Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Non-Precious Transition Metal/Nitrogen-doped Carbon for Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysts in PEMFCs
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Carbon Content on Methanol Oxidation and Photo-Oxidation at Pt-TiO2-C Electrodes
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of Tunable Optical Absorption Plasmonic Au and Ag Decorated TiO2 Structures as Efficient Visible Light Photocatalysts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in Niobium-Based Materials for Photocatalytic Solar Fuel Production
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Catalysts
Volume 10
Issue 1
10.3390/catal10010140
catalysts-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation of Quasi-MIL-101(Cr) Loaded Ceria Catalysts for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx at Low Temperature

by
Min Lu
1,
Haili Hou
1,
Chuanying Wei
1,
Xiaohui Guan
1,
Wei Wei
2,* and
Guang-Sheng Wang
3,*
1
School of Chemical Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132000, China
2
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Henan Engineering Center of New Energy Battery Materials, Henan Key Laboratory of Bimolecular Reorganization and Sensing, Shangqiu Normal University, Shangqiu 476000, China
3
School of Chemistry, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2020, 10(1), 140; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10010140
Submission received: 1 December 2019 / Revised: 13 January 2020 / Accepted: 15 January 2020 / Published: 20 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Photocatalytic Nanocomposite Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
At present, the development of novel catalysts with high activity Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) reaction at the low temperature is still a challenge. In this work, the authors prepare CeO2/quasi-MIL-101 catalysts with various amounts of deposited ceria by a double-solvent method, which are characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and so on. The results show that the increase of Ce content has a great influence on the catalytic property of the catalyst. The introduction of Ce can promote the conversion between Cr3+ and Cr5+ and increase the proportion of lattice oxygen, which improves the activity of the catalyst. However, the catalyst will be peroxidized when the content of Ce is too high, resulting in the decline of the catalytic activity. This experiment indicates that CeO2/quasi-MIL-101 plays a significant role in the NH3-SCR process at the low temperature when the loading of Ce is 0.5%. This work has proved the potential of this kind of material in NH3-SCR process at the low temperature, providing help for subsequent studies.

1. Introduction

With the acceleration of urbanization and industrialization, people enjoy a convenient life while also suffering bad effects from various harmful pollutants. The emission control of nitrogen oxides (NOx) resulting from fossil fuel combustion has been a major environmental concern related to air quality, as they cause a variety of environmentally harmful effects such as acid rain, photochemical smog, greenhouse effects, and ozone depletion [1,2,3]. At present, several methods have been used for the elimination of NOx, such as plasma catalysis [4,5], selective catalytic reduction (SCR) [6,7,8,9], and selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) [10,11]. Therein, selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 as a reductant is one of the effective techniques to remove NOx and has been commercialized in the post-treatment of flue gases of power plants. Catalyst plays an important part in the NH3-SCR technology. The common commercialized industrial catalysts for this process are the mixture of V2O5 with WO3 and MoO3, supported by anatase TiO2 [12,13,14], which shows high catalytic activity for NO reduction within a temperature window ranging from 300 °C to 400 °C. However, there are still some problems caused by this catalyst. For example, the catalyst is placed upstream of the electrostatic precipitator and desulfurization devices, where the flue gas needs to be reheated, and the catalyst easily suffers from the poisoning and deactivates [15,16,17]. Therefore, the tendency is to develop novel catalysts without vanadium at low temperatures (<300 °C) that work downstream of the electrostatic precipitator and desulfurization devices for flue gases without reheating.
In heterogeneous catalysts, most of the catalysts consist of three components: active component, cocatalysts, and carriers. The active component has a crucial influence on the catalytic activity of the catalyst, and the cocatalyst can significantly improve the activity of the catalyst as well as its selectivity. For the catalyst, the carrier is mainly to support, disperse, and stabilize the catalytically active substance. Recently, for industrial application, active catalysts are usually supported by different carriers, such as Al2O3 [18,19], TiO2 [15,20], SiO2 [21,22], ZrO2 [6], activated carbon [23,24] and zeolites [25,26]. Although these carriers have the function of large specific surface area and supporting and stabilizing active components, the integration of high content active components and large specific surface area has become the direction of future development.
Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs), also known as Porous Coordination Polymers (PCPs), constructed by inorganic metal ions and metal clusters with organic linkers, have emerged as a new class of porous materials [27,28,29]. MOFs play a crucial role in gas storage and separation [30,31], sensing [32,33], and catalysis [34,35], which are attributed to the material having an infinite topology, high porosity, large specific surface area and highly metal content [36,37].
Among them, MILs materials are the most typical representatives. MILs are composed of a trivalent metal ion, such as Cr3+, Fe3+, or Al3+ and a carboxylic acid, such as terephthalic acid or trimesic acid [38,39,40,41]. Wang P [42] and co-workers prepared the MIL-100(Fe) catalytic materials for the SCR of NOx with NH3, which proved the feasibility of MOFs as a new catalyst in NH3-SCR, and found that its excellent catalytic activity is attributed to high metal content, large specific surface area, and abundant active sites of MILs. Zhang M [43] et al. used in situ deposition to prepare Mn-based catalysts on a UiO-66 carrier for the selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3 (NH3-SCR). At the same time, some scholars reported that the MOFs of the transition metal center are directly used for SCR [44,45,46]. In the pores of MOFs, even those with coordinatively unsaturated sites, the inorganic nodes are partitioned from the guest metal oxides or nanoparticles (NPs) by organic ligands, resulting in weak interactions between MOFs and the immobilized metal NPs. Furthermore, Tsumori N [47] et al. reported a quasi-MOF. By calcining the already prepared MIL-101(Cr), an open framework structure could be formed to expose inorganic nodes, which would contribute to the interaction between metal nanoparticles and inorganic nodes and improve the catalytic activity. Therefore, this method will be capable of achieving active ingredient-carrier integration easily.
In recent years, as a relatively nontoxic material, ceria (CeO2) has attracted tremendous attention for its application in NH3-SCR catalysts due to promoting the oxidization of NO to NO2. The main reason is that it has two stable oxidation states, which are Ce4+ and Ce3+. Meanwhile, the shift between Ce4+ and Ce3+ leads to the storage and release of oxygen, the material possesses unique redox performance and oxygen storage capacity [48,49]. Qiu et al. [50] develope cobalt and cerium doped Mn/TiO2 catalysts, and the catalytic rate is as high as 99% at 150 °C. Boningari ] and colleagues [51] report that Ce-doped Mn/TiO2 catalysts enhance catalytic activity at low-temperature for SCR. Zhang [52] investigate the catalytic materials for the oxidation of NO using chromium-ceria doped on TiO2-pillared clay nanocomposites catalysts, and the results indicated that the addition of CeOx improves the oxidation to NO in the extent. Ceria, as a cocatalyst, has a significant influence on enhancing catalytic activity.
In this study, the authors investigated the feasibility of catalytic materials for the SCR of NOx with NH3 using the ceria as a cocatalyst doped into MIL-101(Cr) with quasi-MOF structure and explored the performance of quasi-MIL-101(Cr). The physical structure and chemical properties of the catalyst are characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), Scanning electron microscope (SEM), Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Thermogravimetric (TG), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and so on.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characteristics of the Catalysts

The thermal stability of MIL-101(Cr) is studied by the thermogravimetric analysis from 37 °C to 600 °C in air, and the results are shown in Figure 1. The material weight reduces by 5.6% below 200 °C in stage a, which results from the removal of physically and chemically adsorbed water at low temperatures. The loss observed at 200–300 °C is 13% in stage b, which indicated the removal of some hydroxyl groups and guest groups. In stage c (T > 300 °C), the loss of the weight increases, which indicates that the MIL-101(Cr) structure collapses, and the crystal form changes. Hence, the quasi-MIL-101(Cr) is the deligandation of the MIL-101(Cr), and this thermal stability could ensure the applicability of the catalyst over this temperature range in SCR. Figure S1 displays the thermogravimetric analysis of xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101 doped with different ceria content. It can be seen from the figure that the trend of the three samples is similar, and they restructured after 300 °C.
The diffraction peaks of MIL-101(Cr) are consistent with the published literature [53], as shown in Figure S2. XRD patterns of the quasi-MIL-101(Cr) and CeO2/quasi-MIL-101 catalysts with various amounts of deposited ceria being displayed in Figure 2. The quasi-MIL-101(Cr), broadening of the diffractions around 3–10° from MIL-101(Cr), is observed, which implies the partial deligandation of MIL-101(Cr) and carbon generation [47]. Due to the less Ce content, the XRD diffraction peak is not obvious [52,54]. However, ceria has a strong oxidation property. Under the same temperature of calcination, the oxidation rate of MIL-101(Cr) is enhanced, and more active sites are exposed. In addition, FT-IR spectroscopy of various samples is shown in Figure 3. FT-IR spectra of quasi-MIL-101(Cr) is almost the same as that of MIL-101(Cr). However, when the calcination temperature increases to 300 °C, the bands of carboxylates at 1630–1396 cm−1 broaden while the band of Cr-O at around 594 cm−1 indicates a red shift, which implies the partial deligandation of MIL-101(Cr). Moreover, a new broad band appears at 750–500 cm−1, belonging to Cr2O3 and CeO2. The original Cr-O bond disappearance may be due to the addition of Ce, which increases the oxidation performance of the catalyst. At the same temperature, partial deligandation phenomenon is aggravated, and the Cr-O bond is converted into Cr2O3 [47]. This is consistent with the XRD characterization.
Figure S3 shows the nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of MIL-101(Cr), quasi-MIL-101(Cr), and xCeO2/quasi-MIL samples. Apparently, we obtained MIL-101(Cr) and quasi-MIL-101(Cr) as a type I isotherm, which indicates that pore sizes mainly distribute in microporous magnitude. In addition, Figure 4a–c displays the N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101 doped with different ceria content, respectively. They correspond to typical IV isotherms, as classified by International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), indicating the presence of mesopores [55,56]. The changing of material pore structure from microporous to mesoporous is reflected in the transformation of the isotherm type. In Figure 4a–c, it can be observed that both xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101materials have H4 type hysteretic loops, indicating that the material has a mixed microporous and mesoporous pore structure. Figure 4d shows the pore size distribution of xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101, corresponding to the above data. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface areas of the MIL-101(Cr), quasi-MIL-101(Cr), and xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101 materials with various amounts of deposited ceria are shown in Table 1. The results display that the MIL-101(Cr) sample has a BET specific area of 1767 m2/g, the quasi-MIL-101(Cr) sample has a BET specific area of 1147 m2/g. The decrease of specific surface areas results from the partial deligandation of the MIL-101(Cr) material by calcining at 300 °C. Furthermore, with the increase of cerium oxide content, the surface area of the prepared CeO2/quasi-MIL-101(Cr) catalyst decreases rapidly. When the ceria content is 0.6%, the specific surface areas decreases to 203 m2/g. We have considered that the addition of Ce may cause the blockage of pores in the materials, and the blockage of pore in materials with low Ce content must exist, but it is not the main reason for the obvious change of the specific surface area of materials. The main reason is that Ce has strong oxidation properties. With the increase of Ce content, the peroxidization of the material results in the change of the skeleton and the decrease of the specific surface area. This is consistent with the Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) characterization (Figure S5).
The SEM image of the MIL-101(Cr) is shown in Figure S4. The SEM pattern indicates that MIL-101(Cr) has an octahedral crystal structure. The TEM patterns of xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101 with various amounts of deposited ceria are displayed in Figure S5. According to the TEM images, it can be observed that the appearance of xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101 catalysts with different Ce content still has a regular octahedral structure. However, with the increase of the Ce content, it can be observed that the skeleton of the catalysts becomes to collapse, which is attributed to the strong oxidation property of Ce. At the same calcination temperature, the addition of Ce accelerates the oxidation of the catalyst and changes its skeleton. The TEM image of the 0.5%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101 is shown in Figure 5a. To reveal the elemental distribution on the 0.5%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101, High-angle annular dark field image-scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF STEM) image and EDS elemental mapping are performed, and the results are presented in Figure 5b–d. Figure 5b shows the HAADF STEM image of a single 0.5%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101. The EDS elemental mappings (Figure 5c,d) demonstrate the distributions of the Cr and Ce. Due to the strong oxidation ability of Ce, the surface of the original structure is rough and overlapped with the loaded Ce, which will affect the observation of Ce. Through Figure 5c, there are still some carbon skeletons and a large number of Cr elements, which is consistent with the previously reported literature [47]. Figure 5d shows that Ce is mainly dispersed in the framework, which is attributed to the preparation of the double solvent method [57].
To investigate the surface chemical state of the most active catalyst, the XPS spectra of the Cr 2p and O 1s in catalysts with various amounts of deposited ceria are obtained, as shown in Figure 6. The Cr 2p of xCqM catalyst was separated into two types of peaks by the same peak-fitting deconvolution technique. The “low valence” Cr is characterized by average binding energy at about 576 eV, and the “high valence” Cr is characterized by average binding energy at about 578.3–578.5 eV [16]. The former peaks can be assigned to Cr2+ (575.7–576.0 eV) and Cr3+ (576.8–577.1 eV). The rear peak should be assigned to a higher valence chromium state at about (578.3–578.5 eV), perhaps Cr5+ or Cr6+. Russo N [58] and his colleagues have reported that the binding energy of Cr5+ has a value in the range of 578.0–578.8 eV. Hence, the peaks with higher valence Cr in the range of 578.48–578.58 eV could be assigned to Cr5+ (Figure 6A). It has been reported that Cr6+ exhibits higher binding energy at about 579–580 eV, which we do not observe. It can be seen from Figure 6A that Cr5+ exerts a significant impact on the SCR process, which is consistent with previous literature reports. Table 2 lists the binding energies of core electrons of xCqM and the percent of differential valence state. Due to the low content of ceria, XPS cannot be clearly observed. However, with the addition of the Ce element, the proportion of Cr3+ decreases, and that of Cr5+ rises. It indicates that the Cr has the oxidation reaction, and the binding energy is shifted toward the high energy direction, which is caused by the addition of the Ce element. Meanwhile, the addition of Ce accelerates the conversion between Cr3+ and Cr5+, improving the redox performance of the catalyst.
The O 1s spectrum (Figure 6B) could be fitted by two peaks, corresponding to lattice oxygen at 530.3–530.5 eV, and chemisorbed oxygen at 531.3–531.5 eV [59,60]. As the Ce content increases, the lattice oxygen content increases. The lattice oxygen ratio arrives at 56.73% when the Ce content is 0.6%. The conversion between Ce3+ and Ce4+ could create a charge imbalance and the vacancies [61]. The surfaces of the nanosized ceria particles encapsulated inside the quasi-MIL-101(Cr) pore will give rise to oxygen vacancies that promote the adsorption and activation of oxygen.

2.2. Catalytic Performance

2.2.1. NH3-SCR Performance

NOx conversions are displayed in Figure 7 for the quasi-MIL-101(Cr) and xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101 catalysts at low temperatures. All of the catalysts exhibit good catalytic activities at a temperature window ranging from 175 °C to 300 °C, and they fall after 300 °C. In particular, the conversion of NOx can be attained by 90% at 200 °C when xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101 is used as a catalyst. This fact fully demonstrates that the catalytic activity of xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101 is better than that of quasi-MIL-101(Cr) at low temperatures (<300 °C).
Meanwhile, the catalyst has the best catalytic activity when the Ce content is 0.5%. Moreover, compared with the conventional Cr-Ce catalyst, the activation temperature of the xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101 catalyst is improved. It can be shown by XPS that the increase of Ce content can improve the performance of Cr, which is caused by the electron conversion between Ce and Cr. However, the oxidation performance of CeO2 is too high. As the content increases, the catalyst has undergone peroxidation to significantly change catalyst skeleton, which can be observed by XRD and FT-IR. At the same time, the NOx conversion and the selectivity of N2 decrease. The NOx conversion rates of various catalysts are arranged in the following order: 0.5%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101 > 0.4%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101 > 0.6%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101 > quasi-MIL-101(Cr). Panagintis et al. [62] explored the low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 by using CrxOy supported on TiO2. The results showed that the NOx conversion rate could reach 90% at low temperature (120 °C), and the low-temperature activity of the catalyst we prepared failed to reach the expectation. However, compared with the TixCryO catalyst prepared by Sounak Roy [63] et al. and the Cr/TiO2 catalyst prepared by Bo Li [64] et al., the activity at the same temperature (>240 °C) was significantly better than that of both. Through the above analysis, it can be concluded that this material has basic catalytic performance, which is improved compared with the traditional Cr-based catalyst, but still does not reach the ideal low-temperature removal rate, which also provides a direction for the subsequent research of this kind of materials.
Figure 8 shows the selectivity of different catalysts for N2 during the SCR reaction. As the temperature increases, the selectivity of all catalysts decreases to various extents. Compared with the quasi-MIL-101(Cr) catalyst, the xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101 catalysts have higher N2 selectivity. Among them, the catalyst with 0.5% Ce has the best selectivity to N2. Similarly, excessive addition of Ce leads to the peroxidation of catalysts and decreases the selectivity to N2. The most intuitive performance is the transformation of the catalyst skeleton, which can be observed by FT-IR and TEM.
Overall, both the SCR activity and N2 selectivity of the catalyst with 0.5% Ce content are the best, which is attributed to the oxidizing ability of cerium oxide and the electron transfer between Cr and Ce. In addition, the peroxidation of 0.5% Ce content is too weak to ensure the efficiency of the NOx conversion to N2. The above data indicate that the 0.5%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101 catalyst is relatively successful.

2.2.2. Effect of SO2 and H2O on the SCR Reaction

The SO2 and H2O in the flue gas impact the activity of the SCR catalyst significantly. The test results of the stability of the 0.5%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101 catalyst under the conditions of 100 ppm SO2 and 5% H2O at 250 °C are shown in Figure 9.
Figure 9 indicates that the 0.5%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101 catalyst has a high catalytic activity for NOx at 250 °C during the SCR reaction without the introduction of SO2 and H2O. When 100 ppm SO2 and 5% H2O are introduced, the activity of the catalyst is affected, and the NOx conversion rate was gradually stabilized after dropping to 70%. It could be attributed to two aspects: firstly, the competitive adsorption between reactants and SO2 leads to the formation and deposition of sulfate on the surface of the catalyst, which inhibits the catalyst activity. Secondly, the competing adsorption between H2O and NH3/NO on the acid sites results in the occupation of the partial active sites on the catalyst surface by H2O, which reduces the adsorption of reactive gases and makes catalyst poisoning inactivation. The precious literature has proved that Cr has excellent resistance to SO2 and H2O, compared with other metals, such as Mn, Co [52]. The NOx conversion can be gradually restored to 80% after terminating the introduction of SO2 and H2O. The above results indicate that the 0.5%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101 catalyst also has good H2O and SO2 durability.

3. Experimental

3.1. Materials

Chromic nitrate nonahydrate [Cr(NO)3∙9H2O], terephthalate [H2BDC], deionized water [H2O], sodium hydroxide solution [NaOH], N,N-dimethylformamide [DMF], ethanol solution [C2H5OH] and n-hexane solution [C6H14].

3.2. Preparation of Catalysts

Preparation of MIL-101(Cr): MIL-101(Cr) was synthesized by the hydrothermal method, a mixture consisting of chromic nitrate nonahydrate ( Cr ( NO ) 3 · 9 H 2 O ) and pure terephthalic acid (PTA, H2BDC) were dissolved into H2O (molar ratio = 1:1:277) with magnetic stirring, the NaOH solution (4 moL/L) was slowly added with the as-prepared solution to adjust the pH from 1.3 to 2.5. Then the mixtures were transferred into a 100 mL Teflon-lined autoclave, which was sealed and maintained at 200 °C for 24 h. After hydrothermal processing, the obtained samples were collected. The samples were respectively purified with N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), and ethanol solution at 60 °C for 3 h to remove impurities, and finally, the filtered material was dried in a vacuum oven at 150 °C to obtain a green powder material.
Preparation of quasi-MIL-101(Cr): The thermal transformation of as-prepared purified MIL-101(Cr) materials were uniformly dispersed in a porcelain boat, placed in a muffle furnace, heated to 300 °C for 2 h, and cooled to room temperature to obtain a desired quasi-MOF material. For convenience, the resulting samples were labeled as quasi-MIL-101(Cr) materials, denoted as qM.
Preparation of xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101(Cr): By a double-solvent method, MIL-101(Cr) materials were placed in an n-hexane solution by ultrasonication for 1 h, and to make it uniformly dispersed. Different concentrations of Ce3+ solution (x = 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%) prepared by dissolving Ce (NO)3·6H2O in deionized water, were added to the mixture solution by vigorous stirring at room temperature for 3 h. The samples were dried at 200 °C for 12 h and calcined 300 °C for 2 h in a muffle furnace. For convenience, the resulting samples were labeled as xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101(Cr) materials, denoted as xCqM.

3.3. Catalyst Characterization

XRD patterns were obtained by using a Rigaku SmartLab Auto X-ray diffractometer (Tokyo, Japan) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) in the 2–80° range. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were measured at a liquid nitrogen temperature, using a micromeritics ASAP 2460 instrument (Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA) in static mode. Before the measurement, the catalysts were degassed at 300 °C for 4 h. The specific surface area was calculated by the BET equation, and pore volumes and average pore diameters were determined by using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method from the desorption branch of the N2 adsorption isotherm. An inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICPOES, Optima 2000DV) (Shanghai, China) was employed to determine the overall Ce content in the prepared catalyst. The morphologies of the catalysts and the structure of nano-ceria encapsulated inside quasi-MIL-101(Cr) were observed by SEM (XL-30 FEG Hillsboro, FEI Inc., Hillsboro, OR, USA) and TEM (TECNAI F20 Hillsboro, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The elemental distribution over the selected region was acquired by an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) attached to the transmission electron microscope (TEM). XPS measurements were carried out by a Thermo Fisher Scientific EscaLab 250Xi Electron Spectrometer (Shanghai, China) with monochromatic Al Kα radiation. The C 1s line at 284.6 eV was considered as a reference for the binding energy calibration. TG analysis was conducted by a thermogravimetric analyzer (Seiko TG/DTA 6300 Tokyo, Japan) under the condition of the air, which is at a heating rate of 5 °C/min from 37 °C to 600 °C. The FT-IR spectrum was recorded on an FT-IR spectrometer (Bruker VERTEX 70-FT-IR Shanghai, China) with a standard KBr pellet method. All spectra were collected over accumulative 20 scans with a resolution of 8 cm−1 in the range of 3500–400 cm−1.

3.4. Catalytic Activity Measurement

The NH3-SCR activity measurement was carried out in a fixed-bed quartz rector (inner diameter 9 mm) loaded with approximately 0.12 g catalyst of 40–60 mesh. The typical composition of the reactant gas was as follows: 500 ppm NO, 500 ppm NH3, 5% O2 and N2 as the balance gas. The total gas flow rate was 300 mL/min (atmospheric pressure), which corresponded to a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 79,000 h−1. The catalytic activity of the prepared catalysts was evaluated from 50 °C to 325 °C, and the concentrations of the NO, NO2, and O2 in the inlet and outlet streams were continually monitored by the FT-IR spectrometer (MKS6030HS). The NOx conversion and the selectivity to N2 were calculated according to the following equations:
NO X   conversion = [ NO X ] in − [ NO X ] out [ NO X ] in × 100 %
N 2   selectivity = [ NO X ] in + [ NH 3 ] in − [ NO X ] out − [ NH 3 ] out − 2 [ N 2 O ] out [ NO X ] in + [ NH 3 ] in − [ NO X ] out − [ NH 3 ] out × 100 %
where [ NO x ] = [ NO ] + [ NO 2 ] , and [ NO x ] in and [ NO x ] out indicated the concentrations of NOx at the inlet and outlet of the reactor at steady state, respectively.

4. Conclusions

In summary, ceria nanoparticles are successfully encapsulated within MIL-101(Cr) by a double-solvent method to prepare xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101 with various Ce content. The xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101 catalysts are enhanced NH3-SCR activity at low temperatures. The 0.5%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101 composite exhibits the fine catalytic activity at low temperature (<300 °C) with 98% NOx conversion obtained at 275 °C, which is attributed to high dispersion of Cr and the strong electronic interaction between Ce and unsaturated Cr-O bond in quasi-MIL-101(Cr) to promote electron transfer between the active component and the cocatalyst. The research results verify that the introduction of Ce can effectively improve the catalytic performance of the catalyst at low temperatures. The composite catalysts display the good catalytic performance at low temperature by adjusting the loading content. This has laid a foundation for the doping of other metals, the change of material structure and the improvement of preparation methods, and provided favorable evidence for subsequent studies. It is expected that denitrification catalysts with excellent performance will be prepared at low temperatures in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/10/1/140/s1, Figure S1: TGA under air (5 °C/min heated rate) of xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101, Figure S2: The diffraction peak of MIL-101(Cr) and MIL-101(Cr) samples of the published literature, Figure S3: Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of MIL-101(Cr), quasi-MIL-101(Cr) and xCeO2/quasi-MIL samples, Figure S4: The SEM image of the MIL-101(Cr), Figure S5: (a) TEM image of 0.4% CeO2/quasi-MIL-101 (b) TEM image of 0.5% CeO2/quasi-MIL-101 (c) TEM image of 0.6% CeO2/quasi-MIL-101.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology—H.H. and M.L.; formal analysis, investigation and data curation—H.H., W.W. and X.G.; writing—original draft preparation—H.H.; writing—review and editing—M.L., C.W., H.H., W.W. and G.-S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported financially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 51672040 and 51672013), Science and Technology Research Projects of the Education Department of Jilin Province (no. JJKH20180429KJ) and Jilin City Science and Technology Bureau (no. 201750228).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, Z.; Ihl Woo, S. Recent Advances in Catalytic DeNOx Science and Technology. Catal. Rev. 2006, 48, 43–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, J.; Liu, F.; Liang, J.; Yu, H.; Liu, W.; Wang, X.; Peng, H.; Wu, P. Exploring the nano-size effect of mordenite zeolites on their performance in the removal of NOx. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 8625–8635. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang, L.; Wen, X.; Lei, Z.; Gao, L.; Sha, X.L.; Ma, Z.H.; He, H.B.; Wang, Y.S.; Jia, Y.; Li, Y.H. Study on the mechanism of a manganese-based catalyst for catalytic, NOX flue gas denitration. Aip Adv. 2018, 8, 045004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hueso, J.; Cotrino, J.; Caballero, A.; Espinos, J.; Gonzalezelipe, A. Plasma catalysis with perovskite-type catalysts for the removal of NO and CH4 from combustion exhausts. J. Catal. 2007, 247, 288–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gholami, R.; Stere, C.E.; Goguet, A.; Hardacre, C. Non-thermal-plasma-activated de-NOx catalysis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2018, 376, 20170054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Li, Y.; Cheng, H.; Li, D.; Qin, Y.; Xie, Y.; Wang, S. WO3/CeO2-ZrO2, a promising catalyst for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NOx with NH3 in diesel exhaust. Chem. Commun. 2008, 1470–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lai, J.-K.; Wachs, I.E. A Perspective on the Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) of NO with NH3 by Supported V2O5–WO3/TiO2 Catalysts. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 6537–6551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhu, M.; Lai, J.-K.; Tumuluri, U.; Ford, M.E.; Wu, Z.; Wachs, I.E. Reaction Pathways and Kinetics for Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) of Acidic NOx Emissions from Power Plants with NH3. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 8358–8361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, R.G.; Han, L.; Yang, T. Research progress on new technology of denitrification in coal-fired power plants. J. Northeast Electr. Power Univ. 2010, 30, 17–20. [Google Scholar]
  10. Locci, C.; Vervisch, L.; Farcy, B.; Domingo, P.; Perret, N. Selective Non-catalytic Reduction (SNCR) of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions: A Perspective from Numerical Modeling. Flow Turbul. Combust. 2017, 100, 301–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Y.L.; Li, N.; Zhang, H.Z.; Cui, S.P.; Zhang, Y.N. Effect of the Cement Raw Meal Rate Value on SNCR deNOx Efficiency with NH3 as Reducing Agent. Mater. Sci. Forum 2019, 944, 1215–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, R.; Zhang, N.; Liu, X.; Li, L.; Song, L.; Qiu, W.; He, H. The Keggin Structure: An Important Factor in Governing NH3–SCR Activity Over the V2O5–MoO3/TiO2 Catalyst. Catal. Lett. 2018, 148, 1228–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, L.; Wang, C.; Chang, H.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, T.; Li, J. New Insight into SO2 Poisoning and Regeneration of CeO2-WO3/TiO2 and V2O5-WO3/TiO2 Catalysts for Low-Temperature NH3-SCR. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 7064–7071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shi, Y.F.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Y.W.; Zhang, Q. Study on Denitration Performance of Fly Ash Supported Vanadium Oxide Low Temperature SCR Catalyst. J. Northeast Electr. Power Univ. 2015, 35, 59–63. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gao, X.; Jiang, Y.; Fu, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Luo, Z.; Cen, K. Preparation and characterization of CeO2/TiO2 catalysts for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. Catal. Commun. 2010, 11, 465–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, Z.; Yang, Q.; Li, H.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; Chi Tsang, S. Cr–MnOx mixed-oxide catalysts for selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 at low temperature. J. Catal. 2010, 276, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Arfaoui, J.; Ghorbel, A.; Petitto, C.; Delahay, G. Withdrawn: Novel Vanadium supported onto mixed Molybdenum-Titanium Pillared Clay catalysts for the low temperature SCR-NO by NH3. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 356, 598–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Qu, L.; Li, C.; Zeng, G.; Zhang, M.; Fu, M.; Ma, J.; Zhan, F.; Luo, D. Support modification for improving the performance of MnOx–CeOy/γ-Al2O3 in selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 242, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Selleri, T.; Gramigni, F.; Nova, I.; Tronconi, E. NO oxidation on Fe- and Cu-zeolites mixed with BaO/Al2O3: Free oxidation regime and relevance for the NH3-SCR chemistry at low temperature. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 225, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, J.; Guo, R.-T.; Li, M.-Y.; Sun, P.; Liu, S.-M.; Pan, W.-G.; Liu, S.-W.; Sun, X. Enhancement of the SO2 resistance of Mn/TiO2 SCR catalyst by Eu modification: A mechanism study. Fuel 2018, 223, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cao, L.; Wu, X.; Xu, Y.; Lin, Q.; Hu, J.; Chen, Y.; Ran, R.; Weng, D. Ceria-modified WO3-TiO2-SiO2 monolithic catalyst for high-temperature NH3-SCR. Catal. Commun. 2019, 120, 55–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhou, H.; Ge, M.; Wu, S.; Ye, B.; Su, Y. Iron based monolithic catalysts supported on Al2O3, SiO2, and TiO2: A comparison for NO reduction with propane. Fuel 2018, 220, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ren, S.; Li, S.; Su, Z.; Yang, J.; Long, H.; Kong, M.; Yang, J.; Cai, Z. Poisoning effects of KCl and As2O3 on selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 over Mn-Ce/AC catalysts at low temperature. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 351, 540–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hou, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, Q.; Liu, Y.; Huang, Z. Insight into the role of TiO2 modified activated carbon fibers for the enhanced performance in low-temperature NH3-SCR. Fuel 2019, 245, 554–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shi, J.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, Z.; Chen, M.; Zhang, Z.; Shangguan, W. Widened Active Temperature Window of a Fe-ZSM-5 Catalyst by an Impregnation Solvent for NH3-SCR of NO. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 13703–13712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yu, R.; Zhao, Z.; Shi, C.; Zhang, W. Insight into the Synergic Effect of Fe-SSZ-13 Zeolite and FeMnTiZrOx Catalyst with Enhanced Reactivity in NH3-SCR of NOx. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 2216–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhu, L.; Liu, X.Q.; Jiang, H.L.; Sun, L.B. Metal-Organic Frameworks for Heterogeneous Basic Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 8129–8176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tang, J.; Yamauchi, Y. Carbon materials: MOF morphologies in control. Nat. Chem. 2016, 8, 638–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shekhah, O.; Liu, J.; Fischer, R.A.; Woll, C. MOF thin films: Existing and future applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 1081–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Damasceno Borges, D.; Normand, P.; Permiakova, A.; Babarao, R.; Heymans, N.; Galvao, D.S.; Serre, C.; De Weireld, G.; Maurin, G. Gas Adsorption and Separation by the Al-Based Metal-Organic Framework MIL-160. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 26822–26832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Alezi, D.; Belmabkhout, Y.; Suyetin, M.; Bhatt, P.M.; Weselinski, L.J.; Solovyeva, V.; Adil, K.; Spanopoulos, I.; Trikalitis, P.N.; Emwas, A.H.; et al. MOF Crystal Chemistry Paving the Way to Gas Storage Needs: Aluminum-Based soc-MOF for CH4, O2, and CO2 Storage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 13308–13318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhang, C.; Sun, L.; Yan, Y.; Shi, H.; Wang, B.; Liang, Z.; Li, J. A novel photo- and hydrochromic europium metal-organic framework with good anion sensing properties. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 8999–9004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, D.-M.; Zhang, N.-N.; Liu, C.-S.; Du, M. Template-directed synthesis of a luminescent Tb-MOF material for highly selective Fe3+ and Al3+ ion detection and VOC vapor sensing. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 2311–2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bhadra, M.; Sasmal, H.S.; Basu, A.; Midya, S.P.; Kandambeth, S.; Pachfule, P.; Balaraman, E.; Banerjee, R. Predesigned Metal-Anchored Building Block for In Situ Generation of Pd Nanoparticles in Porous Covalent Organic Framework: Application in Heterogeneous Tandem Catalysis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 13785–13792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dhakshinamoorthy, A.; Asiri, A.M.; Garcia, H. Metal-Organic Framework (MOF) Compounds: Photocatalysts for Redox Reactions and Solar Fuel Production. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2016, 55, 5414–5445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhu, Q.L.; Xu, Q. Metal-organic framework composites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5468–5512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sennu, P.; Aravindan, V.; Lee, Y.-S. High energy asymmetric supercapacitor with 1D@2D structured NiCo2O4@Co3O4 and jackfruit derived high surface area porous carbon. J. Power Sources 2016, 306, 248–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Janiak, C.; Vieth, J.K. MOFs, MILs and more: Concepts, properties and applications for porous coordination networks (PCNs). New J. Chem. 2010, 34, 2366–2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tan, B.; Luo, Y.; Liang, X.; Wang, S.; Gao, X.; Zhang, Z.; Fang, Y. Mixed-Solvothermal Synthesis of MIL-101(Cr) and Its Water Adsorption/Desorption Performance. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 2983–2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hupp, J.T.; Poeppelmeier, K.R. Chemistry. Better living through nanopore chemistry. Science 2005, 309, 2008–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhao, T.; Jeremias, F.; Boldog, I.; Nguyen, B.; Henninger, S.K.; Janiak, C. High-yield, fluoride-free and large-scale synthesis of MIL-101(Cr). Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 16791–16801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Wang, P.; Zhao, H.; Sun, H.; Yu, H.; Chen, S.; Quan, X. Porous metal–organic framework MIL-100(Fe) as an efficient catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 48912–48919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, M.; Huang, B.; Jiang, H.; Chen, Y. Metal-organic framework loaded manganese oxides as efficient catalysts for low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2017, 11, 594–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jiang, H.; Zhou, J.; Wang, C.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, M. Effect of Cosolvent and Temperature on the Structures and Properties of Cu-MOF-74 in Low-temperature NH3-SCR. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 3542–3550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jiang, H.; Wang, Q.; Wang, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, M. MOF-74 as an Efficient Catalyst for the Low-Temperature Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 26817–26826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Evans, J.D.; Sumby, C.J.; Doonan, C.J. Post-synthetic metalation of metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5933–5951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tsumori, N.; Chen, L.; Wang, Q.; Zhu, Q.-L.; Kitta, M.; Xu, Q. Quasi-MOF: Exposing Inorganic Nodes to Guest Metal Nanoparticles for Drastically Enhanced Catalytic Activity. Chem 2018, 4, 845–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Wang, P.; Sun, H.; Quan, X.; Chen, S. Enhanced catalytic activity over MIL-100(Fe) loaded ceria catalysts for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 at low temperature. J Hazard. Mater. 2016, 301, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, W.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, C.; He, H. Selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3 over a Ce/TiO2 catalyst. Catal. Commun. 2008, 9, 1453–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Qiu, L.; Meng, J.; Pang, D.; Zhang, C.; Ouyang, F. Reaction and Characterization of Co and Ce Doped Mn/TiO2 Catalysts for Low-Temperature SCR of NO with NH3. Catal. Lett. 2015, 145, 1500–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Boningari, T.; Ettireddy, P.R.; Somogyvari, A.; Liu, Y.; Vorontsov, A.; McDonald, C.A.; Smirniotis, P.G. Influence of elevated surface texture hydrated titania on Ce-doped Mn/TiO2 catalysts for the low-temperature SCR of NOx under oxygen-rich conditions. J. Catal. 2015, 325, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, J.; Zhang, S.; Cai, W.; Zhong, Q. The characterization of CrCe-doped on TiO2-pillared clay nanocomposites for NO oxidation and the promotion effect of CeOx. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 268, 535–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ferey, G. A Chromium Terephthalate-Based Solid with Unusually Large Pore Volumes and Surface Area. Science 2005, 309, 2040–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Geng, Y.; Shan, W.; Yang, S.; Liu, F. W-Modified Mn-Ti Mixed Oxide Catalyst for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with NH3. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 9112–9119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fan, Z.; Shi, J.W.; Gao, C.; Gao, G.; Wang, B.; Niu, C. Rationally Designed Porous MnOx-FeOx Nanoneedles for Low-Temperature Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx by NH3. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 16117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gao, G.; Shi, J.-W.; Liu, C.; Gao, C.; Fan, Z.; Niu, C. Mn/CeO2 catalysts for SCR of NOx with NH3: Comparative study on the effect of supports on low-temperature catalytic activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 411, 338–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jiang, D.; Fang, G.; Tong, Y.; Wu, X.; Wang, Y.; Hong, D.; Leng, W.; Liang, Z.; Tu, P.; Liu, L.; et al. Multifunctional Pd@UiO-66 Catalysts for Continuous Catalytic Upgrading of Ethanol to n-Butanol. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 11973–11978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Russo, N.; Fino, D.; Saracco, G.; Specchia, V. Studies on the redox properties of chromite perovskite catalysts for soot combustion. J. Catal. 2005, 229, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, F.; Tian, G.; Wang, H.; Wang, H.; Zhang, C.; Cui, Y.; Huang, J.; Shu, Y. CeO2/TiO2 monolith catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3: Influence of H2O and SO2. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2016, 32, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yang, R.; Huang, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, X.; Lu, H. Performance of Cr-doped vanadia/titania catalysts for low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. Chin. J. Catal. 2015, 36, 1256–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Campbell, C.T.; Peden, C.H. Chemistry: Oxygen Vacancies and Catalysis on Ceria Surfaces. Science 2005, 309, 713–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Smirniotis, P.G.; Peña, D.A.; Uphade, B.S. Low-Temperature Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) of NO with NH3 by Using Mn, Cr, and Cu Oxides Supported on Hombikat TiO2. Chembiochem. 2010, 32, 2479–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Roy, S.; Hegde, M.S.; Madras, G. Catalysis for NOx abatement. Appl. Energy 2009, 86, 2283–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, B.; Xiong, S.; Liao, Y.; Xiao, X.; Huang, N.; Geng, Y.; Zou, S.; Yang, S. Why the Low Temperature SCR Performance of Cr/TiO2 Much Less than That of Mn/TiO2: A Mechanism Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 23511–23522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Catalysts 10 00140 g001 550
Figure 1. Thermogravimetric analysis under air (5 °C/min heated rate) of MIL-101(Cr).
Figure 1. Thermogravimetric analysis under air (5 °C/min heated rate) of MIL-101(Cr).
Catalysts 10 00140 g001
Catalysts 10 00140 g002 550
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of various catalysts.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of various catalysts.
Catalysts 10 00140 g002
Catalysts 10 00140 g003 550
Figure 3. Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) characterization of various catalysts.
Figure 3. Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) characterization of various catalysts.
Catalysts 10 00140 g003
Catalysts 10 00140 g004 550
Figure 4. xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101 N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and pore size distribution (a). 0.4%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101; (b) 0.5%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101; (c) 0.6%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101; (d) Median pore width distribution of xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101).
Figure 4. xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101 N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and pore size distribution (a). 0.4%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101; (b) 0.5%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101; (c) 0.6%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101; (d) Median pore width distribution of xCeO2/quasi-MIL-101).
Catalysts 10 00140 g004
Catalysts 10 00140 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) TEM image of 0.5%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101 (b) High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy image of 0.5%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101, and the corresponding elemental mapping images of (c) chromium, (d) cerium.
Figure 5. (a) TEM image of 0.5%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101 (b) High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy image of 0.5%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101, and the corresponding elemental mapping images of (c) chromium, (d) cerium.
Catalysts 10 00140 g005
Catalysts 10 00140 g006 550
Figure 6. (A) Cr 2p (a) 0.4%CqM (b) 0.5%CqM (c) 0.6%CqM; (B) O 1s (d) 0.4%CqM (e) 0.5%CqM (f) 0.6%CqM.
Figure 6. (A) Cr 2p (a) 0.4%CqM (b) 0.5%CqM (c) 0.6%CqM; (B) O 1s (d) 0.4%CqM (e) 0.5%CqM (f) 0.6%CqM.
Catalysts 10 00140 g006
Catalysts 10 00140 g007 550
Figure 7. NOx conversions over various catalysts. Reaction condition: [NH3] = 500 ppm, [NO] = 500 ppm, [O2] = 4%, and N2 balance, the gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) = 79,000 h−1.
Figure 7. NOx conversions over various catalysts. Reaction condition: [NH3] = 500 ppm, [NO] = 500 ppm, [O2] = 4%, and N2 balance, the gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) = 79,000 h−1.
Catalysts 10 00140 g007
Catalysts 10 00140 g008 550
Figure 8. N2 selectivity over various catalysts.
Figure 8. N2 selectivity over various catalysts.
Catalysts 10 00140 g008
Catalysts 10 00140 g009 550
Figure 9. Stability test of the 0.5%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101 catalyst in the presence of SO2 and H2O at 250 °C. Reaction conditions: 500 ppm NO, 500 ppm NH3, 5% O2, 5% H2O and 100 ppm SO2, balance N2, GHSV = 79,000 h−1.
Figure 9. Stability test of the 0.5%CeO2/quasi-MIL-101 catalyst in the presence of SO2 and H2O at 250 °C. Reaction conditions: 500 ppm NO, 500 ppm NH3, 5% O2, 5% H2O and 100 ppm SO2, balance N2, GHSV = 79,000 h−1.
Catalysts 10 00140 g009
Table
Table 1. Ce content and BET surface area over various catalysts.
Table 1. Ce content and BET surface area over various catalysts.
SampleCe 1 (wt%)SBET (m2g1)Median Pore Width(Å)
MIL-101(Cr)—17676.726
quasi-MIL-101(Cr)—11466.225
0.4%CeO2/quasi-MIL-1010.42186.508
0.5%CeO2/quasi-MIL-1010.52116.506
0.6%CeO2/quasi-MIL-1010.62026.088
1 Ce content was detected by the Inductive Coupled Plasma Emission Spectrometer (ICP) method.
Table
Table 2. The binding energies of core electrons of xCqM and the percent of differential valence state.
Table 2. The binding energies of core electrons of xCqM and the percent of differential valence state.
XPS SpectraElement Valence0.4%CqM0.5%CqM0.6%CqM
Binding Energies, eVPercent of Valence State, %Binding Energies, eVPercent of Valence State, %Binding Energies, eVPercent of Valence State, %
Cr 2pCr2+575.7713.95575.7113.99575.9219.17
Cr3+576.8746.14576.8342.71577.0536.84
Cr5+578.4839.91578.5843.30578.5543.99
O 1sOLatt530.3549.47530.3054.40530.4156.73
OAds531.5050.53531.3045.60531.3743.27

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, M.; Hou, H.; Wei, C.; Guan, X.; Wei, W.; Wang, G.-S. Preparation of Quasi-MIL-101(Cr) Loaded Ceria Catalysts for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx at Low Temperature. Catalysts 2020, 10, 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10010140

AMA Style

Lu M, Hou H, Wei C, Guan X, Wei W, Wang G-S. Preparation of Quasi-MIL-101(Cr) Loaded Ceria Catalysts for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx at Low Temperature. Catalysts. 2020; 10(1):140. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10010140

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Min, Haili Hou, Chuanying Wei, Xiaohui Guan, Wei Wei, and Guang-Sheng Wang. 2020. "Preparation of Quasi-MIL-101(Cr) Loaded Ceria Catalysts for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx at Low Temperature" Catalysts 10, no. 1: 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10010140

APA Style

Lu, M., Hou, H., Wei, C., Guan, X., Wei, W., & Wang, G. -S. (2020). Preparation of Quasi-MIL-101(Cr) Loaded Ceria Catalysts for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx at Low Temperature. Catalysts, 10(1), 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10010140

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop