Prognostic Value of FDG-PET/CT Parameters in Patients with Relapse/Refractory Multiple Myeloma before Anti-CD38 Based Therapy
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Patient Population
2.2. PET/CT Acquisition and Analysis
2.3. Flow Cytometry
2.4. Statistical Analysis
2.5. Ethics Approval
3. Results
3.1. Patient’s Characteristics
3.2. PET/CT Characteristics and Correlation with Laboratory Findings
3.3. Prognostic Factors
3.4. Prognostic Score before Anti-CD38 Immunotherapy
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chari, A.; Suvannasankha, A.; Fay, J.W.; Arnulf, B.; Kaufman, J.L.; Ifthikharuddin, J.J.; Weiss, B.M.; Krishnan, A.; Lentzsch, S.; Comenzo, R.; et al. Daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2017, 130, 974–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van de Donk, N.; Richardson, P.G.; Malavasi, F. CD38 antibodies in multiple myeloma: Back to the future. Blood 2018, 131, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavo, M.; Terpos, E.; Nanni, C.; Moreau, P.; Lentzsch, S.; Zweegman, S.; Hillengass, J.; Engelhardt, M.; Usmani, S.Z.; Vesole, D.H.; et al. Role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma and other plasma cell disorders: A consensus statement by the International Myeloma Working Group. Lancet Oncol. 2017, 18, e206–e217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baffour, F.I.; Glazebrook, K.N.; Kumar, S.K.; Broski, S.M. Role of imaging in multiple myeloma. Am. J. Hematol. 2020, 95, 966–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bredella, M.A.; Steinbach, L.; Caputo, G.; Segall, G.; Hawkins, R. Value of FDG PET in the assessment of patients with multiple myeloma. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005, 184, 1199–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zamagni, E.; Nanni, C.; Patriarca, F.; Englaro, E.; Castellucci, P.; Geatti, O.; Tosi, P.; Tacchetti, P.; Cangini, D.; Perrone, G.; et al. A prospective comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and whole-body planar radiographs in the assessment of bone disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2007, 92, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Durie, B.G.; Waxman, A.D.; D’Agnolo, A.; Williams, C.M. Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET identifies high-risk myeloma. J. Nucl. Med. 2002, 43, 1457–1463. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- McDonald, J.E.; Kessler, M.M.; Gardner, M.W.; Buros, A.F.; Ntambi, J.A.; Waheed, S.; van Rhee, F.; Zangari, M.; Heuck, C.J.; Petty, N.; et al. Assessment of Total Lesion Glycolysis by (18)F FDG PET/CT Significantly Improves Prognostic Value of GEP and ISS in Myeloma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 1981–1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Elliott, B.M.; Peti, S.; Osman, K.; Scigliano, E.; Lee, D.; Isola, L.; Kostakoglu, L. Combining FDG-PET/CT with laboratory data yields superior results for prediction of relapse in multiple myeloma. Eur. J. Haematol. 2011, 86, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Derlin, T.; Weber, C.; Habermann, C.R.; Herrmann, J.; Wisotzki, C.; Ayuk, F.; Wolschke, C.; Klutmann, S.; Kröger, N. 18F-FDG PET/CT for detection and localization of residual or recurrent disease in patients with multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2012, 39, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hillengass, J.; Usmani, S.; Rajkumar, S.V.; Durie, B.G.M.; Mateos, M.V.; Lonial, S.; Joao, C.; Anderson, K.C.; García-Sanz, R.; Riva, E.; et al. International myeloma working group consensus recommendations on imaging in monoclonal plasma cell disorders. Lancet Oncol. 2019, 20, e302–e312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nanni, C.; Versari, A.; Chauvie, S.; Bertone, E.; Bianchi, A.; Rensi, M.; Bellò, M.; Gallamini, A.; Patriarca, F.; Gay, F.; et al. Interpretation criteria for FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma (IMPeTUs): Final results. IMPeTUs (Italian myeloma criteria for PET USe). Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2018, 45, 712–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palumbo, A.; Avet-Loiseau, H.; Oliva, S.; Lokhorst, H.M.; Goldschmidt, H.; Rosinol, L.; Richardson, P.; Caltagirone, S.; Lahuerta, J.J.; Facon, T.; et al. Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: A Report From International Myeloma Working Group. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 33, 2863–2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tacchetti, P.; Pezzi, A.; Zamagni, E.; Pantani, L.; Rocchi, S.; Zannetti, B.A.; Mancuso, K.; Rizzello, I.; Cavo, M. Role of serum free light chain assay in the detection of early relapse and prediction of prognosis after relapse in multiple myeloma patients treated upfront with novel agents. Haematologica 2017, 102, e104–e107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Boellaard, R.; Delgado-Bolton, R.; Oyen, W.J.; Giammarile, F.; Tatsch, K.; Eschner, W.; Verzijlbergen, F.J.; Barrington, S.F.; Pike, L.C.; Weber, W.A.; et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: Version 2.0. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2015, 42, 328–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zamagni, E.; Patriarca, F.; Nanni, C.; Zannetti, B.; Englaro, E.; Pezzi, A.; Tacchetti, P.; Buttignol, S.; Perrone, G.; Brioli, A.; et al. Prognostic relevance of 18-F FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with up-front autologous transplantation. Blood 2011, 118, 5989–5995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Usmani, S.Z.; Stratton, K.; Hansen, E.; Zhang, Q.; Panozzo, S.B.; Petty, N.M. Final results of a phase II study of pomalidomide (Pom) in GEP-defined high risk relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Blood 2013, 122, 3191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreau, P.; Attal, M.; Caillot, D.; Macro, M.; Karlin, L.; Garderet, L.; Facon, T.; Benboubker, L.; Escoffre-Barbe, M.; Stoppa, A.M.; et al. Prospective Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography at Diagnosis and Before Maintenance Therapy in Symptomatic Patients With Multiple Myeloma Included in the IFM/DFCI 2009 Trial: Results of the IMAJEM Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, 2911–2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ripani, D.; Caldarella, C.; Za, T.; Pizzuto, D.A.; Rossi, E.; De Stefano, V.; Giordano, A. Prognostic significance of normalized FDG-PET parameters in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing induction chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A retrospective single-center evaluation. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2019, 46, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mesguich, C.; Latrabe, V.; Hulin, C.; Lascaux, A.; Bordenave, L.; Hindié, E.; Marit, G. Prospective Comparison of 18-FDG PET/CT and Whole-Body MRI with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Treatment Response of Multiple Myeloma Patients Eligible for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant. Cancers 2021, 13, 1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zamagni, E.; Nanni, C.; Dozza, L.; Carlier, T.; Bailly, C.; Tacchetti, P.; Versari, A.; Chauvie, S.; Gallamini, A.; Gamberi, B.; et al. Standardization of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT According to Deauville Criteria for Metabolic Complete Response Definition in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartel, T.B.; Haessler, J.; Brown, T.L.; Shaughnessy, J.D., Jr.; van Rhee, F.; Anaissie, E.; Alpe, T.; Angtuaco, E.; Walker, R.; Epstein, J.; et al. F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Blood 2009, 114, 2068–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, A.; Hoffmann, M.; Bergner, R.; Uppenkamp, M.; Haberkorn, U.; Strauss, L.G. Prediction of progression-free survival in patients with multiple myeloma following anthracycline-based chemotherapy based on dynamic FDG-PET. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2009, 34, 576–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jamet, B.; Bailly, C.; Carlier, T.; Planche, L.; Touzeau, C.; Kraeber-Bodéré, F.; Moreau, P.; Bodet-Milin, C. Added prognostic value of FDG-PET/CT in relapsing multiple myeloma patients. Leuk. Lymphoma 2019, 60, 222–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lapa, C.; Lückerath, K.; Malzahn, U.; Samnick, S.; Einsele, H.; Buck, A.K.; Herrmann, K.; Knop, S. 18 FDG-PET/CT for prognostic stratification of patients with multiple myeloma relapse after stem cell transplantation. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 7381–7391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moreau, P.; Zweegman, S.; Perrot, A.; Hulin, C.; Caillot, D.; Facon, T.; Leleu, X.; Belhadj, K.; Karlin, L.; Benboubker, L.; et al. Evaluation of the Prognostic Value of Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) at Diagnosis and Follow-up in Transplant-Eligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (TE NDMM) Patients Treated in the Phase 3 Cassiopeia Study: Results of the Cassiopet Companion Study. Blood 2019, 134 (Suppl. 1), 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jelinek, T.; Sevcikova, T.; Zihala, D.; Popkova, T.; Kapustova, V.; Broskevicova, L.; Capkov, L.; Rihova, L.; Bezdekova, R.; Sevcikova, S.; et al. Limited efficacy of daratumumab in multiple myeloma with extramedullary disease. Leukemia 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Evangelista, L.; Panunzio, A.; Polverosi, R.; Ferretti, A.; Chondrogiannis, S.; Pomerri, F.; Rubello, D.; Muzzio, P.C. Early bone marrow metastasis detection: The additional value of FDG-PET/CT vs. CT imaging. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2012, 66, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perrot, A.; Lauwers-Cances, V.; Tournay, E.; Hulin, C.; Chretien, M.L.; Royer, B.; Dib, M.; Decaux, O.; Jaccard, A.; Belhadj, K.; et al. Development and Validation of a Cytogenetic Prognostic Index Predicting Survival in Multiple Myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 1657–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, X.; Dierks, A.; Kertels, O.; Samnick, S.; Kircher, M.; Buck, A.K.; Haertle, L.; Knorz, S.; Böckle, D.; Scheller, L.; et al. The Link between Cytogenetics/Genomics and Imaging Patterns of Relapse and Progression in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Pilot Study Utilizing 18F-FDG PET/CT. Cancers 2020, 12, 2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michaud-Robert, A.V.; Zamagni, E.; Carlier, T.; Bailly, C.; Jamet, B.; Touzeau, C.; Moreau, P.; Kraeber-Bodere, F.; Nanni, C.; Bodet-Milin, C. Glucose Metabolism Quantified by SUVmax on Baseline FDG-PET/CT Predicts Survival in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Combined Harmonized Analysis of Two Prospective Phase III Trials. Cancers 2020, 12, 2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galieni, P.; Travaglini, F.; Vagnoni, D.; Ruggieri, M.; Caraffa, P.; Bigazzi, C.; Falcioni, S.; Picardi, P.; Mazzotta, S.; Troiani, E.; et al. The detection of circulating plasma cells may improve the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) risk stratification of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Br. J. Haematol. 2021, 193, 542–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, W.; Jin, Y.; Xu, M.; Zhao, S.S.; Shi, Q.; Qu, X.; Zhang, R.; Li, J.; Wu, Y.; Chen, L. Prognostic value of circulating clonal plasma cells in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Hematology 2021, 26, 510–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheng, Q.; Cai, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, L.; Hu, Y.; Sun, C. Circulating Plasma Cells as a Biomarker to Predict Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Prognosis: Developing Nomogram Prognostic Models. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 639528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nowakowski, G.S.; Witzig, T.E.; Dingli, D.; Tracz, M.J.; Gertz, M.A.; Lacy, M.Q.; Lust, J.A.; Dispenzieri, A.; Greipp, P.R.; Kyle, R.A.; et al. Circulating plasma cells detected by flow cytometry as a predictor of survival in 302 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood 2005, 106, 2276–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sanoja-Flores, L.; Flores-Montero, J.; Pérez-Andrés, M.; Puig, N.; Orfao, A. Detection of Circulating Tumor Plasma Cells in Monoclonal Gammopathies: Methods, Pathogenic Role, and Clinical Implications. Cancers 2020, 12, 1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Characteristics | All Patients n = 38 | PET ≤ 3 FLs n = 19 | PET > 3 FLs n = 19 | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
Clinical characteristics at relapse | ||||
Age, median (range) | 73 (58–87) | 75 (62–87) | 69 (58–87) | 0.58 |
Age > 75 years, n (%) | 17 (45) | 10 (53) | 7 (37) | 0.51 |
Sex ratio male/female | 1 (19/19) | 0.7 (8/11) | 1.37 (11/8) | 0.52 |
Biological parameters at relapse | ||||
dFLC mg/L, median (IQR) * | 180 (18–946) | 85 (10–437) | 206 (103–1142) | 0.08 |
Abnormal FLC ratio, n (%) * | 25 (66) | 11 | 14 | 0.29 |
High FLC ratio (>120), n (%) | 6 (16) | 1 | 5 | 0.18 |
Creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min | 14 (37) | 7 | 7 | 1 |
Hemoglobin < 10 g/dL, n (%) | 11 (29) | 3 | 8 | 0.15 |
β2microglobulin (mg/L) * | 3.67 (1.3–14.2) | 2.75 (1.3–9.6) | 4.13 (1.8–19) | 0.015 |
Elevated LDH, n (%) | 12 (32) | 6 | 6 | 1 |
Initial myeloma characteristics | ||||
Isotype | ||||
IgG, n (%) | 21 (55) | 10 | 11 | 0.95 |
IgA, n (%) | 8 (21) | 4 | 4 | |
Light chain only (kappa), n (%) | 9 (24) | 5 | 4 | |
ISS stage | ||||
ISS 1, n (%) | 16 (42) | 12 | 4 | 0.028 |
ISS 2, n (%) | 14 (37) | 5 | 9 | |
ISS 3, n (%) | 8 (21) | 2 | 6 | |
Cytogenetics | ||||
High-risk cytogenetics, n (%) | 8 (21) | 2 | 6 | 0.24 |
No High-risk cytogenetics, n (%) | 25 (66) | 13 | 12 | |
Missing | 5 (13) | 4 | 1 | |
Therapy | ||||
Line of therapy before antiCD38 | 3 (2–10) | 3 (2–4) | 3 (2–10) | 0.48 |
>2 previous lines of therapy, n (%) | 20 (53) | 10 | 10 | 1 |
ASCT transplantation, n (%) | 18 (47%) | 8 | 10 | 0.74 |
Type of anti-CD38 | ||||
Daratumumab, n (%) | 32 (84) | 18 | 14 | 0.18 |
Isatuximab, n (%) | 6 (16) | 1 | 5 | |
Associated treatment | ||||
Corticosteroids only, n (%) | 7 (18) | 2 | 5 | 0.40 |
ImiD, n (%) | 19 (50) | 10 | 9 | 1 |
Proteasome inhibitor, n (%) | 10 (26) | 6 | 4 | 0.71 |
Other, n (%) 1 | 4 (11) | 1 | 3 | 0.60 |
PET/CT Parameters | Patients (n = 38) |
---|---|
Presence of FLs, DS score | 26 |
2 | 0 |
3 | 3 |
4–5 | 23 |
Presence of >3 FLs | 19 |
Presence of EMD | 7 |
Median FL SUVmax (IQR) | 7.8 (5.1–13.8) |
Median EMD SUVmax (IQR) | 12.9 (6.8–17.7) |
Median liver SUVmax (IQR) * | 3.2 (2.7–3.5) |
Presence of BM uptake, DS score | |
<4 | 31 |
≥4 | 7 |
Parameters | PFS | OS | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HR (95%CI) | p | HR (95%CI) | p | |
Initial MM characteristics | ||||
Initial ISS score (1 vs. 2–3) | 4.4 (1.3–15.3) | 0.019 | 7.0 (0.9–55.1) | 0.066 |
Initial ISS score (1–2 vs. 3) | 4.0 (1.5–10.7) | 0.0065 | 6.6 (1.6–27.8) | 0.010 |
Initial ISS score (1 vs. 2 vs. 3) | 2.7 (1.4–5.1) | 0.0026 | 3.8 (1.4–10.6) | 0.0098 |
High-risk cytogenetics | 1.2 (0.4–3.7) | 0.79 | 1.0 (0.2–5.2) | 0.95 |
Previous treatments | ||||
>2 previous line | 1.1 (0.4–2.9) | 0.85 | 1.6 (0.4–6.3) | 0.51 |
Previous ASCT | 0.6 (0.2–1.8) | 0.41 | 0.4 (0.7–1.7) | 0.21 |
Biological parameters before anti- CD38 therapy | ||||
β2microglobulin ≥ 3.5 mg/ | 2.8 (0.9–8.5) | 0.073 | 6.0 (0.7–48) | 0.089 |
β2microglobulin > 5.5 mg/L | 1.7 (0.6–4.8) | 0.31 | 3.1 (0.8–11.7) | 0.098 |
dFLC | 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | 0.19 | 1 (1.0–1.0) | 0.013 |
Abnormal FLC ratio | 2.5 (0.7–8.8) | 0.15 | - | 0.95 |
Albumin ≤ 3.5 g/dL | 2.6 (0.9–7.7) | 0.082 | 1.3 (0.3–6.5) | 0.72 |
Hb ≤ 10 g/dL | 2.9 (1.1–7.5) | 0.030 | 6.3 (1.6–25) | 0.0096 |
LDH upper than normal | 1.1 (0.4–3.1) | 0.83 | 2.1 (0.6–7.9) | 0.26 |
PET parameters before anti-CD38 therapy | ||||
Presence of at least one FL | 1.4 (0.5–4.1) | 0.48 | 1.8 (0.3–8.5) | 0.47 |
Presence of >3 FLs | 4.3 (1.5–12.5) | 0.0071 | 5.2 (1.1–25.4) | 0.042 |
Presence of EMD | 2.4 (0.8–7.8) | 0.11 | 2.5 (0.4–14.5) | 0.17 |
Lesion SUVmax > 11.5 | 2.8 (1.0–7.7) | 0.045 | 3.9 (1.0–14.5) | 0.045 |
Bone marrow ≥ DS 4 | 1.4 (0.5–4.4) | 0.52 | 2.2 (0.5–8.9) | 0.26 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Fouquet, G.; Wartski, M.; Dechmi, A.; Willems, L.; Deau-Fischer, B.; Franchi, P.; Descroocq, J.; Deschamps, P.; Blanc-Autran, E.; Clerc, J.; et al. Prognostic Value of FDG-PET/CT Parameters in Patients with Relapse/Refractory Multiple Myeloma before Anti-CD38 Based Therapy. Cancers 2021, 13, 4323. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13174323
Fouquet G, Wartski M, Dechmi A, Willems L, Deau-Fischer B, Franchi P, Descroocq J, Deschamps P, Blanc-Autran E, Clerc J, et al. Prognostic Value of FDG-PET/CT Parameters in Patients with Relapse/Refractory Multiple Myeloma before Anti-CD38 Based Therapy. Cancers. 2021; 13(17):4323. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13174323
Chicago/Turabian StyleFouquet, Guillemette, Myriam Wartski, Amina Dechmi, Lise Willems, Bénédicte Deau-Fischer, Patricia Franchi, Justine Descroocq, Paul Deschamps, Estelle Blanc-Autran, Jérôme Clerc, and et al. 2021. "Prognostic Value of FDG-PET/CT Parameters in Patients with Relapse/Refractory Multiple Myeloma before Anti-CD38 Based Therapy" Cancers 13, no. 17: 4323. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13174323
APA StyleFouquet, G., Wartski, M., Dechmi, A., Willems, L., Deau-Fischer, B., Franchi, P., Descroocq, J., Deschamps, P., Blanc-Autran, E., Clerc, J., Bouscary, D., Barreau, S., Chapuis, N., Vignon, M., & Cottereau, A. -S. (2021). Prognostic Value of FDG-PET/CT Parameters in Patients with Relapse/Refractory Multiple Myeloma before Anti-CD38 Based Therapy. Cancers, 13(17), 4323. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13174323