Next Article in Journal
Overview of Silica-Polymer Nanostructures for Waterborne High-Performance Coatings
Next Article in Special Issue
Introduction of Re(CO)3+/99mTc(CO)3+ Organometallic Species into Vinylpyrrolidone-Allyliminodiacetate Copolymers
Previous Article in Journal
Copolyamide-Imide Membrane with Low CTE and CME for Potential Space Optical Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Single and Double-Stranded 1D-Coordination Polymers with 4′-(4-Alkyloxyphenyl)-3,2′:6′,3″-terpyridines and {Cu2(μ-OAc)4} or {Cu43-OH)2(μ-OAc)23-OAc)2(AcO-κO)2} Motifs
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Terpyridine-Fe2+-Based Coordination Polymer Film for On-Chip Micro-Supercapacitor with AC Line-Filtering Performance

Polymers 2021, 13(7), 1002; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071002
by Hongxing Wang 1, Feng Qiu 1,*, Chenbao Lu 2, Jinhui Zhu 2, Changchun Ke 3, Sheng Han 1,* and Xiaodong Zhuang 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Polymers 2021, 13(7), 1002; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071002
Submission received: 9 March 2021 / Revised: 21 March 2021 / Accepted: 22 March 2021 / Published: 24 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coordination Polymers: Properties and Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper concerns the use of polymer coatings as ultrathin, flexible electrodes in flexible electronics. The work is interesting and the manuscript is well-structured. However, some critical methodological information is missing, as well as a few other minor additions/corrections.

 

EXPERIMENTAL:

  • Percentage purities of chemicals missing
  • NMR solvents and/or reference standards not stated.
  • Acquisition parameters, step sizes, etc., are missing for all instrumental methodologies. This needs to be added for all instruments. For example, XPS:
    • What was the pass energy?
    • What was the reference signal?
    • How many scans per reading?
    • How was the data analysed/data deconvolution done? Etc.
  • In the device fabrication section, even though the detailed procedure may have been given in previous work, the authors should at least offer an abbreviated summary of the procedure in this manuscript, for the benefit of the reader.

 

RESULTS:

  • BET: the authors refer to a reference value, but do not state it (page 6, line 229). That would be a helpful and valuable addition.
  • Figures: All the figures, while generally looking good are a little on the small side. It is hard to make out many of the details when everything is small and crammed together. Perhaps consider reorganising and expanding the images, at a higher resolution.

 

REFERENCES:

  • Inconsistencies in article title format. Some have capitalised words, others have a sentence-type format. Please pick a consistent style and use throughout.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript “A Terpyridine-Fe2+-based Coordination Polymer Film for On-Chip Micro-Supercapacitor with AC Line-Filtering Performance” deals with the production of ultrathin polymer films, characterized by flexible properties, good redox-active and narrow bandgap. These films can be used as micro-sized energy storage devices. The work is interesting and well organized. Good results have been also obtained. Therefore, the publication is recommended; but after some revisions.

In particular:

- Please, define MSC the first time it appears in the Introduction.

- The state of the art in the Introduction can be enlarged adding other works related to alternative production techniques. For this purpose, see, for example, the work of Sarno et al., SC-CO2-assisted process for a high energy density aerogel supercapacitor: The effect of GO loading, Nanotechnology, 2017, 28, Article number 204001; etc..

- Please, add chemico-physical properties of chemicals.

- Please, remove bold from TpPB-Fe-MSC.

- Please, enlarge the graphs in Figure 6 since are difficult to be read.

- The morphology of the produced films can have an effect on the supercapacitor performance. Please, discuss this aspect.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors performed the modifications proposed by the Reviewer and improved the manuscript.

Back to TopTop