Next Article in Journal
Clinical Characterization of a Table Mounted Range Shifter Board for Synchrotron-Based Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Pediatric Craniospinal Irradiation
Next Article in Special Issue
Macrophage-Based Therapeutic Strategies in Hematologic Malignancies
Previous Article in Journal
Discordant and Converting Receptor Expressions in Brain Metastases from Breast Cancer: MRI-Based Non-Invasive Receptor Status Tracking
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Combination of High-Resolution Structures for the B Cell Receptor and Co-Receptors Provides an Understanding of Their Interactions with Therapeutic Antibodies

Cancers 2023, 15(11), 2881; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15112881
by Puja Bhattacharyya 1,2, Richard I. Christopherson 3, Kristen K. Skarratt 1,4, Jake Z. Chen 5,6, Thomas Balle 5,6 and Stephen J. Fuller 1,4,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Cancers 2023, 15(11), 2881; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15112881
Submission received: 19 April 2023 / Revised: 19 May 2023 / Accepted: 19 May 2023 / Published: 23 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tumor Microenvironment and Treatment Resistance)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Bhattacharyya et al provide a well written and comprehensive review of the structure and function of components of the B cell receptor (BCR) and an overview of BCR-targeted therapeutics, primarily antibody-based. I have only minor comments.

·         Although the title stresses the use of high-resolution structures to help guide development of such therapeutics, this is not really discussed. For example, in section 2.4., it would be good to add some commentary around how novel IgM BCR epitopes revealed by cryo-EM structures may help guide development of improved therapeutics. Similarly, in section 3, it would be good to discuss how knowledge of CD19 structure in complex with antibody has helped understanding of MOA and/or may help guide therapeutic development.

·         Line 70; monoclonal antibodies can also induce phagocytosis (ADCP) and direct cell killing – for example see work by Mark Cragg and others on CD20 antibodies.

·         First sentence paragraph 2.2 is a little misleading: The antibodies discussed  are not tumour specific they are B cell specific.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a timely and well-written article combining recently obtained insights into the architecture of the BCR with new perspectives of designing antibody-based tools to interfere with B cell malignancies. Also, the concise summary of BCR signaling events is appreciated. Hence, this review will be of interest for the community of basic researchers and clinicians alike. 

I have only minor comments/recommendations.

- Firstly, authors describe antigen-induced BCR signaling as compared to "tonic" BCR signaling, but the latter appears a little bit under-represented. I am aware that the nature of tonic BCR signaling is still mysterious (even though PI3K has been suggested to play a role). However, the role of tonic and chronic BCR signaling for the survival of certain B lymphoma cells could be a bit more detailed.

- Secondly, authors carefully distinguish between the various BCR isotypes. However, the role of the IgG-BCR class and its unique signaling properties as a prototypic memory type BCR appears should be discussed.

- Lastly, given the key role of Ig-alpha and Ig-beta and their ITAM- and non-ITAM based signaling elements, citing the original publications would be appropriate.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop