Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Novel Catalytic Hydrodeoxygenation Strategies for Biomass Valorization without Exogenous Hydrogen Donors—A Review
Previous Article in Journal
The Research Progress of Ruthenium-Based Catalysts for the Alkaline Hydrogen Evolution Reaction in Water Electrolysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
CO2 Reduction Performance with Double-Layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 as Photocatalysts under Different Light Illumination Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hierarchical Ag3VO4 Nanorods as an Excellent Visible Light Photocatalyst for CO2 Conversion to Solar Fuels

by
Abdullah Bafaqeer
*,
Aniz Chennampilly Ummer
* and
Duraisami Dhamodharan
Interdisciplinary Research Center for Refining & Advanced Chemicals, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2024, 14(10), 672; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14100672
Submission received: 28 July 2024 / Revised: 24 September 2024 / Accepted: 25 September 2024 / Published: 28 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enhancement of the Performance of Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction)

Abstract

:
The potential of photocatalytic CO2 conversion is significant for the production of fuels and chemicals, while simultaneously mitigating CO2 emissions and addressing environmental concerns. Despite the current drawbacks of single metal-based photocatalysts, such as lower performance, uncontrollable selectivity, and instability, this study focuses on the synthesis of Ag3VO4 nanorods using the sol–gel method. The goal is to create a highly effective catalyst for visible light-responsive CO2 conversion. The successful synthesis of Ag3VO4 nanorods with a nanorod structure, functional under visible light, resulted in the highest yields of CH4 and dimethyl ether (DME) at 271 and 69 µmole/g-cat, respectively. The optimized Ag3VO4 nanorods demonstrated performance improvements, with CH4 and DME production 6.4 times and 4.5 times higher than when using V2O5 samples. This suggests that Ag3VO4 nanorods facilitate electron transfer to CO2, offer short pathways for electron transfer, and create empty spaces within the nanorods as electron reservoirs, enhancing the photoactivity. The prolonged stability of Ag3VO4 in the CO2 conversion system confirms that the nanorod structure provides controllable selectivity and stability. Therefore, the fabrication of nanorod structures holds promise in advancing high-performance photocatalysts in the field of photocatalytic CO2 conversion to solar fuels.

1. Introduction

The exploration of the photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide into valuable chemicals and fuels has become a highly focused area of study in response to concerns about global warming and energy shortages [1,2,3,4,5,6]. In recent years, there has been significant interest in artificial photosynthesis processes aimed at converting CO2 into beneficial carbon sources like CH4 and DME [7,8,9,10,11]. These processes are considered attractive alternatives as they contribute to the need for techniques that recycle CO2 as a natural resource [12,13,14,15,16]. Solar photocatalytic CO2 reduction into high-value fuels stands out as a particularly appealing strategy [17,18,19]. Consequently, numerous research efforts have been dedicated to developing efficient photocatalysts for CO2 reduction, including V2O5 [20], TiO2 [21,22,23], Ta2O5 [24,25], ZnO [26,27,28], WO3 [29,30], and CdS [31]. Notably, V2O5 has been extensively studied as a semiconductor due to its potent oxidation and reduction capabilities. Furthermore, it is environmentally friendly [32], cost-effective, and can be synthesized in various nanostructures through economical methods. However, its high charge recombination rate has led to subpar photocatalytic performance. To overcome these challenges, various approaches, such as depositing noble metals, surface photosensitization, and forming carbon-based composites, have been explored.
One effective strategy to enhance the activity of vanadium oxide (V2O5) in the presence of visible light involves combining it with semiconductors possessing low band gap energy. This combination extends the optical absorption range into the visible portion of the solar spectrum. A promising candidate for this purpose is silver oxide (Ag2O), a transition metal oxide known for its relatively narrow band gap of approximately 1.89 eV [33,34]. Combining vanadium oxide (V2O5) with Ag2O has the potential to significantly improve the photoactivity when exposed to visible light.
In recent times, there has been significant interest in hierarchical nanostructures such as nanosheets, nanorods, and nanoplates, particularly in the realm of photochemical and catalytic applications [35,36,37]. Ag3VO4 nanostructures have shown great promise as efficient photocatalysts due to their unique structural properties, which enhance both the photoactivity and selectivity when compared to other materials like V2O5/Ag2O. The appeal of Ag3VO4 lies in its intriguing structural transformations at low temperatures [37], making it a versatile catalyst for a range of reactions. Ag3VO4 has been effectively employed in various catalytic applications, including the degradation of organic pollutants and the reduction of CO2, highlighting its potential in environmental remediation [38,39,40]. While existing studies on Ag3VO4-based photocatalysts have explored their use in CO2 reduction [41], our study specifically focuses on novel structured Ag3VO4 photocatalysts, aiming to bridge the gap in understanding their potential for photocatalytic CO2 conversion under solar energy conditions. Furthermore, the introduction of CH4 and DME as feedstocks in catalytic processes has gained attention due to their roles in producing valuable chemicals and fuels [42]. Methane (CH4) is a key component in natural gas and serves as a primary feedstock for hydrogen production, while dimethyl ether (DME) is a promising alternative fuel with applications in combustion engines. By integrating Ag3VO4 nanostructures, we aim to enhance the efficiency of these processes, offering a sustainable pathway for the conversion of CH4 and DME into higher-value products.
Herein, we successfully created and produced innovative Ag3VO4 nanorods using the sol–gel method. We examined these materials for their ability to catalyze the reduction of CO2 by H2O into fuels when exposed to visible light. The Ag3VO4 nanorods demonstrated improved photocatalytic efficiency in converting CO2 into CH4 and DME. The notable enhancement in the photocatalytic efficiency was attributed to the exceptional hierarchical nanostructure inherent in Ag3VO4 nanorods. This research also systematically investigated the influence of the catalyst content on the photocatalytic activity and stability of the Ag3VO4 nanorods.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Catalyst Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was employed to investigate the crystal phase and structure of the photocatalysts. The XRD patterns of the Ag3VO4 photocatalyst are depicted in Figure 1. The pure Ag3VO4 displayed distinct peaks at 2θ values of 19.6°, 21.6°, 31.7°, 32.6°, 35.3°, 38.9°, 41.5°, 43.3°, 46.1°, 53.7°, and 54.05°, corresponding to the (011), (−111), (−121), (121), (301), (022), (320), (400), (−213), and (132) crystal planes of monoclinic Ag3VO4 (JCPDS:43-0542) [43,44], respectively.
The investigation of the Ag3VO4 nanorods involved the examination of the morphology and microstructural features using FESEM and HRTEM. It can be seen in Figure 2a that the FESEM image of Ag3VO4 contains a large number of nanorods with 1D nanostructures. The elemental composition, determined through EDX analysis and shown in Figure 2b,c, identified silver, vanadium, and oxygen. The TEM images of the pure Ag3VO4 photocatalyst, prepared after 24 h of stirring, are presented in Figure 2d–f. Figure 2d displays the microstructure of Ag3VO4, composed of numerous compact, smaller nanorods. The interplanar distance was measured at 0.263 nm, corresponding to the (220) plane of Ag3VO4, as presented in Figure 2e. The SAED pattern in Figure 2f exhibits a clear polycrystalline ring, indicating the good crystallization of Ag3VO4.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was employed to analyze the elemental composition and valence states of Ag3VO4, as depicted in Figure 3. The overall survey spectra (Figure 3a) reveal the presence of Ag, V, and O in the composite. The high-resolution XPS spectra of Ag 3d, V 2p, and O ls were further examined. In Figure 3b, the high-resolution Ag 3d spectra exhibit distinctive binding energy values of 369.5 and 375.4 eV, corresponding to Ag 3d 5/2 and Ag 3d 3/2 binding energies [44,45], respectively. The peaks observed at 517.9 and 524.1 eV in the high-resolution XPS spectra for V 2p (Figure 3c) are attributed to V 2p 3/2 and V 2p 1/2, aligning with the characteristic features of V5+ [46,47]. Examining the high-resolution XPS of O1s for Ag3VO4 (Figure 3d), two deconvoluted peaks at 531.40 and 529.85 eV are identified, associated with surface-adsorbed oxygen and lattice oxygen, respectively.
Figure 4a illustrates the UV–visible diffuse reflectance absorbance spectra for the Ag3VO4 photocatalysts. It is evident that the Ag3VO4 nanorods exhibit strong absorption intensities within the visible light range. The energy band gap (Ebg) of the Ag3VO4 photocatalyst was determined using the Tauc equation, as depicted in Equation (1).
E g ( e V ) = 1240 λ
The Ag3VO4 photocatalyst exhibits a wavelength of 563 nm, corresponding to a calculated Eg value of 2.2 eV. The conduction band position (ECB) of the Ag3VO4 semiconductor was determined using Equation (2).
E V B = E C B + E b g
Valence band X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (VB-XPS) was utilized to examine the valence band of the Ag3VO4 photocatalyst. As illustrated in Figure 4b, the valence band edges of Ag3VO4 were observed to be situated at around 1.86 eV. The energy band gap (Ebg) for Ag3VO4 was determined to be 2.2 eV. Therefore, the conduction band of the Ag3VO4 photocatalyst was calculated to be at −0.34 eV.
Figure 5 illustrates the photoluminescence (PL) analysis of V2O5 and Ag3VO4 samples excited at 325 nm. The pure V2O5 exhibits broad and intense PL signals in the same spectral regions. In contrast, the Ag3VO4 nanorods exhibit a lower PL emission intensity compared to V2O5. The diminished intensity of the peak signifies a lower likelihood of free charges recombining, suggesting that the sol–gel method, involving the coupling of vanadium with Ag2O to form the ternary Ag3VO4 structure, effectively mitigates the recombination of photogenerated electron–hole pairs.

2.2. Photocatalytic Activity and Stability

The experiments examining the conversion of CO2 with H2O were conducted in the presence of visible light. During these tests, it was observed that when the lamp was turned off, there were no carbon-containing compounds present in the reaction system. Conversely, under light exposure, the consistent generation of CH4 and dimethyl ether (DME) was identified. This observation indicates that both the samples and the photoreactors were effectively cleaned, and any carbon-containing compounds were exclusively formed through the reduction of CO2.
Figure 6 illustrates the impact of varying V2O5 and Ag3VO4 samples on the photoactivity of photocatalytic CO2 conversion under visible light. The assessment of the photocatalysts focused on the yields of CH4 and DME, the two resulting products. The pure V2O5 photocatalyst, synthesized through the sol–gel process, demonstrated minimal CO2 reduction and exhibited poor efficiency in generating CH4 and DME. In contrast, the utilization of the innovative Ag3VO4 nanorods significantly increased the production of CH4 and DME. This improvement can be ascribed to the nanorods’ effective absorption of visible light, proficient charge transfer characteristics, and heightened electron mobility achieved through the coupling of vanadium with silver using the sol–gel method.
Figure 7 depicts the impact of varying photocatalyst preparation durations (6 h, 12 h, and 24 h) under room conditions and atmospheric pressure on the Ag3VO4 photocatalyst intended for CO2 conversion with H2O under visible light. The efficiency analysis of different stirring durations focused on the yields of CH4 and DME, the two products resulting from the process. The findings reveal that the Ag3VO4 sample stirred for 24 h exhibits significantly enhanced photoactivity in the evolution of CH4 and DME compared to samples stirred for 6 h and 12 h. Consequently, the Ag3VO4 sample prepared with a stirring duration of 24 h was chosen for further investigation into the effects of the irradiation time and stability analysis.
Figure 8 demonstrates the impact of the irradiation time on the visible-light-driven photocatalytic conversion of CO2 with H2O to CH4 and DME over Ag3VO4 nanorods. The gradual increase in CH4 and DME generation becomes evident as the irradiation time extends. When employing Ag3VO4 nanorods, CH4 emerges as the main product in the process of CO2 photoreduction. Significantly, the catalyst exhibits sustained activity even after 4 h of continuous irradiation, ensuring the ongoing production of CH4 and DME. Consequently, these innovative Ag3VO4 nanorods offer heightened photoactivity and stability, thereby enhancing the conversion of CO2 into solar fuels.
Figure 9 illustrates the cycling performance of hierarchical Ag3VO4 nanorods in the continuous generation of CH4 and DME under visible light. To assess the stability, the reactor and catalyst were purged with nitrogen gas for 30 min after each photocatalytic reaction before initiating the next cycle. It is important to note that there was no significant decrease in catalytic activity observed during the stability test over four consecutive runs. While the CH4 production remained consistent throughout all cyclic runs, the DME production showed a slight decline after the third cycle. This decline may be attributed to the reduced adsorption capacity of Ag3VO4 towards CO2, possibly resulting from the inefficient desorption of intermediate products and hydrocarbons within the vacant spaces of the nanorods. Overall, the prolonged stability of the hierarchical Ag3VO4 nanorods in this study can be attributed to the gas–solid heterogeneous system and the use of heterostructure materials. Consequently, the enhanced photoactivity and selectivity of Ag3VO4 nanorods are evidently linked to their hierarchical structure, which facilitates the dynamic movement of electron–hole pairs and hinders their recombination under visible light.

2.3. Reaction Mechanism

Ag3VO4 nanorods serve as photocatalysts for the assessment of photocatalytic activity through CO2 conversion to CH4 and DME. In the course of the reduction process, key reaction steps are observed, which are succinctly outlined in Equations (3)–(7).
A g 3 V O 4 + h v h + + e
H 2 O + h + O H + H +
CO 2 + e CO 2
CO 2 + 8 H + + 8 e CH 4 + H 2 O
CO 2 + 12 H + + 12 e C 2 H 6 O + H 2 O
Equation (3) illustrates the generation of electron–hole pairs upon photoexcitation. The conversion of CO2 takes place in the conduction band through electron participation, whereas holes in the valence band facilitate the oxidation of H2O, as elucidated in Equations (4) and (5). The mechanisms for the production of CH4 and DME via the reduction of CO2 involving 6, 8, and 12 electrons are detailed in Equations (6) and (7). The investigation of the photoactivity and reaction pathways provides valuable insights into the reaction mechanism.
The diagram in Figure 10 illustrates the reaction mechanism. When exposed to visible light, electrons excited from the valence band (VB) of the Ag3VO4 nanorods migrate to the conduction band (CB). Holes in the VB of the Ag3VO4 nanorods interact with H2O, leading to the generation of O2 and H+. Concurrently, absorbed CO2 molecules undergo reduction to form CH4 and DME, facilitated by the enriched electrons on the surface of Ag3VO4. In the context of CO2 reduction with H2O, the Ag3VO4 nanorods predominantly yield CH4 as the main product, likely due to the suitable reduction potential of CO2/CH4 (−0.24 V). The reaction is more favorable for CH4 production as the reduction potential of CO2/CH4 (−0.24 V) is lower than the conduction band of Ag3VO4. While C2H6O requires more electrons and has a conduction band closer to that of CH4 compared to Ag3VO4 nanorods, the proper band alignment of Ag3VO4 contributes to the selective production of CH4 during CO2 conversion under visible light. Consequently, the novel Ag3VO4 nanorods exhibit significantly enhanced CH4 production due to effective visible light absorption, a suitable band structure, and higher electron mobility with inhibited recombination.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Chemicals

The chemicals used for the preparation of the Ag3VO4 photocatalyst were silver nitrate (AgNO3—purity 99%) and ammonium vanadate (NH4VO3—purity 99%) from Sigma Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA).

3.2. Synthesis of Ag3VO4 Nanorods

Ag3VO4 nanorods were prepared through the sol–gel method. Typically, 10 g AgNO3 was added to 40 mL of distilled water and stirred for 45 min to form solution A. Simultaneously, 2.3 g NH4VO3 was dissolved in 40 mL of distilled water and stirred for 45 min to form solution B. After both solutions were prepared, solution B was carefully transferred to solution A in a dropwise manner while continuously stirring to ensure uniform mixing. The combined solution was then stirred continuously for 24 h. Finally, the obtained products were washed with distilled water and dried overnight at 80 °C for 12 h. Pristine Ag3VO4 nanorods were obtained. The schematic for the fabrication of the Ag3VO4 nanorods is illustrated in Figure 11.

3.3. Material Characterization

The crystalline structures of the photocatalysts were investigated with X-ray diffraction (XRD) using the Rigaku Mini Flex II (Woodlands, TX, USA) at 30 kV and 15 mA, employing Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). The structure and morphology of the samples were assessed through field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) using the Tescan (Brno, Czech Republic) Mira 3 LMU and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) with the JEM-2100 F model (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was employed to analyze the chemical states of the samples, utilizing the JEOL (Peabody, MA, USA) JPS-9200 Photoelectron Spectrometer. UV–vis diffuse reflectance (DR) spectra were obtained using an Agilent (Santa Clara, CA, USA) UV–vis spectrophotometer (Cary 100 model) equipped with an integrating sphere. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra were taken using a HORIBA (Irvine, CA, USA) spectrometer operating at a wavelength of 325 nm.

3.4. Photocatalytic Activity Test

The as-prepared photocatalysts were tested for the photocatalytic conversion of CO2 using a gaseous-phase fixed-bed photoreactor. To activate the photocatalytic reactions, a 50 W LED flood light was used as the light source and the focused light intensity at the surface of the photocatalyst was 32 mW/cm2. A quartz window was employed to optimize the light exposure. A total of 150 mg of powder photocatalyst was evenly distributed at the bottom of the photoreactor to ensure uniform exposure. Prior to introducing the reactant gases, the reactor was purged with nitrogen to remove residual gases. High-purity compressed CO2, regulated by a mass flow controller, was passed through a water saturator to introduce moisture. For continuous CO2 reduction, the gas flowed through the reactor at a rate of 10 mL/min. Product analysis was conducted using an online gas chromatograph with FID and TCD detectors (GC/FID/TCD). No carbon-containing products were detected in the absence of light irradiation or catalysts.
The as-prepared photocatalysts were tested for the photocatalytic conversion of CO2 using a gaseous-phase fixed-bed photoreactor. A 50 W LED flood light, coupled with a concentrator, served as the illumination source to activate the photocatalytic reactions, with a quartz window optimizing light involvement. First, 150 mg of powder photocatalyst was dispersed at the bottom of the photoreactor to ensure proper distribution. Prior to introducing the reactant gases, the reactor was purged with nitrogen to remove other gases. High-purity compressed CO2, regulated by a mass flow controller, was passed through a water saturator to introduce moisture. For continuous CO2 reduction, the gas flowed through the reactor at a rate of 10 mL/min. Product analysis was performed using an online gas chromatograph with FID and TCD detectors (GC/FID/TCD). In the absence of light irradiation or catalysts, carbon-containing products were not detected.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we successfully employed the sol–gel method to create Ag3VO4 hierarchical nanorods for the purpose of the photocatalytic reduction of CO2 with H2O in a fixed-bed photoreactor. The Ag3VO4 nanorods exhibited improved photocatalytic performance and suppressed charge recombination rates during the process of converting CO2 with H2O into CH4 and DME. The hierarchical structure of the Ag3VO4 nanorods specifically favored efficient and stable CH4 production. Under visible light, the highest efficiency for CH4 production with the Ag3VO4 nanorods reached a yield rate of 271 μmol/g-cat. The elevated photocatalytic performance and stability of the Ag3VO4 nanostructure can be ascribed to its hierarchical composition, which enhances charge separation. This research suggests that hierarchical ternary materials hold promise as effective photocatalysts for the solar-driven reduction of CO2 into valuable solar fuels.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, review and editing, data curation, data analysis, A.B.; review and editing, funding acquisition, A.C.U.; software, D.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals under INRC 2434.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Interdisciplinary Research Center for Refining and Advanced Chemicals (IRC-RAC) at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for providing the facilities and hosting the research activities. The authors are thankful to the Deanship of Research Innovation at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for project grant under INRC 2434.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kong, N.; Du, H.; Li, Z.; Lu, T.; Xia, S.; Tang, Z.; Song, S. Nano heterojunction of double MOFs for improved CO2 photocatalytic reduction performance. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023, 663, 131005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ma, L.; Guan, R.; Kang, W.; Sun, Z.; Li, H.; Li, Q.; Shen, Q.; Chen, C.; Liu, X.; Jia, H. Preparation of highly dispersed Ni single-atom doped ultrathin g-C3N4 nanosheets by metal vapor exfoliation for efficient photocatalytic CO2 reduction. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2024, 660, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bafaqeer, A.; Amin, N.A.S.; Ummer, A.C.; Ahmed, S.; Al-Qathmi, A.T.; Usman, J.; Kulal, N.; Tanimu, G. Well-designed glucose precursor carbon/g-C3N4 nanocomposite for enhanced visible light photocatalytic CO2 reduction activity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2024, 447, 115272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cao, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Zubairu, S.M.; Ding, Y.; Zhu, G. In-situ construction of Z-scheme 2D/2D g-C3N4/BiOBr heterojunction with enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Surf. Interfaces 2024, 45, 103875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, M.; Chen, C.; Han, X.; Hu, W.; Li, B. Synchronous Construction of Cu and Ni Single-atom Sites in Ordered Porous TiO2 for Enhanced Photo-Conversion of CO2 and H2O to Methane. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 688, 133676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Duraisami, D.; Al-Harthi, M.A.; Ramya, B.; Baskaran, D.; Elakkiya, M.; Bafaqeer, A. Metal organic frameworks: Building blocks for a greener future. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 451, 142057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khan, A.A.; Tahir, M.; Khan, N. Process optimization and kinetic study for solar-driven photocatalytic methane bi-reforming over TiO2/Ti3C2 supported CoAlLa-LDH-g-C3N4 dual S-scheme nanocomposite. Energy Convers. Manag. 2023, 286, 117021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lv, Y.; Li, P.; Chen, X.; Wang, D.; Xiao, M.; Song, H.; Gao, J.; Shang, Y. Photo-induced surface oxygen vacancy in hierarchical nanoarchitectonics g-C3N4/BiOCOOH to boost photocatalytic CO2 reduction. J. Mol. Struct. 2024, 1297, 136961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Raza, A.; Haidry, A.A.; Yao, Z.; Saleem, M.F.; Alothman, A.A.; Mohammad, S. Synergistic effect of CuO and Sr doped g-C3N4 for CO2 photoreduction into hydrocarbon fuels. J. Chem. Eng. 2024, 480, 148162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bafaqeer, A.; Tahir, M.; Amin, N.A.S.; Thabit, H.A.; Ummer, A.C. Fabrication of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) mediated ZnV2O6 nanosheets for enhancing photocatalytic CO2 reduction under UV and solar light irradiation. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2023, 155, 110993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, H.; Bian, H.; Wang, F.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, S.; Xia, D. Enhanced photocatalytic reduction of CO2 over pg-C3N4-supported TiO2 nanoparticles with Ag modification. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023, 674, 131989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khan, A.A.; Tahir, M.; Khan, N. LDH-based nanomaterials for photocatalytic applications: A comprehensive review on the role of bi/trivalent cations, anions, morphology, defect engineering, memory effect, and heterojunction formation. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 84, 242–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, Z.; Xiong, J.; Cheng, G. Recent advances in brookite phase TiO2-based photocatalysts toward CO2 reduction. Fuel 2024, 357, 129806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tahir, M.; Ali Khan, A.; Bafaqeer, A.; Kumar, N.; Siraj, M.; Fatehmulla, A. Highly Stable Photocatalytic Dry and Bi-Reforming of Methane with the Role of a Hole Scavenger for Syngas Production over a Defective Co-Doped g-C3N4 Nanotexture. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gawal, P.M.; Golder, A.K. Vegetal route for synthesis of CQDs/CdS nanocomposites for photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to methanol under visible light. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 683, 133068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dhamodharan, D.; Al-Harthi, M.A.; Ramya, B.; Bafaqeer, A.; Alam, F. MXenes: A Promising Material with Multifunctional Applications. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 112316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhou, D.; Zhang, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wang, T.; Cao, S. Construction of local coordination environment of iron sites over g-C3N4/PCN-222 (Fe) composite with high CO2 photoreduction performance. Appl. Catal. B 2024, 344, 123639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Sun, R.; Luo, Y.; Xin, L.; Wang, D. Interfacial hot electron injection in Cu2O/MXene-g-C3N4 pn heterojunction for efficient photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 684, 133236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bafaqeer, A.; Tahir, M.; Amin, N.A.S.; Ummer, A.C.; Thabit, H.A.; Dhamodharan, D.; Ahmed, S.; Kumar, N. Performance analysis of rGO-bridged g-C3N4/ZnV2O6 S-scheme heterojunction for CO2 photoreduction with H2O in an externally reflected photoreactor. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 968, 171833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fu, H.; Liu, X.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Zheng, Z.; Cheng, H.; Liu, Y.; Dai, Y.; Huang, B. Construction of a bismuth-based perovskite direct Z-scheme heterojunction Au-Cs3Bi2Br9/V2O5 for efficient photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 622, 156964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Z.; Bai, W.; Liu, D.; Han, B.; Liang, Y.; Qi, J. Preloaded oxygen vacancy conditioning Ni/TiO2 to enhance photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 330, 125250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bafaqeer, A.; Amin, N.A.S.; Tahir, M.; Ummer, A.C.; Thabit, H.A.; Theravalappil, R.; Usman, J.; Ahmad, N. Construction of glucose precursor carbon/TiO2 heterojunction with high ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) for visible light driven CO2 reduction. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2024, 201, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Guo, X.; Qiu, C.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wang, L.; Ding, J.; Zhang, J.; Wan, H.; Guan, G. Coaxial electrospinning prepared Cu species loaded SrTiO3 for efficient photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to CH3OH. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 111990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shao, X.; Li, K.; Li, J.; Cheng, Q.; Wang, G.; Wang, K. Investigating S-scheme charge transfer pathways in NiS@Ta2O5 hybrid nanofibers for photocatalytic CO2 conversion. Chin. J. Catal. 2023, 51, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Thabit, H.A.; Sayyed, M.; Es-soufi, H.; Bafaqeer, A.; Ismail, A.K. Insights into the influence of Bi2O3 on the structural and optical characteristics of novel Bi2O3–B2O3–TeO2–MgO–PbO glasses. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2024, 56, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, S.; Song, H.; Li, X.; Gao, Q.; Shang, W.; Hu, S. MXene Ti3C2 decorated g-C3N4/ZnO photocatalysts with improved photocatalytic performance for CO2 reduction. Nano Mater. Sci. 2023, 5, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Thabit, H.A.; Kabir, N.A.; Al Mutairi, A.M.; Bafaqeer, A.; Alraddadi, S.; Jaji, N.-D.; Sayyed, M.; Al-Ameri, S.M. Investigation of the thermoluminescence dosimeter characteristics of multilayer ZnO (300 nm)/Ag (50 nm)/ZnO (x) thin films for photonic dosimetry applications. Opt. Mater. 2023, 137, 113548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Abdurabu Thabit, H.; Ismail, A.K.; Kabir, N.A.; Abu Mhareb, M.H.; Al Mutairi, A.M.; Bafaqeer, A.; Alajerami, Y.; Abualsayyed, M.I. Photoluminescence and thermoluminescence dosimetry properties of Ag/Y co-doped ZnO nanophosphor for radiation measurements. Luminescence 2024, 39, e4683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chico-Vecino, M.; Murillo-Sierra, J.; Pino-Sandoval, D.; Hinojosa-Reyes, L.; Maya-Treviño, M.; Contreras, D.; Hernández-Ramírez, A. Preparation of WO3/In2O3 heterojunctions and their performance on the CO2 photocatalytic conversion in a continuous flow reactor. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 110372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, Y.; Dong, X.; Yuan, Q.; Liang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Qu, X.; Dong, B. In-situ synthesis of WO3–x/MoO3–x heterojunction with abundant oxygen vacancies for efficient photocatalytic reduction of CO2. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 621, 126582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhao, M.; Qin, J.; Wang, N.; Zhang, Y.; Cui, H. Reconstruction of surface oxygen vacancy for boosting CO2 photoreduction mediated by BiOBr/CdS heterojunction. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 329, 125179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Espinosa, R.; Manríquez, M.E.; Trejo-Valdez, M.; Tzompantzi, F.; Bustos, A.F.; Ortiz-Islas, E. Synthesis and characterization of V2O5-Ga2O3 photocatalysts and their application on the photocatalytic reduction of CO2. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 54119–54129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. De, A.K.; Kamal, N.; Kumar, U.; Jatav, N.; Sinha, I. The bandgap of sulfur-doped Ag2O nanoparticles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2023, 25, 2320–2330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Padilla Villavicencio, M.; Escobedo Morales, A.; Ruiz Peralta, M.D.L.; Sánchez-Cantú, M.; Rojas Blanco, L.; Chigo Anota, E.; Camacho García, J.H.; Tzompantzi, F. Ibuprofen photodegradation by Ag2O and Ag/Ag2O composites under simulated visible light irradiation. Catal. Lett. 2020, 150, 2385–2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, Y.; Xu, Z.; Wang, Q.; Hao, W.; Zhai, X.; Fei, X.; Huang, X.; Bi, Y. Unveiling the activity origin of ultrathin BiOCl nanosheets for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Appl. Catal. B 2021, 299, 120679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lin, C.-C.; Liu, T.-R.; Lin, S.-R.; Boopathi, K.M.; Chiang, C.-H.; Tzeng, W.-Y.; Chien, W.-H.C.; Hsu, H.-S.; Luo, C.-W.; Tsai, H.-Y. Spin-polarized photocatalytic CO2 reduction of Mn-doped perovskite nanoplates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 15718–15726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yu, M.; Lv, X.; Idris, A.M.; Li, S.; Lin, J.; Lin, H.; Wang, J.; Li, Z. Upconversion nanoparticles coupled with hierarchical ZnIn2S4 nanorods as a near-infrared responsive photocatalyst for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 612, 782–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mkhalid, I.A.; Ismail, A.A.; Hussein, M.A.; Al Thomali, R.H. Enhanced photocatalytic performance of mesoporous TiO2 by incorporating Ag3VO4 nanoparticles for degradation of tetracycline under visible light. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2023, 34, 784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bafaqeer, A.; Ummer, A.C.; Benaafi, M.; Usman, J.; Dhamodharan, D.; Abba, S.I.; Thabit, H.A. Constructing type II heterojunction of 2D/1D Pg-C3N4/Ag3VO4 nanocomposite with high interfacial charge separation for boosting photocatalytic CO2 reduction under solar energy. J. Alloys Compd. 2024, 1007, 176505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nagamuthu, S.; Vijayakumar, S.; Ryu, K.-S. Synthesis of Ag anchored Ag3VO4 stacked nanosheets: Toward a negative electrode material for high-performance asymmetric supercapacitor devices. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 18963–18970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gao, M.; Sun, L.; Ma, C.; Li, X.; Jiang, H.; Shen, D.; Wang, H.; Huo, P. Constructed Z-scheme g-C3N4/Ag3VO4/rGO photocatalysts with multi-interfacial electron-transfer paths for high photoreduction of CO2. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 1755–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bhatia, P.; Dharaskar, S.; Unnarkat, A.P. CO2 reduction routes to value-added oxygenates: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 61929–61950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Alshaikh, H.; Al-Hajji, L.; Mahmoud, M.H.H.; Ismail, A.A. Visible-light-driven S-scheme mesoporous Ag3VO4/C3N4 heterojunction with promoted photocatalytic performances. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 272, 118914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cui, Y.; Zhang, P.; Li, M.; Lin, C.; Wang, Y. Z-scheme silver-based pn junction of AgFeO2-modified Ag3VO4 with enhanced photocatalytic performance. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 918, 165771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, X.; Hu, T.; Zhang, J.; Dai, K.; Liang, C. Novel 2D SnNb2O6/Ag3VO4 S-scheme heterojunction with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 7169–7176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sun, H.; Qin, P.; Wu, Z.; Liao, C.; Guo, J.; Luo, S.; Chai, Y. Visible light-driven photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants by a novel Ag3VO4/Ag2CO3 p–n heterojunction photocatalyst: Mechanistic insight and degradation pathways. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 834, 155211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mei, F.; Dai, K.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.; Liang, C. Construction of Ag SPR-promoted step-scheme porous g-C3N4/Ag3VO4 heterojunction for improving photocatalytic activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 488, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the Ag3VO4 nanorods.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the Ag3VO4 nanorods.
Catalysts 14 00672 g001
Figure 2. (a) SEM image of Ag3VO4, (b,c) EDX spectrum of Ag3VO4 photocatalyst, (d) TEM image of Ag3VO4 after 24 h, (e) HRTEM image of lattice fringes of Ag3VO4 photocatalyst, (f) SAED pattern of Ag3VO4 photocatalyst.
Figure 2. (a) SEM image of Ag3VO4, (b,c) EDX spectrum of Ag3VO4 photocatalyst, (d) TEM image of Ag3VO4 after 24 h, (e) HRTEM image of lattice fringes of Ag3VO4 photocatalyst, (f) SAED pattern of Ag3VO4 photocatalyst.
Catalysts 14 00672 g002
Figure 3. XPS spectra of Ag3VO4 photocatalyst: (a) survey spectrum, (b) Ag 3d, (c) V 2p, and (d) O 1s.
Figure 3. XPS spectra of Ag3VO4 photocatalyst: (a) survey spectrum, (b) Ag 3d, (c) V 2p, and (d) O 1s.
Catalysts 14 00672 g003aCatalysts 14 00672 g003b
Figure 4. (a) Diffuse reflectance (DR) UV–vis spectra of Ag3VO4 photocatalyst and (b) XPS spectrum of Ag3VO4 photocatalyst in the valence band energy region.
Figure 4. (a) Diffuse reflectance (DR) UV–vis spectra of Ag3VO4 photocatalyst and (b) XPS spectrum of Ag3VO4 photocatalyst in the valence band energy region.
Catalysts 14 00672 g004aCatalysts 14 00672 g004b
Figure 5. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra for Ag3VO4 photocatalyst.
Figure 5. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra for Ag3VO4 photocatalyst.
Catalysts 14 00672 g005
Figure 6. Yields of CH4 and DME over various photocatalysts (irradiation time = 1 h, room temperature, and atmospheric pressure).
Figure 6. Yields of CH4 and DME over various photocatalysts (irradiation time = 1 h, room temperature, and atmospheric pressure).
Catalysts 14 00672 g006
Figure 7. Effect of different exposure times of stirring for 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h on prepared Ag3VO4 sample for CO2 photoconversion (irradiation time = 1 h, room temperature, and atmospheric pressure).
Figure 7. Effect of different exposure times of stirring for 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h on prepared Ag3VO4 sample for CO2 photoconversion (irradiation time = 1 h, room temperature, and atmospheric pressure).
Catalysts 14 00672 g007
Figure 8. Effect of the irradiation time on the performance of Ag3VO4 for the production of CH4 and DME.
Figure 8. Effect of the irradiation time on the performance of Ag3VO4 for the production of CH4 and DME.
Catalysts 14 00672 g008
Figure 9. Stability analysis of Ag3VO4 in four consecutive cycles for the production of CH4 and DME (irradiation time = 1 h, room temperature, and atmospheric pressure).
Figure 9. Stability analysis of Ag3VO4 in four consecutive cycles for the production of CH4 and DME (irradiation time = 1 h, room temperature, and atmospheric pressure).
Catalysts 14 00672 g009
Figure 10. Schematic representation of the reaction mechanism proposed for the photoreduction of CO2 to CH4 and DME over Ag3VO4 nanorods under visible light.
Figure 10. Schematic representation of the reaction mechanism proposed for the photoreduction of CO2 to CH4 and DME over Ag3VO4 nanorods under visible light.
Catalysts 14 00672 g010
Figure 11. Schematic illustration of the formation process of Ag3VO4 nanorods.
Figure 11. Schematic illustration of the formation process of Ag3VO4 nanorods.
Catalysts 14 00672 g011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bafaqeer, A.; Chennampilly Ummer, A.; Dhamodharan, D. Hierarchical Ag3VO4 Nanorods as an Excellent Visible Light Photocatalyst for CO2 Conversion to Solar Fuels. Catalysts 2024, 14, 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14100672

AMA Style

Bafaqeer A, Chennampilly Ummer A, Dhamodharan D. Hierarchical Ag3VO4 Nanorods as an Excellent Visible Light Photocatalyst for CO2 Conversion to Solar Fuels. Catalysts. 2024; 14(10):672. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14100672

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bafaqeer, Abdullah, Aniz Chennampilly Ummer, and Duraisami Dhamodharan. 2024. "Hierarchical Ag3VO4 Nanorods as an Excellent Visible Light Photocatalyst for CO2 Conversion to Solar Fuels" Catalysts 14, no. 10: 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14100672

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop