Next Article in Journal
Photocatalytic Alkylation of α-(Trifluoromethyl)Styrenes with Potassium Xanthogenates
Previous Article in Journal
Insights into the Influence of Key Preparation Parameters on the Performance of MoS2/Graphene Oxide Composites as Active Materials in Supercapacitors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl Molybdenum(V) Complexes Derived from Iodoanilines: Synthesis, Structure, and ROP of ε-Caprolactone

1
Plastics Collaboratory, Department of Chemistry, The University of Hull, Cottingham Rd., Hull HU6 7RX, UK
2
Chemistry Department, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2021, 11(12), 1554; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11121554
Submission received: 19 November 2021 / Revised: 2 December 2021 / Accepted: 2 December 2021 / Published: 20 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Catalysis for Sustainable Chemistry and Energy)

Abstract

:
The reaction of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4] with the ortho-, meta-, or para-iodo-functionalized anilines 2-IC6H4NH2, 3-IC6H4NH2, 4-IC6H4NH2 yields imido or amine products of the type [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(IC6H4N)] (2-I, 1, 3-I, 3, 4-I, 5) or [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4(IC6H4NH2)] (3-I, 2, 4-I, 4), respectively, depending on the reaction stoichiometry/conditions; we were unable to isolate an amine complex of the 2-I derivative. The reaction of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4] with one equivalent of 2-I,4-FC6H3NH2 in the presence of Et3N afforded [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(2-I,4-FC6H3N)]·MeCN (6·MeCN), which, upon exposure to air, afforded the Mo(VI) imido complex [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl3(2-I,4-FC6H3N)] (7). For comparative studies, the structure of the aniline (C6H5NH2)-derived complex [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(2-C6H3N)] (8) has also been prepared. The molecular structures of 18 have been determined and reveal packing in the form of zig-zag chains or ladders. The complexes catalyze, in the presence of benzyl alcohol under N2, the ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of ε-caprolactone affording relatively low molecular weight products. The MALDI-ToF spectra indicate that a number of polymer series bearing a variety of end groups are formed. Conducting the ROPs as melts or under air results in the isolation of higher molecular weight products, again bearing a variety of end groups. Kinetic studies reveal the aniline-derived imido complex 8 performs best, whilst a meta-iodo substituent and a Mo(V) centre are also found to be beneficial. The structures of the side products 2-IC6H4NH3Cl and 3-IC6H4NH3Cl are also reported.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Molybdenum, and to a lesser extent tungsten, organoimido chemistry has been of interest for a number of decades now, given its relevance to a number of areas, particularly olefin metathesis [1]. Although the literature on imido-containing compounds is vast, reports concerning the synthesis of functionalized imido complexes are less widespread [2]. We have previously investigated the chemistry of [W(η-C5Me5)Cl4] as an entry point to new half-sandwich species and have reported the structures of a number of products, including the diamido complex {W(η-C5Me5)Cl2[1,2-(HN)2C6H4]} [3], as well as imido, hydrazido, amino acid derived chelates [4], and functionalized 6,12-epiiminodibenzo[b,f][1.5]diazocine ligands [5]. The complex [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4] is prepared by a similar procedure to its tungsten analogue [6], and its chemistry is similarly relatively unexplored [7,8,9,10,11,12]. We and others have also been exploring the potential of molybdenum-based complexes as catalysts for the ring opening polymerization (ROP) of cyclic esters [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. We were attracted to the use of iodo-substituted organomido groups as a stabilizing motif given their tendency to be involved in intermolecular bonding in the solid state. Such interactions are useful for crystal engineering, halogen-catalyzed reactions, and even in drug design [23,24,25]. Furthermore, early transition metal imido complexes are known to be quite reactive [26].
Herein, we find that the presence of the iodo-substituted organoimido groups does indeed aid the formation of intermolecular interactions in the solid state, and adoption of zig-zag chains or ladder motifs. Furthermore, such systems are capable of acting as catalysts, in the presence of benzyl alcohol, for the ring opening polymerization (ROP) of ε-caprolactone (ε-CL) at elevated temperatures, either under N2 or air, or as melts. The iodo-containing imido complexes prepared herein are shown in Scheme 1.

2. Results

2.1. 2-Iodo Complexes

The interaction of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4] with two equivalents of 2-iodoaniline, 2-IC6H4NH2 in refluxing toluene afforded, following work-up in acetonitrile, the imido complex [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(2-IC6H4N)] (1) in good yield (ca. 76%). Small, single crystals, suitable for an X-ray structure determination using synchrotron radiation, were obtained on prolonged standing (2–3 days) at ambient temperature. The molecular structure is shown in Figure 1, with selected bond lengths and angles given in the caption. The asymmetric unit contains one molecule of the molybdenum complex. The geometry of the molecule is a three-legged piano stool, typical of such organometal imido dichlorides [11]. The distance from the Cp* ring centroid to Mo(1) is 2.045(3) Å, whilst C(1) > C(5) are co-planar within 0.021 Å. Meanwhile, the methyl groups all tilt away from the metal, and of these, the most marked is that for C(7), which is under N(1), and C(10) under Cl(1). Bonds Mo(1)–C(4) and Mo(1)–C(5) trans to N are longer than those trans to the Cl ligands. The ring slippage can be measured by the τ value [3], which, here, is 3.5°. The organoimido ligand is somewhat bent at 159.8(4)°, but is still considered linear, albeit at the lower end [27].
In the packing of 1, there are some weak I(1)∙∙∙Cl(2) halogen bond interactions at 3.738 Å which result in zig-zag chains parallel to b (Figure 2). For alternative views of 1, see Figure S1.
The side product in this reaction is the salt [2-I-NH3C6H4]+Cl. It, too, has an interesting structure, involving a number of intermolecular interactions. In the asymmetric unit, there is one cation/anion pair, in which all three of the NH protons are involved in strong H-bonds to the chloride anion. Unlike in [2-I-NH3C6H4]+Cl vide infra, there are no I∙∙∙I halogen-halogen interactions, instead there are Cl∙∙∙I interactions at 3.306 Å. There are no π∙∙∙π interactions; at best the molecules are highly slipped, forming a layered structure with alternating hydrophilic ionic and hydrophobic aromatic layers. The ionic layers are in the b/c plane, see Figure S2.

2.2. 3-Iodo Complexes

Treatment of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4] with one equivalent of the meta aniline 3-IC6H4NH2 at ambient temperature led, following work-up, to isolation of the amine complex [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4(3-IC6H4NH2)]∙MeCN (2∙MeCN). The IR spectrum of 2 contains two sharp (weak) stretches in the N–H region, at 3415 and 3328 cm−1, characteristic of the NH2 group. As for 1 and 3 (see below), the 1H NMR spectrum is broad and uninformative consistent with the presence of the paramagnetic Mo(V) centre. The molecular structure of 2∙MeCN is shown in Figure 3, with selected bond lengths and angles given in the caption. The asymmetric unit contains one molecule of the molybdenum complex and a solvent (MeCN) molecule of crystallisation. The geometry at the metal is best described as distorted octahedral with the Mo ion 0.5783(18) Å out of the Cl4 plane. The Mo to Cp* ring centroid distance is 2.078(6) Å and all the methyl groups bend substantially away from the C5 aromatic ring, by 0.14–0.22(2) Å; the τ value is 3.3°. In contrast to 1, here the aniline-derived ligand maintains the amine group, hence the elongated Mo–N bond length at 2.322(10) Å.
The Mo complex molecules form H-bonded zig-zag ladders in the crystallographic a direction. Each complex forms four strong H-bonds, two as donor and two as acceptor. These are via two independent N–H∙∙∙Cl′ H-bonds (see Figure 4). There are also two weaker, supporting, aromatic ortho-C–H∙∙∙Cl interactions along the ladders. Otherwise, there are only weak interactions involving C–H hydrogens between ladders. The MeCN solvent molecule of crystallization forms a weak N∙∙∙I interaction at 3.22 Å (see Figure S3).
As for 1, use of three equivalents under reflux conditions affords an imido complex, namely [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(3-I-NC6H4)] (3), see Figure 5. In the asymmetric unit, there is one molecule of 1. The distance from Mo(1) to the Cp* ring centroid is 2.0233(7) Å. All the methyl groups bend a little away from the metal relative to the C5 ring by between 0.06–0.12 Å, whilst the C(3) & C(4) bond lengths to Mo(1) are the longest because they are trans to N(1); the τ value is 3.9°.
There are a number of weak (Me)C–H∙∙∙I/Cl interactions between molecules of 3. The molecules pack in weakly-bound layers in the b/c plane (Figure S4). The shortest, and only feasible halogen–halogen interaction is Cl(1)∙∙∙I(1′) at 3.464 Å.
For the secondary product, namely [3-I-NH3C6H4]+Cl, there is one cation/anion pair in the asymmetric unit. Within the salt, the ions form strongly H-bonded stacks/layers via +N–H∙∙∙Cl interactions in the a and b directions. Among the NH hydrogen atoms, two form fairly strong, single N–H∙∙∙Cl H-bonds, while the last is bifurcated to two different Cl ions, and, hence, all these are notably weaker. Moreover, in the b direction, there are zig-zag I∙∙∙I interactions at 3.890 Å, and overall a 3D supramolecular network is formed (Figure S5).

2.3. 4-Iodo Complexes

Extension of this chemistry to the para iodoaniline 4-IC6H4NH2 led, following the conditions used for 2, to isolation of the amine complex [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4(4-IC6H4NH2)] (4). The IR spectrum of 4 contains two weak stretches in the N–H region, at 3318 and 3286 cm−1, characteristic of the NH2 group. Unlike 2, this complex crystallizes without any solvent of crystallization. The molecular structure of 4 is shown in Figure 6, with selected bond lengths and angles given in the caption. The distorted octahedral Mo ion lies 0.5750(5) Å out of the Cl4 plane. The Mo(1) to Cp* ring centroid distance is 2.0826(15) Å (cf 2.078(6) in amine complex 2), and the methyl carbons are pushed between 0.173–0.215(6) Å away from the Cp* ring plane in the direction away from the metal ion; the τ value is 3.3°. As in 2, the aniline-derived ligand is an amine with Mo–N at 2.340(3) Å.
As in 2, molecules form zig-zag ladders via strong N–H∙∙∙Cl H-bonds in the b direction, with each molecule forming four such interactions, two as donor and two as acceptor (see Figure 7). The location of the iodine atom in either the meta or para position allows the ladder motif to form. In addition, in 4, there are some weak aromatic C–H∙∙∙X interactions either along ladders or between ladders. These involve all four of the hydrogens on the halogenated ring (Figure S6).
Use of three equivalents of 4-iodoaniline in refluxing toluene led, on work-up, to the imido complex [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(p-NC6H4I)] (5) as dark prisms in ca. 60% isolated yield. In the crystal structure there is one molecule in the asymmetric unit (Figure 8). The distance from Mo(1) to the Cp* ring plane is 2.034(2) Å, which compares favorably with the other imido complexes 1 (2.045(3) Å) and 3 (2.0233(7) Å). The Me groups all point a little away from the metal relative to the Cp* ring plane, with C(12) pushed further away than the other four due to the location of the imido ligand; the τ value is 4.8°. The Mo(1)–C(9)/C(10) distances are rather longer than the other three due to the trans influence at N.
In the packing of 5, there are halogen bond interactions between I(1) and Cl(2′) on a neighboring molecule at a distance of 3.431 Å. This gives rise to zig-zag chains propagating in the c direction (Figure S7).

2.4. Use of 2-I,4-FC6H3NH2

Reactions using this aniline proved to be more sensitive than others employed herein. It was found that to avoid oxidation (see 7), it was better to mix [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4] with one equivalent of 2-I,4-FC6H3NH2 in the presence of Et3N in toluene at ambient temperature. Work-up as before (i.e., extraction into MeCN) afforded orange/brown crystals on standing. The molecular structure of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(2-I,4-FC6H3N)]·MeCN (6·MeCN) is shown in Figure 9, with selected bond lengths and angles given in the caption. This is the asymmetric unit. The Mo(1) to ring centroid distance is 2.0375(7) Å. All of the Me groups point away from the Mo(V) ion, with C(15) furthest displaced due to the proximity of the large imido ligand; the τ value is 4.4°. As seen for the other complexes, C(7) and C(8) are notably further from the Mo than the other three C atoms in the ring due to the trans influence of the N atom.
Molecules of 6·MeCN pack in H-bonded tapes in the b direction. There is an intermolecular I(1)∙∙∙Cl(2′) halogen bond with separation 3.486 Å. For an alternative view of 6·MeCN and different views of the packing, see Figure S8.
Oxidized product: Consistent use of three equivalents of 2-I,4-FC6H3NH2 afforded, following work up, the diamagnetic complex [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl3(2-I,4-F-NC6H3)] (7). Presumably, here the complex has been oxidized by adventitious exposure to the atmosphere resulting in the formation of a Mo(VI) centre. We note that the complex [W(η-C5Me5) (NC6F5)Cl3] has been isolated from exposure of [W(η-C5Me5)(NC6F5)Cl2] to air [11]. The molecular structure of 7 is shown in Figure 10, with selected bond lengths and angles given in the caption. The geometry is a four-legged piano stool in which the Cp* centroid lies 2.071(3) Å from Mo(1) and is considerably slipped with a large variation in Mo(1)–C bond lengths from 2.300(6) Å for C(5) to 2.546(7) Å for C(2), which lies trans to N(1), itself having a strong trans influence. All five methyl groups are pushed away from the aromatic C5 plane, with C(7) less affected than the four others. The displacements away from the C5 plane (Å) are 0.166(12) C(6), 0.052(12) C(7), 0.185(12) C(8), 0.139(12) C(9), 0.176(12) C(10). There is a degree of variation, i.e., localization in the C5 C–C distances with C(1)–C(5) and C(3)–C(4), being longer at ca. 1.45 Å than the other three at ca. 1.41–1.42 Å; the τ value is 7.6°.
In the packing (Figure S9), there are a number of weak C–H∙∙∙Cl interactions. The F∙∙∙I distance at 3.390 Å suggests weak halogen bonding. The molecules pack in layers with Cp*Mo units together and the halogen-bonded imido ligands together.

2.5. Use of Aniline

For comparative catalytic studies, we also prepared the complex [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(NC6H5)] via the use of three equivalents of the parent aniline. As for the other derivatives isolated above, single crystals suitable for an X-ray diffraction study were grown from a saturated solution of acetonitrile. There is one molecule of the complex in the asymmetric unit, which adopts a piano-stool conformation (Figure 11). The Cp* ligand is disordered over two sets of positions related by a ca. 22° rotation. The Mo(1) to Cp* ring plane distance is 2.013(8) Å for the major component and 2.058(17) Å for the minor component. For the major component, all the Cp* Me groups are bent somewhat away from the ring plane relative to the metal, but C(14) is notably more displaced away than the other four, presumably due to the proximity of the imido ligand ‘below’. The statistics are less reliable for the minor component. The bond lengths Mo(1)–C(11)/C(11X)/C(7X) are notably longer than the other Mo–C distances, being positioned trans to the imido nitrogen N; the τ values are 3.2° and 3.6° for the major and minor components, respectively. The packing of 8 is shown in Figure S10.

3. Ring Opening Polymerization (ROP) Studies

Based on our previous molybdenum ROP studies [20,21,22], we selected the conditions of 130 °C with a ratio of ε-CL to complex of 500:1 in the presence of one equivalent of benzyl alcohol over 24 h under N2. Data for the runs are presented in Table 1, and it can be seen that at ambient temperature, low molecular weight oily products are formed with good control (PDI < 1.25). End group analysis by 1H NMR spectroscopy (e.g., Figure S11 for entry 7, Table 1) is consistent with the presence of a BnO end group, which indicates that the polymerization proceeds through a coordination-insertion mechanism. Interestingly, despite the narrow PDI values, MALDI-TOF spectra revealed at least five series of ions corresponding to sodiated PCL. For example, in Figure 12 (using PCL from entry 2, Table 1; for the full spectrum, see Figure S12), for each group of the five species, the end groups, from lowest to highest mass, very likely correspond to BnO-/-H (n-1 compared with the rest of the group), no end groups, H-/-OH end groups, MeO-/-H, and the artifact NaO-/-H. On increasing the temperature from ambient to 70 °C, the molecular weight increased (by more than 6-fold in the case of 2, entries 5 v 6, Table 1), although this was generally at the cost of control. On further increasing the temperature to 130 °C, there was a further increase in polymer molecular weight, together with an increase in the PDI. The presence of a high oxidation state appears beneficial for affording a high molecular weight product given that use of the molybdenum(VI) precursor 7, afforded the highest molecular weight product, albeit with the worst control (entry 16, Table 1).
However, if the runs were conducted as melts (Table 2), all the systems (except for the use of 2) afforded higher molecular weight products versus runs conducted in solution. Runs employing the amine species 2 (entry 2, Table 2) and 4 (entry 4, Table 2) afforded the lowest molecular weight products. Analysis of the MALDI-TOF spectra again indicated the presence of multiple species, e.g., for the PCL from entry 2 of Table 2, the same five polymer series as identified above were present but in different relative intensities (see Figure 13; for the full spectrum, see Figure S13).
Good conversions were also observed on conducting the runs under air at 130 °C for 24 h (Table 3). Molecular weights were far higher than those observed under N2 when using 15, whilst that for 7 (entry 7, Table 3) was far lower. At ambient temperature under air, the products were low molecular weight oily products (e.g., entry 8, Table 3). In the MALDI-TOF spectra, there is one dominant series corresponding to no end groups, with two minor series likely corresponding to BnO-/-H and H-/-OH series; the former of these two starts to become more dominant at higher mass (see Figure 14, entry 5, Table 3; for the full spectrum, see Figure S14).

Kinetics

Kinetic studies for the imido complexes 1, 3, 5, and 8 (Figure 15), conducted using the ratio 500:1:1 ([CL]:[Cat]:[BnOH]) revealed the rate trend 8 > 3 > 1 > 5. This suggests the presence of either a meta- or an ortho-iodo substituent is beneficial to the rate of conversion for the iodo-bearing systems, whilst the best rate was observed for the aniline-derived system.
Comparing the kinetics for complexes 6 and 7 (Figure 16) suggests that a molybdenum(V) centre is beneficial to the rate of conversion versus molybdenum(VI).
For the amine complexes 2 and 4, kinetics (Figure 17) revealed, as for the imido complexes, that a meta- rather than a para-iodo group is beneficial for the rate of conversion. Note complex 8 exhibits a slightly better rate than 2 (see Figure S15); prior to screening, sample 2 was dried in vacuo for >2 h to remove the acetonitrile of crystallization.
An overall analysis of the kinetics for the systems herein reveals the rate trend 8 > 2 > 3 > 61 > 7 > 5 > 4. Thus, the most active catalyst systems amongst the ‘functionalized’ systems are those bearing a meta iodo substituent, which is more likely influenced by the electronics of the system rather than the sterics. The near linear relationships above imply the polymerizations follow a first-order dependence on the monomer concentration.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. General

All manipulations were carried out under an atmosphere of dry nitrogen using conventional Schlenk and cannula techniques or in a conventional nitrogen-filled glove box. Toluene (Aldrich, Dorset, UK) was refluxed over Na-benzophenone/Ketyl (Aldrich, Dorset, UK), acetonitrile (Aldrich, Dorset, UK) was refluxed over calcium hydride (Aldrich, Dorset, UK), whilst benzyl alcohol (Aldrich) was dried over molecular sieves. ε-CL (Aldrich, Dorset, UK) was dried over calcium hydride, and distilled prior to use. The purity of the monomer ε-CL was determined to be 99.6% (determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy, JEOL ECZ 400S spectrometer, Tokyo, Japan). The anilines 2-iodoaniline (TCI, Oxford, UK), 3-iodoaniline (TCI, Oxford, UK), 4-iodoaniline (TCI, Oxford, UK) and 4-fluoro-2-iodoaniline (Fluorochem, Hadfield, UK) were purchased from commercial sources and used directly.
IR spectra (nujol mulls, KBr windows) were recorded on a Nicolet Avatar 360 FT IR spectrometer (Thermo Nicolet Corporation, Madison, WI, USA); 1H NMR spectra were recorded at 400.2 MHz at room temperature on a on a JEOL ECZ 400S spectrometer (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The 1H NMR spectra were calibrated against the residual protio-impurity of the deuterated solvent; chemical shifts are given in ppm (δ). Elemental analyses were performed by the elemental analysis service in the Department of Chemistry at the University of Hull, OEA Labs Ltd. (Devon, UK), or London Metropolitan University. The precursor [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4] was prepared by the literature method [6]. All other chemicals were purchased from Sigma Aldrich or TCI UK.
MALDI-TOF mass spectra (Wyatt Analytical Ltd., Colwyn Bay, UK) were acquired on a Bruker Autoflex Speed MALDI-TOF spectrometer, in both positive-linear (LP/-1) and reflectron (RP/-3) modes and processed with Bruker PolyTools and Strohalm mMass (v5.5.0) software. Molecular weights were calculated from the experimental traces using the OmniSEC 467 (Thermo Nicolet Corporation, Madison, WI, USA).
The mass spectra of the complexes 18 were run on a Bruker Maxis Impact HD Mass spectrometer at the University of Hull in ESI positive mode, or at the National Mass Spectrometry Facility at Swansea (UK), using an atmospheric solids analysis probe (ASAP).

4.2. Synthesis of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(2-IC6H4N)] (1)

To [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4] (1.00 g, 2.68 mmol) and 2-IC6H4NH2 (1.76 g, 8.04 mmol) in a Schlenk flask was added toluene (20 mL). The system was refluxed for 12 h, and on cooling, volatiles were removed. The residue was extracted into MeCN (40 mL) and on standing for 24 h at 0 °C afforded the complex 1 as dark crystals. Yield 1.06 g, 76%. C16H19Cl2NIMo requires C 37.02, H 3.69, N 2.70%. Found C 37.02, H 4.09, N 3.71%. IR: 1631w, 1564w, 1301s, 1261s, 1198w, 1156m, 1140w, 1092m, 1044m, 1016s, 967m, 948w, 919w, 892w, 844w, 801m, 765s, 722s, 690w, 645w, 635w, 6166w, 565m. Mass spec (ASAP, solid): 483 (M+–Cl).

4.3. Synthesis of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4(3-IC6H4NH2)]∙MeCN (2∙MeCN)

As for 1, but using [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4] (1.00 g, 2.68 mmol) and 3-IC6H4NH2 (0.32 mL, 2.7 mmol) which, under prolonged standing at 0 °C afforded dark red crystals of 2.MeCN. Yield 0.97 g, 57%. C16H21Cl4NIMo·(C2H3N) requires (sample dried in vacuo for 2 h, -MeCN) C 32.46, H 3.58, N 2.37% Found C 33.28, H 3.85, N 2.31%. IR: 3415w, 3328w, 2314w, 2289w, 2250w, 1702w, 1644w, 1570w, 1552w, 1306m, 1260s, 1168m, 1156m, 1094s, 1062s, 1020s, 987m, 932w, 911w, 879w, 847w, 801s, 782m, 722s, 673w, 655w. Mass spec (ASAP, solid): 521 (M+-MeCN–2Cl), 486 (M+-MeCN–3Cl).

4.4. Synthesis of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(3-IC6H4N)] (3)

As for 2 but using [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4] (1.00 g, 2.68 mmol) and 3-IC6H4NH2 (0.97 mL, 8.1 mmol) which, under prolonged standing at 0 °C afforded dark red crystals of 3. Yield 0.95 g, 68%. C16H19Cl2NIMo requires C 37.02, H 3.69, N 2.70%. Found C 36.81, H 4.03, N 2.65%. IR: 1583w, 1557w, 1414m, 1260s, 1094s, 1020s, 908w, 865m, 800s, 733w, 697w, 673w, 662w, 571w, 550w, 526w, 507w, 466w. M.S. (ESI, positive): 448 (M+–2Cl).

4.5. Synthesis of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4(4-IC6H4NH2)] (4)

As for 1 but using [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4] (1.00 g, 2.68 mmol) and 4-IC6H4NH2 (0.59 g, 2.7 mmol) which, under prolonged standing at 0 °C afforded dark red crystals of 4. Yield 0.72 g, 45%. C16H21Cl4NIMo∙½MeCN requires C 33.33, H 3.70, N 3.43%. Found C 33.33, H 3.51, N 3.40%. IR: 3421w, 3332w, 2310w, 2288w, 1641m, 1609m, 1558m, 1401s, 1312m, 1260s, 1197m, 1170m, 1094s, 1058s, 1020s, 1011s, 987s, 933w, 913m, 879w, 846m, 805s, 722m, 687w, 660w. Mass spec (ASAP, solid): 521 (M+–2Cl), 486 (M+–3Cl).

4.6. Synthesis of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(4-IC6H4N)] (5)

As for 1 but using [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4] (1.00 g, 2.68 mmol) and 4-IC6H4NH2 (1.76 g, 8.04 mmol) affording 5 as dark crystals. Yield: 0.83 g, 60%. C16H19Cl2NIMo requires C 37.02, H 3.69, N 2.70%. Found C 36.94, H 4.24, N 2.71%. IR: 1558w, 1312s, 1290w, 1261s, 1208w, 1167w, 1153w, 1110m, 1093s, 1051m, 1022s, 998s, 986m, 893w, 838s, 809s, 800s, 723m, 669m, 633w, 614w, 536m, 516s. M.S. (ESI, positive): 520 (MH+), 449 (M+–2Cl).

4.7. Synthesis of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(2-I,4-FC6H3N)]∙MeCN (6∙MeCN)

To [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4] (1.12 g, 3.00 mmol) and 2-I,4-FC6H3NH2 (0.36 mL, 3.0 mmol) in a Schlenk flask was added toluene (20 mL) and triethylamine (0.86 mL, 6.2 mmol). The system was stirred for 12 h, and then the volatiles were removed. The residue was extracted into MeCN (40 mL) and on standing for 24 h at ambient temperature, the complex 6∙MeCN formed as dark orange crystals. Yield 1.06 g, 61%. C16H18Cl2FNIMo requires C 35.75, H 3.38, N 2.61%. Found C 35.50, H 3.67, N 2.67%. IR: 1573m, 1561m, 1309m, 1283w, 1259s, 1245m, 1199s, 1157w, 1109m, 1095m, 1032s, 1022s, 985w, 950w, 891w, 869s, 855m, 821s, 802s, 722m, 663w, 623w, 589w, 576w, 552w, 467w, 451m. M.S. (ESI, positive): 543 (M+–Cl), 537 (M+–MeCN).

4.8. Synthesis of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl3(2-I,4-FC6H3N)] (7)

As for 1 but using [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4] (1.00 g, 2.68 mmol) and 2-I,4-FC6H3NH2 (0.96 mL, 8.1 mmol) affording 7 as yellow plate-like crystals. Yield 0.83 g, 54%. C16H18Cl3FNIMo requires C 33.57, H 3.17, N 2.45%. Found C 34.21, H 3.48, N 3.23%. IR: 1745w, 1606w, 1595w, 1574w, 1543w, 1299m, 1260s, 1240m, 1198m, 1184s, 1158m, 1096s, 1022s, 985w, 932w, 910w, 879m, 864m, 801s, 753w, 722m, 663w. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz), δ: 7.66 (m, 1H, arylH), 7.61 (m, 1H, arylH), 7.14 (m, 1H, arylH), 2.27 (s, 15H, C5Me5). M.S. (ESI, positive): 502 (M+–2Cl).

4.9. Synthesis of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(C6H5N)] (8)

As for 1 but using [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4] (1.00 g, 2.68 mmol) and C6H4NH2 (0.75 g, 8.1 mmol) affording 8 as pale brown crystals. Yield: 0.84 g, 80%. C16H20Cl2NMo requires C 48.87, H 5.13, N 3.56%. Found C 49.71, H 5.12, N 4.16%. IR: 1565w, 1303m, 1260s, 1200w, 1153w, 1095m, 1068m, 1021s, 981m, 920w, 881w, 801m, 775s, 740m, 723m, 691m, 617w, 548w, 506w, 473w. M.S. (ESI, positive): 394 (MH+), 357 (M+–Cl).

4.10. ROP of ε-Caprolactone (ε-CL)

All polymerizations were carried out in Schlenk tubes under nitrogen atmosphere unless otherwise stated. ε-CL was polymerized using complexes 18 in the presence of BnOH (0.1 M in toluene) as a co-initiator. Complexes were weighed out in the glove box and then initiator and monomer were added to the flask successively via syringe. The molar ratio of monomer/catalyst/BnOH ([CL]/[Cat]/[BnOH]) used was 500:1:1. The reaction mixture was then placed into an oil bath, preheated to the required temperature. The reaction was quenched by the addition of an excess of glacial acetic acid (0.2 mL), then the reaction solution was poured into cold methanol (20 mL). The reaction conversion was monitored by 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) spectroscopic studies. The resulting polymer was washed several times with methanol, collected on filter paper and then dried under vacuum to constant weight at 40 °C. GPC (in THF) were used to determine molecular weights (Mn and PDI) of the polymer products.

4.11. Polymerization Kinetics

Kinetic experiments were carried out following the previous polymerization method. At regular time intervals, 0.05 mL aliquots were removed, quenched with wet CDCl3 (1 mL), and analysed by 1H NMR spectroscopy.

4.12. Polymer Samples Preparation for MALDI-TOF

All samples were dissolved in THF, as was the matrix. Data was acquired using a dithranol matrix and NaTFA additive, where the matrix, sample, and additive solutions were mixed together in a 5:1:0.1 ratio. Then, 0.5 μL of the mixture solution was spotted onto the MALDI target and left to air-dry prior to analysis.

4.13. Crystal Structure Determinations

In all cases, crystals suitable for an X-ray diffraction study were grown from a saturated MeCN solution at 0 °C or ambient temperature. Compounds 3 and 3I co-crystallized from the same vial. All (except 1) single crystal X-ray diffraction data were collected at the UK National Crystallography service using Rigaku Oxford Diffraction ultra-high intensity instruments employing modern areas detectors. For 1 diffraction data were collected using silicon 111-monochromated synchrotron radiation at Daresbury Laboratory Station 9.8. In all cases, standard procedures were employed for integration and processing of data.
Complex 2 was refined as a two-component non-merohedral twin with 180° rotation about direct and reciprocal axes 0 0 1 with the major:minor component ratio: 56.2:43.8(2)%. For 7, there was some evidence of unresolved twinning from some largish residual electron density peaks and Fobs > Fcalc for many reflections.
Crystal structures were solved using dual space methods implemented within SHELXT [28]. The completion of these structures was achieved by performing least squares refinement against all unique F2 values using SHELXL-2018 [29]. Table 4 contains the crystallographic data for 1–8, 2-I NH3Cl and 3-I NH3Cl. CCDC 2122492-2122501 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures (accessed on 6 December 2021).

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have utilized iodoanilines to access and stabilize zig-zag chains or ladders incorporating organometallic molybdenum fragments. Amine or organoimido species can be accessed depending on conditions for the 3- and 4-iodoanilines; for the 2-iodoaniline, only an imido product could be isolated. Use of 4-fluoro-2-idoaniline was more sensitive, and both Mo(V) and Mo(VI) imido complexes were accessible, the latter via adventitious oxidation. All structures exhibit a variety of intermolecular interactions. In terms of ROP, the substituent pattern of the iodo substituents strongly influences the polymerization rate. A meta-iodo substituent is favoured, and it is assumed that the presence of this electron withdrawing group promotes the ability of the metal to perform a nucleophilic attack at the carbonyl of the ε-caprolactone.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/catal11121554/s1, Figure S1: Alternative views of 1, Figure S2: Views of the molecular structure of [2-I-NH3C6H4]Cl, Figure S3: Packing of the complex 2∙MeCN, Figure S4: Packing views of 3, Figure S5: Different views of [3-I-NH3C6H4]Cl, Figure S6: Different views of the packing of 4, Figure S7: Packing of the complex 5, Figure S8: Alternative view and packing for 6∙MeCN, Figure S9: Packing of complex 7, Figure S10: Packing of the aniline complex 8, Figure S11: 1H NMR spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz, 298 K) of the PCL synthesized with 3/BnOH at 130 °C under N2 (entry 7, Table 1), Figure S12: Mass spectra of the PCL synthesized with 2/BnOH (entry 2, Table 1), Figure S13: Mass spectra of the PCL synthesized with 2/BnOH (entry 2, Table 2), Figure S14: Mass spectra of the PCL synthesized with 2/BnOH (entry 5, Table 3), Figure S15: Kinetics of 8 versus 2.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.R.; methodology, C.R.; formal analysis, C.R. and T.X.; investigation, C.R. and T.X.; writing—original draft preparation, C.R. and M.R.J.E.; writing—review and editing, C.R. and M.R.J.E.; supervision, C.R.; Crystallography M.R.J.E. and S.H.D.; project administration, C.R.; funding acquisition, C.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by UKRI Creative Circular Plastic grant (EP/S025537/1). The Chinese Scholarship Council is thanked for awarding a Ph.D. scholarship to T.X.

Acknowledgments

The EPSRC National Crystallographic Service Centre at Southampton is thanked for data. Data for 1 were collected at Daresbury Laboratory Station 9.8, whilst mass spectra of the complexes were collected at the National Mass Spectrometry Facility at Swansea University or at the University of Hull. Mass spectra of the PCL samples were collected by Mass and Wyatt Analytical Ltd.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Schrock, R.R.; Hoveyda, A.H. Molybdenum and tungsten imido alkylidene complexes as efficient olefin-metathesis catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4592–4633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gibson, V.C.; Redshaw, C.; Clegg, W.; Elsegood, M.R.J. Synthesis and characterization of molybdenum complexes bearing highly functionalized imido substituents. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1997, 18, 3207–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Redshaw, C.; Wilkinson, G.; Sweet, T.K.N.; Hursthouse, M.B. Synthesis and X-ray structure of the organotungsten(V) o-phenylene diamido complex (η-C5Me5)WCl2{1,2-(HN)2C6H4}. Polyhedron 1993, 12, 2417–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Redshaw, C.; Gibson, V.C.; Clegg, W.; Edwards, A.J.; Miles, B. Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl tungsten complexes containing imido, hydrazido and amino acid derived N-O chelate ligands. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1997, 18, 3343–3347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Redshaw, C.; Wood, P.T.; Elsegood, M.R.J. Synthesis and structure of pentamethylcyclopentadienyl tungsten(V) complexes containing functionalized 6,12-epiiminodibenzo[b,f][1.5]diazocine ligands. Organometallics 2007, 26, 6501–6504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Murray, R.C.; Blum, L.; Liu, A.H.; Schrock, R.R. Simple routes to mono(η5-pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) complexes of molybdenum(V) and tungsten(VI). Organometallics 1985, 4, 953–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Radius, U.; Sundermeyer, J. Organometall-Imide—Höhervalente Derivate der d-Metall-Säure, 2. Alkyl-, Aryl- und Cyclopentadienyl-substituierte Molybdän(VI)- und Wolfram(VI)-Imide. Chem. Ber. 1992, 125, 2183–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sundermeyer, J.; Radius, U.; Burschka, C. Organometall-Imide—Höhervalente Derivate der d-Metall-Säuren, 3. Synthese und Reaktionen von (Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)(imido)-Komplexen des Molybdäns und Wolframs und eine effiziente Strategie zur Synthese der Organometallate NBu4[Cp*MO3] (M = Mo, W). Chem. Ber. 1992, 125, 2379–2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abugideiri, F.; Brewer, G.A.; Desai, J.U.; Gordon, J.C.; Poli, R. (Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)molybdenum(IV) chloride. Synthesis, Structure, and Properties. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 3745–3751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Köhler, K.; Roesky, H.W.; Herzog, A.; Gornitzka, H.; Steiner, A.; Usón, I. Syntheses, Structures, and Reactivity of a Series of (Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)molybdenum(V) and Tungsten(V) Imido Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 1773–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pedraz, T.; Pellinghelli, M.A.; Royo, P.; Tiripicchio, A.; Vázquez de Miquel, A. Preparation of imido pentamethylcyclopentadienyl molybdenum(IV) complexes X-ray molecular structure of cis-[MoCp* Cl(μ-NtBu)]2·C6H6. J. Organomet. Chem. 1997, 534, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Sal, P.G.; Jiménez, I.; Martín, A.; Pedraz, T.; Royo, P.; Sellés, A.; Vázquez de Miguel, A. Synthesis of chloro and methyl imido cyclopentadienyl molybdenum and tungsten complexes. X-ray molecular structures of [WCp*Cl3(NtBu)], [MoCp*ClMe2(NtBu)] and [WCp*ClMe2(NtBu)]. Inorg. Chimia Acta 1998, 273, 270–278. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kubo, M.; Nakanishi, M.; Kimura, M. Process for the Preparation of Lactone Polyesters. Germany Patent No. DE2947978, 15 September 1981. [Google Scholar]
  14. Báez, J.E.; Martĭnez-Rosales, M.; Martĭnez-Richa, A. Ring-opening polymerization of lactones catalyzed by decamolybdate anion. Polymer 2003, 44, 6767–6772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Báez, J.E.; Martĭnez-Richa, A. Synthesis and characterization of poly(ε-caprolactone) and copolyesters by catalysis with molybdenum compounds: Polymers with acid-functional asymmetric telechelic architecture. Polymer 2005, 46, 12118–12129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Báez, J.E.; Marcos-Fernández, A.; Martĭnez-Richa, A. One-step route to α-hydroxyl-ω-(carboxylic acid) polylactones using catalysis by decamolybdate anion. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 1599–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mahha, Y.; Atlamsani, A.; Blais, J.-C.; Tessier, M.; Brégeault, J.M.; Salles, L. Oligomerization of ɛ-caprolactone and δ-valerolactone using heteropolyacid initiators and vanadium or molybdenum complexes. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2005, 234, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Reyes-López, S.Y.; Richa, A.M. The ring-opening polymerization of ε-caprolactone catalyzed by molybdenum trioxide: A kinetic approach study using NMR and DSC data. Macromol. Symp. 2013, 325–326, 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Maruta, Y.; Abiko, A. Bis(salicylaldehydato)dioxomolybdenum complexes: Catalysis for ring-opening polymerization. Polym. Bull. 2014, 71, 1433–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, W.; Zhao, Q.-K.; Redshaw, C.; Elsegood, M.R.J. Molybdenum complexes derived from the oxydianiline [(2-NH2C6H4)2O]: Synthesis, characterization and ε-caprolactone ROP capability. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 13133–13140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Al-Khafaji, Y.; Prior, T.J.; Elsegood, M.R.J.; Redshaw, C. Molybdenum(VI) imido complexes derived from chelating phenols: Synthesis, characterization and ɛ-caprolactone ROP capability. Catalysts 2015, 5, 1928–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Sun, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Prior, T.J.; Elsegood, M.R.J.; Wang, K.; Xing, T.; Redshaw, C. Mono-oxo molybdenum(VI) and tungsten(VI) complexes bearing chelating aryloxides: Synthesis, structure and ring opening polymerization of cyclic esters. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 1454–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Cavallo, G.; Metrangolo, P.; Milani, R.; Pilati, T.; Priimagi, A.; Resnati, G.; Terraneo, G. The halogen bond. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 2478–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Bulfield, D.; Engelage, E.; Mancheski, L.; Stoesser, J.; Huber, S.M. Crystal engineering with multipoint halogen bonding: Double two-point donors and acceptors at work. Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 1567–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Dumitrescu, D.; Shova, S.; Man, I.C.; Caira, M.R.; Popa, M.M.; Dumitrascu, F. 5-Iodo-1-arylpyrazoles as potential benchmarks for investigating the tuning of the halogen bonding. Crystals 2020, 10, 1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kawakita, K.; Kakiuchi, Y.; Tsurugi, H.; Mashima, K.; Parker, B.F.; Arnold, J.; Tonks, I.A. Reactivity of terminal imido complexes of group 4—6 metals: Stoichiometric and catalytic reactions involving cycloaddition with unsaturated organic molecules. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 407, 213118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nugent, W.A.; Haymore, B.L. Transition metal complexes containing organoimido (nr) and related ligands. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1980, 31, 123–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT—Integrated space-group and crystal structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Adv. 2015, A71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C Struct. Chem. 2015, C71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Complexes 18 prepared herein.
Scheme 1. Complexes 18 prepared herein.
Catalysts 11 01554 sch001
Figure 1. Molecular structure of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(2-IC6H4N)] (1). H atoms omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Mo(1)–Cl(1) 2.3636(18), Mo(1)–Cl(2) 2.3634(15), Mo(1)–N(1) 1.756(4); Mo(1)–N(1)–C(11) 159.8(4), Cl(1)–Mo(1)–Cl(2) 92.92(7).
Figure 1. Molecular structure of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(2-IC6H4N)] (1). H atoms omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Mo(1)–Cl(1) 2.3636(18), Mo(1)–Cl(2) 2.3634(15), Mo(1)–N(1) 1.756(4); Mo(1)–N(1)–C(11) 159.8(4), Cl(1)–Mo(1)–Cl(2) 92.92(7).
Catalysts 11 01554 g001
Figure 2. Packing observed in 1 with halogen-bonded zig-zag chains in the b direction.
Figure 2. Packing observed in 1 with halogen-bonded zig-zag chains in the b direction.
Catalysts 11 01554 g002
Figure 3. Molecular structure of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4(3-IC6H4NH2)]∙MeCN (2∙MeCN). Most H atoms omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Mo(1)–Cl(1) 2.407(3), Mo(1)–Cl(2) 2.413(3), Mo(1)–Cl(3) 2.376(3), Mo(1)–Cl(4) 2.420(3), Mo(1)–N(1) 2.322(10); Mo(1)–N(1)–Cl(1) 124.8(7), Cl(1)–Mo(1)–Cl(2) 86.85(10), Cl(1)–Mo(1)–Cl(4) 151.67(11).
Figure 3. Molecular structure of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4(3-IC6H4NH2)]∙MeCN (2∙MeCN). Most H atoms omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Mo(1)–Cl(1) 2.407(3), Mo(1)–Cl(2) 2.413(3), Mo(1)–Cl(3) 2.376(3), Mo(1)–Cl(4) 2.420(3), Mo(1)–N(1) 2.322(10); Mo(1)–N(1)–Cl(1) 124.8(7), Cl(1)–Mo(1)–Cl(2) 86.85(10), Cl(1)–Mo(1)–Cl(4) 151.67(11).
Catalysts 11 01554 g003
Figure 4. Independent N–H∙∙∙Cl′ H-bonds in 2∙MeCN forming ladder motifs. Symmetry operators: A = −x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1; B = −x + 2, −y + 1, −z + 1.
Figure 4. Independent N–H∙∙∙Cl′ H-bonds in 2∙MeCN forming ladder motifs. Symmetry operators: A = −x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1; B = −x + 2, −y + 1, −z + 1.
Catalysts 11 01554 g004
Figure 5. Molecular structure of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(3-IC6H4N)] (3). Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Mo(1)–Cl(1) 2.3722(4), Mo(1)–Cl(2) 2.3724(4), Mo(1)–N(1) 1.7423(13); Mo(1)–N(1)–Cl(1) 169.50(12), Cl(1)–Mo(1)–Cl(2) 93.507(15).
Figure 5. Molecular structure of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(3-IC6H4N)] (3). Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Mo(1)–Cl(1) 2.3722(4), Mo(1)–Cl(2) 2.3724(4), Mo(1)–N(1) 1.7423(13); Mo(1)–N(1)–Cl(1) 169.50(12), Cl(1)–Mo(1)–Cl(2) 93.507(15).
Catalysts 11 01554 g005
Figure 6. Molecular structure of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4(4-IC6H4NH2)] (4). Most H atoms omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Mo(1)–Cl(1) 2.4181(9), Mo(1)–Cl(2) 2.3771(10), Mo(1)–Cl(3) 2.4063(9), Mo(1)–Cl(4) 2.4403(10), Mo(1)–N(1) 2.340(3); Mo(1)–N(1)–Cl(1) 123.1(2), Cl(1)–Mo(1)–Cl(2) 84.80(3), Cl(1)–Mo(1)–Cl(4) 86.66(3).
Figure 6. Molecular structure of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl4(4-IC6H4NH2)] (4). Most H atoms omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Mo(1)–Cl(1) 2.4181(9), Mo(1)–Cl(2) 2.3771(10), Mo(1)–Cl(3) 2.4063(9), Mo(1)–Cl(4) 2.4403(10), Mo(1)–N(1) 2.340(3); Mo(1)–N(1)–Cl(1) 123.1(2), Cl(1)–Mo(1)–Cl(2) 84.80(3), Cl(1)–Mo(1)–Cl(4) 86.66(3).
Catalysts 11 01554 g006
Figure 7. Packing observed in 4 with the same H-bonded ladder motif observed for 2MeCN. Symmetry operators: A = −x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1; B = −x + 1, −y + 2, −z + 1.
Figure 7. Packing observed in 4 with the same H-bonded ladder motif observed for 2MeCN. Symmetry operators: A = −x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1; B = −x + 1, −y + 2, −z + 1.
Catalysts 11 01554 g007
Figure 8. Molecular structure of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(4-IC6H4N)] (5). Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Mo(1)–Cl(1) 2.3676(12), Mo(1)–Cl(2) 2.3646(11), Mo(1)–N(1) 1.739(4); Mo(1)–N(1)–C(1) 175.6(4), Cl(1)–Mo(1)–Cl(2) 92.66(4).
Figure 8. Molecular structure of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(4-IC6H4N)] (5). Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Mo(1)–Cl(1) 2.3676(12), Mo(1)–Cl(2) 2.3646(11), Mo(1)–N(1) 1.739(4); Mo(1)–N(1)–C(1) 175.6(4), Cl(1)–Mo(1)–Cl(2) 92.66(4).
Catalysts 11 01554 g008
Figure 9. Molecular structure of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(2I,4F-C6H3N)]·MeCN (6·MeCN). Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Mo(1)–Cl(1) 2.3646(4), Mo(1)–Cl(2) 2.3727(4), Mo(1)–N(1) 1.7483(13); Mo(1)–N(1)–C(1) 165.03(11), Cl(1)–Mo(1)–Cl(2) 92.402(14).
Figure 9. Molecular structure of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(2I,4F-C6H3N)]·MeCN (6·MeCN). Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Mo(1)–Cl(1) 2.3646(4), Mo(1)–Cl(2) 2.3727(4), Mo(1)–N(1) 1.7483(13); Mo(1)–N(1)–C(1) 165.03(11), Cl(1)–Mo(1)–Cl(2) 92.402(14).
Catalysts 11 01554 g009
Figure 10. Molecular structure of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl3(2-I,4-F-NC6H3)] (7). Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Mo(1)–Cl(1) 2.4362(17), Mo(1)–Cl(2) 2.4159(16), Mo(1)–Cl(3) 2.4137(17), Mo(1)–N(1) 1.750(5); Mo(1)–N(1)–C(11) 178.4(5), Cl(1)–Mo(1)–Cl(2) 80.04(6).
Figure 10. Molecular structure of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl3(2-I,4-F-NC6H3)] (7). Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Mo(1)–Cl(1) 2.4362(17), Mo(1)–Cl(2) 2.4159(16), Mo(1)–Cl(3) 2.4137(17), Mo(1)–N(1) 1.750(5); Mo(1)–N(1)–C(11) 178.4(5), Cl(1)–Mo(1)–Cl(2) 80.04(6).
Catalysts 11 01554 g010
Figure 11. Molecular structure of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(C6H5N)] (8). Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Mo(1)–Cl(1) 2.3702(10), Mo(1)–Cl(2) 2.3693(11), Mo(1)–N(1) 1.735(3); Mo(1)–N(1)–C(1) 165.0(3), Cl(1)–Mo(1)–Cl(2) 92.16(4).
Figure 11. Molecular structure of [Mo(η-C5Me5)Cl2(C6H5N)] (8). Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Mo(1)–Cl(1) 2.3702(10), Mo(1)–Cl(2) 2.3693(11), Mo(1)–N(1) 1.735(3); Mo(1)–N(1)–C(1) 165.0(3), Cl(1)–Mo(1)–Cl(2) 92.16(4).
Catalysts 11 01554 g011
Figure 12. Close up of MALDI-TOF spectrum of PCL (entry 2, Table 1).
Figure 12. Close up of MALDI-TOF spectrum of PCL (entry 2, Table 1).
Catalysts 11 01554 g012
Figure 13. Close up of MALDI-TOF spectrum of PCL (entry 2, Table 2).
Figure 13. Close up of MALDI-TOF spectrum of PCL (entry 2, Table 2).
Catalysts 11 01554 g013
Figure 14. Close up of MALDI-TOF spectrum of PCL (entry 5, Table 3).
Figure 14. Close up of MALDI-TOF spectrum of PCL (entry 5, Table 3).
Catalysts 11 01554 g014
Figure 15. (a) Relationship between conversion and time for the polymerization of ε-CL by using complexes 1, 3, 5, and 8; (b) Plot of ln[CL]0/[CL]t vs. time for the polymerization of ε-CL by using complexes 1, 3, 5, and 8; Conditions: T = 130 °C, nMonomer:nCat:BnOH = 500:1:1.
Figure 15. (a) Relationship between conversion and time for the polymerization of ε-CL by using complexes 1, 3, 5, and 8; (b) Plot of ln[CL]0/[CL]t vs. time for the polymerization of ε-CL by using complexes 1, 3, 5, and 8; Conditions: T = 130 °C, nMonomer:nCat:BnOH = 500:1:1.
Catalysts 11 01554 g015
Figure 16. (a) Relationship between conversion and time for the polymerization of ε-CL by using complexes 6 and 7; (b) Plot of ln[CL]0/[CL]t vs. time for the polymerization of ε-CL by using complexes 6 and 7; Conditions: T = 130 °C, nMonomer:nCat:BnOH = 500:1:1.
Figure 16. (a) Relationship between conversion and time for the polymerization of ε-CL by using complexes 6 and 7; (b) Plot of ln[CL]0/[CL]t vs. time for the polymerization of ε-CL by using complexes 6 and 7; Conditions: T = 130 °C, nMonomer:nCat:BnOH = 500:1:1.
Catalysts 11 01554 g016
Figure 17. (a) Relationship between conversion and time for the polymerization of ε-CL by using complex 2 and 4; (b) Plot of ln[CL]0/[CL]t vs. time for the polymerization of ε-CL by using complexes 2 and 4; Conditions: T = 130 °C, nMonomer:nCat:BnOH = 500:1:1.
Figure 17. (a) Relationship between conversion and time for the polymerization of ε-CL by using complex 2 and 4; (b) Plot of ln[CL]0/[CL]t vs. time for the polymerization of ε-CL by using complexes 2 and 4; Conditions: T = 130 °C, nMonomer:nCat:BnOH = 500:1:1.
Catalysts 11 01554 g017
Table 1. Synthesis of polycaprolactone from using catalysts 1–8 over 24 h under N2 a.
Table 1. Synthesis of polycaprolactone from using catalysts 1–8 over 24 h under N2 a.
EntryCat.Temp (°C)Conv. (%) bMn cMnCalcd dPDI e
1113099159056,499 1.35
217099465056,499 1.49
31159985056,499 1.25
4213098.6684056,271 1.33
527099574056,499 1.50
62159989056,499 1.21
73130>9916,71056,499 1.76
831566.240037,780 1.27
9413099101556,499 1.62
1047099249056,499 1.19
114159984056,499 1.25
12513097.412,30055,586 1.76
1351597.990055,872 1.22
14613098.5570056,214 1.46
1561596.384054,958 1.09
16713098.721,47056,328 2.10
177159685054,787 1.08
18813099774056,499 2.12
1987099156056,499 1.30
2082094.947054,159 1.19
a All conducted with [monomer]:[Cat]:BnOH = 500:1:1. b Conversion was confirmed by 1H NMR spectroscopy. c Determined by GPC analysis calibrated with polystyrene standards and multiplied by correction factor of 0.56. d F.W.[M]/[BnOH])(conversion) + BnOH. e Polydispersity index (Mw/Mn) were determined by GPC.
Table 2. Synthesis of polycaprolactone from using catalysts 18 as melts (130 °C) under N2 a.
Table 2. Synthesis of polycaprolactone from using catalysts 18 as melts (130 °C) under N2 a.
EntryCat.Conv. (%) bMn cMnCalcd dPDI e
1194.712,49054,045 2.41
2297.6351055,700 1.53
33>9918,29056,499 2.05
4497.4582055,586 1.37
5598.526,78056,214 2.00
66>9919,58056,499 1.76
77>9912,45056,499 1.22
88>9910,99056,499 2.35
a All conducted with [monomer]:[Cat]:BnOH = 500:1:1. b Conversion was confirmed by 1H NMR spectroscopy. c Determined by GPC analysis calibrated with polystyrene standards and multiplied by correction factor of 0.56. d F.W.[M]/[BnOH])(conversion) + BnOH. e Polydispersity index (Mw/Mn) were determined by GPC.
Table 3. Synthesis of polycaprolactone from using catalysts 18 over 24 h at 130 °C under air a,b.
Table 3. Synthesis of polycaprolactone from using catalysts 18 over 24 h at 130 °C under air a,b.
EntryCat.Conv. (%) cMn dMnCalcd ePDI f
1189.617,05051,135 2.41
229918,39056,499 2.47
3392.221,60052,619 2.17
4497.821,04055,814 2.45
55>9920,66056,499 2.27
66>99864056,499 1.71
77>99700056,499 2.47
88 f9971056,499 1.38
98>99747056,499 1.81
a All conducted with [monomer]:[Cat]:BnOH = 500:1:1. b Conducted at 20 °C. c Conversion was confirmed by 1H NMR spectroscopy. d Determined by GPC analysis calibrated with polystyrene standards and multiplied by correction factor of 0.56. e F.W.[M]/[BnOH])(conversion) + BnOH. f Polydispersity index (Mw/Mn) were determined by GPC.
Table 4. X-ray crystallographic data for 1–8, 2-I NH3Cl and 3-I NH3Cl.
Table 4. X-ray crystallographic data for 1–8, 2-I NH3Cl and 3-I NH3Cl.
Compound12·MeCN34
FormulaC16H19Cl2NIMoC16H21Cl4NIMo·(C2H3N)C16H19Cl2NIMoC16H21Cl4NIMo
Formula weight519.06633.03519.06591.98
Crystal systemMonoclinicMonoclinicMonoclinicMonoclinic
Space groupP21/cP21/cP21/cP21/c
a (Å)13.959(7)8.6986(4)14.2972(2)11.8409(3)
b (Å)7.926(4)22.7727(7)17.0160(2)9.8584(2)
c (Å)16.248(8)11.3268(10)7.60500(12)17.9445(4)
α (°)90909090
β (°)97.953(10)92.068(5)101.7956(15)105.356(3)
γ (°)90909090
V3)1780.4(15)2242.3(2)1811.08(4)2019.92(8)
Z4444
Temperature (K)120(2)100(2)100(2)100(2)
Wavelength (Å)0.69030.710730.710730.71073
Calculated density (g.cm−3)1.9361.8751.9041.947
Absorption coefficient (mm−1)2.522.442.722.71
Transmission factors (min./max.)0.770, 0.9470.256, 1.0000.595, 1.0000.326, 1.000
Crystal size (mm3)0.10 × 0.05 × 0.020.22 × 0.09 × 0.040.20 × 0.18× 0.040.12 × 0.04 × 0.02
θ(max) (°)25.027.628.727.5
Reflections measured7905179583681219181
Unique reflections3172845746704624
Rint0.0320.1630.0340.063
Reflections with F2 > 2σ(F2)2863705245193231
Number of parameters195242196221
R1 [F2 > 2σ(F2)]0.0480.0940.0160.036
wR2 (all data)0.1350.2260.0400.089
GOOF, S1.061.101.131.02
Largest difference peak and hole (e Å−3)3.08 and −1.443.13 and −1.840.55 and −0.400.81 and −0.92
Compound56 MeCN78
FormulaC16H19Cl2NIMoC18H21Cl2FN2IMoC16H18Cl3FNIMoC16H20Cl2NMo
Formula weight519.06578.11572.50393.17
Crystal systemOrthorhombicMonoclinicOrthorhombicOrthorhombic
Space groupPca21I2/aFdd2Pbca
a (Å)15.3004(5)14.45516(19)14.6309(3)12.93812(8)
b (Å)7.28895(19)8.64656(9)63.6134(13)14.34123(9)
c (Å)16.7395(4)33.2386(4)8.14550(17)17.82290(11)
α (°)
β (°)
γ (°)
V3)
90909090
9096.0961(12)9090
90909090
1866.85(9)4130.91(9)7581.2(3)3307.01(4)
Z
Temperature (K)
48168
100(2)100(2)100(2)100(2)
Wavelength (Å)
Calculated density (g·cm−3)
Absorption coefficient (mm−1)
Transmission factors (min./max.)
0.710730.710730.710731.54178
1.8471.8592.0061.579
2.642.402.759.36
0.722, 1.0000.775, 1.0000.960, 1.0000.537, 0.893
Crystal size (mm3)
θ(max) (°)
0.20 × 0.18 × 0.120.24 × 0.16 × 0.080.24 × 0.18 × 0.030.09 × 0.04 × 0.02
28.728.733.270.5
Reflections measured191053689959080113441
Unique reflections4744534567723153
Rint0.0370.0160.0610.043
Reflections with F2 > 2σ(F2)4704511366133095
Number of parameters196232213273
R1 [F2 > 2σ(F2)]0.0240.0160.0420.038
wR2 (all data)0.0620.0370.0950.084
GOOF, S1.061.101.121.32
Largest difference peak and hole (e Å−3)1.08 and −0.960.47 and −0.452.69 and −1.490.46 and −0.81
Compound2-I NH3Cl3-I NH3Cl
FormulaC6H7NI·ClC6H7NI·Cl
Formula weight255.48255.48
Crystal systemMonoclinicMonoclinic
Space groupP21/cP21/n
a (Å)9.24697(19)4.51643(17)
b (Å)9.29797(18)5.99872(17)
c (Å)9.3626(2)30.1104(11)
α (°)
β (°)
γ (°)
V3)
9090
100.672(2)92.257(4)
9090
791.05(3)815.14(5)
Z
Temperature (K)
44
100(2)100(2)
Wavelength (Å)
Calculated density (g.cm−3)
Absorption coefficient (mm−1)
Transmission factors (min./max.)
0.710730.71073
2.1452.082
4.304.17
0.328, 1.0000.588, 1.000
Crystal size (mm3)
θ(max) (°)
0.18 × 0.09 × 0.090.16 × 0.12 × 0.01
28.728.7
Reflections measured1591113319
Unique reflections20412077
Rint0.0250.050
Reflections with F2 > 2σ(F2)19841840
Number of parameters9591
R1 [F2 > 2σ(F2)]0.0120.029
wR2 (all data)0.0290.068
GOOF, S1.111.09
Largest difference peak and hole (e Å−3)0.42 and −0.392.79 and −0.91
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xing, T.; Elsegood, M.R.J.; Dale, S.H.; Redshaw, C. Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl Molybdenum(V) Complexes Derived from Iodoanilines: Synthesis, Structure, and ROP of ε-Caprolactone. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1554. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11121554

AMA Style

Xing T, Elsegood MRJ, Dale SH, Redshaw C. Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl Molybdenum(V) Complexes Derived from Iodoanilines: Synthesis, Structure, and ROP of ε-Caprolactone. Catalysts. 2021; 11(12):1554. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11121554

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xing, Tian, Mark R. J. Elsegood, Sophie H. Dale, and Carl Redshaw. 2021. "Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl Molybdenum(V) Complexes Derived from Iodoanilines: Synthesis, Structure, and ROP of ε-Caprolactone" Catalysts 11, no. 12: 1554. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11121554

APA Style

Xing, T., Elsegood, M. R. J., Dale, S. H., & Redshaw, C. (2021). Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl Molybdenum(V) Complexes Derived from Iodoanilines: Synthesis, Structure, and ROP of ε-Caprolactone. Catalysts, 11(12), 1554. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11121554

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop