Next Article in Journal
Inflammation-Responsive Nanovalves of Polymer-Conjugated Dextran on a Hole Array of Silicon Substrate for Controlled Antibiotic Release
Previous Article in Journal
Loading and Release of Phenolic Compounds Present in Mexican Oregano (Lippia graveolens) in Different Chitosan Bio-Polymeric Cationic Matrixes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 14
Issue 17
10.3390/polym14173612
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis, Characterization and Catalytic Property Studies for Isoprene Polymerization of Iron Complexes Bearing Unionized Pyridine-Oxime Ligands

by
Mengmeng Zhao
1,2,
Ying Ma
3,
Xianhui Zhang
3,
Liang Wang
2,
Guangqian Zhu
2 and
Qinggang Wang
2,*
1
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Linyi University, Linyi 276000, China
2
Key Laboratory of Biobased Materials, Qingdao Institute of Biomass Energy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266000, China
3
Key Laboratory of Structure & Materials for Aviation Tire, CHEMCHINA Shuguang Rubber Industry Research & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Guilin 541000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(17), 3612; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14173612
Submission received: 14 July 2022 / Revised: 26 August 2022 / Accepted: 27 August 2022 / Published: 1 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Analysis and Characterization)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Iron complexes of the types [Fe(HL)2Cl2] (Fe1: HL1 = pyridine-2-aldoxime; Fe2: HL2 = 6-methylpyridine-2-aldoxime; Fe3: HL3 = phenyl-2-pyridylketoxime; Fe4: HL4 = picolinaldehyde O-methyl oxime) were prepared and characterized by elemental analysis and IR spectroscopy. The crystal structure of Fe2, determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, featured a distorted octahedral coordination of the iron center binding with two ligands of HL2. The X-ray structure and infrared spectral data indicated that pyridine-oxime ligands act as unionized bidentate ligand by coordinating with Npyridine and Noxime. The catalytic performance for isoprene polymerization, catalyzed by these pyridine-oxime-ligated iron complexes, was examined. For a binary catalytic system combined with MAO, complexes Fe1, Fe3 and Fe4 were found to be highly active (up to 6.5 × 106 g/mol·h) in cis-1,4-alt-3,4 enchained polymerization, with average molecular weights in the range of 60–653 kg/mol and narrow PDI values of 1.7–3.5, even with very low amounts of MAO (Al/Fe = 5). Upon activation with [Ph3C][B(C6F5)4]/AlR3 for the ternary catalytic system, theses complexes showed extremely high activities, as well about 98% yield after 2 min, to afford cis-1,4-alt-3,4-polyisoprene with a molecular weight of 140–420 kg/mol.

1. Introduction

The catalytic polymerization of conjugated dienes is one of the most promising methods for manufacturing synthetic rubber to make up for the deficiency of natural rubber. From a mechanistic point of view, 1,3-dienes can be polymerized in different ways, such as radical [1], cationic [2], or coordination polymerization [3,4], all yielding polymers with diverse structures and properties. Notably, coordination polymerization catalyzed by a transition metal has attracted much attention since the discovery of Ziegler-Natta catalysts in the 1950s [5,6,7]. From the early-1960s onwards, lanthanide metal-catalyzed polymerization of conjugated dienes came to be the focus of fundamental research [8]. Later, in 1995, Brookhart and coworkers applied cationic Ni and Pd complexes with bulky diimine ligands as new catalysts, marking a milestone in the research of olefin polymerization catalyzed by late transition metals [9]. On the basis of the good performance in terms of strength, flexibility and easy processing, recent progress in diene polymerization catalyzed by early transition metal complexes [8,9,10], rare earth complexes [11,12,13,14], and late transition metal complexes [15,16,17], has made it possible to tailor various properties of rubbers according to the type of catalyst used.
Catalysts using late transition metals are promising for 1,3-diene polymerization. Historically, iron, as an abundant, first-row, late transition metal, has attracted much less attention than Ni, Co and Pd compounds, despite the fact that it is less toxic and more sustainable than other metals. Early research on the iron-catalyzed polymerization of conjugated diene focused on (1) the addition of some nitrogenous or phosphorous compounds to stabilize the iron ions and improve the activity and selectivity, and (2) on the catalytic mechanism of these coordinating compounds [18,19,20,21]. Various well-defined iron complexes coordinated with bidentate or tridentate ligands, e.g., pyridine, imine, pyrazole, oxazoline, and phosphine moieties, etc. (Figure 1), have been systematically explored in olefin polymerization and have exhibited high levels of activity and the ability to control the molecular weight and molecular weight distribution of the resultant polymers [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. As part of our work developing iron-based catalysts for isoprene polymerization, various pyridine-imine and pyridine-amine iron complexes have been applied to the polymerization of conjugated dienes to probe the ligand effects [34,35,36,37,38,39]. Therefore, the discovery of a novel catalytic system—with diverse steric hindrance and electronic circumstances that affect the activity and selectivity of isoprene polymerization—is particularly significant. Presently, we are trying to identify suitable ligands with different structures toward the iron center.
Pyridine-oxime compounds are important organic ligands with unique coordination abilities and various coordination modes. They can be obtained from the Schiff base condensation of pyridine-2-aldehyde or ketone with hydroxylamine. Metal complexes chelating with pyridine-oxime ligands have long been attracted attention as bioinorganic model compounds and molecule-based magnetic materials [40,41]. However, the catalytic applications of these complexes have rarely been explored, especially in the field of olefin polymerization [42,43]. Here, we report the synthesis, structures, and activities of pyridine-oxime-ligated mononuclear iron complexes and investigate the novel catalytic performance in an iron-catalyzed isoprene polymerization process in which pyridine-oxime is used as a neutral ligand. Additionally, the function of the H atom in oxime is determined by replacing it with a methyl group. Furthermore, we investigated isoprene polymerization with Fe/Al binary and Fe/Al/[Ph3C][B(C6F5)4] ternary catalytic systems, respectively, to demonstrate the wide application potential of these pyridine-oxime-ligated iron complexes.

2. Materials & Methods

2.1. Materials

All experiments were carried out under argon atmosphere. FeCl2, L1, L3, 2-pyridinecarboxaldehyde, 6-methylpicolinaldehyde, hydroxylamine hydrochloride, methoxyamine hydrochloride and cocatalysts were purchased. Toluene was refluxed and distilled over sodium and stored over molecular sieves under nitrogen. Hexane, dichloromethane and isoprene were refluxed and distilled over calcium hydride and stored over molecular sieves under nitrogen. The molecular weights (Mn) and molecular weight distributions (Mw/Mn) of polymers were measured by high temperature gel permeation chromatography (GPC) using a PL-GPC 220 chromatography and maintained at 150 °C, using trichlorobenzene as an eluent and polystyrene as a standard. The NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker Advance 400 spectrometer at 298 K. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of polyisoprene were recorded in CDCl3 and trimethylsilane as an internal reference. The polyisoprene microstructure of the 1,4 and 3,4 ratio was determined from 1H NMR of the 1,4 =CH signals at 5.15 ppm and the 3,4 =CH2 signal at 4.7 ppm. The trans/cis-1,4 stereoisomer ratio was determined from 13C NMR of the –CH3 signals of cis-1,4 at 23.8 ppm and trans-1,4 at 16.3 ppm. The mass spectra for iron complexes were detected using an ACQUITYTM UPLC & Q-TOF MS Premier. Elemental analyses were performed using a Vario EL III elemental analyzer. X-ray diffraction data were obtained using a Smart 1000 diffractometer with a Mo K-alpha X-ray source (λ = 0.71073 Å) at 298 K. Attenuated total reflection-infrared (ATR-IR) spectroscopy was conducted using a Thermo Scientific Nicolet iN10.

2.2. Preparation of Ligands L2 and L4

Ligand L2 was prepared using a procedure reported in [44] with a little change. Briefly, to a suspension of 6-methylpicolinaldehyde (2.0 g, 16.51 mmol) in MeOH (40 mL) was added hydroxylamine hydrochloride (1.15 g, 16.51 mmol) followed by Na2CO3 (0.97 g, 9.08 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h. Then, the orange suspension was filtered and the solid was dissolved in ethyl acetate (40 mL). The solution was transferred to a separatory funnel, washed in water (3 × 20 mL), and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was removed in a rotary evaporator and the product was dried under vacuum. The compound was characterized as follows: a yellow solid, 1.9 g, 84% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K) δ 8.28–8.25 (m, 2H), 7.64–7.55 (m, 2H), 7.15 (dd, J = 8.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 2.59 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K) δ 158.5, 151.0, 150.9, 136.8, 123.8, 118.2, 24.3.
Ligand L4 was prepared similarly to ligand L2, i.e., by blending 2-pyridinecarboxaldehyde (5.30 g, 49.48 mmol) and methoxyamine hydrochloride (4.13 g, 49.48 mmol) in methanol (60 mL), followed by the addition of Na2CO3 (2.91 g, 27.24 mmol). The compound was characterized as follows: light yellow oil, 5.8 g, 86% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K) δ 8.61–8.59 (m, 1H), 8.15 (s, 1H), 7.77 (dt, J = 8.0, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (td, J = 7.7, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (ddd, J = 15.6, 8.0, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 4.02 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K) δ 151.5, 149.6, 149.0, 136.3, 123.9, 121.0, 62.4.

2.3. Preparation of Complexes Fe1–Fe4

Ligand (L1–L4) (2.0 equiv.) and FeCl2 (1.0 equiv.) were added to anhydrous dichloromethane (10 mL) in a glovebox. The reaction mixture was stirred for 15 h at room temperature. Then, the solvent was concentrated to 2 mL and hexane (5 mL) was added, resulting in precipitation which was collected by filtration, washed with hexane (3 × 5 mL) and dried under vacuum to give the corresponding complex.
dichloro[pyridine-2-aldoxime]iron(II) Fe1 [45]: Claret-red solid, 229 mg, 78% yield. ATR-IR (cm−1): 3360, 2744, 1605, 1515, 1460, 1046, 885, 768. TOF-MS-ES+ (m/z): calcd. for [C12H12ClFeN4O2]+: 334.9998, found: 335.0007. Anal.: calcd. For C12H12Cl2FeN4O2: C, 38.85; H, 3.26; N, 15.10; found: C, 37.61; H, 3.26; N, 14.35.
dichloro[6-methylpyridine-2-aldoxime]iron(II) Fe2 [45]: Orange solid, 421 mg, 87% yield. ATR-IR (cm−1): 3072, 3003, 1650, 1600, 1491, 1320, 1031, 1006, 798. TOF-MS-ES+ (m/z): calcd. for [C18H21FeN6O2]+: 409.1075, found: 409.1614. Anal.: calcd. For C14H16Cl2FeN4O2: C, 42.14; H, 4.04; N, 14.04; found: C, 42.02; H, 4.01; N, 13.93.
dichloro[phenyl-2-pyridylketoxime] iron(II) Fe3 [46]: Dark brown solid, 352 mg, 85% yield. ATR-IR (cm−1): 3064, 1598, 1459, 1441, 1338, 1048, 1024, 957, 790, 747, 701. TOF-MS-ES+ (m/z): calcd. for [C36H29FeN6O3]+: 649.1651, found: 649.1646. Anal.: calcd. For C24H20Cl2FeN4O2: C, 55.10; H, 3.85; N, 10.71; found: C, 54.59; H, 3.94; N, 10.62.
dichloro[picolinaldehyde O-methyl oxime]iron(II) Fe4: Rufous solid, 275 mg, 87% yield. ATR-IR (cm−1): 2972, 1609, 1588, 1476, 1461, 1154, 1050, 946, 866, 785, 776. TOF-MS-ES+ (m/z): calcd. for [C14H16ClFeN4O2]+: 363.0311, found: 363.0292. Anal.: calcd. For C14H16Cl2FeN4O2: C, 42.14; H, 4.04; N, 14.04; found: C, 39.76; H, 3.84; N, 13.32.

2.4. Polymerization Procedure

Binary component-catalyzed polymerization: The iron complex was weighed in a glove box and transferred to a dried Schlenk tube (25 mL). Under argon, the quantitative solvent, isoprene, and the aluminum reagent were added. At the end of the reaction, HCl solution in methanol (methanol/HCl = 50/1) was added to quench the polymerization, and the mixture was poured into a large volume of methanol with 2,6-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-methylphenol as a stabilizing agent. The solid was collected and washed several times with methanol before being dried under vacuum at 50 °C for 15 h. The polymer yield was determined by gravimetry.
Ternary component-catalyzed polymerization: The iron complex was weighed in glove box and transferred to a dried Schlenk tube (25 mL). Under argon, the quantitative solvent and isoprene were added. Following that, a solution of [Ph3C][B(C6F5)4] in toluene (1.0 equiv. to iron catalyst) and cocatalyst were added. At the end of the reaction, HCl solution in methanol (methanol/HCl = 50/1) was added to quench the polymerization, and the mixture was poured into a large volume of methanol containing 2,6-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-methylphenol as a stabilizing agent. The solid was collected and washed several times with methanol before being dried under vacuum at 50 °C for 15 h. The polymer yield was determined by gravimetry.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Ligands L2, L4 and Fe(II) Complexes

Following the reported procedure, ligands L2 and L4 were prepared by Schiff base condensation and were characterized by NMR and IR. Ligands L1 and L3 were used as received. After that, the former ligands were treated with FeCl2 in methylene dichloride at room temperature to afford various of pyridine-oxime-ligated iron(II) complexes which were characterized by IR, high resolution mass spectroscopies and elemental analysis (Scheme 1). The IR spectra showed a shift in the characteristic v(C=N) bands (1650–1604 cm−1) of the iron complexes toward higher wave numbers than the v(C=N) bands (1586–1593 cm−1) observed for the corresponding free ligands, an indication of the coordination of ligands to the iron center. Krause et al. [47] postulated that transition metal complexes bearing pyridine-2-aldoxime and containing unionized oxime proton have v(CH=N) bands in the range of 1654–1614 cm−1 and v(N-O) bands in the range of 1069–1036 cm−1, respectively. Furthermore, the v(OH) stretching frequency of metal complexes with unionized oxime proton displayed multiple bands between 3194 and 2791 cm−1, instead of the broad band at 3250 cm−1 of v(OH) observed with free ligands [48]. Therefore, similar to Krause’s findings, these IR data for present iron complexes (Fe1–Fe3) showed that oxime protons are unionized (Figure S1).
In order to demonstrate the bonding and coordinating mode, a monocrystal of Fe2 that would be suitable for X-ray diffraction was grown by the slow diffusion of hexane into a dichloromethane solution at −30 °C in glovebox (The detailed data were displayed in Tables S1–S3). The molecular structure with selected bond distances and angles is described in Figure 2 (CCDC number: 2160530). These data also demonstrate the existence of two unionized oxime protons. The structure of Fe2 consists of two ligands and two chloride atoms and adopts a distorted octahedron geometry in which two Noxime atoms occupy the apical position [N(2)1-Fe-N(2) = 175.2(2)] and N(1)pyridine, N(1)1pyridine, Cl(1) and Cl(1)1 atoms form the basal equatorial plane. Interestingly, the coordination environments of the two ligands were exactly same and the bond lengths of each Fe-Npyridine, Fe-Noxime and Fe-Cl were identical [Fe-N(1) = Fe-N(1)1 = 2.283(5), Fe-N(2) = Fe(1)-N(2)1 = 2.159(4), Fe-Cl(1) = Fe-Cl(1)1 = 2.4871(16)]. It is worth noting that the protons on Ooxime atoms point toward the chloride atoms, indicating the presence of hydrogen bonds; these results were similar to those for Ni complexes bearing pyridine-oxime ligands, as reported by Mukherjee [42]. The bond lengths of Noxime-O [1.397(5) Å] are closer to those of a free oxime ligand (1.4 Å), and the bond angles of C=Noxime-O [115.3(4)°] match well with the reported complexes [47,48]. To further study the electronic properties of the iron center, the 57Fe Mössbauer spectrum of complex Fe1 was collected at 90 K, as displayed in Figure S2. However, three quadrupole doublets were noticed for the solid samples, which clearly indicated that the sample was composed of high-spin low-spin states.

3.2. Isoprene Polymerization with Binary Catalytic System

As shown in Table 1, iron complexes Fe1–Fe4 were investigated for isoprene polymerization combined with methylaluminoxane (MAO) in toluene. They showed medium-to-high activities at room temperature. In addition, the GPC analyses of polymers catalyzed by all iron complexes showed unimodal and narrow distributions (1.8–3.5), proving the occurrence of typical single site catalysis (Figure 3A). Complexes Fe1, Fe3 and Fe4 revealed relatively high activities (8.2 × 105 g/mol·h) with about 50% of cis-1,4-selectivity, and high molecular weight polymers were obtained (Table 1, entries 1, 5, 6). However, complex Fe2, bearing one 6-methyl substituent at the pyridine group, showed lower activity because of steric hindrance. Notably, 98% conversion could be achieved in 5 h via catalysis with Fe2 (Table 1, entry 4). Interestingly, the substituent at 6-position of pyridine also slightly affected the selectivity to produce some trans-1,4-polyisoprene; the trans-1,4-unit gradually increased with an increase in the conversion rate. We attributed the variation in trans-1,4-selectivity to the steric effect of the progressively larger polymer chains. Likewise, the PDI of polyisoprene obtained with complex Fe2 increased as the reaction time lengthened, albeit with decreasing molecular weight, suggesting fast chain transfer due to the large amount of MAO that was present (Figure 3B).
Subsequently, the effects of the reaction parameters on catalytic performance, e.g., the amount of MAO and reaction temperature, were systematically studied using Fe1 and Fe4. The results are summarized in Table 2. For precatalyst Fe1, the catalytic activities remained largely unchanged as the [Al]/[Fe] ratio decreased from 500 to 50, resulting in around a 91% yield after 10 min when the [Al]/[Fe] ratio was 50 (Table 2, entry 3). However, the catalytic activities went down by decreasing the [Al]/[Fe] amount to 10, whereby a 54% yield of polyisoprene in 10 min was obtained (Table 2, entry 4) and a 98% yield by prolonging the reaction time to 1 h (Table 2, entry 5). Fortunately, even if the amount of MAO was reduced to 0.05 mmol, polymerization could still be carried out with 92% yield in 120 min (Table 2, entry 7), indicating the excellent catalytic properties of complex Fe1 with a low amount of cocatalyst. It was interesting to note that reducing the [Al]/[Fe] ratio from 500 to 10 led to a decrease in the polymer molecular weight, probably due to the stability of the catalyst transition state maintaining chain propagation rather than causing chain termination/transfer in the presence of excessive MAO (Figure 3C). Variation of the [Al]/[Fe] ratio did not have obvious effects on the molecular weight distribution or polymerization selectivity. Furthermore, in order to study the role of oxime hydroxyl groups, complex Fe4 was synthesized and catalytic isoprene polymerization was conducted. The results showed that complex Fe4 possessed higher catalytic activities than Fe1; this was ascribed to the electron-donating properties of the oxime methoxyl groups, which facilitated isoprene coordination to the Fe center. For example, when reactions were quenched after 1 min under the same conditions with an [Al]/[Fe] ratio of 100, complex Fe4 (Table 2, entry 9) exhibited the highest activity, i.e., 6.5 × 106, compared to precatalyst Fe1, with 4.8 × 106 (Table 2, entry 2). These results may also indicate that there was an induction period of Fe1 to destroy hydrogen bonds between oxime hydroxyl groups and chloride atoms. To continue the comparison, temperature dependence tests were conducted with complexes Fe1 and Fe4. When the polymerization temperature was −30 °C, the catalyst systems of Fe1 (Table 2, entry 13) and Fe4 (Table 2, entry 15) maintained high levels of activity with only marginal decrease. For catalyst Fe1, the cis-1,4-unit was better-suited to the low temperature, i.e., from 47% at 25 °C to 62% at −30 °C. Meanwhile, a high temperature slightly elevated the 3,4-structure (Table 2, entry 14). However, the high-temperature resistance of complex Fe4 was lower than that of the former, and the polymer yield decreased to 74% at 70 °C (Table 2, entry 16), indicating low thermal stability. Upon expanding the application of this new catalyst, polymerization was catalyzed by complex Fe1 with [Fe]/[Ip]/[MAO] = 1/20000/500 to achieve an 85% yield of polyisoprene in 2 h (Table 2, entry 17).

3.3. Isoprene Polymerization with Ternary Catalytic System

The catalytic performance of a ternary catalytic system using Fe1–Fe4, together with [Ph3C][B(C6F5)4] and trialkylaluminium, is summarized in Table 3. The polymerization results showed that the substituent at the 6-position of pyridine group also significantly affected activity and selectivity of isoprene polymerization because of the crowded iron center. In the case of complex Fe2, when AlEt3 was used as a cocatalyst, no polyisoprene was produced (Table 3, entry 3), and a fairly low yield was obtained by activating with Al(i-Bu)3 (Table 3, entry 4). Free 6-substitute catalysts (Fe1, Fe3 and Fe4) showed higher activity than complex Fe2 or previously reported imine ligated iron catalysts [31,35], regardless of cocatalyst type. Interestingly, when the Ph-substituent was added at the C=N position, complex Fe3 showed the highest activity, i.e., up to 4.0 × 106 g/mol·h (Table 3, entry 5). This may have been due to the steric effect of phenyl accelerating dealkylation by [Ph3C][B(C6F5)4]. In addition, it was clearly seen that the pyridine-oxime-ligated Fe1 had big advantages in terms of these activities over complex Fe4, further emphasizing the particularity of oxime hydroxyl group. Otherwise, the ternary catalytic system provided polyisoprene with higher PDI than the binary one, but possessed similar selectivity and molecular weight. The results of previous works on iron-catalyzed isoprene polymerization are compared with those presented in this work in Table S4. Notably, the pyridine-oxime-ligated iron complexes showed higher activities in a ternary catalytic system.

4. Conclusions

Iron complexes chelated with bidentate pyridine-oxime ligands were developed and examined for use in isoprene polymerization. For the binary catalytic system activated by MAO, the iron catalysts exhibited activities up to 6.5 × 106 g/mol·h, and produced polyisoprene with high molecular weight (0.6–6.5 × 105 g/mol) and narrow PDI (1.7–3.5), even at very low temperatures. The catalytic performance of precatalysts Fe1–Fe4 was further studied by combing with [Ph3C][B(C6F5)4] and trialkylaluminium, yielding polymers at up to 98% yield in 2 min and suggesting the high catalytic capacity of these compounds. Steric influences on the catalytic activity and selectivity of complex Fe2 were also clearly represented both in the binary and ternary catalytic methods. Moreover, these Fe complexes demonstrated high thermal stability regarding both activity and molecular weight. In summary, the newly developed, unionized, pyridine-oxime-ligated iron complexes are very promising compounds for isoprene polymerization applications. The development of other metal complexes suitable for pyridine-oxime ligand-catalyzed olefin polymerization is ongoing.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym14173612/s1, Figure S1: FTIR data for ligands L1–L4 and complexes Fe1–Fe4; Figure S2: Mössbauer spectrum of complex Fe1; Table S1: Crystal data and structure refinement for complex Fe2; Table S2: Bond lengths for complex Fe2; Table S3: Selected bond angles for complex Fe3; Table S4: Comparison of previous works and this work.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Methodology, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing—Original Draft Preparation, M.Z.; Funding Acquisition, Y.M.; Funding Acquisition, X.Z.; Investigation, Writing—Review & Editing, L.W.; Investigation, Visualization, G.Z.; Supervision, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition, Q.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Linyi University (LYDX2020BS012), Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province (tsqn201812112), the Scientific Research and Innovation Fund Project of Shandong Energy Research Institute (SEI S202101) and Guangxi Science and Technology Project (Grant No. AB21196038; Talent No. AD21238015).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Moad, G. Reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (co)polymerization of conjugated diene monomers: Butadiene, isoprene and chloroprene. Polym. Int. 2017, 66, 26–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ouardad, S.; Bakleh, M.-E.; Kostjuk, S.V.; Ganachaud, F.; Puskas, J.E.; Deffieux, A.; Peruch, F. Bio-inspired cationic polymerization of isoprene and analogues: State-of-the-art. Polym. Int. 2012, 61, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Osakada, K.; Takeuchi, D. Coordination polymerization of dienes, allenes, and methylenecycloalkanes. Polym. Syn. 2004, 171, 137–194. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhu, G.Q.; Wang, L.; Kuang, J.; Xu, G.Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Q.G. High double bond content of polyisoprene synthesis via cationic polymerization synergistically catalyzed by Tf2NH-ionic liquids. Macromolecules 2021, 54, 6109–6116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Thiele, S.K.H.; Wilson, D.R. Alternate transition metal complex based diene polymerization. J. Macromol. Sci.-Pol. Rev. 2003, C43, 581–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tinyakova, E.I.; Yakovlev, V.A. New aspects of stereospecific polymerization of butadiene and isoprene with coordination catalysts. Polym. Sci. Ser. B 2003, 45, 219–236. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ricci, G.; Sommazzi, A.; Masi, F.; Ricci, M.; Boglia, A.; Leone, G. Well-defined transition metal complexes with phosphorus and nitrogen ligands for 1,3-dienes polymerization. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2010, 254, 661–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gong, D.R.; Jia, X.Y.; Wang, B.L.; Zhang, X.Q.; Huang, K.-W. Trans-1,4 selective polymerization of 1,3-butadiene with symmetry pincer chromium complexes activated by MMAO. J. Organomet. Chem. 2014, 766, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Faisca Phillips, A.M.; Suo, H.Y.; Guedes da Silva, M.d.F.C.; Pombeiro, A.J.L.; Sun, W.-H. Recent developments in vanadium-catalyzed olefin coordination polymerization. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2020, 416, 213332–213360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, J.-Y.; Jiang, M.-H.; Dong, K.-X.; He, A.-H. Species on the activated TiCl4/MgCl2 pre-catalyst for diene polymerizations. Catal. Lett. 2021, 152, 2543–2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Friebe, L.; Nuyken, O.; Obrecht, W. Neodymium-based Ziegler/Natta catalysts and their application in diene polymerization. Adv. Polym. Sci. 2006, 204, 1–154. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhu, H.; Zuo, X.L.; Zhang, S.; Ma, X.L.; Liu, Y.F.; Wu, Y.X. Progress in rare earth catalysts and their use in the synthesis of rubber and elastomer. Polym. Bull. 2014, 5, 65–87. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pan, Y.; Cai, Y.C.; Song, D.Y.; He, G.H. Development of rare earth metal catalyst systems for cis-1,4-polymerization of 1,3-conjugated dienes. Chin. Rare Earths 2016, 37, 100–107. [Google Scholar]
  14. Huang, J.M.; Liu, Z.H.; Cui, D.M.; Liu, X.L. Precisely controlled polymerization of styrene and conjugated dienes by group 3 single-site catalysts. Chemcatchem 2018, 10, 42–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Takeuchi, D.; Osakada, K. New polymerization of dienes and related monomers catalyzed by late transition metal complexes. Polymer 2008, 49, 4911–4924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ricci, G.; Pampaloni, G.; Sommazzi, A.; Masi, F. Dienes polymerization: Where we are and what lies ahead. Macromolecules 2021, 54, 5879–5914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, L.J.; Wang, F.; Zhang, C.Y.; Liu, H.; Wu, G.F.; Zhang, X.Q. Thermally robust alpha-diimine nickel and cobalt complexes for cis-1,4 selective 1,3-butadiene polymerizations. Mol. Catal. 2022, 517, 112044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bi, J.F.; Ge, J.N.; Zhang, X.Q. Isoprene polymerization behaviors by using Fe(2-EHA)3/Al(i-Bu)3/AIBN catalyst system. J. Nat. Sci. Heilongjiang Univ. 2011, 28, 690–695. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hu, Y.M.; Dong, W.M.; Jiang, L.S.; Zhang, X.Q. Polymerization of isoprene using an iron-based catalyst with diethyl phosphate as third component. Chin. Synth. Rubber Ind. 2004, 27, 344–347. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shen, Q.; Guo, X.G.; Xu, X.L.; Liu, G.Z. A novel high active novel iron catalyst Fe(naph)2-Al(i-Bu)3-halides for polymerization of butadiene. Chin. Sci. Bull. 1988, 12, 988–990. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, F.J.; Liu, G.Z.; Qian, B.G. Studies on the polymerization of butadiene in the presence of iron catalyst VI. Effects of nitrogen-containing ligands on the polymerization and the microstructure of polymer. Chin. J. Appl. Chem. 1988, 5, 15–20. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. Bazzini, C.; Giarrusso, A.; Porri, L. Diethyl bis(2,2′-bipyridine) iron/MAO. A very active and stereospecific catalyst for 1, 3-diene polymerization. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2002, 23, 922–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ricci, G.; Morganti, D.; Sommazzi, A.; Santi, R.; Masi, F. Polymerization of 1,3-dienes with iron complexes based catalysts. Influence of the ligand on catalyst activity and stereospecificity. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2003, 204, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bazzini, C.; Giarrusso, A.; Porri, L.; Pirozzi, B.; Napolitano, R. Synthesis and characterization of syndiotactic 3, 4-polyisoprene prepared with diethylbis (2,2′-bipyridine) iron–MAO. Polymer 2004, 45, 2871–2875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pirozzi, B.; Napolitano, R.; Petraccone, V.; Esposito, S. Determination of the crystal structure of syndiotactic 3,4-poly (2-methyl-1,3-butadiene) by molecular mechanics and X-Ray diffraction. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2004, 205, 1343–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nakayama, Y.; Baba, Y.; Yasuda, H.; Kawakita, K.; Ueyama, N. Stereospecific polymerizations of conjugated dienes by single site iron complexes having chelating N,N,N-donor ligands. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 7953–7958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gong, D.R.; Wang, B.L.; Bai, C.X.; Bi, J.F.; Wang, F.; Dong, W.M.; Zhang, X.Q.; Jiang, L.S. Metal dependent control of cis-1,4/trans-1,4 regioselectivity in 1,3-butadiene polymerization catalyzed by transition metal complexes supported by 2,6-bis[1-(iminophenyl)ethyl]pyridine. Polymer 2009, 50, 6259–6264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, B.L.; Bi, J.F.; Zhang, C.Y.; Dai, Q.; Bai, C.X.; Zhang, X.Q.; Hu, Y.M.; Jiang, L.S. Highly active and trans-1,4 specific polymerization of 1,3-butadiene catalyzed by 2-pyrazolyl substituted 1,10-phenanthroline ligated iron (II) complexes. Polymer 2013, 54, 5174–5181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, J.S.; Gao, W.; Lang, X.M.; Wu, Q.L.; Zhang, L.; Mu, Y. Ni(II) and Fe(II) complexes based on bis(imino)aryl pincer ligands: Synthesis, structural characterization and catalytic activities. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 9639–9645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gong, D.R.; Jia, X.Y.; Wang, B.L.; Zhang, X.Q.; Jiang, L.S. Synthesis, characterization, and butadiene polymerization of iron(III), iron(II) and cobalt(II) chlorides bearing 2,6-bis(benzimidazolyl)pyridyl or 2,6-bis(pyrazol)pyridine ligand. J. Organomet. Chem. 2012, 702, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Raynaud, J.; Wu, J.Y.; Ritter, T. Iron-catalyzed polymerization of isoprene and other 1,3-dienes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 11805–11808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Guo, L.H.; Jing, X.Y.; Xiong, S.Y.; Liu, W.J.; Liu, Y.L.; Liu, Z.; Chen, C.L. Influences of alkyl and aryl substituents on iminopyridine Fe(II)- and Co(II)-catalyzed isoprene polymerization. Polymers 2016, 8, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hashmi, O.H.; Champouret, Y.; Visseaux, M. Highly active iminopyridyl iron-based catalysts for the polymerization of isoprene. Molecules 2019, 24, 3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhu, G.Q.; Zhang, X.H.; Zhao, M.M.; Wang, L.; Jing, C.Y.; Wang, P.; Wang, X.W.; Wang, Q.G. Influences of fluorine substituents on iminopyridine Fe(II)- and Co(II)-catalyzed isoprene polymerization. Polymers 2018, 10, 934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang, X.H.; Zhu, G.Q.; Mahmood, Q.; Zhao, M.M.; Wang, L.; Jing, C.Y.; Wang, X.W.; Wang, Q.G. Iminoimidazole-based Co(II) and Fe(II) complexes: Syntheses, characterization, and catalytic behaviors for isoprene polymerization. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2019, 57, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhao, M.M.; Wang, L.; Mahmood, Q.; Jing, C.Y.; Zhu, G.Q.; Zhang, X.H.; Wang, X.W.; Wang, Q.G. Controlled isoprene polymerization mediated by iminopyridine-iron(II) acetylacetonate pre-catalysts. Appl. Organometal. Chem. 2019, 33, e4836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jing, C.Y.; Wang, L.; Mahmood, Q.; Zhao, M.M.; Zhu, G.Q.; Zhang, X.H.; Wang, X.W.; Wang, Q.G. Synthesis and characterization of aminopyridine iron(ii) chloride catalysts for isoprene polymerization: Sterically controlled monomer enchainment. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 7862–7874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jing, C.Y.; Wang, L.; Zhu, G.Q.; Hou, H.B.; Zhou, L.; Wang, Q.G. Enhancing thermal stability in aminopyridine iron(II)-catalyzed polymerization of conjugated dienes. Organometallics 2020, 39, 4019–4026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, L.; Wang, X.W.; Hou, H.B.; Zhu, G.Q.; Han, Z.Y.; Yang, W.Y.; Chen, X.Y.; Wang, Q.G. An unsymmetrical binuclear iminopyridine-iron complex and its catalytic isoprene polymerization. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 8846–8849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Weyhermüller, T.; Wagner, R.; Khanra, S.; Chaudhuri, P. A magneto structural study of linear NiII MnIII NiII, NiIICrIIINiII and triangular NiII3 species containing (pyridine-2-aldoximato)nickel(II) unit as a building block. Dalton Trans. 2005, 15, 2539–2546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Erdogan, D.A.; Özalp-Yaman, Ş. Novel Pt(II) complexes containing pyrrole oxime; synthesis, characterization and DNA binding studies. J. Mol. Struct. 2014, 1064, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mukherjee, S.; Patel, B.A.; Bhaduri, S. Selective ethylene oligomerization with nickel oxime complexes. Organometallics 2009, 28, 3074–3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tayade, K.N.; Mane, M.V.; Sen, S.; Murthy, C.N.; Tembe, G.L.; Pillai, S.M.; Vanka, K.; Mukherjee, S. A catalytic and DFT study of selective ethylene oligomerization by nickel(II) oxime-based complexes. J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem. 2013, 366, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tyagi, D.; Rai, R.K.; Mobin, S.M.; Singh, S.K. N-Substituted iminopyridine arene–Ruthenium complexes for the regioselective catalytic hydration of terminal alkynes. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2017, 6, 1647–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mohan, M.; Mittal, S.G.; Khera, H.C.; Srivastava, A.K. Transition metal chemistry of oxime containing ligands: Part III. Complexes of iron(II), cobalt(II), and nickel(II) with pyridine-2-aldoxime and 6-methylpyridine-2-aldoxime. Indian J. Chem. A 1977, 15, 696–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mohan, M.; Paramhans, B.D. Transition metal chemistry of oxime-containing ligands, part XIV. Iron (II) complexes of syn-phenyl-2-pyridylketoxime and syn-methyl-2-pyridylketoxime. Croat. Chem. Acta 1981, 54, 173–182. [Google Scholar]
  47. Krause, R.A.; Colthup, N.B.; Busch, N.B. Infrared spectra of complexes of 2-pyridinaldoxime. J. Phys. Chem. 1961, 65, 2216–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chaudhuri, P.; Weyhermüller, T.; Wagner, R.; Khanra, S.; Biswas, B.; Bothe, E.; Bill, E. Tridentate facial ligation of tris(pyridine-2-aldoximato)nickel(II) and tris(imidazole-2-aldoximato)nickel(II) to generate NiIIFeIIINiII, MnIIINiII, NiIINiII, and ZnIINiII and the electrooxidized MnIVNiII, NiIINiIII, and ZnIINiIII species:  A magnetostructural, electrochemical, and EPR spectroscopic study. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 9003–9016. [Google Scholar]
Polymers 14 03612 g001 550
Figure 1. Parts of ligands used in the iron-catalyzed polymerization of diene.
Figure 1. Parts of ligands used in the iron-catalyzed polymerization of diene.
Polymers 14 03612 g001
Polymers 14 03612 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthetic protocol for ligands and iron complexes.
Scheme 1. Synthetic protocol for ligands and iron complexes.
Polymers 14 03612 sch001
Polymers 14 03612 g002 550
Figure 2. Molecular structure of Fe2. Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (deg): Fe-N(1) = 2.283(5), Fe-N(1)1 = 2.283(5), Fe-N(2) = 2.159(4), Fe(1)-N(2)1 = 2.159(4), Fe-Cl(1) = 2.4871(16), Fe-Cl(1)1 = 2.4871(16), N(2)1-Fe-N(2) = 175.2(2), N(1)-Fe-Cl(1)1 = 157.41(11), N(1)1-Fe-Cl(1) = 157.41(11), N(2)-Fe-N(1)1 = 109.70(16), N(2)1-Fe-N(1) = 109.70(16), N(2)1-Fe-N(1)1 = 73.66(16), N(2)-Fe-N(1) = 73.66(16), N(1)-Fe-Cl(1) = 86.71(11), N(1)1-Fe-Cl(1)1 = 86.71(11), N(2)-Fe-Cl(1) = 92.65(13), N(2)1-Fe-Cl(1)1 = 92.65(13).
Figure 2. Molecular structure of Fe2. Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (deg): Fe-N(1) = 2.283(5), Fe-N(1)1 = 2.283(5), Fe-N(2) = 2.159(4), Fe(1)-N(2)1 = 2.159(4), Fe-Cl(1) = 2.4871(16), Fe-Cl(1)1 = 2.4871(16), N(2)1-Fe-N(2) = 175.2(2), N(1)-Fe-Cl(1)1 = 157.41(11), N(1)1-Fe-Cl(1) = 157.41(11), N(2)-Fe-N(1)1 = 109.70(16), N(2)1-Fe-N(1) = 109.70(16), N(2)1-Fe-N(1)1 = 73.66(16), N(2)-Fe-N(1) = 73.66(16), N(1)-Fe-Cl(1) = 86.71(11), N(1)1-Fe-Cl(1)1 = 86.71(11), N(2)-Fe-Cl(1) = 92.65(13), N(2)1-Fe-Cl(1)1 = 92.65(13).
Polymers 14 03612 g002
Polymers 14 03612 g003 550
Figure 3. GPC curves of isoprene under different reaction conditions: (A) Fe1–Fe4 catalyzed polymerization; (B) Fe2 with different reaction times; (C) Fe1 with different [Al]/[Fe] ratios.
Figure 3. GPC curves of isoprene under different reaction conditions: (A) Fe1–Fe4 catalyzed polymerization; (B) Fe2 with different reaction times; (C) Fe1 with different [Al]/[Fe] ratios.
Polymers 14 03612 g003
Table
Table 1. Isoprene polymerization using Fe1–Fe4 with MAO as a cocatalyst a.
Table 1. Isoprene polymerization using Fe1–Fe4 with MAO as a cocatalyst a.
EntryCat.Time
(min)		Yield b
(%)		Act. c
(×10−5)		Mnd
(×10−4)		Mw/MndMicrostructure (%) e
trans-1,4cis-1,43,4
1Fe110>998.247.51.804852
2Fe210494.011.51.8114346
3Fe2120860.67.82.3183943
4Fe2300980.35.93.5203743
5Fe310>998.232.32.104654
6Fe410>998.257.22.304258
a General conditions: Total volume = 8 mL; [Ip] = 2.5 mol/L; [Fe]/[MAO]/[Ip] = 1/500/2000; reaction temperature 25 °C. b Isolated yield. c g/mol·h. d Determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC). e Determined by 1H and 13C NMR.
Table
Table 2. Isoprene polymerization using Fe1 and Fe4 with MAO a.
Table 2. Isoprene polymerization using Fe1 and Fe4 with MAO a.
EntryCat.[Fe]/[MAO]Time
(min)		Yield b
(%)		Act. c
(×10−5)		Mnd
(×10−5)		Mw/MndMicrostructure (%) e
cis-1,43,4
1Fe11/10010>998.23.51.84753
2Fe11/10015645.74.91.94555
3Fe11/5010918.12.62.04753
4Fe11/1010546.92.11.94852
5Fe11/1060981.32.31.74852
6Fe11/53030.28.73.15644
7Fe11/5120920.64.71.84951
8Fe41/10010>998.25.82.34258
9Fe41/10018065.36.52.04258
10Fe41/5010937.63.42.94258
11Fe41/1010715.84.53.44654
12Fe41/530190.53.51.84753
13 fFe11/10010998.14.62.16238
14 gFe11/10010977.94.72.24357
15 fFe41/10010977.95.12.24951
16 gFe41/10010746.04.42.64258
17 hFe11/500120855.83.82.04258
a General conditions: Total volume = 8 mL; [Ip] = 2.5 mol/L; [Fe]/[Ip] = 1/2000; 25 °C. b Isolated yield. c g/mol·h. d Determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC). e Determined by 1H and 13C NMR. f −30 °C. g 70 °C. h [Fe]/[Ip] = 1/20,000, [Ip] = 2.5 mol/L; toluene (300 mL), 25 °C.
Table
Table 3. Isoprene polymerization using Fe1–Fe4/[Ph3C][B(C6F5)4]/AlR3 a.
Table 3. Isoprene polymerization using Fe1–Fe4/[Ph3C][B(C6F5)4]/AlR3 a.
EntryCat.AlR3Time
(min)		Yield b
(%)		Act. c
(×10−5)		Mnd
(×10−5)		Mw/MndMicrostructure (%) e
trans-1,4cis-1,43,4
1Fe1AlEt329639.21.42.604456
2Fe1Al(i-Bu)326426.12.82.204456
3Fe2AlEt31200------
4Fe2Al(i-Bu)3120110.14.23.4412039
5Fe3AlEt329840.03.73.334453
6Fe3Al(i-Bu)329337.93.62.204555
7Fe4AlEt32104.17.64.004357
8Fe4Al(i-Bu)325120.83.12.204753
a General conditions: Total volume = 8 mL; [Ip] = 2.5 mol/L; [Fe]/[Ip] [Ph3C][B(C6F5)4]/AlR3 = 1/2000/1/40; 25 °C. b Isolated yield. c g/mol·h. d Determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC). e Determined by 1H and 13C NMR.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, M.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Zhu, G.; Wang, Q. Synthesis, Characterization and Catalytic Property Studies for Isoprene Polymerization of Iron Complexes Bearing Unionized Pyridine-Oxime Ligands. Polymers 2022, 14, 3612. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14173612

AMA Style

Zhao M, Ma Y, Zhang X, Wang L, Zhu G, Wang Q. Synthesis, Characterization and Catalytic Property Studies for Isoprene Polymerization of Iron Complexes Bearing Unionized Pyridine-Oxime Ligands. Polymers. 2022; 14(17):3612. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14173612

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Mengmeng, Ying Ma, Xianhui Zhang, Liang Wang, Guangqian Zhu, and Qinggang Wang. 2022. "Synthesis, Characterization and Catalytic Property Studies for Isoprene Polymerization of Iron Complexes Bearing Unionized Pyridine-Oxime Ligands" Polymers 14, no. 17: 3612. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14173612

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop