Next Article in Journal
Aluminum-Filled Amorphous-PET, a Composite Showing Simultaneous Increase in Modulus and Impact Resistance
Previous Article in Journal
Sorption Features of Polyurethane Foam Functionalized with Salicylate for Chlorpyrifos: Equilibrium, Kinetic Models and Thermodynamic Studies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/polym12092037
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Caranan Fiber from Mauritiella armata Palm Tree as Novel Reinforcement for Epoxy Composites

by
Andressa Teixeira Souza
1,
Raí Felipe Pereira Junio
1,
Lucas de Mendonça Neuba
1,
Verônica Scarpini Candido
2,
Alisson Clay Rios da Silva
2,
Afonso Rangel Garcez de Azevedo
3,
Sergio Neves Monteiro
1,* and
Lucio Fabio Cassiano Nascimento
1
1
Department of Materials Science, Military Institute of Engineering-IME, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, Brazil
2
Materials Science and Engineering, Federal University of Para-UFPA, Rodovia BR-316, km 7.5-9.0, Centro, Ananindeua, 67000-000, Brazil
3
Department of Agricultural Engineering and Environment, Federal Fluminense University—UFF, Rua Passo da Pátria, 156, São Domingo, Niteroi, Rio de Janeiro 24210-240, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2020, 12(9), 2037; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12092037
Submission received: 29 July 2020 / Revised: 29 August 2020 / Accepted: 1 September 2020 / Published: 8 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A growing environmental concern is increasing the search for new sustainable materials. In this scenario, natural lignocellulosic fibers (NLFs) became an important alternative to replace synthetic fibers commonly used as composites reinforcement. In this regard, unknown NLFs such as the caranan fiber (Mauritiella armata) found in South American rain forests revealed promising properties for engineering applications. Thus, for the first time, the present work conducted a technical characterization of caranan fiber-incorporated composites. Epoxy matrix composites with 10, 20 and 30 vol% of continuous and aligned caranan fibers were investigated by tensile tests, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Composites with more than 10% vol of caranan fibers significantly increase the elastic modulus and toughness in comparison to the neat epoxy. Indeed, the composite with 30 vol% was 50% stiffer, 130% tougher, and 100% stronger, which characterized an effective reinforcement. As for the elastic modulus, total strain and tensile toughness, there is a clear tendency of improvement with the amount of caranan fiber. The TGA disclosed the highest onset temperature of degradation (298 °C) with the least mass loss (36.8%) for the 30 vol% caranan fiber composite. It also displayed a higher degradation peak at 334 °C among the studied composites. The lowest glass transition temperature of 63 °C was obtained by DSC, while the highest of 113 °C by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) for the 30 vol% caranan composite. These basic technical findings emphasize the caranan fiber potential as reinforcement for polymer composites.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Widely available in nature, natural lignocellulosic fibers (NLFs) are increasingly being considered sustainable alternatives for replacing synthetic fibers as polymer composite reinforcement in both scientific reviews [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11] and possible industrial applications [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. In fact, the specific properties (divided by the density) of the NLF composites are in some cases better than those of glass fiber composites (fiberglass) [19,20]. Moreover, Joshi et al. [21] propose that NLF composites are likely to be environmentally superior to fiberglass in most applications. It is also noteworthy that cellulose nanofibers extracted from NFL have recently been reported to substantially improve the mechanical properties and adhesion to a polymer nanocomposite [22]. In addition to superior specific properties, NLF composites have the advantage of fiber biodegradability, lower density, reduced process energy and cost effectiveness [23]. However, unattractive factors must be taken into account regarding the NLF behavior in terms of a large dispersion of physical properties, inhomogeneity inherent to the plant fiber structure and hydrophilicity [17,23]. Indeed, a relatively high level of moisture absorption might weaken the fiber adhesion to the hydrophobic polymer matrix [5,7]. Thermal stability is another issue of NLF processing, which is restricted by the fiber’s low temperature of cellulose degradation (~200 °C) as well as long periods of aging [24].
Today researchers are looking for new, less-known NLFs for developing improved polymer composites and their innovative application in engineering [25,26,27,28,29,30]. In this context, fibers extracted from the plant hard parts, like the stem or leaf-stalk (petiole), have better mechanical properties owing to greater cellulose content [31]. The caranan (English name adapted from the Portuguese caranã) fiber appears in the present scenario as a relatively unknown NLF extracted from leaf-stalk of a South American palm tree, Mauritiella armata. To our knowledge, the few scientific articles available on this palm tree are restricted to botanic characterization [32,33]. Except for possible use of its leaves for modest house roofing [34], no publication has yet been found in terms of caranan fiber application in composites. To explore this engineering potential, the present work investigates for the first time the basic mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy composites incorporated with up to 30 vol% of caranan fibers. The choice of the caranan fiber, in addition of its unknown potential for possible use in engineering composite, is due to its Amazonian origin. As a local rain forest product, which is collected without cutting the palm tree, the marketing of caranan fiber contributes to preserving the Amazon forest. The selection of epoxy as the composite matrix was based on its superior mechanical, thermal and corrosion resistance among most polymer resins as well as easy processing with NLFs [31,35]. Based on reviews in the literature [36,37], a possible application in multilayered armor systems (MAS) is another motivation to study this combination of less-known NLF polymer composites [38].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Leaf-stalks from Mauritiella armata, Figure 1a, used in this work to obtain caranan fibers, Figure 1b, were supplied by the Federal University of Para (UFPA, Belém Brazil). The polymer used to produce the composite matrix was an epoxy resin diglycidyl ether of the bisphenol A (DGEBA), produced by Dow Chemical, São Paulo, and distributed by Epoxyfiber, Rio de Janeiro, both in Brazil. The hardener applied to the resin was triethylene tetramine (TETA) with a stoichiometric ratio of 100 parts of epoxy to 13 parts of TETA. After manual extraction with a sharp razor, the caranan fibers, Figure 1a, were cleaned, defibrillated, cut to a length of 150 mm and dried in an oven at 70 °C for 24 h or until the weight of the fiber remains stable.

2.2. Composites Processing

For the preparation of composites, the proportions used were 10, 20 and 30% by volume of fiber, which correspond in absolute terms of mold loading to 14.12, 28.25 and 42.37 g, respectively. The density value of the epoxy resin was based on data reported elsewhere for the same epoxy [28]. For the DGEBA/TETA, an estimate of 1.11 g/cm3 was considered. The composite plates, Figure 2, were manufactured in a steel mold with an internal volume of 180 cm3 and dimensions of 15 × 12 × 1 cm3. With the aid of a SKAY hydraulic press (Skay Industry, São Paulo, Brazil) and a load of 5 tons for 24 h, the final plate was obtained.

2.3. Density and Porosity Measurements

Density and porosity of the neat epoxy and different composites were obtained by precise measurement of volume by the Archimedes methods and geometric dimensions using a caliper with 0.01 mm of precision. Weight measurements was performed in a 0.001 g of precision analog scale.

2.4. Tensile Tests

Tensile tests were performed according to the ASTM D3039 standard [39], in an Instron universal equipment (Instron, Norwood, MA, USA) model 3365, with a 25 kN load cell. The test crosshead speed was 2 mm/min. Four different composite plates were produced: 10, 20 and 30 vol% of fibers plus a neat epoxy (0% fiber) plate for control. All plates were cut to the dimensions indicated by the standard [39], shown in Figure 3. Seven specimens were tested for each composition.

2.5. Thermal Analysis

To analyze the thermal stability of the composites, thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were performed according to the ASTM E1131 standard [40]. The equipment used was a Shimadzu, model DTG-60H (Shimadzu Precision Instruments Inc., Long Beach, CA, USA). Samples with approximately 10 mg were reduced to particles and placed in a platinum crucible. The atmosphere used was nitrogen with a flow rate of 50 mL/min, heating rate 10 °C/min, and temperature range from 10 to 600 °C for the TGA and from 25 to 250 °C for DSC.
The following variables were obtained during the TGA test: loss of mass, temperature at the beginning of abrupt loss of mass (Tonset), and temperature at maximum rate of mass loss, associated with the derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) peak, as well as the characteristic thermal events. In addition, it was possible to disclose a thermal stability relationship between the volume fractions of 10, 20 and 30 vol% and that for the neat epoxy.

2.6. Micrography Analysis

Caranan fiber morphology was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in order to verify details such as surface, cross section, lumen and microfibrils. For this, the fiber was cryogenically fractured to preserve the relative shape and dimensions. The samples were fixed on a carbon ribbon and later sputtered with gold. The equipment used for metallization was a vacuum desk V by Denton, TX, USA, while for the images, a Quanta FEG 250 model FEI microscope (Field electron and Ion Co., Hillsboro, OR, USA). The working distance used was 10 mm and secondary electrons accelerated with 15 kV.

2.7. Dynamic Mechanical Analysis

Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) was carried out in order to identify the viscoelastic behavior of the material, as well as important parameters such as the glass transition temperature of the composites. The samples used in the percentages of 0, 10, 20 and 30 vol% followed the ASTM D4065 standard [41] and the test mode was two points bending for samples fixed by one end. The equipment used was a model DMA Q800, from TA Instruments (New Castle, DE, USA) and the samples dimensions 46 × 12 × 3 mm, from which curves of storage modulus, loss modulus and tangent delta were recorded.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Materials Basic Characterization

Table 1 presents calculated density for the neat epoxy and different caranan fiber epoxy composites. In this table is also presented the corresponding porosity for each of these investigated materials.
SEM images of the caranan fiber cross section are shown in Figure 4. It can be seen that it presents structures similar to those of other NFLs [23,24], with a lumen in the center, surrounded by several walls formed by microfibrils of semi-crystalline cellulose incorporated into a matrix of hemicellulose and lignin. The structure has an almost circular shape. In addition, its low density of 0.66 g/cm3, in comparison with other fibers [27,41,42,43,44,45], could be partially explained due to the large amount of lumen and the thin hollow structure of the cell wall.
A preliminary characterization of the caranan fiber/epoxy bonding performed by pullout test provided a relatively high interfacial shear strength of 17 MPa. Therefore, one should expect a good fiber/matrix adhesion and a caranan fiber reinforcement potential.

3.2. Tensile Test

Table 2 presents the basic tensile properties of neat epoxy (0%) and caranan fiber epoxy composites. Based on the results in Table 2, Figure 5 shows the variation in the tensile properties of the composites with the volume fraction of caranan fiber.
For the 20 and 30 vol% caranan fiber composites, it was found that the mechanical strength increases with the percentage of fibers, confirming the hypothesis that the fiber works as an effective reinforcement. As already reported in the literature [46], this is a consequence of the mechanisms of rupture of the fibers and their debonding at the fiber–matrix interface. However, with the addition of only 10 vol%, the fiber acted as a filler or defect, reducing the tensile strength of the epoxy matrix. On the other hand, there is an increase in the modulus of elasticity as well in the total elongation and tensile toughness (absorbed energy) for 30 vol% caranan fiber composite as compared to the neat (0%) epoxy.
As shown in Figure 5 the incorporation of higher amounts of caranan fibers improves the tensile properties. Indeed, as presented in Table 2, the incorporation of 30 vol% of caranan fibers tends to increase not only the strength (100%), stiffness (50%) and toughness (130%) of the epoxy matrix but also its total elongation by 40%. This proves the reinforcement behavior of the fibers, which also contributes to the ductility of the epoxy matrix. Regarding the results of tensile strength in Table 2 and Figure 5a for the 30% vol% caranan fiber, it is relevant to establish a comparison with 30 vol% glass fiber reinforcement epoxy composite, as was previously reported for a similar curaua epoxy composite [19]. The tensile strength of 131 MPa for the glass fiber composite when divided by the composite density (1.55 g/cm3) gives a specific strength (85 MPa) lower than that of the caranan fiber composite (105/0.975 = 108 MPa) Therefore, for this volume fraction, the caranan composite might be a viable substitute for fiberglass.
Figure 6 shows typical broken specimens of each composition ruptured in tensile tests.
To confirm the reinforcement effect provided by the caranan fibers, the properties obtained in tensile tests of each composite, Figure 5, were statistically analyzed by the Weibull method. Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10 shows the statistical reliability versus the corresponding Weibull location parameter. Straight lines adjust the corresponding points for the same property in the different composites.
Table 3 presents the values of the Weibull parameters (β and R2), as well as their characteristic stress θ. The R2 values indicate that all the results obtained are statistically reliable. The observed θ values are similar to those found for corresponding properties in Table 2. Here, it is important to note that the relatively low value of the Weibull modulus β is due to the heterogeneous characteristics related to the biological process of formation of any NLF [23,47], such as caranan in the present work.

3.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis

The results of TG/DTG curves evaluating the influence of the volume fraction of caranan fibers on the thermal stability of the epoxy composites are shown in Figure 11.
As already described in the literature [48,49] the greater the volume of NLFs in the composite, the higher its temperature of onset degradation (Tonset). Table 4 indicates that the thermal stability of the composites is directly related to the amount of fibers added as reinforcement. In the curves of Figure 11 this become evident by the DTG peaks of the composites, which are moving to the right and increasing their thermal stability. The initial small weight loss (<5%) is associated with water release below 150 °C, which is a common feature of composites reinforced with natural fibers [48,49].
With the increase in caranan fiber content, the maximum degradation temperature rises and the weight loss % significantly decreases. It is worth noting that the onset of degradation occurs between 200–300 °C, and is attributed to the decomposition of cellulose and hemicellulose. As for the lignin, its thermal decomposition occurs in a broader range that initiates earlier but extends to higher temperature [48]. According to the TG/DTG curves in the inset in Figure 11, the complete thermal degradation of caranan fibers and epoxy matrix are expected to occur above 400 and 500 °C, respectively. The weight loss around 80% at 600 °C in Figure 11 corresponds to formation of a relatively higher amount of char. At even higher temperatures, one would expect a final char residue of around 10% for all investigated materials [50]. As such, one may consider 200 °C as the maximum working temperature for the caranan fiber epoxy composite.

3.4. Differential Scanning Calorimetry Analysis

The DSC analysis, Figure 12, is an important technique used and disseminated for the characterization and identification of polymers [49]. From the DSC curves, it was possible to determine the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the composites studied in this work.
Table 5 shows that the Tg of the epoxy is around 81 °C while that of the caranan fiber would be at 64 °C. However, the endothermic event might also be related to the fiber moisture release. It is known that the Tg of a polymer depends on the mobility of the chain segment of the macromolecules in the polymeric matrix [49,50,51,52]. In this case, the reinforcing effect of the caranan fibers interfere with the movement of the polymeric chains and, thus, decreases the Tg of the composite. Within the investigated temperature range, the curves did not present any relevant event for this analysis, which suggests that the glass transition temperature of the composite shifted because of the presence of the reinforcement. Exothermic peaks at around 114 °C are related to a possible curing of the polymer matrix [28].

3.5. Dynamic Mechanical Analysis

Figure 13 shows the curves of storage modulus, G’, loss modulus, G’’, and tangent delta, tan δ, of the neat epoxy [53] and different caranan fiber composites, from 25 up to 200 °C.
The G’ results in Figure 13a reveal an improvement of the storage modulus with the incorporation of caranan fiber, which confirms the reinforcement effect owing to its better interaction with polymer matrix [30]. As for the G’’ results in Figure 13, the incorporation of caranan fiber displaces the peak of loss modulus to higher temperatures as compared to that of the neat epoxy reported elsewhere [53]. According to Mohanty et al. [54], the G’’ peak is related to the structural relaxation and might be assigned to Tg. A similar situation occurs for the Tan δ peaks in Figure 13c. Table 6 presents the main DMA parameters associated with the composite curves in Figure 13 and neat epoxy [53]. A comparison between the values of Tg obtained from DSC in Table 5 with those in Table 6, indicates that the DMA Tan δ values correspond to the upper limits of Tg [54].

4. Conclusions

The first technological results on caranan fibers extracted from the leaf-stalk of Mauritiella armata and their 10, 20 and 30 vol% epoxy composites are revealed. A caranan fiber density of 0.66 g/cm3 was found as one of the lowest for natural lignocellulosic fiber (NLFs), which contribute to lower densities: 1.065, 1.020 and 0.975 g/cm3 of the 10, 20 and 30 vol% composites, respectively. Porosities of composites (9.32–11.90%) increase in comparison with that of neat epoxy (9.01%) due to the porous microstructure of the caranan fiber. The SEM micrograph of the caranan fiber showed a morphological porous aspect similar to that already reported for other NLFs with a cross section tending to a circular shape. In addition, cylindrical elements close to the lumen are attributed to the cellulose-based microfibrils, as well hemicellulose and lignin, that make up the fiber walls. Moreover, 30 vol% caranan fiber significantly improves (100%) the tensile strength of epoxy resin composites characterizing a reinforcement effect. Modulus of elasticity (50%), total elongation (40%) and tensile toughness (130%) of the composite also increase with 30 vol% of caranan fibers incorporated into the matrix. The thermal analysis results show that the maximum working temperature of the fiber and the composite is 200 °C. Furthermore, the thermal stability of composites is directly related to the amount of fibers added as reinforcement. The DSC and DMA tests made it possible to determine the limits of the glass transition temperature (Tg) of epoxy composites reinforced with caranan fiber. The interval of 62–65 °C was found to be lower limits, and 96–113 °C to be upper limits, for Tg. For our particular research, such properties regarding the caranan composites enable potential applications in multilayered armor systems against high-energy projectiles. However, the lack of information in the literature about the fiber strength and its epoxy composite’s ballistic performance makes it necessary to conduct a more comprehensive study by means of impact tests and residual velocity.

Author Contributions

A.T.S. prepared testing specimens, analyzed the data and wrote the article; R.F.P.J., V.S.C., A.C.R.d.S. and L.d.M.N. prepared testing specimens; A.T.S. and A.R.G.d.A. performed the tests. S.N.M. and L.F.C.N. conceived and coordinated the project and reviewed the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the support to this investigation by the Brazilian agencies: CNPq, CAPES and FAPERJ; UFPA for supplying the caranan fibers; Nondestructive testing, Corrosion and Welding Laboratory (LNDC/UFRJ) for the tensile tests and Macromolecules Institute (IMA/UFRJ) for the thermal analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hassan, K.M.; Horvath, P.G.; Alpár, T. Potential Natural Fiber Polymeric Nanobiocomposites: A Review. Polymers 2020, 12, 1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhang, Z.; Cai, S.; Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; Long, Y.; Yu, T.; Shen, Y. High performances of plant fiber reinforced Composites—A new insight from hierarchical microstructures. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2020, 108151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sanjay, M.R.; Madhu, P.; Jawaid, M.; Senthamaraikannan, P.; Senthil, S.; Pradeep, S. Characterization and properties of natural fiber polymer composites: A comprehensive review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 566–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pickering, K.L.; Efendy, M.A.; Le, T.M. A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 83, 98–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Güven, O.; Monteiro, S.N.; Moura, E.A.; Drelich, J.W. Re-emerging field of lignocellulosic fiber–polymer composites and ionizing radiation technology in their formulation. Polym. Rev. 2016, 56, 702–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mohammed, L.; Ansari, M.N.M.; Pua, G.; Jawaid, M.; Islam, M.S. A Review on Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite and Its Applications. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2015, 243947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Faruk, O.; Bledzki, A.K.; Fink, H.P.; Sain, M. Progress report on natural fiber reinforced composites. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2014, 299, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Thakur, V.K.; Thakur, M.K.; Gupta, R.K. Raw natural fiber–based polymer composites. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. 2014, 19, 256–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shah, D.U. Developing plant fibre composites for structural applications by optimising composite parameters: A critical review. J. Mater. Sci. 2013, 48, 6083–6107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Faruk, O.; Bledzki, A.K.; Fink, H.-P.; Sain, M. Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 1552–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zini, E.; Scandola, M. Green composites—An overview. Polym. Compos. 2011, 32, 1905–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Potluri, R.; Krishna, N.C. Potential and Applications of Green Composites in Industrial Space. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 22, 2041–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Youssef, A.M.; El-Sayed, S.M. Bionanocomposites materials for food packaging applications: Concepts and future outlook. Carbohyd. Polym. 2018, 193, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Di Bella, G.; Fiore, V.; Galtieri, G.; Borsellino, C.; Valenza, A. Effects of natural fibres reinforcement in lime plasters (kenaf and sisal vs. Polypropylene). Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 58, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Majeed, K.; Jawaid, M.; Hassan, A.; Abu Bakar, A.; Abdul Khalil, H.P.S.; Salema, A.A.; Inuwa, I. Potential materials for food packaging from nanoclay/natural fibres filled hybrid composites. Mater. Des. 2013, 46, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dittenber, D.B.; GangaRao, H.V.S. Critical review of recent publications on use of natural composites in infrastructure. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2012, 43, 1419–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Thomas, N.; Paul, S.A.; Pothan, L.A.; Deepa, B. Natural fibers: Structure, properties and applications. In Cellulose Fibers: Bio-and Nano-Polymer Composites; Kalia, S., Kaith, B.S., Kaur, I., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2011; pp. 3–42. [Google Scholar]
  18. Holbery, J.; Houston, D. Natural-fiber-reinforced polymer composites in automotive applications. JOM-US 2016, 58, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Maciel, N.D.O.R.; Ferreira, J.B.; da Vieira, J.S.; Ribeiro, C.G.D.; Lopes, F.P.D.; Margem, F.M.; Silva, L.C.d. Comparative tensile strength analysis between epoxy composites reinforced with curaua fiber and glass fiber. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2018, 7, 561–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wambua, P.; Ivens, J.; Verpoest, I. Natural fibres: Can they replace glass in fibre reinforced plastics? Compos. Sci. Technol. 2003, 63, 1259–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Joshi, S.; Drzal, L.; Mohanty, A.; Arora, S. Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites? Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2004, 35, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tarrés, Q.; Oliver-Orteza, H.; Alcala, M.; Espinach, F.X.; Mutjé, P.; Delgado-Aguilar, M. Research on the strengthening advantages on using cellulose nanofibers as polyvinyl alcohol reinforcement. Polymers 2020, 12, 974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Monteiro, S.N.; Lopes, F.P.D.; Barbosa, A.P.; Bevitori, A.B.; Silva, I.L.A.D.; Costa, L.L.D. Natural Lignocellulosic Fibers as Engineering Materials—An Overview. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2011, 42, 2963–2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Hassan, T.; Jamshaid, H.; Mishra, R.; Khan, M.Q.; Petru, M.; Novak, J.; Choteborsky, R.; Hromasova, M. Acoustic, Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Green Composites Reinforced with Natural Fibers Waste. Polymers 2020, 12, 654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Da Costa Garcia Filho, F.; da Luz, F.S.; Oliveira, M.S.; Pereira, A.C.; Costa, U.O.; Monteiro, S.N. Thermal behavior of graphene oxide-coated piassava fiber and their epoxy composites. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 5343–5351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. De Mendonça Neuba, L.; Pereira Junio, R.F.; Ribeiro, M.P.; Souza, A.T.; de Sousa Lima, E.; Garcia Filho, F.D.C.; Monteiro, S.N.; da Silva Figueiredo, A.B.-H.; de Oliveira Braga, F.; de Azevedo, A.R.G. Promising mechanical, thermal, and ballistic properties of novel epoxy composites reinforced with cyperus malaccensis sedge fiber. Polymers 2020, 12, 1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Reis, R.H.M.; Nunes, L.F.; Oliveira, M.S.; de Veiga, V.F.; Garcia Filho, F.D.C.; Pinheiro, M.A.; Monteiro, S.N. Guaruman fiber: Another possible reinforcement in composites. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 622–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nascimento, L.F.C.; da Luz, F.S.; Costa, U.O.; Braga, F.O.; Lima Júnior, É.P.; Monteiro, S.N. Curing Kinetic Parameters of Epoxy Composite Reinforced with Mallow Fibers. Materials 2019, 12, 3939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Da Demosthenes, L.C.C.; Nascimento, L.F.C.; Monteiro, S.N.; Costa, U.O.; da Garcia Filho, F.C.; da Luz, F.S.; Oliveira, M.S.; Ramos, F.J.H.T.V.; Pereira, A.C.; Braga, F.O. Thermal and structural characterization of buriti fibers and their relevance in fabric reinforced composites. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 9, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, H.; Memon, H.; Hassan, E.A.M.; Elagib, T.H.H.; Hassan, F.E.A.A.; Yu, M. Rheological and dynamic mechanical properties of abutilon natural staw and polyactic acid biocomposites. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2019, 2019, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jeyapragash, R.; Srinivasan, V.; Sathiyamurthy, S. Mechanical properties of natural fiber/particulate reinforced epoxy composites—A review of the literature. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 22, 1223–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Funk, V.; Hollowell, T.; Berry, P.; Kelloff, C.; Alexander, S.N.; Hollowell, T.H.; Kellof, C.L. Checklist of the plants of the Guayana Shield (Venezuela: Amazonas, Bolivar, Delta Amacuro; Guyana, Surinam, French Guiana); Contributions from the United States National Herbarium; Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2007; Volume 55, pp. 1–584. [Google Scholar]
  33. Henderson, H. Araliaceae in: Steyermark JA. In Glora of the Venezuelan Guayana: Araliaceae—Cactaceae; Berry, P.E., Holst, B.K., Eds.; Missouri Botanical Garden Press: St Luis, MI, USA, 1997; Volume 3, pp. 32–112. [Google Scholar]
  34. Smith, N. Mauritiella Armata. Palms and People in the Amazon; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 383–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Neves, A.C.C.; Rohen, L.A.; Mantovani, D.P.; Carvalho, J.P.R.G.; Vieira, C.M.F.; Lopes, F.P.D.; Monteiro, S.N. Comparative mechanical properties between biocomposites of Epoxy and polyester matrices reinforced by hemp fiber. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 9, 1296–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nayar, S.Y.; Sultan, M.T.B.H.; Shenuy, S.T.; Kini, C.R.; Samant, R.; Shah, A.U.M.; Amunthakkaannan, P. Potential of natural fibers in composites for ballistic applications—A review. J. Nat. Fibers 2020, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Benzait, Z.; Trabzon, L. A review of recent research on materials used in in polymer-matrix composites for body armor application. J. Comp. Mater. 2018, 52, 3241–3263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nascimento, L.F.C.; Louro, L.H.L.; Monteiro, S.N.; Lima, E.P., Jr.; Luz, F.S. Mallow fiber-reinforced epoxy composites in multilayered armor for personal ballistic protection. JOM-US 2017, 69, 2052–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. ASTM D3039/D3039M-17. Standard (Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017.
  40. ASTM E1131-20. Standard Test Method for Compositional Analysis by Thermogravimetry; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2020.
  41. ASTM D4065. Standard Practice for Plastics: Dynamic Mechanical Properties: Determination and Report of Procedures; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2012.
  42. Hamad, S.F.; Stehling, N.; Holland, C.; Foreman, J.P.; Rodenburg, C. Low-Voltage SEM of Natural Plant Fibers: Microstructure Properties (Surface and Cross-Section) and their Link to the Tensile Properties. Procedia Eng. 2017, 200, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Da Luz, F.S.; Ramos, F.J.H.T.V.; Nascimento, L.F.C.; da Silva Figueiredo, A.B.H.; Monteiro, S.N. Critical length and interfacial strength of PALF and coir fiber incorporated in epoxy resin matrix. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2018, 7, 528–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Monteiro, S.N.; Margem, F.M.; Margem, J.I.; de Souza Martins, L.B.; Oliveira, C.G.; Oliveira, M.P. Infra-Red Spectroscopy Analysis of Malva Fibers. Mater. Sci. Forum 2014, 775, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Monteiro, S.N.; Satyanarayana, K.G.; Ferreira, A.S.; Nascimento, D.C.O.; Lopes, F.P.D.; Silva, I.L.A.; Portela, T.G. Selection of high strength natural fibers. Matéria 2010, 15, 488–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Glória, G.O.; Teles, M.C.A.; Lopes, F.P.D.; Vieira, C.M.F.; Margem, F.M.; de Almeida Gomes, M.; Monteiro, S.N. Tensile strength of polyester composites reinforced with PALF. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2017, 6, 401–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, F.; Shao, J. Modified Weibull Distribution for Analyzing the Tensile Strength of Bamboo Fibers. Polymers 2014, 6, 3005–3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Monteiro, S.N.; Calado, V.; Rodriguez, R.J.S.; Margem, F.M. Thermogravimetric behavior of natural fibers reinforced polymer composites—An overview. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2012, 557, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Monteiro, S.N.; Calado, V.; Rodriguez, R.J.; Margem, F.M. Thermogravimetric Stability of Polymer Composites Reinforced with Less Common Lignocellulosic Fibers—An Overview. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2012, 1, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Mézáros, E.; Jakob, E.; Várhegyl, G. Pyrolysis-GC/MS and TG/MS study of mediated laccase biodelinification of Eucalyptus globulus kraft pulp. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 2007, 79, 61–70. [Google Scholar]
  51. Oliveira, M.S.; Pereira, A.C.; Monteiro, S.N.; da Costa Garcia Filho, F.; da Cruz Demosthenes, L.C. Thermal Behavior of Epoxy Composites Reinforced with Fique Fabric by DSC. In Green Materials Engineering; The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series; Ikhmayies, S., Li, J., Vieira, C., Margem, J., de Oliveira Braga, F., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Revanth, J.S.; Madhav, V.S.; Sai, Y.K.; Krishna, D.V.; Srividya, K.; Sumanth, C.H.M. TGA and DSC analysis of vinyl ester reinforced by Vetiveria zizanioides, jute and glass fiber. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 26, 460–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Silva, I.L.A.; Bevitare, A.B.; Oliveira, C.G.; Margem, F.M.; Monteiro, S.N. Dynamical-Mechanical Behavior of Epoxy Composites Reinforced with Jutefiber. Characterization of Minerals, Metals and Materials; The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, TMS-Willey: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  54. Mohanty, A.K.; Misra, M.; Hinrichsen, G. Biofiber, biodegradable polymers and Biocomposites: An overview. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2000, 276, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 12 02037 g001 550
Figure 1. Defibrillation process of caranan fibers (a) leaf-stalk (b) defibrilated caranan fibers.
Figure 1. Defibrillation process of caranan fibers (a) leaf-stalk (b) defibrilated caranan fibers.
Polymers 12 02037 g001
Polymers 12 02037 g002 550
Figure 2. Composite plates of epoxy resin reinforced with caranan fiber.
Figure 2. Composite plates of epoxy resin reinforced with caranan fiber.
Polymers 12 02037 g002
Polymers 12 02037 g003 550
Figure 3. Specimen for tensile test of caranan fiber epoxy composites (a) 0% specimens, A1; 10%, B1; 20%, C1 and 30%, D1 (b) dimensions according to the standard (ASTM D3039) [39].
Figure 3. Specimen for tensile test of caranan fiber epoxy composites (a) 0% specimens, A1; 10%, B1; 20%, C1 and 30%, D1 (b) dimensions according to the standard (ASTM D3039) [39].
Polymers 12 02037 g003
Polymers 12 02037 g004 550
Figure 4. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images: (a) 400× and (b) 800× of the cross section of a caranan fiber.
Figure 4. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images: (a) 400× and (b) 800× of the cross section of a caranan fiber.
Polymers 12 02037 g004
Polymers 12 02037 g005 550
Figure 5. Variation of (a) tensile strength (b) elastic modulus (c) total elongation (d) tensile toughness for neat epoxy (0%) and caranan fiber composites.
Figure 5. Variation of (a) tensile strength (b) elastic modulus (c) total elongation (d) tensile toughness for neat epoxy (0%) and caranan fiber composites.
Polymers 12 02037 g005
Polymers 12 02037 g006 550
Figure 6. Typical broken specimens of the caranan fiber epoxy composite after the tensile test.
Figure 6. Typical broken specimens of the caranan fiber epoxy composite after the tensile test.
Polymers 12 02037 g006
Polymers 12 02037 g007 550
Figure 7. Tensile strength Weibull plots for the epoxy composites reinforced with different volume fractions of caranan fiber.
Figure 7. Tensile strength Weibull plots for the epoxy composites reinforced with different volume fractions of caranan fiber.
Polymers 12 02037 g007
Polymers 12 02037 g008 550
Figure 8. Elastic modulus Weibull plots for the epoxy composites reinforced with different volume fractions of caranan fiber.
Figure 8. Elastic modulus Weibull plots for the epoxy composites reinforced with different volume fractions of caranan fiber.
Polymers 12 02037 g008
Polymers 12 02037 g009 550
Figure 9. Total elongation Weibull plots for the epoxy composites reinforced with different volume fractions of caranan fiber.
Figure 9. Total elongation Weibull plots for the epoxy composites reinforced with different volume fractions of caranan fiber.
Polymers 12 02037 g009
Polymers 12 02037 g010 550
Figure 10. Tensile toughness Weibull plots for the epoxy composites reinforced with different volume fractions of caranan fiber.
Figure 10. Tensile toughness Weibull plots for the epoxy composites reinforced with different volume fractions of caranan fiber.
Polymers 12 02037 g010
Polymers 12 02037 g011 550
Figure 11. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) curves of caranan fiber, epoxy resin and their composites.
Figure 11. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) curves of caranan fiber, epoxy resin and their composites.
Polymers 12 02037 g011
Polymers 12 02037 g012 550
Figure 12. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves of (a) caranan fiber, epoxy resin and their composites (b) magnified endothermic peaks for the caranan fiber and neat epoxy.
Figure 12. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves of (a) caranan fiber, epoxy resin and their composites (b) magnified endothermic peaks for the caranan fiber and neat epoxy.
Polymers 12 02037 g012
Polymers 12 02037 g013 550
Figure 13. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA): (a) storage modulus; (b) loss modulus and (c) tangent delta for the caranan fiber composites.
Figure 13. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA): (a) storage modulus; (b) loss modulus and (c) tangent delta for the caranan fiber composites.
Polymers 12 02037 g013
Table
Table 1. Results for density and porosity test of the epoxy-caranan composite.
Table 1. Results for density and porosity test of the epoxy-caranan composite.
Fiber Volume (%)Density (g/cm3)Porosity (%)
01.1109.01
101.0659.32
201.0209.74
300.97511.90
Table
Table 2. Results for tensile test of the epoxy–caranan composite.
Table 2. Results for tensile test of the epoxy–caranan composite.
Fiber Volume (%)Tensile Strength (MPa)Elastic Modulus (GPa)Total Elongation (%)Tensile Toughness (J/mm3)
050.0 ± 6.44.9 ± 1.71.0 ± 1.06.6 ± 4.0
1038.3 ± 3.65.7 ± 1.50.7 ± 0.61.7 ± 1.35
2091.7 ± 5.96.9 ± 0.21.3 ± 1.311.3 ± 5.14
30105.2 ± 6.07.4 ± 0.31.4 ± 1.415.4 ± 5.54
Table
Table 3. Weibull parameters for the measured properties by the tensile strength test of epoxy composites reinforced with caranan fiber Weibull analysis.
Table 3. Weibull parameters for the measured properties by the tensile strength test of epoxy composites reinforced with caranan fiber Weibull analysis.
Fiber Volume (%)Tensile StrengthModulus of ElasticityTotal StrainTensile Toughness
R2βϴR2βθR2βθR2βθ
00.881.6656.670.861.691.220.940.978.510.860.828.38
100.853.2842.950.922.760.760.923.727.020.940.812.32
200.875.0299.280.795.291.460.903.228.060.822.3512.86
300.845.59113.50.975.271.530.895.238.430.982.5417.53
Table
Table 4. Information about TGA analysis in different conditions.
Table 4. Information about TGA analysis in different conditions.
ConditionTonset (°C)Weight Loss (%)Maximum Degradation Temperature (°C)
Caranan Fiber257.569.7339.0
Epoxy Resin286.577.6386.3
10% 210.549.6309.4
20%272.642.6323.5
30%298.136.5334.2
Table
Table 5. Glass transition temperature (Tg) for different material conditions.
Table 5. Glass transition temperature (Tg) for different material conditions.
ConditionTg (°C)
Caranan Fiber64
Epoxy Resin81
10%65
20%65
30%63
Table
Table 6. DMA parameters.
Table 6. DMA parameters.
MaterialG’ (35 °C)G’’ Tg(°C)Tan δ Tg (°C)Reference
0% (epoxy)13526472[53]
10%175092110PW
20%14968796PW
30%1378101113PW
PW = Present Work.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Souza, A.T.; Pereira Junio, R.F.; Neuba, L.d.M.; Candido, V.S.; da Silva, A.C.R.; de Azevedo, A.R.G.; Monteiro, S.N.; Nascimento, L.F.C. Caranan Fiber from Mauritiella armata Palm Tree as Novel Reinforcement for Epoxy Composites. Polymers 2020, 12, 2037. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12092037

AMA Style

Souza AT, Pereira Junio RF, Neuba LdM, Candido VS, da Silva ACR, de Azevedo ARG, Monteiro SN, Nascimento LFC. Caranan Fiber from Mauritiella armata Palm Tree as Novel Reinforcement for Epoxy Composites. Polymers. 2020; 12(9):2037. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12092037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Souza, Andressa Teixeira, Raí Felipe Pereira Junio, Lucas de Mendonça Neuba, Verônica Scarpini Candido, Alisson Clay Rios da Silva, Afonso Rangel Garcez de Azevedo, Sergio Neves Monteiro, and Lucio Fabio Cassiano Nascimento. 2020. "Caranan Fiber from Mauritiella armata Palm Tree as Novel Reinforcement for Epoxy Composites" Polymers 12, no. 9: 2037. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12092037

APA Style

Souza, A. T., Pereira Junio, R. F., Neuba, L. d. M., Candido, V. S., da Silva, A. C. R., de Azevedo, A. R. G., Monteiro, S. N., & Nascimento, L. F. C. (2020). Caranan Fiber from Mauritiella armata Palm Tree as Novel Reinforcement for Epoxy Composites. Polymers, 12(9), 2037. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12092037

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop