Next Article in Journal
Metformin and Androgen Receptor-Axis-Targeted (ARAT) Agents Induce Two PARP-1-Dependent Cell Death Pathways in Androgen-Sensitive Human Prostate Cancer Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Incidence and Survival Outcomes in Patients with Lung Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in the United States
Previous Article in Journal
Integrative Transcriptomic Network Analysis of Butyrate Treated Colorectal Cancer Cells
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Prognostic Value of the De Ritis Ratio for Progression-Free Survival in Patients with NET Undergoing [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC-PRRT: A Retrospective Analysis

Cancers 2021, 13(4), 635; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040635
by Tristan Ruhwedel 1, Julian M. M. Rogasch 1,2, Kai Huang 1, Henning Jann 3, Imke Schatka 1, Christian Furth 1, Holger Amthauer 1 and Christoph Wetz 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Cancers 2021, 13(4), 635; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040635
Submission received: 19 January 2021 / Revised: 29 January 2021 / Accepted: 1 February 2021 / Published: 5 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Neuroendocrine Tumors: Treatment and Management)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The topic of the article is very interesting considering the lack of literature data about De Ritis ratio in NETs, the simplicity and availability to obtain the parameter (AST/ALT ratio) and its prognostic value demonstrated also in other malignancies.

The analysis is clearly and in detail described, dealing with various endpoints in an exhaustive manner.

I have minor considerations for the authors:

  • I would suggest moving the “Materials and Methods” paragraph immediately after the introduction, for a clearer reading of the results.
  • In discussion section, in line 132-137, the results are reported again. Rather, I suggest to distribute them in the discussion, commenting them on the basis of literature data
  • In Materials and Methods section, specify the radiopharmaceutical PET/CT used in the study and describe the scheduled doses of PRRT.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript has evaluated the prognostic role of AST/ALT in NET treated with  [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC-PRR. The results and conclusion are well supported by data. The manuscript is comprehensive and well written. Please define all abbreviations at their first appearance (PFS). 

detailed comments:

  1. Please provide the graph for the changes in the levels of AST, ALT, ALP, and CgA during the treatment.
  2. Radiation therapy may induce liver disease which typically presents 4–8 weeks after therapy and the changes in ALP are more pronounced that in AST and ALT, please provide the data for ALP for at least  initial 10 weeks
  3. A reversible initial increase in AST and ALT has been reported with 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment, please discuss if the authors find the same or not.
  4. Similarly, please include the changes in LHD during the course of treatment
  5. Please provide the histological, imaging, CT scan or MRI imaging suggesting improvement with the therapy and no damage to liver and a decrease in liver and lung metastasis
  6. Was there any hematologic toxicity during the treatment
  7. Was there any radiogenic edema during the treatment
  8. An increase in size directly after PRRT has been reported, was there such findings during the study?
  9. Since this is a retrospective study and clinical investigations and imaging data is not available, please discuss these aspects in the discussion.
  10. Please expand all abbreviations on their first appearance.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop