Next Article in Journal
Semiquantitative X-ray Powder Diffraction Analysis in Counterfeit Medicines Investigation—The Viagra Example
Next Article in Special Issue
Piezoelectric Elements with PVDF–TrFE/MWCNT-Aligned Composite Nanowires for Energy Harvesting Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Aluminum Addition on the Microstructure, Magnetic, and Mechanical Properties of FeCrCoNiMn High-Entropy Alloy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design and Performance Enhancement of a Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer Based on NBBT Lead-Free Piezoelectric Single-Crystal Thin Film
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Axicon-Based Annular Pump Acousto-Optic Q-Switched Nd:GdVO4 Self-Raman Vortex Laser

1
Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Micro-Nano Optoelectronic Devices, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China
2
Zhejiang International Sci-Tech Cooperation Base for Photoelectric Functional Devices and Digital Detections, Wenzhou 325035, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2023, 13(10), 1484; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13101484
Submission received: 21 September 2023 / Revised: 5 October 2023 / Accepted: 10 October 2023 / Published: 12 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Photoelectric Functional Crystals)

Abstract

:
We report, for the first time, the generation of a 1173 nm acousto-optic Q-switched self-Raman vortex laser with an axicon-based annular pump system. A 20 mm long Nd:GdVO4 crystal was used as the self-Raman crystal. Both the fundamental field and the first-Stokes field were investigated using the respective output couplers. In comparison with both vortex fields, a noticeable beam cleaning-up effect and pulse compression were observed from the 1063 nm fundamental field to the 1173 nm first-Stokes field. A Stokes field carrying a unitary topological charge was achieved. Finally, the average output power of the first-Stokes vortex emission reached 454 mW under an incident pump power of 19.5 W, corresponding to a pulse width of 45.7 ns. It was beneficial to apply a high peak power from the Q-switched laser and self-Raman conversion to expand the applications of the vortex laser beam.

1. Introduction

Carrying spiral wavefront and central phase singularity, optical vortices are known as a kind of beam with doughnut intensity distribution [1]. Given their unique structure, many applications have been found in fields such as optical tweezing, particle manipulation, optical communication, topological quantum simulation, ultra-resolution imaging, chiral processing and astronomy [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Currently, the methods used to generate optical vortices include extra-cavity tuning and intracavity direct generation. For extra-cavity tuning, extra components are utilized, such as a spiral phase plate [10], Q-plate [11], mode converter [12], forked diffraction grating [13] and meta-surfaces [14]. In comparison, intracavity methods are cost-effective and suitable for multi-wavelength vortex beam generation with a higher conversion efficiency and higher beam quality. Moreover, it is relatively easy to produce optical vortex beams with tunable handedness and a topological charge. Recent studies have revealed promising results [15,16].
Of the four intracavity optical vortex generation methods, namely, mode selection with a spheric lens, off-axis pumping, a defect mirror and an annular pump, the most promising method with extensive developments is the annular pump. The idea is to excite the Laguerre–Gaussian mode with an annular gain profile. Given its simple linear structure and flexibility, the annular pump can be used in many laser designs, making it an ideal choice for producing high-power optical vortices. An axicon is a better approach for realizing flexibility in the annular gain profile. In 2015, Zeng et al. [17] presented a theoretical analysis of an annular beam generated with an axicon–lens system based on interference theory; they found that a thin ring will be formed in the focal position. In 2016, Hu et al. [18] applied an axicon–lens system in a 1.0%at Nd:YVO4 microchip laser for a 10 cm cavity. Under the absorbed power of 7 W, a pulsed LG01 laser with an output power of approximately 570 mW and pulse width of 198 ns was obtained under the pulse repetition frequency of 65 kHz.
Nonlinear frequency conversion methods [19,20], such as stimulated Raman scattering, are a useful tool for achieving an easy frequency conversion, orbital angular momentum transfer and even topological charge doubling. In 2013, Andrew et al. [21] from Macquarie University used a 20 mm long Nd:GdVO4 as a Raman and lasing medium, which as a first-Stokes emission produced an output power of 380 mW and a fundamental beam of 400 mW under the incident pump power of 6.8 W. The LG01 mode was preserved for the fundamental and the Stokes fields, respectively, which showed that the orbital angular momentum in the fundamental fields was transferred to the Stokes field. In 2020, Ma et al. [22] applied an annular pump beam to power a 5 mm Nd:GdVO4 crystal for stimulated Raman conversion. Under the pump power of 5.69 W, continuous-waves first-Stokes were emitted at the wavelengths of 1173 nm (corresponding to a Raman shift of 882 cm−1) and 1108 nm (corresponding to a Raman shift of 382 cm−1). The corresponding output power was 133.4 mW and 49.8 mW, respectively. They also observed that in the pump power region of 3.46~3.97 W, 1108 nm and 1173 nm Stokes emissions can both retain the annular intensity profile through a slight adjustment of the output coupler.
With regard to stimulated Raman scattering, an acousto-optic Q-switched pulse may prove more favorable against continuous waves, since Q-switched pulsed leads to a high peak power and efficient Raman conversion. Vanadate crystal has been used for stimulated Raman scattering owing to its rich Raman shifts [23,24]. In this paper, we report on an acousto-optic Q-switched self-Raman vortex laser operated based on a 20 mm long Nd: GdVO4 crystal, which simultaneously achieved optical vortex generation and orbital angular momentum transfer from the fundamental field to the Stokes field. In this experiment, fundamental and self-Raman vortex laser operation were investigated. Comparing the obtained intensity and pulse profiles of the fundamental and the Stokes emissions, the beam cleaning-up effect and pulse compression could be clearly observed. A first-Stokes vortex field with an average output power of 454 mW and pulse width of 45.7 ns was obtained at the pump power of 19.5 W and the pulse repetition frequency of 40 kHz.

2. Materials and Methods

Nd3+-doped vanadate is widely used as a laser crystal for diode-pumped solid-state lasers. Being in the vanadate family, GdVO4 crystal is a uniaxial crystal with 4 ¯ 2 m symmetry, where every Gd3+ is surrounded by eight oxygen atoms. [25] Since Gd3+ is larger in size than Y3+, the distance between adjacent atoms in GdVO4 crystal is greater than that in YVO4. The decrease of the interactions between adjacent atoms gives GdVO4 an edge over YVO4. For instance, the absorption coefficient of Nd:GdVO4 at 808 nm and its stimulated emission cross-section are much greater than those of other neodymium-doped crystals at the same doping concentration. The primary transition is 4F3/24I11/2 with the emission wavelength of 1063 nm. The great natural birefringence of a-cut crystal results in a linearly polarized laser beam of the fundamental laser oscillation, which has an advantage in frequency conversion. For a-cut Nd:GdVO4 crystal, the oscillation in the laser cavity without polarization-selective optics always produces a c-axis polarized laser. Compared with Nd:YVO4, Nd:GdVO4 has a higher thermal conductivity (11.7 W·m−1·K−1) and higher damage threshold, which means it is widely used for high-power lasers. Moreover, it has rich Raman shifts and a high Raman gain coefficient. The primary Raman shifts of Nd:GdVO4 are the active vibration modes at 882 cm−1 with a Raman gain coefficient of approximately 4.5 cm/GW excited by a ~1 μm laser [26]. Based on an 882 cm−1 Raman shift, a first-Stokes emission at 1173 nm can be achieved with the fundamental wave at 1063 nm. Additionally, one can combine lasing and Raman conversion in a single crystal (a process called self-Raman conversion), which significantly reduces the cavity length.
In this experiment, an 808 nm fiber-coupled diode laser with a core diameter of 200 μm and numeric aperture of 0.22 was used as the pump source. A tailoring device for the pump beam was configured with a collimated lens (L1), an axicon (Thorlabs AX251-B, γ   = 1 °) and a focus lens (L2), as shown in Figure 1A,B. According to [27], a collimated beam will be reconfigured into a Bessel beam in a given region upon passing through an axicon. The maximum range of that region is called the maximum diffraction range Z max . Outside this range, an annular beam can be formed, but with multiple diffraction rings. L2 was used to refocus the beam in order to produce a better annular pump beam with fewer diffraction effects. The distance between the axicon and the lens Z 0 was a key element affecting the structure of the annular pump beam. The point where the annular gain appeared was called the appearance point. z 1 represents the distance between the appearance point and the lens L2. The point where the central intensity is resumed is called the disappearance point. z 2 represents the distance between the disappearance point and the lens L2. When the distance Z 0 was shorter than the focal length of the lens L2 ( 0 < Z 0 < F ), a divergent annular beam was formed with z 1 being a function of F and Z 0 and z 2 being infinite. When the distance Z 0 was greater than the focal length of F but smaller than the maximum diffraction range Z max ( F < Z 0 < Z max ), a localized annular beam (sometimes referred to as the optical bottle beam) was formed, with z 1 and z 2 both being a function of the distance Z 0 and the focal length of L2. In both cases, the focal radius of the annular pump beam satisfies R = F γ n 1 [17], where F, n and γ are the focal length, the refractive index and the base angle of the axicon, respectively. Considering mode matching for a 20 mm long laser crystal, we decided to apply the second scenario, where the focal length of L2 was 80 mm and the distance Z 0 was 90 mm.
The linear cavity comprised a plane mirror (IM) and a concave mirror (OC). The total cavity length was approximately 90 mm. The IM had a high transmission coating at 808 nm (T > 95%) and a high reflection coating from 1.06 to 1.18 μm. The output coupler had a radius of curvature of 100 mm. It also had a high reflection coating at 1.0~1.1 μm (R > 99.9%) and a 4% transmission at 1173 nm. An a-cut 0.3 at.% Nd:GdVO4 with the dimensions of 3 × 3 × 20 mm3 was wrapped with indium foil and placed in a water-cooled copper block for heat dissipation. The temperature was set to 20 °C. The two-facet crystal was polished and had an anti-reflection coating of 808 nm and 1.06 μm (R < 0.2%). An acousto-optic module (AOM, Gooch & Housego Co. (Ilminster, UK)) with anti-reflection coating of 1.06 μm was placed next to it for the Q-switching operation.
The parameters of the output beam were measured with the respective devices. To measure the topological charge, a home-made Mach–Zehnder interferometer was devised with two reflection mirrors and two beam splitters, as shown in Figure 1C. The intensity profile and self-referenced interference fringes of the vortex beam were recorded using a CCD-based laser profiler (Model: BeamOn U3, Thorlabs Inc. (Newton, NJ, USA)). The spectrum of the self-Raman vertex laser emission was obtained using a grating monochromator (Model: Omni-λ500, ZOLIX (Beijing, China)). The temporal pulse profiles of the laser output were detected with an InGaAs free-space photo detector (5 GHz, Thorlabs Inc.) and displayed on a 500 MHz oscilloscope (Model DPO3052B). The average output power was measured with a thermal sensor power meter (Model: PM310D, Thorlabs Inc.).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Acousto-Optic Q-Switched 1063 nm Fundamental Vortex Laser

According to the experimental configuration in Figure 1, the output coupler was first replaced with a concave mirror with a radius of curvature of 100 mm and a transmission of 5% at 1.06 μm. The average output power of the acousto-optic Q-switched 1063 nm fundamental vortex laser is depicted in Figure 2. The output power increased linearly with the increase in the incident pump power. At the incident pump power of 9.38 W, the maximum output was 855 mW at the pulse repetition frequency of 20 kHz. The conversion efficiency was 9.1%. Increasing the pulse repetition frequency to 30 kHz, the output power reached 1.02 W with a corresponding conversion efficiency up to 10.9%. The fitted slope efficiency for the output power with respect to the incident pump power was 10.2% at the pulse repetition frequency of 20 kHz, as shown in Figure 2. When the pulse repetition frequency increased to 30 kHz, the fitted slope efficiency rose to 12.7%.
Then, a CCD-based laser profiler (Beamon U3, Thorlabs Inc.) was used to record the intensity profile. As shown in Figure 2a–c, the intensity pattern changed as the pump power increased from the threshold to the maximum pump power of 9.38 W. The intensity at the center increased with the increase in the pump power. Although only the intensity profile under the pulse repetition frequency of 30 kHz is given in Figure 2, we would like to point out that this phenomenon was also observed in the fundamental field under the pulse repetition frequency of 20 kHz. This phenomenon could be explained by the superposition of the fundamental mode LG00 and first-order LG01 beam. A theoretical simulation of the results was performed, as shown in Figure 3. As can be observed, the center intensity increased as the intensity ratio of the LG00 and LG01 components increased. The ratio m is defined as the intensity of the LG00 component divided by the total intensity. The intensity of the LG00 component will increase as the ratio increases. Near the threshold, the loss for the LG00 mode was greater than the loss for the LG01 mode. As a result, the LG00 component was weak, which resulted in a relatively weak central intensity and a clear doughnut structure (see Figure 3a,d). With the increase in the pump power, the gain condition changed, allowing for the intensity of the LG00 component to grow. According to the simulation, the LG01 mode was still a dominant component when the decrease in the depth of the central dip became noticeable (see Figure 3b,e, when m was merely 0.1; Figure 3c,f, when the ratio m was 0.2). In this case, the vortex feature of the fundamental field could also be observed and verified based on the spiral interference fringes.
Considering their highly degenerate cavity condition, the LG00 and LG01 components could not be separated. This may cause concerns regarding mode purity. The long laser crystal used for efficient self-Raman conversion could be responsible for this problem, causing the mismatch between the pump beam and the laser mode in the Nd:GdVO4 crystal.
The temporal characteristics of the LG01 vortex pulse were investigated. Figure 4a,c shows the pulse train and the pulse profile at a pulse repetition frequency of 20 kHz. In Figure 4b,d, the pulse train and the pule profile for the 1063 nm fundamental field under the pulse repetition frequency of 30 kHz are depicted. When the pulse repetition frequency decreased from 30 kHz to 20 kHz, the pulse width shrank from 146 ns to 115.7 ns. At a low pulse repetition frequency, the peak power was higher. Compared with the LG00 pulse, the pulse width of the LG01 vortex beam was significantly broadened owing to spatial effects.

3.2. Acousto-Optic Q-Switched Self-Raman Vortex Laser

Next, the acousto-optic Q-switched self-Raman vortex laser’s operation was investigated using an output coupler with 4% transmission for a first-Stokes emission at 1173 nm. Under the pulse repetition frequency of 20 kHz, the first-Stokes emission appeared as the pump power increased to 10.2 W. With the increase in the pump power, the average output power also increased, though nonlinearly. The turn-over power for 1173 nm under the pulse repetition frequency of 20 kHz was 17.5 W, where the maximum output power was 314 mW and the conversion efficiency was only 1.8%. As the pulse repetition frequency increased to 30 kHz, the threshold pump power increased to 11.9 W, while the maximum output power rose to 421 mW. When the pulse repetition frequency was increased to 40 kHz, the maximum average output power and the conversion efficiency reached 454 mW and 2.3% under the incident pump power of 19.5 W. In Figure 5, the intensity profile of the Stokes field retains a well-defined doughnut pattern, as shown by the inset in Figure 5a–c. The mode purity, as compared with that of the fundamental field, was greatly improved due to the Raman beam cleaning-up effect.
The spectrum of the self-Raman vortex laser emission is shown in Figure 6. The central wavelength was measured to be 1172.9 nm, corresponding to the Raman shift of 882 cm−1. The polarization state of the Stokes field was measured with a Glan laser prism. Rotating the prism, the extinction appeared, which suggested that the Stokes field was also linearly polarized, just the same as the fundamental wave. Moreover, the polarization state of the first Stokes field was along the c-axis of the Nd:GdVO4 crystal. The vortex beam carries orbital angular momentum, which is signified by spiral interference patterns and a topological charge l . The topological charge was measured with a home-made Mach-Zehnder interferometer. The self-reference interference fringes at pulse repetition frequencies of 20 kHz, 30 kHz and 40 kHz were recorded with a CCD-based laser profiler, as shown in Figure 7a–c. In all three images, spiral interference fringes with a unitary arm and clockwise heading can be observed. We also created simulated interference fringes for an optical vortex carrying unitary orbital angular momentum. It is well-known that an optical vortex carries a Hilbert factor E l exp i l θ . Considering a paraxial spherical wave as a reference wave, a spherical phase term E r exp i k x 2 + y 2 contributes the formation of the spiral interference fringes. The intensity of the interference fringes can be written as I E l + E r 2 cos l θ k x 2 + y 2 . The interference is a spiral pattern where the number of the spiral arm signifies the absolute value of the topological charge, while the heading of the spiral signifies the sign of the topological charge and the handedness. For instance, l = 1 corresponds to an optical vortex with left handedness and a clockwise heading. Meanwhile, l = 1 corresponds to an optical vortex with right handedness and an anti-clockwise heading. The simulation conforms to the images recorded with the CCD laser profiler. It proves that the Stokes field carried a unitary topological charge, i.e., l   = 1.
The temporal characteristics of the Stokes pulse were measured at different pulse repetition frequencies, as shown in Figure 8. In Figure 8a,b, the pulse profiles of the Stokes emission at pulse repetition frequencies of 20 kHz and 30 kHz are depicted. In Figure 8c,d, the pulse profile and the pulse train of the Stokes emission under the pulse repetition frequency of 40 kHz can be observed. As the pulse repetition frequency decreased, the average power also decreased. Meanwhile, the peak power increased with the decrease in the pulse repetition frequency. The peak power for the Stokes emission at the pulse repetition frequencies of 40 kHz, 30 kHz and 20 kHz were 0.33 kW, 0.78 kW and 1.11 kW, respectively. In addition, the pulse width became narrower as the pulse repetition frequency decreased. The pulse width for the Stokes emission under the pulse repetition frequencies of 40 kHz, 30 kHz and 20 kHz were 45.7 ns, 39.8 ns and 28 ns, respectively. As compared to the pulse width of the fundamental pulse, the pulse width of the Stokes field was shortened due to Raman pulse width compression.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we reported the generation of an acousto-optic Q-switched self-Raman optical vortex beam with an annular pump design. According to our knowledge, this is the first report of acousto-optic Q-switching applied to a 1173 nm Raman vortex beam’s generation. An annular pump beam was obtained with an γ = 1° axicon and a focus lens. Firstly, a 1063 nm LG01 vortex beam was obtained in a plano-concave cavity. Under the pulse repetition frequency of 30 kHz, the maximum power reached 1.02 W under the pump power of 9.38 W. Driven by the acousto-optic Q-switched fundamental field, a 1173 nm Stokes emission was realized based on self-Raman conversion in the Nd: GdVO4 crystal. The average output power of the Stokes fields reached 454 mW under the pulse repetition frequency of 40 kHz, corresponding to the pulse width of 45.7 ns. The results revealed that acousto-optic Q-switching can further increase the average output power of the vortex Stokes emission. The laser peak power can be increased through Q-switching, while stimulated Raman conversion helps to expand the wavelength of the vortex beam. All of these findings can be applied to further the applications of vortex lasers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L. and H.Z.; methodology, J.L., W.M., Y.D. and H.Z.; software, J.L.; validation, J.L. and W.M.; formal analysis, J.L. and Y.D.; investigation, J.L., W.M., Y.D. and H.Z.; resources, Y.D. and H.Z.; data curation, W.M., X.J. and Z.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.L. and H.Z.; writing—review and editing, W.M., X.J., Z.L. and Y.D.; supervision, Y.D. and H.Z.; project administration, H.Z.; funding acquisition, Y.D. and H.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant numbers 62275200 and 62075167, and the Basic scientific research project of Wenzhou City, grant number G20220014.

Data Availability Statement

All of the data reported in the paper are presented in the main text. Any other data will be provided on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, J.; Duan, Y.M.; Li, Z.H.; Zhang, G.; Zhu, H.Y. Recent progress in nonlinear frequency conversion of optical vortex lasers. Front. Phys. 2022, 10, 865029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Paterson, L.; Paterson, L.; MacDonald, M.P.; Arlt, J.; Sibbett, W.; Bryant, P.E.; Dholakia, K. Controlled Rotation of Optically Trapped Microscopic Particles. Science 2001, 292, 912–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gahagan, K.T.; Swartzlander, G.A. Optical vortex trapping of particles. Opt. Lett. 1996, 21, 829–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. García-Escartín, J.C.; Chamorro-Posada, P. Quantum multiplexing with the orbital angular momentum of light. Phys. Rev. A 2008, 78, 062320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, M.; Zhang, H.Q.; Liao, Y.W.; Liu, Z.H.; Zhou, Z.W.; Zhou, X.X.; Xu, J.S.; Han, Y.J.; Li, C.F.; Guo, G.C. Topological band structure via twisted photons in a degenerate cavity. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Moneron, G.; Medda, R.; Hein, B.; Giske, A.; Westphal, V.; Hell, S.W. Fast STED microscopy
with continuous-wave fiber lasers. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 1302–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Duocastella, M.; Arnold, C.B. Bessel and annular beams for materials processing. Laser Photonics Rev. 2012, 6, 607–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Harwit, M. Photon Orbital Angular Momentum in Astrophysics. Astrophys. J. 2003, 597, 1266–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bojowald, M.A. Twist on relativistic astrophysics. Nat. Phys. 2011, 7, 188–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Moh, K.J.; Yuan, X.C.; Bu, J.; Burge, R.E.; Gao, B.Z. Generating radial or azimuthal polarization by axial sampling of circularly polarized vortex beams. Appl. Opt. 2007, 46, 7544–7551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ji, W.; Lee, C.H.; Chen, P.; Hu, W.; Ming, Y.; Zhang, L.; Lin, T.H.; Chigrinov, V.; Lu, Y.Q. Meta-q-plate for complex beam shaping. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Allen, L.; Beijersbergen, M.W.; Spreeuw, R.J.; Woerdman, J.P. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes. Phys. Rev. A 1992, 45, 8185–8189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mirhosseini, M.; Magaña-Loaiza, O.S.; Chen, C.; Rodenburg, B.; Malik, M.; Boyd, R.W. Rapid generation of light beams carrying orbital angular momentum. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 30196–30203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, M.; Huo, P.; Zhu, W.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, S.; Song, M.; Xu, T. Broadband generation of perfect Poincaré beams via dielectric spin-multiplexed metasurface. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, S.; Zhao, Z.G.; Ito, I.; Kobayashi, Y.H. Direct generation of femtosecond vortex beam from a Yb:KYW oscillator featuring a defect spot mirror. OSA Continuum. 2021, 2, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sheng, Q.; Wang, A.; Ma, Y.; Wang, S.J.; Wang, M.; Shi, Z.; Liu, J.J.; Fu, S.J.; Shi, W.; Yao, J.Q.; et al. Intracavitty spherical aberration for selective generation of single transverse mode Laguerre-Gaussian output with order up to 95. PhotoniX 2022, 3, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zeng, X.H.; Wu, F.T. The analytical description and experiments of the optical bottle generated by an axicon and a lens. J. Mod. Opt. 2008, 55, 3071–3081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hu, A.; Chen, P.; Wang, Y.; Li, S. Generation of continuous-wave and pulsed vortex beams in an a-cut Nd:YVO4 laser with annular end-pumping. In Proceedings of the CLEO: 2015, OSA Technical Digest (online) (Optica Publishing Group, 2015), San Jose, CA, USA, 10–15 May 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tung, J.C.; Liu, K.W.; Chen, S.C. Generating multiple optical vortices in orange beams induced by selectively pumped frequency-doubled solid-state Raman lasers with mode conversion. Opt. Lett. 2022, 47, 945–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Miao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, D.; Dong, J. Broadband 2D n × n Vortex Arrays Generated from an Efficient Petal-Like Raman Laser with an Astigmatic Mode Convertor. Adv. Photonics Res. 2023, 4, 2200293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, A.J.; Omatsu, T.; Pask, H.M. Direct generation of a first-Stokes vortex laser beam from a self-Raman laser. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 12401–12409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ma, Y.; Lee, A.J.; Pask, H.M.; Miyamoto, K.; Omatsu, T. Direct generation of 1108 nm and 1173 nm Laguerre-Gaussian modes from a self-Raman Nd:GdVO4 laser. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 24095–24103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Duan, Y.M.; Xu, J.; Li, Y.H.; Li, Z.H.; Jin, X.X.; Zhu, H.Y. Generation of 1216 nm and 608 nm laser emission using cascaded Raman shifts in Nd:YVO4. Opt. Laser Technol. 2023, 157, 108716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Duan, Y.M.; Li, Y.H.; Xu, C.W.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Zhu, H.Y. Generation of 589 nm Emission Via Frequency Doubling of a Composite c-Cut Nd:YVO4 Self-Raman Laser. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2022, 34, 831–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jensen, T.; Ostroumov, V.G.; Meyn, J.P.; Huber, G.; Zagumennyi, A.I.; Shcherbakov, I.A. Spectroscopic characterization and laser performance of diode-laser-pumped Nd: GdVO4. Appl. Phys. B 1994, 58, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kaminskii, A.A.; Ueda, K.; Eichler, H.J.; Kuwano, Y.; Kouta, H.; Bagaev, S.N.; Chyba, T.H.; Barnes, J.C.; Gad, G.M.A.; Murai, T.; et al. Tetragonal vanadates YVO4 and GdVO4 – new efficient χ(3)-materials for Raman lasers. Opt. Commun. 2001, 194, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Arlt, J.; Dholakia, K. Generation of high-order Bessel beams by use of an axicon. Opt. Commun. 2000, 177, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematics for acousto-optic Q-switched Nd:GdVO4 self-Raman vortex laser. (A) Main body of setup. (B) Illustration to show the principle of axicon-based annular pump shaping. (C) The home-made Mach–Zehnder interferometer and the pulse profile measurement setup.
Figure 1. Schematics for acousto-optic Q-switched Nd:GdVO4 self-Raman vortex laser. (A) Main body of setup. (B) Illustration to show the principle of axicon-based annular pump shaping. (C) The home-made Mach–Zehnder interferometer and the pulse profile measurement setup.
Crystals 13 01484 g001
Figure 2. Average output power of 1063 nm vortex beam at pulse repetition frequencies of 20 kHz and 30 kHz. Insets: (a) Intensity profile for fundamental field near threshold. (b) Intensity profile for fundamental field when the output power was 0.5 W. (c) Intensity profile for fundamental field when the output power reached 1.02 W at the pulse repetition frequency of 30 kHz.
Figure 2. Average output power of 1063 nm vortex beam at pulse repetition frequencies of 20 kHz and 30 kHz. Insets: (a) Intensity profile for fundamental field near threshold. (b) Intensity profile for fundamental field when the output power was 0.5 W. (c) Intensity profile for fundamental field when the output power reached 1.02 W at the pulse repetition frequency of 30 kHz.
Crystals 13 01484 g002
Figure 3. Simulated intensity profile for various output power at pulse repetition frequency of 30 kHz. (a) Simulated intensity profile of the mixed mode when the ratio m was 0. (b) Simulated intensity profile of the mixed mode when the ratio m was 0.1. (c) Simulated intensity profile of the mixed mode when the ratio m was 0.2. (df) are the corresponding normalized intensity distributions.
Figure 3. Simulated intensity profile for various output power at pulse repetition frequency of 30 kHz. (a) Simulated intensity profile of the mixed mode when the ratio m was 0. (b) Simulated intensity profile of the mixed mode when the ratio m was 0.1. (c) Simulated intensity profile of the mixed mode when the ratio m was 0.2. (df) are the corresponding normalized intensity distributions.
Crystals 13 01484 g003
Figure 4. (a) Temporal pulse profile for 1063 nm acousto-optic Q-switched vortex beam at pulse repetition frequency of 20 kHz. (b) Temporal pulse train for 1063 nm acousto-optic Q-switched vortex beam at pulse repetition frequency of 20 kHz. (c) Temporal pulse profile for 1063 nm acousto-optic Q-switched vortex beam at pulse repetition frequency of 30 kHz. (d) Temporal pulse train for 1063 nm acousto-optic Q-switched vortex beam at pulse repetition frequency of 30 kHz.
Figure 4. (a) Temporal pulse profile for 1063 nm acousto-optic Q-switched vortex beam at pulse repetition frequency of 20 kHz. (b) Temporal pulse train for 1063 nm acousto-optic Q-switched vortex beam at pulse repetition frequency of 20 kHz. (c) Temporal pulse profile for 1063 nm acousto-optic Q-switched vortex beam at pulse repetition frequency of 30 kHz. (d) Temporal pulse train for 1063 nm acousto-optic Q-switched vortex beam at pulse repetition frequency of 30 kHz.
Crystals 13 01484 g004
Figure 5. Average output power of 1173 nm vortex beam at pulse repetition frequencies of 20 kHz, 30 kHz and 40 kHz. Insets: (a) intensity profile for the 1173 nm Stokes field at pulse repetition frequency of 20 kHz, (b) intensity profile for the 1173 nm Stokes field at pulse repetition frequency of 30 kHz, (c) intensity profile for the 1173 nm Stokes field at pulse repetition frequency of 40 kHz.
Figure 5. Average output power of 1173 nm vortex beam at pulse repetition frequencies of 20 kHz, 30 kHz and 40 kHz. Insets: (a) intensity profile for the 1173 nm Stokes field at pulse repetition frequency of 20 kHz, (b) intensity profile for the 1173 nm Stokes field at pulse repetition frequency of 30 kHz, (c) intensity profile for the 1173 nm Stokes field at pulse repetition frequency of 40 kHz.
Crystals 13 01484 g005
Figure 6. Spectral line of the self-Raman vortex Stokes field corresponding to 1173 nm.
Figure 6. Spectral line of the self-Raman vortex Stokes field corresponding to 1173 nm.
Crystals 13 01484 g006
Figure 7. (a) Interference fringes for 1173 nm vortex Stokes field at pulse repetition frequency of 20 kHz. (b) Interference fringes for 1173 nm vortex Stokes field at pulse repetition frequency of 30 kHz. (c) Interference fringes for 1173 nm vortex Stokes field at pulse repetition frequency of 40 kHz and (d) simulated interference fringes for optical vortices with the unitary topological charge.
Figure 7. (a) Interference fringes for 1173 nm vortex Stokes field at pulse repetition frequency of 20 kHz. (b) Interference fringes for 1173 nm vortex Stokes field at pulse repetition frequency of 30 kHz. (c) Interference fringes for 1173 nm vortex Stokes field at pulse repetition frequency of 40 kHz and (d) simulated interference fringes for optical vortices with the unitary topological charge.
Crystals 13 01484 g007
Figure 8. Temporal pulse profile of the 1173 nm Stokes field. (a) Pulse profile at pulse repetition frequency of 20 kHz. (b) Pulse profile at pulse repetition frequency of 30 kHz. (c) Pulse profile at pulse repetition frequency of 40 kHz. (d) Pulse train at pulse repetition frequency of 40 kHz.
Figure 8. Temporal pulse profile of the 1173 nm Stokes field. (a) Pulse profile at pulse repetition frequency of 20 kHz. (b) Pulse profile at pulse repetition frequency of 30 kHz. (c) Pulse profile at pulse repetition frequency of 40 kHz. (d) Pulse train at pulse repetition frequency of 40 kHz.
Crystals 13 01484 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, J.; Duan, Y.; Mao, W.; Jin, X.; Li, Z.; Zhu, H. An Axicon-Based Annular Pump Acousto-Optic Q-Switched Nd:GdVO4 Self-Raman Vortex Laser. Crystals 2023, 13, 1484. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13101484

AMA Style

Liu J, Duan Y, Mao W, Jin X, Li Z, Zhu H. An Axicon-Based Annular Pump Acousto-Optic Q-Switched Nd:GdVO4 Self-Raman Vortex Laser. Crystals. 2023; 13(10):1484. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13101484

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Jie, Yanmin Duan, Wenjie Mao, Xinxin Jin, Zhihong Li, and Haiyong Zhu. 2023. "An Axicon-Based Annular Pump Acousto-Optic Q-Switched Nd:GdVO4 Self-Raman Vortex Laser" Crystals 13, no. 10: 1484. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13101484

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop