Next Article in Journal
The Impact of ETV6-NTRK3 Oncogenic Gene Fusions on Molecular and Signaling Pathway Alterations
Next Article in Special Issue
Editorial: Special Issue on the Epidemiology of Human Papilloma Virus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
Immunotherapy for Colorectal Cancer with High Microsatellite Instability: The Ongoing Search for Biomarkers
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Lack of Standardized Outcomes for Surgical Salvage of HPV-Positive Recurrent Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Scoping Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Barriers to Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Initiation and Completion among Adults Aged 18–26 Years in a Large Healthcare System

1
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
2
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy
3
Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
4
Department of Clinical Analytics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2023, 15(17), 4243; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15174243
Submission received: 21 July 2023 / Revised: 20 August 2023 / Accepted: 22 August 2023 / Published: 24 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epidemiology of HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This study investigated HPV vaccination rates and associated factors among 265,554 patients aged 18–26 within a large healthcare system. Alarmingly, only 30% had completed the vaccine series, far below national averages and targets. Significant disparities were found, with males less likely to be vaccinated than females and Black Americans less likely to complete vaccination despite higher initiation rates. Many patients remained unvaccinated despite recent primary care visits, highlighting missed opportunities. Low uptake, particularly among males, and disparities emphasize the urgent need for targeted interventions to improve provider communication and community education around HPV risks and vaccine benefits to increase vaccination coverage in this population.

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a common sexually transmitted infection, with over 40% prevalence in the US. Oropharyngeal cancers (OPCs) driven by high-risk HPV are increasing (up to 90%), with HPV vaccination being the only prevention available. The aim of this study was to investigate HPV vaccination among patients aged between 18 and 26 years old with at least one encounter at a large healthcare system and identify sociodemographic factors associated with vaccine initiation and completion. A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted between 2018 and 2021, including 265,554 patients identified from the Clinical Data Warehouse. HPV vaccination status by age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance type, primary care (PCP) visits in the past year, alcohol, tobacco, illicit drug use, and age at vaccination was examined. Overall, 33.6% of females and 25.4% of males have completed the HPV vaccine. Black Americans were 35% more likely to initiate the vaccine than White Americans but were less likely to complete the entire course. Overall, HPV vaccination prevalence was far below the Health People 2030 goal of 80%, especially in young males. This low rate is troubling, since many patients had a PCP visit and remained unvaccinated, which serves as a missed opportunity for vaccination.

1. Introduction

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States (US), with over 40% of people infected [1]. The symptoms of HPV infection vary depending on the site and subtype of the virus, ranging from a benign wart to an HPV-associated malignancy. HPV is a known cause of certain types of cancer like cervical cancer and vaginal, vulvar, anal, penile, and oropharyngeal cancers. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), more than 45,000 annual cases of HPV-related malignancies are diagnosed yearly. While primary and secondary prevention strategies have significantly reduced the incidence of HPV-associated cervical cancer [2], the rates of other HPV-associated cancers, especially oropharyngeal cancer, which is now the most common cancer caused by HPV [3], have been increasing in recent years [4]. Moreover, it has been suggested that women who have undergone prior treatment for cervical precancerous lesions could face an elevated risk of developing subsequent HPV-associated malignancies [5]. Nonetheless, there is limited understanding regarding the extent of risk associated with these secondary tumors, as well as the efficacy of HPV vaccination in individuals who have already received treatment.
HPV vaccination is highly effective and recommended for boys and girls between 11 and 12 years old and can be started at nine years old, with catch-up vaccines at the age of 26. Vaccination is the only primary prevention available for oropharyngeal cancer. While HPV vaccination is not recommended after 26 years of age, some patients between 27 and 45 years old could benefit depending on whether they were vaccinated adequately when younger after discussing it with their physician [6]. HPV vaccination can provide benefits even in cases of an existing infection. Remarkably, it has shown the capability to diminish the risk of a persistent HPV infection and aid in the regression of cervical precancerous lesions [7]. Furthermore, it appears to play a role in decreasing the prevalence of high-risk HPV genotype infections among individuals who have previously tested positive for them [8]. In 2020, 54.5% of adolescents aged between 13 and 15 years old had received at least two or three vaccine doses [9,10], far from the Healthy People 2030 goal of 80%.
In this study, an estimate is provided of HPV vaccination uptake among eligible adults aged between 18 and 26 years old within the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) hospital system, which is a large private healthcare system operating multiple hospitals. The aim was to identify which sociodemographic factors are associated with low vaccination initiation and completion in this population to reduce the burden of diseases related to HPV in vulnerable populations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

Data were collected from Clinical Data Warehouse, an extensive database that stores healthcare data from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted between 2018 and 2021, including 265,554 patients aged between 18 and 26, who received the vaccine either from their primary care physician, pediatrician, or upon direct request to pharmacies. Patients with inconsistent reporting of gender were excluded in order to ensure data integrity and analytical accuracy. The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Review Board reviewed and approved this study.

2.2. Data and Measurement

The primary outcome of this study was HPV vaccination status, classified as none, initiated, and completed (3 doses). Several factors were investigated, including age, gender, race/ethnicity, type of insurance (private, Medicaid, and others), number of primary care (PCP) visits in the past year, and alcohol and tobacco use. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) 2020, which measures the level of deprivation in the census block group geographic area with a ranking of 1, indicating the lowest level of “disadvantage” within the nation, and an ADI with a ranking of 100, indicating the highest level of “disadvantage”, was also included. Race/ethnicity was classified as Hispanic/Latino (all races), Non-Hispanic (NH) White, NH Black, NH Asian, NH Native American, other, and refused. Additionally, age was classified at first vaccination with the following categories: a recommended age between 11 and 12 years old; early vaccination, 9 years old; early adherent, 9 to 10 years; catch-up, 13–18 years old; and a catch-up between 18 and 26 years old.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The median (interquartile range (IQR)) for continuous variables and counts, and percentages for categorical variables were calculated. The prevalence of HPV vaccination was assessed in the study population and was stratified using the chi-square test for descriptive statistics. A Poisson regression with robust standard errors was performed to calculate prevalence ratios and examine risk factors associated with vaccine initiation and completion. The statistical analysis was conducted using R software for statistical computing (R version 4.3.1). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. HPV Vaccination Initiation Is More Common among Black Americans Than White Americans

A total of 104,426 patients, with a mean age of 21.89 ± 2.63 years old, received at least one vaccination dose (Table 1).
Overall, 42.2% (67,034) of all the females in the study population received a dose of the HPV vaccine. Females were 37% more likely (PR: 1.37 (95% CI 1.35–1.38)) to initiate the vaccine than males were. When examining vaccination by race, NH Black Americans were 35% more likely (PR: 1.35 (95% CI 1.33–1.37)) to initiate the vaccine compared to NH White Americans. No difference was found regarding insurance, where 40.7% (85,991) and 40.4% (14,109) of patients covered by private insurance and Medicaid initiated the vaccine, respectively. However, in the adjusted model, patients with Medicaid coverage were 8% less likely (PR: 0.92 (95% CI 0.91–0.94)) to initiate the vaccine than those with private insurance coverage. A PCP visit was important for vaccination, where 49.2% of patients who visited a PCP in the past year had received at least one dose of the vaccine, compared to 33.1% who received a vaccine dose with no PCP visit. When stratified by gender (Table 2), 53.9% (9342) of NH Black females and 43.3% (53,923) of NH White females initiated the vaccine. In contrast, 44.7% (4597) of NH Black males and 36.7% (30,678) of NH White males initiated the vaccine.

3.2. Characteristics of Patients by HPV Vaccination Completion

A total of 80,480 patients completed the HPV vaccination (Table 3).
Females who completed the full HPV vaccine accounted for a prevalence of 79.6% (53,369). Females were 10% more likely (PR: 1.10 (95% CI 1.09–1.11)) to complete the vaccination than males were. Among NH Black Americans, 68.5% (n = 9551) completed the entire vaccine course, while NH White Americans had a completion percentage of 78.8% (n = 66,668). NH Black Americans were 11% less likely (PR: 0.89 (95% CI 0.88–0.9)) to complete the entire vaccination course when compared to NH White Americans. Patients with private insurance were more likely to complete the HPV vaccine course (78.1%, n = 67,134) than patients with Medicaid (72.2%, n = 10,184) or another type of insurance (73.1%, n = 3162). When adjusted, patients with Medicaid coverage were less likely (PR: 0.96 (95% CI 0.95–0.98)) to complete the vaccine than those with private insurance coverage. Out of the patients who did not have a PCP visit in the past year, 75.5% (40,631) completed the entire vaccine course. Conversely, among patients who visited a PCP, 78.7% (39,849) completed the vaccine. Gender stratification is shown in Table 4.
Completion rates were lower among NH Black individuals compared to those of NH White individuals. Specifically, 71.4% (6670) of NH Black females and 62.7% (2881) of NH Black males completed the HPV vaccine, whereas 81.4% (43,886) of NH White females and 74.3% (22,782) of White males completed the vaccine. NH Black females and males had similar prevalence ratios of 0.89 (95% CI 0.88–0.91) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.85–0.90), respectively, indicating that they were less likely than their White counterparts to complete the HPV vaccine.

3.3. Characteristics of Patients by Age at First Vaccination

A total of 25.1% (13,904) of the females received their vaccine dose during the routine age range of 11–12 years old, compared to 15.4% (5004) of the males (Table 5).
Among females, 55.5% (30,807) received their first vaccine dose between the ages of 13 and 17 years (in the catch-up group), while among males, the prevalence was 67.9% (22,109) in this category. When considering races, NH Black Americans had the highest rate of vaccine initiation at early routine age (5.9% (671)) and routine age (25.5% (2916)). NH White Americans had the highest prevalence (61.8% (44,216)) of vaccination during the catch-up phase (13–17 years old). Of the patients who did not visit a PCP, 25.3% (11,224) received the first vaccine dose in the routine age, while 17.6% (7648) of the patients who visited a PCP were in the routine group. Among patients who received the first dose during the routine group, 27.7% (3211) of patients were covered by Medicaid, the highest insurance type rate in this group. In comparison, private insurance had a prevalence of 20.5% (14,938) in the routine group.

4. Discussion

The present study aimed to investigate HPV vaccination among patients aged between 18 and 26 years old with at least one encounter at a large healthcare system and identify sociodemographic factors associated with vaccine initiation and completion. In the current sample of 265,554 patients, only 30.3% (80,480) of participants reported having completed the HPV vaccine, while 9.0% (23,946) reported having initiated the HPV vaccine. These rates are substantially lower than the Healthy People 2030 goal of 80%. Moreover, it was found that males were 37% less likely than females to initiate and 10% less likely to complete the vaccination schedule. Although the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended routine vaccination for males in 2011, vaccination rates for males remain well below those for females. This highlights the importance of further implementing policies to increase male vaccination rates.
In the United States (US), HPV vaccination coverage has been below the recommended optimal levels. Moreover, HPV coverage rates may differ by region and US state. Southern and Midwestern states have exhibited lower rates of HPV vaccination than other states [11,12]. The exact reasons behind geographic disparities in vaccination rates are poorly understood. It seems unlikely that affordability issues are the only factors accounting for lower uptake of HPV vaccines between regions, as the Vaccines for Children program ensures coverage of vaccination costs. In addition, rural populations lag behind urban populations in both vaccine initiation and completion [13,14]. Data from the 2020 National Immunization Survey-Teen (NIS-Teen) showed that vaccination coverage was lower among adolescents living in non-metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) compared to that of those living in MSA cities [15]. Different barriers to HPV vaccine uptake among rural residents could include poor awareness regarding cancer risks and prevention, significant stigma about sexually transmitted infections, fewer health insurance options, and limited access to healthcare providers and preventive care [16,17,18].
Several studies have demonstrated that racial and ethnic minority populations are less likely to receive vaccine recommendations from healthcare providers [19,20,21,22,23,24]. However, it was found that Black Americans were more likely to initiate the HPV vaccine than White Americans and other race and ethnicities. A possible explanation is that healthcare providers in this region have implemented targeted interventions to increase HPV vaccination rates in minority communities [25,26]. In an urban family medicine residency practice in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, a project was conducted from November 2015 to October 2016 to enhance HPV vaccination rates among 9–26-year-old patients from low-income minority populations. Strategies employed included integrating HPV vaccination promotion with community center events (community center mash-ups), sensory-based incentives for interactive vaccine promotion (for example petting a pup or striking a gong after receiving the vaccine), provider training programs, seasonal changing posters, and standing orders for non-physician healthcare professionals to administer the vaccine. As a result, there was a significant 11.3% increase in HPV vaccine initiation and a 12.5% increase in completion rates. [26]. Nevertheless, it was found that despite higher initiation rates among Black Americans, they exhibited lower completion rates. This result aligns with a previous meta-analysis indicating that ethnic/racial minorities tend to have higher vaccine initiation rates but lower completion rates than their White counterparts [27]. This discrepancy might be explained by factors such as a lack of informed discussion about HPV by providers, lack of a regular site of care, less continuity with the same provider, and vaccine hesitancy [27,28,29,30,31,32].
Vaccine hesitancy (i.e., a delay in acceptance or the refusal of vaccination despite the availability of vaccination services) is a crucial barrier to HPV vaccination. In a recent study conducted by Szilagyi et al. [31], it was found that around 23% of parents in the United States with adolescents aged 11–17 displayed hesitancy towards the HPV vaccine, and this hesitancy was strongly linked to a lower likelihood of their adolescents receiving the vaccine [31]. However, it is worth noting that vaccine hesitancy alone does not fully explain the phenomenon of non-vaccination, as the study also revealed that up to 20% of hesitant parents reported that their adolescents still received at least one dose of the HPV vaccine. Moreover, the exact relationship between vaccine hesitancy and sociodemographic factors must be clarified. Indeed, some authors found that the likelihood of delaying/refusing the HPV vaccine was higher among White Americans with higher incomes [33]. In contrast, others in high-income Hispanic communities were characterized by lower hesitancy [31].
Socioeconomic status and health insurance coverage play an important role in vaccination rates. The cost of vaccination is widely recognized as a significant obstacle to initiating and completing the HPV vaccination series in the US [34]. Indeed, a systematic review by Rambout and colleagues found that cost is the primary factor hindering access to the vaccine [35]. Interestingly, most patients in this area presented a relatively high deprivation rate (ADI with a median of 69). However, a previous meta-analysis suggested that the absence of health insurance is even more critical than income in predicting non-vaccination, which has significant implications for vaccination strategies [36]. Accordingly, an association was found between insurance type and HPV vaccination status in this study. The findings showed that private insurance patients were less likely to initiate HPV vaccination than patients with other insurance types. However, patients with private insurance were found to be more prone to complete HPV vaccination than those with either Medicaid or another insurance type. Interestingly, Sriram et al. also found that adolescents with private health insurance coverage displayed a lower likelihood of receiving the HPV vaccine compared to that of those covered by Medicaid health insurance plans [37]. Conversely, data from the 2019 NIS-Teen showed that adolescents with Medicaid were more likely to complete HPV vaccination than those with private insurance or without insurance [38]. One possible explanation for this disparity could be the Medicaid expansion facilitated by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2014, which provided newly eligible enrollees with access to HPV vaccine coverage [39]. However, the exact reasons underlying the observed differences in HPV vaccine uptake across various insurance coverages remain uncertain. Thus, further investigation is necessary to explore the potential impact of restrictions imposed by private insurance companies on the acceptance of HPV vaccines.
According to a study by Berdnarczyk et al. [40], approximately 4% of US adolescents initiated the HPV vaccine between the ages of 9 and 10, whereas 51% began receiving the vaccine between the ages of 11 and 12. Moreover, although most of those initiating vaccination before age 14 eventually completed the series (>85% by age 17), only 20% of those starting the series at 15 or older achieved series completion. This study showed that 1.5% of males and 5.6% of females received their first HPV vaccine dose between 9 and 10 years old, while most patients received their first dose between 13 and 17 years old (55.5% of females and 67.9% of males). It was also found that despite the recommended age for vaccination initiation being 11–12 years old, the vaccine initiation rate was only 25.1% for females and 15.4% for males within that specific age group. This highlights the urgent need to collaborate and raise awareness about the importance of HPV vaccination and the recommended age for initiation by launching an educational campaign targeting healthcare providers, parents, and schools.
Finally, it has been demonstrated that access to a primary care provider is a crucial factor associated with improved HPV vaccination rates [41], which was also seen in this study. There is a need for further interventions to assist providers in recommending HPV vaccination effectively and efficiently. These interventions should account for factors that might influence HPV vaccine uptake, both provider- and patient-related. Provider-related factors might include time constraints, knowledge of the vaccine, self-efficacy in discussing the vaccine, and confidence in its efficacy. On the other hand, patient-related factors might include trust issues, perceived high cost, perceived side effects, and concerns about adolescent sexual activity [42]. From this perspective, it is imperative to implement education and training programs to overcome these existing limitations.
Despite its strengths and significant research findings, this study has some limitations. First, as this is a cross-sectional descriptive study, causality cannot be inferred from the observed associations. Second, the study focuses on patients aged 18–26 years with at least one encounter at a large healthcare system. Thus, the observed trends may not be generalizable and fully represent the wider population. Finally, HPV status was abstracted from the clinical intake forms, which is subject to potential misclassification by recall and may have introduced bias that can impact validity accuracy. However, the subjects were also randomly sampled for clinical chart review, and high concurrence was found.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, HPV vaccination rates among patients aged 18–26 years within a large healthcare system were significantly below national rates and far from the Healthy People 2030 goal. Implementing targeted education and training programs becomes imperative, aiming to provide individuals, particularly males, with the necessary knowledge to make informed decisions regarding vaccination. Furthermore, enhancing healthcare providers’ communication skills by effectively conveying the benefits and safety of vaccines can effectively alleviate concerns and uncertainties surrounding vaccination. Moreover, efforts should be made to ensure that education and training programs are accessible, inclusive, and tailored to the diverse needs of different communities. Engaging with individuals and communities, gaining insights into their specific concerns, and adapting communication strategies, accordingly, will help build a more trusting and supportive environment that promotes vaccine acceptance. Therefore, empowering individuals through knowledge, dispelling myths, and nurturing trust can significantly increase vaccination rates.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.P.Z., A.L.M., K.V. and L.K.; data collection, L.K., A.L.M. and K.V.; statistical analyses, L.K., A.L.M. and K.V.; writing—original draft preparation, L.K., E.R., A.L.M. and J.P.Z.; writing—review and editing, L.K., E.R., A.L.M. and J.P.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Pittsburgh (STUDY23030089, 2 May 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lewis, R.M.; Laprise, J.F.; Gargano, J.W.; Unger, E.R.; Querec, T.D.; Chesson, H.; Brisson, M.; Markowitz, L.E. Estimated Prevalence and Incidence of Disease-Associated Human Papillomavirus Types among 15- to 59-Year-Olds in the United States. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2021, 48, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Liao, C.I.; Francoeur, A.A.; Kapp, D.S.; Caesar, M.A.; Huh, W.K.; Chan, J.K. Trends in Human Papillomavirus–Associated Cancers, Demographic Characteristics, and Vaccinations in the US, 2001–2017. JAMA Netw. Open 2022, 5, e222530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chaturvedi, A.K.; Engels, E.A.; Pfeiffer, R.M.; Hernandez, B.Y.; Xiao, W.; Kim, E.; Jiang, B.; Goodman, M.T.; Sibug-Saber, M.; Cozen, W.; et al. Human Papillomavirus and Rising Oropharyngeal Cancer Incidence in the United States. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 4294–4301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Faraji, F.; Rettig, E.M.; Tsai, H.L.; El Asmar, M.; Fung, N.; Eisele, D.W.; Fakhry, C. The prevalence of human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal cancer is increasing regardless of sex or race, and the influence of sex and race on survival is modified by human papillomavirus tumor status. Cancer 2019, 125, 761–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Preti, M.; Rosso, S.; Micheletti, L.; Libero, C.; Sobrato, I.; Giordano, L.; Busso, P.; Gallio, N.; Cosma, S.; Bevilacqua, F.; et al. Risk of HPV-related extra-cervical cancers in women treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. BMC Cancer 2020, 20, 972. [Google Scholar]
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HPV Vaccination Recommendations; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2021.
  7. Paraskevaidis, E.; Athanasiou, A.; Paraskevaidi, M.; Bilirakis, E.; Galazios, G.; Kontomanolis, E.; Dinas, K.; Loufopoulos, A.; Nasioutziki, M.; Kalogiannidis, I.; et al. Cervical Pathology Following HPV Vaccination in Greece: A 10-year HeCPA Observational Cohort Study. In Vivo 2020, 34, 1445–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Valasoulis, G.; Pouliakis, A.; Michail, G.; Kottaridi, C.; Spathis, A.; Kyrgiou, M.; Paraskevaidis, E.; Daponte, A. Alterations of HPV-Related Biomarkers after Prophylactic HPV Vaccination. A Prospective Pilot Observational Study in Greek Women. Cancers 2020, 12, 1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. National Cancer Institute. HPV Vaccination; National Cancer Institute: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2022.
  10. Pingali, C.; Yankey, D.; Elam-Evans, L.D.; Markowitz, L.E.; Valier, M.R.; Fredua, B.; Crowe, S.J.; Stokley, S.; Singleton, J.A. National Vaccination Coverage among Adolescents Aged 13–17 Years—National Immunization Survey-Teen, United States, 2021. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National, state, and local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13–17 years—United States, 2009. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2010, 59, 1018–1023. [Google Scholar]
  12. Walker, T.Y.; Elam-Evans, L.D.; Singleton, J.A.; Yankey, D.; Markowitz, L.E.; Fredua, B.; Williams, C.L.; Meyer, S.A.; Stokley, S. National, Regional, State, and Selected Local Area Vaccination Coverage among Adolescents Aged 13–17 Years—United States, 2016. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2017, 66, 874–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Walker, T.Y.; Elam-Evans, L.D.; Williams, C.L.; Fredua, B.; Yankey, D.; Markowitz, L.E.; Stokley, S. Trends in human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination initiation among adolescents aged 13–17 by metropolitan statistical area (MSA) status, National Immunization Survey—Teen, 2013–2017. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2020, 16, 554–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cataldi, J.R.; Brewer, S.E.; Perreira, C.; Furniss, A.; Nederveld, A.; Suresh, K.; Williams, C.; O’Leary, S.T.; Dempsey, A.F. Rural Adolescent Immunization: Delivery Practices and Barriers to Uptake. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 2021, 34, 937–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pingali, C.; Yankey, D.; Elam-Evans, L.D.; Markowitz, L.E.; Williams, C.L.; Fredua, B.; McNamara, L.A.; Stokley, S.; Singleton, J.A. National, Regional, State, and Selected Local Area Vaccination Coverage among Adolescents Aged 13–17 Years—United States, 2020. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021, 70, 1183–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hung, P.; Henning-Smith, C.E.; Casey, M.M.; Kozhimannil, K.B. Access To Obstetric Services in Rural Counties Still Declining, With 9 Percent Losing Services, 2004–2014. Health Aff. 2017, 36, 1663–1671, Erratum in Health Aff. 2018, 37, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Befort, C.A.; Nazir, N.; Engelman, K.; Choi, W. Fatalistic cancer beliefs and information sources among rural and urban adults in the USA. J. Cancer Educ. 2013, 28, 521–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Weigel, P.A.; Ullrich, F.; Shane, D.M.; Mueller, K.J. Variation in Primary Care Service Patterns by Rural-Urban Location. J. Rural Health 2016, 32, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chan, J.K.; Mann, A.K.; Lee, D.; Rohatgi, A.; Chan, C.; Abel, M.K.; Argueta, C.; Kapp, D.S. Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Trends and Disparities in the United States: Who Is Getting Left Behind? Sex. Transm. Dis. 2021, 48, 714–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jeudin, P.; Liveright, E.; Del Carmen, M.G.; Perkins, R.B. Race, ethnicity, and income factors impacting human papillomavirus vaccination rates. Clin. Ther. 2014, 36, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ding, X.; Tian, C.; Wang, H.; Wang, W.; Luo, X. Characteristics associated with human papillomavirus vaccination initiation and completion among young adults. Am. J. Infect. Control 2019, 47, 1096–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wiener, R.C.; Findley, P.A.; Shen, C.; Dwibedi, N.; Sambamoorthi, U. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine utilization among adults (18–29 years), BRFSS 2015. Vaccine 2020, 38, 5119–5122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Henry, K.A.; Stroup, A.M.; Warner, E.L.; Kepka, D. Geographic Factors and Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Initiation among Adolescent Girls in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2016, 25, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Do, E.K.; Rossi, B.; Miller, C.A.; Ksinan, A.J.; Wheeler, D.C.; Chukmaitov, A.; Cyrus, J.W.; Fuemmeler, B.F. Area-Level Variation and Human Papillomavirus Vaccination among Adolescents and Young Adults in the United States: A Systematic Review. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2021, 30, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zimmerman, R.K.; Raviotta, J.M.; Nowalk, M.P.; Moehling, K.K.; Reis, E.C.; Humiston, S.G.; Lin, C.J. Using the 4 Pillars™ Practice Transformation Program to increase adolescent human papillomavirus, meningococcal, tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis and influenza vaccination. Vaccine 2017, 35, 6180–6186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. McGaffey, A.; Lombardo, N.P.; Lamberton, N.; Klatt, P.; Siegel, J.; Middleton, D.B.; Hughes, K.; Susick, M.; Lin, C.J.; Nowalk, M.P. A “Sense”-ational HPV Vaccination Quality Improvement Project in a Family Medicine Residency Practice. J. Natl. Med. Assoc. 2019, 111, 588–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Spencer, J.C.; Calo, W.A.; Brewer, N.T. Disparities and reverse disparities in HPV vaccination: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev. Med. 2019, 123, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Davlin, S.L.; Berenson, A.B.; Rahman, M. Correlates of HPV knowledge among low-income minority mothers with a child 9-17 years of age. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2015, 28, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. O’Leary, S.T.; Lockhart, S.; Barnard, J.; Furniss, A.; Dickinson, M.; Dempsey, A.F.; Stokley, S.; Federico, S.; Bronsert, M.; Kempe, A. Exploring Facilitators and Barriers to Initiation and Completion of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Series among Parents of Girls in a Safety Net System. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Osaghae, I.; Darkoh, C.; Chido-Amajuoyi, O.G.; Chan, W.; Padgett Wermuth, P.; Pande, M.; Cunningham, S.A.; Shete, S. HPV Vaccination Training of Healthcare Providers and Perceived Self-Efficacy in HPV Vaccine-Hesitancy Counseling. Vaccines 2022, 10, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Szilagyi, P.G.; Albertin, C.S.; Gurfinkel, D.; Saville, A.W.; Vangala, S.; Rice, J.D.; Helmkamp, L.; Zimet, G.D.; Valderrama, R.; Breck, A.; et al. Prevalence and characteristics of HPV vaccine hesitancy among parents of adolescents across the US. Vaccine 2020, 38, 6027–6037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Doescher, M.P.; Saver, B.G.; Fiscella, K.; Franks, P. Racial/ethnic inequities in continuity and site of care: Location, location, location. Health Serv. Res. 2001, 36 Pt 2, 78–89. [Google Scholar]
  33. Dorell, C.; Yankey, D.; Jeyarajah, J.; Stokley, S.; Fisher, A.; Markowitz, L.; Smith, P.J. Delay and refusal of human papillomavirus vaccine for girls, national immunization survey-teen, 2010. Clin. Pediatr. 2014, 53, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Laz, T.H.; Rahman, M.; Berenson, A.B. Human papillomavirus vaccine uptake among 18- to 26-year-old women in the United States: National Health Interview Survey, 2010. Cancer 2013, 119, 1386–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rambout, L.; Tashkandi, M.; Hopkins, L.; Tricco, A.C. Self-reported barriers and facilitators to preventive human papillomavirus vaccination among adolescent girls and young women: A systematic review. Prev. Med. 2014, 58, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Fisher, H.; Trotter, C.L.; Audrey, S.; MacDonald-Wallis, K.; Hickman, M. Inequalities in the uptake of human papillomavirus vaccination: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2013, 42, 896–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sriram, S.; Ranganathan, R. Why human papilloma virus vaccination coverage is low among adolescents in the US? A study of barriers for vaccination uptake. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2019, 8, 866–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Elam-Evans, L.D.; Yankey, D.; Singleton, J.A.; Sterrett, N.; Markowitz, L.E.; Williams, C.L.; Fredua, B.; McNamara, L.; Stokley, S. National, Regional, State, and Selected Local Area Vaccination Coverage among Adolescents Aged 13–17 Years—United States, 2019. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2020, 69, 1109–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. US Government. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. Law 111–148; As amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (HCERA); Pub. Law 111–152; U.S. Government Publishing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
  40. Bednarczyk, R.A.; Brandt, H.M. Descriptive epidemiology of age at HPV vaccination: Analysis using the 2020 NIS-Teen. Hum. Vaccin Immunother. 2023, 19, 2204784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation. The HPV Vaccine: Access and Use in the US. Available online: https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/fact-sheet/the-hpv-vaccine-access-and-use-in-the-u-s/ (accessed on 16 June 2023).
  42. Vu, M.; King, A.R.; Jang, H.M.; Bednarczyk, R.A. Practice-, provider- and patient-level facilitators of and barriers to HPV vaccine promotion and uptake in Georgia: A qualitative study of healthcare providers’ perspectives. Health Educ. Res. 2020, 35, 512–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Characteristics of patients aged 18–26 with at least one UPMC encounter between 2018 and 2021 by HPV vaccination initiation status.
Table 1. Characteristics of patients aged 18–26 with at least one UPMC encounter between 2018 and 2021 by HPV vaccination initiation status.
No VaccinationVaccination Initiation
n = 161,128n = 104,426
n (%)n (%)pRR (95% CI)p
Gender
  Male69,134 (64.9)37,392 (35.1)<0.0011
  Female91,994 (57.8)67,034 (42.2) 1.37 (1.35, 1.38)<0.001
Race/Ethnicity
  White123,569 (59.4)84,601 (40.6)<0.0011<0.001
  Black13,663 (49.5)13,939 (50.5) 1.35 (1.33, 1.37)<0.001
  American Indian403 (66.8)200 (33.2) 0.89 (0.79, 1.01)<0.001
  AAPI5157 (73.1)1902 (26.9) 0.69 (0.66, 0.72)<0.001
  Hispanic2779 (66.1)1425 (33.9) 0.87 (0.83, 0.91)<0.001
  Other506 (86.5)79 (13.5) 0.42 (0.34, 0.52)<0.001
  Declined3608 (78.7)976 (21.3) 0.56 (0.52, 0.59)<0.001
  Missing11,4431304 --
PCP visit
  No108,824 (66.9)53,796 (33.1)<0.0011
  Yes52,304 (50.8)50,630 (49.2) 1.81 (1.79, 1.82)<0.001
Insurance type
  Private125,176 (59.3)85,991 (40.7)<0.0011
  Medicaid20,804 (59.6)14,109 (40.4) 0.92 (0.91, 0.94)<0.001
  Other15,148 (77.8)4326 (22.2) 0.65 (0.63, 0.67)<0.001
Tobacco
  No130,962 (59.7)88,573 (40.3)0.7871
  Yes22,345 (59.7)15,065 (40.3) 1.04 (1.03, 1.06)<0.001
  Missing7821788 --
Alcohol
  No78,761 (60.4)51,605 (39.6)<0.0011
  Yes54,184 (63.5)31,087 (36.5) 0.96 (0.95, 0.97)<0.001
  Missing28,18321,734 --
Illicit drugs
  No112,517 (61.1)71,575 (38.9)<0.001----
  Yes11,003 (58.3)7876 (41.7) --
  Missing37,60824,975 --
Age (mean (SD))22.57 (2.50)21.89 (2.63)<0.0010.94 (0.94, 0.94)<0.001
ADI
  [75, 100]56,433 (62.2)34,301 (37.8)<0.0011
  [1, 25)5805 (84.3)1080 (15.7) 0.56 (0.52, 0.59)<0.001
  [25, 50)26,390 (53.8)22,637 (46.2) 1.33 (1.31, 1.35)<0.001
  [50, 75)71,894 (60.8)46,342 (39.2) 1.09 (1.08, 1.1)<0.001
p: p-value; RR: risk ratio; CI: confidence interval; AAPI: Asian American Pacific Islander; PCP: Primary Care Physician; SD: standard deviation; ADI: Area Deprivation Index.
Table 2. HPV vaccination initiation among patients aged 18–26 with at least one UPMC encounter between 2018 and 2021 by gender.
Table 2. HPV vaccination initiation among patients aged 18–26 with at least one UPMC encounter between 2018 and 2021 by gender.
FemalesMales
No VaccinationVaccination Initiation No VaccinationVaccination Initiation
n = 91,994n = 67,034 n = 69,134n = 37,392
n (%)n (%)pRR (95% CI)pn (%)n (%)pRR (95% CI)p
Race/Ethnicity
  White70,674 (56.7)53,923 (43.3)<0.0011 52,895 (63.3)30,678 (36.7)<0.0011
  Black7976 (46.1)9342 (53.9) 1.34 (1.32, 1.37)0.0085687 (55.3)4597 (44.7) 1.35 (1.31, 1.39)<0.001
  American Indian239 (66.2)122 (33.8) 0.81 (0.70, 0.94)0.076164 (67.8)78 (32.2) 1.08 (0.90, 1.31)0.403
  AAPI2892 (69.5)1272 (30.5) 0.71 (0.68, 0.75)0.0242265 (78.2)630 (21.8) 0.67 (0.62, 0.72)0.000
  Hispanic1644 (63.7)935 (36.3) 0.86 (0.82, 0.91)0.0271135 (69.8)490 (30.2) 0.89 (0.82, 0.97)0.009
  Other264 (84.6)48 (15.4) 0.4 (0.31, 0.53)0.140242 (88.6)31 (11.4) 0.45 (0.32, 0.63)<0.001
  Declined1986 (77.1)589 (22.9) 0.56 (0.52, 0.61)0.0401622 (80.7)387 (19.3) 0.56 (0.50, 0.62)<0.001
  Missing6319803 -- 5124501 --
PCP visit
  No65,818 (66.3)33,415 (33.7)<0.0011 43,006 (67.8)20,381 (32.2)<0.0011
  Yes26,176 (43.8)33,619 (56.2) 1.84 (1.82, 1.86)0.00626,128 (60.6)17,011 (39.4) 1.75 (1.72, 1.79)<0.001
Insurance type -- --
  Private71,079 (56.5)54,776 (43.5)<0.0011 54,097 (63.4)31,215 (36.6)<0.0011
  Medicaid13,229 (58.2)9485 (41.8) 0.92 (0.90, 0.94)0.0097575 (62.1)4624 (37.9) 0.94 (0.91, 0.97)<0.001
  Other7686 (73.5)2773 (26.5) 0.69 (0.66, 0.71)0.0177462 (82.8)1553 (17.2) 0.59 (0.56, 0.62)<0.001
Tobacco
  No77,631 (57.3)57,805 (42.7)<0.0011 53,331 (63.4)30,768 (36.6)<0.0011
  Yes10,313 (53.9)8809 (46.1) 1.08 (1.06, 1.1)0.00912,032 (65.8)6256 (34.2) 1.01 (0.99, 1.04)<0.001
  Missing4050420 -- 3771368 --
Alcohol
  No48,166 (58.4)34,241 (41.6)<0.0011 30,595 (63.8)17,364 (36.2)<0.0011
  Yes30,251 (57.5)22,377 (42.5) 1.00 (0.99, 1.01)0.00723,933 (73.3)8710 (26.7) 0.91 (0.89, 0.93)0.349
  Missing13,57710,416 -- 14,60611,318
Illicit drugs
  No68,318 (57.7)50,095 (42.3)<0.001----44,199 (67.3)21,480 (32.7)<0.001----
  Yes5768 (54.3)4859 (45.7) -- 5235 (63.4)3017 (36.6) --
  Missing17,90812,080 -- 19,70012,895 --
Age (mean (SD))22.63 (2.49)22.33 (2.64)<0.0010.97 (0.97, 0.97)0.00122.48 (2.51)21.11 (2.42)<0.0010.89 (0.88, 0.89)<0.001
ADI
  [75, 100]33,067 (59)22,944 (41)<0.0011 23,366 (67.3)11,357 (32.7)<0.0011
  [1, 25)3401 (83.4)678 (16.6) 0.55 (0.51, 0.59)0.0392404 (85.7)402 (14.3) 0.58 (0.52, 0.65)<0.001
  [25, 50)14,114 (51.2)13,457 (48.8) 1.29 (1.26, 1.31)0.00912,276 (57.2)9180 (42.8) 1.43 (1.4, 1.47)<0.001
  [50, 75)41,077 (57.9)29,908 (42.1) 1.07 (1.06, 1.09)0.00730,817 (65.2)16,434 (34.8) 1.12 (1.1, 1.15)<0.001
p: p-value; RR: risk ratio; CI: confidence interval; AAPI: Asian American Pacific Islander; PCP: Primary Care Physician; SD: standard deviation; ADI: Area Deprivation Index.
Table 3. Characteristics of patients aged 18–26 with at least one UPMC encounter between 2018 and 2021 by HPV vaccination status.
Table 3. Characteristics of patients aged 18–26 with at least one UPMC encounter between 2018 and 2021 by HPV vaccination status.
Vaccination InitiationVaccination Completion
n = 23,946n = 80,480
n (%)n (%)pRR (95% CI)p
Gender
  Male10,281 (27.5)27,111 (72.5) 1
  Female13,665 (20.4)53,369 (79.6) 1.10 (1.09, 1.11)<0.001
Race/Ethnicity
  White17,933 (21.2)66,668 (78.8)<0.0011.00
  Black4388 (31.5)9551 (68.5) 0.89 (0.88, 0.9)0.000
  American Indian46 (23)154 (77) 0.97 (0.89, 1.05)0.440
  AAPI486 (25.6)1416 (74.4) 0.93 (0.9, 0.96)0.000
  Hispanic367 (25.8)1058 (74.2) 0.94 (0.91, 0.97)0.000
  Other30 (38)49 (62) 0.82 (0.69, 0.97)0.025
  Declined271 (27.8)705 (72.2) 0.92 (0.88, 0.96)0.000
  Missing425879 --
PCP visit
  No13,165 (24.5)40,631 (75.5)<0.0011
  Yes10,781 (21.3)39,849 (78.7) 1.03 (1.02, 1.04)<0.001
Insurance type
  Private18,857 (21.9)67,134 (78.1)<0.0011
  Medicaid3925 (27.8)10,184 (72.2) 0.96 (0.95, 0.98)<0.001
  Other1164 (26.9)3162 (73.1) 0.95 (0.93, 0.97)<0.001
Tobacco
  No19,582 (22.1)68,991 (77.9)<0.0011
  Yes4090 (27.1)10,975 (72.9) 0.95 (0.94, 0.96)0.000
  Missing274514 --
Alcohol
  No12,381 (24)39,224 (76)<0.001
  Yes5975 (19.2)25,112 (80.8) 1.01 (1, 1.02)0.010
  Missing559016,144 --
Illicit drugs
  No15,480 (21.6)56,095 (78.4)<0.001--
  Yes2143 (27.2)5733 (72.8) ----
  Missing632318,652 --
Age (mean (SD))21.41 (2.76)22.03 (2.57) 1.01 (1.01, 1.02)<0.001
ADI
  [75, 100]8845 (25.8)25,456 (74.2)<0.0011
  [1, 25)243 (22.5)837 (77.5) 1.04 (1.00, 1.08)0.025
  [25, 50)4692 (20.7)17,945 (79.3) 1.05 (1.04, 1.06)0.000
  [50, 75)10,144 (21.9)36,198 (78.1) 1.03 (1.02, 1.04)0.000
Age at vaccination (mean (SD))16.21 (3.67)13.97 (2.75)<0.001--
p: p-value; RR: risk ratio; CI: confidence interval; AAPI: Asian American Pacific Islander; PCP: Primary Care Physician; SD: standard deviation; ADI: Area Deprivation Index.
Table 4. HPV vaccination completion among patients aged 18–26 with at least one UPMC encounter between 2018 and 2021 by gender.
Table 4. HPV vaccination completion among patients aged 18–26 with at least one UPMC encounter between 2018 and 2021 by gender.
FemalesMales
Vaccination InitiationVaccination Completion Vaccination InitiationVaccination Completion
n = 13,665n = 53,369 n = 10,281n = 27,111
n (%)n (%)pRR (95% CI)pn (%)n (%)pRR (95% CI)p
Race/Ethnicity
  White10,037 (18.6)43,886 (81.4)<0.0011 7896 (25.7)22,782 (74.3)<0.0011
  Black2672 (28.6)6670 (71.4) 0.89 (0.88, 0.91)<0.0011716 (37.3)2881 (62.7) 0.87 (0.85, 0.90)<0.001
  American Indian25 (20.5)97 (79.5) 0.97 (0.88, 1.07)0.51521 (26.9)57 (73.1) 0.96 (0.82, 1.14)0.662
  AAPI285 (22.4)987 (77.6) 0.94 (0.91, 0.97)<0.001201 (31.9)429 (68.1) 0.90 (0.85, 0.96)0.002
  Hispanic233 (24.9)702 (75.1) 0.92 (0.89, 0.96)<0.001134 (27.3)356 (72.7) 0.97 (0.91, 1.04)0.393
  Other17 (35.4)31 (64.6) 0.77 (0.61, 0.97)0.02613 (41.9)18 (58.1) 0.91 (0.70, 1.18)0.466
  Declined150 (25.5)439 (74.5) 0.91 (0.86, 0.96)0.001121 (31.3)266 (68.7) 0.95 (0.87, 1.03)0.190
  Missing246557 -- 179322 --
PCP visit
  No7570 (22.7)25,845 (77.3)<0.0011 5595 (27.5)14,786 (72.5)<0.0011
  Yes6095 (18.1)27,524 (81.9) 1.03 (1.02, 1.04)<0.0014686 (27.5)12,325 (72.5) 1.02 (1.01, 1.04)0.007
Insurance type
  Private10,615 (19.4)44,161 (80.6)<0.0011 8242 (26.4)22,973 (73.6)<0.0011
  Medicaid2420 (25.5)7065 (74.5) 0.96 (0.95, 0.98)<0.0011505 (32.5)3119 (67.5) 0.95 (0.92, 0.98)<0.001
  Other630 (22.7)2143 (77.3) 0.97 (0.95, 0.99)0.003534 (34.4)1019 (65.6) 0.91 (0.88, 0.95)<0.001
Tobacco
  No11,389 (19.7)46,416 (80.3) 1 8193 (26.6)22,575 (73.4) 1
  Yes2136 (24.2)6673 (75.8) 0.95 (0.94, 0.97)<0.0011954 (31.2)4302 (68.8) 0.95 (0.92, 0.97)<0.001
  Missing140280 -- 134234 --
Alcohol
  No7464 (21.8)26,777 (78.2)<0.0011 4917 (28.3)12,447 (71.7)<0.0011
  Yes3643 (16.3)18,734 (83.7) 1.02 (1.01, 1.03)<0.0012332 (26.8)6378 (73.2) 1.00 (0.98, 1.01)0.629
  Missing25587858 -- 30328286 --
Illicit drugs
  No9641 (19.2)40,454 (80.8)<0.001----5839 (27.2)15,641 (72.8)<0.001----
  Yes1167 (24)3692 (76) -- 976 (32.4)2041 (67.6) --
  Missing28579223 -- 34669429 --
Age (mean (SD))21.72 (2.82)22.48 (2.56)<0.0011.02 (1.02, 1.02)<0.00121.00 (2.63)21.15 (2.34)<0.0011.01 (1, 1.01)0.002
ADI
  [75, 100]5268 (23)17,676 (77)<0.001 3577 (31.5)7780 (68.5)<0.001
  [1, 25)140 (20.6)538 (79.4) 1.03 (0.99, 1.07)0.147103 (25.6)299 (74.4) 1.07 (1, 1.15)0.051
  [25, 50)2438 (18.1)11,019 (81.9) 1.04 (1.02, 1.05)<0.0012254 (24.6)6926 (75.4) 1.08 (1.05, 1.1)<0.001
  [50, 75)5808 (19.4)24,100 (80.6) 1.03 (1.02, 1.04)<0.0014336 (26.4)12,098 (73.6) 1.04 (1.02, 1.06)<0.001
Age at Vaccination (mean (SD))16.18 (3.96)13.69 (2.79)<0.001----16.25 (3.24)14.50 (2.61)<0.001----
p: p-value; RR: risk ratio; CI: confidence interval; AAPI: Asian American Pacific Islander; PCP: Primary Care Physician; SD: standard deviation; ADI: Area Deprivation Index.
Table 5. Characteristics of patients aged 18–26 with at least one UPMC encounter between 2018 and 2021 by age at first vaccination.
Table 5. Characteristics of patients aged 18–26 with at least one UPMC encounter between 2018 and 2021 by age at first vaccination.
Early:
<9 Years
Early Routine:
9–10 Years
Routine:
11–12 Years
Catch Up: 13–17 YearsCatch Up:
18–26 Years
p-Value
n = 285n = 3615n = 18,843n = 52,916n = 12,338
n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)
Gender
  Male51 (0.2)498 (1.5)5004 (15.4)22,109 (67.9)4915 (15.1)<0.001
  Female234 (0.4)3117 (5.6)13,904 (25.1)30,807 (55.5)7423 (13.4)
Race/Ethnicity
  White229 (0.3)2778 (3.9)15,138 (21.2)44,216 (61.8)9176 (12.8)<0.001
  Black40 (0.4)671 (5.9)2916 (25.5)6063 (53.1)1734 (15.2)
  American Indian1 (0.6)9 (5.7)34 (21.5)89 (56.3)25 (15.8)
  AAPI0 (0)40 (2.4)217 (12.8)855 (50.5)580 (34.3)
  Hispanic6 (0.5)65 (5.4)263 (22)626 (52.3)236 (19.7)
  Other0 (0)0 (0)12 (16.7)40 (55.6)20 (27.8)
  Declined4 (0.5)27 (3.2)161 (19.1)463 (55.1)186 (22.1)
  Missing1675025564
PCP visit
  No125 (0.3)1809 (4.1)11,224 (25.3)26,906 (60.6)4367 (9.8)<0.001
  Yes160 (0.4)1806 (4.1)7684 (17.6)26,010 (59.6)7971 (18.3)
Insurance type
  Private216 (0.3)2736 (3.8)14,938 (20.5)44,422 (61.1)10,432 (14.3)<0.001
  Medicaid46 (0.4)745 (6.4)3211 (27.7)6277 (54.1)1322 (11.4)
  Other23 (0.6)134 (3.6)759 (20.4)2217 (59.6)584 (15.7)
Tobacco
  No245 (0.3)2983 (4)15,828 (21.2)45,023 (60.3)10,631 (14.2)<0.001
  Yes39 (0.3)613 (4.8)2941 (23.2)7500 (59.1)1593 (12.6)
  Missing119139393114
Alcohol
  No134 (0.3)2125 (4.9)10,387 (24.1)25,241 (58.7)5131 (11.9)<0.001
  Yes117 (0.4)882 (3.2)3819 (14)16613 (61)5783 (21.3)
  Missing34608468811,0621424
Illicit drugs
  No223 (0.4)2605 (4.3)12,357 (20.3)36,144 (59.5)9444 (15.5)0.253
  Yes24 (0.4)310 (4.6)1338 (19.9)3943 (58.7)1100 (16.4)
  Missing38700520012,8291794
Vaccination frequency
  Initiation25 (0.1)237 (1.1)1957 (9.1)12,720 (59.2)6551 (30.5)<0.001
  Completion260 (0.4)3378 (5.1)16,951 (25.5)40,196 (60.4)5787 (8.7)
Age (mean (SD))22.67 (2.49)21.19 (2.17)20.81 (2.32)22.10 (2.64)23.67 (2.21)<0.001
ADI
  [75, 100]121 (0.4)1451 (5.1)6998 (24.5)16,300 (57)3740 (13.1)<0.001
  [1, 25)2 (0.2)18 (1.9)138 (14.9)585 (63)186 (20)
  [25, 50)45 (0.2)491 (2.5)2967 (15.3)12,954 (66.9)2904 (15)
  [50, 75)117 (0.3)1654 (4.2)8794 (22.5)23,039 (58.9)5498 (14.1)
p: p-value; AAPI: Asian American Pacific Islander; PCP: Primary Care Physician; SD: standard deviation; ADI: Area Deprivation Index.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khalil, L.; Russo, E.; Venkatakrishnan, K.; Mazul, A.L.; Zevallos, J.P. Barriers to Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Initiation and Completion among Adults Aged 18–26 Years in a Large Healthcare System. Cancers 2023, 15, 4243. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15174243

AMA Style

Khalil L, Russo E, Venkatakrishnan K, Mazul AL, Zevallos JP. Barriers to Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Initiation and Completion among Adults Aged 18–26 Years in a Large Healthcare System. Cancers. 2023; 15(17):4243. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15174243

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khalil, Lucien, Elena Russo, Kripa Venkatakrishnan, Angela L. Mazul, and Jose P. Zevallos. 2023. "Barriers to Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Initiation and Completion among Adults Aged 18–26 Years in a Large Healthcare System" Cancers 15, no. 17: 4243. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15174243

APA Style

Khalil, L., Russo, E., Venkatakrishnan, K., Mazul, A. L., & Zevallos, J. P. (2023). Barriers to Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Initiation and Completion among Adults Aged 18–26 Years in a Large Healthcare System. Cancers, 15(17), 4243. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15174243

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop