Next Article in Journal
Inter-Institutional Comparison of Personalized Risk Assessments for Second Malignant Neoplasms for a 13-Year-Old Girl Receiving Proton versus Photon Craniospinal Irradiation
Next Article in Special Issue
Profiling Invasiveness in Head and Neck Cancer: Recent Contributions of Genomic and Transcriptomic Approaches
Previous Article in Journal
Proton Radiobiology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Complex of MUC1, CIN85 and Cbl in Colon Cancer Progression and Metastasis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Tumor and Stromal-Based Contributions to Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Invasion

Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Program in Cancer Cell Biology, Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2015, 7(1), 382-406; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers7010382
Submission received: 12 January 2015 / Revised: 10 February 2015 / Accepted: 15 February 2015 / Published: 27 February 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Cell Invasion)

Abstract

:
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is typically diagnosed at advanced stages with evident loco-regional and/or distal metastases. The prevalence of metastatic lesions directly correlates with poor patient outcome, resulting in high patient mortality rates following metastatic development. The progression to metastatic disease requires changes not only in the carcinoma cells, but also in the surrounding stromal cells and tumor microenvironment. Within the microenvironment, acellular contributions from the surrounding extracellular matrix, along with contributions from various infiltrating immune cells, tumor associated fibroblasts, and endothelial cells facilitate the spread of tumor cells from the primary site to the rest of the body. Thus far, most attempts to limit metastatic spread through therapeutic intervention have failed to show patient benefit in clinic trails. The goal of this review is highlight the complexity of invasion-promoting interactions in the HNSCC tumor microenvironment, focusing on contributions from tumor and stromal cells in order to assist future therapeutic development and patient treatment.

1. Introduction

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is one of the most aggressive and invasive cancer types [1]. A common HNSCC hallmark is loco-regional invasion and metastasis to cervical lymph nodes, accounting for an 88% patient mortality rate in the two years following metastatic disease development [1]. Despite the long-held notion of genomic instability in advanced disease stages, recent studies have found no difference in the accumulation of mutations in tumors from patients with and without lymph node involvement [2]. This indicates that alterations other than mutations in signaling pathways likely account for progression from primary tumor to invasive and metastatic disease. The contributions towards metastatic disease arise both from changes in the behavior of tumor cells and interactions with various stromal components in the tumor microenvironment. The purpose of this review is to highlight the molecular and cellular mechanisms utilized by tumor cells and the associated microenvironment in promoting HNSCC invasiveness.

2. Tumor Cell Contributions

In HNSCC patients, two out of three individuals exhibit locoregional or distal metastasis at diagnosis, correlating with poor patient survival [3,4]. As in other carcinomas, HNSCC invasion involves a multi-step process that entails initial breaching of the basement membrane, tumor cell migration through the stromal extracellular matrix (ECM), intravasation into regional vasculature, and extravasation at the metastatic site. These stages frequently utilize proteolytic-mediated degradation of ECM proteins to facilitate tumor cell spreading [5,6,7,8,9].

2.1. Cell-ECM Interactions

The activity of several actin cytoskeletal-modulating proteins has been demonstrated to alter the invasive nature of HNSCC. The basement membrane and ECM are barriers that tumor cells must bypass in order to move into the surrounding stroma [6,10,11]. Tumor cell mediated proteolytic degradation of ECM components, globally or at focalized points termed invadopodia, is essential to the invasive process [6,10,11,12]. Invadopodia are actin-based membrane protrusions that mediate tumor cell dissemination by degrading restrictive ECM proteins through the action of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) [5,10,11,12]. Many MMPs are overexpressed in HNSCC, including the invadopodia-associated MMPs MMP-2, MMP-9, and MMP-14 [9,12,13]. Invadopodia comprise a central filamentous (F)-actin core surrounded by an integrin-based adhesion complex ring [6,10,11]. Cortactin and Arp2/3 complex are essential protein components involved in formation of the F-actin invadopodia core [14,15,16,17]. Cortactin is overexpressed in several cancer types including HNSCC, resulting in enhanced tumor cell motility and invasion [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Cortactin stabilizes actin branch points, binding to both the F-actin “mother” filament and Arp2/3 complex on the “daughter” filament [22,25,26,27]. The end result of this activity is enhanced invadopodia formation and maturation, leading to robust localized ECM degradation [22,25,26,27]. Further evidence indicates that cortactin overexpression correlates with lymph node involvement and metastases [28,29,30]. In addition to modulating cytoskeletal dynamics, cortactin facilitates localization and activation of MMP-14 (also termed membrane type 1—matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP)) to invadopodia along with the secretion of MMP-2 and MMP-9 at sites of focalized degradation of ECM proteins [13,31,32]. The activity of MMP-14, MMP-2, and MMP-9 is significantly elevated in HNSCC cell lines with high metastatic potential and well as oral cancer patient samples with lymph node involvement [12,33,34].
Several studies have demonstrated increased localization of the actin bundling protein fascin at the tumor invasive front [35,36]. Facin functions by bundling F-actin, which facilitates the formation of cellular protrusions necessary for cell-ECM interactions and cell motility [35,36,37]. Bundling of F-actin into parallel strands stabilizes filopodia and invadopodia, resulting in enhanced cell motility and localized ECM degradation [35,36,37]. Re-expression of fascin in facin-null SW1222 human colonic epithelial cells results in relocalization of integrin β1 and vinculin to the leading edge of motile cells [38]. Overexpression of fascin in various tumors, including HNSCC, correlates with aggressive disease, high metastatic potential, and poor prognosis [35,36].
Similarly, the serine/threonine kinase p21 protein (Cdc42/Rac)-activated kinase (PAK1) is enriched at the invasive boarder of HNSCC tumors, and is essential for HNSCC invasion in vitro [39,40]. PAK1 resides in the cytoplasm, but can be detected at the leading edge of motile cells, focal adhesions, cell-cell junctions, and cortical actin structures [41,42,43,44]. PAKs phosphorylate several cytoskeletal protein targets, including vimentin, desmin, LIM kinase (LIMK), myosin light chain (MLC), and myosin light chain kinase (MLCK), where phosphorylation directly correlates with enhanced cellular motility [39,40]. PAK1-mediated MLCK phosphorylation reduces stress fiber formation, while PAK-1-mediated MLC phosphorylation induces contractility [41,45,46]. LIMK activation facilitates LIMK binding to the F-actin severing protein ADF/cofilin, inhibiting ADF/cofilin activity via phosphorylation to stabilize the F-actin network [41,47,48]. The p41-ARC subunit of Arp2/3 complex can be directly phosphorylated by PAK1, activating Arp2/3 actin nucleation activity to enhance F-actin formation and increase cell motility [49,50]. This effect on actin network formation can also be accomplished through PAK1 phosphorylation of cortactin [49,51]. In addition to altering cytoskeletal dynamics, PAK1 has been implicated in the downregulation of cell-cell contacts. PAK1-mediated phosphorylation of the transcription factor Snail results in reduced expression of the epithelial cell-cell adhesion molecule epithelial (E)-cadherin [41,52]. Secretion of MMP-1, MMP-3, and MMP-9 correlates directly with PAK1 expression, suggesting that the activity of PAK1 may enhance proteolytic degradation of ECM [53,54]. Overexpression of PAK1 in various tumors, including HNSCC, correlates with aggressive disease and poor prognosis [39,40].
The calcium binding proteins S100A8 and S100A9 belong to a family of low-molecular-weight cytoplasmic proteins primarily detected as a S100A8/A9 heterodimer termed calprotectin [55,56,57,58]. Expression and secretion of S100A8/A9 is associated with chronic inflammation and is released from tumor cells in response to hypoxic stress [55]. While S100A8 and S100A9 are overexpressed in a multitude of cancers, their expression is suppressed in HNSCC [55,59,60]. Certain studies have demonstrated a pro-apoptotic role of S100A8/A9, inducing pro-caspase-3 cleavage and downregulating expression of anti-apoptotic members of the Bcl family, Bcl2 and Bcl-XL [55,61]. The ability of S100A8/A9 to induce an apoptotic response, rather than the role in inflammatory signaling, is the most likely reason that expression of these proteins is lost in HNSCC. In addition to inflammatory signaling and apoptotic response, S100A8/A9 regulates the expression and secretion of MMP-2, representing a potential upstream therapeutic target [59,60]. Thus, calprotectin may serve a dual role in HNSCC by preventing apoptosis while facilitating MMP-2-driven metastatic dissemination.
In order to monitor the surrounding ECM, cells form actin-rich protrusions that in a migratory cell contact the ECM to form structures known as focal adhesions. Focal adhesions contain the well-characterized cytoskeletal proteins talin, paxillin, α-actinin, vinculin and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) [62,63,64]. Focal adhesions serve as intermediary structures by linking the actin cytoskeleton within the cell to the ECM surrounding the cell by interacting with the cytoplasmic domains of the integrin class of transmembrane ECM receptors [62,65,66,67,68]. Integrin extracellular domains directly bind ECM proteins, including fibronectin, laminin, collagen I and collagen IV. [62,65,66,67,68]. FAK activation precedes focal contact formation and facilitates focal adhesion maturation through phosphorylation of Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factors and phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase isoform γ, which enhances talin binding to integrin cytoplasmic domains [66,69]. Regulation of focal adhesion disassembly at the trailing edge by FAK dramatically alters cellular motility [66,70,71]. FAK overexpression occurs early in HNSCC development, correlating with increased tumor cell invasion and lymph node metastasis, partially through an increase in MMP-2 and MMP-9 secretion [67,68,69]. As such, FAK has become a therapeutic target in many tumor types, where pharmacological inhibition of FAK tyrosine kinase activity results in decreased tumor cell invasion [72,73,74,75].
Phospholipase D (PLD1), mediates the hydrolysis of phosphatidyl choline into choline and the second messenger phosphatidic acid [49,76,77]. Phosphatidic acid is further hydrolyzed by phosphatidic acid phosphohydrolases to generate diacylglycerol and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), the latter being a key mediator of inflammatory response and has been implicated in oncogenesis and metastatic progression [10,76]. In addition, LPA activates the Rho family of cytoskeletal regulatory GTPases, facilitating the formation of filopodia, lamellipodia, and stress fibers essential for cell movement [49,76]. PLD1 has been shown to drive stress fiber and focal adhesion formation in HeLa cells [78]. PLD1 is overexpressed in several cancers including HNSCC, where it activates Src kinase and mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK), driving invadopodia formation, maturation, and tumor cell invasion [79,80,81,82]. Due to the numerous migratory and invasive signaling networks stimulated by PLD1 and PLD1 substrates, PLD1 represents a viable upstream target for limiting tumor spread and metastatic progression. To this end, the PLD1 inhibitors quercetin, ML298, and ML299 decrease U87 glioblastoma cell invasion in in vitro assays [83,84]. These data support further investigation into PLD1 inhibitor efficacy in suppressing HNSCC invasion.
The phosphoinsositide-3-kinase (PI3K) family of kinases are among the most frequently altered oncongenic drivers in cancer [85,86]. Genomic alteration of PI3K occurs in approximately 31% of HNSCC tumors [85,86]. The PI3K class IA isoforms, p110α, p110β, and p110δ lie directly downstream of many oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3), Met, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), and insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF-1R) [85,87]. The PI3K isoform p110α is the most commonly overexpressed family member in HNSCC, acting upstream of Cdc42, Rac, and Rho kinases, to enhance filopodia and lamellipodia formation resulting in increased cellular motility [85,86,88,89,90].
Despite the expression of several fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptors in HNSCC, surprisingly little investigation has focused on secretion of the FGF gene products FGF-3, FGF-4, and FGF-19 located within the 11q13 amplified region found in nearly a third of HNSCC patient samples [91,92]. Studies have focused on FGF-2 and FGF-binding protein, identifying autocrine loops with these FGF receptors that correlate with enhanced HNSCC invasion [92,93]. Given the establishment of these autocrine loops and the potential for these secreted FGFs to attract fibroblasts into proximity with HNSCC cells (see below), further investigation into the 11q13 amplified FGFs is warranted to determine if these proteins contribute to HNSCC metastatic progression.

2.2. Cell-Cell Interactions

In addition to enhanced motility at the individual cellular level, the mode of tumor cell migration also impacts local invasion and metastasis. Tumor cells can invade as individual cells, displaying either mesenchymal or amoeboid migration depending on intercellular signaling events, which result in poorly differentiated tumors due to the intermingling of individual invasive tumor cells with the stromal tissue [94,95]. Other tumor cells utilize multicellular or collective invasion, maintaining tumor cell-cell junctions, resulting in moderately to well differentiated tumors as the invasive tumor cells can be distinguished from the surrounding tissue [94,95]. In histological HNSCC samples displaying a broad invasive front, tumors remain well-to moderately-differentiated due the tumor cells being easily distinguished from the surrounding tissue by retaining membranous E-cadherin staining. These characteristics indicate that such tumors undergo collective invasion. In addition, cases where tumors display individual finger-like invasive fronts, tumors are poorly differentiated as individual tumor cells are intermingled with stromal cells. These invasive tumor cells show reduced E-cadherin staining, with notable increases in both phospho-Src and vimentin that represent a more mesenchymal invasion modality [96]. Patients with elevated phospho-Src and vimentin have direct correlation with greater lymph node involvement and advanced tumor stage [96]. Although E-cadherin is not essential to collective invasion, maintenance of cell-cell adhesions and an epithelial phenotype allow for multicellular invasive clusters to migrate simultaneously [94,95].
In addition to direct cell-cell contact, tumor cells interact through autocrine and paracrine signaling networks. EGFR is overexpressed in greater than 95% of HNSCC patient samples, and phosphorylation of the downstream effector Src kinase correlates with poorly differentiated HNSCC, lymph node involvement, and poor patient outcome [97,98,99]. Recent studies indicate that there are two distinct subpopulations within most HNSCC tumors, in which E-cadherin and vimentin are inversely expressed [100,101,102]. These two subpopulations demonstrate plasticity in regenerating heterogeneity in culture and xenograft tumors derived from single subpopulations, but respond differentially to various chemotherapeutic agents [100,101,102]. Expression of EGFR is variable in these subpopulations, correlating inversely with vimentin expression, suggesting a potential mechanism for acquired EGFR inhibitor resistance that is observed in the clinic [100,101,102]. Another receptor tyrosine kinase, tyrosine receptor kinase B (TrkB), is expressed in more than half of HNSCC patient tumors. TrkB activates the transcription factors Snail and Twist, driving the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and enhancing tumor cell invasion [103]. These data collectively support the idea that deterioration of cell-cell contacts drives a drug resistant and more invasive phenotype in HNSCC.

2.3. Angiogenesis and Neo-Vascularization

Angiogenesis not only supplies growing tumors with requisite nutrition, but also provides cells at the tumor periphery a route to disseminate into surrounding tissues and the rest of the body. In addition to MMPs, HNSCC cells secrete a variety of pro-angiogenic factors that recruit endothelial cells into the local tumor microenvironment, resulting in formation of a leaky capillary bed that facilitates tumor cell intra- and extravasation. Two key angiogenic paracrine signaling profiles have been proposed for HNSCC cells. The first utilizes excess secreted VEGF, FGF-2, with small amounts of interleukin (IL)-8. The second mainly consists of IL-8, with lesser amounts of VEGF and FGF-2 [104,105,106]. In addition, primary HNSCC tumor cell cultures, tissue specimens, and established cells lines have enhanced secretion of VEGF and/or PDGF-AB, with lesser, yet still elevated, secretion of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte macrophage (GM)-CSF [105,107]. Increased secretion of these cytokines drives HNSCC tumor angiogenesis and corresponds with decreased patient survival [105]. Furthermore, oral SCC tissue samples display enhanced lymphatic microvessel density in the presence of VEGF, PDGF, basic FGF, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and IGF-1 [108,109]. Enhanced primary tumor lymphatic and blood microvessel density in response to these secreted factors correlates with lymph node metastasis and invasive tumor margins [110,111]. Endothelial cell recruitment and formation of an immature vascular network around the tumor in response to HNSCC cell angiogenic secretions are therefore prime contributors for providing essential routes for primary tumor cell invasion and metastatic dissemination.

2.4. Metastasis to Distant Sites

Once tumor cells reach the blood or lymphatic vasculature, they must survive in circulation until they reach lymph nodes or other metastatic sites. While little has been elucidated about such circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in HNSCC, the amount of HNSCC CTCs rises significantly in stage IV tumors, correlating directly with increased metastasis and inversely with therapeutic response [112,113]. HNSCC CTCs are not well defined, and are typically characterized as cells expressing epidermal cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) or cytokeratin (CK) 8, CK18, or CK19 in blood samples [112,113]. One study found that IL-6 enhanced survival and self-renewal of the aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)highCD44high cell population, representing a potential cancer stem cell (CSC) subpopulation sufficient to reconstitute a tumor when transplanted into a mouse xenograft model [114]. This same CSC subpopulation is resistant to cisplatin-induced cell death [115]. There is evidence that indicates EGFR, TrkB, and IL-1β are essential to maintaining a mesenchymal subpopulation associated with chemotherapeutic resistance in HNSCC [103,116,117]. Other studies suggest that these mesenchymal-like cells can recapitulate the epithelial population of a tumor following chemotherapeutic therapy, potentially representing the HNSCC tumor equivalent to the CD44+/CD24 stem-like subpopulation in breast carcinomas [100,101,102]. It remains unclear if these mesenchymal-like cells, CSCs and CTCs are the same or unique HNSCC subpopulations, but all show tumor initiating capacity that can be utilized to form metastases [101,102,103,114,115,117]. Once these tumor initiating cells (TICs) reach the metastatic site, they must first extravasate, a process aided by the local endothelial cells [114]. Following extravasation, some TICs differentiate back into the more epithelial phenotype that makes up the majority of the tumor mass, while other TICs undergo self-renewal to maintain the subpopulation [100,101,102,114]. Reconstituting the entire tumor mass allows the tumor to grow rapidly, taking advantage of the hospitable metastatic niche since the epithelial cell phenotype shows enhanced proliferation rates as compared to TICs [101,117]. While CTCs, CSCs, and mesenchymal-like cells represent resistant subpopulations potentially capable of initiating recurrence and correlates with invasive and metastatic disease, investigation into this aspect of HNSCC progression for therapeutic targeting has become an important newly emerging field [100,103,112,113,116].

3. Stromal Cell Contributions

In addition to carcinoma cells, various cellular and acellular stromal components contribute to promoting and maintaining HNSCC invasion. Deposition of specific ECM proteins (collagen IV, collagen XVII, fibronectin, and laminin) is enhanced in HNSCC tumors and serve as a chemo-attractant for HNSCC cells in various in vitro invasion assays [118,119,120]. As HNSCC tumors progress towards metastatic disease, non-tumor cell types from the associated stroma have been shown to have direct and indirect roles in facilitating HNSCC invasion.

3.1. Mast Cells

Mast cells are part of the immune myeloid lineage that mediate innate and acquired immune responses through granule exocyctosis, releasing histamine, serine proteases, carboxypeptidase A (CPA1), proteoglycans, prostaglandin D2 (PGD2), leukotriene C4 (LTC4), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, GM-CSF, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-16 [121]. During advanced HNSCC stages, where the tumor has spread to loco-regional or distal lymph nodes, mast cells accumulate in the tumor stroma, with their presence directly correlating with increased angiogenesis [104,122,123]. How HNSCC tumors suppress rapid mast cell activation in response to immunoglobulin E or CD32 binding to FRI or FRIIb respectively remains to be elucidated, but may occur by blocking FRI activation on mast cells [121]. Additionally, heparanase, an enzyme involved in cleavage and remodeling heparin sulfate proteoglycans in the ECM, accumulates at the HNSCC invasive front, and is a marker of poor prognosis for lymph node metastasis and tumor recurrence [124]. Mast cells, along with tumor infiltrating neutrophils, endothelial cells, and macrophages exhibit heparanase activity [124,125]. However, since mast cells also secrete large amounts of heparin, they are the cell type that is likely responsible for invasion-associated heparanase activity in the tumor microenvironment. While the main contribution of mast cells to tumor progression may be inflammation-mediated recruitment of other cell types into the microenvironment, their presence also facilitates HNSCC tumor neo-vascularization and dissemination to loco-regional lymph nodes.

3.2. Neutrophils

Neutrophils are another component of the immune system that contributes to the innate immune response [126]. Neutrophils are recruited to the tumor microenvironment by pro-inflammatory signals, including IL-8, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, GM-CSF, and TNF-α [127,128]. Following recruitment to the tumor microenvironment, neutrophils secrete VEGF-A, stimulating neovascularization through endothelial cell recruitment and proliferation, which can be abrogated via anti-VEGF-A antibodies or angiostatin treatment [128,129,130]. Additionally, neutrophil-derived HGF and MMP-9 facilitate tumor cell migration and invasion towards the newly formed vascular bed [128]. In this context, neutrophils bridge the gap between the growing tumor mass and the local vasculature, bringing in endothelial cells to an area of growing hypoxia while promoting a chemotactic invasive phenotype in the tumor cells.

3.3. Macrophages

Macrophages belong to the myeloid lineage of the immune system [131]. Macrophages play a direct role in immune surveillance through endocytosis of pathogens and cellular debris [131]. Tumor associated macrophage (TAM) infiltration into the tumor microenvironment correlates with lymph node involvement, tumor stage, and extracapsular spread [132,133,134]. Once TAMs arrive in the tumor microenvironment, TAM secretions set up several paracrine signaling loops that drive tumor cell invasion and metastasis. In one loop, TAMs secrete EGF stimulating tumor cell growth, migration, and invasion. Correspondingly, HNSCC cells secrete CSF-1 that drives further TAM proliferation and tumor infiltration [135,136,137]. In another loop, TAMs secrete macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MMIF), attracting and activating neutrophils, which subsequently interact with HNSCC cells as described above [128,129,130,138]. In response to HNSCC secreted paracrine factors, TAMs develop podosomes, capable of assisting tumor cells breach the basement membrane and enter the vascular or lymphatic network [133,139]. Similar to invadopodia, podosomes are membrane protrusions containing an actin-rich core surrounded by an integrin ring that mediates interaction with the ECM [140]. Podosomes are formed at the leading edge of motile cells and contribute to cellular motility, simultaneously allowing cells to adhere to the ECM and initiating acto-mysoin contractility to pull the cell body forward [139,140]. Podosomes can also localize MMPs, including MMP-2, MMP-9, and MT1-MMP to proteolytically degrade and rearrange the ECM [140,141]. TAMs also secrete the chemotactic factor macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-3α, which drives HNSCC cell migration and invasion [142]. Through these signaling pathways, macrophages are able to promote and maintain the HNSCC invasive phenotype, assist in basement membrane breakdown and recruitment of other cell types into the tumor microenvironment.

3.4. Endothelial Cells

While endothelial cells play a major role in vascularization of the growing tumor mass, emerging evidence demonstrates a novel role for endothelial cells in facilitating tumor cell invasion. The chemotactic factors VEGF, TNF-α, and TGF-β induce podosome formation in endothelial cells along the invasive tumor front [141,143,144,145,146]. This allows endothelial cells to reach hypoxic tumor regions, facilitating breakdown of basement membrane encapsulating the primary tumor. Once endothelial cells come into direct contact with tumor cells, endothelial cell Notch activation in response to HNSCC-derived Notch ligand Jagged1 drives capillary-like sprout formation and neovascularization of the expanding tumor mass [147]. The combined effort of endothelial cell-mediated rearrangement of the microenvironment to promote tumor cell access to the vascular network makes endothelial cells important contributors to HNSCC tumor progression.

3.5. Fibroblasts

The desmoplastic response is a hallmark of cancer progression, where secretion and restructuring of ECM proteins drives tumor cell proteolytic invasion and production of “tracks” for proteolytic-independent invasion modes [148,149]. Fibroblasts are specialized for this task, as they can degrade and rearrange a variety of ECM proteins including type I and IV collagens, laminin, and fibronectin [145,149,150]. Integrin α6 expression allows such cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) to bind the basement membrane protein laminin, enabling CAF-mediated proteolytic laminin degradation [140,151]. Expression of integrin α6 in CAFs has been linked to poor prognosis in oral cancer patients [151]. Fibroblast-mediated proteolytic cleavage of ECM proteins requires direct contact with tumor cells or binding of HNSCC secreted endothelin-1 (ET-1), leading to localization of a disintegrin and metalloprotease (ADAM)-12 and ADAM-17 at fibroblast podosomes, followed by secretion and activation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 from carcinoma cells and CAFs [34,152,153,154]. Other studies suggest that chemokine C-X-C motif receptor type 4 (CXCR4) binding to CAF-secreted chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 12 (CXCL12) initiates carcinoma derived MMP-9 secretion in the tumor microenvironment [34,155]. Regardless of the source of MMP secretion, total MMP levels and the ratio of activated MMPs to total MMP concentration compared with adjacent normal tissue positively correlates with lymph node involvement [155,156]. As a result, the HNSCC stroma is enriched in infiltrating CAFs, with the highest concentrations accumulating near the invasive front of the tumor [24,29,157]. Infiltrating CAFs have several characteristics of myofibroblasts, including enhanced proliferation and motility, expression of cytokeratins, vimentin, and α-smooth muscle actin (SMA), and secretion of MMP-2 and HGF [122,158,159]. CAF MMP secretion facilitates ECM degradation and remodeling, whereas HGF enhances HNSCC cell motility [122,158,159]. In turn, enhanced CAF proliferation and motility allows the CAF population to expand and spread in accordance with the growing invasive tumor front [122,158,159]. The adaptation of HNSCC CAFs with myofibroblast characteristics results in extracapsular tumor cell spread, increased invasion, and lymph node metastasis [160]. Orthotopic floor of mouth co-injection of HNSCC cells with CAFs or normal fibroblasts in mice indicates that CAFs contribute significantly to lymph node and distal metastatic disease [161]. The net results of fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment is rearrangement of ECM proteins, allowing fibroblasts to lead tumor cells into surrounding tissues or paving pathways in the stroma for invasive tumor cells to follow. Additionally, TGF-β and miR-210 induced CAF senescence promotes fibroblast MMP-2 secretion and tumor cell EMT, enhancing in vitro tumor cell invasion [151,162,163,164]. Further evidence indicates that coinjection of tumor cells with senescent CAFs promotes xenograft engraftment and tumor growth [165,166,167]. These activities ultimately result in facilitating HNSCC metastatic progression.

4. Anti-Metastatic Therapeutic Approaches

While indolent primary HNSCC tumors are typically treated by surgical resection and/or radiation therapy, the treatment of invasive and metastatic disease is more complex. The development of preventative anti-metastatic therapies holds promise to broaden patient treatment options and improve survival rates. Many recent anti-metastatic treatments have been aimed at Src kinase due to the essential role Src plays in cancer cell motility and invadopodia formation, as well as the multitude of overexpressed upstream transmembrane receptors that activate Src in tumors [25,26,27]. Initial in vitro studies using saracatinib (AZD0530) resulted in decreased MMP-9 activation and ECM degradation in established HNSCC cell lines, and also reduced invasion in HNSCC cells lines from primary tumors and matched lymph node metastases in combination with the phospholipase C inhibitor U73122 [168,169]. Another combination study showed that saracatinib with the EGFR small molecule inhibitor gefitinib suppressed HNSCC cell invasion in vitro to a greater extent than either drug alone [170]. However, a subsequent Phase II trial of saracatinib resulted in no therapeutic benefit in either recurrent or metastatic HNSCC [171]. Treatment of HNSCC cell lines with the Src/Abl small molecule inhibitor dasatinib (BMS-354825) decreased migration and invasion while blocking the G1-S transition [172]. A Phase II clinical trial of dasatinib alone also failed to show clinical benefit to patients with late stage HNSCC [173]. These trial results clearly demonstrate that targeting Src is insufficient to prevent HNSCC progression, prompting the need to evaluate additional pro-invasive oncogenic targets. The activity of another oncogenic tyrosine kinase, Abl, downstream of EGFR and Src kinase facilitates invadopodia formation and promotes tumor cell invasion and metastasis [30,174,175,176,177,178]. In vitro treatment with the Abl family inhibitor imatinib mesylate (STI571; Gleevac) resulted in enhanced HNSCC cell invasion, opposite of what has been observed in invasive breast cancer [179]. Imatinib mesylate stimulates HNSCC shedding of heparin-binding EGF, which activates EGFR on the HNSCC cell surface, driving invadopodia formation and ECM degradation [179]. A phase II trial of imatinib mesylate and docetaxel for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung carcinoma and HNSCC found no clinical benefit and closed early due to significant toxicity from this drug regimen [180]. Cetuximab (IMC-C225), an anti-EGFR humanized monoclonal antibody, shows multifaceted benefit in HNSCC by blocking proliferation, angiogenesis and metastasis while increasing tumor cell apoptosis [181,182,183]. Phase II clinical trials for patients with late stage HNSCC showed partial response to cetuximab alone in a small patient subset, while complete response was observed in the majority of patients when cetuximab was used in combination with cisplatin, fluorouracil, and radiotherapy [184,185]. The Erbitux in First-Line Treatment of Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer (EXTREME) Phase III trial showed significant increases in overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rate for the combination of cetuximab and platinum/5-fluorouralcil compared with platinum/5-fluorouracil alone [186,187,188,189]. While these trials did not directly investigate an anti-metastatic role for cetuximab, it is a promising advance in HNSCC treatment. Another study found that the potassium ionophore antibiotic salinomycin significantly inhibited growth of the cisplatin-resistant mesenchymal-like HNSCC subpopulation, likely through induction of apoptosis [101,190]. These data demonstrate a potential mechanism for targeting a drug resistant, highly mobile subpopulation that has been implicated in metastatic dissemination as well as disease recurrence [100,101,102]. While these initial studies have demonstrated some efficacy in patients with advanced disease, direct anti-invasive and anti-metastatic therapeutic targeting continues to remain elusive in HNSCC.

5. Conclusions

HNSCC tumors contain a host of aberrant signaling pathways, from cytoskeletal modulation responsible for driving increased invasion to promoting tumor cell survival in the circulation. Interactions with the surrounding ECM as well as between individual tumor cells influences the ability of HNSCC cells to invade into the surrounding tissue and eventually to other parts of the body, predominantly the cervical lymph nodes. Changes in cell-cell adhesions along with alterations in cellular morphology allow HNSCC cells to undergo a variety of invasive patterns. Additionally, HNSCC cells utilize various autocrine and paracrine secreted factors in order to optimize tumor dissemination, whether through neovascularization by endothelial cells or rearrangement of ECM protein by local fibroblasts. The tumor microenvironment, depicted in Figure 1, is therefore a complex, dynamic system, complicating our understanding of tumor behavior and potential therapeutic interventions.
Figure 1. Diagram of tumor and stromal-based contributions that promote head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) invasion. Depicted is an invasive HNSCC tumor cell mass invading into the surrounding stroma and muscle tissue of the oral tongue. Specific cell types and their respective secreted protein contributions are detailed, demonstrating subsequent cellular responses and paracrine signaling networks. See text for additional detail.
Figure 1. Diagram of tumor and stromal-based contributions that promote head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) invasion. Depicted is an invasive HNSCC tumor cell mass invading into the surrounding stroma and muscle tissue of the oral tongue. Specific cell types and their respective secreted protein contributions are detailed, demonstrating subsequent cellular responses and paracrine signaling networks. See text for additional detail.
Cancers 07 00382 g001
Use of conventional wet-bench‒based cell and xenograft assays cannot incorporate the breath of tumor-stromal interactions that occur in patient tumors. The inability of these models to accurately guide pharmaceutical intervention development, as witnessed by the lack of successful clinical trials to date, is a testament to the complexity and difficulty of targeting HNSCC invasion and metastasis. This is likely due to the multitude of pro-invasive signaling networks in HNSCC cells and various tumor-stromal interactions. Therefore, in order to make meaningful advances in the treatment of HNSCC invasion, new model systems need to be developed that include, or at least consider, all of the intracellular, cell-cell, and cell-matrix contributions from carcinoma cells and corresponding tumor-associated stromal cells found in patient tumors.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy and Office of Research and Graduate Education at West Virginia University. Additional support from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, U54GM104942 is gratefully acknowledged. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Author Contributions

S.M.M. and S.A.W. wrote the manuscript.

Abbreviations

ALDH
aldehyde dehydrogenase
ADAM-12
a disintegrin and metalloprotease 12
ADAM-17
a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17
bFGF
basic fibroblast growth factor
CAF
cancer associated fibroblast
CK
cytokeratin
CK8
cytokeratin 8
CK18
cytokeratin 18
CK19
cytokeratin 19
CSC
cancer stem cell
CTC
circulating tumor cell
CXCL12
chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 12
CXCR4
chemokine C-X-C motif receptor type 4
E-cadherin
epithelial-cadherin
ECM
extracellular matrix
EGF
epidermal growth factor
EGFR
epidermal growth factor receptor
EMT
epithelial to mesenchymal transition
EpCAM
epidermal cell adhesion molecule
ET-1
endothelin-1
F-actin
filamentous-actin
FAK
focal adhesion kinase
FGF-2
fibroblast growth factor 2
FGF-3
fibroblast growth factor 3
FGF-4
fibroblast growth factor 4
FGF-19
fibroblast growth factor 19
FGF-BP
fibroblast growth factor binding protein
G-CSF
granulocyte colony stimulating factor
GM-CSF
granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor
HER3
human epidermal growth factor receptor 3
HGF
hepatocyte growth factor
HNSCC
head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
IGF-1
insulin-like growth factor 1
IGF-1R
insulin-like growth factor receptor 1
IL-1β
interleukin 1β
IL-3
interleukin 3
IL-4
interleukin 4
IL-5
interleukin 5
IL-6
interleukin 6
IL-8
interleukin 8
IL-10
interleukin 10
IL-13
interleukin 13
IL-16
interleukin 16
LIMK
LIM kinase
LTC4
leukotriene C4
MAPK
mitogen activated protein kinase
MIP-3α
macrophage inhibitor protein 3α
MLC
myosin light chain
MLCK
myosin light chain kinase
MMIF
macrophage migration inhibitory factor
MMP
matrix metalloproteinase
MMP-1
matrix metalloproteinase 1
MMP-2
matrix metalloproteinase 2
MMP-3
matrix metalloproteinase 3
MMP-9
matrix metalloproteinase 9
MMP-14
matrix metalloproteinase 14
MT1-MMP
membrane type 1-matrix metalloproteinase
PAK1
p21 protein (Cdc42/Rac)-activated kinase 1
PDGF
platelet-derived growth factor
PDGF-AB
platelet-derived growth factor AB
PDGFR
platelet-derived growth factor receptor
PGD2
prostaglandin D2
PI3K
phosphoinsositide-3-kinase
TAM
tumor associated macrophage
TGF-β
transforming growth factor β
TIC
tumor initiating cell
TNF-α
tumor necrosis factor α
TrkB
tyrosine receptor kinase B
VEGF
vascular endothelial growth factor
VEGF-A
vascular endothelial growth factor A
VEGFR
vascular endothelial growth factor receptor

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Probert, J.C.; Thompson, R.W.; Bagshaw, M.A. Patterns of spread of distant metastases in head and neck cancer. Cancer 1974, 33, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Onken, M.D.; Winkler, A.E.; Kanchi, K.-L.; Chalivendra, V.; Law, J.H.; Rickert, C.G.; Kallogjeri, D.; Judd, N.P.; Dunn, G.P.; Piccirillo, J.F.; et al. A surprising cross-species conservation in the genomic landscape of mouse and human oral cancer identifies a transcriptional signature predicting metastatic disease. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 2873–2884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Leemans, C.R.; Braakhuis, B.J.M.; Brakenhoff, R.H. The molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Koontongkaew, S. The tumor microenvironment contribution to development, growth, invasion and metastasis of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. J. Cancer 2013, 4, 66–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bowden, E.T.; Barth, M.; Thomas, D.; Glazer, R.I.; Mueller, S.C. An invasion-related complex of cortactin, paxillin and PKCmu associates with invadopodia at sites of extracellular matrix degradation. Oncogene 1999, 18, 4440–4449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Branch, K.M.; Hoshino, D.; Weaver, A.M. Adhesion rings surround invadopodia and promote maturation. Biol. Open 2012, 1, 711–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yamaguchi, H.; Wyckoff, J.; Condeelis, J. Cell migration in tumors. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2005, 17, 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Baldassarre, M.; Pompeo, A.; Beznoussenko, G.; Castaldi, C.; Cortellino, S.; McNiven, M.A.; Luini, A.; Buccione, R. Dynamin participates in focal extracellular matrix degradation by invasive cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 2003, 14, 1074–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Leong, H.S.; Robertson, A.E.; Stoletov, K.; Leith, S.J.; Chin, C.A.; Chien, A.E.; Hague, M.N.; Ablack, A.; Carmine-Simmen, K.; McPherson, V.A.; et al. Invadopodia are required for cancer cell extravasation and are a therapeutic target for metastasis. Cell Rep. 2014, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lohmer, L.L.; Kelley, L.C.; Hagedorn, E.J.; Sherwood, D.R. Invadopodia and basement membrane invasion in vivo. Cell Adh. Migr. 2014, 8, 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Paz, H.; Pathak, N.; Yang, J. Invading one step at a time: The role of invadopodia in tumor metastasis. Oncogene 2014, 33, 4193–4202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rosenthal, E.; Matrisian, L.M. Matrix metalloproteases in head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2006, 28, 639–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Clark, E.S.; Whigham, A.S.; Yarbrough, W.G.; Weaver, A.M. Cortactin is an essential regulator of matrix metalloproteinase secretion and extracellular matrix degradation in invadopodia. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 4227–4235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wu, H.; Parsons, J.T. Cortactin, an 80/85-Kilodalton pp60Src substrate, is a Filamentous Actin-binding Protein Enriched in the Cell Cortex. J. Cell Biol. 1993, 120, 1417–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wu, H.; Reynolds, A.B.; Kanner, S.B.; Vines, R.R.; Parsons, J.T. Identification and characterization of a novel cytoskeleton-associated pp60src substrate. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1991, 11, 5113–5124. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Weed, S.A.; Du, Y.; Parsons, J.T. Translocation of cortactin to the cell periphery is mediated by the small GTPase Rac1. J. Cell Sci. 1998, 111, 2433–2443. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Siton, O.; Ideses, Y.; Albeck, S.; Unger, T.; Bershadsky, A.D.; Gov, N.S.; Bernheim-Groswasser, A. Cortactin releases the brakes in actin- based motility by enhancing WASP-VCA detachment from Arp2/3 branches. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21, 2092–2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Schuuring, E.; Verhoeven, E.; Litvinov, S.; Michalides, R.J.A.M. The product of the EMS1 gene, amplified and overexpressed in human carcinomas, is homologous to a v-src substrate and is located in cell-substratum contact sites. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1993, 13, 2891–2898. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Schuuring, E.; Verhoeven, E.; Mooi, W.J.; Michalides, R.J.A.M. Identification and cloning of two overexpressed genes, U21B31/PRAD1 and EMS1, within the amplified chromosome 11q13 region in human carcinomas. Oncogene 1992, 7, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Clark, E.S.; Brown, B.; Whigham, A.S.; Kochaishvili, A.; Yarbrough, W.G.; Weaver, A.M. Aggressiveness of HNSCC tumors depends on expression levels of cortactin, a gene in the 11q13 amplicon. Oncogene 2009, 28, 431–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Huang, C.; Liu, J.; Haudenschild, C.C.; Zhan, X. The Role of Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Cortactin in the Locomotion of Endothelial Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 25770–25776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Patel, A.S.; Schechter, G.L.; Wasilenko, W.J.; Somers, K.D. Overexpression of EMS1/cortactin in NIH3T3 fibroblasts causes increased cell motility and invasion in vitro. Oncogene 1998, 16, 3227–3232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kowalski, J.R.; Egile, C.; Gil, S.; Snapper, S.B.; Li, R.; Thomas, S.M. Cortactin regulates cell migration through activation of N-WASP. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rodrigo, J.P.; Garcı, L.A.; Ramos, S.; Lazo, P.S.; Sua, C. EMS1 gene amplification correlates with poor prognosis in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000, 6, 3177–3182. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Rothschild, B.L.; Shim, A.H.; Ammer, A.G.; Kelley, L.C.; Irby, K.B.; Head, J.A.; Chen, L.; Varella-Garcia, M.; Sacks, P.G.; Frederick, B.; et al. Cortactin overexpression regulates actin-related protein 2/3 complex activity, motility, and invasion in carcinomas with chromosome 11q13 amplification. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 8017–8025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kelley, L.C.; Hayes, K.E.; Ammer, A.G.; Martin, K.H.; Weed, S.A. Cortactin phosphorylated by ERK1/2 localizes to sites of dynamic actin regulation and is required for carcinoma lamellipodia persistence. PLoS One 2010, 5, e13847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kelley, L.C.; Ammer, A.G.; Hayes, K.E.; Martin, K.H.; Machida, K.; Jia, L.; Mayer, B.J.; Weed, S.A. Oncogenic Src requires a wild-type counterpart to regulate invadopodia maturation. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123, 3923–3932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Luo, M.-L.; Shen, X.-M.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, F.; Xu, X.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, X.; Sun, Y.-T.; Zhan, Q.-M.; Wu, M.; et al. Amplification and overexpression of CTTN (EMS1) contribute to the metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by promoting cell migration and anoikis resistance. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 11690–11699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Li, Y.; Tondravi, M.; Liu, J.; Smith, E.; Haudenschild, C.C.; Kaczmarek, M.; Zhan, X. Cortactin potentiates bone metastasis of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 6906–6911. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Mader, C.C.; Oser, M.; Magalhaes, M.A.O.; Bravo-Cordero, J.J.; Condeelis, J.; Koleske, A.J.; Gil-Henn, H. An EGFR-Src-Arg-Cortactin pathway mediates functional maturation of invadopodia and breast cancer cell invasion. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 1730–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Bowden, E.T.; Onikoyi, E.; Slack, R.; Myoui, A.; Yoneda, T.; Yamada, K.M.; Mueller, S.C. Co-localization of cortactin and phosphotyrosine identifies active invadopodia in human breast cancer. Exp. Cell Res. 2006, 321, 1240–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Clark, E.S.; Weaver, A.M. A new role for cortactin in invadopodia: Regulation of protease secretion. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 87, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Patel, B.P.; Shah, S.V.; Shukla, S.N.; Shah, P.M.; Patel, P.S. Clinical significance of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in patients with oral cancer. Head Neck 2007, 29, 564–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Koontongkaew, S.; Amornphimoltham, P.; Monthanpisut, P.; Saensuk, T.; Leelakriangsak, M. Fibroblasts and extracellular matrix differently modulate MMP activation by primary and metastatic head and neck cancer cells. Med. Oncol. 2012, 29, 690–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Papaspyrou, K.; Brochhausen, C.; Schmidtmann, I.; Fruth, K.; Gouveris, H.; Kirckpatrick, J.; Mann, W.; Brieger, J. Fascin upregulation in primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is associated with lymphatic metastasis. Oncol. Lett. 2014, 7, 2041–2046. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Karasavvidou, F.; Barbanis, S.; Pappa, D.; Moutzouris, G.; Tzortzis, V.; Melekos, M.D.; Koukoulis, G. Fascin determination in urothelial carcinomas of the urinary bladder: A marker of invasiveness. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2008, 132, 1912–1915. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Adams, J.C. Roles of fascin in cell adhesion and motility. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2004, 16, 590–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Jawhari, A.U.; Buda, A.; Jenkins, M.; Shehzad, K.; Sarraf, C.; Noda, M.; Farthing, M.J.G.; Pignatelli, M.; Adams, J.C. Fascin, an actin-bundling protein, modulates colonic epithelial cell invasiveness and differentiation in vitro. Am. J. Pathol. 2003, 162, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Park, J.; Kim, J.-M.; Park, J.K.; Huang, S.; Kwak, S.Y.; Ryu, K.A.; Kong, G.; Park, J.; Koo, B.S. Association of p21-activated kinase-1 activity with aggressive tumor behavior and poor prognosis of head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. McCarty, S.K.; Saji, M.; Zhang, X.; Jarjoura, D.; Fusco, A.; Vasko, V.V.; Ringel, M.D. Group I p21-activated kinases regulate thyroid cancer cell migration and are overexpressed and activated in thyroid cancer invasion. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2010, 17, 989–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. King, H.; Nicholas, N.S.; Wells, C.M. Role of p-21-activated kinases in cancer progression. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2014, 309, 347–387. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Dharmawardhane, S.; Brownson, D.; Lennartz, M.; Bokoch, G.M. Localization of p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1) to pseudopodia, membrane ruffles, and phagocytic cups in activated human neutrophils. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1999, 66, 521–527. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Dharmawardhane, S.; Sanders, L.C.; Martin, S.S.; Daniels, R.H.; Bokoch, G.M. Localization of p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1) to pinocytic vesicles and cortical actin structures in stimulated cells. J. Cell Biol. 1997, 138, 1265–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Delorme-Walker, V.D.; Peterson, J.R.; Chernoff, J.; Waterman, C.M.; Danuser, G.; DerMardirossian, C.; Bokoch, G.M. Pak1 regulates focal adhesion strength, myosin IIA distribution, and actin dynamics to optimize cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 193, 1289–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sanders, L.C. Inhibition of myosin light chain kinase by p21-activated kinase. Science 1999, 283, 2083–2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Stockton, R.A.; Schaefer, E.; Schwartz, M.A. p21-Activated kinase regulates endothelial permeability through modulation of contractility. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 46621–46630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Arber, S.; Barbayannis, F.A.; Hanser, H.; Schneider, C.; Stanyon, C.A.; Bernard, O.; Caroni, P. Regulation of actin dynamics through phosphorylation of cofilin by LIM-kinase. Nature 1998, 393, 805–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Yang, N.; Higuchi, O.; Ohashi, K.; Nagata, K.; Wada, A.; Kangawa, K.; Nishida, E.; Mizuno, K. Cofilin phosphorylation by LIM-kinase 1 and its role in Rac-mediated actin reorganization. Nature 1998, 393, 809–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kelley, L.C.; Shahab, S.; Weed, S.A. Actin cytoskeletal mediators of motility and invasion amplified and overexpressed in head and neck cancer. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2008, 25, 289–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Vadlamudi, R.K.; Li, F.; Barnes, C.J.; Bagheri-Yarmand, R.; Kumar, R. P41-Arc subunit of human Arp2/3 complex is a p21-activated kinase-1-interacting substrate. EMBO Rep. 2004, 5, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Webb, B.A.; Zhou, S.; Eves, R.; Shen, L.; Jia, L.; Mak, A.S. Phosphorylation of cortactin by p21-activated kinase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2006, 456, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Elloul, S.; Vaksman, O.; Stavnes, H.T.; Trope, C.G.; Davidson, B.; Reich, R. Mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition determinants as characteristics of ovarian carcinoma effusions. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2010, 27, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Goc, A.; Al-Azayzih, A.; Abdalla, M.; Al-Husein, B.; Kavuri, S.; Lee, J.; Moses, K.; Somanath, P.R. P21 activated kinase-1 (Pak1) promotes prostate tumor growth and microinvasion via inhibition of transforming growth factor β expression and enhanced matrix metalloproteinase 9 secretion. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 3025–3035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Rider, L.; Oladimeji, P.; Diakonova, M. PAK1 regulates breast cancer cell invasion through secretion of matrix metalloproteinases in response to prolactin and three-dimensional collagen IV. Mol. Endocrinol. 2013, 27, 1048–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Srikrishna, G. S100A8 and S100A9: New insights into their roles in malignancy. J. Innate Immun. 2012, 4, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Donato, R. S100: A multigenic family of calcium-modulated proteins of the EF-hand type with intracellular and extracellular functional roles. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2001, 33, 637–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Heizmann, C.W.; Fritz, G.; Schäfer, B.W. S100 proteins: Structure, functions and pathology. Front. Biosci. 2002, 7, d1356–d1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Leukert, N.; Vogl, T.; Strupat, K.; Reichelt, R.; Sorg, C.; Roth, J. Calcium-dependent tetramer formation of S100A8 and S100A9 is essential for biological activity. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 359, 961–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Silva, E.J.; Argyris, P.; Zou, X.; Ross, K.F.; Herzberg, M.C. S100A8/A9 regulates MMP-2 expression and invasion and migration by carcinoma cells. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2014, 55, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Fung, L.F.; Lo, A.K.F.; Yuen, P.W.; Wang, X.H.; Tsao, S.W. Differential gene expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Life Sci. 2000, 67, 923–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ghavami, S.; Chitayat, S.; Hashemi, M.; Eshraghi, M.; Chazin, W.J.; Halayko, A.J.; Kerkhoff, C. S100A8/A9: A Janus-faced molecule in cancer therapy and tumorgenesis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2009, 625, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Fogh, B.S.; Multhaupt, H.A.B.; Couchman, J.R. Protein kinase C, focal adhesions and the regulation of cell migration. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2014, 62, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zaidel-Bar, R.; Itzkovitz, S.; Ma’ayan, A.; Iyengar, R.; Geiger, B. Functional atlas of the integrin adhesome. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9, 858–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zaidel-Bar, R.; Cohen, M.; Addadi, L.; Geiger, B. Hierarchical assembly of cell-matrix adhesion complexes. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2004, 32, 416–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Tang, H.; Li, A.; Bi, J.; Veltman, D.M.; Zech, T.; Spence, H.J.; Yu, X.; Timpson, P.; Insall, R.H.; Frame, M.C.; et al. Loss of Scar/WAVE complex promotes N-WASP- and FAK-dependent invasion. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Schlaepfer, D.D.; Mitra, S.K. Multiple connections link FAK to cell motility and invasion. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2004, 14, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Canel, M.; Secades, P.; Rodrigo, J.-P.; Cabanillas, R.; Herrero, A.; Suarez, C.; Chiara, M.-D. Overexpression of focal adhesion kinase in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is independent of fak gene copy number. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 3272–3279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Gabarra-Niecko, V.; Schaller, M.D.; Dunty, J.M. FAK regulates biological processes important for the pathogenesis of cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2003, 22, 359–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Hsia, D.A.; Mitra, S.K.; Hauck, C.R.; Streblow, D.N.; Nelson, J.A.; Ilic, D.; Huang, S.; Li, E.; Nemerow, G.R.; Leng, J.; et al. Differential regulation of cell motility and invasion by FAK. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 160, 753–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. McLean, G.W.; Carragher, N.O.; Avizienyte, E.; Evans, J.; Brunton, V.G.; Frame, M.C. The role of focal-adhesion kinase in cancer—A new therapeutic opportunity. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2005, 5, 505–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Schaller, M.D.; Borgman, C.A.; Cobb, B.S.; Vines, R.R.; Reynolds, A.B.; Parsons, J.T. pp125FAK a structurally distinctive protein-tyrosine kinase associated with focal adhesions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 5192–5196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Shanthi, E.; Krishna, M.H.; Arunesh, G.M.; Venkateswara Reddy, K.; Sooriya Kumar, J.; Viswanadhan, V.N. Focal adhesion kinase inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic cancer: A patent review. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2014, 24, 1077–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Dao, P.; Smith, N.; Tomkiewicz-Raulet, C.; Yen-Pon, E.; Camacho-Artacho, M.; Lietha, D.; Herbeuval, J.-P.; Coumoul, X.; Garbay, C.; Chen, H. Design, synthesis, and evaluation of novel imidazo(1,2-a)(1,3,5)triazines and their derivatives as focal adhesion kinase inhibitors with antitumor activity. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 58, 237–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lin, J.-J.; Su, J.-H.; Tsai, C.-C.; Chen, Y.-J.; Liao, M.-H.; Wu, Y.-J. 11-epi-Sinulariolide acetate reduces cell migration and invasion of human hepatocellular carcinoma by reducing the activation of ERK1/2, p38MAPK and FAK/PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 4783–4798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Guo, B.; Su, J.; Zhang, T.; Wang, K.; Li, X. Fangchinoline as a kinase inhibitor targets FAK and suppresses FAK-mediated signaling pathway in A549. J. Drug Target. 2014, 24, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  76. Steed, P.M.; Chow, A.H. Intracellular signaling by phospholipase D as a therapeutic target. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2001, 2, 241–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Jenkins, G.M.; Frohman, M.A. Phospholipase D: A lipid centric review. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005, 62, 2305–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Kim, J.H.; Kim, H.; Jeon, H.; Suh, P.-G.; Ryu, S.H. Phospholipase D1 regulates cell migration in a lipase activity-independent manner. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 15747–15756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Ahn, B.-H.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, E.H.; Choi, K.S.; Kwon, T.K.; Lee, Y.H.; Chang, J.-S.; Kim, M.-S.; Jo, Y.-H.; Min, D.S. Transmodulation between phospholipase D and c-Src enhances cell proliferation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23, 3103–3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Martinez-quiles, N.; Ho, H.H.; Kirschner, M.W.; Ramesh, N.; Geha, R.S. Erk/Src phosphorylation of cortactin acts as a switch on-switch off mechanism that controls its ability to activate N-WASP. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24, 5269–5280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Noh, D.Y.; Ahn, S.J.; Lee, R.A.; Park, I.A.; Kim, J.H.; Suh, P.G.; Ryu, S.H.; Lee, K.H.; Han, J.S. Overexpression of phospholipase D1 in human breast cancer tissues. Cancer Lett. 2000, 161, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kelley, L.C.; Hayes, K.E.; Ammer, A.G.; Martin, K.H.; Weed, S.A. Revisiting the ERK/Src cortactin switch. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2011, 4, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. O’Reilly, M.C.; Scott, S.A.; Brown, K.A.; Oguin, T.H.; Thomas, P.G.; Daniels, J.S.; Morrison, R.; Brown, H.A.; Lindsley, C.W. Development of dual PLD1/2 and PLD2 selective inhibitors from a common 1,3,8-Triazaspiro(4.5)decane Core: Discovery of Ml298 and Ml299 that decrease invasive migration in U87-MG glioblastoma cells. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 2695–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Park, M.H.; Min, D.S. Quercetin-induced downregulation of phospholipase D1 inhibits proliferation and invasion in U87 glioma cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 412, 710–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Simpson, D.R.; Mell, L.K.; Cohen, E.E.W. Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Oral Oncol. 2014, in press. [Google Scholar]
  86. Lui, V.W.Y.; Hedberg, M.L.; Li, H.; Vangara, B.S.; Pendleton, K.; Zeng, Y.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Du, Y.; Gilbert, B.R.; et al. Frequent mutation of the PI3K pathway in head and neck cancer defines predictive biomarkers. Cancer Discov. 2013, 3, 761–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Engelman, J.A.; Luo, J.; Cantley, L.C. The evolution of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases as regulators of growth and metabolism. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006, 7, 606–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Volinia, S.; Hiles, I.; Ormondroyd, E.; Nizetic, D.; Antonacci, R.; Rocchi, M.; Waterfield, M.D. Molecular cloning, cDNA sequence, and chromosomal localization of the human phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase p110 alpha (PIK3CA) gene. Genomics 1994, 24, 472–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Roymans, D.; Slegers, H. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases in tumor progression. Eur. J. Biochem. 2001, 268, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Estilo, C.L.; O-Charoenrat, P.; Ngai, I.; Patel, S.G.; Reddy, P.G.; Dao, S.; Shaha, A.R.; Kraus, D.H.; Boyle, J.O.; Wong, R.J.; et al. The role of novel oncogenes squamous cell carcinoma-related oncogene and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase p110alpha in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003, 9, 2300–2306. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  91. Katoh, M. WNT and FGF gene clusters. Int. J. Oncol. 2002, 21, 1269–1273. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  92. Marshall, M.E.; Hinz, T.K.; Kono, S.A.; Singleton, K.R.; Bichon, B.; Ware, K.E.; Marek, L.; Frederick, B.A.; Raben, D.; Heasley, L.E. Fibroblast growth factor receptors are components of autocrine signaling networks in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 5016–5025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Li, W.; Wang, C.; Juhn, S.K.; Ondrey, F.G.; Lin, J. Expression of fibroblast growth factor binding protein in head and neck cancer. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2009, 135, 896–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Friedl, P.; Locker, J.; Sahai, E.; Segall, J.E. Classifying collective cancer cell invasion. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14, 777–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Friedl, P.; Alexander, S. Cancer invasion and the microenvironment: Plasticity and reciprocity. Cell 2011, 147, 992–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Mandal, M.; Myers, J.N.; Lippman, S.M.; Johnson, F.M.; Williams, M.D.; Rayala, S.; Ohshiro, K.; Rosenthal, D.I.; Weber, R.S.; Gallick, G.E.; et al. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition in head and neck squamous carcinoma: Association of Src activation with E-cadherin down-regulation, vimentin expression, and aggressive tumor features. Cancer 2008, 112, 2088–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Sok, J.C.; Coppelli, F.M.; Thomas, S.M.; Lango, M.N.; Xi, S.; Hunt, J.L.; Freilino, M.L.; Graner, M.W.; Wikstrand, C.J.; Bigner, D.D.; et al. Mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRvIII) contributes to head and neck cancer growth and resistance to EGFR targeting. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 5064–5073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Xi, S.; Zhang, Q.; Dyer, K.F.; Lerner, E.C.; Smithgall, T.E.; Gooding, W.E.; Kamens, J.; Grandis, J.R. Src kinases mediate STAT growth pathways in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 31574–31583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Bryne, M.; Koppang, H.S.; Lilleng, R.; Kjaerheim, A. Malignancy grading of the deep invasive margins of oral squamous cell carcinomas has high prognostic value. J. Pathol. 1992, 166, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Basu, D.; Bewley, A.F.; Sperry, S.M.; Montone, K.T.; Gimotty, P.A.; Rasanen, K.; Facompre, N.D.; Weinstein, G.S.; Nakagawa, H.; Diehl, J.A.; et al. EGFR inhibition promotes an aggressive invasion pattern mediated by mesenchymal-like tumor cells within squamous cell carcinomas. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2013, 12, 2176–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Basu, D.; Montone, K.T.; Wang, L.-P.; Gimotty, P.A.; Hammond, R.; Diehl, J.A.; Rustgi, A.K.; Lee, J.T.; Rasanen, K.; Weinstein, G.S.; et al. Detecting and targeting mesenchymal-like subpopulations within squamous cell carcinomas. Cell Cycle 2011, 10, 2008–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Basu, D.; Nguyen, T.-T.K.; Montone, K.T.; Zhang, G.; Wang, L.-P.; Diehl, J.A.; Rustgi, A.K.; Lee, J.T.; Weinstein, G.S.; Herlyn, M. Evidence for mesenchymal-like sub-populations within squamous cell carcinomas possessing chemoresistance and phenotypic plasticity. Oncogene 2010, 29, 4170–4182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Kupferman, M.E.; Jiffar, T.; El-Naggar, A.; Yilmaz, T.; Zhou, G.; Xie, T.; Feng, L.; Wang, J.; Holsinger, F.C.; Yu, D.; et al. TrkB induces EMT and has a key role in invasion of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncogene 2010, 29, 2049–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Sawatsubashi, M.; Yamada, T.; Fukushima, N.; Mizokami, H.; Tokunaga, O.; Shin, T. Association of vascular endothelial growth factor and mast cells with angiogenesis in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Virchows Arch. 2000, 436, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Ninck, S.; Reisser, C.; Dyckhoff, G.; Helmke, B.; Bauer, H.; Herold-Mende, C. Expression profiles of angiogenic growth factors in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Int. J. Cancer 2003, 106, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Liss, C.; Fekete, M.J.; Hasina, R.; Lam, C.D.; Lingen, M.W. Paracrine angiogenic loop between head-and-neck squamous-cell carcinomas and macrophages. Int. J. Cancer 2001, 93, 781–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Bran, B.; Bran, G.; Hormann, K.; Riedel, F. The platelet-derived growth factor receptor as a target for vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated anti-angiogeneic therapy in head and neck cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2009, 34, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  108. Ali, M.A. Lymphatic microvessel density and the expression of lymphangiogenic factors in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Med. Princ. Pract. 2008, 17, 486–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Li, C.; Shintani, S.; Terakada, N.; Klosek, S.K.; Ishikawa, T.; Nakashiro, K.; Hamakawa, H. Microvessel density and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, and platelet-derived endothelial growth factor in oral squamous cell carcinomas. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2005, 34, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Sedivy, R.; Beck-Mannagetta, J.; Haverkampf, C.; Battistutti, W.; Honigschnabl, S. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor-C correlates with the lymphatic microvessel density and the nodal status in oral squamous cell cancer. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2003, 32, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Beasley, N.J.P.; Prevo, R.; Banerji, S.; Leek, R.D.; Moore, J.; van Trappen, P.; Cox, G.; Harris, A.L.; Jackson, D.G. Intratumoral lymphangiogenesis and lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 1315–1320. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  112. Jatana, K.R.; Balasubramanian, P.; Lang, J.C.; Yang, L.; Jatana, C.; White, E.; Agrawal, A.; Ozer, E.; Schuller, D.E.; Teknos, T.N.; et al. Significance of cirulating tumors cells in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2010, 136, 1274–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Buglione, M.; Grisanti, S.; Almici, C.; Mangoni, M.; Polli, C.; Consoli, F.; Verardi, R.; Costa, L.; Paiar, F.; Pasinetti, N.; et al. Circulating tumor cells in locally advanced cancer: Preliminary report about their possible role in predicting response to non-surgical treatment and survival. Eur. J. Cancer 2012, 48, 3019–3026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Krishnamurthy, S.; Warner, K.A.; Dong, Z.; Imai, A.; Nör, C.; Ward, B.B.; Helman, J.I.; Taichman, R.S.; Bellile, E.L.; McCauley, L.K.; et al. Endothelial interleukin-6 defines the tumorigenic potential of primary human cancer stem cells. Stem Cells 2014, 32, 2845–2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Nör, C.; Zhang, Z.; Warner, K.A.; Bernardi, L.; Visioli, F.; Helman, J.I.; Roesler, R.; Nör, J.E. Cisplatin induces Bmi-1 and enhances the stem cell fraction in head and neck cancer. Neoplasia 2014, 16, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  116. Zuo, J.-H.; Zhu, W.; Li, M.-Y.; Li, X.-H.; Yi, H.; Zeng, G.-Q.; Wan, X.-X.; He, Q.-Y.; Li, J.-H.; Qu, J.-Q.; et al. Activation of EGFR promotes squamous carcinoma SCC10A cell migration and invasion via inducing EMT-like phenotype change and MMP-9-mediated degradation of E-cadherin. J. Cell. Biochem. 2011, 112, 2508–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. St. John, M.A.; Dohadwala, M.; Luo, J.; Wang, G.; Lee, G.; Shih, H.; Heinrich, E.; Krysan, K.; Walser, T.; Hazra, S.; et al. Proinflammatory mediators upregulate snail in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 6018–6027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Cao, X.-L.; Xu, R.-J.; Zheng, Y.-Y.; Liu, J.; Teng, Y.-S.; Li, Y.; Zhu, J. Expression of type IV collagen, metalloproteinase-2, metalloproteinase-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 in laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2011, 12, 3245–3249. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  119. Nielsen, J.D.; Moeslund, M.; Wandall, H.H.; Dabelsteen, S. Influences of tumor stroma on the malignant phenotype. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2008, 37, 412–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Parikka, M.; Nissienen, L.; Kainulainen, T.; Bruckner-Tuderman, L.; Salo, T.; Heino, J.; Tasanen, K. Collagen XVII promotes integrin-mediated squamous cell carcinoma transmigration—A novel role for αIIb integrin and tirofiban. Exp. Cell Res. 2006, 312, 1431–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Prussin, C.; Metcalfe, D.D. IgE, mast cells, basophils, and eosinophils. J. Allergy Clin. Imunol. 2003, 111, S486–S494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Barth, P.J.; Schweinsberg zu Schweinsberg, T.; Ramaswamy, A.; Moll, R. CD34+ fibrocytes, alpha-smooth muscle antigen-positive myofibroblasts, and CD117 expression in the stroma of invasive squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx. Virchows Arch. 2004, 444, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Iamaroon, A.; Pongsiriwet, S.; Jittidecharaks, S.; Pattanaporn, K.; Prapayasatok, S.; Wanachantararak, S. Increase of mast cells and tumor angiogenesis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2003, 32, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Beckhove, P.; Helmke, B.M.; Ziouta, Y.; Bucur, M.; Borner, W.; Mogler, C.; Dyckhoff, G.; Herold-Mende, C. Heparanase expression at the invasion front of human head and neck cancers and correlation with poor prognosis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 2899–2906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Friedmann, Y.; Vlodavsky, I.; Aingorn, H.; Aviv, A.; Peretz, T.; Pecker, I.; Pappo, O. Expression of heparanase in normal, dysplastic and neoplastic human colonic mucosa and stroma. Am. J. Pathol. 2000, 157, 1167–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Nathan, C. Neutrophils and immunity: Challenges and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006, 6, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Waugh, D.J.J.; Wilson, C. The interleukin-8 pathway in cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 6735–6741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Scapini, P.; Bazzoni, F.; Cassatella, M.A. Regulation of B-cell-activating factor (BAFF)/B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) expression in human neutrophils. Immunol. Lett. 2008, 116, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Scapini, P.; Morini, M.; Tecchio, C.; Minghelli, S.; di Carlo, E.; Tanghetti, E.; Albini, A.; Lowell, C.; Berton, G.; Noonan, D.M.; et al. CXCL1/Macrophage inflammatory protein-2-induced angiogenesis in vivo is mediated by neutrophil-derived vascular endothelial growth factor-A. J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 5034–5040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Benelli, R.; Morini, M.; Carrozzino, F.; Ferrari, N.; Minghelli, S.; Santi, L.; Cassatella, M.; Noonan, D.M.; Albini, A. Neutrophils as a key cellular target for angiostatin: Implications for regulation of angiogenesis and inflammation. FASEB J. 2002, 2, 267–269. [Google Scholar]
  131. Eming, S.A.; Krieg, T.; Davidson, J.M. Inflammation in wound repair: Molecular and cellular mechanisms. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2007, 127, 514–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Li, C.; Shintani, S.; Terakada, N.; Nakashiro, K.; Hamakawa, H. Infiltration of tumor-associated macrophages in human oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2002, 9, 1219–1223. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  133. Marcus, B.; Arenberg, D.; Lee, J.; Kleer, C.; Chepeha, D.B.; Schmalbach, C.E.; Islam, M.; Paul, S.; Pan, Q.; Hanash, S.; et al. Prognostic factors in oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 2004, 101, 2779–2787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Liu, S.-Y.; Chang, L.-C.; Pan, L.-F.; Hung, Y.-J.; Lee, C.-H.; Shieh, Y.-S. Clinicopathologic significance of tumor cell-lined vessel and microenvironment in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2008, 44, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Yamaguchi, H.; Pixley, F.; Condeelis, J. Invadopodia and podosomes in tumor invasion. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 85, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Wyckoff, J.; Wang, W.; Lin, E.Y.; Wang, Y.; Pixley, F.; Stanley, E.R.; Graf, T.; Pollard, J.W.; Segall, J.; Condeelis, J. A paracrine loop between tumor cells and macrophages is required for tumor cell migration in mammary tumors. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 7022–7029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Goswami, S.; Sahai, E.; Wyckoff, J.; Cammer, M.; Cox, D.; Pixley, F.J.; Stanley, E.R.; Segall, J.E.; Condeelis, J.S. Macrophages promote the invasion of breast carcinoma cells via a colony-stimulating factor-1/epidermal growth factor paracrine loop. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 5278–5283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Dumitru, C.A.; Gholaman, H.; Trellakis, S.; Bruderek, K.; Dominas, N.; Gu, X.; Bankfalvi, A.; Whiteside, T.L.; Lang, S.; Brandau, S. Tumor-derived macrophage migration inhibitory factor modulates the biology of head and neck cancer cells via neutrophil activation. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 129, 859–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Linder, S.; Nelson, D.; Weiss, M.; Aepfelbacher, M. Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein regulates podosomes in primary human macrophages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 9648–9653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Schachtner, H.; Calaminus, S.D.J.; Thomas, S.G.; Machesky, L.M. Podosomes in adhesion, migration, mechanosensing and matrix remodeling. Cytoskeleton 2013, 70, 572–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Varon, C.; Tatin, F.; Moreau, V.; van Obberghen-Schilling, E.; Fernandez-Sauze, S.; Reuzeau, E.; Kramer, I.; Genot, E. Transforming growth factor beta induces rosettes of podosomes in primary aortic endothelial cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26, 3582–3594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Chang, K.-P.; Kao, H.-K.; Yen, T.-C.; Chang, Y.-L.; Liang, Y.; Liu, S.-C.; Lee, L.-Y.; Chang, Y.-L.; Kang, C.-J.; Chen, I.-H.; et al. Overexpression of macrophage inflammatory protein-3alpha in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma is associated with nodal metastasis. Oral Oncol. 2011, 47, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Osiak, A.-E.; Zenner, G.; Linder, S. Subconfluent endothelial cells form podosomes downstream of cytokine and RhoGTPase signaling. Exp. Cell Res. 2005, 307, 342–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Yamaguchi, H.; Lorenz, M.; Kempiak, S.; Sarmieto, C.; Coniglio, S.; Symons, M.; Segall, J.; Eddy, R.; Miki, H.; Takenawa, T.; et al. Molecular mechanisms of invadopodium formation: The role of the N-WASP-Arp2/3 complex pathway and cofilin. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 168, 441–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Mizutani, K.; Miki, H.; He, H.; Maruta, H.; Takenawa, T. Essential role of neural Wiskot-Aldrich syndrome protein in podosome formation and degradation of extracellular matrix in src-transformed fibroblasts. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 669–674. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  146. Spinardi, L.; Rietdorf, J.; Nitsch, L.; Bono, M.; Tacchetti, C.; Way, M.; Marchisio, P.C. A dynamic podosome-like structure of endothelial cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2004, 295, 360–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Zeng, Q.; Li, S.; Chepeha, D.B.; Giordano, T.J.; Li, J.; Zhang, H.; Polverini, P.J.; Nor, J.; Kitajewski, J.; Wang, C.-Y. Crosstalk between tumor and endothelial cells promotes tumor angiogenesis by MAPK activation of Notch signaling. Cancer Cell 2005, 8, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Goetz, J.G.; Minguet, S.; Navarro-Lerida, I.; Lazcano, J.J.; Samaniego, R.; Calvo, E.; Tello, M.; Osteso-Ibanez, T.; Pellinen, T.; Echarri, A.; et al. Biomechanical remodeling of the microenvironment by stromal caveolin-1 favors tumor invasion and metastasis. Cell 2011, 146, 148–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Gaggioli, C.; Hooper, S.; Hidalgo-Carcedo, C.; Grosse, R.; Marshall, J.F.; Harrington, K.; Sahai, E. Fibroblast-led collective invasion of carcinoma cells with differing roles for RhoGTPases in leading and following cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9, 1392–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Kelly, T.; Mueller, S.C.; Yeh, Y.; Chen, W.T. Invadopodia promote proteolysis of a wide variety of extracellular matrix proteins. J. Cell. Physiol. 1994, 158, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Lim, K.P.; Cirillo, N.; Hassona, Y.; Wei, W.; Thurlow, J.K.; Cheong, S.C.; Pitiyage, G.; Parkinson, E.K.; Prime, S.S. Fibroblast gene expression profile reflects the stage of tumour progression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Pathol. 2011, 223, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Abram, C.L.; Seals, D.F.; Pass, I.; Salinsky, D.; Maurer, L.; Roth, T.M.; Courtneidge, S.A. The adaptor protein fish associates with members of the ADAMs family and localizes to podosomes of Src-transformed cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 16844–16851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Seals, D.F.; Azucena, E.F.J.; Pass, I.; Tesfay, L.; Gordon, R.; Woodrow, M.; Resau, J.H.; Courtneidge, S.A. The adaptor protein Tks5/Fish is required for podosome formation and function, and for the protease-driven invasion of cancer cells. Cancer Cell 2005, 7, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Hinsley, E.E.; Hunt, S.; Hunter, K.D.; Whawell, S.A.; Lambert, D.W. Endothelin-1 stimulates motility of head and neck squamous carcinoma cells by promoting stromal-epithelial interactions. Int. J. Cancer 2012, 130, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Ishikawa, T.; Nakashiro, K.; Klosek, S.K.; Goda, H.; Hara, S.; Uchida, D.; Hamakawa, H. Hypoxia enhances CXCR4 expression by activating HIF-1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2009, 21, 707–712. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  156. Uchida, D.; Begum, N.M.; Almofti, A.; Nakashiro, K.; Kawamata, H.; Tateishi, Y.; Hamakawa, H.; Yoshida, H.; Sato, M. Possible role of stromal-cell-derived factor-1/CXCR4 signaling on lymph node metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Exp. Cell Res. 2003, 290, 289–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Chuma, M.; Sakamoto, M.; Yasuda, J.; Fujii, G.; Nakanishi, K.; Tsuchiya, A.; Asaka, M.; Hirohashi, S. Overexpression of cortactin is involved in motility and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2004, 41, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Liu, Y.; Hu, T.; Shen, J.; Li, S.F.; Lin, J.W.; Zheng, X.H.; Gao, Q.H.; Zhou, H.M. Separation, cultivation and biological characteristics of oral carcinoma-associated fibroblasts. Oral Dis. 2006, 12, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Lewis, M.P.; Lygoe, K.A.; Nystrom, M.L.; Anderson, W.P.; Speight, P.M.; Marshall, J.F.; Thomas, G.J. Tumor-derived TGF-β1 modulates myofibroblast differentiation and promotes HGF/SF-dependent invasion of squamous carcinoma cells. Br. J. Cancer 2004, 90, 822–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Marsh, D.; Suchak, K.; Moutasim, K.A.; Vallath, S.; Hopper, C.; Jerjes, W.; Upile, T.; Kalavrezos, N.; Violette, S.M.; Weinreb, P.H.; et al. Stromal features are predictive of disease mortality in oral cancer patients. J. Pathol. 2011, 223, 470–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Wheeler, S.E.; Shi, H.; Lin, F.; Dasari, S.; Bednash, J.; Thorne, S.; Watkins, S.; Joshi, R.; Thomas, S.M. Enhancement of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma proliferation, invasion, and metastasis by tumor-associated fibroblasts in preclinical models. Head Neck 2014, 36, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Taddei, M.L.; Cavallini, L.; Comito, G.; Giannoni, E.; Folini, M.; Marini, A.; Gandellini, P.; Morandi, A.; Pintus, G.; Raspollini, M.R.; et al. Senescent stroma promotes prostate cancer progression: The role of miR-210. Mol. Oncol. 2014, 8, 1729–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Hassona, Y.; Cirillo, N.; Heesom, K.; Parkinson, E.K.; Prime, S.S. Senescent cancer-associated fibroblasts secrete active MMP-2 that promotes keratinocyte dis-cohesion and invasion. Br. J. Cancer 2014, 111, 1230–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Hassona, Y.; Cirillo, N.; Lim, K.P.; Herman, A.; Mellone, M.; Thomas, G.J.; Pitiyage, G.N.; Parkinson, E.K.; Prime, S.S. Progression of genotype-specific oral cancer leads to senescence of cancer-associated fibroblasts and is mediated by oxidative stress and TGF-β. Carcinogenesis 2013, 34, 1286–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Ren, C.; Cheng, X.; Lu, B.; Yang, G. Activation of interleukin-6/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 by human papillomavirus early proteins 6 induces fibroblast senescence to promote cervical tumourigenesis through autocrine and paracrine pathways in tumour microenvironment. Eur. J. Cancer 2013, 49, 3889–3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Capparelli, C.; Chiavarina, B.; Whitaker-Menezes, D.; Pestell, T.G.; Pestell, R.G.; Hulit, J.; Andò, S.; Howell, A.; Martinez-Outschoorn, U.E.; Sotgia, F.; et al. CDK inhibitors (p16/p19/p21) induce senescence and autophagy in cancer-associated fibroblasts, “fueling” tumor growth via paracrine interactions, without an increase in neo-angiogenesis. Cell Cycle 2012, 11, 3599–3610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Capparelli, C.; Whitaker-Menezes, D.; Guido, C.; Balliet, R.; Pestell, T.G.; Howell, A.; Sneddon, S.; Pestell, R.G.; Martinez-Outschoorn, U.; Lisanti, M.P.; et al. CTGF drives autophagy, glycolysis and senescence in cancer-associated fibroblasts via HIF1 activation, metabolically promoting tumor growth. Cell Cycle 2012, 11, 2272–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Ammer, A.G.; Kelley, L.C.; Hayes, K.E.; Evans, J.V.; Lopez-skinner, A.; Martin, K.H.; Frederick, B.; Rothschild, B.L.; Elvin, P.; Green, T.P.; et al. Saracatinib impairs head and neck squamous cell carcinoma invasion by disruption invadopodia function. J. Cancer Sci. Ther. 2009, 1, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Nozawa, H.; Howell, G.; Suzuki, S.; Zhang, Q.; Qi, Y.; Klein-Seetharaman, J.; Wells, A.; Grandis, J.R.; Thomas, S.M. Combined inhibition of PLCγ-1 and c-Src abrogates epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma invasion. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 4336–4344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Koppikar, P.; Choi, S.-H.; Egloff, A.M.; Cai, Q.; Suzuki, S.; Freilino, M.; Nozawa, H.; Thomas, S.M.; Gooding, W.E.; Siegfried, J.M.; et al. Combined inhibition of c-Src and epidermal growth factor receptor abrogates growth and invasion of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 4284–4291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Fury, M.G.; Baxi, S.; Shen, R.; Kelly, K.W.; Lipson, B.L.; Carlson, D.; Stambuk, H.; Haque, S.; Pfister, D.G. Phase II study of saracatinib (AZD0530) for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Anticancer Res. 2011, 31, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  172. Johnson, F.M.; Saigal, B.; Talpaz, M.; Donato, N.J. Dasatinib (BMS-354825) tyrosine kinase inhibitor suppresses invasion and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 6924–6932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Brooks, H.D.; Glisson, B.S.; Bekele, B.N.; Johnson, F.M.; Ginsberg, L.E.; El-Naggar, A.; Culotta, K.S.; Takebe, N.; Wright, J.; Tran, H.T.; et al. Phase 2 study of dasatinib in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 2011, 117, 2112–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Srinivasan, D.; Plattner, R. Activation of Abl tyrosine kinases promotes invasion of aggressive breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 5648–5655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Lin, J.; Sun, T.; Ji, L.; Deng, W.; Roth, J.; Minna, J.; Arlinghaus, R. Oncogenic activation of c-Abl in non-small cell lung cancer cells lacking FUS1 expression: Inhibition of c-Abl by the tumor suppressor gene product Fus1. Oncogene 2007, 26, 6989–6996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Furlan, A.; Stagni, V.; Hussain, A.; Richelme, S.; Conti, F.; Prodosmo, A.; Destro, A.; Roncalli, M.; Barilà, D.; Maina, F. Abl interconnects oncogenic Met and p53 core pathways in cancer cells. Cell Death Differ. 2011, 18, 1608–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Ganguly, S.S.; Fiore, L.S.; Sims, J.T.; Friend, J.W.; Srinivasan, D.; Thacker, M.A.; Cibull, M.L.; Wang, C.; Novak, M.; Kaetzel, D.M.; et al. C-Abl and Arg are activated in human primary melanomas, promote melanoma cell invasion via distinct pathways, and drive metastatic progression. Oncogene 2012, 31, 1804–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Smith-Pearson, P.S.; Greuber, E.K.; Yogalingam, G.; Pendergast, A.M. Abl kinases are required for invadopodia formation and chemokine-induced invasion. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 40201–40211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Hayes, K.E.; Walk, E.L.; Ammer, A.G.; Kelley, L.C.; Martin, K.H.; Weed, S.A. Ableson kinases negatively regulate invadopodia function and invasion in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by inhibiting an HB-EGF autocrine loop. Oncogene 2013, 32, 4766–4777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Tsao, A.S.; Liu, S.; Fujimoto, J.; Wistuba, I.I.; Lee, J.J.; Marom, E.M.; Charnsangavej, C.; Fossella, F.V.; Tran, H.T.; Blumenschein, G.R.; et al. Phase II trials of imatinib mesylate and docetaxel in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2011, 6, 2104–2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Herbst, R.S.; Kim, E.S.; Harari, P.M. IMC-C225, an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody, for treatment of head and neck cancer. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2001, 1, 719–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Huang, S.M.; Bock, J.M.; Harari, P.M. Epidermal growth factor receptor blockade with C225 modulates proliferation, apoptosis, and radiosensitivity in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 1935–1940. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  183. Huang, S.M.; Harari, P.M. Modulation of radiation response after epidermal growth factor receptor blockade in squamous cell carcinomas: Inhibition of damage repair, cell cycle kinetics, and tumor angiogenesis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000, 6, 2166–2174. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  184. Fury, M.G.; Sherman, E.; Lisa, D.; Agarwal, N.; Algazy, K.; Brockstein, B.; Langer, C.; Lim, D.; Mehra, R.; Rajan, S.K.; et al. A randomized phase II study of cetuximab every 2 weeks at either 500 or 750 mg/m2 for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer. J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw. 2012, 10, 1391–1398. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  185. Merlano, M.; Russi, E.; Benasso, M.; Corvò, R.; Colantonio, I.; Vigna-Taglianti, R.; Vigo, V.; Bacigalupo, A.; Numico, G.; Crosetto, N.; et al. Cisplatin-based chemoradiation plus cetuximab in locally advanced head and neck cancer: A phase II clinical study. Ann. Oncol. 2011, 22, 712–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Licitra, L.; Störkel, S.; Kerr, K.M.; van Cutsem, E.; Pirker, R.; Hirsch, F.R.; Vermorken, J.B.; von Heydebreck, A.; Esser, R.; Celik, I.; et al. Predictive value of epidermal growth factor receptor expression for first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab in patients with head and neck and colorectal cancer: Analysis of data from the EXTREME and CRYSTAL studies. Eur. J. Cancer 2013, 49, 1161–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Licitra, L.; Mesia, R.; Rivera, F.; Remenár, E.; Hitt, R.; Erfán, J.; Rottey, S.; Kawecki, A.; Zabolotnyy, D.; Benasso, M.; et al. Evaluation of EGFR gene copy number as a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: EXTREME study. Ann. Oncol. 2011, 22, 1078–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Rivera, F.; García-Castaño, A.; Vega, N.; Vega-Villegas, M.E.; Gutiérrez-Sanz, L. Cetuximab in metastatic or recurrent head and neck cancer: The EXTREME trial. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2009, 9, 1421–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. William, W.N.; Kim, E.S.; Herbst, R.S. Cetuximab therapy for patients with advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Nat. Clin. Pract. Oncol. 2009, 6, 132–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Fuchs, D.; Heinold, A.; Opelz, G.; Daniel, V.; Naujokat, C. Salinomycin induces apoptosis and overcomes apoptosis resistance in human cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 390, 743–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Markwell, S.M.; Weed, S.A. Tumor and Stromal-Based Contributions to Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Invasion. Cancers 2015, 7, 382-406. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers7010382

AMA Style

Markwell SM, Weed SA. Tumor and Stromal-Based Contributions to Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Invasion. Cancers. 2015; 7(1):382-406. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers7010382

Chicago/Turabian Style

Markwell, Steven M., and Scott A. Weed. 2015. "Tumor and Stromal-Based Contributions to Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Invasion" Cancers 7, no. 1: 382-406. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers7010382

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop