Next Article in Journal
Carcinoma-Associated Mesenchymal Stem Cells Promote Chemoresistance in Ovarian Cancer Stem Cells via PDGF Signaling
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Targets for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Neoadjuvant Treatment Options in Soft Tissue Sarcomas
Previous Article in Special Issue
Leukaemia Inhibitory Factor (LIF) Inhibits Cancer Stem Cells Tumorigenic Properties through Hippo Kinases Activation in Gastric Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Inhibitors of Ceramide- and Sphingosine-Metabolizing Enzymes as Sensitizers in Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

1
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
2
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Itami City Hospital, Itami, Hyogo 664-8540, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2020, 12(8), 2062; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12082062
Submission received: 13 June 2020 / Revised: 21 July 2020 / Accepted: 23 July 2020 / Published: 26 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeted Cancer Therapy)

Abstract

:
In the treatment of advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), including oral SCC, radiotherapy is a commonly performed therapeutic modality. The combined use of radiotherapy with chemotherapy improves therapeutic effects, but it also increases adverse events. Ceramide, a central molecule in sphingolipid metabolism and signaling pathways, mediates antiproliferative responses, and its level increases in response to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. However, when ceramide is metabolized, prosurvival factors, such as sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), ceramide-1-phosphate (C1P), and glucosylceramide, are produced, reducing the antitumor effects of ceramide. The activities of ceramide- and sphingosine-metabolizing enzymes are also associated with radio- and chemo-resistance. Ceramide analogs and low molecular-weight compounds targeting these enzymes exert anticancer effects. Synthetic ceramides and a therapeutic approach using ultrasound have also been developed. Inhibitors of ceramide- and sphingosine-metabolizing enzymes and synthetic ceramides can function as sensitizers of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for HNSCC.

1. Introduction

Head and neck cancers are malignant tumors of the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx, with the sixth highest incidence worldwide, accounting for 5% of all cancers [1,2,3]. Over 90% of head and neck cancers are squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), and the majority of oral cancers are also SCC [4]. Surgery is prioritized for the treatment of oral SCC. Among digestive organ cancers, a characteristic of head and neck SCC (HNSCC), including oral SCC, is the availability of radiotherapy. For advanced oral SCC, postoperative ionizing radiation with X-rays is usually combined with chemotherapy to improve the outcomes. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved chemotherapeutic agents for HNSCC include cisplatin, methotrexate, 5-FU, bleomycin, docetaxel, and small-molecule targeted drugs [5,6]. Combination of radiotherapy with chemotherapy, when overdosed in any combination, can lead to serious acute side effects and late-onset dysfunction [7]. Therefore, safe and effective sensitizing drugs against radiotherapy and chemotherapy are needed.
The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) program reported the results of whole-genome sequencing on tumor tissues from 279 patients with HNSCC [8]. This led to the division of HNSCC into two subsets with different clinical and molecular profiles: human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive tumors, which generally have a better prognosis, and HPV-negative tumors with a poorer prognosis. Although HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer has a better prognosis, evaluation of HPV and p16 expression in oral SCC failed to demonstrate any survival benefit [9]. In HPV-negative HNSCC, activating mutations in classic oncogenes are relatively rare, and most genetic alterations are in tumor suppressor genes such as p53 and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A). This finding is important to develop therapeutic agents because the discovering of new compounds to restore the activity of altered tumor suppressor genes is highly challenging [10]. On the other hand, activation of numerous signaling pathways has been implicated in cell survival, proliferation, angiogenesis, and/or inflammation, and many molecules in theses pathways have emerged as potential targets [11,12]. For HNSCC, monoclonal antibodies against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human EGF receptor 3 (HER3), in addition to as small-molecule inhibitors against serine threonine kinase, cyclin-dependent kinase and tyrosine kinase are under clinical investigation [13,14,15]. Other types of approaches are also required.
Among sphingolipids constituting cell membranes, ceramide, a central molecule in sphingolipid metabolism and signaling pathways, is a typical sphingolipid exhibiting cytotoxicity [16,17,18,19,20,21]. In cancer cells, its levels and signaling are usually suppressed by the overexpression of ceramide-metabolizing enzymes or down-regulation of ceramide-generating enzymes. Radiotherapy and chemotherapeutic drugs increase intracellular ceramide levels, and this increase can restore the therapeutic sensitivity of HNSCC to these therapies [22,23,24,25]. Therefore, drugs that inhibit ceramide-metabolizing enzymes are expected to be sensitizers of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In this article, we review the metabolic pathways of ceramide, its function, the inhibitors of ceramide- and sphingosine-metabolizing enzymes, and their mechanisms of action.

2. The Pathways of Generation and Metabolization of Ceramide

Sphingolipids are structural molecules of cell membranes and important regulators of proliferation, migration, invasion, and metastasis of cancer cells. Ceramide can be generated through the hydrolysis of complex sphingolipids, de novo synthesis pathway, or salvage pathway [26]. In the sphingomyelinase (SMase) pathway, SMase hydrolyzes plasma membrane sphingomyelin, and produces ceramide and phosphocholine [27,28,29]. There are acidic, neutral, and basic isoforms of SMase. The de novo synthesis of ceramide begins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) with the condensation of serine and palmitoyl-CoA by serine palmitoyl transferase (SPT) to form 3-ketodihydrosphingosine (3-ketosphinganine), which is, then, reduced to dihydrosphingosine (sphinganine) and acylated by dihydroceramide synthase, referred to as ceramide synthase (CerS), to produce dihydroceramide. Lastly, the desaturation of dihydroceramide by dihydroceramide desaturase (DES) generates ceramide (Figure 1). In the salvage pathway, ceramides can be synthesized, re-utilizing free sphingosine formed by the degradation of glycosphingolipids and other complex sphingolipids [30].
Ceramide is metabolized via the action of many metabolizing enzymes. Three classes of ceramidases (CDases)—acid, neutral, and alkaline—have been identified and distinguished by their pH for optimal activity [31,32,33]. CDase hydrolyzes ceramide to yield sphingosine, which is phosphorylated by sphingosine kinase 1 (SphK1) and SphK2 to generate sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) [34]. SphK1 is localized predominantly in the cytosol, whereas SphK2 is localized mainly in the nuclear membrane and cytoplasm [35,36]. S1P functions in both extracellularly and intracellularly [37]. Extracellularly, S1P engages with five G protein-coupled receptors, S1PR1-5, to elicit prosurvival signaling [38,39,40]. Ceramide is involved in cell growth arrest and apoptosis, whereas S1P has the opposing function of promoting cell growth and cell survival, suggesting that the balance of ceramide and S1P is essential for cell fate [41]. S1P is metabolized by S1P phosphatase to sphingosine or by S1P lyase 1 to yield ethnolamine-1-phosphate and C16 fatty aldehyde. In the Golgi apparatus, ceramide is converted to sphingomyelin by sphingomyelin synthase (SMS) or to glucosylceramide by glucosylceramide synthase (GluCS), and then, to complex glycosylsphingolipids [42,43]. Phosphorylation of ceramide by ceramide kinase (CerK) produces ceramide-1-phosphate (C1P) [44]. C1P activates cytosolic phospholipase 2 (cPLA2), which recruits it to the Golgi apparatus and the cell membrane to cleave arachidonic acid and produce prostaglandin [45,46,47]. C1P also stimulates reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation in primary marrow-derived macrophages and ROS are required for the mitogenic effect of C1P [48].

3. Functions of Ceramide

Ceramide is composed of a sphingosine base and amide-linked acyl chains varying in length from C14 to C26. CerS has six isoforms, CerS1-6, and the ceramides synthesized by these isoforms have different fatty acyl chains and distinct biological properties [21,49,50]. CerS1 preferentially generates ceramide with 18-carbon fatty acids, C18-ceramide, whereas CerS5 or CerS6 primarily generate ceramide 16-carbon fatty acids, C16-ceramide. A proapoptotic role of CerS1-generated C18-ceramide and prosurvival role of CerS6-generated C16-ceramide were suggested. Indeed, in HNSCC cells, CerS6-generated C16-ceramide protects cells from ER stress-mediated apoptosis and C18-ceramide is selectively down-regulated [49,51,52]. Karahatay et al. [52] measured ceramide levels in tumor tissues of 45 patients with HNSCC. The levels of C16- and C24-ceramides were significantly increased in the majority of tumor tissues compared with their normal tissues, whereas the levels of only C18-ceramide were significantly decreased in tumors. The decrease in C18-ceramide levels was also associated with the higher incidence of lymph node metastasis. Treatment with gemcitabine and doxorubicin, known inducers of ceramide generation, supra-additively inhibited the growth of human HNSCC cells. The treatment resulted in the elevation of mRNA and protein levels of the human homologue of yeast longevity assurance gene 1 (LASS1), which was consistent with an increase in the endogenous CerS activity for generation of C18-ceramide [53].
When the production and accumulation of ceramide increase in response to cellular stress, cell death is induced through numerous mechanisms such as apoptosis, necroptosis, autophagy, and ER stress [54]. These cell death pathways depend on cell type, the subcellular location of ceramide, and downstream targets of ceramide. Many types of cellular stress stimulate acid SMase (aSMase) to produce ceramide from sphingomyelin, leading to the formation of ceramide-enriched membrane platforms. In such platforms, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase subunits and other redox molecules are aggregated, leading to signal transduction by the increase in ROS [55,56,57,58] (Figure 2). In neuronal cells, TNF-α exposure dramatically increased neutral SMase activity, thus, generating ceramide essential for subsequent NADPH oxidase activation and oxidative stress [59,60]. If the level of ROS increases further, it will damage DNA, proteins, and glycols. Mitochondria were demonstrated as a primary target of ceramide, leading to the generation of ROS by interacting with complex III of the electron transport chain [61,62].
Ceramide and activated Bax directly interact to induce outer membrane permeabilization in isolated mitochondria and induce Bax-dependent apoptosis [63]. Protein phosphatases, together with protein kinases, control the reversible phosphorylation of proteins, playing a central role in cellular signal transduction [64,65]. One of the well-described downstream targets of ceramide is the protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) that regulates vital cellular processes, including cell cycle, growth, metabolism, and apoptosis [65]. SET is a nuclear protein and known inhibitor of PP2A activity. A unique mechanism for ceramide-mediated PP2A activation is the direct binding of ceramide to SET, relieving PP2A from SET, increasing PP2A activity, and leading to tumor suppression. C2-ceramide induces the PP2A-dependent dephosphorylation of Bcl-2 to inhibit its antiapoptotic activity and promote its binding to p53 for the induction of apoptosis [66,67,68].
Protein kinase C (PKC)ζ is an additional direct effector of ceramide implicated in ceramide-mediated growth arrest and apoptosis [69,70,71]. There are nine mammalian isoforms of PKC, which consist of the classical PKC (PKCα, β, γ), the novel PKC (PKCδ, ε, θ, η), and the atypical PKC (PKCζ, ι) [72,73,74]. The identification of PKC as the major receptor for tumor promoting phorbol esters marked the concept that PKC functions as an oncoprotein [69,75]. However, although phorbol esters result in acute activation of PKC, this is followed by the chronic loss or down-regulation of PKC. The repetitive application of phorbol esters is expected to cause a loss of PKC, promoting tumor formation. PKCζ inhibits Akt phosphorylation and activates the stress-induced protein kinase JNK [70,71,76]. In PKC mutations of cancers, loss-of-function with no gain-of-function was often identified [77].
Ceramide has been implicated in the induction of autophagy, which has dual functions in cell survival and cell death. Ceramide is a well-established suppressor of Akt [78], which inactivates downstream mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling and leads to the induction of autophagy [79,80]. Ceramide also activates JNK and the JNK-mediated activation of the transcription factor c-Jun increases Beclin1 expression [81]. C-Jun positively regulates the transcription of LC3 to increase the autophagic process in response to ceramide [82]. In HNSCC and acute myeloid leukemia cells, stress-induced mitophagy is dependent on the localization of de novo-generated C18-ceramide at the outer mitochondrial membrane, which directly binds LC3 protein. Ceramide-LC3 binding results in the recruitment of autophagosomes for the execution of mitophagy [83,84].
Ceramide-mediated autophagy is also attributed to the induction of ER stress. The ER is the largest organelle in the cell and performs a variety of functions, including the synthesis of lipids, regulation of intracellular calcium, and synthesis and maturation of secreted and membrane-bound proteins, generating correctly folded proteins [85,86,87]. An increased need for protein-folding components is defined as ER proteotoxic stress. This stress induces the unfold protein response (UPR). The mammalian UPR consists of three parallel signaling pathways, initiated by the ER transmembrane sensors inositol requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1), PKR-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), and activating transcription factor-6 (ATF6) [88,89,90,91]. Accumulation of long-chain ceramides, such as C14- and C16-ceramides, induces ER stress-dependent autophagy and functions in cell survival [92]. NADPH oxidase 4, an ER resident capable of producing ROS, acts as a signaling intermediate to transduce ER stress to the UPR. Chronic ER stress causes a secondary increase in ROS, generally resulting in cell death [93,94,95].

4. Radiation Therapy and Ceramide Generation

Ionizing radiation with X-rays stimulates cells to generate ceramide, an established second messenger in apoptotic signaling pathways. In irradiated cells, ceramide is mainly generated via the hydrolysis of sphingomyelin by SMase or by CerS-mediated synthesis [96,97,98]. Unlike the fast generation of ceramide at the plasma membrane via SMase, engagement of CerS and ceramide neogenesis is delayed, and increases between 8 and 24 h after irradiation [99,100]. In HeLa cells, dose-dependent ceramide generation was induced 28 h after irradiation, with a 2.3-fold increase by 10 Gy but 1.25-fold by 5 Gy [99]. Apoptosis of vascular endothelial cells in tumors and abnormal microvascular function lead to cell death of tumor cells. High doses of radiation can induce the translocation of endothelial cell aSMase into glycosphingolipid-enriched plasma membrane rafts, where it hydrolyzes sphingomyelin to generate ceramide. In contrast, the endothelial cell damage induced by the low-dose exposure in fractionated radiotherapy does not efficiently increase tumor cell death, as the death signaling pathway in endothelium is repressed by concomitant activation of tumor cell hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1). The post-radiation translation of HIF results in the up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and other proangiogenic factors [101]. Single-dose radiotherapy (SDRT), a disruptive technique that ablates more than 90% of human cancers, operates a distinct dual-target mechanism, linking aSMase-mediated microvascular perfusion defects to DNA unrepair in tumor cells to confer tumor cell lethality [102].
CDases are overexpressed in several forms of cancer, including head and neck cancer, prostate cancer, and melanoma. Overexpression of acid CDase (aCDase) was observed in 70% of HNSCC patients, with an increased incidence of overexpression in higher grade tumors [103]. In prostate cancer, 5-Gy ionizing radiation induces increased sphingolipid expression between 24 and 72 h. Specifically, total ceramide content increased between 40% and 100%, whereas the products of ceramide metabolism, sphingosine and S1P, demonstrated a 200% to 270% increase, suggesting that irradiation elicited a marked shift of sphingolipid content toward the soluble products of ceramide metabolism [104]. The radiation-induced increase in aCDase activity confers resistance to Taxol and C6-ceramide [105,106].

5. Chemotherapy and Ceramide Generation

Chemotherapeutic agents can apply stress to cancer cells, and in response to this stress, ceramide levels are increased by both sphingomyelin hydrolysis and through de novo ceramide synthesis [21]. This increase, demonstrated by many chemotherapeutics, including daunorubicin (anthracycline), etoposide (topoisomerase II inhibitor), and gemcitabine (nucleoside analog), can be ascribed to the activation of CerS or SPT [107,108,109]. Vinblastine and paclitaxel were reported to increase ceramide levels and caspase activity in doxorubicin-resistant MCF-7-AdrR breast cancer cells [110]. Gemcitabine and doxorubicin combination reconstituted levels of C18-ceramide vis up-regulation of CerS1 expression, increasing CerS1 activity for C18-ceramide generation, leading to growth inhibition in head and neck xenografts in vivo [53]. In a phase II clinical trial, the combination therapy with gemcitabine and doxorubicin could represent an effective treatment for some patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC, and that serum C-18-ceramide elevation might be a serum biomarker of chemotherapy responses [111]. Up-regulation of GluCS levels prevents the accumulation of a ceramide pool, which reduces ceramide-induced apoptosis in response to certain cytotoxic drugs [18]. Doxorubicin treatment was reported to increase GluCS expression in invasive ductal breast cancer cells through the recruitment of transcription factor Sp1 to the GluCS promoter [112]. Cisplatin is widely used in many types of human solid neoplasms, including HNSCC, but the main limitation of its clinical usefulness is the high incidence of chemoresistance. Up-regulation of GluCS and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) leads to cisplatin resistance in head and neck cancer [113,114].

6. Inhibitors of Ceramide- and Sphingosine-Metabolizing Enzymes

6.1. CDase Inhibitor

A number of ceramide analogs, including LCL204, LCL385, and LCL521, were previously designed to target aCDase in the lysosomal compartment where aCDase primarily functions [115,116,117,118]. LCL204 alone was not toxic, but pretreatment of HNSCC cells with LCL204 significantly increased Fas-induced toxicity and apoptosis induction [103]. LCL385 was demonstrated to increase ceramide levels and sensitize PPC-1 prostate cancer cells to radiation, and significantly reduce tumor xenograft growth [119]. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a clinically established treatment modality for cancer. In PDT, a light-absorbing agent is activated by a highly focused laser to induce oxidative stress and destroy a cellular target [120]. When PDT-treated mouse SCCVII cells were used to vaccinate SCCVII tumor-bearing mice, adjuvant LCL521 treatment resulted in the marked retardation of tumor growth. This effect may have been due to the ability of LCL521 to restrict the activity of regulatory T cells (Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) [121]. A novel CDase inhibitor, Ceranib-2, inhibited CDase activity, increased ceramide levels, reduced S1P levels, and inhibited cell proliferation and tumor growth [118]. Ceranib-2 and carboplatin exhibit synergism in combination for non-small cell lung cancer, where caspase 3, caspase 9, and Bax expression were increased, whereas Bcl-2 expression was reduced [122]. Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia cell lines with a novel aCDase inhibitor, SACLAC, effectively blocked aCDase activity and induced a decrease in S1P and an increase in total ceramide levels [123].

6.2. GluCS Inhibitor

D-threo-1-phenyl-2-palmitoylamino-3-morpholino-l-propanol (PPMP) and D-threo-1-phenyl-2-decanoylamino-3-morpholino-1-propanol (PDMP) were previously developed as GluCS inhibitors [124,125]. Exposure of MCF-7-AdrR breast cancer cells to PPMP reduced cellular ganglioside levels, restored sensitivity to vinblastine, increased vinblastine uptake three-fold, and reduced the expression of multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1) by 58% compared with untreated controls [126,127]. GluCS and P-gp overexpression is also associated with acquired cisplatin resistance in head and neck cancer. PPMP induced the accumulation of ceramide and increased cisplatin-induced cell death via P-gp down-regulation and restoration of p53-dependent apoptosis [113]. The antiestrogen tamoxifen, a first-generation P-gp inhibitor, blocked C6-ceramide glycosylation and magnified apoptotic responses. Specific high-affinity P-gp inhibitors, tariquidar and zosuquidar, synergistically enhanced C6-ceramide cytotoxicity in multidrug resistant leukemia cells [128]. A drug cocktail of GluCS inhibitor, CDase inhibitor, and imipramine that disturbs lipid turnover in biological membranes was reported to induce a marked increase in ceramide levels in radio-resistant HNSCC cells, corresponding with marked effects on radiation sensitivity [129]

6.3. SphK Inhibitor

Sphingosine kinases modulate the proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation of keratinocytes through the regulation of ceramide and S1P. SphK1 expression has been shown to be elevated in HNSCC as compared with normal tissue, and positive SphK1 expression was associated with shorter survival time [130]. SphK1 is found to be the target of the microRNA, miR-124, which acts as a suppressor of HNSCC by directly inhibiting SphK1 activity and its downstream signaling [131]. These findings suggest that SphK1 inhibitors could be used to treat HNSCC Inhibitors for both SphK1 and SphK2 have been developed. They include N,N-dimethylsphingosine (DMS), SK1-I, SK-I-II, safingol, PF543, FTY720, and ABC294640 [132,133,134,135,136].

6.3.1. Safingol

Safingol, the synthetic L-threo-stereoisomer of the naturally occurring (D-erythro-) dihydrosphingosine [137], was initially reported to be a PKC inhibitor, but was later found to inhibit SphK [138]. As other PKC inhibitors were not effective on cancer in clinical trials [74], the antitumor ability of safingol is not due to its anti-PKC activity. Safingol is a competitive inhibitor of SphK with a Ki of approximately 5 μM [139]. In MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells and HT-29 colon cancer cells, 5–10 μM safingol reduced glucose uptake, activated AMP-activated protein kinase, and induced autophagy. In addition, Bcl-xL expression was decreased and Bax expression was increased, resulting in ROS-mediated necrotic cell death [140]. At the doses of 25–50 μM, safingol induced ROS-mediated apoptosis of human oral SCC cells [141]. During this process, Bcl-xL expression was decreased and mitochondrial endonuclease G was released into the cytoplasm, resulting in DNA fragmentation in the nucleus [142,143]. Autophagy was also induced, which promotes cell survival because autophagy inhibitors increase cell death by safingol [144]. Treatment of human colon cancer cells with 12 μM safingol increased the amounts of cell-associated safingol and N-acyl-safingol. In addition, small increases in endogenous sphingosine and dihydrosphingosine were noted, whereas no increases were observed in ceramide or dihydroceramide [145]. In response to ER stress, levels of dihydroceramide and dihydrosphingosine increased and, conversely, the addition of exogenous dihydroceramide or dihydrosphingosine activated on the ER stress sensor, ATF6, in HEK293 cells [146]. ATF6 can induce the objective genes, Bip/Grp78, Grp94, and C/EBP homology protein (CHOP) [147,148]. The transcription factor CHOP is induced late in ER stress, leading to increased expression of ER oxidase 1 and the generation of ROS within the ER [94]. In addition to the endogenous dihydrosphingosine increase by safingol treatment, safingol, the L-thero-dihydrosphingosine, may function as dihydrosphingosine intracellularly, leading to the induction of ER stress, ROS production, and cell death (Figure 3A). Safingol was the first SphK inhibitor to enter clinical trials as an anticancer agent [149,150]. In a phase I clinical trial, patients with advanced solid tumors were treated using safingol in combination with cisplatin [150]. Patients treated using a dose at or near the maximum tolerated dose achieved safingol levels of higher than 20 μM and maintained levels higher than 5 μM for 4 h. A dose-dependent reduction in S1P in plasma was observed. Reversible dose-dependent hepatic toxicity was also noted. The best response was stable disease in 6/37 (16%) for an average of 3.3 months (range 1.8–7.2 months). Safingol synergistically sensitized epigallocatechin-induced apoptotic cell death, and suppressed multiple myeloma cells by preventing protein tyrosine kinase phoshorylation and activation of death-associated protein kinase 1 (DAPK1) [151]. As high SphK1 correlates with resistance to cisplatin in gastric cancer, safingol was used synergistically with cisplatin to restore the efficacy of the chemotherapy in gastric cancer cells [152].

6.3.2. PF543

PF543, a sphingosine-competitive cell-permeant inhibitor of SphK1, inhibits Sphk1 with a Ki of 3.6 nM. Its selectivity is more than 100-fold greater for SphK1 than for SphK2 [153]. However, PF543 had no inhibitory effects on the proliferation or survival of 1483 HNSCC cells, regardless of the marked decrease in the S1P/sphingosine ratio. Why PF543 did not exert antiproliferative effects was not clarified. The increased binding affinity of PF543 to SphK1 may result in a lack of specificity toward other enzymes, such as CerS, which effectively negates the effects of inhibiting SphK1 activity on cell growth and survival by preventing the formation of ceramide from sphingosine [154]. However, in 1483 cells treated with 3–10 μM PF543 for 16 h, PF543 did not inhibit CerS, increasing the amount of available sphingosine and synthesis of ceramides, including C18-ceramide and C24-ceramide. Long-chain ceramides, such as C18-ceramide, are antiproliferative, whereas very-long-chain ceramides, such as C24-ceramide, promote cell proliferation [155]. The variety of ceramide species generated by PF543 may determine its effects on cell viability. Alternatively, as an off-target effect, PF543 may inhibit mixed lineage kinase 1 (MLK1) at low concentrations [153]. The MLK family functions in JNK activation and TGF-β-induced cell death [156,157]. The cytotoxicity of PF543 by inhibiting SphK1 activity may be attenuated by its effects on the MLK family. On the other hand, at a concentration of 2.5 μM or higher, potent antiproliferative and cytotoxic effects of PF543 were demonstrated in human colorectal cancer cells, leading to necroptosis. In animal studies, intravenous injection of PF543 significantly suppressed HCT-166 xenograft growth while markedly improving mouse survival [158]. Treatment of oral SCC cells with PF543 at a concentration of 25 μM reduced cell viability, and induced apoptosis, necrosis, and autophagy, although autophagy promoted cell survival [159]. At higher concentrations, the inhibitory effects of PF543 on cell proliferation and cell survival may be ascribed to its off-target effects on other cellular enzymes, including SphK2. Levels of SphK1 in triple-negative breast cancer patients were significantly higher than those in patients with other breast tumors. PF543 sensitized such breast cancer cells to 5-FU and doxorubicin [160,161]. A PF543 derivative, Compound-2, has inhibitory activity on SphK1 in a manner similar to that of PF543, but it exerted antitumor activity on HT29 and HCT116 colorectal cancer cells at low concentrations [162].

6.3.3. FTY720 (Fingolimod)

FTY720 is a sphingosine analog that functions via intracellular and extracellular pathways [163,164,165]. FTY720 is phosphorylated by SphK2 to become p-FTY720, and down-regulates S1PRs and inhibits T lymphocyte leakage in lymphoid tissues, marking it an immunosuppressant for recurrent multiple sclerosis [166,167]. S1PR inhibition by p-FTY720 sensitized drug-resistant colorectal cancer cells and tumors to cetuximab [25]. At higher concentrations (5–10 μM), FTY720 was demonstrated to be a potent apoptosis inducer in prostate, liver, and bladder cancer cells [165,168,169]. The antitumor effects of FTY720 were suggested to be due to its ability to stimulate ROS production, which culminated in PKCδ activation and subsequent caspase-3-dependent apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells [170] (Figure 3B). FTY720 also activates PP2A, which dephosphorylates proteins, with the most well-defined targets being Akt, Erk, c-Myc, and β-catenin, all of which are known to play a role in tumorigenesis [171,172]. In oral SCC, FTY720 inhibited Akt/NF-κB signaling, facilitated the proteasomal degradation of the antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1, and increased ROS generation, leading to apoptosis. When FTY720-induced autophagy was blocked by the autophagy inhibitor bafilomycin A1, FTY720-induced cell death was suppressed. This suggests that FTY720 induces autophagic cell death in oral SCC cells [173]. FTY720 acts synergistically with cisplatin to induce cell death [174]. In contrast to FTY720, OSU-2S was not phosphorylated by SphK2 in vitro and did not cause S1PR internalization in hepatocellular carcinoma cells or T lymphocyte homing in immunocompetent mice. OSU-2S suppressed the proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma via ROS/PKCδ/caspase signaling and exhibited high in vivo potency in suppressing xenograft tumor growth without overt toxicity [175]. Furthermore, another FTY720 analog, Compound 7, which activates PP2A with antitumor activity was previously developed based on a PP2A docking study [176].

6.3.4. ABC294640 (Opaganib)

ABC294640, 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-adamantane-1-carboxylic acid (pyridin-4-ylmethyl)amide, is a small-molecule SphK2-selective inhibitor that is orally available, has favorable pharmacological properties, and can reach therapeutic levels in mouse plasma and tumors without overt toxicity [136,177,178]. ABC294640 reduces S1P levels and increases ceramide in tumor cells, suppresses signaling through Akt, Erk, and NF-κB, increases proteasomal degradation of c-Myc, and promotes autophagy and/or apoptosis in a variety of cancer cells. In addition, ABC294640 induces proteasomal degradation of SphK1 and DES [179] (Figure 3C). As dihydroceramide was reported to be involved in ER stress [146], accumulation of dihydroceramide by DES inhibition may induce ER stress and ROS production, and function in the antitumor effects of ABC294640 [136,180]. In a phase I clinical study, ABC294640 was orally administered continuously in cycles of 28 days to 21 patients with advanced solid cancer [181]. The most common drug-related toxicities were nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. Among the patients evaluated, one (6%) had a partial response, six (38%) had stable disease, and nine (56%) had progressive disease as their best response. ABC294640 increased the transcription of pro-apoptotic Noxa and degradation of prosurvival Bcl-2 family molecule Mcl-1 in human cholangiocarcinoma cells. ABC294640 synergized with Bcl-2/Bcl-xL inhibitors ABT-263 and Obatoclax to induce cholangiocarcinoma cell death [182,183].

6.4. CerK Inhibitor

The CerK/C1P pathway has been implicated in survival signaling for cancer progression [184]. Exogenous C1P at low concentrations was reported to increase the survival and proliferation of NIH3T3 fibroblasts and A549 lung cancer cells, but at high concentrations, it reduced survival and induced apoptosis in correlation with the conversion of C1P to proapoptotic ceramide [185]. In MCF-7 breast cancer and NCI-H358 lung cancer cells, the CerK inhibitor NVP-231 caused a concentration-dependent decrease in cell viability and induced apoptosis. Cell cycle analysis revealed that NVP-231 reduced the number of cells in S phase and induced M phase arrest [186]. CerK is up-regulated in metastatic breast cancer cells, and plays a role in migration and invasion. The increased migration of CerK overexpressing cells was mitigated by NVP-231 via inhibition of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway and Rho kinase, but not by inhibition of the classical Erk pathway [187].

7. Anti-S1P Antibody

Antibodies against S1P have been generated to block the S1P-mediated growth signal [188,189]. Sonepcizumab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody directed at S1P. In a phase I study for treatment-resistant solid tumors, no dose-limiting adverse events were observed [190]. A phase II study was performed in patients with metastatic renal carcinoma with a history of prior VEGF-directed therapy [191]. Although the study did not achieve its primary endpoint based on two-month progression-free survival, a median overall survival of 21.7 months was observed. Four (10%) of 40 patients demonstrated a partial response, with a median duration of response of 5.9 months. No grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were observed. The most frequent grade 1/2 treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (30%), weight gain (18%), constipation (15%), and nausea (15%).

8. Synthetic Ceramides

Short-chain ceramides, unlike long-chain ceramides, can induce cell death, which is useful for therapeutic applications in cancer [192,193]. However, decreased solubility and bioavailability of ceramides analogues present problems for their delivery as chemotherapeutic agents in vivo. To overcome these problems, varied-chain pyridinium ceramides, such as C6-, C16-, or C18-pyridinium ceramides, have been synthesized with increased solubility and cell membrane permeability [194,195]. When PDT was combined with C6-pyridinum ceramide (LCL29), apoptosis via mitochondrial ceramide accumulation was increased [193]. A cationic water-soluble L-thero-C6-pyridinium-ceramide bromide (Ws-CER) inhibited the growth of several HNSCC cell lines, independent of their p53 status. Consistent with its targeting ability to negatively charged intracellular compartments, Ws-CER accumulated mainly in mitochondria- and nuclei-enriched fractions from treated cancer cells [192]. The combination of Ws-CER with gemcitabine further suppressed HNSCC in mice. Liposome-mediated delivery of C6-ceramide was reported to be an effective drug delivery method. Nanoliposomal C6-ceramide inhibited the in vitro and in vivo growth of breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, hepatocellular carcinoma, ovarian cancer, and melanoma [196,197,198,199,200,201]. Nanoliposomal C6-ceramide induced the phosphorylation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and PKCζ, and dephosphorylation of PKCα. Concomitantly, activated PKCζ caused the dephosphorylation of paxillin, resulting in stress fiber depolymerization and focal adhesion disassembly in the metastatic tumor cells [202]. The combined use of nanoliposomal C6-ceramide with sub-therapeutic concentrations of gemcitabine exhibited cell toxicity in PANC-1, a gemcitabine-resistant human pancreatic cancer cell line [203].

9. Future Perspectives

A characteristic of treatment for HNSCC is the application of photon radiotherapy with gamma rays and X-rays. Although it is possible to irradiate a high dose of 6–13 Gy equivalent in particle radiotherapy using proton or carbon beams [204,205], each irradiation dose in fractionated X-ray radiotherapy for head and neck cancer is usually 2 Gy [206]. Previous studies reported that ceramide production in tumors and tumor vessels was low at an irradiation dose of 2 Gy [99,207]. Therefore, it is necessary to further investigate the interaction between the X-ray irradiation dose and ceramide production. PDT was reported to produce ceramide in the treatment of oral SCC, and the combined use of synthetic ceramide further increases the ceramide level and antitumor effects [193]. However, its effects may be limited to the superficial layer of advanced tumors. Microbubbles are often composed of microscopic lipid or protein shells encapsulating gaseous content, such as octafluoropropane, and have previously been used for imaging, gene delivery, tumor ablation, and as disrupting agents [208]. Recent studies using preclinical models of human tumors demonstrated that ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB) can mechanically perturb cell membranes, resulting in additive increases in ceramide-based radiation effects [209,210]. This method was confirmed to accumulate ceramide in endothelial, leukemia, breast cancer, prostate cancer, and fibrosarcoma cells [211,212], and has the advantage of producing ceramide at deeper tumors. Indeed, when sarcoma-bearing mice were treated with varying radiation doses with prior USMB exposure, acute vascular effects were induced, resulting in extensive tumor cell death. This was caused by increased ceramide production and can be elicited at low radiation doses (<8 Gy) by prior USMB exposure [213]. For distant metastasis unable to be treated by radiotherapy, chemotherapy with cisplatin or paclitaxel may be combined with USMB to increase the ceramide production at the site of ultrasound exposure. On the other hand, Alphonse et al. [129] demonstrated that a drug cocktail of GluCS inhibitor, CDase inhibitor, and imipramine increased ceramide levels in HNSCC cells, with marked effects on radiation sensitivity. This suggests that inhibitors of GluCS, CDase, SphK, or CerK can be used simultaneously to improve therapeutic outcomes.

10. Application of Sphingolipid Target Therapy to HNSCC

The aCDase is overexpressed in 70% of HNSCC compared to normal controls (Section 4). Therefore, the aCDase inhibitor, LCL204, which can sensitize HNSCC cells to Fas-induced apoptosis in vitro and in vivo, could be a therapeutic agent for HNSCC (Section 6.1). SphK1 expression was also shown to be elevated in head and neck SCC compared to normal tissue, and positive SphK1 expression was associated with shorter survival time. SphK1 was found to be a target of the microRNA, miR-124, which acts as a suppressor in HNSCC by directly inhibiting SphK1 activity and downstream signaling (Section 6.3). These findings suggest that SphK1 inhibitors could be used to treat HNSCC. Indeed, in a phase I study, treatment of solid tumors containing HNSCC with safingol and cisplatin effectively down-regulated S1P (Section 6.3.1). Synthetic ceramides, such as C6-pyridium ceramide, enhanced the ability of PDT to accumulate ceramide in mitochondria, followed by cytochrome c release and caspase 3 activation. Therefore, the utility of C6-pyridium ceramide in the treatment of HNSCC with PDT was suggested (Section 8). As a clinical study, a phase II clinical trial revealed that combination therapy with gemcitabine and doxorubicin was an effective treatment for some patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC, and that serum C-18-ceramide elevation can serve as a serum biomarker to determine responsiveness to chemotherapy (Section 5). In another clinical trial, patients with recurrent HNSCC were treated with combination therapy of in vitro-expanded natural killer T (NKT) cells and α-galactosylceramide (αGalCer)-pulsed antigen-presenting cells. The intra-arterial infusion of Vα24NKT cells and the submucosal injection of αGalCer-pulsed APC induced significant antitumor immunity with beneficial clinical effects in the management of advanced HNSCC [214]. Thus, although clinical trials on sphingolipids in HNSCC have been limited, GluCS inhibitors, SphKs inhibitors (PF543, FTY720, and ABC294640), CerK inhibitors, anti-S1P antibodies, and synthetic ceramides (Section 6, Section 7 and Section 8) against HNSCC should be validated in clinical studies. Radiotherapy is a major treatment modality for HNSCC, with radiation increasing ceramide levels through hydrolysis of sphingolipid by SMase and CerS-mediated synthesis (Section 4). Because these reagents can be used to sensitize SCC to radiotherapy/ radiochemotherapy, HNSCC is in an advantageous situation compared to tumors that cannot be treated with radiation.

11. Conclusions

Although a number of inhibitors for ceramide- and sphingosine-metabolizing enzymes have been developed, published clinical trials have been limited to several inhibitors, such as safingol and ABC294640, and the anti-S1P antibody sonepcizumab. The major role of these inhibitors may be to increase the sensitivity of HNSCC, including oral SCC, to radiotherapy and chemotherapy through the increase in ceramide levels in the tumor. When the X-ray radiation dose in fractionated radiotherapy is low, an additional method, such as prior USMB exposure, is helpful to increase ceramide generation. Based on studies using the SphK2-selective inhibitor ABC294640, it can inhibit DES and SphK2. This suggests the importance of off-target effects of the inhibitor in its antitumor activity. In order to improve the therapeutic effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for HNSCC, a cocktail of multiple inhibitors for ceramide- and sphingosine-metabolizing enzymes may be also useful.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Marur, S.; Forastiere, A.A. Head and neck cancer: Changing epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2008, 83, 489–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bagan, J.; Sarrion, G.; Jimenez, Y. Oral cancer: Clinical features. Oral Oncol. 2010, 46, 414–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2017, 67, 7–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Vigneswaran, N.; Williams, M.D. Epidemiological trends in head and neck cancer and aids in diagnosis. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2014, 26, 123–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cohen, E.E.; Lingen, M.W.; Vokes, E.E. The expanding role of systemic therapy in head and neck cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2004, 22, 1743–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pignon, J.-P.; le Maitre, A.; Bourhis, J.; MACH-NC Collaborative Group. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): An update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother. Oncol. 2009, 92, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Merlano, M.C.; Denaro, N.; Galizia, D.; Garrone, O. How I treat squamous ENT cancer. ESMO Open 2019, 4, e000542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nature 2015, 517, 576–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Chinn, S.B.; Myers, J.N. Oral cavity carcinoma: Current management, controversies, and future directions. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 33, 3269–3276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Machiels, J.P.; Lambrecht, M.; Hanin, F.X.; Duprez, T.; Gregoire, V.; Schmitz, S.; Hamoir, M. Advances in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. F1000Prime Rep. 2014, 6, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Agrawal, N.; Frederick, M.J.; Pickering, C.R.; Bettegowda, C.; Chang, K.; Li, R.J.; Fakhry, C.; Xie, T.X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J.; et al. Exome sequencing of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma reveals inactivating mutations in NOTCH1. Science 2011, 333, 1154–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Stransky, N.; Egloff, A.M.; Tward, A.D.; Kostic, A.D.; Cibulskis, K.; Sivachenko, A.; Kryukov, G.V.; Lawrence, M.S.; Sougnez, C.; McKenna, A.; et al. The mutational landscape of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Science 2011, 333, 1157–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Price, K.A.; Cohen, E.E. Current treatment options for metastatic head and neck cancer. Curr. Treat. Opt. Oncol. 2012, 13, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kozakiewicz, P.; Grzybowska-Szatkowska, L. Application of molecular targeted therapies in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 15, 7497–7505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Sola, A.M.; Johnson, D.E.; Grandis, J.R. Investigational multitargeted kinase inhibitors in development for head and neck neoplasms. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2019, 28, 351–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Beckham, T.H.; Elojeimy, S.; Cheng, J.C.; Turner, L.S.; Hoffman, S.; Norris, J.S.; Liu, X. Targeting sphingolipid metabolism in head and neck cancer:rational therapeutic potentials. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2010, 14, 529–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Tamashiro, P.M.; Furuya, H.; Shimizu, Y.; Iino, K.; Kawamori, T. The impact of sphingosine kinase-1 in head and neck cancer. Biomolecules 2013, 3, 481–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Liu, J.; Beckman, B.S.; Foroozesh, M. A review of ceramide analogs as potential anticancer agents. Future Med. Chem. 2013, 5, 1405–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Camp, E.R.; Patterson, L.D.; Kester, M.; Voelkel-Johnson, C. Therapeutic implications of bioactive sphingolipids: A focus on colorectal cancer. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2017, 18, 640–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ogretmen, B. Sphingolipid metabolism in cancer signalling and therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2018, 18, 33–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shaw, J.; Costa-Pinheiro, P.; Patterson, L.; Drews, K.; Spiegel, S.; Kester, M. Novel sphingolipid-based cancer therapeutics in the personalized medicine era. Adv. Cancer. Res. 2018, 140, 327–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liu, Y.Y.; Han, T.Y.; Giuliano, A.E.; Cabot, M.C. Ceramide glycosylation potentiates cellular multidrug resistance. FASEB J. 2001, 15, 719–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Patwardhan, G.A.; Zhang, Q.-J.; Yin, D.; Gupta, V.; Bao, J.; Senkal, C.E.; Ogretmen, B.; Cabot, M.C.; Shah, G.V.; Sylvester, P.W.; et al. A new mixed-backbone oligonucleotide against glucosylceramide synthase sensitizes multidrug-resistant tumors to apoptosis. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Liu, Y.Y.; Patwardhan, G.A.; Bhinge, K.; Gupta, V.; Gu, X.; Jazwinski, S.M. Suppression of glucosylceramide synthase restores p53-dependent apoptosis in mutant p53 cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 2276–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Rosa, R.; Marciano, R.; Malapelle, U.; Formisano, L.; Nappi, L.; D’Amato, C.; D’Amato, V.; Damiano, V.; Marfè, G.; Del Vecchio, S.D.; et al. Sphingosine kinase 1 overexpression contributes to cetuximab resistance in human colorectal cancer models. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Hannun, Y.A.; Obeid, L.M. Principles of bioactive lipid signalling: Lessons from sphingolipids. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ogretmen, B.; Hannun, Y.A. Biologically active sphingolipids in cancer pathogenesis and treatment. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2004, 4, 604–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gault, C.R.; Obeid, L.M.; Hannun, Y.A. An overview of sphingolipid metabolism: From synthesis to breakdown. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2010, 688, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kroll, A.; Cho, H.E.; Kang, M.H. Antineoplastic agents targeting sphingolipid pathways. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Eliyahu, E.; Park, J.H.; Shtraizent, N.; He, X.; Schuchman, E.H. Acid ceramidase is a novel factor required for early embryo survival. FASEB J. 2007, 21, 1403–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mao, Z.; Sun, W.; Xu, R.; Novgorodov, S.; Szulc, Z.M.; Bielawski, J.; Obeid, L.M.; Mao, C. Alkaline ceramidase 2 (ACER2) and its product dihydrosphingosine mediate the cytotoxicity of N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) retinamide in tumor cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 29078–29090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Airola, M.V.; Allen, W.J.; Pulkoski-Gross, M.J.; Obeid, L.M.; Rizzo, R.C.; Hannun, Y.A. Structural basis for ceramide recognition and hydrolysis by human neutral ceramidase. Structure 2015, 23, 1482–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Hait, N.C.; Maiti, A. The role of sphingosine-1-phosphate and ceramide-1-phosphate in inflammation and cancer. Mediat. Inflamm. 2017, 2017, 4806541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pitson, S.M.; Moretti, P.A.B.; Zebol, J.R.; Lynn, H.E.; Xia, P.; Vadas, M.A.; Wattenberg, B.W. Activation of sphingosine kinase 1 by ERK1/2-mediated phosphorylation. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 5491–5500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Igarashi, N.; Okada, T.; Hayashi, S.; Fujita, T.; Jahangeer, S.; Nakamura, S. Sphingosine kinase 2 is a nuclear protein and inhibits DNA synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 46832–46839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Pitson, S.M.; Xia, P.; Leclercq, T.M.; Moretti, P.A.; Zebol, J.R.; Lynn, H.E.; Wattenberg, B.W.; Vadas, M.A. Phosphorylation-dependent translocation of sphingosine kinase to the plasma membrane drives its oncogenic signalling. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 201, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Spiegel, S.; Milstien, S. Sphingosine-1-phosphate: An enigmatic signalling lipid. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4, 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pyne, N.J.; Pyne, S. Sphingosine 1-phosphate and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2010, 10, 489–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Brinkmann, V. Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors in health and disease: Mechanistic insights from gene deletion studies and reverse pharmacology. Pharmacol. Ther. 2007, 115, 84–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sukocheva, O.A. Expansion of sphingosine kinase and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor function in normal and cancer cells: From membrane restructuring to mediation of estrogen signaling and stem cell programming. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Jeckel, D.; Karrenbauer, A.; Burger, K.N.; van Meer, G.; Wieland, F. Glucosylceramide is synthesized at the cytosolic surface of various Golgi subfractions. J. Cell Biol. 1992, 117, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Ichikawa, S.; Sakiyama, H.; Suzuki, G.; Hidari, K.I.; Hirabayashi, Y. Expression cloning of a cDNA for human ceramide glucosyltransferase that catalyzes the first glycosylation step of glycosphingolipid synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 4638–4643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Lamour, N.F.; Stahelin, R.V.; Wijesinghe, D.S.; Maceyka, M.; Wang, E.; Allegood, J.C.; Merrill, A.H., Jr.; Cho, W.; Chalfant, C.E. Ceramide kinase uses ceramide provided by ceramide transport protein: Localization to organelles of eicosanoid synthesis. J. Lipid Res. 2007, 48, 1293–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Sugiura, M.; Kono, K.; Liu, H.; Shimizugawa, T.; Minekura, H.; Spiegel, S.; Kohama, T. Ceramide kinase, a novel lipid kinase. Molecular cloning and functional characterization. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 23294–23300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Wijesinghe, D.S.; Brentnall, M.; Mietla, J.A.; Hoeferlin, L.A.; Diegelmann, R.F.; Boise, L.H.; Chalfant, C.E. Ceramide kinase is required for a normal eicosanoid response and the subsequent orderly migration of fibroblasts. J. Lipid Res. 2014, 55, 1298–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Payne, A.W.; Pant, D.K.; Pan, T.C.; Chodosh, L.A. Ceramide kinase promotes tumor cell survival and mammary tumor recurrence. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 6352–6363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Senkal, C.E.; Ponnusamy, S.; Bielawski, J.; Hannun, Y.A.; Ogretmen, B. Antiapoptotic roles of ceramide-synthase-6-generated C16-ceramide via selective regulation of the ATF6/CHOP arm of ER-stress-response pathways. FASEB J. 2010, 24, 296–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Arana, L.; Gangoiti, P.; Ouro, A.; Rivera, I.G.; Ordoñez, M.; Trueba, M.; Lankalapalli, R.S.; Bittman, R.; Gomez-Muñoz, A. Generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is a key factor for stimulation of macrophage proliferation by ceramide 1-phosphate. Exp. Cell Res. 2012, 318, 350–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hannun, Y.A.; Obeid, L.M. Many ceramides. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 27855–27862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Morad, S.A.F.; Cabot, M.C. Ceramide-orchestrated signalling in cancer cells. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013, 13, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Koybasi, S.; Senkal, C.E.; Sundararaj, K.; Spassieva, S.; Bielawski, J.; Osta, W.; Day, T.A.; Jiang, J.C.; Jazwinski, S.M.; Hannun, Y.A.; et al. Defects in cell growth regulation by C18:0-ceramide and longevity assurance gene 1 in human head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 44311–44319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Karahatay, S.; Thomas, K.; Koybasi, S.; Senkal, C.E.; Elojeimy, S.; Liu, X.; Bielawski, J.; Day, T.A.; Gillespie, M.B.; Sinha, D.; et al. Clinical relevance of ceramide metabolism in the pathogenesis of human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC): Attenuation of C(18)-ceramide in HNSCC tumors correlates with lymphovascular invasion and nodal metastasis. Cancer Lett. 2007, 256, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Senkal, C.E.; Ponnusamy, S.; Rossi, M.J.; Bialewski, J.; Sinha, D.; Jiang, J.C.; Jazwinski, S.M.; Hannun, Y.A.; Ogretmen, B. Role of human longevity assurance gene 1 and C18-ceramide in chemotherapy-induced cell death in human head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2007, 6, 712–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Young, M.M.; Kester, M.; Wang, H.G. Sphingolipids: Regulators of crosstalk between apoptosis and autophagy. J. Lipid Res. 2013, 54, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Lecour, S.; Van der Merwe, E.; Opie, L.H.; Sack, M.N. Ceramide attenuates hypoxic cell death via reactive oxygen species signaling. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2006, 47, 158163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Corda, S.; Laplace, C.; Vicaut, E.; Duranteau, J. Rapid reactive oxygen species production by mitochondria in endothelial cells exposed to tumor necrosis factor-alpha is mediated by ceramide. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2001, 24, 762–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, A.Y.; Yi, F.; Jin, S.; Xia, M.; Chen, Q.Z.; Gulbins, E.; Li, P.L. Acid sphingomyelinase and its redox amplification in formation of lipid raft redox signaling platforms in endothelial cells. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2007, 9, 817–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, P.-L.; Zhang, Y. Cross talk between ceramide and redox signaling: Implications for endothelial dysfunction and renal disease. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2013, 216, 171–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Barth, B.M.; Gustafson, S.J.; Kuhn, T.B. Neutral sphingomyelinase activation precedes NADPH oxidase-dependent damage in neurons exposed to the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-α. J. Neurosci. Res. 2012, 90, 229–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Barth, B.M.; Gustafson, S.J.; Hankins, J.L.; Kaiser, J.M.; Haakenson, J.K.; Kester, M.; Kuhn, T.B. Ceramide kinase regulates TNFα-stimulated NADPH oxidase activity and eicosanoid biosynthesis in neuroblastoma cells. Cell. Signal. 2012, 24, 1126–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Gudz, T.I.; Tserng, K.Y.; Hoppel, C.I. Direct inhibition of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex III by cell-permeable ceramide. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 24154–24158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. García-Ruiz, C.; Colell, A.; Marí, M.; Morales, A.; Fernández-Checa, J.C. Direct effect of ceramide on the mitochondrial electron transport chain leads to generation of reactive oxygen species. Role of mitochondrial glutathione. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 11369–11377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Ganesan, V.; Perera, M.N.; Colombini, D.; Datskovskiy, D.; Chadha, K.; Colombini, M. Ceramide and activated Bax act synergistically to permeabilize the mitochondrial outer membrane. Apoptosis 2010, 15, 553–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Shi, Y. Serine/threonine phosphatases: Mechanism through structure. Cell 2009, 139, 468–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. O’Connor, C.M.; Perl, A.; Leonard, D.; Sangodkar, J.; Narla, G. Therapeutic Targeting of PP2A. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2018, 96, 182–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ruvolo, P.P.; Deng, X.; Ito, T.; Carr, B.K.; May, W.S. Ceramide induces Bcl2 dephosphorylation via a mechanism involving mitochondrial PP2A. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 20296–20300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Deng, X.; Gao, F.; May, W.S. Protein phosphatase 2A inactivates Bcl2’s antiapoptotic function by dephosphorylation and up-regulation of Bcl2-p53 binding. Blood 2009, 113, 422–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Oaks, J.; Ogretmen, B. Regulation of PP2A by Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling. Front Oncol. 2015, 4, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Wang, Y.M.; Seibenhener, M.L.; Vandenplas, M.L.; Wooten, M.W. Atypical PKC zeta is activated by ceramide, resulting in coactivation of NF-kappaB/JNK kinase and cell survival. J. Neurosci. Res. 1999, 55, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bourbon, N.A.; Yun, J.; Kester, M. Ceramide directly activates protein kinase C zeta to regulate a stress-activated protein kinase signaling complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 35617–35623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Fox, T.E.; Houck, K.L.; O’Neill, S.M.; Nagarajan, M.; Stover, T.C.; Pomianowski, P.T.; Unal, O.; Yun, J.K.; Naides, S.J.; Kester, M. Ceramide recruits and activates protein kinase C zeta (PKC zeta) within structured membrane microdomains. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 12450–12457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Nishizuka, Y. Intracellular signaling by hydrolysis of phospholipids and activation of protein kinase C. Science 1992, 258, 607–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nishikawa, K.; Toker, A.; Johannes, F.J.; Songyang, Z.; Cantley, L.C. Determination of the specific substrate sequence motifs of protein kinase C isozymes. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 952–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Newton, A.C. Protein kinase C as a tumor suppressor. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2018, 48, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Castagna, M.; Takai, Y.; Kaibuchi, K.; Sano, K.; Kikkawa, U.; Nishizuka, Y. Direct activation of calcium-activated, phospholipid-dependent protein kinase by tumor-promoting phorbol esters. J. Biol. Chem. 1982, 257, 7847–7851. [Google Scholar]
  76. Kurinna, S.M.; Tsao, C.C.; Nica, A.F.; Jiffar, T.; Ruvolo, P.P. Ceramide promotes apoptosis in lung cancer-derived A549 cells by a mechanism involving c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 7852–7856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. McSkimming, D.I.; Dastgheib, S.; Baffi, T.R.; Byrne, D.P.; Ferries, S.; Scott, S.T.; Newton, A.C.; Eyers, C.E.; Kochut, K.J.; Eyers, P.A.; et al. A visual comparative sequence analysis tool for integrated kinome research. Mol. Biosyst. 2016, 12, 3651–3665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Scarlatti, F.; Bauvy, C.; Ventruti, A.; Sala, G.; Cluzeaud, F.; Vandewalle, A.; Ghidoni, R.; Codogno, P. Ceramidemediated macroautophagy involves inhibition of protein kinase B and up-regulation of beclin 1. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 18384–18391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Pattingre, S.; Bauvy, C.; Carpentier, S.; Levade, T.; Levine, B.; Codogno, P. Role of JNK1-dependent Bcl-2 phosphorylation in ceramide-induced macroautophagy. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 2719–2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Taniguchi, M.; Kitatani, K.; Kondo, T.; Hashimoto-Nishimura, M.; Asano, S.; Hayashi, A.; Mitsutake, S.; Igarashi, Y.; Umehara, H.; Takeya, H.; et al. Regulation of autophagy and its associated cell death by “sphingolipid rheostat”: Reciprocal role of ceramide and sphingosine 1-phosphate in the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 39898–39910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Li, D.D.; Wang, L.L.; Deng, R.; Tang, J.; Shen, Y.; Guo, J.F.; Wang, Y.; Xia, L.P.; Feng, G.K.; Liu, Q.Q.; et al. The pivotal role of c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase-mediated Beclin 1 expression during anticancer agents-induced autophagy in cancer cells. Oncogene 2009, 28, 886–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Sun, T.; Li, D.D.; Wang, L.; Xia, L.P.; Ma, J.G.; Guan, Z.; Feng, G.K.; Zhu, X.F. c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase activation is essential for up-regulation of LC3 during ceramide-induced autophagy in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. J. Transl. Med. 2011, 9, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Sentelle, R.D.; Senkal, C.E.; Jiang, W.; Ponnusamy, S.; Gencer, S.; Selvam, S.P.; Ramshesh, V.K.; Peterson, Y.K.; Lemasters, J.J.; Szulc, Z.M.; et al. Ceramide targets autophagosomes to mitochondria and induces lethal mitophagy. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2012, 8, 831–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Oleinik, N.; Kim, J.; Roth, B.M.; Selvam, S.P.; Gooz, M.; Johnson, R.H.; Lemasters, J.J.; Ogretmen, B. Mitochondrial protein import is regulated by p17/PERMIT to mediate lipid metabolism and cellular stress. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaax1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Hampton, R.Y. ER-associated degradation in protein quality control and cellular regulation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2002, 14, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Schroder, M.; Kaufman, R.J. The mammalian unfolded protein response. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2005, 74, 739–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Chang, T.Y.; Chang, C.C.; Ohgami, N.; Yamauchi, Y. Cholesterol sensing, trafficking, and esterification. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2006, 22, 129–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Mori, K. Tripartite management of unfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell 2000, 101, 451–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Rutkowski, D.T.; Kaufman, R.J. A trip to the ER: Coping with stress. Trends Cell Biol. 2004, 14, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ron, D.; Walter, P. Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Choi, S.; Snider, J.M.; Olakkengil, N.; Lambert, J.M.; Anderson, A.K.; Ross-Evans, J.S.; Cowart, L.A.; Snider, A.J. Myristate-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress requires ceramide synthases 5/6 and generation of C14-ceramide in intestinal epithelial cells. FASEB J. 2018, 32, 5724–5736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Spassieva, S.D.; Mullen, T.D.; Townsend, D.M.; Obeid, L.M. Disruption of ceramide synthesis by CerS2 down-regulation leads to autophagy and the unfolded protein response. Biochem. J. 2009, 424, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Haynes, C.M.; Titus, E.A.; Cooper, A.A. Degradation of misfolded proteins prevents ER-derived oxidative stress and cell death. Mol. Cell 2004, 15, 767–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Marciniak, S.J.; Yun, C.Y.; Oyadomari, S.; Novoa, I.; Zhang, Y.; Jungreis, R.; Nagata, K.; Harding, H.P.; Ron, D. CHOP induces death by promoting protein synthesis and oxidation in the stressed endoplasmic reticulum. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 3066–3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Salazar, M.; Carracedo, A.; Salanueva, I.J.; Hernández-Tiedra, S.; Lorente, M.; Egia, A.; Vázquez, P.; Blázquez, C.; Torres, S.; García, S.; et al. Cannabinoid action induces autophagy-mediated cell death through stimulation of ER stress in human glioma cells. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 1359–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Haimovitz-Friedman, A.; Kan, C.C.; Ehleiter, D.; Persaud, R.S.; McLoughlin, M.; Fuks, Z.; Kolesnick, R.N. Ionizing radiation acts on cellular membranes to generate ceramide and initiate apoptosis. J. Exp. Med. 1994, 180, 525–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Vit, J.P.; Rosselli, F. Role of the ceramide-signaling pathways in ionizing radiation-induced apoptosis. Oncogene 2003, 22, 8645–8652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Hara, S.; Nakashima, S.; Kiyono, T.; Sawada, M.; Yoshimura, S.; Iwama, T.; Banno, Y.; Shinoda, J.; Sakai, N. p53-Independent ceramide formation in human glioma cells during gamma-radiation-induced apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2004, 11, 853–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Mesicek, J.; Lee, H.; Feldman, T.; Jiang, X.; Skobeleva, A.; Berdyshev, E.V.; Haimovitz-Friedman, A.; Fuks, Z.; Kolesnick, R. Ceramide synthases 2, 5, and 6 confer distinct roles in radiation-induced apoptosis in HeLa cells. Cell. Signal. 2010, 22, 1300–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Carroll, B.; Donaldson, J.C.; Obeid, L. Sphingolipids in the DNA damage response. Adv. Biol. Regul. 2015, 58, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Fuks, Z.; Kolesnick, R. Engaging the vascular component of the tumor response. Cancer Cell 2005, 8, 89–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Bodo, S.; Campagne, C.; Thin, T.H.; Higginson, D.S.; Vargas, H.A.; Hua, G.; Fuller, J.D.; Ackerstaff, E.; Russell, J.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Single-dose radiotherapy disables tumor cell homologous recombination via ischemia/reperfusion injury. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 129, 786–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Elojeimy, S.; Liu, X.; McKillop, J.C.; El-Zawahry, A.M.; Holman, D.H.; Cheng, J.Y.; Meacham, W.D.; Mahdy, A.E.; Saad, A.F.; Turner, L.S.; et al. Role of acid ceramidase in resistance to FasL: Therapeutic approaches based on acid ceramidase inhibitors and FasL gene therapy. Mol. Ther. 2007, 15, 1259–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Cheng, J.C.; Bai, A.; Beckham, T.H.; Marrison, S.T.; Yount, C.L.; Young, K.; Lu, P.; Bartlett, A.M.; Wu, B.X.; Keane, B.J.; et al. Radiation-induced acid ceramidase confers prostate cancer resistance and tumor relapse. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 4344–4358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Garzotto, M.; Haimovitz-Friedman, A.; Liao, W.C.; White-Jones, M.; Huryk, R.; Heston, W.D.; Cardon-Cardo, C.; Kolesnick, R.; Fuks, Z. Reversal of radiation resistance in LNCaP cells by targeting apoptosis through ceramide synthase. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 5194–5201. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  106. Kolesnick, R.; Fuks, Z. Radiation and ceramide-induced apoptosis. Oncogene 2003, 22, 5897–5906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Bose, R.; Verheij, M.; Haimovitz-Friedman, A.; Scotto, K.; Fuks, Z.; Kolesnick, R. Ceramide synthase mediates daunorubicin-induced apoptosis: An alternative mechanism for generating death signals. Cell 1995, 82, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Jaffrézou, J.P.; Levade, T.; Bettaïeb, A.; Andrieu, N.; Bezombes, C.; Maestre, N.; Vermeersch, S.; Rousse, A.; Laurent, G. Daunorubicin-induced apoptosis: Triggering of ceramide generation through sphingomyelin hydrolysis. EMBO J. 1996, 15, 2417–2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Perry, D.K.; Carton, J.; Shah, A.K.; Meredith, F.; Uhlinger, D.J.; Hannun, Y.A. Serine palmitoyltransferase regulates de novo ceramide generation during etoposide-induced apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 9078–9084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Gouazé, V.; Liu, Y.Y.; Prickett, C.S.; Yu, J.Y.; Giuliano, A.E.; Cabot, M.C. Glucosylceramide synthase blockade down-regulates P-glycoprotein and resensitizes multidrug-resistant breast cancer cells to anticancer drugs. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 3861–3867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Saddoughi, S.A.; Garrett-Mayer, E.; Chaudhary, U.; O’Brien, P.E.; Afrin, L.B.; Day, T.A.; Gillespie, M.B.; Sharma, A.K.; Wilhoit, C.S.; Bostick, R.; et al. Results of a phase II trial of gemcitabine plus doxorubicin in patients with recurrent head and neck cancers: Serum C (1)(8)-ceramide as a novel biomarker for monitoring response. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 6097–6105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Zhang, X.; Wu, X.; Su, P.; Gao, Y.; Meng, B.; Sun, Y.; Li, L.; Zhou, Z.; Zhou, G. Doxorubicin influences the expression of glucosylceramide synthase in invasive ductal breast cancer. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Roh, J.L.; Kim, E.H.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, J.W. Inhibition of glucosylceramide synthase sensitizes head and neck cancer to cisplatin. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2015, 14, 1907–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Roh, J.L.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, E.H.; Jang, H.J. Targeting acid ceramidase sensitises head and neck cancer to cisplatin. Eur. J. Cancer 2016, 52, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Selzner, M.; Bielawska, A.; Morse, M.A.; Rüdiger, H.A.; Sindram, D.; Hannun, Y.A.; Clavien, P.A. Induction of apoptotic cell death and prevention of tumor growth by ceramide analogues in metastatic human colon cancer. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 1233–1240. [Google Scholar]
  116. Samsel, L.; Zaidel, G.; Drumgoole, H.M.; Jelovac, D.; Drachenberg, C.; Rhee, J.G.; Brodie, A.M.H.; Bielawska, A.; Smyth, M.J. The ceramide analog, B13, induces apoptosis in prostate cancer cell lines and inhibits tumor growth in prostate cancer xenografts. Prostate 2004, 58, 382–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Liu, X.; Elojeimy, S.; El-Zawahry, A.M.; Holman, D.H.; Bielawska, A.; Bielawski, J.; Rubinchik, S.; Guo, G.W.; Dong, J.Y.; Keane, T.; et al. Modulation of ceramide metabolism enhances viral protein apoptin’s cytotoxicity in prostate cancer. Mol. Ther. 2006, 14, 637–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Draper, J.M.; Xia, Z.; Smith, R.A.; Zhuang, Y.; Wang, W.; Smith, C.D. Discovery and evaluation of inhibitors of human ceramidase. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2011, 10, 2052–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Mahdy, A.E.M.; Cheng, J.C.; Li, J.; Elojeimy, S.; Meacham, W.D.; Turner, L.S.; Bai, A.; Gault, C.R.; McPherson, A.S.; Garcia, N.; et al. Acid ceramidase upregulation in prostate cancer cells confers resistance to radiation: AC inhibition, a potential radiosensitizer. Mol. Ther. 2009, 17, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Dougherty, T.J.; Gomer, C.J.; Henderson, B.W.; Jori, G.; Kessel, D.; Korbelik, M.; Moan, J.; Peng, Q. Photodynamic therapy. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1998, 90, 889–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Korbelik, M.; Banáth, J.; Zhang, W.; Saw, K.M.; Szulc, Z.M.; Bielawska, A.; Separovic, D. Interaction of acid ceramidase inhibitor LCL521 with tumor response to photodynamic therapy and photodynamic therapy-generated vaccine. Int. J. Cancer 2016, 139, 1372–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Yildiz-Ozer, M.; Oztopcu-Vatan, P.; Kus, G. The investigation of ceranib-2 on apoptosis and drug interaction with carboplatin in human non small cell lung cancer cells in vitro. Cytotechnology 2018, 70, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Pearson, J.M.; Tan, S.F.; Sharma, A.; Annageldiyev, C.; Fox, T.E.; Abad, J.L.; Fabrias, G.; Desai, D.; Amin, S.; Wang, H.G.; et al. Ceramide analogue SACLAC modulates sphingolipid levels and MCL-1 splicing to induce apoptosis in acute myeloid leukemia. Mol. Cancer Res. 2020, 18, 352–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Vunnam, R.R.; Radin, N.S. Analogs of ceramide that inhibit glucocerebroside synthetase in mouse brain. Chem. Phys. Lipids 1980, 26, 265–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Kovacs, P.; Pinter, M.; Csaba, G. Effect of glucosphingolipid synthesis inhibitor (PPMP and PDMP) treatment on Tetrahymena pyriformis: Data on the evolution of the signaling system. Cell. Biochem. Funct. 2000, 18, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Sietsma, H.; Veldman, R.J.; Kolk, D.; Ausema, B.; Nijhof, W.; Kamps, W.; Vellenga, E.; Kok, J.W. 1-phenyl-2-decanoylamino-3-morpholino-1-propanol chemosensitizes neuroblastoma cells for taxol and vincristine. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000, 6, 942–948. [Google Scholar]
  127. Dijkhuis, A.J.; Klappe, K.; Jacobs, S.; Kroesen, B.J.; Kamps, W.; Sietsma, H.; Kok, J.W. PDMP sensitizes neuroblastoma to paclitaxel by inducing aberrant cell cycle progression leading to hyperploidy. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2006, 5, 593–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Morad, S.A.F.; Davis, T.S.; MacDougall, M.R.; Tan, S.F.; Feith, D.J.; Desai, D.H.; Amin, S.G.; Kester, M.; Loughran, T.P., Jr.; Cabot, M.C. Role of P-glycoprotein inhibitors in ceramide-based therapeutics for treatment of cancer. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2017, 130, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Alphonse, G.; Bionda, C.; Aloy, M.-T.; Ardail, D.; Rousson, R.; Rodriguez-Lafrasse, C. Overcoming resistance to gamma-rays in squamous carcinoma cells by poly-drug elevation of ceramide levels. Oncogene 2004, 23, 2703–2715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Facchinetti, M.M.; Gandini, N.A.; Fermento, M.E.; Sterin-Speziale, N.B.; Ji, Y.; Patel, V.; Gutkind, J.S.; Rivadulla, M.G.; Curino, A.C. The expression of sphingosine kinase-1 in head and neck carcinoma. Cells Tissues Organs 2010, 192, 314–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Zhao, Y.; Ling, Z.; Hao, Y.; Pang, X.; Han, X.; Califano, J.A.; Shan, L.; Gu, X. MiR-124 acts as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting the expression of sphingosine kinase 1 and its downstream signaling in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 25005–25020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Edmonds, Y.; Milstien, S.; Spiegel, S. Development of small-molecule inhibitors of sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011, 132, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Pitman, M.R.; Powell, J.A.; Coolen, C.; Moretti, P.A.B.; Zebol, J.R.; Pham, D.H.; Finnie, J.W.; Don, A.S.; Ebert, L.M.; Bonder, C.S.; et al. A selective ATP-competitive sphingosine kinase inhibitor demonstrates anti-cancer properties. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 7065–7083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Pitman, M.R.; Costabile, M.; Pitson, S.M. Recent advances in the development of sphingosine kinase inhibitors. Cell. Signal. 2016, 28, 1349–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Powell, J.A.; Lewis, A.C.; Zhu, W.; Toubia, J.; Pitman, M.R.; Wallington-Beddoe, C.T.; Moretti, P.A.; Iarossi, D.; Samaraweera, S.E.; Cummings, N.; et al. Targeting sphingosine kinase 1 induces MCL1-dependent cell death in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2017, 129, 771–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Lewis, C.S.; Voelkel-Johnson, C.; Smith, C.D. Targeting sphingosine kinases for the treatment of cancer. Adv. Cancer Res. 2018, 140, 295–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Schwartz, G.K.; Haimovitz-Friedman, A.; Dhupar, S.K.; Ehleiter, D.; Maslak, P.; Loganzo, F.; Kelsen, D.P.; Fuks, Z.; Albino, A.P. Potentiation of apoptosis by treatment with the protein kinase C specific inhibitor safingol in mitomycin-C treated gastric cancer cells. J. NatI. Cancer Inst. 1995, 8, 1394–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Buehrer, B.M.; Bell, R.M. Inhibition of sphingosine kinase in vitro and in platelets. Implications for signal transduction pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 3154–3159. [Google Scholar]
  139. Olivera, A.; Kohama, T.; Tu, Z.; Milstien, S.; Spiegel, S. Purification and characterization of rat kidney sphingosine kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 12576–12583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Ling, L.U.; Tan, K.B.; Lin, H.; Chiu, G.N. The role of reactive oxygen species and autophagy in safingol-induced cell death. Cell Death Dis. 2011, 2, e129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Hamada, M.; Wakabayashi, K.; Masui, A.; Iwai, S.; Imai, T.; Yura, Y. Involvement of hydrogen peroxide in safingol-induced endonuclease G-mediated apoptosis of squamous cell carcinoma cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 2660–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Hamada, M.; Sumi, T.; Iwai, S.; Nakazawa, M.; Yura, Y. Induction of endonuclease G-mediated apopotosis in human oral squamous cell carcinoma cells by protein kinase C inhibitor safingol. Apoptosis 2006, 11, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Noda, T.; Iwai, S.; Hamada, M.; Fujita, Y.; Yura, Y. Induction of apoptosis of detached oral squamous cell carcinoma cells by safingol. Possible role of Bim, focal adhesion kinase and endonuclease G. Apoptosis 2009, 14, 287–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Masui, A.; Hamada, M.; Kameyama, H.; Wakabayashi, K.; Takasu, A.; Imai, T.; Iwai, S.; Yura, Y. Autophagy as a survival mechanism for squamous cell carcinoma cells in endonuclease G-mediated apoptosis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0162786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Coward, J.; Ambrosini, G.; Musi, E.; Truman, J.P.; Haimovitz-Friedman, A.; Allegood, J.C.; Wang, E.; Merrill, A.H., Jr.; Schwartz, G.K. Safingol (L-threo-sphinganine) induces autophagy in solid tumor cells through inhibition of PKC and the PI3-kinase pathway. Autophagy 2009, 5, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Tam, A.B.; Roberts, L.S.; Chandra, V.; Rivera, I.G.; Nomura, D.K.; Forbes, D.J.; Niwa, M. The UPR activator ATF6 responds to proteotoxic and lipotoxic stress by distinct mechanisms. Dev. Cell 2018, 46, 327–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Bailey, D.; O’Hare, P. Transmembrane bZIP transcription factors in ER stress signaling and the unfolded protein response. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2007, 9, 2305–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Zeeshan, H.M.; Lee, G.H.; Kim, H.R.; Chae, H.J. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and associated ROS. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Schwartz, G.K.; Ward, D.; Saltz, L.; Casper, E.S.; Spiess, T.; Mullen, E.; Woodworth, J.; Venuti, R.; Zervos, P.; Storniolo, A.M.; et al. A pilot clinical/pharmacological study of the protein kinase C-specific inhibitor safingol alone and in combination with doxorubicin. Clin. Cancer Res. 1997, 3, 537–543. [Google Scholar]
  150. Dickson, M.A.; Carvajal, R.D.; Merrill, A.H., Jr.; Gonen, M.; Cane, L.M.; Schwartz, G.K. A phase I clinical trial of safingol in combination with cisplatin in advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 2484–2492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Tsukamoto, S.; Huang, Y.; Kumazoe, M.; Lesnick, C.; Yamada, S.; Ueda, N.; Suzuki, T.; Yamashita, S.; Kim, Y.H.; Fujimura, Y.; et al. Sphingosine kinase-1 protects multiple myeloma from apoptosis driven by cancer-specific inhibition of RTKs. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2015, 14, 2303–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Matula, K.; Collie-Duguid, E.; Murray, G.; Parikh, K.; Grabsch, H.; Tan, P.; Lalwani, S.; Garau, R.; Ong, Y.; Bain, G.; et al. Regulation of cellular sphingosine-1- phosphate by sphingosine kinase 1 and sphingosine-1-phopshate lyase determines chemotherapy resistance in gastroesophageal cancer. BMC Cancer 2015, 15, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Schnute, M.E.; McReynolds, M.D.; Kasten, T.; Yates, M.; Jerome, G.; Rains, J.W.; Hall, T.; Chrencik, J.; Kraus, M.; Cronin, C.N.; et al. Modulation of cellular S1P levels with a novel, potent and specific inhibitor of sphingosine kinase-1. Biochem. J. 2012, 444, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Byun, H.S.; Pyne, S.; Macritchie, N.; Pyne, N.J.; Bittman, R. Novel sphingosine-containing analogues selectively inhibit sphingosine kinase (SK) isozymes, induce SK1 proteasomal degradation and reduce DNA synthesis in human pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells. Medchemcomm 2013, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Hartmann, D.; Lucks, J.; Fuchs, S.; Schiffmann, S.; Schreiber, Y.; Ferreirós, N.; Merkens, J.; Marschalek, R.; Geisslinger, G.; Grösch, S. Long chain ceramides and very long chain ceramides have opposite effects on human breast and colon cancer cell growth. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2012, 44, 620–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Durkin, J.T.; Holskin, B.P.; Kopec, K.K.; Reed, M.S.; Spais, C.M.; Steffy, B.M.; Gessner, G.; Angeles, T.S.; Pohl, J.; Ator, M.A.; et al. Phosphoregulation of mixed-lineage kinase 1 activity by multiple phosphorylation in the activation loop. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 16348–16355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Kim, K.-Y.; Kim, B.-C.; Xu, Z.; Kim, S.-J. Mixed lineage kinase 3 (MLK3)-activated p38 MAP kinase mediates transforming growth factor-beta-induced apoptosis in hepatoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 29478–29484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Ju, T.; Gao, D.; Fang, Z.-Y. Targeting colorectal cancer cells by a novel sphingosine kinase 1 inhibitor PF-543. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 470, 728–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Hamada, M.; Kameyama, H.; Iwai, S.; Yura, Y. Induction of autophagy by sphingosine kinase 1 inhibitor PF-543 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Cell Death Discov. 2017, 3, 17047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Maiti, A.; Takabe, K.; Hait, N.C. Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer is dependent on SphKs/S1P signaling for growth and survival. Cell. Signal. 2017, 32, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Wang, S.; Liang, Y.; Chang, W.; Hu, B.; Zhang, Y. Triple negative breast cancer depends on sphingosine kinase 1 (SphK1)/sphingosine- 1-phosphate (S1P)/sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 3 (S1PR3)/Notch signaling for metastasis. Med. Sci. Monit. 2018, 24, 1912–1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Kim, S.W.; Lee, T.; Oh, Y.S.; Shin, S.M.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, S.; Baek, D.J.; Park, E.Y. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of PF-543 Derivative Containing Aliphatic Side Chain. Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo) 2019, 67, 599–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Fujita, T.; Inoue, K.; Yamamoto, S.; Ikumoto, T.; Sasaki, S.; Toyama, R.; Chiba, K.; Hoshino, Y.; Okumoto, T. Fungal metabolites. Part 11. A potent immunosuppressive activity found in Isaria sinclairii metabolite. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 1994, 47, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Liang, J.; Nagahashi, M.; Kim, E.Y.; Harikumar, K.B.; Yamada, A.; Huang, W.C.; Hait, N.C.; Allegood, J.C.; Price, M.M.; Avni, D.; et al. Sphingosine-1-phosphate links persistent STAT3 activation, chronic intestinal inflammation, and development of colitis-associated cancer. Cancer Cell 2013, 23, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Takasaki, T.; Hagihara, K.; Satoh, R.; Sugiura, R. More than just an immunosuppressant: The emerging role of FTY720 as a novel inducer of ROS and apoptosis. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 4397159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  166. Cohen, J.A.; Barkhof, F.; Comi, G.; Hartung, H.P.; Khatri, B.O.; Montalban, X.; Pelletier, J.; Capra, R.; Gallo, P.; Izquierdo, G.; et al. Oral fingolimod or intramuscular interferon for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 362, 402–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Kappos, L.; Radue, E.W.; O’Connor, P.; Polman, C.; Hohlfeld, R.; Calabresi, P.; Selmaj, K.; Agoropoulou, C.; Leyk, M.; Zhang-Auberson, L.; et al. A placebo-controlled trial of oral fingolimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 362, 387–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Zhang, L.; Wang, H.-D.; Ji, X.-J.; Cong, Z.-X.; Zhu, J.-H.; Zhou, Y. FTY720 for cancer therapy (review). Oncol. Rep. 2013, 30, 2571–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. White, C.; Alshaker, H.; Cooper, C.; Winkler, M.; Pchejetski, D. The emerging role of FTY720 (Fingolimod) in cancer treatment. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 23106–23127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Hung, J.H.; Lu, Y.-S.; Wang, Y.-C.; Ma, Y.-H.; Wang, D.-S.; Kulp, S.K.; Muthusamy, N.; Byrd, J.C.; Cheng, A.-L.; Chen, C.-S. FTY720 induces apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells through activation of rotein kinase C delta signaling. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 1204–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Saddoughi, S.A.; Gencer, S.; Peterson, Y.K.; Ward, K.E.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Oaks, J.; Bielawski, J.; Szulc, Z.M.; Thomas, R.J.; Selvam, S.P.; et al. Sphingosine analogue drug FTY720 targets I2PP2A/SET and mediates lung tumour suppression via activation of PP2A-RIPK1-dependent necroptosis. EMBO Mol. Med. 2013, 5, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Stafman, L.L.; Williams, A.P.; Marayati, R.; Aye, J.M.; Stewart, J.E.; Mroczek-Musulman, E.; Beierle, E.A. PP2A activation alone and in combination with cisplatin decreases cell growth and tumor formation in human HuH6 hepatoblastoma cells. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0214469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Bai, L.Y.; Chiu, C.F.; Chiu, S.J.; Chu, P.C.; Weng, J.R. FTY720 induces autophagy-associated apoptosis in human oral squamous carcinoma cells, in part, through a reactive oxygen species/Mcl-1-dependent mechanism. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Patmanathan, S.N.; Johnson, S.P.; Lai, S.L.; Bernam, S.P.; Lopes, V.; Wei, W.; Ibrahim, M.H.; Torta, F.; Narayanaswamy, P.; Wenk, M.R.; et al. Aberrant expression of the S1P regulating enzymes, SPHK1 and SGPL1, contributes to a migratory phenotype in OSCC mediated through S1PR2. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  175. Mani, R.; Yan, R.; Mo, X.; Chen, C.-S.; Phelps, M.A.; Klisovic, R.; Byrd, J.C.; Kisseberth, W.C.; London, C.A.; Muthusamy, N. Non-immunosuppressive FTY720-derivative OSU-2S mediates reactive oxygen species mediated cytotoxicity in canine B-cell lymphoma. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2017, 15, 1115–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Shrestha, J.; Ki, S.H.; Shin, S.M.; Kim, S.W.; Lee, J.-Y.; Jun, H.-S.; Lee, T.; Kim, S.; Baek, D.J.; Park, E.-Y. Synthesis of novel FTY720 analogs with anticancer activity through PP2A activation. Molecules 2018, 23, 2750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. French, K.J.; Zhuang, Y.; Maines, L.W.; Gao, P.; Wang, W.; Beljanski, V.; Upson, J.J.; Green, C.L.; Keller, S.N.; Smith, C.D. Pharmacology and antitumor activity of ABC294640, a selective inhibitor of sphingosine kinase-2. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2010, 333, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Gao, P.; Peterson, Y.K.; Smith, R.A.; Smith, C.D. Characterization of isoenzyme-selective inhibitors of human sphingosine kinases. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. McNaughton, M.; Pitman, M.; Pitson, S.M.; Pyne, N.J.; Pyn, E.S. Proteasomal degradation of sphingosine kinase 1 and inhibition of dihydroceramide desaturase by the sphingosine kinase inhibitors, SKi or ABC294640, induces growth arrest in androgen-independent LNCaP-AI prostate cancer cells. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 16663–16675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Venant, H.; Rahmaniyan, M.; Jones, E.E.; Lu, P.; Lilly, M.B.; Garrett-Mayer, E.; Drake, R.R.; Kraveka, J.M.; Smith, C.D.; Voelkel-Johnson, C. The sphingosine kinase 2 inhibitor ABC294640 reduces the growth of prostate cancer cells and results in accumulation of dihydroceramides in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2015, 14, 2744–2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Britten, C.D.; Garrett-Mayer, E.; Chin, S.H.; Shirai, K.; Ogretmen, B.; Bentz, T.A.; Brisendine, A.; Anderton, K.; Cusack, S.L.; Maines, L.W.; et al. A phase I study of ABC294640, a first-in-class sphingosine kinase-2 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 4642–4650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  182. Sundaramoorthy, P.; Gasparetto, C.; Kang, Y. The combination of a sphingosine kinase 2 inhibitor (ABC294640) and a Bcl-2 inhibitor (ABT-199) displays synergistic anti-myeloma effects in myeloma cells without a t(11;14) translocation. Cancer Med. 2018, 7, 3257–3268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Ding, X.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, T.; Xu, G.; Peng, C.; Chen, G.; Kong, B.; Friess, H.; Shen, S.; Lv, Y.; et al. Targeting sphingosine kinase 2 suppresses cell growth and synergizes with BCL2/BCL-XL inhibitors through NOXA-mediated MCL1 degradation in cholangiocarcinoma. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2019, 9, 546–561. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  184. Mitra, P.; Maceyka, M.; Payne, S.G.; Lamour, N.; Milstien, S.; Chalfant, C.E.; Spiegel, S. Ceramide kinase regulates growth and survival of A549 human lung adenocarcinoma cells. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 735–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Rivera, I.G.; Ordoñez, M.; Presa, N.; Gangoiti, P.; Gomez-Larrauri, A.; Trueba, M.; Fox, T.; Kester, M.; Gomez-Muñoz, A. Ceramide 1-phosphate regulates cell migration and invasion of human pancreatic cancer cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2016, 102, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Graf, C.; Klumpp, M.; Habig, M.; Rovina, P.; Billich, A.; Baumruker, T.; Oberhauser, B.; Bornancin, F. Targeting ceramide metabolism with a potent and specific ceramide kinase inhibitor. Mol. Pharmacol. 2008, 74, 925–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Pastukhov, O.; Schwalm, S.; Zangemeister-Wittke, U.; Fabbro, D.; Bornancin, F.; Japtok, L.; Kleuser, B.; Pfeilschifter, J.; Huwiler, A. The ceramide kinase inhibitor NVP-231 inhibits breast and lung cancer cell proliferation by inducing M phase arrest and subsequent cell death. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 171, 5829–5844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. Visentin, B.; Vekich, J.A.; Sibbald, B.J.; Cavalli, A.L.; Moreno, K.M.; Matteo, R.G.; Garland, W.A.; Lu, Y.; Yu, S.; Hall, H.S.; et al. Validation of an anti-sphingosine-1-phosphate antibody as a potential therapeutic in reducing growth, invasion, and angiogenesis in multiple tumor lineages. Cancer Cell 2006, 9, 225–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  189. O’Brien, N.; Jones, S.T.; Williams, D.G.; Cunningham, H.B.; Moreno, K.; Visentin, B.; Gentile, A.; Vekich, J.; Shestowsky, W.; Hiraiwa, M.; et al. Production and characterization of monoclonal anti-sphingosine-1-phosphate antibodies. J. Lipid Res. 2009, 50, 2245–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Sabbadini, R.A. Sphingosine-1-phosphate antibodies as potential agents in the treatment of cancer and age-related macular degeneration. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 162, 1225–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Pal, S.K.; Drabkin, H.A.; Reeves, J.A.; Hainsworth, J.D.; Hazel, S.E.; Paggiarino, D.A.; Wojciak, J.; Woodnutt, G.; Bhatt, R.S. A phase 2 study of the sphingosine-1-phosphate antibody sonepcizumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 2017, 123, 576–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Senkal, C.E.; Ponnusamy, S.; Rossi, M.J.; Sundararaj, K.; Szulc, Z.; Bielawski, J.; Bielawska, A.; Meyer, M.; Cobanoglu, B.; Koybasi, S.; et al. Potent antitumor activity of a novel cationic pyridinium-ceramide alone or in combination with gemcitabine against human head and neck squamous cell carcinomas in vitro and in vivo. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2006, 317, 1188–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  193. Boppanaa, N.B.; Stochajb, U.; Kodihab, M.; Bielawskac, A.; Bielawskic, J.; Piercec, J.S.; Korbelikd, M.; Separovica, D. C6-pyridinium ceramide sensitizes SCC17B human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells to photodynamic therapy. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2015, 143, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  194. Novgorodov, S.A.; Szulc, Z.M.; Luberto, C.; Jones, J.A.; Bielawski, J.; Bielawska, A.; Hannun, Y.A.; Obeid, L.M. Positively charged ceramide is a potent inducer of mitochondrial permeabilization. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 16096–16105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  195. Szulc, Z.M.; Bielawski, J.; Gracz, H.; Gustilo, M.; Mayroo, N.; Hannun, Y.A.; Obeid, L.M.; Bielawska, A. Tailoring structure-function and targeting properties of ceramides by site-specific cationization. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 7083–7104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Stover, T.C.; Sharma, A.; Robertson, G.P.; Kester, M. Systemic delivery of liposomal short-chain ceramide limits solid tumor growth in murine models of breast adenocarcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 3465–3474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  197. Tran, M.A.; Smith, C.D.; Kester, M.; Robertson, G.P. Combining nanoliposomal ceramide with sorafenib synergistically inhibits melanoma and breast cancer cell survival to decrease tumor development. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 3571–3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  198. Tagaram, H.R.; Divittore, N.A.; Barth, B.M.; Kaiser, J.M.; Avella, D.; Kimchi, E.T.; Jiang, Y.; Isom, H.C.; Kester, M.; Staveley-O’Carroll, K.F. Nanoliposomal ceramide prevents in vivo growth of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut 2011, 60, 695–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Kester, M.; Bassler, J.; Fox, T.E.; Carter, C.J.; Davidson, J.A.; Parette, M.R. Preclinical development of a C6-ceramide NanoLiposome, a novel sphingolipid therapeutic. Biol. Chem. 2015, 396, 737–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Li, G.; Liu, D.; Kimchi, E.T.; Kaifi, J.T.; Qi, X.; Manjunath, Y.; Liu, X.; Deering, T.; Avella, D.M.; Fox, T.; et al. Nanoliposome C6-ceramide increases the anti-tumor immune response and slows growth of liver tumors in mice. Gastroenterology 2018, 154, 1024–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. Zhang, X.; Kitatani, K.; Toyoshima, M.; Ishibashi, M.; Usui, T.; Minato, J.; Egiz, M.; Shigeta, S.; Fox, T.; Deering, T.; et al. Ceramide nanoliposomes as a MLKL-dependent, necroptosis-inducing, chemotherapeutic reagent in ovarian cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2018, 17, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  202. Zhang, P.; Fu, C.; Hu, Y.; Dong, C.; Song, Y.; Song, E. C6-ceramide nanoliposome suppresses tumor metastasis by eliciting PI3K and PKCζ tumor-suppressive activities and regulating integrin affinity modulation. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  203. Jiang, Y.; DiVittore, N.A.; Kaiser, J.M.; Shanmugavelandy, S.S.; Fritz, J.L.; Heakal, Y.; Tagaram, H.R.; Cheng, H.; Cabot, M.C.; Staveley-O’Carroll, K.F.; et al. Combinatorial therapies improve the therapeutic efficacy of nanoliposomal ceramide for pancreatic cancer. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2011, 12, 574–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  204. Tsujii, H.; Kamada, T. A review of update clinical results of carbon ion radiotherapy. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 42, 670–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  205. Yura, Y.; Tada, S.; Fujita, Y.; Hamada, M. Current treatment, particle radiotherapy, and boron neutron capture therapy for advanced oral cancer in patients. Oral Sci. Int. 2019, 16, 49–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Bernier, J.; Domenge, C.; Ozsahin, M.; Matuszewska, K.; Lefèbvre, J.L.; Greiner, R.H.; Giralt, J.; Maingon, P.; Rolland, F.; Bolla, M.; et al. Postoperative irradiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 350, 1945–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  207. Lee, H.; Rotolo, J.A.; Mesicek, J.; Penate-Medina, T.; Rimner, A.; Liao, W.C.; Yin, X.; Ragupathi, G.; Ehleiter, D.; Gulbins, E.; et al. Mitochondrial ceramide-rich macrodomains functionalize Bax upon irradiation. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  208. Reynolds, C.P.; Maurer, B.J.; Kolesnick, R.N. Ceramide synthesis and metabolism as a target for cancer therapy. Cancer Lett. 2004, 206, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Czarnota, G.J.; Karshafian, R.; Burns, P.N.; Wong, S.; Al Mahrouki, A.; Lee, J.W.; Caissie, A.; Tran, W.; Kim, C.; Furukawa, M.; et al. Tumor radiation response enhancement by acoustical stimulation of the vasculature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, E2033–E2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  210. El Kaffas, A.; Czarnota, G.J. Biomechanical effects of microbubbles: From radiosensitization to cell death. Future Oncol. 2015, 11, 1093–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Nofiele, J.T.; Karshafian, R.; Furukawa, M.; Al Mahrouki, A.; Giles, A.; Wong, S.; Czarnota, G.J. Ultrasound-activated microbubble cancer therapy: Ceramide production leading to enhanced radiation effect in vitro. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2013, 12, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Kim, H.C.; Al-Mahrouki, A.; Gorjizadeh, A.; Sadeghi-Naini, A.; Karshafian, R.; Czarnota, G.J. Quantitative ultrasound characterization of tumor cell death: Ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles for radiation enhancement. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e102343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. El Kaffas, A.; Al-Mahrouki, A.; Hashim, A.; Law, N.; Giles, A.; Czarnota, G.J. Role of acid sphingomyelinase and ceramide in mechano-acoustic enhancement of tumor radiation responses. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2018, 110, 1009–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Kunii, N.; Horiguchi, S.; Motohashi, S.; Yamamoto, H.; Ueno, N.; Yamamoto, S.; Sakurai, D.; Taniguchi, M.; Nakayama, T.; Okamoto, Y. Combination therapy of in vitro-expanded natural killer T cells and alpha-galactosylceramide-pulsed antigen-presenting cells in patients with recurrent head and neck carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2009, 100, 1092–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Ceramide-generating and -metabolizing pathways. Sphingomyelin present in the cell membrane is hydrolyzed by sphingomyelinase (SMase) to produce ceramide. Serine and palmitoyl-CoA were condensed by serine palmitoyl transferase (SPT) to form 3-ketosphinganine, which then becomes dihydroceramide by ceramide synthase (CerS). Dihydroceramide desaturase (DES) functions to form ceramide. Ceramide is metabolized by the action of ceramidase (CDase) and converted into sphingosine, which is phosphorylated by sphingosine kinase 1 (SphK1) and SphK2 to become sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P). Glucosylceramide synthase (GluCS) glucosylates ceramide to yield glucosylceramide. Ceramide is also phosphorylated by ceramide kinase (CerK) and converted into ceramide-1-phosphate (C1P). SMS, sphingomyelin synthase; S1PPtase, sphingosine-1-phosphate phosphatase; C1PPtase, ceramide-1-phosphate phosphatase.
Figure 1. Ceramide-generating and -metabolizing pathways. Sphingomyelin present in the cell membrane is hydrolyzed by sphingomyelinase (SMase) to produce ceramide. Serine and palmitoyl-CoA were condensed by serine palmitoyl transferase (SPT) to form 3-ketosphinganine, which then becomes dihydroceramide by ceramide synthase (CerS). Dihydroceramide desaturase (DES) functions to form ceramide. Ceramide is metabolized by the action of ceramidase (CDase) and converted into sphingosine, which is phosphorylated by sphingosine kinase 1 (SphK1) and SphK2 to become sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P). Glucosylceramide synthase (GluCS) glucosylates ceramide to yield glucosylceramide. Ceramide is also phosphorylated by ceramide kinase (CerK) and converted into ceramide-1-phosphate (C1P). SMS, sphingomyelin synthase; S1PPtase, sphingosine-1-phosphate phosphatase; C1PPtase, ceramide-1-phosphate phosphatase.
Cancers 12 02062 g001
Figure 2. Outlines of ceramide-driven signaling pathways. Ceramide activates PP2A, which activates Bax and suppresses Bcl-2 to promote apoptosis. Ceramide suppresses Akt, inactivates downstream mTOR, and induces autophagy. Ceramide activates PKCζ, which inhibits Akt phosphorylation and activates JNK. Activated c-Jun increases Beclin1 expression. Ceramide also increases NADPH oxidase- and mitochondrial complex III-mediated ROS production. NADPH oxidase, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase; PP2A, protein phosphatase 2A; ER stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress; ROS, reactive oxygen species; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin.
Figure 2. Outlines of ceramide-driven signaling pathways. Ceramide activates PP2A, which activates Bax and suppresses Bcl-2 to promote apoptosis. Ceramide suppresses Akt, inactivates downstream mTOR, and induces autophagy. Ceramide activates PKCζ, which inhibits Akt phosphorylation and activates JNK. Activated c-Jun increases Beclin1 expression. Ceramide also increases NADPH oxidase- and mitochondrial complex III-mediated ROS production. NADPH oxidase, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase; PP2A, protein phosphatase 2A; ER stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress; ROS, reactive oxygen species; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin.
Cancers 12 02062 g002
Figure 3. Proposed signaling pathways affected by SphK inhibitors. (A) Safingol inhibits SphK, and increases sphingosine and dihydrosphingosine (DSph), but not ceramide. These increased sphingolipids may induce ER stress and ROS production, leading to apoptosis and/or autophagy. (B) FTY720 is phosphorylated by SphK2, resulting in p-FTY720, which extracellularly inhibits S1PR signaling. Intracellularly, FTY720 inhibits SphK1, activates PP2A, and suppresses Akt, Erk, c-Myc, and β-catenin. FTY720 also activates PKCδ through an NADPH-mediated pathway. (C) ABC294640 inhibits SphK2, and induces proteasomal degradation of SphK1 and dihydroceramide desaturase (DES). Accumulated dihydroceramide (DCer) can induce ER stress, up mark(triangle), increase by the inhibitor, and down mark (inverted triangle), decrease by the SphK inhibitor.
Figure 3. Proposed signaling pathways affected by SphK inhibitors. (A) Safingol inhibits SphK, and increases sphingosine and dihydrosphingosine (DSph), but not ceramide. These increased sphingolipids may induce ER stress and ROS production, leading to apoptosis and/or autophagy. (B) FTY720 is phosphorylated by SphK2, resulting in p-FTY720, which extracellularly inhibits S1PR signaling. Intracellularly, FTY720 inhibits SphK1, activates PP2A, and suppresses Akt, Erk, c-Myc, and β-catenin. FTY720 also activates PKCδ through an NADPH-mediated pathway. (C) ABC294640 inhibits SphK2, and induces proteasomal degradation of SphK1 and dihydroceramide desaturase (DES). Accumulated dihydroceramide (DCer) can induce ER stress, up mark(triangle), increase by the inhibitor, and down mark (inverted triangle), decrease by the SphK inhibitor.
Cancers 12 02062 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yura, Y.; Masui, A.; Hamada, M. Inhibitors of Ceramide- and Sphingosine-Metabolizing Enzymes as Sensitizers in Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 2062. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12082062

AMA Style

Yura Y, Masui A, Hamada M. Inhibitors of Ceramide- and Sphingosine-Metabolizing Enzymes as Sensitizers in Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers. 2020; 12(8):2062. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12082062

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yura, Yoshiaki, Atsushi Masui, and Masakazu Hamada. 2020. "Inhibitors of Ceramide- and Sphingosine-Metabolizing Enzymes as Sensitizers in Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma" Cancers 12, no. 8: 2062. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12082062

APA Style

Yura, Y., Masui, A., & Hamada, M. (2020). Inhibitors of Ceramide- and Sphingosine-Metabolizing Enzymes as Sensitizers in Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers, 12(8), 2062. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12082062

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop