Next Article in Journal
Cu/O Frustrated Lewis Pairs on Cu Doped CeO2(111) for Acetylene Hydrogenation: A First-Principles Study
Next Article in Special Issue
En Route to CO2-Based (a)Cyclic Carbonates and Polycarbonates from Alcohols Substrates by Direct and Indirect Approaches
Previous Article in Journal
Glycerol Hydrogenolysis to 1,2-Propanediol over Novel Cu/ZrO2 Catalysts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hierarchical Mesoporous SSZ-13 Chabazite Zeolites for Carbon Dioxide Capture
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Tandem Reactions Based on the Cyclization of Carbon Dioxide and Propargylic Alcohols: Derivative Applications of α-Alkylidene Carbonates

1
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
3
Dirección de Investigación en Transformación de Hidrocarburos, Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo, Eje Central Lázaro Cárdenas 152, San Bartolo Atepehuacan, Mexico City 07730, Mexico
4
State Key Laboratory of Biobased Material and Green Papermaking, Qilu University of Technology, Shandong Academy of Sciences, Jinan 250353, China
5
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Lenin Avenue 30, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Catalysts 2022, 12(1), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12010073
Submission received: 22 December 2021 / Revised: 3 January 2022 / Accepted: 7 January 2022 / Published: 10 January 2022

Abstract

:
As a well-known greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide (CO2) has attracted increasing levels of attention in areas of energy, environment, climate, etc. Notably, CO2 is an abundant, nonflammable, and renewable C1 feedstock in view of chemistry. Therefore, the transformation of CO2 into organic compounds is an extremely attractive research topic in modern green and sustainable chemistry. Among the numerous CO2 utilization methods, carboxylative cycloaddition of CO2 into propargylic alcohols is an ideal route due to the corresponding products, α-alkylidene cyclic carbonates, which are a series of highly functionalized compounds that supply numerous potential methods for the construction of various synthetically and biologically valuable agents. This cyclization reaction has been intensively studied and systematically summarized, in the past years. Therefore, attention has been gradually transferred to produce more derivative compounds. Herein, the tandem reactions of this cyclization with hydration, amination, alcoholysis, and isomerization to synthesize α-hydroxyl ketones, oxazolidinones, carbamates, unsymmetrical carbonates, tetronic acids, ethylene carbonates, etc. were systematically reviewed.

1. Introduction

Since the industrial revolution, fossil fuels have become the primary energy source for human beings. Simultaneously, continuous consumption of fossil fuels has produced excessive carbon dioxide (CO2), which leads to global warming and causes severe environmental impact such as rising sea levels, frequent extreme weather events, and imbalances of the ecosystem [1,2,3,4]. The threat of global warming to the environment and climate has been a significant challenge for human beings in the 21st century. Accordingly, the capture and treatment of CO2 has become a strategic priority and has been intensively investigated [5]. In this aspect, the carbon capture and utilization (CCU) strategy has been regarded as a promising option for controlling the accumulation of CO2 [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Compared with the traditional carbon capture and storage (CCS) strategy, CCU eliminates the extra energy-consuming process of CO2 desorption and compression whereby CO2 can be captured and transformed directly into valuable compounds [14,15,16], fuels [17,18], and materials [19,20,21,22,23]. In other words, the CCU strategy can not only reduce the level of CO2 amount but bring a series of economic and environmental benefits [24]. Consequently, CCU is an essential way to successfully achieve carbon neutrality, which meets the requirements of sustainable development.
From the standpoint of green chemistry, CO2 is an abundant, nonflammable, and inexpensive carbon resource [5,25], which makes it a feasible substitute for some non-renewable and toxic chemicals such as phosgene, cyanic acid, and carbon monoxide in various synthetic processes [26,27]. Hence, the catalytic conversion of CO2 has become an extremely attractive field in modern green chemistry [28,29,30]. However, the inherent thermodynamic stability and kinetic inertness of CO2 remain the main obstacles to its effective conversion [31]. Generally, strong nucleophiles or harsh reaction conditions (high temperature or high CO2 pressure) were required when CO2 was utilized in CCU processes [32]. Therefore, developing new synthetic routes and high-efficiency catalysts are urgently needed in this area.
Hitherto, many strategies have been developed to capitally transform CO2 into high value-added chemicals such as carbonates, aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, esters, amides, alkanes, quinazolines, and so forth [33,34]. Among them, α-alkylidene cyclic carbonates, fabricated by the cyclic carboxylation of CO2 with propargylic alcohols, are a class of representative and meritorious compounds with a wide range of applications, such as polar aprotic solvents, electrolytes in batteries, monomers in the synthesis of polycarbonates, and more importantly as reaction intermediates in the manufacture of fine chemicals [27,35]. Therefore, scientists have gradually focused on the derivative tandem reactions based on these α-alkylidene cyclic carbonates, such as their combinations with amination, hydration, alcoholysis, isomerization, etc. Specifically, multicomponent reactions are one-pot reactions adopting more than two different kinds of raw materials, which offers numerous remarkable advantages such as easy operation, facile automation, high atom economy, simple separation and purification process, and reduced generation of by-products [36]. Based on this, the synthesis of carbamates, oxazolidinones, α-hydroxyl ketones, non-symmetric carbonates, cyclic carbonates, and even some polymers like polyurethanes and polycarbonates via three-component tandem reaction of CO2 and propargylic alcohols with respective amines [37,38,39], H2O [40,41,42,43], alcohols [33,38,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52], and 2-aminoethanols [53,54,55,56,57,58] in the presence of high-efficiency catalysts such as transition metals, organic bases, ionic liquids (ILs), and heterogeneous catalysts has been recently developed with explosive growth (Figure 1). Apart from the multicomponent tandem reactions, an in situ transformation of these α-alkylidene cyclic carbonates was also developed. The tetronic acids could be smoothly derived from the isomerization of the corresponding cyclic carbonates [59]. In this review, multicomponent tandem reactions of CO2, propargylic alcohols with nucleophiles by the one-pot method and their mechanisms were expounded through the systematic investigations on the reports in the past few years. In addition, the rarely reported isomerization reactions of cyclic carbonates were also briefly introduced.

2. Three-Component Reactions of Propargylic Alcohols, CO2 and Amines

As a series of typical nucleophilic reagents, amines can be employed in the three-component tandem reactions with CO2 and propargylic alcohols to effectively prepare oxazolidinones or carbamates, both of which are vital skeletons in biology, pharmaceutical chemistry and organic synthesis [60,61,62,63,64]. These three-component reactions undertake a two-step procedure. In the first step, the cyclic carbonate intermediates M1 are formed by the carboxylative cyclization of CO2 with the propargylic alcohols. The next step is the nucleophilic attack of the nitrogen atoms in amines to the carbonyl groups in M1. After this ring-opening process, the intramolecular cyclization or the keto-enol tautomerism occurs and the desired oxazolidinones 1, oxazolones 2 or carbamates 3 are generated. Generally, the three-component reaction of tertiary propargylic alcohols, CO2 and primary amines affords the 4-methyleneoxazolidin-2-ones (1); the three-component reaction of primary or secondary propargylic alcohols, CO2 and primary amines affords 4-methyloxazol-2-ones (2); and the three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines affords β-oxopropylcarbamates (3), as illustrated in Scheme 1.

2.1. Oxazolidinones as Products

In 1987, Sasaki and Dixneuf [65] pioneered the three-component tandem reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols, and primary amines employing the ruthenium complex as the catalyst. With the participation of Ru3(CO)12, 2-oxo-l,3-oxazolines were generated in 13–28% yields from the reaction of prop-2-yn-1-ol or 3-butyn-2-ol with n-propylamine under 5 MPa of CO2 in CH3CN (Scheme 2).
Until 2005, a relatively economical copper(I) catalyst was developed for this three-component reaction by Deng et al. [66], who reported a type of recyclable CuCl/1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([BMIm]BF4) system. With this catalyst, 4-methylene-2-oxazolidinones could be obtained in 78–95% yields from the corresponding propargylic alcohols and primary amines under 2.5 MPa of CO2 (Scheme 3). Furthermore, the CuCl/[BMIm]BF4 system could be reused at least 3 times without obvious activity decline. Unfortunately, when primary and secondary propargylic alcohols or aniline were applied as one of the substrates, the desired oxazolidinone products could not be formed. In 2007, Jiang et al. [67] proposed a superior copper-catalyzed process in which CuI was utilized under supercritical CO2 (scCO2) conditions. Both 4-methyleneoxazolidin-2-ones and 4-methyloxazol-2-ones were obtained from the reactions of various primary propargylic alcohols and secondary propargylic alcohols with primary amines in 70–95% and 88–96% yields (Scheme 4), indicating its broad substrate scope. Shortly afterwards, Zhao et al. [68] found that CuCl was also an effective catalyst without the participation of ILs, which enabled this three-component reaction under solvent-free and atmospheric CO2 pressure. Although excess primary amines were required and the yields were relatively low, the oxazolidinones could be obtained through this facile and mild process (Scheme 5).
In 2019, Wang et al. [69] reported a CuI/tetrabutylphosphoniumimidazol ([P4444][Im]) system for the transformation of CO2 into oxazolidinones under room temperature and atmospheric CO2 pressure (Scheme 6). The corresponding products were obtained in 54–87% yields. However, anilines also failed to generate the oxazolidinones. Regarding the mechanism, CuI and [P4444][Im] synergistically catalyzed the reaction. CuI activated the C≡C bonds of the propargyl alcohols; meanwhile, [P4444][Im] activated the hydroxyl groups of the propargyl alcohols. Furthermore, the authors proposed that the catalytic activity was affected by the alkalinity of ILs. A higher pKa would enhance its CO2 fixation ability in this three-component reaction, which led to an improved reaction performance of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines. On the other hand, the dissociation ability of the metal anions played a pivotal role in the activity of the halogenated copper salts. Generally, a stronger dissociation ability of the anions would result in the better catalytic activity of the corresponding copper salt.
Apart from the copper(I) compounds, silver salts had been found to be an excellent catalyst for this three-component reaction. In 2009, Jiang and Zhao [70] reported that AgOAc could efficiently promote the reaction of internal propargylic alcohols with primary amines in scCO2. It was noteworthy that when internal propargylic alcohols were used as substrates, both the primary and secondary alcohols could participate in this reaction, providing corresponding oxazolidinones rather than oxazolones (Scheme 7). In 2014, He group [71] developed a AgWO4/Ph3P system that worked under solvent-free conditions and 0.5 MPa of CO2. The oxazolidinones derivatives were obtained in 83–95% yields (Scheme 8). Notably, this catalytic system was not sensitive to air and moisture, which facilitated the operations of the CO2 conversion process. Recently, Zhang and He et al. [72] demonstrated that the 1,3-oxazolidin-2-one derivatives could be achieved from the three-component reaction of typical terminal propargylic alcohols, CO2, and diverse primary amines employing Ag2CO3 as catalyst and (p-MeOC6H4)3P as an additive. Specifically, they developed a one-pot stepwise strategy to afford oxazolidinones. In this stepwise process, propargylic alcohols react with CO2 to form α-alkylidene cyclic carbonates under 2 MPa of CO2. Then, primary amines were directly added without any separation operation. Finally, the oxazolidinones were obtained at 120 °C under atmospheric CO2 pressure (Scheme 9). Moreover, this catalytic system could be reused at least 3 times.
Although transition metal compounds proved to be suitable catalysts for promoting CO2 conversion, most reported systems were costly, unstable, and sensitive to air, water, or light. Therefore, some attention has been drawn to metal-free organocatalysis due to its economy, tunability, and functionality [73,74].
In 1990, Fournier and his colleagues [75] demonstrated that organocatalysts could efficiently promote the three-component tandem reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols, and primary amines. In the presence of tri-n-butylphosphine (Bu3P), 4-methylene oxazolidin-2-ones were generated from the reaction of 2-methyl-3-butyn-2-ol, CO2, and primary amines in 38–72% yields under 5 MPa of CO2 (Scheme 10). Based on this, the Costa group [76] discovered that a series of organic bases and bicyclic guanidines, were a type of favorable catalysts for the reaction of scCO2 with terminal propargylic alcohols and primary amines. The yield of desired products were generally high when primary alkyl-, allyl- and benzylamines were employed, while lower yields were given using primary arylamines (Scheme 11). In 2016, Liu and Hua [77] revealed that both secondary and tertiary propargylic alcohols could efficiently react with primary amines and CO2 under the catalysis of 2,2′,2″-terpyridine in one-pot at 3 MPa of CO2 to afford oxazolidinones and oxazolones (Scheme 12).
ILs are a type of new green organic solvents, which have been applied in numerous areas owing to their unique features such as high stability, nonvolatility, recyclability, and tunability [78,79]. Mainly, ILs are often used as catalysts for the conversion of CO2. In 2005, Deng et al. [80] demonstrated that even if the metal compounds were absent, the ILs themselves could act as a superior catalyst for this three-component reaction. For example, a range of terminal tertiary propargylic alcohols were able to effectively react with CO2 and primary amines to afford N-substituted 4-methylene-2-oxazolidinones in IL of 1,3-dimethylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([DMIm] [BF4]) under 5 MPa of CO2 (Scheme 13).
ScCO2 has been recognized as an environmentally friendly alternative to organic solvents owing to its nonflammability, easy separation, availability and low cost. In particular, it could be used as a green reaction medium as well as an exceptional raw material [67]. In order to develop an efficient and eco-friendly process for transforming CO2 into oxazolidinones, Xu et al. [81] tried to adopt scCO2 to react with propargylic alcohols and primary amines in the absence of any additional catalyst and solvent under 14 MPa pressure. Although aniline and tert-butylamine could not produce the desired product, the corresponding 4-methyleneoxazolidin-2-ones were smoothly given in 65–88% yields (Scheme 14).
Apart from the intensively studied homogeneous catalysis, various kinds of heterogeneous catalysts, including metal–oxides [82], metal nanoparticles [83], molecular sieves [84], silica-supported metal salts [85], and porous polymers [86], etc., were also employed to transform CO2 into high-value chemicals. Recently, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have been demonstrated to be favorable solid-state catalysts, owing to their high porosity, thermal stability, structural diversity, and excellent reusability [87,88]. Additionally, MOFs have been regarded as one of the most effective and promising CO2 adsorbents. Therefore, MOFs can significantly heighten the local concentration of CO2 near the catalytic sites to promote the conversion of CO2 [89]. In this aspect, Fei et al. [87] synthesized a Ag(I)-embedded sulfonate-MOF, a non-interpenetrated sulfonate-based porous structure with a prototypical primitive-cubic (pcu) topology, which possessed high CO2 affinity and alkyne activation properties. This MOF could efficiently promote the cyclization reaction of propargylic alcohols with CO2 and the three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and primary amines affording α-alkylidene cyclic carbonates and oxazolidinones with excellent yields under atmospheric pressure (Scheme 15).
Moreover, this Ag(I)-embedded sulfonate-MOF can be reused at least three times. In 2020, Das and Nagaraja [90] reported the one-pot three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2, and primary amines at room temperature and atmospheric pressure conditions in the presence of a functional MOF-SO3Ag, which was constructed by a Ag(I)-anchored sulfonate-functionalized UiO-66 structure. When 1,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) was employed as an additive, the yield of several oxazolidinones increased to 99%. Further, the recyclability investigation demonstrated that the activity of MOF-SO3Ag would not significantly decrease after five cycles of regeneration, and the original skeleton structure remains intact. In the mechanism study, the high catalytic activity might be ascribed to the synergistic effect between sulfonate functionality and Ag(I) ions, in which Ag(I) activated the C≡C bonds of propargylic alcohols and sulfonates which were responsible for attracting CO2 (Scheme 16).

2.2. Carbamates as Products

Originally, methods for synthesizing carbamates through a one-pot three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols, and secondary amines were reported by Bruneau and Dixneuf [91] in 1987, employing (RuCl2(Norbornadiene))n as a catalyst in CH3CN. The corresponding carbamates were given in low to moderate yields (Scheme 17). In the same year, an analogous strategy was reported by Sasaki [65], in which Ru3(CO)12 was used to afford carbamates (Scheme 18). In addition to ruthenium compounds, iron and copper complexes were found to be suitable catalysts for this reaction [92,93]. In 1997, Kim et al. [93] demonstrated that a copper complex [Cu(L)]PF6 can effectively promote this three-component reaction under 3.8 MPa of CO2 to afford carbamates. Years later, Jiang et al. [94] reported a AgOAc/DBU system to synthesize β-oxoalkyl carbamates from the reaction of CO2, internal propargylic alcohols and secondary amines in 1,4-dioxane under 2 MPa of CO2. Although the bulky diisopropylamines failed to give the desired products, a range of carbamates could be obtained in 70–93% yields (Scheme 19).
Inspired by this case, the synergistic catalytic systems of silver(I) compounds with organic additives have been widely applied in this three-component tandem reaction. In 2014, the He group developed a milder Ag2WO4/Ph3P system [71], which was suitable for the three-component reaction of terminal propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines. Catalyzed by this system, carbamates were obtained in moderate to excellent yields under 0.5 MPa (Scheme 20). Subsequently, the same group found that once Ag2WO4 was replaced by Ag2CO3 [95], this three-component tandem reaction could be realized under atmospheric CO2 pressure. The yields of the corresponding β-oxopropylcarbamates were up to 68–98% (Scheme 21a). According to the proposed mechanism, Ag(I) activated the C≡C bonds of propargylic alcohols; meanwhile, the Ag2CO3 and Ph3P in situ formed [(Ph3P)2Ag]2CO3 to simultaneously activate the hydroxyls of the propargyl alcohols and CO2, embedding CO2 into propargyl alcohols to generate cyclic carbonate IV via intermediates I, II and III. Afterwards, the nitrogen atoms in secondary amines attacked the carbonyl groups of the cyclic carbonate IV to produce intermediate V, followed by the tautomerization of the enol to the carbamates 3 (Scheme 21b).
Driven by these works, ever increasing attention has been paid to developing the reaction conditions’ mildness and economy for the reaction system, especially for the low CO2 pressure and recycling performance of the catalyst. In 2018, Zhang and He et al. [72] reported the Ag2CO3/(p-MeOC6H4)3 system for the synthesis of β-oxopropylcarbamates via a one-pot stepwise method. Similar to the abovementioned synthesis method for oxazolidinones, the first step was to generate α-alkylidene cyclic carbonates under 2 MPa of CO2. Then, the second step involved directly adding secondary amines to synthesize carbamates under ambient temperature and atmospheric CO2 pressure without any separation operations or additional additives (Scheme 22). Although this strategy required high pressure, the metal loading of this system was extremely low (0.01%), and the catalyst could be recycled at least 3 times. In the same year, a AgCl/Et4NCl system was proposed by Song, Zhang and Hao et al. [96], which could obtain β-oxopropylcarbamates through a milder and easier strategy. In this reaction, β-oxopropylcarbamates were synthesized in moderate to excellent yields at 60 °C and atmospheric CO2 pressure in CH3CN. Yields of products were mainly affected by the steric hindrance effect and the induction effect of the oxygen atom (Scheme 23).
Recently, our group also achieved significant progress in preparing β-oxopropylcarbamates through this one-pot three-component tandem reaction strategy. For example, in 2018, we reported a green and recyclable catalytic system based on AgBr and an IL of 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([C2C1im][OAc]) for the three-component tandem reaction of propargylic alcohols, secondary amines, and CO2 under atmospheric CO2 pressure without any solvent (Scheme 24a) [97]. Notably, this AgBr/[C2C1im][OAc] system exhibited desirable stability and could be reused at least 5 times. Judging from the yield data, the generation of carbamates was mainly affected by the steric effects of the substituted R1 and R2 groups in the propargylic alcohols. The desired products were obtained in high to excellent yields in the case of most secondary amines. The seldom-reported dissymmetric secondary amine also gave the target product in a moderate yield. Its proposed mechanism is shown in Scheme 24b. Initially, OAc and secondary amines simultaneously activated CO2 and the hydroxyl groups of substrate 1 (intermediate I) and enhanced the nucleophilicity of the hydroxyl oxygens to the CO2 molecules, leading to the formation of carbonate intermediate II. Subsequently, Ag(I) activated the C≡C bond to facilitate the combination of C−O, generating the five-membered ring III. Afterwards, the catalysts were released from III to form the key intermediate IV. Finally, the secondary amine attacked the carbonyl groups of the intermediate IV to generate the intermediate V, followed by the keto-enol tautomerism and formation of β-oxopropylcarbamates 3. Moreover, N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) silver complexes were found in this catalytic system, which might be formed by the interaction between C(2) protons and acetate ions, generating free NHC and then reacting with the Ag salt to create the bis-NHC structure (Scheme 24c).
Apart from the metal-catalyzed process, the metal-free organocatalytic method was also studied. The Costa group [76] studied the reactions of propargylic alcohols with scCO2 or in acetonitrile with gaseous CO2, employing organic bases as catalysts. They found that bicyclic guanidines such as 1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene (TBD) and 7-Methyl-1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene (MTBD) were effective catalysts for transforming CO2 into α-alkylidene cyclic carbonates. Based on this, they successfully obtained a range of carbonates in high yields and good selectivity through a one-step three-component tandem reaction of CO2, terminal propargylic alcohols and an external N-nucleophiles (secondary amines). According to his results, the catalytic performance of MTBD was better than TBD (Scheme 25). In 2007, Qi and Jiang [98] reported that β-oxopropylcarbamates could be efficiently synthesized in the absence of any additional catalysts and organic solvents in compressed CO2 with propargylic alcohols, secondary amines. The target products were obtained in 35–88% yields at 130 °C and 14 MPa of CO2 (Scheme 26).
Recently, some heterogeneous catalysts were also developed for the target reaction, such as the metal-based nanostructured materials of one-dimensional silver nanowires (Ag NWs) and spherical silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs). Their unique properties (good dispersity and uniformity) and the rapid development of synthesis strategies made it feasible to prepare nanomaterials with different shapes, sizes, structures and tunable compositions [99]. Recently, these kinds of materials were gradually applied in converting CO2 under environmentally friendly conditions. In 2015, the Han group [100] reported the Ag NPs catalyzed cyclic carboxylation reaction of CO2 with propargylic alcohols affording α-alkylidene cyclic carbonates. Later, Ag NPs combined with MOF was employed to synthesize propionic acid from terminal alkynes and CO2 [54,101].
Inspired by these works, Qi and Hu et al. [99] successfully synthesized a diversity of β-oxopropylcarbamates via a three-component coupling reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines employing Ag NWs as a catalyst for the first time (Scheme 27). In this reaction, terminal propargylic alcohols with various alkyl or aryl substituents could react with symmetric and asymmetric dialkylamines and amines with long alkyl chains to afford target products with good to excellent yields under 1 MPa of CO2 in CH3CN with DMAP as an additive. Moreover, Ag NWs could be easily recycled by centrifugation and reused at least 4 times. In 2019, Chang and Sadeghzadeh et al. [102] developed ionic gelation (IG) (of TPP and spirulina) related catalyst (DFNS/IG–Ag(I) NPs) for the one-pot synthesis of β-oxopropylcarbamates through the three-component tandem reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines at 50 °C and 1.5 MPa of CO2 (Scheme 28). The yields of carbamates were mainly affected by steric hindrance of the substituents in propargylic alcohols or amines. Notably, this catalyst could be recycled 5 times. In the proposed catalytic mechanism, spirulina and TPP synergistically activated the hydroxyl groups of propargyl alcohols. Simultaneously, CO2 was captured and activated by the synergistic effects of TPP and spirulina. Afterwards, Ag(I) species activated the C≡C bonds to facilitate the combination of the negatively charged oxygen atoms with the carbons in the triple bonds, leading to the formation of the five-membered rings. Subsequently, the catalysts were released from the five-membered ring to form the cyclic carbonate intermediate. Finally, the secondary amine attacked the carbonyl groups of the cyclic carbonate intermediates, followed by the keto-enol tautomerism and formation of β-oxopropylcarbamates.
In the same year, Fan et al. [103] developed a unique bifunctional hybrid catalyst (TEMPO–FPS-laccase NPs) through co-immobilization of 2,2,6,6-tetra-methylpiperidine-1oxyl (TEMPO) and laccase in the same cavities into glycidyloxypropyl functionalized fibrous phosphosilicate (FPS) nanoparticles (Scheme 29a). This catalyst was applied for the one-pot synthesis β-oxopropylcarbamates via a three-component tandem reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2, and secondary amines employing water as the solvent under 1.5 MPa of CO2 (Scheme 29b). The yields of the corresponding carbamates ranged from 48–97%. Although the system required relatively high CO2 pressure, this heterogeneous bio-catalyst was truly attractive due to its environmentally friendly characters such as superior storage stability, easy separation and remarkable recyclability, which could be reused at least 10 times by extremely low catalyst loading. The remarkable cycle performances were mainly attributed to the FPS nanostructure, while the excellent catalytic performances were determined by the use of enzymes. Similar to the above mechanism, this production of β-oxopropylcarbamates also proceeded with the formation of α- alkylidene cyclic carbonate, nucleophilic attack of amine, and keto-enol tautomerism. In 2020, Hassan et al. [104] reported that in the presence of a new magnetic nano-catalyst, palladium NPs supported on magnetic fibrous silica ionic gelation (FeNi3/DFNS/IG/Pd MNPs), β-oxopropylcarbamates were synthesized through a three-component tandem reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines in 54–98% yields at 70 °C and 2 MPa of CO2 with water as a solvent. Moreover, this nano-catalyst can be recycled at least 10 times (Scheme 30).
In the past decades, graphene has been widely used as a favorable supporter for metal or metal–oxide nanoparticles due to its large specific surface area [105,106], excellent dispersion for metal particles, and superior stability [107,108,109]. Based on this, a more gentle strategy was developed by He et al. [109]. They reported the graphene oxide (rGO) supported Ag NPs catalysts (Ag-rGO) for the efficient transformation of CO2 at ambient conditions. Target β-oxopropylcarbamates could be obtained smoothly from the reaction of 2-methyl-3-butyn-2-ol, diethylamine, and CO2 in 86% yield under atmospheric CO2 pressure in the presence of Ag-rGO and [N4444][Triz]. Additionally, the robust stability of Ag-rGO enables its structure and activity to be maintained after 5 cycles (Scheme 31).

3. Three-Component Reactions of Propargylic Alcohols, CO2 and H2O

Since Kutscheroff developed the Hg(II) salts/H2SO4 catalytic system for the hydration of alkynes [110,111], great efforts have been devoted to a mercury-free route to obtain versatile carbonyl compounds [112,113,114]. Hydration of propargylic alcohols is a straightforward method to generate α-hydroxy ketones, which are vital skeletons in various drugs and natural products [115,116,117]. However, the direct hydration of propargylic alcohols to prepare α-hydroxy ketones was not an ideal route, owing to the formation of byproducts resulting from the Meyer–Schuster and Rupe rearrangements [118,119]. Therefore, a more efficient and eco-friendly reaction route has been developed, employing CO2 as a promoter for hydrating propargylic alcohols and H2O. The procedures of this three-component reaction were involved with the generation of α-alkylidene cyclic carbonates, in situ hydrolysis and the keto−enol tautomerization to afford the desired α-hydroxy ketones (Scheme 32). In the overall cycle, CO2 was not consumed and acted as a co-catalyst.
Transition-metal compounds such as Ag and Cu salts are favorable catalysts for the CO2-promoted hydration of propargylic alcohols. In 2014, Qi et al. [40] reported that the CO2-promoted process could proceed smoothly in the presence of AgOAc and DBU under 2 MPa of CO2 in a mixed acetonitrile/water solvent. Both the internal and terminal propargylic alcohols could produce the target products in good yields (Scheme 33). In 2018, Song and Liu et al. [46] discovered that α-hydroxy ketones could be efficiently produced in the presence of ZnCl2 and DBU under 1 MPa of CO2 in CH3CN (Scheme 34). In 2019, Chen et al. [42] developed a Cu2O/DBU system that could efficiently transform a range of propargylic alcohols into desired α-hydroxy ketones under atmospheric CO2 pressure in CH3CN employing cyclohexyldiphenylphosphine as an additive (Scheme 35).
In order to synthesize α-hydroxy ketones through a greener route, our group developed an effective AgOAc/1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([Emim][OAc]) system for the CO2-promoted hydration of propargylic alcohols to afford α-hydroxy ketones under atmospheric CO2 pressure and solvent-free condition (Scheme 36a) [43]. Diverse propargylic alcohols could be transformed into target hydroxy ketones in excellent yields with the catalysis of only a trace amount of silver (0.005−0.25 mol %). Notably, this system could be reused at least 5 times. Furthermore, an unprecedented turnover number (TON) of 9200 was obtained. The proposed catalytic mechanism of the AgOAc/[Emim][OAc] system is shown in Scheme 36b. Firstly, the highly concentrated [OAc] simultaneously activated CO2 and the hydroxyl groups from substrates 1, inducing the following nucleophilic attack and formation of intermediates II. Afterward, Ag species activated the C≡C bonds to promote the formation of the C−O bonds, resulting in the creation of five-membered rings III. Then, the catalysts were released and the key α-alkylidene cyclic carbonates IV were generated. Subsequently, water molecules acted as nucleophiles and attacked the carbonyls of α-alkylidene cyclic carbonates IV to generate the intermediates V with the catalysis of the basic ILs, followed by the keto-enol tautomerism. Finally, one equivalent of CO2 was released and the desired ketone 2 was formed.
In 2015, Liu et al. [41] reported a metal-free catalytic system for hydrating propargylic alcohols and H2O with CO2 as a co-catalyst to produce α-hydroxy ketones at atmospheric CO2 pressure (Scheme 37). A series of desired products could be obtained in good to excellent yields in the presence of tetrabutylphosphonium imidazole ([Bu4P][Im]). More investigations revealed that both CO2 and [Bu4P][Im] were indispensable for this reaction. Additionally, [Bu4P][Im] acts as the catalyst and solvent, which could be easily separated and reused at least 5 times without obvious activity loss.

4. Three-Component Reactions of Propargylic Alcohols, CO2 and Monohydric Alcohols

As weak nucleophiles, monohydric alcohols could also react with propargylic alcohols and CO2, affording β-oxoalkyl carbonates, which are a kind of dissymmetric carbonate and generally used as important reagents and intermediates in organic synthesis [120,121]. The three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and monohydric alcohols could proceed smoothly through the sequential steps of carboxylative cyclization, nucleophilic attack of monohydric alcohols, and tautomerization (Scheme 38).
Dixneuf et al. [122] initially first synthesized cyclic carbonates using tributylphosphine as a catalyst. Then these cyclic carbonates react with monohydric alcohols to afford desired dissymmetric carbonates in the presence of triethylamine or KCN (Scheme 39). Later, the Costa group [76] developed the one-pot synthesis strategy to obtain β-oxoalkyl carbonates through the three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and monohydric alcohols employing bicyclic guanidines as catalysts under scCO2 conditions.
In recent years, silver and zinc compounds have been developed as excellent catalysts for this three-component reaction. In 2016, He et al. [44] reported an effective Ag2CO3/Ph3P system for the target reaction under 1 MPa of CO2 in CH3CN (Scheme 40). In 2017, Ma and Han et al. [123] developed a AgCl/1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([Bmim][OAc]) system, which could catalyze this three-component reaction under ambient conditions without any solvents. In addition, this catalytic system could be recycled 5 times (Scheme 41). In 2018, Song and Liu et al. [46] explored non-noble ZnCl2 and DBU as the catalytic system for the synthesis of β-oxopropyl carbonates under 1 MPa of CO2 in CH3CN (Scheme 42).
Although the above strategies could effectively synthesize β-oxoalkyl carbonates, several drawbacks remain, such as high CO2 pressure, narrow substrate scope, etc. To improve the reaction conditions, Song and Zhang et al. [47] developed a synergistic silver sulfadiazine/nBu4NBr system for the one-pot synthesis of β-oxopropyl carbonates under atmospheric CO2 pressure and solvent-free conditions (Scheme 43). Additionally, this protocol showed excellent tolerance for a wide range of propargyl alcohols and monohydric alcohols. Various desired carbonates could be obtained in 64–99% yields, although phenol failed to afford the target product, and an excess amount of alcohol was generally required. Furthermore, they speculated that the excellent catalytic performance was attributed to the synergistic catalysis of silver sulfadiazine and nBu4NBr. In 2020, Detrembleur et al. [51] proposed a AgI/tetrabutylammonium phenolate ([TBA][OPh]) catalytic system, which was highly active for this one-pot process (Scheme 44). Most of the desired products could be obtained in more than 97% yields under atmospheric CO2 pressure in DMSO. The yield data further demonstrated that primary monohydric alcohols were more active than secondary or tertiary monohydric alcohols. Notably, the authors explored the kinetic insights and the catalytic mechanism through FT-IR spectroscopy and density functional theory (DFT) calculations.
Recently, natural minerals have also been designed as catalysts for the transformation of CO2. In 2020, Liu et al. [50] loaded silver on attapulgite (ATP) material, a hydrous silicate clay mineral-rich in Mg and Al with a fibrous morphology and demonstrated a certain adsorption effect on CO2. This effective Ag/ATP nanocomposite catalyst was applied for the one-pot synthesis of non-symmetric carbonates through the three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and monohydric alcohols (Scheme 45a). The desired β-oxoalkyl carbonates were obtained in low to high yields under 1 MPa of CO2 in DMF with 1,5-diazabicyclo[4.3.0]non-5-ene (DBN) as a co-catalyst. Moreover, the yields were largely influenced by the electron-donating effect of R3 in alcohols. In the investigations on recyclability, the authors found that Ag/ATP could be recycled at least 10 times by increasing the reaction temperature to decompose the produced carbonates coated on the catalyst’s surface. Regarding the catalytic mechanism, the hydroxyl protons in propargyl alcohols firstly interacted with DBN to form [DBNH]+. Then the adsorbed CO2 on the ATP was attacked by the hydroxyl and oxygen anions to form intermediates II. Subsequently, the silver nanoparticles on the ATP activated the C≡C to promote the connections of the oxygen atoms from the CO2 to the carbon atoms in the triple bonds, resulting in the formation of five-membered rings III. Afterward, intermediates III received the protons from [HDBN]+ and gave the key α-alkylidene cyclic carbonates IV. Eventually, DBN activated the hydroxyl groups in monohydric alcohols to attack the carbonyl groups of the cyclic carbonates IV to produce intermediates V. The target β-oxoalkyl carbonates 3 were finally formed by the following tautomerism (Scheme 45b).

5. Three-Component Reactions of Propargylic Alcohols, CO2 and Bi-Nucleophiles

In the area of CCU, the condensation of vicinal diols or 2-aminoethanols with CO2 has attracted significant attention. Many strategies have been reported for this reaction to afford the corresponding cyclic carbonates or 2-oxazolidinones, which are a series of high-value chemical intermediates [124,125,126,127,128,129,130]. Unfortunately, these condensations are usually incomplete due to the thermodynamic limitations and invalidation of catalysts caused by the formation of by-products such as water. Although dehydrating agents are typically applied to overcome the equilibrium limitation [126,127,130], the other by-products derived from the consumed additives still remained in this process [58]. As a result, the yields of desired products in these reactions were usually unsatisfactory even under harsh reaction conditions, which largely limits its practical application. Delightedly, a significant breakthrough has been achieved recently. Scientists revealed that introducing propargylic alcohols into these reactions could effectively avoid the formation of water and bypass the thermodynamic limitation. In this method, the reverse reactions were completely suppressed due to the low nucleophilicity of the generated α-hydroxy ketone [45,49,53]. More importantly, these three-component reactions of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and vicinal diols or 2-aminoethanols could simultaneously afford the high-value products of cyclic carbonates or 2-oxazolidinones. Regarding the mechanism, this thermodynamically favorable process undertook a two-step procedure: (1) the formation of α-alkylidene cyclic carbonate intermediates M1 from the carboxylative cyclization of propargylic alcohols and CO2; (2) the nucleophilic ring-opening reaction of intermediates M1 and vicinal diols or 2-aminoethanols to produce M2 or M3, followed by the generation of cyclic carbonates 2 or 2-oxazolidinones 3 with 1 equiv. of α-hydroxyl ketones through intramolecular nucleophilic cyclization (Scheme 46).

5.1. Vicinal Diols as Bi-Nucleophiles

In the past few years, considerable progress on metal-catalyzed systems for this reaction has been achieved. In 2017, He et al. [45] first proposed a Ag(Ⅰ)-catalyzed system for this three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and vicinal diols to afford cyclic carbonates and α-hydroxyl ketones with an electron-rich bidentate phosphine 4,5-Bis(diphenylphosphino)-9,9-dimethylxanthene (Xantphos) as an additive (Scheme 47). They proved this process was a thermodynamically favorable route through DFT calculations, in which desired products could be obtained in good to excellent yields under 1 MPa of CO2 in CH3CN catalyzed by the Ag2CO3/Xantphos system. Subsequently, Song and Liu et al. [46] developed a Zn(Ⅱ)-catalyzed system for this three-component reaction (Scheme 48) in 2018. Target products could be obtained in excellent yields under 1 or 2 MPa in CH3CN. However, an excess of vicinal diols (1.5 equiv.) was required. Moreover, both of these routes required solvents and high CO2 pressure.
In 2019, Song and Zhang et al. [48] developed an efficient silver sulfadiazine/Et4NBr synergistic catalytic system, enabling this three-component reaction to proceed smoothly under atmospheric CO2 pressure and solvent-free conditions (Scheme 49a). Furthermore, this catalytic system exhibited a broad substrate scope. Propargylic alcohols with different alkyl substituents, including long-chain alkyl, isopropyl, cyclohexyl, vinyl, and phenyl, could react smoothly with 1,2-diols bearing short- or long-chain alkyl and sterically hindered substituents. The corresponding cyclic carbonates and α-hydroxyl ketones were obtained in satisfactory yields under optimal conditions. Moreover, a plausible mechanism was speculated, as shown in Scheme 49b. Initially, sulfadiazine and Ag species simultaneously activated −OH and C≡C of the propargylic alcohols to form the carbonate intermediates II. Significantly, Et4N+ stabilized the carbonate intermediates II and enhanced the nucleophilicity of the oxygen atoms. Then, the catalysts were released and the cyclic carbonates III were generated. Afterward, the activated −OH from vicinal diols attacked the carbonyl groups of intermediates III to produce intermediates IV. Eventually, the target cyclic carbonates 3 were produced through the intramolecular nucleophilic cyclization with 1 equiv. of α-hydroxyl ketones 4 released from the skeletons.
Regarding organocatalysis, strong bases such as DBU, TBD, and MTBD, etc., are beneficial for the activation of CO2 and hydroxyl groups due to their rich electronegativity [52]. Based on this, Song and Liu et al. [52] reported a facile metal-free DBU-catalyzed strategy for the one-pot preparation of cyclic carbonates and α-hydroxy ketones from propargylic alcohols, CO2 and vicinal diols. However, the reaction required a large amount of solvent (DMF) and relatively high CO2 pressure (3 MPa) (Scheme 50). Subsequently, mild N-heterocyclic olefins–CO2 adducts (NHO–CO2)/MTBD organic catalytic system was reported by Zhou and Lu et al. [49]. In the presence of this system, various functionalized five-membered cyclic carbonates could be obtained under ambient conditions (Scheme 51a). Notably, this system showed high tolerance for a wide range of vicinal diols. The corresponding cyclic carbonates could be produced in moderate to high yields. Specifically, this three-component reaction proceeded via a one-pot two steps strategy. The initial carboxylative cyclization was catalyzed by the NHO-CO2 adducts under ambient conditions. Once propargylic alcohols were completely converted, MTBD, vicinal diols and solvents were added successively for the subsequent transesterification. Additionally, the authors employed complicated polyhydroxy carbohydrate derivatives for this one-pot method to accurately synthesize bio-based cyclic carbonates.

5.2. Aminoethanols as Bi-Nucleophiles

Recently, Ag(I) and Cu(I) compounds have been found to be efficient catalysts for this three-component reaction. In 2016, the He group [53] first reported the Ag2CO3/Xantphos system for the three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2, and 2-aminoethanols, which could smoothly convert diverse substrates into the corresponding 2-oxazolidinones and a-hydroxyl ketones under 1 MPa of CO2 in CHCl3 (Scheme 52). This reaction proceeded through the sequential steps of carboxylative cyclization, ring-opening and intramolecular nucleophilic cyclization. Subsequently, they reported a similar Ag2O/1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidine (TMG) system for this three-component reaction, which could proceed successfully under 1 MPa of CO2 in CH3CN with a TON up to 1260 (Scheme 53) [54]. In addition to the Ag(I) catalytic systems, more economical Cu(I) catalytic systems were developed for this three-component reaction by the same group in 2018. The desired products could be obtained in good to excellent yield in the presence of CuI, 1,10-phen, and t-BuOK under 0.5 MPa of CO2 (Scheme 54) [55]. Although significant progress has been achieved, these catalytic systems still suffered from several shortcomings such as the requirement for high CO2 pressure, the addition of solvents or additives, low catalyst recyclability, and high metal loading, which limited their further applications in industry.
Inspired by these works, our group combined the advantages of transition-metal catalysts and ILs and developed a favorable AgNO3/[C2C1im][OAc] system for this reaction (Scheme 55a) [57]. A wide range of 2-oxazolidinones and α-hydroxyl ketones could be simultaneously obtained in excellent yields under atmospheric CO2 pressure at 60 °C without any additives or traditional volatile solvents with an extremely low metal loading (0.25% AgNO3). In addition, this system showed excellent recyclability, which could be easily recycled and reused 5 times. Moreover, this system exhibited outstanding performance in evaluating the green metrics. In the aspect of the catalytic mechanism, the basic OAc firstly activated the −OH in substrates 2, promoting its interaction with CO2 to form the carbonate intermediates II. Next, the Ag species activated the C≡C bonds, resulting in the combination of the negatively charged oxygen atoms with the carbon atoms in the triple bonds to afford the five-membered rings III. Subsequently, the catalysts were released from the five-membered rings and intermediates IV were generated. Afterwards, intermediates V were produced through the nucleophilic attack of the carbonyl groups in intermediates IV by the nitrogen atoms of the substrates 2. Then the keto-enol tautomerism occurred, leading to the formation of intermediates VI. Finally, the desired 2-oxazolidinones 3 were generated via the intramolecular nucleophilic cyclization of intermediates VI with α-hydroxyl ketones 4 released from the molecules (Scheme 55b). Later, we demonstrated that the cheaper Cu(I) salt could also be employed as an effective catalyst for this reaction when combined with ILs (Scheme 56) [58]. In the presence of CuBr and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([C4C1im][OAc]), a variety of desired products could be produced in good to excellent yields under 1 atm of CO2 pressure with a low metal loading (0.5 mol% of CuBr). This system also did not require additional volatile organic solvents and additives. Moreover, it could be reused at least 3 times.
In 2018, Li and He et al. [56] synthesized a task-specific IL, 1,5,7-triazabicylo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene trifluoroethanol ([TBDH][TFE]) through an anion-exchange resin, for the green synthesis of 2-oxazolidinones and α-hydroxyl ketones based on the three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and 2-aminoethanols under atmospheric CO2 pressure at 80 °C (Scheme 57). These ILs act as both catalysts and solvents, which could be easily recycled and reused at least for 5 times without significant loss of activity.

6. Isomerization of α-Alkylidene Cyclic Carbonates

Recently, the isomerization of α-alkylidene cyclic carbonates generated from the carboxylative cycloaddition of CO2 into propargylic alcohols was developed to afford valuable tetronic acids, which are a series of crucial intermediates and essential skeletons in agricultural, pharmaceutical, and biological chemistry [131,132,133]. Compared with the already reported route [59,134,135,136,137,138,139], this route showed the advantages of easily accessible raw materials, mild reaction conditions, simple operation, high atom economy, etc. Consequently, it is an environmentally friendly alternative strategy, which provides a new methodology for the subsequent derivative applications of α-alkylidene cyclic carbonates.
AnUntil now, the only example for synthesizing tetronic acids through the reactions of propargylic alcohols and CO2 was reported in 2018. Zhou and Yu et al. [59] demonstrated that a wide range of tetronic acid derivatives could be obtained in 58–90% yields through the tandem reactions of cyclization and isomerization in the presence of excessive Cs2CO3 at atmospheric CO2 pressure and 65 °C in 1,3-dimethyl-2-imidazolidinone (DMI) (Scheme 58a). This system showed excellent tolerance for functional groups. The substrates with both symmetric and asymmetric dialkyl, methyl, and phenyl at α-position of the hydroxyl group, and cyclic, tertiary alcohols with various halogen substituents could undergo this process smoothly and obtain the target products with satisfactory yields. Based on the yield data, the aryl propargylic alcohols with electron-withdrawing groups were more favorable than those with electron-donating groups. The proposed mechanism for this reaction is shown in Scheme 58b. First, the CO2 reacts with the proton-removed substrates 1 to form carbonate intermediates I. Then the α-alkylidene cyclic carbonate intermediates II are formed through the intramolecular cyclization of intermediates I. Afterwards, the carbonate anions attacked the carbonyl groups in intermediates II and opened the rings to form intermediates III. Next, the carbonate anions were released via Dieckmann-type condensation and the intermediates IV were formed. Finally, the intermediates IV underwent further deprotonation by addition of excess Cs2CO3, resulting in the formation of enolates V, which could be quenched by the acids to produce the desired tetronic acids 2.

7. Conclusions

In summary, the tandem reactions based on the cyclization of CO2 and propargylic alcohols were summarized in this review. Notably, the three-component tandem reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols with nucleophiles and the isomerization of α-alkylidene cyclic carbonates could afford a series of vital skeletons in organic synthesis, biology, and pharmacy. Moreover, these tandem routes exhibited great economic and environmental benefits. Currently, catalytic systems have been increasingly developed for these reactions, aiming to remove volatile organic solvents, and improve catalytic activity and recyclability. However, the reported reaction systems still have some drawbacks such as dependence on high catalyst equivalent and high purity of CO2, which limits their large-scale industrial application. Therefore, the development of catalysts with low catalyst loading to reduce costs and a higher CO2 adsorption to utilize low-concentration CO2 are urgently required. These achievements will expand this area into a more important branch of the future CCU strategy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Y.; methodology, B.J. and X.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Y., Y.G. and Y.X.; writing—review and editing, B.J., X.Y., Y.G., N.L., H.D.V. and Y.Y.; supervision, Y.Y. and F.V.; funding acquisition, F.V. and Y.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22102127) and the Foundation (No. GZKF202023) of State Key Laboratory of Biobased Material and Green Papermaking, Qilu University of Technology, Shandong Academy of Sciences.

Data Availability Statement

All data were taken from the articles of the bibliography section.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Federsel, C.; Jackstell, R.; Beller, M. State-of-the-Art Catalysts for Hydrogenation of Carbon Dioxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6254–6257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sanz-Pérez, E.S.; Murdock, C.R.; Didas, S.A.; Jones, C.W. Direct Capture of CO2 from Ambient Air. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 11840–11876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Draper, A.M.; Weissburg, M.J. Impacts of Global Warming and Elevated CO2 on Sensory Behavior in Predator-Prey Interactions: A Review and Synthesis. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 7, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Burkart, M.D.; Hazari, N.; Tway, C.L.; Zeitler, E.L. Opportunities and Challenges for Catalysis in Carbon Dioxide Utilization. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 7937–7956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. He, M.; Sun, Y.; Han, B. Green Carbon Science: Scientific Basis for Integrating Carbon Resource Processing, Utilization, and Recycling. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 9620–9633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Markewitz, P.; Kuckshinrichs, W.; Leitner, W.; Linssen, J.; Zapp, P.; Bongartz, R.; Schreiber, A.; Müller, T.E. Worldwide innovations in the development of carbon capture technologies and the utilization of CO2. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7281–7305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Stolten, D. Efficient Carbon Capture for Coal Power Plants. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2012, 35, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Goeppert, A.; Czaun, M.; Prakash, G.K.S.; Olah, G.A. Air as the renewable carbon source of the future: An overview of CO2 capture from the atmosphere. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7833–7853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mac Dowell, N.; Fennell, P.S.; Shah, N.; Maitland, G.C. The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2017, 7, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Pieri, T.; Nikitas, A.; Castillo-Castillo, A.; Angelis-Dimakis, A. Holistic Assessment of Carbon Capture and Utilization Value Chains. Environments 2018, 5, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Shi, X.; Xiao, H.; Azarabadi, H.; Song, J.; Wu, X.; Chen, X.; Lackner, K.S. Sorbents for the Direct Capture of CO2 from Ambient Air. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 6984–7006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Olfe-Kräutlein, B. Advancing CCU Technologies Pursuant to the SDGs: A Challenge for Policy Making. Front. Energy Res. 2020, 8, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ghiat, I.; Al-Ansari, T. A review of carbon capture and utilisation as a CO2 abatement opportunity within the EWF nexus. J. CO2 Util. 2021, 45, 101432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dalpozzo, R.; Della Ca’, N.; Gabriele, B.; Mancuso, R. Recent Advances in the Chemical Fixation of Carbon Dioxide: A Green Route to Carbonylated Heterocycle Synthesis. Catalysts 2019, 9, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ding, P.; Zhao, H.; Li, T.; Luo, Y.; Fan, G.; Chen, G.; Gao, S.; Shi, X.; Lu, S.; Sun, X. Metal-based electrocatalytic conversion of CO2 to formic acid/formate. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 21947–21960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, G.; Chen, J.; Ding, Y.; Cai, P.; Yi, L.; Li, Y.; Tu, C.; Hou, Y.; Wen, Z.; Dai, L. Electrocatalysis for CO2 conversion: From fundamentals to value-added products. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 4993–5061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wei, J.; Ge, Q.; Yao, R.; Wen, Z.; Fang, C.; Guo, L.; Xu, H.; Sun, J. Directly converting CO2 into a gasoline fuel. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Roy, S.C.; Varghese, O.K.; Paulose, M.; Grimes, C.A. Toward Solar Fuels: Photocatalytic Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Hydrocarbons. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 1259–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Joos, L.; Huck, J.M.; Van Speybroeck, V.; Smit, B. Cutting the cost of carbon capture: A case for carbon capture and utilization. Faraday Discuss. 2016, 192, 391–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Christensen, T.H.; Bisinella, V. Climate change impacts of introducing carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) in waste incineration. Waste Manag. 2021, 126, 754–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aresta, M.; Dibenedetto, A.; Angelini, A. Catalysis for the Valorization of Exhaust Carbon: From CO2 to Chemicals, Materials, and Fuels. Technological Use of CO2. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 1709–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Park, J.H.; Yang, J.; Kim, D.; Gim, H.; Choi, W.Y.; Lee, J.W. Review of recent technologies for transforming carbon dioxide to carbon materials. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 427, 130980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wickramasinghe, S.; Wang, J.; Morsi, B.; Li, B. Carbon Dioxide Conversion to Nanomaterials: Methods, Applications, and Challenges. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 11820–11834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mohsin, I.; Al-Attas, T.A.; Sumon, K.Z.; Bergerson, J.; McCoy, S.; Kibria, M.G. Economic and Environmental Assessment of Integrated Carbon Capture and Utilization. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2020, 1, 100104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, K.; Sun, C.-L.; Shi, Z.-J. Transition-metal-catalyzed C–C bond formation through the fixation of carbon dioxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 2435–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pulla, S.; Felton, C.M.; Ramidi, P.; Gartia, Y.; Ali, N.; Nasini, U.B.; Ghosh, A. Advancements in oxazolidinone synthesis utilizing carbon dioxide as a C1 source. J. CO2 Util. 2013, 2, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pescarmona, P.P.; Taherimehr, M. Challenges in the catalytic synthesis of cyclic and polymeric carbonates from epoxides and CO2. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 2169–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Artz, J.; Müller, T.E.; Thenert, K.M.; Kleinekorte, J.; Meys, R.; Sternberg, A.; Bardow, A.; Leitner, W. Sustainable Conversion of Carbon Dioxide: An Integrated Review of Catalysis and Life Cycle Assessment. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 434–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ganesh, K.N.; Zhang, D.; Miller, S.J.; Rossen, K.; Chirik, P.J.; Kozlowski, M.C.; Zimmerman, J.B.; Brooks, B.W.; Savage, P.E.; Allen, D.T.; et al. Green Chemistry: A Framework for a Sustainable Future. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2021, 8, 487–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kuchurov, I.V.; Zharkov, M.N.; Fershtat, L.L.; Makhova, N.N.; Zlotin, S.G. Prospective Symbiosis of Green Chemistry and Energetic Materials. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 3914–3946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, Z.-Z.; He, L.-N.; Gao, J.; Liu, A.-H.; Yu, B. Carbon dioxide utilization with C–N bond formation: Carbon dioxide capture and subsequent conversion. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 6602–6639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sekine, K.; Yamada, T. Silver-catalyzed carboxylation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 4524–4532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Song, Q.-W.; Zhou, Z.-H.; He, L.-N. Efficient, selective and sustainable catalysis of carbon dioxide. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 3707–3728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, M.; Abdolmohammadi, S.; Hoseininezhad-Namin, M.S.; Behmagham, F.; Vessally, E. Carboxylative cyclization of propargylic alcohols with carbon dioxide: A facile and Green route to alpha-methylene cyclic carbonates. J. CO2 Util. 2020, 38, 220–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Comerford, J.W.; Ingram, I.D.V.; North, M.; Wu, X. Sustainable metal-based catalysts for the synthesis of cyclic carbonates containing five-membered rings. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 1966–1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gu, Y. Multicomponent reactions in unconventional solvents: State of the art. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 2091–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Arshadi, S.; Vessally, E.; Hosseinian, A.; Soleimani-Amiri, S.; Edjlali, L. Three-component coupling of CO2, propargyl alcohols, and amines: An environmentally benign access to cyclic and acyclic carbamates (A Review). J. CO2 Util. 2017, 21, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gennen, S.; Grignard, B.; Tassaing, T.; Jérôme, C.; Detrembleur, C. CO2-Sourced α-Alkylidene Cyclic Carbonates: A Step Forward in the Quest for Functional Regioregular Poly(urethane)s and Poly(carbonate)s. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 10394–10398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Habets, T.; Siragusa, F.; Grignard, B.; Detrembleur, C. Advancing the Synthesis of Isocyanate-Free Poly(oxazolidones)s: Scope and Limitations. Macromolecules 2020, 53, 6396–6408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. He, H.; Qi, C.; Hu, X.; Guan, Y.; Jiang, H. Efficient synthesis of tertiary alpha -hydroxy ketones through CO2-promoted regioselective hydration of propargylic alcohols. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 3729–3733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhao, Y.; Yang, Z.; Yu, B.; Zhang, H.; Xu, H.; Hao, L.; Han, B.; Liu, Z. Task-specific ionic liquid and CO2-cocatalysed efficient hydration of propargylic alcohols to α-hydroxy ketones. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 2297–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zhou, Z.-H.; Zhang, X.; Huang, Y.-F.; Chen, K.-H.; He, L.-N. Synthesis of α-hydroxy ketones by copper(I)-catalyzed hydration of propargylic alcohols: CO2 as a cocatalyst under atmospheric pressure. Chin. J. Catal. 2019, 40, 1345–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, D.; Gong, Y.; Du, M.; Bu, C.; Chen, C.; Chaemcheun, S.; Hu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Verpoort, F. CO2-Promoted Hydration of Propargylic Alcohols: Green Synthesis of α-Hydroxy Ketones by an Efficient and Recyclable AgOAc/Ionic Liquid System. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 8148–8155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhou, Z.-H.; Song, Q.-W.; Xie, J.-N.; Ma, R.; He, L.-N. Silver(I)-Catalyzed Three-Component Reaction of Propargylic Alcohols, Carbon Dioxide and Monohydric Alcohols: Thermodynamically Feasible Access to beta-Oxopropyl Carbonates. Chem.—Asian J. 2016, 11, 2065–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhou, Z.-H.; Song, Q.-W.; He, L.-N. Silver(I)-Promoted Cascade Reaction of Propargylic Alcohols, Carbon Dioxide, and Vicinal Diols: Thermodynamically Favorable Route to Cyclic Carbonates. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Song, Q.-W.; Liu, P.; Zhao, Q.-N.; Li, J.-Y.; Zhang, K. Selective Conversion of CO2 and Switchable Alcohols into Linear or Cyclic Carbonates via Versatile Zinc Catalysis. Synthesis 2018, 51, 739–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Li, J.; Song, Q.; Zhang, H.; Liu, P.; Zhang, K.; Wang, J.; Zhang, D. Synergistic Ag(I)/ Bu4NBr-catalyzed fixation of CO2 to β-oxopropyl carbonates via propargylic alcohols and monohydric alcohols. Tetrahedron 2019, 75, 2343–2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, J.-Y.; Han, L.-H.; Xu, Q.-C.; Song, Q.-W.; Liu, P.; Zhang, K. Cascade Strategy for Atmospheric Pressure CO2 Fixation to Cyclic Carbonates via Silver Sulfadiazine and Et4NBr Synergistic Catalysis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 3378–3388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhou, H.; Zhang, H.; Mu, S.; Zhang, W.-Z.; Ren, W.-M.; Lu, X.-B. Highly regio- and stereoselective synthesis of cyclic carbonates from biomass-derived polyolsviaorganocatalytic cascade reaction. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 6335–6341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Guo, R.; Wang, G.; Liu, W. Clever use of natural clay materials in the synthesis of non-symmetric carbonates by utilizing CO2 as a feedstock: Ag/attapulgite nano-catalyst. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 10232–10239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ngassam Tounzoua, C.; Grignard, B.; Brege, A.; Jerome, C.; Tassaing, T.; Mereau, R.; Detrembleur, C. A Catalytic Domino Approach toward Oxo-Alkyl Carbonates and Polycarbonates from CO2, Propargylic Alcohols, and (Mono- and Di-)Alcohols. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 9698–9710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Han, L.-H.; Li, J.-Y.; Song, Q.-W.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, Q.-X.; Sun, X.-F.; Liu, P. Thermodynamic favorable CO2 conversion via vicinal diols and propargylic alcohols: A metal-free catalytic method. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Song, Q.-W.; Zhou, Z.-H.; Wang, M.-Y.; Zhang, K.; Liu, P.; Xun, J.-Y.; He, L.-N. Thermodynamically Favorable Synthesis of 2-Oxazolidinones through Silver-Catalyzed Reaction of Propargylic Alcohols, CO2, and 2-Aminoethanols. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 2054–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhu, N.-N.; Liu, X.-H.; Li, T.; Ma, J.-G.; Cheng, P.; Yang, G.-M. Composite System of Ag Nanoparticles and Metal–Organic Frameworks for the Capture and Conversion of Carbon Dioxide under Mild Conditions. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 3414–3420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Li, X.-D.; Cao, Y.; Ma, R.; He, L.-N. Thermodynamically favorable protocol for the synthesis of 2-oxazolidinones via Cu(I)-catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and 2-aminoethanols. J. CO2 Util. 2018, 25, 338–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Xia, S.; Song, Y.; Li, X.; Li, H.; He, L.-N. Ionic Liquid-Promoted Three-Component Domino Reaction of Propargyl Alcohols, Carbon Dioxide and 2-Aminoethanols: A Thermodynamically Favorable Synthesis of 2-Oxazolidinones. Molecules 2018, 23, 3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Du, M.; Gong, Y.; Bu, C.; Hu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, C.; Chaemchuen, S.; Yuan, Y.; Verpoort, F. An efficient and recyclable AgNO3/ionic liquid system catalyzed atmospheric CO2 utilization: Simultaneous synthesis of 2-oxazolidinones and α-hydroxyl ketones. J. Catal. 2021, 393, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bu, C.; Gong, Y.; Du, M.; Chen, C.; Chaemchuen, S.; Hu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Díaz Velázquez, H.; Yuan, Y.; Verpoort, F. Green Synthesis of 2-Oxazolidinones by an Efficient and Recyclable CuBr/Ionic Liquid System via CO2, Propargylic Alcohols and 2-Aminoethanols. Catalysts 2021, 11, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shen, G.; Zhou, W.-J.; Zhang, X.-B.; Cao, G.-M.; Zhang, Z.; Ye, J.-H.; Liao, L.-L.; Li, J.; Yu, D.-G. Synthesis of tetronic acids from propargylic alcohols and CO2. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 5610–5613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Roger, C.; Roberts, J.A.; Muller, L. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Oxazolidinones. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2018, 57, 559–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, K.; Zhu, H.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, K.; Tian, Y. Application of carbamyl in structural optimization. Bioorgan. Chem. 2020, 98, 103757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bosak, A.; Bavec, A.; Konte, T.; Šinko, G.; Kovarik, Z.; Goličnik, M. Interactions of Paraoxonase-1 with Pharmacologically Relevant Carbamates. Molecules 2020, 25, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Schilling, W.; Das, S. Transition Metal-Free Synthesis of Carbamates Using CO2 as the Carbon Source. ChemSusChem 2020, 13, 6246–6258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Foti, C.; Piperno, A.; Scala, A.; Giuffrè, O. Oxazolidinone Antibiotics: Chemical, Biological and Analytical Aspects. Molecules 2021, 26, 4280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sasaki, Y.; Dixneuf, P.H. Ruthenium-catalyzed reaction of carbon dioxide, amine, and acetylenic alcohol. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 4389–4391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Duan, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, A.S.; Deng, Y. Ionic Liquid as an Efficient Promoting Medium for Fixation of Carbon Dioxide: A Clean Method for the Synthesis of 5-Methylene-1,3-oxazolidin-2-ones from Propargylic Alcohols, Amines, and Carbon Dioxide Catalyzed by Cu(I) under Mild Conditions. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 7376–7380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jiang, H.; Zhao, J.; Wang, A. An efficient and eco-friendly process for the conversion of carbon dioxide into oxazolones and oxazolidinones under Supercritical conditions. Synthesis 2008, 5, 763–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Xu, J.; Zhao, J.; Jia, Z.; Zhang, J. Facile and Mild Process for Chemical Fixation of CO2 to 4-Methylene-1,3-oxazolidin-2-ones Under Solvent-Free Conditions. Synth. Commun. 2011, 41, 858–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Qiu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Jiao, T. Cu(I)/Ionic Liquids Promote the Conversion of Carbon Dioxide into Oxazolidinones at Room Temperature. Molecules 2019, 24, 1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Jiang, H.-F.; Zhao, J.-W. Silver-catalyzed activation of internal propargylic alcohols in supercritical carbon dioxide: Efficient and eco-friendly synthesis of 4-alkylidene-1,3-oxazolidin-2-ones. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 60–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Song, Q.-W.; Yu, B.; Li, X.-D.; Ma, R.; Diao, Z.-F.; Li, R.-G.; Li, W.; He, L.-N. Efficient chemical fixation of CO2 promoted by a bifunctional Ag2WO4/Ph3P system. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 1633–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Song, Q.-W.; Liu, P.; Han, L.-H.; Zhang, K.; He, L.-N. Upgrading CO2 by Incorporation into Urethanes through Silver-Catalyzed One-Pot Stepwise Amidation Reaction. Chin. J. Chem. 2018, 36, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Cokoja, M.; Wilhelm, M.E.; Anthofer, M.H.; Herrmann, W.A.; Kuehn, F.E. Synthesis of Cyclic Carbonates from Epoxides and Carbon Dioxide by Using Organocatalysts. ChemSusChem 2015, 8, 2436–2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Fiorani, G.; Guo, W.; Kleij, A.W. Sustainable conversion of carbon dioxide: The advent of organocatalysis. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 1375–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Fournier, J.; Bruneau, C.; Dixneuf, P.H. A simple synthesis of oxazolidinones in one step from carbon dioxide. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 1721–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Della Ca’, N.; Gabriele, B.; Ruffolo, G.; Veltri, L.; Zanetta, T.; Costa, M. Effective Guanidine-Catalyzed Synthesis of Carbonate and Carbamate Derivatives from Propargyl Alcohols in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Liu, H.; Hua, R. Conversion of carbon dioxide into 2-oxazolidinones and 2(3H)-oxazolones catalyzed by 2,2′,2″-terpyridine. Tetrahedron 2016, 72, 1200–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Antonietti, M.; Kuang, D.-B.; Smarsly, B.; Yong, Z. Ionic Liquids for the Convenient Synthesis of Functional Nanoparticles and Other Inorganic Nanostructures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4988–4992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Olivier-Bourbigou, H.; Magna, L.; Morvan, D. Ionic liquids and catalysis: Recent progress from knowledge to applications. Appl. Catal. A 2010, 373, 1–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhang, Q.H.; Shi, F.; Gu, Y.L.; Yang, J.; Deng, Y.Q. Efficient and eco-friendly process for the synthesis of N-substituted 4-methylene-2-oxazolidinones in ionic liquids. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 5907–5911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Xu, J.X.; Zhao, J.W.; Jia, Z.B. Efficient catalyst-free chemical fixation of carbon dioxide into 2-oxazolidinones under supercritical condition. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2011, 22, 1063–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhao, Y.; Liu, Z. Recent Advances in Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction Using Earth-Abundant Metal Complexes-Derived Photocatalysts. Chin. J. Chem. 2018, 36, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Shiraishi, Y.; Fujiwara, K.; Sugano, Y.; Ichikawa, S.; Hirai, T. N-Monoalkylation of Amines with Alcohols by Tandem Photocatalytic and Catalytic Reactions on TiO2 Loaded with Pd Nanoparticles. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Calabrese, C.; Liotta, L.F.; Giacalone, F.; Gruttadauria, M.; Aprile, C. Supported Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane-Based (POSS) Materials as Highly Active Organocatalysts for the Conversion of CO2. ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 560–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. He, Q.; O’Brien, J.W.; Kitselman, K.A.; Tompkins, L.E.; Curtis, G.C.T.; Kerton, F.M. Synthesis of cyclic carbonates from CO2 and epoxides using ionic liquids and related catalysts including choline chloride–metal halide mixtures. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 1513–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhao, Q.-N.; Song, Q.-W.; Liu, P.; Zhang, Q.-X.; Gao, J.-H.; Zhang, K. Catalytic Conversion of CO2 to Cyclic Carbonates through Multifunctional Zinc-Modified ZSM-5 Zeolite. Chin. J. Chem. 2018, 36, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhang, G.; Yang, H.; Fei, H. Unusual Missing Linkers in an Organosulfonate-Based Primitive–Cubic (pcu)-Type Metal–Organic Framework for CO2 Capture and Conversion under Ambient Conditions. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 2519–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kreno, L.E.; Leong, K.; Farha, O.K.; Allendorf, M.; Van Duyne, R.P.; Hupp, J.T. Metal–Organic Framework Materials as Chemical Sensors. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1105–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Liu, X.; Li, J.; Li, N.; Li, B.; Bu, X.-H. Recent Advances on Metal-Organic Frameworks in the Conversion of Carbon Dioxide. Chin. J. Chem. 2021, 39, 440–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Das, R.; Nagaraja, C.M. Highly Efficient Fixation of Carbon Dioxide at RT and Atmospheric Pressure Conditions: Influence of Polar Functionality on Selective Capture and Conversion of CO2. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 9765–9773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bruncau, C.; Dixncuf, P.H. Catalytic synthesis of O-beta-oxoalkylcarbamates. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 2005–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kim, T.-J.; Kwon, K.-H.; Kwon, S.-C.; Baeg, J.-O.; Shim, S.-C.; Lee, D.-H. Iron complexes of 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene (BPPF) as efficient catalysts in the synthesis of carbamates. X-ray crystal structure of (BPPF)Fe(CO)3. J. Organomet. Chem. 1990, 389, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kim, H.-S.; Kim, J.-W.; Kwon, S.-C.; Shim, S.-C.; Kim, T.-J. Catalytic formation of carbamates and cyclic carbonates by copper complex of 2,5,19,22-tetraaza[6,6](1,1′)ferrocenophane-1,5-diene X-ray crystal structure of [Cu(1)]PF6. J. Organomet. Chem. 1997, 545, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Qi, C.; Huang, L.; Jiang, H. Efficient Synthesis of beta-Oxoalkyl Carbamates from Carbon Dioxide, Internal Propargylic Al-cohols, and Secondary Amines Catalyzed by Silver Salts and DBU. Synthesis 2010, 9, 1433–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Song, Q.-W.; Chen, W.-Q.; Ma, R.; Yu, A.; Li, Q.-Y.; Chang, Y.; He, L.-N. Bifunctional Silver(I) Complex-Catalyzed CO2 Conversion at Ambient Conditions: Synthesis of alpha-Methylene Cyclic Carbonates and Derivatives. ChemSusChem 2015, 8, 821–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Zhao, Q.-N.; Song, Q.-W.; Liu, P.; Zhang, K.; Hao, J. Ag(I)/(C2 H5 )4 NCl Cooperation Catalysis for Fixing CO2 or Its Derivatives into beta-Oxopropylcarbamates. Chemistryselect 2018, 3, 6897–6901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Song, D.; Li, D.; Xiao, X.; Cheng, C.; Chaemchuen, S.; Yuan, Y.; Verpoort, F. Synthesis of β-oxopropylcarbamates in a recyclable AgBr/ionic liquid catalytic system: An efficient assembly of CO2 under ambient pressure. J. CO2 Util. 2018, 27, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Qi, C.-R.; Jiang, H.-F. Efficient synthesis of β-oxopropylcarbamates in compressed CO2 without any additional catalyst and solvent. Green Chem. 2007, 9, 1284–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wang, Q.; Xiong, W.; Deng, X.; Zhou, X.; Qi, C.; Hu, J. Silver-Nanowire-Catalyzed Three-Component Coupling of Carbon Dioxide, Amines and Propargylic Alcohols for the Synthesis of beta-Oxopropyl Carbamates. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2018, 8, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Cui, M.; Qian, Q.; He, Z.; Ma, J.; Kang, X.; Hu, J.; Liu, Z.; Han, B. Synthesizing Ag Nanoparticles of Small Size on a Hierarchical Porosity Support for the Carboxylative Cyclization of Propargyl Alcohols with CO2 under Ambient Conditions. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 15924–15928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Liu, X.-H.; Ma, J.-G.; Niu, Z.; Yang, G.-M.; Cheng, P. An Efficient Nanoscale Heterogeneous Catalyst for the Capture and Conversion of Carbon Dioxide at Ambient Pressure. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 988–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Chang, L.; Zhiani, R.; Sadeghzadeh, S.M. Fixing CO2 into beta-oxopropylcarbamates in neat condition by ionic gelation/Ag(i) supported on dendritic fibrous nanosilica. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 16955–16965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Fan, L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X.; Sadeghzadeh, S.M.; Zhiani, R.; Shahroudi, M.; Amarloo, F. Co-immobilization of Laccase and TEMPO onto Glycidyloxypropyl Functionalized Fibrous Phosphosilicate Nanoparticles for Fixing CO2 into β-Oxopropylcarbamatesin. Catal. Lett. 2019, 149, 3465–3475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Asadi Zeydabadi, H.; Mehrzad, J.; Motavalizadehkakhky, A.; Zhiani, R. Fixing CO2 into β-Oxopropylcarbamatesin by Palladium NPs Supported on Magnetic Fibrous Silica Ionic Gelation. Catal. Lett. 2021, 151, 582–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zhao, R.; Lv, M.; Li, Y.; Sun, M.; Kong, W.; Wang, L.; Song, S.; Fan, C.; Jia, L.; Qiu, S.; et al. Stable Nanocomposite Based on PEGylated and Silver Nanoparticles Loaded Graphene Oxide for Long-Term Antibacterial Activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 15328–15341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Zhao, R.; Kong, W.; Sun, M.; Yang, Y.; Liu, W.; Lv, M.; Song, S.; Wang, L.; Song, H.; Hao, R. Highly Stable Graphene-Based Nanocomposite (GO–PEI–Ag) with Broad-Spectrum, Long-Term Antimicrobial Activity and Antibiofilm Effects. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 17617–17629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zhang, Z.; Xu, F.; Yang, W.; Guo, M.; Wang, X.; Zhanga, B.; Tang, J. A facile one-pot method to high-quality Ag-graphene composite nanosheets for efficient surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 6440–6442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Tang, X.-Z.; Cao, Z.; Zhang, H.-B.; Liu, J.; Yu, Z.-Z. Growth of silver nanocrystals on graphene by simultaneous reduction of graphene oxide and silver ions with a rapid and efficient one-step approach. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 3084–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Zhang, X.; Chen, K.-H.; Zhou, Z.-H.; He, L.-N. Reduced Graphene Oxide Supported Ag Nanoparticles: An Efficient Catalyst for CO2 Conversion at Ambient Conditions. ChemCatChem 2020, 12, 4825–4830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kutscheroff, M. Ueber eine neue Methode direkter Addition von Wasser (Hydratation) an die Kohlenwasserstoffe der Acetylenreihe. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1881, 14, 1540–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Kutscheroff, M. Ueber die Einwirkung der Kohlenwasserstoffe der Acetylenreihe auf Quecksilberoxyd und dessen Salze. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1884, 17, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Niu, T.-F.; Jiang, D.-Y.; Li, S.-Y.; Shu, X.-G.; Li, H.; Zhang, A.-L.; Xu, J.-Y.; Ni, B.-Q. Visible light promoted copper-catalyzed Markovnikov hydration of alkynes at room temperature. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017, 58, 1156–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Mei, Q.; Liu, H.; Hou, M.; Liu, H.; Han, B. Selective hydration of asymmetric internal aryl alkynes without directing groups to α-aryl ketones over Cu-based catalyst. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 6290–6295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Xing, Y.; Zhang, M.; Ciccarelli, S.; Lee, J.; Catano, B. AuIII-Catalyzed Formation of α-Halomethyl Ketones from Terminal Alkynes. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 2017, 781–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Hoyos, P.; Sinisterra, J.-V.; Molinari, F.; Alcántara, A.R.; domínguez de María, P. Biocatalytic Strategies for the Asymmetric Synthesis of α-Hydroxy Ketones. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 288–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Fu, Y.; Wu, P.; Xue, J.; Wei, X. Cytotoxic and Antibacterial Quinone Sesquiterpenes from a Myrothecium Fungus. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 1791–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Macabeo, A.P.G.; Martinez, F.P.A.; Kurtán, T.; Tóth, L.; Mándi, A.; Schmidt, S.; Heilmann, J.; Alejandro, G.J.D.; Knorn, M.; Dahse, H.-M.; et al. Tetrahydroxanthene-1,3(2H)-dione Derivatives from Uvaria valderramensis. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 2711–2715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Engel, D.A.; Dudley, G.B. The Meyer–Schuster rearrangement for the synthesis of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 4149–4158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Swaminathan, S.; Narayanan, K.V. Rupe and Meyer-Schuster rearrangements. Chem. Rev. 1971, 71, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Ogoshi, S.; Morimoto, T.; Nishio, K.; Ohe, K.; Murai, S. Palladium-catalyzed reactions of ketone.alpha.-carbonates with norbornenes. An unusual cyclopropanation. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 9–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Stainforth, N.E.; Cutting, G.A.; John, M.P.; Willis, M.C. Direct catalytic diastereoselective Mannich reactions: The synthesis of protected alpha-hydroxy-beta-aminoketones. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2009, 20, 741–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Joumier, J.M.; Fournier, J.; Bruneau, C.; Dixneuf, P.H. Functional carbonates: Cyclic α-methylene and β-oxopropyl carbonates from prop-2-ynyl alcohol derivatives and CO2. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1991, 1, 3271–3274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Hu, J.; Ma, J.; Lu, L.; Qian, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, C.; Han, B. Synthesis of Asymmetrical Organic Carbonates using CO2 as a Feedstock in AgCl/Ionic Liquid System at Ambient Conditions. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 1292–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Tomishige, K.; Yasuda, H.; Yoshida, Y.; Nurunnabi, M.; Li, B.; Kunimori, K. Catalytic performance and properties of ceria based catalysts for cyclic carbonate synthesis from glycol and carbon dioxide. Green Chem. 2004, 6, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Du, Y.; He, L.-N.; Kong, D.-L. Magnesium-catalyzed synthesis of organic carbonate from 1,2-diol/alcohol and carbon dioxide. Catal. Commun. 2008, 9, 1754–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Da Silva, E.; Dayoub, W.; Mignani, G.; Raoul, Y.; Lemaire, M. Propylene carbonate synthesis from propylene glycol, carbon dioxide and benzonitrile by alkali carbonate catalysts. Catal. Commun. 2012, 29, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Honda, M.; Tamura, M.; Nakao, K.; Suzuki, K.; Nakagawa, Y.; Tomishige, K. Direct Cyclic Carbonate Synthesis from CO2 and Diol over Carboxylation/Hydration Cascade Catalyst of CeO2 with 2-Cyanopyridine. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 1893–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Juárez, R.; Concepción, P.; Corma, A.; García, H. Ceria nanoparticles as heterogeneous catalyst for CO2 fixation by omega-aminoalcohols. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 4181–4183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Takada, Y.; Foo, S.W.; Yamazaki, Y.; Saito, S. Catalytic fluoride triggers dehydrative oxazolidinone synthesis from CO2. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 50851–50857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Niemi, T.; Fernández, I.; Steadman, B.; Mannisto, J.K.; Repo, T. Carbon dioxide-based facile synthesis of cyclic carbamates from amino alcohols. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 3166–3169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  131. Foden, F.R.; McCormick, J.; O’Mant, D.M. Vulpinic acids as potential antiinflammatory agents. 1. Vulpinic acids with substituents in the aromatic rings. J. Med. Chem. 1975, 18, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Zhao, J.H.; Ji, M.H.; Xu, X.H.; Cheng, J.L.; Zhu, G.N. Synthetic derivatives of spiromesifen and their bioactivity research. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2009, 20, 1307–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Vieweg, L.; Reichau, S.; Schobert, R.; Leadlay, P.F.; Süssmuth, R.D. Recent advances in the field of bioactive tetronates. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 1554–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Campbell, A.C.; Maidment, M.S.; Pick, J.H.; Stevenson, D.F.M. Synthesis of (E)- and (Z)-pulvinones. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1985, 1, 1567–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Effenberger, F.; Syed, J. Stereoselective synthesis of biologically active tetronic acids. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 1998, 9, 817–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Mallinger, A.; Le Gall, T.; Mioskowski, C. 3-Aryltetronic Acids: Efficient Preparation and Use as Precursors for Vulpinic Acids. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 1124–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Yang, W.; Liu, J.; Zhang, H. Total synthesis of pulverolide: Revision of its structure. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 4874–4876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Manchoju, A.; Pansare, S.V. Catalytic Undirected Intermolecular C–H Functionalization of Arenes with 3-Diazofuran-2,4-dione: Synthesis of 3-Aryl Tetronic Acids, Vulpinic Acid, Pinastric Acid, and Methyl Isoxerocomate. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 5952–5955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Sadamitsu, Y.; Komatsuki, K.; Saito, K.; Yamada, T. Access to Tetronic Acids via Silver-Catalyzed CO2 Incorporation into Conjugated Ynones. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 3191–3194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of several routes for CO2 transformation.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of several routes for CO2 transformation.
Catalysts 12 00073 g001
Scheme 1. The process of the three-component reactions of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and amines.
Scheme 1. The process of the three-component reactions of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch001
Scheme 2. Ru3(CO)12 catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Scheme 2. Ru3(CO)12 catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch002
Scheme 3. CuCl/[BMIm]BF4 system catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Scheme 3. CuCl/[BMIm]BF4 system catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch003
Scheme 4. CuI catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Scheme 4. CuI catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch004
Scheme 5. CuCl catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Scheme 5. CuCl catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch005
Scheme 6. CuI/[P4444][Im] system catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Scheme 6. CuI/[P4444][Im] system catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch006
Scheme 7. AgOAc catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Scheme 7. AgOAc catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch007
Scheme 8. AgWO4/Ph3P system catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Scheme 8. AgWO4/Ph3P system catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch008
Scheme 9. Ag2CO3/ (p-MeOC6H4)3P system catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Scheme 9. Ag2CO3/ (p-MeOC6H4)3P system catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch009
Scheme 10. Bu3P catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Scheme 10. Bu3P catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch010
Scheme 11. MTBD or TBD catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Scheme 11. MTBD or TBD catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch011
Scheme 12. 2,2′,2″-terpyridine catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Scheme 12. 2,2′,2″-terpyridine catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch012
Scheme 13. [DMIm][BF4] catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Scheme 13. [DMIm][BF4] catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch013
Scheme 14. Catalyst-free reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Scheme 14. Catalyst-free reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch014
Scheme 15. Ag(I)-embedded sulfonate-MOF catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Scheme 15. Ag(I)-embedded sulfonate-MOF catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch015
Scheme 16. (a) The process of the synthesis of MOF-SO3Ag. (b) MOF-SO3Ag catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Scheme 16. (a) The process of the synthesis of MOF-SO3Ag. (b) MOF-SO3Ag catalyzed three-component reaction of CO2, propargylic alcohols and primary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch016
Scheme 17. (RuCl2(Norbornadiene))n catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Scheme 17. (RuCl2(Norbornadiene))n catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch017
Scheme 18. Ru3(CO)12 catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Scheme 18. Ru3(CO)12 catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch018
Scheme 19. AgOAc/DBU system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Scheme 19. AgOAc/DBU system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch019
Scheme 20. Ag2WO4/Ph3P system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Scheme 20. Ag2WO4/Ph3P system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch020
Scheme 21. (a) Ag2CO3/Ph3P system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines. (b) The proposed catalytic mechanism of the Ag2CO3/Ph3P system.
Scheme 21. (a) Ag2CO3/Ph3P system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines. (b) The proposed catalytic mechanism of the Ag2CO3/Ph3P system.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch021
Scheme 22. Ag2CO3/(p-MeOC6H4)3 system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Scheme 22. Ag2CO3/(p-MeOC6H4)3 system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch022
Scheme 23. AgCl/Et4NCl system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Scheme 23. AgCl/Et4NCl system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch023
Scheme 24. (a) AgBr/[C2C1im][OAc] system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2, and secondary amines. (b) The proposed catalytic mechanism of the AgOAc/[Emim][OAc] system. (c) The formation process of N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) silver complexes.
Scheme 24. (a) AgBr/[C2C1im][OAc] system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2, and secondary amines. (b) The proposed catalytic mechanism of the AgOAc/[Emim][OAc] system. (c) The formation process of N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) silver complexes.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch024
Scheme 25. MTBD or TBD catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Scheme 25. MTBD or TBD catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch025
Scheme 26. Catalyst-free reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Scheme 26. Catalyst-free reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch026
Scheme 27. Ag NWs/DMAP system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2, and secondary amines.
Scheme 27. Ag NWs/DMAP system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2, and secondary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch027
Scheme 28. DFNS/IG–Ag(I) NPs catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Scheme 28. DFNS/IG–Ag(I) NPs catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch028
Scheme 29. (a) The process of co-immobilization of TEMPO laccase and laccase onto glycidyloxypropyl-functionalized FPS nanoparticles; (b) TEMPO–FPS-laccase NPs catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Scheme 29. (a) The process of co-immobilization of TEMPO laccase and laccase onto glycidyloxypropyl-functionalized FPS nanoparticles; (b) TEMPO–FPS-laccase NPs catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch029
Scheme 30. FeNi3/DFNS/IG/Pd MNPs catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Scheme 30. FeNi3/DFNS/IG/Pd MNPs catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch030
Scheme 31. Ag-rGO catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Scheme 31. Ag-rGO catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and secondary amines.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch031
Scheme 32. The process of CO2-promoted hydration of propargylic alcohols.
Scheme 32. The process of CO2-promoted hydration of propargylic alcohols.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch032
Scheme 33. AgOAc and DBU catalyzed CO2-promoted hydration of propargylic alcohols.
Scheme 33. AgOAc and DBU catalyzed CO2-promoted hydration of propargylic alcohols.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch033
Scheme 34. ZnCl2 and DBU catalyzed CO2-promoted hydration of propargylic alcohols.
Scheme 34. ZnCl2 and DBU catalyzed CO2-promoted hydration of propargylic alcohols.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch034
Scheme 35. Cu2O/DBU system catalyzed CO2-promoted hydration of propargylic alcohols.
Scheme 35. Cu2O/DBU system catalyzed CO2-promoted hydration of propargylic alcohols.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch035
Scheme 36. (a) AgOAc/[Emim][OAc] system catalyzed CO2-promoted hydration of propargylic alcohols; (b) The proposed catalytic mechanism of the AgOAc/[Emim][OAc] system.
Scheme 36. (a) AgOAc/[Emim][OAc] system catalyzed CO2-promoted hydration of propargylic alcohols; (b) The proposed catalytic mechanism of the AgOAc/[Emim][OAc] system.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch036
Scheme 37. [Bu4P][Im] catalyzed CO2-promoted hydration of propargylic alcohols.
Scheme 37. [Bu4P][Im] catalyzed CO2-promoted hydration of propargylic alcohols.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch037
Scheme 38. The process of the three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and monohydric alcohols.
Scheme 38. The process of the three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and monohydric alcohols.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch038
Scheme 39. Two step strategy for the three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and monohydric alcohols.
Scheme 39. Two step strategy for the three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and monohydric alcohols.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch039
Scheme 40. Ag2CO3/Ph3P system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and monohydric alcohols.
Scheme 40. Ag2CO3/Ph3P system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and monohydric alcohols.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch040
Scheme 41. AgCl/[Bmim][OAc] system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and monohydric alcohols.
Scheme 41. AgCl/[Bmim][OAc] system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and monohydric alcohols.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch041
Scheme 42. ZnCl2/DBU system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and monohydric alcohols.
Scheme 42. ZnCl2/DBU system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and monohydric alcohols.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch042
Scheme 43. Silver sulfadiazine/nBu4NBr system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and monohydric alcohols.
Scheme 43. Silver sulfadiazine/nBu4NBr system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and monohydric alcohols.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch043
Scheme 44. AgI/[TBA][OPh] catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and monohydric alcohols.
Scheme 44. AgI/[TBA][OPh] catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and monohydric alcohols.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch044
Scheme 45. (a) Ag/ATP nanocomposite and DBN system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and monohydric alcohols. (b) The proposed catalytic mechanism of the Ag/ATP nanocomposite and DBN system.
Scheme 45. (a) Ag/ATP nanocomposite and DBN system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and monohydric alcohols. (b) The proposed catalytic mechanism of the Ag/ATP nanocomposite and DBN system.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch045
Scheme 46. The process of three-component reaction of vicinal diols or 2-aminoethanols with propargylic alcohols and CO2.
Scheme 46. The process of three-component reaction of vicinal diols or 2-aminoethanols with propargylic alcohols and CO2.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch046
Scheme 47. (a) Ag2CO3/Xantphos system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and vicinal diols. (b) The structure of Xantphos.
Scheme 47. (a) Ag2CO3/Xantphos system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and vicinal diols. (b) The structure of Xantphos.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch047
Scheme 48. ZnCl2/DBU system catalyzed three-component reactions of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and vicinal diols.
Scheme 48. ZnCl2/DBU system catalyzed three-component reactions of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and vicinal diols.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch048
Scheme 49. (a) Silver sulfadiazine/Et4NBr synergistic catalytic system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and vicinal diols. (b) The proposed catalytic mechanism of silver sulfadiazine/Et4NBr synergistic catalytic system.
Scheme 49. (a) Silver sulfadiazine/Et4NBr synergistic catalytic system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and vicinal diols. (b) The proposed catalytic mechanism of silver sulfadiazine/Et4NBr synergistic catalytic system.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch049
Scheme 50. DBU catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and vicinal diols.
Scheme 50. DBU catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and vicinal diols.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch050
Scheme 51. (a) NHO–CO2/MTBD organic catalytic system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and vicinal diols. (b) The structure of NHO–CO2 and MTBD.
Scheme 51. (a) NHO–CO2/MTBD organic catalytic system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2 and vicinal diols. (b) The structure of NHO–CO2 and MTBD.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch051
Scheme 52. Ag2CO3/Xantphos system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2, and 2-aminoethanols.
Scheme 52. Ag2CO3/Xantphos system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2, and 2-aminoethanols.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch052
Scheme 53. Ag2O/TMG system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2, and 2-aminoethanols.
Scheme 53. Ag2O/TMG system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2, and 2-aminoethanols.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch053
Scheme 54. CuI, 1,10-phen and t-BuOK catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2, and 2-aminoethanols.
Scheme 54. CuI, 1,10-phen and t-BuOK catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2, and 2-aminoethanols.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch054
Scheme 55. (a) AgNO3/[C2C1im][OAc] system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2, and 2-aminoethanols. (b) The proposed catalytic mechanism of AgNO3/[C2C1im][OAc] system.
Scheme 55. (a) AgNO3/[C2C1im][OAc] system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2, and 2-aminoethanols. (b) The proposed catalytic mechanism of AgNO3/[C2C1im][OAc] system.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch055
Scheme 56. CuBr/[C4C1im][OAc] system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2, and 2-aminoethanols.
Scheme 56. CuBr/[C4C1im][OAc] system catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2, and 2-aminoethanols.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch056
Scheme 57. [TBDH][TFE] catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2, and 2-aminoethanols.
Scheme 57. [TBDH][TFE] catalyzed three-component reaction of propargylic alcohols, CO2, and 2-aminoethanols.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch057
Scheme 58. (a) Cs2CO3-catalyzed reaction of propargylic alcohols with CO2. (b) The proposed catalytic mechanism of Cs2CO3.
Scheme 58. (a) Cs2CO3-catalyzed reaction of propargylic alcohols with CO2. (b) The proposed catalytic mechanism of Cs2CO3.
Catalysts 12 00073 sch058
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, B.; Yan, X.; Xu, Y.; Likhanova, N.; Velázquez, H.D.; Gong, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Verpoort, F. Tandem Reactions Based on the Cyclization of Carbon Dioxide and Propargylic Alcohols: Derivative Applications of α-Alkylidene Carbonates. Catalysts 2022, 12, 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12010073

AMA Style

Jiang B, Yan X, Xu Y, Likhanova N, Velázquez HD, Gong Y, Yuan Y, Verpoort F. Tandem Reactions Based on the Cyclization of Carbon Dioxide and Propargylic Alcohols: Derivative Applications of α-Alkylidene Carbonates. Catalysts. 2022; 12(1):73. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12010073

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Bowen, Xiangyu Yan, Yong Xu, Natalya Likhanova, Heriberto Díaz Velázquez, Yanyan Gong, Ye Yuan, and Francis Verpoort. 2022. "Tandem Reactions Based on the Cyclization of Carbon Dioxide and Propargylic Alcohols: Derivative Applications of α-Alkylidene Carbonates" Catalysts 12, no. 1: 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12010073

APA Style

Jiang, B., Yan, X., Xu, Y., Likhanova, N., Velázquez, H. D., Gong, Y., Yuan, Y., & Verpoort, F. (2022). Tandem Reactions Based on the Cyclization of Carbon Dioxide and Propargylic Alcohols: Derivative Applications of α-Alkylidene Carbonates. Catalysts, 12(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12010073

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop