Next Article in Journal
Catalytic Stereoselective Conversion of Biomass-Derived 4′-Methoxypropiophenone to Trans-Anethole with a Bifunctional and Recyclable Hf-Based Polymeric Nanocatalyst
Previous Article in Journal
Shear-Thinning in Oligomer Melts—Molecular Origins and Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hybrid Microporous Polymeric Materials with Outstanding Permeability and Increased Gas Transport Stability: PTMSP Aging Prevention by Sorption of the Polymerization Catalyst on HCPS
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 13
Issue 16
10.3390/polym13162804
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel High Flux Poly(m-phenylene isophtalamide)/TiO2 Membranes for Ultrafiltration with Enhanced Antifouling Performance

by
Mariia Dmitrenko
1,2,*,
Anna Kuzminova
1,2,
Andrey Zolotarev
1,2,
Vladislav Liamin
1,
Tatiana Plisko
3,
Katsiaryna Burts
3,
Alexandr Bildyukevich
3,
Sergey Ermakov
1 and
Anastasia Penkova
1,2
1
St. Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya Nab., 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
2
Sirius University of Science and Technology, 1 Olympic Ave, 354340 Sochi, Russia
3
Institute of Physical Organic Chemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 13 Surganov Str., 220072 Minsk, Belarus
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(16), 2804; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13162804
Submission received: 21 July 2021 / Revised: 14 August 2021 / Accepted: 17 August 2021 / Published: 20 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Polymeric Materials for Membrane Technology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Wide application of ultrafiltration in different industrial fields requires the development of new membranes with tailored properties and good antifouling stability. This study is devoted to the improvement of ultrafiltration properties of poly(m-phenylene isophtalamide) (PA) membranes by modification with titanium oxide (TiO2) particles. The introduction of TiO2 particles improved membrane separation performance and increased antifouling stability and cleaning ability under UV irradiation. The developed membranes were characterized by scanning electron and atomic force microscopy methods, the measurements of water contact angle, and total porosimetry. The transport properties of the PA and PA/TiO2 membranes were tested in ultrafiltration of industrially important feeds: coolant lubricant (cutting fluid) emulsion (5 wt.% in water) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution (0.5 wt.%). The PA/TiO2 (0.3 wt.%) membrane was found to possess optimal transport characteristics in ultrafiltration of coolant lubricant emulsion due to the highest pure water and coolant lubricant fluxes (1146 and 32 L/(m2 h), respectively), rejection coefficient (100%), and flux recovery ratio (84%). Furthermore, this membrane featured improved ability of surface contamination degradation after UV irradiation in prolonged ultrafiltration of BSA, demonstrating a high flux recovery ratio (89–94%).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nowadays, the surface of our planet consists of more than 70% water, but only 6% is fresh water [1]. Oil is the main pollutant of water resources due to rapid industrial development and energy demand growth, which affect living organisms and lead to environmental degradation and pollution [2]. Thus, water purification and its recovery from pollutions, especially from oils, is an important task that needs to be urgently solved. There are various technologies used for water purification, but they become ineffective at low oil concentrations in water [3]. The application of membrane technologies (in particular, ultrafiltration) is a relevant alternative due to efficiency, flexibility, productivity, selectivity, and environmental friendliness [4]. However, porous membranes used in ultrafiltration have an inherent problem of fouling, which increases cleaning costs, equipment breakdown, membrane rupture, and short service life [5]. The introduction of various particles with antibacterial and photocatalytic properties in membranes has attracted great attention for water purification, yielding the reduction of the membrane fouling degree [6,7]. Moreover, this membrane modification provides improved mechanical, optical, electrical, thermal, and chemical stability [8,9,10].
Titanium oxide (TiO2) is one of the widespread, commercially available, inexpensive, and promising photocatalysts with excellent chemical stability and high photocatalytic potential [1]. Its use as an independent catalyst has led to concerns about its negative impact on the environment. However, its inclusion in small concentrations in a polymeric material (membrane) may both reduce environmental hazards and improve the separation performance and efficiency of the membrane process for water purification [11,12,13].
In this work, TiO2 was introduced into the poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) (PA) matrix, which is widely used to develop membranes for nanofiltration [14,15], ultrafiltration [16,17], distillation [18], and reverse osmosis [19,20], as well as for the design of tissue biostructures, batteries, air filters, and in electric elements [21,22,23,24,25]. The active application of PA is associated with its unique properties such as mechanical and chemical resistance, commercial availability and low cost, ease of processing, and the possibility to design highly porous materials [26].
There are only a few works devoted to the application of composite polyamide/TiO2 in membrane technology, particularly for the preparation of membranes for nanofiltration [27,28,29,30,31,32], reverse osmosis [33,34,35,36,37,38], pervaporation [39], and microfiltration [40]. In [27,28,29,30], the nanofiltration thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes based on PA were subjected to the modification with TiO2. The TFN PA membrane modified by TiO2 was developed for improved salt rejection [27]. The optimal membrane demonstrated enhanced separation performance (in 12% and 19% of water permeability and NaCl rejection, respectively) and antifouling properties with high flux recovery (94%) compared to a pristine PA TFN membrane. In [28], graphene oxide decorated with TiO2 nanoparticles was incorporated into the TFN membrane for the efficient organic solvent nanofiltration to achieve improved antifouling properties. The GO nanosheets promoted solvent channels and TiO2 provided super surface hydrophilic properties resulting in the formation of a permeable hydrophilic membrane with enhanced antifouling properties. The comparison of the effect of TiO2 (15 nm) and SiO2 (10–20 nm) as nanofillers in the TFN PA membrane in terms of flux and rejection of organic matter (humic and tannic acids) and salts (MgSO4 and NaCl) was carried out in [29]. The permeability of modified PA membranes was increased by 24 and 58% with the incorporation of TiO2 and SiO2, respectively. The modification of the PA membrane with TiO2 significantly improved the MgSO4 rejection. However, TiO2- and SiO2-modified membranes had a lower flux decline ratio (FDR) in organic matter filtration compared to the pristine membrane. TFN PA membranes were prepared by interfacial polymerization on a polyethersulfone (PES) substrate with the incorporation of aminated titanium dioxide (APTES-TiO2) in the work [30]. The membrane with 0.3 w/v % APTES-TiO2 had greatly improved pure water flux with a high level of Na2SO4 rejection (>95%), and NaCl and Na2SO4 rejection (23.2%, 99.7%, respectively) in the separation of single salt solution. The works in [31,32] were aimed at modifying commercial nanofiltration PA membranes. A commercial PA membrane was modified by coating with silver-doped TiO2 (Ag–TiO2) nanoparticles (0.05, 0.1, and 0.5 wt.%) on the membrane surface by a dip coating method [32]. The transport properties of the modified membrane were tested in filtration of pure water, saltwater, and by examining the bacterial growth of Gram-positive (Bacillus subtilis) and Gram-negative (Escherichia coli) on the membrane surface. It was indicated that the modified membranes demonstrated efficient antibacterial properties: the bacterial growth reduced approximately 93% and 91% compared to the pristine membrane. The other commercial PA membrane was surface modified by the coating of nanomaterials graphene oxide (GO) and titanium dioxide (TiO2) to enhance membrane separation and antifouling properties for the removal of methylene blue (MB) in water [31]. The increased flux from 28% to 61% and improved antifouling property of the coated membranes (especially under UV-irradiation) were reported.
For reverse osmosis (RO), the modification with TiO2 of PA membrane was carried out by various approaches: the introduction of fillers into polymer matrix [33] or the coating of fillers on the surface [34,35,36,37,38]. In [33], a RO PA membrane was developed by the incorporation of GO and TiO2 to enhance the salt rejection and filtration performance for purification of drinking water and treatment of wastewater. The introduction of TiO2-GO into the membrane matrix improved the membrane performance (62 L/(m2 h) flux, 97% salt rejection, and 100% hydrocarbons rejection) due to changes in charge, roughness, and hydrophilicity of the membrane surface. The surface modifification of a commercial RO TFN PA membrane was carried out using irradiated chitosan/titanium dioxide (CS/TiO2); the highest flux was demonstrated for the membrane with TiO2 concentration of 0.125 wt.% [34]. For RO desalination, a TFN PA membrane was also fabricated with deposition of positively and negatively charged titania nanosheets on the surface by layer-by-layer (LbL) assembly to enhance hydrophilicity [35]. The modification significantly increased water permeability and salt rejection due to the hydration layer hindered the direct contact of salt with the membrane surface. The highest water permeability (0.8 L/(m2 h bar)), 60% higher compared to the pristine membrane) and higher NaCl rejection (98.45%) were demonstrated for the membrane with two bilayers. In [36], a RO PA membrane was surface modified by coating with TiO2 nanoparticles (10, 20, 30 and 50 ppm) on the membrane and using UV-initiated graft polymerization at different irradiation times and various acrylamide concentrations. The TiO2-coated membranes demonstrated the increasing water flux with the increase of nanoparticles concentration and irradiation time, and slightly decreased membrane rejection at low irradiation times. RO membrane modified with both acrylamide and TiO2 under UV irradiation had enhanced water flux up to 18% with slightly higher rejection and better antifouling properties compared to the pristine membrane. RO TFN PA membrane was also modified by the layer-by-layer (LbL) assembly of positively and negatively charged titanium nanosheets (TNS) on the surface to improve the fouling resistance for high concentration oily saline water and to maintain a high level of salt rejection [37]. It was demonstrated that the modification improved surface hydrophilicity, roughness, and PA cross-linking. The membrane coated with two bilayers of TNS had an improved permeability, much lower fouling propensity, and improved oil and salt rejection (>99% and >98%, respectively). Additionally, TiO2 was deposited on a porous PES support as a sublayer for the fabrication of high-performance RO TFN PA membrane; this increased the affinity between modified PES and amine monomer during the interfacial polymerization [38]. The obtained modified thin film composite (TFC) membrane with TiO2 coverage demonstrated improved RO performance (high permeance of 1.8 L/(m2 h bar) and salt rejection of 96.1%).
TFN PA membranes were also fabricated by interfacial polymerization on the surface of TiO2 modified ceramic hollow fiber (CHF) substrate to improve the pervaporation dehydration performance [39]. The modified TFC membrane had the highest separation index (PSI, 7.83 × 107), separation factor (above 12,000), and the permeation flux (~6.44 kg/(m2 h)) in dehydration of 90 wt.% isopropanol at 60 °C. In [40], the modification of a microfiltration PA membrane by TiO2 + AgO coating was carried out. The TiO2 + AgO coating improved and formed novel functional properties: bactericidal and photocatalytic. The photocatalytic properties of the PA membrane were tested on MB degradation under UV irradiation and visible light. The filtration results showed that membranes covered with two-component TiO2 + AgO had a permeate flux similar to the non-coated membrane. The antibacterial properties of TiO2 + AgO coatings were evaluated for two bacteria (Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis). The TiO2 + AgO coatings on the PA membrane caused a complete suppression of bacterial growth, due to the presence of Ag/AgO nanoparticles and created very good photocatalytic properties due to TiO2. However, to the best of our knowledge, the development of composite poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide)/TiO2 membranes for ultrafiltration has not been reported so far.
As the development of ultrafiltration membrane with good performance and low surface fouling is a challenging task and is very important for membrane technology, the aim of the present work is to develop and characterize the ultrafiltration membranes based on poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) with improved transport and antifouling properties related to the membrane modification with TiO2 particles. The effect of the introduction of TiO2 particles into the PA casting solution on the structure, separation performance, and antifouling stability of PA porous ultrafiltration membranes was thoroughly studied in this work. The transport properties were studied in ultrafiltration of industrially important feeds: coolant lubricant (cutting fluid) emulsion and bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution. The characterization of membrane structure and physicochemical properties was carried out by different methods: scanning electron and atomic force microscopies, the measurements of contact angle, and total porosimetry. Moreover, the cleaning of surface contamination of modified membranes after the ultrafiltration was carried out using the UV lamp illumination; the flux recovery ratio was also evaluated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Poly(m-phenylene isophtalamide) (PA, Fenylon C2, lot. 146/19, “UNIPLAST” Ltd., Vladimir, Russia) was used as a membrane material. Titanium oxide (TiO2, >99.9%, PKF “Non-ferrous metallurgy” Ltd., Yekaterinburg, Russia) was used for the modification of porous PA membranes. The average particle size of TiO2 was determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Figure 1) and equals ~20 µm. N,N′-Dimethylacetamide (DMA) and lithium chloride LiCl (“Vekton”, St. Petersburg, Russia) were used without further treatment. Coolant lubricant (cutting fluid) (Wittol 297, SERVOVIT, Minsk, Belarus) emulsion (5 wt.% in water) and 0.5 wt.% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Mw = 67,000 g/mol, “Sigma-Aldrich”, St. Louis, MO, USA) solution in phosphate buffer (pH 7.0–7.2) were applied to evaluate membrane separation performance and antifouling properties.

2.2. Porous Membrane Preparation

Anisotropic porous membranes were prepared as follows: a predetermined amount of PA powder was dissolved in DMA with 0.66 wt.% lithium chloride at 100 °C with a constant stirring for 3 h to obtain 12 wt.% polymer solution. Porous PA membranes were prepared by phase inversion technique: the PA solution gradually cooled to ambient temperature (25 °C) was cast with a casting blade (200 µm gap width) onto a glass plate and then immersed in a coagulation bath with distilled water (non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS)). The thickness of the prepared porous PA membranes measured by the micrometer was 80 ± 10 μm.
The modification of porous PA membranes using TiO2 was carried out by grinding the PA powder with the predetermined amount of TiO2 particles (0.3, 0.5, 0.75 wt.% with respect to the polymer weight) in an agate mortar with a further dissolution of composites in DMA with LiCl as described above. The formation of porous membranes based on a composite PA/TiO2 was carried out in the same way as for a membrane based on a pristine polymer described above. The thickness of the porous PA/TiO2 membranes measured by the micrometer was equal to 90 ± 10 μm, which does not differ much from the thickness of the membrane based on pristine PA and not significantly affect the transport properties of the modified membranes.
The preparation of porous membranes based on PA and its composites with TiO2 is presented schematically in Figure 2.

2.3. Structural Investigation of the Membranes

The inner and surface structure of porous membranes was investigated by scanning electron (SEM) and atomic force (AFM) microscopies, the standard porosimetry method, and contact angle measurements. The inner morphology of the developed porous PA-based membranes was investigated with a Phenom Pro scanning electron microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Membranes were cleaved in liquid nitrogen followed by the application of a gold layer using a cathode sputtering vacuum installation DSR (Vaccoat, London, UK). The surface of the porous PA-based membranes was investigated with an NT-MDT NTegra Maximus atomic force microscope (“NT-MDT Spectrum Instruments”, Moscow, Russia) in the tapping mode. The pores in the PA-based membranes were measured with a Porosimeter 3.1 instrument (POROTECH Ltd., Woodbridge, ON, Canada) by the standard porosimetry method; n-octane was applied as a reference liquid. Water contact angle of the porous PA-based membranes was measured by the attached bubble method with a Goniometer LK-1 device (“NPK Open Science” Ltd., Krasnogorsk, Russia) to assess the hydrophilic surface properties [41]. To analyze contact angle data, the “DropShape” software was applied. For each membrane, at least three different locations were tested, and the average contact angle values were calculated.

2.4. Determination of Separation and Antifouling Membrane Performance

Transport properties of the developed PA-based membranes were evaluated by ultrafiltration in a stirred filtration Amicon-type setup with an effective membrane area of 24.6 cm2 (Figure 3). Pure water flux, feed flux, and rejection coefficient were determined in stirred ultrafiltration at the transmembrane pressure of 1 bar and ambient temperature (25 °C) at a stirrer rate of 300 rpm. Emulsions of coolant lubricant in water (5 wt.%) and 0.5 wt.% BSA solution in phosphate buffer were used as feed solutions in ultrafiltration experiments. First, the membrane was pre-conditioned upon ultrafiltration of distilled water for 30 min at a transmembrane pressure of 1 bar. Thereafter, the pure water flux was determined according to Equation (1). Then, the water was replaced with the feed solution in the ultrafiltration cell. The permeate flux and rejection coefficient were determined after 10 min of filtration according to Equations (1) and (2), respectively.
The flux (J) of membranes was calculated as follows [42]:
J = V A × t ,
where A is the effective membrane area (m2), V is the volume of permeate (L), and t is the permeation time (h).
The content of coolant lubricant and BSA in permeates was investigated by spectrophotometry using a Spectrophotometer PE-5400UV (“ECROCHEM”, Moscow, Russia) at a wavelength of 500 and 280 nm corresponding to the absorbance maximum for the coolant lubricant and BSA, respectively.
The rejection coefficient (R, %) was calculated as follows:
R = ( 1 − C p C f ) × 100 % ,
where Cp and Cf are the foulant contents in the permeate and the feed (g/L), respectively.
For evaluation of membrane transport properties, at least three different membrane samples were tested, and the average flux and rejection coefficient were calculated. The relative error was found to be less than 5% for the flux measurements and less than 0.5% for the rejection coefficient.
To study membrane antifouling performance, the following procedure was applied. The membrane was pre-conditioned for 30 min at 1 bar and ambient temperature (25 °C). Then, the pure water flux was determined. The feed BSA solution or coolant lubricant emulsion was placed in the ultrafiltration cell and filtered at 1 bar for 40 min. The flux was measured every 10 min. Thereafter, the pure water flux of the membrane after the BSA solution or coolant lubricant aqueous emulsion ultrafiltration was determined. The flux recovery ratio (FRR) was calculated as follows:
FRR = ( J J 0 ) × 100 % ,
where J is the flux of pure water after the contact of the membrane with foulant and Jo is the initial pure water flux [43].
To evaluate the cleaning ability of the modified PA/TiO2 membranes and reference PA membrane, the contaminated with BSA membrane after rinsing with water in ultrafiltration setup was immersed into Petri dishes with water under an ultraviolet DRT-125 lamp (230–400 nm, MEDtechnique No. 7, St. Petersburg, Russia) for 2.5 h. After the membrane was taken out, its pure water flux was measured again in order to consider the flux recovery ratio according to Equation (3) [44]. To investigate long-term membrane stability, the PA and PA/TiO2 (0.3) membranes were tested in ultrafiltration of BSA solution with ultraviolet illumination for 2.5 h during four cycles for two days. The membrane flux was measured every 10 min. Two cycles were carried out during one day, then after the second UV irradiation, the membranes were left immersed in water in Petri dishes for a night and tested again the next day.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Characterization of PA and PA/TiO2 Membranes

The effect of TiO2 particles incorporation in the PA membrane matrix on the membrane structure was studied using SEM and AFM. The membrane structure is known to determine membrane transport properties as well as membrane antifouling performance. To explain the change of membrane transport properties in ultrafiltration due to modification by TiO2 particles, the structure of the membrane cross section and surface of the selective layer of PA and PA/TiO2 membranes was investigated. The cross-sectional SEM micrographs of the porous membranes are presented at different scales in Figure 4.
It was found that all prepared membranes featured asymmetric structure of the cross section with thin selective layer and porous membrane matrix. The porous membrane matrix is pierced by the large cellular macrovoids, typical of membranes prepared by non-solvent induced phase separation. It was found that the narrow macrovoids passed into wider and larger macrovoids of the PA membrane further from the membrane selective layer compared to the PA/TiO2 membranes, where the broad macrovoids were located much closer to the selective layer. The increase in TiO2 concentration from 0.3 to 0.75 wt.% in the PA matrix increased macrovoid size. The selective layer became less dense and more porous, contributing to the increase in the flux of the TiO2-modified membranes in comparison to the membrane based on pristine PA. The effect of TiO2 incorporation into the membrane matrix on the membrane transport properties will be discussed in detail in Section 3.2. The SEM images of the surface of the selective layer are presented in Figure 5.
The modification of the PA membrane with TiO2 led to the accumulation of particles and their aggregates on the surface of the membrane selective layer. The same trend of TiO2 particles aggregates on polybenzimidazole (PBI) membranes was also reported in the work [45]. It was found that the size and the number of TiO2 particles and their aggregates significantly increased with the increase of the modifier content in the membrane matrix. The surface of the selective layer was found to be rather rough, featuring cavities which may contain pores at their bottom. These cavities may be attributed to the pore openings. However, their size, which was determined using the SEM images, was too large for ultrafiltration membranes taking into account the rejection of the developed membranes, which will be discussed in detail in Section 3.2. The membrane separation performance (Section 3.2) indicates that the size of the transport pores is much smaller compared to the size of these cavities observed on the surface of the membrane selective layer. Note that SEM is not a perfect tool for the study of the porous structure of the membrane selective layer as it gives the opportunity to observe the shape and size of the pore only on the surface of the membrane selective layer. However, the pore can change its size along the thickness of the selective layer which cannot be monitored by SEM, so the size of transport pores can be inconsistent with those observed on the surface of the selective layer by SEM. The quantity and density of cavities of the PA membrane compared to the PA/TiO2 membranes is smaller. However, at TiO2 concentration over 0.3 wt.%, the particles began to clog these surface cavities. This may change membrane surface structure significantly affecting the membrane antifouling properties. In addition, TiO2 particles on the surface of the modified membranes play an important role in determining the hydrophilic and photocatalytic properties discussed in the following sections. The changes in surface topography of the membranes were studied by AFM. AFM images of the PA and PA/TiO2 membranes are presented in Figure 6.
It was revealed that the surface of the selective layer featured the nodule structure typical for membranes prepared by non-solvent-induced phase separation. Similar to the SEM images, AFM studies revealed that the introduction of TiO2 particles into the membrane matrix resulted in the formation of more pores (cavities) on the surface of the selective layer. Moreover, deeper cavities with sharper edges were formed for the PA/TiO2 composite membranes compared to the reference PA membrane (Figure 6). Large aggregates of TiO2 particles are observed on the selective layer surface for the PA/TiO2 membranes. An increase in TiO2 concentration with respect to the PA weight increases the number of TiO2 particle aggregates on the membrane surface.
To evaluate membrane surface roughness during modification, surface parameters of the PA and PA/TiO2 membranes were calculated based on AFM images in terms of the root mean squared surface roughness (Rq) and average roughness (Ra) (Table 1). Water contact angle determined by the attached bubble method and total porosity data for the PA and PA/TiO2 membranes are presented in Table 1.
The accumulation and aggregation of TiO2 particles on the membrane surface (confirmed by SEM and AFM data, Figure 5 and Figure 6) increased the surface roughness parameters of the modified membranes compared to the non-modified PA membrane, which increased with the rise of TiO2 content in the PA matrix (Table 1). The increased surface roughness of modified membranes would significantly affect contact between foulants (coolant lubricant and BSA) and membrane increasing the tendency to membrane fouling [44]. The total porosity data obtained by the standard porosimetry method also indicate that an increase in the modifier content above 0.3 wt.% partly clogs the membrane pores. The porosity of the PA/TiO2 (0.5 and 0.75 wt.%) membranes decreases slightly to 83 and 79%, respectively, compared to the membranes based on the pristine PA (88%) and PA/TiO2 (0.3 wt.%) composite (90%). The water contact angle data indicate the surface hydrophilization of the PA membrane during the modification with TiO2 [46]. The water contact angle significantly decreases with an increase in the TiO2 concentration in the PA matrix, contributing to the changes in the separation and antifouling properties of the membranes, which will be discussed in Section 3.2. Water molecules are adsorbed on the membrane surface due to the TiO2, forming a thin boundary on the membrane surface and increasing its hydrophilicity, which promotes more intensive penetration of water molecules through the membrane, increasing the flux and reducing the degree of membrane fouling [32].
The results of the structural studies of the membranes indicate that TiO2 introduction into the membrane matrix affects the mechanism of non-solvent phase separation. Hydrophilic TiO2 particles migrate to the membrane surface in NIPS due to the affinity to the non-solvent (water) and can partly be washed out to the coagulation bath together with the pore former (LiCl). It results in a significant change of pore number and size in the selective layer. Moreover, the migration of TiO2 particles to the membrane surface leads to the deposition of TiO2 particle aggregates on the membrane surface, which changes surface roughness and water contact angle of the selective layer.

3.2. Transport Properties of PA and PA/TiO2 Membranes in Ultrafiltration

3.2.1. Ultrafiltration of Coolant Lubricant Emulsion

The increase in energy demand leads to the rise of oil and gas exploration and production generating large volumes of oily wastewater. Various technologies are applied to treat this water, but their effectiveness decreases with decreasing oil content, and the fraction of dissolved oil in water can be retained [3]. Membrane separation by ultrafiltration is one of the high-performance, selective, and efficient technologies for removing oil from water. Thus, the developed porous PA-based membranes were tested in ultrafiltration with a coolant lubricant (cutting fluid) emulsion (5 wt.% in water) to assess their promising application in industry. Transport properties of the PA and PA/TiO2 membranes are presented in Figure 7.
The ultrafiltration data demonstrate that the modification of the PA membrane by TiO2 improves pure water and coolant lubricant emulsion fluxes (Figure 7a) of modified membranes, which may be due to the surface hydrophilization (Table 1) [45,46] and the changes in the structure of the selective layer (less dense and more porous selective layer, Figure 4). The obtained data are also confirmed by the previous research, where it was shown that the addition of hydrophilic particles into the polymer matrix increased the stratification during membrane preparation due to increased thermodynamic instability [47], which resulted in membrane with higher porosity, pore radius, and surface porosity. This indicates that the addition of TiO2 in PA modified the pore system of the membrane and changed its hydrophilicity and pore structure, causing an increase in membrane pure water and water solution permeability [29].
Note that all membranes had a high rejection coefficient of coolant lubricant (from 99.81 up to100 wt.% in the permeate) (Figure 7b). The modified membranes have slightly higher coolant lubricant rejection compared to the PA membrane (99.81 wt.%). It can be explained by the fact that the introduction of TiO2 into the PA matrix probably blocked some of the pores of the membrane (confirmed by SEM and total porosity data, Figure 5 and Table 1) resulting in a rejection improvement [48]. However, the best flux recovery ratio was found for the PA/TiO2 (0.3 wt.%) membrane (84%) compared to membranes based on the pristine PA (61%) and PA/TiO2 (0.5 and 0.75 wt.%) composites (Figure 7b). The FRR value depends on the hydrophilicity, pore size, and roughness of the selective membrane layer. The increased surface hydrophilicity of the filled membranes should reduce membrane fouling (increase in FRR). As membrane permeability (and thus surface pore size) increases compared to the pristine PA membrane, it may promote increased availability of the selective layer structure for the pollutant (coolant lubricant) facilitating its penetration inside the pores [49]. However, the optimal content of TiO2 (0.3%) in the PA matrix forms a balance between surface hydrophilicity, roughness, and pore size of the membrane, maintaining high performance (fluxes) and FRR [29]. Despite the increase in surface hydrophilicity of the PA/TiO2 (0.5 and 0.75 wt.%) membranes, their higher surface roughness compared to the PA and PA/TiO2 (0.3 wt.%) membranes (Table 1) caused an increase in the specific area of the selective layer for the adsorption of coolant lubricant molecules. This results in higher contamination by pollutants and a decrease in FRR compared to the PA/TiO2 (0.3 wt.%) membrane [50].
Moreover, the increased FRR of the PA/TiO2 (0.3 wt.%) membrane compared to the PA membrane is related to the significant surface hydrophilization (decrease of water contact angle), which counterbalances a slight increase in surface roughness. The PA/TiO2 (0.3 wt.%) membrane demonstrates better antifouling performance compared to the other modified membranes due to the absence of strong TiO2 agglomeration on the surface of the selective layer. All these factors resulted in improved flux, R, and FRR due to simplified penetration of water molecules through the unblocked and more hydrophilic pores. Thus, the optimal ultrafiltration properties were obtained for the PA/TiO2 (0.3 wt.%) membrane, which was further studied for photocatalytic activity.

3.2.2. Ultrafiltration of BSA Solution and Flux Recovery of Membranes by Photocatalysis

The designed porous PA/TiO2 (0.3 wt.%) membrane was tested in prolonged ultrafiltration sessions using BSA as a model protein to study the cleaning ability under lamp illumination after the reversible fouling. The obtained data are presented in Figure 8. The membrane based on pristine PA was also investigated in prolonged ultrafiltration for the comparison with the modified membrane to evaluate the changes during the modification with TiO2.
To investigate the long-term membrane stability, the PA and modified PA/TiO2 (0.3) membranes were tested in ultrafiltration of BSA solution with ultraviolet illumination during four cycles (for two days) (Figure 8a). It was demonstrated that the rejection coefficient of BSA for both membranes was similar and equal to ~60 ± 5% during the whole experiment. Pure water flux of the PA membrane had the constant values during 30 min prefiltration (785 L/(m2 h)), while it was slightly decreased for the PA/TiO2 (0.3 wt.%) membrane (from 1146 to 977 L/(m2 h)). During the BSA filtration process, the flux of the PA and PA/TiO2 (0.3 wt.%) membranes decreased sharply to 47 and 53 L/(m2 h) (Figure 8a), respectively, which could be explained by the BSA deposition on the membrane surface causing the formation of BSA gel layers [44]. After the water flushing of the membranes for 40 min, the pure water flux of the PA and PA/TiO2 (0.3 wt.%) membranes recovered by 57% and 65% of the initial pure water flux value after 30 min of pre-filtration, respectively (Figure 8b). Afterwards, the membranes were immersed in water under UV lamp illumination for 2.5 h to evaluate the photocatalytic activity. After this, the flux of the PA membrane recovered by 68%, and the flux of the PA/TiO2 (0.3 wt.%) membrane to 89% (Figure 8b). Further, the same three cycles were repeated for the membranes (Figure 8a). FRR after the UV illumination for the PA/TiO2 (0.3 wt.%) membrane increased from 89% to 94% during four cycles, while for the PA membrane R slightly decreased from 68% to 65% and was significantly lower compared to the modified membrane (Figure 8b). The lower FRR values after water rinsing for both membranes (Figure 8b) compared to FRR values after the UV illumination indicated the effectiveness of UV application.
The improved recoverability of the modified membrane flux indicates the photocatalytic activity: titanium oxide in the PA matrix absorbing a quantum of light generates free charge carriers: negative electrons and positive vacancies (holes) [51]. They react with oxygen and water vapor by oxidation-reduction reactions forming strong oxidizing agents (O2−, −OH, and radicals). Active species directly interact, degrade, and mineralize organic pollutants on the membrane surface, increasing in the removal degree of impurities from the membrane [52]. The high values of R, FRR, and similar values of pure water and protein fluxes of the modified PA/TiO2 (0.3 wt.%) membrane and their constancy show its effectiveness in long-term filtration experiments and the indelibility or washout of titanium oxide particles from the polymer matrix. Thus, the modified PA/TiO2 (0.3 wt.%) membrane has a higher flux and due to its photocatalytic properties exhibits self-cleaning properties after UV illumination, when contaminants on the membrane surface and in the pores can be effectively removed providing a high level of flux recovery ratio.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the improvement of transport properties and antifouling stability of the ultrafiltration poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) (PA) membranes was achieved by modification with TiO2 particles. Thus, the novel ultrafiltration poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) (PA)/TiO2 membranes were prepared by non-solvent-induced phase separation. The analysis of transport characteristics of membranes was carried out in ultrafiltration of industrially relevant feeds: coolant lubricant (cutting fluid) emulsion in water and bovine serum albumin solution. Antifouling performance was studied in prolonged ultrafiltration using BSA solution.
The investigation of membranes in ultrafiltration of coolant lubricant (cutting fluid) emulsion demonstrated that the modification of PA membrane by TiO2 improved pure water and coolant lubricant fluxes of modified membranes, which could be related to the surface hydrophilization (confirmed by water contact angle measurements) and the formation of less dense and more porous selective layer (confirmed by SEM data). Furthermore, note that all membranes had a high rejection coefficient of coolant lubricant (from 99.81 up to 100 wt.% in the permeate). Moreover, the modified membranes had slightly higher coolant lubricant rejection compared to the PA membrane (99.81 wt.%) because the introduction of TiO2 into the PA matrix blocked some of the pores of the membrane (confirmed by SEM and total porosity data). Among all studied membranes, the PA/TiO2 (0.3 wt.%) membrane demonstrated the best ultrafiltration properties (FRR 84%, pure water and coolant lubricant fluxes (J) 32 and 1146 L/(m2 h), respectively, R 100%) caused by the significant selective layer surface hydrophilization, which counterbalances a slight increase in surface roughness, as well as the absence of strong TiO2 agglomeration on the surface in contrast to other modified membranes.
The study of PA/TiO2 (0.3 wt.%) membrane separation and antifouling performance in prolonged ultrafiltration using BSA solution was performed to analyze the cleaning ability after reversible fouling under UV lamp illumination. It was demonstrated that the membrane exhibited self-cleaning properties after UV illumination: contaminants on the membrane surface and in the pores were effectively removed providing a high level of flux recovery ratio (89–94%).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.D., T.P., A.B. and A.P.; methodology, T.P., K.B., S.E. and A.B.; investigation, A.Z., A.K., K.B. and V.L.; data curation, M.D., T.P. and A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.D.; writing—review and editing, M.D. and A.P.; visualization, M.D. and A.P.; supervision, A.P.; project administration, A.P.; funding acquisition, A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The reported study was funded by RFBR, Sirius University of Science and Technology, JSC Russian Railways and Educational Fund “Talent and success”, project number 20-38-51022.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The experimental work of this study was facilitated by the equipment from the Chemical Analysis and Materials Research Centre, Nanophotonics Centre, Cryogenic department, Thermogravimetric and Calorimetric Research Centre and the Interdisciplinary Resource Centre for Nanotechnology at the St. Petersburg State University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Blanco, M.; Monteserín, C.; Angulo, A.; Pérez-Márquez, A.; Maudes, J.; Murillo, N.; Aranzabe, E.; Ruiz-Rubio, L.; Vilas, J.L. TiO2-Doped Electrospun Nanofibrous Membrane for Photocatalytic Water Treatment. Polymers 2019, 11, 747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Lee, S.-Y.; Park, S.-J. TiO2 photocatalyst for water treatment applications. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2013, 19, 1761–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hejase, C.A.; Tarabara, V.V. Nanofiltration of saline oil-water emulsions: Combined and individual effects of salt concentration polarization and fouling by oil. J. Memb. Sci. 2021, 617, 118607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ulbricht, M. Advanced functional polymer membranes. Polymer 2006, 47, 2217–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Mohammad, A.W.; Teow, Y.H.; Ang, W.L.; Chung, Y.T.; Oatley-Radcliffe, D.L.; Hilal, N. Nanofiltration membranes review: Recent advances and future prospects. Desalination 2015, 356, 226–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ouzzine, M.; Maciá-Agulló, J.A.; Lillo-Ródenas, M.A.; Quijada, C.; Linares-Solano, A. Synthesis of high surface area TiO2 nanoparticles by mild acid treatment with HCl or HI for photocatalytic propene oxidation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 154–155, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Jyoti, K.; Baunthiyal, M.; Singh, A. Characterization of silver nanoparticles synthesized using Urtica dioica Linn. leaves and their synergistic effects with antibiotics. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2016, 9, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Singh, T.; Srivastava, N.; Mishra, P.K.; Bhatiya, A.K.; Singh, N.L. Application of TiO2 Nanoparticle in Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants. Mater. Sci. Forum 2016, 855, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Al-Hobaib, A.S.; Al-Sheetan, K.M.; Shaik, M.R.; Al-Suhybani, M.S. Modification of thin-film polyamide membrane with multi-walled carbon nanotubes by interfacial polymerization. Appl. Water Sci. 2017, 7, 4341–4350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Kotlhao, K.; Lawal, I.; Moutloali, R.; Klink, M. Antifouling Properties of Silver-Zinc Oxide Polyamide Thin Film Composite Membrane and Rejection of 2-Chlorophenol and 2,4-Dichlorophenol. Membranes 2019, 9, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Chong, M.N.; Jin, B.; Chow, C.W.K.; Saint, C. Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: A review. Water Res. 2010, 44, 2997–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Van Gerven, T.; Mul, G.; Moulijn, J.; Stankiewicz, A. A review of intensification of photocatalytic processes. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2007, 46, 781–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sampaio, M.J.; Silva, C.G.; Silva, A.M.T.; Vilar, V.J.P.; Boaventura, R.A.R.; Faria, J.L. Photocatalytic activity of TiO2-coated glass raschig rings on the degradation of phenolic derivatives under simulated solar light irradiation. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 224, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, M.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, S.; Li, P.; Hou, D. Preparation of graphene oxide modified poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) nanofiltration membrane with improved water flux and antifouling property. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 394, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hua, D.; Japip, S.; Wang, K.Y.; Chung, T.-S. Green Design of Poly(m-Phenylene Isophthalamide)-Based Thin-Film Composite Membranes for Organic Solvent Nanofiltration and Concentrating Lecithin in Hexane. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 10696–10705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pramila, J.; Melbiah, J.S.B.; Rana, D.; Gandhi, N.N.; Nagendran, A.; Mohan, D. Permeation characteristics of tailored poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) ultrafiltration membranes and probing its efficacy on bovine serum albumin separation. Polym. Test. 2018, 67, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sudareva, N.N.; Penkova, A.V.; Kostereva, T.A.; Polotskii, A.E.; Polotskaya, G.A. Properties of casting solutions and ultrafiltration membranes based on fullerene-polyamide nanocomposites. Express Polym. Lett. 2012, 6, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ruan, H.; Guo, C.; Yu, H.; Shen, J.; Gao, C.; Sotto, A.; Van der Bruggen, B. Fabrication of a MIL-53(Al) Nanocomposite Membrane and Potential Application in Desalination of Dye Solutions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 12099–12110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shawky, H.A. Performance of aromatic polyamide RO membranes synthesized by interfacial polycondensation process in a water–tetrahydrofuran system. J. Memb. Sci. 2009, 339, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Joshi, S.V.; Rao, A.V. Synthesis and evaluation of poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) as a reverse osmosis membrane. Desalination 1990, 78, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, J.W.; Han, S.S.; Zo, S.M.; Choi, S.M. Cellulose/poly-(m-phenylene isophthalamide) porous film as a tissue-engineered skin bioconstruct. Results Phys. 2018, 9, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xiao, K.; Zhai, Y.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Nanonet-structured poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide)–polyurethane membranes with enhanced thermostability and wettability for high power lithium ion batteries. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 55478–55485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhong, L.; Wang, T.; Liu, L.; Du, W.; Wang, S. Ultra-fine SiO2 nanofilament-based PMIA: A double network membrane for efficient filtration of PM particles. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 202, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, S.; Liu, H.; Yu, J.; Luo, W.; Ding, B. Microwave structured polyamide-6 nanofiber/net membrane with embedded poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) staple fibers for effective ultrafine particle filtration. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 6149–6157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jeong, Y.G.; Jeon, G.W. Microstructure and Performance of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube/m-Aramid Composite Films as Electric Heating Elements. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 6527–6534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dmitrenko, M.E.; Penkova, A.V.; Kuzminova, A.I.; Atta, R.R.; Zolotarev, A.A.; Mazur, A.S.; Vezo, O.S.; Lahderanta, E.; Markelov, D.A.; Ermakov, S.S. Development and investigation of novel polyphenylene isophthalamide pervaporation membranes modified with various fullerene derivatives. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 226, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kedchaikulrat, P.; Vankelecom, I.F.J.; Faungnawakij, K.; Klaysom, C. Effects of colloidal TiO2 and additives on the interfacial polymerization of thin film nanocomposite membranes. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2020, 601, 125046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Abadikhah, H.; Kalali, E.N.; Behzadi, S.; Khan, S.A.; Xu, X.; Shabestari, M.E.; Agathopoulos, S. High flux thin film nanocomposite membrane incorporated with functionalized TiO2@reduced graphene oxide nanohybrids for organic solvent nanofiltration. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2019, 204, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Urper-Bayram, G.M.; Bossa, N.; Warsinger, D.M.; Koyuncu, I.; Wiesner, M. Comparative impact of SiO2 and TiO2 nanofillers on the performance of thin-film nanocomposite membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 49382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wei, S.; Chen, Y.; Hu, X.; Wang, C.; Huang, X.; Liu, D.; Zhang, Y. Monovalent/Divalent salts separation via thin film nanocomposite nanofiltration membrane containing aminated TiO2 nanoparticles. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2020, 112, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ngo, T.H.A.; Nguyen, C.T.M.; Do, K.D.; Duong, Q.X.; Tran, N.H.; Nguyen, H.T.V.; Tran, D.T. Improvement of Hydrophilicity for Polyamide Composite Membrane by Incorporation of Graphene Oxide-Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2020, 2020, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Habib, Z.; Khan, S.J.; Ahmad, N.M.; Shahzad, H.M.A.; Jamal, Y.; Hashmi, I. Antibacterial behaviour of surface modified composite polyamide nanofiltration (NF) membrane by immobilizing Ag-doped TiO2 nanoparticles. Environ. Technol. 2020, 41, 3657–3669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Al-Gamal, A.Q.; Falath, W.S.; Saleh, T.A. Enhanced efficiency of polyamide membranes by incorporating TiO2-Graphene oxide for water purification. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 323, 114922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gayed, H.M.; El Fadl, F.I.A.; Maziad, N.A.; El-Aassar, A.H.M.; Abdel Mottaleb, M.S.A. Surface modification of composite polyamide reverse osmosis membrane by irradiated chitosan and TiO2 nanoparticles. Desalin. WATER Treat. 2019, 160, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Ahmad, N.A.; Goh, P.S.; Wong, K.C.; Zulhairun, A.K.; Ismail, A.F. Enhancing desalination performance of thin film composite membrane through layer by layer assembly of oppositely charged titania nanosheet. Desalination 2020, 476, 114167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Asadollahi, M.; Bastani, D.; Mousavi, S.A.; Heydari, H.; Mousavi, D.V. Improvement of performance and fouling resistance of polyamide reverse osmosis membranes using acrylamide and TiO2 nanoparticles under UV irradiation for water desalination. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 48461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ahmad, N.A.; Goh, P.S.; Zulhairun, A.K.; Ismail, A.F. Antifouling Property of Oppositely Charged Titania Nanosheet Assembled on Thin Film Composite Reverse Osmosis Membrane for Highly Concentrated Oily Saline Water Treatment. Membranes 2020, 10, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zarshenas, K.; Jiang, G.; Zhang, J.; Jauhar, M.A.; Chen, Z. Atomic scale manipulation of sublayer with functional TiO2 nanofilm toward high-performance reverse osmosis membrane. Desalination 2020, 480, 114342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, X.-W.; Cao, Y.; Li, Y.-X.; Xu, Z.-L.; Li, Z.; Wang, M.; Ma, X.-H. High-performance polyamide/ceramic hollow fiber TFC membranes with TiO2 interlayer for pervaporation dehydration of isopropanol solution. J. Memb. Sci. 2019, 576, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kacprzyńska-Gołacka, J.; Łożyńska, M.; Barszcz, W.; Sowa, S.; Wieciński, P.; Woskowicz, E. Microfiltration Membranes Modified with Composition of Titanium Oxide and Silver Oxide by Magnetron Sputtering. Polymers 2020, 13, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Plisko, T.V.; Liubimova, A.S.; Bildyukevich, A.V.; Penkova, A.V.; Dmitrenko, M.E.; Mikhailovskii, V.Y.; Melnikova, G.B.; Semenov, K.N.; Doroshkevich, N.V.; Kuzminova, A.I. Fabrication and characterization of polyamide-fullerenol thin film nanocomposite hollow fiber membranes with enhanced antifouling performance. J. Memb. Sci. 2018, 551, 20–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Daraei, P.; Madaeni, S.S.; Ghaemi, N.; Khadivi, M.A.; Rajabi, L.; Derakhshan, A.A.; Seyedpour, F. PAA grafting onto new acrylate-alumoxane/PES mixed matrix nano-enhanced membrane: Preparation, characterization and performance in dye removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 221, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ma, T.; Su, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, R.; Liu, Y.; He, M.; Li, Y.; Dong, N.; Wu, H.; Jiang, Z. Fabrication of electro-neutral nanofiltration membranes at neutral pH with antifouling surface via interfacial polymerization from a novel zwitterionic amine monomer. J. Memb. Sci. 2016, 503, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, Q.; Yu, Z.; Pan, Y.; Zeng, G.; Shi, H.; Yang, X.; Li, F.; Yang, S.; He, Y. Enhancing the photocatalytic and antibacterial property of polyvinylidene fluoride membrane by blending Ag–TiO2 nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2017, 28, 3865–3874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Akhtar, F.H.; Kumar, M.; Villalobos, L.F.; Vovusha, H.; Shevate, R.; Schwingenschlögl, U.; Peinemann, K.-V. Polybenzimidazole-based mixed membranes with exceptionally high water vapor permeability and selectivity. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 21807–21819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Lee, H.S.; Im, S.J.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, J.P.; Min, B.R. Polyamide thin-film nanofiltration membranes containing TiO2 nanoparticles. Desalination 2008, 219, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bai, L.; Bossa, N.; Qu, F.; Winglee, J.; Li, G.; Sun, K.; Liang, H.; Wiesner, M.R. Comparison of Hydrophilicity and Mechanical Properties of Nanocomposite Membranes with Cellulose Nanocrystals and Carbon Nanotubes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Qin, A.; Li, X.; Zhao, X.; Liu, D.; He, C. Engineering a Highly Hydrophilic PVDF Membrane via Binding TiO2 Nanoparticles and a PVA Layer onto a Membrane Surface. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 8427–8436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lalia, B.S.; Kochkodan, V.; Hashaikeh, R.; Hilal, N. A review on membrane fabrication: Structure, properties and performance relationship. Desalination 2013, 326, 77–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dmitrenko, M.E.; Penkova, A.V.; Atta, R.R.; Zolotarev, A.A.; Plisko, T.V.; Mazur, A.S.; Solovyev, N.D.; Ermakov, S.S. The development and study of novel membrane materials based on polyphenylene isophthalamide—Pluronic F127 composite. Mater. Des. 2019, 165, 107596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ravidhas, C.; Anitha, B.; Arivukarasan, D.; Venkatesh, R.; Christy, A.J.; Jothivenkatachalam, K.; Nithya, A.; Moses Ezhil Raj, A.; Ravichandran, K.; Sanjeeviraja, C. Tunable morphology with selective faceted growth of visible light active TiO2 thin films by facile hydrothermal method: Structural, optical and photocatalytic properties. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2016, 27, 5020–5032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ben Chobba, M.; Messaoud, M.; Weththimuni, M.L.; Bouaziz, J.; Licchelli, M.; De Leo, F.; Urzì, C. Preparation and characterization of photocatalytic Gd-doped TiO2 nanoparticles for water treatment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 32734–32745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Polymers 13 02804 g001 550
Figure 1. The SEM micrograph of TiO2 particles used for membrane modifications.
Figure 1. The SEM micrograph of TiO2 particles used for membrane modifications.
Polymers 13 02804 g001
Polymers 13 02804 g002 550
Figure 2. The scheme of preparation of porous membranes based on PA and its composites with TiO2.
Figure 2. The scheme of preparation of porous membranes based on PA and its composites with TiO2.
Polymers 13 02804 g002
Polymers 13 02804 g003 550
Figure 3. The scheme of ultrafiltration set-up.
Figure 3. The scheme of ultrafiltration set-up.
Polymers 13 02804 g003
Polymers 13 02804 g004a 550Polymers 13 02804 g004b 550
Figure 4. SEM cross-sectional micrographs of the membranes based on PA (a) and PA/TiO2 (0.3 (b), 0.5 (c), and 0.75 (d) wt.%) composites.
Figure 4. SEM cross-sectional micrographs of the membranes based on PA (a) and PA/TiO2 (0.3 (b), 0.5 (c), and 0.75 (d) wt.%) composites.
Polymers 13 02804 g004aPolymers 13 02804 g004b
Polymers 13 02804 g005 550
Figure 5. SEM images of the surface of the selective layer of membranes based on PA (a) and PA/TiO2 (0.3 (b), 0.5 (c), and 0.75 (d) wt.%) composites.
Figure 5. SEM images of the surface of the selective layer of membranes based on PA (a) and PA/TiO2 (0.3 (b), 0.5 (c), and 0.75 (d) wt.%) composites.
Polymers 13 02804 g005
Polymers 13 02804 g006a 550Polymers 13 02804 g006b 550
Figure 6. AFM images of the membranes based on PA (a) and PA/TiO2 (0.3 (b), 0.5 (c), and 0.75 (d) wt.%) composites.
Figure 6. AFM images of the membranes based on PA (a) and PA/TiO2 (0.3 (b), 0.5 (c), and 0.75 (d) wt.%) composites.
Polymers 13 02804 g006aPolymers 13 02804 g006b
Polymers 13 02804 g007 550
Figure 7. The dependence of (a) pure water and coolant lubricant fluxes, (b) rejection coefficient (R), and flux recovery ratio (FRR) on the TiO2 content in the PA membranes.
Figure 7. The dependence of (a) pure water and coolant lubricant fluxes, (b) rejection coefficient (R), and flux recovery ratio (FRR) on the TiO2 content in the PA membranes.
Polymers 13 02804 g007
Polymers 13 02804 g008a 550Polymers 13 02804 g008b 550
Figure 8. Performance and antifouling stability of the reference PA and modified PA/TiO2 (0.3) membranes in ultrafiltration of BSA solution: (a) the dependence of flux on the time of ultrafiltration; (b) flux recovery ratio (FRR) after water rinsing and after ultraviolet illumination for 2.5 h during four cycles. Rejection coefficient of BSA for all membranes was ~60 ± 5%.
Figure 8. Performance and antifouling stability of the reference PA and modified PA/TiO2 (0.3) membranes in ultrafiltration of BSA solution: (a) the dependence of flux on the time of ultrafiltration; (b) flux recovery ratio (FRR) after water rinsing and after ultraviolet illumination for 2.5 h during four cycles. Rejection coefficient of BSA for all membranes was ~60 ± 5%.
Polymers 13 02804 g008aPolymers 13 02804 g008b
Table
Table 1. Surface roughness parameters, total porosity, and water contact angle of PA and PA/TiO2 membranes.
Table 1. Surface roughness parameters, total porosity, and water contact angle of PA and PA/TiO2 membranes.
MembraneRa, nmRq, nmTotal Porosity, %Contact Angle, °
PA7.910.18831 ± 2
PA/TiO2 (0.3)8.511.09025 ± 2
PA/TiO2 (0.5)9.812.68322 ± 2
PA/TiO2 (0.75)14.018.97920 ± 2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dmitrenko, M.; Kuzminova, A.; Zolotarev, A.; Liamin, V.; Plisko, T.; Burts, K.; Bildyukevich, A.; Ermakov, S.; Penkova, A. Novel High Flux Poly(m-phenylene isophtalamide)/TiO2 Membranes for Ultrafiltration with Enhanced Antifouling Performance. Polymers 2021, 13, 2804. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13162804

AMA Style

Dmitrenko M, Kuzminova A, Zolotarev A, Liamin V, Plisko T, Burts K, Bildyukevich A, Ermakov S, Penkova A. Novel High Flux Poly(m-phenylene isophtalamide)/TiO2 Membranes for Ultrafiltration with Enhanced Antifouling Performance. Polymers. 2021; 13(16):2804. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13162804

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dmitrenko, Mariia, Anna Kuzminova, Andrey Zolotarev, Vladislav Liamin, Tatiana Plisko, Katsiaryna Burts, Alexandr Bildyukevich, Sergey Ermakov, and Anastasia Penkova. 2021. "Novel High Flux Poly(m-phenylene isophtalamide)/TiO2 Membranes for Ultrafiltration with Enhanced Antifouling Performance" Polymers 13, no. 16: 2804. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13162804

APA Style

Dmitrenko, M., Kuzminova, A., Zolotarev, A., Liamin, V., Plisko, T., Burts, K., Bildyukevich, A., Ermakov, S., & Penkova, A. (2021). Novel High Flux Poly(m-phenylene isophtalamide)/TiO2 Membranes for Ultrafiltration with Enhanced Antifouling Performance. Polymers, 13(16), 2804. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13162804

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop