Next Article in Journal
Analysis of the Risk of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Patients with and without Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis: A Retrospective Evaluation of Real-World Data of about 150,000 Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
Colorectal Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases: The Impact of the Results of PROPHYLOCHIP, COLOPEC, and PRODIGE 7 Trials on Peritoneal Disease Management
Previous Article in Journal
Small Gastric Stromal Tumors: An Underestimated Risk
Previous Article in Special Issue
Complications and Mortality Rate of Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Italian Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Oncoteam Results Analysis
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and HIPEC for Advanced Ovarian Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases: Italian PSM Oncoteam Evidence and Study Purposes

Cancers 2022, 14(23), 6010; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14236010
by Daniele Marrelli 1, Luca Ansaloni 2, Orietta Federici 3, Salvatore Asero 4, Ludovico Carbone 1,*, Luigi Marano 1, Gianluca Baiocchi 5, Marco Vaira 6, Federico Coccolini 7, Andrea Di Giorgio 8, Massimo Framarini 9, Roberta Gelmini 10, Carmen Palopoli 11, Fabio Accarpio 12 and Anna Fagotti 13
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Cancers 2022, 14(23), 6010; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14236010
Submission received: 6 November 2022 / Revised: 25 November 2022 / Accepted: 1 December 2022 / Published: 6 December 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a broad overview of advanced ovarian cancer management especially focusing on HIPEC from Italian SICO. This review summarized conclusively about the role of surgery and HIPEC in advanced ovarian cancer. Below please find some comments.

1. It will be better to include “HIPEC” in the title of this manuscript as the main focus is HIPEC.

2. Figure 1. The logo of SICO is unnecessary in this manuscript.

3. Line 134. “three cycles before plus six additional cycles” is not a fixed way of platinum-combined chemotherapy. “three to six additional cycles” may be better.

4. Page 357. The reason HIPEC has been shown to be valid in improving (3) quality of life, is not clear. Please clearly show the reference.

5. Figure 5. (c) corresponds to (a), (e) corresponds to (b).

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,
thank you very much for your pertinent suggestions.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Marrelli and colleagues presented a very interesting review article describing the therapeutic results obtained by the Italian PSM Oncoteam in advanced ovarian cancer with peritoneal metastases. Overall, the authors described almost all the relevant aspects of ovarian cancer. The authors comprehensively described the therapeutic strategies available for metastatic OC by reporting the data of the main trials in this field. Overall, the manuscript is very interesting, below are reported some minor revisions that will further improve the quality of the paper:

1) In the Introduction or Discussion (Conclusions) sections, the authors have to better describe the therapeutic approaches available for OC by describing the novel PARP-inhibitors and other targeted therapies or monoclonal antibodies available (e.g. bevacizumab);

2) In the Introduction or Discussion (Conclusions) sections, the authors have to indicate how germline and somatic BRCA mutations influence the prognosis of patients and their response to therapies. At present almost all the germline mutations were identified and collected into databases and several studies demonstrated different metastatic rates and response rates in patients harboring pathogenic BRCA mutations. For this purpose, please see:

- PMID: 27403072

- PMID: 35383859

- PMID: 36063278

- PMID: 32131779

- PMID: 30909618

3) The authors should add a table reporting all the studies cited in the review article. The table should contain the Trial code, the center, the type of treatment, the main results obtained, the reference.

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,
thank you very much for your insightful remarks.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop