones of inhibition (mm) of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) against CLR- and MTZ-resistant H. pylori strains, Table S5: The effect of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) on the culturability of H. pylori Tx30a, Table S6: The effect of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) on the culturability of H. pylori J99, Table S7: The effect of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) on the number of spiral forms of H. pylori Tx30a, Table S8: The effect of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) on the number of spiral forms of H. pylori J99, Table S9: The analysis of the mean green/red fluorescence ratios during the incubation of H. pylori Tx30a with 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) in time, Table S10: The analysis of the mean green/red fluorescence ratios during the incubation of H. pylori J99 with 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) in time, Table S11: The morphology of H. pylori T30a after a 3-day incubation with 3-BP and CLR during the checkerboard assay, Table S12: The morphology of H. pylori T30a after a 3-day incubation with 3-BP and TET during the checkerboard assay, Table S13: The morphology of H. pylori T30a after a 3-day incubation with 3-BP and AMX during the checkerboard assay, Table S14: The morphology of H. pylori T30a after a 3-day incubation with 3-BP and MTZ during the checkerboard assay, Table S15: The morphology of H. pylori 7143 after a 3-day incubation with 3-BP and CLR during the checkerboard assay, Table S16: The morphology of H. pylori 7143 after a 3-day incubation with 3-BP and TET during the checkerboard assay, Table S17: The morphology of H. pylori 7143 after a 3-day incubation with 3-BP and AMX during the checkerboard assay, and Table S18: The morphology of H. pylori 7143 after a 3-day incubation with 3-BP and MTZ during the checkerboard assay.

Author Contributions

P.K. and R.F. designed the experiments; P.K. and B.K. performed the antimicrobial tests; P.K. carried out the light and fluorescence microscopy; P.M. carried out the scanning electron microscopy; Ł.Ł. performed the statistical analysis; P.K. and R.F. analyzed the data; P.K. wrote the original draft; R.F. and G.G. reviewed and polished the paper; P.K., R.F., and G.G. acquired the funding; G.G. supervised the project.

Funding

The study was supported by the Wroclaw Medical University grant No: STM.A130.17.034 and partly from grant No: ST.A130.16.031. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, and analysis; in the decision to publish; or in the preparation of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Díaz, P.; Valenzuela Valderrama, M.; Bravo, J.; Quest, A.F.G. Helicobacter pylori and Gastric Cancer: Adaptive Cellular Mechanisms Involved in Disease Progression. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hooi, J.K.Y.; Lai, W.Y.; Ng, W.K.; Suen, M.M.Y.; Underwood, F.E.; Tanyingoh, D.; Malfertheiner, P.; Graham, D.Y.; Wong, V.W.S.; Wu, J.C.Y.; et al. Global Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology 2017, 153, 420–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Malfertheiner, P.; Megraud, F.; O’Morain, C.A.; Gisbert, J.P.; Kuipers, E.J.; Axon, A.T.; Bazzoli, F.; Gasbarrini, A.; Atherton, J.; Graham, D.Y.; et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection—The Maastricht V/Florence consensus report. Gut 2017, 66, 6–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yamaoka, Y.; Graham, D.Y. Helicobacter pylori Virulence and Cancer Pathogenesis. Futur. Oncol. 2014, 10, 1487–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Watari, J.; Chen, N.; Amenta, P.S.; Fukui, H.; Oshima, T.; Tomita, T.; Miwa, H.; Lim, K.-J.; Das, K.M. Helicobacter pylori Associated Chronic Gastritis, Clinical Syndromes, Precancerous Lesions, and Pathogenesis of Gastric Cancer Development. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 5461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans Schistosomes, Liver Flukes and Helicobacter pylori. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Lyon, 7–14 June 1994. IARC Monogr. Eval. Carcinog. Risks Hum. 1994, 61, 1–241.
  7. Torre, L.A.; Bray, F.; Siegel, R.L.; Ferlay, J.; Lortet-Tieulent, J.; Jemal, A. Global Cancer Statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2015, 65, 87–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Dikshit, R.; Eser, S.; Mathers, C.; Rebelo, M.; Parkin, D.M.; Forman, D.; Bray, F. Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: Sources, Methods and Major Patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int. J. Cancer 2015, 136, E359–E386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nagini, S. Carcinoma of The Stomach: A Review of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Molecular Genetics and Chemoprevention. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2012, 4, 156–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Choi, J.M.; Kim, S.G.; Choi, J.; Park, J.Y.; Oh, S.; Yang, H.-J.; Lim, J.H.; Im, J.P.; Kim, J.S.; Jung, H.C. Effects of Helicobacter pylori Eradication for Metachronous Gastric Cancer Prevention: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2018, 88, 475–485.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Han, S.J.; Kim, S.G.; Lim, J.H.; Choi, J.M.; Oh, S.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.S.; Jung, H.C. Long-Term Effects of Helicobacter pylori Eradication on Metachronous Gastric Cancer Development. Gut Liver 2018, 12, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jung, D.H.; Kim, J.-H.; Chung, H.S.; Park, J.C.; Shin, S.K.; Lee, S.K.; Lee, Y.C. Helicobacter pylori Eradication on the Prevention of Metachronous Lesions after Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Neoplasm: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Savoldi, A.; Carrara, E.; Graham, D.Y.; Conti, M.; Tacconelli, E. Prevalence of Antibiotic Resistance in Helicobacter pylori: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis in World Health Organization Regions. Gastroenterology 2018, 155, 1372–1382.e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tacconelli, E.; Carrara, E.; Savoldi, A.; Harbarth, S.; Mendelson, M.; Monnet, D.L.; Pulcini, C.; Kahlmeter, G.; Kluytmans, J.; Carmeli, Y.; et al. Discovery, Research, and Development of New Antibiotics: The WHO Priority List of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria and Tuberculosis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lis, P.; Dyląg, M.; Niedźwiecka, K.; Ko, Y.; Pedersen, P.; Goffeau, A.; Ułaszewski, S. The HK2 Dependent “Warburg Effect” and Mitochondrial Oxidative Phosphorylation in Cancer: Targets for Effective Therapy with 3-Bromopyruvate. Molecules 2016, 21, 1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Azevedo-Silva, J.; Queirós, O.; Baltazar, F.; Ułaszewski, S.; Goffeau, A.; Ko, Y.H.; Pedersen, P.L.; Preto, A.; Casal, M. The Anticancer Agent 3-Bromopyruvate: A Simple but Powerful Molecule Taken from the Lab to the Bedside. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2016, 48, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ko, Y.H.; Pedersen, P.L.; Geschwind, J.F. Glucose Catabolism in the Rabbit VX2 Tumor Model for Liver Cancer: Characterization and Targeting Hexokinase. Cancer Lett. 2001, 173, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guo, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, T.; Xian, S.; Lu, Y. 3-Bromopyruvate and Sodium Citrate Induce Apoptosis in Human Gastric Cancer Cell Line MGC-803 by Inhibiting Glycolysis and Promoting Mitochondria-Regulated Apoptosis Pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 475, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xian, S.-L.; Cao, W.; Zhang, X.-D.; Lu, Y.-F. Inhibitory Effects of 3-Bromopyruvate on Human Gastric Cancer Implant Tumors in Nude Mice. Asian Pacific J. Cancer Prev. 2014, 15, 3175–3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Barnard, J.P.; Reynafarje, B.; Pedersen, P.L. Glucose Catabolism in African Trypanosomes. Evidence that the Terminal Step is Catalyzed by a Pyruvate Transporter Capable of Facilitating Uptake of Toxic Analogs. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 3654–3661. [Google Scholar]
  21. de Lima, L.P.O.; Seabra, S.H.; Carneiro, H.; Barbosa, H.S. Effect of 3-Bromopyruvate and Atovaquone on Infection during In Vitro Interaction of Toxoplasma gondii and LLC-MK2 Cells. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 5239–5249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lis, P.; Zarzycki, M.; Ko, Y.H.; Casal, M.; Pedersen, P.L.; Goffeau, A.; Ułaszewski, S. Transport and Cytotoxicity of the Anticancer Drug 3-Bromopyruvate in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2012, 44, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Dyląg, M.; Lis, P.; Niedźwiecka, K.; Ko, Y.H.; Pedersen, P.L.; Goffeau, A.; Ułaszewski, S. 3-Bromopyruvate: A Novel Antifungal Agent against the Human Pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 434, 322–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jagielski, T.; Niedźwiecka, K.; Roeske, K.; Dyląg, M. 3-Bromopyruvate as an Alternative Option for the Treatment of Protothecosis. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Singh, K.S.; Singh, S.K. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra Gene MRA_1916 Causes Growth Defects upon Down-Regulation. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Visca, P.; Pisa, F.; Imperi, F. The Antimetabolite 3-Bromopyruvate Selectively Inhibits Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ansari, S.; Yamaoka, Y. Drug Resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Adv. Res. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 7. ARGH.MS.ID.555715. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ghotaslou, R.; Leylabadlo, H.E.; Asl, Y.M. Prevalence of Antibiotic Resistance in Helicobacter pylori: A Recent Literature Review. World J. Methodol. 2015, 5, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Megraud, F.; Coenen, S.; Versporten, A.; Kist, M.; Lopez-Brea, M.; Hirschl, A.M.; Andersen, L.P.; Goossens, H.; Glupczynski, Y.; Study Group participants. Helicobacter pylori Resistance to Antibiotics in Europe and Its Relationship to Antibiotic Consumption. Gut 2013, 62, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Boltin, D.; Ben-Zvi, H.; Perets, T.T.; Kamenetsky, Z.; Samra, Z.; Dickman, R.; Niv, Y. Trends in Secondary Antibiotic Resistance of Helicobacter pylori from 2007 to 2014: Has the Tide Turned? J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bisignano, C.; Filocamo, A.; La Camera, E.; Zummo, S.; Fera, M.T.; Mandalari, G. Antibacterial Activities of Almond Skins on cagA-Positive and-Negative Clinical Isolates of Helicobacter pylori. BMC Microbiol. 2013, 13, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Liu, W.; Hsu, C.; Yin, M. In Vitro Anti-Helicobacter pylori Activity of Diallyl Sulphides and Protocatechuic Acid. Phyther. Res. 2008, 22, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Obonyo, M.; Zhang, L.; Thamphiwatana, S.; Pornpattananangkul, D.; Fu, V.; Zhang, L. Antibacterial Activities of Liposomal Linolenic Acids against Antibiotic-Resistant Helicobacter pylori. Mol. Pharm. 2012, 9, 2677–2685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fahey, J.W.; Haristoy, X.; Dolan, P.M.; Kensler, T.W.; Scholtus, I.; Stephenson, K.K.; Talalay, P.; Lozniewski, A. Sulforaphane Inhibits Extracellular, Intracellular, and Antibiotic-Resistant Strains of Helicobacter pylori and Prevents Benzo[a]pyrene-Induced Stomach Tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 7610–7615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Vali, M.; Liapi, E.; Kowalski, J.; Hong, K.; Khwaja, A.; Torbenson, M.S.; Georgiades, C.; Geschwind, J.-F.H. Intraarterial Therapy with a New Potent Inhibitor of Tumor Metabolism (3-Bromopyruvate): Identification of Therapeutic Dose and Method of Injection in an Animal Model of Liver Cancer. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2007, 18, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kunjithapatham, R.; Geschwind, J.-F.H.; Rao, P.P.; Boronina, T.N.; Cole, R.N.; Ganapathy-Kanniappan, S. Systemic Administration of 3-Bromopyruvate Reveals Its Interaction with Serum Proteins in a Rat Model. BMC Res. Notes 2013, 6, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Levison, M.E. Pharmacodynamics of Antimicrobial Drugs. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 2004, 18, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Krzyżek, P.; Gościniak, G. Morphology of Helicobacter pylori as a Result of Peptidoglycan and Cytoskeleton Rearrangements. Prz. Gastroenterol. 2018, 13, 182–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sarem, M.; Corti, R. Role of Helicobacter pylori Coccoid Forms in Infection and Recrudescence. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 39, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cellini, L. Helicobacter pylori: A Chameleon-Like Approach to Life. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 5575–5582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Krzyżek, P.; Biernat, M.M.; Gościniak, G. Intensive Formation of Coccoid Forms as a Feature Strongly Associated with Highly Pathogenic Helicobacter pylori Strains. Folia Microbiol. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Lee, H.-K.; Song, H.E.; Lee, H.-B.; Kim, C.-S.; Koketsu, M.; Thi My Ngan, L.; Ahn, Y.-J. Growth Inhibitory, Bactericidal, and Morphostructural Effects of Dehydrocostus Lactone from Magnolia sieboldii Leaves on Antibiotic-Susceptible and -Resistant Strains of Helicobacter pylori. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ngan, L.T.M.; Moon, J.-K.; Shibamoto, T.; Ahn, Y.-J. Growth-Inhibiting, Bactericidal, and Urease Inhibitory Effects of Paeonia lactiflora Root Constituents and Related Compounds on Antibiotic-Susceptible and -Resistant Strains of Helicobacter pylori. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 9062–9073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Faghri, J.; Poursina, F.; Moghim, S.; Zarkesh Esfahani, H.; Nasr Esfahani, B.; Fazeli, H.; Mirzaei, N.; Jamshidian, A.; Ghasemian Safaei, H. Morphological and Bactericidal Effects of Different Antibiotics on Helicobacter pylori. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 2014, 7, e8704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Li, L.; Mendis, N.; Trigui, H.; Oliver, J.D.; Faucher, S.P. The Importance of the Viable but Non-Culturable State in Human Bacterial Pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yang, T.-S.; Ou, K.-L.; Peng, P.-W.; Liou, B.-C.; Wang, W.-T.; Huang, Y.-C.; Tsai, C.-M.; Su, C.-H. Quantifying Membrane Permeability of Amphotericin B Ion Channels in Single Living Cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1828, 1794–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Novo, D.J.; Perlmutter, N.G.; Hunt, R.H.; Shapiro, H.M. Multiparameter Flow Cytometric Analysis of Antibiotic Effects on Membrane Potential, Membrane Permeability, and Bacterial Counts of Staphylococcus aureus and Micrococcus luteus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 827–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Novickij, V.; Švedienė, J.; Paškevičius, A.; Markovskaja, S.; Lastauskienė, E.; Zinkevičienė, A.; Girkontaitė, I.; Novickij, J. Induction of Different Sensitization Patterns of MRSA to Antibiotics Using Electroporation. Molecules 2018, 23, 1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tateda, K.; Ishii, Y.; Matsumoto, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Miyazaki, S.; Yamaguchi, K. Potential of Macrolide Antibiotics to Inhibit Protein Synthesis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Suppression of Virulence Factors and Stress Response. J. Infect. Chemother. 2000, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gościniak, G.; Biernat, M.; Grabińska, J.; Bińkowska, A.; Poniewierka, E.; Iwańczak, B. The Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori Strains Isolated from Children and Adults with Primary Infection in the Lower Silesia Region, Poland. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2014, 63, 57–61. [Google Scholar]
  51. Gościniak, G.; Biernat, M.M.; Bińkowska, A.; Kus, A.; Iwańczak, B. Frequency of Infection with Helicobacter pylori Isolates of Different Antimicrobial Profiles in Children and Adolescents: A Preliminary Study. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2017, 26, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. EUCAST (The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing). Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters. Version 5.0; EUCAST: Växjö, Sweden, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  53. Chisholm, S.A.; Owen, R.J. Frequency and Molecular Characteristics of Ciprofloxacin- and Rifampicin-resistant Helicobacter pylori from Gastric Infections in the UK. J. Med. Microbiol. 2009, 58, 1322–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Boyanova, L.; Gergova, G.; Nikolov, R.; Derejian, S.; Lazarova, E.; Katsarov, N.; Mitov, I.; Krastev, Z. Activity of Bulgarian Propolis against 94 Helicobacter pylori strains In Vitro by Agar-Well Diffusion, Agar Dilution and Disc Diffusion Methods. J. Med. Microbiol. 2005, 54, 481–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yonezawa, H.; Osaki, T.; Hanawa, T.; Kurata, S.; Ochiai, K.; Kamiya, S. Impact of Helicobacter pylori Biofilm Formation on Clarithromycin Susceptibility and Generation of Resistance Mutations. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cellini, L.; Di Bartolomeo, S.; Di Campli, E.; Genovese, S.; Locatelli, M.; Di Giulio, M. In vitro activity of Aloe vera inner gel against Helicobacter pylori strains. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 59, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hirschl, A.M.; Apfalter, P.; Makristathis, A.; Rotter, M.L.; Wimmer, M. In Vitro Activities of Linezolid Alone and in Combination with Amoxicillin, Clarithromycin, and Metronidazole against Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 1977–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nostro, A.; Cellini, L.; Di Bartolomeo, S.; Cannatelli, M.A.; Di Campli, E.; Procopio, F.; Grande, R.; Marzio, L.; Alonzo, V. Effects of Combining Extracts (from Propolis or Zingiber officinale) with Clarithromycin on Helicobacter pylori. Phyther. Res. 2006, 20, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Abu-Qatouseh, L.; Abu-Sini, M.; Mayyas, A.; Al-Hiari, Y.; Darwish, R.; Aburjai, T. Synthesis of New Nitrofluoroquinolone Derivatives with Novel Anti-Microbial Properties against Metronidazole Resistant H. pylori. Molecules 2017, 22, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Brown, J.C.; Jiang, X. Activities of Muscadine Grape Skin and Polyphenolic Constituents against Helicobacter pylori. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 114, 982–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chou, T.-M.; Ke, Y.-Y.; Tsao, Y.-H.; Li, Y.-C.; Lin, Z.-H. Fabrication of Te and Te-Au Nanowires-Based Carbon Fiber Fabrics for Antibacterial Applications. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Marchesini, M.I.; Morrone Seijo, S.M.; Guaimas, F.F.; Comerci, D.J. A T4SS Effector Targets Host Cell Alpha-Enolase Contributing to Brucella abortus Intracellular Lifestyle. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2016, 6, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cancers 11 00229 g001 550
Figure 1. The effect of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) on the culturability and morphology of H. pylori Tx30a during the incubation period. The number of spiral forms is marked with dotted lines, while the culturability is indicated by continuous lines.
Figure 1. The effect of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) on the culturability and morphology of H. pylori Tx30a during the incubation period. The number of spiral forms is marked with dotted lines, while the culturability is indicated by continuous lines.
Cancers 11 00229 g001
Cancers 11 00229 g002 550
Figure 2. The effect of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) on the culturability and morphology of H. pylori J99 during the incubation period. The number of spiral forms is marked with dotted lines, while the culturability is indicated by continuous lines.
Figure 2. The effect of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) on the culturability and morphology of H. pylori J99 during the incubation period. The number of spiral forms is marked with dotted lines, while the culturability is indicated by continuous lines.
Cancers 11 00229 g002
Cancers 11 00229 g003 550
Figure 3. The light microscopy of H. pylori cells during the incubation with 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP): The representative microscopic images of H. pylori cells during the incubation with the MIC of 3-BP after (A) 0 h, (B) 1 h, (C) 2 h, (D) 4 h, (E) 6 h, (F) 8 h, and (G) 24 h show a time-dependent decrease in the number of spiral forms with an inversely proportional increase in the number of coccoid forms. The negative control consisted of bacterial cells (H) after a 1 h treatment with 70% ethanol. The scale bar in the light microscopy is 2 μm.
Figure 3. The light microscopy of H. pylori cells during the incubation with 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP): The representative microscopic images of H. pylori cells during the incubation with the MIC of 3-BP after (A) 0 h, (B) 1 h, (C) 2 h, (D) 4 h, (E) 6 h, (F) 8 h, and (G) 24 h show a time-dependent decrease in the number of spiral forms with an inversely proportional increase in the number of coccoid forms. The negative control consisted of bacterial cells (H) after a 1 h treatment with 70% ethanol. The scale bar in the light microscopy is 2 μm.
Cancers 11 00229 g003
Cancers 11 00229 g004 550
Figure 4. The scanning electron microscopy images of H. pylori Tx30a (A,C,E,G,I) and J99 (B,D,F,H,J) cells (A,B) without 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP), seen mainly as spiral forms, and treated with different concentrations of 3-BP: (C,D) ½× MIC, (E,F) MIC, (G,H) 2× MIC, and (I,J) 4× MIC, in which the coccoid forms predominate.
Figure 4. The scanning electron microscopy images of H. pylori Tx30a (A,C,E,G,I) and J99 (B,D,F,H,J) cells (A,B) without 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP), seen mainly as spiral forms, and treated with different concentrations of 3-BP: (C,D) ½× MIC, (E,F) MIC, (G,H) 2× MIC, and (I,J) 4× MIC, in which the coccoid forms predominate.
Cancers 11 00229 g004
Cancers 11 00229 g005a 550Cancers 11 00229 g005b 550
Figure 5. The fluorescence microscopy of H. pylori cells during the incubation with 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP): The representative microscopic images of H. pylori cells during the incubation with the MIC of 3-BP after (A) 0 h, (B) 1 h, (C) 2 h, (D) 4 h, (E) 6 h, (F) 8 h, and (G) 24 h. The negative control consisted of bacterial cells (H) after a 1 h treatment with 70% ethanol. The green cells indicate live bacteria, whereas the red/orange cells indicate damaged, dead bacteria. The scale bar in the fluorescence microscopy is 20 μm.
Figure 5. The fluorescence microscopy of H. pylori cells during the incubation with 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP): The representative microscopic images of H. pylori cells during the incubation with the MIC of 3-BP after (A) 0 h, (B) 1 h, (C) 2 h, (D) 4 h, (E) 6 h, (F) 8 h, and (G) 24 h. The negative control consisted of bacterial cells (H) after a 1 h treatment with 70% ethanol. The green cells indicate live bacteria, whereas the red/orange cells indicate damaged, dead bacteria. The scale bar in the fluorescence microscopy is 20 μm.
Cancers 11 00229 g005aCancers 11 00229 g005b
Cancers 11 00229 g006 550
Figure 6. The fluorescence microscopy analysis of the viability during the incubation of H. pylori Tx30a with 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) in time. The blue top and red bottom lines indicate the positive (0 h incubation) and negative controls (1 h treatment with 70% ethanol), respectively. Columns with the same subscript letters are not significantly different from each other (p > 0.05).
Figure 6. The fluorescence microscopy analysis of the viability during the incubation of H. pylori Tx30a with 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) in time. The blue top and red bottom lines indicate the positive (0 h incubation) and negative controls (1 h treatment with 70% ethanol), respectively. Columns with the same subscript letters are not significantly different from each other (p > 0.05).
Cancers 11 00229 g006
Cancers 11 00229 g007 550
Figure 7. The fluorescence microscopy analysis of the viability during the incubation of H. pylori J99 with 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) in time. The blue top and red bottom lines indicate the positive (0 h incubation) and negative controls (1 h treatment with 70% ethanol), respectively. Columns with the same subscript letters are not significantly different from each other (p > 0.05).
Figure 7. The fluorescence microscopy analysis of the viability during the incubation of H. pylori J99 with 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) in time. The blue top and red bottom lines indicate the positive (0 h incubation) and negative controls (1 h treatment with 70% ethanol), respectively. Columns with the same subscript letters are not significantly different from each other (p > 0.05).
Cancers 11 00229 g007
Cancers 11 00229 g008 550
Figure 8. The antibacterial and morphological effects of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP), clarithromycin (CLR), and combinations of both against H. pylori Tx30a and 7143 strains: The existence of the interaction in the antimicrobial activity of 3-BP with CLR was determined against (A) the reference antibiotic-susceptible H. pylori Tx30a and (B) the clinical double-resistant H. pylori 7143 strain. The white circles indicate the wells in which the number of spiral forms was ≤15%, while the white circles with a cross in the middle indicate empty wells. Using asterisks, the wells with the MICs of the tested substances were marked, whereas in the case of the interaction verifications, they indicate the lowest FIC. Abbreviations: 3-BP, 3-Bromopyruvate; CLR, Clarithromycin; CON+, Positive control; and CON−, Negative control.
Figure 8. The antibacterial and morphological effects of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP), clarithromycin (CLR), and combinations of both against H. pylori Tx30a and 7143 strains: The existence of the interaction in the antimicrobial activity of 3-BP with CLR was determined against (A) the reference antibiotic-susceptible H. pylori Tx30a and (B) the clinical double-resistant H. pylori 7143 strain. The white circles indicate the wells in which the number of spiral forms was ≤15%, while the white circles with a cross in the middle indicate empty wells. Using asterisks, the wells with the MICs of the tested substances were marked, whereas in the case of the interaction verifications, they indicate the lowest FIC. Abbreviations: 3-BP, 3-Bromopyruvate; CLR, Clarithromycin; CON+, Positive control; and CON−, Negative control.
Cancers 11 00229 g008
Cancers 11 00229 g009 550
Figure 9. The antibacterial and morphological effects of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP), tetracycline (TET), and combinations of both against H. pylori Tx30a and 7143 strains. The existence of the interaction in the antimicrobial activity of 3-BP with CLR was determined against (A) the reference antibiotic-susceptible H. pylori Tx30a and (B) the clinical double-resistant H. pylori 7143 strain. The white circles indicate the wells in which the number of spiral forms was ≤15%, while the white circles with a cross in the middle indicate empty wells. Using asterisks, the wells with the MICs of the tested substances were marked, whereas in the case of the interaction verifications, they indicate the lowest FIC. Abbreviations: 3-BP, 3-Bromopyruvate; TET, Tetracycline; CON+, Positive control; and CON−, Negative control.
Figure 9. The antibacterial and morphological effects of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP), tetracycline (TET), and combinations of both against H. pylori Tx30a and 7143 strains. The existence of the interaction in the antimicrobial activity of 3-BP with CLR was determined against (A) the reference antibiotic-susceptible H. pylori Tx30a and (B) the clinical double-resistant H. pylori 7143 strain. The white circles indicate the wells in which the number of spiral forms was ≤15%, while the white circles with a cross in the middle indicate empty wells. Using asterisks, the wells with the MICs of the tested substances were marked, whereas in the case of the interaction verifications, they indicate the lowest FIC. Abbreviations: 3-BP, 3-Bromopyruvate; TET, Tetracycline; CON+, Positive control; and CON−, Negative control.
Cancers 11 00229 g009
Cancers 11 00229 g010 550
Figure 10. The antibacterial and morphological effects of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP), amoxicillin (AMX), and combinations of both against H. pylori Tx30a and 7143 strains. The existence of the interaction in the antimicrobial activity of 3-BP with AMX was determined against (A) the reference antibiotic-susceptible H. pylori Tx30a and (B) the clinical double-resistant H. pylori 7143 strain. The white circles indicate the wells in which the number of spiral forms was ≤15%, while the white circles with a cross in the middle indicate empty wells. Using asterisks, the wells with the MICs of the tested substances were marked, whereas in the case of the interaction verifications, they indicate the lowest FIC. Abbreviations: 3-BP, 3-Bromopyruvate; AMX, Amoxicillin; CON+, Positive control; and CON−, Negative control.
Figure 10. The antibacterial and morphological effects of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP), amoxicillin (AMX), and combinations of both against H. pylori Tx30a and 7143 strains. The existence of the interaction in the antimicrobial activity of 3-BP with AMX was determined against (A) the reference antibiotic-susceptible H. pylori Tx30a and (B) the clinical double-resistant H. pylori 7143 strain. The white circles indicate the wells in which the number of spiral forms was ≤15%, while the white circles with a cross in the middle indicate empty wells. Using asterisks, the wells with the MICs of the tested substances were marked, whereas in the case of the interaction verifications, they indicate the lowest FIC. Abbreviations: 3-BP, 3-Bromopyruvate; AMX, Amoxicillin; CON+, Positive control; and CON−, Negative control.
Cancers 11 00229 g010
Cancers 11 00229 g011 550
Figure 11. The antibacterial and morphological effects of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP), metronidazole (MTZ), and combinations of both against H. pylori Tx30a and 7143 strains. The existence of the interaction in the antimicrobial activity of 3-BP with MTZ was determined against (A) the reference antibiotic-susceptible H. pylori Tx30a and (B) the clinical double-resistant H. pylori 7143 strain. The white circles indicate the wells in which the number of spiral forms was ≤15%, while the white circles with a cross in the middle indicate empty wells. Using asterisks, the wells with the MICs of the tested substances were marked, whereas in the case of the interaction verifications, they indicate the lowest FIC. Abbreviations: 3-BP, 3-Bromopyruvate; MTZ, Metronidazole; CON+, Positive control; and CON−, Negative control.
Figure 11. The antibacterial and morphological effects of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP), metronidazole (MTZ), and combinations of both against H. pylori Tx30a and 7143 strains. The existence of the interaction in the antimicrobial activity of 3-BP with MTZ was determined against (A) the reference antibiotic-susceptible H. pylori Tx30a and (B) the clinical double-resistant H. pylori 7143 strain. The white circles indicate the wells in which the number of spiral forms was ≤15%, while the white circles with a cross in the middle indicate empty wells. Using asterisks, the wells with the MICs of the tested substances were marked, whereas in the case of the interaction verifications, they indicate the lowest FIC. Abbreviations: 3-BP, 3-Bromopyruvate; MTZ, Metronidazole; CON+, Positive control; and CON−, Negative control.
Cancers 11 00229 g011
Table
Table 1. The zones of inhibition (mm) of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) against clinical and control H. pylori strains.
Table 1. The zones of inhibition (mm) of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) against clinical and control H. pylori strains.
StrainsAntibiotic Resistance *3-BPAMX **
200 µg/disk1000 µg/disk2000 µg/disk25 µg/disk
MTZCLRSampleAverageSampleAverageSampleAverageSampleAverage
IIIIIIIIIIII
1950RR666172119212422,5697069.5
1952SR111312202321.5232122677169
1954RR131212.5131313182220686767.5
1964RR666141514.5242022707170.5
2093RS8109111211.5161616626463
2095SS111010.5181516.5252826.5706969.5
6010RS9109.5141514.5182119.5666565.5
6171SS101010141414181717.5656565
6237SS9109.5181717.5262827687270
6291RR161515.5232524262726.5697069.5
6341RR999252123343132.5717070.5
6343SS798192120293230.5697170
6522RR787.5151615.5201819656464.5
6559RS888171616.5283129.5666967.5
6574SS888141615171918606462
6575SS898.5151515293331646363.5
6638SR888161515.5273028.5706969.5
6649SS676.5131413.5181818666666
6653SR777131313252927687069
6687RR787.5151615.5202321.5686968.5
6699SR798182019222523.5697069.5
6716SS182019292828.5303231717070.5
6735SS101010151515222423676867.5
6741SS9109.5131413.5191919636564
6794RR988.5121212171918636664.5
6858SR777131413.5171717615859.5
6875RS9109.5121212181918.5687270
6885SS666101010161716.5697270.5
7042SS11910131413.5181717.5616462.5
7080RS101211151314161716.5626262
7101SS9109.5131413.5181818656464.5
7110SS111111141615222322.5676867.5
7143RR888131313181717.5666766.5
7173RS91110131413.5171717606261
7189SR111010.5121212201819646363.5
7208SS898.5141514.5212422.5676365
7264SS999111312171817.5697069.5
7286RS898.5141414191718696868.5
7297SS101110.5171717202221636162
7308SS999121212181918.5575958
7317SR111211.5151414.5191919596059.5
7357RS111010.5161716.5192019.5697069.5
7361RS999151515191818.5697170
7388RS888131413.5171717717070.5
7394RS141313.5262425293331676465.5
7404SS111010.5171717242725.5686767.5
7471SS121312.5212221.5273028.5576058.5
7556SR171516242323.5292728717070.5
7649RR101010161616252625.5646162.5
8064RR787.5161515.5202221606261
J99SS666111111191818.5656866.5
Tx30aSS101211141514.5242323.5687169.5
* The antibiotic resistance: S is susceptible, R is resistant, MTZ is Metronidazole, and CLR is Clarithromycin. ** Amoxicillin (AMX) was a positive control of the study. The negative control was a 1% DMSO solution (v/v) that did not cause the appearance of the growth inhibition zone in all tested H. pylori strains (6 mm).
Table
Table 2. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) against selected H. pylori strains.
Table 2. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP) against selected H. pylori strains.
StrainsAntibiotic Resistance *Activity of 3-BP
MTZCLRMIC**MBC **MBC/MIC Ratio
J99SS1281281
Tx30aSS1281281
6237SS321284
7471SS641282
7189SR321284
7556SR1281281
7388RS1281281
7394RS641282
7143RR1281281
7649RR1281281
* The antibiotic resistance: S is susceptible, R is resistant, MTZ is Metronidazole, and CLR is Clarithromycin. ** The MIC and MBC concentrations are given in µg/mL.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Krzyżek, P.; Franiczek, R.; Krzyżanowska, B.; Łaczmański, Ł.; Migdał, P.; Gościniak, G. In Vitro Activity of 3-Bromopyruvate, an Anticancer Compound, Against Antibiotic-Susceptible and Antibiotic-Resistant Helicobacter pylori Strains. Cancers 2019, 11, 229. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020229

AMA Style

Krzyżek P, Franiczek R, Krzyżanowska B, Łaczmański Ł, Migdał P, Gościniak G. In Vitro Activity of 3-Bromopyruvate, an Anticancer Compound, Against Antibiotic-Susceptible and Antibiotic-Resistant Helicobacter pylori Strains. Cancers. 2019; 11(2):229. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020229

Chicago/Turabian Style

Krzyżek, Paweł, Roman Franiczek, Barbara Krzyżanowska, Łukasz Łaczmański, Paweł Migdał, and Grażyna Gościniak. 2019. "In Vitro Activity of 3-Bromopyruvate, an Anticancer Compound, Against Antibiotic-Susceptible and Antibiotic-Resistant Helicobacter pylori Strains" Cancers 11, no. 2: 229. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020229

APA Style

Krzyżek, P., Franiczek, R., Krzyżanowska, B., Łaczmański, Ł., Migdał, P., & Gościniak, G. (2019). In Vitro Activity of 3-Bromopyruvate, an Anticancer Compound, Against Antibiotic-Susceptible and Antibiotic-Resistant Helicobacter pylori Strains. Cancers, 11(2), 229. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020229

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop