Next Article in Journal
One-Pot Synthesis of UPy-Functionalized Nanocellulose under Mechanochemical Synergy for High-Performance Epoxy Nanocomposites
Next Article in Special Issue
Adsorption of Hydrophobic Ions on Environmentally Relevant Sorbents
Previous Article in Journal
Refractive Index and Temperature Sensing Performance of Microfiber Modified by UV Glue Distributed Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Diluents on Mechanical Characteristics of Epoxy Compounds
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 14
Issue 12
10.3390/polym14122426
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Control of Stimuli Sensitivity in pH-Switchable LCST/UCST-Type Thermosensitive Dendrimers by Changing the Dendrimer Structure

by
Chie Kojima
*,
Yunshen Fu
and
Mamiko Tamaki
Department of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka Prefecture University, 1-1, Gakuen-cho, Naka-ku, Sakai 599-8531, Osaka, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(12), 2426; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122426
Submission received: 4 May 2022 / Revised: 8 June 2022 / Accepted: 9 June 2022 / Published: 15 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Polymer Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Stimuli-sensitive materials, such as pH- and temperature-responsive polymers, are useful as smart materials. Phenylalanine (Phe)-modified polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers with succinic acid termini, PAMAM-Phe-Suc, have been reported as unique pH-switchable lower critical solution temperature (LCST)-/upper critical solution temperature (UCST)-type thermosensitive polymers. Regulating the phase transition behavior of dendrimers is important for their applications. This study investigated the relationship between the dendrimer structure and stimuli sensitivity. Phe-modified PAMAM dendrimers with cyclohexanedicarboxylate termini (PAMAM-Phe-CHex) and sulfonate termini (PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na) were synthesized. The temperature-dependent transmittance of these aqueous dendrimer solutions was examined at various pH values. PAMAM-Phe-CHex with Phe at all termini (PAMAM-Phe64-CHex) demonstrated a broad UCST-like phase transition at pH 7.0 but lacked an LCST-type phase transition. PAMAM-Phe-CHex with ≤ 27 Phe residues showed both LCST- and UCST-like phase transitions at different pH values, but the phase transition was broad. PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na showed both LCST- and UCST-type phase transitions at different pH values, and the transition temperature increased as the bound Phe number decreased. Thus, the phase transition behavior of PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na dendrimers can be regulated by varying the Phe/PAMAM ratios.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Smart materials, such as temperature-responsive and pH-sensitive polymers, have attracted significant interest in various fields [1,2]. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) is a typical example of a lower critical solution temperature (LCST)-type thermosensitive polymer [3,4]. Poly(N-acryloyl glycinamide) with amide bonds and poly(sulfobetaine methacrylate) with zwitterionic groups are upper critical solution temperature (UCST)-type thermosensitive polymers [5,6,7]. LCST-type thermosensitive polymers are soluble at low temperatures but are insoluble above the LCST. In contrast, UCST-type thermosensitive polymers are insoluble at low temperatures but are soluble above the UCST. Block copolymers bearing both LCST and UCST thermosensitive segments were designed as unique polymers exhibiting both LCST- and UCST-type thermosensitive behaviors [8]. It was reported that the LCST-type thermosensitive behaviors of PNIPAM in water were changed into the UCST-type in a binary aqueous solution containing alcohol and DMSO [9]. Some polymers with the LCST/UCST switching behaviors by changing solvents, like PNIPAM, were also reported [10,11,12]. Besides, the addition of salt induced the switching of the LCST/UCST behaviors of these LCST/UCST diblock polymers [5,6,13,14,15]. Due to the fact that the control of these phase transition temperatures is important for the application of thermosensitive polymers, various kinds of polymers have been studied [5,6,7].
Dendrimers are highly branched polymers synthesized via a stepwise reaction. The molecular weight, shape, and size of dendrimers are highly controllable. Since dendrimers can load several types of molecules via attachment to their terminal groups or encapsulation into their interiors, they are useful as multifunctional nanocarriers and smart materials [16,17,18,19]. Stimuli-responsive dendrimers have previously been reported [20]. For example, LCST-type thermosensitive dendrimers have been produced via modification of dendrimers with various compounds, including oligo(ethylene glycol), N-isopropyl groups, and elastin-like peptides, which are useful for drug delivery and substance separation [20,21,22,23,24]. However, there are limited reports of UCST-type thermosensitive dendrimers. The carboxylate-terminal phenylalanine (Phe)-modified polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers showed UCST-type thermosensitivity at pH 5 [25], whereas the amino-terminal Phe-modified PAMAM dendrimers showed LCST-type thermosensitivity at pH 7.4 [26]. The zwitterionic structure of the carboxylate-terminal Phe-modified dendrimers may induce UCST-type thermosensitive behavior [25]. Two carboxylate-terminal Phe-modified PAMAM dendrimers (PAMAM-Phe-Suc and PAMAM-Suc-Phe), synthesized by changing the reaction order of succinamic anhydride and Phe, demonstrated different pH and temperature sensitivities. Interestingly, PAMAM-Phe-Suc exhibited both UCST- and LCST-type thermosensitivity at pH 5.5 and 4, respectively [27]. A sulfonate-terminal dendrimer (PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na) also exhibited UCST- and LCST-type thermosensitivity modulated by pH [27]. The control of stimuli sensitivity in these pH-switchable LCST/UCST-type thermosensitive dendrimers is important for their application. Hydrophobicity is known to significantly affect thermosensitivity [5,6,7]. This study investigated the relationship between the dendrimer structure and stimuli sensitivity in unique pH-switchable LCST/UCST-type thermosensitive dendrimers. Phe-modified PAMAM dendrimers with cyclohexanedicarboxylate termini (PAMAM-Phe-CHex) were synthesized. Moreover, we varied the Phe/PAMAM ratio in PAMAM-Phe-CHex and PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na to regulate their stimuli-responsive properties (Figure 1). Their stimuli-responsive properties were investigated and compared to PAMAM-Phe-Suc. Our results provide a basis for the molecular design of pH-switchable LCST/UCST-type thermosensitive dendrimers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

PAMAM-Phe-Chex and PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na, bearing Phe at all dendrimer termini, were synthesized as previously reported [27,28]. Briefly, N-(tert-butoxycarbonyl)-l-phenylalanine (Boc-Phe) was reacted with 1.3 equivalents of N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC), 1.2 equivalents of N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), and 1.5 equivalents of triethylamine (TEA) in N,N-dimethyl formamide (DMF, anhydrous) for 4 h on ice. Then, PAMAM dendrimer with an ethylenediamine core of a generation 4 (G4) dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, anhydrous) was added at a molar ratio of 96/1 to Boc-Phe/PAMAM. The reaction mixture was stirred for 2 days at room temperature. These compounds were purified by dialysis (MWCO 2k) using methanol. After drying under vacuum, PAMAM–(Boc-Phe) was obtained. Then, the dendrimer was dissolved in trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and reacted for 4 h on ice to remove the Boc group. Finally, excess 1,3-propane sultone dissolved in acetonitrile or cyclohexanedicarboxylic anhydride powder was reacted with all dendrimer termini in 125 mM NaHCO3 buffer. Similarly, PAMAM-Phe-Chex and PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na, with different Phe residues, were synthesized by varying the Boc-Phe/PAMAM ratio (Table 1).

2.2. Characterization

Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectra were recorded using a 400 MHz instrument (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded by using JASCO FTIR 4600 spectrometer (Jasco Inc., Tokyo, Japan). A powder dendrimer sample was sandwiched between KBr plates for the FT-IR measurement.
Dendrimer-containing solutions were prepared using 100 mM buffers (dendrimer 1 mg/mL, buffer 20 mM) at different pH values. Phosphate (pH 6 and higher) and acetate (pH 3.5–6) buffer solutions were prepared. Phosphoric acid was used to adjust the pH to <3.5. The temperature-dependent transmittance at 500 nm was measured with a 1.0 °C/min heating speed using a Jasco Model V-630 UV/Vis spectrophotometer equipped with an ETC-717 (Jasco Inc.). The dendrimer solutions were prepared using heavy water and the temperature-dependent transmittance curves were also measured.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis of Various Anionic Terminal Dendrimers Bearing Phe

PAMAM-Phe-Chex and PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na were synthesized according to our previous reports [27,28] (Figure 2). Briefly, the PAMAM G4 dendrimer was reacted with excess Boc-Phe using condensation agents. The bound number of Boc-Phe was changed by varying the Phe/PAMAM ratio (Table 1). After deprotection with TFA, excess cyclohexanedicarboxylic anhydride or 1.3-propane sultone was reacted with all termini of the dendrimer in an alkaline solution. The synthesized dendrimers are presented in Table 1. The average bound number of Phe was evaluated from the average integral ratios of the signals at 7.0–7.4 ppm, 4.2 ppm, and 1.2 ppm (Boc-Phe) to 2.2 ppm (dendrimer) in the 1H-NMR spectra of PAMAM-(Boc-Phe) (see Supplementary Figures). The removal of Boc from the dendrimer was confirmed by the disappearance of the Boc signal at 1.2 ppm (see Supplementary Figures). The bound number of CHex was evaluated from the integral ratio of the signals at 1.1–1.9 ppm (CHex) to 7.0–7.4 ppm (Phe) in the 1H NMR spectra (see Supplementary Figures). The bound number of propane sultone (SO3Na) was evaluated from the integral ratio of the signals at 1.8 ppm (center methylene in propane sultone) to 7.0–7.4 ppm (Phe) in the 1H NMR spectra (see Supplementary Figures). Since 1,3-propane sultone could react with both primary and secondary amines, the bound number of SO3Na possibly exceeded 64 dendrimer termini. The FT-IR spectroscopy of these dendrimers was carried out. The FT-IR spectra of PAMAM-Phe-CHex and PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na contained amide signals (1550 cm−1, 1650 cm−1, around 3300 cm−1, and around 3500 cm−1) derived from the PAMAM dendrimer and mono-substituted benzene signals (700 cm−1 and 750 cm−1) derived from Phe [29]. Sulfonate signals (1040 cm−1 and 1180 cm-1) were observed in the FT-IR spectra of PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na [29]. A signal at 2940 cm−1, derived from cyclohexane of CHex, was enlarged in the FT-IR spectra of PAMAM-Phe-CHex [29]. Thus, these results indicated that different terminal Phe-modified PAMAM dendrimers were synthesized.

3.2. Thermosensitivity at Different pH Values

We examined the temperature-dependent transmittance of the synthesized Phe-modified dendrimers at different pH values. Stimuli-responsive behaviors of these dendrimers were compared to those of PAMAM-Phe56-Suc and PAMAM-Phe57-SO3Na which were previously reported [27]. First, we attempted to regulate the stimuli sensitivity of the carboxylate-terminal Phe-modified dendrimers. Figure 3A demonstrates the thermosensitivity of PAMAM-Phe56-Suc at different pH values. The UCST and LCST were defined as the temperature at which the transmittance was 50%. The dendrimer solutions at pH 6.0 or higher and pH 3.5 or lower were clear at 20–80 °C, while the pH 5.0 solution was turbid. And, UCST- and LCST-type thermosensitivity was observed at 60 °C at pH 4.0 and 71 °C at pH 5.5, respectively [27]. The increased hydrophobicity of thermosensitive polymers decreased the phase transition temperature [5,6,7]. Thus, the terminal groups of PAMAM-Phe-Suc were changed from succinic acid to the more hydrophobic cyclohexyl acid. Figure 3B–F demonstrate the temperature dependencies of PAMAM-Phe-CHex bearing different Phe residues. And, the phase transition temperatures of these dendrimers at different pH values are summarized in Table 2. The PAMAM-Phe64-CHex solution at pH 7.0 was turbid at 20 °C but became clear after heating. This UCST-type thermosensitive behavior is comparable to that of PAMAM-Phe56-Suc at pH 5.5. It is because the pKa of cyclohexyl acid is higher than that of succinic acid [30]. At pH values between 6.5 and 4.5, the PAMAM-Phe64-CHex solutions were turbid, irrespective of the temperature. Before heating, the aqueous solutions of PAMAM-Phe56-Suc were clear at pH values ≤ 4.0. However, aqueous PAMAM-Phe64-CHex solutions remained turbid at pH 4.0, although the transmittance became higher. PAMAM-Phe56-Suc showed the LCST-type thermosensitive behavior, but PAMAM-Phe64-Chex did not. The hydrophobic-hydrophilic balance is important in LCST-type thermosensitive polymers [5,6,7]. PAMAM-Phe64-CHex is likely too hydrophobic to exhibit LCST-type thermosensitivity. The hydrophobicity of PAMAM-Phe-CHex increased as Phe was incorporated into the dendrimer. The UCST-type thermosensitive behavior of PAMAM-Phe46-CHex was observed at a lower phase-transition temperature at pH 7.0. The UCST of PAMAM-Phe35-CHex became lower than 20 °C at pH 7.0, and PAMAM-Phe-CHex bearing ≤ 35 Phe residues did not show the UCST under our experimental conditions. The UCST-type thermosensitive behavior of PAMAM-Phe-CHex bearing small amount of Phe was observed at lower pH, although the UCST was not in the range between 20 °C and 80 °C. When the pH of the solution was reduced to around pH 5.0, the transmittance decreased, and the UCST-type thermosensitivity diminished. However, when the pH was further decreased to 3.5, the transmittance tended to increase. Meanwhile, LCST-type thermosensitive behavior was not observed in PAMAM-Phe-CHex bearing ≥35 Phe residues. LCST-type thermosensitive behavior was observed in PAMAM-Phe-CHex bearing ≤27 Phe residues, but the phase transition became broad. Overall, controlling the phase transition temperature of the dendrimer proved difficult for carboxylate-terminal Phe-modified dendrimers.
Next, we examined the temperature-dependent transmittance of PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na with Phe/PAMAM ratios at varying pH values (Figure 4). The PAMAM-Phe57-SO3Na64 solution was clear at pH 7.0 and 4.0, irrespective of the temperature. UCST- and LCST-type thermosensitive behaviors were observed at 36 °C at pH 6.5 and 50 °C at pH 5.0, respectively. Both UCST- and LCST-type phase transitions at 24 °C and 68 °C were observed at pH 5.5 [27]. As the bound number of Phe decreased, the UCST and the solution became lower and clearer, respectively. As the bound number of Phe decreased, the LCST was observed at lower pH. pH-Switchable UCST- and LCST-type thermosensitive behaviors were observed in these dendrimer solutions, except for PAMAM-Phe16-SO3Na62. The phase transition temperatures of these dendrimers at different pH values are summarized in Table 3. PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na, with fewer Phe residues, demonstrated a lower UCST at pH 5.5 and pH 6 but also a lower LCST at pH 5. The sensitivity at body temperature could be changed from pH 6.5 to 5.5 by varying the Phe/PAMAM ratio. Thus, the Phe/PAMAM ratio facilitated the control over the sensitivity of PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na, which is useful for biomedical applications.

4. Discussion

We previously developed unique pH-switchable dendrimers (PAMAM-Phe-Suc and PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na) with LCST- and UCST-type thermosensitive behaviors [27]. Some LCST-type thermosensitive polymers, such as PNIPAM, are known to adopt UCST-type behavior upon changing the solvent [9,10,11]. The pH-switchable thermosensitive behavior of our dendrimers is unique. In this study, we attempted to regulate the stimuli-responsive properties of anionic terminal Phe-modified dendrimers by varying the structure of the terminal group and the Phe/PAMAM ratio. We first investigated the phase transitions of various carboxylate-terminal Phe-modified dendrimers at different pH values. Since PAMAM-Phe-Suc exhibits the LCST-type phase transition at 71 °C, dendrimers with increased hydrophobicity were designed and synthesized to decrease the LCST. However, the thermosensitive properties of the dendrimers diminished upon conversion of the dendrimer termini from succinic acid to cyclohexyl acid, negating its previous LCST-type thermosensitive behavior. This could be due to the extremely increased hydrophobicity of cyclohexyl acid. Then, dendrimers with fewer Phe residues were synthesized to decrease the hydrophobicity. The UCST of dendrimers with fewer Phe residues became lower at pH 7.0, but the UCST-type phase transition of PAMAM-Phe-CHex with 35 or less Phe residues was not observed in the range from 20 °C to 80 °C. Although LCST-like thermosensitivity was observed for PAMAM-Phe-CHex with 27 or fewer Phe residues, there was no obvious phase transition. As a result, adjusting the phase transition temperature, by altering the dendrimer structure of carboxylate-terminal Phe-modified dendrimers, was difficult.
We then attempted to control the phase transition temperature of the sulfonate-terminal Phe-modified dendrimers (PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na). PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na with different Phe/PAMAM ratios were synthesized, and its phase transition behaviors were analyzed. Lower LCST and UCST were observed for PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na with fewer Phe residues at the same pH. Thus, changing the dendrimer structure could regulate the phase transition of sulfonate-terminal Phe-modified dendrimers. A sharper thermosensitivity was observed for sulfonate-terminal Phe-modified dendrimers than those for carboxylate-terminal Phe-modified dendrimers. This may be due to the zwitterionic structure at every terminal with a stable anion derived from the sulfonate. The phase transition temperature was also affected by the pH. Higher LCST and UCST were observed at lower pH for the same PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na dendrimer. Thus, PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na dendrimers can be applicable as smart materials.
Our previous paper indicated that coacervated droplets were observed when the transmittance of the solutions containing PAMAM-Phe-Suc and PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na became low [27]. Dendrimers synthesized in this study were probably coacervated when the transmittance was low. The phase transition mechanism of this kind of dendrimer is discussed. The ionic effects in the phase transition of anionic terminal fully Phe-modified dendrimers were previously investigated [27]. The dendrimer solutions, which showed the UCST-and LCST-type thermosensitivity, became clear and turbid by adding NaCl, indicating that both LCST- and UCST-type thermosensitive behaviors disappeared in the presence of NaCl. In the presence of salt, the intermolecular electrostatic interactions between zwitterionic groups are suppressed [5], and hydrophobic interaction becomes strong [31]. These facts suggest that electrostatic interaction and hydrophobic interactions play important roles to the UCST- and LCST-type thermosensitive behaviors of these dendrimers, respectively [27], as shown in Figure 5. Our previous paper also indicated that the ζ-potential of these dendrimers was changed from negative to positive as the pH decreased [27]. The negative surfaces increased the dendrimer solubility. When the ζ-potential became neutral, the zwitterionic dendrimers were associated each other via the electrostatic interaction, which induced the UCST-type phase transition (Figure 5). When the ζ-potential became positive, the anionic termini of the dendrimers were not located at the surface. It is possible that the anionic termini were interacted with tertiary amines of the PAMAM dendrimer core. Consequently, Phe residues were located at the dendrimer surface, which possibly induced the LCST-type phase transition based on the hydrophobic interaction (Figure 5). We synthesized sulfonate-terminal Phe-modified dendrigraft-polylysine without any tertiary amines and examined the temperature-dependent transmittance at different pHs. Figure S23 shows a UCST-type thermosensitive behavior at pH 7, but not any LCST-type thermosensitive behaviors. This suggests that the core PAMAM dendrimer is important for pH-switchable LCST/UCST-type thermosensitive behaviors. In this study, the influence of the hydrogen bond on the phase transition behaviors was also investigated. The temperature-dependent transmittance of these dendrimers in heavy water was measured. Interestingly, carboxylate-terminal PAMAM-Phe-Suc showed higher LCST and lower UCST in heavy water, but sulfonate-terminal PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na showed lower LCST and higher UCST (Figure S24). This suggests that the effect of hydrogen bonding in PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na is different from that in PAMAM-Phe-Suc. Besides this, we examined the effect of the dendrimer concentration to the phase transition behaviors. Figure S25 shows that the UCST and the LCST of these dendrimers were almost unchanged by the concentration under our conditions. However, the initial solubility of PAMAM-Phe-CHex was greatly changed by lowering the dendrimer concentration. The detailed phase transition mechanisms remain to be investigated.
In conclusion, we attempted to regulate the stimuli-sensitive behaviors of pH-switchable LCST/UCST-type thermosensitive dendrimers. This was done by varying the terminal group and the Phe/PAMAM ratio in carboxylate- and sulfonate-terminal dendrimers. Although varying the terminal group and the Phe/PAMAM ratio for carboxylate-terminal Phe-modified dendrimers did not show any clear phase transition, the phase transition temperature of PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na increased when the Phe/PAMAM ratio decreased. The ability to regulate the sensitivity of polymers to various stimuli will facilitate their utilization in many applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym14122426/s1, Figure S1: The dendrimer structure for the peak assignment. Figures S2–S21: 1H NMR spectra of the dendrimers synthesized in this study. Figure S22: FT-IR spectra of the dendrimers synthesized in this study. Figures S23–S25. Temperature-dependent transmittance curves of dendrigraft polylysine in different pHs, PAMAM-Phe-Suc and PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na in H2O and D2O buffers, and PAMAM-Phe-CHex and PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na at different dendrimer concentrations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.K.; validation, C.K.; investigation, Y.F. and M.T.; resources, C.K.; writing—original draft preparation, C.K.; writing—review and editing, C.K.; project administration, C.K.; funding acquisition, C.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP20H05232 and JP22H04556 (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas: Aquatic Functional Materials).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wei, M.; Gao, Y.; Li, X.; Serpe, M.J. Stimuli-responsive polymers and their applications. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 127–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Zhao, J.; Lee, V.E.; Liu, R.; Priestley, D.R. Responsive polymers as smart nanomaterials enable diverse applications. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2019, 10, 361–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kim, Y.J.; Matsunaga, Y.T. Thermo-responsive polymers and their application as smart biomaterials. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 4307–4321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sponchioni, M.; Palmiero, U.C.; Moscatelli, D. Thermo-responsive polymers: Applications of smart materials in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 102, 589–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Niskanen, J.; Tenhu, H. How to manipulate the upper critical solution temperature (UCST)? Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 220–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Seuring, J.; Agarwal, S. Polymers with upper critical solution temperature in aqueous solution. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2012, 33, 1898–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kotsuchibashi, Y.; Ebara, M.; Aoyagi, T.; Narain, R. Recent advances in dual temperature responsive block copolymers and their potential as biomedical applications. Polymers 2016, 8, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Arotçaréna, M.; Heise, B.; Ishaya, S.; Laschewsky, A. Switching the inside and the outside of aggregates of water-soluble block copolymers with double thermoresponsivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3787–3793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Costa, R.O.R.; Freitas, R.F.S. Phase behavior of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) in binary aqueous solutions. Polymer 2002, 43, 5879–5885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Q.; Hoogenboom, R. Polymers with upper critical solution temperature behavior in alcohol/water solvent mixtures. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2015, 48, 122–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Amemori, S.; Kokado, K.; Sada, K. Fundamental molecular design for precise control of thermoresponsiveness of organic polymers by using ternary systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 8344–8347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Plamper, F.A.; Ballauff, M.A.; Müller, H.E. Tuning the thermoresponsiveness of weak polyelectrolytes by pH and light: Lower and upper critical-solution temperature of poly(N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 14538–14539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Papadakis, C.M.; Müller-Buschbaum, P.; Laschewsky, A. Switch it inside-out: “Schizophrenic” behavior of all thermoresponsive UCST–LCST diblock copolymers. Langmuir 2019, 35, 9660−9676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vishnevetskaya, N.S.; Hildebrand, V.; Nizardo, N.M.; Ko, C.-H.; Di, Z.; Radulescu, A.; Barnsley, L.C.; Müller-Buschbaum, P.; Laschewsky, A.; Papadakis, C.M. All-in-one “schizophrenic” self-assembly of orthogonally tuned thermoresponsive diblock copolymers. Langmuir 2019, 35, 6441–6452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cao, H.; Guo, F.; Chen, Z.; Kong, X.Z. Preparation of thermoresponsive polymer nanogels of oligo(ethylene glycol) diacrylate-methacrylic acid and their property characterization. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Tomalia, D.A.; Naylor, A.M.; Goddard, W.A. Starburst dendrimers: Molecular-level control of size, shape, surface chemistry, topology, and flexibility from atoms to macroscopic matter. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1990, 29, 138–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Svenson, S.; Tomalia, D.A. Dendrimers in biomedical applications—Reflections on the field. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2005, 57, 2106–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Astruc, D.; Boisselier, E.; Ornelas, C. Dendrimers designed for functions: From physical, photophysical, and supramolecular properties to applications in sensing, catalysis, molecular electronics, photonics, and nanomedicine. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 1857–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tomalia, D.A.; Nixon, L.S.; Hedstrand, D.M. The role of branch cell symmetry and other critical nanoscale design parameters in the determination of dendrimer encapsulation properties. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kojima, C. Design of stimuli-responsive dendrimers. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2010, 7, 307–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Haba, Y.; Harada, A.; Takagishi, T.; Kono, K. Rendering poly(amidoamine) or poly(propylenimine) dendrimers temperature sensitive. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12760–12761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Haba, Y.; Kojima, C.; Harada, A.; Kono, K. Comparison of thermosensitive properties of poly(amidoamine) dendrimers with peripheral N-isopropylamide groups and linear polymers with the same groups. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 234–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, X.; Haba, Y.; Ochi, K.; Yuba, E.; Harada, A.; Kono, K. PAMAM dendrimers with an oxyethylene unit-enriched surface as biocompatible temperature-sensitive dendrimers. Bioconjug. Chem. 2013, 24, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kojima, C.; Irie, K.; Tada, T.; Tanaka, N. Temperature-sensitive elastin-mimetic dendrimers: Effect of peptide length and dendrimer generation to temperature sensitivity. Biopolymers 2014, 101, 603–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tamaki, M.; Fukushima, D.; Kojima, C. Dual pH-sensitive and UCST-type thermosensitive dendrimers: Phenylalanine-modified polyamidoamine dendrimers with carboxyl termini. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 28147–28151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Tono, Y.; Kojima, C.; Haba, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Harada, A.; Yagi, S.; Kono, K. Thermosensitive properties of poly(amidoamine) dendrimers with peripheral phenylalanine residues. Langmuir 2006, 22, 4920–4922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tamaki, M.; Kojima, C. pH-Switchable LCST/UCST-type thermosensitive behaviors of phenylalanine-modified zwitterionic dendrimers. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 10452–10460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Shiba, H.; Nishio, M.; Sawada, M.; Tamaki, M.; Michigami, M.; Nakai, S.; Nakase, I.; Fujii, I.; Matsumoto, A.; Kojima, C. Carboxy-terminal dendrimers with phenylalanine for pH-sensitive delivery system into immune cells including T cells. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 10, 2463–2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Socrates, G. Infrared and Raman Characteristic Group Frequencies: Tables and Charts, 3rd ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  30. Williams, R. pKa Data Compiled by R. Williams. Available online: https://organicchemistrydata.org/hansreich/resources/pka/pka_data/pka-compilation-williams.pdf (accessed on 7 April 2022).
  31. Melander, W.; Horváth, C. Salt effects on hydrophobic interactions in precipitation and chromatography of proteins: An interpretation of the lyotropic series. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1977, 183, 200–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 14 02426 g001 550
Figure 1. Dendrimer structures of PAMAM-Phe-Suc, PAMAM-Phe-CHex and PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na.
Figure 1. Dendrimer structures of PAMAM-Phe-Suc, PAMAM-Phe-CHex and PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na.
Polymers 14 02426 g001
Polymers 14 02426 g002 550
Figure 2. Synthetic scheme of PAMAM-Phe-CHex and PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na.
Figure 2. Synthetic scheme of PAMAM-Phe-CHex and PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na.
Polymers 14 02426 g002
Polymers 14 02426 g003 550
Figure 3. Temperature-dependent transmittance curves of aqueous solutions containing carboxylate-terminal Phe-modified dendrimer with different Phe/PAMAM ratios and different terminal groups at different pH values (1 mg/mL). (A) PAMAM-Phe56-Suc was referred to our previous paper [27]. (B) PAMAM-Phe-64-CHex, (C) PAMAM-Phe46-CHex, (D) PAMAM-Phe35-CHex, (E) PAMAM-Phe27-CHex, and (F) PAMAM-Phe16-CHex.
Figure 3. Temperature-dependent transmittance curves of aqueous solutions containing carboxylate-terminal Phe-modified dendrimer with different Phe/PAMAM ratios and different terminal groups at different pH values (1 mg/mL). (A) PAMAM-Phe56-Suc was referred to our previous paper [27]. (B) PAMAM-Phe-64-CHex, (C) PAMAM-Phe46-CHex, (D) PAMAM-Phe35-CHex, (E) PAMAM-Phe27-CHex, and (F) PAMAM-Phe16-CHex.
Polymers 14 02426 g003
Polymers 14 02426 g004 550
Figure 4. Temperature-dependent transmittance curves of aqueous solutions containing PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na with different Phe/PAMAM ratios at different pH values (1 mg/mL). (A) PAMAM-Phe57-SO3Na64, (B) PAMAM-Phe37-SO3Na68, (C) PAMAM-Phe27-SO3Na61, and (D) PAMAM-Phe16-SO3Na62.
Figure 4. Temperature-dependent transmittance curves of aqueous solutions containing PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na with different Phe/PAMAM ratios at different pH values (1 mg/mL). (A) PAMAM-Phe57-SO3Na64, (B) PAMAM-Phe37-SO3Na68, (C) PAMAM-Phe27-SO3Na61, and (D) PAMAM-Phe16-SO3Na62.
Polymers 14 02426 g004
Polymers 14 02426 g005 550
Figure 5. Possible phase transition mechanisms of PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na.
Figure 5. Possible phase transition mechanisms of PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na.
Polymers 14 02426 g005
Table
Table 1. List of synthesized dendrimers in this study.
Table 1. List of synthesized dendrimers in this study.
Dendrimer 1PheSuc/CHex/SO3NaThermo-
Sensitivity
In FeedBoundBound
PAMAM-Phe-Suc 2965657LCST/UCST
PAMAM-Phe64-CHex966462UCST
PAMAM-Phe46-CHex6246~64UCST
PAMAM-Phe35-CHex4635~64UCST
PAMAM-Phe27-CHex382762LCST/UCST
PAMAM-Phe16-CHex2716~64LCST/UCST
PAMAM-Phe57-SO3Na64 2965764LCST/UCST
PAMAM-Phe37-SO3Na68493768LCST/UCST
PAMAM-Phe27-SO3Na61382761LCST/UCST
PAMAM-Phe16-SO3Na62271662UCST
1 The number of terminal groups in the dendrimer is 64. 2 Referred to our previous reports [27,28].
Table
Table 2. pH-switchable thermosensitive behavior of PAMAM-Phe-CHex at different pH values 1.
Table 2. pH-switchable thermosensitive behavior of PAMAM-Phe-CHex at different pH values 1.
DendrimerTemperature (°C)
pH 7pH 5pH 4.5pH 4
PAMAM-Phe64-CHex60 (U)TurbidTurbidSlightly
turbid
PAMAM-Phe46-CHex46 (U)>80 (U)TurbidSlightly
turbid
PAMAM-Phe35-CHex<20 (U)>80 (U)TurbidSlightly
turbid
PAMAM-Phe27-CHexClearTurbid32 (L)Clear
PAMAM-Phe16-CHexClear>80 (U)68 (L)Clear
1 Phase transition temperatures (UCST and LCST) were estimated as the temperatures with 50% transmittance, which are shown as (U) and (L), respectively.
Table
Table 3. pH-switchable thermosensitive behavior of PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na at different pH values 1.
Table 3. pH-switchable thermosensitive behavior of PAMAM-Phe-SO3Na at different pH values 1.
DendrimerTemperature (°C)
pH 6.5pH 6pH 5.5pH 5pH 4
PAMAM-Phe57-SO3Na6436 (U)68 (U)24 (L)/50 (L)Clear
68 (U)
PAMAM-Phe37-SO3Na68Clear38 (U)62 (U)25 (L)/Clear
76 (U)
PAMAM-Phe27-SO3Na61Clear37 (U)55 (U)21 (L)/Clear
>80 (U)
PAMAM-Phe16-SO3Na62ClearClear38 (U)44 (U)Clear
1 Phase transition temperatures (UCST and LCST) were estimated as the temperatures with 50% transmittance, which are shown as (U) and (L), respectively.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kojima, C.; Fu, Y.; Tamaki, M. Control of Stimuli Sensitivity in pH-Switchable LCST/UCST-Type Thermosensitive Dendrimers by Changing the Dendrimer Structure. Polymers 2022, 14, 2426. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122426

AMA Style

Kojima C, Fu Y, Tamaki M. Control of Stimuli Sensitivity in pH-Switchable LCST/UCST-Type Thermosensitive Dendrimers by Changing the Dendrimer Structure. Polymers. 2022; 14(12):2426. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122426

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kojima, Chie, Yunshen Fu, and Mamiko Tamaki. 2022. "Control of Stimuli Sensitivity in pH-Switchable LCST/UCST-Type Thermosensitive Dendrimers by Changing the Dendrimer Structure" Polymers 14, no. 12: 2426. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122426

APA Style

Kojima, C., Fu, Y., & Tamaki, M. (2022). Control of Stimuli Sensitivity in pH-Switchable LCST/UCST-Type Thermosensitive Dendrimers by Changing the Dendrimer Structure. Polymers, 14(12), 2426. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122426

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop