Next Article in Journal
Insights into the Role of microRNAs in Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Metabolism
Next Article in Special Issue
Aggressive NK Cell Leukemia: Current State of the Art
Previous Article in Journal
Decoding the Role of CD271 in Melanoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
Feasibility, Image Quality and Clinical Evaluation of Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI Performed in a Supine Position Compared to the Standard Prone Position
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Comment

Comment on Aasebø, E., et al. “The Progression of Acute Myeloid Leukemia from First Diagnosis to Chemoresistant Relapse: A Comparison of Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Profiles”. Cancers 2020, 12, 1466

1
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC 20422, USA
2
Department of Pathology, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2020, 12(9), 2461; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092461
Submission received: 10 August 2020 / Accepted: 28 August 2020 / Published: 31 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in Cancer Diagnostic Evaluation and Biomarker Detection)
In a recent article published in this journal, Aasebø and colleagues reported [1] increased levels of various proteins, including CD36, in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells at relapse, when compared with the time of first presentation, and suggest targeting these proteins for direct therapeutic strategies to alleviate chemoresistance in relapsed AML. Interestingly, CD36 is a scavenger receptor that mediates lipid uptake, and is gaining attention in clinical trials as a potential druggable target in cancer treatment [2]. Using next generation sequencing (NGS) in a bone marrow specimen from a patient with AML and synchronous plasma cell myeloma, we have identified a CD36/Y325* mutation, which would encode a truncated protein lacking the signaling intracytoplasmic carboxyl-terminus end. This specific mutation is not retrievable in PubMed or database searches (ClinVar, HGMD, COSMIC and others).
However, a detailed literature search revealed that only one prior publication described the same mutation in AML [3]. Therefore, we speculate that this specific mutation may confer a survival advantage to neoplastic cells, since wild type CD36 has been shown to be involved in apoptosis by activation of caspase 3 [4]. In summary, we have independently identified an unrecognized CD36/Y235* mutation in a case of AML by NGS, which underscores the strength of this technology to decipher genetic alterations and further supports a possible oncogenic role of CD36 [2].

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aasebø, E.; Berven, F.S.; Hovland, R.; Døskeland, S.O.; Bruserud, Ø.; Selheim, F.; Hernandez-Valladares, M. The Progression of Acute Myeloid Leukemia from First Diagnosis to Chemoresistant Relapse: A Comparison of Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Profiles. Cancers 2020, 12, 1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, J.; Li, Y. CD36 tango in cancer: Signaling pathways and functions. Theranostics 2019, 9, 4893–4908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Overholt, K.; Guinipero, T.L.; Heerema, N.A.; Loken, M.R.; Kahwash, S.B. Promyelocytic Leukemia with No Retinoic Acid Receptor Alpha Abnormality but with RUNX1T1 Insertion to Chromosome 7q: A Classification and Management Dilemma. Case Rep. Hematol. 2015, 2015, 412016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Wintergerst, E.S.; Jelk, J.; Rahner, C.; Asmis, R. Apoptosis induced by oxidized low density lipoprotein in human monocyte-derived macrophages involves CD36 and activation of caspase-3. JBIC J. Boil. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 267, 6050–6059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

DeRosa, P.; Nava, V. Comment on Aasebø, E., et al. “The Progression of Acute Myeloid Leukemia from First Diagnosis to Chemoresistant Relapse: A Comparison of Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Profiles”. Cancers 2020, 12, 1466. Cancers 2020, 12, 2461. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092461

AMA Style

DeRosa P, Nava V. Comment on Aasebø, E., et al. “The Progression of Acute Myeloid Leukemia from First Diagnosis to Chemoresistant Relapse: A Comparison of Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Profiles”. Cancers 2020, 12, 1466. Cancers. 2020; 12(9):2461. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092461

Chicago/Turabian Style

DeRosa, Peter, and Victor Nava. 2020. "Comment on Aasebø, E., et al. “The Progression of Acute Myeloid Leukemia from First Diagnosis to Chemoresistant Relapse: A Comparison of Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Profiles”. Cancers 2020, 12, 1466" Cancers 12, no. 9: 2461. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092461

APA Style

DeRosa, P., & Nava, V. (2020). Comment on Aasebø, E., et al. “The Progression of Acute Myeloid Leukemia from First Diagnosis to Chemoresistant Relapse: A Comparison of Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Profiles”. Cancers 2020, 12, 1466. Cancers, 12(9), 2461. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092461

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop