Next Article in Journal
Reasons for Treatment Discontinuation and Their Effect on Outcomes of Immunotherapy in Southwest Finland: A Retrospective, Real-World Cohort Study
Previous Article in Journal
The Value of Local Therapies in Advanced Adrenocortical Carcinoma
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CXCL13 Positive Cells Localization Predict Response to Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in Pulmonary Non-Small Cell Carcinoma

1
Centre de Recherche de l’Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ), Quebec City, QC G1V 4G5, Canada
2
Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, QC G1V 4G5, Canada
3
Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
4
Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec—Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 4G5, Canada
5
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC G8Z 4M3, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cancers 2024, 16(4), 708; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16040708
Submission received: 18 November 2023 / Revised: 25 January 2024 / Accepted: 29 January 2024 / Published: 7 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Lung cancer is the most lethal cancer worldwide. Recently, immunotherapy has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of pulmonary non-small cell carcinomas. While the utilization of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis has improved survival, only a small percentage of cases will show a durable response. In this project, we aim to assess the potential of CXCL13+ cells to identify good responders to immunotherapy. Our results showed that the density and the localization of these cells are associated with the extent of the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancers. This research provides new insights into the roles of the tumor microenvironment in modulating response to immunotherapy.

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) treatment, but only 20–30% of patients benefit from these treatments. Currently, PD-L1 expression in tumor cells is the only clinically approved predictor of ICI response in lung cancer, but concerns arise due to its low negative and positive predictive value. Recent studies suggest that CXCL13+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) may be a good predictor of response. We aimed to assess if CXCL13+ cell localization within the TME can predict ICI response in advanced NSCLC patients. Methods: This retrospective study included 65 advanced NSCLC patients treated with Nivolumab/Pembrolizumab at IUCPQ or CHUM and for whom a pretreatment surgical specimen was available. Good responders were defined as having a complete radiologic response at 1 year, and bad responders were defined as showing cancer progression at 1 year. IHC staining for CXCL13 was carried out on a representative slide from a resection specimen, and CXCL13+ cell density was evaluated in tumor (T), invasive margin (IM), non-tumor (NT), and tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) compartments. Cox models were used to analyze progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) probability, while the Mann–Whitney test was used to compare CXCL13+ cell density between responders and non-responders. Results: We showed that CXCL13+ cell density localization within the TME is associated with ICI efficacy. An increased density of CXCL13+ cells across all compartments was associated with a poorer prognostic (OS; HR = 1.22; 95%CI = 1.04–1.42; p = 0.01, PFS; HR = 1.16; p = 0.02), or a better prognostic when colocalized within TLSs (PFS; HR = 0.84, p = 0.03). Conclusion: Our results support the role of CXCL13+ cells in advanced NSCLC patients, with favorable prognosis when localized within TLSs and unfavorable prognosis when present elsewhere. The concomitant proximity of CXCL13+ and CD20+ cells within TLSs may favor antigen presentation to T cells, thus enhancing the effect of PD-1/PD-L1 axis inhibition. Further validation is warranted to confirm the potential relevance of this biomarker in a clinical setting.

1. Introduction

Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) are aggressive malignant neoplasms, and a large majority of patients with advanced disease progression have no possibility of curative surgical treatment [1,2]. Over the last decade, numerous clinical trials have demonstrated the survival benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments (ICIs), such as monoclonal antibodies that block immune checkpoints like programmed death-1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1), when used alone or in combination therapy [3,4]. While ICI treatment is associated with improved outcomes, a significant percentage (60–85%) of patients do not respond well [5].
The expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells is currently utilized as a biomarker to predict the response to anti-PD-L1/PD-1 therapies, although it is documented that some patients with high PD-L1 expression may experience worsened clinical outcomes and patients with low PD-L1 expression may show complete response [6]. Recent studies have revealed that some immune components of the tumor microenvironment (TME) could predict response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in several types of cancers [7,8]. The number of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs), which are ectopic lymphoid tissues that can develop in non-lymphoid organs, has emerged as a potential factor linked to a positive prognosis in diverse tumor types. Recent studies have unveiled the potential of TLSs in promoting immunotherapy response in melanomas, soft-tissue sarcomas, and renal cell carcinomas [9,10,11]. Moreover, researchers have highlighted the synergistic effects of TLS-associated B cells with T cells in exerting anti-tumor effects, and the co-presence of TLS and B cells in tumors has been found to enhance the immunotherapy effectiveness [9,10,11,12]. CXCL13s are chemokines controlling the recruitment of B cells to secondary lymphoid organs [13,14,15]. In cancer, it also plays a major role in the recruitment of B cells to TLSs [16,17,18,19,20], yet the potential effect of CXCL13 in the TME as a predictive prognostic biomarker is controversial. Several studies have demonstrated that high levels of CXCL13+ cells or CXCL13 expression in the TME could be used as a prognostic biomarker for ICI-treated bladder cancer and ovarian cancer patients and is associated with prolonged survival and objective response [21,22,23]. In addition, in another study, M. Sorin et al. revealed the effective role of CXCL13 as a soluble molecule within the TME of NSCLC patients and its potential in anti-PD-1 therapy [23]. In contrast, some studies have shown that CXCL13+ T cells were associated with inferior overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in treated renal cell carcinoma and gastric cancer patients [24,25]. In NSCLC, the impact of CXCL13+ cells in different compartments of the TME and its prognostic significance remains unclear.
In the current study, we investigated whether CXCL13+ cells could be used as a predictive biomarker for ICI response in NSCLC patients. In particular, we investigated whether CXCL13+ cell prediction performance was different in various compartments, including non-tumor (NT), invasive margin (IM), tumor (T), and TLS, even after accounting for other known predictive factors. We analyzed the density of CXCL13+ cells in those various compartments using whole sections from resection specimens. Additionally, by examining the CXCL13+ cells’ density in the different TME compartments in the presence of TLSs, we indirectly tested the hypothesis that CXCL13+ cells migrate toward the TLS compartment to recruit CD20+ cells within TLSs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient’s Clinical Data and Tissue Selection

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with a diagnosis of NSCLCs, treated with Pembrolizumab/Nivolumab (2015 to 2021) in a first or second-line setting from the Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ, n = 23) and the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM, n = 42). In order to be included in the current study, patients must have undergone a surgical resection prior to their immunotherapy treatment. A consent form was obtained for all participants by each institution’s biobank. Clinical and pathological data, including age, sex, smoking status, stage of cancer, and survival, were retrieved using the electronic medical files and pathology reports.

2.2. Immunohistochemistry

A thoracic pathologist (PJ) reviewed each tumor’s hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) histology slides, and one formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) block, representative of the lesion, was selected for each patient, ensuring it contained tumoral tissue. Sections of 4.0-μm-thick were cut from the selected blocks on a microtome and placed on charged slides. The following antibodies were used for IHC experiments: CXCL13, CD20, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD56, CD163, FoxP3, Lag3, TIM3, PD-1 (Supplementary Table S1). All slides underwent heat-induced epitope retrieval in a DAKO PT-Link using EnVision FLEX Target Retrieval Solution, high pH Tris/EDTA buffer (PH 9) (Dako, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), followed by an automatized IHC protocol on Dako Autostainer Link 48, using the Dako EnVision FLEX+ kit reagents (Dako, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). A previous fine-tuning assay with tonsil tissue enabled setting the CXCL13 antibody dilution to 1:500 and the incubation time to 20 min. Antibody clones and dilution protocols are available in Supplementary Table S1. After IHC, slides were counter-stained using EnVision FLEX hematoxylin reagent.
PD-L1 score was performed prior to the initiation of the ICI treatment and extracted from clinical files. The assay used locally was antibody kit PD-L1 clone 22C3 (PharmDx, distributed by Agilent). Results were expressed in TPS (Tumor Proportion Score = % of tumor cells IHC positive) and separated into 3 categories: <1, ≥1 and <50, ≥50 or as a continuous variable. Characteristics of patients in relation to PDL1-TPS are presented in Supplementary Table S2.

2.3. Slide Digitalization and CXCL13 Scoring in Different Tumor Microenvironments

All H&E and IHC slides were digitalized at 20× magnification using a slide scanner (NanoZoomer 2.0-HT; Hamamatsu, Bridgewater, NJ, USA). CXCL13 IHC slides were visualized using the companion software NDP.view2 (Version 2.9.29) (Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan). Prior to manual scoring CXCL13 and CD20, the compartments of the tumoral microenvironment were defined (Figure 1A). Briefly, they were annotated by a pathologist (PJ or CB) to determine Tumor (T), Invasive Margin (IM defined as 1 mm or less in size, including 500 µm in the tumor border line and 500 µm out of the tumor border line) and Non-Tumor (NT) areas. A pathologist (CB) identified the TLSs on CD20 IHC slides, with TLSs having a minimum of 50 aggregated CD20+ cells. Subsequently, the images of CXCL13 slides and CD20 slides were matched to locate identical viewpoints with precision, a process facilitated by the software NDP.view2. Scoring was completed manually by counting CXCL13+ cells within 1 mm2 areas of the T compartment (CXCL13_T) representing 10% of the respective investigated area, not overlapping with a TLS (>200 μm distance). We scored CXCL13+ cells localized in IM (CXCL13_IM), which represent almost half of the respective investigated area, and we scored CXCL13+ cells localized in NT (CXCL13_NT) representing 10% of the respective investigated area. The CXCL13+ cells were scored within the TLS (CXCL13_TLSin) and the TLS’s neighborhood (CXCL13_TLSne, 200 μm radius surrounding the TLS) for five randomly selected TLSs. Also, we computed the CXCL13+ cells count within and in the neighborhood of TLSs (CXCL13_TLS), as well as the TME area defined by the summation of CXCL13-T and CXCL13_TLS (CXCL13_TME) (Figure 1A).
Since it has been shown that some CXCL13+ cells can either possess some of the following immune markers or be associated with immune cells expressing these immune markers (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD56, CD163, FoxP3, Lag3, TIM3, and PD-1) [24,25], those IHC markers were evaluated in the tumor compartment (including tumor and stroma) with the image analysis modules Tissue Recognition (Version 3.2.0) and Immunosurface (Version 3.0.0) from CaloPix software (CaloPix, Tribun Health, Paris, France). Both “tissue recognition” and “immune surface” applications were used to build an algorithm for the identification of tumor zones and segmentation of the IHC staining, as previously published [26]. Data were exported and compiled: the cellular positivity of a given IHC marker was expressed as the percentage of surface occupied by positive immune cells normalized by the surface of the analyzed area.

2.4. Survival Analysis

We investigated the prognostic significance of CXCL13+ cells in different compartments (Figure 1A), along with various other IHC markers (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD56, CD163, FoxP3, Lag3, TIM3, PD-1), and clinical and pathological features such as sex, age, Ecog performance status (Eastern cooperative oncology group), PD-L1-TPS, and histology groups. This analysis was carried out to evaluate if these markers and clinical features, along with CXCL13, could also predict the response to immunotherapy. A PFS (assessed through CT-scan results) of 1 year was defined as a cut-off based on previous studies to determine responders and non-responders [27,28,29,30,31], and PFS-months and OS-months were defined as the time between starting immunotherapy to the time of progression or last follow-up and death or last follow-up respectively. Univariate and multivariate COX models were employed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Additionally, a comprehensive multivariate COX model was constructed, incorporating all the mentioned IHC markers and clinical features. A Spearman correlation coefficient between CXCL13 and other IHC markers was calculated and visualized with a heatmap. When two features were highly correlated, only one was kept for the following evaluations. To build the final multivariate COX model, we selected the variables with a two-step process: first, we selected significant features (p < 0.05) in the univariate COX models (26 variables), and second, we used a backward selection procedure within a multivariate COX model. We reported the HR for each COX model as well as the global HR for multivariate COX regressions.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

A Spearman correlation was carried out to test the association between CXCL13+ cell density in different compartments and OS/PFS, using the SciPy library and SciPy Stats from Python packages (Version 3.10). The Mann–Whitney test was used to examine the differences in the density of CXCL13+ cells among various compartments in patients categorized by the number of TLSs. Patients in terms of the number of TLSs were equally classified into four groups: those without TLSs (n = 0), low TLSs (n = 1–2), intermediate TLSs (n = 3–8), and high TLSs (n ≥ 9). The analysis involved Python libraries, including SciPy (Version 1.7.1), Matplotlib (Version 3.4.0), Pandas (Version 1.3.3), and Seaborn (Version 0.11.2), in addition to the SciPy Stats module (Version 1.7.0) from the Python package (Version 3.10). All analyses were conducted with a statistically significant threshold of 5% (p < 0.05) using a two-tailed approach. Both illustrations and statistical analyses were performed using the Python Jupiter program for Windows (Version 3.10).

3. Results

3.1. Clinical Features of Treated NSCLC Patients

The clinicopathological features of the 65 treated patients included in our cohort, treated either with Pembrolizumab (n = 27), Nivolumab (n = 31), or combinations of Nivolumab/Pembrolizumab and/or chemotherapy (n = 7) are described in Table 1. The number of males (n = 31) and females (n = 34) was similar, and the 1-year PFS rate was 43%; no significant differences based on gender were observed. The median age at surgery was 68 years. Adenocarcinoma was the most common histologic subtype (n = 54), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (n = 11) (Table 1). The other clinical and immunological features of the patients by PDL1-TPS subgroups are presented in Supplementary Tables S2 and S3, respectively.

3.2. Association between CXCL13+ Cell Density and Response to ICI

We first tested the linear association between CXCL13+ cell density across the TME compartments and OS or PFS in months in the whole cohort. We found a negative correlation (r = −0.25, p = 0.046) between OS and CXCL13+ cell density in the tumor compartment (T) (Figure 1B). We observed a positive correlation between the CXCL13_TLS/CXCL13_T ratio and OS (r = 0.41, p = 7 × 10−4) or PFS (r = 0.34, p = 0.006) (Figure 1C). On the other hand, we found a significantly negative correlation between CXCL13+ (T+NT) cells and OS (r = −0.3, p = 0.03) (Figure 1B), and PFS (r = −0.28, p = 0.04) (Figure 1C). All linear regression models are described in Supplementary Figures S1 and S2.
Secondly, we investigated if the responders (PFS ≥ 1 year) and non-responders (PFS < 1 year) displayed differences in the density of CXCL13+ cells in each TME compartment. We observed that responders had a significantly lower CXCL13+ cell density in the tumor (p = 0.016), even considering the surrounding area of the tumor (CXCL13+ (T+IM), p = 0.019; or CXCL13+ (T+IM+NT), p = 0.003; or CXCL13+ cells (T+NT), p = 1.5 × 10−3) (Figure 2A–D). However, we found a greater density of CXCL13+ cells in TLSs compared to the tumor (CXCL13_TLS/CXCL13_T ratio, p = 0.031 (Figure 2E)) in responders vs. non-responders, which is believed to be influenced by interaction between CXCL13+ and CD20+ cells within the TLS compartment [9,22].

3.3. CXCL13 Is a Factor Predictive of Survival and Progression-Free Survival

Given that the density of CXCL13+ cells was associated with PFS and OS in certain compartments, we further investigated if CXCL13+ cells could predict OS and PFS in different TME compartments using univariate and multivariate COX models (Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5). Our analysis revealed that CXCL13+ cells in NT and CXCL13+ (T+IM+NT) cells compartments slightly increased the risk of death (HR = 1.13, 95% CI [1.02–1.26]; HR = 1.22, 95% CI [1.04–1.42]) and progression (HR = 1.31, 95% CI [1.04–1.64]; HR = 1.16, 95% CI [1.02–1.32]) respectively in a univariate COX model (Table 2), but not in a multivariate model (Table 3). Interestingly, the CXCL13_TLS/CXCL13_T ratio predicted a decreased risk of progression (HR = 0.84, 95% CI [0.73–0.98]) in a univariate COX model (Table 4) but not in a multivariate model (Table 5). We reported the HR for each COX model as well as the global HR for multivariate COX regressions. We also found that while CXCL13+ (T+NT) cells could be used as an independent prognostic predictor for OS (HR = 1.23, 95% CI [1.07–1.42]) or PFS (HR = 1.15, 95% CI [1.02–1.30]), it was highly correlated with CXCL13+ (T+IM+NT) cells and thus was removed from multivariate COX regressions. The HR for all compartments is reported in Supplementary Tables S4 and S5. Overall, these results suggested that CXCL13+ cells in collaboration with CD20+ cells in TLSs decreased the risk of progression, while in other compartments, the CXCL13+ cells in the absence of CD20+ cells increased the risk of death and progression. It is important to note that among other IHC markers tested (such as CD3, CD4, CD8, FoxP3, Tim3, Lag3, PD-1) (Supplementary Tables S6 and S7, Supplementary Figure S3) as well as the clinical features investigated (Supplementary Tables S8 and S9), none were able to predict OS and PFS. In addition, to assess the potential role of all clinical and immunological variables (IHC markers) in predicting OS and PFS, we performed a multivariate COX model, and we obtained a non-significant global HR for OS (HR = 0.71, p = 0.50) and for PFS (HR = 0.42, p = 0.56), respectively (Supplementary Tables S10 and S11). Multivariate COX analysis revealed that neither clinical nor immunological factors could independently predict OS or PFS.

3.4. CXCL13+ Cells in the Tumor Have a Link with Chemotaxis toward TLS

Our investigation focused on two aspects: first, understanding the notable increase in CXCL13+ cell density when transitioning from NT to T regions, and second, examining the transition in CXCL13+ cell density from T to TLSs in the presence of TLSs. We explored the idea that CXCL13+ cells move into the TLS to interact with CD20+ cells, potentially triggering the recruitment of additional immune cells. In order to test this prediction, we equally categorized patients into four groups based on TLS number (none, low, intermediate, and high). The characteristics of these groups are shown in Supplementary Table S12. Then, we compared the density of CXCL13+ cells in each compartment and group. We found that for patients without TLSs, the CXCL13+ cell density was significantly higher in IM compared to patients with low TLSs (p = 0.02), intermediate TLSs (p = 0.005), and high TLSs (p = 0.002) (Figure 3). Based on these results, we concluded that when at least two TLSs are present (the presence of only one TLS was not significant and did not seem logical for this comparison, Supplementary Figure S4), CXCL13+ cells had a chemotactic link and migrated toward T and finally to the TLS compartment. Interestingly, we did not find any significant differences in the density of CXCL13+ cells in IM between patients with low, intermediate, and high TLSs, suggesting that having a minimum of two TLSs is adequate for CXCL13+ cells to have a migratory from NT toward to IM, T, and finally to TLS compartments (Figure 3).

4. Discussion

Until the recent emergence of immunotherapies, the treatment of advanced-stage NSCLC patients remained relatively unchanged. Although ICIs as immunotherapy have shown encouraging response rates in NSCLC patients, there is still a need to better select patients that are most likely to benefit from these expensive treatments. This can be achieved by identifying and applying context-dependent biomarkers with high predictive power to ICI treatments. By utilizing such biomarkers, we can maximize the therapeutic outcomes and tailor treatments more precisely to individual NSCLC patients [32]. While several predictive immune biomarkers for ICI have been proposed, including PD-L1 [5] and INF-ɣ [33], CXCL13 appears to exhibit superior performance, although there are conflicting reports regarding its impact on survival [21]. In this study, we hypothesized that the density of CXCL13+ cells predicted the response to ICI in NSCLC patients and that the prognostic potential of CXCL13+ cells varied based on their localization in the different TME compartments. Our results indicate that CXCL13+ cells are prognostic in the advanced-stage NSCLC patients treated with Pembrolizumab/Nivolumab. These findings are consistent with previous reports identifying CXCL13 as a prognostic marker for ICI response in several cancer types [21,24,34]. In this study, we investigated the long-term response by defining our responders versus non-responders using a one-year period, as previously published, which was associated with an Objective Response Rate (ORR) of 43.08% at 6 months [27,28,29,30,31]. The response rate is similar to previous studies using immunotherapy in NSCLC in a first- or second-line setting [35,36,37,38].
In addition, we have reported, for the first time, both a favorable and unfavorable association between improved clinical outcomes in NSCLC patients undergoing ICI treatment and the density of CXCL13+ cells, depending on their location within the TME and its adjacent area. This study conducted a thorough analysis of cell densities and investigated the localization of CXCL13+ cells in various compartments of NSCLC. This aspect has not been explored in previous studies. We found an unfavorable association between improved clinical outcomes in ICI-treated NSCLC and an elevated density of CXCL13+ cells in non-TLS regions, including the tumor, non-tumor, and invasive margin, as well as solely the NT (T+NT+IM, NT). Accordingly, a rise in the CXCL13+ cell density within the mentioned compartments increases the risk of death and tumor progression. Our findings are consistent with the prior study of Panse et al., which reported a strong relationship between CXCL13 expression and tumor progression in breast cancer by the ERK signaling pathway [39]. Previous studies did not assess the potential predictive role of CXCL13+ cells in IM, but Bindea et al. revealed that the absence of CXCL13 in individuals with colorectal tumors led to a decrease in the concentration of B cells in the invasive border of the tumors, resulting in a substantial increase in the likelihood of disease recurrence [40].
In our study, we have discovered a significant association between improved clinical outcomes in NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy and an increased density of CXCL13 within TLSs compared to the tumor itself. Similarly, another study revealed a prognostic and predictive role of CXCL13-mediated TLSs in bladder cancer patients treated with ICI and favorable outcomes [21], but they did not evaluate CXCL13+ cell density potential role in different compartments. However, our findings are supported by substantial evidence that demonstrates the connection between CXCL13 and the formation of TLSs [16,41,42], as well as the recruitment of B cells, TFH-cells, and dendritic cells to the TLSs. These cells play a crucial role in presenting antigens to effector T cells, thereby influencing the loco-regional anti-tumor immunity of tumors [43,44]. Several studies have demonstrated that the presence of B cells in TLSs enhances the effectiveness of immunotherapy [45]. This fact was experimentally confirmed, wherein the inhibition of B cells by anti-CD20 resulted in a reduction of inflammation and a decrease in the number of CD8+ T cells [46]. Notably, TLSs with a high abundance of antigen-presenting cells exhibit better survival rates [44], and these findings underscore the vital role of TLSs in priming immune cell sites with antigen-presenting cells to help coordinate an effective immune response [34].
Based on our results, we believe CXCL13+ cells have a propensity to migrate from NT to IM and toward TLSs in patients who have at least two TLSs in their tumor area and have different functions in those different locations.
According to previous studies, CXCL13+ cells may have two different and opposite functions. When bound to their receptors, they have the ability to directly impact tumor growth by promoting the proliferation of cancer cells and inhibiting apoptosis [47,48,49,50]. In addition, CXCL13+ cells can indirectly promote the growth of tumor cells by facilitating their evasion from immune responses mediated by effector T cells and by attracting immune cells that have an immunosuppressive function [51,52,53]. This effect is mediated through the secretion of the immunoregulatory cytokine IL-10 by tumor cells or the recruitment of immunosuppressive cells such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and T-regulatory (Treg) cells within the TME, leading to a pro-tumoral activity. However, it is important to note that the CXCL13 axis also has the potential to elicit anti-tumoral responses by promoting the formation of TLSs [24], as pointed out before.
Our study has a few limitations that need to be acknowledged. It is a retrospective study with a cohort of patients who underwent surgical resection at different intervals of time, which may impact the profile of the immune cells given the dynamic variation of the TME over time. In addition, the validation of our findings in an independent set of patients would strengthen our findings. This limitation also emphasizes the small size of our cohort, which undoubtedly reduces the statistical power to detect associations. Finally, double IHC staining was not used, so the exact subtype of CXCL13-producing cells could not be confirmed with specific marker.

5. Conclusions

Our findings provide insights into the distribution and specific localization of CXCL13+ cells within different areas of NSCLC patients’ tumor sites, including the IM, TLS, and NT regions. Notably, our study demonstrates that IHC analysis of CXCL13+ cells can predict favorable and unfavorable prognostic in NSCLC patients undergoing Pembrolizumab/Nivolumab treatment. Furthermore, the precise location of CXCL13+ cells rather than their number determines their function and role as either favorable or unfavorable prognostic indicators of treatment response. The diverse localization of CXCL13+ cells occurs through a process of movement, starting from the NT and progressing to the IM, T, and eventually to the TLSs. Additionally, utilizing these markers, we have developed risk score models that hold promise in determining the prognosis of NSCLC patients. Further studies are required to further evaluate and characterize CXCL13+ cells within specific compartments in a larger and more diverse cohort of patients to better understand the biological mechanisms driving the efficacy of immunotherapy.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cancers16040708/s1, Figure S1: All linear regressions between CXCL13+ cells in different compartments and OS; Figure S2: All linear regressions between CXCL13+ cells in different compartments and PFS; Figure S3: Correlation coefficients between CXCL13 in different compartments and other IHC markers; Figure S4: Comparing density of CXCL13+ cells in IM of the tumor in patients with no TLS with those with one TLS; Table S1: Antibodies information for IHC experiments; Table S2: Clinicopathological characteristics of patients subdivided in PDL1-TPS groups; Table S3: Continuous variables of 65 NSCLC patients in our cohort; Table S4: Association between CXCL13+ cells in different compartments and OS; Table S5: Association between CXCL13+ cells in different compartments and PFS; Table S6: Association between other IHC markers and OS; Table S7: Association between other IHC markers and PFS; Table S8: Association between clinical features and OS; Table S9: Association between clinical features and PFS; Table S10: General multivariate COX models for all clinical and immunological (IHC markers) to predict OS; Table S11: General multivariate COX models for all clinical and immunological (IHC markers) to predict PFS; Table S12: Clinicopathological characteristics of the selected 65 NSCLC patients divided by TLS groups.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.V., F.C.L. and P.J.; methodology, F.V., F.C.L., C.B. and A.G.; software, F.V. and C.B.; validation, F.V., F.C.L., C.B., F.C., A.G., F.B., M.T., M.O., B.R., V.S.K.M. and P.J.; formal analysis, F.V., F.C.L. and C.B.; investigation, F.V., C.B., M.O. and P.J.; resources, P.J.; data curation, F.C.L., F.C., A.G., F.B., M.T. and M.O.; writing—original draft preparation, F.V.; writing—review and editing, F.V., F.C.L., A.G., M.O., B.R., V.S.K.M. and P.J.; visualization, F.V.; supervision, P.J., V.SKM. and F.C.L.; project administration, M.O.; funding acquisition, P.J., V.S.K.M. and B.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Oncotech-MEDTEQ research grant provided the funding for this project. Venkata Manem holds a salary support award from the Fonds de recherche du Québec—Santé (FRQS: Quebec Foundation for Health Research). Philippe Joubert holds a salary support award from the FRQS. Dr. Joubert and Manem are members of the Quebec Respiratory Health Research Network.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of IUCPQ-Université Laval protocol code MP10-2020-3397, 21890, and date of approval 28 May 2020.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Data presented here are available from the corresponding author Philippe Joubert.

Acknowledgments

Our team would like to thank the IUCPQ biobank for providing the tissues and the clinical data, and Sébastien Renaud for the thorough review of the manuscript. We are grateful for the great support & knowledge of Sophie Plante coordinator of the TRITON platform at CRIUCPQ that processed all the immunohistochemistry slides.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, R.; Manochakian, R.; James, L.; Azzouqa, A.-G.; Shi, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, K.; Lou, Y. Emerging therapeutic agents for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2020, 13, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Fuchs, H.E.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 7–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Behrouzieh, S.; Sheida, F.; Rezaei, N. Review of the recent clinical trials for PD-1/PD-L1 based lung cancer immunotherapy. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2021, 21, 1355–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pasello, G.; Pavan, A.; Attili, I.; Bortolami, A.; Bonanno, L.; Menis, J.; Conte, P.; Guarneri, V. Real world data in the era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs): Increasing evidence and future applications in lung cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2020, 87, 102031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mariathasan, S.; Turley, S.J.; Nickles, D.; Castiglioni, A.; Yuen, K.; Wang, Y.; Kadel, E.E., III; Koeppen, H.; Astarita, J.L.; Cubas, R. TGFβ attenuates tumour response to PD-L1 blockade by contributing to exclusion of T cells. Nature 2018, 554, 544–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, Q.; Xu, Z.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, L.; You, Q.; Sun, J. Multimodal detection of PD-L1: Reasonable biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2018, 8, 1689. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yi, M.; Jiao, D.; Xu, H.; Liu, Q.; Zhao, W.; Han, X.; Wu, K. Biomarkers for predicting efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Mol. Cancer 2018, 17, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Solomon, B.; Young, R.J.; Bressel, M.; Urban, D.; Hendry, S.; Thai, A.; Angel, C.; Haddad, A.; Kowanetz, M.; Fua, T. Prognostic significance of PD-L1+ and CD8+ immune cells in HPV+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2018, 6, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cabrita, R.; Lauss, M.; Sanna, A.; Donia, M.; Larsen, M.S.; Mitra, S.; Johansson, I.; Phung, B.; Harbst, K.; Vallon-Christersson, J. Tertiary lymphoid structures improve immunotherapy and survival in melanoma. Nature 2020, 577, 561–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Petitprez, F.; de Reyniès, A.; Keung, E.Z.; Chen, T.W.-W.; Sun, C.-M.; Calderaro, J.; Jeng, Y.-M.; Hsiao, L.-P.; Lacroix, L.; Bougoüin, A. B cells are associated with survival and immunotherapy response in sarcoma. Nature 2020, 577, 556–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Helmink, B.A.; Reddy, S.M.; Gao, J.; Zhang, S.; Basar, R.; Thakur, R.; Yizhak, K.; Sade-Feldman, M.; Blando, J.; Han, G. B cells and tertiary lymphoid structures promote immunotherapy response. Nature 2020, 577, 549–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bruno, T.C. New Predictors for Immunotherapy Responses Sharpen Our View of the Tumour Microenvironment; Nature Publishing Group: London, UK, 2020; Volume 577, pp. 474–476. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cyster, J.G. Chemokines, sphingosine-1-phosphate, and cell migration in secondary lymphoid organs. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2005, 23, 127–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ansel, K.M.; McHeyzer-Williams, L.J.; Ngo, V.N.; McHeyzer-Williams, M.G.; Cyster, J.G. In vivo–activated CD4 T cells upregulate CXC chemokine receptor 5 and reprogram their response to lymphoid chemokines. J. Exp. Med. 1999, 190, 1123–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Legler, D.F.; Loetscher, M.; Roos, R.S.; Clark-Lewis, I.; Baggiolini, M.; Moser, B. B cell–attracting chemokine 1, a human CXC chemokine expressed in lymphoid tissues, selectively attracts B lymphocytes via BLR1/CXCR5. J. Exp. Med. 1998, 187, 655–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sautès-Fridman, C.; Petitprez, F.; Calderaro, J.; Fridman, W.H. Tertiary lymphoid structures in the era of cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2019, 19, 307–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ansel, K.M.; Ngo, V.N.; Hyman, P.L.; Luther, S.A.; Förster, R.; Sedgwick, J.D.; Browning, J.L.; Lipp, M.; Cyster, J.G. A chemokine-driven positive feedback loop organizes lymphoid follicles. Nature 2000, 406, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gunn, M.D.; Ngo, V.N.; Ansel, K.M.; Ekland, E.H.; Cyster, J.G.; Williams, L.T. A B-cell-homing chemokine made in lymphoid follicles activates Burkitt’s lymphoma receptor-1. Nature 1998, 391, 799–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cosgrove, J.; Novkovic, M.; Albrecht, S.; Pikor, N.B.; Zhou, Z.; Onder, L.; Mörbe, U.; Cupovic, J.; Miller, H.; Alden, K. B cell zone reticular cell microenvironments shape CXCL13 gradient formation. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fridman, W.H.; Zitvogel, L.; Sautès, C.; Kroemer, G. The immune contexture in cancer prognosis and treatment. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 14, 717–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Groeneveld, C.S.; Fontugne, J.; Cabel, L.; Bernard-Pierrot, I.; Radvanyi, F.; Allory, Y.; de Reyniès, A. Tertiary lymphoid structures marker CXCL13 is associated with better survival for patients with advanced-stage bladder cancer treated with immunotherapy. Eur. J. Cancer 2021, 148, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, M.; Lu, J.; Zhang, G.; Wang, Y.; He, M.; Xu, Q.; Xu, C.; Liu, H. CXCL13 shapes immunoactive tumor microenvironment and enhances the efficacy of PD-1 checkpoint blockade in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. J. ImmunoTher. Cancer 2021, 9, e001136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sorin, M.; Karimi, E.; Rezanejad, M.; Miranda, W.Y.; Desharnais, L.; McDowell, S.A.; Doré, S.; Arabzadeh, A.; Breton, V.; Fiset, B. Single-cell spatial landscape of immunotherapy response reveals mechanisms of CXCL13 enhanced antitumor immunity. J. Immunother. Cancer 2023, 11, e005545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dai, S.; Zeng, H.; Liu, Z.; Jin, K.; Jiang, W.; Wang, Z.; Lin, Z.; Xiong, Y.; Wang, J.; Chang, Y. Intratumoral CXCL13+ CD8+ T cell infiltration determines poor clinical outcomes and immunoevasive contexture in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J. Immunother. Cancer 2021, 9, e001823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jin, K.; Cao, Y.; Gu, Y.; Fang, H.; Fei, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, X.; Lv, K.; He, X.; Lin, C. Poor clinical outcomes and immunoevasive contexture in CXCL13+ CD8+ T cells enriched gastric cancer patients. Oncoimmunology 2021, 10, 1915560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fend, L.; Remy-Ziller, C.; Foloppe, J.; Kempf, J.; Cochin, S.; Barraud, L.; Accart, N.; Erbs, P.; Fournel, S.; Préville, X. Oncolytic virotherapy with an armed vaccinia virus in an orthotopic model of renal carcinoma is associated with modification of the tumor microenvironment. Oncoimmunology 2016, 5, e1080414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Shiroyama, T.; Nagatomo, I.; Koyama, S.; Hirata, H.; Nishida, S.; Miyake, K.; Fukushima, K.; Shirai, Y.; Mitsui, Y.; Takata, S. Impact of sarcopenia in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer treated with PD-1 inhibitors: A preliminary retrospective study. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tan, A.; Emmett, L.; Lo, S.; Liu, V.; Kapoor, R.; Carlino, M.; Guminski, A.; Long, G.; Menzies, A. FDG-PET response and outcome from anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma. Ann. Oncol. 2018, 29, 2115–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Mody, R.; Alice, L.Y.; Naranjo, A.; Zhang, F.F.; London, W.B.; Shulkin, B.L.; Parisi, M.T.; Diccianni, M.B.; Hank, J.A.; Felder, M. Irinotecan, temozolomide, and dinutuximab with GM-CSF in children with refractory or relapsed neuroblastoma: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38, 2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lim, S.Y.; Rizos, H. Immune cell profiling in the age of immune checkpoint inhibitors: Implications for biomarker discovery and understanding of resistance mechanisms. Mamm. Genome 2018, 29, 866–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Khan, M.; Du, K.; Ai, M.; Wang, B.; Lin, J.; Ren, A.; Chen, C.; Huang, Z.; Qiu, W.; Yuan, Y. PD-L1 expression as biomarker of efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic triple negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1060308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Berghmans, T.; Durieux, V.; Hendriks, L.E.; Dingemans, A.-M. Immunotherapy: From advanced NSCLC to early stages, an evolving concept. Front. Med. 2020, 7, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Necchi, A.; Raggi, D.; Gallina, A.; Ross, J.S.; Farè, E.; Giannatempo, P.; Marandino, L.; Colecchia, M.; Luciano, R.; Bianchi, M. Impact of molecular subtyping and immune infiltration on pathological response and outcome following neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur. Urol. 2020, 77, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Park, S.; Cha, H.; Kim, H.S.; Lee, B.; Kim, S.; Kim, T.M.; Jung, H.A.; Sun, J.M.; Ahn, J.S.; Ahn, M.J. Transcriptional upregulation of CXCL13 is correlated with a favorable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Med. 2023, 12, 7639–7650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Malhotra, J.; Jabbour, S.K.; Aisner, J. Current state of immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2017, 6, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, B.T.; Shen, R.; Buonocore, D.; Olah, Z.T.; Ni, A.; Ginsberg, M.S.; Ulaner, G.A.; Offin, M.; Feldman, D.; Hembrough, T. Ado-trastuzumab emtansine for patients with HER2-mutant lung cancers: Results from a phase II basket trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Gettinger, S.; Rizvi, N.A.; Chow, L.Q.; Borghaei, H.; Brahmer, J.; Ready, N.; Gerber, D.E.; Shepherd, F.A.; Antonia, S.; Goldman, J.W. Nivolumab monotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, 2980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rizvi, N.A.; Hellmann, M.D.; Brahmer, J.R.; Juergens, R.A.; Borghaei, H.; Gettinger, S.; Chow, L.Q.; Gerber, D.E.; Laurie, S.A.; Goldman, J.W. Nivolumab in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, 2969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Panse, J.; Friedrichs, K.; Marx, A.; Hildebrandt, Y.; Luetkens, T.; Bartels, K.; Horn, C.; Stahl, T.; Cao, Y.; Milde-Langosch, K. Chemokine CXCL13 is overexpressed in the tumour tissue and in the peripheral blood of breast cancer patients. Br. J. Cancer 2008, 99, 930–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bindea, G.; Mlecnik, B.; Tosolini, M.; Kirilovsky, A.; Waldner, M.; Obenauf, A.C.; Angell, H.; Fredriksen, T.; Lafontaine, L.; Berger, A. Spatiotemporal dynamics of intratumoral immune cells reveal the immune landscape in human cancer. Immunity 2013, 39, 782–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Luther, S.A.; Ansel, K.M.; Cyster, J.G. Overlapping roles of CXCL13, interleukin 7 receptor α, and CCR7 ligands in lymph node development. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 197, 1191–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Luther, S.A.; Lopez, T.; Bai, W.; Hanahan, D.; Cyster, J.G. BLC expression in pancreatic islets causes B cell recruitment and lymphotoxin-dependent lymphoid neogenesis. Immunity 2000, 12, 471–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Van de Pavert, S.A.; Mebius, R.E. New insights into the development of lymphoid tissues. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 10, 664–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Goc, J.; Germain, C.; Vo-Bourgais, T.K.D.; Lupo, A.; Klein, C.; Knockaert, S.; de Chaisemartin, L.; Ouakrim, H.; Becht, E.; Alifano, M. Dendritic Cells in Tumor-Associated Tertiary Lymphoid Structures Signal a Th1 Cytotoxic Immune Contexture and License the Positive Prognostic Value of Infiltrating CD8+ T CellsMature DC Coordinate Intratumoral Immune Reaction. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 705–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lauss, M.; Donia, M.; Svane, I.M.; Jonsson, G. B Cells and Tertiary Lymphoid Structures: Friends or Foes in Cancer Immunotherapy? Clin. Cancer Res. 2022, 28, 1751–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Griss, J.; Bauer, W.; Wagner, C.; Simon, M.; Chen, M.; Grabmeier-Pfistershammer, K.; Maurer-Granofszky, M.; Roka, F.; Penz, T.; Bock, C. B cells sustain inflammation and predict response to immune checkpoint blockade in human melanoma. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Heinig, K.; Gätjen, M.; Grau, M.; Stache, V.; Anagnostopoulos, I.; Gerlach, K.; Niesner, R.A.; Cseresnyes, Z.; Hauser, A.E.; Lenz, P. Access to Follicular Dendritic Cells Is a Pivotal Step in Murine Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia B-cell Activation and ProliferationCXCR5 and Lymphotoxin-Dependent Leukemia Growth. Cancer Discov. 2014, 4, 1448–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ticchioni, M.; Essafi, M.; Jeandel, P.; Davi, F.; Cassuto, J.; Deckert, M.; Bernard, A. Homeostatic chemokines increase survival of B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells through inactivation of transcription factor FOXO3a. Oncogene 2007, 26, 7081–7091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chunsong, H.; Yuling, H.; Li, W.; Jie, X.; Gang, Z.; Qiuping, Z.; Qingping, G.; Kejian, Z.; Li, Q.; Chang, A.E. CXC chemokine ligand 13 and CC chemokine ligand 19 cooperatively render resistance to apoptosis in B cell lineage acute and chronic lymphocytic leukemia CD23+ CD5+ B cells. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 6713–6722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Vickers, N.J. Animal communication: When i’m calling you, will you answer too? Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, R713–R715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ding, Y.; Shen, J.; Zhang, G.; Chen, X.; Wu, J.; Chen, W. CD40 controls CXCR5-induced recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells to gastric cancer. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 38901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. LL CD23. CCL19 and CXCL13 Synergistically Regulate. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 2880–2888.
  53. Chen, X.; Takemoto, Y.; Deng, H.; Middelhoff, M.; Friedman, R.A.; Chu, T.H.; Churchill, M.J.; Ma, Y.; Nagar, K.K.; Tailor, Y.H. Histidine decarboxylase (HDC)-expressing granulocytic myeloid cells induce and recruit Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in murine colon cancer. Oncoimmunology 2017, 6, e1290034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic and histologic evaluation of TLS as well as CXCL13+ cells in different compartments. (A) IHC slide for assessing CXCL13+ cells in different compartments, including T, IM, TLS, and NT. (B) Spearman correlation coefficient in different compartments between CXCL13+ cells and OS, and (C) between CXCL13+ cells and PFS. T, tumor; IM, invasive margin; TLS, tertiary lymphoid structures; TLSin, inside TLS; TLSne, neighborhood of TLS; NT, non-tumor. TME, tumor microenvironment. A green color indicates a positive correlation whereas a red color indicates a negative correlation.
Figure 1. Schematic and histologic evaluation of TLS as well as CXCL13+ cells in different compartments. (A) IHC slide for assessing CXCL13+ cells in different compartments, including T, IM, TLS, and NT. (B) Spearman correlation coefficient in different compartments between CXCL13+ cells and OS, and (C) between CXCL13+ cells and PFS. T, tumor; IM, invasive margin; TLS, tertiary lymphoid structures; TLSin, inside TLS; TLSne, neighborhood of TLS; NT, non-tumor. TME, tumor microenvironment. A green color indicates a positive correlation whereas a red color indicates a negative correlation.
Cancers 16 00708 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of CXCL13+ cell density between responders (PFS > 1 year) and non-responders (PFS < 1 year). Patients were treated with either Pembrolizumab or Nivolumab. In responders, a consistent lower density of CXCL13+ cells in non-TLS compartments are observed, such as T (A), T+IM (B), T+IM+NT (C), and T+NT (D). A higher density of CXCL13+ cells is observed in the TLS compared to the T compartments in responders (E). T, tumor; IM, invasive margin; NT, non-tumor.
Figure 2. Comparison of CXCL13+ cell density between responders (PFS > 1 year) and non-responders (PFS < 1 year). Patients were treated with either Pembrolizumab or Nivolumab. In responders, a consistent lower density of CXCL13+ cells in non-TLS compartments are observed, such as T (A), T+IM (B), T+IM+NT (C), and T+NT (D). A higher density of CXCL13+ cells is observed in the TLS compared to the T compartments in responders (E). T, tumor; IM, invasive margin; NT, non-tumor.
Cancers 16 00708 g002
Figure 3. CXCL13+ cell density underly a migratory pattern toward the TLS compartment. This result shows CXCL13+ cells in patients with no TLS; the density of CXCL13+ cells in IM is significantly higher than in other groups (Low, Intermediate, and High groups). In cases with no TLS, CXCL13+ cells transition from NT to T and accumulate in IM. But in patients with at least 2 TLSs, CXCL13+ cells accumulate in TLSs after this transition. Low TLSs (1–2), intermediate (3–8), High (>=9). T, tumor; IM, invasive margin; NT, non-tumor; TLS, tertiary lymphoid structures.
Figure 3. CXCL13+ cell density underly a migratory pattern toward the TLS compartment. This result shows CXCL13+ cells in patients with no TLS; the density of CXCL13+ cells in IM is significantly higher than in other groups (Low, Intermediate, and High groups). In cases with no TLS, CXCL13+ cells transition from NT to T and accumulate in IM. But in patients with at least 2 TLSs, CXCL13+ cells accumulate in TLSs after this transition. Low TLSs (1–2), intermediate (3–8), High (>=9). T, tumor; IM, invasive margin; NT, non-tumor; TLS, tertiary lymphoid structures.
Cancers 16 00708 g003
Table 1. Clinicopathological characteristics of the selected 65 NSCLC patients.
Table 1. Clinicopathological characteristics of the selected 65 NSCLC patients.
VariablesNumber of Patients (%)
Sex
Male
Female

31 (48%)
34 (52%)
Smoking habit
Former
Current
Never

49 (75%)
14 (22%)
2 (3%)
Histology groups
Adenocarcinoma
Squamous

54 (83%)
11 (17%)
Ecog-status
0
1
2
3

18 (28%)
41 (63%)
4 (6%)
2 (3%)
Type of immunotherapy
Nivolumab
Pembrolizumab
Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy
Nivolumab + Pembrolizumab

31 (48%)
27 (42%)
6 (9%)
1 (1%)
Stage at the start of immunotherapy
II
III
IV

2 (3%)
6 (9%)
57 (88%)
PFS
>1 year
<1 year

28 (43%)
37 (57%)
Ecog, Eastern cooperative oncology group; PFS, progression-free survival.
Table 2. Univariate COX model for CXCL13 positive cells in different compartments and OS.
Table 2. Univariate COX model for CXCL13 positive cells in different compartments and OS.
VariablesNumber of PatientsHRCI 95%
Lower
CI 95%
Upper
p
CXCL13-NT521.131.021.260.02
CXCL13-T+IM+NT521.221.041.420.01
CXCL13-T+NT521.231.071.42<0.005
Abbreviations: T, tumor; IM, invasive margin; NT, non-tumor.
Table 3. Multivariate COX model for CXCL13 positive cells in different compartments and OS.
Table 3. Multivariate COX model for CXCL13 positive cells in different compartments and OS.
Overall Model HROverall Model p
1.230.08
VariablesNumber of PatientsHRCI 95%
Lower
CI 95%
Upper
p
CXCL13-NT521.050.921.200.49
CXCL13-T+IM+NT521.180.981.410.09
Abbreviations: T, tumor; IM, invasive margin; NT, non-tumor.
Table 4. Univariate COX model for CXCL13 positive cells in different compartments and PFS.
Table 4. Univariate COX model for CXCL13 positive cells in different compartments and PFS.
VariablesNumber of PatientsHRCI 95% LowerCI 95%
Upper
p
CXCL13-NT521.311.041.640.02
CXCL13-T+IM+NT521.161.021.320.02
CXCL13-T+NT521.151.021.300.02
CXCL13-TLS/CXCL13-T630.840.730.980.03
Abbreviations: T, tumor; IM, invasive margin; TLS, tertiary lymphoid structures; NT, non-tumor.
Table 5. Multivariate COX model for CXCL13 positive cells in different compartments and PFS.
Table 5. Multivariate COX model for CXCL13 positive cells in different compartments and PFS.
Overall Model HROverall Model p
1.160.56
VariablesNumber of PatientsHRCI 95%
Lower
CI 95%
Upper
p
CXCL13-NT501.250.991.570.06
CXCL13-T+IM+NT501.050.891.230.56
CXCL13-TLS/CXCL13-T500.890.751.050.17
Abbreviations: T, tumor; IM, invasive margin; TLS, tertiary lymphoid structures; NT, non-tumor.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vahidian, F.; Lamaze, F.C.; Bouffard, C.; Coulombe, F.; Gagné, A.; Blais, F.; Tonneau, M.; Orain, M.; Routy, B.; Manem, V.S.K.; et al. CXCL13 Positive Cells Localization Predict Response to Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in Pulmonary Non-Small Cell Carcinoma. Cancers 2024, 16, 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16040708

AMA Style

Vahidian F, Lamaze FC, Bouffard C, Coulombe F, Gagné A, Blais F, Tonneau M, Orain M, Routy B, Manem VSK, et al. CXCL13 Positive Cells Localization Predict Response to Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in Pulmonary Non-Small Cell Carcinoma. Cancers. 2024; 16(4):708. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16040708

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vahidian, Fatemeh, Fabien C. Lamaze, Cédrik Bouffard, François Coulombe, Andréanne Gagné, Florence Blais, Marion Tonneau, Michèle Orain, Bertrand Routy, Venkata S. K. Manem, and et al. 2024. "CXCL13 Positive Cells Localization Predict Response to Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in Pulmonary Non-Small Cell Carcinoma" Cancers 16, no. 4: 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16040708

APA Style

Vahidian, F., Lamaze, F. C., Bouffard, C., Coulombe, F., Gagné, A., Blais, F., Tonneau, M., Orain, M., Routy, B., Manem, V. S. K., & Joubert, P. (2024). CXCL13 Positive Cells Localization Predict Response to Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in Pulmonary Non-Small Cell Carcinoma. Cancers, 16(4), 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16040708

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop