Next Article in Journal
Nanocellulose-Based Passivated-Carbon Quantum Dots (P-CQDs) for Antimicrobial Applications: A Practical Review
Next Article in Special Issue
A Comprehensive Review on the Thermal Stability Assessment of Polymers and Composites for Aeronautics and Space Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Efficient and Green Isolation of Keratin from Poultry Feathers by Subcritical Water
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of the Coupling Agent (3-Aminopropyl) Triethoxysilane on the Structure and Fire Behavior of Solvent-Free One-Pot Synthesized Silica-Epoxy Nanocomposites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Wall Materials for Encapsulating Bioactive Compounds via Spray-Drying: A Review

by
Elsa Díaz-Montes
Unidad Profesional Interdisciplinaria de Biotecnología, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av. Acueducto s/n, Barrio La Laguna Ticoman, Ciudad de Mexico 07340, Mexico
Polymers 2023, 15(12), 2659; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122659
Submission received: 28 March 2023 / Revised: 6 June 2023 / Accepted: 7 June 2023 / Published: 12 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Polymer/Biopolymer Stabilization and Degradation)

Abstract

:
Spray-drying is a continuous encapsulation method that effectively preserves, stabilizes, and retards the degradation of bioactive compounds by encapsulating them within a wall material. The resulting capsules exhibit diverse characteristics influenced by factors such as operating conditions (e.g., air temperature and feed rate) and the interactions between the bioactive compounds and the wall material. This review aims to compile recent research (within the past 5 years) on spray-drying for bioactive compound encapsulation, emphasizing the significance of wall materials in spray-drying and their impact on encapsulation yield, efficiency, and capsule morphology.

1. Introduction

Encapsulation is a process that involves trapping a particle, substance, or compound (core material) within a material called the wall material [1]. Encapsulation has been widely employed in various industries to protect, stabilize, and/or delay the degradation of components [2]. For instance, in the food industry, it is utilized to preserve enzymes, flavors, colors, and aromas, enhancing their stability, improving textures, and enabling controlled release [3]. In the pharmaceutical industry, it is used to facilitate easy administration and rapid absorption of oral drugs [4]. Meanwhile, the cosmetics industry employs encapsulation to develop personal care products such as anti-aging creams, sunscreens, moisturizers, and fragrances, which contain active substances (e.g., antioxidants, sunscreens, and whitening agents) [5].
Encapsulation processes can be carried out using hot techniques (e.g., solvent evaporation, spray-drying, and melt extrusion) or cold techniques (e.g., spray-chilling and freeze-drying), with spray-drying being the most widely used technique at the industrial level [6]. Depending on the technique, nanoparticles (capsules or spheres) ranging from 10 to 1000 nm or microcapsules (mononuclear, multinuclear, or matrix) from 3 to 800 µm can be generated [7,8], as depicted in Figure 1.
Nanocapsules are systems in which the compound of interest is surrounded by a single polymer, while nanospheres have the compound uniformly dispersed within their matrix [9]. Mononuclear microspheres have the compound surrounded by the wall material, multinuclear microspheres have multiple compounds trapped in their core, and matrix-type microspheres have the compound distributed homogeneously throughout the wall material [8].
The most commonly used wall materials in encapsulation processes include carbohydrates (such as maltodextrin, starch, dextran, alginate, chitosan, and gums), gums (such as Arabic, karaya, and xanthan), fibers (such as pectin and carrageenan), proteins (such as whey, casein, and gelatin), and waxes (such as beeswax, carnauba, and candelilla) [10].
Figure 2 illustrates publications from the last decade that are related to the wall materials used in encapsulation processes. The wall material plays a crucial role in encapsulation processes, and its selection often involves a trial-and-error approach. However, this approach can result in time and resource losses. The most viable option for choosing wall materials is to consider the compatibility of their physicochemical characteristics with the compounds to be encapsulated.
Based on the information provided, the aim of this study was to gather and summarize general information about encapsulation processes and the most commonly used wall materials in the industry. Relevant information (within the last 5 years) related to the spray-drying of bioactive components using various wall materials was analyzed.
The bibliographic search was conducted from 6 November 2021, to 23 May 2023, using the Scopus and Google Scholar databases. The search focused on the following keywords: encapsulation, spray-drying, chitosan, whey protein, gum Arabic, alginate, maltodextrin, dextran, starch, pectin, and carrageenan. Three types of documents were sought: book chapters, review articles, and original research articles. Book chapters and review articles were selected if the title contained the word “encapsulation”, regardless of the publication year. Original research articles had to meet two criteria: (1) being published between 2017 and 2023, and (2) mentioning spray-drying of bioactive compounds in the title or abstract. The selected information was then used to gather introductory information, definitions, contextualization, and a general overview from the review articles and book chapters. For the discussion, the information was synthesized from the methodologies and most relevant findings of the original research articles. Figure 3 summarizes the search strategy and the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the bibliographic search. The selected information was synthesized into images and tables for analysis and discussion in the subsequent sections.

2. Spray-Drying Process

Among the various encapsulation processes, techniques such as spray-drying, spray bed drying, fluid bed coating, and spray-cooling are employed, each with its own mode of operation, although they share the common goal of producing dry particles [11]. Spray-drying, in particular, is a unit process that converts a liquid dispersion into dry particles (<40 µm) and is considered one of the oldest and most widely used encapsulation techniques. It is renowned for its simplicity, user-friendliness, speed, continuous operation, and cost-effectiveness [2,12]. It is estimated that approximately 90% of encapsulated products, including ingredients and additives, are manufactured using this process [12].

Stages of the Spray-Drying Process

The spray-drying process is conducted using equipment such as the one depicted in Figure 4, and involves five consecutive stages. First, a liquid solution (without wall material) or a liquid dispersion (containing wall material) is sprayed through an atomizer, which can be pneumatic, rotating disk, fluid nozzle, pressure nozzle, or sonic nozzle [5]. Second, the generated droplets descend through the vacuum chamber, where hot gas (typically air) circulates. Third, temperature differences facilitate the transfer of mass from liquid to gas. Fourth, the liquid exits the equipment in vapor form. Finally, the remaining solid from the dispersion is collected in a container [13]. The spray-drying process predominantly produces polynuclear or matrix microcapsules (as shown in Figure 1) [11]. However, their shape and morphology are influenced by factors such as wall material, the concentration of dispersion (ratio of wall material to core material), and the operating conditions of the dryer (such as air temperature and feed rate) [8,11].

3. Wall Materials Used in Spray-Drying

The wall material refers to the protective matrix that safeguards the core material, such as particles, substances, or compounds, throughout the encapsulation process and subsequent handling. It should possess the ability to withstand mechanical stress (e.g., handling) and environmental conditions (e.g., humidity, temperature, and water activity) [14]. In spray-drying processes, the chosen wall material must ensure the stability and shelf-life of the encapsulated particle, substance, or compound, while also being cost-effective in terms of encapsulation yield and efficiency [15]. It is essential to understand the characteristics of the materials, regardless of this section aiming to define the primary materials utilized in spray-drying processes.
In this section, the composition and characteristics of the most commonly employed wall materials in spray-drying processes are described.

3.1. Polysaccharides

Polysaccharides are chains of simple sugars linked by glycosidic bonds. They are naturally synthesized by plants (e.g., starch and cellulose), animals (e.g., chitosan and chitin), and microorganisms (e.g., dextran and gellan gum) to produce energy and fulfill physiological and structural functions [16]. Some polysaccharides can also be enzymatically and chemically synthesized (e.g., condensation), such as certain cyclodextrins and chitosan derivates, to create non-natural, well-defined, and pure structures [17]. In commercial applications, polysaccharides are widely used as emulsifiers, gelling agents, flavorings, and encapsulants [18] as a result of their physicochemical properties such as viscosity and solubility [16]. They are commonly employed as ingredients in confectionery, beer, fried foods, ice creams, and sausages [18]. The most frequently used polysaccharides in spray-drying processes due to their low costs are starch, maltodextrin, chitosan, dextran, carrageenan, and gums [10]. The main characteristics of each are as follows:
  • Starch is a complex polysaccharide composed of amylose and amylopectin, primarily derived from tubers (e.g., potatoes, cassava, and sweet potatoes) and cereals (e.g., corn, sorghum, wheat, rice, rye, oats, and barley) [19]. This carbohydrate is made up of glucose monomers with free hydroxyl groups (-OH) at positions C2, C3, and C6, giving it a highly hydrophilic helical structure [20]. Starch finds applications in various industries such as textiles, chemicals, healthcare, and food, due to its physicochemical properties such as solubility, viscosity, texture, and thermal stability [20].
  • Maltodextrin is a polysaccharide derived from the hydrolysis of starch (from corn, rice, wheat, tapioca, sorghum, barley, etc.) with a dextrose equivalent value (DE: the ratio of reducing sugars to total sugars) of less than 20 [21]. Maltodextrin has different characteristics and properties compared to starch, leading to varied applications [22]. It is used as an additive in food products and beverages [23] and as a fat replacer in dairy, meat, and baked goods due to its ability to form gels, its hygroscopicity, solubility, viscosity, and sweetness [24].
  • Chitosan is a structural polysaccharide extracted from microorganisms (such as fungi and algae), marine animals (such as crustaceans and mollusks), and insects (such as scorpions and spiders), or obtained through the chemical deacetylation of chitin [25]. Chitosan is highly regarded for its antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral activity, attributed to its cationic polyelectrolyte character. It also possesses the ability to form gels due to its viscosity, plasticity, and solubility [26]. In recent years, chitosan has found applications in post-harvest pathogen control [27] and the development of biodegradable packaging [28].
  • Dextran is a polysaccharide synthesized by microorganisms, particularly lactic acid bacteria, and it possesses various thermal, rheological, viscosity, and solubility properties due to its branching structure [29]. The application of dextran has been primarily explored as a food additive in the formulation of emulsions, nanoparticles, and immobilizers [30]. It is also used as an excipient in the formulation of inhaled drugs (such as rifampicin and budesonide) due to its humectant, stabilizing, and preserving action [31,32].
  • Carrageenan is a sulfated polysaccharide extracted from red seaweeds such as Kappaphycus and Eucheuma. It exhibits structural diversity due to the degree of sulfation and can be classified as κ-, ι-, θ-, μ-, ν-, and λ-carrageenan [33]. Carrageenan does not have proven nutritional value, but it finds special application in the food industry due to its gelling, stabilizing, binding, and thickening properties. It is used in products such as jellies, dressings, fat substitutes, and pet food. Additionally, carrageenan has been utilized in experimental medicine, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics as anti-inflammatory agents, hydrogels, drug carriers, and vehicle for drug delivery [34].
  • Gums are water-soluble polysaccharides that do not have a specific classification but are recognized for producing viscous–sticky dispersions at low concentrations. Gums are extracted from algae (such as agars and alginates), microorganisms (such as gellan and xanthan), or higher plants (such as pectin, Arabic, and arabinogalactans) [35]. The gel-forming properties of gums are due to their affinity for water, allowing for rapid hydration and swelling of the structure. The degree of hydration results in various rheological properties that enable their application in construction materials (such as adhesives), food products (such as texture enhancers, stabilizers, and coatings), medical and pharmaceutical products (such as encapsulants), and textile products (such as additives) [36].

3.2. Proteins

Proteins are macromolecular structures composed of amino acids and play a vital role in all biological processes of living organisms. They can exist in the form of enzymes, hormones, antibodies, and receptors [37]. Proteins are part of the human diet as they are present in varying proportions in all animal- and plant-based products that are consumed. These macromolecules are valued in the industry for their gel-forming and foaming properties, particularly in the food industry, allowing their application to enrich existing products [38]. The use of proteins in spray-drying processes is feasible due to their ability to form rigid matrices, especially with proteins such as gluten, isolated proteins (e.g., soy and pea proteins), caseins, whey proteins, and gelatin [10]. Below, their main characteristics are described:
  • Gluten is a mixture of insoluble, gummy proteins found in cereals such as wheat, rye, and barley. It is obtained by removing starch and soluble material from a dough made with grains [39]. The rheological properties of gluten facilitate the retention of air in the dough, making it particularly useful in processed food products such as breads, pasta, cookies, cakes, and other fermented goods [40].
  • Casein is a group of proteins found in milk, which can be divided into four phosphoproteins: αS1, αS2, β, and κ-casein. These proteins organize themselves into micellar networks. Casein can be obtained through milk precipitation at pH 4.6, electrophoresis, or membrane processes [41]. The primarily significance of casein lies in the realm of sports, as it contributes to the nutritional composition of dietary supplements. However, it can also be applied in the formulation of nano and micro materials, food additives, and biodegradable films, as it can form gels when interacting with other polymers [42].
  • Gelatin is a water-soluble protein derived from the hydrolysis of collagen, an insoluble product found in animal cartilage, skin, fibers, and tendons. Gelatin is classified as a hydrocolloid due to its high water-holding capacity. Its viscosity is its main property, which allows it to texture, thicken, stabilize emulsions, create foams, and form thermo-reversible gels [43]. Gelatin is free of sugars and fats and is rich in proteins. It is commonly used as an additive in food products such as confectionery, beverages, sweets, and dairy products. It also serves as an excipient in the pharmaceutical industry [44].
  • Whey proteins are by-products obtained during the processing of dairy products such as cheese and casein. They can be classified into protein concentrates and protein isolates [45]. Whey proteins can be further categorized into four main proteins: β-lactoglobulin, α-lactalbumin, serum albumin, and immunoglobulin. Apart from their nutritional value, whey proteins possess binding and gelling properties, and they are capable of stabilizing foams and forming emulsions. As a result, they are used in various food products, including supplements, soups, sausages, desserts, and sweets) [46].

3.3. Lipids

Lipids are organic molecules that, as polysaccharides and proteins do, also play important biological and structural roles within living organisms. They are characterized by their insolubility in water [10]. Lipids exhibit a high degree of diversity due to their infinite structures; however, they can be generally classified into triacylglycerols, waxes esters, phosphoglycerides, sphingolipids, and sterols [47]. Lipids are used as fuels, plastics, detergents, soaps, paints, lubricants, and cosmetics. In the food industry, they are utilized as edible oils and coatings [48]. Among lipids, waxes are the most commonly employed in spray-drying encapsulation. Below, their main characteristics are described.
  • Waxes are soft or sticky substances that form on the surface of plants (e.g., carnauba and candelilla), as well as on the body of animals (e.g., whales and sheep) and insects (e.g., bees). They are composed of long-chain aliphatic compounds that vary depending on their source of production, Waxes may contain fatty acids, primary and secondary alcohols, aldehydes, sterol esters, ketones, triacylglycerols, and triterpenes [49]. Waxes exhibit high hydrophobicity and resistance to hydrolytic degradation, making them suitable for use as protectants, surface polishes, lubricants, and repellents in the food, cosmetic and automotive industries [50].

4. Encapsulation of Bioactive Compounds Using Spray-Drying Processes

Bioactive compounds are secondary metabolites extracted from plants, and their significance lies in their wide range of properties that promote the health of humans and animals, such as antioxidant, antimicrobial, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer effects [51]. The most valued bioactive compounds for the industry include essential oils, carotenoids, fatty acids, phenolic acids, and flavonoids. These metabolites are extracted using methods such as solvent extraction, electrical pulses, hydrolysis, membrane systems, and others. However, the main challenge arises when it comes to their storage. Bioactive compounds can be volatile, thermolabile, and unstable, requiring protection to maintain their bioactive activity [52].
Spray-drying has emerged as a favorable alternative to protect bioactive compounds from environmental conditions, stabilize them, and enhance their bioavailability for potential application in food and pharmaceutical products. While there is no established protocol for conducting a spray-drying process for all bioactive compounds, there are five factors that can be considered:
  • Functional groups of the wall material [53,54];
  • Molecular weight of the wall material [55,56];
  • Hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity of the wall material [57,58];
  • Concentration of the wall material [59,60];
  • Mixtures between wall materials [55,56];
  • Operating conditions of the dryer [60,61].
These parameters significantly influence the stability of the encapsulates during the drying process and storage. This section summarizes studies from the last five years that have reported the use of spray-drying in the encapsulation of bioactive components from various plant sources. Tables are provided, which group the wall materials, operating conditions of the dryers, and the main results in terms of morphology, yield, efficacy, and preserved bioactive compounds.

4.1. Polysaccharide-Based Wall Materials

Polysaccharides are characterized by the presence of multiple -OH groups in their structure, enabling them to interact with each other and with other molecules, including water and other wall materials [62]. Based on Table 1, polysaccharides are widely employed as materials in spray-drying processes for encapsulating bioactive compounds. Here, some important findings in spray-drying with polysaccharides are presented.
  • Starch is a carbohydrate that can undergo modifications to interact with hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds. For example, Ocampo-Salinas et al. [72] stated that substituting the native groups of rice starch with octenyl-succinic anhydride modified its viscosity and thermal properties, enhancing its emulsifying capacity and facilitating the encapsulation process of bioactive compounds from vanilla. García-Gurrola et al. [115] modified starch through phosphorylation, esterification, and acetylation techniques, improving the retention and stability of encapsulated phenolic compounds extracted from red sorghum. This enhancement was attributed to increased hydration and swelling of the capsules. The study by García-Gurrola et al. [115] also demonstrated that starch acetylation increases its hydrophobic nature and improves the retention of lipidic bioactive compounds. Márquez-Gómez [70] reported that the mixture of native starch with modified starches (acetylated starch and maltodextrin) improved the stability and prevented the oxidation of essential orange oil. This improvement was attributed to a reduction in diffusivity and an increase in hydrophobicity through starch acetylation.
  • Maltodextrin, a polysaccharide, plays a crucial role in encapsulation, particularly due to its DE level. The study carried out by Laokuldilok and Kanha [116] reports that as the DE decreased (from 30 to 10), the encapsulation efficiency of black rice anthocyanins increased by 30%. The authors observed that the increase in drying temperature also negatively impacted the encapsulation efficiency, but only in the encapsulates with a high DE, which could be attributed to increased oxidative reactions in the polymer. The effect of temperature in spray-drying processes with maltodextrin was also evaluated by Boyano-Orozco et al. [117], who found that the concentration of the wall material significantly affected the encapsulation efficiency when encapsulating phenolic compounds and tannins from rambutan peel. The authors noted that temperatures above 160 °C adversely affected the stability of the bioactive components when using maltodextrin concentrations below 10% w/w. Meanwhile, Balasubramani et al. [118] concluded, after encapsulating garlic oleoresin with maltodextrin, that the concentration of maltodextrin must be in an appropriate ratio to the core material concentration. Specifically, a wall material to core material ratio of 6:1 is required to ensure the highest encapsulation efficiency and component stability.
  • Chitosan contains -OH groups at positions C3 and C6, as well as an amino group (-NH2) at position C2, which enables it to form ionic and electrostatic interactions with other molecules [119]. However, to achieve more rigid and resistant matrices, chitosan is often cross-linked with compounds that possess reactive functional groups, such as dialdehydes, glutaraldehyde, or tripolyphosphate [120]. For example, Aranaz et al. [102] encapsulated venlafaxine hydrochloride with chitosan obtained from two sources (blue crab and royal crab) and mixed it with tripolyphosphate. The authors observed that the degree of cross-linking between chitosan and tripolyphosphate varied among different experiments. Specifically, chitosan with higher viscosity exhibited less cross-linking, resulting in lower encapsulation efficiency. The study by Amorim et al. [121] reports that chitosan cross-linking improves with an increase in the inlet temperature during the spray-drying process.
  • Dextran’s properties are primarily influenced by the molecular size of its chains. In a study by Wilson et al. [122], proteins were encapsulated with dextrans of two different sizes, 20 and 70 kDa, and it was observed that as the size increased, the available area also increased, resulting in a more rigid and less flexible three-dimensional structure. This improvement in structural properties enhanced the protein encapsulation efficiency. Another influential parameter in dextran encapsulation is temperature, as demonstrated by Wang and Meenach [123]. When encapsulating curcumin, the authors found that the highest encapsulation efficiency was achieved at a low dextran concentration (20%) and a high drying temperature (140 °C). The authors attributed these results to the polydispersity generated in the matrices, suggesting that the combination of low dextran concentration and high temperature contributed to the formation of more uniform and efficient encapsulation matrices.
  • Carrageenan’s encapsulation efficiency is influenced by the type of component it encapsulates. Generally, any type of carrageenan is suitable for the encapsulating aqueous extracts. However, the study by Marín-Peñalver et al. [124] demonstrated that the encapsulation of lipid components is deficient. The interaction between carrageenan and lipids is very poor, resulting in incomplete homogenization and the components being left outside the capsules.
  • Gums are another type of polysaccharide with gel-forming properties, which are attributed to their chemical structure consisting of -OH groups that may have branching or side substitutions of ester groups (-COO-R) or ether groups (ROR’), giving them a linear, helical, or cyclic conformation [36]. Gums undergo modifications during spray-drying processes, leading to the formation of encapsulates. Correâ-Filho et al. [60] encapsulated β-carotene with gum Arabic and evaluated the encapsulation yield at varying concentrations (5–35%) and temperatures (110–200 °C). The study reports that temperature influenced antioxidant activity only when the percentage of wall material was low, while the highest yield was obtained using intermediate levels of temperature and gum concentration. The morphology was affected by temperature, with lower temperatures resulting in microspheres with higher cavity content and rougher surfaces. Additionally, lower inlet temperatures resulted in smaller particles, which can be attributed to the increased swelling and shrinkage that occurs when water evaporates slowly.
Polysaccharides, including carbohydrates and gums, are highly versatile wall materials extensively used in encapsulation processes [125]. Their gelling properties enable the formation of matrices capable of entrapping various types of compounds. This ability is dependent on their chemical structure, the bonds they can establish with other molecules, their functional groups, and their molecular weight [126].

4.2. Protein-Based Wall Materials

Proteins possess a diverse array of functional groups, including carboxylic acids, amines, carboxamides, alcohols, thioethers, and thiols [127]. These functional groups enable proteins to interact with both hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds [128]. However, in many studies involving proteins as wall materials, the focus is on investigating their interaction with other wall materials (see Table 2 and Section 4.4), particularly polysaccharides. This is because the combination of protein and polysaccharide results in heightened electrostatic interactions between the two components [129].
For instance, Fu et al. [143] observed that capsules formed with protein isolate during the encapsulation of vitamin E exhibited a collapsed spherical shape with surface cracks and roughness. This irregular morphology was attributed to the uneven dispersion of the droplet during the spray-drying process. The authors concluded that the incorporation of a polysaccharide into the protein dispersion improved homogenization, resulting in a more stable particle size and a regular morphology. In another study by Khalilvandi-Behroozyar et al. [144], the encapsulation of a polyunsaturated oil, specifically fish oil, with casein was evaluated. The findings indicated that effective oil protection was achieved when casein was used in a ratio equal to or less than the oil, such as 1:1 or 1:2 (casein–oil). Moreover, the combination of a polysaccharide with the protein enhanced encapsulation efficiency and prolonged the storage period of the encapsulated components.

4.3. Lipid-Based Wall Materials

Lipids are wall materials that are rarely used alone (see Section 4.4). The role of lipids in encapsulation processes is to enhance the gelling properties and viscosity of dispersions based on polysaccharides and proteins [145].
Some studies use lipid materials to create emulsions which are subsequently subjected to the spray-drying process using another wall material. For instance, Salminen et al. [146] developed two emulsions: one based on triacylglycerol with lecithin and saponins, and the other based on triacylglycerol and the compound to be encapsulated (fish oil). The authors combined both emulsions to induce crystallization and then mixed them with maltodextrin as the wall material for the drying process.

4.4. Spray-Drying with Wall Material Mixtures

The evaluation of different types of wall materials has been conducted during spray-drying of the same compound to compare their encapsulation efficiency, morphology, and the properties preserved in each encapsulated compound. This comparison aims to select the most suitable or best-performing wall material. Table 3 presents the combinations of polysaccharides, proteins and lipids used in spray-drying processes for the encapsulation of bioactive compounds. However, most of the research focuses on creating polymer blends to examine whether the combination of their characteristics leads to improvements in the properties of the encapsulation compounds. The following are the five most interesting findings in the encapsulation of bioactive components using material blends:
  • The type and concentration of polysaccharides, lipids, and/or proteins have an impact on the encapsulation efficiency and capsule morphology [147].
  • Blending materials of different nature enables the encapsulation of various type of bioactive compounds [148,149,150,151].
  • Polysaccharides have the greatest influence on the yield within the wall material blends [152].
  • Polysaccharides can be blended with other polysaccharides [153], lipids [154], and/or proteins [155].
  • Lipids enhance the morphological characteristics of the capsules when combined with polysaccharides and/or proteins [154].
Table 3. Encapsulation of bioactive compounds with wall material mixtures.
Table 3. Encapsulation of bioactive compounds with wall material mixtures.
Wall MaterialCore MaterialConcentration: Wall Material: Core MaterialConditions (Feed Rate, Inlet Air, Outlet Air)Particles (Shape/Morphology, Particle Size Distribution)Process Yield/Encapsulation EfficiencyEncapsulated CompoundsReferences
CH/MDTuna fish oil15:15:10–40% w/w/w0.7 L/h, 180 °C, 85 °Cnr./nr., nr.nr./81–91%Anisidine [156]
Lentil-PI/MDFlaxseed oil16.5–19:1% w/w3 mL/min, 135 °C, 95 °CSpherical/Wrinkled, nr.nr./nr.Oil and Thiobarbituric acid [157]
Lentil-PI/κ-Carr/MDFlaxseed oil16.5–19:1:5–7.5% w/w/w3 mL/min, 135 °C, 95 °CSpherical/Wrinkled, nr.nr./85%Oil and Thiobarbituric acid [157]
Lentil-PI/ι-Carr/MDFlaxseed oil16.5–19:1:5–7.5% w/w/w3 mL/min, 135 °C, 95 °CSpherical/Wrinkled, nr.nr./83–84%Oil and Thiobarbituric acid [157]
Kidney bean-PI/κ-CarrShrimp oil10:0.1:0.1–1% w/w/w5 mL/min, 180 °C, 105 °CSpherical/Wrinkled, 2.5–6.4 μmnr./43–89%Fatty acids (C14, C15, C16, C17, C18, C20, C23, C24, SFA, MUFA, and PUFA) [158]
GA/CH/Apple pectinSatureja khuzistanica Jamzad extract10:1% w/w3.5 mL/min, 115 °C, nr.Semi-spherical/Smooth, 2–5 μmnr./58%Phenolic compounds [96]
GA/CH/Apple pectinSatureja rechingeri Jamzad extract10:1% w/w3.5 mL/min, 115 °C, nr.Semi-spherical/Smooth, 2–5 μmnr./54%Phenolic compounds [96]
HCP/GelatinTurmeric oleoresin30:1:15% w/w/w6 mL/min, 170 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Smooth, 2–20 μm40%/72%Phenolic compounds and curcumin [152]
MD/GelatinTurmeric oleoresin26:0.6:15% w/w/w6 mL/min, 170 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Smooth, 2–20 μm25%/52%Phenolic compounds and curcumin [152]
Casein/PectinGrape (Vitis labrusca) by-product extract12.5:12.5:1.41% w/w/w10–14 mL/min, 120–160 °C, 68–98 °CSpherical/Smooth, 10 μm3–19%/60–83%Phenolic compounds and anthocyanins [159]
WPI/Rice-PCBaltic herring (Clupea harengus membras) oil7.5:7.5:15% w/w/w17 kg/h, 123–129 °C, 72–78 °CNon-spherical/Porous, 56 μmnr./40–50%Fatty acids (C14, C16, C18, C20, C22, C24, SFA, MUFA, and PUFA) [160]
WPI/MDMix (paprika-cinnamon oleoresin)2.5–7.5:1:1%w/ratio/ratio6 mL/min, 150 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Porous, 17–19 μm40–43%/90–96%Carotenoids [80]
WP/Mo-StarchCapsaicin1–9:1–9:20 ratio/ratio/%wnr., 185 °C, 85 °CSpherical/Wrinkled, 1.2–51.6 μm9–64%/50–94%Capsaicin [138]
WPI/MDGurum seed oil2:1:1 ratio20 mL/min, 180 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Withered, 3–25 μm85%/91%Oil [161]
GA/MDGurum seed oil2:1:1 ratio20 mL/min, 180 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Withered, 2–10 μm93%/97%Oil [161]
WPI/GA/MDGurum seed oil1:1:1:1 ratio20 mL/min, 180 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Withered, 3–10 μm90%/93%Oil [161]
MD/GAMamey (Pouteria sapota) pulp10:5–10:nr.%/%/nr.10 mL/min, 160 °C, 62–81 °Cnr./nr., 3 μmnr./nr.Carotenoids [162]
MD/Moringa oleitera gumMamey (Pouteria sapota) pulp10:5–10:nr.%/%/nr.10 mL/min, 160 °C, 62–81 °Cnr./nr., 3 μmnr./nr.Carotenoids [162]
MD/GACarriot (Daucus carota) pulp10:5–10:nr.%/%/nr.10 mL/min, 160 °C, 60–87 °Cnr./nr., 3 μmnr./nr.Carotenoids [162]
MD/Moringa oleitera gumCarriot (Daucus carota) pulp10:5–10:nr.%/%/nr.10 mL/min, 160 °C, 60–87 °Cnr./nr., 3 μmnr./nr.Carotenoids [162]
CH/GA/MDPetai leaf extract0–1:75:25:2.5% w/w/w/w20 mL/min, nr., 80 °CSpherical/Collapsed, nr.nr./nr.Phenolic compounds [163]
HP-βCD/MDGrape cane extract2.2:10:100% w/w/vnr., 130 °C, 71 °CSemi spherical/Smooth, 11 μm84%/81%Phenolic compounds (protocatechuic acid-O-hexoside, protocatechuic acid, ethyl protocatechuate, protocatechuic aldehyde, gallic acid, caftaric acid, ellagic acid pentoside, and hydroxybenzaldehyde), flavonoids (eriodictyol, quercetin-O-glucoside, quercetin-3-O-glucuronide, and astilbin), and stilbenes (resveratrol, stilbenoid tetramer, pallidol, ε-viniferin, stilbene, and restrytisol) [164]
GA/WPIBasil (Ocimum basilicum L.) essential oil2:2:1% w/w3 mL/min, 150 °C, nr.Spherical/Wrinkled, 4.2 μm71%/78%Essential oil [105]
WPI/MDBasil (Ocimum basilicum L.) essential oil2:2:1% w/w3 mL/min, 150 °C, nr.Spherical/Wrinkled, 3.2 μm66%/87%Essential oil [105]
GA/WPI/MDBasil (Ocimum basilicum L.) essential oil1.3:1.3:1% w/w/w3 mL/min, 150 °C, nr.Spherical/Wrinkled, 0.6 μm76%/83%Essential oil [105]
MD/Low methoxylated pectin/Sunflower waxFlaxseed oil3–12:1–2:1–2:1–15% w/w/w/w4 mL/min, 135 °C, nr.Spherical/Wrinkled, 12.9 μmnr./44–71%Carotenoids [154]
MD/Mo-StarchFish oil24:8:8% w/w/w40 L/min, 190 °C, 100 °CSpherical/Wrinkled, 0.3–69.2 μmnr./69%Fatty acids (saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated) [165]
GA/MDVitamin A7.5:7.5:2% w/w/w4 mL/min, 150 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Irregular, 0.1–0.2 μm20%/96%Vitamin A [67]
Starch/GAVitamin A7.5:7.5:2% w/w/w4 mL/min, 150 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Irregular, 0.1–0.2 μm7%/97%Vitamin A [67]
Starch/MDVitamin A7.5:7.5:2% w/w/w4 mL/min, 150 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Irregular, 0.1–0.2 μm19%/97%Vitamin A [67]
Starch/GA/MDVitamin A5:5:5:2% w/w/w/w4 mL/min, 150 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Irregular, 0.1–0.2 μm20%/98%Vitamin A [67]
MD/Mo-Starch/WPFingered citron extract33:33:33:10% w/w/w/w17–21 mL/min, 185 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Irregular, 27.5 μm76%/71%Phenolic compounds [166]
GA/Mo-Starch/WPFingered citron extract33:33:33:10% w/w/w/w17–21 mL/min, 185 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Irregular, 22.5 μm81%/76%Phenolic compounds [166]
GA/MD/WPFingered citron extract33:33:33:10% w/w/w/w17–21 mL/min, 185 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Irregular, 14.5 μm86%/79Phenolic compounds [166]
GA/MD/Mo-StarchFingered citron extract33:33:33:10% w/w/w/w17–21 mL/min, 185 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Irregular, 22.5 μm89%/86%Phenolic compounds [166]
GA/MD/Mo-Starch/WPFingered citron extract25:25:25:25:10% w/w/w/w/w17–21 mL/min, 185 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Irregular, 17.5 μm78%/84%Phenolic compounds [166]
Ar-Starch/GABlackberry (Rubus fruticosus) pulp0.5–2:1:1% w/w/w)0.2 kg/h, 100–150 °C, n.r.Spherical/Withered, 50–120 μm29–57/nr.Ascorbic acid and anthocyanins [167]
MD/GAChipilin (Crotalaria longirostrata) extract15:2:1% w/w/w3 mL/min, 120 °C, 60 °CAmorphous/Irregular, 3–8 μm47%/90%Phenolic compounds [85]
MD/Cajanus cajan gumChipilin (Crotalaria longirostrata) extract15:2:1% w/w/w3 mL/min, 120 °C, 60 °CAmorphous/Irregular, 3–8 μm51%/78%Phenolic compounds [85]
MD/Cocoa shell pectinChipilin (Crotalaria longirostrata) extract15:2:1% w/w/w3 mL/min, 120 °C, 60 °CAmorphous/Irregular, 3–8 μm62%/75%Phenolic compounds [85]
MD/Cajanus cajan proteinChipilin (Crotalaria longirostrata) extract15:2:1% w/w/w3 mL/min, 120 °C, 60 °CAmorphous/Irregular, 3–8 μm61%/93%Phenolic compounds [85]
MD/SPIChipilin (Crotalaria longirostrata) extract15:2:1% w/w/w3 mL/min, 120 °C, 60 °CAmorphous/Irregular, 3–8 μm62%/65%Phenolic compounds [85]
MD/PIEssential avocado oil10:5 w/w ratio5 mL/min, 160 °C, 90 °CSpherical/Aggregates, 0.1–1 μmnr./62%Essential oil [148]
OSA-MDEssential avocado oil10:5 w/w ratio5 mL/min, 160 °C, 90 °CSpherical/Aggregates, 0.1–1 μmnr./45%Essential oil [148]
OSA-MD/PIEssential avocado oil9:1:5 w/w/w ratio5 mL/min, 160 °C, 90 °CSpherical/Aggregates, 0.1–1 μmnr./61%Essential oil [148]
λ-Carr/GA/MDPropolis extract1:0.2:1:1% w/w/w/vnr., nr., nr.Spherical/Aggregates, 0.5–6 μm45–64%/nr.Phenolic compounds [168]
Ca-Starch/GALemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) essential oil1–9:1:1–4 rationr., 150–200 °C, nr.Spherical/Smooth, nr.nr./43–92%Essential oil [169]
MD/GAHorseradish leaf (Armoracia rusticana L.) juice20–80:20–80:20–80 ratio0.33 L/h, 120 °C, 80 °Cnr./nr., 3.8–4.3 μmnr./nr.Phenolic compounds, rutin, epicatechin, catechin and sinapic acid [77]
MD/GAHorseradish root (Armoracia rusticana L.) juice20–80:20–80:20–80 ratio0.33 L/h, 120 °C, 80 °Cnr./nr., 3.6–3.7 μmnr./nr.Phenolic compounds, rutin, epicatechin, catechin and sinapic acid [77]
MD/GANoni (Morinda citrifolia L.) juice5–9:1:5:1% w/w/wnr., 170 °C, 90 °CSemi-spherical/Wrinkled, 95–106 μmnr./nr.Phenolic compounds [170]
MD/WPC/GGRape seed oil15.4:3.9:9.5% w/w/w77 mL/min, 130 °C, 90 °CIrregular/Porous, 5–75 μm29%/90%Fatty acids (C14, C16, C18, SFA, MUFA, and PUFA) [155]
MD/WPC/GGFlax seed oil15.4:3.9:9.5% w/w/w77 mL/min, 130 °C, 90 °CIrregular/Porous, 5–75 μm30%/88%Fatty acids (C14, C16, C18, SFA, MUFA, and PUFA) [155]
MD/WPC/GGSafflower seed oil15.4:3.9:9.5% w/w/w77 mL/min, 130 °C, 90 °CIrregular/Porous, 5–75 μm30%/82%Fatty acids (C14, C16, C18, SFA, MUFA, and PUFA) [155]
Gelatin/Chia mucilageOregano (Origanum vulgare) essential oil1:1:1% w/w/wnr., 160–180 °C, nr.Spherical/Aggregates, 38–120 μm81–89%/85–96%Essential oil [171]
Gelatin/GAOregano (Origanum vulgare) essential oil1:1:1% w/w/wnr., 160–180 °C, nr.Spherical/Aggregates, 18–85 μm72–88%/89–95%Essential oil [171]
Casein/MDThyme (Thymus
vulgaris) essential oil
4.17:80:20% w/w/w7–5 mL/min, 110 °C, 70 °CSpherical/Irregular, 0.87 μmnr./89%Phenolic compounds [172]
OSA-Starch/MDβ-carotene1:1–3:1 ratio1100 mL/h, 185 °C, nr.Spherical/Wrinkled, 2–6 μmnr.β-carotene [173]
CH/WPIGarlic bulbs extract1:1:nr.% w/w/nr.nr., 160 °C, nr.Spherical/Aggregates, 2–10 μmnr./nr.Phenolic compounds [129]
Zein/NaCasCurcumin10:10% w/w120 L/min, 100 °C, nr.Spherical/Irregular, 143 nmnr./90–95%Curcumin [149]
κ-Carr/MPTuna oil1:1–50:1 ratio2.5 mL/min, 180 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Smooth, 3–6 μm82–97%/91–97%Oil [174]
λ-Carr/MPTuna oil1:1–50:1 ratio2.5 mL/min, 180 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Smooth, 3–5 μm82–99%/91–98%Oil [174]
MD/GelatinTurmeric (Curcuma longa L.) oleoresin12–26:0.6–6:15% w/w/w1.4–8.6 mL/min, 124–190 °C, nr.Spherical/Aggregates, nr.nr./4–77%Phenolic compounds [175]
Gelatin/Sodium hexametaphosphateAnchovy oil8:0.5:30% w/w/wnr., 160 °C, 94 °COval/Rough, 40–60 μm96%/100%Oil [176]
GA/MDFish oil15:15:15% w/w/wnr., 118–120 °C, nr.Spherical/Rugged, 13–105 μmnr./51–57%Oil [177]
Casein/Pectin/MDFish oil15:15:15:15% w/w/w/wnr., 118–120 °C, nr.Spherical/Rugged, 11–68 μmnr./65–68%Oil [177]
WPC/Hawthorn pectinGrape seed oil1–1.5:1–1.5:1% w/w/w40 mL/min, 170 °C, 85 °CSpherical/Smooth, 1.6–2.6 μmnr./65–71%Oil [178]
Ar-Starch/GABlackberry (Rubus fruticosus) pulp15.4:10.2% w/w0.2 kg/h, 100–150 °C, nr.Spherical/Aggregates, 50.9–119.8 μm29–57%/nr.Phenolic compounds [179]
MD/SPLemon by-product aqueous extract5:1 ratio4 mL/min, 125 °C, 55 °CSpherical/Smooth, nr.58–67%/nr.Phenolic compounds and flavonoids [89]
MD/ι-CarrLemon by-product aqueous extract9:1 ratio4 mL/min, 125 °C, 55 °CSpherical/Smooth, nr.56–59%/nr.Phenolic compounds and flavonoids [89]
Gelatin/MDFish oil7.5:32.5:10% w/wnr., 180 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Smooth, nr.nr./85%Oil [180]
κ-Carr/MDFish oil1:38.5:10% w/wnr., 180 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Smooth, nr.nr./67%Oil [180]
Gelatin/κ-CarrFish oil7.5:31.5:10% w/wnr., 180 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Smooth, nr.nr./75%Oil [180]
SC/βCDKenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) seed oil2:1:1 ratio8 g/min, 160 °C, nr.Spherical/Smooth holes, 37.3 μmnr./93%Oil [181]
GA/βCDKenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) seed oil2:1:1 ratio8 g/min, 160 °C, nr.Spherical/Smooth holes, 30.6 μmnr./95%Oil [181]
GA/SC/βCDKenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) seed oil4:1:1:1 ratio8 g/min, 160 °C, nr.Spherical/Smooth holes, 25.4 μmnr./90%Oil [181]
Brea gum/InulinCorn oil20:10–20:10% w/w/wnr., 150 °C, 60 °CSemi-spherical/Dents, 0.8–18 μmnr./74–92%Oil [111]
GA/InulinCorn oil20:10–20:10% w/w/wnr., 150 °C, 60 °CSemi-spherical/Dents, 15 μmnr./87–89%Oil [111]
MD/CarrPouzolzia zeylanica extract5–15:0.06–0.1:nr.% w/w/nr.nr., 180 °C, nr.nr./nr., 6 μmnr./nr.Phenolic compounds, anthocyanins, flavonoids, and tannins [182]
GA/MDGrape seed oil15:15:10% w/w/w350 mL/h, 180 °C, 105 °CSpherical/Collapsed, 27 μmnr./63%Fatty acids (C14, C16, C18, C20, SFA, MUFA, and PUFA) and phenolic compounds [110]
MD/GAAlgal (Tetraselmis chuii) biomass60:40:1 ratio/ratio/%w2.5 mL/min, 150 °C, 60 °CSpherical/Rough, 3.5–13.7 μm22–45%/54–84%Phenolic compounds, β-carotene, and carotenoids [99]
MD/GAPeach palm peel extract7.6:7.6:nr.% w/w/nr.12.6 mL/min, 160 °C, 70 °CIrregular/Irregular, nr.72%/67%β-carotene [183]
WPI/SCConjugated linoleic acid1:4:8% w/w/wnr., 160 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Irregular, 10–25 μmnr./96%Conjugated linoleic acid [141]
SOS-Starch/MDChili seed oil1–5:1:20–45% w/w/wnr., 160 °C, 80 °CPolyhedral/Irregular, 3–20 μmnr.Fatty acids (C14, C16, C18, C20, C22, SFA, MUFA, PUFA, and UFA) [151]
R-Starch/Mo-Starch/MD/HPOrange essential oil0–30:0–30:0–30:0–30:15% w/w/w/w/w3.75 mL/min, 180 °C, 85 °CSpherical/Rough, 30–40 μm38–82%/45–96%D-Limonene [70]
R-Starch/Mo-StarchOrange essential oil0–30:15% w/w/w3.75 mL/min, 180 °C, 85 °CSpherical/Rough, 30–40 μm65–73%/96–99%D-Limonene [70]
Mo-Starch/MDOrange essential oil0–30:15% w/w/w3.75 mL/min, 180 °C, 85 °CSpherical/Rough, 30–40 μm58%/99%D-Limonene [70]
MD/HPOrange essential oil0–30:15% w/w/w3.75 mL/min, 180 °C, 85 °CSpherical/Rough, 30–40 μm33%/44%D-Limonene [70]
R-Starch/HPOrange essential oil0–30:15% w/w/w3.75 mL/min, 180 °C, 85 °CSpherical/Rough, 30–40 μm87%/58%D-Limonene [70]
MD/GADrumstick (Moringa oleifera) oil25–75:25–75:30% w/w/w10 g/min, 180 °C, 85 °CSpherical/Smooth, 23–28 μmnr./83–91Oil [184]
MD/WPCDrumstick (Moringa oleifera) oil25–75:25–75:30% w/w/w10 g/min, 180 °C, 85 °CSpherical/Smooth, 11–18 μmnr./66–73%Oil [184]
MD/GASpent coffee ground extract1:1:10 w/w/v ratio108 mL/min, 100 °C, nr.Spherical/Withered, <30 μmnr./25–80%Phenolic compounds and flavonoids [94]
MD/Moringa oleitera gumTender coconut (Cocos nucifera) water10–50:0.5–1.5% w/w0.4 kg/h, 100–140 °C, 90–97 °CSpherical/Irregular, 2.5–15 μm9–38%/38–95%Phenolic compounds [185]
MD-CAPVitamin A70:30:1% w/w/w2 mL/min, 120 °C, 74 °CSemi-spherical/Dented, 2–4 μm80–81%/48–100%Vitamin A [186]
MD-SCVitamin E70:30:1% w/w/w2 mL/min, 120 °C, 74 °CSemi-spherical/Dented, 2–4 μm77–85%/23–29%Vitamin E [186]
MD/CAPVitamin A2.2–6.6:2.2–6.6:6% w/w/w1–5 mL/min, 110–130 °C, 55–60 °CSpherical/Irregular, 3–15 μmnr./59–63%Vitamin A [150]
MD/GVPropolis30:0.3:0.123% w/w/w8 mL/min, 120 °C, 70–74 °CDeformed spherical/Smooth, nr.60%/81–89%Phenolic compounds [91]
MD/GAPropolis30:0.3:0.123% w/w/w8 mL/min, 120 °C, 70–74 °CDeformed spherical/Smooth, nr.68%/84–93%Phenolic compounds [91]
C-Zein/-βCDα-Tocopherol2.5:1.85:0.5% w/w/w7–9 mL/min, 110–180 °C, nr.Spherical/Smooth holes, 10 μm44–77%/31–42%α-Tocopherol [137]
Gelatin/GAFish oil0.5:0.5:2% w/w/w6 mL/min, 190 °C, 90 °CSpherical/Smooth, 2–6 μmnr./87–94%Oil [187]
WPC/GAPumpkin (Cucurbita spp.) seed oil5:5:5% w/w/w0.8 L/h, 160 °C, 60 °CSpherical/Cracked, nr.65%/60%Oil [153]
WPC/C-StarchPumpkin (Cucurbita spp.) seed oil5:5:5% w/w/w0.8 L/h, 160 °C, 60 °CSpherical/Cracked, nr.60%/30%Oil [153]
WPC/Ma-StarchPumpkin (Cucurbita spp.) seed oil5:5:5% w/w/w0.8 L/h, 160 °C, 60 °CSpherical/Cracked, nr.55%/40%Oil [153]
WPC/MDPumpkin (Cucurbita spp.) seed oil5:5:5% w/w/w0.8 L/h, 160 °C, 60 °CSpherical/Cracked, nr.56%/93%Oil [153]
WPC/GlucosePumpkin (Cucurbita spp.) seed oil5:5:5% w/w/w0.8 L/h, 160 °C, 60 °CSpherical/Cracked, nr.56%/95%Oil [153]
WPC/SucrosePumpkin (Cucurbita spp.) seed oil5:5:5% w/w/w0.8 L/h, 160 °C, 60 °CSpherical/Cracked, nr.53%/96%Oil [153]
WPC/LactosePumpkin (Cucurbita spp.) seed oil5:5:5% w/w/w0.8 L/h, 160 °C, 60 °CSpherical/Cracked, nr.48%/95%Oil [153]
WPC/MaltosePumpkin (Cucurbita spp.) seed oil5:5:5% w/w/w0.8 L/h, 160 °C, 60 °CSpherical/Cracked, nr.56%/95%Oil [153]
Pectin/WPCFolic acid0.1–2:0.1–0.3% w/w/w450 mL/h, 180 °C, 90 °CSpherical/Smooth, 2–10 μmnr./nr.Folic acid [188]
nr.: not reported; Ar: arrowroot; C: corn; Ca: cassava; Carr: carrageenan; CAP: capsul; CH: chitosan; βCD: β-cyclodextrin; GA: gum Arabic; GG: gum guar; GV: gum vinal; C14: myristic acid; C15: pentadecanoic acid; C16: palmitic acid; C17: heptadecanoic acid; C18: stearic acid; C20: cetoleic acid; C22: adrenic acid; C23: tricosanoic acid; C24: tetracosanoic acid; HCP: Hi-cap100; HP-βCD: hydroxypropyl β-cyclodextrin; HP: hydrolyzed protein; Ma: manioc; MD: maltodextrin; Mo: modified; MP: myofibrillar protein; MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acid; NaCas: sodium caseinate; OSA: octenyl succinic anhydride; PC: protein concentrate; PI: protein isolate; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acid; R: rice; SC: sodium caseinate; SFA: saturated fatty acid; SOS: sodium octenylsuccinate; SP: soybean protein; SPI: soy protein isolate; UFA: unsaturated fatty acid; WP: whey protein; WPC: whey protein concentrate; WPI: whey protein isolate.

5. Concluding Remarks

Spray-drying is a versatile technique that finds wide application in various industries, such as food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic. Its adaptability to meet industry-specific requirements makes it a popular choice for encapsulating bioactive compounds. The selection of an appropriate wall material plays a crucial role in spray-drying processes, as it determines the formation of capsules, their stability, and the degree of protection provided to the core material (the desired compounds). Polysaccharides, due to their cost-effectiveness and favorable properties, are the most commonly used materials in encapsulation. They can be combined due to their cost and properties, which allow them to be mixed with other polysaccharides, proteins, or lipids to enhance encapsulation yield, efficiency, morphology, and stability. By carefully selecting one or more wall materials, the operating conditions of spray-drying, such as air temperature, airflow rate, and feed rate, can be manipulated to achieve optimal yields, encapsulation efficiency, and the desired physical and physicochemical properties in the encapsulated materials, while preserving their bioactivity.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Risch, S.J. Encapsulation: Overview of Uses and Techniques. In Encapsulation and Controlled Release of Food Ingredients; Risch, S.J., Reineccius, G.A., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1995; pp. 2–7. ISBN 9780841231641. [Google Scholar]
  2. Nedovic, V.; Kalusevic, A.; Manojlovic, V.; Levic, S.; Bugarski, B. An Overview of Encapsulation Technologies for Food Applications. Procedia Food Sci. 2011, 1, 1806–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Shahidi, F.; Han, X.-Q. Encapsulation of Food Fngredients. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1993, 33, 501–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ahmad, M.; Madni, A.; Usman, M.; Munir, A.; Akhtar, N.; Shoaib Khan, H.M. Pharmaceutical Micro Encapsulation Technology for Development of Controlled Release Drug Delivery Systems. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2011, 75, 384–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Casanova, F.; Santos, L. Encapsulation of Cosmetic Active Ingredients for Topical Application—A Review. J. Microencapsul. 2015, 33, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Mohammed, N.K.; Tan, C.P.; Manap, Y.A.; Muhialdin, B.J.; Hussin, A.S.M. Spray Drying for the Encapsulation of Oils—A Review. Molecules 2020, 25, 3873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gunasekaran, S.; Ko, S. Rationales of Nano- and Microencapsulation for Food Ingredients. In Nano- and Microencapsulation for Foods; Kwak, H.-S., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; Volume 9781118292, pp. 43–64. ISBN 9781118292327. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tolve, R.; Galgano, F.; Caruso, M.C.; Tchuenbou-Magaia, F.L.; Condelli, N.; Favati, F.; Zhang, Z. Encapsulation of Health-Promoting Ingredients: Applications in Foodstuffs. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 67, 888–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ezhilarasi, P.N.; Karthik, P.; Chhanwal, N.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Nanoencapsulation Techniques for Food Bioactive Components: A Review. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 628–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wandrey, C.; Bartkowiak, A.; Harding, S.E. Materials for Encapsulation. In Encapsulation Technologies for Active Food Ingredients and Food Processing; Zuidam, N.J., Nedovic, V.A., Eds.; Springer Science + Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 31–100. ISBN 9781441910073. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zuidam, N.J.; Shimoni, E. Overview of Microencapsulates for Use in Food Products and Processes and Methods to Make Them. In Encapsulation Technologies for Active Food Ingredients and Food Processing; Zuidam, N.J., Nedovic, V., Eds.; Springer Science + Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 3–29. ISBN 9781441910080. [Google Scholar]
  12. Đorđević, V.; Balanč, B.; Belščak-Cvitanović, A.; Lević, S.; Trifković, K.; Kalušević, A.; Kostić, I.; Komes, D.; Bugarski, B.; Nedović, V. Trends in Encapsulation Technologies for Delivery of Food Bioactive Compounds. Food Eng. Rev. 2015, 7, 452–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vehring, R.; Snyder, H.; Lechuga-Ballesteros, D. Spray Drying. In Drying Technologies for Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Applications; Ohtake, S., Izutsu, K., Lechuga-Ballesteros, D., Eds.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2020; ISBN 9783527341122. [Google Scholar]
  14. Coimbra, P.P.S.; Cardoso, F.d.S.N.; Gonçalves, É.C.B.d.A. Spray-Drying Wall Materials: Relationship with Bioactive Compounds. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 61, 2809–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Anandharamakrishnan, C.; Ishwarya, S.P. (Eds.) Selection of Wall Material for Encapsulation by Spray Drying. In Spray Drying Techniques for Food Ingredient Encapsulation; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 77–100. ISBN 9781118863985. [Google Scholar]
  16. Aravamudhan, A.; Ramos, D.M.; Nada, A.A.; Kumbar, S.G. Natural Polymers: Polysaccharides and Their Derivatives for Biomedical Applications. In Natural and Synthetic Biomedical Polymers; Kumbar, S.G., Laurencin, C.T., Deng, M., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: San Diego, CA, USA, 2014; pp. 67–89. ISBN 9780123969835. [Google Scholar]
  17. Yu, Y.; Delbianco, M. Synthetic Polysaccharides. In Recent Trends in Carbohydrate Chemistry; Rauter, A.P., Christensen, B.E., Somsák, L., Kosma, P., Adamo, R., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 333–371. ISBN 9780128174678. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jindal, N.; Singh Khattar, J. Microbial Polysaccharides in Food Industry. In Biopolymers for Food Design; Grumezescu, A.M., Holban, A.M., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: Oxford, UK, 2018; pp. 95–123. ISBN 9780128114490. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jane, J.L. Structural Features of Starch Granules II. In Starch—Chemistry and Technology; BeMiller, J., Whistler, R., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: Oxford, UK, 2009; pp. 193–236. ISBN 9780127462752. [Google Scholar]
  20. Omoregie Egharevba, H. Chemical Properties of Starch and Its Application in the Food Industry. In Chemical Properties of Starch; Emeje, M., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019; pp. 1–26. ISBN 9781838801168. [Google Scholar]
  21. Parikh, A.; Agarwal, S.; Raut, K. A Review on Applications of Maltodextrin in Pharmaceutical Industries. Int. J. Pharm. Biol. Sci. 2014, 4, 67–74. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ishwarya, S.P.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Nanospray Drying: Principle and Food Processing Applications. In Innovative Food Processing Technolgies; Knoerzer, K., Muthukumarappan, K., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 605–633. ISBN 9780128157824. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hofman, D.L.; van Buul, V.J.; Brouns, F.J.P.H. Nutrition, Health, and Regulatory Aspects of Digestible Maltodextrins. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 56, 2091–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chavan, R.S.; Khedkar, C.D.; Bhatt, S. Fat Replacer. Encycl. Food Health 2016, 2, 589–595. [Google Scholar]
  25. Rinaudo, M. Chitin and Chitosan: Properties and Applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2006, 31, 603–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lizardi-Mendoza, J.; Argüelles Monal, W.M.; Goycoolea Valencia, F.M. Chemical Characteristics and Funtional Properties of Chitosan. In Chitosan in the Preservation of Agricultural Commodities; Bautista-Baños, S., Romanazzi, G., Jiménez-Aparicio, A., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: Oxford, UK, 2016; pp. 3–31. ISBN 9780128027356. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bautista-Baños, S.; Ventura-Aguilar, R.I.; Correa-Pacheco, Z.; Corona-Rangel, M.L. Quitosano: Un Polisacárido Antimicrobiano Versátil Para Frutas y Hortalizas En Poscosecha—Una Revisión. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Hortic. 2017, 23, 103–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Díaz-Montes, E.; Castro-Muñoz, R. Trends in Chitosan as a Primary Biopolymer for Functional Films and Coatings Manufacture for Food and Natural Products. Polymers 2021, 13, 767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Heinze, T.; Liebert, T.; Heublein, B.; Hornig, S. Functional Polymers Based on Dextran. In Polysaccharides II; Klemm, D., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 199–291. [Google Scholar]
  30. Díaz-Montes, E. Dextran: Sources, Structures, and Properties. Polysaccharides 2021, 2, 554–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Varshosaz, J.; Ahmadi, F.; Emami, J.; Tavakoli, N.; Minaiyan, M.; Mahzouni, P.; Dorkoosh, F. Microencapsulation of Budesonide with Dextran by Spray Drying Technique for Colon-Targeted Delivery: An in Vitro/in Vivo Evaluation in Induced Colitis in Rat. J. Microencapsul. 2011, 28, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kadota, K.; Yanagawa, Y.; Tachikawa, T.; Deki, Y.; Uchiyama, H.; Shirakawa, Y.; Tozuka, Y. Development of Porous Particles Using Dextran as an Excipient for Enhanced Deep Lung Delivery of Rifampicin. Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 555, 280–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ortiz-Tena, J.G.; Schieder, D.; Sieber, V. Carrageenan and More: Biorefinery Approaches with Special Reference to the Processing of Kappaphycus. In Tropical Seaweed Farming Trends, Problems and Opportunities: Focus on Kappaphycus and Eucheuma of Commerce; Hurtado, A.Q., Critchley, A.T., Neish, I.C., Eds.; Springer International Publishing AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 9, pp. 155–164. ISBN 9783319634975. [Google Scholar]
  34. Loureido, R.R.; Cornish, M.L.; Neish, I.C. Applications of Carrageenan: With Special Reference to Iota and Kappa Forms as Derived from the Eucheumatoid Seaweeds. In Tropical Seaweed Farming Trends, Problems and Opportunities: Focus on Kappaphycus and Eucheuma of Commerce; Hurtado, A.Q., Critchley, A.T., Neish, I.C., Eds.; Springer International Publishing AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 165–171. ISBN 9783319634975. [Google Scholar]
  35. BeMiller, J.N. (Ed.) Guar, Locust Bean, Tara, and Cassia Gums. In Carbohydrate Chemistry for Food Scientists; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 241–252. ISBN 9780128120699. [Google Scholar]
  36. BeMiller, J.N. Gums and Related Polysaccharides. In Glycoscience; Fraser-Reid, B., Tatsuta, K., Thiem, J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 1513–1533. ISBN 9783540304296. [Google Scholar]
  37. Blanco, A.; Blanco, G. (Eds.) Proteins. In Medical Biochemistry; Elsevier Inc.: Oxford, UK, 2017; pp. 21–71. ISBN 9780128035504. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lafarga, T. Potential Applications of Plant-Derived Proteins in the Food Industry. In Novel Proteins for Food, Pharmaceuticals and Agriculture: Sources, Applications and Advances; Hayes, M., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 117–137. ISBN 9781119385301. [Google Scholar]
  39. Shewry, P. What Is Gluten—Why Is It Special? Front. Nutr. 2019, 6, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Day, L.; Augustin, M.A.; Batey, I.L.; Wrigley, C.W. Wheat-Gluten Uses and Industry Needs. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2006, 17, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. O’Kennedy, B.T. Caseins. In Handbook of Food Proteins; Phillips, G.O., Williams, P.A., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Sawston, UK, 2011; pp. 13–29. ISBN 9781845697587. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wusigale; Liang, L.; Luo, Y. Casein and Pectin: Structures, Interactions, and Applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 97, 391–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Haug, I.J.; Draget, K.I. Gelatin. In Handbook of Food Proteins; Phillips, G.O., Williams, P.A., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Sawston, UK, 2011; pp. 92–115. ISBN 9781845697587. [Google Scholar]
  44. Mariod, A.A.; Adam, H.F. Review: Gelatin, Source, Extraction and Industrial Applications. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2013, 12, 135–147. [Google Scholar]
  45. Boland, M. Whey Protein. In Handbook of Food Proteins; Phillips, G.O., Williams, P.A., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Sawston, UK, 2011; pp. 30–55. ISBN 9781845697587. [Google Scholar]
  46. Jovanović, S.; Barać, M.; Maćej, O. Whey Proteins-Properties and Possibility of Application. Mljekarstvo 2005, 55, 215–233. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sargent, J.R.; Tocher, D.R.; Bell, J.G. The Lipids. In Fish Nutrition; Halver, J.E., Hardy, R.W., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 181–257. ISBN 9780123196521. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tao, B.Y. Industrial Applications for Plant Oils and Lipids. In Bioprocessing for Value-Added Products from Renewable Resources—New Technologies and Applications; Yang, S.-T., Ed.; Elsevier B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 611–627. ISBN 9780444521149. [Google Scholar]
  49. Tinto, W.F.; Elufioye, T.O.; Roach, J. Waxes. In Pharmacognosy: Fundamentals, Applications and Strategy; Badal, S., Delgoda, R., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 443–455. ISBN 9780128021040. [Google Scholar]
  50. Vanhercke, T.; Wood, C.C.; Stymne, S.; Singh, S.P.; Green, A.G. Metabolic Engineering of Plant Oils and Waxes for Use as Industrial Feedstocks. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2013, 11, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Uwineza, P.A.; Waśkiewicz, A. Recent Advances in Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Natural Bioactive Compounds from Natural Plant Materials. Molecules 2020, 25, 3847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bazana, M.T.; Codevilla, C.F.; de Menezes, C.R. Nanoencapsulation of Bioactive Compounds: Challenges and Perspectives. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2019, 26, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ceja-Medina, L.I.; Ortiz-Basurto, R.I.; Medina-Torres, L.; Calderas, F.; Bernad-Bernad, M.J.; González-Laredo, R.F.; Ragazzo-Sánchez, J.A.; Calderón-Santoyo, M.; González-ávila, M.; Andrade-González, I.; et al. Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus Plantarum by Spray Drying with Mixtures of Aloe Vera Mucilage and Agave Fructans as Wall Materials. J. Food Process Eng. 2020, 43, e13436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Medina-Torres, L.; Núñez-Ramírez, D.M.; Calderas, F.; González-Laredo, R.F.; Minjares-Fuentes, R.; Valadez-García, M.A.; Bernad-Bernad, M.J.; Manero, O. Microencapsulation of Gallic Acid by Spray Drying with Aloe Vera Mucilage (Aloe Barbadensis Miller) as Wall Material. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2019, 138, 111461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Desai, K.G.; Liu, C.; Park, H.J. Characteristics of Vitamin C Encapsulated Tripolyphosphate-Chitosan Microspheres as Affected by Chitosan Molecular Weight. J. Microencapsul. 2006, 23, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sun, Y.; Cui, F.; Shi, K.; Wang, J.; Niu, M.; Ma, R. The Effect of Chitosan Molecular Weight on the Characteristics of Spray-Dried Methotrexate-Loaded Chitosan Microspheres for Nasal Administration. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2009, 35, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chang, C.; Nickerson, M.T. Encapsulation of Omega 3-6-9 Fatty Acids-Rich Oils Using Protein-Based Emulsions with Spray Drying. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 2850–2861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Subtil, S.F.; Rocha-Selmi, G.A.; Thomazini, M.; Trindade, M.A.; Netto, F.M.; Favaro-Trindade, C.S. Effect of Spray Drying on the Sensory and Physical Properties of Hydrolysed Casein Using Gum Arabic as the Carrier. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 2014–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Santana, A.A.; Cano-Higuita, D.M.; De Oliveira, R.A.; Telis, V.R.N. Influence of Different Combinations of Wall Materials on the Microencapsulation of Jussara Pulp (Euterpe edulis) by Spray Drying. Food Chem. 2016, 212, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Correâ-Filho, L.C.; Lourenço, M.M.; Moldaõ-Martins, M.; Alves, V.D. Microencapsulation of β-Carotene by Spray Drying: Effect of Wall Material Concentration and Drying Inlet Temperature. Int. J. Food Sci. 2019, 2019, 8914852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Shamaei, S.; Seiiedlou, S.S.; Aghbashlo, M.; Tsotsas, E.; Kharaghani, A. Microencapsulation of Walnut Oil by Spray Drying: Effects of Wall Material and Drying Conditions on Physicochemical Properties of Microcapsules. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2017, 39, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Buljeta, I.; Pichler, A.; Ivić, I.; Šimunović, J.; Kopjar, M. Encapsulation of Fruit Flavor Compounds through Interaction with Polysaccharides. Molecules 2021, 26, 4207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Gómez-Aldapa, C.A.; Castro-Rosas, J.; Rangel-Vargas, E.; Navarro-Cortez, R.O.; Cabrera-Canales, Z.E.; Díaz-Batalla, L.; Martínez-Bustos, F.; Guzmán-Ortiz, F.A.; Falfan-Cortes, R.N. A Modified Achira (Canna indica L.) Starch as a Wall Material for the Encapsulation of Hibiscus Sabdariffa Extract Using Spray Drying. Food Res. Int. 2019, 119, 547–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Guo, B.; Zhu, C.; Huang, Z.; Yang, R.; Liu, C. Microcapsules with Slow-Release Characteristics Prepared by Soluble Small Molecular Starch Fractions through the Spray Drying Method. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 200, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ogrodowska, D.; Konopka, I.Z.; Tańska, M.; Brandt, W.; Piłat, B. Effect of Maltodextrin Replacement by Selected Native Starches and Disaccharides on Physicochemical Properties of Pumpkin Oil Capsules Prepared by Spray-Drying. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bamidele, O.P.; Duodu, K.G.; Emmambux, M.N. Encapsulation and Antioxidant Activity of Ascorbyl Palmitate with Normal and High Amylose Maize Starch by Spray Drying. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 86, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ribeiro, A.M.; Shahgol, M.; Estevinho, B.N.; Rocha, F. Microencapsulation of Vitamin A by Spray-Drying, Using Binary and Ternary Blends of Gum Arabic, Starch and Maltodextrin. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 108, 106029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Carlan, I.C.; Estevinho, B.N.; Rocha, F. Production of Vitamin B1 Microparticles by a Spray Drying Process Using Different Biopolymers as Wall Materials. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 98, 1682–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Botrel, D.A.; Borges, S.V.; de Fernandes, R.V.B.; Antoniassi, R.; de Faria-Machado, A.F.; de Feitosa, J.P.A.; de Paula, R.C.M. Application of Cashew Tree Gum on the Production and Stability of Spray-Dried Fish Oil. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 1522–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Márquez-Gómez, M.; Galicia-García, T.; Márquez-Meléndez, R.; Ruiz-Gutiérrez, M.; Quintero-Ramos, A. Spray-Dried Microencapsulation of Orange Essential Oil Using Modified Rice Starch as Wall Material. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2017, 42, e13428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sepelevs, I.; Stepanova, V.; Galoburda, R. Encapsulation of Gallic Acid with Acid-Modified Low Dextrose Equivalent Potato Starch Using Spray-and Freeze-Drying Techniques. Polish J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2018, 68, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ocampo-Salinas, I.O.; Gómez-Aldapa, C.A.; Castro-Rosas, J.; Vargas-León, E.A.; Guzmán-Ortiz, F.A.; Calcáneo-Martínez, N.; Falfán-Cortés, R.N. Development of Wall Material for the Microencapsulation of Natural Vanilla Extract by Spray Drying. Cereal Chem. 2020, 97, 555–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Abedi, A.-S.; Rismanchi, M.; Moosavi, M.H.; Khaneghah, A.M.; Mohammadi, A.; Mahmoudzadeh, M. A Mixture of Modified Starch-Maltodextrin for Spray Drying Encapsulation of Nigella Sativa Seeds Oil Containing Thymoquinone. Starch/Staerke 2020, 73, 1900255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hoyos-Leyva, J.D.; Bello-Perez, L.A.; Agama-Acevedo, J.E.; Alvarez-Ramirez, J.; Jaramillo-Echeverry, L.M. Characterization of Spray Drying Microencapsulation of Almond Oil into Taro Starch Spherical Aggregates. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 101, 526–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hoyos-Leyva, J.D.; Chavez-Salazar, A.; Castellanos-Galeano, F.; Bello-Perez, L.A.; Alvarez-Ramirez, J. Physical and Chemical Stability of L-Ascorbic Acid Microencapsulated into Taro Starch Spherical Aggregates by Spray Drying. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 83, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Baltrusch, K.L.; Torres, M.D.; Domínguez, H.; Flórez-Fernández, N. Spray-Drying Microencapsulation of Tea Extracts Using Green Starch, Alginate or Carrageenan as Carrier Materials. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 203, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tomsone, L.; Galoburba, R.; Kruma, Z.; Durrieu, V.; Cinkmanis, I. Microencapsulation of Horseradish (Armoracia rusticana L.) Juice Using Spray-Drying Lolita. Foods 2020, 9, 1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Rehman, A.; Tong, Q.; Jafari, S.M.; Korma, S.A.; Khan, I.M.; Mohsin, A.; Manzoor, M.F.; Ashraf, W.; Mushtaq, B.S.; Zainab, S.; et al. Spray Dried Nanoemulsions Loaded with Curcumin, Resveratrol, and Borage Seed Oil: The Role of Two Different Modified Starches as Encapsulating Materials. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 186, 820–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Truong, C.B.H.; Nguyen, T.K.H.; Tran, T.T.T.; Nguyen, T.N.L.; Mai, H.C. Microencapsulation of Corn Mint (Mentha arvensis L.) Essential Oil Using Spray-Drying Technology. Food Res. 2022, 6, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Ferraz, M.C.; Procopio, F.R.; Furtado, G.D.F. Co-Encapsulation of Paprika and Cinnamon Oleoresin by Spray Drying Using Whey Protein Isolate and Maltodextrin as Wall Material: Development, Characterization and Storage Stability. Food Res. Int. 2022, 162, 112164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. De Ferreira, L.M.M.C.; Pereira, R.R.; Carvalho-Guimarães, F.B.; de Remígio, M.S.d.N.; Barbosa, W.L.R.; Ribeiro-Costa, R.M.; Silva-Júnior, J.O.C. Microencapsulation by Spray Drying and Antioxidant Activity of Phenolic Compounds from Tucuma Coproduct (Astrocaryum vulgare Mart.) Almonds. Polymers 2022, 14, 2905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Agatha, R.; Agatha, R.; Maryati, Y.; Susilowati, A.; Aspiyanto, A.; Devi, A.F.; Mulyani, H.; Budiari, S.; Filailla, E.; Rahmawati, D.; et al. Effect of Type and Concentration of Encapsulating Agents on Physicochemical, Phytochemical, and Antioxidant Properties of Red Dragon Fruit Kombucha Powdered Beverage. J. Kim. Terap. Indones. 2021, 23, 7–15. [Google Scholar]
  83. Pashazadeh, H.; Zannou, O.; Ghellam, M.; Koca, I.; Galanakis, C.M.; Aldawoud, T.M.S. Optimization and Encapsulation of Phenolic Compounds Extracted from Maize Waste by Freeze-Drying, Spray-Drying, and Microwave-Drying Using Maltodextrin. Foods 2021, 10, 1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Nkurunziza, D.; Sivagnanam, S.P.; Park, J.S.; Cho, Y.J.; Chun, B.S. Effect of Wall Materials on the Spray Drying Encapsulation of Brown Seaweed Bioactive Compounds Obtained by Subcritical Water Extraction. Algal Res. 2021, 58, 102381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Navarro-Flores, M.J.; Ventura-Canseco, L.M.C.; Meza-Gordillo, R.; del Ayora-Talavera, T.R.; Abud-Archila, M. Spray Drying Encapsulation of a Native Plant Extract Rich in Phenolic Compounds with Combinations of Maltodextrin and Non-Conventional Wall Materials. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 4111–4122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zorzenon, M.R.T.; Formigoni, M.; da Silva, S.B.; Hodas, F.; Piovan, S.; Ciotta, S.R.; Jansen, C.A.; Dacome, A.S.; Pilau, E.J.; Mareze-Costa, C.E.; et al. Spray Drying Encapsulation of Stevia Extract with Maltodextrin and Evaluation of the Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Produced Powders. J. Food Sci. 2020, 85, 3590–3600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lourenço, S.C.; Moldão-Martins, M.; Alves, V.D. Microencapsulation of Pineapple Peel Extract by Spray Drying Using Maltodextrin, Inulin, and Arabic Gum as Wall Matrices. Foods 2020, 9, 718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Ćujić-Nikolić, N.; Stanisavljević, N.; Šavikin, K.; Kalušević, A.; Nedović, V.; Samardžić, J.; Janković, T. Chokeberry Polyphenols Preservation Using Spray Drying: Effect of Encapsulation Using Maltodextrin and Skimmed Milk on Their Recovery Following in Vitro Digestion. J. Microencapsul. 2019, 36, 693–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Papoutsis, K.; Golding, J.B.; Vuong, Q.; Pristijono, P.; Stathopoulos, C.E.; Scarlett, C.J.; Bowyer, M. Encapsulation of Citrus By-Product Extracts by Spray-Drying and Freeze-Drying Using Combinations of Maltodextrin with Soybean Protein and ι-Carrageenan. Foods 2018, 7, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Kyriakoudi, A.; Tsimidou, M.Z. Properties of Encapsulated Saffron Extracts in Maltodextrin Using the Büchi B-90 Nano Spray-Dryer. Food Chem. 2018, 266, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Busch, V.M.; Pereyra-Gonzalez, A.; Šegatin, N.; Santagapita, P.R.; Poklar Ulrih, N.; Buera, M.P. Propolis Encapsulation by Spray Drying: Characterization and Stability. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 75, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ghani, A.A.; Adachi, S.; Shiga, H.; Neoh, T.L.; Adachi, S.; Yoshii, H. Effect of Different Dextrose Equivalents of Maltodextrin on Oxidation Stability in Encapsulated Fish Oil by Spray Drying. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2017, 81, 705–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Araujo-Díaz, S.B.; Leyva-Porras, C.; Aguirre-Bañuelos, P.; Álvarez-Salas, C.; Saavedra-Leos, Z. Evaluation of the Physical Properties and Conservation of the Antioxidants Content, Employing Inulin and Maltodextrin in the Spray Drying of Blueberry Juice. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 167, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ballesteros, L.F.; Ramirez, M.J.; Orrego, C.E.; Teixeira, J.A.; Mussatto, S.I. Encapsulation of Antioxidant Phenolic Compounds Extracted from Spent Coffee Grounds by Freeze-Drying and Spray-Drying Using Different Coating Materials. Food Chem. 2017, 237, 623–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Prudkin-Silva, C.; Martínez, J.H.; Mazzobre, F.; Quiroz-Reyes, C.; San-Juan, E.; San-Martín, E.; Pérez, O.E. High Molecular Weight Chitosan Based Particles for Insulin Encapsulation Obtained via Nanospray Technology. Dry. Technol. 2022, 40, 430–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Fathi, F.; Ebrahimi, S.N.; Pereira, D.M.; Estevinho, B.N.; Rocha, F. Microencapsulation of Enriched Extracts of Two Satureja Species by Spray Drying, Evaluation of the Controlled Release Mechanism and Cytotoxicity. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 28, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hamad, A.; Suriyarak, S.; Devahastin, S.; Borompichaichartkul, C. A Novel Approach to Develop Spray-Dried Encapsulated Curcumin Powder from Oil-in-Water Emulsions Stabilized by Combined Surfactants and Chitosan. J. Food Sci. 2020, 85, 3874–3884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Mulia, K.; Putri, T.; Krisanti, E.A.; Handayani, N.A. Preparation and Evaluation of Chitosan Biopolymers Encapsulated Iron Gluconate Using Spray Drying Method. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2092, 030005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. De Bonilla-Ahumada, F.J.; Khandual, S.; Lugo-Cervantes, E. del C. Microencapsulation of Algal Biomass (Tetraselmis chuii) by Spray-Drying Using Different Encapsulation Materials for Better Preservation of Beta-Carotene and Antioxidant Compounds. Algal Res. 2018, 36, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Olivares, E.C.; Olivares-Romero, J.L.; Barrera-Méndez, F. Microencapsulation of Potassium Phosphate in Chitosan and the Effect of Spray Drying Operating Variables on the Particle Size Experimental. J. Mex. Chem. Soc. 2018, 62, 67–74. [Google Scholar]
  101. Altin, G.; Ozcelik, B. Chitosan Coated Liposome Dispersions Loaded with Cacao Hull Waste Extract: Effect of Spray Drying on Physico-Chemical Stability and in Vitro Bioaccessibility. J. Food Eng. 2018, 223, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Aranaz, I.; Paños, I.; Peniche, C.; Heras, Á.; Acosta, N. Chitosan Spray-Dried Microparticles for Controlled Delivery of Venlafaxine Hydrochloride. Molecules 2017, 22, 1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Kumar, L.R.G.; Chatterjee, N.S.; Tejpal, C.S.; Vishnu, K.V.; Anas, K.K.; Asha, K.K.; Anandan, R.; Mathew, S. Evaluation of Chitosan as a Wall Material for Microencapsulation of Squalene by Spray Drying: Characterization and Oxidative Stability Studies. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 104, 1986–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Pinho, L.S.; de Lima, P.M.; Henrique, S.; de Sá, S.H.G.; Chen, D.; Campanella, O.H.; da Rodrigues, C.E.C.; Favaro-Trindade, C.S. Encapsulation of Rich-Carotenoids Extract from Guaran á (Paullinia cupana) Byproduct by a Combination of Spray Drying and Spray Chilling. Foods 2022, 11, 2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ozdemir, N.; Bayrak, A.; Tat, T.; Altay, F.; Kiralan, M.; Kurt, A. Microencapsulation of Basil Essential Oil: Utilization of Gum Arabic/Whey Protein Isolate/Maltodextrin Combinations for Encapsulation Efficiency and in Vitro Release. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2021, 15, 1865–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Šturm, L.; Osojnik Črnivec, I.G.; Istenič, K.; Ota, A.; Megušar, P.; Slukan, A.; Humar, M.; Levic, S.; Nedović, V.; Kopinč, R.; et al. Encapsulation of Non-Dewaxed Propolis by Freeze-Drying and Spray-Drying Using Gum Arabic, Maltodextrin and Inulin as Coating Materials. Food Bioprod. Process. 2019, 116, 196–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Barra, P.A.; Márquez, K.; Gil-Castell, O.; Mujica, J.; Ribes-Greus, A.; Faccini, M. Spray-Drying Performance and Thermal Stability of L-Ascorbic Acid Microencapsulated with Sodium Alginate and Gum Arabic. Molecules 2019, 24, 2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Corrêa-Filho, L.C.; Lourenço, S.C.; Duarte, D.F.; Moldão-Martins, M.; Alves, V.D. Microencapsulation of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Pomace Ethanolic Extract by Spray Drying: Optimization of Process Conditions. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Bucurescu, A.; Blaga, A.C.; Estevinho, B.N.; Rocha, F. Microencapsulation of Curcumin by a Spray-Drying Technique Using Gum Arabic as Encapsulating Agent and Release Studies. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2018, 11, 1795–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Böger, B.R.; Georgetti, S.R.; Kurozawa, L.E. Microencapsulation of Grape Seed Oil by Spray Drying. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 38, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Castel, V.; Rubiolo, A.C.; Carrara, C.R. Brea Gum as Wall Material in the Microencapsulation of Corn Oil by Spray Drying: Effect of Inulin Addition. Food Res. Int. 2018, 103, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. González, E.; Gómez-Caravaca, A.M.; Giménez, B.; Cebrián, R.; Maqueda, M.; Martínez-Férez, A.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Robert, P. Evolution of the Phenolic Compounds Profile of Olive Leaf Extract Encapsulated by Spray-Drying during in Vitro Gastrointestinal Digestion. Food Chem. 2019, 279, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Urzúa, C.; González, E.; Dueik, V.; Bouchon, P.; Giménez, B.; Robert, P. Olive Leaves Extract Encapsulated by Spray-Drying in Vacuum Fried Starch–Gluten Doughs. Food Bioprod. Process. 2017, 106, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Fuentes-Ortega, T.; Martínez-Vargas, S.L.; Sortés-Camargo, S.; Guadarrama-Lezama, A.Y.; Gallardo-Rivera, R.; Baeza-Jimenéz, R.; Pérez-Alonso, C. Effects of the process variables of microencapsulation sesame oil (Sesamum indica L.) by spray drying. Rev. Mex. Ing. Química 2017, 16, 477–490. [Google Scholar]
  115. García-Gurrola, A.; Rincón, S.; Escobar-Puentes, A.A.; Zepeda, A.; Martínez-Bustos, F. Microencapsulation of Red Sorghum Phenolic Compounds with Esterified Sorghum Starch as Encapsulant Materials by Spray Drying. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2019, 57, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Laokuldilok, T.; Kanha, N. Microencapsulation of Black Glutinous Rice Anthocyanins Using Maltodextrins Produced from Broken Rice Fraction as Wall Material by Spray Drying and Freeze Drying. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2017, 41, e12877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Boyano-Orozco, L.; Gallardo-Velázquez, T.; Meza-Márquez, O.G.; Osorio-Revilla, G. Microencapsulation of Rambutan Peel Extract by Spray Drying. Foods 2020, 9, 899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Balasubramani, P.; Palaniswamy, P.T.; Visvanathan, R.; Thirupathi, V.; Subbarayan, A.; Prakash Maran, J. Microencapsulation of Garlic Oleoresin Using Maltodextrin as Wall Material by Spray Drying Technology. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 72, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Muñoz Ruiz, G.A.; Zuluaga Corrales, H.F. Chitosan, Chitosan Derivatives and Their Biomedical Applications. In Biological Activities and Application of Marine Polysaccharides; Shalaby, E., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2017; pp. 87–106. [Google Scholar]
  120. Estevinho, B.N.; Rocha, F.; Santos, L.; Alves, A. Microencapsulation with Chitosan by Spray Drying for Industry Applications—A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 31, 138–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. De Amorim, C.M.; Couto, A.G.; Netz, D.J.A.; de Freitas, R.A.; Bresolin, T.M.B. Antioxidant Idebenone-Loaded Nanoparticles Based on Chitosan and N-Carboxymethylchitosan. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2010, 6, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Wilson, N.E.; Mutukuri, T.T.; Zemlyanov, D.Y.; Taylor, L.S.; Topp, E.M.; Zhou, Q.T. Surface Composition and Formulation Heterogeneity of Protein Solids Produced by Spray Drying. Pharm. Res. 2020, 37, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Wang, Z.; Meenach, S.A. Optimization of Acetalated Dextran–Based Nanocomposite Microparticles for Deep Lung Delivery of Therapeutics via Spray-Drying. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 106, 3539–3547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Marín-Peñalver, D.; Alemán, A.; Montero, M.P.; Gómez-Guillén, M.C. Entrapment of Natural Compounds in Spray-Dried and Heat-Dried Iota-Carrageenan Matrices as Functional Ingredients in Surimi Gels. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 2137–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ding, Z.; Tao, T.; Wang, X.; Prakash, S.; Zhao, Y.; Han, J.; Wang, Z. Influences of Different Carbohydrates as Wall Material on Powder Characteristics, Encapsulation Efficiency, Stability and Degradation Kinetics of Microencapsulated Lutein by Spray Drying. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 2872–2882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Santiago, L.G.; Castro, G.R. Novel Technologies for the Encapsulation of Bioactive Food Compounds. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2016, 7, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Berg, J.M.; Tymoczko, J.L.; Stryer, L. Biochemistry, 6th ed.; W. H. Freeman and Company 41: New York, NY, USA, 2007; ISBN 9780716787242. [Google Scholar]
  128. Fathi, M.; Donsi, F.; McClements, D.J. Protein-Based Delivery Systems for the Nanoencapsulation of Food Ingredients. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018, 17, 920–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Tavares, L.; Zapata Noreña, C.P. Encapsulation of Garlic Extract Using Complex Coacervation with Whey Protein Isolate and Chitosan as Wall Materials Followed by Spray Drying. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 89, 360–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Jovanović, A.A.; Lević, S.M.; Pavlović, V.B.; Marković, S.B.; Pjanović, R.V.; Đorđević, V.B.; Nedović, V.; Bugarski, B.M. Freeze vs. Spray Drying for Dry Wild Thyme (Thymus serpyllum L.) Extract Formulations: The Impact of Gelatin as a Coating Material. Molecules 2021, 26, 3933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Silva, D.M.; Vyas, H.K.N.; Sanderson-Smith, M.L.; Sencadas, V. Development and Optimization of Ciprofloxacin-Loaded Gelatin Microparticles by Single-Step Spray-Drying Technique. Powder Technol. 2018, 330, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Sadiq, U.; Gill, H.; Chandrapala, J.; Shahid, F. Influence of Spray Drying on Encapsulation Efficiencies and Structure of Casein Micelles Loaded with Anthraquinones Extracted from Aloe Vera Plant. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Nogueira, M.H.; Tavares, G.M.; Casanova, F.; Silva, C.R.J.; Rocha, J.C.G.; Stringheta, P.C.; Stephani, R.; Perrone, Í.T.; de Carvalho, A.F. Cross-Linked Casein Micelle Used as Encapsulating Agent for Jaboticaba (Plinia jaboticaba) Phenolic Compounds by Spray Drying. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2020, 73, 765–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Tan, S.; Ebrahimi, A.; Langrish, T. Controlled Release of Caffeine from Tablets of Spray-Dried Casein Gels. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 88, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Tan, S.; Hadinoto, K.; Ebrahimi, A.; Langrish, T. Fabrication of Novel Casein Gel with Controlled Release Property via Acidification, Spray Drying and Tableting Approach. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2019, 177, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Khanji, A.N.; Michaux, F.; Petit, J.; Salameh, D.; Rizk, T.; Jasniewski, J.; Banon, S. Structure, Gelation, and Antioxidant Properties of Curcumin-Doped Casein Micelle Powder Produced by Spray-Drying. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 971–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Saldanha Do Carmo, C.; Maia, C.; Poejo, J.; Lychko, I.; Gamito, P.; Nogueira, I.; Bronze, M.R.; Serra, A.T.; Duarte, C.M.M. Microencapsulation of α-Tocopherol with Zein and β-Cyclodextrin Using Spray Drying for Colour Stability and Shelf-Life Improvement of Fruit Beverages. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 32065–32075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Zhang, B.; Zheng, L.; Liang, S.; Lu, Y.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, G.; Li, W.; Jiang, H. Encapsulation of Capsaicin in Whey Protein and OSA-Modified Starch Using Spray-Drying: Physicochemical Properties and Its Stability. Foods 2022, 11, 612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Shi, X.; Lee, Y. Encapsulation of Tributyrin with Whey Protein Isolate (WPI) by Spray-Drying with a Three-Fluid Nozzle. J. Food Eng. 2020, 281, 109992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Zhang, Z.; Peng, H.; Wai, M.; Zeng, X.; Brennan, M.; Brennan, C.S. Preparation and Characterization of Whey Protein Isolate-Chlorophyll Microcapsules by Spray Drying: Effect of WPI Ratios on the Physicochemical and Antioxidant Properties. J. Food Eng. 2020, 267, 109729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Zhuang, F.; Li, X.; Hu, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, S.; Tang, C.; Zhou, P. Effects of Casein Micellar Structure on the Stability of Milk Protein-Based Conjugated Linoleic Acid Microcapsules. Food Chem. 2018, 269, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Jansen-alves, C.; Fernandes, K.F.; Crizel-Cardozo, M.M.; Krumreich, F.D.; Borges, C.D.; Zambiazi, R.C. Microencapsulation of Propolis in Protein Matrix Using Spray Drying for Application in Food Systems. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2018, 11, 1422–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Fu, N.; You, Y.J.; Quek, S.Y.; Wu, W.D.; Chen, X.D. Interplaying Effects of Wall and Core Materials on the Property and Functionality of Microparticles for Co-Encapsulation of Vitamin E with Coenzyme Q10. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2020, 13, 705–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Khalilvandi-Behroozyar, H.; Banadaky, M.D.; Ghaffarzadeh, M. Investigating the Effects of Varying Wall Materials and Oil Loading Levels on Stability and Nutritional Values of Spray Dried Fish Oil. Vet. Res. Forum 2020, 11, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Chauhan, B.; Shimpi, S.; Paradkar, A. Preparation and Characterization of Etoricoxib Solid Dispersions Using Lipid Carriers by Spray Drying Technique. AAPS PharmSciTech 2005, 6, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Salminen, H.; Ankenbrand, J.; Zeeb, B.; Badolato Bönisch, G.; Schäfer, C.; Kohlus, R.; Weiss, J. Influence of Spray Drying on the Stability of Food-Grade Solid Lipid Nanoparticles. Food Res. Int. 2019, 119, 741–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Polekkad, A.; Franklin, M.E.E.; Pushpadass, H.A.; Battula, S.N.; Rao, S.B.N.; Pal, D.T. Microencapsulation of Zinc by Spray-Drying: Characterisation and Fortification; Elsevier B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Volume 381, ISBN 0000000266369. [Google Scholar]
  148. Sotelo-Bautista, M.; Bello-Perez, L.A.; Gonzalez-Soto, R.A.; Yañez-Fernandez, J.; Alvarez-Ramirez, J. OSA-Maltodextrin as Wall Material for Encapsulation of Essential Avocado Oil by Spray Drying. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2020, 41, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Rodriguez, N.J.; Hu, Q.; Luo, Y. Oxidized Dextran as a Macromolecular Crosslinker Stabilizes the Zein/Caseinate Nanocomplex for the Potential Oral Delivery of Curcumin. Molecules 2019, 24, 4061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Gangurde, A.B.; Amin, P.D. Microencapsulation by Spray Drying of Vitamin A Palmitate from Oil to Powder and Its Application in Topical Delivery System. J. Encapsul. Adsorpt. Sci. 2017, 7, 10–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Wang, Y.; Liu, B.; Wen, X.; Li, M.; Wang, K.; Ni, Y. Quality Analysis and Microencapsulation of Chili Seed Oil by Spray Drying with Starch Sodium Octenylsuccinate and Maltodextrin. Powder Technol. 2017, 312, 294–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Malacrida, C.R.; Ferreira, S.; Nicoletti, V.R. Turmeric Oleoresin Encapsulated by Spray Drying in Maltodextrin/Gelatin and Starch/Gelatin Blends: Storage Stability and Water Sorption. Acta Sci. Technol. 2022, 44, e56950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Le, T.H.; Tran, T.M.V.; Ton, N.M.N.; Tran, T.T.T.; Huynh, T.V.; Nguyen, T.N.; Quang, S.P.; Le, V.V.M. Combination of Whey Protein and Carbohydrate for Microencapsulation of Pumpkin (Cucurbita spp.) Seed Oil by Spray-Drying. Int. Food Res. J. 2017, 24, 1227–1232. [Google Scholar]
  154. Elik, A. A Comparative Study of Encapsulation of Carotenoid Enriched-Flaxseed Oil and Flaxseed Oil by Spray Freeze-Drying and Spray Drying Techniques. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 143, 111153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ogrodowska, D.; Tanska, M.; Brandt, W.; Czaplicki, S. Impact of the Encapsulation Process by Spray- And Freeze-Drying on the Properties and Composition of Powders Obtained from Cold-Pressed Seed Oils with Various Unsaturated Fatty Acids. Polish J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2020, 70, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Kanwal, S.; Hussain, A.; Nadeem, M.; Abbas, F.; Akram, M.; Inayat, M.; Sughra, F. Development of Chitosan Based Microencapsulated Spray Dried Powder of Tuna Fish Oil: Oil Load Impact and Oxidative Stability. Braz. J. Biol. 2021, 84, e254010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Wang, Y.; Ghosh, S.; Nickerson, M.T. Microencapsulation of Flaxseed Oil by Lentil Protein Isolate-κ-Carrageenan and-ι-Carrageenan Based Wall Materials through Spray and Freeze Drying. Molecules 2022, 27, 3195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Gulzar, S.; Balange, A.K.; Nagarajarao, R.C.; Zhao, Q.; Benjakul, S. Microcapsules of Shrimp Oil Using Kidney Bean Protein Isolate and κ-Carrageenan as Wall Materials with the Aid of Ultrasonication or High-Pressure Microfluidization: Characteristics and Oxidative Stability. Foods 2022, 11, 1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Bassetto Carra, J.; Luís Nascimento de Matos, R.; Paula Novelli, A.; Oliveira do Couto, R.; Yamashita, F.; Alessandro dos Santos Ribeiro, M.; César Meurer, E.; Aparecido Verri Junior, W.; Casagrande, R.; Regina Georgetti, S.; et al. Spray-Drying of Casein/Pectin Bioconjugate Microcapsules Containing Grape (Vitis labrusca) by-Product Extract. Food Chem. 2022, 368, 130817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Damerau, A.; Ogrodowska, D.; Banaszczyk, P.; Dajnowiec, F.; Tanska, M.; Linderborg, K.M. Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus Membras) Oil Encapsulation by Spray Drying Using a Rice and Whey Protein Blend as a Coating Material. J. Food Eng. 2022, 314, 110769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Karrar, E.; Mahdi, A.A.; Sheth, S.; Mohamed Ahmed, I.A.; Manzoor, M.F.; Wei, W.; Wang, X. Effect of Maltodextrin Combination with Gum Arabic and Whey Protein Isolate on the Microencapsulation of Gurum Seed Oil Using a Spray-Drying Method. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 171, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. González-Peña, M.A.; Lozada-Ramírez, J.D.; Ortega-Regules, A.E. Antioxidant Activities of Spray-Dried Carotenoids Using Maltodextrin-Arabic Gum as Wall Materials. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2021, 45, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Buanasari; Sugiyo, W.; Rustaman, H. Preparation and Evaluation of Plant Extract Microcapsules Using Chitosan. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 755, 012063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Escobar-Avello, D.; Avendaño-Godoy, J.; Santos, J.; Lozano-Castellón, J.; Mardones, C.; von Baer, D.; Luengo, J.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M.; Vallverdú-Queralt, A.; Gómez-Gaete, C. Encapsulation of Phenolic Compounds from a Grape Cane Pilot-Plant Extract in Hydroxypropyl Beta-Cyclodextrin and Maltodextrin by Spray Drying. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Ramos, F.D.M.; Júnior, V.S.; Prata, A.S. Impact of Vacuum Spray Drying on Encapsulation of Fish Oil: Oxidative Stability and Encapsulation Efficiency. Food Res. Int. 2021, 143, 110283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Mahdi, A.A.; Mohammed, J.K.; Al-Ansi, W.; Ghaleb, A.D.S.; Al-Maqtari, Q.A.; Ma, M.; Ahmed, M.I.; Wang, H. Microencapsulation of Fingered Citron Extract with Gum Arabic, Modified Starch, Whey Protein, and Maltodextrin Using Spray Drying. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 152, 1125–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Nogueira, G.F.; Soares, C.T.; Martin, L.G.P.; Fakhouri, F.M.; de Oliveira, R.A. Influence of Spray Drying on Bioactive Compounds of Blackberry Pulp Microencapsulated with Arrowroot Starch and Gum Arabic Mixture. J. Microencapsul. 2020, 37, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Sari, D.K.; Lestari, R.S.D.; Khinanta, P.; Sahlan, M. Encapsulation Bioactive Compund Propolis with Carrageenan–Gum Arabic by Spray Drying. J. Integr. Proses 2020, 9, 8–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Boonsom, T.; Dumkliang, E. Response Surface Optimization on Microencapsulation of Lemongrass Essential Oil Using Spray Drying. Key Eng. Mater. 2020, 859, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Zhang, C.; Khoo, S.L.A.; Swedlund, P.; Ogawa, Y.; Shan, Y.; Quek, S.Y. Fabrication of Spray-Dried Microcapsules|containing Noni Juice Using Blends of Maltodextrin and Gum Acacia: Physicochemical Properties of Powders and Bioaccessibility of Bioactives during in Vitro Digestion. Foods 2020, 9, 1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Hernández-Nava, R.; López-Malo, A.; Palou, E.; Ramírez-Corona, N.; Jiménez-Munguía, M.T. Encapsulation of Oregano Essential Oil (Origanum vulgare) by Complex Coacervation between Gelatin and Chia Mucilage and Its Properties after Spray Drying. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 109, 106077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Radünz, M.; dos Santos Hackbart, H.C.; Camargo, T.M.; Nunes, C.F.P.; de Barros, F.A.P.; Dal Magro, J.; Filho, P.J.S.; Gandra, E.A.; Radünz, A.L.; da Rosa Zavareze, E. Antimicrobial Potential of Spray Drying Encapsulated Thyme (Thymus vulgaris) Essential Oil on the Conservation of Hamburger-like Meat Products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 330, 108696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Fang, S.; Zhao, X.; Liu, Y.; Liang, X.; Yang, Y. Fabricating Multilayer Emulsions by Using OSA Starch and Chitosan Suitable for Spray Drying: Application in the Encapsulation of β-Carotene. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 93, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Bakry, A.M.; Huang, J.; Zhai, Y.; Huang, Q. Myofibrillar Protein with κ- or λ-Carrageenans as Novel Shell Materials for Microencapsulation of Tuna Oil through Complex Coacervation. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 96, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Ferreira, S.; Piovanni, G.M.O.; Malacrida, C.R.; Nicoletti, V.R. Influence of Emulsification Methods and Spray Drying Parameters on the Microencapsulation of Turmeric Oleoresin. Emirates J. Food Agric. 2019, 31, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Wang, B.; Adhikari, B.; Mathesh, M.; Yang, W.; Barrow, C.J. Anchovy Oil Microcapsule Powders Prepared Using Two-Step Complex Coacervation between Gelatin and Sodium Hexametaphosphate Followed by Spray Drying. Powder Technol. 2019, 358, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Dos Vaucher, A.C.S.; Dias, P.C.M.; Coimbra, P.T.; dos Costa, I.S.M.; Marreto, R.N.; Dellamora-Ortiz, G.M.; De Freitas, O.; Ramos, M.F.S. Microencapsulation of Fish Oil by Casein-Pectin Complexes and Gum Arabic Microparticles: Oxidative Stabilisation. J. Microencapsul. 2019, 36, 459–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Cuevas-Bernardino, J.C.; Pérez-Alonso, C.; Nieto-Ángel, R.; Aguirre-Mandujano, E. Microencapsulation of Grape Seed Oil by Spray Drying Using Whey Protein and Hawthorn Pectin. Ing. Agrícola Y Biosist. 2019, 11, 127–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Nogueira, G.F.; Pereira Martin, L.G.; Matta Fakhouri, F.; de Oliveira, R.A. Microencapsulation of Blackberry Pulp with Arrowroot Starch and Gum Arabic Mixture by Spray Drying. J. Microencapsul. 2018, 35, 482–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Shabanpour, B.; Mehrad, B.; Pourashouri, P.; Jafari, S.M. The Effect of Wall Material and Encapsulation Method on Physicochemical Properties Micro-Encapsulated Fish Oil. J. Res. Innov. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 7, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Chew, S.C.; Tan, C.P.; Nyam, K.L. Microencapsulation of Refined Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) Seed Oil by Spray Drying Using β-Cyclodextrin/Gum Arabic/Sodium Caseinate. J. Food Eng. 2018, 237, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Nguyen, T.D. Optimization of Maltodextrin and Carrageenan Gum Concentration Added in Spray Drying Process of Pouzolzia Zeylanica Extract by Response Surface Methodology. J. Agric. Dev. 2018, 17, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Ordoñez-Santos, L.E.; Martínez-Girón, J.; Villamizar-Vargas, R.H. Encapsulation of β-Carotene Extracted from Peach Palm Residues: A Stability Study Using Two Spray-Dried Processes. DYNA 2018, 85, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Premi, M.; Sharma, H.K. Effect of Different Combinations of Maltodextrin, Gum Arabic and Whey Protein Concentrate on the Encapsulation Behavior and Oxidative Stability of Spray Dried Drumstick (Moringa oleifera) Oil. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 105, 1232–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Nambiar, R.B.; Sellamuthu, P.S.; Perumal, A.B. Microencapsulation of Tender Coconut Water by Spray Drying: Effect of Moringa Oleifera Gum, Maltodextrin Concentrations, and Inlet Temperature on Powder Qualities. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2017, 10, 1668–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Mujica-Álvarez, J.; Gil-Castell, O.; Barra, P.A.; Ribez-Greus, A.; Bustos, R.; Faccini, M.; Matiacevich, S. Encapsulation of Vitamins A and E as Spray-Dried Additives for the Feed Industry. Molecules 2020, 25, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  187. Yu, F.; Li, Z.; Zhang, T.; Wei, Y.; Xue, Y.; Xue, C. Influence of Encapsulation Techniques on the Structure, Physical Properties, and Thermal Stability of Fish Oil Microcapsules by Spray Drying. J. Food Process Eng. 2017, 40, e12576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Assadpour, E.; Jafari, S.; Maghsoudlou, Y. Evaluation of Folic Acid Release from Spray Dried Powder Particles of Pectin-Whey Protein Nano-Capsules. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 95, 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Types of nanoparticles and microcapsules.
Figure 1. Types of nanoparticles and microcapsules.
Polymers 15 02659 g001
Figure 2. Number of publications related to encapsulation processes using various wall materials (source: Scopus; keywords: encapsulation, chitosan, alginate, starch, whey protein, maltodextrin, pectin, gum Arabic, dextran, and carrageenan; accessed: 23 May 2023).
Figure 2. Number of publications related to encapsulation processes using various wall materials (source: Scopus; keywords: encapsulation, chitosan, alginate, starch, whey protein, maltodextrin, pectin, gum Arabic, dextran, and carrageenan; accessed: 23 May 2023).
Polymers 15 02659 g002
Figure 3. Flowchart of the references selected for the systematic review.
Figure 3. Flowchart of the references selected for the systematic review.
Polymers 15 02659 g003
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the spray-drying process.
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the spray-drying process.
Polymers 15 02659 g004
Table 1. Encapsulation of bioactive compounds with polysaccharide-based wall materials.
Table 1. Encapsulation of bioactive compounds with polysaccharide-based wall materials.
Wall MaterialCore MaterialConcentration (Wall Material: Core Material)Conditions (Feed Rate, Inlet Air, Outlet Air)Particles (Shape/Morphology, Particle Size Distribution)Process Yield/Encapsulation EfficiencyEncapsulated CompoundsReferences
A-StarchHibiscus sabdariffa extract10–15:nr.% w/nr.4 mL/min, 100–140 °C, 56–84 °COvoid/Collapsed, 10 μmnr./15–69%Antimicrobial compounds [63]
C-StarchCorn oil2:1% w/wnr., 180 °C, 115 °CSemispherical/Shrunken, 12–38 μm64%/89%Oil [64]
M-StarchPumpkin oil15.4:10.2% w/w77 mL/min, 130 °C, 90 °CSpherical/Withered, 51.6–77.3 μmnr./42%α-Tocopherol, γ-tocopherol, squalene, spinasterol, β-sitosterol, stigmastatrienol, stigmasterol, and stigmastadienol [65]
M-StarchAscorbyl palmitate3:1 ratio6.3 mL/min, 185 °C, 70 °Cnr./nr., nr.nr.Ascorbyl palmitate [66]
Mo-StarchVitamin A15:2% w/w4 mL/min, 150 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Irregular, 0.1–0.2 μm17%/89%Vitamin A [67]
Mo-StarchVitamin B11:0.125% w/w4 mL/min, 120 °C, 50–67 °CSpherical/Irregular, 0.1–3.6 μm25%/95%Vitamin B1 [68]
Mo-StarchFish oil15:nr.% w/nr.0.7 L/h, 180 °C, nr.Spherical/Smooth holes, 10–26 μmnr./76%Oil [69]
Mo-StarchOrange essential oil30:15% w/w3.75 mL/min, 180 °C, 85 °CSpherical/Rough, 30–40 μm73%/99%D-Limonene [70]
P-StarchGallic acid20:0.1–10% w/wnr., 160 °C, 75 °CSpherical/Withered, 1–15 μmnr./70–84%Gallic acid [71]
R-StarchPumpkin oil15.4:10.2% w/w77 mL/min, 130 °C, 90 °CSpherical/Withered, 41.1–67.7 μmnr./35%α-Tocopherol, γ-tocopherol, squalene, spinasterol, β-sitosterol, stigmastatrienol, stigmasterol, and stigmastadienol [65]
R-StarchVanilla extract10–15:nr.% w/nr.4 mL/min, 100–140 °C, 70–94 °CPolyhedral/Irregular, 2–7 μm20–44%/15–69%Vanillin [72]
R-StarchOrange essential oil30:15% w/w3.75 mL/min, 180 °C, 85 °CSpherical/Rough, 30–40 μm73%/37%D-Limonene [70]
SOS-StarchNigella sativa seeds oil18.75:6.25:1% w/w/wnr., 140 °C, 95–98 °CSpherical/Irregular, 1–30 μmnr./80–90%Volatile compounds [73]
T-StarchAlmond oil20:10–20% w/w10.6 g/min, 145 °C, nr.Spherical/Aggregates, 1.6–31.1 μm56%/38–45%Peroxides [74]
T-StarchL-ascorbic acid30:10% w/w19.5 g/min, 145 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Aggregates, 2–10 μmnr.L-ascorbic acid [75]
W-StarchPumpkin oil15.4:10.2% w/w77 mL/min, 130 °C, 90 °CSpherical/Withered, 41.4–70.9 μmnr./68%α-Tocopherol, γ-tocopherol, squalene, spinasterol, β-sitosterol, stigmastatrienol, stigmasterol, and stigmastadienol [65]
StarchTea (Camelia sinensis L.) leaves extract1.5:1% w/w4 mL/min, 115 °C, 65 °COvoid/Smooth, 10–50 μm59/nr.Phenolic compounds [76]
StarchHorseradish leaf (Armoracia rusticana L.) juice20–80:20–80 ratio0.33 L/h, 120 °C, 80 °Cnr./nr., 9.5–14.1 μmnr./nr.Phenolic compounds, rutin, epicatechin, catechin and sinapic acid [77]
HCPBorage seed oil10–30:13% w/w10 mL/min, 170 °C, 80 °CAsymmetrical/Dented, 4–15 μmnr./89%Oil [78]
HCPBorage seed oil/Curcumin10–30:13:0.6% w/w/w10 mL/min, 170 °C, 80 °CAsymmetrical/Dented, 4–15 μmnr./91%Curcumin [78]
HCPBorage seed oil/Resveratrol10–30:13:0.4% w/w/w10 mL/min, 170 °C, 80 °CAsymmetrical/Dented, 4–15 μmnr./88%Resveratrol [78]
HCPBorage seed oil/Curcumin/Resveratrol10–30:13:0.6:0.4% w/w/w/w10 mL/min, 170 °C, 80 °CAsymmetrical/Dented, 4–15 μmnr./93%Curcumin and resveratrol [78]
C-MDCorn mint (Mentha arvensis L.) essential oil20–30:0.5–2% w/w4–10 mL/min, 130–150 °C, nr.nr./nr., nr.69%/99%Menthol, menthone, menthyl acetate, isomenthone, caryphyllene, eucalyptol, α-terpineol, δ-cadinene, neoisomenthol, pulegone, β-bourbonene, and nerolidol [79]
MDMix (paprika-cinnamon oleoresin)10:1:1%w/ratio/ratio6 mL/min, 150 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Porous, 33 μm34%/65%Carotenoids [80]
MDTucuma coproduct (Astrocaryum vulgare Mart.) almonds extract5:5% w/w7.5 mL/min, 100 °C, nr.Spherical/Wrinkled, 2–8 μmnr./81–96%Phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and tannins [81]
MDPumpkin oil15.4:10.2% w/w77 mL/min, 130 °C, 90 °CSpherical/Withered, 58.0–103.0 μmnr./70%α-Tocopherol, γ-tocopherol, squalene, spinasterol, β-sitosterol, stigmastatrienol, stigmasterol, and stigmastadienol [65]
MDRed dragón fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) juice5–15:nr.% w/nr.500 mL/h, 170 °C, 70 °Cnr./nr., nr.53–74%/nr.Phenolic compounds [82]
MDCornsilk extract10:90% w/wnr., nr., nr.Spherical/Irregular, nr.76–87%/99%Phenolic compounds (gallic acid, protocateuic acid, protocatechuic aldehyde, catechin, caffeic acid, vanillin, p-cumaric acid, ferulic acid, 4-hydroxy benzoic acid, salicylic acid, and ellagic acid) and flavonoids [83]
MDBrown seaweed (Saccharina japonica) extract10:100% w/v30 mL/min, 230 °C, 105 °CSpherical/Wrinkled, 9.3 μmnr./33%Phenolic acids (gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, gentisic acid, protocatechuic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, vanillic acid, caffeic acid, and syringic acid) [84]
MDVitamin B11:0.125% w/w4 mL/min, 120 °C, 50–67 °CSpherical/Irregular, 0.1 μm50%/65%Vitamin B1 [68]
MDVitamin A15:2% w/w4 mL/min, 150 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Irregular, 0.1–0.2 μm39%/95%Vitamin A [67]
MDChipilin (Crotalaria longirostrata) extract17:1% w/w3 mL/min, 120 °C, 60 °CAmorphous/Irregular, 3–8 μm64%/86%Phenolic compounds [85]
MDStevia extract2:1 w/w rationr., 130 °C, 87 °CSpherical/Aggregates, <20 μmnr./77–88%Steviol glycoside, stevioside, rebaudioside A, rebaudioside C, and phenolic compounds [86]
MDPineapple (Ananas comosus) peel extract5:nr.% w/nr.3.7 mL/min, 150–190 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Aggregates, 2–13 μmnr./nr.Phenolic compounds [87]
MDHorseradish root (Armoracia rusticana L.) juice20–80:20–80 ratio0.33 L/h, 120 °C, 80 °Cnr./nr., 3.7–4.0 μmnr./nr.Phenolic compounds, rutin, epicatechin, catechin, and sinapic acid [77]
MDChokeberry extract2:10 w/v rationr., nr., nr.Spherical/Aggregates, 4–10 μmnr./97%Phenolic compounds, anthocyanins, and cyanidin-3-glucoside [88]
MDLemon by-product aqueous extract30–35:30% w/v4 mL/min, 125 °C, 55 °CSpherical/Smooth, nr.56–58%/nr.Phenolic compounds and flavonoids [89]
MDGreek saffron extract5–20:1 w/w rationr., 100 °C, nr.Spherical/Aggregates, 2–5 μm71–87%/55–80%Crocins and picrocrocin [90]
MDOrange essential oil30:15% w/w3.75 mL/min, 180 °C, 85 °CSpherical/Rough, 30–40 μm29%/72%D-Limonene [70]
MDPropolis30:0.123% w/w/w8 mL/min, 120 °C, 70–74 °CDeformed spherical/Smooth, nr.68%/86–98%Phenolic compounds [91]
MDFish oil34.2:24% w/w25 mL/min, 140 °C, 70–95 °CSpherical/Wrinkled, 1 μmnr./74–90%Oil [92]
MDBlueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) juice30:70% w/w7 mL/min, 180 °C, 70 °CSpherical/Irregular, nr.nr./nr.Resveratrol and quercetin 3-D-galactoside [93]
MDSpent coffee ground extract2:10 w/v ratio108 mL/min, 100 °C, nr.Spherical/Withered, <30 μmnr./50–85%Phenolic compounds and flavonoids [94]
Mo-CHVitamin B11:0.125% w/w4 mL/min, 120 °C, 50–67 °CSpherical/Irregular, 0.6 μm42%/95%Vitamin B1 [68]
CHInsulin1:0.2% w/w3 mL/min, 120 °C, 50–55 °CSpherical/Irregular, <1.2 μmnr./nr.Insulin [95]
CHSatureja khuzistanica Jamzad extract10:1% w/w3.5 mL/min, 115 °C, nr.Spherical/Smooth, 2 μmnr./59%Phenolic compounds [96]
CHSatureja rechingeri Jamzad extract10:1% w/w3.5 mL/min, 115 °C, nr.Spherical/Smooth, 2 μmnr./43%Phenolic compounds [96]
CHCurcumin0.25–0.5:1.7% w/w4 mL/min, 180 °C, nr.Spherical/Irregular, 1–5 μm92–99%/51–72%Curcumin [97]
CHVitamin B11:0.125% w/w4 mL/min, 120 °C, 50–67 °CSpherical/Irregular, 0.1–0.8 μm35%/95%Vitamin B1 [68]
CHIron gluconate3:1 rationr., 160 °C, nr.Spherical/Wrinkled, 1–10 μm28–43%/24–38%Iron gluconate [98]
CHAlgal (Tetraselmis chuii) biomass3:1% w/w2.5 mL/min, 150 °C, 60 °CSpherical/Rough, 1–15.2 μm22–45%/53–73%Phenolic compounds, β-carotene, and carotenoids [99]
CHPotassium phosphate25:5–50% w/w1.4–3.6 mL/min, 120–150 °C, nr.Semi-spherical/collapsed, 1–2 μmnr./88–92%Potassium phosphate [100]
CHCacao hull waste extract0.4:0.1–0.9% w/w2.5 cm3/min, 170 °C, 75–80 °CSemi-spherical/Dented, 156–400 nmnr./19–88%Phenolic compounds and flavonoids [101]
CHVenlafaxine hydrochloride0.5:30% w/w32 m3/h, 160 °C, nr.Spherical/Irregular, 3–10 μm44–74%/37–94%Venlafaxine hydrochloride [102]
CHSqualene1:0.3–1 rationr., 160 °C, 90 °CSpherical/Smooth, 6.8 μmnr./26%Squalene [103]
GASatureja khuzistanica Jamzad extract10:1% w/w3.5 mL/min, 115 °C, nr.Semi-cubes/Rough, 2.6 μmnr./50%Phenolic compounds [96]
GASatureja rechingeri Jamzad extract10:1% w/w3.5 mL/min, 115 °C, nr.Semi-cubes/Rough, 2.6 μmnr./38%Phenolic compounds [96]
GAGuaraná (Paullinia cupana) peel extract20:20–33% w/w10 mL/min, 140 °C, nr.Spherical/Irregular, 10–16 μmnr./82–100%Carotenoids [104]
GARed dragón fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) juice5–15:nr.% w/nr.500 mL/h, 170 °C, 70 °Cnr./nr., nr.80–91%/nr.Phenolic compounds [82]
GABrown seaweed (Saccharina japonica) extract10:100% w/v30 mL/min, 230 °C, 105 °CSpherical/Wrinkled, 34.4 μmnr./39%Phenolic acids (gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, gentisic acid, protocatechuic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, vanillic acid, caffeic acid, and syringic acid) [84]
GABasil (Ocimum basilicum L.) essential oil4:1% w/w3 mL/min, 150 °C, nr.Spherical/Wrinkled, 0.5 μm66%/82%Essential oil [105]
GAVitamin B11:0.125% w/w4 mL/min, 120 °C, 50–67 °CSpherical/Irregular, 0.1–0.6 μm38%/95%Vitamin B1 [68]
GAVitamin A15:2% w/w4 mL/min, 150 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Irregular, 0.1–0.2 μm35%/88%Vitamin A [67]
GAPineapple (Ananas comosus) peel extract5:nr.% w/nr.3.7 mL/min, 150–190 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Aggregates, 4–8 μmnr./nr.Phenolic compounds [87]
GANon-dewaxed propolis extract4:1 w/w ratio8 mL/min, 120 °C, 68 °CSpherical/Withered, 0.6 μmnr./46%Bioflavonoids, pinocembrin, galangin, chrysin and phenolic compounds [106]
GAL-ascorbic acid1–4:1 ratio2–7 mL/min, 140 °C, 86 °CSpherical/Aggregates, 3–10 μm67–83%/82–98%L-ascorbic acid [107]
GATomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) pomace extract9.4–30.6:15% w/w3.7 mL/min, 110–200 °C, nr.Spherical/Smooth holes, 0.7–27 μm15–44%/3–21%Lycopene [108]
GANon-dewaxed propolis extract4:1 w/w ratio0.5 mL/min, 80 °C, 50 °CSpherical/Withered, 0.5 μmnr./21%Bioflavonoids, pinocembrin, galangin, chrysin and phenolic compounds [106]
GACurcumin10–20:0.1% w/w4 mL/min, 150 °C, 88 °CSpherical/Rough, 0.2–0.3 μm29–42%/nr.Curcumin [109]
GAGrape seed oil30:10% w/w350 mL/h, 180 °C, 105 °CSpherical/Collapsed, 27 μmnr./68%Fatty acids (C14, C16, C18, C20, SFA, MUFA, and PUFA) and phenolic compounds [110]
GACorn oil20:20% w/wnr., 150 °C, 60 °CSemi-spherical/Dents, 0.8–10 μmnr./89%Oil [111]
GAFish oil15:nr.% w/nr.0.7 L/h, 180 °C, nr.Spherical/Smooth holes, 9–22 μmnr./60%Oil [69]
GASpent coffee ground extract2:10 w/v ratio108 mL/min, 100 °C, nr.Spherical/Withered, <30 μmnr./35–80%Phenolic compounds and flavonoids [94]
SATea (Camelia sinensis L.) leaves extract1.5:1% w/w4 mL/min, 115 °C, 65 °CSpherical/Dented, 1–5 μm55/nr.Phenolic compounds [76]
SAVitamin B11:0.125% w/w4 mL/min, 120 °C, 50–67 °CSpherical/Irregular, 0.6–1.0 μm42%/95%Vitamin B1 [68]
SAL-ascorbic acid1–4:1 ratio2–7 mL/min, 140 °C, 86 °CSpherical/Aggregates, 5–14 μm35–76%/92–99%L-ascorbic acid [107]
SAOlive (Olea europaea L.) leaves extract0.35–2.15:1 ratio3 mL/min, 135–195 °C, 70–90 °CSpherical/Smooth holes, 0.25–20 μm35–57%/54–69%Oleuropein [112]
SCBrown seaweed (Saccharina japonica) extract10:100% w/v30 mL/min, 230 °C, 105 °CSpherical/Wrinkled, 13 μmnr./63%Phenolic acids (gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, gentisic acid, protocatechuic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, vanillic acid, caffeic acid, and syringic acid) [84]
λ-CarrVitamin B11:0.125% w/w4 mL/min, 120 °C, 50–67 °CSpherical/Irregular, 0.5–1.2 μm32%/95%Vitamin B1 [68]
CarrTea (Camelia sinensis L.) leaves extract1.5:1% w/w4 mL/min, 115 °C, 65 °CSpherical/Rough, 0.5–4 μm46/nr.Phenolic compounds [76]
InulinRed dragón fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) juice5–15:nr.% w/nr.500 mL/h, 170 °C, 70 °Cnr./nr., nr.32–46%/nr.Phenolic compounds [82]
InulinPineapple (Ananas comosus) peel extract5:nr.% w/nr.3.7 mL/min, 150–190 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Aggregates, 1–18 μmnr./nr.Phenolic compounds [87]
InulinTomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) pomace extract9.4–30.6:15% w/w3.7 mL/min, 110–200 °C, nr.Spherical/Smooth, 0.6–22 μm35–50%/7–25%Lycopene [108]
InulinBlueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) juice30:70% w/w7 mL/min, 180 °C, 70 °CSpherical/Irregular, nr.nr./nr.Resveratrol and quercetin 3-D-galactoside [93]
InulinOlive (O. europaea L.) leaves extract0.34–2.15:1 rationr., 135–184 °C, nr.nr./nr., nr.64%/87%Phenolic compounds [113]
LactosePumpkin oil15.4:10.2% w/w77 mL/min, 130 °C, 90 °CSpherical/Withered, 58.3–104.0 μmnr./71%α-Tocopherol, γ-tocopherol, squalene, spinasterol, β-sitosterol, stigmastatrienol, stigmasterol, and stigmastadienol [65]
LactoseBrown seaweed (Saccharina japonica) extract10:100% w/v30 mL/min, 230 °C, 105 °CSpherical/Wrinkled, 127 μmnr./30%Phenolic acids (gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, gentisic acid, protocatechuic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, vanillic acid, caffeic acid, and syringic acid) [84]
TrehalosePumpkin oil15.4:10.2% w/w77 mL/min, 130 °C, 90 °CSpherical/Withered, 85.2–176.0 μmnr./59%α-Tocopherol, γ-tocopherol, squalene, spinasterol, β-sitosterol, stigmastatrienol, stigmasterol, and stigmastadienol [65]
DextrinBrown seaweed (Saccharina japonica) extract10:100% w/v30 mL/min, 230 °C, 105 °CSpherical/Wrinkled, 43.4 μmnr./1%Phenolic acids (gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, gentisic acid, protocatechuic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, vanillic acid, caffeic acid, and syringic acid) [84]
XanthanVitamin B11:0.125% w/w4 mL/min, 120 °C, 50–67 °CSpherical/Irregular, 0.1–0.7 μm17%/95%Vitamin B1 [68]
Skimmed milkChokeberry extract2:10 w/v rationr., nr., nr.Spherical/Aggregates, 8–14 μmnr./74–79%Phenolic compounds, anthocyanins, and cyanidin-3-glucoside [88]
Apple pectinSatureja khuzistanica Jamzad extract10:1% w/w3.5 mL/min, 115 °C, nr.Semi-cubes/Porous, 3 μmnr./51%Phenolic compounds [96]
Apple pectinSatureja rechingeri Jamzad extract10:1% w/w3.5 mL/min, 115 °C, nr.Semi-cubes/Porous, 3 μmnr./38%Phenolic compounds [96]
Apple pectinVitamin B11:0.125% w/w4 mL/min, 120 °C, 50–67 °CSpherical/Irregular, 0.5–1.3 μm44%/95%Vitamin B1 [68]
PG2000Borage seed oil10–20:13% w/w10 mL/min, 170 °C, 80 °CAsymmetrical/Wrinkled, 4–20 μmnr./87%Oil [78]
PG2000Borage seed oil/Curcumin10–20:13:0.6% w/w/w10 mL/min, 170 °C, 80 °CAsymmetrical/Wrinkled, 4–20 μmnr./89%Curcumin [78]
PG2000Borage seed oil/Resveratrol10–20:13:0.4% w/w/w10 mL/min, 170 °C, 80 °CAsymmetrical/Wrinkled, 4–20 μmnr./86%Resveratrol [78]
PG2000Borage seed oil/Curcumin/Resveratrol10–20:13:0.6:0.4% w/w/w/w10 mL/min, 170 °C, 80 °CAsymmetrical/Wrinkled, 4–20 μmnr./89%Curcumin and resveratrol [78]
Brea gumCorn oil5–20:10% w/wnr., 150 °C, 60 °CSemi-spherical/Dents, 0.8–26 μmnr./34–76%Oil [111]
Cashew tree gumFish oil15:nr.% w/nr.0.7 L/h, 180 °C, nr.Spherical/Smooth holes, 30–63 μmnr./76%Oil [69]
Mesquite gumSesame (Sesamum indica L.) oil1–3:1 rationr., 120–160 °C, nr.Spherical/Wrinkled, nr.nr./70–90%Oil [114]
nr.: not reported; A: achira; C: corn; Carr: carrageenan; CH: chitosan; GA: gum Arabic; C14: myristic acid; C16: palmitic acid; C18: stearic acid; C20: cetoleic acid; HCP: Hi-cap100; M: maize; MD: maltodextrin; Mo: modified; MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acid; P: potato; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acid; PG2000: purity gum 2000; R: rice; SA: sodium alginate; SC: sodium caseinate; SFA: saturated fatty acid; SOS: sodium octenylsuccinate; T: taro; W: wheat.
Table 2. Encapsulation of bioactive compounds with protein-based wall materials.
Table 2. Encapsulation of bioactive compounds with protein-based wall materials.
Wall MaterialCore MaterialConcentration (Wall Material: Core Material)Conditions (Feed Rate, Inlet Air, Outlet Air)Particles (Shape/Morphology, Particle Size Distribution)Process Yield/Encapsulation EfficiencyEncapsulated CompoundsReferences
GelatinBrown seaweed (Saccharina japonica) extract10:100% w/v30 mL/min, 230 °C, 105 °CSpherical/Wrinkled, 15.8 μmnr./87%Phenolic acids (gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, gentisic acid, protocatechuic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, vanillic acid, caffeic acid, and syringic acid) [84]
GelatinThyme (Thymus serpyllum L.) extract5:100% w/vnr., 140 °C, 72–75 °CSemi-spherical/Wrinkled, 130–223 μmnr./1–44%Phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and sugars [130]
GelatinAlgal (Tetraselmis chuii) biomass2:1% w/w2.5 mL/min, 150 °C, 60 °CSpherical/Rough, 1.5–15.3 μm22–45%/46–78%Phenolic compounds, β-carotene, and carotenoids [99]
GelatinCiprofloxacin0.5–2:1–5% w/w90–308 mL/h, 115–140 °C, nr.Spherical/Smooth, 2.6–3.7 μmnr./95–100%Ciprofloxacin [131]
CaseinAloe vera (Aloe barbadensis) leaves4:1% w/wnr., 160 °C, 70 °CSpherical/Smooth, 2 μmnr./nr.Anthraquinone [132]
CaseinJaboticaba (Plinia jaboticaba) skin extract1:5 ratio1 L/h, 190 °C, 81 °CSpherical/Wrinkled, 3–25 μmnr./nr.Phenolic compounds [133]
CaseinCaffeine0–1:0–1 ratio8 mL/min, 100–190 °C, nr.Irregular/Smooth, 10 μm20–65%/nr.Caffeine [134]
CaseinAscorbic acid0.62:0.1% w/w8 mL/min, 100–150 °C, nr.Spherical/Wrinkled, 3–27 μm60–80%/20–70%Ascorbic acid [135]
CaseinCurcumin15.5:1% w/w46.5 mL/min, 180 °C, 90 °CSpherical/Wrinkled, 33 μmnr./nr.Curcumin [136]
SPIHorseradish leaf (Armoracia rusticana L.) juice20–80:20–80 ratio0.33 L/h, 120 °C, 80 °Cnr./nr., 7.5–14.0 μmnr./nr.Phenolic compounds, rutin, epicatechin, catechin and sinapic acid [77]
SPIHorseradish root (Armoracia rusticana L.) juice20–80:20–80 ratio0.33 L/h, 120 °C, 80 °Cnr./nr., 6.5–6.9 μmnr./nr.Phenolic compounds, rutin, epicatechin, catechin and sinapic acid [77]
C-Zeinα-Tocopherol1:6 ratio7–9 mL/min, 110–180 °C, nr.Irregular/Porous, 0.5–5 μm44–77%/31–42%α-Tocopherol [137]
WPCapsaicin10:20% w/wnr., 185 °C, 85 °CSpherical/Wrinkled, 0.8–8.1 μm68%/95%Capsaicin [138]
WPBrown seaweed (Saccharina japonica) extract10:100% w/v30 mL/min, 230 °C, 105 °CSpherical/Wrinkled, 143 μmnr./87%Phenolic acids (gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, gentisic acid, protocatechuic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, vanillic acid, caffeic acid, and syringic acid) [84]
WPITributyrin3–5:1 rationr., 160 °C, nr.Spherical/Smooth, 7–11 μmnr./24–35%Tributyrin [139]
WPIFresh kale (Brassica oleracea L.) leaves extract5–15:40% w/v12 mL/min, 215 °C, 65 °CSpherical/Wrinkled, 80 μmnr./99%Chlorophyll [140]
WPIMix (paprika-cinnamon oleoresin)10:1:1%w/ratio/ratio6 mL/min, 150 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Porous, 15 μm43%/84%Carotenoids [80]
Milk-PCConjugated linoleic acid1:8% w/wnr., 160 °C, 80 °CSpherical/Irregular, 10–25 μmnr./84%Conjugated linoleic acid [141]
Rice proteinPropolis extract1:1% v/v0.4 m3/min, 120 °C, 72 °CSpherical/Rough, nr.28%/90%Propolis [142]
Pea proteinPropolis extract1:1% v/v0.4 m3/min, 120 °C, 72 °CSpherical/Rough, nr.41%/90%Propolis [142]
Soy proteinPropolis extract1:1% v/v0.4 m3/min, 120 °C, 72 °CSpherical/Rough, nr.20%/70%Propolis [142]
OvalbuminPropolis extract1:1% v/v0.4 m3/min, 120 °C, 72 °CSpherical/Rough, nr.53%/73%Propolis [142]
HPOrange essential oil30% w/w3.75 mL/min, 180 °C, 85 °CSpherical/Rough, 30–40 μm36%/89%D-limonene [70]
nr.: not reported; C: corn; HP: hydrolyzed protein; SPI: soy protein isolate; WP: whey protein; WPI: whey protein isolate.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Díaz-Montes, E. Wall Materials for Encapsulating Bioactive Compounds via Spray-Drying: A Review. Polymers 2023, 15, 2659. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122659

AMA Style

Díaz-Montes E. Wall Materials for Encapsulating Bioactive Compounds via Spray-Drying: A Review. Polymers. 2023; 15(12):2659. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122659

Chicago/Turabian Style

Díaz-Montes, Elsa. 2023. "Wall Materials for Encapsulating Bioactive Compounds via Spray-Drying: A Review" Polymers 15, no. 12: 2659. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122659

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop