Next Article in Journal
Olaparib Synergizes the Anticancer Activity of Daunorubicin via Interaction with AKR1C3
Previous Article in Journal
Combination of Irreversible Electroporation and STING Agonist for Effective Cancer Immunotherapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Medullary Thyroid Cancer in Patients Older than 45—Epidemiologic Trends and Predictors of Survival

1
Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
2
Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2020, 12(11), 3124; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113124
Submission received: 20 September 2020 / Revised: 16 October 2020 / Accepted: 22 October 2020 / Published: 26 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Sporadic medullary thyroid cancer can occur anytime in life although they tend to present at a later age (≥45 years old) when the tumors are more easily discernible or become symptomatic. We present, in this study, a group of patients diagnosed with medullary thyroid cancer at or after 45 years of age when they are more likely to develop sporadic forms of medullary thyroid cancer with regard to their natural history and prognosis. In this study, we evaluated factors affecting survival in such patients. We found that the incidence of medullary thyroid cancer in patients ≥45 years of age is increasing. Our findings suggest that patients should be offered surgical resection at an early stage to improve their outcomes.

Abstract

Sporadic medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) can occur anytime in life although they tend to present at a later age (≥45 years old) when the tumors are more easily discernible or become symptomatic. We aimed to identify the factors affecting the survival in patients ≥45 years of age diagnosed with MTC. We analyzed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry from 1973–2016 focusing on patients ≥45 years of age with MTC as an isolated primary. A total of 2533 patients aged ≥45 years with MTC were identified. There has been a statistically significant increase of 1.19% per year in the incidence of MTC for this group of patients. The disease was more common in females and the Caucasian population. Most patients had localized disease on presentation (47.6%). Increasing age and advanced stage of presentation were associated with worse survival with HR 1.05 (p < 0.001) and HR 3.68 (p < 0.001), respectively. Female sex and surgical resection were associated with improved survival with HR 0.74 (p < 0.001) and 0.36 (p < 0.001), respectively. In conclusion, the incidence of MTC in patients ≥45 years of age is increasing. Patients should be offered surgical resection at an early stage to improve their outcomes.

1. Introduction

Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is an uncommon malignancy accounting for approximately 5–10% of all thyroid cancers [1,2,3]. More specifically, sporadic MTC accounts for approximately 75% of all MTC, diagnosed in the United States yearly, while hereditary MTC is responsible for the remaining 25% of the cases [4,5,6,7]. The age of onset for sporadic MTC is much more variable than hereditary MTC, albeit often at a later age in patients [4,8,9]. Management of patients with MTC frequently involves first identifying patients with undetected germline RET mutations along with determination of the extent of disease in newly diagnosed MTC patients. As a group, their prognosis is worse than differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and frequently involves patients developing nodal and occasional systemic disease following diagnosis.
Somatic mutations or gene rearrangements in the RET proto-oncogene occurs in approximately 40–75% of the cases diagnosed in the sporadic MTC group [3,10]. The overall prevalence of somatic RET mutation is somewhat lower than expected, but codon 634 still comprises a majority of the RET mutation similar to MEN2A patients [11,12]. Patients with sporadic MTC tend to have larger tumors, advanced stage, nodal metastases, and overall worse outcome [3,13,14]. Alternatively, the development of MTC can occur through a RAS mutation, which is generally exclusive for sporadic, non-hereditary, MTC. The most common type of mutation not related to RET mutation is the HRASQ61R HRAS mutation occurring in up to 11% of sporadic MTC cases, which is thought to be associated with an intermediate level of aggressiveness in terms of tumor progression [15,16].
Historically, only DTC prominently features age as a discriminating factor in terms of prognosis. More recently, age is becoming a more notable prognostic indicator in patients with sporadic MTC [4,8,9]. Through the use of the SEER database from 2000 till 2010, age has been identified as a key component of a nomogram to prognosticate MTC patients [8]. Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, Qu et al. were able to generate two nomograms, one based on age cutoff of 49 and 69 years of age, and another with 45 years of age as the cutoff. Therefore, although not part of the current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging, age is increasingly being recognized as an important prognostic indicator [8].
Patients with sporadic MTC have not been well studied as a group due to the difficulty in isolating them as a group. Sporadic MTC presents a unique challenge to the treating physician. The treating physician needs to exclude familial syndromes first, which may give rise to MTC. Familial cases of MTC need to be identified in order to exclude undiagnosed associated endocrinopathies. This will also allow family members to be treated early on. Subsequently, patients with isolated sporadic MTC still present a management challenge due to the unfavorable prognosis compared with DTC [17,18].
The older sporadic MTC patient is sometimes overlooked although they comprise the larger proportion of the patients with MTC. To isolate the patients in the SEER database presenting with sporadic MTC, we chose to use the age cutoff of 45 to capture the majority of patients with sporadic MTC. The SEER database has one of the largest cohort of patients with MTC. We explored this specific group of patients (≥45 years of age) in an attempt to better understand the natural history of patients with sporadic MTC.

2. Results

2.1. Epidemiology and Cancer-Free Survival Rate

Demographics of the included patients are summarized in Table 1. A total of 2533 patients with MTC were identified from the SEER database between the years 1973–2016, with a mean age of 60.1 ± 10.7 years. There has been a statistically significant increase in age-adjusted localized MTC by 1.19% per year including all stages from the years 1973–2015 (Figure 1A). When accounting for the extent of the disease, localized disease in this group of the patient has increased by 1.04% (Figure 1B), regional MTC increased by 1.18% per year (Figure 1C), and the incidence of MTC with distant metastasis increased by 1.27% per year (Figure 1D) over the past 43 years.

2.2. Survival Based on Demographics

Table 1 shows the demographic distribution and survival based on the reported variables. Females outnumbered males in both number (58.6% vs. 41.4%) and overall survival (239.0 ± 7.5 vs. 180.7 ± 8.4 months) (Figure 2). In terms of racial distribution, Caucasians represented the largest cohort (n = 2172, 85.7%) followed by African-Americans (n = 177, 7.0%), and other minority races (Native Americans, Asian/Pacific islanders, n = 156, 6.2%). The survival based on racial distribution was highest in Asians/Native Americans, followed by Caucasians (Figure 3). When the patients were divided into different age groups, younger patients had better survival than older patients.

2.3. Tumor Description and Survival Characteristics

The mean tumor size was 25.6 ± 2.7 mm (range 1–99.5 mm) (Table 2). A mean of 20.0 ± 20.2 cervical lymph nodes were isolated during surgery and approximately 5.75 ± 11.07 nodes were positive for metastasis, indicating the majority of lymph nodes were positive following diagnosis based on surgical pathology.
In the histopathological subgroup analysis, MTC NOS (n = 1704, 67.3%) was the most common variant with the best survival followed by MTC with an amyloid stoma (n = 702, 27.7%). MTC with the papillary variant (n = 89, 3.5%) and MTC with follicular variant (n = 38, 1.5%) were less common and also showed worse survival, respectively. This difference in survival based on histopathological subtype was statistically significant (p < 0.01) (Figure 4).
The extension of the tumor also impacted survival. The most common type of tumor extension was a single invasive tumor confined to the thyroid associated with the best survival (n = 955, 37.7%). This was followed by in situ invasion (n = 464, 18.3%), extension into the thyroid capsule (n = 317, 12.5%), and multiple foci confined to the thyroid gland (n = 275, 10.9%), respectively. Other less common patterns of tumor extension are also listed in Table 3 and included direct extension into surrounding structures. Together, they account for about 7.5% (n = 190) of patients. The survival gradually worsened with advanced tumor extension (p < 0.01).
Patients who underwent total thyroidectomy had the best survival (165.3 ± 2.7 months), followed by patients who had lobectomy with or without ipsilateral thyroidectomy (162.1 ± 7.1 months), than those who had a subtotal thyroidectomy (122.2 ± 14.4 months). Patients who did not receive surgery had the poorest survival (47.3 ± 5.3 months) (Figure 5).

2.4. Cox Proportional Hazard Model

The results of the stratified Cox model are shown in Table 3. Increasing age, male gender, number of positive cervical lymph nodes, patients who did not receive surgical resection, and distant metastasis were all associated with a higher risk of mortality.

3. Discussion

The incidence of sporadic MTC among the population greater than or equal to 45 years of age is rising nationally. This group of patients frequently present with advanced stage disease, higher tumor burden, and more nodal metastasis. Based on an analysis of this group of patients, early diagnosis, along with surgical intervention, is associated with improved survival.
Medullary thyroid carcinoma was first described as a distinct histologic entity in 1959 [19]. This early report of MTC found a high incidence of lymph node metastases (12/21 cases) along with an intermediate grade of malignancy when compared with DTC and anaplastic thyroid cancers. Out of the 21 cases described, the median age was 50 years, two-thirds were women, and eight out of twenty-one patients developed distant metastases following initial diagnosis [19]. Furthermore, they were able to determine that the presence of amyloid was paramount for the characterization of this tumor type [19]. Additionally, as the tumor required a separate terminology from papillary or follicular and anaplastic tissue types, the word medullary, used in other fields such as botany, was chosen based on the similar histologic pattern and having a better description than the term “solid” carcinoma can convey [19].
Subsequent investigations into the pathophysiology of MTC revealed its relationship with familial MTC and MEN syndromes [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Germline mutations in the RET proto-oncogene was studied extensively and led to early treatment recommendations for patients harboring the mutation [21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Current American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines for MTC are based on genetic karyotyping with its well-known phenotypic presentations and associated endocrinopathies [11]. For sporadic MTC, the diagnosis can be more challenging. Due to the presence of calcitonin elaboration, patients being evaluated for thyroid nodules are sometimes considered for calcitonin level measurements, based on several European association guidelines [11,20]. Although popular in Europe, variations in the European guidelines and ATA guidelines as a screening modality for thyroid nodules in older patients never led to its widespread adoption in the U.S. [11,28].
The typical age of presentation for sporadic MTC is in the fifth decade of life [18,29,30,31]. In contrast, patients with MEN 2A and FMTC typically present with MTC in the third decade of life while MEN 2B develops MTC in those younger than 20 years of age [18,29,30,31]. As the incidence of MTC is nearly 100% in familial cases, patients who develop MTC after 45 years of age are likely to be of the sporadic type. Several studies have looked into the characteristics of this group of patients in particular. Based on the Irish National Cancer Registry, Lennon et al. found this group of patients to have a median age of 52 from a group of 43 patients. [9] Notably, this group of patients had a 10-year survival of 48.63%, which is worse than the traditional cohort of patients seen with MTC found with MEN syndromes. Only two of the 43 patients had RET proto-oncogene defects associated with their disease. Due to the lack of widespread screening for thyroid cancer, 65.1% of the patients in the Irish National Cancer Registry had advanced stage III or IV disease on presentation [9]. Similarly, Jayakody et al. looked into their database from Sydney and found a higher incidence of advanced-stage disease in sporadic MTC compared with familial MTC [32]. The patients with sporadic MTC also presented with a median age of 55.4 compared with 43.9 in patients with MEN2 syndrome [32]. Patients also tended to have larger size tumors and a higher incidence of lymph node metastases. Their preoperative calcitonin is higher and survival is worse, perhaps due to the delay in diagnosis seen in this cohort of patients [32].
In order to study patients with MTC without germline RET mutation without resorting to germline testing, we elected to study the patient population greater than or equal to 45 years of age [29]. Compared to other published studies, the group of patients found in the SEER database showed that they were slightly older than previously recognized. The mean age of presentation was 60.1 years old, although one has to bear in mind that younger patients were excluded from the analysis, assuming that most of them had associated MEN syndrome or FMTC. The patients were mostly Caucasian, although the disease is also present in other races with the prognosis somewhat worse in African-Americans. A majority of patients do present with localized disease and are offered surgery, which improves their outcome.
Patients with MTC in this study had a high incidence of disease confined to the thyroid. However, despite 85.9% of patients having the disease confined to the thyroid, a high number showed positive lymph nodes for metastatic thyroid cancer. A large percentage of patients (78.9%) underwent total or subtotal thyroidectomy as primary treatment for this disease.
Our study has a few advantages. It is the biggest study to date on sporadic MTC. We used the SEER database and the information was gathered from multiple SEER databases and registries, which allows for the inclusion of a large sample population. However, it does add to the heterogeneity of the dataset. We used a unique epidemiological tool in the form of a Joinpoint regression-based method to assess the age-adjusted trend of this pathology across various stages in patients. There are few inherent limitations to the study. First, it is retrospective in nature. The clinical follow-up, adjuvant treatment in the form of chemotherapy and radiation, post-operative morbidity/mortality, and radiological imaging are not available in this dataset. The SEER database is unable to provide information on the genetic constitution of the patient population. Finally, data on disease progression is limited, which prevents the formulation of strong recommendations on follow-up, surveillance, and treatment.

4. Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study from the SEER database using 18 registries to identify all patients aged ≥ 45 years from 1973–2016, using SEER site-specific primary code, based on the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition (ICD-O-3). Medullary carcinoma of the thyroid was identified by using the ICD-O-3 code for the primary site (C73.9). The histology codes used for MTC histopathology were extracted from ICD-O-3 (Supplementary Table S1).

4.1. Inclusion Criteria

All patients with isolated MTC ≥ 45 years of age were included in the study.

4.2. Exclusion Criteria

Patients that were <45 years old were excluded. Patients with any histopathology other than MTC were excluded. Patients with more than one concurrent malignancy were excluded. Patients with incomplete or missing data were excluded.

4.3. Patient-Related Variables

The data were collected for age, gender, and race. Tumor related variables such as histopathological subclasses, grade, size and extension of tumor, SEER historic stage (the SEER program tries to make all localized/regional/distant stage variables consistent for all cancer sites for the appropriate years), number of involved lymph nodes, and type of surgical resection were collected. Survival time after diagnosis in months, and the status of the patient in terms of being alive or deceased was also noted.

4.4. Outcome Measures

The primary objective was to identify the predictors of mortality. The secondary objective was to analyze differences in survival based on age, gender, race, tumor characteristics, tumor grade, histopathological subclass, tumor extent, lymph node status, SEER based stage, and types of surgical resection. Changes in the epidemiological trend in the U.S. over the last four decades were also analyzed.
We used the frequency and survival session from SEERStat version 8.3.5 to observe incidence and trend analysis over four-decades in the U.S. in this age group. Joinpoint software 6.0.0 was utilized to analyze the age-adjusted epidemiological trends at the national level. The software takes trend data (e.g., cancer rates) and fits the simplest Joinpoint model that the data allow. This enables the user to test whether an apparent change in trend is statistically significant [33]. The data on epidemiological trend was calculated using Joinpoint from the years 1973–2015. Patients with missing data were excluded from the analysis.

4.5. Survival Analysis

In the first step of data analysis, due to the survival nature of the outcome data, preliminary analyses such as the Kaplan–Meier log-rank tests were performed. Subsequently, we utilized the Cox proportional hazard model for predicting and refining patient survival rates. The overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using the actuarial (Kaplan–Meier) method. Differences in survival based on age, sex, histology, tumor extent, lymph node status, grade, SEER stage, and surgery was computed using a log-rank test (Mantzel–Cox). Multivariable analysis was conducted using Cox regression for proportional hazards by backward elimination to identify the independent effect of covariates on survival controlling for the previously mentioned variables.
All p-values were 2-sided and a p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS for IBM Corp, released 2017 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. IBM Corp; Armonk, NY, USA).
According to the hospital policy, this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of New York Medical College (IRB Log Number: 12,996). Patient consent form is not applicable as the SEER database was analyzed retrospectively. This retrospective observational study is reported according to Strengthening The Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines [34].

5. Conclusions

The incidence of MTC in patients aged ≥ 45 years is increasing. Patients undergoing surgical resection at the early stage have improved outcomes. Advanced age and higher tumor burden are detrimental to overall survival.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/11/3124/s1, Table S1: Histological subtypes of MTC.

Author Contributions

Specifically, S.G., M.G. (Mahir Gachabayov), and X.D.D. did the study conception and design. S.G., D.S., and M.G. (Mahir Gachabayov) did the acquisition of data. S.G., M.G. (Michael Goldberg), and A.A. did the analysis and/or interpretation of data. Finally, S.G., M.G. (Michael Goldberg), D.M.F., and X.D.D. drafted the manuscript and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the current version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ho, A.S.; Wang, L.; Palmer, F.L.; Yu, C.; Toset, A.; Patel, S.; Kattan, M.W.; Tuttle, R.M.; Ganly, I. Postoperative Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Mortality in Medullary Thyroid Cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2015, 22, 2700–2706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Miyauchi, A.; Matsuzaka, F.; Hirai, K.; Yokozawa, T.; Kobayashi, K.; Ito, Y.; Nakano, K.; Kuma, K.; Futami, H.; Yamaguchi, K. Prospective trial of unilateral surgery for nonhereditary medullary thyroid carcinoma in patient without germline RET mutations. World J. Surg. 2002, 26, 1023–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Larouche, V.; Akirov, A.; Thomas, C.M.; Krzyzanowska, M.K.; Ezzat, S. A primer on the genetics of medullary thyroid cancer. Curr. Oncol. 2019, 26, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Randle, R.W.; Balentine, C.J.; Leverson, G.E.; Havlena, J.A.; Sippel, R.S.; Schneider, D.F.; Pitt, S.C. Trends in the presentation, treatment, and survival of patients with medullary thyroid cancer over the past 30 years. Surgery 2017, 161, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Viola, D.; Elisei, R. Management of medullary thyroid cancer. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. 2019, 48, 285–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Moo-Young, T.A.; Traugott, A.L.; Moley, J.F. Sporadic and familial medullary thyroid carcinoma, state of the art. Surg. Clin. 2009, 89, 1193–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Fallah, M.; Sundquist, K.; Hemminki, K. Risk of thyroid cancer in relatives of patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma by age at diagnosis. Endocr.-Relat. Cancer 2013, 20, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Qu, N.; Shi, R.L.; Luo, T.X.; Wang, Y.L.; Li, D.S.; Wang, Y.; Huang, C.P.; Ji, Q.H. Prognostic significance and optimal cutoff of age in medullary thyroid cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 15937–15947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Lennon, P.; Deady, S.; White, N.; Lambert, D.; Healy, M.L.; Green, A.; Kinsella, J.; Timon, C.; O’Neill, J.P.O. Aggressive medullary thyroid cancer, an analysis of the Irish National Cancer Registry. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 2017, 186, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gundara, J.S.; Zhao, J.; Gill, A.J.; Lee, J.C.; Delbridge, L.; Robinson, B.G.; McLean, C.; Serpell, J.; Sidhu, S.B. Noncoding RNA blockade of autophagy is therapeutic in medullary thyroid cancer. Cancer Med. 2015, 4, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Patel, K.N.; Yip, L.; Lubitz, C.C.; Grubbs, E.G.; Miller, B.S.; Shen, W.; Angelos, P.; Chen, H.; Doherty, G.M.; Fahey, T.J., III; et al. Executive summary of the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons Guidelines for the Definitive surgical management of thyroid disease in adults. Ann. Surg. 2020, 271, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wells, S.A.; Asa, S.L.; Dralle, H.; Elisei, R.; Evans, D.B.; Gagel, R.F. Revised American Thyroid Association Guidelines for the Management of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Thyroid 2015, 25, 567–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rich, T.A.; Feng, L.; Busaidy, N.; Cote, G.J.; Gagel, R.F.; Hu, M.; Jimenez, C.; Lee, J.E.; Perrier, N.; Sherman, S.I.; et al. Prevalence by Age and Predictors of Medullary Thyroid Cancer in Patients with Lower Risk Germline RET Proto-Oncogene Mutations. Thyroid 2014, 24, 1096–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Figlioli, G.; Landi, S.; Romei, C.; Elisei, R.; Gemignani, F. Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and RET proto-oncogene: Mutation spectrum in the familial cases and a meta-analysis of studies on the sporadic form. Mutat. Res. 2013, 752, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Moura, M.M.; Cavaco, B.M.; Leite, V. RAS proto-oncogene in medullary thyroid carcinoma. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2015, 22, R235–R252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yamada, T.; Iwai, T.; Takahashi, G.; Kan, H.; Koizumi, M.; Matsuda, A.; Shinji, S.; Yamagishi, A.; Yokoyama, Y.; Tatsuguchi, A.; et al. Utility of KRAS mutation detection using circulating cell-free DNA from patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Sci. 2016, 107, 936–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Fink, M.; Weinhausel, A.; Niederle, B.; Hass, O.A. Distinction between sporadic and hereditary medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) by mutation analysis of the RET proto-oncogene. Int. J. Cancer 1996, 69, 312–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Roy, M.; Chen, H.; Sippel, R.S. Current understanding and management of medullary thyroid cancer. Oncologist 2013, 18, 1093–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Hazard, J.B.; HAWK, W.A.; CRILE, J.R.G. Medullary (solid) carcinoma of the thyroid; a clinicopathologic entity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1959, 19, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Machens, A.; Dralle, H. Surgical cure rates of sporadic medullary thyroid cancer in the era of calcitonin screening. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2016, 175, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Grubbs, E.G.; Williams, M.D.; Scheet, P.; Vattathil, S.; Perrier, N.D.; Lee, J.E.; Gagel, R.F.; Hai, T.; Feng, L.; Cabanillas, M.E.; et al. Role of CDKN2C copy number in sporadic medullary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 2016, 26, 1553–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Takahasi, M.; Ritz, J.; Cooper, G.M. Activation of a novel human transforming gene, ret, by DNA rearrangement. Cell 1985, 42, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pasini, A.; Geneste, O.; Legrand, P.; Schlumberger, M.; Rossel, M.; Fournier, L.; Rudkin, B.B.; Schuffenecker, I.; Lenoir, G.M.; Billaud, M. Oncogenic activation of RET by two distinct FMTC mutations affecting the tyrosine kinase domain. Oncogene 1997, 15, 393–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Mulligan, L.M.; Kwok, J.B.; Healey, C.S.; Elsdon, M.J.; Eng, C.; Gardner, E.; Love, D.R.; Mole, S.E.; Moore, K.K.; Papi, L.; et al. Germline mutations of the RET proto-oncogene in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A. Nature 1993, 363, 458–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Donis-Keller, H.; Dou, S.; Chi, D.; Carlson, K.M.; Toshima, K.; Lairmore, T.C.; Howe, J.R.; Moley, J.F.; Goodfellow, P.; Wells, S.A., Jr.; et al. Mutations of the RET proto-oncogene are associated with MEN 2A and FMTC. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1993, 2, 851–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Elisei, R.; Cosci, B.; Romei, C.; Bottici, V.; Renzini, G.; Molinaro, E.; Agate, L.; Vivaldi, A.; Faviana, P.; Basolo, F.; et al. Prognostic significance of somatic RET oncogene mutations in sporadic medullary thyroid cancer: A 10-year follow-up study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 93, 682–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Accardo, G.; Conzo, G.; Esposito, D.; Gambardella, C.; Mazzella, M.; Castaldo, F.; Donna, C.D.; Polistena, A.; Avenia, N.; Colantuoni, V.; et al. Genetics of medullary thyroid cancer: An overview. Int. J. Surg. 2017, 41, S2–S6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pacini, F.; Schlumberger, M.; Dralle, H.; Elisei, R.; Smit, J.W.A.; Wiersinga, W. European consensus for the management of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma of the follicular epithelium. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2006, 154, 787–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Farndon, J.R.; Leightt, G.S.; Dilley, W.G.; Baylin, S.B.; Smallridge, R.C.; Harrison, T.S.; Wells, S.A., Jr. Familial medullary thyroid carcinoma without associated endocrinopathies: A distinct clinical entity. Br. J. Surg. 1986, 73, 278–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kebebew, E.; Ituarte, P.G.; Siperstein, A.E.; Duh, Q.Y.; Clark, O.H. Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: Clinical Characteristics, Treatment, Prognostic Factors, and a Comparison of Staging Systems. Cancer 2000, 88, 1139–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Roman, S.; Lin, R.; Sosa, J.A. Prognosis of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: Demographic, Clinical, and Pathologic Predictors of Survival in 1252 Cases. Cancer 2006, 107, 2134–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jayakody, S.; Reagh, J.; Bullock, M.; Aniss, A.; Clifton-Bligh, R.; Learoyd, D.; Robinson, B.; Delbridge, L.; Sidhu, S.; Gill, A.J.; et al. Medullary thyroid carcinoma: Survival analysis and evaluation of mutation-specific immunohistochemistry in the detection of sporadic disease. World J. Surg. 2018, 42, 1432–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kim, H.J.; Fay, M.P.; Feuer, E.J.; Midthune, D.N. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat. Med. 2000, 19, 335–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Von Elm, E.; Altman, D.G.; Egger, M.; Pocock, S.J.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Vandenbroucke, J.P. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann. Intern. Med. 2007, 147, 573–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (A) Overall trend. (B) Trend observed in the localized stage. (C) Trend observed in the regional stage. (D) Trend observed in the distant stage.
Figure 1. (A) Overall trend. (B) Trend observed in the localized stage. (C) Trend observed in the regional stage. (D) Trend observed in the distant stage.
Cancers 12 03124 g001aCancers 12 03124 g001b
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival curves based on gender.
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival curves based on gender.
Cancers 12 03124 g002
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier survival curves based on race.
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier survival curves based on race.
Cancers 12 03124 g003
Figure 4. Kaplan–Meier survival curves based on the type of tumor histology.
Figure 4. Kaplan–Meier survival curves based on the type of tumor histology.
Cancers 12 03124 g004
Figure 5. Kaplan–Meier survival curve based on the type of surgical resection.
Figure 5. Kaplan–Meier survival curve based on the type of surgical resection.
Cancers 12 03124 g005
Table 1. Demographics and survival of the patient population.
Table 1. Demographics and survival of the patient population.
VariablesN (%)Survival (Months)p-Value
Age
45–64 years1362 (53.7%)254.2 ± 7.3
65–84 years772 (30.4%)124.5 ± 6.5<0.01
≥85 years399 (15.7%)43.6 ± 6.5
Gender <0.01
Males (N, %)1049 (41.4%)180.7 ± 8.4
Females (N, %)1484 (58.6%)239.0 ± 7.5
Race 0.02
Caucasians2172 (85.7%)215.1 ± 6.0
African-Americans177 (7.0%)173.0 ± 16.0
Others (American Indians, Asian Pacific islanders)156 (6.2%)251 ± 16.3
Unknown28 (1.1%)194 ± 8.1
Table 2. Description of tumor characteristics and survival.
Table 2. Description of tumor characteristics and survival.
VariablesMean SD p-Value
Tumor size (±SD)25.6 (mm) 2.7 (mm)
Number of cervical lymph nodes isolated (N ± SD)42.497.6
Number of cervical lymph nodes positive for metastasis (N ± SD)36.044.6
N (%)Survival (months)
Histological subtypes <0.01
Medullary adenocarcinoma NOS1704 (67.3%)250 ± 16
Medullary adenocarcinoma with an amyloid stoma702 (27.7%)202.6 ± 7.0
Medullary adenocarcinoma with papillary variant89 (3.5%)156.5 ± 6.7
Medullary adenocarcinoma with follicular variant38 (1.5%)119.3 ± 12.4
Tumor extension <0.01
In-situ: Noninvasive464 (18.3%)172.6 ± 9.4
Single invasive tumor confined to the thyroid955 (37.7%)243 ± 6.2
Multiple foci confined to the thyroid275 (10.9%)229.6 ± 12.4
Localized, NOS165 (6.5%)171.2 ± 11.2
Into thyroid capsule, but not beyond317 (12.5%)179 ± 11.2
Pericapsular soft/connective tissue, Parathyroid
Strap muscle(s), Nerves: Recurrent laryngeal, vagus
97 (3.8%)136.1 ± 12
Extension to: Major blood vessel(s), SCM muscle
Esophagus, Larynx (The tumor is described as fixed to adjacent tissues)
23 (0.9%)80.1 ± 13
Trachea, Skeletal muscle, other than strap or
SCM muscle, Bone
29 (1.1%)46.3 ± 9.1
Extension into Mediastinal tissues41 (1.6%)55.3 ± 9.0
Metastasis76 (3.0%)37.0 ± 7.0
Unknown if extension present91 (3.4%)62.0 ± 7.7
Type of surgery performed <0.01
Total thyroidectomy1655 (65.3%)165.3 ± 2.7
Subtotal thyroidectomy344 (13%)122.2 ± 14.4
Thyroid Lobectomy262 (10%)162.1 ± 7.1
No surgery272 (10%)47.3 ± 5.3
Table 3. Cox regression model predicting mortality for patients (age ≥ 45 years) with medullary carcinoma thyroid.
Table 3. Cox regression model predicting mortality for patients (age ≥ 45 years) with medullary carcinoma thyroid.
FactorsHazard Ratio95% CIp-Value
Age1.0581.049–1.069<0.01
Gender
Females (Reference)1
Males1.2041.009–1.4370.04
Nodal Status
Negative cervical nodes
Positive cervical lymph nodes1.0031.001–1.006<0.01
Type of Surgical resection
Total thyroidectomy (Reference)
Subtotal thyroidectomy0.2890.166–0.317<0.01
Thyroid Lobectomy0.8320.392–1.1170.30
No surgery2.1801.390–3.419<0.01
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gogna, S.; Goldberg, M.; Samson, D.; Gachabayov, M.; Felsenreich, D.M.; Azim, A.; Dong, X.D. Medullary Thyroid Cancer in Patients Older than 45—Epidemiologic Trends and Predictors of Survival. Cancers 2020, 12, 3124. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113124

AMA Style

Gogna S, Goldberg M, Samson D, Gachabayov M, Felsenreich DM, Azim A, Dong XD. Medullary Thyroid Cancer in Patients Older than 45—Epidemiologic Trends and Predictors of Survival. Cancers. 2020; 12(11):3124. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113124

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gogna, Shekhar, Michael Goldberg, David Samson, Mahir Gachabayov, Daniel M. Felsenreich, Asad Azim, and Xiang D (Eric) Dong. 2020. "Medullary Thyroid Cancer in Patients Older than 45—Epidemiologic Trends and Predictors of Survival" Cancers 12, no. 11: 3124. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113124

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop