Next Article in Journal
Investigating the Long-Term Kinetics of Pd Nanoparticles Prepared from Microemulsions and the Lindlar Catalyst for Selective Hydrogenation of 3-Hexyn-1-ol
Previous Article in Journal
Performance of Traditional and Emerging Water-Treatment Technologies in the Removal of Tetracycline Antibiotics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CO2 Reduction Performance with Double-Layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 as Photocatalysts under Different Light Illumination Conditions

1
Division of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Mie University, 1577 Kurimamachiya-cho, Tsu 514-8507, Mie, Japan
2
School of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2024, 14(4), 270; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14040270
Submission received: 11 March 2024 / Revised: 15 April 2024 / Accepted: 15 April 2024 / Published: 17 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enhancement of the Performance of Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction)

Abstract

:
This paper presents an experimental study of using a double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 as photocatalysts for CO2 reduction with an extended wavelength of range light from ultraviolet light (UV) to infrared light (IR). The lights studied were UV + visible light (VIS) + IR, VIS + IR and IR only. This study also investigated the impact of the molar ratio of CO2:H2O on the CO2 reduction performance. This study revealed that the optimum molar ratio of CO2:H2O to produce CO was 1:1, irrespective of light illumination condition, which matched the theoretical molar ratio to produce CO according to the reaction scheme of CO2 reduction with H2O. Comparing the results of double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 with those of double-layered TiO2 obtained under the UV + VIS + IR light illumination condition, the highest concentration of formed CO and the molar quantity of formed CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst increased by 281 ppmV and 0.8 μmol/g, in the case of the molar ratio of CO2:H2O = 1:1. With IR-only illumination, the highest concentration of formed CO and the molar quantity of CO formed per unit weight of the photocatalyst was 251 ppmV and 4.7 μmol/g, respectively.

1. Introduction

Global warming is a present problem–challenge currently facing the whole world. Photocatalytic CO2 reduction, if developed as a potential technology, would assist in confronting this challenge. CO2 can be converted, with the help of photocatalysts, from CO2 into fuel, e.g., CO, CH4, CH3OH, etc. [1,2,3]. This study adopted TiO2 as the photocatalyst. TiO2 is the most widely investigated photocatalyst due to its chemical stability, abundance, low cost, and low toxic characteristics [4]. However, TiO2 has some weak points. TiO2 absorbs ultraviolet light (UV) only, which accounts for only 5% in sunlight [5]. The sunlight reaching the earth consists of UV, visible light (VIS), and infrared light (IR) which account for 5%, 45% and 50%, respectively [5]. This study aimed to develop new modified TiO2 photocatalysts which could absorb the light from UV to IR.
According to previous studies [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20], many approaches to extend the light absorption of photocatalysts from UV to VIS have been conducted. Metal doping is one of the popular approaches to extend the light absorption of photocatalysts from UV to VIS [6,7]. Though some metals such as Pt [8], Au [9] and Pd [10,11,12] have been investigated, this study focuses on Cu, which is abundant and has a low cost, so it might be easy to apply to industrial needs. According to the review paper [13], Cu/TiO2 displayed good improvements compared to TiO2. This phenomenon occurs since its estimated band gap is relatively the same compared to TiO2 (3.1 eV), and Cu does not shift the absorption spectrum of TiO2. Other previous studies have reported the impact of the amount of Cu loaded on TiO2 on the performance of CO2 reduction [14]. The highest production rate of CH4 of 1.284 μmol/(g·h) and that of CO of 9.913 μmol/(g·h) were obtained for the weight amount of Cu of 1 wt% under the condition of CO2/H2O. When increasing the weight amount of Cu, the performance of photocatalytic CO2 reduction decreased. Cu2O/TiO2 exhibited a production rate of CO, which is 20 times as large as that of TiO2 under the condition of CO2/H2O [15]. Cu2O also showed the photocatalytic performance by itself [16]. The C2H6 formation of 10 μmol/g was performed by Cu2O, which worked under the light illumination condition of VIS in the case of CO2/H2O. The authors’ previous studies have reported the development of Cu/TiO2 with a pulse arc plasma method to load a fine Cu particle after preparing TiO2 film coated on a netlike glass disc [17,18]. According to these reports [17], Cu/TiO2 exhibited the CO2 reduction performance under the light illumination condition with VIS. Changing the pulse numbers of the fine Cu particles by 100, 200, and 500, the highest molar quantity of CO per weight of the photocatalyst obtained was 12.0 μmol/g for the pulse number of 200 under the light illumination condition without UV. Though the CO2 reduction performance is promoted with the increase in the loading weight of Cu, it is thought that too much Cu loading covers the surface of the TiO2 film [18,19]. It indicates that CO2 and reductants cannot reach the surface of TiO2 film sufficiently due to the optimum loading of Cu. According to previous studies [20], a Z-scheme heterojunction Cu2O/PCN-250 photocatalyst has been utilized for photocatalytic CO2 reduction with H2O vapor. The significant reduction in the Cu2+ content means that the Cu2+ species accept photogenerated electrons for the production of Cu+ during the light irradiation. The Fermi energy level of Cu2O nanoparticles is higher than that of PCN-250, which can lead to interlaced energy levels between two components, providing the possibility of constructing a Z-type heterojunction. From other previous studies [21], Co-MOF/Cu2O heterojunction has conducted for photocatalytic CO2 reduction with H2O. The Schottky barrier can prevent the back transfer of injected electrons. Hence, under visible-light irradiation, the excited electrons in the CB of Cu2O can quickly move to the CB of CO-MOF which is above the Ev (CO2/CO, —0.53 V vs. NHE) by the p-n junction induced electric field. Then, the photoexcited electrons remaining in the CB of Co-oxo clusters in Co-MOF react with the absorbed CO2 molecules to produce CO2, and then the photoinduced holes from the VB of Co-MOF move to Cu2O. According to previous research, to extend the light absorption of the photocatalyst from UV to IR or near IR [22,23,24,25], many trials have been reported. W18O49/g-C3N4 composite exhibited the production performance of CO of 45 μmol/g and CH4 of 28 μmol/g under the light illumination condition when the wavelength ranged from 200 nm to 2400 nm [22]. WS2/Bi2S3 nanotube exhibited the production performance of CH3OH of 28 μmol/g and C2H5OH of 25 μmol/g under the light illumination condition when the wavelength ranged from 420 nm to 1100 nm [23]. CuInZnS decorated g-C3N4 exhibited the production performance of CO of 38 μmol/g under the light illumination condition when the wavelength ranged from 200 nm to 1000 nm [24]. Hierarchical ZnIn2S4 nanorods, prepared using the solvothermal method, exhibited the production performance of CO of 54 μmol/g and CH4 of 9 μmol/g [25]. According to the authors’ previous studies [26], P4O10/TiO2 has been investigated. The largest molar quantity of the CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst for P4O10/TiO2 film in the case of CO2/H2O was 2.36 μmol/g under the light illumination condition with IR, while that in case of CO2/NH3 was 33.4 μmol/g [26].
This study introduced metal doping to explain the basis for adopting Cu and P4O10 as a dopant for TiO2 in this study. Cu is a promising dopant for expanding the light absorption to VIS since many previous studies have reported its good performance [13,14,15,16,17,18]. In addition, P4O10 is also a promising dopant to expand the light absorption to IR since previous studies carried out by authors have reported its good performance [26]. However, there is no study to clarify the impact of the combination of the photocatalyst absorbing the light with VIS as well as that with IR. If we could develop a photocatalyst absorbing the light ranging from UV to IR, it could then be able to utilize the sunlight for the photocatalytic CO2 reduction in near future. The aim of this study is to clarify the impact of double-layered photocatalysts consisting of Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 on the CO2 reduction performance under the different light illumination conditions. This study adopts H2O as a reductant for CO2 reduction. The molar ratio of CO2:H2O is also changed and the impact on the CO2 reduction performance is investigated. According to previous review papers [6,27], H2O is adopted generally as a reductant. It is necessary to clarify the optimum molar ratio of CO2:H2O since H+ is needed for the reduction reaction to enhance the CO2 reduction performance. From past studies [28,29,30], the reaction scheme of CO2 reduction with H2O can be explained as follows:
  • Electron-hole pair generation process
TiO2 + → h+ + e
  • Oxidization reaction process
H2O + h+ → OH + H+
·OH + H2O + h+ → O2 + 3H+
  • Reduction reaction process
CO2 + 2H+ + 2e → CO + H2O
CO2 + 8H+ + 8e → CH4 + 2H2O
This study also compared the CO2 reduction performance of double-layered photocatalysts consisting of Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 with that of double-layered TiO2. The light illumination, with a wavelength ranging from 185 nm to 2000 nm, 401 nm to 2000 nm, and 801 nm to 2000 nm, respectively, is changed. In addition, the molar ratio of CO2:H2O is changed by 1:0.5, 1:1, 1:2, and 1:4. The pulse number of Cu for preparing Cu/TiO2 was 200, which followed the optimum pulse number decided by the authors’ previous study [17]. P4O10/TiO2 has been prepared by sol-gel and the dip-coating processes following the authors’ previous studies [26].

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2

Figure 1 shows SEM and EPMA images of Cu/TiO2, which was coated on a netlike glass disc. The black and white SEM images at 1500 times magnification were used for EPMA analysis. As for the EPMA images, the concentrations of each element in the observation area are indicated by the diverse colors. If the amount of element was large, light colors such as white, pink, and red were shown. On the other hand, if the amount of element was small, dark colors such as black and blue were shown. According to Figure 1, it is seen that TiO2 film has a tooth-like shape, coated on the netlike glass fiber. The reason this was caused was thought to be that the temperature distribution of the TiO2 solution adhered on the netlike glass disc was not even during the firing process due to the different thermal conductivities of Ti and SiO2 at 600 K, which were 19.4 W/(m·K) and 1.82 W/(m·K), respectively [31]. Due to the thermal expansion and shrinkage around the netlike glass fiber, a thermal crack formed within the TiO2 film. As a result, the TiO2 film coated on the netlike glass fiber was tooth-like. As for Cu, it is seen that the nano-sized Cu particles are loaded on TiO2 uniformly, since nano-sized Cu particles are emitted by the pulse arc plasma gun process. The center part of the netlike glass disc, with a diameter of 300 μm, was analyzed by EPMA for the measurement of the amount of loaded Cu within TiO2 film. The ratio of Cu to Ti within Cu/TiO2 was counted as 8.3 wt%.
Figure 2 shows SEM and EPMA images of P4O10/TiO2, which was coated on the netlike glass disc. The black and white SEM images at 1500 times magnification were used for EPMA analysis. According to Figure 2, it can be seen that the TiO2 film had a tooth-like shape coated on the netlike glass fiber as well, which was caused by the same reason explained before for Cu/TiO2. In addition, it can be seen that the nano-sized P4O10 particles were loaded on the TiO2 film. The center part of the netlike glass disc, which had a diameter of 300 μm, was analyzed by EPMA for the amount of loaded Cu within the TiO2 film. The ratio of Cu to Ti within Cu/TiO2 was counted by 6.4 wt%. On the other hand, the total weight of Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 was measured by an electron balance which was 0.255 g.
This study has not tested PXRD patterns of prepared photocatalysts, but the crystal type of the TiO2 photocatalyst made was thought to be anatase, since the photocatalyst was prepared at the controlled firing temperature of 623 K. According to the reference presented in [32], the crystal type of the TiO2 photocatalyst would be anatase when prepared below 973 K.

2.2. CO2 Reduction Characteristics of Double-Layered TiO2 under the Light Illumination Condition of Xe Lamp with UV + VIS + IR

Figure 3 and Figure 4 exhibit the change of concentration of formed CO and the molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst with time, respectively. For the expression in the unit of μmol/g in Figure 4, the total weight of TiO2 in double layers was measured by an electron balance, which was 0.136 g. In this study, the CO2 reduction experiment was conducted without the introduction of H2O and the CO2 reduction experiment under no Xe lamp illumination conditions and the CO2 reduction experiment with H2O without a photocatalyst were conducted. As a result, no fuel was detected.
Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the highest concentration of formed CO and the molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst of 262 ppmV and 9.5 μmol/g, respectively, which were obtained with the molar ratio of CO2:H2O = 1:1. This optimal molar ratio agrees with the theoretical molar ratio to produce CO as shown in Equations (1)–(5). The production rate of CO was saturated after 8 h of the illumination from the Xe lamp. The peak of the production rate of CO was observed at 2 h.

2.3. CO2 Reduction Characteristics of Double-Layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 with the Illumination of UV + VIS + IR

Figure 5 illustrates the double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2, which also shows the image of double-layered TiO2 for readers to better understand the experimental condition. Figure 6 and Figure 7 show the concentration change of formed CO and the molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst with time, respectively. The data obtained under the light illumination condition with UV + VIS + IR are shown in these figures. In Figure 7, the total weight of double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 was measured by an electron balance, which was 0.255 g. In this study, the CO2 reduction experiment without the introduction of H2O, the CO2 reduction experiment under no Xe lamp illumination condition, and the CO2 reduction experiment with H2O without a photocatalyst were conducted. As a result, no fuel was detected.
According to Figure 6 and Figure 7, the highest concentration of formed CO and the molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst were obtained in the case of the molar ratio of CO2:H2O = 1:1. The highest concentration of formed CO and the molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst is 543 ppmV and 10.3 μmol/g, respectively. Compared to the results of double-layered TiO2 shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4, the highest concentration of formed CO and the molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst increased by 281 ppmV and 0.8 μmol/g, respectively, with the optimal molar ratio of CO2:H2O = 1:1. Due to the improvement of light absorption performance with the aid of loading Cu and P4O10, it is thought that the highest concentration of formed CO and the molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst increased, respectively. Since Cu/TiO2 was coated on both surfaces of the netlike glass disc, it is thought that the electron emitted from Cu/TiO2 could reach P4O10/TiO2, which was located under Cu/TiO2. Additionally, it is thought that the balance of electrons and H+, which clarifies the optimum molar ratio according to the reaction scheme as shown in Equations (1)–(5), was not influenced by loading Cu and P4O10 on TiO2 in this study. Therefore, the optimum molar ratio using double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 with UV + VIS + IR illumination in this study follows the theoretical molar ratio to produce CO as shown in Equations (1)–(5).

2.4. CO2 Reduction Characteristics of Double-Layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 with VIS + IR Illumination

Figure 8 and Figure 9 show the concentration change of formed CO and the molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst with VIS + IR illumination along time, respectively. The total weight of double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 was measured by an electron balance before the experiment, which was 0.255 g.
According to Figure 8 and Figure 9, the highest concentration of formed CO and the molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst are obtained with the molar ratio of CO2:H2O = 1:1. The highest concentration of formed CO and the molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst was 373 ppmV and 7.1 μmol/g, respectively, as shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9. There was no CO found in the reference experiment conducted, which was with the double-layered TiO2 and VIS + IR. Therefore, loading Cu and P4O10 on TiO2 indeed provided the photocatalyst the absorption capability of VIS + IR. In addition, it also revealed that the optimum molar ratio with double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 and VIS + IR followed the theoretical molar ratio to produce CO as shown in Equations (1)–(5).
In the reference presented in [33], Cu/TiO2 was prepared by the impregnation with aqueous solution of copper acetate, followed by reduction with sodium borohydride. The preparation procedure might influence the chemical/electrochemical state of Cu, which decided the absorption spectrum of TiO2 and the spectrum of TiO2 action in the oxidization reaction. Since this preparation procedure was based on a chemical reaction, it is different from the pulse arc plasma gun method adopted in this study. The pulse arc plasma gun method loads Cu fine particles on the surface of TiO2 physically. Therefore, the role/state played by Cu to TiO2 was different from that in the reference presented in [33].

2.5. CO2 Reduction Characteristics of Double-Layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 with IR Only Illumination

Figure 10 and Figure 11 show the concentration of formed CO and the molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst with IR only illumination with time, respectively. The total weight of double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 was measured by an electron balance, which was 0.255 g.
According to Figure 10 and Figure 11, the highest concentration of formed CO and the molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst were obtained when CO2:H2O = 1:1. The highest concentration of formed CO and the molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst was 251 ppmV and 4.7 μmol/g, respectively. There was no CO found in the reference experiment conducted, which was with the double-layered TiO2 and IR illumination. Therefore, the CO2 reduction reaction could occur with IR only illumination by loading Cu and P4O10 into the TiO2. In addition, the optimal molar ratio between CO2 and H2O was also 1:1 for the reaction with IR only, which is the same as with UV + VIS + IR and that with VIS + IR.
When compared to previous studies [22,23,24,25,26], the CO2 reduction performance with IR only illumination obtained in this study was not high. However, the concept was thought-provoking, i.e., by doping Cu and P4O10 the wavelength of illumination required by CO2 reduction reaction could be extended to IR range.

3. Experimental Procedure

3.1. Preparation Procedure of Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2

The TiO2 film was prepared by sol-gel and dip-coating processes [34]. [(CH3)2CHO]4Ti (purity of 95 wt%, Nacalai Tesque Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) of 0.3 mol, anhydrous C2H5OH (purity of 99.5 wt%, Nacalai Tesque Co., Ltd.) of 2.4 mol, distilled water of 0.3 mol, and HCl (purity of 35 wt%, Nacalai Tesque Co., Ltd.) of 0.07 mol were mixed to prepare TiO2 sol solution. The TiO2 film was coated on netlike glass fiber (SILIGLASS U, Nihonmuki Co., Ltd., Yuki City, Japan) by means of sol-gel and dip-coating processes. The glass fiber, with a diameter of approximately 10 μm, weaved as a net, was collected to be at a diameter of about 1 mm. The porous diameter of the glass fiber and the specific surface area is approximately 1 nm and 400 m2/g, respectively, from the specification of the netlike glass fiber. The netlike glass fiber was composed of SiO2, whose purity was 96 wt%. The opening space of the net glass is approximately 2 mm × 2 mm. The netlike glass fiber with the porous characteristics could capture TiO2 film easily during the sol-gel and dip-coating processes. In addition, CO2 was also more easily absorbed by the prepared photocatalyst due to the porous characteristics. In this study, the netlike glass fiber was cut to be a disc shape with a diameter and the thickness of 50 mm and 1 mm, respectively. The netlike glass disc was dipped into the TiO2 sol solution at the speed of 1.5 mm/s and pulled up it at the fixed speed of 0.22 mm/s. After that, the disc was dried out and fired under the controlled firing temperature (FT) and firing duration time (FD) to coat TiO2 film on the base material. The FT and FD was 623 K and 180 s, respectively, in this study.
After the coating of TiO2, Cu was loaded on TiO2 using a pulse arc plasma gun [34], which emitted nano-sized Cu fine particles uniformly with an applied high voltage potential difference of 200 V. Cu fine particles were loaded on both surfaces of TiO2. The pulse number applied could control the quantity of metal loaded on TiO2. This study set the pulse number at 200. This study used the pulse arc plasma gun device (ULVAC, Inc., Chigasaki City, Japan, ARL-300), which had a Cu electrode with a diameter of 10 mm. By setting the distance between the Cu electrode and TiO2 film at 150 mm, Cu particles could be uniformly speared over the TiO2 film. Figure 12 shows the photo of the final coated Cu/TiO2 sample.
As to P4O10/TiO2, P4O10 was made from red P by means of mechanical synthesis [34]. The red P, which had an average diameter of 75 μm (Nacalai Tesque) was filled in a ball mill crusher (AV-1, Asahi Rika Factory, Suginami City, Japan) with Al2O3 balls. The diameter of the Al2O3 balls was 3/8 inches (HD-10, NIKKATO COPORATION, Tokyo, Japan). The weight ratio of Al2O3 balls to red P particles in the ball mill crusher was set at 20 [34]. The rotation speed of 600 rpm was kept for 12 h, and P4O10 was identified to be one type of oxidized P by XPS (PHI Quantera SXM, ULVAC PHI Inc., Chigasaki City, Japan) [26]. The prepared P4O10 particles were put into the TiO2 sol solution and were mixed with the TiO2 sol solution by a magnetic stirrer for 60 min. After that, the netlike glass disc was immersed into this mixed solution. The following dipping and pulling process was the same as explained above. Figure 13 shows the photo of P4O10/TiO2 coated on the netlike glass disc.

3.2. The Characterization Procedure of Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2

The characteristics of the external and crystal structure of Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 film prepared above were evaluated by SEM (JXA-8530F, JEOL Ltd., Akishima City, Japan) and EPMA (JXA-8530F, JEOL Ltd.) [35]. Since the netlike glass disc adopted for base material to coat Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 cannot conduct electricity, the vaporized carbon was deposited by the carbon deposition device (JEE-420, JEOL Ltd.) on the surface of Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 before analyzing the characterization. The thickness of the deposited carbon was about 2030 nm. The acceleration voltage and the current were set at 15 kV and 3.0 × 10−8 A, respectively, in order to analyze the external structure.

3.3. The Experimental Procedure of CO2 Reduction

Figure 14 illustrates the experimental apparatus, which is as follows: the reactor, composed of a stainless tube of 100 mm (H.) × 50 mm (I.D.); Cu/TiO2, which is located over the P4O10/TiO2, coated on a netlike glass disc of 50 mm (D.) × 1mm (t.) positioned on the Teflon cylinder of 84 mm (D.) × 10 mm (t.); a sharp cut filter removing the wavelength of light which is below 400 nm (SCF-49.5C-42L, SIGMA KOKI Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan); a 150W Xe lamp (L2175, Hamamatsu Photonics K. K., Hamamatsu City, Japan); mass flow controller; and CO2 gas cylinder (purity of 99.995 vol%) [34]. The size of the reactor chamber is 1.25 × 10−4 m3. The light of Xe lamp positioned on the stainless tube illuminates toward Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 passing the sharp cut filter and the quartz glass disc located on the top of the stainless tube. The wavelength of the Xe lamp light ranges from 185 nm to 2000 nm. The sharp cut filter can eliminate UV from the Xe lamp light, resulting in the wavelength of light after the filter ranging from 401 nm to 2000 nm or from 801 nm to 2000 nm. Figure 15 exhibits the light transmittance characteristics after the sharp cut filter to demonstrate, as an example, the removal of the wavelength of light under 400 nm [34]. Though this study has not taken the data on the absorption of light by synthesized catalyst samples, this study exhibits the light transmittance data of the sharp cut filter cutting the wavelength below 400 nm as shown in Figure 15, supporting the UV light illumination condition without UV, i.e., VIS + IR. The authors think this could be evidence for the light absorption range of prepared photocatalysts.
The mean light intensity of light from the Xe lamp without the cut filter was 72.0 mW/cm2 in the wavelength ranging from 185 nm to 2000 nm, while that with the filter was 60.4 mW/cm2 for the wavelength between 401 nm and 2000 nm. Additionally, the mean light intensity of light was 51.2 mW/cm2 in the wavelength ranging from 801 nm to 2000 nm with the sharp cut filter. The light intensities above were measured by the light intensity meter located 55 mm away from the lamp, which was the distance between the Xe lamp and the prepared photocatalyst during the CO2 reduction experiment. Unfortunately, it was impossible to measure the reflect radiation from the walls of reactor by this light intensity meter during the experiment. The light intensity spectrum data of the Xe lamp used in this study, according to the brochure of Hamamatsu Photonics Corp. [36], is shown in Figure 16.
CO2 gas with the purity of 99.995 vol% was filled in the vacuumed reactor chamber. After that, the valves installed at the inlet and the outlet of reactor were closed during the experiment. The pressure was 0.1 MPa and the gas temperature was set at 298 K in the reactor. Liquid H2O was injected into the reactor via the gas sampling tap and the Xe lamp was tuned on at the same time. The amount of injected H2O was changed following the set molar ratio of CO2:H2O. The injected H2O was vaporized because of the heat of the infrared light components illuminated by the Xe lamp. The temperature in the reactor attained 343 K within an hour, and it was kept at 343 K during the experiment. The molar ratio of CO2:H2O was changed by 1:0.5, 1:1, 1:2 and 1:4. The reacted gas filled in the reactor was extracted busing a gas syringe via gas sampling tap and it was analyzed by an FID gas chromatograph (GC353B, GL Science, Tokyo, Japan) and a methanizer (MT221, GL Science). The minimum resolution of the FID gas chromatograph and methanizer is 1 ppmV. Regarding the recyclability of photocatalysts, the experiment was conducted three times for the double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 in this study.

4. Conclusions

The impact of double-layered photocatalysts consisting of Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 on the CO2 reduction performance under different light illumination conditions was studied in this paper. The impact of the molar ratio of CO2:H2O on the CO2 reduction performance was also investigated. As a result, the following conclusions were drawn:
(i)
The highest concentration of formed CO and the molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst were achieved when the molar ratio of CO2:H2O = 1:1, which matched the theoretical molar ratio to produce CO according to the reaction scheme of CO2 reduction with H2O, irrespective of the light illumination conditions.
(ii)
Comparing the results of double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 with the results of double-layered TiO2 obtained under the UV + VIS + IR illumination, the highest concentration of formed CO and the molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst increased by 281 ppmV and 0.8 μmol/g, respectively, when CO2:H2O = 1:1.
(iii)
With VIS + IR illumination, the highest concentration of formed CO and the molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst reached 373 ppmV and 7.1 μmol/g, respectively. This proves that CO2 reduction could be activated with VIS + IR illumination if TiO2 loaded with Cu and P4O10 was used as the photocatalyst.
(iv)
With only IR illumination, the highest concentration of formed CO and the molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst was 251 ppmV and 4.7 μmol/g, respectively. This proves that CO2 reduction reaction could be activated with IR only illumination if TiO2 loaded with Cu and P4O10 was used as the photocatalyst.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and writing—original draft preparation, A.N.; data curation, H.S.; methodology, H.M. and R.H.; writing—review and editing, E.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Mie University and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP21K04769.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Jesic, D.; Jurkovic, L.D.; Pohar, A.; Suhadolnik, L.; Likozar, B. Engineering Photocatalytic and Photoelectrocatalytic CO2 Reduction Reactions: Mechanisms, Intrinsic Kinetics, Mass Transfer Resistances, Reactors and Multi-scale Modeling Simulations. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 407, 126799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kaushik, R.; Singh, P.K.; Halder, A. Modulation Strategies in Titania Photocatalyst for Energy Recovery and Environmental Remediation. Catal. Today 2022, 384–386, 45–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, Z.W.; Shi, Y.Z.; Liu, C.; Kang, Y.Y.; Wu, L. Cu+-Ti3+ Interface Interaction Mediated CO2 Coordination model for Controlling the Selectivity of Photocatalytic Reduction CO2. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2022, 301, 120803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jiang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, Z.; Chen, J.; Huang, B.; Dionysiou, D.D.; Yang, G. Enhanced Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction via the Synergetic Effect between Ag and Activated Carbon in TiO2/AC-Ag Ternary Composite. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 348, 592–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kumar, A.; Kumar, P.; Borker, R.; Bansiwal, A.; Labhsetwar, N.; Jain, S.L. Metal-organic hybrid: Photoreduction of CO2 using graphitic carbon nitride supported heteroleptic iridium complex under visible light irradiation. Carbon 2017, 123, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nahar, S.; Zain, M.F.M.; Kadhum, A.A.H.; Hasan, F.A.; Hasan, M.R. Advances in Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction with Water: A Review. Materials 2017, 10, 629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ola, O.; Maroto-Valer, M.M. Review of Material Design and Reactor Engineering on TiO2 Photocatalysis for CO2 Reduction. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2015, 24, 16–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tasbihi, M.; Fresno, F.; Simon, U.; Villar-Garcia, I.J.; Perez-Dieste, V.; Escudero, C.; O’Shea, V.A.D.L.P. On the Selectivity of CO2 Photoreduction towards CH4 Using Pt/TiO2 Catalysts Supported on Mesoporous Silica. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 239, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Remiro-Buenamanana, S.; Garcia, H. Photoassisted CO2 Conversion to Fuels. ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 342–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, Y.; Lan, Z.; Guo, L.; Wang, E.; Yao, J.; Cao, Y. Synergetic Effects of Zn and Pd Species in TiO2 towards Efficient Photo-reduction of CO2 into CH4. R. Soc. Chem. 2018, 42, 483–488. [Google Scholar]
  11. Singhal, N.; Kumar, U. Noble Metal Modified TiO2: Selective Photoreduction of CO2 to Hydrocarbons. Mol. Catal. 2017, 439, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yui, T.; Kan, A.; Saitoh, C.; Koike, K.; Ibusuki, T.; Ishitani, O. Photochemical Reduction of CO2 Using TiO2: Effects of Organic Adsorbates on TiO2 and Deposition of Pd onto TiO2. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 2594–2600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Abdulah, H.; Khan, M.M.R.; Ong, H.R.; Yaakob, Z. Modified TiO2 Photocatalyst for CO2 Photocatalytic Reduction: An Overview. J. CO2 Util. 2017, 22, 15–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Camarillo, R.; Toston, S.; Martinez, F.; Jimenez, C.; Rincon, J. Improving the Photo-reduction of CO2 to Fuels with Catalysts Synthesized under High Pressure: Cu/TiO2. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2018, 93, 1237–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Aguirre, M.E.; Zhou, R.; Engene, A.J.; Guzman, M.I.; Grela, M.A. Cu2O/TiO2 Heterostructures for CO2 Reduction through a Direct Z-scheme: Protecting Cu2O from Photocorrosion. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 217, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kulandaivalu, T.; Rashid, S.A.; Sabli, N.; Tan, T.L. Visible Light Assisted Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 to Ethane Using CQDs/Cu2O Nanocomposite Photocatalyst. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2019, 91, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nishimura, A.; Sakakibara, Y.; Koshio, A.; Hu, E. The Impact of Amount of Cu on CO2 Reduction Performance of Cu/TiO2 with NH3 and H2O. Catalysts 2021, 11, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhao, H.; Rao, G.; Wang, L.; Xu, L.; Liu, L.; Li, X. Synthesis of Novel MgAl Layered Double Oxide Grafted TiO2 Cuboids and their Photocatalytic Activity on CO2 Reduction with Water Vapor. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 3288–3295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, R.; Huang, Z.; Li, C.; Zuo, Y.; Zhou, Y. Monolithic g-C3H4/Reduced Graphene Oxide Aerogel with in Situ Embedding of Pd Nanoparticles for Hydrogeneration of CO2 to CH4. Appl. Suf. Sci. 2019, 475, 953–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, M.M.; Cao, J.M.; Qi, G.D.; Shen, X.Y.; Yan, G.Y.; Wang, Y.; Dong, W.W.; Zhao, J.; Li, D.S.; Zhang, Q. Construction of low-cost z-scheme heterojunction Cu2O/PCN-250 photocatalysts simultaneously for the enhanced photoreduction of CO2 to alcohols and photooxidation of water. Inorg. Chem. 2023, 62, 15963–15970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dong, W.W.; Jia, J.; Wang, Y.; An, J.R.; Yang, O.Y.; Gao, X.J.; Liu, Y.L.; Zhao, J.; Li, D.S. Visible-light-driven solvent-free photocatalytic CO2 reduction to CO by Co-MOF/Cu2O heterojunction with superior selectivity. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 438, 135622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hong, L.F.; Guo, R.T.; Yuan, Y.; Ji, X.Y.; Lin, Z.D.; Gu, J.W.; Pan, W.G. Urchinlike W18O49/g-C3H4 Z-Scheme Heterojunction for Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 under Full Spectrum Light. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 11468–11478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dai, W.; Yu, J.; Luo, S.; Hu, X.; Yang, L.; Zhang, S.; Li, B.; Luo, X.; Zou, J. WS2 Quantum Dots Seeding in Bi2S3 Nanotubes: A Novel Vis-NIR Light Sensitive Photocatalyst with Low-Resistance Junction Interface for CO2 Reduction. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 389, 123430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gan, J.; Wang, H.; Hu, H.; Su, M.; Chen, F.; Xu, H. Efficient Synthesis of Tunable Band-Gap CuInZnS Decorated g-C3H4 Hybrids for Enhanced CO2 Photocatalytic Reduction and Near-Infrared- Triggered Photordegradation Performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 564, 150396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yu, M.; Lv, X.; Idris, A.M.; Li, S.; Lin, J.; Lin, H.; Wang, J.; Li, Z. Upconversion Nanoparticles Coupled with Hierarchical ZnIn2S4 Nanorods as a Near-Infrared Responsive Photocatalyst for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 612, 782–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nishimura, A.; Mae, H.; Kato, T.; Hu, E. Utilization from ultraviolet to infrared light for CO2 reduction with P4O10/TiO2 photocatalyst. Phys. Astron. Int. J. 2022, 6, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tahir, M.; Amin, N.S. Advances in Visible Light Responsive Titamium Oxide Based Photocatalysts for CO2 Conversion to Hydrocarbon Fuels. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 76, 194–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Goren, Z.; Willner, I.; Nelson, A.J. Selective Photoreduction of CO2/HCO3− to Formate by Aqueous Suspensions and Colloids of Pd-TiO2. J. Physic. Chem. 1990, 94, 3784–3790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tseng, I.H.; Chang, W.C.; Wu, J.C.S. Photoreduction of CO2 Using Sol-gel Derived Titania and Titania-supported Copper Catalysts. Appl. Catal. B 2002, 37, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Izumi, Y. Recent Advances in the Photocatalytic Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Fuels with Water and/or Hydrogen Using Solar Energy and Beyond. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2013, 257, 171–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Japan Society of Mechanical Engineering. Heat Transfer Hand Book, 1st ed.; Maruzen: Tokyo, Japan, 1993; pp. 367–369. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yokoi, Y.; Ando, N.; Yokoi, H.; Iwashita, H.; Suzuki, R. Application of sintered titanium dioxide to biomaterials: Sintering temperature of anatase-type TiO2 and cell proliferation of L929 cells. J. Jpn. Soc. Oral Implantol. 2012, 25, 262–270. Available online: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsoi/25/2/25_262/_pdf/-char/en (accessed on 14 April 2024).
  33. Kovalevskiy, N.S.; Lyulyukin, M.N.; Kozlov, D.V.; Selishchev, D.S. Cu-grafted TiO2 photocatalysts: Effect of Cu on the action spectrum of composite materials. Mendeleev Commun. 2021, 31, 644–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nishimura, A.; Ishida, N.; Tatematsu, D.; Hirota, M.; Koshio, A.; Kokai, F.; Hu, E. Effect of Fe Loading Condition and Reductants on CO2 Reduction Performance with Fe/TiO2 Photocatalyst. Int. J. Photoenergy 2017, 2017, 1625274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Licensable Patent Information Database. P2009-184861A. 2022. Available online: https://plidb.inpit.go.jp (accessed on 14 April 2024).
  36. Brochure of Hamamatsu Photonics Corp. 2000. Available online: https://www.hamamatsu.com/content/dam/hamamatsu-photonics/sites/documents/99_SALES_LIBRARY/etd/Xe-HgXe_TLS1016J.pdf (accessed on 14 April 2024).
Figure 1. SEM and EPMA images of Cu/TiO2 coated on the netlike glass disc, which was prepared in this study.
Figure 1. SEM and EPMA images of Cu/TiO2 coated on the netlike glass disc, which was prepared in this study.
Catalysts 14 00270 g001
Figure 2. SEM and EPMA images of P4O10/TiO2 coated on the netlike glass disc, which was prepared in this study.
Figure 2. SEM and EPMA images of P4O10/TiO2 coated on the netlike glass disc, which was prepared in this study.
Catalysts 14 00270 g002
Figure 3. Concentration of the formed CO for double-layered TiO2 with UV + VIS + IR illumination.
Figure 3. Concentration of the formed CO for double-layered TiO2 with UV + VIS + IR illumination.
Catalysts 14 00270 g003
Figure 4. Molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst for double-layered TiO2 with UV + VIS + IR illumination.
Figure 4. Molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst for double-layered TiO2 with UV + VIS + IR illumination.
Catalysts 14 00270 g004
Figure 5. Schematic drawing of double-layered photocatalysts.
Figure 5. Schematic drawing of double-layered photocatalysts.
Catalysts 14 00270 g005
Figure 6. Concentration of the formed CO for double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 with UV + VIS + IR illumination.
Figure 6. Concentration of the formed CO for double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 with UV + VIS + IR illumination.
Catalysts 14 00270 g006
Figure 7. Molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst for double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 with UV + VIS + IR illumination.
Figure 7. Molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst for double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 with UV + VIS + IR illumination.
Catalysts 14 00270 g007
Figure 8. Concentration of the formed CO for double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 with VIS + IR illumination.
Figure 8. Concentration of the formed CO for double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 with VIS + IR illumination.
Catalysts 14 00270 g008
Figure 9. Molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst for double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 with VIS + IR illumination.
Figure 9. Molar quantity of CO per unit weight of the photocatalyst for double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 with VIS + IR illumination.
Catalysts 14 00270 g009
Figure 10. Concentration of the formed CO for double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 with IR only illumination.
Figure 10. Concentration of the formed CO for double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 with IR only illumination.
Catalysts 14 00270 g010
Figure 11. Molar quantity of CO per unit of the photocatalyst for double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 with IR only illumination.
Figure 11. Molar quantity of CO per unit of the photocatalyst for double-layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 with IR only illumination.
Catalysts 14 00270 g011
Figure 12. Photo of Cu/TiO2 coated on the netlike glass disc.
Figure 12. Photo of Cu/TiO2 coated on the netlike glass disc.
Catalysts 14 00270 g012
Figure 13. Photo of P4O10/TiO2 coated on the netlike glass disc.
Figure 13. Photo of P4O10/TiO2 coated on the netlike glass disc.
Catalysts 14 00270 g013
Figure 14. Schematic drawing of the CO2 reduction experimental set-up.
Figure 14. Schematic drawing of the CO2 reduction experimental set-up.
Catalysts 14 00270 g014
Figure 15. Light transmittance data of the sharp cut filter.
Figure 15. Light transmittance data of the sharp cut filter.
Catalysts 14 00270 g015
Figure 16. Light intensity spectrum data of the Xe lamp used in this study [36].
Figure 16. Light intensity spectrum data of the Xe lamp used in this study [36].
Catalysts 14 00270 g016
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nishimura, A.; Senoue, H.; Mae, H.; Hanyu, R.; Hu, E. CO2 Reduction Performance with Double-Layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 as Photocatalysts under Different Light Illumination Conditions. Catalysts 2024, 14, 270. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14040270

AMA Style

Nishimura A, Senoue H, Mae H, Hanyu R, Hu E. CO2 Reduction Performance with Double-Layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 as Photocatalysts under Different Light Illumination Conditions. Catalysts. 2024; 14(4):270. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14040270

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nishimura, Akira, Hiroki Senoue, Homare Mae, Ryo Hanyu, and Eric Hu. 2024. "CO2 Reduction Performance with Double-Layered Cu/TiO2 and P4O10/TiO2 as Photocatalysts under Different Light Illumination Conditions" Catalysts 14, no. 4: 270. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14040270

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop