Next Article in Journal
Loss of MAGEC3 Expression Is Associated with Prognosis in Advanced Ovarian Cancers
Next Article in Special Issue
Inflammation of the Pleural Cavity: A Review on Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Implications in Tumor Pathophysiology
Previous Article in Journal
Simultaneous Resection of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors with Synchronous Liver Metastases: Safety and Oncological Efficacy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mesothelioma Malignancy and the Microenvironment: Molecular Mechanisms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 14
Issue 3
10.3390/cancers14030722
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Primary Effusion Lymphoma: A Clinicopathologic Perspective

by
Diamone A. Gathers
1,*,
Emily Galloway
2,
Katalin Kelemen
3,
Allison Rosenthal
4,
Sarah E. Gibson
3,† and
Javier Munoz
4,†
1
Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
2
Department of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ 85721, USA
3
Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
4
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cancers 2022, 14(3), 722; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030722
Submission received: 29 October 2021 / Revised: 3 December 2021 / Accepted: 22 December 2021 / Published: 30 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pleural Cavity Tumor Microenvironment: Primary and Metastatic Tumors)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is a rare B-cell lymphoma with a particularly aggressive course. This disease usually affects the variably immunocompromised and maintains a predilection for body cavities, leading to the development of malignant effusions. Pathogenesis suggests an association with HHV8 and EBV, although this is unclear. There are no definitive guidelines for the treatment of PEL, but commonly used initial regimens include those similar to DA-EPOCH and CHOP. The prognosis remains poor, even with advanced treatment. Newer therapies incorporate the use of axicabtagene ciloleucel, CAR-T cell therapies, and augmented EPOCH regimens. Further investigation into oncogenesis and targeted molecular pathways could provide insights into treatment targets. In this review, the authors would like to compare this disease with other similarly aggressive B-cell lymphomas, as well as highlight the unique epidemiology, pathogenesis, and current treatment options for patients diagnosed with PEL.

Abstract

Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell lymphoma that usually localizes to serous body cavities to subsequently form effusions in the absence of a discrete mass. Although some tumors can develop in extracavitary locations, the areas most often affected include the peritoneum, pleural space, and the pericardium. PEL is associated with the presence of human herpesvirus 8 (HHV8), also called the Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), with some variability in transformation potential suggested by frequent coinfection with the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) (~80%), although the nature of the oncogenesis is unclear. Most patients suffering with this disease are to some degree immunocompromised (e.g., Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or post-solid organ transplantation) and, even with aggressive treatment, prognosis remains poor. There is no definitive guideline for the treatment of PEL, although CHOP-like regimens (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) are frequently prescribed and, given the rarity of this disease, therapeutic focus is being redirected to personalized and targeted approaches in the experimental realm. Current clinical trials include the combination of lenalidomide and rituximab into the EPOCH regimen and the treatment of individuals with relapsed/refractory EBV-associated disease with tabelecleucel.

1. Clinical Presentation and Epidemiology

PEL predominantly affects elderly or immunocompromised individuals, particularly those infected with HIV. This malignancy accounts for approximately 4% of all HIV-associated non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) [1,2]. In studies of HIV-positive patients with PEL, the median age of diagnosis was 44–45 years old and 92–95% of the patients were male [3,4].
The clinical presentation of PEL is largely influenced by the location and extent of malignant lymphomatous effusions in body cavities. The classic form of PEL can affect the pleural, peritoneal, or pericardial space [1,5]. A patient with pleural effusions may present with shortness of breath. Those with pericardial effusions may have low blood pressure due to cardiac tamponade. General symptoms can include weight loss, fever, and night sweats [6]. B-cell lymphoproliferation may also lead to adenopathy or splenomegaly [3]. Common laboratory findings of PEL are compatible with severe immunosuppression and the depletion of CD4+ lymphocytes [7].
A variant of PEL may lead to development of the lymphoma in lymph nodes or as a solid tumor mass in extranodal sites such as the gastrointestinal tract, lung, skin, or central nervous system [4,8]. Although this extracavitary lymphoma is not associated with an effusion, it is still classified as a PEL variant due to its indistinguishable morphologic and immunophenotypic characteristics and association with HHV8 [9]. Guillet et al. studied 51 patients with HIV diagnosed with PEL and found that one third developed extracavitary solid tumors; these patients with extracavitary disease had similar demographics to those with classic PEL [4].

2. Pathogenesis and Association with Viral Infections and Immunosuppression (e.g., HIV, EBV, HHV8)

PEL was first described in the setting of the AIDS epidemic in the late 1980s and was later discovered to be associated with AIDS-associated Kaposi sarcoma [10,11]. A subsequent study identified HHV8 as the causative agent of PEL [5]. Approximately 80% of PEL cases, particularly those developing in patients with HIV, show coinfection with EBV [3,12]. However, the EBV in these cases shows restricted gene expression and is not thought to be required for the pathogenesis of this lymphoma [13,14,15]. In healthy individuals, the immune system limits HHV8-induced B-cell proliferation. However, when the immune system is impaired, as in the setting of HIV infection or iatrogenic immunosuppression, the viral promotion of cell proliferation may proceed unchecked, leading to HHV8-mediated lymphomagenesis (Figure 1) [16,17,18].

Immune-Evasion Mechanisms by HHV8

The key for establishing a persistent HHV8 infection in the human cell is a complex interaction between HHV8 and the host immune system. HHV8 accomplishes this task by producing proteins homologous to human immune modulatory proteins that have likely been hijacked from human host cells over the course of viral evolution [14]. Persistent infections can be established by either a latent or a lytic viral life cycle. The latent life cycle results in a prolonged, stable, immunologically silent infection. During the lytic cycle, virions are released and infect new host cells [14,16]. HHV8 engages sophisticated cellular processes to make a persistent infection possible by interfering with the host immune responses.
A latent infection specifically targeting lymphoid cells is not unique to HHV8 but is a general feature of gamma herpesviruses [16]. Most lymphoproliferative disorders develop many years after a primary viral infection by a gamma herpesvirus, underlining the medical importance of the persistent latent infection. It is known that the lymphoma cells of PEL are in the latent phase of infection, a viral life cycle that is characterized by the lack of expression of most viral antigens [14,16]. While many other proteins are not expressed in latency, abundant expression of the latency-associated nuclear antigen (LANA) is crucial for the preservation of the viral genome in host cells during replication [18]. Interestingly, potential viral epitopes on LANA do not always provoke a strong response by the cytotoxic T-cells (CTLs), in part due to immune escape mechanisms [20,21]. One of the main immune-escape mechanisms of the latency phase is the inhibition of CTLs, a feat achieved by engaging a variety of proteins produced by HHV8, including viral caspase-8 and the (FLICE)-like inhibitory protein (vFLIP). Viral FLIP is a protein of strong anti-apoptotic properties in T-cell lines [22] and a promoter of nuclear factor kB (NF-kB) in host cells through engaging members of the TRAF family (tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor family) [23,24].
Many proteins produced by HHV8 target a central paradigm of T-cell mediated immune regulation, notably a promotion of the host TH2-cell responses and a concomitant downregulation of the TH1-dependent T-cell immunity. Several virally encoded cytokines, especially viral interleukin-6 (vIL-6), viral chemokines, and CD200, play a central role in this process. The pleiotropic cytokine IL-6 exhibits complex roles in human cells with important effects in hematopoiesis, inflammation, and oncogenesis by binding to one of two receptors, IL-6 receptor and gp130. HHV8 exploits these interactions by producing a homologue of IL-6 (vIL-6) that is encoded by the open-reading frame (ORF) K2 of the HHV8 genome. The expression of vIL-6 is well documented in both lytically infected and latently infected cells [25,26]. An important feature of vIL-6 is the capability to activate gp130 independently of the IL-6 receptor [27,28]. Once gp130 is activated, vIL-6 can initiate different pathways of immune evasion. The downstream effects of vIL-6 include the promotion of TH2-cell response over a TH1-type response [29] and the inhibition of the influx of neutrophils by increasing the expression of the chemokine CCL2 and decreasing the expression of CXCL8 [30].
Viral IL-6 is not the only human cytokine homologue produced by HHV8. Viral CC-chemokine ligand 1 (cCCL1), vCCL2, and vCCL3, which are also encoded by the HHV8 genome [25], target both TH2 cells and CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells [31]. ORF K14 of HHV8 encodes viral CD200 (vCD200), a glycosylated cell surface protein with a strong inhibitory effect on TH1-type cytokine production [32]. HHV8 also produces four different interferon (IFN)-regulatory factors, viral IRF1, vIRF2, vIRF3, and vIRF4, which are produced during the lytic reactivation and latency phase. As with their human homologues, these regulatory proteins inhibit type I interferon (IFN)-mediated signaling and IFN-mediated apoptosis [33].
In addition to its interference with the cell-mediated immunity, HHV8 also modulates the activity of the complement system. The complement system is capable of linking the innate and adaptive immune systems and plays an important role against viruses. HHV8 evades complement-mediated immunity by producing three complement lytic proteins (KCPs) that are encoded by ORF4 and are produced by alternative splicing [34]. KCPs contribute to the lysis of C3 convertase, the main product of the classical complement pathway, and they can inactivate C3b and C4b. Once the intact C3b and C4b are bound to the infected cell, they can exhibit a strong anti-viral effect by either lysing an infected cell or coating the viral particle and promoting complement-mediated phagocytosis [35]. The importance of this immune-evasion mechanism is that lymphoma genesis is highlighted by the observation of KCPs detected on the surface of the HHV8-infected cells of PEL [34].
Immune eradication of viral infections requires a strong CD8+ CTL-mediated attack on virus-infected cells. These cytotoxic cells are strongly dependent on MHC class I-dependent antigen presentation; therefore, they require a strong response by antigen presenting cells (APCs), such as dendritic cells, macrophages, and B cells. HHV8 engages several strategies to escape recognition by CD8+ CTLs. HHV8-infected cells express two homologous proteins, modulator of immune recognition 1 (MIR1) and MIR2, both capable of downregulating the expression of MHC class I molecules on the surface of infected cells [36,37,38]. These two proteins have been shown to be expressed in PEL and in latently infected B cells [39]. An additional effect of vMIR2 is the decreasing of the expression of CD86 and ICAM1, resulting in the inhibition of APCs [40,41].
In summary, HHV8 generates complex immune-regulatory mechanisms that antagonize both the innate and the adaptive immune system of the host, creating a milieu to promote HHV8-related lymphoproliferative disease. HHV8 encodes more than 10 homologues of cellular genes that are thought to play an important role in lymphomagenesis, including LANA, vIRF3, the viral homolog of cyclin D (vCYC), vFLIP, and vIL-6. NF-kB is constitutively activated in PEL and is required for cell survival [42]. Viral FLIP plays a major role in this NF-kB activation via both the classical and the alternative pathways, leading to the expression of both antiapoptotic and growth factor genes. The antiapoptotic functions of vFLIP have been shown to be critical for PEL tumor cell survival in vitro [16]. LANA additionally suppresses apoptosis by inhibiting TP53 and induces cell proliferation via the RB-E2F pathway [14]. Immune evasion also plays a role in the pathogenesis of PEL and is enhanced, at least in part, by vIRF3, which inhibits HLA trans-activators, resulting in reduced tumor cell recognition and killing by T cells [14,43].

3. Pathology and Ancillary Tests (e.g., HHV8, CD30, EBER, etc.)

The diagnosis of PEL may be made by the evaluation of a body fluid or a solid tissue mass in those cases with an extracavitary presentation. The neoplastic cells may be quite pleomorphic in body fluids, ranging from large immunoblastic/plasmablastic cells to more anaplastic-appearing cells (Figure 2) [1,14,44,45,46]. The lymphoma cells contain large nuclei with round to irregular nuclear contours and prominent nucleoli and generally contain abundant basophilic cytoplasm. Some cells may show a perinuclear “hof” or halo compatible with plasmacytoid differentiation. Occasional multinucleated Reed-Sternberg-like cells may be present. Although the morphologic features of extracavitary PELs are similar, the neoplastic cells may have a more uniform appearance than those found in body fluids, and such cases may show the involvement of lymph node sinuses or other lymphatic or vascular channels mimicking anaplastic large-cell lymphoma or intravascular lymphoma [44,45].
The neoplastic cells of PEL originate from post-germinal center B cells that show further plasmablastic differentiation [14,44]. The cells usually express the leukocyte common antigen CD45 and show variable staining for plasma-cell-associated markers, such as CD138, CD38, IRF4/MUM1, and EMA [1,14,44,45,46]. The neoplastic cells generally lack expression of the pan-B-cell markers CD19, CD20, CD79a, and PAX5, and the surface and cytoplasmic immunoglobulin are usually negative or low in expression. However, it is noted that the extracavitary variant of PEL shows a slightly more frequent expression of B-cell-associated markers and immunoglobulins compared to classic PEL [44,45,46]. Although T-cell- and natural-killer-cell-associated antigens are generally negative, aberrant expressions of some T-cell markers, including CD3, may occasionally be seen, particularly in those cases with extracavitary presentation [14,44,45,46]. CD30, which is frequently expressed by PELs, raises the differential diagnosis of both anaplastic large-cell lymphoma and classic Hodgkin lymphoma [14,44,45,46]. However, the diagnosis of PEL can be confirmed with immunohistochemical staining for LANA1, an HHV8-associated latent protein, which is positive in the nuclei of the PEL cells [6,14,44,45,46,47]. EBV may be demonstrated with in situ hybridization for EBV-encoded small RNA (EBER) in many cases, while EBV LMP1 is absent [44,46].
PEL shows clonally rearranged and hypermutated immunoglobulin genes, and some cases may show genotypic infidelity by harboring a clonal T-cell receptor gene rearrangement in addition to a clonal immunoglobulin gene rearrangement [1,44,45]. Gene expression profiling of AIDS-related PEL supports its plasmablastic derivation, with a distinct profile combining features of plasma cells and EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines (4,44). Although PELs may show complex karyotypes, no recurrent chromosomal alterations have been described [1,44,45,46]. Mutations of the BCL6 gene are seen in a subset of cases [44,48].

4. Differential Diagnosis (HHV8-Negative Effusion-Based Lymphoma, Pyothorax-Associated Lymphoma, Burkitt Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified, Plasmablastic Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma, Poorly Differentiated Carcinoma)

Lymphomas presenting as effusions without an associated tumor mass are rare [45]. Aside from PEL, there are other lymphomas that are not associated with HHV8 that could be considered in the differential diagnosis (Table 1). Effusion-based lymphomas that morphologically resemble PEL, but are not associated with HHV8 or HIV infection, are described in older individuals with underlying medical conditions leading to fluid overload. These lymphomas commonly express pan-B-cell markers and a subset are EBV-positive and may show abnormalities of MYC. HHV8-negative effusion-based lymphomas have a more favorable prognosis compared to PEL [19,45,49].
Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) associated with chronic inflammation may occur in body cavities, with pyothorax-associated lymphoma (PAL) being the prototypical form [44,45,50]. PAL develops in the pleural cavity of patients with longstanding pyothorax and is more frequently associated with a local solid infiltrate [44,45,50]. Although PAL is also composed of B cells that may have plasmacytoid differentiation, these lymphomas are associated with EBV and not HHV8 [44,45,50,51].
Other B-cell lymphomas may occasionally involve serous fluids, including Burkitt lymphoma (BL) and DLBCL, not otherwise specified (NOS) [44,45,52]. BL, particularly the variant with the plasmacytoid differentiation that is more commonly seen in patients with HIV, may have cytomorphologic overlap with PEL [44,45]. However, BL is not associated with HHV8 and may be easily distinguished from PEL by its pan-B-cell marker expression, characteristic staining for CD10 and BCL6, and the presence of an MYC gene rearrangement [44,45]. The cytomorphologic features of the immunoblastic variant of DLBCL, NOS may also overlap with PEL [44]. However, the majority of DLBCL, NOS involving serous fluids are associated with contiguous or disseminated disease [52]. As with BL, DLBCL may be distinguished from PEL by the expression of pan-B-cell markers and the lack of association with HHV8. It is also important to note that compared to DLBCL, PEL has a higher degree of association with hypoalbuminemia, thrombocytopenia, and elevated IL-10 levels [3]. In addition, the cytomorphologic and immunophenotypic features of PEL overlap with those of plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL), particularly in cases of extracavitary PEL [44,45]. PBL also occurs in association with HIV infection or other immunodeficiencies but more frequently presents as a solid mass in extranodal regions of the head and neck or gastrointestinal tract and is associated with EBV and not HHV8 [44,45,53].
The cytomorphology and frequent CD30 expression seen in PEL raises the differential diagnosis of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) [20,45,46]. Occasional PELs may show some T-cell marker expression, which makes distinguishing these lymphomas even more difficult [14,44,45,46]. However, ALCL only occasionally involves serous body cavities, expresses ALK protein in most cases, and is not associated with HHV8 [44,45]. A poorly differentiated carcinoma is also in the differential diagnosis of PEL, particularly in extracavitary cases that show infiltration of sinusoids or vascular spaces [45]. However, expression of CD45 and lack of cytokeratin staining in PEL would help to exclude carcinoma. As can be seen, the diagnosis of PEL requires a multiparameter approach with extensive immunophenotyping and confirmation of HHV8 infection in all cases [44,45].

5. Prognosis and Treatment

There is no definitive guideline for the treatment of PEL, and even with treatment, prognosis remains poor. Median survival with treatment in some studies remains less than 24 months [3]. Prognosis is worsened by performance status, concurrent untreated HIV, and the involvement of the pericardial cavity as opposed to the pleural or peritoneal cavities. In addition, EBV positivity in patients with PEL has been associated with improved survival, in contrast with the association of elevated IL-6 levels with inferior survival [3]. It is suggested that disease involvement of greater than one body cavity is an adverse prognostic indicator; Narkhede et al. found that clinically significant overall survival decreased from 18 months to 4 months in patients with single versus multiple cavity involvement, respectively [6,54,55].

5.1. Current Treatment Options

Common regimens for treatment of PEL include dose-adjusted (DA) EPOCH (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin) or traditional chemotherapy with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), which are typically used for treatment of other aggressive lymphomas [10,55]. CHOP is a commonly prescribed regimen for NHL, but it has not been shown to lengthen median survival for PEL [55]. Guillet et al. found, in a single-center retrospective analysis of 45 of 51 patients diagnosed with PEL, that treatment with a CHOP-derived regimen achieved complete remission (CR) in 62% of the classic (cavitary) PEL group with a 71.5% 2-year disease free survival rate [4].
EPOCH infusion therapy is a well-tolerated regimen that has been modified with success to DA-EPOCH [56]. DA-EPOCH incorporates the use of platelet and absolute neutrophil counts to guide subsequent dose adjustments to etoposide, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide [57]. It has been suggested that this responsive dose adjustment can overcome limitations encountered by traditional EPOCH therapy, ultimately leading to improved outcomes in comparison with more traditional regimens [58].
Rituximab has been explored for use in CD20+ PEL, but this marker is infrequently expressed by PEL. The addition of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) to the CHOP regimen has shown a modest increase in median overall survival (OS) from 6 to 10 months but HD-MTX toxicity related to its tendency to accumulate in effusions is an undesirable effect of use [14]. Talc pleurodesis, often used for the management of recurrent malignant pleural effusions, could also be considered as an option for potentially alleviating symptoms [59]. Many of these individual therapies have been assessed for palliative use as independent agents in the elderly and those with poor functional status felt not to be able to tolerate more aggressive therapies.

5.2. Relapsed and Refractory PEL

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) B-cell Lymphoma Guidelines (Version 3.2021) include axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) as a category 2A recommendation for the treatment of PEL, relapsed/refractory DLBCL, HHV8-positive DLBCL, and similar conditions for patients with relapsed/refractory disease [60,61]. Autologous stem cell transplant in combination with high-dose chemotherapy has been used to achieve a CR period of 12 months [62]. Cassoni et al. showed that a similar period of remission was achieved using radiotherapy directed towards localized pleural masses in a patient diagnosed with chemotherapy-refractory HIV-associated PEL [63]. The use of ibrutinib, lenalidomide, and rituximab in the treatment of similarly aggressive relapsed/refractory non-germinal center B-cell-like DLBCL has shown promising activity with an objective response rate (ORR) of 65% and 41% with CR, although this study did not include patients with PEL [64]. In a small cohort, the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab (in various combinations with pomalidomide) showed an OS of about 15 months when used to treat patients living with HIV (PLWH) who have relapsed/refractory disease [65]. A case study by Marquet et al. showed radiological CR and transformation of HHV8 DNA from positive to negative after the initiation of treatment with oral valganciclovir [66].

5.3. HIV-Positive PEL

Consideration must be given to HIV status, as many patients diagnosed with PEL are HIV positive. Ramaswami and team highlight that PEL associated with the often-underdiagnosed multicentral Castleman’s disease led to a clinically significant reduction in overall survival from 71% at 10 years to a 5-year OS of 38% [67]. Patients with AIDS-NHL should be treated with full-dose chemotherapy regimens and concurrent antiretroviral therapy (ART) in a multidisciplinary team inclusive of a hematologist and an HIV specialist. As lack of anti-HIV therapy is a poor prognostic indicator of PEL, the concurrent combination ART (cART) has been shown to allow for faster immune recovery (although cART therapy does not directly influence OS) when used in combination with chemotherapy [57]. It has been suggested that if ART has not already been initiated at the time of the lymphoma diagnosis, determining the sequence of initiation of ART and chemotherapy should be on a case-by-case basis. There should be special care taken to monitor for the development of cytopenias and drug–drug interactions in this population. Known interactions with ART include vinca alkaloid and taxane toxicity with protease inhibitors and cobicistat, severe cytopenias and neuropathy with nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and a decrease in vinca alkaloid and taxane levels with non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors due to induction of the CYP3A4 enzyme. To avoid drug interactions, it is advisable that the ART regimen be modified when treatment for PEL is initiated. Antiviral therapies such as cidofovir and interferon have also been used. Uldrick et al. found that in HIV patients with concurrent diagnoses of non-AIDS-defining cancers who were also on ART, pembrolizumab had an acceptable safety profile with persistent HIV control and stable CD4 counts [68]. In all patients with HIV being treated for lymphoma, it is necessary to provide G-CSF support and Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis and prevent tumor lysis syndrome. There is an increased risk for concomitant opportunistic infections and usually a need to include central nervous system chemoprophylaxis.

5.4. Overlap of PEL with Kaposi’s Sarcoma (KS) and Kaposi Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Multicentric Castleman Disease (KSHV-MCD)

Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (HHV8) is directly associated with the development of concurrent PEL and/or Multicentric Castleman Disease. This is likely due to a common viral etiology and KSHV’s ability to utilize B cells as a persistent reservoir of inflammatory cytokines, leading to proliferation and transformation to PEL and MCD. Interestingly, EBV-positive status in PEL is associated with improved survival compared to the more commonly occurring HIV-DLBCL. However, higher-than-normal circulating inflammatory markers (specifically IL-6, IL-10, and viral IL-6), as well as increased HHV8 viral loads, are often found in patients with concurrent PEL and KSHV-MCD, which confer a worse prognosis [69,70]. NCCN guidelines recommend treatment of KSHV-MCD with rituximab-based regimens; however, it is recommended that patients with concurrent PEL receive cytotoxic chemotherapy in addition to these rituximab-based regimens [3,67]. Rituximab has been shown to downregulate inflammatory cytokines as well as work synergistically with common topoisomerase inhibitors and other antineoplastic agents [71,72]. The effective use of rituximab, regardless of the CD20 status in patients with concurrent PEL and KSHV-MCD, was evidenced by the work of Lurain et al. who suggest that the use of rituximab could decrease the likelihood of patients diagnosed with KSHV-MCV developing PEL, given its downregulatory effects on inflammatory cytokines [69].

5.5. CAR-T Therapies in Other B-Cell Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) is a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-Cell agent, currently used as a third-line treatment for follicular and large B-cell lymphoma. ZUMA-1 is a phase 2 clinical trial across multiple centers, including 111 patients. Axi-cel was successfully manufactured for 99% of these patients and administered to 91%, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR) of 82% and a complete response rate (CRR) of 54%. These responses were sustained with a median follow-up of about 15 months and an OS at 18 months of 52% [73]. Brexucabtagene autoleucel (previously KTE-X19) is another CAR-T cell therapy, typically used for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma. This therapy was used in the 74-patient ZUMA-2 trial, ultimately showing a 12-month progression free survival (PFS) of 61% and OS of 83%. The most common adverse events were those effects previously experienced after CAR-T therapy, including cytopenias (94%) and infections (32%) [74]. Similar success was observed in the smaller ATTCK-20-2 trial, which incorporated the use of ACTR087 plus rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory CD20-positive B-cell lymphoma. Of the 26 patients enrolled, 69% were diagnosed with relapsed/refractory DLBCL and subsequently treated with fixed doses of rituximab administered concurrently with variable doses of ACTR087, leading to an ORR of 50%. In addition, the team was able to further define safety monitoring and adverse reaction management guidance across clinical studies inclusive of ACTR T-cell products [75]. That said, the pivotal trials that led to the FDA approval of CAR-T cell therapies excluded patients with HIV infection.
In addition to these trials, case reports have shown promise in the use of CAR-T cell therapies for patients with DLBCL in the setting of HIV infection. Abbasi et al. found that treatment of relapsed/refractory lymphoma with axi-cel led to significant responses with 8/10 patients, including 2 with prior CNS involvement, achieving a complete response at 3 months and manageable toxicities [76]. Similarly, Abramson et al. treated two patients with refractory high-grade B-cell lymphoma in the setting of HIV; one with grade 2 cytokine release syndrome but with achievement of the CR of the disease within one month, which was sustained for at least one year, and the other with CR in 28 days [77]. Recommended steps to optimize success of CAR-T therapy in the HIV+ patient include assessment of the HIV control and T-cell repertoire, infection control with a recommended absolute lymphocyte count of >100 for the use of successful CAR-T manufacturing, and assessment of the drug/drug interactions to minimize overlapping toxicities between CAR-T and ART. In the post CAR-T therapy phase, it is critical to monitor HIV control, assess immune reconstitution and determine the need for G-CSF as well as maintain appropriate infectious prophylaxis, including coverage for PJP, fungal infections, HSV, and VZV [78].
Future opportunities for treatment of PEL include therapies targeting the mTOR pathway, the ribonucleotide reductase signaling pathway, CD30, and proteosome inhibitors as well as a focus on CD38 as a specific marker of PEL cells via the use of daratumumab, which may induce tumor response as well as decreased HHV-8 levels [79,80,81,82,83,84]. The immune-escape phenomenon is one plausible explanation for the challenges in treatment of PEL; therefore, several molecular-targeted therapies, including NF-kB, JAK/STAT, and PT3-kinase/AKT pathways are under investigation to treat PEL [14].

5.6. Clinical Trials

A prospective phase I-II trial is underway at the National Cancer Institute (NCT02911142) to evaluate the efficacy of an expanded EPOCH regimen to include rituximab and the immunomodulator lenalidomide (EPOCH-R2) in the treatment of PEL [69,85]. Participants were prescribed EPOCH and rituximab with the addition of a set dose of lenalidomide, administered for days 1–10 at the beginning of each 21-day cycle (total of 6). Preliminary results have shown promise, with a 2-year OS calculated at 66.7%, pending phase II outcomes [69]. The ongoing phase II trial NCT04554914 is a multicenter, multicohort trial set to evaluate treatment of individuals with relapsed/refractory EBV-associated disease with tabelecleucel which will be administered in 35-day cycles at a dose of 2 × 106 cells/kg intravenously (IV), weekly for 3 weeks, and assessed for response [86].

6. Summary/Conclusions

Primary effusion lymphoma is a rare, aggressive disease with a very poor prognosis. Further investigation into oncogenesis and targeted molecular pathways could provide great insights into treatment targets. Guidance for current treatment regimens is largely based on limited case reports and expert consensus, and treatment choice requires careful consideration of comorbidities, performance status, potential medication interactions, and the presence of concurrent HIV infection. Clinical trials are in the early stages but to date provide promising potential for progress in this uncommon disease.

Author Contributions

D.A.G.: Writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, visualization; E.G.: resources, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing; K.K.: resources, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing; A.R.: resources, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing; S.E.G.: conceptualization, methodology, resources, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, visualization, supervision, project administration; J.M.: conceptualization, methodology, resources, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, visualization, supervision, project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Hematology/Oncology and Pathology departments at Mayo Clinic in AZ for their generous contributions.

Conflicts of Interest

D.A.G.: declares no conflict of interest. E.G.: declares no conflict of interest. K.K.: declares no conflict of interest. A.R.: declares no conflict of interest. S.G.: declares no conflict of interest. J.M.: Consulting–Pharmacyclics/Abbvie, Bayer, Gilead/Kite Pharma, Pfizer, Janssen, Juno/Celgene, BMS, Kyowa, Alexion, Fosunkite, Innovent, Seattle Genetics, Debiopharm, Karyopharm, Genmab, ADC Therapeutics, Epizyme, Beigene, Servier; Research funding—Bayer, Gilead/Kite Pharma, Celgene, Merck, Portola, Incyte, Genentech, Pharmacyclics, Seattle Genetics, Janssen, Millennium. Honoraria from Targeted Oncology, OncView, Curio, Kyowa, Physicians’ Education Resource, and Seattle Genetics; Speaker’s bureau–Gilead/Kite Pharma, Kyowa, Bayer, Pharmacyclics/Janssen, Seattle Genetics, Acrotech/Aurobindo, Beigene, Verastem, AstraZeneca, Celgene/BMS, Genentech/Roche.

References

  1. Chen, Y.; Rahemtullah, A.; Hochberg, E. Primary Effusion Lymphoma. Oncologist 2007, 12, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Zanelli, M.; Sanguedolce, F.; Zizzo, M.; Palicelli, A.; Bassi, M.C.; Santandrea, G.; Martino, G.; Soriano, A.; Caprera, C.; Corsi, M.; et al. Primary effusion lymphoma occurring in the setting of transplanted patients: A systematic review of a rare, life-threatening post-transplantation occurrence. BMC Cancer 2021, 21, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lurain, K.; Polizzotto, M.N.; Aleman, K.; Bhutani, M.; Wyvill, K.M.; Gonçalves, P.H.; Ramaswami, R.; Marshall, V.A.; Miley, W.; Steinberg, S.M.; et al. Viral, immunologic, and clinical features of primary effusion lymphoma. Blood 2019, 133, 1753–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Guillet, S.; Gérard, L.; Meignin, V.; Agbalika, F.; Cuccini, W.; Denis, B.; Katlama, C.; Galicier, L.; Oksenhendler, E. Classic and extracavitary primary effusion lymphoma in 51 HIV-infected patients from a single institution. Am. J. Hematol. 2016, 91, 233–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Cesarman, E.; Chang, Y.; Moore, P.; Said, J.W.; Knowles, D.M. Kaposi’s Sarcoma–Associated Herpesvirus-Like DNA Sequences in AIDS-Related Body-Cavity–Based Lymphomas. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995, 332, 1186–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Narkhede, M.; Arora, S.; Ujjani, C. Primary effusion lymphoma: Current perspectives. Onco Targets Ther. 2018, 11, 3747–3754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Carbone, A.; Cesarman, E.; Gloghini, A.; Drexler, H.G. Understanding pathogenetic aspects and clinical presentation of primary effusion lymphoma through its derived cell lines. AIDS 2010, 24, 479–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Chadburn, A.; Hyjek, E.; Mathew, S.; Cesarman, E.; Said, J.; Knowles, D.M. KSHV-Positive Solid Lymphomas Represent an Extra-Cavitary Variant of Primary Effusion Lymphoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2004, 28, 1401–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pan, Z.-G.; Zhang, Q.-Y.; Lu, Z.-B.; Quinto, T.; Rozenvald, I.B.; Liu, L.-T.; Wilson, D.; Reddy, V.; Huang, Q.; Wang, H.-Y.; et al. Extracavitary KSHV-associated Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2012, 36, 1129–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Knowles, D.M.; Inghirami, G.; Ubriaco, A.; Dalla-Favera, R. Molecular genetic analysis of three AIDS-associated neoplasms of uncertain lineage demonstrates their B-cell derivation and the possible pathogenetic role of the Epstein-Barr virus. Blood 1989, 73, 792–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Chang, Y.; Cesarman, E.; Pessin, M.S.; Lee, F.; Culpepper, J.; Knowles, D.M.; Moore, P.S. Identification of herpesvirus-like DNA sequences in AIDS-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma. Science 1994, 266, 1865–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Bibas, M.; Antinori, A. EBV and HIV-Related Lymphoma. Mediterr. J. Hematol. Infect. Dis. 2009, 1, e2009032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fan, W.; Bubman, D.; Chadburn, A.; Harrington, W.J.; Cesarman, E.; Knowles, D.M. Distinct Subsets of Primary Effusion Lymphoma Can Be Identified Based on Their Cellular Gene Expression Profile and Viral Association. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 1244–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Shimada, K.; Hayakawa, F.; Kiyoi, H. Biology and management of primary effusion lymphoma. Blood 2018, 132, 1879–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Horenstein, M.G.; Nador, R.G.; Chadburn, A.; Hyjek, E.M.; Inghirami, G.; Knowles, D.M.; Cesarman, E. Epstein-Barr virus latent gene expression in primary effusion lymphomas containing Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus/human herpesvirus-8. Blood 1997, 90, 1186–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Cesarman, E. Gammaherpesviruses and Lymphoproliferative Disorders. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 2014, 9, 349–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Harrington, J.W.J.; Bagasra, O.; Sosa, C.E.; Bobroski, L.E.; Baum, M.; Wen, X.L.; Cabral, L.; Byrne, G.E.; Pomerantz, R.J.; Wood, C. Human Herpesvirus Type 8 DNA Sequences in Cell-Free Plasma and Mononuclear Cells of Kaposi’s Sarcoma Patients. J. Infect. Dis. 1996, 174, 1101–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ballestas, M.E.; Chatis, P.A.; Kaye, K.M. Efficient Persistence of Extrachromosomal KSHV DNA Mediated by Latency-Associated Nuclear Antigen. Science 1999, 284, 641–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alexanian, S.; Said, J.; Lones, M.; Pullarkat, S.T. KSHV/HHV8-negative Effusion-based Lymphoma, a Distinct Entity Associated with Fluid Overload States. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2013, 37, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Woodberry, T.; Dollard, S.; Khatri, A.; Suscovich, T.J.; Henry, L.M.; Martin, J.N.; O’Connor, P.G.; Davis, J.K.; Osmond, D.; Lee, T.-H.; et al. Impact of Kaposi Sarcoma–Associated Herpesvirus (KSHV) Burden and HIV Coinfection on the Detection of T Cell Responses to KSHV ORF73 and ORF65 Proteins. J. Infect. Dis. 2005, 192, 622–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bihl, F.; Narayan, M.; Chisholm, J.V.; Henry, L.M.; Suscovich, T.J.; Brown, E.E.; Welzel, T.M.; Kaufmann, D.E.; Zaman, T.M.; Dollard, S.; et al. Lytic and Latent Antigens of the Human Gammaherpesviruses Kaposi’s Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus and Epstein-Barr Virus Induce T-Cell Responses with Similar Functional Properties and Memory Phenotypes. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 4904–4908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Djerbi, M.; Screpanti, V.; Catrina, A.I.; Bogen, B.; Biberfeld, P.; Grandien, A. The Inhibitor of Death Receptor Signaling, Flice-Inhibitory Protein Defines a New Class of Tumor Progression Factors. J. Exp. Med. 1999, 190, 1025–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Chaudhary, P.M.; Jasmin, A.; Eby, M.T.; Hood, L. Modulation of the NF-κB pathway by virally encoded Death Effector Domains-containing proteins. Oncogene 1999, 18, 5738–5746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Guasparri, I.; Wu, H.; Cesarman, E. The KSHV oncoprotein vFLIP contains a TRAF-interacting motif and requires TRAF2 and TRAF3 for signalling. EMBO Rep. 2006, 7, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Moore, P.S.; Boshoff, C.; Weiss, R.A.; Chang, Y. Molecular Mimicry of Human Cytokine and Cytokine Response Pathway Genes by KSHV. Science 1996, 274, 1739–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cannon, J.S.; Nicholas, J.; Orenstein, J.M.; Mann, R.B.; Murray, P.G.; Browning, P.J.; DiGiuseppe, J.A.; Cesarman, E.; Hayward, G.S.; Ambinder, R.F. Heterogeneity of Viral IL-6 Expression in HHV-8–Associated Diseases. J. Infect. Dis. 1999, 180, 824–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wan, X.; Wang, H.; Nicholas, J. Human Herpesvirus 8 Interleukin-6 (vIL-6) Signals through gp130 but Has Structural and Receptor-Binding Properties Distinct from Those of Human IL-6. J. Virol. 1999, 73, 8268–8278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Boulanger, M.J.; Chow, D.-C.; Brevnova, E.; Martick, M.; Sandford, G.; Nicholas, J.; Garcia, K. Molecular Mechanisms for Viral Mimicry of a Human Cytokine: Activation of gp130 by HHV-8 Interleukin-6. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 335, 641–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Diehl, S.; Rincón, M. The two faces of IL-6 on Th1/Th2 differentiation. Mol. Immunol. 2002, 39, 531–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fielding, C.; McLoughlin, R.; Colmont, C.S.; Kovaleva, M.; Harris, D.; Rose-John, S.; Topley, N.; Jones, S.A. Viral IL-6 Blocks Neutrophil Infiltration during Acute Inflammation. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 4024–4029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Iellem, A.; Mariani, M.; Lang, R.; Recalde, H.; Panina-Bordignon, P.; Sinigaglia, F.; D’Ambrosio, D. Unique Chemotactic Response Profile and Specific Expression of Chemokine Receptors Ccr4 and Ccr8 by Cd4+Cd25+ Regulatory T Cells. J. Exp. Med. 2001, 194, 847–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Foster-Cuevas, M.; Wright, G.; Puklavec, M.J.; Brown, M.H.; Barclay, A.N. Human Herpesvirus 8 K14 Protein Mimics CD200 in Down-Regulating Macrophage Activation through CD200 Receptor. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 7667–7676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Cunningham, C.; Barnard, S.; Blackbourn, D.J.; Davison, A.J. Transcription mapping of human herpesvirus 8 genes encoding viral interferon regulatory factors. J. Gen. Virol. 2003, 84, 1471–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Spiller, O.B.; Robinson, M.; O’Donnell, E.; Milligan, S.; Morgan, P.; Davison, A.J.; Blackbourn, D.J. Complement Regulation by Kaposi’s Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus ORF4 Protein. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 592–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Mark, L.; Lee, W.H.; Spiller, O.B.; Proctor, D.; Blackbourn, D.J.; Villoutreix, B.O.; Blom, A.M. The Kaposi’s Sarcoma-associated Herpesvirus Complement Control Protein Mimics Human Molecular Mechanisms for Inhibition of the Complement System. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 45093–45101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Coscoy, L.; Ganem, D. Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus encodes two proteins that block cell surface display of MHC class I chains by enhancing their endocytosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 8051–8056, Erratum in Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Haque, M.; Ueda, K.; Nakano, K.; Hirata, Y.; Parravicini, C.; Corbellino, M.; Yamanishi, K. Major histocompatibility complex class I molecules are down-regulated at the cell surface by the K5 protein encoded by Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus/human herpesvirus-8. J. Gen. Virol. 2001, 82, 1175–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Ishido, S.; Wang, C.; Lee, B.-S.; Cohen, G.B.; Jung, J.U. Downregulation of Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Molecules by Kaposi’s Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus K3 and K5 Proteins. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 5300–5309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Taylor, J.L.; Bennett, H.N.; Snyder, B.A.; Moore, P.; Chang, Y. Transcriptional Analysis of Latent and Inducible Kaposi’s Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Transcripts in the K4 to K7 Region. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 15099–15106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Coscoy, L.; Sanchez, D.J.; Ganem, D. A novel class of herpesvirus-encoded membrane-bound E3 ubiquitin ligases regulates endocytosis of proteins involved in immune recognition. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 155, 1265–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ishido, S.; Choi, J.-K.; Lee, B.-S.; Wang, C.; DeMaria, M.; Johnson, R.; Cohen, G.B.; Jung, J.U. Inhibition of Natural Killer Cell–Mediated Cytotoxicity by Kaposi’s Sarcoma–Associated Herpesvirus K5 Protein. Immunity 2000, 13, 365–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Keller, S.A.; Schattner, E.J.; Cesarman, E. Inhibition of NF-kappaB induces apoptosis of KSHV-infected primary effusion lymphoma cells. Blood 2000, 96, 2537–2542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zuo, J.; Hislop, A.D.; Leung, C.S.; Sabbah, S.; Rowe, M. Kaposi’s Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus-Encoded Viral IRF3 Modulates Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II (MHC-II) Antigen Presentation through MHC-II Transactivator-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms: Implications for Oncogenesis. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 5340–5350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Swerdlow, S.H.; Campo, E.; Harris, N.L.; Jaffe, E.S.; Pileri, S.A.; Stein, H.; Thiele, J. (Eds.) WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, 4th ed.; IARC: Lyon, France, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  45. Jaffe, E.S.; Arber, D.A.; Campo, E.; Quintanilla-Martinez, L.; Orazi, A. Hematopathology, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  46. Hu, Z.; Pan, Z.; Chen, W.; Shi, Y.; Wang, W.; Yuan, J.; Wang, E.; Zhang, S.; Kurt, H.; Mai, B.; et al. Primary Effusion Lymphoma: A Clinicopathological Study of 70 Cases. Cancers 2021, 13, 878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Guerrero, C.; Jain, T.; Kelemen, K. HHV-8-Associated Lymphoproliferative Disorders and Pathogenesis in an HIV-Positive Patient. Case Rep. Hematol. 2019, 2019, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Gaidano, G.; Capello, D.; Cilia, A.M.; Gloghini, A.; Perin, T.; Quattrone, S.; Migliazza, A.; Lo Coco, F.; Saglio, G.; Ascoli, V.; et al. Genetic characterization of HHV-8/KSHV-positive primary effusion lymphoma reveals frequent mutations of BCL6: Implications for disease pathogenesis and histogenesis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1999, 24, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kaji, D.; Ota, Y.; Sato, Y.; Nagafuji, K.; Ueda, Y.; Okamoto, M.; Terasaki, Y.; Tsuyama, N.; Matsue, K.; Kinoshita, T.; et al. Primary human herpesvirus 8–negative effusion-based lymphoma: A large B-cell lymphoma with favorable prognosis. Blood Adv. 2020, 4, 4442–4450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nakatsuka, S.-I.; Yao, M.; Hoshida, Y.; Yamamoto, S.; Iuchi, K.; Aozasa, K. Pyothorax-Associated Lymphoma: A Review of 106 Cases. J. Clin. Oncol. 2002, 20, 4255–4260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Cesarman, E.; Nador, R.G.; Aozasa, K.; Delsol, G.; Said, J.W.; Knowles, D.M. Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus in non-AIDS related lymphomas occurring in body cavities. Am. J. Pathol. 1996, 149, 53–57. [Google Scholar]
  52. Das, D.K. Serous effusions in malignant lymphomas: A review. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2006, 34, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jiang, P.; Liu, M.; Liu, B.; Liu, B.; Zhou, Y.; Dong, L. Human immunodeficiency virus-negative plasmablastic lymphoma in the neck: A rare case report and literature review. Eur. J. Med Res. 2014, 19, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Castillo, J.J.; Shum, H.; Lahijani, M.; Winer, E.S.; Butera, J.N. Prognosis in primary effusion lymphoma is associated with the number of body cavities involved. Leuk. Lymphoma 2012, 53, 2378–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Boulanger, E.; Gérard, L.; Gabarre, J.; Molina, J.-M.; Rapp, C.; Abino, J.-F.; Cadranel, J.; Chevret, S.; Oksenhendler, E. Prognostic Factors and Outcome of Human Herpesvirus 8–Associated Primary Effusion Lymphoma in Patients With AIDS. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005, 23, 4372–4380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Okada, S.; Goto, H.; Yotsumoto, M. Current status of treatment for primary effusion lymphoma. Intractable Rare Dis. Res. 2014, 3, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Tan, C.R.C.; Barta, S.K.; Lee, J.; Rudek, M.A.; Sparano, J.A.; Noy, A. Combination antiretroviral therapy accelerates immune recovery in patients with HIV-related lymphoma treated with EPOCH: A comparison within one prospective trial AMC034. Leuk. Lymphoma 2018, 59, 1851–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Wilson, W.H.; Grossbard, M.; Pittaluga, S.; Cole, D.; Pearson, D.; Drbohlav, N.; Steinberg, S.M.; Little, R.F.; Janik, J.; Gutierrez, M.; et al. Dose-adjusted EPOCH chemotherapy for untreated large B-cell lymphomas: A pharmacodynamic approach with high efficacy. Blood 2002, 99, 2685–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Birsen, R.; Boutboul, D.; Crestani, B.; Seguin-Givelet, A.; Fieschi, C.; Bertinchamp, R.; Giol, M.; Malphettes, M.; Oksenhendler, E.; Galicier, L. Talc pleurodesis allows long-term remission in HIV-unrelated Human Herpesvirus 8-associated primary effusion lymphoma. Leuk. Lymphoma 2017, 58, 1993–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Medical Coverage Guideline 09-J3000-94. Available online: http://mcgs.bcbsfl.com/MCG?mcgId=09-J3000-94&pv=false (accessed on 5 September 2021).
  61. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. B-Cell Lymphomas (Version 5.2021). Available online: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/b-cell.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2021).
  62. Won, J.-H.; Han, S.-H.; Bae, S.-B.; Kim, C.-K.; Lee, N.-S.; Lee, K.-T.; Park, S.-K.; Hong, D.-S.; Lee, D.-W.; Park, H.-S. Successful Eradication of Relapsed Primary Effusion Lymphoma with High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in a Patient Seronegative for Human Immunodeficiency Virus. Int. J. Hematol. 2006, 83, 328–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cassoni, A.; Ali, U.; Cave, J.; Edwards, S.G.; Ramsay, A.; Miller, R.F.; Lee, S.M. Remission After Radiotherapy for a Patient With Chemotherapy-Refractory HIV-Associated Primary Effusion Lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26, 5297–5299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Goy, A.; Ramchandren, R.; Ghosh, N.; Munoz, J.; Morgan, D.S.; Dang, N.H.; Knapp, M.; Delioukina, M.; Kingsley, E.; Ping, J.; et al. Ibrutinib plus lenalidomide and rituximab has promising activity in relapsed/refractory non–germinal center B-cell–like DLBCL. Blood 2019, 134, 1024–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Lurain, K.; Ramaswami, R.; Mangusan, R.; Widell, A.; Ekwede, I.; George, J.; Ambinder, R.; Cheever, M.; Gulley, J.L.; Goncalves, P.H.; et al. Use of pembrolizumab with or without pomalidomide in HIV-associated non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J. Immunother. Cancer 2021, 9, e002097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Marquet, J.; Velazquez-Kennedy, K.; López, S.; Benito, A.; Blanchard, M.-J.; Garcia-Vela, J.A. Case report of a primary effusion lymphoma successfully treated with oral valganciclovir after failing chemotherapy. Hematol. Oncol. 2018, 36, 316–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ramaswami, R.; Lurain, K.; Polizzotto, M.N.; Ekwede, I.; Waldon, K.; Steinberg, S.M.; Mangusan, R.; Widell, A.; Rupert, A.; George, J.; et al. Characteristics and outcomes of KSHV-associated multicentric Castleman disease with or without other KSHV diseases. Blood Adv. 2021, 5, 1660–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Uldrick, T.S.; Gonçalves, P.H.; Abdul-Hay, M.; Claeys, A.J.; Emu, B.; Ernstoff, M.S.; Fling, S.P.; Fong, L.; Kaiser, J.C.; Lacroix, A.M.; et al. Assessment of the Safety of Pembrolizumab in Patients with HIV and Advanced Cancer—A Phase 1 Study. JAMA Oncol. 2019, 5, 1332–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lurain, K.; Ramaswami, R.; Widell, A.; Ekwede, I.; George, J.; Stetler-Stevenson, M.; Raffeld, M.; Yuan, C.M.; Ziegelbauer, J.; Maldarelli, F.; et al. Phase I/II Study of Lenalidomide Combined with DA-EPOCH and Rituximab (DA-EPOCH-R2) in Primary Effusion Lymphoma in Patients with or without HIV. Blood 2019, 134 (Suppl. 1), 4096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nicol, S.M.; Sabbah, S.; Brulois, K.F.; Jung, J.U.; Bell, A.I.; Hislop, A.D. Primary B Lymphocytes Infected with Kaposi’s Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Can Be Expanded In Vitro and Are Recognized by LANA-Specific CD4 + T Cells. J. Virol. 2016, 90, 3849–3859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Vega, M.I.; Huerta-Yepaz, S.; Garban, H.; Jazirehi, A.; Emmanouilides, C.; Bonavida, B. Rituximab inhibits p38 MAPK activity in 2F7 B NHL and decreases IL-10 transcription: Pivotal role of p38 MAPK in drug resistance. Oncogene 2004, 23, 3530–3540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Ghetie, M.-A.; Crank, M.; Kufert, S.; Pop, I.; Vitetta, E. Rituximab but not Other anti-CD20 Antibodies Reverses Multidrug Resistance in 2 B lymphoma Cell Lines, Blocks the Activity of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), and Induces P-gp to Translocate out of Lipid Rafts. J. Immunother. 2006, 29, 536–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Neelapu, S.S.; Locke, F.L.; Bartlett, N.L.; Lekakis, L.J.; Miklos, D.B.; Jacobson, C.A.; Braunschweig, I.; Oluwole, O.O.; Siddiqi, T.; Lin, Y.; et al. Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T-Cell Therapy in Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 2531–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, M.; Munoz, J.; Goy, A.; Locke, F.L.; Jacobson, C.A.; Hill, B.T.; Timmerman, J.M.; Holmes, H.; Jaglowski, S.; Flinn, I.W.; et al. KTE-X19 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Mantle-Cell Lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1331–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Munoz, J.; Jaglowski, M.S.; McKinney, M.S.; Isufi, I.; Stiff, P.J.; Sachs, J.; Ranger, A.; Harris, M.P.; Payumo, B.F.; Akard, L.P. A Phase 1 Study of ACTR087 in Combination with Rituximab, in Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory CD20-Positive B-Cell Lymphoma. Blood 2019, 134, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Abbasi, A.; Peeke, S.; Shah, N.; Mustafa, J.; Khatun, F.; Lombardo, A.; Abreu, M.; Elkind, R.; Fehn, K.; De Castro, A.; et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel CD19 CAR-T cell therapy results in high rates of systemic and neurologic remissions in ten patients with refractory large B cell lymphoma including two with HIV and viral hepatitis. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2020, 13, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Abramson, J.S.; Irwin, K.E.; Frigault, M.J.; Dietrich, J.; McGree, B.; Jordan, J.T.; Yee, A.J.; Chen, Y.; Raje, N.S.; Barnes, J.A.; et al. Successful anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in HIV-infected patients with refractory high-grade B-cell lymphoma. Cancer 2019, 125, 3692–3698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Allred, J.; Bharucha, K.; Özütemiz, C.; He, F.; Janakiram, M.; Maakaron, J.; Carrier, C.; Grzywacz, B.; Bachanova, V. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for HIV-associated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Case report and management recommendations. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2021, 56, 679–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Caro-Vegas, C.; Bailey, A.; Bigi, R.; Damania, B.; Dittmer, D.P. Targeting mTOR with MLN0128 Overcomes Rapamycin and Chemoresistant Primary Effusion Lymphoma. mBio 2019, 10, e02871-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Dai, L.; Lin, Z.; Qiao, J.; Chen, Y.; Flemington, E.K.; Qin, Z. Ribonucleotide reductase represents a novel therapeutic target in primary effusion lymphoma. Oncogene 2017, 36, 5068–5074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Sin, S.-H.; Roy, D.; Wang, L.; Staudt, M.R.; Fakhari, F.D.; Patel, D.D.; Henry, D.; Harrington, W.H., Jr.; Damania, B.A.; Dittmer, D.P. Rapamycin is efficacious against primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) cell lines in vivo by inhibiting autocrine signaling. Blood 2007, 109, 2165–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Bhatt, S.; Ashlock, B.M.; Toomey, N.L.; Diaz, L.A.; Mesri, E.A.; Lossos, I.S.; Ramos, J.C. Efficacious proteasome/HDAC inhibitor combination therapy for primary effusion lymphoma. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 2616–2628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Bhatt, S.; Ashlock, B.M.; Natkunam, Y.; Sujoy, V.; Chapman, J.R.; Ramos, J.C.; Mesri, E.A.; Lossos, I.S. CD30 targeting with brentuximab vedotin: A novel therapeutic approach to primary effusion lymphoma. Blood 2013, 122, 1233–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Shah, N.N.; Singavi, A.K.; Harrington, A. Daratumumab in Primary Effusion Lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 689–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. ClinicalTrials.gov. Lenalidomide Combined with Modified DA-EPOCH and Rituximab (EPOCH-R2) in Primary Effusion Lymphoma or KSHV-Associated Large Cell Lymphoma. Available online: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT02911142 (accessed on 29 September 2021).
  86. ClinicalTrials.gov. Available online: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT04554914 (accessed on 29 September 2021).
Cancers 14 00722 g001 550
Figure 1. Pathogenesis Overview of PEL based on references [14,19]. P53: Tumor suppressor protein/transcription factor. Viral particle: Invasive HHV8, example of cell entry accessed via PDL-1. LANA-1,2: Latency associated nuclear antigen/oncoprotein. PD 1, 2: B cell surface marker. Kaposin molecule: representative of Kaposin protein A, B or C. A: Viral invasion of B-cell via PD-1/PDL-1 pathway. B1: Binding of LANA-2/vIRF3 complex to polymerized microtubules leads to transcription instability, facilitates viral proliferation. B2: Binding of LANA-1 to P53 prevent cell apoptosis facilitates viral proliferation. B3: Binding of Kaposi A, B, or C to variable sites of mRNA facilitates viral proliferation. C: Predominance of post-infectious effusion by organ site.
Figure 1. Pathogenesis Overview of PEL based on references [14,19]. P53: Tumor suppressor protein/transcription factor. Viral particle: Invasive HHV8, example of cell entry accessed via PDL-1. LANA-1,2: Latency associated nuclear antigen/oncoprotein. PD 1, 2: B cell surface marker. Kaposin molecule: representative of Kaposin protein A, B or C. A: Viral invasion of B-cell via PD-1/PDL-1 pathway. B1: Binding of LANA-2/vIRF3 complex to polymerized microtubules leads to transcription instability, facilitates viral proliferation. B2: Binding of LANA-1 to P53 prevent cell apoptosis facilitates viral proliferation. B3: Binding of Kaposi A, B, or C to variable sites of mRNA facilitates viral proliferation. C: Predominance of post-infectious effusion by organ site.
Cancers 14 00722 g001
Cancers 14 00722 g002 550
Figure 2. PEL arising in a patient who had previously received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem transplant for T-cell lymphoma. The cytospin slides (A,B) and cell block (C) of the pleural fluid in this case show a proliferation of large, pleomorphic lymphoid cells. Although some neoplastic cells have relatively round nuclear contours with prominent nucleoli, many others have a more anaplastic appearance with multinucleated forms that resemble Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg cells. The neoplastic cells express CD138, EMA, and CD30 (Gibson, S.E., Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA; Gibson.Sarah@mayo.edu (S.E.G.), 2021) and are strongly positive for HHV8 (D), confirming the diagnosis of PEL. (A) Papanicolaou stain; (B) Wright stain; (C) H&E stain; and (D) immunohistochemical stain with hematoxylin counterstain; (A–D) magnification × 1000).
Figure 2. PEL arising in a patient who had previously received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem transplant for T-cell lymphoma. The cytospin slides (A,B) and cell block (C) of the pleural fluid in this case show a proliferation of large, pleomorphic lymphoid cells. Although some neoplastic cells have relatively round nuclear contours with prominent nucleoli, many others have a more anaplastic appearance with multinucleated forms that resemble Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg cells. The neoplastic cells express CD138, EMA, and CD30 (Gibson, S.E., Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA; Gibson.Sarah@mayo.edu (S.E.G.), 2021) and are strongly positive for HHV8 (D), confirming the diagnosis of PEL. (A) Papanicolaou stain; (B) Wright stain; (C) H&E stain; and (D) immunohistochemical stain with hematoxylin counterstain; (A–D) magnification × 1000).
Cancers 14 00722 g002
Table
Table 1. Differential Diagnosis of Primary Effusion Lymphoma.
Table 1. Differential Diagnosis of Primary Effusion Lymphoma.
Primary Effusion LymphomaHHV8-Negative Effusion-Based LymphomaPyothorax-Associated LymphomaPlasmablastic LymphomaBurkitt
Lymphoma		Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma *
Clinical presentationPleural, peritoneal, or pericardial effusion +/− nodal/extranodal mass
B symptoms		Pleural, peritoneal, or pericardial effusion
Fluid overload		Chest pain, fever, cough, dyspnea, chest wall mass
History of TB related pyothorax		Extranodal tumor of head and neck or other extranodal sites +/− nodal disease
B symptoms, variable based on immunologic status		Facial, abdominal, or other extranodal mass +/− nodal diseaseRapid tumor growthNodal or extranodal mass
B symptoms in one-third
MorphologyLarge, pleomorphic immunoblastic, plasmablastic or anaplastic cellsLarge, pleomorphic immunoblastic or plasmablastic cellsDiffuse proliferation of centroblastic or immunoblastic cells, may show plasmacytoid differentiationDiffuse proliferation of large, immunoblastic or plasmablastic cellsMedium-sized, monotonous cells with frequent cytoplasmic vacuoles; rarely resemble small, plasmacytoid immunoblastsDiffuse proliferation of large immunoblastic cells (round nuclei and a single prominent nucleolus), may include cells with plasmacytoid features
EBV positivity70%30%70%60–75%20–40% (100% in endemic form)9–15%
HHV8 status+-----
PhenotypeCD45+
CD20−
CD19−
CD79a−
PAX5−
IRF4/MUM1+/−
CD38+/−
CD138+/−
CD30+/−
Ig light chain−/+		CD45+/−
CD20+/−
CD19+/−
CD79a+/−
PAX5+/−
IRF4/MUM1+/−
CD38−/+
CD138−/+
CD30−/+
Ig light chain+/−		CD45+
CD20+/−
CD19+
CD79a+/−
PAX5+
IRF4/MUM1+
CD138−/+
CD30+/−
Ig light chain+/−		CD45−/+
CD20−
CD19−
CD79a−/+
PAX5−
IRF4/MUM1+
CD38+
CD138+
CD30−/+
Ig light chain+		CD45+
CD20+
CD19+
CD79a+
PAX5+
IRF4/MUM1−/+
CD38+
CD138−
MYC+
CD10+		CD45+
CD20+
CD19+
CD79a+
PAX5+
IRF4/MUM1+/−
CD38−/+
CD138−/+
CD30−/+
Cellular originPost-GC B cell with plasmablastic differentiationGC or post-GC B cellPost-GC B cellPlasmablastGC B cellGC or post-GC B cell
HIV status+++/−−−−/+-++/−−−/+−−−/+
Other associationsOrgan transplant; elderlyFluid overloadLong-standing pyothoraxOrgan transplant; other iatrogenic immunodeficiency; elderlyMalaria (endemic form); organ transplant; primary immune disordersOrgan transplant; other iatrogenic immunodeficiency; primary immune disorders
PrognosisMedian survival < 2 yr2-yr survival 85%5-yr survival 20–35%Median survival <1 yrVariable
5-yr survival ≥70%		Variable
5-yr survival >60%
Anatomic siteBody cavities
(rare extracavitary)		Body cavitiesThoracic cavityExtranodal (<10% nodal)Extranodal (less frequent nodal)Nodal or extranodal
PEL = Primary Effusion Lymphoma. DLBCL = Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma. PAL = Pyothorax associated Lymphoma. GC = Germinal center. LAD = Lymphadenopathy. TB = Tuberculosis. CNS = Central Nervous System. GI = Gastrointestinal. B Symptoms = constitutional symptoms including fevers, night sweats, and weight loss, typically associated with lymphomas. EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; GC, germinal center; HHV8, human herpes virus 8; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; TB, tuberculosis; yr, year; * immunoblastic variant.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gathers, D.A.; Galloway, E.; Kelemen, K.; Rosenthal, A.; Gibson, S.E.; Munoz, J. Primary Effusion Lymphoma: A Clinicopathologic Perspective. Cancers 2022, 14, 722. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030722

AMA Style

Gathers DA, Galloway E, Kelemen K, Rosenthal A, Gibson SE, Munoz J. Primary Effusion Lymphoma: A Clinicopathologic Perspective. Cancers. 2022; 14(3):722. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030722

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gathers, Diamone A., Emily Galloway, Katalin Kelemen, Allison Rosenthal, Sarah E. Gibson, and Javier Munoz. 2022. "Primary Effusion Lymphoma: A Clinicopathologic Perspective" Cancers 14, no. 3: 722. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030722

APA Style

Gathers, D. A., Galloway, E., Kelemen, K., Rosenthal, A., Gibson, S. E., & Munoz, J. (2022). Primary Effusion Lymphoma: A Clinicopathologic Perspective. Cancers, 14(3), 722. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030722

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop