Next Article in Journal
Development and Validation of an Explainable Radiomics Model to Predict High-Aggressive Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Radiomics Study Based on Biparametric MRI
Previous Article in Journal
Gender Differences in Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma: A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Skin Extracellular Matrix Breakdown Following Paclitaxel Therapy in Patients with Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

From a Clustering of Adverse Symptoms after Colorectal Cancer Therapy to Chronic Fatigue and Low Ability to Work: A Cohort Study Analysis with 3 Months of Follow-Up

Cancers 2024, 16(1), 202; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16010202
by Tomislav Vlaski 1,2, Marija Slavic 1, Reiner Caspari 3, Bettine Bilsing 4, Harald Fischer 5, Hermann Brenner 1,6 and Ben Schöttker 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Cancers 2024, 16(1), 202; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16010202
Submission received: 30 November 2023 / Revised: 28 December 2023 / Accepted: 29 December 2023 / Published: 1 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Side Effects of Cancer Treatments: New Approaches)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

please review the attached documents as there are some clarifications required

this work is very interesting and certainly an area to investigate further

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

only minor details see attached document

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for the helpful comments. We have modified our manuscript accordingly. Attached you will find our point-by-point response.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors,

thank you for the opportunity to review your work.

The research is very interesting, up to date, novel, and extremely important, especially for planning psychosocial interventions for patients with CRC.

Your manuscript is very well organized, in the introductory part all relevant and recent findings are explained.

The sample selection is appropriate and representative.

The methodology is well conceived and allows for the implementation of statistical procedures. Relevant statistical procedures and data processing were used.

 In the discussion part, you gave a clear presentation of the obtained results and compared them with similar recent research.

Well done!

 

 

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for the appraisal of our manuscript.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop