Next Article in Journal
Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs): Biopolymers for Biofuel and Biorefineries
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Poly(methacrylic acid-co-butyl acrylate) Grafted onto Functionalized Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposites for Drug Delivery
Previous Article in Journal
Eco-Friendly and Economic, Adsorptive Removal of Cationic and Anionic Dyes by Bio-Based Karaya Gum—Chitosan Sponge
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study on the Effect of Zinc on the Rheological, Mechanical and Thermal Properties and Fire Hazard of Unfilled and Filled CR/BR Vulcanizates
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/polym13020252
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Studies of CPEs Modified with Distinctive Metal Nanoparticle-Decorated Electroactive Polyimide for the Detection of UA

by
Aamna Bibi
1,
Sheng-Chieh Hsu
1,
Wei-Fu Ji
1,
Yi-Chi Cho
1,
Karen S. Santiago
2,* and
Jui-Ming Yeh
1,*
1
Department of Chemistry and Center for Nanotechnology, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung Li District, Tao-Yuan City 32023, Taiwan
2
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, University of Santo Tomas, España, Manila 1015, Philippines
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(2), 252; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13020252
Submission received: 15 December 2020 / Revised: 25 December 2020 / Accepted: 8 January 2021 / Published: 13 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Polymer Composites)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this present work, an electrochemical sensor was developed for the sensing of uric acid (UA). The sensor was based on a carbon paste electrode (CPE) modified with electroactive polyimide (EPI) synthesized using aniline tetramer (ACAT) decorated with reduced nanoparticles (NPs) of Au, Pt, and Ag. The initial step involved the preparation and characterization of ACAT. Subsequently, the ACAT-based EPI synthesis was performed by chemical imidization of its precursors 4,4′-(4.4′-isopropylidene-diphenoxy) bis (phthalic anhydride) BPADA and ACAT. Then, EPI was doped with distinctive particles of Ag, Pt and Au, and the doped EPIs were abbreviated as EPIS, EPIP and EPIG, respectively. Their structures were characterized by XRD, XPS, and TEM, and the electrochemical properties were determined by cyclic voltammetry and chronoamperometry. Among these evaluated sensors, EPI with Au NPs turned out the best with a sensitivity of 1.53 uA uM−1 UA, a low limit of detection (LOD) of 0.78 uM, and a linear detection range (LDR) of 5–50 uM UA at a low potential value of 310 mV. Additionally, differential pulse voltammetric (DPV) analysis showed that the EPIG sensor showed the best selectivity for a tertiary mixture of UA, dopamine (DA), and ascorbic acid (AA) as compared to EPIP and EPIS.

1. Introduction

Uric acid (UA) in the human body stems from purine metabolism and is an important marker for illness [1]. Generally, a person’s health is related to the concentration of UA in the blood (1.2–4.5 × 10−4 mol L−1) or urine (2 × 10−3 mol L−1) [2]. An abnormal concentration of UA in body fluids could be a symptom of a disease like Lesch–Nyhan syndrome [3], toxemia of pregnancy [4], or hyperuricemia [5], and along with cardiovascular diseases it may also affect the circulatory system [6]. Therefore, UA sensing with cost-effective monitoring, intended sensitivity, and accuracy in human body fluids is crucial to disease screening [7]. In general, different techniques have been acquired for UA sensing, including HPLC [8], fluorescence [9], a single line manifold [10], uricase immobilization methods [11], chemiluminescence [12], and direct electrochemical detection [13].
Among all these methods, the electrochemical technique is extensively used and has been proven to be an excellent method for the determination of UA due to its quick response, easy handling, specificity, low expenditure, and high sensitivity [14,15]. In an aqueous solution, UA undergoes oxidation at common electrodes with ease, so direct electrochemical detection leads to better sensing. Moreover, direct sensing can be extended for evaluating UA in a blood sample by the simple pin-prick method [13].
However, other potentially co-existing analytes in body fluids like AA and DA may interfere with the electrochemical detection of UA. The oxidation potential of UA, AA, and DA are too close to strongly overlap, which results in poor selectivity of electrodes. To address this concern, two techniques have been employed, i.e., polymer-modified electrodes and chemically-modified electrodes. Thus, the electrode can be modified and improved using conducting polymers (CPs), noble metal nanoparticles, organic/inorganic compounds, and ionic/polymeric film [16,17]. Conducting polymers have various properties, including electrochemical activity, electrical conductivity, mechanical strength, biocompatibility, and environmental stability, which are highly desirable for the advancement of sensing performance in analytical or bioanalytical system. Moreover, they can be easily doped by electrochemical techniques [18].
For instance, Ramanavicius et al., recently developed a quartz-crystal microbalance sensor (EQCM) based on polypyrrole imprinted by uric acid (MIP(UA)-Ppy). Experimental measurements and theoretical calculations showed that the formation of a uric acid complex with MIP(UA)-Ppy is thermodynamically more favorable than that of complexation with NIP-Ppy. However, the sensitivity of the MIP(UA)-Ppy-based sensor to uric acid in a linear dependence interval was approximately 3.5 times higher than that of a NIP-Ppy-based sensor [19]. Gryglewicz et al., developed a GCE sensor modified with nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide and gold nanoparticle nanocomposites to improve the simultaneous detection of DA, AA, and UA. The results showed that nitrogen doping exhibited better electrochemical performance due to the more efficient anchoring of Au NPs on the N-doped areas of the graphene structure [20]. Similarly, Ma et al., devised a system that includes a screen-printed electrode (SPE), which is used as a sensor by alternately depositing PEDOT, CS, and graphene onto the working electrode for the detection of dopamine. The system could detect DA with a detection sensitivity of 0.52 ± 0.01 uA/uM and a limit of detection of 0.29 uM in the linear range of DA concentrations from 0.05 to 70 uM [21].
Due to its superior environmental stability, ease of synthesis, low cost, and uniform conductive mechanism, PANI is a popular conjugated polymer. Doped PANI is often used in sensing applications as it shows high conductivity under acidic conditions. Generally, PANI doped with noble metal nanoparticles (NPs) enhances the electron transfer and improves the conductivity and stability. Therefore, it is used in electrochemical sensing [22,23,24] as it provides rapid and accurate sensing [25].
As a model compound of PANI, oligoanilines have been studied enormously in the past decade. Consequently, oligoaniline-derived electroactive polymers (OAEPs) have gained considerable attention [26,27,28,29] due to their good solubility, biodegradable nature, and mechanical strength [30,31,32,33]. For instance, Chao and Wang prepared OAEPs that have remarkable electrochemical and electrochromic behavior [34,35]. In 2020, Yeh et al. reported an H2S gas sensor based on an electroactive polymer containing aniline trimer in the main chain [36]. Additionally, Huang et al., prepared a polylactide-based OAEP for tissue engineering [37]. Some reports [38] of fullerene (C60) and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) grafted with oligoanilines were reported in the literature. Moreover, OAEPs report good thermal stability [39], electrochemical activity [40,41], biomedical applications [42], electrochromic properties [43], and electrochemical [44] and conductivity studies [45]. Additionally, in our previous studies, OAEPs have been used for electrochemical sensing of ascorbic acid [46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54].
To the best of our knowledge, OAEPs are generally use for electrochemical sensing of ascorbic acid [55,56] but are seldom mentioned for UA sensing. With this information in hand, we constructed an electrochemical sensor for UA sensing based upon an oligoaniline derived electroactive polyimide (EPI). Furthermore, to improve analytical performances like sensitivity and detection limit, nanosized particles of noble metals [57,58,59,60,61] were reduced on the surface of EPI. An electroactive polyimide (EPI) was prepared by a two-step process followed by a complete characterization. The as-prepared EPI was then immersed in different aqueous solutions including AgNO3, H2PtCl6, and HAuCl4 for 6 h. The presence of metal particles that were reduced on the EPI surface was examined by XRD, TEM, and XPS. The electrochemical sensors constructed for UA sensing were investigated for various studies, such as electroanalytical, kinetic, sensitivity, selectivity, and differential-pulse voltammetry.

2. Materials and Methods

All the chemicals purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), TCI (Tokyo, Japan) and Seechem (Seoul, Korea). All the solvents were purchased from J.T. Baker (Randor, PA, USA), Riedel-de-haën (Seelz, Germany) and Macron (Belmont, CA, USA), with 99.99% purity. HAuCl4•3H2O), H2PtCl6•6H2O, hydrazine, and AgNO3 were all from Alfa Aesar. 1H-NMR and LCMS were performed on a Bruker AVANCE300 spectrometer and Bruker Daltonics IT mass spectrometer model Esquire 2000 (Leipzig, Germany), respectively. An FTIR spectrometer (JASCO FT/IR-4100, Easton, PA, USA) and VoltaLab 50 (PST050) were used to perform FTIR and electrochemical experiments. The molecular weight was determined on a Waters GPC-150CV (Milford, CT, USA), and a JEOL-200FX TEM (Tokyo, Japan) was used for TEM study.

2.1. Synthesis of Amino-Capped Aniline Tetramer (ACAT)

As shown in Scheme I, aniline tetramer (ACAT) was prepared using a simple procedure [62]. First, diphenylamine (0.01 mol) and 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl-amine sulphate (0.01 mol) were dissolved in a tri-solvent system of DMF (100 mL), H2O (20 mL) and 1 N HCl (25 mL). After that, ammonium persulphate solution (2.28 g in 25 mL of 1 N HCl) was added slowly to the above-mentioned solution at 0 °C via a dropping funnel. Subsequently, after one hour of stirring at 0 °C the reaction was precipitated out in distilled water (700 mL). Finally, the vacuum filtration was used to obtain the precipitate followed by a washing with 400 mL of HCl (1 N), 100 mL of NH4OH (1.2 N), and distilled water. Lastly, the crude product of ACAT was dried in a vacuum at 50 °C and obtained as blue powder.

2.2. Synthesis of EPI

The EPI preparation was a two-step process. First, 0.52 g of 4,4′-(4.4′-isopropylidene-diphenoxy) bis (phthalic anhydride) and 0.379 g of ACAT were added to 16 g of DMAc in a two-neck-round bottom flask. The reaction mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature to produce electroactive polyamic acid (EPAA). Afterwards, the mixture of acetic anhydride and pyridine (0.102/0.079, v/v) was added to the previous solution under stirring for 1 h. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was heated at 150 °C for 3 h to obtain the EPI solution. Finally, the precipitation was carried out in methanol and the precipitate washed with hot methanol. Lastly, the EPI was dried at 60 °C in a vacuum and collected in a good yield (80%) [62].

2.3. Preparation of EPIS, EPIP, and EPIG

The standard procedure for the preparation of EPIS, EPIP, and EPIG was as follows: Firstly, an EPI (leucoemeraldine base) was prepared by dispersing 0.1 g of as-prepared EPI in 10 mL of 1.0 M NH4OH containing 1 mL of hydrazine solution. The reaction mixture was stirred for 24 h, filtered, and washed with water until the pH became neutralized. At this time, a freeze-drying technique was used at −42 °C for 24 h, and EPI (leucoemeraldine base) was collected in form of blue powder. Similarly, EPIS, EPIP, and EPIG were prepared by immersing 0.1 g EPI (leucoemeraldine base) in 19 mL of 0.1 mM AgNO3, H2PtCl6•6H2O and HAuCl4•3H2O for 6 h, respectively. Later, the EPIS, EPIP, and EPIG powders were collected by centrifugal filtration, washed with an excess amount of distilled H2O and dried at 50 °C for 24 h. Finally, the as-prepared EPI decorated with distinctive metallic particles was collected as a fine blue powder. The synthetic route for EPI decorated with Ag/Pt/Au particles is shown in Scheme 1.

2.4. Electrochemical Cyclic Voltammetry of EPI, EPIS, EPIP, and EPIG

The redox behavior of the as-prepared EPI, EPIS, EPIP, and EPIG was determined by spin-coating these electroactive materials onto an indium titanium oxide (ITO) followed by performing a series of CV studies. Firstly, different solutions were prepared by dissolving 0.05 g of respective sample in 5 mL of DMAc under magnetic stirring for 6 h. After this, these solutions were spin-coated on an ITO and dried by heating at 120 °C for 1 h. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) of as-prepared ITOs was performed on a AutoLab PGSTAT 204 (Houten, The Netherlands).

2.5. Electrochemical Sensing of UA

Figure 1 shows the fabrication of a sensor for electrochemical detection of UA by using a carbon paste electrode (CPE) modified with EPIs. At first, four different samples were prepared by a thorough mixing of 0.04 g of each respective polymer (EPI, EPIS, EPIP, EPIG) with graphite powder (0.05 g) and paraffin oil (0.01) to form a homogeneous carbon paste. A portion of all these samples was packed firmly into a Teflon tube cavity, and the opposite end was inserted with a copper rod to make an electrical contact. Voltammetric studies were performed on an AutoLab PGSTAT 204 electrochemical work station in a 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution (PBS) (20 mL). Platinum foil was used as a counter electrode and Ag/AgCl (3.0 M NaCl solution) served as a reference electrode, while CPE electrodes modified with EPI, EPIS, EPIP or EPIG were employed as working electrodes.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of ACAT

Figure 2 shows the complete characterization of ACAT. As presented in Figure 2a, the 1H-NMR spectrum of ACAT reveals the signal at 5.50 ppm indicating the NH2 protons. Moreover, the signals around 7.3–6.8 ppm show the splitting of the aromatic protons. The FTIR spectrum of ACAT in Figure 2b shows the absorption band at 3300 and 3200 cm−1 corresponding to the NH2 groups, while the vibrational bands for quinoid and benzenoid ring appears at 1600 and 1500 cm−1, respectively. The peak at 830 cm−1 may be correlated to the substitution pattern of a 1,4-disubstituted benzene ring. Moreover, Figure 2c shows the molecular weight of ACAT with a molecular ion peak appeared at 380 (m/z) [63,64].

3.2. Characterization of EPAA and EPI

As shown in Figure 3, FTIR was used to characterize the structure of EPAA and EPI. The FTIR spectra of EPAA 3a showed a characteristic carboxylic and amide absorption band at 3250–3500 (N–H and O–H spectra), 1677 (acid C=O spectra), and 1641 (amide C=O spectra) cm−1. In addition, the peaks observed at 1596 and 1503 cm−1 indicated the presence of quinoid and benzenoid rings. On the other hand, EPI showed typical asymmetric and symmetric carbonyl group absorption bands at 1715 and 1675 cm−1. Moreover, the absorption band of the carboxylic acid group completely disappeared, which indicated the complete conversion of EPAA to EPI.

3.3. Structural and Morphological Characterization of EPIS, EPIP, and EPIG

Various characterization tools were used for the determination of structure and morphology of the as-prepared materials.

3.3.1. X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

The XRD patterns clearly indicates that EPIS, EPIP, and EPIG had a crystalline nature as shown in Figure 4a. It can be seen that as compared to EPI and EPIS, EPIG exhibited four additional peaks at 2θ of 38.01°, 43.96°, 64.50°, and 77.42°. All these peaks were attributed to the standard Bragg reflection from (111), (200), (220), and (311) of the crystallographic planes of the face-centered cubic lattice. The intense peak at 38.1 indicated that the growth of gold was fixed in (111) direction. Likewise, the EPIP curve showed the crystal-plane peaks of (111), (200), and (220) of platinum metal at 2θ of 39.5°, 44.6°, and 64.9°. Thus, we may infer that the composition of the respective material was as expected, and no impurities were found in the XRD pattern [57,65,66].

3.3.2. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

The XPS analysis was employed to determine the composition of all the given samples as shown in Figure 4b. The XPS spectra of EPIS, EPIP, and EPIG clearly showed peaks for C, N, and O atoms, while the absence of any other peak indicated the purity of the given materials. The binding energy peak at 287.82 eV arose from C 1 s, while the peak at 399.8 eV corresponded to N 1 s. This peak was developed due to interactions with the N atom and respective nanoparticles. In addition, for EPIS the binding energy of Ag 3d5/2 Ag 3d3/2 was found to be 371.5 eV and 365.6 eV, respectively, which were comparable to the values reported in the literature for bulk Ag crystals (368 eV, 374 eV) [67]. Similarly, in case of EPIP, peaks appeared at 71.3 eV and 74.6 eV for Pt 4f7/2 and 4f5/2, respectively, corresponding to the zero-oxidation state [68]. Moreover, the EPIG XPS signal for Au 4f7/2 and Au 4f5/2 was observed as doublets at 81.5 and 85.3 eV, respectively, which clearly indicates the reduction of Au3+ into Au0, as the binding energy of Au 4f7/2 for Au+3 is 86.5 eV [54].

3.3.3. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

Figure 4c–e presents the TEM images of EPIS, EPIP, and EPIG, respectively, under high magnification (200 K). The reduced metal NPs developed on the EPI surface were observed as black spots as shown in the Figure The average particle size of EPIS, EPIP, and EPIG was found to be ≈22 nm, ≈68 nm, and ≈20 ± 2 nm in diameter, respectively, as seen in Figure 4c–e.

3.4. Redox Capability of Materials Measured by Electrochemical CV Studies

The cyclic voltammograms (CV) of all EPIs are shown in Figure 5. As no redox peak was observed for bare ITO electrodes, it was used as a control for 5a. The CV curve for EPI 5b showed a relatively small peak of a redox current at 100 A cm−2. However, the doping of EPI with respective metal nanoparticles resulted in an increase in current density. For example, the current density for EPIS 5c was 225 A cm−2, which was 2.3 times higher than that for EPI, while the response for EPIP 5d increased by four times with a current density of 400 A cm−2. Subsequently, the highest response was observed for EPIG with a current density of about 600 A cm−2, as shown in Figure 5e. Thus, the redox capability of the as-prepared ITO electrode coated with electroactive materials was decreased in the following order: EPIG > EPIP > EPIS > EPI.

3.5. Kinetic Parameters Study of CPE Modified with EPIG

To study the nature and kinetics of the electrochemical reaction, the effect of the scan rate on CV was determined on a CPE modified with EPIG was used in 0.1 M PBS (pH = 7) towards the oxidation of 50 μM UA as evident in Figure 6a. It can be seen that with an increasing scan rate, the current density increased from 3 µA cm−2 to 8.6 µA cm−2. Furthermore, the peak potential shifted towards the positive side with the increasing scan rate. Figure 6b showed a linear relationship between the peak current (Ip) and square root of the scan rates (ν1/2), and the regression equation was Ip (μA) = 11.147 ν1/2(VS−1)1/2 + 0.562 with a correlation coefficient of R2 = 0.9958. Thus, it indicated that the UA oxidation process proceeds via a diffusion-controlled electron transfer reaction, which is generally observed in systems when the kinetics are fast. Additionally, to investigate the mechanism of UA electrocatalysis on an EPIG, a graph was plotted between the peak potential (Ep) and logν as shown in Figure 6c. From the curve, it can be seen that Ep was proportional to logν by the following linear equation Ep = 0.1112 log (ν) + 0.5346, R2 = 0.97548, which indicates that the reaction is irreversible. Hence, an anodic peak potential can be evidenced by [69]
Ep = 2.303 RT 2 ( 1 − α ) naF · log ϑ + k
where R and F are the universal gas constant and Faraday constant, respectively; α is the electron transfer coefficient; na is the number of electrons transferred; and T is the room temperature. The Tafel slope value calculated from Figure 6c was 0.222 V/decade, which shows that one electron transferred in a rate-determining step by assuming α = 0.61.

3.6. Electrochemical Sensing of UA

CV and amperometric studies were used to determine the electrocatalytic activity of the respective material for the detection of UA. Figure 7a showed the CV response corresponding to a bare CPE and a CPE modified with EPI, EPIS, EPIP, and EPIP in 0.1 M PBS (pH = 7) at 350 M UA concentration with scan rate of 50 mV s−1. As observed, the bare CPE 7a showed the smallest response with a current density of 12.73 uA cm−2 at a more positive potential of 459 mV, while, the current density for the CPE modified with EPI, EPIS, EPIP, and EPIG was found to be 28.10, 29.67, 32.68, and 37.39 uA cm−2, respectively. It may be conclude that UA sensitivity decreases in the following order EPIG > EPIP > EPIS > EPI.
The quantitative detection of UA with bare CPE and the EPI, EPIS, EPIP, and EPIG modified CPE was investigated by chronoamperometric measurements as shown in Figure 7b. The response was obtained by plotting a current–time (i–t) curve for 350 M UA at 340 mV in 30 mL of PBS solution (pH = 7) under constant stirring. It is noteworthy that the current density increases after each addition of UA. Further, a rapid and sensitive response was observed in the case of a CPE modified with EPIG, the sensitivity of which was calculated to be 0.153 A M−1, which is 1.84-fold, 3.56-fold, 4.5-fold, and 6.12-fold higher than those of a CPE modified with EPIP, EPIS, EPI, and a bare CPE, respectively, under the same analytical conditions as shown in Table 1.
At a constant potential of 340 mV and a lower concentration (0–50 µM), all the electrochemical sensors showed a linear relationship between current response and UA, as shown in Figure 7c. However, the response curve for EPIG was steep among all electrodes with a high sensitivity (0.153 A M−1) and having a good correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.9951). On the other hand, at a higher concentration of UA, the relationship between current density, and UA concentration was determined by the following equation [70]:
j = jmax[1 − exp(−c/b)]
(c = concentration of UA, j = oxidation current, b = empirical coefficient related to the steepness of the j, c transient curve and jmax = current maxima at higher UA concentration). Based on the data, the previous equation yielded jmax = 15.33 A cm−2, b = 92.59 M, and a correlation coefficient of R2 = 0.9968. However, it is not easy to apply the above equation for a current vs concentration plot. Thus, we generated a linear relationship by taking the log of the abscissa of the calibration curve. So, the sensitivity values calculated for a CPE modified with an EPIG, EPIP, EPIS, EPI, and a bare CPE was 0.153, 8.3 × 10−2, 4.7 × 10−2, 3.4 × 10−2, and 2.5 × 10−2 A M−1, respectively. In addition, the current density increased with the successive addition of UA, while the steady state was achieved after 2 s. These results indicated that, an EPIG is a highly sensitive sensor with a rapid response, wide linear dynamic range (LDR) and low limit of detection (LOD) (Table 1).

3.7. Differential Pulse Voltammetric Responses for Tertiary Mixtures of AA, UA, and DA

Differential pulse voltammograms (DPVs) were used [80] to determine the selectivity of designed electrochemical sensors. The experiment was carried out using a tertiary mixture of 10 M of DA, 10 M of AA, and 10 M of UA for a bare CPE, a CPE modified with an EPI, EPIS, EPIP, and EPIG in 0.1 M PBS (pH = 7) in the range of −0.3 to 0.8 V, as shown in Figure 8. It can be seen that the bare CPE 8a showed poor selectivity for a tertiary mixture of AA/DA/UA. However, an improved and clearly distinguished signal can be seen for a CPE modified with EPI 8b, EPIS 8c, EPIP 8d, and EPIG 8e. The overall current value of a CPE modified with metal NPs increased as compared to a EPI due to electrocatalysis. The separation potential was also significantly improved. It showed good separation with three oxidation peaks around 10–50 mV, 160–180 mV, and 300–340 mV, which corresponded to the anodic potentials of AA, DA, and UA respectively. Due to the excellent electrocatalysis of EPIG as caused by Au NPs, the overall sensing current value was increased, depicting excellent selectivity, good resolution and prominent voltammetric peaks.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we fabricated stable and sensitive UA sensors based on EPI decorated with reduced nanoparticles of Ag, Pt, and Au, i.e., EPIS, EPIP, and EPIG, respectively. The characterization of the as-prepared materials via XRD, XPS, CV, and TEM demonstrated the metallic nanoparticles were successfully reduced upon the electroactive segment of the EPI. The redox capability of the UA sensors based on CV studies decreased in the following order EPIG > EPIP > EPIS > EPI > ITO, which implied that EPIG may reveal the highest sensitivity. The amperometric data showed that the UA sensor EPIG exhibited higher sensitivity (0.153 A.M−1 UA), low LOD (0.78 µM,) and wide LDA (5–50 µM UA) at a lower oxidation potential of 310 mV. Similarly, the DPV results clearly indicated the excellent selectivity of EPIG as compared to other constructed sensors. Hence, the EPIG electrochemical sensor developed for UA detection showed reliable results. Considering the good selectivity, simple preparation, low cost, and selectivity of the modified sensor of UA the practical application value of this system will be later evaluated using real samples.

Author Contributions

Methodology, A.B.; software, S.-C.H.; validation, S.-C.H.; formal analysis, A.B. and Y.-C.C.; investigation, W.-F.J.; writing—original draft preparation, J.-M.Y.; writing—review and editing, K.S.S.; supervision, J.-M.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) Taiwan, grant number MOST-109-2113-M-033-002-.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hu, L.; Deng, L.; Alsaiari, S.; Zhang, D.; Khashab, N.M. Light-on Sensing of Antioxidants Using Gold Nanoclusters. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 4989–4994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bi, H.; Fernandes, A.C.; Cardoso, S.; Freitas, P. Interference-blind microfluidic sensor for ascorbic acid determination by UV/vis spectroscopy. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 224, 668–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Keeley, G.P.; McEvoy, N.; Nolan, H.; Holzinger, M.; Cosnier, S.; Duesberg, G.S. Electroanalytical Sensing Properties of Pristine and Functionalized Multilayer Graphene. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 1807–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lou, C.; Liu, W.; Liu, X. Quantitative analysis of arsenic speciation in guano and ornithogenic sediments using microwave-assisted extraction followed by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B 2014, 969, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xia, N.; Liu, L.; Wu, R.; Liu, H.; Li, S.J.; Hao, Y. Ascorbic acid-triggered electrochemical–chemical–chemical redox cycling for design of enzyme-amplified electrochemical biosensors on self-assembled monolayer-covered gold electrodes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2014, 731, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Manohara Reddy, Y.V.; Sravani, B.; Agarwal, S.; Gupta, V.K.; Madhavi, G. Electrochemical sensor for detection of uric acid in the presence of ascorbic acid and dopamine using the poly(DPA)/SiO2@Fe3O4 modified carbon paste electrode. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018, 820, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hsine, Z.; Bizid, S.; Mlika, R.; Sauriat-Dorizon, H.; Said, A.H.; Youssoufi, H.K. Nanocomposite Based on Poly (para-phenylene)/Chemical Reduced Graphene Oxide as a Platform for Simultaneous Detection of Ascorbic Acid, Dopamine and Uric Acid. Sensors 2020, 20, 1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Micić, D.; Šljukić, B.; Zujovic, Z.; Travas-Sejdic, J.; Ćirić-Marjanović, G. Electrocatalytic Activity of Carbonized Nanostructured Polyanilines for Oxidation Reactions: Sensing of Nitrite Ions and Ascorbic Acid. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 120, 147–158. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pakapongpan, S.; Mensing, J.P.; Phokharatkul, D.; Lomas, T.; Tuantranont, A. Highly selective electrochemical sensor for ascorbic acid based on a novel hybrid graphene-copper phthalocyanine-polyaniline nanocomposites. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 133, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sk, M.M.; Yue, C.Y. Synthesis of polyaniline nanotubes using the self-assembly behavior of vitamin C: A mechanistic study and application in electrochemical supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 2830–2838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xue, C.; Wang, X.; Zhu, W.; Han, Q.; Zhu, C.; Hong, J.; Zhou, X.; Jiang, H. Electrochemical serotonin sensing interface based on double-layered membrane of reduced graphene oxide/polyaniline nanocomposites and molecularly imprinted polymers embedded with gold nanoparticles. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 196, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rana, U.; Paul, N.D.; Mondal, S.; Chakraborty, C.; Malik, S. Water soluble polyaniline coated electrode: A simple and nimble electrochemical approach for ascorbic acid detection. Synth. Met. 2014, 192, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Iyyappan, E.; Samuel Justin, S.J.; Wilson, P.; Palanippan, A. Nanoscale Hydroxyapatite for Electrochemical Sensing of Uric Acid: Roles of Mesopore Volume and Surface Acidity. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 7761–7773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhou, C.; Shi, Y.; Luo, J.; Zhang, L.; Xiao, D. Diameter-controlled synthesis of polyaniline microtubes and their electrocatalytic oxidation of ascorbic acid. J. Mater. Chem. 2014, 2, 4122–4129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, T.; Wang, L.Y.; Du, S.; Guo, W.J.; Pei, M.S. Micro/nanostructures of PANI obtained in the presence of water soluble polymers and their electrochemical sensing properties. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 69067–69074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lakshmi, D.; Whitcombe, M.J.; Davis, F.; Sharma, P.S.; Prasad, B.B. Electrochemical Detection of Uric Acid in Mixed and Clinical Samples: A Review. Electroanalysis 2011, 23, 305–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, X.; Tian, A.; Wang, Q.; Huang, D.; Fan, S.; Wu, H.; Zhang, H. An Electrochemical Sensor Based on Platinum Nanoparticles and Mesoporous Carbon Composites for Selective Analysis of Dopamine. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2019, 14, 1082–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ramanavicius, S.; Ramanavicius, A. Conducting Polymers in the Design of Biosensors and Biofuel Cells. Polymers 2021, 13, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Plausinaitis, D.; Sinkevicius, L.; Samukaite-Bubniene, U.; Ratautaite, V.; Ramanavicius, A. Evaluation of electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance based sensor modified by uric acid-imprinted polypyrrole. Talanta 2020, 220, 121414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Minta, M.; González, Z.; Wiench, P.; Gryglewicz, S.; Gryglewicz, G. N-Doped Reduced Graphene Oxide/Gold Nanoparticles Composite as an Improved Sensing Platform for Simultaneous Detection of Dopamine, Ascorbic Acid, and Uric Acid. Sensors 2020, 20, 4427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shen, X.; Ju, F.; Li, G.; Ma, L. Smartphone-Based Electrochemical Potentiostat Detection System Using PEDOT: PSS/Chitosan/Graphene Modified Screen-Printed Electrodes for Dopamine Detection. Sensors 2020, 20, 2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Anan, W.K.; Wanich, A.O.; Sriprachuabwong, C.; Karuwan, C.; Tuantranont, A.; Wisitsorall, A.; Srituravanich, W.; Pimpim, A. Disposable paper-based electrochemical sensor utilizing inkjet-printed Polyaniline modified screen-printed carbon electrode for Ascorbic acid detection. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2012, 685, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rwei, S.P.; Lee, Y.H.; Shiu, J.W.; Sasikumar, R.; Shyr, U.T. Characterization of Solvent-Treated PEDOT:PSS Thin Films with Enhanced Conductivities. Polymers 2019, 11, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Kalakodimi, R.P.; Nookala, M. Electrooxidation of Ascorbic Acid on a Polyaniline-Deposited Nickel Electrode:  Surface Modification of a Non-Platinum Metal for an Electrooxidative Analysis. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 5531–5537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Selvolini, G.; Lazzarini, C.; Marrazza, G. Electrochemical Nanocomposite Single-Use Sensor for Dopamine Detection. Sensors 2019, 19, 3097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Guo, B.; Finne-Wistrand, A.; Albertsson, A.C. Universal Two-Step Approach to Degradable and Electroactive Block Copolymers and Networks from Combined Ring-Opening Polymerization and Post-Functionalization via Oxidative Coupling Reactions. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 5227–5236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chao, D.; Zhang, J.; Liu, X.; Lu, X.; Wang, C.; Zhang, W.; Wei, Y. Synthesis of novel poly(amic acid) and polyimide with oligoaniline in the main chain and their thermal, electrochemical, and dielectric properties. Polymer 2010, 51, 4518–4524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Arukula, R.; Thota, A.R.; Rao, C.R.K.; Narayan, R.; Sreedhar, B. Novel electrically conducting polyurethanes with oligoanilines: Synthesis, conductivity, and electrochemical properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131, 40794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hardy, J.G.; Mouser, D.J.; Arroyo-Curras, N.; Geissler, S.; Chow, J.K.; Nguy, L.; Kim, J.M.; Schmidt, C.E. Biodegradable electroactive polymers for electrochemically-triggered drug delivery. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 6809–6822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Qu, G.; Li, F.; Berda, E.B.; Chi, M.; Liu, X.; Wang, C.; Chao, D. Electroactive polyurea bearing oligoaniline pendants: Electrochromicand anticorrosive properties. Polymer 2015, 58, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Udeh, C.U.; Fey, N.; Faul, C.F.J. Functional block-like structures from electroactive tetra(aniline) oligomers. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 18137–18153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wei, Z.; Faul, C.F.J. Aniline Oligomers–Architecture, Function and New opportunities for Nanostructured Materials. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2008, 29, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jia, X.; Chao, D.; Liu, H.; He, L.; Zheng, T.; Bian, X.; Wang, C. Synthesis and properties of novel electroactive poly(amic acid) and polyimide copolymers bearing pendant oligoaniline-groups. Polym. Chem. 2011, 2, 1300–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chao, D.; Jia, X.; Tuten, B.; Wang, C.; Berda, E.B. Controlled folding of a novel electroactive polyolefin via multiple sequential orthogonal intra-chain interactions. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 4178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chao, D.; He, L.; Berda, E.B.; Wang, W.; Jia, X.; Wang, C. Multifunctional hyperbranched polyamide: Synthesis and properties. Polymer 2013, 54, 3223–3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bibi, A.; Huang, C.H.; Lan, Y.X.; Chen, K.Y.; Ji, W.F.; Yeh, J.M.; Santiago, K.S.J. Effect of Surface Morphology of Electro-spun EPAA Coatings on the H2S Sensing Performance of Corresponding Interdigitated Electrode. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 117510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Huang, L.; Hu, J.; Lang, L.; Wang, X.; Zhang, P.; Jing, X.; Wang, X.; Chen, X.; Lelkes, P.I.; MacDiarmid, A.G.; et al. Synthesis and characterization of electroactive and biodegradable ABA block copolymer of polylactide and aniline pentamer. Biomaterials 2007, 28, 1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Anantharaj, V.; Wang, L.Y.; Canteenwala, T.; Chiang, L.Y. Synthesis of starburst hexa(oligoanilinated) C60 using hexanitro[60]fullerene as a precursor. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1999, 1, 3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, Z.Y.; Yang, C.; Gao, J.P.; Lin, J.; Meng, S.X.; Wei, Y.; Li, S. Electroactive Polyimides Derived from Amino-Terminated Aniline Trimer. Macromolecules 1988, 31, 2702–2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chao, D.; Ma, C.; Lu, X.; Cui, L.; Mao, H.; Zhang, W.; Wei, Y. Design, synthesis and characterization of novel electroactive polyamide with amine-capped aniline pentamer in the main chain via oxidative coupling polymerization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 104, 1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Han, D.H.; Yang, L.P.; Zhang, X.F.; Pan, C.Y. Synthesis and characterization of polystyrene-b-tetraaniline stars from polystyrene stars with surface reactive groups prepared by RAFT polymerization. Eur. Polym. J. 2007, 43, 3873–3881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, Y.; Hu, J.; Zhuang, X.; Zhang, P.; Chen, X.; Wei, Y.; Wang, X. Preparation and Characterization of Biodegradable and Electroactive Polymer Blend Materials Based on mPEG/Tetraaniline and PLLA. Macromol. Biosci. 2011, 11, 806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chao, D.; Jia, X.; Liu, H.; He, L.; Cui, L.; Wang, C.; Berda, E.B. Novel electroactive poly(arylene ether sulfone) copolymers containing pendant oligoaniline groups: Synthesis and properties. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2011, 49, 1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, R.; Benicewicz, B.C. Preparation and Properties of Poly(methacrylamide)s Containing Oligoaniline Side Chains. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 6333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, S.; Kaizheng, Z.T.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, T.X. Synthesis and electrical conductivity of poly(methacrylamide) (PMAA) with fixed length oligoaniline as side chains. Mater. Lett. 2005, 59, 3715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ji, W.F.; Chu, C.M.; Hsu, S.C.; Lu, Y.D.; Yu, Y.C.; Santiago, K.S.; Yeh, J.M. Synthesis and characterization of organo-soluble aniline oligomer-based electroactive doped with gold nanoparticles, and application to electrochemical sensing of ascorbic acid. Polymer 2017, 128, 218–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chang, K.C.; Chu, C.M.; Chang, C.H.; Cheng, H.T.; Hsu, S.C.; Lan, C.C.; Chen, H.H.; Peng, Y.Y.; Yeh, J.M. Photoisomerization of electroactive polyimide/multiwalled carbon nanotube composites on the effect of electrochemical sensing for ascorbic acid. Polym. Int. 2015, 64, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Weng, C.J.; Jhou, Y.S.; Chen, Y.L.; Feng, C.F.; Chang, C.H.; Chen, S.W.; Yeh, J.M.; Yen, W. Intrinsically electroactive polyimide microspheres fabricated by electrospraying technology for ascorbic acid detection. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 15666–15672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yeh, L.C.; Huang, T.C.; Lin, Y.J.; Lai, G.H.; Yang, T.I.; Lo, A.Y.; Yeh, J.M. Electroactive polyamide modified carbon paste electrode for the determination of ascorbic acid. Int. J. Green Energy 2016, 13, 1334–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Huang, T.S.; Yeh, L.C.; Huang, H.Y.; Nian, Z.Y.; Yeh, Y.C.; Chou, Y.C.; Yeh, J.M.; Tsai, M.H. The use of a carbon paste electrode mixed with multiwalled carbon nanotube/electroactive polyimide composites as an electrode for sensing ascorbic acid. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 630–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yeh, L.C.; Huang, T.C.; Huang, Y.P.; Huang, H.Y.; Chen, H.H.; Yang, T.I.; Yeh, J.M. Synthesis electroactive polyurea with aniline-pentamer-based in the main chain and its application in electrochemical sensor. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 94, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yeh, L.C.; Huang, T.C.; Lai, F.Y.; Lai, G.H.; Lo, A.Y.; Hsu, S.C.; Yang, T.I.; Yeh, J.M. Synthesis of electroactive polyazomethine and its application in electrochromic property and electrochemical sensor. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 303, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Huang, T.C.; Yeh, L.C.; Lai, G.H.; Lai, F.Y.; Yang, T.I.; Huang, Y.J.; Lo, A.Y.; Yeh, J.M. Electroactive polyurea/CNT composite-based electrode for detection of vitamin C. Express Polym. Lett. 2016, 10, 450–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Weng, C.J.; Hsu, P.H.; Hsu, S.C.; Chang, C.H.; Hung, W.I.; Wu, P.S.; Yeh, J.M. Synthesis of electroactive mesoporous gold–organosilica nanocomposite materials via a sol–gel process with non-surfactant templates and the electroanalysis of ascorbic acid. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 4893–4991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Tsai, M.H.; Lu, S.H.; Lai, Y.H.; Lai, G.H.; Dizon, G.V.; Yang, T.-I.; Lin, Y.J.; Chou, Y.C. Novel ascorbic acid sensor prepared from gold/aniline-pentamer-based electroactive polyamide composites. Express Polym. Lett. 2018, 12, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Devasena, S.; Meenakshi, S.; Sayeekannan, R.; Pandian, K. In-situ functionalization of aniline oligomer onto layered graphene sheet and study of its application on electrochemical detection of ascorbic acid in food samples. Nanosyst. Phys. Chem. Math. 2016, 7, 774–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Han, B.; Pan, M.; Liu, X.; Liu, J.; Cui, T.; Chen, Q. Electrochemical Detection for Uric Acid Based on β-Lactoglobulin-Functionalized Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes Synthesis with PtNPs Nanocomposite. Materials 2019, 12, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Guo, S.; Wang, E. Synthesis and electrochemical applications of gold nanoparticles. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 598, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Income, K.; Ratnarathorn, N.; Khamchaiyo, N.; Srisuvo, C.; Ruckthong, L.; Dungchai, W. Disposable Nonenzymatic Uric Acid and Creatinine Sensors Using PAD Coupled with Screen-Printed Reduced Graphene Oxide-Gold Nanocomposites. Int. J. Anal. Chem. 2019, 3457247. [Google Scholar]
  60. Shams, N.; Lim, H.N.; Hajian, R.; Yusof, N.A.; Abdullah, J.; Sulaiman, Y.; Ibrahim, I.; Huang, N.M. Electrochemical sensor based on gold nanoparticles/ethylenediamine-reduced graphene oxide for trace determination of fenitrothion in water. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 89430–89439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yang, Z.; Qi, C.; Zheng, X.; Zheng, J. Facile synthesis of silver nanoparticle-decorated graphene oxide nanocomposites and their application for electrochemical sensing. New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 9358–9362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chang, K.C.; Lu, H.I.; Peng, C.W.; Lai, M.C.; Hsu, S.C.; Hsu, M.S.; Tsai, Y.K.; Chang, C.H.; Hung, W.I.; Wei, Y.; et al. Nanocasting Technique to Prepare Lotus-leaf-like Superhydrophobic Electroactive Polyimide as Advanced Anticorrosive Coatings. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 1460–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Różalska, I.; Kułyk, P.; Kulszewicz Bajer, I. Linear 1,4-coupled oligoanilines of defined length: Preparation and spectroscopic properties. New J. Chem. 2004, 28, 1235–1243. [Google Scholar]
  64. Weng, C.J.; Huang, K.Y.; Jhuo, Y.S.; Chen, Y.L.; Feng, C.F.; Cho Ming, C.; Yeh, J.M. Electroactive PI sphere generated by electrospraying. Polym. Int. 2012, 61, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Krishnamurthy, S.; Esterle, A.; Sharma, N.C.; Sahi, S.V. Yucca-derived synthesis of gold nanomaterial and their catalytic potential. Nanoscale Res. lett. 2014, 9, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Shameli, K.; Ahmad, M.B.; Zamanian, A.; Sanpour, P.; Shabanzadeh, P.; Abdollahi, Y.; Zargar, M. Green biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using Curcuma longa tuber powder. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 5603–5610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Xin, Z.; Deng, M.; Wen, Y.; Song, Y. Synthesis of monodisperse silver nanoparticles for ink-jet printed flexible electronics. Nanotechnology 2011, 22, 425601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, G.; Yang, D.; Sacher, E. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopic Analysis of Pt Nanoparticles on Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite, Using Symmetric Component Line Shapes. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2007, 111, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bard, A.J.; Faulkner, J.L.R. Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2001; ISBN 978-0-471-04372-0. [Google Scholar]
  70. Shi, W.; Liu, C.; Song, Y.; Lin, N.; Zhou, S.; Cai, X. An ascorbic acid amperometric sensor using over-oxidized polypyrrole and palladium nanoparticles composites. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012, 38, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Fu, L.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, A.; Cai, W.; Deng, B.; Zhang, Z. An Electrochemical Sensor Based on Reduced Graphene Oxide and ZnO Nanorods-Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode for Uric Acid Detection. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Fua, L.; Wangd, A.; Laic, G.; Sua, W.; Malherbeb, F.; Yue, J.; Line, C.T.; Yu, A. Defects regulating of graphene ink for electrochemical determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid. Talanta 2017, 180, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Chikere, C.O.; Faisal, N.H.; Lin, P.K.; Fernandez, C. Interaction between Amorphous Zirconia Nanoparticles and Graphite: Electrochemical Applications for Gallic Acid Sensing Using Carbon Paste Electrodes in Wine. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Chikere, C.O.; Hobben, E.; Faisal, N.H.; Lin, P.K.; Fernandez, C. Electroanalytical determination of gallic acid in red and white wine samples using cobalt oxide nanoparticles-modified carbon-paste electrodes. Microchem. J. 2021, 160, 105668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Habibi, B.; Pezhhan, H.; Pournaghi-Azar, M.H. Voltammetric and amperometric determination of uric acid at a carbon-ceramic electrode modified with multi walled carbon nanotubes. Microchim. Acta 2010, 169, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yan, J.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Z.; He, G.; Zhou, P.; Liang, H.; Tian, L.; Zhou, X.; Jiang, H. Simultaneous electrochemical detection of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid based on graphene anchored with Pd–Pt nanoparticles. Colloid Surf. B 2013, 111, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhou, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xie, H.; Chen, B.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, X.; Jia, P. A novel sensor based on LaPO4 nanowires modified electrode for sensitive simultaneous determination of dopamine and uric acid. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 75, 360–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Manivel, P.; Dhakshnamoorthy, M.; Balamurugan, A.; Ponpandian, N.; Mangalaraj, D.; Viswanathan, C. Conducting polyaniline-graphene oxide fibrous nanocomposites: Preparation, characterization and simultaneous electrochemical detection of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 14428–14437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Anu Prathap, M.U.; Srivastava, R. Tailoring properties of polyaniline for simultaneous determination of a quaternary mixture of ascorbic acid, dopamine, uric acid, and tryptophan. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 177, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chikere, C.O.; Faisal, N.H.; Lin, P.K.T.; Fernandez, C. Zinc oxide nanoparticles modified-carbon paste electrode used for the electrochemical determination of Gallic acid. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1310, 012008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Polymers 13 00252 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Possible mechanism for the formation of metal nanoparticles on EPI.
Scheme 1. Possible mechanism for the formation of metal nanoparticles on EPI.
Polymers 13 00252 sch001
Polymers 13 00252 g001 550
Figure 1. The flowchart for preparing CPE modified with different samples (i.e., EPI-S, EPI-P, and EPI-G).
Figure 1. The flowchart for preparing CPE modified with different samples (i.e., EPI-S, EPI-P, and EPI-G).
Polymers 13 00252 g001
Polymers 13 00252 g002 550
Figure 2. Characterization of ACAT as determined by (a) 1H-NMR, (b) FTIR, and (c) mass spectroscopy.
Figure 2. Characterization of ACAT as determined by (a) 1H-NMR, (b) FTIR, and (c) mass spectroscopy.
Polymers 13 00252 g002
Polymers 13 00252 g003 550
Figure 3. The representative FTIR spectra for (a) EPAA, (b) EPI.
Figure 3. The representative FTIR spectra for (a) EPAA, (b) EPI.
Polymers 13 00252 g003
Polymers 13 00252 g004a 550Polymers 13 00252 g004b 550
Figure 4. Characterization of EPIS, EPIP, EPIG as determined by XRD (a), XPS (b), TEM images EPIS (c), EPIP (d), and EPIG (e).
Figure 4. Characterization of EPIS, EPIP, EPIG as determined by XRD (a), XPS (b), TEM images EPIS (c), EPIP (d), and EPIG (e).
Polymers 13 00252 g004aPolymers 13 00252 g004b
Polymers 13 00252 g005 550
Figure 5. Electrochemical cyclic voltammetry for (a) ITO, (b) EPI, (c) EPIS (d), EPIP, and (e) EPIG, as measured in 1.0 M H2SO4 aqueous solution with a scan rate of 50 mV s−1.
Figure 5. Electrochemical cyclic voltammetry for (a) ITO, (b) EPI, (c) EPIS (d), EPIP, and (e) EPIG, as measured in 1.0 M H2SO4 aqueous solution with a scan rate of 50 mV s−1.
Polymers 13 00252 g005
Polymers 13 00252 g006a 550Polymers 13 00252 g006b 550
Figure 6. Cyclic voltammograms obtained from (a) EPIG in PBS (pH = 7) at different scan rates (curves a to g; 40, 100, 150, 200, 400, 500 mV s−1) in the presence of 50 μM UA. (b) The plot between Ip vs. square roots of scan rates (ν1/2) (c) The plot of Ep vs. log (ν).
Figure 6. Cyclic voltammograms obtained from (a) EPIG in PBS (pH = 7) at different scan rates (curves a to g; 40, 100, 150, 200, 400, 500 mV s−1) in the presence of 50 μM UA. (b) The plot between Ip vs. square roots of scan rates (ν1/2) (c) The plot of Ep vs. log (ν).
Polymers 13 00252 g006aPolymers 13 00252 g006b
Polymers 13 00252 g007a 550Polymers 13 00252 g007b 550
Figure 7. (a) Cyclic voltammograms of CPE (a), EPI (b), EPIS (c), EPIP (d), and EPIG (e) modified electrodes in PBS (pH~7) with 350 µM UA concentrations with scan rate of 50 mV·s−1. (b) Typical Amperometric response obtained with CPE (a), EPI (b), EPIS (c), EPIP (d), and EPIG (e) modified electrode at 310 mV with successive additions of AA into 30 mL of PBS. (c) The corresponding calibration plot for current density vs. [UA] of CPE (a), EPI (b), EPIS (c), EPIP (d), and EPIG (e) modified electrodes.
Figure 7. (a) Cyclic voltammograms of CPE (a), EPI (b), EPIS (c), EPIP (d), and EPIG (e) modified electrodes in PBS (pH~7) with 350 µM UA concentrations with scan rate of 50 mV·s−1. (b) Typical Amperometric response obtained with CPE (a), EPI (b), EPIS (c), EPIP (d), and EPIG (e) modified electrode at 310 mV with successive additions of AA into 30 mL of PBS. (c) The corresponding calibration plot for current density vs. [UA] of CPE (a), EPI (b), EPIS (c), EPIP (d), and EPIG (e) modified electrodes.
Polymers 13 00252 g007aPolymers 13 00252 g007b
Polymers 13 00252 g008 550
Figure 8. Differential pulse voltammograms obtained with (a) CPE, (b) EPI, (c) EPIS, (d), EPIP, and (e) EPIG modified electrodes for a tertiary mixture of 10 uM AA/DA/ UA in 0.1 M PBS.
Figure 8. Differential pulse voltammograms obtained with (a) CPE, (b) EPI, (c) EPIS, (d), EPIP, and (e) EPIG modified electrodes for a tertiary mixture of 10 uM AA/DA/ UA in 0.1 M PBS.
Polymers 13 00252 g008
Table
Table 1. Comparison of our electrochemical sensor with other modified electrodes using various methods reported in the literature.
Table 1. Comparison of our electrochemical sensor with other modified electrodes using various methods reported in the literature.
Materials/Electrode TypeAnalyteSensitivity
(µA·µM−1)		Limit of Detection
(LOD)(µM)		Linear Dynamic Range (LDR)(μM)Reference
RGO/ZnO/GCE [66]UA 0.311–800[71]
G-30 [67]UA 17.85–1000[72]
ZnO NPs/CPE [68]GA 0.1241–1000[73]
CoO NPs/CPEGA 1.52100–10,000[74]
CCE/MWCNTUA1.51.40.5–10.0[75]
CPE/MWCNT/α-CDUA0.32555.0–40[76]
LaPO4/CPEUA 0.92.7–24[77]
PANI/GO fibersUA 0.22–18[78]
Fe-Meso-PANIUA0.2621  5.3100–300[79]
EPI/CPEUA0.343.815–15This work
EPIS/CPEUA0.474.335–20This work
EPIP/CPEUA0.832.605–20This work
EPIG/CPEUA1.530.785–50This work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bibi, A.; Hsu, S.-C.; Ji, W.-F.; Cho, Y.-C.; Santiago, K.S.; Yeh, J.-M. Comparative Studies of CPEs Modified with Distinctive Metal Nanoparticle-Decorated Electroactive Polyimide for the Detection of UA. Polymers 2021, 13, 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13020252

AMA Style

Bibi A, Hsu S-C, Ji W-F, Cho Y-C, Santiago KS, Yeh J-M. Comparative Studies of CPEs Modified with Distinctive Metal Nanoparticle-Decorated Electroactive Polyimide for the Detection of UA. Polymers. 2021; 13(2):252. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13020252

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bibi, Aamna, Sheng-Chieh Hsu, Wei-Fu Ji, Yi-Chi Cho, Karen S. Santiago, and Jui-Ming Yeh. 2021. "Comparative Studies of CPEs Modified with Distinctive Metal Nanoparticle-Decorated Electroactive Polyimide for the Detection of UA" Polymers 13, no. 2: 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13020252

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop