Next Article in Journal
Maltol-Incorporated Acetylated Cassava Starch Films for Shelf-Life-Extension Packaging of Bakery Products
Previous Article in Journal
Biodegradable Mulching Films Based on Polycaprolactone and Its Porous Structure Construction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mechanochemistry: An Efficient Way to Recycle Thermoset Polyurethanes
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Separating Information on Transparent Polypropylene Labels on Packaging with Dual Properties for the Visible Spectrum and Instrumental Infrared Observation

Polymers 2022, 14(24), 5341; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14245341
by Denis Jurečić 1,*, Jana Žiljak Gršić 2, Diana Bratić 1 and Silvio Plehati 2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Polymers 2022, 14(24), 5341; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14245341
Submission received: 31 October 2022 / Revised: 23 November 2022 / Accepted: 4 December 2022 / Published: 7 December 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this paper, the authors presented transparent linear NIR digital graphics for security information

on polypropylene material. The article is organized but needs some major improvements before to consider for publication.

1.       Please extend the introduction part by focusing on the relative reports published recently.

2.       Please add more relevant recently published references.

3.       What’s the importance of the recipes of the colorants of the dual design? Need to explain.

 

4.       Please explain what is the novelty here, and there is a need to perform such compact work. 

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript (polymers-2035682), Separating Information on Transparent Polypropylene Labels on Packaging with Dual Properties for the Visible Spectrum and Instrumental Infrared Observation, shows an interesting result for the visible spectrum and instrumental infrared observation. Authors presented quite comprehensive analysis in this manuscript. Some minor comment would like to provide here, shown as following - 

1. Please provide a simple benchmark Table to summarize the current research work and other research tasks. What kind of metrics authors have seen the improvement in here as compared to others? And why? This would be quite helpful for this referee and potential readers to get a further insight of the research work impact and contribution in this work as compared to other works. 

2. For the visible spectrum and instrumental infrared observation, does the area or scaling of the words/pictures/objects size impact here? What would be the major impact for objects scaling?

Due to the above comments, this referee would like to put the manuscript status as "Major Revision" in the current phase. 

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thanks for the revision

Reviewer 2 Report

Authors have replied to this referee in detail. No further comments from this referee. 

Back to TopTop