Next Article in Journal
New Insights into Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Pathobiology
Previous Article in Journal
Clinical Significance of Adverse Events for Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Lenvatinib: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Development of Antibody Immuno-PET/SPECT Radiopharmaceuticals for Imaging of Oncological Disorders—An Update

by
Jonatan Dewulf
1,3,
Karuna Adhikari
2,
Christel Vangestel
1,3,
Tim Van Den Wyngaert
1,3 and
Filipe Elvas
1,3,*
1
Molecular Imaging Center Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
2
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Biomedical and Veterinary Sciences, Medicinal Chemistry, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
3
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, B-2650 Edegem, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2020, 12(7), 1868; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12071868
Submission received: 8 June 2020 / Revised: 6 July 2020 / Accepted: 10 July 2020 / Published: 11 July 2020

Abstract

:
Positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) are molecular imaging strategies that typically use radioactively labeled ligands to selectively visualize molecular targets. The nanomolar sensitivity of PET and SPECT combined with the high specificity and affinity of monoclonal antibodies have shown great potential in oncology imaging. Over the past decades a wide range of radio-isotopes have been developed into immuno-SPECT/PET imaging agents, made possible by novel conjugation strategies (e.g., site-specific labeling, click chemistry) and optimization and development of novel radiochemistry procedures. In addition, new strategies such as pretargeting and the use of antibody fragments have entered the field of immuno-PET/SPECT expanding the range of imaging applications. Non-invasive imaging techniques revealing tumor antigen biodistribution, expression and heterogeneity have the potential to contribute to disease diagnosis, therapy selection, patient stratification and therapy response prediction achieving personalized treatments for each patient and therefore assisting in clinical decision making.

1. Introduction

Continuous progression in the molecular characterization of tumors, biomarker discovery and cancer specific pathways have opened new possibilities for targeted cancer treatment, adding new antibody (Ab)-based treatment options (e.g., trastuzumab, nivolumab,…) to non-specific cytotoxic therapies (e.g., paclitaxel, doxorubicin,…). Ab-based therapeutics in oncology benefit from their high specificity and high affinity for a particular target that is overexpressed on tumor cells, while leaving healthy tissues lacking this target unharmed. Immuno- positron emission tomography (PET)/ single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is defined as the radiolabeling of Abs (Abs) and antibody fragments with positron- (PET) or gamma- (SPECT) emitting radionuclides for imaging. Immuno-PET/SPECT combines the benefits of targeting specificity of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with the superior sensitivity of PET and SPECT, which can provide information on whole-body biomarker distribution or tumor target expression in vivo [1]. Functional tumor biomarker changes can be detected earlier with immuno-PET/SPECT, when compared to changes in lesion size as assessed on morphological imaging that typically represent late effects of treatment.
The standard method for biomarker quantification is generally biopsy sampling with downstream immunohistochemistry (IHC) or mRNA validation. This is a suboptimal invasive method compared to immuno-PET/SPECT imaging, since biomarker expression suffers from tumor heterogenicity and subsequent sampling error issues. Additionally, repetitive biopsies and histopathological confirmation are required to monitor treatment response, making clinical use challenging [2]. In contrast, immuno-PET/SPECT can provide a non-invasive, longitudinal and quantitative assessment of tumor target expression and distribution. While liquid biopsies or a rise in serum tumor markers can also identify patients with treatment failure or relapse, subsequent imaging is frequently required to localize the disease and guide subsequent treatment decisions [3]. The current reference standard in routine clinical practice for functional PET/CT tumor imaging is 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) targeting highly metabolic tissues (tumor, brain, heart,…), but also non-specifically activated inflammatory cells, whereas immuno-PET/SPECT radiotracers show target specific binding. Promising clinical trial data in the setting of HER-2 overexpressing breast cancer support the principle combining baseline target-specific immuno-PET/CT imaging with early assessment of tumor metabolism using [18F]FDG-PET/CT to identify the subset of patients who will benefit from the treatment [4].
Ab radiolabeling pioneered with SPECT radio-isotopes (131I,123I, 111In, 99mTc) but interest of the nuclear medicine community shifted along the years towards PET radio-isotopes (89Zr, 64Cu, 124I) since these became more readily available due to optimized nuclear reactions and higher purity. In general, PET scanners produce higher resolution images and have higher sensitivity, resulting in more-accurate image quantification. These benefits are generally offset by higher tracer production costs and higher radiation burden because of higher photon energies of PET radionuclides. In practice, this increased exposure was often balanced since SPECT tracers required higher injected activities due to the lower detector sensitivity [5,6]. However, gradual introduction of novel detector and system designs with higher sensitivity will enable lower administered activities and therefore facilitate immuno-PET/SPECT use in the upcoming years. Another unique characteristic of SPECT radio-isotopes is the ability to perform dual isotope imaging since emitted γ-rays and their accompanying energies are a unique fingerprint of that SPECT radio-isotope. Not only multiple radio-isotope labeled tracers can be imaged using SPECT in this way [7], but they can also be combined with a PET tracer, if combined SPECT/PET hardware is available. Knight et al. took advantage of this property to evaluate the tumor enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect using SPECT combined with target imaging using PET in tumor bearing mice [8]. Unfortunately, this technique is currently limited to preclinical research settings.
While several reviews on immuno-PET exist, none provide up-to-date descriptions of immuno-PET and -SPECT imaging with monoclonal Abs in nuclear medicine. After a brief introduction on the monoclonal Ab structure, the different bioconjugation modalities used in immuno-PET/SPECT will be discussed more in depth, ranging from conventional to more recent site-specific strategies. Then an extensive overview of common PET and SPECT radioisotopes used in mAb imaging will be presented, followed by the different radiolabeling strategies, advantages and limitations. Finally, relevant preclinical and clinical studies will be discussed for each radioisotope.

2. Antibody Structure

Abs, also known as immunoglobulins, consist of a Y-shaped structure. The bi-fork shaped end comes together in a stalk and both are connected by a flexible hinge region. The fork consists of two distinct functional units: the fragment antigen-binding (Fab) variable region and the stalk consists of the fragment crystallizable (Fc) constant region of the Ab (Figure 1) In human Abs, the Fab region is responsible for antigen recognition, while the Fc region is in charge of the immune response by interaction with effectors cells [9]. There are five classes of immunoglobulins based on the heavy chain constant region: IgA, IgD, IgE, IgG, and IgM. The most abundant Abs in human serum are IgG (80%) and IgM (10%) [10]. Of the five classes, immunoglobulin type 1 Abs (IgGs) are the most frequently used Abs for targeted cancer therapy and cancer immunotherapy. IgGs are about 150 kDa and are composed of two identical polypeptide heavy chains connected with two light chains via disulfide bonds and a conserved glycosylated position at N297 of each heavy chain. IgG are attractive Abs since different anti-tumor mechanisms are available dependent on the chosen immunoglobulin G subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4). For example, IgG1 & IgG3 allow IgG–Fc-γ-receptors (FcγR) interactions, enabling recognition of these targets by immune effector populations that express FcγR (e.g., NK cells, neutrophils, mononuclear phagocytes and dendritic cells). Cross-linking of FcγRs on these cells promote Ab dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and tumor cell destruction [11,12]. On the other hand, IgG2 and IgG4 are less immunoreactive and are ideal for blocking receptor-ligand/ receptor-receptor interactions. Structural factors are also important in selecting your Ab class e.g., stability of the hinge region (where IgG1 = IgG4 > IgG2 > IgG3). The highly unstable hinge region of IgG3 is also the reason why this subclass is the only one that has not been explored commercially [13].
In immuno-PET/SPECT binding of the Fc region with Fc receptors for example in the reticuloendothelial system, most notably FcγR can result in off-target sequestration and decrease in quality and diagnostic utility of the images. In a recent immuno-PET study tackling this nonspecific uptake, Ab deglycosylation resulted in higher tumor-to-healthy organ contrast and higher quality PET images [14]. A lower affinity for binding to the FcγR was proposed as mechanism, resulting from the modified 3D configuration of the Fc region [15].
Smaller fragments resulting from biochemical digestion of full-size IgG Abs, such as antigen-binding fragments (Fab, (Fab’)2, Fab’, and scFv), have also been developed for immunoPET/SPECT imaging applications [16]. When compared to full-size Abs all antigen-binding fragments show lower accumulation at the tumor target site, however they benefit from higher tumor permeability and faster clearance from circulation, mainly by the kidneys. Indeed, full-length IgG Abs generally show slow tissue distribution and long circulation time (t1/2=1–3 weeks). Slow intracellular catabolism by lysosomal degradation to amino acids after uptake by either pinocytosis, or by a receptor-mediated endocytosis process is the main pathway for IgG elimination. In addition, a salvage pathway mediated by the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) exists as a protective mechanism for IgG molecules to maintain their concentrations in the plasma in order to support their physiologic function to provide long-term immunity. The FcRn-mediated recycling releases the IgG molecules back to the vascular space [17]. As a consequence, the elimination half-life for IgG1, IgG2, and IgG4 is ∼18–21 days, which is substantially longer than the half-life of other proteins with similar molecular weight. The long elimination half-life of IgG molecules is a desirable characteristic for therapeutic tumor targeting, since continuous circulation of the Ab will result in maximum exposure and increased accumulation of the Ab at the target site [18].
Recently described radioimmunoconjugates include both full-length IgG mAbs and small Ab fragments. Radiolabeled small fragment derivatives allow obtaining high target to background ratio at earlier time points (1–12 h) following administration, while full-length IgG Abs require significantly greater time periods (1 day–1 week) to enable the Ab to accumulate at the target site and clear from circulation [19]. Ab fragment imaging grants access to the use of shorted lived isotopes (e.g., 18F) which generally have more favorable intrinsic properties (higher positron branching ratio (97%), lower average positron energies (250 keV)) and therefore result in better resolution of the PET images. In addition, fragments lack the Fc region, reducing the immunoreactivity and therefore removing activation of effector responses, which is desired in imaging applications. However, conjugation sites on Ab fragments are limited and should be performed carefully to maintain immunoreactivity whereas this risk is minimal in full Abs since more options are available [20]. In addition, labelling intact Abs can still provide useful important longitudinal imaging information, whereas fragments would require repeated injections. Discussing Ab fragments and their applications more into dept lies outside the scope of this paper and therefore the authors recommend some excellent reviews [19,21].

3. Radiolabeling and Bioconjugation Strategies of Monoclonal Antibodies

The choice of Ab radiolabeling strategy is influenced by the choice of radioisotope, the nature of the Ab and the availability of the radioisotope. The use of PET and SPECT radiometals, such as 89Zr and 111In, respectively, requires the use of a bifunctional chelating (BFC) group, while nonmetallic radionuclides, such as 123I, can be labeled directly via electrophilic aromatic substitution on histidine or tyrosine amino acid residues on peptides or proteins. In cases where direct labeling conditions are too harsh and thus incompatible with the nature of the Abs, prosthetic groups can be used to circumvent these issues. The conventional prosthetic groups and bifunctional chelators have relied on reactions with natural amino acids for attachment to the Ab structure. These consist typically out of reactions between lysines and N-hydroxysuccinimidyl esters or thiocyanate family and cysteines and maleimides (Michael addition). Since Ab structures consist out of a multitude of cysteines and lysines, heterogeneous mixture of conjugates will be generated which can result in decreased target affinity. To circumvent these issues, site selective reactions were introduced for attaching prosthetic groups. In immuno-PET/SPECT, site-specific conjugation is generally achieved by cysteine engineering, but also new strategies achieving chemoselectivity were developed e.g., click chemistry, enzymatic reactions and biorthogonal transformations (Figure 1).

3.1. Conjugation Reactions Using Solvent Accessible Amino Acids in Antibodies

3.1.1. Lysine

A typical IgG1 Ab consists out of 80 lysines from which 30 are highly solvent accessible and therefore easily available for conjugation reactions [22]. A typical conjugation consists of activating the solvent exposed ε-amino groups of the lysine residues on the Ab structure at alkaline pH 9 (more nucleophilic than at neutral pH), by removing the positive charge on these groups. After activation, these lysines can be conjugated using a one-step approach by direct conjugation via an amine reactive group using reactive electrophilic groups such as activated esters, isothiocyanate (SCN), isocyanate, anhydrides, amongst others [23]. Several amine reactive groups have been successfully used in immuno-PET/SPECT and demonstrated adequate stability [24,25]. In mice bearing FaDu human tumors both [89Zr]Zr-DFO-p-Phe-SCN-U36 and the [89Zr]Zr-DFO-N-SUC-U36 were compared, but no difference in biodistribution/ tumor uptake could be observed [26].

3.1.2. Cysteine

Typically, IgG molecules consist out of 32 cysteine residues forming 4 interchain and 12 intrachain bonds. Only the four interchain disulfide bonds in the Ab hinge region are solvent exposed, and thus accessible for conjugation, creating after their reduction eight reactive thiols [27]. Cysteines in IgG molecules are all in disulfide bonded state, therefore conjugation requires reduction of the disulfide bonds using a reducing agent such as dithiothreitol (DTT) or tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP). The resulting thiol group of the cysteine residue will typically be reacted with maleimide groups via Michael addition to form thioether bonds. Maleimide conjugated Abs have been widely used and successfully implemented, resulting in adequate tumor visualization in several studies [28,29]. This thioether bond (maleimide reactive group) shows superior in vivo stability over the disulfide bond (pyridyldithiopropionate reactive group) as evaluated in a biodistribution study of [111In]In-anti-CEA mAb fragments. The higher renal uptake for S-S conjugated fragments indicates in vivo cleavage of the disulfide bond [30]. However, the thioether bond can undergo a reverse Michael addition reverting back to the free thiol and maleimide starting products, resulting in release of the chelate from the targeting ligand [31]. The free radiolabeled maleimide motif can then undergo in vivo Michael additions with endogenous thiol-containing compounds (e.g., albumin or glutathione) resulting in higher uptake in non-target tissue, reducing uptake in target tissue, increase radiation dose to healthy tissues and reduced imaging contrast [32,33].
Due to suboptimal synthesis and a lack of available alternatives, the maleimide bond remains the standard for cysteine conjugations in immuno-PET/SPECT. Adumeau et al. recognized these in vivo stability concerns, and in an effort to generate a less reactive final bond they developed a simplified synthesis of a new reagent phenyloxadiazolyl methylsulfone (PODS), allowing to move away from the instable maleimide-thioether [28]. Synthesis of the compound was adapted and simplified from Toda et al. [34]. This study compared 89Zr-DFO-PODS-huA33 and [89Zr]Zr-DFO-mal-huA33 in a PDX model of colorectal cancer and showed similar 50-60% ID/g uptake in the tumors at 48h post injection (pi). However, the stability of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-PODS-huA33 was improved when compared to [89Zr]Zr-DFO-mal-huA33 [28].
Conventional (non-specific) conjugation can be considered a poor and imprecise manner to conjugate Abs. Three levels of heterogeneity can be observed: number of conjugates attached, regioisomers and batch to batch variability. Undoubtably differences in pharmacokinetic, biological and chemical characteristics are expected between e.g., an Ab conjugate with 1 chelator attached to the Fc region and a construct where 5 chelators are attached to Fab and Fc regions. Sharma et al. evaluated this impact in their search for optimized immuno-PET 89Zr radiolabeling [35]. Generally, increasing DFO chelators/Ab resulted in decreased immunoreactive fraction and poor in vivo PET images (increased log D and hepatic uptake, lower radiotracer tumor uptake). All this can act as a barrier to regulatory approval of their clinical application. Comparative studies between random labeling and different site-specific approaches are discussed more in detail below [36].

3.2. Site-Specific Cysteine Bioconjugation

In addition to their use in random conjugation, cysteines can also be used for site-specific conjugation. Cysteines are highly interesting compared to other amino acids in proteins, since the nucleophilicity of the deprotonated thiol group exceeds the reactivity of other nucleophilic groups in Abs. Therefore, cysteines have the potential to be engineered in mAbs and selectively conjugated, leaving native residues (disulfide bonds) intact and therefore avoiding potential stability issues (denaturation) observed during disulfide bond reduction [37]. Junutula et al. developed a biochemical assay (phage ELISA for selection of reactive thiols, PHESELECTOR) in which potential sites are identified for mutation to cysteine residues [38].
Tinianow et al. used this assay to develop thiotrastuzumab which contains a cysteine in two regions on the heavy chain of the constant Fab region. In a later stage, these were conjugated via different reactive groups to DFO and radiolabeled with 89Zr. Conventional radiolabeling strategies, using random coupling isothiocynate, were compared to these site-specifically conjugated radiotracers in tumor bearing BT474 mice. The number of chelators attached per Ab in the site-specific bioconjugates varied from 1.8–2.0 (showing in some cases incomplete loading of the thiotrastuzumab constructs), compared to 2.4 chelators/Ab when using random conjugation. The affinity to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) was similar in the site-specific modified constructs compared to unbound thiotrastuzumab. Unfortunately, the affinity of the randomly labeled bioconjugates was not assessed. All BT474 tumors could be clearly visualized using radiotracers and showed similar biodistribution and tumor uptake without significant differences between site-specifically and randomly bioconjugated constructs as assessed by ex vivo gamma-counting [29]. Notably, HER2 expressing tumors are known to exhibit irregular growth patterns in mice resulting in heterogeneous target expression tumors and were for this reason abandoned by other groups for proof of concept validation [28].
Using this approach, homogenous well defined bioconjugates could be developed, which provides limited batch to batch variability, which simplifies regulatory approval. However, genetic engineering of the Ab will add additional expenses and complexity to the production process, especially for full mAbs. Maintaining immunoreactivity is another benefit of site-specifically labelling, but in beforementioned study no difference in tumor uptake between randomly and site-specifically labeled bioconjugates could be observed. Full mAbs do contain a large Fc region and no change in immunoreactivity is expected by random conjugation in this region. The engineering and radiolabeling of cysteines in Ab fragments, which generally have fewer bioconjugation site options, resulted in distinct differences in tumor uptake between randomly and site-specifically bioconjugated constructs [39].

3.3. Glycans

IgG Abs contain two conserved post-translational modification glycosylation sites that can be chemically modified to enable site-specific attachment of chelators. Glycans are an interesting conjugation target for different reasons: (i) they are located distal to the antigen binding regions, which decreases the potential impact on Ab conjugate immunoreactivity; (ii) their distinct chemical structure grants the potential use of new conjugating methods which is extensively studied and readily available; and (iii) the glycosylation sites (one on each heavy chain) are always located at the Asn297 region, giving access to a natural site-specific moiety. Glycans are however not readily reactive and need to be modified. Three different approaches of glycans modifications have been investigated for immuno-PET/SPECT imaging.
The oldest used method consists of chemical glycan oxidation. The cis-glycol groups of glycans are reacted with periodate (IO4) to yield aldehyde groups. These new functional groups are more reactive and can undergo covalent binding with nucleophilic groups (e.g., amines, hydrazide and aminooxy) of chelator containing probes. Formed linkages between nucleophilic groups and aldehydes are not equally stable. Imines (formed by reaction with amines) and hydrazones (formed by reaction with hydrazines) show hydrolytic instability and require an additional reduction step with cyanoborohydride to increase their stability. While hydrazones are more stable then imines, aldehyde oxime ethers (formed by reaction with aminooxy functionalities) show the best stability and do not require an additional reduction step. Using amine bearing reactive groups Rodwell et al. was able to successfully develop [111In]In-DTPA-R9.75 and could clearly visualize lymphoma xenografts with an ex vivo tumor uptake of 22% ID/g, 48 h pi [40]. The hydrazine bearing chelator CYT-395 coupled to glycans of a PSMA targeting Ab and radiolabeled with 99mTc was used to visualize prostate cancer in a subset of patients [41]. Another aminoxy nucleophilic group was also successfully used in immuno-SPECT, radiolabeling [111In]In-DOTA-trastuzumab site-specifically and targeting HER2 expressing xenografts [42]. In some cases, the harsh oxidizing conditions using IO4 can lead to oxidation methionine residues of the Ab, reducing Ab stability. Alternatives to IO4 have not yet been explored in the immuno-PET/SPECT setting [43].
To overcome this limitation, the chemo-enzymatic modification of the glycan residues in the Ab was developed. This dual-enzyme strategy consists of removing the terminal galactose residues with β-1,4-galactosidase, followed by insertion of a modified galactose reactive group at this site that will react with a desired chelator using mutant β-1,4-galactosyltransferase (Y289L) [44]. Zeglis et al. was the first to successfully implement this method combined with click chemistry in immuno-PET, using an azide modified galactose. This azide group was then reacted to DFO-modified dibenzocyclooctynes via the strain promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition (SPAAC) reaction and radiolabeled with 89Zr. In PSMA expressing prostate xenograft mice the site-specific-radiolabeled DFO-J591 Ab showed an increased absolute tumor uptake when compared to randomly radiolabeled controls at 96 h pi (68 vs. 58% ID/g) [45].
Using a similar strategy, Kristensen et al. confirmed higher mean tumor uptake values of site-specifically labeled [89Zr]Zr-DFO-trastuzumab in nude mice SKOV3 xenografts compared to conventional lysine modifications. Remarkably, the tumor uptake of the glycan modified Ab (24% ID/g) was twice that of the randomly labeled radio-immunoconjugates (11% ID/g) at 120 h pi, while the difference in Kd between both conjugates was not that prominent (1.55 nM vs. 1.45 nM). To investigate whether this rather important difference in tumor uptake was solely due to the difference in immunoreactivity and not because of reduced Fc-FcγR interactions as a result of glycan modifications, a follow-up experiment was conducted. No difference in maximum tumor uptake was found between trastuzumab and deglycosylated trastuzumab when both were randomly radiolabeled, with 11% and 12% ID/g tumor uptake at 120 h pi respectively. This indicates that the high tumor uptake values of the site-specifically modified trastuzumab is related to the antigen binding region [46].
In a recent study, Vivier et al. investigated the influence of site-specifically glycan modified [89Zr]Zr-DFO-pertuzumab on Fc-FcγRI binding more in depth, using BT474 xenografts in nude and humanized NOD-SCID mice. In both mouse models site-specifically glycan modified and randomly [89Zr]Zr-DFO-pertuzumab labeled conjugates were evaluated, with both showing similar Kd values for HER2. Athymic nude mice carry murine FcγRI and humanized NOD-SCID mice (huNSG) express human FcγRI, showing low and high binding affinity to human Fc part of the Ab pertuzumab, respectively. Ex vivo biodistribution data confirmed similar radiotracer tumor uptake of site-specifically glycan modified and randomly bioconjugated [89Zr]Zr-DFO-pertuzumab at 144 h p.i in athymic nude mice. On the other hand, in humanized NOD-SCID animals a significant difference was observed using an identical experimental set-up [47]. This study confirms the importance of site-specific biomodifications in immuno-PET/SPECT and also shows the added benefit of glycan modification in avoiding Fc-FcγR binding, promoting retention in the vascular space and allowing more time for immune interactions.
Another method of site-specific glycan conjugation consists of metabolic cell engineering of the cells that produce Abs. In this approach the cell media is enriched with a specific sugar for insertion into the Ab, relying on the hypothesis that cells will incorporate these into the Ab [48]. Using this method, Rochefort et al. was able to introduce an azide modified mannose onto an anti-CA19-9 Ab, which was reacted with a fluorophore and was able to visualized pancreatic tumors in xenografts [49]. These findings are important for translation to immuno-PET/SPECT, since currently no radiotracers using metabolic glycan engineering are available in clinical routine.

3.4. Antibody Engineering

3.4.1. Protein Engineering

Enzymatic modifications resulting in protein engineering of Abs have been around for some years, mostly investigated for fluorescence in vivo applications. However, in immuno-PET/SPECT only a few reports are available that use enzymatic Ab engineering, focusing mainly on sortase A and transglutaminase. The enzymatic bioconjugation via Sortase A cleaves the LPXTG tag in the polypeptide backbone of the protein upon recognition and inserts an oligoglycine tag attached to a probe, which is then radiolabeled in subsequent steps [50]. Successful visualization of HER-2 expressing xenografts was achieved when implementing this approach with Ab fragments [51].
Transglutaminase protein engineering uses transglutaminases to catalyze the isopeptide bond between the acyl functionality of glutamine residues and primary amines. Abs contains many glutamine residues, but a glutamine position (Q295) only becomes accessible for enzymatic modification after deglycosylation (N297 position), due to increased flexibility of the peptide backbone.
Jeger et al. have shown that the site-specific enzymatic modification of mAbs using transglutaminase leads to homogeneous immunoconjugates with defined stoichiometries, which is important for clinical translation. In vivo these immunoconjugates showed higher tumor uptake in a SKOV3ip (derived from ascites cells that developed in a mouse IP cavity injected with SKOV3 cells) human ovarian carcinoma xenograft model, when compared to those prepared using chemical conjugation methods (58.7% ID/g vs. 15% ID/g at 72h pi, respectively) [52]. These findings are remarkable, particular since no difference in immunoreactivity could be observed between chemically (61 ± 20%) and enzymatically (52 ± 2%) modified radioimmunoconjugates. It has to be considered whether the large difference in radiotracer tumor uptake is not solely related to deglycosylation of the Ab, which would result in reduced Fc-FcγR binding (as discussed above). Indeed, when looking at blood % ID/g of the enzymatically and chemically modified Ab (10.19 ± 0.80 vs 2.50 ± 2.23 at 72h pi respectively) such a phenomenon can be hypothesized.

3.4.2. Unnatural Amino Acids (uAA)

The incorporation of unnatural amino acids in Abs is challenging and not yet fully explored in immuno-PET/SPECT applications. This approach consists out of expanding the genetic code of the cells, during the translation phase of the recombinant Ab, to interpret nonsense codons as uAA, leading to incorporation of the UAA in the Ab. Using a cell-free method, Boros and coworkers were able to insert four para-azidomethyl-L-phenylalanine (pAMF) residues on the heavy chain of the Fc region of trastuzumab, which was at a later stage conjugated with DFO-PEG4-DBCO via SPAAC for [89Zr]Zr4+ radiolabeling. In SKOV3 tumor bearing mice site-specifically labeled [89Zr]Zr-DFO-trastuzumab showed slightly higher radiotracer tumor uptake 33.50 ± 8.48% ID/g when compared with conventional random (p-SCN-DFO) lysine conjugated radiolabeling 31.86 ± 7.97% ID/g at 96 h pi [53] (Figure 2).
Undoubtedly the authors were able to create homogenous site specifically labeled radioimmunoconjugates using unnatural amino acids, facilitating possible future regulatory approval of the conjugates. In the site-specific conjugated constructs 4 chelators/Ab could be observed, whereas the randomly labeled approach showed binding of 0–5 chelators/Ab. However, in their concluding experiments only a trend towards significance over the randomly labeled approach could be established. In addition, the cell binding assay showed no difference in immunoreactivity between radioimmunoconjugates. Stability between constructs was similar but notably in this study ex vivo bone uptake of all conjugates was negligible with < 3% ID/g at 96 h pi, whereas DFO is known to show instability in vivo in mice. These findings are probably related with premature [89Zr]Zr-DFO cleavage of the Ab resulting in fast < 24 h [89Zr]Zr-DFO clearance via the kidneys, a possible confounder to their results [54]. Certainly, this site- specific approach is the most challenging and implementation will require considerable resources.

3.5. Pretargeting Approach

Pretargeting is a commonly used approach to circumvent the limitations of directly radiolabeled Abs. These normally show long circulation times and can therefore increase the radiation dose to healthy tissues during immuno-PET/SPECT imaging.
In a pretargeting approach the Ab is initially conjugated to a targeting moiety and allowed to accumulate in the Ab target before a complementary, fast clearing small radiolabeled probe is injected. This probe will find and react specifically to the targeting moiety present in the Ab bound to the target, while the unreacted probe is cleared fast, enabling high target-to-background ratio (Figure 3) [55,56]. Separate injections of radionuclide and Ab have several benefits. On the one hand it decreases circulation time of radioactivity, reduces the uptake of the radioisotope in healthy tissue and therefore lowers the radiation dose for the patient. On the other hand, it facilitates the use of short-lived radionuclides, opening up new perspectives.
The nature of the different pretargeting approaches is similar and several mechanisms for pretargeting are available: the use of bi-specific Abs binding a tumor specific antigen and radiolabeled haptens, avidin-biotin systems, complementary oligonucleotides and biorthogonal reactions [57,58,59,60,61,62]. An excellent review describing these different mechanisms has already been published by Altai et al. [63]. Although all of these strategies have proven to be effective, biorthogonal click reactions have recently emerged as a promising tool for in vivo pretargeting due to their favorable properties such as biorthogonality, fast reaction rates and selectivity. First generation bioorthogonal reactions, such as the Staudinger ligation and the SPAAC, suffered from sub-optimal reaction kinetics which made them unsuitable for in vivo pretargeting applications [64,65].
The revisiting of the inverse electron demand Diels-Alder (IEDDA) biorthogonal reaction, achieved between a 1,2,4,5-tetrazine (Tz) and trans-cyclooctene (TCO), by several research groups however boosted the pretargeting immuno-PET/SPECT approach. Apart from its selectivity and biorthogonality, the speed plays a pivotal role in the feasibility of in vivo pretargeting, with the first order rate constant between a TCO and tetrazine being of 105 M−1s−1, which is orders of magnitude faster than either the Staudinger or SPAAC ligations [66]. The vast majority of IEDDA-based pretargeting uses a TCO-labeled Ab and a tetrazine based radioligand [66]. Robillard et al. are the pioneers in the use of IEDDA in pretargeting approach. In their initial work, a TCO-Ab conjugate (CC49-TCO) and an 111In labeled DOTA-tetrazine radioligand was employed for the SPECT imaging of TAG-72 expressing colorectal cancer xenografts with excellent image contrast [67]. Additionally, pretargeting studies of TCO-5B1-Ab targeting carbohydrate antigen 19.9 on pancreatic cancer xenografts with 64Cu-labeled tetrazine showed that this approach is viable even in the difficult circumstances presented by a circulating antigen and internalized targeting vector [68]. The pretargeting approach further expanded the immuno-PET scope with even shorter-lived isotopes such as 68Ga and 18F. Using TCO-cetuximab and 68Ga-labeled tetrazine epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expressing xenografts could be clearly visualized [69]. Similarly, using TCO-5B1 and 18F-tetrazine pancreatic cancer xenografts could be imaged [70]. Pretargeting studies often involve radiolabeled tetrazine compared to its counterpart TCO for which the radiolabeling is less explored, due to the in vivo instability and possible non-specific uptake related to high lipophilicity of TCOs. Fox and co-workers were the first to describe a 18F-labeled TCO probe based on classic trans-cyclooctenol [71]. However, 18F-TCO was shown to degrade rapidly in vivo giving rise to radiometabolites [72]. Recently, more reactive 18F-labeled conformationally strained TCOs were described with better stability profiles [73,74]. Of these, only cis-dioxolane fused transcyclooctene (dTCO) has been successfully evaluated in SKOV3 xenografts, with the ability to clearly visualize the tumor [75].
Zeglis et al. initiated a study where the promising IEDDA pretargeting approach and directly radiolabeled Ab were compared. Using SW1222 xenografts injected with direct labeled [64Cu]Cu-NOTA-A33 yielded 33% ID/g absolute tumor uptake. In the pretargeting approach SW1222 xenografts bearing mice were firstly injected with TCO modified Ab and after 24 h with their radioactive counterpart 64Cu-NOTA-Tz and showed 4.0% ID/g tumour uptake at 24 h post injection. However, the tumor to blood ratio of these constructs was higher in the pretargeting approach (2.9 vs. 1.9 at 24 h pi). However, at 48h pi the tumor to blood ratio for [64Cu]Cu-NOTA-A33 was increased to 24.5 surpassing the maximum ratio for the pretargeting approach. An additional study with [89Zr]Zr-DFO-A33 showed similar results as 64Cu labeled mAb in comparison with the pretargeting approach. Final dosimetry calculations showed superiority of the pretargeting approach with an effective dose 0.0124 mSv/MBq compared to [89Zr]Zr-DFO-A33, 0.416 mSv/MBq and [64Cu]Cu-NOTA-A33, 0.0359 mSv/MBq [76].
A challenge in the pretargeting approach is slow clearance of the modified Ab. Ideally injection of the complementary counterpart is done when Ab accumulation at the tumor site has reached a maximum. However, additional waiting time is necessary to allow the Ab to clear from circulation. Otherwise high background, due to binding of the radiolabeled probe to the Ab in circulation, would result in suboptimal images. Increasing the waiting time before injecting the radiolabeled probe could result in internalization of the Ab, resulting in decreased available secondary moiety. The use of a three step pretargeting approach, where a clearing agent is administered before injection of the complementary counterpart showed improvement in aforementioned problem. However, when administering a clearing agent some considerations have to be made regarding the reduced amount of Ab in the target, immunoreactivity and toxicity. Translation to clinic using this approach is not straightforward either with three different injections and two return visits [77].
Internalization of the Ab resulting in decreased available secondary moiety is another concern of the IEDDA pretargeting approach, specifically since almost all Abs internalize, though at different rates. The opposite is true for direct labeled Abs, where internalization is an advantage resulting in accumulation of radioactivity in the tumor. A rule of thumb suggests that vectors for pretargeting should not be internalized upon binding their target, therefore researchers are limited to certain targets (tumor-associated glycoprotein 72 – A33) to test their pretargeting proof of concept [78,79]. However recent reports indicate that pretargeting is possible with internalizing systems. Keinänen et al. were able to successfully visualize A431 and BT-474 xenografts using internalizing TCO-trastuzumab and TCO-cetuximab, respectively. In this approach TCO-trastuzumab and TCO-cetuximab were coupled with an average of five and six TCO moieties respectively and injected 72 h post radioactive [18F]TAF injection. PET imaging was obtained 4 h post radioactive tetrazine injection. Ex vivo biodistribution of pretargeted TCO-trastuzumab showed 1.38 ± 0.20% ID/g and TCO-cetuximab showed 3.70 ± 0.13 tumour uptake [80].

4. Radionuclides for Antibody Imaging

Table 1 is an overview for all the radionuclides discussed below.

4.1. Common Radionuclides

4.1.1. Iodine

Radioiodination was the first immuno-PET/SPECT (124I/123I) imaging and theranostic (131I) application. The process usually involves the action of a strong oxidizing agent to transform iodide ions into a highly reactive electrophilic iodine which then reacts via electrophilic substitution on the phenolic group of the Ab tyrosine. There are three main iodination protocols: (i) Bolton-Hunter; (ii) based on chemical oxidation of iodide with chloramine-T; and (iii) based on enzymatic oxidation of iodide with lactoperoxidase. All these methods can yield radiolabeled Abs with high specific activities.
Although full-length Abs have been successfully radio-iodinated using these methods, in some cases, the use of strong oxidizing agents, such as chloramine-T, can lead to unwanted oxidizing reactions of the Ab (SH group), reducing the Ab stability [83]. Milder reaction conditions using the lactoperoxidase method have been introduced, in which the enzyme catalyzes the oxidation of iodide by using hydrogen peroxide [84]. In addition, newer techniques aim to limit the access of the oxidizing agent to Ab reactive functionalities by using solid phase oxidation (Iodogen) or a two-step approach (Bolton-Hunter) [85,86]. The formation of a radioiodinated Ab structure containing a phenolic group and iodine atom in the ortho position, using the abovementioned methods, may increase susceptibility for deiodination of the Ab due to deiodinase enzymes involved in thyroid hormone metabolism.
The N-succinimidyl 4-iodobenzoate (SIB) based method (derived from Bolton-Hunter), addresses this problem. The method consists of labeling the N-succinimidyl (tri-n-butylstannyl) benzoate precursor with radioactive iodine via iododestannylation and further on attaching the complex randomly to lysine residues of the Ab. Differences between both labeling strategies are the absence of a hydroxyl group and the location of iodine in the para position. Indeed, in a biodistribution study comparing both chloramine-T and SIB radiolabeling methods in human melanoma xenografts in nude mice has shown decreased thyroid uptake for an Ab radiolabeled using the SIB method, indicating improved in vivo stability [87].
Once the Ab-antigen complex is internalized, it is generally rapidly taken up within lysosomes. Ab catabolism in these lysosomes increases the clearance of iodotyrosine, uptake in the thyroid and therefore resulting in low tumor to background ratios [88]. This can be overcome by using a non-hydrolysable dilactitol-tyramine (DLT) linker coupled with radioactive iodine, which keeps it inside cells once the Ab-antigen complex is internalized resulting in increased tumor/blood and tumor/organ ratios when compared to chloramine-T [89].
In a more recent study radio-iodinated BODIPY was investigated as a prosthetic group for nuclear and optical dual functional labelling agent of trastuzumab. [123I]I-BODIPY-trastuzumab was evaluated in HER2-positive N87 tumor bearing mice. SPECT/CT images revealed clear visualization of the tumor and importantly showed no thyroid radioactivity accumulation, indicating adequate stability of the radiotracer [90].
Ab radiolabeling was pioneered with immuno-PET (124I) and -SPECT(123I) tracers, with more than 60 years of research, making translation in humans possible. In a subset of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer 83% of the primary lesions were detected by [124I]I-huA33 Ab immuno-PET. All liver and 57% nodal metastasis could be detected by [124I]I-huA33 scans [91]. Delaloye et al. was able to successfully visualize 86% of the known tumor sites with [123I]I-anti-CEA immuno-SPECT [92]. A theranostic approach with 131I has been evaluated in patients as well with [131I]-Tositumomab, an anti-CD20 mAb targeting lymphoid malignancies which received FDA approval in 2003 [93].

4.1.2. 76Bromine

The high positron branching ratio β+ (55%) is the main advantage of 76Bromine (t1/2 = 16.2 h) resulting in increased image sensitivity whereas in other radionuclides this is remarkably lower (124I; 23%, 89Zr; 23%). Unfortunately, the emitted positrons are highly energetic which generates decreased intrinsic spatial resolution and can raise radiation dose concerns. In addition, the half-life of 76Bromine is suboptimal for Ab imaging, with other better alternatives available (124I; 4.2 days and 89Zr; 3.3 days). Besides the aforementioned challenges the major problem of 76Bromine is the availability, large scale production and expensive enriched 76Se targets resulting in lack of extensive and additional research.
Direct radiobromination of the Ab can be performed in similar manner as radioiodination [94]. However, due to the lower oxidation potential of 76Br suboptimal yields are achieved, which implies the use of more powerful oxidizing agents, at the risk of further impacting Ab stability and immunoreactivity. Therefore, an indirect radiolabeling approach was developed, where the initial precursor molecule was radiolabeled with 76Br and subsequently coupled to the Ab via amine groups on lysine residues. Several precursor molecules have been investigated: succin-imidyl-3(4-hydroxypentyl) propionate (SHPP), N-succinimidyl bromobenzoate and 7-(p-isothiocyanato-phenyl)dodecahydro-7,8-dicarba-nido-undecaborate(1-) ion (NBI) [95,96]. The highest yield (56%) was obtained using NBI as precursor [97]. While all prosthetic groups described above resulted in increased immunoreactivity of the Ab compared to direct radiobromination only NBI radiobrominated Abs showed cellular retention. Reduced enzymatic debromination and radioactive exocytosis of this prosthetic group is related to the molecular structure which is completely foreign to the body. Since iodine and bromine have similar chemical properties it is hypothesized that the similar tracer metabolization and excretion pathways take place [98].
In vivo studies of 76Brominated Abs have been successfully performed. A comparative PET imaging study comparing 76Br-labeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen mAb [76Br]Br-38S1, [18F]FDG and L-[methyl-11C]methionine ([11C]Met) in human colon carcinoma bearing rats showed that [76Br]Br-38S1 was the superior imaging agent, with higher tumor/tissue ratios [99,100]. However, translation to clinical trials with brominated Abs are limited or even non-existent, possibly the result of the combined challenges discussed in the first paragraph when using 76Bromine.

4.1.3. 89Zirconium

89Zirconium, with a half-life of 3.3 days, is a suitable radioisotope for Ab imaging, since the half-life matches the clearance of the biological vector. It decays to 89mY via β+ (23%) and electron capture (EC) with additional decay to ground state via γ rays (100%, 909 keV) [101]. 89Zr offers higher quality PET images because of its more favorable β+ energies when compared to 124I. 89Zr can be produced easily and is available worldwide with high purity >99.9%.
The major difference and benefit of 89Zr over the beforementioned radionuclides is the residualizing characteristic, meaning that it becomes trapped in the target cells after Ab internalization, whereas non-residualizing 124I (or 76Br) is excreted as iodotyrosine from the tumor cells when directly labeled to the Ab (Figure 4). In a comparison study between 89Zr and 124I radiolabeled chimeric mAb U36, 124I-U36 (16% ID/g) was outperformed by [89Zr]Zr-DFO-U36 (23% ID/g) with respect to tumor uptake at 72 h pi This residualizing characteristic increased the overall tumor/ background ratio and thus image quality. However, depending on the biodistribution of the antibody, residualizing of 89Zr may occur throughout the body and specifically in clearance organs (liver) resulting in an overall higher background activity [102].
Up to now, the most commonly used chelator for 89Zr is desferrioxamine (DFO) and is still heavily used due to lack of other affordable and commercially available alternatives in the past. In general, the BFC is attached at random to the Ab, since this method is the easiest achieved and can be radiolabeled in neutral pH at acceptable temperature (37 °C) with high yield (>98%), excellent purity (>99%) and good specific activity (5 mCi/mg) [103]. However, in vivo implementation of the [89Zr]Zr-DFO-Ab tracers showed instability of the DFO complex. Non-chelated 89Zr accumulates in bone, with values that reach >10% ID/g, 5 days pi. The effect is more pronounced in internalizing Abs, which suggests a role for catabolism of the [89Zr]Zr-DFO-Ab in the cell and removal of 89Zr, transchelated to proteins, out of the cell. Transchelation of 89Zr to plasma proteins is mentioned as well as possible cause of high bone uptake [2]. Remarkably, the unwanted bone uptake seems to be prominent in rodents as it is hardly an issue in patients [104].
The development of a new chelators DFO* and cycloDFO*, with four hydroxamate groups, showed reduced femur uptake in a comparison study in SKOV3 tumor bearing mice to DFO with 1.5% ID/g, 2.0% ID/g and 4.5% ID/g for [89Zr]Zr-cycloDFO*-trastuzumab, [89Zr]Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab and [89Zr]Zr-DFO-trastuzumab 168h pi respectively [105]. Using another linker, desferrioxamine squaramide (DFOsq) showed better results compared to NCS-DFO, reducing bone uptake but not as pronounced as using chelator DFO* [106]. 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-hydroxypyridinone) (HOPO), which contains hydroxypyridinone groups instead of hydroxamate groups showed in vitro less favorable complex stability then DFO but outperformed DFO in vivo with 2.4% ID/g bone uptake compared to DFO, 17.0% ID/g at 14 days pi [107]. In a recent study using a mini-explorer total body PET system researchers were able to scan 30 days post injection in rhesus monkeys with 89Zr radiolabeled Abs, and therefore opening new possibilities of disease monitoring [108].
89Zr-immuno-PET tracers have been extensively translated into the clinic, with numerous examples available. The most well-known examples are [89Zr]Zr-DFO-trastuzumab and [89Zr]Zr-DFO-bevacizumab. Trastuzumab binds to HER2 receptors, which are expressed in breast cancer. Of breast cancer patients only 20–30% are HER2 positive and only these will benefit from Herceptin®(trastuzumab) treatment. [89Zr]Zr-DFO-trastuzumab has proven to be a reliable biomarker in oncology. In a subset of HER2 negative primary breast cancer patients [89Zr]Zr-DFO-trastuzumab was able to detect unsuspected HER2 positive metastases in 15% of the patients [109]. Also, in breast cancer patients with unclear HER2 (positive/negative) status after normal evaluation with [18F]-FDG PET-scan, [89Zr]Zr-DFO-trastuzumab immuno-PET could assist physicians in treatment planning [110]. Additionally, [89Zr]Zr-DFO-trastuzumab was shown to be useful in response prediction of patients treated with TDM-1 (trastuzumab-emtansine antibody drug conjugate) [4].
The target of bevacizumab is VEGF-A, which is overexpressed in different tumor types and is involved in the development and maintenance of tumor angiogenesis. In primary breast cancer [89Zr]Zr-DFO-bevacizumab was able to image 25 of 26 breast tumors [111]. In patients with neuroendocrine tumors [89Zr]Zr-DFO-bevacizumab was able to detect a treatment effect of everolimus, with a 35% tumor SUVmax decrease [112]. An additional pilot study in 7 NSCLC patients showed a SUVpeak that was 4 times higher than in normal tissues [113].
The PD-1/PD-L1 axis has been shown to induce anti-cancer immunity when blocked by Abs. Clinical trials with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 have shown impressive results in heavily treated cancer patients, rekindling the interest of immunotherapy in oncology [114]. However, not all patients benefit from these treatments which results in sometimes rather low response rates, combined with high treatment costs. 89Zr-immuno-PET scans for baseline and response assessment may be beneficial in patient selection and predicting treatment success. Clinical trials evaluating [89Zr]Zr-DFO-nivolumab (targeting PD-1) are currently ongoing but in an initial study of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-nivolumab and [18F]F-anti-PD-L1 adnectin whole body PET/ CT scans correlated with tumor PD-1 and PD-L1 expression as assessed by IHC [115]. In addition Bensch et al. reported in an [89Zr]Zr-DFO-atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) study in patients treated with atezolizumab a better predictive value in tracer uptake then IHC as treatment response [116].
Long circulation times of 89Zr-mAbs accompanied with high energy γ-rays require careful assessment to limit radiation related toxicity. For example, an early phase [89Zr]Zr-trastuzumab study reported a whole body effective dose of 0.47 mSv/MBq whereas [18F]F-FDG PET reported a mean effective dose of only 0.0199 mSv/MBq [6,117]. More interestingly, using [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-HER2-nanobody resulted in an effective dose of only 0.043 mSv/MBq [16].

4.1.4. 64Copper

64Copper a with half-life of 12.7 h, decays to 64Zn via β (38%) and to 64Ni via β+ (18%) and EC (44%). While its half-life is too short for Ab imaging and more suited for Ab fragment imaging, it has been actively investigated, as its dual β emission makes 64Cu a good candidate for both PET imaging and therapy [118,119]. In addition, since the 64Cu emits lower positron-energy than other radionuclides discussed here, e.g., 66Ga and 89Zr, 64Cu-immunoPET images exhibit better resolution with high quality [120].
Numerous chelators for [64Cu]Cu2+ complexation are available, as reviewed by Price et al. who concluded that 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA) is the current reference standard and suitable for mAb imaging. New chelators are still being developed but most conventional chelators have acceptable in vivo stability within the 48 h pi timeframe desired for 64Cu imaging [121].
Even though the half-life of 64Cu (12.7 h) is not ideal for antibody radiolabeling it has been investigated in patients, mostly using [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab. Mortimer et al. was able to show strong correlation between [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab uptake and HER2 status [122].

4.1.5. 86Yttrium

86Yttrium (t1/2 = 14.7 h) has high energy β+ (32%) decay, accompanied by high energy γ-rays (139–4900 keV) which shows less favorable intrinsic characteristics than those of 89Zr for immuno-PET imaging. Similar to 64Cu, the half-life seems short for imaging of large mAbs, and thus more suitable for imaging mAb fragments. Despite the available diagnostic/therapeutic 86Y/90Y matched-pair (which allows the use of same chelator) for radio-treatment and PET follow up interest in clinical practice is very limited, mostly due to the unfavorable half-life and high energy gamma-rays [123].
Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) is one of the first generation chelators and has been successfully used to complex yttrium to mAbs [124]. Unfortunately, suboptimal in vivo stability of these radiolabeled Abs was observed [125]. This has encouraged the research community to develop new chelators for this radiometal, such as cyclohexyl-diethylenetriaminepenta acetic acid (CHX-A″-DTPA) that has been used in multiple 86Y immuno-PET studies with good stability [126]. However, the modified chelator is still considered less stable in vivo compared to DOTA [125]. While CHX-A″-DTPA and DOTA show good stability, labeling generally requires mild heating (40–60 °C) and long reaction times (30–60 min). Other new chelators, 5p-C-NETA and H4octapa have also been developed with promising stabilities for yttrium radiolabeling of Abs [127,128].
Currently no in human studies with 86Y-mAb are available. However, the radiometal is heavily studied in preclinical work. Nayak et al. was able to visualize EGFR expressing xenografts of colorectal, prostate, ovarian and pancreatic tumors using [86Y]Y-CHX-A’’-DTPA-cetuximab [129]. Generally, 90Y-immunotherapy dose limiting studies are calculated based on 111In-mAb biodistribution in clinical setting. However, a preclinical comparison study between [86Y]Y-CHX-A’’-DTPA-hu3S193 and [111In]In-CHX-A’’-DTPA-hu3S193 Abs in HCT-15 xenograft mice did show differences in distribution, related to the different radiometal attached. Therefore, calculating absorbed dose estimates and exposure based on 111In-mAb would result in inaccurate values [130]. In addition, the PET diagnostic/therapeutic 89Zr/90Y pair was evaluated in a clinical setting and 89Zr-mAb was able to predict biodistribution and dose limiting organ toxicity of the 90Y-mAb [131]. However, 86Y as a surrogate for 90Y seems to be more suitable than 89Zr since the uptake of 89Zr-cetuximab in the bone was higher than that of 86Y-cetuximab [132].

4.1.6. 111Indium

Over the past decades Indium (111In) has been the reference standard in immuno-SPECT imaging of Abs. 111In (t1/2 = 2.8 days) which decays by EC (100%) and low energy γ-rays emission (171 keV, 245 keV), has shown more favorable characteristics for in vivo Ab imaging compared to frequently used 123I in half life and to 131I in imaging quality [82]. In a comparison study 5 patients received both [131I]I-anti-CEA and [111In]In-anti-CEA in which [111In]In-anti-CEA could confirm 87% of the tumor lesions and [131I]I-anti-CEA only 53%. In addition tumor/background ratio was considerably higher for [111In]In-anti-CEA SPECT scans [133]. In addition, when comparing [111In]In-DTPA-trastuzumab and [89Zr]Zr-DFO-trastuzumab in SKOV3 xenograft similar tumor uptake (39.3% ID/g vs 33.4% ID/g) 6 days pi and similar biodistribution could be observed except for the bone. However, the spatial resolution provided by [89Zr]Zr-DFO-trastuzumab was unattainable with [111In]In-DTPA-trastuzumab [2].
The chelators DOTA, DTPA and the derivative CHX-A’’-DTPA can be complexed with [111In]In3+ and all bioconjugates show good in vivo stability. DTPA is generally considered as reference standard for 111In immuno-SPECT radiolabeling, while the use of CHX-A’’-DTPA in the preclinical setting is limited. The optimal chelator to use with 111In remains to be identified [134].
The clinical translation of 111In-labeled Abs has been successful in several types of human cancer. [111In]-trastuzumab was evaluated in HER2 positive breast cancer patients where it showed a detection rate of 45% [135]. [111In]In-J591, a mAb targeting PSMA in the neo-vasculature of non-prostate solid tumor, was able to detect 74% skeletal, 53% nodes and 64% soft tissue/organ lesions [136].

4.1.7. 99mTechnetium

The development of Abs labeled with technetium has been facilitated by the easy availability of this radionuclide from commercial 99Mo/99mTc generators. The intrinsic characteristics of 99mTc except for the half-life (t1/2 = 6 h) are favorable for immuno-SPECT with 99%, 140 keV γ emission. Owing to its stable and readily accessible oxidation states (between −1 and +7), 99mTc has a versatile chemistry, making it possible to produce a variety of complexes with specific desired characteristics, which is a major advantage for Ab conjugate development. The multiple oxidation states are characterized by chemically robust core structures that can be exploited as platforms for the labeling of Abs with technetium [137].
Both indirect and direct radiolabeling strategies have been investigated with 99mTc. Direct radiolabeling is done by first reducing the disulfide bonds of the Ab. These free thiols are then radiolabeled by transchelation of 99mTc from 99mTc-glucoheptonate or 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate [138]. However, reducing these bonds may lead to Ab aggregation and degradation. Additionally, the reducing agent SnO2, required for reducing 99mTc, can reduce functional groups on the Ab, which results in even more stability issues or reduced immunoreactivity [139].
An indirect way of radiolabeling 99mTc is by using bifunctional chelators. DTPA and hydrazine nicotinamide (HYNIC) have been conjugated and radiolabeled successfully to Abs [140,141]. A comparison study between direct and indirect (e.g., using [99mTc]Tc-DTPA/ [99mTc]Tc-HYNIC labeled Abs) radiolabeling methods showed better Ab stability when using indirect methods [142,143]. However, comparing both methods in vivo with immuno-SPECT reference standard 111In-labeled Abs only resulted in similar observations with the [99mTc]Tc-HYNIC labeled Abs, indicating the superiority of the [99mTc]Tc-HYNIC over the DTPA labeling method [143].
Indirect radiolabeling of Abs with 99mTc is an improvement over direct labeling but the method still suffers from random binding of 99mTc (without chelator), formation/binding of colloids to the Ab and difficulties in controlling the oxidation state of 99mTc. Complexation of 99mTc to a (diamide dithiolate) N2S2 ligand (e.g., 4,5-bis(thioacetamide)pentanoate) prior to conjugation to the Ab can remove these issues. This ligand is functionalized with a COO group, which can be activated by an ester group and attached to the lysines of the Ab in similar manner as described before [144].
99mTc-radiolabeled Abs have been successfully translated to patients. In a subset of 10 patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) a moderately increase in [99mTc]Tc-rituximab (anti-CD20) activity could be observed in all but one CT-scan confirmed NHL [145]. In another clinical trial using anti-EGF-r radiolabeled Ab [99mTc]Tc-h-R3 could a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 76.5% be observed [146].

4.2. Emerging Radionuclides

In this part of the review paper some emerging radionuclides are highlighted. The studies mentioned here represent for some of these the first data on radiolabeling, chelator, stability and immuno-PET/SPECT imaging. Some of them show interesting characteristics as discussed below but additional research and comparison studies will be required to conclude if these emerging radionuclides will impact the current field of immuno-PET/SPECT.

4.2.1. 52Manganese

52Manganese (t1/2 = 5.6 days) is probably the most promising radionuclide entering the field of immuno-PET. 52Mn has suitable half-life for Ab imaging and a comparable positron branching ratio (29.7%) and energy (242 keV) as 89Zr (23%/ 396 keV). However, the radiometal is accompanied with rather high energy γ-rays (744 keV, 935 keV and 1434 keV) resulting in high radiation burden and a negative impact on the imaging quality [147].
Extensive comparison of 52Manganese complexation using different chelators is still absent, but DOTA could be easily radiolabeled at room temperature, neutral pH and <1 min. Follow-up in vitro stability tests showed intact tracer up to 2 days in bovine serum [148].
Up until now only one in vivo study using 52Mn-mAb has been performed. In this study an anti-CD105 Ab, [52Mn]Mn-DOTA-TRC105, was used to investigate angiogenesis in a 4T1 breast cancer xenograft model. The tumor could be visualized in this model with peak tumor uptake of 19% ID/g at 24 h pi (Figure 4).
Importantly, no in vivo instability of the [52Mn]Mn-DOTA-TRC105 complex could be observed. Remarkably, high bone uptake was present in [52Mn]Mn-DOTA-TRC105 but not in 52MnCl2 injected mice, which the authors explained as a direct interaction between bone and DOTA-bound manganese instead of bone seeking properties of 52Mn [149].

4.2.2. Gallium

68Gallium (t1/2 = 67.71 min) has been extensively used in radio-pharmacy and made available worldwide due to the 68Ge/68Ga generator. Whilst successfully implemented in patients for immuno-PET imaging of nanobodies, its short half-life makes it unsuitable for full mAb imaging [16]. However, the isotopes 66Ga (PET) (t1/2 = 9.5 h) and 67Ga (SPECT) (t1/2 = 3.3 days) are more suited and have been investigated for mAb imaging, but their availability is not so straightforward. Gallium radiochemistry/labeling has been extensively studied due to the popularity of 68Ga providing a large advantage for 66Ga/67Ga immuno-PET/SPECT in animal models.
Numerous chelators can be complexed with gallium (see Tsionou et al. [150]). The different isotopes of gallium can be complexed and radiolabeled in a similar way. The ability to radiolabel gallium in mild conditions, low temperature and neutral pH, are of great importance in selecting the right chelator for immuno-PET/SPECT imaging, to avoid Ab degradation and denaturation. The chelator that has been specifically made for gallium radiolabeling using this purpose, with reduced cavity size compared to DOTA, is NOTA [150].
66Gallium has been successfully evaluated in vivo, with [66Ga]Ga-NOTA-TRC105 mAb able to image CD105 in 4T1 xenografts. Tumor uptake was 8.5% ID/g at 20 h pi [151]. Goethals et al. evaluated 66Ga-antimyosin Ab in two dogs and were able to image posterior wall necrosis in myocardial infarction [152]. However, clinical translation of this radiometal is hindered or even impossible because of high energy β+ emission and abundant high energy γ-rays (1039 (37%), 2752 (23%), and 4295 keV (4%)), which would result in poor imaging quality, reduced spatial resolution and high radiation burden for patients.
67Gallium proved to have potential for in vivo immuno-SPECT as shown by Milani et al. In their study [67Ga]Ga-DTPA-anti-Ror1 mAb was evaluated 4T1 xenografts and showed 6.5% ID/g tumor uptake [153]. Translation of [67Ga]Ga-DFO-anti-CEA-mAb to the clinic was even possible and showed detection of 86% of the primary tumor sites [154].

4.2.3. 90Niobium

90Niobium(t1/2 = 14.6 h) has been getting attention from the radio-pharmacy research community for Ab imaging, probably due to the suitable characteristics of the radiometal, especially the high positron branching ratio (51%) and acceptable positron energy (662 keV). The positron energy is more favorable compared to other less explored radionuclides (86Y, 66Ga, 72As) but higher than the conventional radioisotope 89Zr [155]. Some limitations are the high energy γ ray co-emission, which results in high radiation dose, decreased imaging quality and suboptimal half-life for Ab imaging, which is more suited for Ab fragments. However, the most important limitation is the 90Niobium production methods which are far from optimized and can contain long half-life co-produced Nb impurities due to the lack of enriched targets [156].
Since 90Nb-immuno-PET is still in an early stage, additional research is required to select more optimal chelators for mAb radiolabeling. An early complexation study between different chelators pointed at DFO as best suited chelator, within mild, Ab desired, reaction conditions [157]. This initial study prompted investigators to assess radiolabeled [90Nb]Nb-DFO-rituximab, which showed >90% yield after 1 h [158]. Radchenko et al. concluded these 90Nb-mAb radiolabeling experiments by assessing [90Nb]Nb-DFO-bevacizumab in a VEGF-transfected human breast cancer xenograft. Although tracer stability was good and tumor imaging feasible, only 3% ID/g uptake at 24 h pi was observed in the tumors, possibly due to the low specific activity of the [90Nb]Nb-DFO-rituximab [156].

4.2.4. Arsenic

Arsenic is a biological reactive element with strong binding to proteins resulting in systemic toxicity with fatal systemic exposure estimated at 0.6 mg/kg daily. However, when investigated as radiometal isotopes subtoxic doses are sufficient for the use as imaging agent [159]. This high biological reactivity is the main benefit over other radiometals since Arsenic can bind directly to sulfhydryl groups of Abs, avoiding the use of chelators and therefore facilitating the radiolabeling procedure [160]. In addition, the intrinsic characteristics of the radioisotope are favorable with high positron branching ratio of 72As (t1/2 = 1.1 days, β+ 86%) and possible theragnostic 74As (t1/2 = 17.8 days, β+ 26%/ β). A drawback of 72As is the high energy positrons resulting in decreased resolution and high radiation dose. In addition, production and supply of clinical grade 72As is questionable with only a few production sites available worldwide
In a first proof of concept study, Jennewein et al. modified Abs with N-succinimidyl S-acetylthioacetate (SATA), to introduce additional sulfhydryl groups onto the Ab. [74As]As-SATA-bavituximab was then evaluated in R3327-AT1 tumor rat xenografts showing promising tumor/muscle ratios, however at 72 h pi only 0.65% ID/g tumor radiotracer uptake could be observed ex vivo [161]. In more recent work Ellison et al. radiolabeled TRC105 mAb directly (by reducing Ab thiol groups using TCEP) and indirectly after introducing sulfhydryl groups via Traut’s reagent with 72As. In both approaches identical biodistribution with free 72As could be observed, showing rapid renal clearance and therefore confirming in vivo dearsenylation and concluding Traut’s reagent as suboptimal arsenic radiolabeling technique [162]. Currently, arsenic immuno-PET mainly suffers from in vivo dearsenylation, which demands the development of better suited chelators before additional immuno-PET research can be done. Alternative concepts have been introduced to solve these stability concerns using dithiol-containing dihydrolipoic acid or trithiol ligands, which resulted in the formation of stable complexes [162,163]. However, in current stage 72As/74As still has a long way to go before translation to clinic is even remotely possible.

5. Conclusions and Future Directions

Preclinical applications of immuno-PET/SPECT are being heavily investigated introducing new technologies and solutions to old problems. However, translation of different radiotracers to the clinic is somewhat hampered, mostly because of absent validation of immuno-PET/SPECT radiotracers in a specific disease setting. In our understanding, implementing immuno-PET/SPECT in clinical practice would result in personalizing medicine: evaluating target expression and therapeutic regimens, predicting response, improving benefit/cost ratio, and therefore optimizing patient care. This claim has been endorsed in numerous clinical studies using [89Zr]Zr-DFO-trastuzumab, [89Zr]Zr-DFO-bevacizumab, [89Zr]Zr-DFO-nivolumab and others. Another important application of immuno-PET/SPECT is the biopharmaceutical antibody development process. Implementation and evaluation of antibody radioimmunoconjugates in animal models and early phase clinical trials have the ability to reduce costs and boost effectiveness. For example, identification of unwanted biodistribution or enriching patient selection.
To conclude this review paper and to answer which strategies are the best to answer which strategies are the best when creating your antibody-PET/SPECT radiotracer is not that straightforward. In bioconjugation one you opt for randomly or site-specifically bioconjugates? Site-specific bioconjugation is undoubtably beneficial to produce homogenous conjugates and reduce batch to batch variability and therefore address the major concern of regulatory authorities. However, creating site-specifically immunoconjugates can be challenging in some strategies and require extensive know-how. In addition, when evaluating the benefit of site-specifically over randomly Ab bioconjugates regarding immunoreactivity, it seems from results discussed above that the impact is not that distinct in some approaches. Full mAbs contain large Fc regions and when your chelator is attached to this region impact on immunoreactivity is expected to be minimal. On the other hand, when using Ab fragments as your targeting vector immunoreactive impact will be more defined and these will benefit more from site-specific conjugation.
Is pretargeting then the way to go in selecting your immuno-PET/SPECT tracer? The pretargeting approach allows the introduction of short-lived radionuclides in immuno-PET/SPECT, which generally show better intrinsic properties (high positron branching ratio, low positron energies) than longer lived radioisotopes and additionally reduces the radiation dose exposure for subjects. However, internalization of the targeted vector reduces the amount of available moiety for radioligand binding and downstream radiotracer uptake in the tumor. In contrast, directly radiolabeled Ab internalization after binding generally results in tumor cell residualization of the radioactivity and therefore increased tumor imaging contrast.
What radioisotope is perfect for your application? This is by far the most difficult question to answer since all radioisotopes show benefits and limitations as discussed above. Generally, the half-life of the radionuclide and biological vector (Ab) should match in decay and clearance respectively (89Zr, 124I, 111In), but perhaps shorter-lived radionuclides show better intrinsic characteristics for your application (64Cu, 74As theragnostic). The initial proof of concept of some of the emerging radionuclides (90Nb, 52Mn) show great results and can perhaps have a bright future in immuno-PET. Unfortunately, the current major concern is their availability and purity, which explains their under investigated application potential. Several other, conventional radionuclides (124I,89Zr,64Cu,99mTc,111In) have been made available worldwide with clinical grade application potential. The intrinsic characteristics are also important in selecting your radionuclide. In PET, high positron branching ratio (72As, 76Br, 90Nb), low positron energy (89Zr, 74As, 64Cu, 52Mn, 90Nb) and low energy γ emission (64Cu) are required for optimal image quality. In SPECT imaging single photon emission radionuclides (99mTc, 111In) are desired over multiple high energy emission radionuclides (123I, 67Ga). A final aspect that has to be considered is the radiation exposure, which is highest in long lived radio-isotopes with high positron energy and γ emission. This may represent an important aspect that could result in failure to acquire approval of Ab-PET/SPECT tracer by the regulatory authorities. However, in radiolabeled Ab fragments this is less of a problem since these are radiolabeled with short half-live radioisotopes and undergo faster clearance, but accumulation in the kidneys can result in renal toxicity. In addition, introducing new generation PET/SPECT-scanners with improved sensitivity can overcome the issue of radiation exposure for regulatory authorities and facilitate the use of immuno-PET/SPECT in the upcoming years.
This review paper showed the remarkable possibilities and successes that immuno-PET/SPECT has achieved over the past decades. While breakthrough applications in routine clinical care are currently still pending, we are convinced that this will change in the upcoming years.

Author Contributions

All authors have contributed substantially to the work and read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Reddy, S.; Robinson, M.K. Immuno-positron emission tomography in cancer models. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2010, 40, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Dijkers, E.C.; Kosterink, J.G.; Rademaker, A.P.; Perk, L.R.; van Dongen, G.A.; Bart, J.; de Jong, J.R.; de Vries, E.G.; Lub-de Hooge, M.N. Development and characterization of clinical-grade 89Zr-trastuzumab for HER2/neu immunoPET imaging. J. Nucl. Med. 2009, 50, 974–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Mirabelli, P.; Incoronato, M. Usefulness of traditional serum biomarkers for management of breast cancer patients. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 685641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Gebhart, G.; Lamberts, L.E.; Wimana, Z.; Garcia, C.; Emonts, P.; Ameye, L.; Stroobants, S.; Huizing, M.; Aftimos, P.; Tol, J.; et al. Molecular imaging as a tool to investigate heterogeneity of advanced HER2-positive breast cancer and to predict patient outcome under trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1): The ZEPHIR trial. Ann. Oncol. 2016, 27, 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gaykema, S.B.; de Jong, J.R.; Perik, P.J.; Brouwers, A.H.; Schroder, C.P.; Oude Munnink, T.H.; Bongaerts, A.H.; de Vries, E.G.; Lub-de Hooge, M.N. (111)In-trastuzumab scintigraphy in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients remains feasible during trastuzumab treatment. Mol. Imaging. 2014, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Laforest, R.; Lapi, S.E.; Oyama, R.; Bose, R.; Tabchy, A.; Marquez-Nostra, B.V.; Burkemper, J.; Wright, B.D.; Frye, J.; Frye, S.; et al. [(89)Zr]Trastuzumab: Evaluation of Radiation Dosimetry, Safety, and Optimal Imaging Parameters in Women with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Mol. Imaging. Biol. 2016, 18, 952–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Hijnen, N.M.; de Vries, A.; Nicolay, K.; Grull, H. Dual-isotope 111In/177Lu SPECT imaging as a tool in molecular imaging tracer design. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 2012, 7, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Knight, J.C.; Mosley, M.J.; Kersemans, V.; Dias, G.M.; Allen, P.D.; Smart, S.; Cornelissen, B. Dual-isotope imaging allows in vivo immunohistochemistry using radiolabelled antibodies in tumours. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2019, 70, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Roux, K.H. Immunoglobulin structure and function as revealed by electron microscopy. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 1999, 120, 85–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Adumeau, P.; Sharma, S.K.; Brent, C.; Zeglis, B.M. Site-Specifically Labeled Immunoconjugates for Molecular Imaging—Part 1: Cysteine Residues and Glycans. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2016, 18, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lu, R.M.; Hwang, Y.C.; Liu, I.J.; Lee, C.C.; Tsai, H.Z.; Li, H.J.; Wu, H.C. Development of therapeutic antibodies for the treatment of diseases. J. Biomed. Sci. 2020, 27, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Weiner, L.M.; Surana, R.; Wang, S. Monoclonal antibodies: Versatile platforms for cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 10, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Irani, V.; Guy, A.J.; Andrew, D.; Beeson, J.G.; Ramsland, P.A.; Richards, J.S. Molecular properties of human IgG subclasses and their implications for designing therapeutic monoclonal antibodies against infectious diseases. Mol. Immunol. 2015, 67, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Vivier, D.; Sharma, S.K.; Adumeau, P.; Rodriguez, C.; Fung, K.; Zeglis, B.M. The Impact of FcgammaRI Binding on Immuno-PET. J. Nucl. Med. 2019, 60, 1174–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Baruah, K.; Bowden, T.A.; Krishna, B.A.; Dwek, R.A.; Crispin, M.; Scanlan, C.N. Selective deactivation of serum IgG: A general strategy for the enhancement of monoclonal antibody receptor interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 2012, 420, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Keyaerts, M.; Xavier, C.; Heemskerk, J.; Devoogdt, N.; Everaert, H.; Ackaert, C.; Vanhoeij, M.; Duhoux, F.P.; Gevaert, T.; Simon, P.; et al. Phase I Study of 68Ga-HER2-Nanobody for PET/CT Assessment of HER2 Expression in Breast Carcinoma. J. Nucl. Med. 2016, 57, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ryman, J.T.; Meibohm, B. Pharmacokinetics of Monoclonal Antibodies. CPT Pharmacomet. Syst. Pharm. 2017, 6, 576–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vidarsson, G.; Dekkers, G.; Rispens, T. IgG subclasses and allotypes: From structure to effector functions. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Fu, R.; Carroll, L.; Yahioglu, G.; Aboagye, E.O.; Miller, P.W. Antibody Fragment and Affibody ImmunoPET Imaging Agents: Radiolabelling Strategies and Applications. ChemMedChem 2018, 13, 2466–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Malmberg, J.; Perols, A.; Varasteh, Z.; Altai, M.; Braun, A.; Sandstrom, M.; Garske, U.; Tolmachev, V.; Orlova, A.; Karlstrom, A.E. Comparative evaluation of synthetic anti-HER2 Affibody molecules site-specifically labelled with 111In using N-terminal DOTA, NOTA and NODAGA chelators in mice bearing prostate cancer xenografts. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2012, 39, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Freise, A.C.; Wu, A.M. In vivo imaging with antibodies and engineered fragments. Mol. Immunol. 2015, 67, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Jain, N.; Smith, S.W.; Ghone, S.; Tomczuk, B. Current ADC Linker Chemistry. Pharm. Res. 2015, 32, 3526–3540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Ducry, L. Antibody-Drug Conjugates; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2013; Volume 1045. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cohen, R.; Vugts, D.J.; Stigter-van Walsum, M.; Visser, G.W.; van Dongen, G.A. Inert coupling of IRDye800CW and zirconium-89 to monoclonal antibodies for single- or dual-mode fluorescence and PET imaging. Nat. Protoc. 2013, 8, 1010–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Vosjan, M.J.; Perk, L.R.; Visser, G.W.; Budde, M.; Jurek, P.; Kiefer, G.E.; van Dongen, G.A. Conjugation and radiolabeling of monoclonal antibodies with zirconium-89 for PET imaging using the bifunctional chelate p-isothiocyanatobenzyl-desferrioxamine. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 739–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Perk, L.R.; Vosjan, M.J.; Visser, G.W.; Budde, M.; Jurek, P.; Kiefer, G.E.; van Dongen, G.A. p-Isothiocyanatobenzyl-desferrioxamine: A new bifunctional chelate for facile radiolabeling of monoclonal antibodies with zirconium-89 for immuno-PET imaging. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2010, 37, 250–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Liu, H.; May, K. Disulfide bond structures of IgG molecules: Structural variations, chemical modifications and possible impacts to stability and biological function. MAbs 2012, 4, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Adumeau, P.; Davydova, M.; Zeglis, B.M. Thiol-Reactive Bifunctional Chelators for the Creation of Site-Selectively Modified Radioimmunoconjugates with Improved Stability. Bioconjug. Chem. 2018, 29, 1364–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Tinianow, J.N.; Gill, H.S.; Ogasawara, A.; Flores, J.E.; Vanderbilt, A.N.; Luis, E.; Vandlen, R.; Darwish, M.; Junutula, J.R.; Williams, S.P.; et al. Site-specifically 89Zr-labeled monoclonal antibodies for ImmunoPET. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2010, 37, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Slinkin, M.A.; Curtet, C.; Sai-Maurel, C.; Gestin, J.F.; Torchilin, V.P.; Chatal, J.F. Site-specific conjugation of chain-terminal chelating polymers to Fab’ fragments of anti-CEA mAb: Effect of linkage type and polymer size on conjugate biodistribution in nude mice bearing human colorectal carcinoma. Bioconjug. Chem. 1992, 3, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Alley, S.C.; Benjamin, D.R.; Jeffrey, S.C.; Okeley, N.M.; Meyer, D.L.; Sanderson, R.J.; Senter, P.D. Contribution of linker stability to the activities of anticancer immunoconjugates. Bioconjug. Chem. 2008, 19, 759–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Baldwin, A.D.; Kiick, K.L. Tunable degradation of maleimide-thiol adducts in reducing environments. Bioconjug. Chem. 2011, 22, 1946–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Ponte, J.F.; Sun, X.; Yoder, N.C.; Fishkin, N.; Laleau, R.; Coccia, J.; Lanieri, L.; Bogalhas, M.; Wang, L.; Wilhelm, S.; et al. Understanding How the Stability of the Thiol-Maleimide Linkage Impacts the Pharmacokinetics of Lysine-Linked Antibody-Maytansinoid Conjugates. Bioconjug. Chem. 2016, 27, 1588–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Toda, N.; Asano, S.; Barbas, C.F., 3rd. Rapid, stable, chemoselective labeling of thiols with Julia-Kocienski-like reagents: A serum-stable alternative to maleimide-based protein conjugation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2013, 52, 12592–12596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Sharma, S.K.; Glaser, J.M.; Edwards, K.J.; Khozeimeh Sarbisheh, E.; Salih, A.K.; Lewis, J.S.; Price, E.W. A Systematic Evaluation of Antibody Modification and (89)Zr-Radiolabeling for Optimized Immuno-PET. Bioconjug. Chem. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, L.; Amphlett, G.; Blattler, W.A.; Lambert, J.M.; Zhang, W. Structural characterization of the maytansinoid-monoclonal antibody immunoconjugate, huN901-DM1, by mass spectrometry. Protein Sci. 2005, 14, 2436–2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Vollmar, B.S.; Wei, B.; Ohri, R.; Zhou, J.; He, J.; Yu, S.F.; Leipold, D.; Cosino, E.; Yee, S.; Fourie-O’Donohue, A.; et al. Attachment Site Cysteine Thiol pKa Is a Key Driver for Site-Dependent Stability of THIOMAB Antibody-Drug Conjugates. Bioconjug. Chem. 2017, 28, 2538–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Junutula, J.R.; Raab, H.; Clark, S.; Bhakta, S.; Leipold, D.D.; Weir, S.; Chen, Y.; Simpson, M.; Tsai, S.P.; Dennis, M.S.; et al. Site-specific conjugation of a cytotoxic drug to an antibody improves the therapeutic index. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 925–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tavare, R.; Wu, W.H.; Zettlitz, K.A.; Salazar, F.B.; McCabe, K.E.; Marks, J.D.; Wu, A.M. Enhanced immunoPET of ALCAM-positive colorectal carcinoma using site-specific (6)(4)Cu-DOTA conjugation. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2014, 27, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Rodwell, J.D.; Alvarez, V.L.; Lee, C.; Lopes, A.D.; Goers, J.W.; King, H.D.; Powsner, H.J.; McKearn, T.J. Site-specific covalent modification of monoclonal antibodies: In vitro and in vivo evaluations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 2632–2636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Chengazi, V.U.; Feneley, M.R.; Ellison, D.; Stalteri, M.; Granowski, A.; Granowska, M.; Nimmon, C.C.; Mather, S.J.; Kirby, R.S.; Britton, K.E. Imaging prostate cancer with technetium-99m-7E11-C5.3 (CYT-351). J. Nucl. Med. 1997, 38, 675–682. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Bejot, R.; Goggi, J.; Moonshi, S.S.; Padmanabhan, P.; Bhakoo, K.K. Aminooxy-functionalized DOTA for radiolabeling of oxidized antibodies: Evaluation of site-specific 111In-labeled trastuzumab. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2012, 55, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, W.; Vlasak, J.; Li, Y.; Pristatsky, P.; Fang, Y.; Pittman, T.; Roman, J.; Wang, Y.; Prueksaritanont, T.; Ionescu, R. Impact of methionine oxidation in human IgG1 Fc on serum half-life of monoclonal antibodies. Mol. Immunol. 2011, 48, 860–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ramakrishnan, B.; Qasba, P.K. Structure-based design of beta 1,4-galactosyltransferase I (beta 4Gal-T1) with equally efficient N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase activity: Point mutation broadens beta 4Gal-T1 donor specificity. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 20833–20839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Zeglis, B.M.; Davis, C.B.; Aggeler, R.; Kang, H.C.; Chen, A.; Agnew, B.J.; Lewis, J.S. Enzyme-mediated methodology for the site-specific radiolabeling of antibodies based on catalyst-free click chemistry. Bioconjug. Chem. 2013, 24, 1057–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kristensen, L.K.; Christensen, C.; Jensen, M.M.; Agnew, B.J.; Schjoth-Frydendahl, C.; Kjaer, A.; Nielsen, C.H. Site-specifically labeled (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab improves immuno-reactivity and tumor uptake for immuno-PET in a subcutaneous HER2-positive xenograft mouse model. Theranostics 2019, 9, 4409–4420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Vivier, D.; Fung, K.; Rodriguez, C.; Adumeau, P.; Ulaner, G.A.; Lewis, J.S.; Sharma, S.K.; Zeglis, B.M. The Influence of Glycans-Specific Bioconjugation on the FcgammaRI Binding and In vivo Performance of (89)Zr-DFO-Pertuzumab. Theranostics 2020, 10, 1746–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Agatemor, C.; Buettner, M.J.; Ariss, R.; Muthiah, K.; Saeui, C.T.; Yarema, K.J. Exploiting metabolic glycoengineering to advance healthcare. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2019, 3, 605–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rochefort, M.M.; Girgis, M.D.; Ankeny, J.S.; Tomlinson, J.S. Metabolic exploitation of the sialic acid biosynthetic pathway to generate site-specifically labeled antibodies. Glycobiology 2013, 24, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Popp, M.W.; Ploegh, H.L. Making and breaking peptide bonds: Protein engineering using sortase. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2011, 50, 5024–5032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Massa, S.; Vikani, N.; Betti, C.; Ballet, S.; Vanderhaegen, S.; Steyaert, J.; Descamps, B.; Vanhove, C.; Bunschoten, A.; van Leeuwen, F.W.; et al. Sortase A-mediated site-specific labeling of camelid single-domain antibody-fragments: A versatile strategy for multiple molecular imaging modalities. Contrast. Media. Mol. Imaging 2016, 11, 328–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Jeger, S.; Zimmermann, K.; Blanc, A.; Grunberg, J.; Honer, M.; Hunziker, P.; Struthers, H.; Schibli, R. Site-specific and stoichiometric modification of antibodies by bacterial transglutaminase. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2010, 49, 9995–9997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ahn, S.H.; Vaughn, B.A.; Solis, W.A.; Lupher, M.L., Jr.; Hallam, T.J.; Boros, E. Site-Specific (89)Zr- and (111)In-Radiolabeling and In Vivo Evaluation of Glycan-free Antibodies by Azide-Alkyne Cycloaddition with a Non-natural Amino Acid. Bioconjug. Chem. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Abou, D.S.; Ku, T.; Smith-Jones, P.M. In vivo biodistribution and accumulation of 89Zr in mice. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2011, 38, 675–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Goodwin, D.A. Tumor pretargeting: Almost the bottom line. J. Nucl. Med. 1995, 36, 876–879. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Goodwin, D.; Meares, C.; Diamanti, C.; McCall, M.; Lai, C.; Torti, F.; McTigue, M.; Martin, B. Use of specific antibody for rapid clearance of circulating blood background from radiolabeled tumor imaging proteins. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 1984, 9, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Reardan, D.T.; Meares, C.F.; Goodwin, D.A.; McTigue, M.; David, G.S.; Stone, M.R.; Leung, J.P.; Bartholomew, R.M.; Frincke, J.M. Antibodies against metal chelates. Nature 1985, 316, 265–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Stickney, D.R.; Anderson, L.D.; Slater, J.B.; Ahlem, C.N.; Kirk, G.A.; Schweighardt, S.A.; Frincke, J.M. Bifunctional antibody: A binary radiopharmaceutical delivery system for imaging colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1991, 51, 6650–6655. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hnatowich, D.J.; Virzi, F.; Rusckowski, M. Investigations of avidin and biotin for imaging applications. J. Nucl. Med. 1987, 28, 1294–1302. [Google Scholar]
  60. Liu, G.; Dou, S.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Rusckowski, M.; Hnatowich, D.J. 90Y labeled phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer for pretargeting radiotherapy. Bioconjug. Chem. 2011, 22, 2539–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Liu, G.; Dou, S.; Cheng, D.; Leif, J.; Rusckowski, M.; Streeter, P.R.; Shultz, L.D.; Hnatowich, D.J.; Greiner, D.L. Human islet cell MORF/cMORF pretargeting in a xenogeneic murine transplant model. Mol. Pharm. 2011, 8, 767–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Wang, Y.; Chang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, N.; Liu, G.; Gupta, S.; Rusckowski, M.; Hnatowich, D.J. Pretargeting with amplification using polymeric peptide nucleic acid. Bioconjug. Chem. 2001, 12, 807–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Altai, M.; Membreno, R.; Cook, B.; Tolmachev, V.; Zeglis, B.M. Pretargeted Imaging and Therapy. J. Nucl. Med. 2017, 58, 1553–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Vugts, D.J.; Vervoort, A.; Stigter-van Walsum, M.; Visser, G.W.M.; Robillard, M.S.; Versteegen, R.M.; Vulders, R.C.M.; Herscheid, J.K.D.M.; van Dongen, G.A.M.S. Synthesis of phosphine and antibody-azide probes for in vivo Staudinger ligation in a pretargeted imaging and therapy approach. Bioconjug. Chem. 2011, 22, 2072–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. van den Bosch, S.M.; Rossin, R.; Renart Verkerk, P.; Ten Hoeve, W.; Janssen, H.M.; Lub, J.; Robillard, M.S. Evaluation of strained alkynes for Cu-free click reaction in live mice. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2013, 40, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Oliveira, B.L.; Guo, Z.; Bernardes, G.J.L. Inverse electron demand Diels–Alder reactions in chemical biology. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 4895–4950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Rossin, R.; Verkerk, P.R.; van den Bosch, S.M.; Vulders, R.C.; Verel, I.; Lub, J.; Robillard, M.S. In vivo chemistry for pretargeted tumor imaging in live mice. Angew. Chem. 2010, 49, 3375–3378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Houghton, J.L.; Zeglis, B.M.; Abdel-Atti, D.; Sawada, R.; Scholz, W.W.; Lewis, J.S. Pretargeted Immuno-PET of Pancreatic Cancer: Overcoming Circulating Antigen and Internalized Antibody to Reduce Radiation Doses. J. Nucl. Med. 2016, 57, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Evans, H.L.; Nguyen, Q.-D.; Carroll, L.S.; Kaliszczak, M.; Twyman, F.J.; Spivey, A.C.; Aboagye, E.O. A bioorthogonal 68Ga-labelling strategy for rapid in vivo imaging. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 9557–9560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Meyer, J.P.; Houghton, J.L.; Kozlowski, P.; Abdel-Atti, D.; Reiner, T.; Pillarsetty, N.V.; Scholz, W.W.; Zeglis, B.M.; Lewis, J.S. (18)F-Based Pretargeted PET Imaging Based on Bioorthogonal Diels-Alder Click Chemistry. Bioconjug. Chem. 2016, 27, 298–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Li, Z.; Cai, H.; Hassink, M.; Blackman, M.L.; Brown, R.C.D.; Conti, P.S.; Fox, J.M. Tetrazine–trans-cyclooctene ligation for the rapid construction of 18F labeled probes. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 8043–8045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Wyffels, L.; Thomae, D.; Waldron, A.-M.; Fissers, J.; Dedeurwaerdere, S.; Van der Veken, P.; Joossens, J.; Stroobants, S.; Augustyns, K.; Staelens, S. In vivo evaluation of 18F-labeled TCO for pre-targeted PET imaging in the brain. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2014, 41, 513–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Darko, A.; Wallace, S.; Dmitrenko, O.; Machovina, M.M.; Mehl, R.A.; Chin, J.W.; Fox, J.M. Conformationally Strained trans-Cyclooctene with Improved Stability and Excellent Reactivity in Tetrazine Ligation. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 3770–3776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Wang, M.; Svatunek, D.; Rohlfing, K.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Giglio, B.; Yuan, H.; Wu, Z.; Li, Z.; Fox, J. Conformationally Strained trans-Cyclooctene (sTCO) Enables the Rapid Construction of (18)F-PET Probes via Tetrazine Ligation. Theranostics 2016, 6, 887–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Billaud, E.M.F.; Belderbos, S.; Cleeren, F.; Maes, W.; Van de Wouwer, M.; Koole, M.; Verbruggen, A.; Himmelreich, U.; Geukens, N.; Bormans, G. Pretargeted PET Imaging Using a Bioorthogonal (18)F-Labeled trans-Cyclooctene in an Ovarian Carcinoma Model. Bioconjug. Chem. 2017, 28, 2915–2920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Zeglis, B.M.; Sevak, K.K.; Reiner, T.; Mohindra, P.; Carlin, S.D.; Zanzonico, P.; Weissleder, R.; Lewis, J.S. A pretargeted PET imaging strategy based on bioorthogonal Diels-Alder click chemistry. J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54, 1389–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Goodwin, D.A.; Meares, C.F.; McCall, M.J.; McTigue, M.; Chaovapong, W. Pre-targeted immunoscintigraphy of murine tumors with indium-111-labeled bifunctional haptens. J. Nucl. Med. 1988, 29, 226–234. [Google Scholar]
  78. Starling, J.J.; Law, K.L.; Hinson, N.A. Internalization studies using a panel of three monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed against the human adenocarcinoma-associated antigen, TAG-72. Antib. Immunoconj Radiopharm 1992, 5, 11. [Google Scholar]
  79. Ackerman, M.E.; Chalouni, C.; Schmidt, M.M.; Raman, V.V.; Ritter, G.; Old, L.J.; Mellman, I.; Wittrup, K.D. A33 antigen displays persistent surface expression. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2008, 57, 1017–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Keinanen, O.; Fung, K.; Pourat, J.; Jallinoja, V.; Vivier, D.; Pillarsetty, N.K.; Airaksinen, A.J.; Lewis, J.S.; Zeglis, B.M.; Sarparanta, M. Pretargeting of internalizing trastuzumab and cetuximab with a (18)F-tetrazine tracer in xenograft models. EJNMMI Res. 2017, 7, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Radford, L.L.; Lapi, S.E. Methods for the Production of Radionuclides for Medicine. In Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry; Lewis, J., Windhorst, A., Zeglis, B., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  82. Synowiecki, M.A.; Perk, L.R.; Nijsen, J.F.W. Production of novel diagnostic radionuclides in small medical cyclotrons. EJNMMI Radiopharm. Chem. 2018, 3, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Hunter, W.M.; Greenwood, F.C. Preparation of iodine-131 labelled human growth hormone of high specific activity. Nature 1962, 194, 495–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. David, G.S. Solid state lactoperoxidase: A highly stable enzyme for simple, gentle iodination of proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1972, 48, 464–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Salacinski, P.R.P.; McLean, C.; Sykes, J.E.C.; Clement-Jones, V.V.; Lowry, P.J. Iodination of proteins, glycoproteins, and peptides using a solid-phase oxidizing agent, 1,3,4,6-tetrachloro-3α,6α-diphenyl glycoluril (Iodogen). Anal. Biochem. 1981, 117, 136–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Rudinger, J.; Ruegg, U. Appendix: Preparation of N-succinimidyl 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propionate. Biochem. J. 1973, 133, 538–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Wilbur, D.S.; Hadley, S.W.; Hylarides, M.D.; Abrams, P.G.; Beaumier, P.A.; Morgan, A.C.; Reno, J.M.; Fritzberg, A.R. Development of a stable radioiodinating reagent to label monoclonal antibodies for radiotherapy of cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 1989, 30, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  88. Geissler, F.; Anderson, S.K.; Venkatesan, P.; Press, O. Intracellular catabolism of radiolabeled anti-mu antibodies by malignant B-cells. Cancer Res. 1992, 52, 2907–2915. [Google Scholar]
  89. Sharkey, R.M.; Behr, T.M.; Mattes, M.J.; Stein, R.; Griffiths, G.L.; Shih, L.B.; Hansen, H.J.; Blumenthal, R.D.; Dunn, R.M.; Juweid, M.E.; et al. Advantage of residualizing radiolabels for an internalizing antibody against the B-cell lymphoma antigen, CD22. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 1997, 44, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ono, M.; Watanabe, H.; Ikehata, Y.; Ding, N.; Yoshimura, M.; Sano, K.; Saji, H. Radioiodination of BODIPY and its application to a nuclear and optical dual functional labeling agent for proteins and peptides. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Carrasquillo, J.A.; Pandit-Taskar, N.; O’Donoghue, J.A.; Humm, J.L.; Zanzonico, P.; Smith-Jones, P.M.; Divgi, C.R.; Pryma, D.A.; Ruan, S.; Kemeny, N.E.; et al. (124)I-huA33 antibody PET of colorectal cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 2011, 52, 1173–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Delaloye, B.; Bischof-Delaloye, A.; Buchegger, F.; von Fliedner, V.; Grob, J.P.; Volant, J.C.; Pettavel, J.; Mach, J.P. Detection of colorectal carcinoma by emission-computerized tomography after injection of 123I-labeled Fab or F(ab’)2 fragments from monoclonal anti-carcinoembryonic antigen antibodies. J. Clin. Invest. 1986, 77, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Vose, J.M. Bexxar: Novel radioimmunotherapy for the treatment of low-grade and transformed low-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Oncologist 2004, 9, 160–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Tolmachev, V.; Lövqvist, A.; Einarsson, L.; Schultz, J.; Lundqvist, H. Production of 76Br by a low-energy cyclotron. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1998, 49, 1537–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wilbur, D.S.; Hylarides, M.D. Radiolabeling of a monoclonal antibody with N-succinimidyl para-(77Br)bromobenzoate. Int. J. Radiat. Appl. Instrum. Part B Nucl. Med. Biol. 1991, 18, 363–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Knight, L.C.; Harwig, S.L.; Welch, M.J. In vitro stability and in vivo clearance of fibrinogen or serum albumin labeled with 77Br, 131I, or 125I by direct or indirect synthetic methods. J. Nucl. Med. 1977, 18, 282–288. [Google Scholar]
  97. Winberg, K.J.; Persson, M.; Malmstrom, P.U.; Sjoberg, S.; Tolmachev, V. Radiobromination of anti-HER2/neu/ErbB-2 monoclonal antibody using the p-isothiocyanatobenzene derivative of the [76Br]undecahydro-bromo-7,8-dicarba-nido-undecaborate(1-) ion. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2004, 31, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bruskin, A.; Sivaev, I.; Persson, M.; Lundqvist, H.; Carlsson, J.; Sjoberg, S.; Tolmachev, V. Radiobromination of monoclonal antibody using potassium [76Br] (4 isothiocyanatobenzyl-ammonio)-bromo-decahydro-closo-dodecaborate (Bromo-DABI). Nucl. Med. Biol. 2004, 31, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Lövqvist, A.; Sundin, A.; Ahlström, H.; Carlsson, J.; Lundqvist, H. 76Br-labeled monoclonal anti-CEA antibodies for radioimmuno positron emission tomography. Nucl. Med. Biol. 1995, 22, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lövqvist, A.; Sundin, A.; Roberto, A.; Ahlström, H.; Carlsson, J.H.L. Comparative PET imaging of experimental tumors with bromine-76-labeled antibodies, fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose and carbon-11-methionine. J. Nucl. Med. 1997, 38. [Google Scholar]
  101. Holland, J.P.; Sheh, Y.; Lewis, J.S. Standardized methods for the production of high specific-activity zirconium-89. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2009, 36, 729–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Verel, I.; Visser, G.W.; Boerman, O.C.; van Eerd, J.E.; Finn, R.; Boellaard, R.; Vosjan, M.J.; Stigter-van Walsum, M.; Snow, G.B.; van Dongen, G.A. Long-lived positron emitters zirconium-89 and iodine-124 for scouting of therapeutic radioimmunoconjugates with PET. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2003, 18, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Price, E.W.; Carnazza, K.E.; Carlin, S.D.; Cho, A.; Edwards, K.J.; Sevak, K.K.; Glaser, J.M.; de Stanchina, E.; Janjigian, Y.Y.; Lewis, J.S. (89)Zr-DFO-AMG102 Immuno-PET to Determine Local Hepatocyte Growth Factor Protein Levels in Tumors for Enhanced Patient Selection. J. Nucl. Med. 2017, 58, 1386–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Bensch, F.; Smeenk, M.M.; van Es, S.C.; de Jong, J.R.; Schroder, C.P.; Oosting, S.F.; Lub-de Hooge, M.N.; Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, C.W.; Brouwers, A.H.; Boellaard, R.; et al. Comparative biodistribution analysis across four different (89)Zr-monoclonal antibody tracers-The first step towards an imaging warehouse. Theranostics 2018, 8, 4295–4304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Raave, R.; Sandker, G.; Adumeau, P.; Jacobsen, C.B.; Mangin, F.; Meyer, M.; Moreau, M.; Bernhard, C.; Da Costa, L.; Dubois, A.; et al. Direct comparison of the in vitro and in vivo stability of DFO, DFO* and DFOcyclo* for (89)Zr-immunoPET. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2019, 46, 1966–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Rudd, S.E.; Roselt, P.; Cullinane, C.; Hicks, R.J.; Donnelly, P.S. A desferrioxamine B squaramide ester for the incorporation of zirconium-89 into antibodies. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 11889–11892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Deri, M.A.; Ponnala, S.; Kozlowski, P.; Burton-Pye, B.P.; Cicek, H.T.; Hu, C.; Lewis, J.S.; Francesconi, L.C. p-SCN-Bn-HOPO: A Superior Bifunctional Chelator for (89)Zr ImmunoPET. Bioconjug. Chem. 2015, 26, 2579–2591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Rosenkrans, Z.T.; Cai, W. Total-Body PET Imaging for up to 30 Days After Injection of (89)Zr-Labeled Antibodies. J. Nucl. Med. 2020, 61, 451–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Ulaner, G.A.; Hyman, D.M.; Lyashchenko, S.K.; Lewis, J.S.; Carrasquillo, J.A. 89Zr-Trastuzumab PET/CT for Detection of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Metastases in Patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Primary Breast Cancer. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2017, 42, 912–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Bensch, F.; Brouwers, A.H.; Lub-de Hooge, M.N.; de Jong, J.R.; van der Vegt, B.; Sleijfer, S.; de Vries, E.G.E.; Schroder, C.P. (89)Zr-trastuzumab PET supports clinical decision making in breast cancer patients, when HER2 status cannot be determined by standard work up. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2018, 45, 2300–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Gaykema, S.B.M.; Brouwers, A.H.; Lub-de Hooge, M.N.; Pleijhuis, R.G.; Timmer-Bosscha, H.; Pot, L.; van Dam, G.M.; van der Meulen, S.B.; de Jong, J.R.; Bart, J.; et al. 89Zr-Bevacizumab PET Imaging in Primary Breast Cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54, 1014–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. van Asselt, S.J.; Oosting, S.F.; Brouwers, A.H.; Bongaerts, A.H.; de Jong, J.R.; Lub-de Hooge, M.N.; Oude Munnink, T.H.; Fiebrich, H.B.; Sluiter, W.J.; Links, T.P.; et al. Everolimus Reduces (89)Zr-Bevacizumab Tumor Uptake in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors. J. Nucl. Med. 2014, 55, 1087–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Bahce, I.; Huisman, M.C.; Verwer, E.E.; Ooijevaar, R.; Boutkourt, F.; Vugts, D.J.; van Dongen, G.A.; Boellaard, R.; Smit, E.F. Pilot study of (89)Zr-bevacizumab positron emission tomography in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. EJNMMI Res. 2014, 4, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Weber, J.S.; D’Angelo, S.P.; Minor, D.; Hodi, F.S.; Gutzmer, R.; Neyns, B.; Hoeller, C.; Khushalani, N.I.; Miller, W.H.; Lao, C.D.; et al. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): A randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015, 16, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Niemeijer, A.N.; Leung, D.; Huisman, M.C.; Bahce, I.; Hoekstra, O.S.; van Dongen, G.; Boellaard, R.; Du, S.; Hayes, W.; Smith, R.; et al. Whole body PD-1 and PD-L1 positron emission tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Bensch, F.; van der Veen, E.L.; Lub-de Hooge, M.N.; Jorritsma-Smit, A.; Boellaard, R.; Kok, I.C.; Oosting, S.F.; Schroder, C.P.; Hiltermann, T.J.N.; van der Wekken, A.J.; et al. (89)Zr-atezolizumab imaging as a non-invasive approach to assess clinical response to PD-L1 blockade in cancer. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 1852–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Quinn, B.; Dauer, Z.; Pandit-Taskar, N.; Schoder, H.; Dauer, L.T. Radiation dosimetry of 18F-FDG PET/CT: Incorporating exam-specific parameters in dose estimates. BMC Med. Imaging 2016, 16, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zhang, Y.; Hong, H.; Engle, J.W.; Bean, J.; Yang, Y.; Leigh, B.R.; Barnhart, T.E.; Cai, W. Positron emission tomography imaging of CD105 expression with a 64Cu-labeled monoclonal antibody: NOTA is superior to DOTA. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e28005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Xie, Q.; Zhu, H.; Wang, F.; Meng, X.; Ren, Q.; Xia, C.; Yang, Z. Establishing Reliable Cu-64 Production Process: From Target Plating to Molecular Specific Tumor Micro-PET Imaging. Molecules 2017, 22, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Zhou, Y.; Li, J.; Xu, X.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, B.; Deng, S.; Wu, Y. (64)Cu-based Radiopharmaceuticals in Molecular Imaging. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat 2019, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Price, E.W.; Orvig, C. Matching chelators to radiometals for radiopharmaceuticals. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 260–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Mortimer, J.E.; Bading, J.R.; Park, J.M.; Frankel, P.H.; Carroll, M.I.; Tran, T.T.; Poku, E.K.; Rockne, R.C.; Raubitschek, A.A.; Shively, J.E.; et al. Tumor Uptake of (64)Cu-DOTA-Trastuzumab in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 2018, 59, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Lewis, J.S.; Windhorst, A.D.; Zeglis, B.M. Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Koppe, M.J.; Bleichrodt, R.P.; Soede, A.C.; Verhofstad, A.A.; Goldenberg, D.M.; Oyen, W.J.G.; Boerman, O.C. Biodistribution and Therapeutic Efficacy of 125/131I-, 186Re-, 88/90Y-, or 177Lu-Labeled Monoclonal Antibody MN-14 to Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Mice with Small Peritoneal Metastases of Colorectal Origin. J. Nucl. Med. 2004, 45, 1224–1232. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  125. Camera, L.; Kinuya, S.; Garmestani, K.; Brechbiel, M.W.; Wu, C.; Pai, L.H.; McMurry, T.J.; Gansow, O.A.; Pastan, I.; Paik, C.H.; et al. Comparative biodistribution of indium- and yttrium-labeled B3 monoclonal antibody conjugated to either 2-(p-SCN-Bz)-6-methyl-DTPA (1B4M-DTPA) or 2-(p-SCN-Bz)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane tetraacetic acid (2B-DOTA). Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 1994, 21, 640–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Nayak, T.K.; Garmestani, K.; Baidoo, K.E.; Milenic, D.E.; Brechbiel, M.W. PET imaging of tumor angiogenesis in mice with VEGF-A–targeted 86Y-CHX-A″-DTPA-bevacizumab. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 128, 920–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Kang, C.S.; Chen, Y.; Lee, H.; Liu, D.; Sun, X.; Kweon, J.; Lewis, M.R.; Chong, H.S. Synthesis and evaluation of a new bifunctional NETA chelate for molecular targeted radiotherapy using (90)Y or (177)Lu. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2015, 42, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Price, E.W.; Edwards, K.J.; Carnazza, K.E.; Carlin, S.D.; Zeglis, B.M.; Adam, M.J.; Orvig, C.; Lewis, J.S. A comparative evaluation of the chelators H4octapa and CHX-A’’-DTPA with the therapeutic radiometal (90)Y. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2016, 43, 566–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Nayak, T.K.; Regino, C.A.; Wong, K.J.; Milenic, D.E.; Garmestani, K.; Baidoo, K.E.; Szajek, L.P.; Brechbiel, M.W. PET imaging of HER1-expressing xenografts in mice with 86Y-CHX-A’’-DTPA-cetuximab. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2010, 37, 1368–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Lövqvist, A.; Humm, J.L.; Sheikh, A.; Finn, R.D.; Koziorowski, J.; Ruan, S.; Pentlow, K.S.; Jungbluth, A.; Welt, S.; Lee, F.T.; et al. PET imaging of (86)Y-labeled anti-Lewis Y monoclonal antibodies in a nude mouse model: Comparison between (86)Y and (111)In radiolabels. J. Nucl. Med. 2001, 42, 7. [Google Scholar]
  131. Rizvi, S.N.; Visser, O.J.; Vosjan, M.J.; van Lingen, A.; Hoekstra, O.S.; Zijlstra, J.M.; Huijgens, P.C.; van Dongen, G.A.; Lubberink, M. Biodistribution, radiation dosimetry and scouting of 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan therapy in patients with relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma using 89Zr-ibritumomab tiuxetan and PET. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2012, 39, 512–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Perk, L.R.; Visser, G.W.; Vosjan, M.J.; Stigter-van Walsum, M.; Tijink, B.M.; Leemans, C.R.; van Dongen, G.A.M.S. (89)Zr as a PET Surrogate Radioisotope for Scouting Biodistribution of the Therapeutic Radiometals (90)Y and (177)Lu in Tumor-Bearing Nude Mice After Coupling to the Internalizing Antibody Cetuximab. J. Nucl. Med. 2005, 46, 1898–1906. [Google Scholar]
  133. Fairweather, D.S.; Bradwell, A.R.; Dykes, P.W.; Vaughan, A.T.; Watson-James, S.F.; Chandler, S. Improved tumour localisation using indium-111 labelled antibodies. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed) 1983, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Sabbah, E.N.; Kadouche, J.; Ellison, D.; Finucane, C.; Decaudin, D.; Mather, S.J. In vitro and in vivo comparison of DTPA- and DOTA-conjugated antiferritin monoclonal antibody for imaging and therapy of pancreatic cancer. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2007, 34, 293–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Perik, P.J.; Lub-De Hooge, M.N.; Gietema, J.A.; van der Graaf, W.T.; de Korte, M.A.; Jonkman, S.; Kosterink, J.G.; van Veldhuisen, D.J.; Sleijfer, D.T.; Jager, P.L.; et al. Indium-111-labeled trastuzumab scintigraphy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24, 2276–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Pandit-Taskar, N.; O‛Donoghue, J.A.; Divgi, C.R.; Wills, E.A.; Schwartz, L.; Gonen, M.; Smith-Jones, P.; Bander, N.H.; Scher, H.I.; Larson, S.M.; et al. Indium 111-labeled J591 anti-PSMA antibody for vascular targeted imaging in progressive solid tumors. EJNMMI Res. 2015, 5, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Lebowitz, E.; Richards, P. Radionuclide generator systems. Semin. Nucl. Med. 1974, 4, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Schwartz, A.; Steinstrasser, A. Anovel approach to Tc-99m labeled monoclonal antibodies. J. Nucl. Med. 1987, 28, 721. [Google Scholar]
  139. Mather, S.J.; Ellison, D. Reduction-mediated technetium-99m labeling of monoclonal antibodies. J. Nucl. Med. 1990, 31, 692–697. [Google Scholar]
  140. Eckelman, W.C.; Paik, C.H.; Steigman, J. Three approaches to radiolabeling antibodies with 99mTc. Int. J. Radiat. Appl. Instrum. Part B. Nucl. Med. Biol. 1989, 16, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Abrams, M.J.; Juweid, M.; tenKate, C.I.; Schwartz, D.A.; Hauser, M.M.; Gaul, F.E.; Fuccello, A.J.; Rubin, R.H.; Strauss, H.W.; Fischman, A.J. Technetium-99m-human polyclonal IgG radiolabeled via the hydrazino nicotinamide derivative for imaging focal sites of infection in rats. J. Nucl. Med. 1990, 31, 2022–2028. [Google Scholar]
  142. Childs, R.L.; Hnatowich, D.J. Optimum conditions for labeling of DTPA-coupled antibodies with technetium-99m. J. Nucl. Med. 1985, 26, 293–299. [Google Scholar]
  143. Hnatowich, D.J.; Mardirossian, G.; Rusckowski, M.; Fogarasi, M.; Virzi, F.; Winnard, P., Jr. Directly and indirectly technetium-99m-labeled antibodies—a comparison of in vitro and animal in vivo properties. J. Nucl. Med. 1993, 34, 109–119. [Google Scholar]
  144. Fritzberg, A.R.; Abrams, P.G.; Beaumier, P.L.; Kasina, S.; Morgan, A.C.; Rao, T.N.; Reno, J.M.; Sanderson, J.A.; Srinivasan, A.; Wilbur, D.S.; et al. Specific and stable labeling of antibodies with technetium-99m with a diamide dithiolate chelating agent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 4025–4029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Gmeiner Stopar, T.; Fettich, J.; Zver, S.; Mlinaric-Rascan, I.; Hojker, S.; Socan, A.; Peitl, P.K.; Mather, S. 99mTc-labelled rituximab, a new non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma imaging agent: First clinical experience. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2008, 29, 1059–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Torres, L.A.; Perera, A.; Batista, J.F.; Hernandez, A.; Crombet, T.; Ramos, M.; Neninger, E.; Perez, M.; Sanchez, E.L.; Romero, S.; et al. Phase I/II clinical trial of the humanized anti-EGF-r monoclonal antibody h-R3 labelled with 99mTc in patients with tumour of epithelial origin. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2005, 26, 1049–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Lewis, C.M.; Graves, S.A.; Hernandez, R.; Valdovinos, H.F.; Barnhart, T.E.; Cai, W.; Meyerand, M.E.; Nickles, R.J.; Suzuki, M. (5)(2)Mn production for PET/MRI tracking of human stem cells expressing divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1). Theranostics 2015, 5, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Fonslet, J.; Tietze, S.; Jensen, A.I.; Graves, S.A.; Severin, G.W. Optimized procedures for manganese-52: Production, separation and radiolabeling. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2017, 121, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  149. Graves, S.A.; Hernandez, R.; Fonslet, J.; England, C.G.; Valdovinos, H.F.; Ellison, P.A.; Barnhart, T.E.; Elema, D.R.; Theuer, C.P.; Cai, W.; et al. Novel Preparation Methods of (52)Mn for ImmunoPET Imaging. Bioconjug. Chem. 2015, 26, 2118–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Tsionou, M.I.; Knapp, C.E.; Foley, C.A.; Munteanu, C.R.; Cakebread, A.; Imberti, C.; Eykyn, T.R.; Young, J.D.; Paterson, B.M.; Blower, P.J.; et al. Comparison of macrocyclic and acyclic chelators for gallium-68 radiolabelling. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 49586–49599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  151. Engle, J.W.; Hong, H.; Zhang, Y.; Valdovinos, H.F.; Myklejord, D.V.; Barnhart, T.E.; Theuer, C.P.; Nickles, R.J.; Cai, W. Positron emission tomography imaging of tumor angiogenesis with a 66Ga-labeled monoclonal antibody. Mol. Pharm. 2012, 9, 1441–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  152. Goethals, P.; Coene, M.; Slegers, G.; Vogelaers, D.; Everaert, J.; Lemahieu, I.; Colardyn, F.; Heyndrickx, G.R. Production of carrier-free 66Ga and labeling of antimyosin antibody for positron imaging of acute myocardial infarction. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 1990, 16, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Milani, S.; Ghaemimanesh, F.; Salimi, A.; Hadavi, R.; Bayat, A.A.; Alirezapour, B.; Rabbani, H. Production and evaluation of a 67Ga-labeled anti-Ror1 monoclonal antibody in a mouse model of breast cancer. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2018, 316, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Ryser, J.E.; Jones, R.M.; Egeli, R.; Pelegrin, A.; Rose, K.; Kurt, A.M.; Perin, M.; Broquet, P.E.; Ambrosetti, P.; Fisch, I.; et al. Colon carcinoma immunoscintigraphy by monoclonal anti-CEA antibody labeled with gallium-67-aminooxyacetyldeferroxamine. J. Nucl. Med. 1992, 33, 1766–1773. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  155. Radchenko, V.; Hauser, H.; Eisenhut, M.; Vugts, D.J.; van Dongen, G.A.M.S.; Roesch, F. 90Nb—a potential PET nuclide: Production and labeling of monoclonal antibodies. Radiochim. Acta 2012, 100, 857–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Radchenko, V.; Bouziotis, P.; Tsotakos, T.; Paravatou-Petsotas, M.; la Fuente, A.; Loudos, G.; Harris, A.L.; Xanthopoulos, S.; Filosofov, D.; Hauser, H.; et al. Labeling and preliminary in vivo assessment of niobium-labeled radioactive species: A proof-of-concept study. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2016, 43, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Radchenko, V.; Busse, S.; Roesch, F. Desferrioxamine as an appropriate chelator for 90Nb: Comparison of its complexation properties for M-Df-Octreotide (M = Nb, Fe, Ga, Zr). Nucl. Med. Biol. 2014, 41, 721–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Radchenko, V.; Filosofov, D.V.; Bochko, O.K.; Lebedev, N.A.; Rakhimov, A.V.; Hauser, H.; Eisenhut, M.; Aksenov, N.V.; Bozhikov, G.A.; Ponsard, B.; et al. Separation of 90Nb from zirconium target for application in immuno-PET. Radiochim. Acta 2014, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Jahn, M.; Radchenko, V.; Filosofov, D.V.; Hauser, H.; Eisenhut, M.; Rösch, F.; Jennewein, M. Separation and purification of no-carrier-added arsenic from bulk amounts of germanium for use in radiopharmaceutical labelling. Radiochim. Acta 2010, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Shen, S.; Li, X.F.; Cullen, W.R.; Weinfeld, M.; Le, X.C. Arsenic binding to proteins. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 7769–7792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Jennewein, M.; Lewis, M.A.; Zhao, D.; Tsyganov, E.; Slavine, N.; He, J.; Watkins, L.; Kodibagkar, V.D.; O’Kelly, S.; Kulkarni, P.; et al. Vascular imaging of solid tumors in rats with a radioactive arsenic-labeled antibody that binds exposed phosphatidylserine. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 1377–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Ellison, P.A.; Barnhart, T.E.; Chen, F.; Hong, H.; Zhang, Y.; Theuer, C.P.; Cai, W.; Nickles, R.J.; DeJesus, O.T. High Yield Production and Radiochemical Isolation of Isotopically Pure Arsenic-72 and Novel Radioarsenic Labeling Strategies for the Development of Theranostic Radiopharmaceuticals. Bioconjug. Chem. 2016, 27, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  163. DeGraffenreid, A.J.; Feng, Y.; Barnes, C.L.; Ketring, A.R.; Cutler, C.S.; Jurisson, S.S. Trithiols and their arsenic compounds for potential use in diagnostic and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2016, 43, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Random and site-specific immuno-PET/SPECT bioconjugation sites of mAb (Figure adapted Servier Creative Commons Attribution https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
Figure 1. Random and site-specific immuno-PET/SPECT bioconjugation sites of mAb (Figure adapted Servier Creative Commons Attribution https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
Cancers 12 01868 g001
Figure 2. Single slice PET/CT images of random (left) and site-specific unnatural amino acid pAMF-DBCO SPAAC (right) conjugated [89Zr]Zr-DFO-Trastuzumab 96h post injection. Adapted with permission from Ahn et al. [53]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.
Figure 2. Single slice PET/CT images of random (left) and site-specific unnatural amino acid pAMF-DBCO SPAAC (right) conjugated [89Zr]Zr-DFO-Trastuzumab 96h post injection. Adapted with permission from Ahn et al. [53]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.
Cancers 12 01868 g002
Figure 3. Pretargeting approach: In a first step an Ab with a targeting moiety is injected. Secondly the Ab is allowed to accumulate at tumor site over time. Thirdly a complementary radiolabeled probe is injected and lastly in vivo ligation of the Ab and the radioligand followed by rapid clearance of any excess of the radioligand (figure adapted under a Servier Creative Commons Attribution https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
Figure 3. Pretargeting approach: In a first step an Ab with a targeting moiety is injected. Secondly the Ab is allowed to accumulate at tumor site over time. Thirdly a complementary radiolabeled probe is injected and lastly in vivo ligation of the Ab and the radioligand followed by rapid clearance of any excess of the radioligand (figure adapted under a Servier Creative Commons Attribution https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
Cancers 12 01868 g003
Figure 4. Serial maximum intensity projection (MIP) PET images of mice injected with (A) [52Mn]Mn-DOTA-TRC105 and (B) 52MnCl2. Note: H, Heart; L, Liver; K, Kidneys; T, Tumor; Th, Thyroid. Adapted with permission from Graves et al. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society [149].
Figure 4. Serial maximum intensity projection (MIP) PET images of mice injected with (A) [52Mn]Mn-DOTA-TRC105 and (B) 52MnCl2. Note: H, Heart; L, Liver; K, Kidneys; T, Tumor; Th, Thyroid. Adapted with permission from Graves et al. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society [149].
Cancers 12 01868 g004
Table 1. Overview of radionuclides’ decay properties, emission and chelators for monoclonal antibody immuno-PET/SPECT imaging [81].
Table 1. Overview of radionuclides’ decay properties, emission and chelators for monoclonal antibody immuno-PET/SPECT imaging [81].
RadionuclidesDecay-LifeProduction Method [82] ***EmissionLabeling Strategies
PET β+ (%; EMean)
124Iodine
4.2 days
Cyclotron
β+ (12%; 687 keV)
β+ (11%; 975 keV)
Direct radiolabeling
89Zirconium3.3 daysCyclotronβ+ (23%; 396 keV)DFO, DFO*, DFOSq, HOPO
72Arsenic1.1 daysGeneratorβ+ (6%; 824 keV)
β+ (64%; 1117 keV)
β+ (16%; 1528 keV)
Direct labelling, SATA, Traut’s reagent
74Arsenic
17.8 days
High energy
Cyclotron
β+ (26%; 408 keV)
β
Direct labelling, SATA, Traut’s reagent
64Copper12.7 hCyclotronβ+ (18%; 278 keV)
β
NOTA
86Yttrium14.7 hCyclotronβ+ (32%; 394–1437 keV) * DOTA, CHX-A″-DTPA
76Bromine16.2 hCyclotronβ+ (55%; 336–1800 keV) *Direct radiolabeling
52Manganese5.6 daysHigh energy cyclotronβ+ (29%; 242 keV)DOTA
90Niobium14.6 h β+ (51%; 662 keV)DFO
66Gallium
9.5 h
Cyclotron
β+ (4%; 397 keV)
β+ (51%; 1904 keV)
NOTA
SPECT γ (%; Energy) **
123Iodine13.2 hHigh energy
Cyclotron
γ1 (83%; 159 keV)
γ2 (1%; 529 keV)
Direct radiolabeling
131Iodine8.0 daysReactor
γ1 (82%; 364 keV)
γ2 (7%; 637 keV)
Direct radiolabeling
67Gallium3.3 daysHigh energy
Cyclotron
γ1 (3%; 91 keV)
γ2 (39%; 93 keV)
γ3 (21%; 184 keV)
γ4 (2%; 209 keV)
γ5 (17%; 300 keV)
γ6 (5%; 394 keV)
NOTA
99mTechnetium6 hGeneratorγ (89%; 141 keV)HYNIC, N2S2 ligand
111Indium2.8 daysHigh energy
Cyclotron
γ1 (91%; 171 keV)
γ2 (94%; 245 keV)
DOTA, CHX-A″-DTPA
* Range different Eβ+Average /** Gamma rays used solely for SPECT imaging/ *** High energy cyclotron >20 MeV proton energies.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dewulf, J.; Adhikari, K.; Vangestel, C.; Wyngaert, T.V.D.; Elvas, F. Development of Antibody Immuno-PET/SPECT Radiopharmaceuticals for Imaging of Oncological Disorders—An Update. Cancers 2020, 12, 1868. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12071868

AMA Style

Dewulf J, Adhikari K, Vangestel C, Wyngaert TVD, Elvas F. Development of Antibody Immuno-PET/SPECT Radiopharmaceuticals for Imaging of Oncological Disorders—An Update. Cancers. 2020; 12(7):1868. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12071868

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dewulf, Jonatan, Karuna Adhikari, Christel Vangestel, Tim Van Den Wyngaert, and Filipe Elvas. 2020. "Development of Antibody Immuno-PET/SPECT Radiopharmaceuticals for Imaging of Oncological Disorders—An Update" Cancers 12, no. 7: 1868. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12071868

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop