Next Article in Journal
Characterisation of Polyamide (PA)12 Nanocomposites with Montmorillonite (MMT) Filler Clay Used for the Incremental Forming of Sheets
Next Article in Special Issue
Fabrication and Evaluation of a Novel Non-Invasive Stretchable and Wearable Respiratory Rate Sensor Based on Silver Nanoparticles Using Inkjet Printing Technology
Previous Article in Journal
Application of PEG-Covered Non-Biodegradable Polyelectrolyte Microcapsules in the Crustacean Circulatory System on the Example of the Amphipod Eulimnogammarus verrucosus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Emergence of Flexible White Organic Light-Emitting Diodes
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

A Low-Cost, Flexible Pressure Capacitor Sensor Using Polyurethane for Wireless Vehicle Detection

Polymers 2019, 11(8), 1247; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081247
by Chien Khong Duc 1,2, Van-Phuc Hoang 1, Duy Tien Nguyen 3 and Toan Thanh Dao 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Polymers 2019, 11(8), 1247; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081247
Submission received: 19 June 2019 / Revised: 17 July 2019 / Accepted: 25 July 2019 / Published: 27 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymer-Based Flexible Printed Electronics and Sensors)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

For figure 8 - How bend radius is related to the sensor performance? it should be explained and the text related to the figure is ambiguous. Properly operated with more than 500 mm bend radius? but with more than 500 mm, capacitance is less. do you want less capacitance? 

Figure 1 - Are electrodes, polymer and the cover are in ratio of their actual thickness? If not, then " Not to Scale" should be written. Then you dont need to add 20 mm scale bar.  

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

A simple, yet functional sensor has been presented for detecting cars on the road and on intersections. The sensor is based on capacitance variations that occur when the car’s wheel exerts pressure on the parallel plates of the sensor. The manuscript has been extensively reviewed from its original version, but still there are some corrections to be done before acceptance and publication, they are next listed:

 

Line 66-71: I agree with the authors in that most sensing applications report nominal pressures of tens or hundreds KPa at most; this is so because the development of wearable devices is a hot trend nowadays. However, there are also multiple studies that have characterized force/pressure sensors within the range of tens MPa [1]. So please, reconsider your statement in Line 71.

Figure 7 provides important information to the reader; the figure reports that the sensor can detect cars during loading-unloading cycles. However, information is missing about how long the sensor takes to fully recover between subsequent loadings, i.e. how long is required for the sensor’s capacitance to show the null-stress reading after a full load? Besides this, could you specify if the sensor loses repeatability after several trials (100 trials or ever more).

 

References

[1] doi: 10.1186/1556-276X-6-419


Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Suggested changes and concerns have been performed. The article can be published in present form.

Back to TopTop