Next Article in Journal
ACY1 Downregulation Enhances the Radiosensitivity of Cetuximab-Resistant Colorectal Cancer by Inactivating the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway
Previous Article in Journal
Surgical Extent for Oral Cancer: Emphasis on a Cut-Off Value for the Resection Margin Status: A Narrative Literature Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dietary EPA+DHA Mitigate Hepatic Toxicity and Modify the Oxylipin Profile in an Animal Model of Colorectal Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy

1
Division of Human Nutrition, Department of Agricultural Food and Nutritional Science, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
2
Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2022, 14(22), 5703; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14225703
Submission received: 6 October 2022 / Revised: 18 November 2022 / Accepted: 18 November 2022 / Published: 21 November 2022

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Liver toxicity as a result of chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer is common, but it remains poorly understood. The bioactive metabolites of polyunsaturated fatty acids, oxylipins, and pro-inflammatory cytokines play crucial roles in numerous biological processes and pathological conditions. A preclinical model of colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy was used to understand the alterations of oxylipins and cytokines concurrently with the alterations of the liver pathology and to test whether liver toxicity can be modified by a diet containing eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in the form of fish oil. After chemotherapy, the measures of liver toxicity were evident and were associated with the elevation of specific oxylipins and cytokines. Dietary fish oil influenced oxylipin and cytokine production while mitigating liver toxicity after chemotherapy treatment. Fish oil may present a novel dietary strategy to attenuate liver toxicity during chemotherapy.

Abstract

Irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) are commonly used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer, but chemotherapy-associated steatosis/steatohepatitis (CASSH) frequently accompanies their use. The objective of this study was to determine effect of CPT-11+5-FU on liver toxicity, liver oxylipins, and cytokines, and to explore whether these alterations could be modified by dietary eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in the form of fish oil (EPA+DHA). Tumor-bearing animals were administered CPT-11+5-FU and maintained on a control diet or a diet containing EPA+DHA (2.3 g/100 g). Livers were collected one week after chemotherapy for the analysis of oxylipins, cytokines, and markers of liver pathology (oxidized glutathione, GSSH; 4-hydroxynonenal, 4-HNE, and type-I collagen fiber). Dietary EPA+DHA prevented the chemotherapy-induced increases in liver GSSH (p < 0.011) and 4-HNE (p < 0.006). Compared with the tumor-bearing animals, ten oxylipins were altered (three/ten n-6 oxylipins were elevated while seven/ten n-3 oxylipins were reduced) following chemotherapy. Reductions in the n-3 fatty-acid-derived oxylipins that were evident following chemotherapy were restored by dietary EPA+DHA. Liver TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-10 were elevated (p < 0.05) following chemotherapy; dietary EPA+DHA reduced IL-6 (p = 0.09) and eotaxin (p = 0.007) levels. Chemotherapy-induced liver injury results in distinct alterations in oxylipins and cytokines, and dietary EPA+DHA attenuates these pathophysiological effects.

1. Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second-most-common cause of cancer death, and it is estimated that it will represent 8–10% of all new cancer cases in 2022 [1,2]. Liver metastasis is common in patients with CRC, as approximately 15–25% of patients present with liver metastases at the time of primary diagnosis and a further 18–25% patients have developed metastases at follow-up [3]. Surgical resection is the most effective treatment, and is curative in 20–25% patients with a median survival of 40 months [4]. Chemotherapy provided prior to surgery reduces tumor size, increases curative resection rates, and sometimes converts an unresectable disease to a resectable disease [4,5]. A common drug combination for colorectal liver metastasis is irinotecan (CPT-11) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). While the drug combination has a good response rate, it is associated with steatosis and steatohepatitis [4,5,6,7,8]; related hepatic dysfunction may limit the capability to resect larger portions of the liver [4]. A higher prevalence (20.2% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.001) of chemotherapy-associated steatohepatitis was observed in patients with colorectal liver metastasis receiving CPT-11+5-FU-based chemotherapy before liver resection when compared with patients who had no chemotherapy [7]. Although chemotherapy-associated steatosis/steatohepatitis (CASSH) is common, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood, and are being continually investigated.
Oxylipins are biologically active compounds present in all tissues, including the liver. Oxylipins are primarily formed enzymatically by the oxidative metabolism of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) [9,10]. Upon release from membrane phospholipids (PLs) by the action of cytosolic phospholipase A2, free PUFAs are converted to oxylipins by three classes of enzymes (cyclooxygenase, lipoxygenase, and cytochrome P450) via oxygenation reactions to form distinct products, depending on the fatty acid substrate [9,11]. Oxylipins are important regulators of tissue homeostasis, inflammation, and signaling, and are involved in many inflammatory diseases, including arthritis, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and renal disease [9,10,12,13,14]. Oxylipins are key mediators of hepatic inflammation [15,16,17], and therefore might play an important role in the pathogenesis of CASSH.
Depending on the PUFA substrate, oxylipins can be classified as pro- or anti-inflammatory, due to the fact that oxylipins derived from n-3 PUFA are generally anti-inflammatory or less inflammatory, while those derived from n-6 PUFA are generally pro-inflammatory [9,18,19,20]. Pro-inflammatory oxylipins induce the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, while anti-inflammatory oxylipins decrease their expression and limit the production of oxylipins that are inflammatory [21,22,23]. Dietary supplementation with specific n-3 PUFAs (i.e., eicosapentaenoic acid, EPA, and docosahexaenoic acid, DHA) increase the cellular membrane’s phospholipid fatty acid content of these fatty acids [24,25,26]. Although the incorporation of EPA+DHA into the membrane alters the substrate available for enzymatic oxidation, the molecular mode of action of PUFAs is still not fully understood; however, it is known that the physiological effects of PUFAs are significantly mediated by the oxylipins produced [9,12,14,16,20,27]. Therefore, to understand the net consequences of any alteration in PUFAs, it is necessary to directly determine what oxylipins are produced.
CASSH has many features similar to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and some studies have reported alterations of circulating oxylipin profiles in NAFLD [28,29,30,31,32]. It is also well accepted that inflammatory cytokines play a critical role in contributing to the development and progression of NAFLD [33,34]. However, no study has reported on hepatic oxylipins nor cytokine alterations in CASSH.
It was hypothesized that chemotherapy is associated with both perturbations in oxylipins and increased pro-inflammatory cytokines. Our hypothesis is based on our previous study [35], in which hepatic PUFAs were depleted after chemotherapy treatment in the same animal model. It was also postulated that providing dietary EPA+DHA in the form of fish oil initiated at the same time as chemotherapy was administrated would reduce liver toxicities and mitigate the oxylipin and pro-inflammatory cytokine alterations caused by chemotherapy treatment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal Handling and Experimental Design

A total of 18 female Fischer 344 rats (Charles River, Senneville, QC, Canada) underwent tumor implantation after two weeks of basal diet feeding, as previously described [36]. Tumor volume was estimated daily using the following formula: cm3 = 0.5 × L × W × H [37]. When the tumor volume reached 2 cm3, one group (n = 6) of rats were euthanized, while the remaining rats (n = 12) were administrated with intraperitoneal CPT-11 injections (50 mg/kg body weight), while 5-FU (50 mg/kg body weight, intraperitoneal) was injected following the next day of CPT-11 injection. The combination of CPT-11+5-FU represents one complete chemotherapy cycle. The rats were randomized to a diet containing fish oil (designated as the Chemo+Fish Oil group throughout the manuscript; n = 6) starting on the day of the CPT-11 injection, or a control semi-purified diet resembling the intake of western diets (designated as the Chemotherapy or Chemo group; n = 6) [38]. Tumor-bearing animals not receiving the chemotherapy treatment (n = 6) designated as the Tumor group were provided a control diet. Healthy rats (n = 6) did not undergo tumor implantation nor receive chemotherapy, consumed only the control diet (designated as the Reference group throughout the manuscript), and were otherwise handled in the same manner as the experimental groups. The experimental design is outlined in Figure 1.
Rats were acclimated for one week prior to the start of the experiment, then fed a North American type of diet based on the AIN-76 basal diet (Harlan Teklad, Indianapolis, IN, USA), while the fish oil diet contained the same proportion of macronutrients as the control diet, differing only in the addition of 2.3 g fish oil/100 g (Ocean Nutrition Canada, Dartmouth, NS, Canada). The food intake and body weight were measured daily following the chemotherapy injections. The rats were euthanized with carbon-dioxide asphyxiation, and their livers were collected, weighed, and immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for further analysis.

2.2. Assessment of Oxidative Stress, Lipid Peroxidation, and Fibrosis Markers from Liver Tissue

To determine the oxidized glutathione (GSSH), the frozen rat livers (~30 mg) were homogenized (1:10 w:v ratio) in the extraction buffer (supplied with the kit) and determined calorimetrically (Abbkine, Inc, Wuhan, China, Cat#: KTB1610). For the lipid peroxidation marker 4-Hydroxy-2-Nonenal (4-HNE), the frozen livers (~30 mg) were homogenized (1:20 w/v ratio) using a RIPA buffer containing SDS and determined using a rat ELISA kit (Abcam, Cambridge, UK, Cat#ab238538). For the classic liver fibrosis marker type-I collagen (COL-1), the frozen livers (~30 mg) were homogenized (1:9 w/v ratio) using PBS (0.01 M, pH = 7.4) and measured using specific rat ELISA kits (Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO, USA, Cat# NBP2-75823). All procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.3. Oxylipin Analysis

Oxylipins were analyzed using a previously established method [25,39,40,41,42]. Briefly, whole liver tissues were homogenized in ice-cold Tyrode’s salt solution (pH 7.6) and Triton X-100 was added to achieve a final concentration of 0.01%. Deuterated internal standards (10 µL) were added to 200 µL tissue homogenates to perform solid-phase extraction using Strata-X SPE columns (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). The samples were loaded onto the columns, washed with 10% methanol and pH 3 water, and dried with hexane, followed by being eluted with 100% methanol. The samples were dried under nitrogen and resuspended in the mobile phase (water/acetonitrile/acetic acid, 70/30/0.02 v/v/v) for HPLC/MS/MS (Shimadzu Nexera XR) coupled with a QTRAP 6500 (Sciex, Concord, ON, Canada) as described in [39,40,41,42], based on methods developed by Deems et al. [43]. Lists of all of the oxylipins screened for, detector response factors, and internal standards are available in [40,42]. The detection and quantification limits were set at 3 and 5 levels above the background, respectively. The quantification of the oxylipins was determined using the stable-isotope-dilution method [44], and the amounts are expressed as pg/mg of tissue.

2.4. Phospholipid (PL) Fatty Acid Analysis

The whole rat livers (50 mg) were homogenized with a calcium chloride solution (0.025%) using a sonicator, and the fatty acid analysis was carried out by the previously described method [35,36,38]. A modified Folch method was used for the extraction of the total lipids from the livers [45]. The PL fraction was isolated using thin-layer chromatography and the band was visualized, scraped, and C17:0 (0.05 µg; Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA; Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to enable the quantification of the fatty acids in the PL fraction. The esterified fatty acids were determined using gas chromatography (Varian 3600CX Gas Chromatograph) equipped with a flame ionization detector and a BP-20 fused capillary column (SGE Instruments, Melbourne, Australia). The fatty acid contents were calculated as proportions (%) as well as absolute amounts (μg/g) based on commercially available standards containing a known fatty acid composition.

2.5. Determination of Cytokines

Frozen whole rat livers (~50 mg) were pulverized in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle and were homogenized (1:10 w:v ratio) in an extraction buffer (20 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5; 0.5% Tween 20; 150 mM NaCl and protease inhibitors 1:100) with glass beads (0.5 mm diameter; Fast Prep®-24, MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) for 25 s, then were placed on ice. All samples were diluted to the same protein concentration of 1.6 mg/mL. Luminex xMAP technology was performed using the Luminex™ 200 system (Luminex, Austin, TX, USA). Ten cytokines (TNF-α, Eotaxin, IFN-γ, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-18, and MCP-1) were simultaneously measured in the samples using the Rat Cytokine Multi Plex Discovery Assay® (Eve Tech, Calgary, AB, Canada), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The assay sensitivities of these markers ranged from 0.3–30.7 pg/mL for the multiplex.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data was analyzed by SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0. IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). The normalities of the data were examined using the Shapiro–Wilk statistic (W > 0.05 for normally distributed data). One-way ANOVA was used to identify significant differences between the groups. The Kruskal–Wallis (nonparametric) test was performed if the data did not follow a normal distribution even if transformed. Post hoc analysis was carried out using the Duncan multiple range test for simple-effect comparisons when interactions were present. All data are presented as mean ± SD. A p-value of <0.05 or 0.008 (for oxylipins Bonferroni-corrected p-value) was considered a significant difference for the interaction and simple effects.

3. Results

3.1. General Findings

There were no significant differences in body weights between the treatment groups at the time of termination (152 ± 7.4 g). The relative food intake significantly decreased in the chemotherapy group but returned to baseline by day four, and all groups had similar daily food intakes (10 ± 0.7 g). The average liver weight, as well as the average liver weight as a percent of body weight, was not different between the groups (5.5 ± 0.2 g and 3.7 ± 0.1%, respectively).

3.2. Effects of Tumor, Chemotherapy, and Dietary Fish Oil on Liver Toxicity Markers

Liver GSSH and 4-HNE were not affected by the tumor; however, both were significantly (p < 0.05) higher following the chemotherapy treatment. For each of these markers, dietary fish oil restored them to values similar to the Reference group (Figure 2A,B). No significant difference (p = 0.124) was observed for the fibrosis marker, Col I, between the groups (Figure 2C).

3.3. Oxylipin and PL Fatty Acid Distribution

Out of the 160 oxylipins scanned, 76 oxylipins were detected and quantified in the livers. Approximately two-thirds (66%) of the oxylipins were derived from n-6 PUFA, with the majority (72%) being derived from arachidonic acid (AA). Approximately half of the remaining n-3 PUFA-derived oxylipins were formed from DHA, 40% from EPA, and one-tenth (12%) from alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), respectively (Supplemental Table S1).
The oxylipin mass did not reflect the PUFA proportions in the PL fractions. For example, in the Reference group, the proportions of linoleic acid (LA), AA, ALA, EPA, and DHA in the PL fraction were 16%, 61%, 0%, 1%, and 19%, respectively, while the proportions of LA, AA, ALA, EPA, and DHA oxylipins were 31%, 54%, 1%, 5%, and 8%, respectively (Figure 3). Similar discrepancies in the distributions of oxylipin masses compared with PUFA mass in PL were also observed in other groups (Figure 3).

3.4. Effects of Tumor, Chemotherapy, and Fish Oil on Liver Oxylipins

Compared with the Reference group, seven oxylipins were altered in the livers of the Tumor group, of which six oxylipins (five from AA and one from ALA) were elevated while one EPA-derived oxylipin was reduced (Supplemental Table S1).
Ten oxylipins were significantly different between the Tumor and Chemotherapy groups. Three oxylipins derived from AA were higher, while seven oxylipins derived from EPA (two/seven) and DHA (five/seven) were lower following chemotherapy (Supplemental Table S1), reflecting the imbalance in n-6/n-3 PUFA metabolites. The total n-3 PUFA-derived oxylipins were also lower (20% reduction by mass) in the liver of the Chemotherapy group when compared with the Tumor group (Figure 4).
In general, n-6 PUFA-derived oxylipins were reduced and n-3 PUFA-derived oxylipins were increased in the livers of the Chemo+Fish Oil group compared with the Chemotherapy group. The heatmap (Figure 5) clearly shows the strong dietary effects of fish oil on liver oxylipins, in which the dietary EPA+DHA reduced the n-6-derived oxylipins while increasing the EPA- and DHA-derived oxylipins (data in Supplemental Table S1).
About half (25/51) of the individual n-6 PUFA-derived oxylipins that were detectable in the livers of the Chemotherapy group were reduced in the Chemo+Fish Oil group (Supplemental Table S1 and visualized in Figure 5). The total, as well as individual, oxylipins derived from LA (5/9), gamma-linolenic acid (1/1), dihomo-γ-linolenic acid (3/4), and AA (16/37) were lower in the Chemo+Fish Oil group (Supplemental Table S1). The total n-6 oxylipins were also reduced by half in the livers of the Chemo+Fish Oil group compared with the Chemotherapy group (Figure 4A).
Dietary fish oil containing EPA and DHA increased the total as well individual n-3 oxylipins derived from EPA and DHA (Supplemental Table S1 and Figure 4B; visualized in Figure 5). All of the EPA and DHA oxylipins were higher in the Chemo+Fish Oil group, except for the DHA-derived 8-HDoHE and the 19,20-DiHDoPE, which remained similar to other groups. Two (out of three) ALA-derived oxylipins were decreased in the Chemo+Fish Oil group compared with the Chemotherapy group (Supplemental Table S1). The total n-3 oxylipins were four-fold higher in the livers of the Chemo+Fish Oil group compared with the Chemotherapy group (Figure 4B).

3.5. Effects of Tumor, Chemotherapy, and Dietary Fish Oil on Liver Cytokines and Chemokines

Tumors had little effect on liver cytokines with the exception of TNF-α, which was lower in the livers of the Tumor group compared with the Reference group (p < 0.05). TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 were all significantly higher in the Chemotherapy group compared with Tumor group. Eotaxin, IL-6, and IL-18 levels were lower in the Chemo+Fish Oil group when compared with the Chemotherapy (eotaxin/IL-6) or Tumor (IL-18) groups, respectively (p < 0.05, Figure 6A–E and Supplemental Table S2). Monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 levels were below the detection limit of the assay for all groups.

4. Discussion

This work demonstrates a distinct alteration of hepatic oxylipin profiles by a common chemotherapeutic regimen with concurrent increase of markers of liver toxicity and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Each of these alterations are modified in a beneficial manner by dietary EPA+DHA in the form of fish oil. Cytotoxic chemotherapy prolongs the survival rates of patients with advanced and metastatic CRC. However, several cytotoxic agents, including CPT-11 and 5-FU, that are administered routinely have been linked to liver toxicities, such as steatosis and/or steatohepatitis, that impair liver function and regeneration [46,47,48,49]. The exact mechanism(s) of liver toxicity during chemotherapy treatment in CRC patients are still being investigated; however, it is well accepted that inflammation and the production of reactive oxygen species play important roles in liver toxicities [50,51,52,53].
Oxylipins play important roles in regulating inflammation and oxidative stress in diverse tissues, including livers [19,54], by being upstream mediators produced after the cleavage of membrane phospholipids. Although no study has investigated systemic or hepatic oxylipin alterations by chemotherapy treatment, several studies have reported that serum oxylipins can be used as a maker of NAFLD detection or severity [28,30,31,32]. The present study shows that chemotherapy treatment increases several n-6 PUFA oxylipins, in particular those derived from AA, while reducing n-3 PUFA (EPA and DHA)-derived oxylipins. These findings are consistent with previous findings in which AA-derived 12-hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid (HETE) was higher, while EPA-derived 11-hydroxy-eicosapentaenoic acid (HEPE) and DHA-derived 13-hydroxy-docosahexaenoic acid (HDoHE) were lower in the livers of mice with diet-induced NAFLD [55]. In general, oxylipins derived from n-6 PUFAs are considered as pro-inflammatory, while oxylipins derived from n-3 PUFAs are considered to be less-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory [9,19]. Due to the fact that oxylipins mediate diverse biologic activities [9,10,12,13,14], it is conceivable that certain oxylipins might contribute to the pathogenesis of liver toxicity. For example, in our study, AA-derived thromboxane (TX)B2 was higher in the livers of chemotherapy-treated animals. TXB2 is a stable, inactive, and non-enzymatically driven degradative product of highly unstable TXA2 [56,57,58]. In NAFLD, NASH, and other liver diseases, higher serum levels or urinary excretions of TXB2 progressively increases with the degree of disease progression [59,60,61,62]. The mechanisms by which enhanced thromboxanes cause liver injury are unknown; however, it is believed that thromboxanes may cause or aggravate liver injury by decreasing blood flow and increasing inflammation and extracellular matrix deposition [63,64,65]. The inhibition of thromboxane production has been shown to alleviate liver injury in several animal models [66,67,68]. Thromboxane inhibition results in the attenuation of necro-inflammatory changes accompanied by a decrease in TNF-α mRNA [63]. Chemotherapy also increases 12-HETE, which is also a well-known pro-inflammatory oxylipin [69,70]. When TXB2 + 12-HETE were injected into mice, the productions of TNF-α and IL-6 were significantly elevated in the macrophages isolated from bone marrow [71]. The exact roles of these pro-inflammatory oxylipins in chemotherapy-associated liver toxicities are not known and need to be investigated in future studies.
Seven n-3 PUFA-derived oxylipins are reduced in the liver by chemotherapy treatment. Prior work revealed that n-3 PUFAs are depleted in the liver by chemotherapy treatment [35], although the tissue levels of oxylipins do not always reflect PUFA precursors (our lab and [25]). Oxylipins derived from n-3 PUFAs are thought to modulate inflammation via two pathways: through their direct anti-inflammatory activities, and/or through their proresolving activities [72,73,74]. N-3 PUFAs-derived oxylipins compete for the same receptors as n-6 PUFAs-derived oxylipins, which reduces their concentrations and therefore their inflammatory processes [75,76]. Inflammation is normally terminated by a multistep resolution mechanism [77], which is important for normal homeostasis. This homeostasis mechanism in the tissue is dysregulated in disease conditions [74,78]. Proresolving oxylipins such as resolvins, protectins, and maresins produced from n-3 PUFAs initiate pathways that signal the termination of an acute inflammatory phase [72], and thus play important roles in this resolution phase of the inflammatory process [77]. We found that several hepatic oxylipins such as 14-HDoHE and 17-HDoHE, precursors of resolvins, protectins, and maresins [27,79], were lowest after chemotherapy treatment, which may favor the production of more pro-inflammatory oxylipins. Understanding the role of specific or groups of these oxylipins in inflammation and its resolution may therefore shed light on how n-3 PUFAs mediate their beneficial effects in chemotherapy-associated liver toxicities.
Although the effect of fish oil on oxidants and antioxidants is always controversial, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials showed that n-3 PUFAs-supplementation enhances the antioxidant defense against reactive oxygen species [80]. The provision of dietary fish oil initiated concurrently with chemotherapy treatment significantly reduces oxidative stress markers, as is indicated by the amelioration of hepatic GSSH and 4-HNE that were elevated in the chemotherapy-treated animals (Figure 2A, B). This is important because hepatotoxicity from cytotoxic chemotherapy, at least in part, is related to the increase oxidative stress [81]. Our findings are consistent with findings from other studies, which indicates that n-3 PUFAs act as antioxidants and reduce reactive-oxygen-species-production by eliminating superoxide [82,83], by increasing expression and activity of key antioxidant enzymes [84], or by lowering 4-HNE-modified protein adduct [84]. Thus, improving antioxidant status by fish oil provision can have very positive effects on improving the pathological status in CASSH. This study shows a strong dietary effect on hepatic oxylipin alterations by dietary fish oil. In general, total, as well as individual, n-6 PUFA-derived oxylipins were lower in the livers of animals provided a fish oil diet compared with other animals. Although there is no data available about the direct effect of fish oil on the liver oxylipins in healthy or diseased animals, nor in the livers of chemotherapy-treated animals, the reduction of n-6 PUFA-derived oxylipins in response to dietary EPA or DHA has been observed in the livers of healthy rats [25,85]. As is consistent with our findings, the effects of fish oil on a larger range of plasma n-6 oxylipins have been reported in humans [86,87], as well as the effects of EPA or DHA in animal models [25,84] or in in vitro models [88]. In contrast with the reduction in the n-6-derived oxylipins, total, as well as individual, n-3-derived oxylipins, particularly EPA- and DHA-derived oxylipins, were increased with fish oil feeding. Fish oil provisions resulted in the reduction of ALA oxylipins, suggesting that the retro-conversion of EPA and DHA to ALA did not occur to a significant extent in the livers in this model. Our findings are consistent with the previous study in which dietary fish oil increased kidney EPA- and DHA-derived oxylipins while reducing ALA-derived oxylipins [26]. These dietary effects on oxylipins may have implications for liver injury and recovery. As discussed in previous sections, AA-derived thromboxanes and several HETEs are involved in the inflammatory responses in the liver, while resolvins, protectins, and maresins formed from EPA and DHA have anti-inflammatory effects. Hence, oxylipin alterations in response to diet are likely to impact liver toxicity and repair.
Under normal physiologic conditions, all tissues, including livers, constitutively produce a minimal level of cytokines. When stimulated, liver cells, particularly immune cells in the liver (i.e., Kupffer cells), become activated, and cytokine production increases dramatically to direct the healing process. However, if the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines does not resolve after a short time, damage to healthy tissue occurs and results in toxicity [89,90,91]. In this study, chemotherapy treatment significantly increased hepatic TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 levels, while dietary fish oil reduced IL-6 and eotaxin levels. These findings are consistent with other studies in which higher plasma levels of TNF-α and IL-6 were found in patients with NAFLD or NASH compared with the healthy controls [92,93,94]. TNF-α is a pro-inflammatory cytokine characterized by various biological effects with enhanced expression in the liver and positively correlates with liver steatosis, stiffness, and fibrosis, suggesting that it plays important roles in liver toxicity [89]. Human and experimental studies imply that TNF-α plays roles in development of every setting of liver toxicity, including steatosis, necrosis, apoptosis, and fibrosis (reviewed in ref. [95]). TNF-α also regulates the secretion of IL-6 from Kupffer cells [96]. IL-6 is another pro-inflammatory cytokine with deleterious effects in several inflammatory disorders [97]. The role of IL-6 in liver toxicity remains obscure; however, several studies have reported that hepatocyte IL-6 expression correlates positively with plasma IL-6 levels, the degree of hepatic inflammation, and the stage of fibrosis [98,99,100]. This study also found that hepatic IL-10 was elevated after chemotherapy treatment. IL-10 is an anti-inflammatory cytokine that plays important roles in regulating hepatic inflammation, cell necrosis, apoptosis, and liver fibrosis and in stimulating liver regeneration after injury [101,102]. Our findings are consistent with a study that shows serum IL-10 levels were elevated in hepatocellular carcinoma patients compared with normal controls, but that they decreased after surgical resection [103]. The higher hepatic levels of IL-10 with the concomitant increase of TNF-α and IL-6 after chemotherapy treatment might be due to the body’s adaptive mechanisms for the resolution of acute inflammatory responses to protect the liver [104]. Patients with NAFLD exhibit a balance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines [89], and these balances are altered with the progression of disease. Whether this higher hepatic level of IL-10 persists after several cycles of chemotherapy remains to be investigated in future studies.
Dietary fish oil mitigates elevated hepatic IL-6. Our finding is consistent with previous findings in which fish oil supplementation significantly reduced serum IL-6 levels in patients with NAFLD [92], as well as patients with other diseases [92,105,106]. The provision of fish oil also reduced hepatic eotaxin levels. Eotaxin is a potent eosinophil-specific chemoattractant which plays an important role in innate and adaptive immune responses [107]. Serum eotaxin levels have been reported to be higher in patients with chronic liver diseases, and this higher serum level was negatively correlated with the liver’s biosynthetic capacity, while being positively associated with higher serum IL-6, hepatic necroinflammation and fibrosis [108]. Similarly, serum eotaxin level has been positively associated with pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) [109,110] and the severity of liver steatosis in NAFLD [111]. Although hepatic eotaxin was not significantly impacted by chemotherapy, the reduction of eotaxin levels by dietary fish oil may favor the liver’s regeneration or resolution mechanisms. However, the exact role of eotaxin in chemotherapy-associated liver toxicities needs to be investigated in future studies.
It should be noted that results obtained from animal models cannot simply be extrapolated to humans due to the fact that lipid metabolism differs between species. However, the experimental model used for this study carefully recapitulated therapy for colorectal cancer in humans with respect to the doses, cycles, and toxicity of a combined regimen of CPT-11+5-FU [37,38,112]. Moreover, we observed a strong dietary effect even after a short time of dietary intervention initiated at the same time as chemotherapy treatment and even after few days of lower food intakes. Female animals were used in this study to enable the assessment of tumor growth and the reduction of variability due to sex. Due to the fact that oxylipin levels and distributions are affected by sex [25,26,40], the results described in the present study may not be (completely) transferable to male animals. Our study is relatively short as only one cycle of chemotherapy was provided, whereas in clinical settings four or more cycles of chemotherapy are commonly provided before liver resection. Therefore, the alteration of oxylipins and the effect of fish oil after several cycles of chemotherapy need to be investigated in future studies. The method we used herein can detect and quantify > 160 non-esterified (free) oxylipins, as the hydrolysis procedures that are currently used to extract esterified oxylipins result in the degradation of certain classes of oxylipins and the potential formation of artifacts, thus measuring the non-esterified oxylipins is the preferred method [113]. There are several methods for oxylipin extraction which vary in their efficiency, with some favoring some types of oxylipins over others; however, the method used herein is one of the most efficient and most frequently used [114]. Several oxylipins have chiral carbons, and consequently present enantiomers that can oppose biological effects [115]. Our method does not provide information on enantiomer balance within an oxylipin species, but rather presents the overall comprehensive oxylipin profile that results from chemotherapy and the modification by a diet containing EPA and DHA. Our data will guide future research to explore targeted oxylipins in these conditions.

5. Conclusions

The present study provides a comprehensive hepatic oxylipin profile in normal, tumorous, chemotherapy-treated animals provided a control diet that mimics a western diet, and chemotherapy-treated animals provided fish oil diet. Chemotherapy-induced liver injury is associated with a reduction in oxylipins that are considered anti-inflammatory or less inflammatory with the subsequent increase of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Dietary fish oil mitigated these alterations. Further studies in other experimental models is warranted to verify whether these chemotherapy-induced oxylipin perturbations occur in humans, in both sexes, and whether fish oil supplementation can abrogate those perturbations.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cancers14225703/s1, Supplemental Table S1: Liver oxylipins in reference, tumor, chemotherapy, and fish oil group animals and Supplemental Table S2: Liver cytokines.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.C.M., M.M. and O.F.B.; methodology, M.M.; software, M.M.; validation, M.M. and V.C.M.; formal analysis, M.M.; investigation, M.M.; resources, V.C.M. and M.M.; data curation, M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.; writing—review and editing, V.C.M. and O.F.B.; supervision, V.C.M.; project administration, V.C.M. and O.F.B.; funding acquisition, V.C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) operating grant, grant number 259704, and M.M. is funded by the Alberta Innovates Postdoctoral Fellowships in Health Innovations 2+1 (202102498) and the CIHR grant.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Animal use and experimental procedures were reviewed and approved by the University of Alberta Institutional Animal Care Committee (protocol code AUP00003572 and date of approval 1 April 2022) and conducted in accordance with the Guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express sincere gratitude to Abha Dunichand-Hoedl for her technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Colorectal Cancer Statistics. 2022. Available online: https://cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-types/colorectal/statistics (accessed on 12 May 2022).
  2. Cancer Stat Facts: Colorectal Cancer. 2022. Available online: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html (accessed on 12 May 2022).
  3. Kow, A.W.C. Hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2019, 10, 1274–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ito, K.; Govindarajan, A.; Ito, H.; Fong, Y. Surgical treatment of hepatic colorectal metastasis: Evolving role in the setting of improving systemic therapies and ablative treatments in the 21st century. Cancer J. 2010, 16, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Vauthey, J.N.; Choti, M.A.; Helton, W.S. AHPBA/SSO/SSAT Consensus Conference on hepatic colorectal metastases: Rationale and overview of the conference. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2006, 13, 1259–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fernandez, F.G.; Ritter, J.; Goodwin, J.W.; Linehan, D.C.; Hawkins, W.G.; Strasberg, S.M. Effect of steatohepatitis associated with irinotecan or oxaliplatin pretreatment on resectability of hepatic colorectal metastases. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2005, 200, 845–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Vauthey, J.N.; Pawlik, T.M.; Ribero, D.; Wu, T.T.; Zorzi, D.; Hoff, P.M.; Xiong, H.Q.; Eng, C.; Lauwers, G.Y.; Mino-Kenudson, M.; et al. Chemotherapy regimen predicts steatohepatitis and an increase in 90-day mortality after surgery for hepatic colorectal metastases. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24, 2065–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Meunier, L.; Larrey, D. Chemotherapy-associated steatohepatitis. Ann. Hepatol. 2020, 19, 597–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gabbs, M.; Leng, S.; Devassy, J.G.; Monirujjaman, M.; Aukema, H.M. Advances in our Understanding of Oxylipins Derived from Dietary PUFAs. Adv. Nutr. 2015, 6, 513–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Christie, W.W.; Harwood, J.L. Oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids to produce lipid mediators. Essays Biochem. 2020, 64, 401–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Caligiuri, S.P.; Love, K.; Winter, T.; Gauthier, J.; Taylor, C.G.; Blydt-Hansen, T.; Zahradka, P.; Aukema, H.M. Dietary linoleic acid and α-linolenic acid differentially affect renal oxylipins and phospholipid fatty acids in diet-induced obese rats. J. Nutr. 2013, 143, 1421–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Lone, A.M.; Tasken, K. Pro-inflammatory and immunoregulatory roles of eicosanoids in T cells. Front. Immunol. 2013, 4, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Câmara, N.O.; Martins, J.O.; Landgraf, R.G.; Jancar, S. Emerging roles for eicosanoids in renal diseases. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2009, 18, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Johnson, A.M.; Kleczko, E.K.; Nemenoff, R.A. Eicosanoids in Cancer: New Roles in Immunoregulation. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 595498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Warner, D.R.; Liu, H.; Ghosh Dastidar, S.; Warner, J.B.; Prodhan, M.; Yin, X.; Zhang, X.; Feldstein, A.E.; Gao, B.; Prough, R.A.; et al. Ethanol and unsaturated dietary fat induce unique patterns of hepatic omega-6 and omega-3 PUFA oxylipins in a mouse model of alcoholic liver disease. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0204119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Schuster, S.; Johnson, C.D.; Hennebelle, M.; Holtmann, T.; Taha, A.Y.; Kirpich, I.A.; Eguchi, A.; Ramsden, C.E.; Papouchado, B.G.; McClain, C.J.; et al. Oxidized linoleic acid metabolites induce liver mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis, and NLRP3 activation in mice. J. Lipid Res. 2018, 59, 1597–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Alvarez, M.L.; Lorenzetti, F. Role of eicosanoids in liver repair, regeneration and cancer. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2021, 192, 114732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Groeger, A.L.; Cipollina, C.; Cole, M.P.; Woodcock, S.R.; Bonacci, G.; Rudolph, T.K.; Rudolph, V.; Freeman, B.A.; Schopfer, F.J. Cyclooxygenase-2 generates anti-inflammatory mediators from omega-3 fatty acids. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010, 6, 433–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Dennis, E.A.; Norris, P.C. Eicosanoid storm in infection and inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 15, 511–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Serhan, C.N. Treating inflammation and infection in the 21st century: New hints from decoding resolution mediators and mechanisms. FASEB J. 2017, 31, 1273–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ávila-Román, J.; Talero, E.; de Los Reyes, C.; García-Mauriño, S.; Motilva, V. Microalgae-derived oxylipins decrease inflammatory mediators by regulating the subcellular location of NFκB and PPAR-γ. Pharmacol. Res. 2018, 128, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pauls, S.D.; Rodway, L.A.; Winter, T.; Taylor, C.G.; Zahradka, P.; Aukema, H.M. Anti-inflammatory effects of α-linolenic acid in M1-like macrophages are associated with enhanced production of oxylipins from α-linolenic and linoleic acid. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2018, 57, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bosviel, R.; Joumard-Cubizolles, L.; Chinetti-Gbaguidi, G.; Bayle, D.; Copin, C.; Hennuyer, N.; Duplan, I.; Staels, B.; Zanoni, G.; Porta, A.; et al. DHA-derived oxylipins, neuroprostanes and protectins, differentially and dose-dependently modulate the inflammatory response in human macrophages: Putative mechanisms through PPAR activation. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017, 103, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mantzioris, E.; Cleland, L.G.; Gibson, R.A.; Neumann, M.A.; Demasi, M.; James, M.J. Biochemical effects of a diet containing foods enriched with n-3 fatty acids. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 72, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Leng, S.; Winter, T.; Aukema, H.M. Dietary ALA, EPA and DHA have distinct effects on oxylipin profiles in female and male rat kidney, liver and serum. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2018, 57, 228–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Devassy, J.G.; Yamaguchi, T.; Monirujjaman, M.; Gabbs, M.; Ravandi, A.; Zhou, J.; Aukema, H.M. Distinct effects of dietary flax compared to fish oil, soy protein compared to casein, and sex on the renal oxylipin profile in models of polycystic kidney disease. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2017, 123, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Serhan, C.N. Pro-resolving lipid mediators are leads for resolution physiology. Nature 2014, 510, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Gorden, D.L.; Myers, D.S.; Ivanova, P.T.; Fahy, E.; Maurya, M.R.; Gupta, S.; Min, J.; Spann, N.J.; McDonald, J.G.; Kelly, S.L.; et al. Biomarkers of NAFLD progression: A lipidomics approach to an epidemic. J. Lipid Res. 2015, 56, 722–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Feldstein, A.E.; Lopez, R.; Tamimi, T.A.; Yerian, L.; Chung, Y.M.; Berk, M.; Zhang, R.; McIntyre, T.M.; Hazen, S.L. Mass spectrometric profiling of oxidized lipid products in human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J. Lipid Res. 2010, 51, 3046–3054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Loomba, R.; Quehenberger, O.; Armando, A.; Dennis, E.A. Polyunsaturated fatty acid metabolites as novel lipidomic biomarkers for noninvasive diagnosis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J. Lipid Res. 2015, 56, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Maciejewska, D.; Ossowski, P.; Drozd, A.; Ryterska, K.; Jamioł-Milc, D.; Banaszczak, M.; Kaczorowska, M.; Sabinicz, A.; Raszeja-Wyszomirska, J.; Stachowska, E. Metabolites of arachidonic acid and linoleic acid in early stages of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease—A pilot study. Subscr. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2015, 121, 184–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Puri, P.; Wiest, M.M.; Cheung, O.; Mirshahi, F.; Sargeant, C.; Min, H.K.; Contos, M.J.; Sterling, R.K.; Fuchs, M.; Zhou, H.; et al. The plasma lipidomic signature of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology 2009, 50, 1827–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Duan, Y.; Pan, X.; Luo, J.; Xiao, X.; Li, J.; Bestman, P.L.; Luo, M. Association of Inflammatory Cytokines with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 880298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, T.S.; Qin, H.L.; Wang, T.; Li, H.T.; Li, H.; Xia, S.H.; Xiang, X.H. Global publication trends and research hotspots of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review. Springerplus 2015, 4, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Monirujjaman, M.; Pant, A.; Nelson, R.; Bathe, O.; Jacobs, R.; Mazurak, V.C. Alterations in hepatic fatty acids reveal depletion of total polyunsaturated fatty acids following irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil treatment in an animal model of colorectal cancer. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2021, 174, 102359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Xue, H.; Sawyer, M.B.; Field, C.J.; Dieleman, L.A.; Baracos, V.E. Nutritional modulation of antitumor efficacy and diarrhea toxicity related to irinotecan chemotherapy in rats bearing the ward colon tumor. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 7146–7154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Cao, S.; Rustum, Y.M. Synergistic antitumor activity of irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil in rats bearing advanced colorectal cancer: Role of drug sequence and dose. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 3717–3721. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Almasud, A.A.; Giles, K.H.; Miklavcic, J.J.; Martins, K.; Baracos, V.E.; Putman, C.T.; Guan, L.L.; Mazurak, V.C. Fish oil mitigates myosteatosis and improves chemotherapy efficacy in a preclinical model of colon cancer. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0183576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Monirujjaman, M.; Aukema, H.M. Cyclooxygenase 2 inhibition slows disease progression and improves the altered renal lipid mediator profile in the Pkd2WS25/− mouse model of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J. Nephrol. 2019, 32, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Monirujjaman, M.; Devassy, J.G.; Yamaguchi, T.; Sidhu, N.; Kugita, M.; Gabbs, M.; Nagao, S.; Zhou, J.; Ravandi, A.; Aukema, H.M. Distinct oxylipin alterations in diverse models of cystic kidney diseases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2017, 1862, 1562–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Penner, A.L.; Waytt, V.; Winter, T.; Leng, S.; Duhamel, T.A.; Aukema, H.M. Oxylipin profiles and levels vary by skeletal muscle type, dietary fat and sex in young rats. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2021, 46, 1378–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Aukema, H.M.; Winter, T.; Ravandi, A.; Dalvi, S.; Miller, D.W.; Hatch, G.M. Generation of Bioactive Oxylipins from Exogenously Added Arachidonic, Eicosapentaenoic and Docosahexaenoic Acid in Primary Human Brain Microvessel Endothelial Cells. Lipids 2016, 51, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Deems, R.; Buczynski, M.W.; Bowers-Gentry, R.; Harkewicz, R.; Dennis, E.A. Detection and quantitation of eicosanoids via high performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. Methods Enzymol. 2007, 432, 59–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hall, L.M.; Murphy, R.C. Electrospray mass spectrometric analysis of 5-hydroperoxy and 5-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids generated by lipid peroxidation of red blood cell ghost phospholipids. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 9, 527–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Folch, J.; Lees, M.; Sloane Stanley, G.H. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 1957, 226, 497–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zorzi, D.; Laurent, A.; Pawlik, T.M.; Lauwers, G.Y.; Vauthey, J.N.; Abdalla, E.K. Chemotherapy-associated hepatotoxicity and surgery for colorectal liver metastases. Br. J. Surg. 2007, 94, 274–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Morris-Stiff, G.; Tan, Y.M.; Vauthey, J.N. Hepatic complications following preoperative chemotherapy with oxaliplatin or irinotecan for hepatic colorectal metastases. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2008, 34, 609–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fong, Y.; Bentrem, D.J. CASH (Chemotherapy-Associated Steatohepatitis) costs. Ann. Surg. 2006, 243, 8–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Duwe, G.; Knitter, S.; Pesthy, S.; Beierle, A.S.; Bahra, M.; Schmelzle, M.; Schmuck, R.B.; Lohneis, P.; Raschzok, N.; Öllinger, R.; et al. Hepatotoxicity following systemic therapy for colorectal liver metastases and the impact of chemotherapy-associated liver injury on outcomes after curative liver resection. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017, 43, 1668–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lim, S.C.; Choi, J.E.; Kang, H.S.; Han, S.I. Ursodeoxycholic acid switches oxaliplatin-induced necrosis to apoptosis by inhibiting reactive oxygen species production and activating p53-caspase 8 pathway in HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 126, 1582–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Au, J.S.; Navarro, V.J.; Rossi, S. Review article: Drug-induced liver injury—Its pathophysiology and evolving diagnostic tools. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011, 34, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Costa, M.L.; Lima-Júnior, R.C.; Aragão, K.S.; Medeiros, R.P.; Marques-Neto, R.D.; de Sá Grassi, L.; Leite, L.L.; Nunes, L.G.; de Mesquita Neto, J.W.; de Castro Brito, G.A.; et al. Chemotherapy-associated steatohepatitis induced by irinotecan: A novel animal model. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2014, 74, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sommer, J.; Mahli, A.; Freese, K.; Schiergens, T.S.; Kuecuekoktay, F.S.; Teufel, A.; Thasler, W.E.; Müller, M.; Bosserhoff, A.K.; Hellerbrand, C. Analysis of molecular mechanisms of 5-fluorouracil-induced steatosis and inflammation in vitro and in mice. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 13059–13072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Qu, Y.; Zhang, H.L.; Zhang, X.P.; Jiang, H.L. Arachidonic acid attenuates brain damage in a rat model of ischemia/reperfusion by inhibiting inflammatory response and oxidative stress. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2018, 37, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hall, Z.; Bond, N.J.; Ashmore, T.; Sanders, F.; Ament, Z.; Wang, X.; Murray, A.J.; Bellafante, E.; Virtue, S.; Vidal-Puig, A.; et al. Lipid zonation and phospholipid remodeling in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2017, 65, 1165–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Patrono, C.; Rocca, B. Measurement of Thromboxane Biosynthesis in Health and Disease. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Patrono, C.; Ciabattoni, G.; Pugliese, F.; Pierucci, A.; Blair, I.A.; FitzGerald, G.A. Estimated rate of thromboxane secretion into the circulation of normal humans. J. Clin. Investig. 1986, 77, 590–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Needleman, P.; Moncada, S.; Bunting, S.; Vane, J.R.; Hamberg, M.; Samuelsson, B. Identification of an enzyme in platelet microsomes which generates thromboxane A2 from prostaglandin endoperoxides. Nature 1976, 261, 558–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ouwendijk, R.J.; Zijlstra, F.J.; Wilson, J.H.; Bonta, I.L.; Vincent, J.E. Raised plasma thromboxane B2 levels in alcoholic liver disease. Prostaglandins Leukot. Med. 1983, 10, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Davì, G.; Ferro, D.; Basili, S.; Iuliano, L.; Camastra, C.; Giammarresi, C.; Santarone, S.; Rocca, B.; Landolfi, R.; Ciabattoni, G.; et al. Increased thromboxane metabolites excretion in liver cirrhosis. Thromb. Haemost. 1998, 79, 747–751. [Google Scholar]
  61. Baratta, F.D.; Pastori, D.; Delben, M.; Carnevale, R.; Novo, M.; Labbadia, G.; Angelico, F.; Violi, F. Enhanced urinary excretion of thromboxane B2 in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Implication for antiplatelet treatment. Atherosclerosis 2018, 275, e65–e66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Baratta, F.; Del Ben, M.; Pastori, D.; Bartimoccia, S.; Cammisotto, V.; Cocomello, N.; Colantoni, A.; Pani, A.; Nocella, C.; Carnevale, R.; et al. The platelets behaviour in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. A potential role for antiplatelets drugs? Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, ehaa946.3158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Nanji, A.A.; Khwaja, S.; Rahemtulla, A.; Miao, L.; Zhao, S.; Tahan, S.R. Thromboxane inhibitors attenuate pathological changes in alcoholic liver disease in the rat. Gastroenterology 1997, 112, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Conti, P.; Caraffa, A.; Gallenga, C.E.; Ross, R.; Kritas, S.K.; Frydas, I.; Younes, A.; Di Emidio, P.; Ronconi, G.; Toniato, E. IL-1 induces throboxane-A2 (TxA2) in COVID-19 causing inflammation and micro-thrombi: Inhibitory effect of the IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra). J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2020, 34, 1623–1627. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Nagai, H.; Shimazawa, T.; Yakuo, I.; Aoki, M.; Koda, A.; Kasahara, M. The role of thromboxane A2 [TxA2] in liver injury in mice. Prostaglandins 1989, 38, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tomishima, Y.; Ishitsuka, Y.; Matsunaga, N.; Nagatome, M.; Furusho, H.; Irikura, M.; Ohdo, S.; Irie, T. Ozagrel hydrochloride, a selective thromboxane A(2) synthase inhibitor, alleviates liver injury induced by acetaminophen overdose in mice. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013, 13, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Nanji, A.A.; Liong, E.C.; Xiao, J.; Tipoe, G.L. Thromboxane inhibitors attenuate inflammatory and fibrotic changes in rat liver despite continued ethanol administrations. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2013, 37, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Ćavar, I.; Kelava, T.; Pravdić, D.; Čulo, F. Anti-thromboxane B2 antibodies protect against acetaminophen-induced liver injury in mice. J. Xenobiot. 2011, 1, e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Srinivasan, S.; Morgan, M.T.; Fiedler, T.L.; Djukovic, D.; Hoffman, N.G.; Raftery, D.; Marrazzo, J.M.; Fredricks, D.N. Metabolic signatures of bacterial vaginosis. mBio 2015, 14, e00204-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Vilaseca, J.; Salas, A.; Guarner, F.; Rodriguez, R.; Malagelada, J.R. Participation of thromboxane and other eicosanoid synthesis in the course of experimental inflammatory colitis. Gastroenterology 1990, 98, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, Q.; Wang, X.; Yan, G.; Lei, J.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, L.; Wang, T.; Zhang, X.; Ye, D.; Li, Y. Anti-versus pro-inflammatory metabololipidome upon cupping treatment. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 45, 1377–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Levy, B.D.; Clish, C.B.; Schmidt, B.; Gronert, K.; Serhan, C.N. Lipid mediator class switching during acute inflammation: Signals in resolution. Nat. Immunol. 2001, 27, 612–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Seki, H.; Fukunaga, K.; Arita, M.; Arai, H.; Nakanishi, H.; Taguchi, R.; Miyasho, T.; Takamiya, R.; Asano, K.; Ishizaka, A.; et al. The anti-inflammatory and proresolving mediator resolvin E1 protects mice from bacterial pneumonia and acute lung injury. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 836–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Devassy, J.G.; Leng, S.; Gabbs, M.; Monirujjaman, M.; Aukema, H.M. Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Oxylipins in Neuroinflammation and Management of Alzheimer Disease. Adv. Nutr. 2016, 7, 905–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Calder, P.C. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and inflammatory processes: Nutrition or pharmacology? Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2013, 75, 645–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Arita, M.; Ohira, T.; Sun, Y.P.; Elangovan, S.; Chiang, N.; Serhan, C.N. Resolvin E1 selectively interacts with leukotriene B4 receptor BLT1 and ChemR23 to regulate inflammation. J. Immunol. 2007, 17, 3912–3917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Freire, M.O.; Van Dyke, T.E. Natural resolution of inflammation. Periodontology 2000, 63, 149–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Wang, X.; Zhu, M.; Hjorth, E.; Cortés-Toro, V.; Eyjolfsdottir, H.; Graff, C.; Nennesmo, I.; Palmblad, J.; Eriksdotter, M.; Sambamurti, K.; et al. Resolution of inflammation is altered in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2015, 11, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Serhan, C.N.; Yang, R.; Martinod, K.; Kasuga, K.; Pillai, P.S.; Porter, T.F.; Oh, S.F.; Spite, M. Maresins: Novel macrophage mediators with potent antiinflammatory and proresolving actions. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 206, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Heshmati, J.; Morvaridzadeh, M.; Maroufizadeh, S.; Akbari, A.; Yavari, M.; Amirinejad, A.; Maleki-Hajiagha, A.; Sepidarkish, M. Omega-3 fatty acids supplementation and oxidative stress parameters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 149, 104462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Maor, Y.; Malnick, S. Liver injury induced by anticancer chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Int. J. Hepatol. 2013, 2013, 815105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Richard, D.; Kefi, K.; Barbe, U.; Bausero, P.; Visioli, F. Polyunsaturated fatty acids as antioxidants. Pharmacol. Res. 2008, 57, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lima Rocha, J.É.; Mendes Furtado, M.; Mello Neto, R.S.; da Silva Mendes, A.V.; Brito, A.; Sena de Almeida, J.; Rodrigues Queiroz, E.I.; de Sousa França, J.V.; Silva Primo, M.G.; Cunha Sales, A.; et al. Effects of Fish Oil Supplementation on Oxidative Stress Biomarkers and Liver Damage in Hypercholesterolemic Rats. Nutrients 2022, 14, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Anderson, E.J.; Thayne, K.A.; Harris, M.; Shaikh, S.R.; Darden, T.M.; Lark, D.S.; Williams, J.M.; Chitwood, W.R.; Kypson, A.P.; Rodriguez, E. Do fish oil omega-3 fatty acids enhance antioxidant capacity and mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation in human atrial myocardium via PPARγ activation? Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2014, 21, 1156–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Kutzner, L.; Esselun, C.; Franke, N.; Schoenfeld, K.; Eckert, G.P.; Schebb, N.H. Effect of dietary EPA and DHA on murine blood and liver fatty acid profile and liver oxylipin pattern depending on high and low dietary n6-PUFA. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 9177–9191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Strassburg, K.; Esser, D.; Vreeken, R.J.; Hankemeier, T.; Müller, M.; van Duynhoven, J.; van Golde, J.; van Dijk, S.J.; Afman, L.A.; Jacobs, D.M. Postprandial fatty acid specific changes in circulating oxylipins in lean and obese men after high-fat challenge tests. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2014, 58, 591–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Keenan, A.H.; Pedersen, T.L.; Fillaus, K.; Larson, M.K.; Shearer, G.C.; Newman, J.W. Basal omega-3 fatty acid status affects fatty acid and oxylipin responses to high-dose n3-HUFA in healthy volunteers. J. Lipid Res. 2012, 5, 1662–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Nieves, D.; Moreno, J.J. Effect of arachidonic and eicosapentaenoic acid metabolism on RAW 264.7 macrophage proliferation. J. Cell. Physiol. 2006, 208, 428–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Fontes-Cal, T.; Mattos, R.T.; Medeiros, N.I.; Pinto, B.F.; Belchior-Bezerra, M.; Roque-Souza, B.; Dutra, W.O.; Ferrari, T.; Vidigal, P.; Faria, L.C.; et al. Crosstalk Between Plasma Cytokines, Inflammation, and Liver Damage as a New Strategy to Monitoring NAFLD Progression. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 708959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Mannaa, F.A.; Abdel-Wahhab, K.G. Physiological potential of cytokines and liver damages. Hepatoma Res. 2016, 2, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Niederreiter, L.; Tilg, H. Cytokines and fatty liver diseases. Liver Res. 2018, 2, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Al-Gayyar, M.M.; Shams, M.E.; Barakat, E.A. Fish oil improves lipid metabolism and ameliorates inflammation in patients with metabolic syndrome: Impact of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Pharm. Biol. 2012, 50, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Bocsan, I.C.; Milaciu, M.V.; Pop, R.M.; Vesa, S.C.; Ciumarnean, L.; Matei, D.M.; Buzoianu, A.D. Cytokines Genotype-Phenotype Correlation in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 4297206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Das, S.K.; Balakrishnan, V. Role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic Fatty liver disease. Indian J. Clin. Biochem. 2011, 26, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Stojsavljević, S.; Gomerčić Palčić, M.; Virović Jukić, L.; Smirčić Duvnjak, L.; Duvnjak, M. Adipokines and pro-inflammatory cytokines, the key mediators in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 18070–18091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Luedde, T.; Trautwein, C. Intracellular survival pathways in the liver. Liver Int. 2006, 26, 1163–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Kovesdy, C.P.; Anderson, J.E.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K. Paradoxical association between body mass index and mortality in men with CKD not yet on dialysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2007, 49, 581–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Jarrar, M.H.; Baranova, A.; Collantes, R.; Ranard, B.; Stepanova, M.; Bennett, C.; Fang, Y.; Elariny, H.; Goodman, Z.; Chandhoke, V.; et al. Adipokines and cytokines in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 27, 412–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wieckowska, A.; Papouchado, B.G.; Li, Z.; Lopez, R.; Zein, N.N.; Feldstein, A.E. Increased hepatic and circulating interleukin-6 levels in human nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 103, 1372–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Baranova, A.; Schlauch, K.; Elariny, H.; Jarrar, M.; Bennett, C.; Nugent, C.; Gowder, S.J.; Younoszai, Z.; Collantes, R.; Chandhoke, V.; et al. Gene expression patterns in hepatic tissue and visceral adipose tissue of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Obes. Surg. 2007, 17, 1111–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. El-Emshaty, H.M.; Nasif, W.A.; Mohamed, I.E. Serum Cytokine of IL-10 and IL-12 in Chronic Liver Disease: The Immune and Inflammatory Response. Dis. Markers 2015, 2015, 707254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Den Boer, M.A.; Voshol, P.J.; Schröder-van der Elst, J.P.; Korsheninnikova, E.; Ouwens, D.M.; Kuipers, F.; Havekes, L.M.; Romijn, J.A. Endogenous interleukin-10 protects against hepatic steatosis but does not improve insulin sensitivity during high-fat feeding in mice. Endocrinology 2006, 147, 4553–4558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Hsia, C.Y.; Huo, T.I.; Chiang, S.Y.; Lu, M.F.; Sun, C.L.; Wu, J.C.; Lee, P.C.; Chi, C.W.; Lui, W.Y.; Lee, S.D. Evaluation of interleukin-6, interleukin-10 and human hepatocyte growth factor 9as tumor markers for hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2007, 33, 208–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Tilg, H. The role of cytokines in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig. Dis. 2010, 28, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Xin, W.; Wei, W.; Li, X. Effects of fish oil supplementation on inflammatory markers in chronic heart failure: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2012, 12, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Ramirez-Ramirez, V.; Macias-Islas, M.A.; Ortiz, G.G.; Pacheco-Moises, F.; Torres-Sanchez, E.D.; Sorto-Gomez, T.E.; Cruz-Ramos, J.A.; Orozco-Aviña, G.; Celis de la Rosa, A.J. Efficacy of fish oil on serum of TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-6 oxidative stress markers in multiple sclerosis treated with interferon beta-1b. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2013, 2013, 709493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Jose, P.J.; Griffiths-Johnson, D.A.; Collins, P.D.; Walsh, D.T.; Moqbel, R.; Totty, N.F.; Truong, O.; Hsuan, J.J.; Williams, T.J. Eotaxin: A potent eosinophil chemoattractant cytokine detected in a guinea pig model of allergic airways inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 1994, 179, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Tacke, F.; Trautwein, C.; Yagmur, E.; Hellerbrand, C.; Wiest, R.; Brenner, D.A.; Schnabl, B. Up-regulated eotaxin plasma levels in chronic liver disease patients indicate hepatic inflammation, advanced fibrosis and adverse clinical course. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2007, 22, 1256–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Duval, C.; Thissen, U.; Keshtkar, S.; Accart, B.; Stienstra, R.; Boekschoten, M.V.; Roskams, T.; Kersten, S.; Müller, M. Adipose tissue dysfunction signals progression of hepatic steatosis towards nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in C57BL/6 mice. Diabetes 2010, 59, 3181–3191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Sindhu, S.; Akhter, N.; Shenouda, S.; Wilson, A.; Ahmad, R. Plasma fetuin-A/α2-HS-glycoprotein correlates negatively with inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and activation biomarkers in individuals with type-2 diabetes. BMC Immunol. 2016, 17, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Tarantino, G.; Costantini, S.; Finelli, C.; Capone, F.; Guerriero, E.; La Sala, N.; Gioia, S.; Castello, G. Carotid intima-media thickness is predicted by combined eotaxin levels and severity of hepatic steatosis at ultrasonography in obese patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e105610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Xue, H.; Le Roy, H.; Sawyer, M.B.; Field, C.F.; Dieleman, L.A.; Baracos, V.E. Single and combined supplementation of glutamine and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on host tolerance and tumour response to 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxy-camptothecin (CPT-11)/5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in rats bearing Ward colon tumour. Br. J. Nutr. 2009, 102, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Willenberg, I.A.I.; Ostermann, A.I.; Schebb, N.H. Targeted metabolomics of the arachidonic acid cascade: Current state and challenges of LC-MS analysis of oxylipins. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 2675–2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Ostermann, A.I.; Willenberg, I.; Schebb, N.H. Comparison of sample preparation methods for the quantitative analysis of eicosanoids and other oxylipins in plasma by means of LC-MS/MS. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 1403–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Cabral, M.; Martín-Venegas, R.; Moreno, J.J. Differential cell growth/apoptosis behavior of 13-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid enantiomers in a colorectal cancer cell line. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2014, 307, G664–G671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Study design. D, day; FU, fluorouracil; X, kill.
Figure 1. Study design. D, day; FU, fluorouracil; X, kill.
Cancers 14 05703 g001
Figure 2. Liver-oxidized glutathione, GSSH (A); 4-Hydroxy-2-Nonenal, 4-HNE (B); type-I collagen, COL-1 (C). Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Significant differences were determined using one-way ANOVA. Post hoc analysis was carried out by Duncan multiple-comparison tests for simple effect when interactions were present or when the Kruskal–Wallis test indicated the presence of differences. Differing lower-case superscript letters indicate significant simple-effect differences between values (a > b). Groups: Reference, healthy rats that did not undergo tumor implantation nor receive chemotherapy, consumed control diet only; Tumor, tumor-bearing animals that did not receive chemotherapy, consumed control diet only; Chemo, tumor-bearing animals that received chemotherapy, consumed control diet only; Chemo+Fish Oil, tumor-bearing animals that received chemotherapy, consumed fish oil diet.
Figure 2. Liver-oxidized glutathione, GSSH (A); 4-Hydroxy-2-Nonenal, 4-HNE (B); type-I collagen, COL-1 (C). Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Significant differences were determined using one-way ANOVA. Post hoc analysis was carried out by Duncan multiple-comparison tests for simple effect when interactions were present or when the Kruskal–Wallis test indicated the presence of differences. Differing lower-case superscript letters indicate significant simple-effect differences between values (a > b). Groups: Reference, healthy rats that did not undergo tumor implantation nor receive chemotherapy, consumed control diet only; Tumor, tumor-bearing animals that did not receive chemotherapy, consumed control diet only; Chemo, tumor-bearing animals that received chemotherapy, consumed control diet only; Chemo+Fish Oil, tumor-bearing animals that received chemotherapy, consumed fish oil diet.
Cancers 14 05703 g002
Figure 3. Distributions of phospholipid polyunsaturated fatty acids and oxylipins in the livers of rats provided control and fish oil diets. Groups: Reference, healthy rats that did not undergo tumor implantation nor receive chemotherapy, consumed control diet; Tumor, tumor-bearing animals that did not receive chemotherapy, consumed control diet; Chemo, tumor-bearing animals that received chemotherapy, consumed control diet; Chemo+Fish Oil, tumor-bearing animals that received chemotherapy, consumed fish oil diet, started same day as chemotherapy.
Figure 3. Distributions of phospholipid polyunsaturated fatty acids and oxylipins in the livers of rats provided control and fish oil diets. Groups: Reference, healthy rats that did not undergo tumor implantation nor receive chemotherapy, consumed control diet; Tumor, tumor-bearing animals that did not receive chemotherapy, consumed control diet; Chemo, tumor-bearing animals that received chemotherapy, consumed control diet; Chemo+Fish Oil, tumor-bearing animals that received chemotherapy, consumed fish oil diet, started same day as chemotherapy.
Cancers 14 05703 g003
Figure 4. Liver total n-6 oxylipins (A); total n-3 oxylipins (B). Values are means ± SD, n = 6. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were determined using one-way ANOVA. Post hoc analysis was carried out by Duncan multiple-comparison tests for simple effect when interactions were present or the Kruskal–Wallis test indicated the presence of differences. Differing lower-case superscript letters indicate significant simple effect differences between values (a > b > c). Groups: Reference, healthy rats that did not undergo tumor implantation nor receive chemotherapy, consumed control diet only; Tumor, tumor-bearing animals that did not receive chemotherapy, consumed control diet only; Chemo, tumor-bearing animals that received chemotherapy, consumed control diet only; Chemo+Fish Oil, tumor-bearing animals that received chemotherapy, consumed fish oil diet.
Figure 4. Liver total n-6 oxylipins (A); total n-3 oxylipins (B). Values are means ± SD, n = 6. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were determined using one-way ANOVA. Post hoc analysis was carried out by Duncan multiple-comparison tests for simple effect when interactions were present or the Kruskal–Wallis test indicated the presence of differences. Differing lower-case superscript letters indicate significant simple effect differences between values (a > b > c). Groups: Reference, healthy rats that did not undergo tumor implantation nor receive chemotherapy, consumed control diet only; Tumor, tumor-bearing animals that did not receive chemotherapy, consumed control diet only; Chemo, tumor-bearing animals that received chemotherapy, consumed control diet only; Chemo+Fish Oil, tumor-bearing animals that received chemotherapy, consumed fish oil diet.
Cancers 14 05703 g004
Figure 5. Heatmap of liver oxylipins showing the strong effects of dietary fish oil containing eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Groups: Reference, healthy rats that did not undergo tumor implantation nor receive chemotherapy, consumed control diet; Tumor, tumor-bearing animals that did not receive chemotherapy, consumed control diet; Chemo, tumor-bearing animals that received chemotherapy, consumed control diet; Chemo+Fish Oil, tumor-bearing animals that received chemotherapy, consumed fish oil diet, started same day as chemotherapy.
Figure 5. Heatmap of liver oxylipins showing the strong effects of dietary fish oil containing eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Groups: Reference, healthy rats that did not undergo tumor implantation nor receive chemotherapy, consumed control diet; Tumor, tumor-bearing animals that did not receive chemotherapy, consumed control diet; Chemo, tumor-bearing animals that received chemotherapy, consumed control diet; Chemo+Fish Oil, tumor-bearing animals that received chemotherapy, consumed fish oil diet, started same day as chemotherapy.
Cancers 14 05703 g005
Figure 6. Hepatic eotaxin (A); IL-6 (B); IL-10 (C); IL-18 (D) and TNF-α (E). Significant differences were determined using one-way ANOVA. Post hoc analysis was carried out by Duncan multiple-comparison tests for simple effect when interactions were present or the Kruskal–Wallis test indicated the presence of differences. Differing lower case superscript letters indicate significant simple effect differences between values (a > b > c). Groups: Reference, healthy rats that did not undergo tumor implantation nor receive chemotherapy, consumed control diet only; Tumor, tumor-bearing animals that did not receive chemotherapy, consumed control diet only; Chemo, tumor-bearing animals that received chemotherapy, consumed control diet only; Chemo+Fish Oil, tumor-bearing animals that received chemotherapy, consumed fish oil diet.
Figure 6. Hepatic eotaxin (A); IL-6 (B); IL-10 (C); IL-18 (D) and TNF-α (E). Significant differences were determined using one-way ANOVA. Post hoc analysis was carried out by Duncan multiple-comparison tests for simple effect when interactions were present or the Kruskal–Wallis test indicated the presence of differences. Differing lower case superscript letters indicate significant simple effect differences between values (a > b > c). Groups: Reference, healthy rats that did not undergo tumor implantation nor receive chemotherapy, consumed control diet only; Tumor, tumor-bearing animals that did not receive chemotherapy, consumed control diet only; Chemo, tumor-bearing animals that received chemotherapy, consumed control diet only; Chemo+Fish Oil, tumor-bearing animals that received chemotherapy, consumed fish oil diet.
Cancers 14 05703 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Monirujjaman, M.; Bathe, O.F.; Mazurak, V.C. Dietary EPA+DHA Mitigate Hepatic Toxicity and Modify the Oxylipin Profile in an Animal Model of Colorectal Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy. Cancers 2022, 14, 5703. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14225703

AMA Style

Monirujjaman M, Bathe OF, Mazurak VC. Dietary EPA+DHA Mitigate Hepatic Toxicity and Modify the Oxylipin Profile in an Animal Model of Colorectal Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy. Cancers. 2022; 14(22):5703. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14225703

Chicago/Turabian Style

Monirujjaman, Md, Oliver F. Bathe, and Vera C. Mazurak. 2022. "Dietary EPA+DHA Mitigate Hepatic Toxicity and Modify the Oxylipin Profile in an Animal Model of Colorectal Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy" Cancers 14, no. 22: 5703. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14225703

APA Style

Monirujjaman, M., Bathe, O. F., & Mazurak, V. C. (2022). Dietary EPA+DHA Mitigate Hepatic Toxicity and Modify the Oxylipin Profile in an Animal Model of Colorectal Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy. Cancers, 14(22), 5703. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14225703

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop