Next Article in Journal
Silver Nanoparticle-Embedded Conductive Hydrogels for Electrochemical Sensing of Hydroquinone
Next Article in Special Issue
Metal-Chelated Polymeric Nanomaterials for the Removal of Penicillin G Contamination
Previous Article in Journal
Flame Retardancy Index (FRI) for Polymer Materials Ranking
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chitosan Polymer Functionalized-Activated Carbon/Montmorillonite Composite for the Potential Removal of Lead Ions from Wastewater
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Flower-like Thiourea–Formaldehyde Resin Microspheres for the Adsorption of Silver Ions

1
Key Laboratory of Carbon Fiber and Functional Polymers, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
2
Aerospace Research Institute of Materials & Processing Technology, Beijing 100076, China
3
Ansteel Beijing Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 102200, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Polymers 2023, 15(11), 2423; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15112423
Submission received: 26 April 2023 / Revised: 14 May 2023 / Accepted: 17 May 2023 / Published: 23 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymeric Materials for Water/Wastewater Treatment Applications)

Abstract

:
Around a quarter of annual worldwide silver consumption comes from recycling. It remains a primary target for researchers to increase the silver ion adsorption capacity of the chelate resin. Herein, a series of flower-like thiourea–formaldehyde microspheres (FTFM) possessing diameters of 15–20 μm were prepared via a one-step reaction under acidic conditions, and the effects of the monomer molar ratio and reaction time on the micro-flower morphology, specific surface area, and silver ion adsorption performance were explored. The nanoflower-like microstructure showed the maximum specific surface area 18.98 ± 0.949 m2/g, which was 55.8 times higher than that of the solid microsphere control. As a result, the maximum silver ion adsorption capacity was 7.95 ± 0.396 mmol/g, which was 10.9 times higher than that of the control. Kinetic studies showed that the equilibrium adsorption amount of FT1F4M was 12.61 ± 0.016 mmol/g, which was 11.6 times higher than that of the control. Additionally, the isotherm study of the adsorption process was performed, and the maximum adsorption capacity of FT1F4M was 18.17 ± 1.28 mmol/g, which was 13.8 times that of the control according to the Langmuir adsorption model. Its high absorption efficiency, convenient preparation strategy, and low cost recommend FTFM bright for further use in industrial applications.

1. Introduction

Growing industrialization and urbanization resulted in severe pollution, particularly that of the aquatic environment [1]. The wastewater produced by the industrial society contains abundant toxic heavy metals such as gold, silver, and cadmium [2,3]. Silver is a noble metal that is widely used in the photography, electronics, chemical, and jewelry industries [1,4,5]. Studies showed that around a quarter of the silver produced from the industry was from wastewater recycling [2,6]. In recent decades, various silver ion recycling strategies have been proposed and evaluated, such as adsorption [1], sedimentation [7], precipitation [8], ion exchange [9], nano-filtration [10], and electrolysis [11]. Among these methods, the adsorbents used for silver recycling have received increasing attention due to their low cost [5]. Common adsorbents include chelating resins [12], activated carbon [5,13], and other biomimetic materials [14].
Polymeric materials containing sulfinyl groups can be used as silver adsorbents due to the high binding affinity between the carbon–sulfur double bond (-C=S-) and silver ion according to hard-soft-acid-base theory [15,16]. Thiourea–formaldehyde resin is a typical chelating resin containing abundant sulfinyl groups that is commonly used for silver ion adsorption [1,5,17,18]. Kirci et al. indicated that thiourea–formaldehyde resin had higher selectivity to silver ion compared with Cu2+ or Zn2+ and a maximum adsorption capacity for silver ions of 0.539 mmol/g [19]. Yirikoglu et al. separated silver from base and earth metal ions using a melamine–formaldehyde–thiourea (MFT) chelating resin [20]. It was concluded that chelation governed the adsorption mechanism of silver ions, and the maximum adsorption capacity was 0.556 mol/g. Iglesias et al. investigated the silver adsorption capacity of chelamine with three different resins with thiol chelating groups: Duolite GT-73, Purolite Thiomethyl resin, and Spheron Thiol [21]. The effectiveness of the resins in adsorbing silver was ordered below: Purolite Thiomethyl resin (2.79 mmol/g) > Duolite GT-73 (1.48 mmol/g) > Spheron Thiol (1.11 mmol/g). This order indicated that the chelate resin has excellent silver ion adsorption performance.
Besides the backbone polymer structural optimization, the design of the adsorbent micromorphology was also an applicable strategy for increasing the adsorption capacity. Hao et al. prepared thiourea–formaldehyde silver absorbent with a controllable porous structure, and the results indicated not only the increasing specific area, but also the larger porous size was able to boom the silver absorption process [22]. Hou et al. designed a shell-hole structural that increases the silver ion adsorption capacity of silver ion-imprinted particles to 0.745 mol/g [23]. Zhao et al. coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles on the surface of MOF-525 (metal–organic framework) to form Fe3O4@MOF-525 via the secondary growth method [24]. Compared with the parent MOF-525 (236 m2/g), the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area of Fe3O4@MOF-525 is significantly increased (427 m2/g), which resulted in enhanced adsorption performance. Moreover, the maximum adsorption capacities of tetracycline (TC) and diclofenac sodium (DF) on Fe3O4@MOF-525 reached 0.62 and 2.34 mol/g, respectively. Zhai et al. fabricated the three-dimensional flower-like magnetic CoFe2O4/CoFe-LDHs through the hydrothermal method [25]. The microflower presented a highly porous open-space three-dimensional (3D) structure, and the maximum adsorption capacity of the composite for Orange II was 5.93 mol/g. Wu et al. dissolved polypyrrole and polyethersulfone in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP), preparing nano-fibrous membranes by electrospinning for silver ion adsorption [26]. The diameters of the synthesized nanofibers ranged from 410 to 540 nm with enhanced porosity and surface area, providing abundant metal binding sites and resulting in a maximum absorption capacity of 0.33 mol/g for silver ions. Jiang et al. prepared porous zinc oxide from two-dimensional nanosheets by the hydrothermal method, enlarging the specific surface area up to 57 m2/g, and the corresponding adsorption capacity for Congo red reached 0.48 mol/g, which was 463.89% higher compared with the commercially available porous microspheres [27].
It was discovered in our previous work that urea formaldehyde nanosheets were constructed by adjusting the reaction pH, the monomer ratio, and the reaction temperature [25]. The formed nanosheets were then assembled generating flower-like nanospheres (UFMs). The thickness of the ‘petals’ in the UFMs ranged from 30 to 50 nm, and the flower-like structure endowed UFMs the large specific surface area [28]. The design presented by this work was inspired by the above results. The thiourea and formaldehyde reacted forming thiourea–formaldehyde resin via the Mannich reaction, which was similar to the reaction between urea and formaldehyde. We synthesized and characterized a series of flower-like thiourea–formaldehyde microspheres (FTFM) possessing diameters of 15–20 μm via a one-step reaction under acidic conditions and studied the effect of specific surface area on adsorption capacity. Then, we explored the relationship between adsorption capacity and specific surface area. It was hypothesized that (1) a flower-like microsphere was able to be generated by the reaction between thiourea and formaldehyde (FTFM), which was able to adsorb silver ions by chelation; (2) the structure of FTFM was tunable by adjusting the monomer molar ratio; (3) the flower-like structure in the micro scale was able to dramatically increase the specific surface areas of the thiourea–formaldehyde resin, which would enhance the silver ion adsorption efficiency.
The FTFM was synthesized, characterized, and used as a silver ion adsorbent for the first time. Variety types of thiourea–formaldehyde resins were synthesized with different reaction conditions to verify the raised hypothesis (Scheme 1). The chemical structures of the formulations were characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy measurements. Additionally, the morphology of the resin microspheres was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the specific surface area of each formulation was tested according to BET test. The silver ion adsorbent efficiency was calculated based on ultraviolet (UV)–visible (vis) spectra of the adsorbent suspension after adsorption; also the corresponding adsorption kinetic was studied. Furthermore, the relationship between the synthesis conditions and micromorphology was constructed, and the corresponding affection towards the silver ion adsorbent efficiency was evaluated and discussed. The microflower was synthesized via a one-step reaction in aqueous environment, followed by simple rinsing and filtration after precipitation. The microflowers showed a high specific surface area, which significantly enhanced the silver ion adsorption efficiency. Its simple preparation, low cost, and high efficiency give FTFM a bright future in industrial applications.

2. Experimental

2.1. Preparation of FTFM

Thiourea (T) (Tianjin Damao Chemical Reagent Factory, Tianjin, China) and formaldehyde (F) (37~40%, Beijing Innochem Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) were reacted together to form a thiourea–formaldehyde resin via the Mannich reaction. Deionized (DI) water (100 mL) was charged into a 150 mL beaker, and thiourea and formaldehyde were added. The molar ratio of thiourea to formaldehyde was listed in Table 1 along with the corresponding sample abbreviations. The pH value of the mixture was adjusted to 2.0 by formic acid (≥98%) and ammonia (28~30%) (Beijing Bailingwei Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) at 25 ℃. The solution was then stirred in a water bath at 50 °C for 4 h, and a white precipitate appeared at the bottom of the beaker, which was FTFM. FTFM was then collected by filtration and washed with DI water 3 times to remove the unreacted reagents.
Solid thiourea–formaldehyde microspheres (STFM) were fabricated by adding NH4Cl (Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) to the mixture after adjusting the pH to 2. The white precipitation was generated after stirring for 4 h. The molar amount of the NH4Cl and the corresponding abbreviations are listed in Table 1. STFM was collected by filtration (filter paper specification: nylon—66, 0.45 μm) and then washed 3 times with DI water (100 mL).

2.2. Characterization of the FTFM

The morphology of FTFM was characterized by SEM. A small amount of the sample was dispersed in aqueous solution, a few drops were placed onto the silicon wafer, and the sample was dried with infrared light. The surface was sprayed with gold (10 mA) by an Oxford Quorum SC7620 sputter coater for 45 s under vacuum. The surface morphologies of the samples were obtained using SEM (TESCAN MIRA LMS, Beijing Yake Chenxu Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) operated at an accelerating voltage of 3 kV. The surface element distribution of the samples was tested by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and the accelerating voltage was set to 15 kV. The structure of FTFM was characterized by FTIR measurements. Dry FTFM powder (approximately 1 mg) and dry KBr (approximately 200 mg) were mixed and grinded for 1 min. The mixture was then placed on the tablet press with a pressure of 15 MPa for 30–60 s to obtain a transparent tablet. The FTIR spectra of the samples were recorded using a Fourier transform interferometer (ALPHA-T, Bruker, Germany) in the range 400–4000 cm–1. The special surface area was observed by BET analysis. The samples were pretreated under vacuum at 120 °C for 7 h in the standard degassing station. Testing was performed by a fully automated specific surface area analyzer (APSP 2460, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA). The porosity of the sample surface was characterized through nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherm analysis at 77 K, and the surface areas were calculated by the BET equation. The silver ion adsorption capacity was obtained by UV absorption test. After reaching the specified adsorption time, the microspheres in the solution were removed with a disposable needle filter (pore size 0.45 μm, MCF film). Additionally, the UV absorption maximum corresponding to silver ions was determined by measuring the absorbance of the supernatant at 400 nm using a UV−vis spectrophotometer (Lambda 35, PerkinElmer).

2.3. Calculation of Adsorption Capacity

The FTFM (0.1g) with a different monomer ratio was placed with 25 mL 0.1mol/L AgNO3 solution for 20 min. After adsorption for 20 min, 1 mL of the suspension was subjected to UV absorption measurements (Hitachi U4150, Beijing, China). The concentration of remaining silver ions in the solution was measured, and the monomer ratio with the maximum adsorption capacity was obtained. Furthermore, the optimal monomer ratio that yielded the maximum adsorption capacity was obtained. These data are presented in the supporting information [29].

2.4. Adsorption Kinetics

The FTFM adsorbent (0.1 g) was added to 25 mL of 0.1 mol/L AgNO3 solution (pH = 6.0) in a centrifuge tube, and adsorption was allowed to occur for 10–480 min. Samples of 5 mL solution were withdrawn at scheduled time intervals and analyzed for silver ion concentration. Based on Brandani’s research on adsorption kinetics [30], the obtained data were fitted to pseudo-first-order (PFO) [31] and pseudo-second-order (PSO) [32] models.

2.5. Adsorption Isotherms

At the optimal pH of 6.0, a solution of silver ion (25 mL, 20–100 mmol/L) and FTFM (0.1 g) were placed in a centrifuge tube. The obtained data were fitted to the Langmuir model. The Langmuir model assumes that the adsorption process occurs in a single layer on a homogeneous medium [33].

3. Results and Discussions

The molar ratio between thiourea and formaldehyde varied in order to optimize the morphology by controlling the self-assembly process. The formulation details and abbreviations for each sample set were illustrated in Table 1. Figure 1 shows SEM images of the particles obtained at different reaction times. For FT1F1M, flower-like microspheres with a diameter of 10 µm were obtained after 1 h (Figure 1b). However, fractures were presented in the sample, indicating the incompletion of the self-assembly process (Figure 1a). The amount of fractures reduced significantly when the reaction time reached 2 h, as presented in Figure 1c, and the diameter of the FTFM was around 15 μm (Figure 1d), which was significantly higher than that of the sample of 1 h reaction. The fractures of the thiourea–formaldehyde resin were hardly observed when the reaction time increased to 4 h, as shown in Figure 1e. Additionally, the corresponding diameter of FTFM remains approximately 15 μm, showing no significant difference compared with that of the sample after 2 h reaction. The amount and distribution of the resin fractures showed no significant change when the reaction time increased to 8 h (Figure 1g), and the diameter of FTFM kept almost unchanged, which was around 15 μm, as presented by Figure 1h. The results indicated that the reaction between formaldehyde and thiourea and the corresponding self-assembly process was completed when the reaction time exceeded 4 h, and the extent of the reaction time showed no significant influence on the diameter of the FTFM.
The effect of the thiourea-to-formaldehyde ratio on the particle morphology was explored, which was presented in Figure 2. As mentioned previously, the reaction time was set to 4 h. The diameter of FT1F0.5M was around 15 μm, as demonstrated in Figure 2a. The petal size decreased significantly when the formulations came to FT1F1M, as presented in Figure 1b, and the diameter of the micro-flower showed no significant change. The diameter of the FTFM kept around 15 μm in FT1F2M, as shown in Figure 2c. The petal size decreased and the petal density increased significantly, compared with that of FT1F1M. Up to increasing the molar ratio further (FT1F4M; see Figure 2d), the petal size continues to decrease, and the petal density increases. At the same time, the diameter showed no significant change. The petals on the FTFM became smaller and were distributed more compactly when the molar ration between thiourea and formaldehyde increased from 1:0.5 to 1:4. The self-assembly mechanism of the FTFM was not totally clear. The proposed reason was that the self-assembly was accelerated when the proportion of the formaldehyde increased due to the increasing number of hydrogen bonds. In addition to the formation of the microflowers, solid microspheres were formed by the addition of ammonia chloride; the probable reason for this was that the Mannich reaction between thiourea and formaldehyde was suppressed, further reducing the size or even preventing the formation of petals. Figure 2c demonstrated the morphology of S1T1F4M, in which the molar ratio between ammonia chloride and thiourea was 0.0187:1. The petal size of S1T1F4M significantly reduced and the petal density increased compared with that of FT1F4M. At the same time, the solid microspheres appeared. When the ratio between ammonia chloride and thiourea increased to 0.0374:1 (S2T1F4M), no microflowers were observed (Figure 2f). The results indicated that the variation of the monomer ratio may dominate the petal size and density for FTFM. However, the corresponding influence of times towards the FTFM dimension was not significant. The introduction of ammonia chloride led to the formation of thiourea–formaldehyde microspheres with a diameter ranging from 8–10 μm, which could be used as the control to investigate the importance of the microflower morphology for silver ion adsorption.
The specific surface area of the FTFM with different formulations was evaluated in order to verify the proposed hypothesis. Figure 3 demonstrated that the BET specific area of the solid thiourea–formaldehyde microsphere (S2T1F4M) was 0.34 ± 0.017 m2/g. This value was increased more than 20 times to 7.46 ± 0.373 m2/g when the formulation changed to FT1F0.5M where the flower-like morphology was formed, which indicated that the self-assembly of the thiourea–formaldehyde petals was able to dramatically increase the specific surface area compared with that of the solid spheres. The specific surface area increased to 14.18 ± 0.709, 16.15 ± 0.808, and 18.98 ± 0.949 m2/g for FT1F1M, FT1F2M, and FT1F4M, respectively. The results were consistent with the morphology evaluation, i.e., with an increase in the thiourea-to-formaldehyde molar ratio, the petal size decreased and the petal density increased.
The silver ion adsorption capacity was evaluated via the suspension UV-vis spectrum after adsorption. Silver ion has the maximum UV absorption at 303 nm as presented in Figure 4a, and the UV extinction coefficient of silver ion at 303 nm was 6.9 × 103 cm2/mol. The corresponding calculation and fitting information were presented in the Supplementary Information. For the adsorption experiments, 0.15 g of FT1F4M was added to 25 mL 0.1 mol/L AgNO3 solution. As shown in Figure 4a, the UV absorption peak at 303 nm reduced significantly after 10 min of adsorption, indicating that FTFM was able to reduce the concentration of silver ions in the solution. The amount of residual silver ion kept decreasing with the adsorption time, and the corresponding adsorption capacity was calculated and presented in the supplementary section. Figure 4b concludes the silver ion adsorption capacity of FTFM with different formulations after 20 min incubation in the AgNO3 solution. The maximum adsorption capacity of the solid spheres was 0.73 ± 0.037 mmol/g, which increased significantly to 4.02 ± 0.201 mmol/g for FT1F0.5M and increased further to 5.52 ± 0.276, 6.96 ± 0.348, and 7.95 ± 0.398 mmol/g for FT1F1M, FT1F2M, and FT1F4M, respectively. The adsorption capacity result was consistent with the morphology and BET specific area that the close-packed microflower endowed the microspheres with a larger specific surface area, increasing the interaction between the silver ions and the thiourea–formaldehyde resin. Subsequently, the morphology and element composition of FT1F4M after 20 min adsorption were examined via SEM-EDS. The microsphere kept its flower-like shape after the adsorption, and the diameter showed no significant change, i.e., it remained at approximately 15 μm. However, the petals became significant thicker due to the stacking of silver on the surface. Figure 4d–g shows the element distribution on the surface of the FTFM microsphere after 20 min adsorption, and the silver atoms were uniformly distributed on the surface of the microflower. The homogeneous distribution of the N and S atoms indicated that the thiourea–formaldehyde structure was not disturbed by the adsorption. Among them, silver atoms account for 68.68 wt% of the surface elements (Figure S1).
The chemical structure of the FTFM before and after the adsorption was further verified by the FTIR, and the corresponding spectrum was plotted in Figure 5. The peaks located at 3311 and 1541 cm−1 were assigned to the N-H stretching and bending vibrations, respectively, which were greatly weakened after the thiourea–formaldehyde resin was formed. Additionally, this trend became more prominent when the molar ratio between thiourea and formaldehyde increased from 1:0.5 to 1:4 as more N-H was replaced by N-C. Correspondingly, the peaks located at 1327 cm−1 representing the N-C connection kept increasing during this process. The peaks caused by the vibration of N-H became wide and unsignificant for the solid microspheres (S2T1F4M) quenched by ammonia chloride. Figure 5b demonstrates the FTIR spectrum of the FTFM samples after 20 min adsorption at 0.1 mol/L AgNO3 solution under room temperature. The peaks located around 1403 cm−1 were assigned to C=S from the thiourea and were greatly reduced after the absorption in the AgNO3 solution, which was supposed to be caused by the chelation between C=S and silver ions. The peaks located around 3311 and 1541 cm−1 were broadened and weakened after adsorption, indicating the chelation between silver ions and N-H during the adsorption. The change of C=S structure of the solid microspheres (S2T1F4M) was hardly observed from the FTIR spectrum; however, the reduction in the peak around 1541 cm−1 indicated the chelation between silver ions and N-H on the surface of the solid microspheres. The FTIR spectrum confirmed the Mannich reaction between formaldehyde and thiourea and the chemical structure evolution of different formulations. Additionally, the chelation of NH-Ag+ and C=S-Ag+ was confirmed for all flower-like microspheres.
The adsorption kinetics of FTFM to silver ions were studied. Figure 6 illustrates the relationship between the silver ion adsorption capacity of the thiourea–formaldehyde microspheres and time. The solid thiourea–formaldehyde spheres were able to adsorb silver in aqueous environment, and the capacity increased with the incubation time, which was much lower than that of the flower-like microspheres due to the low specific surface area. The silver ion adsorption capacity of FTFM increased with the raise of the molar ratio between the formaldehyde and the thiourea. The results of the kinetic study were consistent with those of the specific surface area. It was clearly reflected by Figure 6a that the increasing speed of the adsorption capacity slowed down when the adsorption time exceeded 120 min and showed no significant change after 240 min. This indicated that the adsorption and de-adsorption process on the petal surfaces reached equilibrium when the incubation time exceeded 240 min. The pseudo-first order fitting was applied to the adsorption process of FTFM according to Equation (1) presented in Table 2. The values of ln(Qe-Qt) and time are linear fitted and plotted in Figure 6b, where Qe is the experimental equilibrium adsorption capacity whose value is 240 min, and Qt refers to the adsorption capacity when time is t. The coefficient of determination (R2) of the pseudo-first-order fitting is presented in Table 2, ranging from 0.845 to 0.949. The calculated equilibrium adsorption capacity of the pseudo-first-order fitting (Qe1) from the intercept of the linear fitting is illustrated in Table 2, ranging from 0.53 ± 1.223 to 3.55 ± 2.061 mmol/g, significantly lower than the experimental values.
Moreover, the pseudo-second-order fitting of the adsorption process is plotted in Figure 6c according to Equation (2). The value of t/Qt and the adsorption time was linear fitted. The R2 of the pseudo-second-order fittings for FTFM ranged from 0.991 to 0.998, as presented in Table 2, which was significantly higher than that of the pseudo-first-order fitting. Moreover, the equilibrium adsorption capacity calculated from the slopes by the pseudo-second-order fitting (Qe2) ranged from 1.09 ± 0.012 to 12.61 ± 0.016 mmol/g, which was consistent with the experimental values. However, it was not scientific when only the coefficient of determination and the calculated adsorption capacity were considered in the metal ion adsorption model. In addition, the assessment of data correlation quality (AARD) should be calculated and compared (reference). The AARD was calculated according to Equation (3), where y ^ i = ln(Qe-Qt) and yi = lnQe-k1t for the pseudo-first-order fitting, and y ^ i = t/Qt and yi = t/Qe + 1/k2Qe2 for the pseudo-second-order fitting. The AARD1 and AARD2 were compared by calculating the R(1-2) value according to Equation (4), which is presented in Table 2. The AARD1 ranged from 118.86% to 421.76%, two orders higher than AARD2, which ranged from 1.15% to 3.91%. The R(1-2) values were equal to or greater than 0.99, indicating that the silver ion adsorption of FTFM followed the pseudo-second-order model. Thus, the adsorption process on the FTFM surface was dominated by the chemical chelation, and a single layer of silver was supposed to be generated on the petals after the adsorption.
*   ln Q e Q t = l n Q e k 1 t
t / Q t = t / Q e + 1 / k 2 Q e 2
AARD = 1 N i = 1 N y ^ i y i y i
** R(1-2)2 was calculated to compare the correlation quality between pseudo-first order and pseudo-second-order fitting according to the following equation:
R 1 2   2 = 1 i = 1 N y i 2 y ^ i 2 i = 1 N y i 1 y ^ i 1
The isothermal study of the silver ion adsorption was applied to the FTFM calculating the maximum adsorption capacity (Qmax) for the parallel comparison. As presented by the kinetic study, the adsorption reached equilibrium when the time exceeded 240 min. However, the adsorption capacity at the equilibrium was affected by the initial concentration of AgNO3 (C0), and the relationship between Qe and C0 was demonstrated by Figure 7a. The Qe kept increasing with the initial concentration, and the corresponding value for the solid microsphere was significantly lower than that of the flower-like microspheres due to the huge difference in the specific surface area. The Qe of the FTFM samples with different thiourea/formaldehyde molar ratios kept at the same level when the C0 was 20 and 40 mmol/L, however, changed significantly when C0 exceeded 60 mmol/L. When the C0 was 100 mmol/L, the Qe increased significantly with the molar ratio between formaldehyde and thiourea, which was consistent with the structure characterization results. The residual silver ion concentration at the adsorption equilibrium (Ce) was calculated according to the UV vis spectrum. All of the adsorption processes were fitted by the Langmuir adsorption model (Equation (5)). The Ce and Ce/Qe were linear fitted and presented by Figure 7b. The R2 of all the FTFM samples was larger than 0.99, and the value for the solid microspheres was 0.959. The fitting results indicated that the silver ion adsorption process presented in this work followed the Langmuir model. The Qmax for all of the samples was calculated by the reciprocal of the linear fitting slops demonstrated in Table 3. The Qmax of S2T1F4M was only 1.32 ± 0.16 mmol/g, and the corresponding value for FT1F0.5M was 10.92 ± 0.46 mmol/g, which was around an order higher than that of the solid microspheres. Qmax kept increasing with the molar ratio between formaldehyde and thiourea, which was consistent with the BET specific area results. The maximum Qmax in this work reached 18.17 ± 1.28 mmol/g for FT1F4M, which was 13.8 times that of the thiourea–formaldehyde solid microspheres.
c e Q e = c e Q max + 1 bQ max
As shown in Table S1, the Ag+ adsorption capacity of FT1F4M prepared in this work was significantly higher than the published works about thiourea–aldehyde Ag+ adsorption resin, which are presented in the supplementary section.

4. Conclusions

Thiourea–formaldehyde resin silver adsorbent with flower-like microspheres micro-morphology was prepared and characterized. The silver adsorption capacity was greatly enhanced by the flower-like microsphere structure by increasing the specific areas rather than the chemical formulation optimization. The flower-like microsphere structure was controllable by turning the reaction conditions, and the relationship between the morphology and the adsorption ability was researched. The adsorption kinetic was explored, indicating that the adsorption process on the FTFM surface was dominated by the chemical chelation, and a single layer of silver was supposed to be generated on the petals after the adsorption. The results indicated that the specific surface area of FTFM was up to 18.97 m2/g, which was 55.8 times than that of the solid microspheres control. The silver ion adsorption ability was greatly enhanced, reaching 7.95 ± 0.396 mmol/g in AgNO3 aqueous solution (0.1 mol/L, 20 min), which was 10.9 times that of the control. The adsorption kinetic study indicated that the correlation quality of the pseudo-second-order model was significantly higher than that of the pseudo-first order model, where R(1-2) was greater than 0.99. The Qe of FT1F4M calculated by the pseudo-second-order model was 12.61 ± 0.016 mmol/g, 11.6 times that of the thiourea–formaldehyde solid microspheres control. The isothermal study was applied to the silver ion adsorption, and the Ce and Ce/Qe was linear fitted presenting good correlation quality. The calculated Qmax of FT1F4M was 18.17 ± 1.28 mmol/g, which was 13.8 times that of the control. The strategy presented by this work provided a rapid, simple, and effective way of enhancing the silver adsorption capacity of thiourea–formaldehyde resin with the mechanism clarified. Its high absorption efficiency, convenient preparation strategy, and low cost recommend FTFM bright for further use in industrial applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym15112423/s1. Figure S1: (a) The EDAX for silver ions distribution on FTFM surface. (b) two points on the FTFM surface for element mapping. (c,d) Elemental content of two points. Figure S2: The calculation of the UV extinction coefficient of silver. Figure S3: linear fitting between ln(Qe-Qt) and adsorption time of S2T1F4M according to Equation (1) (main text). Figure S4: linear fitting between ln(Qe-Qt) and adsorption time of FT1F0.5M according to Equation (1) (main text). Figure S5: linear fitting between ln(Qe-Qt) and adsorption time of FT1F1M according to Equation (1) (main text). Figure S6: linear fitting between ln(Qe-Qt) and adsorption time of FT1F2M according to Equation (1) (main text). Figure S7: linear fitting between ln(Qe-Qt) and adsorption time of FT1F4M according to Equation (1) (main text). Figure S8: linear fitting between t/Qt and adsorption time of S2T1F4M according to Equation (2) (main text). Figure S9: linear fitting between t/Qt and adsorption time of FT1F0.5M according to Equation (2) (main text). Figure S10: linear fitting between t/Qt and adsorption time of FT1F1M according to Equation (2) (main text). Figure S11: linear fitting between t/Qt and adsorption time of FT1F2M according to Equation (2) (main text). Figure S12: linear fitting between t/Qt and adsorption time of FT1F4M according to Equation (2) (main text). Figure S13: linear fitting between Ce/Qe and Ce of S2T1F4M according to Equation (5) (main text). Figure S14: linear fitting between Ce/Qe and Ce of FT1F0.5M according to Equation (5) (main text). Figure S15: linear fitting between Ce/Qe and Ce of FT1F1M according to Equation (5) (main text). Figure S16: linear fitting between Ce/Qe and Ce of FT1F2M according to Equation (5) (main text). Figure S17: linear fitting between Ce/Qe and Ce of FT1F4M according to Equation (5) (main text). Table S1: Maximum adsorption capacities for adsorption of Ag+ onto various adsorbents [34,35,36,37].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L. and F.G.; methodology, X.W. (Xiaoli Wang); validation, J.C., F.G. and Y.L.; formal analysis, G.Z.; resources, J.C.; data curation, X.W. (Xiaomu Wang) and F.G.; writing—original draft preparation, J.X. and Y.L.; writing—review and editing, F.G. and Y.L.; supervision, D.W.; funding acquisition, J.Z. and J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Science Foundation of Aeronautics of China (No. 201718S9001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or supplementary material. The data presented in this study are available in supplementary material.

Conflicts of Interest

All of the authors declare there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pan, X.-H.; Fu, L.-X.; Wang, H.; Xue, Y.; Zu, J.-H. Synthesis of novel sulfydryl-functionalized chelating adsorbent and its application for selective adsorption of Ag(I) under high acid. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 271, 118778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nakiboğlu, N.; Toscali, D.; Nişli, G. A novel silver recovery method from waste photographic films with NaOH stripping. Turk. J. Chem. 2003, 27, 127–133. [Google Scholar]
  3. Manjolinho, F.; Arndt, M.; Gooßen, K.; Gooßen, L.J. Catalytic C–H carboxylation of terminal alkynes with carbon dioxide. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 2014–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, G.; Deng, Y.; Song, Y.; Sui, Y.; Cen, J.; Shao, Z.; Li, H.; Tang, T. Transdermal delivery of adipocyte phospholipase A2 siRNA using microneedles to treat thyroid associated ophthalmopathy-related proptosis. Cell Transplant. 2021, 30, 096368972110106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yao, Z.; Shao, P.; Fang, D.; Shao, J.; Li, D.; Liu, L.; Huang, Y.; Yu, Z.; Yang, L.; Yu, K.; et al. Thiol-rich, porous carbon for the efficient capture of silver: Understanding the relationship between the surface groups and transformation pathways of silver. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 427, 131470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hasany, S.M.; Ahmad, R. Removal of traces of silver ions from aqueous solutions using coconut husk as a sorbent. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 3509–3525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Song, Z. Sedimentation of tannery wastewater. Water Res. 2000, 34, 2171–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kang, J.; Sun, W.; Hu, Y.; Gao, Z.; Liu, R.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, H.; Meng, X. The utilization of waste by-products for removing silicate from mineral processing wastewater via chemical precipitation. Water Res. 2017, 125, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mahmoud, A.; Hoadley, A.F.A. An evaluation of a hybrid ion exchange electrodialysis process in the recovery of heavy metals from simulated dilute industrial wastewater. Water Res. 2012, 46, 3364–3376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Taheri, R.; Bahramifar, N.; Zarghami, M.R.; Javadian, H.; Mehraban, Z. Nanospace engineering and functionalization of MCM-48 mesoporous silica with dendrimer amines based on [1,3,5]-triazines for selective and pH-independent sorption of silver ions from aqueous solution and electroplating industry wastewater. Powder Technol. 2017, 321, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Roundhill, D.M.; Koch, H.F. Methods and techniques for the selective extraction and recovery of oxoanions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002, 31, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Donia, A.M.; Atia, A.A.; El-Boraey, H.A.; Mabrouk, D.H. Adsorption of Ag(I) on glycidyl methacrylate/N,N′-methylene bis-acrylamide chelating resins with embedded iron oxide. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 48, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vassileva, P.; Tzvetkova, P.; Lakov, L.; Peshev, O. Thiouracil modified activated carbon as a sorbent for some precious and heavy metal ions. J. Porous Mater. 2008, 15, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Chen, Z. A novel nanocomposite as an efficient adsorbent for the rapid adsorption of Ni(II) from aqueous solution. Materials 2017, 10, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lam, K.F.; Yeung, K.L.; McKay, G. A rational approach in the design of selective mesoporous adsorbents. Langmuir 2006, 22, 9632–9641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, S.; Li, H.; Chen, X.; Yang, M.; Qi, Y. Selective adsorption of silver ions from aqueous solution using polystyrene-supported trimercaptotriazine resin. J. Environ. Sci. 2012, 24, 2166–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Das, R.; Giri, S.; King Abia, A.L.; Dhonge, B.; Maity, A. Removal of noble metal ions (Ag+) by mercapto group-containing polypyrrole matrix and reusability of its waste material in environmental applications. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 2711–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hua, R.; Li, Z. Sulfhydryl functionalized hydrogel with magnetism: Synthesis, characterization, and adsorption behavior study for heavy metal removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 249, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kιrcι, S.; Gülfen, M.; Aydιn, A.O. Separation and recovery of silver(I) ions from base metal ions by thiourea- or urea-formaldehyde chelating resin. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2009, 44, 1869–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yirikoglu, H.; Gülfen, M. Separation and recovery of silver(I) ions from base metal ions by melamine-formaldehyde-thiourea (MFT) chelating resin. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2008, 43, 376–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Iglesias, M.; Anticó, E.; Salvadó, V. The Characterisation of silver sorption by chelating resins containing thiol and amine groups. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2001, 19, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hao, Z.X.; Guo, Y.Q.; Wu, P.F.; Mansur, M.; Zhu, J.F. Adsorption Properties of Silver Ions on Thiourea-Formaldehyde Resin. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 868, 459–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hou, H.; Yu, D.; Hu, G. Preparation and properties of ion-imprinted hollow particles for the selective adsorption of silver ions. Langmuir 2015, 31, 1376–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhao, F.; Fang, S.; Gao, Y.; Bi, J. Removal of aqueous pharmaceuticals by magnetically functionalized Zr-MOFs: Adsorption Kinetics, Isotherms, and regeneration. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 615, 876–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhai, S.; Liu, J.; Sheng, J.; Xu, J.; Jiang, H. Novel morphology-controlled three-dimensional flower-like magnetic CoFe2O4/CoFe-LDHs microsphere for high efficient removal of Orange II. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 421, 130403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, J.J.; Lee, H.W.; You, J.H.; Kau, Y.-C.; Liu, S.-J. Adsorption of silver ions on polypyrrole embedded electrospun nanofibrous polyethersulfone membranes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 420, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lei, C.; Pi, M.; Jiang, C.; Cheng, B.; Yu, J. Synthesis of hierarchical porous zinc oxide (ZnO) microspheres with highly efficient adsorption of Congo red. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 490, 242–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, Y.; Tu, M.; Li, X.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, J. Facile synthesis of marigold-like microspheres from urea formaldehyde with controllable morphology. Mater. Lett. 2015, 145, 27–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yin, X.; Shao, P.; Ding, L.; Xi, Y.; Zhang, K.; Yang, L.; Shi, H.; Luo, X. Protonation of rhodanine polymers for enhancing the capture and recovery of Ag+ from highly acidic wastewater. Environ. Sci. Nano 2019, 6, 3307–3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Brandani, S. Kinetics of liquid phase batch adsorption experiments. Adsorption 2021, 27, 353–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pedersen, M.G.; Bersani, A.M. Introducing total substrates simplifies theoretical analysis at non-negligible enzyme concentrations: Pseudo first-order kinetics and the loss of zero-order ultrasensitivity. J. Math. Biol. 2010, 60, 267–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ofomaja, A.E.; Naidoo, E.B.; Modise, S.J. Kinetic and pseudo-second-order modeling of lead biosorption onto pine cone powder. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 2562–2572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Efome, J.E.; Rana, D.; Matsuura, T.; Lan, C.Q. Insight studies on metal-organic framework nanofibrous membrane adsorption and activation for heavy metal ions removal from aqueous solution. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 18619–18629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, L.; Xing, R.; Liu, S.; Yu, H.; Qin, Y.; Li, K.; Feng, J.; Li, R.; Li, P. Recovery of Silver (I) Using a Thiourea-Modified Chitosan Resin. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 180, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wajima, T. Synthesis of Zeolitic Material from Green Tuff Stone Cake and Its Adsorption Properties of Silver (I) from Aqueous Solution. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016, 233, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kiani, G. High Removal Capacity of Silver Ions from Aqueous Solution onto Halloysite Nanotubes. Appl. Clay Sci. 2014, 90, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, L.; Zhang, G.; Wang, S.; Peng, J.; Cui, W. Sulfoethyl Functionalized Silica Nanoparticle as an Adsorbent to Selectively Adsorb Silver Ions from Aqueous Solutions. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2017, 71, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. The structure and silver ion adsorption process of FTFM.
Scheme 1. The structure and silver ion adsorption process of FTFM.
Polymers 15 02423 sch001
Figure 1. The influence of the reaction time on the morphology of FT1F1M: (a) the suspension of FT1F1M after 1 h reaction; (b) the morphology of FT1F1M microsphere after 1 h reaction; (c) the suspension after 2 h reaction; (d) the morphology after 2 h reaction; (e) the suspension after 4 h reaction; (f) the morphology after 4 h reaction; (g) the suspension after 8 h reaction; and (h) the morphology after 8 h reaction.
Figure 1. The influence of the reaction time on the morphology of FT1F1M: (a) the suspension of FT1F1M after 1 h reaction; (b) the morphology of FT1F1M microsphere after 1 h reaction; (c) the suspension after 2 h reaction; (d) the morphology after 2 h reaction; (e) the suspension after 4 h reaction; (f) the morphology after 4 h reaction; (g) the suspension after 8 h reaction; and (h) the morphology after 8 h reaction.
Polymers 15 02423 g001
Figure 2. The influence of thiourea–formaldehyde molar ratio on the morphology of FTFM: (a) FT1F0.5M, (b) FT1F1M, (c) FT1F2M, and (d) FT1F4M; the influence of ammonium on the morphology of FT1F4M, (e) S1T1F4 M, and (f) S2T1F4M. Reaction time: 4 h.
Figure 2. The influence of thiourea–formaldehyde molar ratio on the morphology of FTFM: (a) FT1F0.5M, (b) FT1F1M, (c) FT1F2M, and (d) FT1F4M; the influence of ammonium on the morphology of FT1F4M, (e) S1T1F4 M, and (f) S2T1F4M. Reaction time: 4 h.
Polymers 15 02423 g002
Figure 3. Specific surface area of the FTFM samples. Reaction time: 4 h. “*” is error bar.
Figure 3. Specific surface area of the FTFM samples. Reaction time: 4 h. “*” is error bar.
Polymers 15 02423 g003
Figure 4. Evaluation of silver ion adsorption capacity: (a) the UV-vis spectrum of FT1F4M in 0.1mol/L AgNO3 solution with different adsorption time; (b) the silver ion adsorption capacity of FTFM with different formulations after 20 min adsorption in 0.1mol/L AgNO3 solution; (c) the SEM morphology of FT1F4M after 20 min adsorption in AgNO3 solution; (d) the EDS of FT1F4M after the adsorption; (e) Ag distribution on FT1F4M after the adsorption; (f) N distribution on FT1F4M after the adsorption; and (g) S distribution on FT1F4M after the adsorption.
Figure 4. Evaluation of silver ion adsorption capacity: (a) the UV-vis spectrum of FT1F4M in 0.1mol/L AgNO3 solution with different adsorption time; (b) the silver ion adsorption capacity of FTFM with different formulations after 20 min adsorption in 0.1mol/L AgNO3 solution; (c) the SEM morphology of FT1F4M after 20 min adsorption in AgNO3 solution; (d) the EDS of FT1F4M after the adsorption; (e) Ag distribution on FT1F4M after the adsorption; (f) N distribution on FT1F4M after the adsorption; and (g) S distribution on FT1F4M after the adsorption.
Polymers 15 02423 g004
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of the thiourea–formaldehyde microspheres before (a) and after (b) adsorption in 0.1 mol/L AgNO3 solution under room temperature for 20 min.
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of the thiourea–formaldehyde microspheres before (a) and after (b) adsorption in 0.1 mol/L AgNO3 solution under room temperature for 20 min.
Polymers 15 02423 g005
Figure 6. Adsorption kinetic study of FTFM: (a) the adsorption capacity of FTFM changing with time; (b) the relationship between ln(Qe-Qt) and time, and the pseudo-first-order fitting; (c) the relationship between t/Qt and time, and the pseudo-second-order fitting.
Figure 6. Adsorption kinetic study of FTFM: (a) the adsorption capacity of FTFM changing with time; (b) the relationship between ln(Qe-Qt) and time, and the pseudo-first-order fitting; (c) the relationship between t/Qt and time, and the pseudo-second-order fitting.
Polymers 15 02423 g006
Figure 7. Adsorption isothermal study: (a) relationship between the Qe and C0; (b) the linear fitted of Ce and Ce/Qe.
Figure 7. Adsorption isothermal study: (a) relationship between the Qe and C0; (b) the linear fitted of Ce and Ce/Qe.
Polymers 15 02423 g007
Table 1. Sample labels and corresponding formulation.
Table 1. Sample labels and corresponding formulation.
Sequence NumberAbbreviationFormaldehyde
(mol)
Thiourea
(mol)
Ammonium
Chloride
(mol) *
1FT1F0.5M0.510
2FT1F1M110
3FT1F2M210
4FT1F4M410
5S1T1F4M410.0187
6S2T1F4M410.0374
* FTFM self-assembly was terminated by the addition of ammonium chloride, which led to the formation of solid microspheres.
Table 2. Kinetic analysis of the adsorbent behavior of FTFM.
Table 2. Kinetic analysis of the adsorbent behavior of FTFM.
Sample NamePseudo-First Order Fitting (Equation (1))Pseudo-Second Order Fitting (Equation (2))R(1-2)2 **
(%)
Qe1
(mmol/g)
R12AARD1 *
(%)
Qe2
(mmol/g)
R22AARD2
(%)
S2T1F4M0.53 ± 1.2230.913118.861.09 ± 0.0120.9911.150.96
FT1F0.5M3.00 ± 1.3180.936308.948.44 ± 0.0090.9953.91>0.99
FT1F1M2.80 ± 2.2710.845290.6210.08 ± 0.0140.9933.78>0.99
FT1F2M3.56 ± 1.8950.949352.2711.20 ± 0.0110.9981.32>0.99
FT1F4M3.55 ± 2.0610.936421.7612.61 ± 0.0160.9943.59>0.99
Table 3. The isothermal analysis of silver ion adsorption on FTFM.
Table 3. The isothermal analysis of silver ion adsorption on FTFM.
Sample NameQmax *
(mmol/g)
b **
(ml/mmol)
R2
S2T1F4M1.32 ± 0.1629.1 ± 4.70.959
FT1F0.5M10.92 ± 0.4638.0 ± 1.90.994
FT1F1M13.48 ± 0.3334.1 ± 1.80.998
FT1F2M15.52 ± 0.6329.5 ± 2.90.995
FT1F4M18.17 ± 1.2825.7 ± 3.40.985
* The maximum absorbance capacity was calculated from the slopes of the linear fitting between Ce and Ce/Qe, where the Qe was measured after 4 hours’ of absorption under 25 °C for each group. ** b was the Langmuir constant, calculated from the intercepts of the fitting curves according to:.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Xia, J.; Zhou, G.; Wang, X.; Wang, D.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, J.; Gao, F. Flower-like Thiourea–Formaldehyde Resin Microspheres for the Adsorption of Silver Ions. Polymers 2023, 15, 2423. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15112423

AMA Style

Li Y, Wang X, Xia J, Zhou G, Wang X, Wang D, Zhang J, Cheng J, Gao F. Flower-like Thiourea–Formaldehyde Resin Microspheres for the Adsorption of Silver Ions. Polymers. 2023; 15(11):2423. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15112423

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yuhan, Xiaoli Wang, Jing Xia, Guangwei Zhou, Xiaomu Wang, Dingxuan Wang, Junying Zhang, Jue Cheng, and Feng Gao. 2023. "Flower-like Thiourea–Formaldehyde Resin Microspheres for the Adsorption of Silver Ions" Polymers 15, no. 11: 2423. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15112423

APA Style

Li, Y., Wang, X., Xia, J., Zhou, G., Wang, X., Wang, D., Zhang, J., Cheng, J., & Gao, F. (2023). Flower-like Thiourea–Formaldehyde Resin Microspheres for the Adsorption of Silver Ions. Polymers, 15(11), 2423. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15112423

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop