Next Article in Journal
Update on Calcitonin Screening for Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma and the Results of a Retrospective Analysis of 12,984 Patients with Thyroid Nodules
Next Article in Special Issue
Editorial for the Special Issue on High-Risk Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy versus Surgical Resection for Stage I/II Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition-Related Markers in Prostate Cancer: From Bench to Bedside
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Differential Expression of miRNAs Contributes to Tumor Aggressiveness and Racial Disparity in African American Men with Prostate Cancer

Cancers 2023, 15(8), 2331; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082331
by Richard Ottman 1, Kavya Ganapathy 1, Hui-Yi Lin 2, Carlos Diaz Osterman 3, Julie Dutil 3, Jaime Matta 3, Gilberto Ruiz-Deya 3, Liang Wang 4, Kosj Yamoah 5, Anders Berglund 6, Ratna Chakrabarti 1,* and Jong Y. Park 7,*
Reviewer 1:
Cancers 2023, 15(8), 2331; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082331
Submission received: 10 March 2023 / Accepted: 15 April 2023 / Published: 17 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue High-Risk Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report (Previous Reviewer 1)

The authors have addressed all questions properly and it's ready to publish in cancers. 

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.


Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript entitled “Differential expression of miRNAs contributes to tumor aggressiveness and racial disparity in African American men with prostate cancer” by Ottman R et al. studied differential expressed (DE) miRNA identified from prostate cancer patients and looked at the correlation between tumor aggressiveness/racial disparity and expression level of some DE miRNAs. Those DE miRNAs could be applied as potential biomarkers for prostate cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Following questions need to be addressed:

1.       Introduction doesn’t provide sufficient background information such as prostate cancer (patients number, stage, therapeutics), research progress of miRNA on cancer field especially prostate cancer, etc.

2.        The authors utilized tumor tissues and adjacent non-involved areas for miRNA expression analysis in this study. Please define “non-involved areas” with more detail in the method section. Besides, the patient number (n=25) is relative limited to get reliable results.  

3.       Please define all the abbreviations in the manuscript. Some are missing such as PSA, CAPRA-S at line106.

4.       In Figure1, the authors used cluster analysis to identify DE miRNAs. How is it implemented? What’s the criteria to cluster some miRNA together? More detail should be provided to explain the analysis approach.

5.       At line154, it is mentioned that 6 miRNAs are >2-fold down-regulated in malignant tissues. What’s the p-value? Statistical analysis is lacking throughout the whole manuscript. Please provide the p-value for all the plots.

6.       Figure 2A seems wrong-inconsistent with figure legend.

7.       For each >2 fold DE genes, separate expression plot should be provided.

8.       What dose the line mark for each miRNA in Figure 4? Is it AVE of all samples or only samples with CAPRA-S Score <=3? Variation seems very large in European American CAPRA-S Score >=4 groups which makes it hard to get the conclusion.

 

 

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have done a great job on analyzing miRNA from human patients. They have extracted RNA from FFPE tissues and did a cluster analysis for differential miRNA expression. They have discovered interesting and clinically relevant miRNAs for diagnosis or future treatment of high risk prostate cancer patients and how it is different for African American and European men.

 

1. Line 75 "by a pathologist andtumor". Please proof read.

2. Please make the font size of all the labels of the same size, please increas the size of the smaller font labels in Fig 2, 3 and 4.

3. Please consider transgender women in future studies.

Back to TopTop