Next Article in Journal
Intact Fibrillated 3D-Printed Cellulose Macrofibrils/CaCO3 for Controlled Drug Delivery
Previous Article in Journal
Total Meniscus Reconstruction Using a Polymeric Hybrid-Scaffold: Combined with 3D-Printed Biomimetic Framework and Micro-Particle
Previous Article in Special Issue
Marked Difference in the Conformational Transition of DNA Caused by Propanol Isomer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Counterions on the Interaction among Concentrated Spherical Polyelectrolyte Brushes

1
State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, Engineering Research Center of Large Scale Reactor Engineering and Technology (Ministry of Education), and International Joint Research Center of Green Energy Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
2
Engineering Research Center of Xinjiang Bingtuan of Materials Chemical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(12), 1911; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13121911
Submission received: 25 April 2021 / Revised: 5 June 2021 / Accepted: 7 June 2021 / Published: 8 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dynamics of Polyelectrolytes)

Abstract

:
The effect of counterions on interactions among spherical polyelectrolyte brushes (SPBs) was systematically investigated by rheology, small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS). The SPB particles consist of a solid polystyrene (PS) core with a diameter of ca.100 nm and a chemically grafted poly-(acrylic acid) (PAA) brush layer. Metal ions of different valences (Na+, Mg2+ and Al3+) were used as counterions to study the interactions among concentrated SPBs. The so-called “structure factor peak” in SAXS, the “local ordered structure peak” in WAXS and rheological properties indicated the interactions among concentrated SPBs. Combining SAXS, WAXS and rheology, the formation mechanism of the local ordered structure among PAA chains in the overlapped area of adjacent SPB, which was generated due to the bridge function of counterions, was confirmed. In contrast, excessive counterions shielded the electrostatic interaction among PAA chains and destroyed the local ordered structure. This work enriches our understanding of the polyelectrolyte assembly in concentrated SPBs under the effect of counterions and lays the foundations for SPB applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Spherical polyelectrolyte brushes (SPB) are nanoparticles that consist of a spherical hydrophobic polymer core and are grafted with a linear hydrophilic polyelectrolyte shell on the surfaces of spherical core substrates [1,2,3,4]. In the field of material science and colloid science, SPBs show great potential an broad prospects [5,6,7,8,9]. Similar with other polyelectrolyte aqueous dispersions, the interactions among concentrated SPBs are highly determined by the properties of SPB dispersions [10]. Interestingly, the properties of SPBs can be simply designed and adjusted by choosing different synthesis conditions and different monomers [11,12]. Additionally, the lengths of poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) brush chains are strongly affected by environmental conditions. Therefore, the interactions among SPBs composed of weak polyelectrolyte can be affected by pH values and the ionic strength in the system [13,14].
Recently, SPBs dispersed in dilute solutions have been thoroughly investigated, with studies focusing on their properties and applications [15,16,17]. For PAA brushes, the polyelectrolyte chains of SPB swell in aqueous dispersions with an increase in pH according to the Daoud–Cotton theory and the mean field theory [18,19], which proposes that there are interactions among concentrated SPBs and the charge degree of PAA chains. A number of characterization methods have been used to characterize the properties of SPBs, such as WAXS, [20] SAXS [21,22,23,24,25], scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [26,27], transmission electron micrography (TEM) [28,29], dynamic light scattering (DLS) [30] and small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) [31]. However, the interactions among concentrated SPB aqueous dispersions have not been carefully examined or investigated by researchers, and there is a scarcity of reports on this in the literature. The viscosity of SPB dispersions, especially at high concentrations, is strongly affected by counterions. Therefore, to investigate the effect of counterions on the interaction among concentrated spherical polyelectrolyte brushes is of critical importance for their applications in coating and painting.
Very recently, we studied PAA brushes in different SPB concentrations, pH values and salt concentrations [32]. Firstly, with the increase in SPB concentration, the viscosity of SPB aqueous solution significantly rose. Then, a “polyelectrolyte peak” [32] at the high q range was observed in the SAXS curve. This was assumed to be caused by the formation of local ordered structures among overlapped polyelectrolyte chains. Moreover, the strength of the polyelectrolyte peak was clearly affected by pH and counterions. To provide more details of this phenomenon, the effects of counterions on the interactions among concentrated SPBs were systematically investigated by combining SAXS, WAXS and rheology in this paper. Metal ions with different valences (Na+, Mg2+ and Al3+) were used in this experiment, and an interesting regularity was discovered. As show in Figure 1, the addition of counterions leads to local ordered structures among polyelectrolyte chains. In this case, the counterions play the role of a bridge to connect the polyelectrolyte chains. However, further increase in the concentration of counterions results in the disappearance of such local ordered structures, mainly because the counterions shield the electrostatic interaction among polyelectrolyte chains. To analyze this local ordered structure, concentrated SPB aqueous dispersions were characterized by SAXS, which can reveal the strength of interaction by structure factor in the SAXS curve. WAXS has also been proved to be an effective way to analyze local ordered structures [33,34,35]. SAXS and WAXS are microscopic characterization methods. At the macroscopic level, the rheological properties of SPB aqueous dispersions with different metal ions were studied to further certify the local ordered structures among SPBs. Combining rheology, WAXS and SAXS, the effect of different valence metal ions on the interactions among concentrated SPBs was systematically studied. This research enriches the polyelectrolyte theory and greatly accelerates the applications of SPBs.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

Potassium persulfate (KPS) was purchased from Shanghai reagent company (Shanghai, China) Co., Ltd. and was purified by recrystallization. Styrene and acrylic acid were also bought from SRC, and their inhibitors were removed by reduced pressure distillation. Sodium chloride (NaCl), magnesium chloride (MgCl2) and aluminum chloride (AlCl3) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent (Shanghai, China) Co., Ltd. The photo-initiator 2-[p-(2-hydroxy-2-methyl-propiophenone)]-ethylene glycol methacrylate (HMEM) was synthesized, and the synthesis process is described in a previous work6. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH; SRC), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS; SRC) and other chemicals were used as received without further purification. The used water was obtained and purified by reverse osmosis of Millipore Milli-Q.

2.2. Preparation of SPBs

The synthesis of SPBs was performed according to our previous work by photo-emulsion polymerization.1 First, the PS core was synthesized by conventional emulsion polymerization. KPS (0.37 g) as initiator and SDS (0.24 g) as surfactant were dissolved in 75 mL deionized water. Then, 5 g of styrene was added into the above mixture under nitrogen atmosphere with a constant stirring rate of 300 rpm. The reaction was carried out at 80 °C for two hours. Second, the reaction temperature was adjusted to 70 °C, and the HMEM (0.5 g), which was dissolved in 3.5 g acetone, was slowly added to the three-necked flask under the “starved” condition (1 drop per 6–7 s). After another 2.5 h, a photoinitiator shell with a thickness of 2–3 nm was formed on the PS surface by copolymerization. The PS aqueous solution was cooled to 25 °C, and the impurities were removed by ultrafiltration with ultrapure water. Finally, the diluted PS core (50 g) dispersion mixed with the AA monomer (0.75 g, 100 mol% of styrene) was added to a photoreactor. Using photoemulsion polymerization to synthesize SPB dispersion, the experiment was carried out under UV irradiation with gentle magnetic stirring. After 2.5 h, the PAA chains were densely grafted from the surface of PS cores and formed the SPB dispersions. The obtained SPB dispersions were purified by ultrafiltration with ultrapure water approximately ten times. The pH of SPB dispersion was adjusted by NaOH and HCl, and the concentration of counterions was adjusted by NaCl, MgCl2 and AlCl3.

2.3. Characterization

SAXS and WAXS characterization was carried out using a BL16B1 beamline at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF). The distance of sample to the detector was set as 0.2 m in the WAXS experiment and 5 m in the SAXS experiment. The incident wavelength of X-ray was 1.24 nm, and the scattering information of the different sample was recorded by the 2D detector (MAR165 CCD). Then, using the software (Fit 2 D) to obtain the one-dimensional curve of SAXS and WAXS, the scattering vector q range was set from 0.05 to 25 nm−1. In these q ranges, the sufficient information of the SPB dispersion could be acquired. All of the data deduct the background of the water and the empty sample. The rheological properties of the SPBs were measured with a stress-controlled rotational rheometer (Physica MCR 501, Anton Paar). The temperature was set with an accuracy of 0.05 °C. The viscosity and shear rate of the concentrated SPBs were measured after a pre-shearing of 100 s−1 for 1 min and with a waiting time of 10 s. The frequency dependence of the storage modulus G′ and loss modulus G″ were measured after a 1 min pre-shear at a shear rate of 100 s−1 and with a 10 s waiting time for the 1% strain from 10 to10−3 Hz. The pH was measured with a DELTA 320 pH-meter. For all of the samples in the experiment, the concentration of SPBs was 12 wt%, and the pH was adjusted to 7.0.

2.4. SAXS Theory

The data analysis in this work was conducted following recently reported studies. [23,24]. The scattering vector q was correlated with the scattering angle θ according to the following equation:
q = 4 π / λ s i n θ / 2
where θ is the scattering angle and λ is the wavelength of incident X-ray radiation (1.24 nm). The scattering intensity I(q) can be described as follows:
I q = N I 0 q S q
where N is the number density, I0(q) is the scattering intensity of an isolated particle and S(q) is the structure factor that indicates the strength of the interaction among particles.
Previous articles [26,27,28] have proved that the structure factor S(q) is only obvious at the smaller q region for systems of concentrated spherical particles. For the dilute solution (<1 wt%), the structure factor can be set as constant, i.e., S(q) = 1, suggesting that the scattering curves directly represent the form factors of the particles. The interaction among particles can be ignored in the analysis. In this way, the structure factor S(q) can be expressed by the following equation:
S q = I q / N I 0 q
For the SPB dispersion, the scattering intensity of an isolated SPB can be decomposed into three independent parts as the following equations:
I 0 q = I c s q + I P S q + I f l u c t q
where Ics(q) signifies the contribution of the overall core–shell structure of the particles, which is caused by the contrast of the electron density between the core–shell structure and the surrounding medium. For the SPB dispersion, SPBs are spherical particles, Ics(q) is equal to the square of the scattering amplitude B(q), and the scattering amplitude B(q) can be described as shown below:
B q = b ( ρ r ρ m r 2 sin q r q r d r
where b is the Thomson scattering length (0.282 × 10−14 m), ( ρ r ρ m ) denoting the radial excess electron density along the radial distance r . For SPB dispersion, ( ρ r ρ m ) is the contrast between the radial electron density of the SPB ρ r and the electron density of ultrapure water ρ m since water is used as solvent.
According to previous work of our group, the “five-layer” model was chosen to fit the SAXS data, which has already been proven to be a feasible theoretical distribution model for the SPB system [36]. As shown in Figure 2 [37,38], the radius of the PS core is set as r 0 , and the PAA shell is radially divided into five layers, with r i ( 1 i 5 ) representing the outer radius of the PAA layer. Thus, on the basis of the five-layer model, B q of SPBs can be calculated by summing up the scattering amplitudes of the PS core and each layer of the PAA shell.
The second term I P S q of Equation (4) is the scattering intensity resulting from the density fluctuations of the PS core, which is much smaller than the other two parts. Thus I P S q could be ignored in our research.
The final term I f l u c t q of Equation (4) results from the thermal fluctuations of the PAA chains, which can be determined by the following equation:
I f l u c t q = I f l u c t 0 1 + ξ 2 q 2
In this equation, I f l u c t 0 is treated as adjustable parameters in our analysis, and ξ is the correlation length of the spatial fluctuations of the PAA chains, which is of the order of a few nanometers. For SPB dispersion, I f l u c t q only influence scattering intensity I(q) at high scattering angles ( q > 0.5 nm−1).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. SAXS

SAXS measurements were conducted on SPB dispersions with salt concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, 1, 5, 10, 50 and 100 mM. The SPB concentration and the pH were kept constant at 12 wt% and 7, respectively, and the five-layer model (Figure 2) was used to fit and analyze the SAXS data in this work. The structure factor S(q) was obtained according to Equation (3).
SAXS scattering curves of SPB with different concentrations of Na+ are shown in Figure 3. It is obvious that when the Na+ concentration increased from 0.01 to 5 mM, the maximum of the structure factor S(q) (e.g., at q around 0.046 nm−1) continued to grow monotonically but decreased when Na+ concentration further increased from 5 to 100 mM. We named this peak in the S(q) curve the “structure factor peak”. The increase in the maximum of SAXS data means that there is an increase in interactions among concentrated SPB chains. This can be attributed to the enhancement of counterions, which leads to more ionized carboxyl groups in PAA chains via the increase in Na+ concentration from 0.01 to 5 mM. Although the pH value of aqueous SPB dispersion was adjusted to 7, there were still non-dissociative carboxyl groups, and the PAA chains were not fully stretched according to the literature [2,38,39]. In this situation, the counterions played the role of a bridge to connect the concentrated PAA chains forming a local ordered structure. However, a further increase in Na+ concentration would lead to the S(q) approaching a constant (S(q) = 1), indicating that the interactions among concentrated SPBs become smaller. This could be because excess counterions shield the electrostatic interactions among the PAA chains, resulting in their shrinkage.
To explore the effects of Mg2+ concentration on the interactions among concentrated SPBs, SPB dispersions with a concentration of 12 wt% and various Mg2+ concentrations (0.01, 0.1, 1, 5, 10, 50 and 100 mM) were characterized by SAXS (Figure 4). The pH value was maintained at 7.
Different to the effect of Na+, with the elevation of Mg2+ concentrations from 0.01 to 1 mM, the structure factor S(q) in the SAXS curve underwent an initial increase and then reached a maximum at the Mg2+ concentration of 1 mM. For the Na+ ions, however, the maximum S(q) was achieved at the concentration of 5 mM. This means that the influence of divalent salt ions (Mg2+) on the interaction among concentrated SPBs is more significant than that of monovalent salt ions (Na+). The reason for the formation of the structure factor peak is similar to that of the polyelectrolyte peak [32] according to our previous work. Both of these peaks indicate the strength of the local ordered structure among the PAA chains.
This non-monotonic variation of structure factor with a counterion concentration can be explained by a partial replacement of protons within the SPBs with increased counterions7. When the Mg2+ concentration changed from 0.01 to 1 mM, the dissociation of carboxyl groups increased and led to the stretching of PAA chains, because Mg2+ redistribution plays an important role. Moreover, with the further increase in Mg2+ concentration to 100 mM, the structure factor peak decreased, in line with the change in the polyelectrolyte peak. This is believed to be caused by excessive Mg2+, which screens the electrostatic interactions among SPBs [7,10] and breaks the local ordered structure among PAA chains.
Figure 5 shows the relationship between the SAXS data of the SPB solution and the q value at various Al3+ concentrations. Unlike Na+, both Mg2+ and Al3+ have high valence. Thus, they are more likely to cause a bridge among PAA chains and can easily shield electrostatic interactions. As shown in Figure 5, when the Al3+ concentration reached 0.1 mM, the strength of the structure factor peak reached its maximum and then began to decrease. On the one hand, the Al3+ had a stronger electrostatic shielding effect, while the ion radius of Al3+ was much larger than that of Na+ and Mg2+; thus, it was more difficult for Al3+ to enter the middle of the PAA chains due to steric hindrance.

3.2. WAXS

A large number of studies [40,41,42] have confirmed that WAXS is a powerful and effective means to characterize the local ordered structure of polyelectrolyte chains. Here, WAXS was used to characterize the influences of different valences and concentrations of metal ions on the local ordered structure of PAA chains.
For Na+, interestingly, an extra peak appeared at q around 16 nm−1 in the WAXS spectra (Figure 6) when the SPB concentration increased to 12 wt%. This extra peak was named the “local ordered structure peak”. The appearance of the local ordered structure peak is due to the formation of local ordered structure among PAA chains from neighbored SPBs. When compared to the WAXS curve of different Na+ concentrations in Figure 6, the peak at q around 16 nm−1 should result from the local ordered structure formed by overlapped PAA chains among the neighbored SPBs bridged by counterions under the driven forces of electrostatic interactions, which is similar to the S(q) curve observed by SAXS. However, with a further increase in the Na+ concentration from 5 to 100 mM, the height of the local ordered structure peak in WAXS spectra was significantly reduced. It seems that the arrangement of PAA chains among SPBs is relatively stable and forms a net-like ordered structure. Excessive sodium ions gradually destroy this structure.
Analogous to the SAXS data as shown above, a similar change in the local ordered structure peak at around 16 nm−1 in the WAXS spectrum was observed, as shown in Figure 7. However, both occurred at a low Mg2+ concentration of 0.01 mM. At a relatively high concentration of 100 mM, the interactions among SPBs seem to be decreased, leading to the unremarkable local ordered structure peak. Only at the moderate salt concentration of 1 mM Mg2+ can a significant local ordered structure peak be found in WAXS spectra, suggesting the formation of ordered structure among SPBs.
Changes in the microstructure of the concentrated SPB upon changing Al3+ were featured by the local ordered structure peak at around 16 nm−1 in the WAXS spectra, as shown in Figure 8. This peak was relatively gentle at both low and relatively high salt concentrations, which is probably due to the fact that at low Al3+ concentrations, only part of the carboxyl groups in PAA chains were ionized, leading to very weak interactions among SPBs. However, this began to shield the electrostatic interaction between polyelectrolyte chains, causing shrinkages among the PAA brushes, when the Al3+ concentration approached 5 mM. Unlike to Na+ and Mg2+, when the Al3+ concentration increased to 0.1 mM, more carboxyl groups were dissociated, leading to a more obvious local ordered structure peak. At this state, the PAA chains were almost completely charged, and the local ordered structure peak was the largest (Figure 8). This means that the SPB dispersion has the most stable and highest locally ordered structure in this situation. Finally, when the Al3+ concentration was adjusted to 100 mM, almost no local ordered structure peak could be observed. Because the arrangement of PAA chains among SPB particles is relatively stable, it is hard for Al3+ to enter the net-like local ordered structure among PAA chains, although some space still exists among them. It seems that the local ordered structure is more sensitive to the counterions with higher valence because of their stronger effect on electrostatic interactions.

3.3. Rheology

SAXS and WAXS are able to characterize the interaction and local ordered structures among concentrated SPB dispersions from the microscopic level, while rheology research of SPB dispersion can characterize the interaction and local ordered structures among concentrated SPB dispersions from the macroscopic level.
In this context, the steady and dynamic rheological measurements were performed on SPB dispersions in the presence of Na+, Mg2+ and Al3+ concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 100 mM (Figure 9). In all experiments, the SPB concentration was maintained at 12 wt%, and the pH was 7. Upon increasing the Na+ concentration from 0.01 to 5 mM, the zero-shear viscosity increased by nearly 10 times (Figure 9). Moreover, with further increase in the Na+ concentration to 100 mM, the zero-shear viscosity decreased to 0.1 Pa·s. This confirms the formation of a strong interaction with a net-like structure among SPBs when they are close to a critical distance with a concentration of around 12 wt%, and the counterions as a bridge formed a local ordered structure among PAA chains. This result of the rheology method is consistent with the observations made via SAXS and WAXS.
The rheological properties of SPB dispersion are strongly affected by Mg2+ (Figure 9). Slightly different from the case of Na+, the zero-shear viscosity increased obviously when the Mg2+ concentration elevated from 0.01 to 1 mM, while it leveled off when the Mg2+ concentration further increased to 100 mM. The significant enhancement appeared as the Mg2+ concentration changes from 0.01 to 1 mM, which is consistent with the trend of the structure factor peak in SAXS spectra and the local ordered structure peak in WAXS spectra. Because the Mg2+ concentration affects the degree of dissociation of the carboxyl group, the amount of charge strongly depends on the Mg2+ concentration. As a result, the associations among PAA chains from the neighbored SPBs bridged by counterions are enhanced, and a net-like local ordered structure forms, thereby leading to high viscosity. In this way, the counterions influence the interaction among PAA chains.
Regarding Al3+, the maximum of viscosity appears when the concentration is 0.1 mM. At higher Al3+ concentrations (>5 mM), the weak electrostatic interactions among PAA chains lead to the low viscosity of SPB dispersion. The PAA chains start to shrink due to the fact that the enhanced counterions decrease the electrostatic interaction among SPBs when the Al3+ concentration is adjusted from 0.1 to 100 mM. In the rheological data, a sharp drop in viscosity can be observed, and the SPB dispersion sample changes from a gel-like state to a liquid state.
Figure 10 shows the relationship between storage modulus G′ (solid symbol) and loss modulus G″ (open symbol) as functions of frequency at different Na+, Mg2+ and Al3+ concentrations. The concentration of SPB dispersion was kept constantly at 12 wt% and the pH = 7. As mentioned above, counterions can strongly affect the interaction among concentrated SPB dispersion. These changes are also reflected in dynamic rheological experiments. When pH = 7, the counterions can, to an extent, act as a bridge to promote the dissociation degree of carboxyl groups, leading to a stable net-like structure among PAA chains nearby SPBs. However, salt can also lead to the screening of electrostatic interactions. These two opposite effects of the counterions on the electrostatic interactions result in the appearance of the maximum of G′ and G″ upon increasing the concentration of counterions (Figure 10). Thus, the conclusion from the rheology experiment is in good agreement with that of the SAXS and WAXS experiments. The effects of counterion concentration on the appearance of the maximum of G′ and G″ are the same as those of the structure factor peak in SAXS spectra and the local ordered structure peak in WAXS spectra.
The phenomena observed by SAXS, WAXS and the rheological methods confirm that the association among SPBs reflected by the structure factor peak in SAXS and local ordered structure peak in WAXS spectra should be driven by the interactions among PAA chains, which can be affected by the counterions.

4. Conclusions

The effects of concentration and valence of counterions on the interactions among concentrated SPB dispersion are systematically investigated using SAXS, WAXS and rheological methods. The so-called “structure factor peak” in SAXS curves and the “local ordered structure peak” in WAXS curves reflect the interactions among concentrated SPBs. Both of these two peaks became more significant at moderate strength of counterions, a result which is consistent with our previously reported “polyelectrolyte peak”. The fluctuation of theses peaks can reflect the strength of interaction among concentrated SPBs, which is caused by local ordered structure among PAA chains of neighbor SPBs. Interestingly, the level of local ordered structure can also be compared at the macroscopic level by rheology. The changes in viscosity, the loss modulus and storage modulus derived from differences in strengths of counterions confirm that the local ordered structure reflected by the structure factor peak in SAXS and the local ordered structure peak in WAXS spectra is driven by interactions among concentrated SPB. Through SAXS, WAXS and rheology, we uncovered the formation mechanism of the local ordered structure among PAA chains in the overlapped area of adjacent SPBs, which are bridged by counterions. In contrast, excessive counterions shielded the electrostatic interaction among PAA chains and destroyed the local ordered structure. This work enriches our understanding of the assembly behaviors of concentrated polyelectrolyte particles under the effect of counterions and can serve as the foundations for SPB applications.

Author Contributions

Data curation, Q.Y.; Formal analysis, Z.Y.; Investigation, L.S.; Methodology, L.L.; Writing–original draft, Y.W. (Yunwei Wang); Writing–review & editing, Y.W. (Yiming Wang), F.Y. and X.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 51773061 and 51761135128. This research also was funded by the Key Scientific and Technological Project of Xinjiang Bingtuan, grant number 2018AB025.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful for the financial support provided by the NSFC Grants (51773061 and 51761135128) and the Key Scientific and Technological Project of Xinjiang Bingtuan (2018AB025). We would also like to express our thanks to the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF) for the experimental support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guo, X.; Weiss, A.A.; Ballauff, M. Synthesis of Spherical Polyelectrolyte Brushes by Photoemulsion Polymerization. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 6043–6046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Guo, X.; Ballauff, M. Spatial Dimensions of Colloidal Polyelectrolyte Brushes as Determined by Dynamic Light Scattering. Langmuir 2000, 16, 8719–8726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ballauff, M. Spherical polyelectrolyte brushes. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32, 1135–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, X.; Xu, J.; Li, L.; Wu, S.; Chen, Q.; Lu, Y.; Ballauff, M.; Guo, X. Synthesis of spherical polyelectrolyte brushes by ther-mo-controlled emulsion polymerization. Macromol. Rapid. Commun. 2010, 31, 1272–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wei, S.; Wang, Q.; Zhu, J.; Sun, L.; Lin, H.; Guo, Z. Multifunctional composite core–shell nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 4474–4502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Guo, X.; Ballauff, M. Spherical polyelectrolyte brushes: Comparison between annealed and quenched brushes. Phys. Rev. E 2001, 64, 051406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mei, Y.; Sharma, G.; Lu, Y.; Ballauff, M. High catalytic activity of platinum nanoparticles immobilized on spherical polyelec-trolyte brushes. Langmuir 2005, 21, 12229–12234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ezhova, A.; Huber, K. Contraction and Coagulation of Spherical Polyelectrolyte Brushes in the Presence of Ag+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ Cations. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 7460–7468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, S.; Shah, H.; Zhang, F.; Lu, W. Silica-based nanocomposites via reverse microemulsions: Classifications, preparations, and applications. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 4418–4437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wang, W.; Han, H.; Tian, Y.; Li, L.; Guo, X. Protein adsorption onto spherical polyelectrolyte brushes observed by small angle X-ray scattering. J. East China Univ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 41, 277–280. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yang, Q.; Li, L.; Zhao, F.; Wang, Y.; Ye, Z.; Guo, X. Generation of MnO2 nanozyme in spherical polyelectrolyte brush for col-orimetric detection of glutathione. Mater. Lett. 2019, 248, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ye, Z.; Li, L.; Zhao, F.; Tian, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Q.; Dai, L.; Guo, X. Enrichment and distribution of counterions in spherical polyelectrolyte brushes probed by small angle X-ray scattering. J. Polym. Sci. B 2019, 57, 738–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wittemann, A.; Haupt, B.; Ballauff, M. Adsorption of proteins on spherical polyelectrolyte brushes in aqueous solution. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 1671–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Jayachandran, K.N.; Takacs-Cox, A.; Brooks, D. Synthesis and Characterization of Polymer Brushes of Poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide) from Polystyrene Latex by Aqueous Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 4247–4257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, W.; Li, L.; Henzler, K.; Lu, Y.; Wang, J.; Han, H.; Tian, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Lotze, G.; et al. Protein Immobilization onto Cationic Spherical Polyelectrolyte Brushes Studied by Small Angle X-ray Scattering. Biomacromolecules 2017, 18, 1574–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Henzler, K.; Rosenfeldt, S.; Wittemann, A.; Harnau, L.; Finet, S.; Narayanan, T.; Ballauff, M. Directed Motion of Proteins along Tethered Polyelectrolytes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 158301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tian, Y.; Li, L.; Han, H.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Ye, Z.; Guo, X. Modification of spherical polyelectrolyte brushes by layer-by-layer self-assembly as observed by small angle X-ray scattering. Polymers 2016, 8, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Zhulina, B.; Birshtein, M.; Borisov, V. Curved polymer and polyelectrolyte brushes beyond the daoud-cotton model. Eur. Phys. J. E 2006, 20, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, L.; Merlitz, H.; He, S.-Z.; Wu, C.-X.; Sommer, J.-U. Polyelectrolyte Brushes: Debye Approximation and Mean-Field Theory. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 3109–3116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lu, Y.; Hoffmann, M.; Yelamanchili, R.S.; Terrenoire, A.; Schrinner, M.; Drechsler, M.; Möller, M.W.; Breu, J.; Ballauff, M. Well-Defined Crystalline TiO2Nanoparticles Generated and Immobilized on a Colloidal Nanoreactor. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2009, 210, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dingenouts, N.; Norhausen, C.; Ballauff, M. Observation of the Volume Transition in Thermosensitive Core−Shell Latex Particles by Small-Angle X-ray Scattering. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 8912–8917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Seelenmeyer, S.; Deike, I.; Rosenfeldt, S.; Norhausen, C.; Dingenouts, N.; Ballauff, M.; Narayanan, T.; Lindner, P. Small-angle x-ray and neutron scattering studies of the volume phase transition in thermosensitive core–shell colloids. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 10471–10478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xuan, Y.; Wei, W.; Li, L.; Xu, G.; Zhi, Z.; Fu, W. Analysis of spherical polyelectrolyte brushes by small angle X-ray scattering. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2014, 32, 778–785. [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang, W.; Li, L.; Han, H.; Tian, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Guo, X. Tunable immobilization of protein in anionic spherical polyelectrolyte brushes as observed by small-angle X-ray scattering. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2015, 293, 2789–2798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Grunder, R.; Urban, G.; Ballauff, M. Small-angle x-ray analysis of latex particles with core-shell morphology. Colloid Polym. Sci. 1993, 271, 563–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, K.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Lu, Y.; Guo, X. Synthesis of Magnetic Spherical Polyelectrolyte Brushes. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 632–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Su, N.; Gu, P.; Zhao, J. Preparation and properties of polyaniline–anionic spherical polyelectrolyte brushes nanocomposite. Micro Nano Lett. 2015, 10, 175–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Koll, R.; Fruhner, L.; Heller, H.; Allgaier, J.; Pyckhout-Hintzen, W.; Kruteva, M. Creating a synthetic platform for the encap-sulation of nanocrystals with covalently bound polymer shells. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 3847–3854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Qian, W.; Zhu, Q.; Duan, B.; Tang, W.; Yuan, Y.; Hu, A. Electrostatic self-assembled nanoparticles based on spherical poly-electrolyte brushes for magnetic resonance imaging. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 7663–7668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kremer, B.; Kirschhock, C.; Jacobs, A. Synthesis and characterization of zeogrid molecular sieves. C. R. Chim. 2005, 8, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Martin, J.R.S.; Bihannic, I.; Santos, C.F.; Farinha, J.P.S.; Demé, B.; Leermakers, F.A.M.; Pinheiro, J.P.; Rotureau, E.; Duval, J.F.L. Structure of Multiresponsive Brush-Decorated Nanoparticles: A Combined Electrokinetic, DLS, and SANS Study. Langmuir 2015, 31, 4779–4790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Q.; Ye, Z.; Hua, C.; Tian, Y.; von Klitzing, R.; Guo, X. Interaction among Spherical Poly-electrolyte Brushes in Concentrated Aqueous Solution. Langmuir 2020, 36, 3104–3110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Giulio, D.; Leonarda, L.; Alessandro, L.; Antonino, M. Structure of natural water-containing glasses from Lipari (Italy) and Eastern Rhodopes (Bulgaria): SAXS, WAXS and IR studies. J. Non–Cryst. Solids 1998, 232–234, 547–553. [Google Scholar]
  34. Nozue, Y.; Shinohara, Y.; Ogawa, Y. Deformation behavior of isotactic polypropylene spherulite during hot drawing inves-tigated by simultaneous microbeam SAXS-WAXS and POM measurement. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 2036–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Polat, K.; Orujalipoor, I.; Semra, I. Nano and microstructures of SEBS/PP/wax blend membranes: SAXS and WAXS analyses. J. Polym. Eng. 2015, 35, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. De Robillard, Q.; Guo, X.; Ballauff, M.; Narayanan, T. Spatial Correlation of Spherical Polyelectrolyte Brushes in Salt-Free Solution As Observed by Small-Angle X-ray Scattering. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 9109–9114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ballauff, M. Nanoscopic Polymer Particles with a Well-Defined Surface: Synthesis, Characterization, and Properties. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2003, 204, 220–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ye, Z.; Li, L.; Dai, L.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Q.; Von Klitzing, R.; Guo, X. Selective uptake of different proteins by annealed and quenched cationic spherical polyelectrolyte brushes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 58, 3018–3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Weihua, W.; Fangfang, C.; Li, L. Interactions among spherical poly(acrylic acid) brushes: Observation by rheology and small angle x-ray scattering. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2015, 54, 405–413. [Google Scholar]
  40. Carlos, R.; López, B.; Burghardt, W.R.; Kweon, M.S. Local and Global Stretching of Polymer Chains during Startup of Extensional Flow. ACS. Macro. Lett. 2019, 9, 26–31. [Google Scholar]
  41. Schrinner, M.; Ballauff, M.; Talmon, Y.; Kauffmann, Y.; Thun, J.; Möller, M.; Breu, J. Single Nanocrystals of Platinum Prepared by Partial Dissolution of Au-Pt Nanoalloys. Science 2009, 323, 617–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Thünemann, A.; Kubowicz, S.; Burger, C. Alpha-helical-within-discotic columnar structures of a complex between poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(l-lysine) and a hexa-peri-hexabenzocoronene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 352–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of interaction among concentrated SPBs with increase in counterion concentration.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of interaction among concentrated SPBs with increase in counterion concentration.
Polymers 13 01911 g001
Figure 2. Five-layer fitting model of SPBs.
Figure 2. Five-layer fitting model of SPBs.
Polymers 13 01911 g002
Figure 3. SAXS data of concentrated SPB dispersion at various Na+ concentrations. SPB concentration = 12 wt%, pH = 7. (a) Scattering intensity I(q) of SPBs as a function of scattering angle q; (b) structure factor S(q) of concentrated SPB dispersion as a function of scattering angle q.
Figure 3. SAXS data of concentrated SPB dispersion at various Na+ concentrations. SPB concentration = 12 wt%, pH = 7. (a) Scattering intensity I(q) of SPBs as a function of scattering angle q; (b) structure factor S(q) of concentrated SPB dispersion as a function of scattering angle q.
Polymers 13 01911 g003
Figure 4. SAXS data of concentrated SPB dispersion at various Mg2+ concentrations. SPB concentration = 12 wt%, pH = 7. (a) Scattering intensity I(q) of SPB as a function of scattering angle q; (b) structure factor S(q) of concentrated SPB dispersion as a function of q.
Figure 4. SAXS data of concentrated SPB dispersion at various Mg2+ concentrations. SPB concentration = 12 wt%, pH = 7. (a) Scattering intensity I(q) of SPB as a function of scattering angle q; (b) structure factor S(q) of concentrated SPB dispersion as a function of q.
Polymers 13 01911 g004
Figure 5. SAXS data of concentrated SPB dispersion at various Al3+ concentrations. SPB concentration = 12 wt%, pH = 7. (a) Scattering intensity I(q) of SPBs as a function of scattering angle q; (b) structure factor S(q) of concentrated SPB dispersion as a function of q.
Figure 5. SAXS data of concentrated SPB dispersion at various Al3+ concentrations. SPB concentration = 12 wt%, pH = 7. (a) Scattering intensity I(q) of SPBs as a function of scattering angle q; (b) structure factor S(q) of concentrated SPB dispersion as a function of q.
Polymers 13 01911 g005
Figure 6. WAXS data of concentrated SPB dispersion at different Na+ concentrations. SPB concentration = 12 wt%, pH = 7.
Figure 6. WAXS data of concentrated SPB dispersion at different Na+ concentrations. SPB concentration = 12 wt%, pH = 7.
Polymers 13 01911 g006
Figure 7. WAXS data of concentrated SPB dispersion at different Mg2+ concentrations; SPB concentration = 12 wt%, pH = 7.
Figure 7. WAXS data of concentrated SPB dispersion at different Mg2+ concentrations; SPB concentration = 12 wt%, pH = 7.
Polymers 13 01911 g007
Figure 8. WAXS data of concentrated SPB dispersion at different Al3+ concentrations; SPB concentration = 12 wt%, pH = 7.
Figure 8. WAXS data of concentrated SPB dispersion at different Al3+ concentrations; SPB concentration = 12 wt%, pH = 7.
Polymers 13 01911 g008
Figure 9. Relationship between viscosity and shear rate of concentrated SPB dispersion at different Na+ (a), Mg2+ (b) and Al3+ (c) ion concentrations; SPB concentration = 12 wt%, pH = 7.
Figure 9. Relationship between viscosity and shear rate of concentrated SPB dispersion at different Na+ (a), Mg2+ (b) and Al3+ (c) ion concentrations; SPB concentration = 12 wt%, pH = 7.
Polymers 13 01911 g009aPolymers 13 01911 g009b
Figure 10. Storage modulus G′ (solid symbol) and loss modulus G″ (open symbol) as functions of frequency at different Na+ (a), Mg2+ (b) and Al3+ (c) concentrations; SPB concentration = 12 wt%, pH = 7.
Figure 10. Storage modulus G′ (solid symbol) and loss modulus G″ (open symbol) as functions of frequency at different Na+ (a), Mg2+ (b) and Al3+ (c) concentrations; SPB concentration = 12 wt%, pH = 7.
Polymers 13 01911 g010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Q.; Ye, Z.; Sun, L.; Yang, F.; Guo, X. Effect of Counterions on the Interaction among Concentrated Spherical Polyelectrolyte Brushes. Polymers 2021, 13, 1911. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13121911

AMA Style

Wang Y, Li L, Wang Y, Yang Q, Ye Z, Sun L, Yang F, Guo X. Effect of Counterions on the Interaction among Concentrated Spherical Polyelectrolyte Brushes. Polymers. 2021; 13(12):1911. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13121911

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yunwei, Li Li, Yiming Wang, Qingsong Yang, Zhishuang Ye, Liang Sun, Fan Yang, and Xuhong Guo. 2021. "Effect of Counterions on the Interaction among Concentrated Spherical Polyelectrolyte Brushes" Polymers 13, no. 12: 1911. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13121911

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop