Next Article in Journal
High-Fidelity Mock Development for the Insensitive High Explosive TATB
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Light Extraction Efficiency and Modulation Bandwidth of Deep-Ultraviolet Light-Emitting Diodes with Al Nanospheres
Previous Article in Journal
Controllable Electrodeposition Adjusts the Electrochromic Properties of Co and Mo Co-Modified WO3 Films
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Investigation of Carrier Leakage Mechanism Based on ABC-Models in InGaN/GaN MQW and Its Effect on Internal Quantum Efficiency under Optical Excitation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

High-Speed GaN-Based Superluminescent Diode for 4.57 Gbps Visible Light Communication

Crystals 2022, 12(2), 191; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12020191
by Dong Li 1, Chicheng Ma 1, Junfei Wang 1, Fangchen Hu 1, Yuqi Hou 1, Shanshan Wang 1, Junhui Hu 1, Shulan Yi 1, Yingnan Ma 1, Jianyang Shi 1,2,3, Junwen Zhang 1,2,3,4, Ziwei Li 1,2,3,4, Nan Chi 1,2,3,4, Liang Xia 5 and Chao Shen 1,2,3,4,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Crystals 2022, 12(2), 191; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12020191
Submission received: 16 December 2021 / Revised: 21 January 2022 / Accepted: 24 January 2022 / Published: 27 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in GaN-Based Optoelectronic Materials and Devices)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The recommendation are enclosed here.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript presents a number of advantages. The subject of the work lies within the thematic scope of this special issue. The research topic is timely and relevant. The obtained results are valuable, especially those concerning the use of SLDs in data communication experiments.

However, the paper has also several weakness.

In part 2 “Materials and Method” basic information on fabrication and processing of SLD semiconductor structure is missing (type of GaN substrate, thicknesses composition and doping of epilayers, chip dimensions, ohmic contacts, plasma etching, etc.). Fig. 1a, b are not informative.

Part 4 “Discussion”, in its current form, is an extension of the state-of-the art. To be useful, the discussion of the results should consider relationships between device structure design, fabrication process and SLD performance and indicate what was the main factor distinguishing the obtained SLDs from the others shown in Table 1, enabling the progress.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The revised manuscript can be published in present form.

Back to TopTop