Next Article in Journal
Complex Determinants of Epithelial: Mesenchymal Phenotypic Plasticity in Ovarian Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Predicting Organ-Specific Risk Interactions between Radiation and Chemotherapy in Secondary Cancer Survivors
Previous Article in Journal
Significance of microRNAs in Androgen Signaling and Prostate Cancer Progression
Previous Article in Special Issue
Complex DNA Damage: A Route to Radiation-Induced Genomic Instability and Carcinogenesis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 9
Issue 8
10.3390/cancers9080103
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Secondary Intracranial Tumors Following Radiotherapy for Pituitary Adenomas: A Systematic Review

by
Ryuya Yamanaka
1,*,
Eisuke Abe
2,
Toshiteru Sato
3,
Azusa Hayano
1 and
Yasuo Takashima
1
1
Laboratory of Molecular Target Therapy for Cancer, Graduate School for Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
2
Division of Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata 951-8122, Japan
3
Department of Radiology, Nagaoka Chuo General Hospital, Nagaoka 940-8653, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2017, 9(8), 103; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers9080103
Submission received: 4 June 2017 / Revised: 2 August 2017 / Accepted: 4 August 2017 / Published: 8 August 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiation-Induced Carcinogenesis)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pituitary adenomas are often treated with radiotherapy for the management of tumor progression or recurrence. Despite the improvement in cure rates, patients treated by radiotherapy are at risk of development of secondary malignancies. We conducted a comprehensive literature review of the secondary intracranial tumors that occurred following radiotherapy to pituitary adenomas to obtain clinicopathological characteristics. The analysis included 48 neuroepithelial tumors, 37 meningiomas, and 52 sarcomas which were published between 1959–2017, although data is missing regarding overall survival and type of irradiation in a significant proportion of the reports. The average onset age for the pituitary adenoma was 37.2 ± 14.4 years and the average latency period before the diagnosis of the secondary tumor was 15.2 ± 8.7 years. Radiotherapy was administered in pituitary adenomas at an average dose of 52.0 ± 19.5 Gy. The distribution of pituitary adenomas according to their function was prolactinoma in 10 (7.2%) cases, acromegaly in 37 (27.0%) cases, Cushing disease in 4 (2.9%) cases, PRL+GH in 1 (0.7%) case, non-functioning adenoma in 57 (41.6%) cases. Irradiation technique delivered was lateral opposing field in 23 (16.7%) cases, 3 or 4 field technique in 27 (19.6%) cases, rotation technique in 10 (7.2%) cases, radio surgery in 6 (4.3%) cases. Most of the glioma or sarcoma had been generated after lateral opposing field or 3/4 field technique. Fibrosarcomas were predominant before 1979 (p < 0.0001). The median overall survival time for all neuroepithelial tumors was 11 months (95% confidence intervals (CI), 3–14). Patients with gliomas treated with radiotherapy exhibited a non-significant positive trend with longer overall survival. The median overall survival time for sarcoma cases was 6 months (95% CI, 1.5–9). The median survival time in patients with radiation and/or chemotherapy for sarcomas exhibited a non-significant positive trend with longer overall survival. In patients treated with radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas, the risk of secondary tumor incidence warrants a longer follow up period. Moreover, radiation and/or chemotherapy should be considered in cases of secondary glioma or sarcoma following radiotherapy to the pituitary adenomas.

1. Introduction

Pituitary adenomas which can either be hormone secreting or non-secreting are benign neoplasms of the pituitary gland approximately account for 8% of all primary brain tumors. In pituitary adenoma patients (non-functioning adenomas or growth hormone (GH) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) secreting adenomas), surgical management is the mainstay treatment. Radiotherapy is an option only if repeated surgery or medical treatment fails in patients with pituitary adenomas. Despite the improvement in cure rates, pituitary tumor patients treated with radiotherapy are at risk of long-term neurological complications such as the development of hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction, leukoencephalopathy, and secondary malignancies [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Radiation-induced intracranial tumors might occur within the brain, the dura mater, leptomeninges, optic sheath, vascular adventitia, or the choroid plexus within the central nervous system (CNS), although it is rare. Tumors such as meningiomas, sarcomas, and gliomas are the most frequently reported secondary neoplasms [7,8,9,10,11]. Cahan et al. [12] established the diagnostic criteria for radiation-induced tumors. These criteria were modified by Schrantz and Araoz [13] as follows: (1) the tumor must occur within the irradiated field; (2) the tumor must not be present prior to the radiotherapy; (3) a sufficient latency period must elapse between irradiation and tumor incidence; and (4) the radiation-induced tumor must be proven to be of a different histological type compared to the original neoplasm treated by radiotherapy. We have reported the results of a systematic review of radiation-induced gliomas, meningiomas, and sarcomas in 728 patients [9,10,11]. Of these, 104 (14.3%) patients were derived from pituitary irradiation, and this is one of the major etiologies of radiation-induced brain tumor. In the present study, we focused on secondary intracranial tumors following radiotherapy to pituitary adenomas to obtain an insight into clinicopathological characteristics.
This review is based on a systemic search in the PubMed databases. The terms used in the search were “radiation induced intracranial tumor” combined with any of the following words: “brain tumor,” “glioma,” “glioblastoma,” “malignant glioma,” “anaplastic astrocytoma,” “meningioma,” “sarcoma,” “secondary neoplasm,” “pituitary adenoma,” “radiotherapy-induced,” “radiation-induced.” Cases with more than 3 years of latency period from radiation therapy to the secondary intracranial tumor diagnosis were selected. Several factors were collected, including patient age at diagnosis, gender, latency period from radiation therapy to the secondary brain tumor diagnosis, total irradiation dosage, irradiation method, pituitary adenoma type, location of secondary tumor, therapy of secondary tumor and overall survival (OS). OS was calculated from the date of secondary brain tumor diagnosis to the date of death, regardless of the cause of last follow-up. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to illustrate the OS. Statistical significance was assessed using a log-rank test. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from a logistic regression model were used to compare groups with respect to major clinical factors. A value of p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

2. Results

2.1. The Incidence of Intracranial Tumors Following Radiotherapy to Pituitary Adenomas Reported in the Literature

We initially identified 728 articles. After articles were excluded based on our present inclusion and exclusion criteria, finally 87 articles with a total of 137 (48 neuroepithelial tumors, 37 meningiomas, 52 sarcomas) patients in the 1959–2017 period were included in this review, although data is missing regarding overall survival and type of irradiation in a significant proportion of the reports (Figure 1, Table 1, Supplementary Table S1) [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102]. The distribution of the histological types of secondary tumors was gliomas in 46 cases (9, grade II; 14, grade III; and 22, grade IV), primitive neuroepithelial tumor (PNET) in 1 case, neuroblastoma in 1 case, meningiomas in 37 cases (6, meningothelial; 5, fibroblastic; 1, transitional; 1, atypical; 1, malignant; 23, meningioma not specified), sarcomas in 52 cases (28, fibrosarcoma; 9, osteosarcoma; 3, malignant histiocytic sarcoma; 2, leiomyosarcoma; 1, fibrochondrosarcoma; 1, hemangioendothelioma; 1, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor; 8, sarcoma not specified) (Supplementary Table S1). The age of radiotherapy administered for pituitary adenomas was 39.7 ± 13.4 years for neuroepithelial tumors, 31.3 ± 13.4 years for meningiomas, and 39.0 ± 15.0 years for sarcomas (neuroepithelial tumors vs. meningiomas, p = 0.0042; meningiomas vs. sarcomas, p = 0.0130; Table 1). The latency period from radiotherapy administration to the onset of secondary tumors was 13.3 ± 9.1 years for neuroepithelial tumors, 20.9 ± 8.5 years for meningiomas, and 12.8 ± 6.5 years for sarcomas (neuroepithelial tumors vs. meningiomas, p < 0.0001; meningiomas vs. sarcomas, p < 0.0001; Table 1, Figure 2A). The radiation dose delivered to the pituitary adenomas was 51.3 ± 10.9 Gy for neuroepithelial tumors, 50.9 ± 23.7 Gy for meningiomas, and 53.2 ± 22.0 Gy for sarcomas (not significant; Table 1). Fibrosarcomas were predominant before 1979 (p < 0.0001; Figure 3). There were two cases of multiple secondary brain tumors with different histological types: meningioma and glioma with an 8-year interval [95] and fibrosarcoma and osteogenic sarcoma with a 4-year interval [77].

2.2. Secondary Intracranial Tumor and Adenoma Type or Age at Pituitary Irradiation

The distribution of pituitary adenomas according to their function was prolactinoma (PRL) in 10 (7.2%) cases, acromegaly (GH) in 37 (27.0%) cases, Cushing disease (ACTH) in 4 (2.9%) cases, thyrotropinoma (TSH) in 1 (0.7%) case, non-functioning adenoma (NF) in 57 (41.6%) cases, PRL + GH in 1 (0.7%) case and not determined (ND) in 27 (19.7%) cases. Secondary tumor developed in PRL, ACTH, GH, NF pituitary adenomas 9, 7, 11, and 14 years after irradiation, respectively (GH vs. NF, p = 0.0386; ACTH vs. NF, p = 0.1786; PRL vs. NF, p = 0.8318) (Figure 2B). Secondary tumor developed in 0–19, 20–39, 40–76 year age group was 18.5, 15, and 10 years after irradiation, respectively (p = 0.0166) (Figure 2C).

2.3. Irradiation Method and Secondary Tumor Location

Irradiation technique delivered was lateral opposing field in 23 (16.7%) cases, 3 or 4 field technique in 27 (19.6%) cases, rotation technique in 10 (7.2%) cases, radiosurgery in 6 (4.3%) cases and, N.D. (not determined) in 71 (51.8%) cases (Table 2). The location of the secondary tumor was frontal lobe in 14 (10.2%) cases, temporal lobe in 17 (12.4%) cases, parietal lobe in 3 (2.1%) cases, basal ganglia in 2 (1.4%) cases, chiasma in 3 (2.1%) cases, brainstem in 3 (2.1%) cases, skull base in 64 (46.7%) cases, calvaria in 15 (10.9%) cases and, N.D. in 24 (17.5%) cases. A typical isodose plan of lateral opposing field, 3-field technique, rotational technique, multiportal technique used for a case of non-functioning pituitary adenoma is shown in Figure 4. The lesion dose is 4500 cGy/25 fractions. The relationship of radiation technique and secondary brain tumor development is shown in Table 2. Most of glioma or sarcoma had occurred after lateral opposing field or 3/4 field technique.

2.4. The Result of Secondary Neuroepithelial Tumor Therapy

In the case of secondary neuroepithelial tumor, total or partial removal was performed in 20 cases, and biopsy was performed in 7 cases. Radiotherapy was performed in 6 cases with an average dose of 53.1 (30–76) Gy. Chemotherapy was prescribed for 6 cases with a range of protocols according to the physician’s choice. The median overall survival time and 2-year survival rate for grade III and IV gliomas were 6.5 months (95% CI, 1.2–23) and 13.3%, 12 months (95% CI, 2–19), and 12.5%, respectively (Figure 5A). The survival time was also estimated depending on the treatment modality administered to grade IV gliomas. The median survival time in patients who underwent total or subtotal surgical removal was 12 months (95% CI, 1–19) with a 2-year survival rate of 16.6% and that in patients who underwent biopsy only was 3 months (95% CI, 2–16) with a 2-year survival rate of 0% (p = 0.2532, Figure 5B). The median survival time following radiotherapy was 19 months (95% CI, 16–19) with a 2-year survival rate of 0%, whereas patients who did not receive radiation had a median survival time of 10 months (95% CI, 1–14), and a 2-year survival rate of 12.5% (p = 0.1490, Figure 5C). The median survival time in patients who received chemotherapy was 16 months (95% CI, 3–26) with a 2-year survival rate of 33.3%, while patients who did not receive chemotherapy had a median survival time of 11.5 months (95% CI, 1–14) and a 2-year survival rate of 0% (p = 0.2206, Figure 5D). In patients who received surgery and radiochemotherapy, the median survival time was 16 months (95% CI, not reached (NR)) with a 2-year survival rate of 0%, whereas that for the remainder of the patients who had not received combined treatment was 11 months (95% CI, 1–19) with a 2-year survival rate of 11.1%, respectively (p = 0.6864, Figure 5E).

2.5. The Results of Secondary Meningioma and Sarcoma Therapy

In case of secondary meningioma, surgical resection was performed in 21 cases. The median overall survival time for all meningioma cases was 130 months (95% CI, 12–NR) with a 10-year survival rate of 65.6% (Figure 5F). There are various treatment options for secondary sarcoma, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Total or partial resection of the tumors was performed in 36 cases, and biopsy was performed in 7 cases. Radiotherapy was administered for 10 cases with an average radiation dose of 46.1 (28–65) Gy. Chemotherapy was administered in 6 cases with a range of protocols according to the physician’s choice. The median overall survival time for all sarcoma cases was 6 months (95% CI, 1.5–9) with a 2-year survival rate of 12.7% (Figure 6A). The median survival time in patients who underwent total or subtotal surgical resection was 6 months (95% CI, 2.5–9.5) with a 1-year survival rate of 28.6%; and that in patients who underwent biopsy only was 3 months (95% CI, 0.06–12) with a 1-year survival rate of 14.2% (p = 0.3749; Figure 6B). There was no impact of surgery on secondary sarcoma. The median survival time in patients who received radiotherapy was 12.2 months (95% CI, 1–16) with a 1-year survival rate of 50.0%, whereas that in patients who did not receive radiotherapy was 4.5 months (95% CI, 1–6) with a 1-year survival rate of 14.2% (p = 0.1123, Figure 6C). The median survival time in patients who underwent chemotherapy was 13 months (95% CI, 3–NR) with a 1-year survival rate of 50%, while patients who did not receive chemotherapy had a median survival time of 5 months (95% CI, 1–8) and a 1-year survival rate of 18.6% (p = 0.1122, Figure 6D). In patients who underwent combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the median survival time was NR months (95% CI, 15–NR) with a 1-year survival rate of 100%; whereas that for the patients who had not undergone radiochemotherapy was 5 months (95% CI, 1.5–8) with a 1-year survival rate of 19.3% (p = 0.1113, Figure 6E).

3. Discussion

In this series, all cases fulfil the criteria of radiation induced tumor. They occurred within the irradiated field; a sufficient latency period elapsed between irradiation and secondary tumor occurrence (at least 3 years) [103]; the secondary tumors were proven to be of a different histological type from the original neoplasm. Pituitary irradiation is one of the important treatment options for functioning and non-functioning adenomas. Radiotherapy is administered in the case of incomplete resection, invasive tumors, or tumors showing resistance to treatments. The use of radiotherapy is well established and effective in delaying tumor regrowth. Using X-ray simulation, radiotherapeutic techniques such as lateral opposing technique, 3-field technique, rotation technique, and radiosurgery had been employed individually to localize uniform radiation to the sellar region and minimize dose to the optic pathways, brainstem, and temporal lobes. The most important dose-limiting factor is the effect on optic pathways and brain. Sheline et al. had reported that the optimal dose range for maximal effects on primary tumor management, with minimal probability of side effects, was 40–50 Gy delivered in fractions <2 Gy per day [104,105]. Sellar region irradiation had been performed to deliver an approximate dose of 45 Gy in fractions. Radiation-induced gliomas or meningiomas had occurred often in the temporal and frontal region. In this series, approximately 75% of gliomas arose in the fronto-temporal region. Pituitary irradiation was often administered via bilateral opposed ports with or without the anterior beam, thereby exposing the temporal lobes to relatively high doses of radiation although this had been the older technique but not with the more contemporary treatment modalities. The incidence of secondary glioma might be enhanced by radiological exposure for the subependymal layer where neural stem cells are present after the lateral opposing field or 3-field technique. The older radiotherapy techniques/higher doses per fraction, favored the development of sarcomas, since most of the sarcomas occurred in patients treated between 1959–1979. Loeffler et al. reported meningioma occurrence after radiosurgery for pituitary adenoma in the region that received a very low estimated dose (4.4 Gy) of radiation [81]. We should consider secondary tumors, since they can occur when neighboring tissue receives even lower doses.
There are conflicting results as to the development of secondary intracranial tumors after pituitary irradiation [84,100,102]. Burman et al. reported the risk ratio for radiotherapy vs. no radiotherapy was 3.34 for malignant brain tumors, and 4.06 for meningiomas [102]. A connection between functional pituitary adenomas and the incidence of cancers has to be investigated, since certain hormones might act as promoters of oncogenesis following irradiation. Actually, patients with acromegaly have been shown to have increased incidence of malignant tumor [106,107,108], as shown in our data the latency period is shorter in patients with GH secreting adenoma compared to that of non-functioning adenomas. The association between functioning pituitary adenoma and secondary intracranial tumor is unclear. Growth hormone and insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) have been reported to be linked to the risk of cancers [109,110]. IGFs promote the proliferation of oligodendrocytes, and are believed to have a role in brain tumor progression [111]. IGF2 gene is overexpressed in gliomas and meningiomas [112]. Several insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins (IGFBPs), which regulate the bioactivity of IGFs are also expressed in brain tumor. Enhanced gene expression of IGFBP1 and IGFBP2 has been demonstrated in meningiomas and gliomas [113]. IGFBP2 is associated with increased cellular proliferation, migration, and invasion in glioblastomas [114,115]. Sex steroids regulate meningioma progression through IGFs and IGFBPs [116]. A mild hyperprolactinaemia is found in some of the patients with meningiomas [117]. PRL receptors are expressed in meningioma, astrocytic tumors, and osteoblastic cells, PRL being implicated as a regulator of proliferative effect of menigiomas, gliomas, and sarcomas [117,118,119]. There are also clinical findings of accelerated growth of co-existing meningiomas in patients with PRL secreting pituitary adenomas [120] and also accelerated growth of meningiomas during pregnancy [121]. Cushing disease results from excessive secretion of glucocorticoid, and patients are immunosuppressed due to hypercorticolism. Intracranial tumor development might be enhanced by the immunosuppressive effect. Although hormone production might have contributed to the brain tumor development, the precise hormonal follow-ups following radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas were not described in these reports.
The latency period from radiation exposure to the occurrence of secondary meningioma was longer compared to that for glioma or sarcoma, possibly owing to the slowly growing nature of the tumor. Spontaneous high-grade gliomas typically affect adults and are preferentially located in the cerebral hemispheres. However, the age of onset of radiation-induced gliomas is lower than that of spontaneous high grade gliomas [9]. In radiation-induced gliomas after pituitary irradiation, onset age is rather older (53 year) compared to radiation-induced gliomas in general (27 year), owing to the fact that the age of pituitary irradiation is rather older. Radiation-induced gliomas are frequently located in the cerebellum and spinal cord, whereas in radiation-induced gliomas after pituitary irradiation, frontal or temporal sites are predominant, probably due to the radiation method.
Radiation-induced meningiomas have been reported to be associated with a lower patient age at diagnosis, a higher number of calvarial tumors, histologically atypical/multiple lesions, and aggressive biological behavior in the course of the disease [10]. In radiation-induced meningioma after pituitary irradiation, onset age is also rather older (53 year) compared to radiation-induced meningioma in general (36 year), owing to the fact that the age of pituitary irradiation is rather older. A lower number of calvarial tumors after pituitary irradiation (21.6%) were identified compared to radiation-induced meningiomas in gereral (51%) probably due to the radiation method. The incidence of grade II and III meningiomas (13.3%) is lower compared to that in patients with radiation-induced meningiomas in general (31.7%), possibly due to lack of precise information.
The reports concerning the genetic alterations in radiation-induced intracranial tumors are limited. Briefly, somatic mutations of p53 gene have been identified in radiation-induced tumors [122,123]. An initial mutation to a single allele might occur after radiotherapy, and an additional mutation to the wild-type allele might be added after several years, leading to oncogenesis. Nine radiation-induced high-grade gliomas were investigated for molecular alterations in p53, PTEN, KRAS, EGFR, and p16 [74]. Genetic alterations similar to those described in spontaneous high-grade gliomas, with the exception of PTEN mutations, were also observed in radiation-induced gliomas. Loss of chromosome 1p was frequent in radiation-induced osteosarcomas and meningiomas [124,125,126]. However, a more wide-scale analysis, using a larger series, is required to truly address these issues.
Radiation-induced glioma is difficult to treat; radiotherapy is not always a therapeutic option because it could be that the patient already had prior exposure. However, Mayer and Sminia reported that re-irradiated normal brain tissue could tolerate a cumulative total dose of more than 100 Gy at conventional fractionation [127]. These observations indicate that higher doses are possible with re-irradiation. Therapeutic approaches by radiation might therefore yield prolonged disease control in some patients with radiation-induced tumor. Patients with neuroepithelial tumors treated with radiotherapy exhibited a non-significant positive trend with longer overall survival. Retrospective data supports the need for combined modality treatment in patients with secondary gliomas as reported [9]. The most effective treatment for radiation-induced meningiomas is surgical management, although radiosurgery could also be considered. Although the median survival time in patients with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy for sarcomas had a tendency to be improved, treatment of radiation-induced sarcomas is much more difficult [11]. Surgical management had limited roles including decompressing mass effect, obtaining target space for radiotherapy, and sampling for pathological diagnosis, because most of the tumors had been adherent and invading to the surrounding structures and could only be partially removed. In our previous study, it was proposed that patients with radiation-induced sarcoma may benefit from intensive chemotherapy [11]. Berkmann et al. reported the usefulness of radiosurgery to obtain significant tumor shrinkage for a limited time [89]. Radiosurgery applies a high dose of radiation to a delineated space with a small risk of causing injury to the neighboring structures [128]. Alexandru et al. reported a case with relatively long-term disease control with cyclophosphamide and imatinib with no limiting toxicities [88]. With recent advances of molecularly targeted therapy for cancer, new agents are emerging for sarcomas.
Consistent and long-term aftercare is basically required in the case of pituitary adenomas not only to detect a possible radiation-induced tumor, but also to check the tumor control and to detect long-term damage to the optic pathway and the pituitary function. The follow-up should be performed in specialized centers with available radiation therapists, neurosurgeons, endocrinologists, and ophthalmologists.
There are limitations to this study, since the data were obtained from retrospective case reports and case series. However, our data supports clinicopathological characteristics of secondary intracranial tumors after irradiation for pituitary adenoma. The high proportion of sarcomas in this review may reflect a publication bias of the most severe tumors. This cannot only be due to different radiation protocols, this might be a problem of histological diagnosis. After irradiation therapy for pituitary adenomas, the risk of radiation-induced tumors will be increased in the longer survivors. Future studies should focus on genetic profiling of radiation-induced tumors to elucidate features that might aid in the development of targeted therapies.

4. Conclusions

The risk of secondary intracranial tumors should be considered before the decision of radiotherapy for treating pituitary adenomas. In addition, we suggest the importance of long-term follow up in patients who undergo radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas. Moreover, combined modality therapy should be considered in cases of secondary sarcoma following radiotherapy to the pituitary adenomas. Extensive molecular pathological research on radiation-induced tumors is warranted.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/9/8/103/s1. Table S1: Radiation-induced secondary intracranial tumor following radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by KAKENHI grant (16H05441 to Ryuya YAMANAKA) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Knosp, E.; Perneczky, A.; Kitz, K.; Grunert, P.; Wild, A. The need for adjunctive focused radiation therapy in pituitary adenomas. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 1995, 63, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Kobayashi, T.; Tanaka, T.; Kida, Y. Stereotactic gamma radiosurgery of craniopharyngiomas. Pediatr. Neurosurg. 1994, 21, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pui, C.H.; Pei, D.; Sandlund, J.T.; Campana, D.; Ribeiro, R.C.; Razzouk, B.I.; Rubnitz, J.E.; Howard, S.C.; Hijiya, N.; Jeha, S.; et al. Risk of adverse events after completion of therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005, 23, 7936–7941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Reddick, W.E.; Glass, J.O.; Helton, K.J.; Langston, J.W.; Xiong, X.; Wu, S.; Pui, C.H. Prevalence of leukoencephalopathy in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia with high-dose methotrexate. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2005, 26, 1263–1269. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Spiegler, B.J.; Kennedy, K.; Maze, R.; Greenberg, M.L.; Weitzman, S.; Hitzler, J.K.; Nathan, P.C. Comparison of long-term neurocognitive outcomes in young children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with cranial radiation or high-dose or very high-dose intravenous methotrexate. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24, 3858–3864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ushio, Y.; Arita, N.; Yoshimine, T.; Nagatani, M.; Mogami, H. Glioblastoma after radiotherapy for craniopharyngioma: Case report. Neurosurgery 1987, 21, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Relling, M.V.; Rubnitz, J.E.; Rivera, G.K.; Boyett, J.M.; Hancock, M.L.; Felix, C.A.; Kun, L.E.; Walter, A.W.; Evans, W.E.; Pui, C.H. High incidence of secondary brain tumours after radiotherapy and antimetabolites. Lancet 1999, 354, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Walter, A.W.; Hancock, M.L.; Pui, C.H.; Hudson, M.M.; Ochs, J.S.; Rivera, G.K.; Pratt, C.B.; Boyett, J.M.; Kun, L.E. Secondary brain tumors in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia at St Jude Children’s Research Hospital. J. Clin. Oncol. 1998, 16, 3761–3767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Yamanaka, R.; Hayano, A.; Kanayama, T. Radiation-induced gliomas: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg. Rev. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yamanaka, R.; Hayano, A.; Kanayama, T. Radiation-induced meningiomas: An exhaustive review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Yamanaka, R.; Hayano, A. Radiation-Induced Sarcomas of the central nervous system: A systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cahan, W.G.; Woodard, H.Q.; Higinbotham, N.L.; Stewart, F.W.; Coley, B.L. Sarcoma arising in irradiated bone: Report of eleven cases. 1948. Cancer 1998, 82, 8–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Schrantz, J.L.; Araoz, C.A. Radiation induced meningeal fibrosarcoma. Arch. Pathol. 1972, 93, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Terry, R.D.; Hyams, V.J.; Davidoff, L.M. Combined nonmetastasizing fibrosarcoma and chromophobe tumor of the pituitary. Cancer 1959, 12, 791–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Meredith, J.M.; Mandeville, F.B.; Kay, S. Osteogenic sarcoma of the skull following roentgenray therapy for benign pituitary tumor. J. Neurosurg. 1960, 17, 792–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Newton, T.H.; Burhenne, H.J.; Palubinskas, A.J. Primary carcinoma of the pituitary. Am. J. Roentgenol. Radium. Ther. Nucl. Med. 1962, 87, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Goldberg, M.B.; Sheline, G.E.; Malamud, N. Malignant intracranial neoplasms, following radiation therapy for acromegaly. Radiology 1963, 80, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Greenhouse, A.H. Pituitary sarcoma: A possible consequence of radiation. JAMA 1964, 190, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Waltz, T.A.; Brownell, B. Sarcoma: A possible late result of effective radiation therapy for pituitary adenoma. Report of two cases. J. Neurosurg. 1966, 24, 901–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Chang, C.H.; Pool, J.L. The radiotherapy of pituitary chromophobe adenomas: An evaluation of indication, technic, and result. Radiology 1967, 89, 1005–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wright, A.D.; Hill, D.M.; Lowy, C.; Fraser, T.R. Mortality in acromegaly. Q. J. Med. 1970, 39, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Lawrence, J.H.; Tobias, C.A.; Linfoot, J.A.; Born, J.L.; Lyman, J.T.; Chong, C.Y.; Manougian, E.; Wei, W.C. Successful treatment of acromegaly: Metabolic and clinical studies in 145 patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1970, 31, 180–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Miura, K.; Iino, M.; Demura, H.; Demura, E.; Sasaki, C. Diagnosis and management of Cushing’ syndrome based on our 28 cases, with special reference to combined therapy of 60Co irradiation of the hypothalamus and reserpine. Nihon Rinsho 1970, 28, 1366–1378. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Sparagana, M.; Eells, R.W.; Stefani, S.; Jablokow, V. Osteogenic sarcoma of the skull: A rare sequela of pituitary irradition. Cancer 1972, 29, 1376–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bogdanowicz, W.M.; Sachs, E., Jr. The possible role of radiation in oncogenesis of meningioma. Surg. Neurol. 1974, 2, 379–383. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Stock, J.M.; Ghatak, N.R.; Oppenheimer, J.H. Unususpected meningioma in a patient with pituitary gigantism. Case report with autopsy findings. Metabolism 1975, 24, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Amine, A.R.; Sugar, O. Suprasellar osteogenic sarcoma following radiation for pituitary adenoma. Case report. J. Neurosurg. 1976, 44, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Gonzalez-Vitale, J.C.; Slavin, R.E.; McQueen, J.D. Radiation-induced intracranial malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Cancer 1976, 37, 2960–2963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Powell, H.C.; Marshall, L.F.; Ignelzi, R.J. Post-irradiation pituitary sarcoma. Acta Neuropathol. 1977, 39, 165–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ahmad, K.; Fayos, J.V. Pituitary fibrosarcoma secondary to radiation therapy. Cancer 1978, 42, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Coppeto, J.R.; Roberts, M. Fibrosarcoma after proton-beam pituitary ablation. Arch. Neurol. 1979, 36, 380–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Shin, H.; Namba, H.; Ishige, N.; Ohsato, K.; Nakamura, T.; Yamaura, A.; Makino, H. Pituitary fibrosarcoma secondary to radiation therapy for the treatment of chromophobe adenoma (author’s transl.). No Shinkei Geka 1980, 8, 605–614. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Martin, W.H.; Cail, W.S.; Morris, J.L.; Constable, W.C. Fibrosarcoma after high energy radiation therapy for pituitary adenoma. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1980, 135, 1087–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vikhert, T.M.; Kasumova, S. Radiation fibrosarcoma of the pituitary. Zh. Vopr. Neirokhir. Im. N. N. Burdenko 1980, 57–58. [Google Scholar]
  35. Pieterse, S.; Dinning, T.A.; Blumbergs, P.C. Postirradiation sarcomatous transformation of a pituitary adenoma: A combined pituitary tumor. Case report. J. Neurosurg. 1982, 56, 283–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Spallone, A. Meningioma as a sequel of radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg) 1982, 25, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yang, D.T. Intracranial malignant meningioma occurring after radiotherapy. Zhonghua Shen Jing Jing Shen Ke Za Zhi 1982, 15, 245–248. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Piatt, J.H., Jr.; Blue, J.M.; Schold, S.C., Jr.; Burger, P.C. Glioblastoma multiforme after radiotherapy for acromegaly. Neurosurgery 1983, 13, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Shi, T.; Farrell, M.A.; Kaufmann, J.C. Fibrosarcoma complicating irradiated pituitary adenoma. Surg. Neurol. 1984, 22, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kolodny, J.; Dluhy, R.G. Recurrent prolactinoma and meningioma following irradiation and bromocriptine treatment. Am. J. Med. 1985, 78, 153–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Okamoto, S.; Handa, H.; Yamashita, J.; Tokuriki, Y.; Abe, M. Post-irradiation brain tumors. Neurol. Med. Chir. (Tokyo) 1985, 25, 528–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Pages, A.; Pages, M.; Ramos, J.; Benezech, J. Radiation-induced intracranial fibrochondrosarcoma. J. Neurol. 1986, 233, 309–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Marus, G.; Levin, C.V.; Rutherfoord, G.S. Malignant glioma following radiotherapy for unrelated primary tumors. Cancer 1986, 58, 886–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Huang, C.I.; Chiou, W.H.; Ho, D.M. Oligodendroglioma occurring after radiation therapy for pituitary adenoma. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1987, 50, 1619–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kasantikul, V.; Shuangshoti, S.; Phonprasert, C. Intrasellar meningioma after radiotherapy for prolactinoma. J. Med. Assoc. Thai. 1988, 71, 524–527. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Hufnagel, T.J.; Kim, J.H.; Lesser, R.; Miller, J.M.; Abrahams, J.J.; Piepmeier, J.; Manuelidis, E.E. Malignant glioma of the optic chiasm eight years after radiotherapy for prolactinoma. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1988, 106, 1701–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Dierssen, G.; Alvarez, G.; Figols, J. Anaplastic astrocytomas associated with previous radiotherapy: Report of three cases. Neurosurgery 1988, 22, 1095–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Romero, F.J.; Ortega, A.; Ibarra, B.; Piqueras, J.; Rovira, M. Post-radiation cranial malignant fibrous histiocytoma studied by CT. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 1989, 13, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Amendola, B.E.; Amendola, M.A.; McClatchey, K.D.; Miller, C.H., Jr. Radiation-associated sarcoma: A review of 23 patients with postradiation sarcoma over a 50-year period. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 1989, 12, 411–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Sridhar, K. Radiation-induced meningioma. Neurosurgery 1991, 28, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Shapiro, S.; Mealey, J., Jr.; Sartorius, C. Radiation-induced intracranial malignant gliomas. J. Neurosurg. 1989, 71, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zampieri, P.; Zorat, P.L.; Mingrino, S.; Soattin, G.B. Radiation-associated cerebral gliomas. A report of two cases and review of the literature. J. Neurosurg. Sci. 1989, 33, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Suda, Y.; Mineura, K.; Kowada, M.; Ohishi, H. Malignant astrocytoma following radiotherapy in pituitary adenoma: Case report. No Shinkei Geka 1989, 17, 783–788. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Sato, K.; Hayashi, M.; Komai, T.; Kubota, T.; Kawano, H.; Handa, Y. Clinical and histological study of pituitary fibrosarcoma following radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma. Case report. Neurol. Med. Chir. (Tokyo) 1990, 30, 888–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Partington, M.D.; Davis, D.H. Radiation-induced meningioma after treatment for pituitary adenoma: Case report and literature review. Neurosurgery 1990, 26, 329–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Jones, A. Radiation oncogenesis in relation to the treatment of pituitary tumours. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf) 1991, 35, 379–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Sugita, Y.; Shigemori, M.; Miyagi, J.; Ochiai, S.; Lee, S.; Watanabe, T.; Abe, H.; Morimatsu, M. Radiation-induced osteosarcoma of the calvaria—Case report. Neurol. Med. Chir. (Tokyo) 1992, 32, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Brada, M.; Ford, D.; Ashley, S.; Bliss, J.M.; Crowley, S.; Mason, M.; Rajan, B.; Traish, D. Risk of second brain tumour after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma. BMJ 1992, 304, 1343–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Tamura, M.; Misumi, S.; Kurosaki, S.; Shibasaki, T.; Ohye, C. Anaplastic astrocytoma 14 years after radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma. No Shinkei Geka 1992, 20, 493–497. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Hodges, L.C.; Smith, J.L.; Garrett, A.; Tate, S. Prevalence of glioblastoma multiforme in subjects with prior therapeutic radiation. J. Neurosci. Nurs. 1992, 24, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Tsang, R.W.; Laperriere, N.J.; Simpson, W.J.; Brierley, J.; Panzarella, T.; Smyth, H.S. Glioma arising after radiation therapy for pituitary adenoma. A report of four patients and estimation of risk. Cancer 1993, 72, 2227–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Salvati, M.; Ciappetta, P.; Capoccia, G.; Capone, R.; Raco, A. Osteosarcoma of the skull. Report of a post-Paget and post-radiation case in an elderly woman. Neurosurg. Rev. 1994, 17, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Chang, S.M.; Barker, F.G., 2nd; Larson, D.A.; Bollen, A.W.; Prados, M.D. Sarcomas subsequent to cranial irradiation. Neurosurgery 1995, 36, 685–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Musa, B.S.; Pople, I.K.; Cummins, B.H. Intracranial meningiomas following irradiation—A growing problem? Br. J. Neurosurg. 1995, 9, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Niwa, J.; Hashi, K.; Minase, T. Radiation induced intracranial leiomyosarcoma: Its histopathological features. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 1996, 138, 1470–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ahmed, M.; Kanaan, I.; Rifai, A.; Tulbah, A.; Ghannam, N. An unusual treatment-related complication in a patient with growth hormone-secreting pituitary tumor. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1997, 82, 2816–2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Rao, M.B.; Rout, D.; Radhakrishnan, V.V. Suprasellar meningioma subsequent to treatment for a pituitary adenoma: Case report. Surg. Neurol. 1997, 47, 443–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chauveinc, L.; Ricoul, M.; Sabatier, L.; Gaboriaud, G.; Srour, A.; Bertagna, X.; Dutrillaux, B. Dosimetric and cytogenetic studies of multiple radiation-induced meningiomas for a single patient. Radiother. Oncol. 1997, 43, 285–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Salvati, M.; Cervoni, L.; Puzzilli, F.; Bristot, R.; Delfini, R.; Gagliardi, F.M. High-dose radiation-induced meningiomas. Surg. Neurol. 1997, 47, 435–441, discussion 441–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nishio, S.; Morioka, T.; Inamura, T.; Takeshita, I.; Fukui, M.; Sasaki, M.; Nakamura, K.; Wakisaka, S. Radiation-induced brain tumours: Potential late complications of radiation therapy for brain tumours. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 1998, 140, 763–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Simmons, N.E.; Laws, E.R., Jr. Glioma occurrence after sellar irradiation: Case report and review. Neurosurgery 1998, 42, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Alexander, M.J.; DeSalles, A.A.; Tomiyasu, U. Multiple radiation-induced intracranial lesions after treatment for pituitary adenoma. Case report. J. Neurosurg. 1998, 88, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Dallasta, L.M.; Martinez, J.; Nichols, L.; Hanzlick, R. Pathologic findings in a transplant donor. Arch. Intern. Med. 1999, 159, 2115–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Brat, D.J.; James, C.D.; Jedlicka, A.E.; Connolly, D.C.; Chang, E.; Castellani, R.J.; Schmid, M.; Schiller, M.; Carson, D.A.; Burger, P.C. Molecular genetic alterations in radiation-induced astrocytomas. Am. J. Pathol. 1999, 154, 1431–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kato, N.; Kayama, T.; Sakurada, K.; Saino, M.; Kuroki, A. Radiation induced glioblastoma: A case report. No To Shinkei 2000, 52, 413–418. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  76. Hill, M.D.; Mackenzie, I.; Mason, W.P. Radiation-induced glioma presenting as diffuse leptomeningeal gliomatosis: A case report. J. Neurooncol. 2001, 55, 113–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Gnanalingham, K.K.; Chakraborty, A.; Galloway, M.; Revesz, T.; Powell, M. Osteosarcoma and fibrosarcoma caused by postoperative radiotherapy for a pituitary adenoma. Case report. J. Neurosurg. 2002, 96, 960–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Osipov, V.; Ho, K.C.; Krouwer, H.G.; Meyer, G.; Shidham, V.B. Post-radiation dedifferentiation of meningioma into osteosarcoma. BMC Cancer 2002, 2, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Santoro, A.; Minniti, G.; Paolini, S.; Passacantilli, E.; Missori, P.; Frati, A.; Cantore, G.P. A typical tentorial meningioma 30 years after radiotherapy for a pituitary adenoma. Neurol. Sci. 2002, 22, 463–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Prabhu, S.S.; Aldape, K.D.; Gagel, R.F.; Benjamin, R.S.; Trent, J.C.; McCutcheon, I.E. Sarcomatous change after sellar irradiation in a growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2003, 30, 378–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Loeffler, J.S.; Niemierko, A.; Chapman, P.H. Second tumors after radiosurgery: Tip of the iceberg or a bump in the road? Neurosurgery 2003, 52, 1436–1440, discussion 1440–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Salvati, M.; Caroli, E.; Brogna, C.; Orlando, E.R.; Delfini, R. High-dose radiation-induced meningiomas. Report of five cases and critical review of the literature. Tumori 2003, 89, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  83. Bembo, S.A.; Pasmantier, R.; Davis, R.P.; Xiong, Z.; Weiss, T.E. Osteogenic sarcoma of the sella after radiation treatment of a pituitary adenoma. Endocr. Pract. 2004, 10, 335–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Minniti, G.; Traish, D.; Ashley, S.; Gonsalves, A.; Brada, M. Risk of second brain tumor after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma: Update after an additional 10 years. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 800–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Toh, C.H.; Wong, H.F.; Jung, S.M.; Wong, A.M. Radiation-induced skull base leiomyosarcoma presenting with intracerebral haemorrhage. Br. J. Radiol. 2007, 80, e212–e215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Wu-Chen, W.Y.; Jacobs, D.A.; Volpe, N.J.; Dalmau, J.O.; Moster, M.L. Intracranial malignancies occurring more than 20 years after radiation therapy for pituitary adenoma. J. Neuroophthalmol. 2009, 29, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Kondziolka, D.; Kano, H.; Kanaan, H.; Madhok, R.; Mathieu, D.; Flickinger, J.C.; Lunsford, L.D. Stereotactic radiosurgery for radiation-induced meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2009, 64, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Alexandru, D.; Van Horn, D.K.; Bota, D.A. Secondary fibrosarcoma of the brain stem treated with cyclophosphamide and Imatinib. J. Neurooncol. 2010, 99, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Berkmann, S.; Tolnay, M.; Hanggi, D.; Ghaffari, A.; Gratzl, O. Sarcoma of the sella after radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 2010, 152, 1725–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Sedney, C.L.; Morris, J.M.; Giannini, C.; Link, M.J.; Swetz, K.M. Radiation-associated sarcoma of the skull base after irradiation for pituitary adenoma. Rare Tumors 2012, 4, e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Yamada, S.M.; Ishii, Y.; Yamada, S.; Kuribayashi, S.; Kumita, S.; Matsuno, A. Advanced therapeutic strategy for radiation-induced osteosarcoma in the skull base: A case report and review. Radiat. Oncol. 2012, 7, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Guo, F.; Song, L.; Meng, Y. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour following radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2014, 21, 184–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Sasagawa, Y.; Tachibana, O.; Iizuka, H. Undifferentiated sarcoma of the cavernous sinus after gamma knife radiosurgery for pituitary adenoma. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2013, 20, 1152–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Zhou, Q.; Chang, H.; Gao, Y.; Cui, L. Tumor-to-tumor metastasis from pituitary carcinoma to radiation-induced meningioma. Neuropathology 2013, 33, 209–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Kon, T.; Natsumeda, M.; Takahashi, H.; Taki, T.; Fujii, Y.; Yamanaka, R. Radiation-induced glioblastoma following radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas: Marked response to chemotherapy. J. Neurol. Neurophysiol. 2013, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Sarkar, S.; Rajaratnam, S.; Backianathan, S.; Chacko, G.; Chacko, A.G. Radiation-induced opticochiasmatic glioblastoma multiforme following conventional radiotherapy for Cushing’s disease. Br. J. Neurosurg. 2014, 28, 510–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Abboud, S.E.; Wolansky, L.J.; Manjila, S.V.; Lo, S.S.; Arafah, B.M.; Selman, W.R.; Couce, M.E.; Rogers, L.R. Histologically proven radiation-induced brainstem glioma 93 months after external beam radiotherapy for pituitary macroadenoma: Radiation treatment dose and volume correlation. J. Neuroimaging 2015, 25, 674–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Snead, F.E.; Amdur, R.J.; Morris, C.G.; Mendenhall, W.M. Long-term outcomes of radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2008, 71, 994–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Norberg, L.; Johansson, R.; Rasmuson, T. Intracranial tumours after external fractionated radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas in northern Sweden. Acta Oncol. 2010, 49, 1276–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Sattler, M.G.; van Beek, A.P.; Wolffenbuttel, B.H.; van den Berg, G.; Sluiter, W.J.; Langendijk, J.A.; van den Bergh, A.C. The incidence of second tumours and mortality in pituitary adenoma patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone. Radiother. Oncol. 2012, 104, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Van Varsseveld, N.C.; van Bunderen, C.C.; Ubachs, D.H.; Franken, A.A.; Koppeschaar, H.P.; van der Lely, A.J.; Drent, M.L. Cerebrovascular events, secondary intracranial tumors, and mortality after radiotherapy for nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: A subanalysis from the Dutch National Registry of Growth Hormone Treatment in Adults. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, 1104–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Burman, P.; van Beek, A.P.; Biller, B.M.; Camacho-Hubner, C.; Mattsson, A.F. Radiotherapy, especially at young age, increases the risk for de novo brain tumors in patients treated for pituitary/sellar lesions. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 2, 1051–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Arlen, M.; Higinbotham, N.L.; Huvos, A.G.; Marcove, R.C.; Miller, T.; Shah, I.C. Radiation-induced sarcoma of bone. Cancer 1971, 28, 1087–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Sheline, G.E. Role of conventional radiation therapy in treatment of functional pituitary tumours. In Recent Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pituitary Tumours; Linfoot, J.A., Ed.; Raven Press: New York, NY, USA, 1979; pp. 289–313. [Google Scholar]
  105. Sheline, G.E.; Goldberg, M.B.; Feldman, R. Pituitary irradiation in acromegaly. Radiology 1961, 76, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Alexander, L.; Appleton, D.; Hall, R.; Ross, W.M.; Wilkinson, R. Epidemiology of acromegaly in the Newcastle region. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf) 1980, 12, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Bengtsson, B.A.; Eden, S.; Ernest, I.; Oden, A.; Sjogren, B. Epidemiology and long-term survival in acromegaly. A study of 166 cases diagnosed between 1955 and 1984. Acta Med. Scand. 1988, 223, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Boguszewski, C.L.; Ayuk, J. Management of endocrine disease: Acromegaly and cancer: An old debate revisited. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2016, 175, R147–R156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Crowe, F.L.; Key, T.J.; Allen, N.E.; Appleby, P.N.; Overvad, K.; Gronbaek, H.; Tjonneland, A.; Halkjaer, J.; Dossus, L.; Boeing, H.; et al. A cross-sectional analysis of the associations between adult height, BMI and serum concentrations of IGF-I and IGFBP-1 -2 and -3 in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Ann. Hum. Biol. 2011, 38, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Roberts, D.L.; Dive, C.; Renehan, A.G. Biological mechanisms linking obesity and cancer risk: New perspectives. Annu. Rev. Med. 2010, 61, 301–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Zumkeller, W. The effect of insulin-like growth factors on brain myelination and their potential therapeutic application in myelination disorders. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 1997, 1, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Glick, R.P.; Unterman, T.G.; Lacson, R. Identification of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and glucose transporter-1 and -3 mRNA in CNS tumors. Regul. Pept. 1993, 48, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zumkeller, W.; Westphal, M. The IGF/IGFBP system in CNS malignancy. Mol. Pathol. 2001, 54, 227–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Santosh, V.; Arivazhagan, A.; Sreekanthreddy, P.; Srinivasan, H.; Thota, B.; Srividya, M.R.; Vrinda, M.; Sridevi, S.; Shailaja, B.C.; Samuel, C.; et al. Grade-specific expression of insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins-2, -3, and -5 in astrocytomas: IGFBP-3 emerges as a strong predictor of survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2010, 19, 1399–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Wang, H.; Wang, H.; Shen, W.; Huang, H.; Hu, L.; Ramdas, L.; Zhou, Y.H.; Liao, W.S.; Fuller, G.N.; Zhang, W. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 enhances glioblastoma invasion by activating invasion-enhancing genes. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 4315–4321. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  116. Glick, R.P.; Lichtor, T.; Unterman, T.G. Insulin-like growth factors in central nervous system tumors. J. Neurooncol. 1997, 35, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Ciccarelli, E.; Razzore, P.; Gaia, D.; Todaro, C.; Longo, A.; Forni, M.; Ghe, C.; Camanni, F.; Muccioli, G.; Faccani, G.; et al. Hyperprolactinaemia and prolactin binding in benign intracranial tumours. J. Neurosurg. Sci. 2001, 45, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  118. Muccioli, G.; Ghe, C.; Faccani, G.; Lanotte, M.; Forni, M.; Ciccarelli, E. Prolactin receptors in human meningiomas: Characterization and biological role. J. Endocrinol. 1997, 153, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Ducret, T.; Boudina, S.; Sorin, B.; Vacher, A.M.; Gourdou, I.; Liguoro, D.; Guerin, J.; Bresson-Bepoldin, L.; Vacher, P. Effects of prolactin on intracellular calcium concentration and cell proliferation in human glioma cells. Glia 2002, 38, 200–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Morioka, T.; Nishio, S.; Fukui, M.; Iwaki, T. Convexity meningioma with galactorrhea and hyperprolactinemia. A case report. Surg. Neurol. 1989, 31, 69–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Thorner, M.O.; Vance, M.L.; Horvarth, E.; Kovacs, K. The anterior pituitary. In Text book of Endocrinology; Wilson, J.D., Foster, D.W., Eds.; WB Saunders Co.: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1992; pp. 221–311. [Google Scholar]
  122. Brachman, D.G.; Hallahan, D.E.; Beckett, M.A.; Yandell, D.W.; Weichselbaum, R.R. p53 gene mutations and abnormal retinoblastoma protein in radiation-induced human sarcomas. Cancer Res. 1991, 51, 6393–6396. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  123. Tada, M.; Sawamura, Y.; Abe, H.; Iggo, R. Homozygous p53 gene mutation in a radiation-induced glioblastoma 10 years after treatment for an intracranial germ cell tumor: Case report. Neurosurgery 1997, 40, 393–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Tarkkanen, M.; Wiklund, T.A.; Virolainen, M.J.; Larramendy, M.L.; Mandahl, N.; Mertens, F.; Blomqvist, C.P.; Tukiainen, E.J.; Miettinen, M.M.; Elomaa, A.I.; et al. Comparative genomic hybridization of postirradiation sarcomas. Cancer 2001, 92, 1992–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Brassesco, M.S.; Valera, E.T.; Neder, L.; Pezuk, J.A.; Oliveira, R.S.; Scrideli, C.A.; Tone, L.G. Cytogenetic findings in pediatric radiation-induced atypical meningioma after treatment of medulloblastoma: Case report and review of the literature. J. Neurooncol. 2012, 110, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Shoshan, Y.; Chernova, O.; Juen, S.S.; Somerville, R.P.; Israel, Z.; Barnett, G.H.; Cowell, J.K. Radiation-induced meningioma: A distinct molecular genetic pattern? J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2000, 59, 614–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Mayer, R.; Sminia, P. Reirradiation tolerance of the human brain. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2008, 70, 1350–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Miller, R.C.; Foote, R.L.; Coffey, R.J.; Gorman, D.A.; Earle, J.D.; Schomberg, P.J.; Kline, R.W. The role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of malignant skull base tumors. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1997, 39, 977–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cancers 09 00103 g001 550
Figure 1. Flowchart of the selection process for studies included in the meta-analysis.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the selection process for studies included in the meta-analysis.
Cancers 09 00103 g001
Cancers 09 00103 g002 550
Figure 2. Latency period from pituitary adenoma to development of secondary brain tumor. (A) Comparing groups classified as brain tumor histology. (B) Comparing groups classified as pituitary adenoma type. ACTH: Cushing disease, GH: acromegaly, N.D.: not determined, NF: non-functioning adenoma, PRL: prolactinoma. (C) Comparing groups classified in 0–19, 20–39, 40–76 year age group.
Figure 2. Latency period from pituitary adenoma to development of secondary brain tumor. (A) Comparing groups classified as brain tumor histology. (B) Comparing groups classified as pituitary adenoma type. ACTH: Cushing disease, GH: acromegaly, N.D.: not determined, NF: non-functioning adenoma, PRL: prolactinoma. (C) Comparing groups classified in 0–19, 20–39, 40–76 year age group.
Cancers 09 00103 g002
Cancers 09 00103 g003 550
Figure 3. Three categories of second brain tumors were divided in year group, 1959–1979, 1980–1999, 2000–2017.
Figure 3. Three categories of second brain tumors were divided in year group, 1959–1979, 1980–1999, 2000–2017.
Cancers 09 00103 g003
Cancers 09 00103 g004 550
Figure 4. Typical isodose plan of lateral opposing field (A), 3-field technique (B), rotational technique (C), multiportal irradiation (D) for a case of non-functioning pituitary adenoma. The lesion dose is 4500 cGy/25 fractions and isodose lines corresponding to 30%, 50%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 100% of the target dose are shown.
Figure 4. Typical isodose plan of lateral opposing field (A), 3-field technique (B), rotational technique (C), multiportal irradiation (D) for a case of non-functioning pituitary adenoma. The lesion dose is 4500 cGy/25 fractions and isodose lines corresponding to 30%, 50%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 100% of the target dose are shown.
Cancers 09 00103 g004
Cancers 09 00103 g005 550
Figure 5. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in patients with secondary gliomas. (A) Grouped by WHO grade. (B) Comparing groups classified by total or subtotal removal [Surgery] or biopsy [Biopy]. (C) Comparing groups classified by with irradiation [IR (+)] or without irradiation [IR (−)]. (D) Comparing groups classified by with chemotherapy [Chemo (+)] or without chemotherapy [Chemo (−)]. (E) Comparing groups classified by with combined modality [Combined modality (+)] or without combined modality [Combined modality (−)]. (F) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in patients with secondary meningiomas.
Figure 5. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in patients with secondary gliomas. (A) Grouped by WHO grade. (B) Comparing groups classified by total or subtotal removal [Surgery] or biopsy [Biopy]. (C) Comparing groups classified by with irradiation [IR (+)] or without irradiation [IR (−)]. (D) Comparing groups classified by with chemotherapy [Chemo (+)] or without chemotherapy [Chemo (−)]. (E) Comparing groups classified by with combined modality [Combined modality (+)] or without combined modality [Combined modality (−)]. (F) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in patients with secondary meningiomas.
Cancers 09 00103 g005
Cancers 09 00103 g006 550
Figure 6. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in patients with secondary sarcomas. (A) Whole cases. (B) Comparing groups classified by total/subtotal or partial removal [Surgery] or biopsy [Biopy]. (C) Comparing groups classified by with irradiation [IR (+)] or without irradiation [IR (−)]. (D) Comparing groups classified by with chemotherapy [Chemo (+)] or without chemotherapy [Chemo (−)]. (E) Comparing groups classified by with combined modality [Combined modality (+)] or without combined modality [Combined modality (−)].
Figure 6. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in patients with secondary sarcomas. (A) Whole cases. (B) Comparing groups classified by total/subtotal or partial removal [Surgery] or biopsy [Biopy]. (C) Comparing groups classified by with irradiation [IR (+)] or without irradiation [IR (−)]. (D) Comparing groups classified by with chemotherapy [Chemo (+)] or without chemotherapy [Chemo (−)]. (E) Comparing groups classified by with combined modality [Combined modality (+)] or without combined modality [Combined modality (−)].
Cancers 09 00103 g006
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of secondary tumor, Average (95% CI).
Table 1. Characteristics of secondary tumor, Average (95% CI).
Secondary TumorNumber of CasesAge at IrradiationIrradiation Dose (Gy)Latency (Years)
Neuroepithelial Tumor4839.7 ± 13.4
(35.7–43.6)		51.3 ± 10.9
(47.5–55.2)		13.3 ± 9.1
(10.6–15.9)
Meningioma3731.3 ± 13.4
(26.7–36.0)		50.9 ± 23.7
(41.7–60.1)		20.9 ± 8.5
(18.1–23.8)
Sarcoma5239.0 ± 15.0
(34.7–43.3)		53.2 ± 22.0
(46.4–59.9)		12.8 ± 6.5
(11.0–14.6)
Total13737.2 ± 14.4
(34.7–39.7)		52.0 ± 19.5
(48.2–55.8)		15.2 ± 8.7
(13.7–16.6)
Table
Table 2. Radiation technique and secondary brain tumor, n (%).
Table 2. Radiation technique and secondary brain tumor, n (%).
Radiation TechniqueNeuroepithelial TumorMeningiomaSarcomaTotal
Lateral opposing field10 (20.8)4 (10.8)9 (17.3)23 (16.7)
3 or 4 field technique9 (18.7)5 (13.5)13 (25.0)27 (19.6)
Rotational technique2 (4.1)6 (16.2)2 (3.8)10 (7.2)
SRS1 (2.0)2 (5.4)3 (5.7)6 (4.3)
N.D.26 (54.1)20 (54.0)25 (48.0)71 (51.8)
Total483752137
N.D.: not determined; SRS: stereotactic radiosurgery.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yamanaka, R.; Abe, E.; Sato, T.; Hayano, A.; Takashima, Y. Secondary Intracranial Tumors Following Radiotherapy for Pituitary Adenomas: A Systematic Review. Cancers 2017, 9, 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers9080103

AMA Style

Yamanaka R, Abe E, Sato T, Hayano A, Takashima Y. Secondary Intracranial Tumors Following Radiotherapy for Pituitary Adenomas: A Systematic Review. Cancers. 2017; 9(8):103. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers9080103

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yamanaka, Ryuya, Eisuke Abe, Toshiteru Sato, Azusa Hayano, and Yasuo Takashima. 2017. "Secondary Intracranial Tumors Following Radiotherapy for Pituitary Adenomas: A Systematic Review" Cancers 9, no. 8: 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers9080103

APA Style

Yamanaka, R., Abe, E., Sato, T., Hayano, A., & Takashima, Y. (2017). Secondary Intracranial Tumors Following Radiotherapy for Pituitary Adenomas: A Systematic Review. Cancers, 9(8), 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers9080103

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop