Next Article in Journal
The Impact of a Preoperative Staging System on Accurate Prediction of Prognosis in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
Overall Survival and Prognostic Factors among Older Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using a Hospital Database
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Landscape of PDK1 in Breast Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 14
Issue 5
10.3390/cancers14051104
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Targeting Protein Kinase C for Cancer Therapy

by
Sijia He
,
Qi Li
,
Qian Huang
and
Jin Cheng
*
Cancer Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201620, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2022, 14(5), 1104; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051104
Submission received: 31 December 2021 / Revised: 15 February 2022 / Accepted: 17 February 2022 / Published: 22 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue AGC Kinases and Cancer)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The protein kinase C (PKC) family belongs to serine-threonine kinases and consists of several subtypes. Increasing evidence suggests that PKCs are critical players in carcinogenesis. Interestingly, PKCs exert both promotive and suppressive effects on tumor cell growth and metastasis, which have attracted immense attention. Herein, we systematically review the current advances in the structure, regulation and biological functions of PKCs, especially the relationship of PKCs with anti-cancer therapy-induced cell death, including the current knowledge of PKCs function in tumor metabolism and microenvironment. Moreover, we discuss the potential role of PKCs as a target for therapeutic intervention in cancer from basic research and clinical trials.

Abstract

Protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms, a group of serine-threonine kinases, are important regulators in carcinogenesis. Numerous studies have demonstrated that PKC isoforms exert both positive and negative effects on cancer cell demise. In this review, we systematically summarize the current findings on the architecture, activity regulation and biological functions of PKCs, especially their relationship with anti-cancer therapy-induced cell death. Additionally, we elaborate on current knowledge of the effects of PKCs on tumor metabolism and microenvironment, which have gained increasing attention in oncology-related areas. Furthermore, we underscore the basic experimental and clinical implications of PKCs as a target for cancer therapy to evaluate their therapeutic benefits and potential applications.

1. Introduction

Protein kinase C (PKC) isoenzymes are a prototypical class of serine/threonine kinases that are conserved throughout evolution and widely expressed in almost all cell types. They consist of domain permutations in their N-terminal regulatory regions linked by variable sequences to a highly conserved C-terminal kinase domain. The biological role of PKC isoenzymes has been intensely studied in both various physiological and pathological conditions. In addition, PKC isoenzymes are implicated in multiple signal transduction pathways that turn environment cues into cellular actions. The PKC signaling pathway has critical roles in regulating gene expression, as well as cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, survival and death. Inactivation or dysregulation of PKC isoenzymes may cause different pathologies, such as allergy [1], inflammatory diseases [2], diabetes [3] and autoimmune diseases [4,5]. Recent scientific breakthroughs and technological advancements have improved our understanding of the functional roles of PKCs in cancer development and progression. Moreover, PKC enzymes can serve as promising targets for cancer treatment [6]. In this review, we focus on the regulatory activities of PKC isoforms and discuss their involvement in cancer progression. Furthermore, we provide a summary of clinical trials with PKC inhibitors in cancers and highlight the latest development of PKCs as targeted anti-cancer therapies.

2. The Structural Features and Activation of PKC Isoforms

PKC isoforms were first identified and found to be activated by proteolysis in 1977 [7]. These isoforms are now known to be critical mediators in signal transduction pathways, which regulate a set of biological functions such as cell proliferation, differentiation, death and tumorigenesis.
The PKC family members are classified into three subfamilies according to their cofactor dependence: (i) conventional or classical PKC isozymes (cPKCs), including PKCα, PKCβ1, PKCβ2 and PKCγ, which are calcium-dependent and activated by both diacylglycerol (DAG) and phosphatidylserine (PS); (ii) novel PKC isozymes (nPKCs), including PKCδ, PKCε, PKCη and PKCθ, which are calcium-independent and regulated by DAG and PS; and (iii) atypical PKC isozymes (aPKCs), including PKCζ and PKCλ/ι, which are calcium-independent and do not require DAG for activation, although PS can regulate their activity.
Members of the PKC family share a common architecture of an N-terminal regulatory moiety (approximately 20–40 kDa) and a C-terminal kinase domain (approximately 45 kDa) [8], composed of conserved regions (C1–C4) interspersed with variable regions (V0–V5), which are of lower homology. The C1 domain, a cysteine-rich motif, is duplicated in most PKC isoenzymes and forms the DAG/phorbol ester binding site, which is preceded by an autoinhibitory pseudosubstrate sequence. The C2 domain contains a calcium-binding site or recognition site for acidic lipids. The C3 and C4 domains constitute the ATP- and substrate-binding lobes of the kinase core. There is a hinge region between the regulatory and catalytic domains that becomes proteolytically labile when the enzyme is membrane-bound [8,9] (Figure 1).
PKC is initially considered an unphosphorylated form (immature) associated with the membrane [10] and under acute structural and spatial regulation including its phosphorylation state, conformation and subcellular location [11,12]. Activation of PKC isoforms strictly relies on a posttranslational maturation process (Figure 2). Thus, when processed by three ordered phosphorylation (activation loop phosphorylation, turn motif phosphorylation, and hydrophobic motif phosphorylation), PKCs will expose their pseudosubstrate and position at the specific intracellular location, transducing signaling [11,12,13]. The first step of this maturation process is regulated by 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1), which phosphorylates threonine residues at the activation loop in the C4 region of PKC isoforms [14]. Such phosphorylation then leads to the autophosphorylation of the “turn” and “hydrophobic” motifs within the C4 region and stabilizes these isoenzymes (maturation) [10]. At this point, the mature form of PKC is prepared for activation. Its inactive form (“folded conformation”) resides predominantly in the cytosol, with an interaction between the C-terminal domain and the N-terminal pseudosubstrate motif [10]. Under physiological conditions, PKC can be activated by interacting with extracellular agonists such as hormones, cytokines and growth factors, which sequentially translocates to different subcellular compartments, thus conferring specific substrate phosphorylation and distinct cellular functions [15]. The translocation of PKC is regulated by anchoring/scaffolding proteins to ensure proper spatio-temporal distribution of PKC isoforms. Receptors for activated C kinase (RACKs) are intracellular scaffolding proteins that bind to individual PKC isoforms following their activation and provide anchorage of each isoform next to its physiological substrates [16]. Subsequently, the translocated PKC phosphorylates specific substrates such as membrane-associated phospholipase C (PLC), which hydrolyzes the membrane phospholipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to generate DAG and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3). IP3 then interacts with the inositol trisphosphate receptor (InsP3R) and triggers the rapid release of Ca2+ from the intracellular store to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). DAG is phosphorylated by diacylglycerol kinases (DGK) and converts to phosphatidic acid (PA) in a reaction that terminates the PKC-regulated signals [17]. The reversal of PKC activity is regulated by dephosphorylation, ubiquitination, and caveolin-dependent endocytosis [18,19,20]. In summary, PKC signaling is initiated by phosphorylation, pseudosubstrate exposure and subcellular localization, which ultimately leads to a specific cellular response.

3. PKCs in Cancer

3.1. Differential Expression and Mutation of PKCs in Cancers

The PKC isoforms show variable expression profiles during cancer progression depending on cell types. For example, in the transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder, PKCα and β2 immunostains were intense in both normal urothelium and all grade tumor tissues. At the same time, PKCβ1 and δ immunostains were intense in normal urothelium and low-grade tumors, but weak in high-grade tumors [21]. In human liver cancer, the level of membrane-bound PKCα was significantly lower in cancer tissues than in adjacent normal tissues. The levels of PKCδ and λ/ι in both cytosolic and membrane fractions were significantly higher in cancer tissues than in adjacent normal tissues [22]. Moreover, Western blot results showed that the expression levels of PKC isoforms (α and λ/ι) were remarkably higher in cancerous tissues than in normal breast tissues [23]. The expression of PKCε was correlated with high histologic grade and poor disease-free and overall survival in breast cancer patients [24]. PKC isoforms (α, β, ε and η) were found to be highly expressed in prostate cancer compared with benign prostatic hyperplasia [25].
The PKC family contains nine genes and is frequently mutated in human cancer [26]. Notably, there are 20–25% PKC mutations verified in melanoma, colorectal cancer and lung squamous cell carcinoma, while less than 5% in ovarian cancer, glioblastoma and breast cancer [27]. PKCα mutation (D294G in the hinge region) was the first reported cancer-associated mutation in PKC, which separated the regulatory and catalytic moieties and abolished the F-actin dependent PKCα accumulation at the cell-cell contacts [28,29]. It has been demonstrated that nPKC isoform mutations are most common in gastrointestinal cancer, with a lower mutation burden than melanoma and lung cancer [26]. Although there are about 8% of PKC mutations confirmed in human cancers, which are heterozygous with an allele frequency varying from 0.05 to 0.67 for the mutations characterized, most of them are considered to have a loss of function rather than activation [26]. For instance, the PKCε R162H pseudosubstrate mutation displayed agonist-stimulated and basal activity limitations [26]. The PKCβ P619Q C-terminal tail mutation prevented the phosphorylation of PKC, which was also a type of loss-of-function mutation [30]. Generally, PKC loss-of-function mutations impeded second-messenger binding through mutations in the C1 or C2 domain, and impaired phosphorylation or catalysis via mutations in the kinase domain. However, gain-of-function mutations are rare in PKC isoforms and have been most commonly reported in Alzheimer’s disease. For example, PKCα M489V mutation permitted synaptic defects in patients with Alzheimer’s disease via increasing signaling output and evasion of kinase degradation [31]. Additionally, PKC fusions have been identified in some rare cancers. SLC44A1 (solute carrier family 44)-PRKCA (PKCα) fusion oncogene was detected in papillary glioneuronal tumor with the rearrangement of chromosomes 9 and 17, thus leading to constitutive PKCα activation [32]. The benign fibrous histiocytomas (BFHs) have been found to possess gene fusions encoding membrane-associated proteins (podoplanin, CD63 and LAMTOR1) and PKC isoforms (PKCα, PKCβ and PKCδ), indicating that BFHs support the pathogenesis of neoplasia [33]. Despite these rare cases, deregulation of PKC activity is generally not involved in genomic alterations.

3.2. The Role of PKC in Anti-cancer Treatment-Induced Cell Death

Over the last decade, it has become apparent that anti-cancer therapy causes tumor cells to die indirectly or directly. Cell death manifests with macroscopic morphological alterations and has been historically classified into three different forms: apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis. Since 2005, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death (NCDD) has focused on the precise definition and consensus criteria of cell death modalities, which has recently subdivided cell death into over ten interconnected subclasses, such as extrinsic apoptosis, intrinsic apoptosis, autophagy-dependent cell death (ADCD), immunogenic cell death (ICD) and necroptosis [34]. Balancing cell death and survival are crucial for preventing cancer and improving therapy efficiency.

3.2.1. PKCs and Apoptosis

Apoptosis is a programmed cell death process mediated by intrinsic and extrinsic signaling pathways. Promoting the effective elimination of cancer cells by apoptosis has been a mainstay and goal of clinical oncology during the last decade. PKC isoforms appear to positively and negatively regulate cancer cell apoptosis. In general, PKCα protects cancer cells against apoptosis. PKCα has been shown to phosphorylate B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) and dephosphorylate Akt, which triggers a survival response [35]. The oxygen radicals induced by irradiation have been substantiated to activate PKC in a direct way [36]. Following irradiation, PKCα translocates to biomembranes through lipid peroxidation and is activated, thus negatively regulating radiation-induced apoptosis, whereby Bcl-2, Raf-1 and HSP70 may be key molecules [36]. Inhibition of PKC decreases the initiation and elongation activity of the HSP70 gene, which protects cells from undergoing apoptosis after heat shock [37]. Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 1 (TRAF1), an anti-apoptotic component of the intracellular signaling pathway of the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) family, can be stimulated by PKC activation via Raf-1/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB)-dependent pathway [38]. Overexpression of PKCα rendered cancer cells resistant to irradiation. Downregulation of PKCα-induced p53-dependent apoptosis via activation of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 (IGFBP3) [36,39]. Enhancement of PKCε expression confers lung cancer cells a significant resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs induced apoptosis via suppressing cytochrome c release from the mitochondria, activation of caspase-3, and cleavage of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) [40]. PKCη also appears to play an important role in apoptosis regulation, and its downregulation triggers tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-induced apoptosis [41]. However, PKCβ [42], δ [43,44], ζ [45] and θ [46,47] are supposed to positively regulate apoptosis. Cisplatin promotes the expression of PKCβ in cervical cancer cells, and inhibition of PKCβ reduces cisplatin-induced cancer cell apoptosis [42]. PKCδ functions downstream of the p53 response and upstream of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activation, leading to cytochrome C release from mitochondria and caspase-3 cleavage [43]. Rad9, DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), Mcl-1 and p73 are also targets of PKCδ to regulate apoptosis. PKCδ is required for the formation of Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 complex and binding to Bcl-2, and inhibition of PKCδ attenuates Rad9-induced apoptosis [44]. Irradiation initiates c-Abl/PKCδ/Rac1/p38 cascades and leads to the oligomerization of Bax and Bak, which results in the release of cytochrome C [48]. It has been demonstrated that PKCα might not contribute to the progression of kidney carcinoma since its inhibition does not affect kidney cancer cell apoptosis [49]. Additionally, in some reports, PKC activation by oxidative stress and irradiation is not always accompanied by translocation [50]. The activation of PKC at an early stage after irradiation promoted anti-apoptosis signaling, but not through translocation [50]. PKCζ is involved in indomethacin-induced apoptosis via activating the p38-DRP1 (dynamin-related protein 1) pathway [45]. PKCθ could be cleaved by caspase-3 and apoptotic cell lysates at the DEVD354/K site [46]. However, PKCζ is one of the molecules involved in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway transducing cell survival signals, knockdown of PKCζ sensitizes colon cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis [51]. Moreover, a high expression of PKCθ is sufficient to inhibit paclitaxel-induced apoptosis. Knockdown of PKCθ expression also enhanced chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in triple-negative breast cancer cells via regulating Bim [52].

3.2.2. PKCs and Autophagy

Autophagy is a dynamic process in which the cells recycle their components to survive under stressful or starvation conditions [53]. The role of autophagy in cancer is context-dependent. Autophagy prevents cell damage that can lead to cancer initiation, thus playing a cytoprotective role in cancer prevention. However, once cancer occurs, the cancer cells may undergo autophagy to survive in the hostile tumor environment. In this setting, aggressive cancers can be addicted to autophagy for survival. Multiple signaling pathways are involved in the process of autophagy, such as mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK)/JNK, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and PKC-related signaling pathway [54,55,56]. PKC enzymes contribute to cellular homeostasis maintenance by regulating the autophagy of cellular components. As autophagy regulators, PKC enzymes mediate the function of other autophagy-related proteins via phosphorylation of serine and threonine amino acid residues. Silencing of PKCε by siRNA suppressed starvation-induced autophagy in breast cancer cells. Overexpression of PKCε activated mTORC1 and increased the expression of LC3-I, LC3-II and p62 in MCF-7 cells [53]. Overexpression of PKCβ sensitized HeLa cells to chemotherapy via autophagy enhancement [42]. However, the role of PKC enzymes in cancer cell autophagy is contradictory. Knockdown of PKCα impaired LC3-II accumulation and autophagic flux in palmitic acid-treated HepG2 cells [57]. PKCα activator positively regulated tri-ortho-cresyl phosphate (TOCP)-induced autophagy by enhancing the protein expression level of LC3 and P62 in neuroblastoma SK-N-SH cells [58]. Nevertheless, one study reported that PKCα suppressed autophagy by regulating miR-129-2, which directly targeted peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor 1 alpha (PGC-1α), a positive regulator of autophagy [59]. PKCδ has been shown to promote autophagy by increasing the formation of autophagosomes and blocking autophagic flux [60]. Rottlerin, a PKCδ inhibitor, could trigger early autophagy by phosphorylating AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) at Thr-172 or suppressing Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in human breast cancer stem cells [61]. These paradoxical results may be explained by the fact that PKC enzymes exhibit different intracellular distribution in different cancer cells and they translocate to different organelles upon activation.

3.2.3. PKCs and Necrosis

In the last decade, necrosis has been identified as a programmed cell death process with cellular swelling and cytoplasmic membrane rupture. Previous research has shown that the modulation of PKC and AMPK signaling pathways can affect H2O2-induced necrosis [62]. Under H2O2 treatment, aPKC isoforms were activated and subsequently inhibited the AMPK signaling pathway, which was crucial for necrosis promotion [62]. Necroptosis, a kind of caspase-independent programmed necrosis, has been recently investigated in cancer cells after treatment with anticancer agents. Ascorbic acid induces intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and PKC activation, especially PKCα and PKCβ2 enzymes, which in turn affects the release of calcium into the cytosol and eventually leads to Hep2 cell necrosis [63]. The mechanisms of the cell death mode switch may point out a new way for the treatment of necrosis-mediated tumor growth. It has been suggested that the necrosis-to-apoptosis switch in solid tumors is controlled by PKC- ERK1/2 pathway, which regulates superoxide dismutase (SOD) and suppresses ROS production [64].

3.2.4. PKCs and Other Cell Death Modalities

Cellular senescence is a permanent state of cell cycle arrest that prevents the cells from acquiring unnecessary damage from different types of stressors, in conjunction with the secretion of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype. In cancer, senescence is considered a potent barrier for preventing tumorigenesis [65]. Studies have shown that PKC enzymes play an important role in senescence. Inhibition of cPKC or aPKC triggered the activation of senescence markers in colon cancer cells via the Akt-FoxO3a-ROS-p53-p21 pathway [66]. Depletion of PKCλ/ι increased the number of senescent cells in PKCλ/ι-overexpressing breast cancer cells and glioblastoma cells, in which PKCλ/ι was activated by loss of PTEN [67]. PKCη promoted senescence induced by oxidative stress and DNA damage through upregulating the expression of p21Cip1 and p27Kip1. In addition, PKCη was demonstrated to enhance the transcription and secretion of interleukin-6 (IL-6) for a positive loop of senescence reinforcement [68]. However, PKCη depletion could also promote senescence by enhancing p27 [69]. Ferroptosis is an iron-dependent form of cell death characterized by ROS accumulation and lipid peroxidation. Erastin, a well-known ferroptosis inducer, triggered rhabdomyosarcoma cell death in a dose-dependent manner, which was reduced by PKCα and β inhibition. Genetic knockdown of PKCα significantly prevented RMS cells from erastin-induced cell death [70]. However, there is a lack of research on the relationship between PKC and other emerging cell death modalities.

3.3. PKCs and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT)

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a process in which epithelial cancer cells lose their epithelial differentiated characteristics and gain mesenchymal characteristics with spindle-shaped morphology to enhance their migratory and invasive potential. During embryonic development, EMT is essential for organ formation, whereby the cells disseminate from the primary site and migrate to a distant site [71]. However, during cancer progression, this process was hijacked by cancer cells for metastasis to different organs. Five main pathways have been demonstrated to trigger the EMT process and EMT-like phenotypes: (i) tyrosine kinase receptors including epidermal growth factor (EGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), plate-derived growth factor (PDGF) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF); (ii) integrins; (iii) Wnt pathway; (iv) NF-κB pathway; and (v) transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) pathway [72]. EGF is known to affect adherens junctions and disrupt cell-cell adhesion in cancer. It has been reported that EGF can phosphorylate PKCδ at tyrosine 311, which is necessary for its binding to E-cadherin. Knockdown of PKCδ with siRNA or impeding PKCδ phosphorylation by overexpression of a mutant repressed EFG-induced cell scattering [73]. In recent years, integrin trafficking has shown its importance in cell migration during cancer metastasis. PKC isoforms appear to function as a vital center in regulating the vesicular pathways of integrins. The trafficking of αvβ3, α2β1 and β1 integrins all hinged on PKC activity [74]. Many studies have implicated the crosstalk between the Wnt and PKC signaling pathways. PKCθ positively mediated the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, whereas PKCη and δ played negative roles in this signaling pathway [75]. Activation of NF-κB is associated with cancer cell migration and metastasis. TPA (12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate) has been reported to activate PKCα/ERK/NF-κB-dependent matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) expression and elicit glioblastoma cell migration, which can be prevented through downregulating PKCα expression [76]. TGF-β signaling is an important regulator of EMT. In conjunction with the canonical TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway that promotes EMT via altering transcriptional responses, another TGF-β signaling pathway was verified where Par6 (an adaptor molecule for the polarity complex) functioned as a binding partner and substrate of TGF-β receptors. aPKC was identified as a crucial component in this TGF-β-activated phosphorylation of the Par6 pathway, and its inhibition decreased TGF-β-induced EMT and migration of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells [77]. Additionally, overexpression of PKCε induced a mesenchymal phenotype of MCF-10A cells and promoted metastasis, which was partially reversed by PKCε knockdown [78]. PKCα inhibitor blocked Wnt5a-enhanced EMT in ovarian cancer [79]. Specificity protein 1 was directly phosphorylated by PKCλ/ι on Ser59, which induced cholangiocarcinoma cells with EMT-like features via binding to Snail promoter [80]. Furthermore, knockdown of apoptosis-stimulating of p53 protein 2 (ASPP2) promoted EMT in gallbladder cancer cells through the glioma-associated oncogene homolog 1 (PKCλ/ι/GLI1) pathway [81].

3.4. PKCs and Tumor Microenvironment (TME)

The tumor microenvironment (TME) consists of stromal cells, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and immune cells, which can be functionally sculpted by cancer cells to foster cancer development and progression. Many PKC enzymes are shown to regulate immune cell function, which is germane to the definition of promotion or suppression of cancer cell growth. PKCα is necessary for T cell-dependent interferon (IFN)-gamma production and B cell IgG2a/2b class-switching [82]. PKCβ is essential in B cell receptor (BCR) signaling, while dispensable for T cell receptor (TCR) signaling [83]. PKCβ has been found to promote tumorigenesis in mouse mammary tumor virus-polyoma middle T-antigen (MMTV-PyMT) breast cancer model via mediating TME [84]. PKCε is implicated in T cell activation and differentiation [85]. It has been well documented that PKCθ is involved in T-cell activation, differentiation and proliferation, thus negatively regulating the suppressive function of Treg cells [86]. Further analysis demonstrated that PKCλ/ι expression was significantly associated with poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma and late recurrence in patients with liver cancer. The deficiency of PKCλ/ι in non-tumorous liver tissue generated a pro-tumorigenic liver microenvironment, indicating this kinase is a tumor suppressor in liver cancer [56]. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), a negative regulator of T cell-mediated immune responses, could physically interact with phosphorylated PKCη and colocalized in regulatory T cells formed immunological synapse with antigen-presenting cells. PKCη-deficient Treg cells displayed defective suppression of tumor immunity via CTLA-4-PKCη signaling axis [87]. Angiogenesis is important for tumor growth and metastasis by enhancing nutrients and oxygen supply, which is modulated by different molecules and cells in TME [88]. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a vital role in angiogenesis. It has been reported that VEGF binds to VEGF receptors and subsequently phosphorylates PLC-γ, and activates PKCβ, which in turn promotes MAPK signaling pathway activation and tumor angiogenesis and growth in breast cancer [89]. It has been demonstrated that PKCβ2 is activated in prostate cancer during angiogenesis, which can be impeded by PKCβ2 inhibitor [90]. Our previous work revealed that caspase-3 cleaved PKCδ and actively secreted VEGF-A into TME and elicit potent growth-stimulating signals to promote tumor repopulation [91].

3.5. PKCs and Tumor Metabolism

Aberrant metabolism is a major hallmark of cancer and directly affects tumor signaling and cellular reactions [92]. In the 1920s, Otto Warburg first proposed the concept that, unlike normal cells, cancer cells obtained ATP through glycolysis, even in oxygen-abundant environments, which was commonly known as the Warburg effect [93]. The maintenance of stable glucose metabolism is important for cancer cell growth and development. To better respond to nutrient stress when glucose is limited, tumor cells can metabolize glutamine, which contributes to mainly every core metabolic task of proliferating tumor cells [94]. It has been demonstrated that bone-derived breast cancer cells show a low expression level of PKCζ compared to the parental population, with low glycolytic reserve and glucose uptake while enhancing glutamine metabolism. These findings suggest that breast cancer cells reprogram metabolic pathways to respond to altered nutrient requirements in the bone microenvironment via upregulation of serine biosynthesis pathway genes and downregulation of PKCζ [95]. Additionally, under glucose deprivation conditions, PKCζ deficiency induces the metabolism to reprogram by increasing glutamine utilization through the serine biosynthetic pathway, where PKCζ suppresses the expression of phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (PHGDH) and phosphoserine aminotransferase (PSAT1): two important enzymes of the pathway [96]. Besides PKCζ, research on the relationship between other PKC isoforms and tumor metabolism is still rare; further studies are expected to figure out the exact mechanism and guide clinical treatment.

4. PKC Inhibitors for Cancer Therapy

Since the PKC isoforms are involved in multiple signaling pathways, they are attractive targets for the treatment of various human diseases, including cancers. Different approaches have been proposed to identify the selective regulators of PKC isoforms. For instance, ATP-competitive molecule inhibitors that bind to the ATP site of PKC enzymes, phorbol esters and other derivative activators or inhibitors that bind to the C1 domain for DAG-binding simulation, and peptides that block the interaction between the regulatory region and RACK of PKC enzymes (Table 1).

4.1. ATP-Competitive Molecule Inhibitors

ATP-competitive molecule inhibitors are molecules that regulate high-affinity interaction with the ATP binding motif within the catalytic domain of PKC isoforms. Staurosporine is a natural and water-soluble pan-inhibitor of PKC. It has been demonstrated that staurosporine could selectively reverse chronic myeloid leukemia resistance to imatinib by inhibiting PKCα-dependent CDC23 inhibition and arresting the cell cycle in the G2/M phase [97]. Midostaurin (PKC412, CGP41251, N-benzoylstaurosporine), a semi-synthetic derivative of staurosporine, shows stronger inhibition on cPKC than nPKC and is inactive towards PKCζ. Midostaurin exhibited a potent anti-tumor effect on rituximab-resistant Burkitt’s lymphoma (BL) cells by reducing the phosphorylation of PKC and promoting proapoptotic activity. Moreover, the combination of midostaurin and rituximab dramatically improved the survival of mice bearing the resistant BL cells compared to rituximab monotherapy [98]. 7-Hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01) has a similar preference for PKC as midostaurin and exhibits anticancer activity via dampening cell cycle progression from the G1 to S phase [99]. Several clinical studies indicated that UCN-01 could be administered safely and well-tolerated [100,101]. Sotrastaurin (also known as AEB071) is a broadly selective molecule that blocks the catalytic activity of PKC enzymes, such as PKCα, PKCβ, PKCθ and PKCδ. Targeted PKC inhibition with sotrastaurin exerted an antitumor effect on uveal melanoma cells harboring GNAQ mutations via suppressing PKC/ERK1/2 and PKC/NF-κB pathways [102]. Enzastaurin (also known as LY317615) is an oral selective PKCβ inhibitor that exhibits a synergistic antitumor effect on NSCLC cell growth when combined with pemetrexed [103]. However, the ATP binding motif shares high sequence homology and structural similarity among kinases, which makes it difficult for the inhibitors to achieve the required selectivity.

4.2. Phorbol Esters and Other Derivatives

Phorbol esters exhibit pharmacological properties via interacting with the C1 domain in PKC, similar to the lipid second messenger DAG, but in a competitive manner [104]. It has been demonstrated that phorbol esters induce cancer cell apoptosis via PKC activation and downregulation of several proto-oncogenes (c-Myc, c-Fos and c-Jun) [105]. Unlike DAG, phorbol esters are not readily metabolized and subsequently fasten PKC in an open and active conformation that is susceptible to ubiquitination, dephosphorylation and degradation. Thus, while phorbol esters induce acute and constitutive activation of PKC, chronic loss or downregulation of all conventional and novel PKC isoforms occurs [106]. Although PKC is the major receptor of phorbol esters, phorbol esters also target other receptors and cause local inflammation. Bryostatin 1 is a macrocyclic lactone that antagonizes the pro-tumor effects of phorbol esters with exceptionally high affinity, leading to significant inhibition of PKCα, PKCε and PKCη, as well as peripheral blood monocytes in patients with advanced malignancies [107]. DAG-lactones are a group of DAG analogs synthesized by a pharmacophore-guided approach, which afford higher affinity for PKC isoforms compared with DAG. HK434 and HK654, two designed compounds of DAG-lactones with highly potent DAG surrogates, are found to induce apoptosis in LNCaP prostate cancer cells by activating PKCα [108]. It is worth noting that the structure of the C1 domain in PKC isoforms is highly conserved, making it arduous to fabricate isoform-selective compounds that target the C1 domain.

4.3. Lipid Analogs

Several lipid analogs have been developed, such as safingol, ilmofosine, perifosine and aurothiomalate, which target activation of PKC at the regulatory domain. Safingol, L-threo-dihydrosphingosine, displayed selective inhibition for PKCα and induced an endonuclease G-mediated cell apoptosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells in a caspase-independent manner [109]. Safingol is also a putative inhibitor of sphingosine kinase 1 (SphK), which catalyzes sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) and mediates cancer cell growth. A phase I clinical trial showed that a combination of safingol with cisplatin was tolerable in patients with advanced solid tumors [110]. Ilmofosine (BM41.440, 1-hexadecylthio-2-methoxymethyl-rac-glycero-3-phosphocholine), a thioether lysophospholipid derivative of lysophosphocholine, is a PKC inhibitor found to induce G2-arrest and Cdc2 kinase suppression via affecting the formation of Cdc2/cyclin B1 complexes [111]. Ilmosofine exhibits concentration-dependent anticancer activities in various solid tumor models [112,113]. However, no tumor regression occurred in patients with non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma when using a schedule of continuous infusion for 5 days and a dose of 300 mg/m2/day of ilmofosine [114]. Perifosine (D-21226) is a synthetic alkyl phospholipid that demonstrates anticancer effects via inhibition of MAPK, Akt and PKC [115,116,117]. However, according to the trial results of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group, perifosine does not show evidence of anticancer activity in patients with previously untreated metastatic or locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma, when given orally on day 1 (900 mg cycle 1, 300 mg cycle 2+) and 2–21 (150 mg daily each cycle) [117]. Aurothiomalate is an anti-rheumatoid gold agent that inhibits PKCλ/ι binding to the adaptor molecule Par6, which regulates Rac1 and induces anchorage-independent growth of NSCLC cells [118]. It also demonstrates a pro-apoptotic effect on advanced prostate cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma [119,120].

4.4. Others

Antisense oligonucleotides offer one approach to target genes that regulate cancer cell proliferation, apoptosis, and signaling pathways. Recent clinical trials have confirmed the anti-tumor activity of antisense oligonucleotides with safety and tolerability [121]. Affinitak (ISIS-3521/LY900003) is an antisense oligonucleotide that specifically blocks PKCα [122]. A phase II study demonstrated that ISIS-3521 is effective and safe in patients with relapsed low-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma [123]. However, there is no evidence of any clinical activity or target modulation of ISIS-3521 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer [124], and no objective responses are observed, even in combination with ISIS-5132 (an antisense inhibitor of Raf-1 kinase) [125].

5. Conclusions

It is obvious that PKC isoforms are involved in cancer progression and represent important targets for cancer therapy. However, the biological functions of PKC isoforms are likely to vary across different tumor types. Studies of cancer-associated mutations revealed that the PKC family members are inactivated in cancer, representing a tumor-suppressive function [126]. Based on this theory, strategies of cancer therapy should focus on restoring rather than suppressing PKC function. It also explains why numerous attempts to target PKC isoforms in cancer have yielded very limited success. Clinical trials demonstrated that the use of PKC inhibitors for cancer treatment not only failed but also worsened patient outcomes in some cases. Current efforts of small molecule compounds have been focused on the kinase domain of PKC enzymes. However, PKC enzymes shared a well-conserved kinase domain, which makes it a major challenge to obtain small molecule modulators with high specificity and sensitivity toward a specific PKC isoform. Despite this, PKC isoforms are promising anti-tumor targets and additional efforts are needed to improve the efficacy and selectivity of PKC isoform inhibitors.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C., Q.H. and S.H.; writing, review and editing, S.H. and J.C.; supervision, Q.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81972887 to J.C., No. 81903117 to S.H.), Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No. 21ZR1451100 to J.C.), and Shanghai Pujiang Program (No. 21PJD056 to J.C.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Prescott, S.L.; Irvine, J.; Dunstan, J.A.; Hii, C.; Ferrante, A. Protein kinase Czeta: A novel protective neonatal T-cell marker that can be upregulated by allergy prevention strategies. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007, 120, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Anderson, K.; Fitzgerald, M.; Dupont, M.; Wang, T.; Paz, N.; Dorsch, M.; Healy, A.; Xu, Y.; Ocain, T.; Schopf, L.; et al. Mice deficient in PKC theta demonstrate impaired in vivo T cell activation and protection from T cell-mediated inflammatory diseases. Autoimmunity 2006, 39, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Geraldes, P.; King, G.L. Activation of Protein Kinase C Isoforms and Its Impact on Diabetic Complications. Circ. Res. 2010, 106, 1319–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Zanin-Zhorov, A.; Dustin, M.L.; Blazar, B.R. PKC-theta function at the immunological synapse: Prospects for therapeutic targeting. Trends Immunol. 2011, 32, 358–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Altman, A.; Kong, K.-F. Protein kinase C inhibitors for immune disorders. Drug Discov. Today 2014, 19, 1217–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Isakov, N. Protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms in cancer, tumor promotion and tumor suppression. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2018, 48, 36–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Takai, Y.; Kishimoto, A.; Inoue, M.; Nishizuka, Y. Studies on a cyclic nucleotide-independent protein kinase and its proenzyme in mammalian tissues. I. Purification and characterization of an active enzyme from bovine cerebellum. J. Biol. Chem. 1977, 252, 7603–7609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Newton, A.C. Protein Kinase C: Structure, Function, and Regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 28495–28498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Garg, R.; Benedetti, L.G.; Abera, M.B.; Wang, H.; Abba, M.; Kazanietz, M.G. Protein kinase C and cancer: What we know and what we do not. Oncogene 2014, 33, 5225–5237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Newton, A.C. Regulation of the ABC kinases by phosphorylation: Protein kinase C as a paradigm. Biochem. J. 2003, 370, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Newton, A.C. Protein Kinase C: Structural and Spatial Regulation by Phosphorylation, Cofactors, and Macromolecular Interactions. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 2353–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Newton, A.C. Protein kinase C as a tumor suppressor. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2017, 48, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gould, C.M.; Newton, A.C. The life and death of protein kinase C. Curr. Drug Targets 2008, 9, 614–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Balendran, A.; Hare, G.R.; Kieloch, A.; Williams, M.R.; Alessi, D.R. Further evidence that 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1) is required for the stability and phosphorylation of protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms. FEBS Lett. 2000, 484, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Parker, P.J. Protein Kinase C Phosphorylation: An Introduction. Methods Mol. Biol. 2003, 233, 159–162. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mochly-Rosen, D. Localization of protein kinases by anchoring proteins: A theme in signal transduction. Science 1995, 268, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Merida, I.; Arranz-Nicolas, J.; Rodriguez-Rodriguez, C.; Avila-Flores, A. Diacylglycerol kinase control of protein kinase C. Biochem. J. 2019, 476, 1205–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lu, Z.; Liu, D.; Hornia, A.; Devonish, W.; Pagano, M.; Foster, D.A. Activation of protein kinase C triggers its ubiquitination and degradation. Mol Cell Biol 1998, 18, 839–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Lee, H.-W.; Smith, L.; Pettit, G.R.; Vinitsky, A.; Smith, J.B. Ubiquitination of Protein Kinase C-α and Degradation by the Proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 20973–20976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Jiao, J.; Garg, V.; Yang, B.; Elton, T.S.; Hu, K. Protein kinase C-epsilon induces caveolin-dependent internalization of vascular adenosine 5’-triphosphate-sensitive K+ channels. Hypertension 2008, 52, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Koren, R.; Langzam, L.; Paz, A.; Livne, P.M.; Gal, R.; Sampson, S.R. Protein kinase C (PKC) isoenzymes immunohistochemistry in lymph node revealing solution-fixed, paraffin-embedded bladder tumors. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 2000, 8, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tsai, J.H.; Hsieh, Y.S.; Kuo, S.J.; Chen, S.T.; Yu, S.Y.; Huang, C.Y.; Chang, A.C.; Wang, Y.W.; Tsai, M.T.; Liu, J.Y. Alteration in the expression of protein kinase C isoforms in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2000, 161, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lin, Y.M.; Su, C.C.; Su, W.W.; Hwang, J.M.; Hsu, H.H.; Tsai, C.H.; Wang, Y.C.; Tsai, F.J.; Huang, C.Y.; Liu, J.Y.; et al. Expression of protein kinase C isoforms in cancerous breast tissue and adjacent normal breast tissue. Chin. J. Physiol. 2012, 55, 55–61. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pan, Q.; Bao, L.W.; Kleer, C.G.; Sabel, M.S.; Griffith, K.A.; Teknos, T.N.; Merajver, S.D. Protein kinase C epsilon is a predictive biomarker of aggressive breast cancer and a validated target for RNA interference anticancer therapy. Cancer Res 2005, 65, 8366–8371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Koren, R.; Ben Meir, D.; Langzam, L.; Dekel, Y.; Konichezky, M.; Baniel, J.; Livne, P.M.; Gal, R.; Sampson, S.R. Expression of protein kinase C isoenzymes in benign hyperplasia and carcinoma of prostate. Oncol. Rep. 2004, 11, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Antal, C.E.; Hudson, A.M.; Kang, E.; Zanca, C.; Wirth, C.; Stephenson, N.L.; Trotter, E.W.; Gallegos, L.L.; Miller, C.J.; Furnari, F.B.; et al. Cancer-associated protein kinase C mutations reveal kinase’s role as tumor suppressor. Cell 2015, 160, 489–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Gao, J.; Aksoy, B.A.; Dogrusoz, U.; Dresdner, G.; Gross, B.; Sumer, S.O.; Sun, Y.; Jacobsen, A.; Sinha, R.; Larsson, E.; et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci. Signal. 2013, 6, pl1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Prevostel, C.; Alvaro, V.; de Boisvilliers, F.; Martin, A.; Jaffiol, C.; Joubert, D. The natural protein kinase C alpha mutant is present in human thyroid neoplasms. Oncogene 1995, 11, 669–674. [Google Scholar]
  29. Vallentin, A.; Lo, T.C.; Joubert, D. A single point mutation in the V3 region affects protein kinase Calpha targeting and accumulation at cell-cell contacts. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21, 3351–3363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gould, C.M.; Kannan, N.; Taylor, S.S.; Newton, A.C. The chaperones Hsp90 and Cdc37 mediate the maturation and stabilization of protein kinase C through a conserved PXXP motif in the C-terminal tail. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 4921–4935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Callender, J.A.; Yang, Y.; Lorden, G.; Stephenson, N.L.; Jones, A.C.; Brognard, J.; Newton, A.C. Protein kinase Calpha gain-of-function variant in Alzheimer’s disease displays enhanced catalysis by a mechanism that evades down-regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E5497–E5505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Bridge, J.A.; Liu, X.Q.; Sumegi, J.; Nelson, M.; Reyes, C.; Bruch, L.A.; Rosenblum, M.; Puccioni, M.J.; Bowdino, B.S.; McComb, R.D. Identification of a novel, recurrent SLC44A1-PRKCA fusion in papillary glioneuronal tumor. Brain Pathol. 2013, 23, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Panagopoulos, I.; Gorunova, L.; Bjerkehagen, B.; Lobmaier, I.; Heim, S. LAMTOR1-PRKCD and NUMA1-SFMBT1 fusion genes identified by RNA sequencing in aneurysmal benign fibrous histiocytoma with t(3;11)(p21;q13). Cancer Genet. 2015, 208, 545–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Galluzzi, L.; Vitale, I.; Aaronson, S.A.; Abrams, J.M.; Adam, D.; Agostinis, P.; Alnemri, E.S.; Altucci, L.; Amelio, I.; Andrews, D.W.; et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death Differ. 2018, 25, 486–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Haughian, J.M.; Jackson, T.A.; Koterwas, D.M.; Bradford, A.P. Endometrial cancer cell survival and apoptosis is regulated by protein kinase C alpha and delta. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2006, 13, 1251–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Nakajima, T. Positive and negative regulation of radiation-induced apoptosis by protein kinase C. J. Radiat. Res. 2008, 49, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Shu, C.W.; Cheng, N.L.; Chang, W.M.; Tseng, T.L.; Lai, Y.K. Transactivation of hsp70-1/2 in geldanamycin-treated human non-small cell lung cancer H460 cells: Involvement of intracellular calcium and protein kinase C. J. Cell Biochem. 2005, 94, 1199–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, X.; Wang, Q.; Hu, W.; Evers, B.M. Regulation of phorbol ester-mediated TRAF1 induction in human colon cancer cells through a PKC/RAF/ERK/NF-kappaB-dependent pathway. Oncogene 2004, 23, 1885–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Shen, L.; Dean, N.M.; Glazer, R.I. Induction of p53-dependent, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3-mediated apoptosis in glioblastoma multiforme cells by a protein kinase Calpha antisense oligonucleotide. Mol. Pharmacol. 1999, 55, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ding, L.; Wang, H.; Lang, W.; Xiao, L. Protein kinase C-epsilon promotes survival of lung cancer cells by suppressing apoptosis through dysregulation of the mitochondrial caspase pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 35305–35313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Martin, P.M.; Hussaini, I.M. PKC eta as a therapeutic target in glioblastoma multiforme. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2005, 9, 299–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, N.; Zhang, W. Protein kinase C beta inhibits autophagy and sensitizes cervical cancer Hela cells to cisplatin. Biosci. Rep. 2017, 37, BSR20160445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Humphries, M.J.; Limesand, K.H.; Schneider, J.C.; Nakayama, K.I.; Anderson, S.M.; Reyland, M.E. Suppression of apoptosis in the protein kinase Cdelta null mouse in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 9728–9737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Yoshida, K.; Wang, H.G.; Miki, Y.; Kufe, D. Protein kinase Cdelta is responsible for constitutive and DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of Rad9. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 1431–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Mazumder, S.; De, R.; Debsharma, S.; Bindu, S.; Maity, P.; Sarkar, S.; Saha, S.J.; Siddiqui, A.A.; Banerjee, C.; Nag, S.; et al. Indomethacin impairs mitochondrial dynamics by activating the PKCzeta-p38-DRP1 pathway and inducing apoptosis in gastric cancer and normal mucosal cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 8238–8258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Datta, R.; Kojima, H.; Yoshida, K.; Kufe, D. Caspase-3-mediated cleavage of protein kinase C theta in induction of apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 20317–20320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Manicassamy, S.; Sun, Z. The critical role of protein kinase C-theta in Fas/Fas ligand-mediated apoptosis. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Choi, S.Y.; Kim, M.J.; Kang, C.M.; Bae, S.; Cho, C.K.; Soh, J.W.; Kim, J.H.; Kang, S.; Chung, H.Y.; Lee, Y.S.; et al. Activation of Bak and Bax through c-abl-protein kinase Cdelta-p38 MAPK signaling in response to ionizing radiation in human non-small cell lung cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 7049–7059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Zhan, B.; Kong, C.; Zhang, Z.; Dong, X.; Zhang, N. Inhibition of PKCalpha reduces the ability of migration of kidney cancer cells but has no impact on cell apoptosis. Exp. Ther. Med. 2017, 13, 2473–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Nakajima, T.; Yukawa, O.; Azuma, C.; Ohyama, H.; Wang, B.; Kojima, S.; Hayata, I.; Hama-Inaba, H. Involvement of protein kinase C-related anti-apoptosis signaling in radiation-induced apoptosis in murine thymic lymphoma(3SBH5) cells. Radiat. Res. 2004, 161, 528–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Umemori, Y.; Kuribayashi, K.; Nirasawa, S.; Kondoh, T.; Tanaka, M.; Kobayashi, D.; Watanabe, N. Protein kinase C zeta regulates survivin expression and inhibits apoptosis in colon cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2014, 45, 1043–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Byerly, J.H.; Port, E.R.; Irie, H.Y. PRKCQ inhibition enhances chemosensitivity of triple-negative breast cancer by regulating Bim. Breast Cancer Res. 2020, 22, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Basu, A. Regulation of Autophagy by Protein Kinase C-epsilon in Breast Cancer Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhou, N.; Wei, Z.; Qi, Z.; Chen, L. Abscisic Acid-Induced Autophagy Selectively via MAPK/JNK Signalling Pathway in Glioblastoma. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2021, 41, 813–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xu, Z.; Han, X.; Ou, D.; Liu, T.; Li, Z.; Jiang, G.; Liu, J.; Zhang, J. Targeting PI3K/AKT/mTOR-mediated autophagy for tumor therapy. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 575–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kudo, Y.; Sugimoto, M.; Arias, E.; Kasashima, H.; Cordes, T.; Linares, J.F.; Duran, A.; Nakanishi, Y.; Nakanishi, N.; L’Hermitte, A.; et al. PKClambda/iota Loss Induces Autophagy, Oxidative Phosphorylation, and NRF2 to Promote Liver Cancer Progression. Cancer Cell 2020, 38, 247–262.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tan, S.H.; Shui, G.; Zhou, J.; Li, J.J.; Bay, B.H.; Wenk, M.R.; Shen, H.M. Induction of autophagy by palmitic acid via protein kinase C-mediated signaling pathway independent of mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin). J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 14364–14376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Deng, Q.; Jiang, L.; Mao, L.; Song, X.H.; He, C.Q.; Li, X.L.; Zhang, Z.H.; Zeng, H.C.; Chen, J.X.; Long, D.X. The role of protein kinase C alpha in tri-ortho-cresyl phosphate-induced autophagy in human neuroblastoma SK-N-SH cells. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2020, 40, 1480–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, F.; Xu, C.; Reece, E.A.; Li, X.; Wu, Y.; Harman, C.; Yu, J.; Dong, D.; Wang, C.; Yang, P.; et al. Protein kinase C-alpha suppresses autophagy and induces neural tube defects via miR-129-2 in diabetic pregnancy. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Wang, T.; Liu, C.; Jia, L. The roles of PKCs in regulating autophagy. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 144, 2303–2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kumar, D.; Shankar, S.; Srivastava, R.K. Rottlerin-induced autophagy leads to the apoptosis in breast cancer stem cells: Molecular mechanisms. Mol. Cancer 2013, 12, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Saberi, B.; Shinohara, M.; Ybanez, M.D.; Hanawa, N.; Gaarde, W.A.; Kaplowitz, N.; Han, D. Regulation of H2O2-induced necrosis by PKC and AMP-activated kinase signaling in primary cultured hepatocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2008, 295, C50–C63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Baek, M.W.; Cho, H.S.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, W.J.; Jung, J.Y. Ascorbic Acid Induces Necrosis in Human Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma via ROS, PKC, and Calcium Signaling. J. Cell. Physiol. 2017, 232, 417–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kim, C.H.; Han, S.I.; Lee, S.Y.; Youk, H.S.; Moon, J.Y.; Duong, H.Q.; Park, M.J.; Joo, Y.M.; Park, H.G.; Kim, Y.J.; et al. Protein kinase C-ERK1/2 signal pathway switches glucose depletion-induced necrosis to apoptosis by regulating superoxide dismutases and suppressing reactive oxygen species production in A549 lung cancer cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2007, 211, 371–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Calcinotto, A.; Kohli, J.; Zagato, E.; Pellegrini, L.; Demaria, M.; Alimonti, A. Cellular Senescence: Aging, Cancer, and Injury. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 1047–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Park, J.W.; Lee, Y.H.; Bae, Y.S. Protein kinase C downregulation induces senescence via FoxO3a inhibition in HCT116 and HEK293 cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 493, 1548–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Paget, J.A.; Restall, I.J.; Daneshmand, M.; Mersereau, J.A.; Simard, M.A.; Parolin, D.A.; Lavictoire, S.J.; Amin, M.S.; Islam, S.; Lorimer, I.A. Repression of cancer cell senescence by PKCiota. Oncogene 2012, 31, 3584–3596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Zurgil, U.; Ben-Ari, A.; Atias, K.; Isakov, N.; Apte, R.; Livneh, E. PKCeta promotes senescence induced by oxidative stress and chemotherapy. Cell Death Dis. 2014, 5, e1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Basu, A.; Pal, D.; Blaydes, R. Differential effects of protein kinase C-eta on apoptosis versus senescence. Cell. Signal. 2019, 55, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dachert, J.; Ehrenfeld, V.; Habermann, K.; Dolgikh, N.; Fulda, S. Targeting ferroptosis in rhabdomyosarcoma cells. Int. J. Cancer 2020, 146, 510–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Thiery, J.P.; Acloque, H.; Huang, R.Y.; Nieto, M.A. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell 2009, 139, 871–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Savagner, P. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenomenon. Ann. Oncol. 2010, 21, vii89–vii92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Singh, R.; Lei, P.; Andreadis, S.T. PKC-delta binds to E-cadherin and mediates EGF-induced cell scattering. Exp. Cell Res. 2009, 315, 2899–2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, J.; Wu, J.; Hong, J.; Chen, R.; Xu, K.; Niu, W.; Peng, C.; Liu, E.; Wang, J.; Liu, S.; et al. PKC promotes the migration of colon cancer cells by regulating the internalization and recycling of integrin alphavbeta6. Cancer Lett. 2011, 311, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kim, S.; Chun, S.Y.; Kwon, Y.S.; Nam, K.S. Crosstalk between Wnt signaling and Phorbol ester-mediated PKC signaling in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2016, 77, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lin, C.W.; Shen, S.C.; Chien, C.C.; Yang, L.Y.; Shia, L.T.; Chen, Y.C. 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-induced invasion/migration of glioblastoma cells through activating PKCalpha/ERK/NF-kappaB-dependent MMP-9 expression. J. Cell Physiol. 2010, 225, 472–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gunaratne, A.; Thai, B.L.; di Guglielmo, G.M. Atypical protein kinase C phosphorylates Par6 and facilitates transforming growth factor beta-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 33, 874–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Jain, K.; Basu, A. Protein Kinase C-epsilon Promotes EMT in Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer 2014, 8, 61–67. [Google Scholar]
  79. Qi, H.; Sun, B.; Zhao, X.; Du, J.; Gu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, R.; Dong, X. Wnt5a promotes vasculogenic mimicry and epithelial-mesenchymal transition via protein kinase Calpha in epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2014, 32, 771–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Qian, Y.; Yao, W.; Yang, T.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, J.; Qi, W.; Wang, J. aPKC-iota/P-Sp1/Snail signaling induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition and immunosuppression in cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology 2017, 66, 1165–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Tian, L.; Deng, Z.; Xu, L.; Yang, T.; Yao, W.; Ji, L.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J. Downregulation of ASPP2 promotes gallbladder cancer metastasis and macrophage recruitment via aPKC-iota/GLI1 pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Pfeifhofer, C.; Gruber, T.; Letschka, T.; Thuille, N.; Lutz-Nicoladoni, C.; Hermann-Kleiter, N.; Braun, U.; Leitges, M.; Baier, G. Defective IgG2a/2b class switching in PKC alpha-/- mice. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 6004–6011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Thuille, N.; Gruber, T.; Bock, G.; Leitges, M.; Baier, G. Protein kinase C beta is dispensable for TCR-signaling. Mol. Immunol. 2004, 41, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Wallace, J.A.; Pitarresi, J.R.; Sharma, N.; Palettas, M.; Cuitino, M.C.; Sizemore, S.T.; Yu, L.; Sanderlin, A.; Rosol, T.J.; Mehta, K.D.; et al. Protein kinase C Beta in the tumor microenvironment promotes mammary tumorigenesis. Front. Oncol. 2014, 4, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Martini, S.; Pozzi, G.; Carubbi, C.; Masselli, E.; Galli, D.; Di Nuzzo, S.; Banchini, A.; Gobbi, G.; Vitale, M.; Mirandola, P. PKCepsilon promotes human Th17 differentiation: Implications in the pathophysiology of psoriasis. Eur. J. Immunol. 2018, 48, 644–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Brezar, V.; Tu, W.J.; Seddiki, N. PKC-Theta in Regulatory and Effector T-cell Functions. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Kong, K.F.; Fu, G.; Zhang, Y.; Yokosuka, T.; Casas, J.; Canonigo-Balancio, A.J.; Becart, S.; Kim, G.; Yates, J.R., 3rd; Kronenberg, M.; et al. Protein kinase C-eta controls CTLA-4-mediated regulatory T cell function. Nat. Immunol. 2014, 15, 465–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Martin, J.D.; Fukumura, D.; Duda, D.G.; Boucher, Y.; Jain, R.K. Reengineering the Tumor Microenvironment to Alleviate Hypoxia and Overcome Cancer Heterogeneity. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect Med. 2016, 6, a027094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Sledge, G.W., Jr.; Gokmen-Polar, Y. Protein kinase C-beta as a therapeutic target in breast cancer. Semin. Oncol. 2006, 33, S15–S18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kim, J.; Choi, Y.L.; Vallentin, A.; Hunrichs, B.S.; Hellerstein, M.K.; Peehl, D.M.; Mochly-Rosen, D. Centrosomal PKCbetaII and pericentrin are critical for human prostate cancer growth and angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 6831–6839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Cheng, J.; He, S.; Wang, M.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, Z.; Feng, X.; Yu, Y.; Ma, J.; Dai, C.; Zhang, S.; et al. The Caspase-3/PKCdelta/Akt/VEGF-A Signaling Pathway Mediates Tumor Repopulation during Radiotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 3732–3743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Pavlova, N.N.; Thompson, C.B. The Emerging Hallmarks of Cancer Metabolism. Cell Metab. 2016, 23, 27–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Warburg, O.; Wind, F.; Negelein, E. The Metabolism of Tumors in the Body. J. Gen. Physiol. 1927, 8, 519–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. DeBerardinis, R.J.; Cheng, T. Q’s next: The diverse functions of glutamine in metabolism, cell biology and cancer. Oncogene 2010, 29, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Tandon, M.; Othman, A.H.; Winogradzki, M.; Pratap, J. Bone metastatic breast cancer cells display downregulation of PKC-zeta with enhanced glutamine metabolism. Gene 2021, 775, 145419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ma, L.; Tao, Y.; Duran, A.; Llado, V.; Galvez, A.; Barger, J.F.; Castilla, E.A.; Chen, J.; Yajima, T.; Porollo, A.; et al. Control of nutrient stress-induced metabolic reprogramming by PKCzeta in tumorigenesis. Cell 2013, 152, 599–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Ma, D.; Wang, P.; Fang, Q.; Yu, Z.; Zhou, Z.; He, Z.; Wei, D.; Yu, K.; Lu, T.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Low-dose staurosporine selectively reverses BCR-ABL-independent IM resistance through PKC-alpha-mediated G2/M phase arrest in chronic myeloid leukaemia. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2018, 46, S208–S216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ge, X.; Chen, J.; Li, L.; Ding, P.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, W.; Li, L.; Lv, X.; Zhou, D.; Jiang, Z.; et al. Midostaurin potentiates rituximab antitumor activity in Burkitt’s lymphoma by inducing apoptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 10, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Koh, J.; Kubota, T.; Migita, T.; Abe, S.; Hashimoto, M.; Hosoda, Y.; Kitajima, M. UCN-01 (7-hydroxystaurosporine) inhibits the growth of human breast cancer xenografts through disruption of signal transduction. Breast Cancer 2002, 9, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Edelman, M.J.; Bauer, K.S., Jr.; Wu, S.; Smith, R.; Bisacia, S.; Dancey, J. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of 7-hydroxystaurosporine and carboplatin in advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 2667–2674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Kortmansky, J.; Shah, M.A.; Kaubisch, A.; Weyerbacher, A.; Yi, S.; Tong, W.; Sowers, R.; Gonen, M.; O’Reilly, E.; Kemeny, N.; et al. Phase I trial of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor and protein kinase C inhibitor 7-hydroxystaurosporine in combination with Fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005, 23, 1875–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wu, X.; Li, J.; Zhu, M.; Fletcher, J.A.; Hodi, F.S. Protein kinase C inhibitor AEB071 targets ocular melanoma harboring GNAQ mutations via effects on the PKC/Erk1/2 and PKC/NF-kappaB pathways. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2012, 11, 1905–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Giovannetti, E.; Honeywell, R.; Hanauske, A.R.; Tekle, C.; Kuenen, B.; Sigmond, J.; Giaccone, G.; Peters, G.J. Pharmacological aspects of the enzastaurin-pemetrexed combination in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Curr. Drug Targets 2010, 11, 12–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Griner, E.M.; Kazanietz, M.G. Protein kinase C and other diacylglycerol effectors in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2007, 7, 281–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Oskoueian, E.; Abdullah, N.; Ahmad, S. Phorbol esters from Jatropha meal triggered apoptosis, activated PKC-delta, caspase-3 proteins and down-regulated the proto-oncogenes in MCF-7 and HeLa cancer cell lines. Molecules 2012, 17, 10816–10830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Newton, A.C. Protein kinase C: Perfectly balanced. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018, 53, 208–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Marshall, J.L.; Bangalore, N.; El-Ashry, D.; Fuxman, Y.; Johnson, M.; Norris, B.; Oberst, M.; Ness, E.; Wojtowicz-Praga, S.; Bhargava, P.; et al. Phase I study of prolonged infusion Bryostatin-1 in patients with advanced malignancies. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2002, 1, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Garcia-Bermejo, M.L.; Leskow, F.C.; Fujii, T.; Wang, Q.; Blumberg, P.M.; Ohba, M.; Kuroki, T.; Han, K.C.; Lee, J.; Marquez, V.E.; et al. Diacylglycerol (DAG)-lactones, a new class of protein kinase C (PKC) agonists, induce apoptosis in LNCaP prostate cancer cells by selective activation of PKCalpha. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Hamada, M.; Sumi, T.; Iwai, S.; Nakazawa, M.; Yura, Y. Induction of endonuclease G-mediated apopotosis in human oral squamous cell carcinoma cells by protein kinase C inhibitor safingol. Apoptosis 2006, 11, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Dickson, M.A.; Carvajal, R.D.; Merrill, A.H., Jr.; Gonen, M.; Cane, L.M.; Schwartz, G.K. A phase I clinical trial of safingol in combination with cisplatin in advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 2484–2492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Hofmann, J.; O’Connor, P.M.; Jackman, J.; Schubert, C.; Ueberall, F.; Kohn, K.W.; Grunicke, H. The protein kinase C inhibitor ilmofosine (BM 41 440) arrests cells in G2 phase and suppresses CDC2 kinase activation through a mechanism different from that of DNA damaging agents. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1994, 199, 937–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Hanauske, A.R.; Degen, D.; Marshall, M.H.; Hilsenbeck, S.G.; McPhillips, J.J.; Von Hoff, D.D. Preclinical activity of ilmofosine against human tumor colony forming units in vitro. Anticancer Drugs 1992, 3, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Giantonio, B.J.; Derry, C.; McAleer, C.; McPhillips, J.J.; O’Dwyer, P.J. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the cytotoxic ether lipid ilmofosine administered by weekly two-hour infusion in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004, 10, 1282–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Woolley, P.V.; Schultz, C.J.; Rodriguez, G.I.; Gams, R.A.; Rowe, K.W., Jr.; Dadey, M.L.; Von Hoff, D.D.; McPhillips, J.J. A phase II trial of ilmofosine in non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma. Investig. New Drugs 1996, 14, 219–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Leighl, N.B.; Dent, S.; Clemons, M.; Vandenberg, T.A.; Tozer, R.; Warr, D.G.; Crump, R.M.; Hedley, D.; Pond, G.R.; Dancey, J.E.; et al. A Phase 2 study of perifosine in advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2008, 108, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Karagul, M.I.; Aktas, S.; Yilmaz, S.N.; Yetkin, D.; Celikcan, H.D.; Cevik, O.S. Perifosine and vitamin D combination induces apoptotic and non-apoptotic cell death in endometrial cancer cells. EXCLI J. 2020, 19, 532–546. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  117. Knowling, M.; Blackstein, M.; Tozer, R.; Bramwell, V.; Dancey, J.; Dore, N.; Matthews, S.; Eisenhauer, E. A phase II study of perifosine (D-21226) in patients with previously untreated metastatic or locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma: A National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group trial. Investig. New Drugs 2006, 24, 435–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Regala, R.P.; Thompson, E.A.; Fields, A.P. Atypical protein kinase C iota expression and aurothiomalate sensitivity in human lung cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 5888–5895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Ma, C.Q.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.M.; Du, G.S.; Shen, Q.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Hu, J.L.; Zhu, P.; Qi, W.P.; et al. The aPKCiota blocking agent ATM negatively regulates EMT and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2014, 5, e1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Trani, M.; Sorrentino, A.; Busch, C.; Landstrom, M. Pro-apoptotic effect of aurothiomalate in prostate cancer cells. Cell Cycle 2009, 8, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Castanotto, D.; Stein, C.A. Antisense oligonucleotides in cancer. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2014, 26, 584–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Roychowdhury, D.; Lahn, M. Antisense therapy directed to protein kinase C-alpha (Affinitak, LY900003/ISIS 3521): Potential role in breast cancer. Semin Oncol. 2003, 30, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Rao, S.; Watkins, D.; Cunningham, D.; Dunlop, D.; Johnson, P.; Selby, P.; Hancock, B.W.; Fegan, C.; Culligan, D.; Schey, S.; et al. Phase II study of ISIS 3521, an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide to protein kinase C alpha, in patients with previously treated low-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2004, 15, 1413–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Marshall, J.L.; Eisenberg, S.G.; Johnson, M.D.; Hanfelt, J.; Dorr, F.A.; El-Ashry, D.; Oberst, M.; Fuxman, Y.; Holmlund, J.; Malik, S. A phase II trial of ISIS 3521 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2004, 4, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Cripps, M.C.; Figueredo, A.T.; Oza, A.M.; Taylor, M.J.; Fields, A.L.; Holmlund, J.T.; McIntosh, L.W.; Geary, R.S.; Eisenhauer, E.A. Phase II randomized study of ISIS 3521 and ISIS 5132 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer: A National Cancer Institute of Canada clinical trials group study. Clin Cancer Res 2002, 8, 2188–2192. [Google Scholar]
  126. Newton, A.C.; Brognard, J. Reversing the Paradigm: Protein Kinase C as a Tumor Suppressor. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 38, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Cancers 14 01104 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the structure of protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms. The PKC family members are classified into three subfamilies according to their cofactor dependence: (i) conventional or classical PKC isozymes (cPKCs), including PKCα, PKCβ1, PKCβ2 and PKCγ, which are calcium-dependent and activated by both diacylglycerol (DAG) and phosphatidylserine (PS); (ii) novel PKC isozymes (nPKCs), including PKCδ, PKCε, PKCη and PKCθ, which are calcium-independent and regulated by DAG and PS; and (iii) atypical PKC isozymes (aPKCs), including PKCζ and PKCλ/ι, which are calcium-independent and do not require DAG for activation, although PS can regulate their activity.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the structure of protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms. The PKC family members are classified into three subfamilies according to their cofactor dependence: (i) conventional or classical PKC isozymes (cPKCs), including PKCα, PKCβ1, PKCβ2 and PKCγ, which are calcium-dependent and activated by both diacylglycerol (DAG) and phosphatidylserine (PS); (ii) novel PKC isozymes (nPKCs), including PKCδ, PKCε, PKCη and PKCθ, which are calcium-independent and regulated by DAG and PS; and (iii) atypical PKC isozymes (aPKCs), including PKCζ and PKCλ/ι, which are calcium-independent and do not require DAG for activation, although PS can regulate their activity.
Cancers 14 01104 g001
Cancers 14 01104 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the activation of protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms. Before activation, PKC isoforms need to be maturated by 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1). Under physiological conditions, PKC can be activated by interacting with extracellular agonists, such as hormones, cytokines and growth factors, which sequentially translocates to different subcellular compartments, thus conferring specific substrate phosphorylation and distinct cellular functions. The translocation of PKC is regulated by anchoring/scaffolding proteins to ensure proper spatio-temporal distribution of PKC isoforms. Receptors for activated C kinase (RACKs) are intracellular scaffolding proteins that bind to individual PKC isoforms following their activation and provide anchorage of each isoform next to its physiological substrates. Subsequently, the translocated PKC phosphorylates specific substrates, such as membrane-associated phospholipase C (PLC), which hydrolyzes the membrane phospholipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to generate diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3). IP3 then interacts with the inositol trisphosphate receptor (InsP3R) and triggers the rapid release of Ca2+ from the intracellular store to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). DAG is phosphorylated by diacylglycerol kinases (DGK) and converts to phosphatidic acid (PA) in a reaction that terminates PKC-regulated signals.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the activation of protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms. Before activation, PKC isoforms need to be maturated by 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1). Under physiological conditions, PKC can be activated by interacting with extracellular agonists, such as hormones, cytokines and growth factors, which sequentially translocates to different subcellular compartments, thus conferring specific substrate phosphorylation and distinct cellular functions. The translocation of PKC is regulated by anchoring/scaffolding proteins to ensure proper spatio-temporal distribution of PKC isoforms. Receptors for activated C kinase (RACKs) are intracellular scaffolding proteins that bind to individual PKC isoforms following their activation and provide anchorage of each isoform next to its physiological substrates. Subsequently, the translocated PKC phosphorylates specific substrates, such as membrane-associated phospholipase C (PLC), which hydrolyzes the membrane phospholipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to generate diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3). IP3 then interacts with the inositol trisphosphate receptor (InsP3R) and triggers the rapid release of Ca2+ from the intracellular store to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). DAG is phosphorylated by diacylglycerol kinases (DGK) and converts to phosphatidic acid (PA) in a reaction that terminates PKC-regulated signals.
Cancers 14 01104 g002
Table
Table 1. Inhibitors of PKC isoforms.
Table 1. Inhibitors of PKC isoforms.
StructureNameSpecificityInhibition Mechanism
Cancers 14 01104 i001StaurosporinePan-PKCscompetitive interfere with the ATP binding site
Cancers 14 01104 i002Midostaurin
(PKC412, CGP41251, N-benzoylstaurosporine)		cPKCs, nPKCscompetitive interfere with the ATP binding site
Cancers 14 01104 i0037-Hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01)cPKCs, nPKCscompetitive interfere with the ATP binding site
Cancers 14 01104 i004Sotrastaurin
(AEB071)		PKCα, β, θ, δcompetitive interfere with the ATP binding site
Cancers 14 01104 i005Enzastaurin
(LY317615)		PKCβcompetitive interfere with the ATP binding site
Cancers 14 01104 i006Bryostatin 1PKCα, PKCε, and PKCηcompetitive interfere with the phorbol ester binding site
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, S.; Li, Q.; Huang, Q.; Cheng, J. Targeting Protein Kinase C for Cancer Therapy. Cancers 2022, 14, 1104. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051104

AMA Style

He S, Li Q, Huang Q, Cheng J. Targeting Protein Kinase C for Cancer Therapy. Cancers. 2022; 14(5):1104. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051104

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Sijia, Qi Li, Qian Huang, and Jin Cheng. 2022. "Targeting Protein Kinase C for Cancer Therapy" Cancers 14, no. 5: 1104. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051104

APA Style

He, S., Li, Q., Huang, Q., & Cheng, J. (2022). Targeting Protein Kinase C for Cancer Therapy. Cancers, 14(5), 1104. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051104

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop