Next Article in Journal
Investigation of Solid-State Hydrate-Anhydrous Phase Transformations of Dabigatran Etexilate Hemi-Edisylate
Previous Article in Journal
Metallurgical and Mechanical Characteristics of an AA5183 Alloy Plate Performed by a Cold Metal Low-Power Additive Manufacturing Technology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis, Characterization, DFT, and Thermogravimetric Analysis of Neutral Co(II)/Pyrazole Complex, Catalytic Activity toward Catecholase and Phenoxazinone Oxidation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis, Characterization and Single Crystal X-ray Diffraction Analysis of Fused Triazolo/Thiadiazole Clubbed with Indole Scaffold

1
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Chemistry, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland
3
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, P.O. Box 426, Alexandria 21321, Egypt
4
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
5
Nuclear Science Research Institute (NSRI), King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), P.O. Box 6086, Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia
6
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2023, 13(3), 423; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13030423
Submission received: 4 February 2023 / Revised: 19 February 2023 / Accepted: 23 February 2023 / Published: 1 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Crystals at Saudi Arabia (Volume II))

Abstract

:
The present synthetic strategy involves the synthesis of indolyl-triazolo-thiadiazole heterocyclic ring systems 813 from the condensation of 4-amino-5-(1H-indol-2-yl)-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione 1 with the aromatic carboxylic acid derivatives 27 in presence of POCl3 for 1 h. All compounds were obtained in very good yields and have been well-characterized using spectroscopic techniques. Exclusively, good quality crystals from the target organic hybrid 8-(1H-indol-2-yl)-5-(p-tolyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo [3,4-b][1,3,4]thiadiazole 9 were obtained and found suitable for X-ray single crystal diffraction measurement, which is used to confirm and analyze the molecular and supramolecular structure aspects of 9. The solid-state structure of the synthesized molecule 9 agrees very well with other characterizations. The packing of 9 is dominated by the N…H, S…H, C…C and S…C non-covalent interactions, which agree with the Hirshfeld surface analysis. The percentages of these contacts are calculated to be 20.3%, 5.4%, 9.4% and 4.3%, respectively.

1. Introduction

Indole chemistry is a wonderful area of research and has gained a lot of attention from researchers for centuries. This fused heterocycle pharmacophore ring exists in many biological hits, which makes this unit a privileged molecule [1]. The indole core structure is found in alkaloid polycyclic compounds and has shown broad-spectrum actions in many pharmacological applications. Among their biological activities, these compounds have been applied as targeting enzyme inhibitors in cancer research, specifically PARP-1 and EGFR inhibitors [2,3,4], α-glucosidase inhibitor [5] and anti-HIV (anti-human immunodeficiency virus) [6], and have also exhibited other activities, including anti-microbial [7], anti-inflammation [8], anti-vascular [9], ischemia/reperfusion injury [10], and anti-malarial potential [11].
On the other hand, the 4-amino-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione motif is an interesting scaffold that can be utilized for the synthesis of heterocyclic compounds via annulation or Schiff base formation because it has good functionality. This pharmacophore showed interesting biological patterns, including anti-tumor [12], anti-malarial [13], anti-microbial [14], anti-convulsant [15], and anti-proliferative behaviors [16]. Additionally, it has been used as an enzyme inhibitor, such as for protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B [17], AChE enzyme [18], urease enzymes [19] and dizinc metallo-β-lactamase [20]. L. Gavara et al. have designed and synthesized a new Schiff base derived from the 4-amino-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione core structure, which showed high efficacy and more selectivity against metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) [21]. Recently, Boraei et al. [22] utilized this synthon combined with indole moiety for annulation, and yielded a new triazolo/thiadiazole heterocycle with a confirmed molecular structure, which makes this scaffold interesting and will lead to further research. Triazole and fused rings have shown great biological importance in the medical chemistry and drug discovery research fields [23,24,25,26,27].
The chemical insights yielded by the newly synthesized molecules have attracted the attention of many researchers. One of the most powerful tools that can provide insights into the intermolecular interactions in molecular crystals is Hirshfeld surface analysis. The shape- and size-based Hirshfeld surface analysis approach allows the quantitative and qualitative exploration and visualization of the intermolecular contacts in crystalline molecules. In this context, based on the findings mentioned above and in continuation of our research program focused on heterocyclic chemistry [28,29,30], we have synthesized new fused triazolo/thiadiazole heterocycles combined with an indole scaffold. The molecular structures of the desired molecules are fully characterized based on spectrophotometric tools, in addition to single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD) analysis. Hirshfeld surface analysis has also been performed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General

Melting points were measured via a melting point apparatus (SMP10) with open capillaries and are inclded uncorrected. Nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR and 13C-NMR) spectra were determined using DMSO-d6 on Bruker AC 300 and 400 MHz spectrometers, respectively, in the presence of tetramethylsilane as an internal standard. Chemical shifts are described in δ (ppm) and coupling constants are given in Hz. Elemental analysis was performed on a Flash EA-1112 instrument. A Finnigan MAT 95XP was used to record the mass spectra of HREI experiments. A Jeol JMS HX110 mass spectrometer was used to capture the FAB-MS data.

2.2. General Procedures

A mixture of 3.0 mmol of appropriate aromatic carboxylic acid derivative 27 (3.0 mmol) was refluxed in 10 mL phosphorus oxychloride for 1 h, then left to cool to room temperature, before being poured over ice water. The formed precipitates were collected by filtration, dried and recrystallized from DMF to produce the pure compounds 813. Only 8-(1H-indol-2-yl)-5-(p-tolyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo [3,4-b][1,3,4]thiadiazole 9 was obtained in a sufficient crystal form for SCXRD measurement.
8-(1H-Indol-2-yl)-5-phenyl-[1,2,4]triazolo [3,4-b][1,3,4]thiadiazole 8
Yield: 87%, m.p. > 300 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) δ 7.09 (dd, J = 7.8, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (dd, J = 7.2, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.47–7.72 (m, 6H), 8.13 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 12.13 (br.s, 1H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) δ 102.67, 111.97, 119.88, 121.00, 122.27, 123.27, 127.30, 127.58, 128.95, 129.63, 132.95, 137.15, 141.13, 153.45, 167.01; HRMS (EI) calcd for C17H11N5S (M+): 317.0715. Found: 317.0726.
8-(1H-Indol-2-yl)-5-(p-tolyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo [3,4-b][1,3,4]thiadiazole 9
Yield: 83%, m.p. > 300 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ 2.42 (s, 3H), 7.08 (dd, J = 8.0, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (dd, J = 7.5, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.45–7.51 (m, 4H), 7.71 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.99 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 12.08 (br.s, 1H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 MHz) δ 21.19, 102.69, 112.04, 119.95, 121.09, 122.94, 123.33, 126.31, 127.29, 127.66, 130.24, 137.21, 143.52, 167.13; HRMS (FAB +ve) calcd for C18H14N5S (M + 1): 332.0970. Found: 332.0955.
3-(1H-Indol-2-yl)-6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo [3,4-b][1,3,4]thiadiazole 10
Yield: 82%, m.p. > 300 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ 3.91 (s, 3H), 7.11 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.18–7.31 (m, 3H), 7.40–7.58 (m, 2H), 7.73 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 8.10 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 12.14 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 MHz) δ 56.19, 103.15, 112.51, 115.57, 120.45, 121.56, 123.40, 123.53, 128.10, 129.70, 137.62, 141.51, 162.90, 163.40; elemental analysis calculated for [C18H13N5OS]: C, 62.23; H, 3.77; N, 20.16; S, 9.23. Found: C, 62.34; H, 3.86; N, 20.08; S, 9.35.
8-(1H-Indol-2-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo [3,4-b][1,3,4]thiadiazole 11
Yield: 92%, m.p. >300 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) δ 7.09 (dd, J = 8.1, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (dd, J = 7.2, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (s, 1H), 7.49 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.69–7.76 (m, 4H), 8.16 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 12.13 (br.s, 1H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) δ 102.74, 111.96, 119.96, 121.06, 122.81, 123.36, 127.61, 127.88, 129.12, 129.77, 137.20, 137.66, 141.18, 153.60, 165.97; HRMS (FAB +ve) calcd for C17H11N5SCl (M+1): 352.0424. Found: 352.0441.
6-(2-Bromophenyl)-3-(1H-indol-2-yl)-[1,2,4]triazolo [3,4-b][1,3,4]thiadiazole 12
Yield: 73%, m.p. 296–297 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 7.11 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.84–7.62 (m, 4H), 8.25 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 12.18 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 MHz) δ 103.30, 112.53, 120.47, 121.61, 121.88, 123.20, 123.93, 128.08, 129.09, 129.88, 132.87, 134.27, 134.71, 137.70, 141.60, 150.53, 165.88; elemental analysis calculated for [C17H10BrN5S]: C, 51.53; H, 2.54; Br, 20.16; N, 17.67; S, 8.09. Found: C, 51.70; H, 2.55; Br, 20.18; N, 17.61; S, 8.13.
3-(1H-indol-2-yl)-6-(pyridin-3-yl)-[1,2,4]triazolo [3,4-b][1,3,4]thiadiazole 13
Yield: 77%, m.p. >300 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ 7.19 (m, 2H), 7.52 (s, 2H), 7.73 (d. J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 8.55 (s, 1H), 8.90 (s, 1H), 9.35 (s, 1H), 12.16 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 MHz) δ 103.50, 112.56, 120.48, 121.58, 123.24, 123.89, 124.95, 128.17, 135.59, 137.78, 148.31, 153.76, 162.82, 165.17; elemental analysis calculated for [C16H10N6S]: C, 60.36; H, 3.17; N, 26.40; S, 10.07. Found: C, 60.41; H, 3.13; N, 26.32; S, 10.11.

2.3. X-ray Structure Determinations

The technical procedure for the chemical structural elucidation of compound 9 via X-ray single-crystal diffraction analysis is given in the Supplementary Materials (The protocol and refinement crystal data Tables S1–S6). Crystal data were refined using the software from [31,32,33,34]. Table 1 lists the data regarding the synthesized crystals of compound 9.

2.4. Hirshfeld Surface Analysis

The Crystal Explorer 17.5 program was used to perform the topology analysis of studied compound 9 [35].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemistry and Characterizations

4-Amino-5-(1H-indol-2-yl)-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione 1 was mixed separately with benzoic acid, p-toluic acid, anisic acid, p-chlorobenzoic acid, o-bromobenzoic acid and nicotinic acid 27 in POCl3 for 1 h; this afforded the indolyl-triazolo-thiadiazoles 813, respectively, in excellent yields (Scheme 1). 1H- and 13C-NMR exhibited the characteristic signals of aromatic protons, between 7.08 ppm and 8.28 ppm, whereas the aromatic carbons were found at 102.0–167.0 ppm. In addition, the NMR study of compound 9 showed the proton for the methyl group at 2.42 ppm, and the carbon of the methyl group at 21.19 ppm. Moreover, the NMR of compound 10 revealed methoxy protons at 3.91 ppm and methoxy carbon at 56.19 ppm. Crystals suitable for the X-ray single-crystal analysis of compound 9 were obtained via recrystallization from DMF.

3.2. Crystal Structure Description

Figure 1 shows the molecular structure of compound 9, obtained by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. Table 1 lists some of the selected bon angles and bond distances of the desired compound. The monoclinic system was observed in the crystallized compound and centrosymmetric P21/n space group, with lattice parameters a = 7.8707(2) Å, b = 15.9681(4) Å, c = 11.9798(4) and β = 100.283(3)°. The asymmetric unit contained one molecule, while the unit cell comprised four molecules. The crystal density was 1.486 Mg/m3 and the unit cell volume was 1481.44(7) Å3. The molecule comprised a number of aromatic ring systems, which were perfectly planar but showed some twists. The phenyl group of the aryl moiety was twisted from the mean plane of the fused aromatic ring system (A) by only 2.85°. The two fused ring systems A and C were nearly coplanar with one another. The twist angle between the mean plane of the two fused ring systems was only 0.60°. Selected bond lengths and angles are depicted in Table 2.
The molecular units of this compound are controlled by a range of weak non-covalent interactions, including the N…H, S…H and C…C interactions. The molecules are connected to each other by N1-H1…N2, N1-H1…N3 and C14-H14…S1 interactions (Table 3). The different N…H and S…H contacts are shown in Figure 2A, while the resulting packing scheme is presented in Figure 2B. Additionally, the packing of 9 is controlled by different levels of C…C interactions, which are kinds of π–π stacking interactions (Figure 2C). The shortest C…C interactions are depicted in Table 4.

3.3. Hirshfeld Surface Analysis

The stability of crystalline materials is controlled by different intermolecular interactions that occur among the adjacent molecules [36,37]. The types, strengths and weights of the intermolecular interactions in the crystal structure could be simply analyzed using Hirshfeld calculations. There are three important maps, which are the dnorm, shape index and curvedness maps. A view of these surfaces is shown in Figure 3. In the dnorm map, the presence of red regions indicates short contacts, which are considered of great importance to crystal stability.
The decomposition of the fingerprint plot gives the weight of each contact in the crystal structure, and also sheds light on the strength of each contact. The percentages of all contacts contributing to molecular packing are presented in Figure 4. The most important short contacts are the N…H, S…H, C…C and S…C interactions. Their percentages are calculated to be 20.3%, 5.4%, 9.4% and 4.3%, respectively. Decomposed fingerprint plots of these short contacts are shown in Figure 5. The majority of these interactions appeared in the fingerprint plots as sharp spikes, which confirms that that these interactions are important. A list of the short N…H, S…H, C…C and S…C contacts and their corresponding interaction distances is presented in Table 5. Other contacts contributed to a large extent in the molecular packing, including H…H and H…C interactions. The percentages of these interactions are 38.3% and 18.3%, respectively.
Another important feature of molecular packing is the π–π stacking interactions. The presence of these types of intermolecular contact is indicated by the presence of short C9…C15 (3.288 Å) and C10…C17 (3.349 Å) interactions. Additionally, the presence of π–π stacking interactions is clearly implied by the presence of red/blue triangles and a flat green area in the shape index and curvedness maps, respectively (Figure 3).

4. Conclusions

New heterocyclic systems including indole, triazole amd thiadiazole rings 813 were synthesized from the reaction of 4-amino-5-(1H-indol-2-yl)-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione and benzoic acid derivatives in POCl3. The success of our strategy to design target compounds is proven by our obtaining of the hybrid heterocycle 9 in a good crystalline form. Its structure was revealed by measuring its X-ray single-crystal structure. The resulting X-ray structure was used to analyze the molecular packing of the newly synthesized compound 9. Additionally, the type, strength and weight of the intermolecular interactions in the crystal structure were analyzed using Hirshfeld calculations. It was found that the N…H (20.3%), S…H (5.4%), C…C (9.4%) and S…C (4.3%) non-covalent interactions were the most important.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cryst13030423/s1, X-ray determination protocol for compound 9 [31,33,34]. Table S1: Atomic coordinates (×104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2 × 103) for 9. U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor; Table S2: Selected bond lengths [Å] and angles [°] for 9; Table S3: Bond lengths [Å] and angles [°] for 9; Table S4: Anisotropic displacement parameters (Å2 × 103) for 9. The anisotropic displacement factor exponent takes the form: −2p2[ h2 a*2U11 + … + 2 h k a* b* U12; Table S5: Hydrogen coordinates (×104) and isotropic displacement parameters (Å2 × 103) for 9; Table S6: Torsion angles [°] for 9.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B., A.T.A.B. and M.F.Y.; methodology, M.S.A., M.F.Y. and E.M.G.; software, M.H. and S.M.S.; formal analysis, M.S.A., A.T.A.B., M.F.Y., E.M.G. and S.O.A.; X-ray crystal structure: M.H.; investigation, M.S.A. and S.M.S.; resources, A.T.A.B., A.B. and M.S.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.T.A.B., M.F.Y., E.M.G., S.M.S. and A.B.; data curation, S.O.A.; writing—review and editing: All authors have prepare. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2023R86), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2023R86), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Elshaier, Y.A.; Nemr, M.T.; Al Refaey, M.; Fadaly, W.A.; Barakat, A. Chemistry of 2-vinylindoles: Synthesis and applications. New J. Chem. 2022, 46, 13383–13400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Boraei, A.T.; Ghabbour, H.A.; Gomaa, M.S.; El Ashry, E.S.H.; Barakat, A. Synthesis and anti-proliferative assessment of triazolo-thiadiazepine and triazolo-thiadiazine scaffolds. Molecules 2019, 24, 4471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Boraei, A.T.A.; Gomaa, M.S.; El Sayed, E.S.H.; Duerkop, A. Design, selective alkylation and X-ray crystal structure determination of dihydro-indolyl-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione and its 3-benzylsulfanyl analogue as potent anticancer agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 125, 360–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Boraei, A.T.; Ashour, H.K.; El Sayed, H.; Abdelmoaty, N.; El-Falouji, A.I.; Gomaa, M.S. Design and synthesis of new phthalazine-based derivatives as potential EGFR inhibitors for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 85, 293–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Islam, M.S.; Barakat, A.; Al-Majid, A.M.; Ali, M.; Yousuf, S.; Choudhary, M.I.; Khalil, R.; Ul-Haq, Z. Catalytic asymmetric synthesis of indole derivatives as novel α-glucosidase inhibitors in vitro. Bioorg. Chem. 2018, 79, 350–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sechi, M.; Derudas, M.; Dallocchio, R.; Dessi, A.; Bacchi, A.; Sannia, L.; Carta, F.; Palomba, M.; Ragab, O.; Chan, C.; et al. Design and synthesis of novel indole β-diketo acid derivatives as HIV-1 integrase inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 47, 5298–5310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Al-Quawasmeh, R.A.; Huesca, M.; Nedunuri, V.; Peralta, R.; Wright, J.; Lee, Y.; Young, A. Potent antimicrobial activity of 3-(4,5-diaryl-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-1H-indole derivatives against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 3518–3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Narayana, B.; Ashalatha, B.V.; Vijayaraj, K.K.; Fernandes, J.; Sarojini, B.K. Synthesis of some new biologically active 1, 3, 4-oxadiazolyl nitroindoles and a modified Fischer indole synthesis of ethyl nitro indole-2-carboxylates. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 4638–4644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ty, N.; Dupeyre, G.; Chabot, G.G.; Seguin, J.; Tillequin, F.; Scherman, D.; Michel, S.; Cachet, X. Synthesis and biological evaluation of new disubstituted analogues of 6-methoxy-3-(3′,4′,5′-trimethoxybenzoyl)-1H-indole (BPR0L075), as potential antivascular agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 7494–7503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bi, W.; Bi, Y.; Xue, P.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, X.; Wang, Z.; Li, M.; Baudy-Floc’h, M.; Ngerebara, N.; Gibson, K.M.; et al. Synthesis and characterization of novel indole derivatives reveal improved therapeutic agents for treatment of ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 6763–6767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mascal, M.; Modes, K.V.; Durmus, A. Concise photochemical synthesis of the antimalarial indole alkaloid decursivine. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 4445–4446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huang, M.; Deng, Z.; Tian, J.; Liu, T. Synthesis and biological evaluation of salinomycin triazole analogues as anticancer agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 127, 900–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gujjar, R.; Marwaha, A.; El Mazouni, F.; White, J.; White, K.L.; Creason, S.; Shackleford, D.M.; Baldwin, J.; Charman, W.N.; Buckner, F.S.; et al. Identification of a metabolically stable triazolopyrimidine-based dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitor with antimalarial activity in mice. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 1864–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Chen, M.; Lu, S.; Yuan, G.; Yang, S.; Du, X. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of some heterocyclic β-enamino ester derivatives with 1,2,3-triazole. Heterocycl. Commun. 2000, 6, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ayati, A.; Emami, S.; Foroumadi, A. The importance of triazole scaffold in the development of anticonvulsant agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 109, 380–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Mohammad, Y.; Fazili, K.M.; Bhat, K.A.; Ara, T. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 3-O-tethered triazoles of diosgenin as potent antiproliferative agents. Steroids 2017, 118, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  17. Baburajeev, C.P.; Mohan, C.D.; Ananda, H.; Rangappa, S.; Fuchs, J.E.; Jagadish, S.; Siveen, K.S.; Chinnathambi, A.; Ali Alharbi, S.A.; Zayed, M.E.; et al. Development of novel triazolo-thiadiazoles from heterogeneous “green” catalysis as protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B inhibitors. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Timur, İ.; Kocyigit, Ü.M.; Dastan, T.; Sandal, S.; Ceribası, A.O.; Taslimi, P.; Gulcin, İ.; Koparir, M.; Karatepe, M.; Çiftçi, M. In vitro cytotoxic and in vivo antitumoral activities of some aminomethyl derivatives of 2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiones—Evaluation of their acetylcholinesterase and carbonic anhydrase enzymes inhibition profiles. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxic. 2019, 33, e22239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Akhtar, T.; Hameed, S.; Khan, K.M.; Choudhary, M.I. Syntheses, urease inhibition, and antimicrobial studies of some chiral 3-substituted-4-amino-5-thioxo-1H,4H-1,2,4-triazoles. Med. Chem. 2008, 4, 539–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sevaille, L.; Gavara, L.; Bebrone, C.; De Luca, F.; Nauton, L.; Achard, M.; Mercuri, P.; Tanfoni, S.; Borgianni, L.; Guyon, C.; et al. 1,2,4-Triazole-3-thione compounds as inhibitors of dizinc metallo-β-lactamases. ChemMedChem 2017, 12, 972–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Gavara, L.; Sevaille, L.; De Luca, F.; Mercuri, P.; Bebrone, C.; Feller, G.; Legru, A.; Cerboni, G.; Tanfoni, S.; Baud, D.; et al. 4-Amino-1, 2, 4-triazole-3-thione-derived Schiff bases as metallo-β-lactamase inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 208, 112720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Boraei, A.T.A.; Soliman, S.M.; Yousuf, S.; Bibi, M.; Barakat, A. N-Acetyl Indole Linked to a Fused Triazolo/Thiadiazole Scaffold: Synthesis, Single Crystal X-Ray Structure, and Molecular Insight. Crystals 2020, 10, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Riyadh, S.M.; Abolibda, T.Z.; Sayed, A.R.; Gomha, S.M. Synthetic utility of aminomercapto [1,2,4] triazoles in the preparation of fused triazoles. Curr. Org. Chem. 2022, 26, 693–714. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhu, L.; Tang, S.Y.; Chen, D.P.; Li, C.P.; Shao, L.H.; Ouyang, G.P.; Wang, Z.C.; Li, Z.R. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of indole 3-substituted-[1,2,4] triazole derivatives. Chem. Pap. 2022, 77, 895–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dadlani, V.G.; Chhabhaiya, H.; Somani, R.R.; Tripathi, P.K. Synthesis, molecular docking, and biological evaluation of novel 1, 2, 4-triazole-isatin derivatives as potential Mycobacterium tuberculosis shikimate kinase inhibitors. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2022, 100, 230–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Trafalis, D.T.; Sagredou, S.; Dalezis, P.; Voura, M.; Fountoulaki, S.; Nikoleousakos, N.; Almpanakis, K.; Deligiorgi, M.V.; Sarli, V. Anticancer Activity of Triazolo-Thiadiazole Derivatives and Inhibition of AKT1 and AKT2 Activation. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liu, X.J.; Liu, H.Y.; Wang, H.X.; Shi, Y.P.; Tang, R.; Zhang, S.; Chen, B.Q. Synthesis and antitumor evaluation of novel fused heterocyclic 1, 2, 4-triazolo [3, 4-b]-1, 3, 4-thiadiazole derivatives. Med. Chem. Res. 2019, 28, 1718–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Boraei, A.T.; Singh, P.K.; Sechi, M.; Satta, S. Discovery of novel functionalized 1, 2, 4-triazoles as PARP-1 inhibitors in breast cancer: Design, synthesis and antitumor activity evaluation. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 182, 111621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Boraei, A.T.A.; Sarhan, A.A.M.; Yousuf, S.; Barakat, A. Synthesis of a New Series of Nitrogen/Sulfur Heterocycles by Linking Four Rings: Indole; 1,2,4-Triazole; Pyridazine; and Quinoxaline. Molecules 2020, 25, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Sarhan, A.A.; Boraei, A.T.; Barakat, A.; Nafie, M.S. Discovery of hydrazide-based pyridazino [4,5-b] indole scaffold as a new phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor for breast cancer therapy. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 19534–19541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rikagu Oxford Diffraction. CrysAlisPro; Rikagu Oxford Diffraction Inc.: Yarnton, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT-Integrated Space-Group and Crystal-Structure Determination. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Adv. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Cryst. C 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Hübschle, C.B.; Sheldrick, G.M.; Dittrich, B.J. ShelXle: A Qt graphical user interface for SHELXL. J. Appl. Cryst. 2011, 44, 1281–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Turner, M.J.; McKinnon, J.J.; Wolff, S.K.; Grimwood, D.J.; Spackman, P.R.; Jayatilaka, D.; Spackman, M.A. Crystal Explorer17 University of Western Australia. 2017. Available online: http://hirshfeldsurface.net (accessed on 31 July 2021).
  36. Dey, D.; Bhandary, S.; Thomas, S.P.; Spackman, M.A.; Chopra, D. Energy frameworks and a topological analysis of the supramolecular features in in situ cryocrystallized liquids: Tuning the weak interaction landscape via fluorination. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 31811–31820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Miroslaw, B.; Demchuk, O.M.; Luboradzki, R.; Tyszczuk-Rotko, K. Low-Molecular-Weight Organogelators Based on N-dodecanoyl-L-amino Acids—Energy Frameworks and Supramolecular Synthons. Materials 2023, 16, 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the target fused heterocycles.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the target fused heterocycles.
Crystals 13 00423 sch001
Figure 1. ORETP of crystalized compound 9.
Figure 1. ORETP of crystalized compound 9.
Crystals 13 00423 g001
Figure 2. The N…H/S…H contacts (A), molecular packing view via N…H/S…H contacts (B) and π–π stacking interactions (C) for 9.
Figure 2. The N…H/S…H contacts (A), molecular packing view via N…H/S…H contacts (B) and π–π stacking interactions (C) for 9.
Crystals 13 00423 g002
Figure 3. Hirshfeld surfaces of 9 showing the most important interactions: N…H (A), S…H (B), C…C (C) and C…S (D).
Figure 3. Hirshfeld surfaces of 9 showing the most important interactions: N…H (A), S…H (B), C…C (C) and C…S (D).
Crystals 13 00423 g003
Figure 4. Intermolecular contacts and their percentages in 9.
Figure 4. Intermolecular contacts and their percentages in 9.
Crystals 13 00423 g004
Figure 5. Decomposed fingerprint plots for the short contacts in 6.
Figure 5. Decomposed fingerprint plots for the short contacts in 6.
Crystals 13 00423 g005
Table 1. Crystal data for 9.
Table 1. Crystal data for 9.
9
CCDC2239222
empirical formulaC18H13N5S
fw331.39
temp. (K)120(2) K
λ(Å)0.71073 Å
cryst systMonoclinic
space groupP21/n
a (Å)a = 7.8707(2) Å
b (Å)b = 15.9681(4) Å
c (Å)c = 11.9798(4) Å
β (deg)100.283(3)°
V3)1481.44(7) Å3
Z4
ρcalc (Mg/m3)1.486 Mg/m3
μ(Mo Kα) (mm−1)0.228 mm−1
No. reflns.7305
Unique reflns.3997
Completeness to θ = 25.242°100%
GOOF (F2)1.031
Rint0.0213
R1 a (I ≥ 2σ)0.0454
wR2 b (I ≥ 2σ)0.1095
a R1 = Σ||Fo| − |Fc||/Σ|Fo|. b wR2 = {Σ[w(Fo2Fc2)2]/Σ[w(Fo2)2]}1/2.
Table 2. Bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) of 9.
Table 2. Bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) of 9.
BondLength/ÅBondLength/Å
S(1)-C(10)1.7275(18)N(3)-C(10)1.306(2)
S(1)-C(11)1.7734(17)N(4)-C(10)1.360(2)
N(1)-C(7)1.376(2)N(4)-C(9)1.370(2)
N(1)-C(8)1.381(2)N(4)-N(5)1.3747(19)
N(2)-C(9)1.324(2)N(5)-C(11)1.304(2)
N(2)-N(3)1.402(2)
BondsAngle/°BondsAngle/°
C(10)-S(1)-C(11)87.61(8)N(1)-C(7)-C(6)130.16(16)
C(7)-N(1)-C(8)108.31(14)N(1)-C(7)-C(2)107.94(15)
C(9)-N(2)-N(3)109.54(14)N(1)-C(8)-C(9)120.90(15)
C(10)-N(3)-N(2)104.79(14)N(2)-C(9)-N(4)107.75(14)
C(10)-N(4)-C(9)105.87(14)N(2)-C(9)-C(8)127.46(16)
C(10)-N(4)-N(5)118.88(14)N(4)-C(9)-C(8)124.79(15)
C(9)-N(4)-N(5)135.17(14)N(3)-C(10)-N(4)112.04(15)
C(11)-N(5)-N(4)107.48(14)N(3)-C(10)-S(1)138.55(14)
N(5)-C(11)-S(1)116.67(13)N(4)-C(10)-S(1)109.37(12)
C(1)-C(8)-N(1)109.98(15)N(5)-C(11)-C(12)123.27(15)
Table 3. Hydrogen bonds for 9 (Å and °).
Table 3. Hydrogen bonds for 9 (Å and °).
D-H…Ad(D-H)d(H…A)d(D…A)<(DHA)
N1-H1…N2#10.85(2)2.12(2)2.959(2)169(2)
N1-H1…N3#10.85(2)2.60(2)3.292(2)139(2)
C14-H14…S1#20.952.9052.905179.35
Symm. codes: #1 −x + 1, −y + 1, −z and #2 −1/2 + x, 1.5−y, −1/2 + z.
Table 4. The shortest C…C for π–π stacking interactions.
Table 4. The shortest C…C for π–π stacking interactions.
ContactDistanceSymmetry Code
C1…C183.3711 − x,1 − y,1 − z
C3…C133.3421 − x,1 − y,1 − z
C9…C153.2882 − x,1 − y,1 − z
C10…C173.3492 − x,1 − y,1 − z
Table 5. Short contacts and the corresponding interaction distances.
Table 5. Short contacts and the corresponding interaction distances.
ContactDistanceContactDistance
N2…H11.963C9…C153.288
N3…H12.483C10…C173.349
N3…H62.512C6…S13.469
S1…H142.772C7…S13.42
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Altowyan, M.S.; Haukka, M.; Soliman, S.M.; Barakat, A.; Alaswad, S.O.; Boraei, A.T.A.; Gad, E.M.; Youssef, M.F. Synthesis, Characterization and Single Crystal X-ray Diffraction Analysis of Fused Triazolo/Thiadiazole Clubbed with Indole Scaffold. Crystals 2023, 13, 423. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13030423

AMA Style

Altowyan MS, Haukka M, Soliman SM, Barakat A, Alaswad SO, Boraei ATA, Gad EM, Youssef MF. Synthesis, Characterization and Single Crystal X-ray Diffraction Analysis of Fused Triazolo/Thiadiazole Clubbed with Indole Scaffold. Crystals. 2023; 13(3):423. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13030423

Chicago/Turabian Style

Altowyan, Mezna Saleh, Matti Haukka, Saied M. Soliman, Assem Barakat, Saleh O. Alaswad, Ahmed T. A. Boraei, Emad M. Gad, and Mohamed F. Youssef. 2023. "Synthesis, Characterization and Single Crystal X-ray Diffraction Analysis of Fused Triazolo/Thiadiazole Clubbed with Indole Scaffold" Crystals 13, no. 3: 423. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13030423

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop