Next Article in Journal
Challenges and Learning Curves in Adopting TaTME and Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Cusum Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Reply to De Giorgi et al. Comment on “Kesić et al. Early Diagnostics of Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Cancers 2022, 14, 1822”
Previous Article in Journal
Biological Response of Human Cancer Cells to Ionizing Radiation in Combination with Gold Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Early Diagnostics of Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia
 
 
Comment
Peer-Review Record

Comment on Kesić et al. Early Diagnostics of Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Cancers 2022, 14, 1822

Cancers 2022, 14(20), 5087; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14205087
by Vincenzo De Giorgi 1,*, Elisabetta Magnaterra 1, Manfredi Magliulo 1, Flavia Silvestri 1, Federico Venturi 1, Biancamaria Zuccaro 1, Jacopo Colombo 1 and Luciana Trane 2
Reviewer 1:
Cancers 2022, 14(20), 5087; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14205087
Submission received: 3 July 2022 / Revised: 1 September 2022 / Accepted: 6 September 2022 / Published: 18 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Vulvar Cancer)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I agree with the authors that dermoscopy is not used in the clinical routine by gynecologists. 

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for his comment. In fact, our comment was made precisely to encourage multidisciplinary management of this particular pathology. English has been revised by a native speaker (certificate of editing is attached)

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop