Next Article in Journal
CO2 Electroreduction on Carbon-Based Electrodes Functionalized with Molecular Organometallic Complexes—A Mini Review
Previous Article in Journal
Photoredox-Catalyzed Acylation/Cyclization of 2-Isocyanobiaryls with Oxime Esters for the Synthesis of 6-Acyl Phenanthridines
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficient Cross-Coupling of Acetone with Linear Aliphatic Alcohols over Supported Copper on a Fluorite-Type Pr2Zr2O7
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effects of Sn Promoter on the Ordered Mesoporous Co3O4-Al2O3 Mixed Metal Oxide for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis Reaction

Catalysts 2022, 12(11), 1447; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12111447
by Dongming Shen †, Sang Beom Han †, Xu Wang, Mansoor Ali and Jong Wook Bae *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Catalysts 2022, 12(11), 1447; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12111447
Submission received: 13 October 2022 / Revised: 5 November 2022 / Accepted: 11 November 2022 / Published: 15 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Catalysis for Environmentally Benign Production of Alternative Fuels)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

My comments are in the PDF document.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Reviewer(#1 and 2)'s comments are attaced. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In this manuscript, authors reported the synthesis of porous Co3O4-Al2O3 metal oxides modified with different amounts of Sn and studied their catalytic performance for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis. Overall, the manuscript is well-written, and the conclusions are supported by the data. I recommend minor revision before publication.
Nanocasting is a common procedure to prepare materials with ordered pore structures, it will be better if the motivation for using nanocasting can be discussed in the introduction. Also, is there a specific reason why KIT-6 is used as the template? Have the authors considered other materials such as SBA-15 or SBA-16?
Was the offset applied for the isotherms in Figure S1A? If so, the offset should be provided in the caption, and the y-axis needs to be added.
What is the distribution of Sn species in the bimetal oxide? Is the Sn on the outside of the bimetal oxide particles or everywhere inside the mesoporous channels? And why does the pore size increase from 3.8 nm to 4.0 or 4.1 nm after Sn modification?

Author Response

Reviewer(#1 and 2)'s comments are attaced. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The article has been improved

Back to TopTop