Next Article in Journal
Towards Tough Thermoplastic Adhesive Tape by Microstructuring the Tape Using Tailored Defects
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of 3D Printing Process Parameters on Damping Characteristic of Cantilever Beams Fabricated Using Material Extrusion
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 15
Issue 2
10.3390/polym15020258
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

N-Containing Hybrid Composites Coatings for Enhanced Fire-Retardant Properties of Cotton Fabric Using One-Pot Sol–Gel Process

by
Laila Khan
1,
Jong Seop Kim
2,
Seok-Hwan Huh
3 and
Bon Heun Koo
2,*
1
Department of Materials Convergence and System Engineering, Changwon National University, Changwon 51140, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Material Science and Engineering, Changwon National University, Changwon 51140, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Mechatronics Convergence Engineering, Changwon National University, Changwon 51140, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(2), 258; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15020258
Submission received: 26 November 2022 / Revised: 23 December 2022 / Accepted: 28 December 2022 / Published: 4 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Composites and Nanocomposites)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this report, a unique methodology/process steps were followed using Sol–gel-based concept to deposit thin flame-retardant coatings on cotton fabric. Surface microstructure and compositional analysis of the coated cotton were carried out using scanning electronic microscope (SEM), which explored significant coverage of the fabric. The obtained samples were further analyzed through rupturing mechanism test and color check. Compositional investigation of the coated samples was carried through Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (ATR–FTIR) and energy-dispersive X-rays spectroscopy (EDS) analysis. Thermal analyses were carried out through Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and Vertical flame tests (VFT), which suggested higher resistance of the coatings obtained for 5 h and zero heat-treatment time on the cotton fabric. A 28.86% char residue was obtained for the same sample (ET–5h–RT) coupled with higher degradation temperature and excellent combustion properties.

1. Introduction

Textile fabrics have been known to human beings for a long time and have been utilized for traditional purposes, as well as in advanced technology ranging from indoor interior application to structural and functional applications [1,2,3]. However, their intrinsic high flammability and ignitibility contribute to their decreasing application and functional failures due to extreme fire hazards caused by these textile fabrics [4,5]. The available commercial solutions in the form of Pyrovatex CP® or Proban® for various types of textile fabrics provide a satisfactory recipe for a cost-effective process and availability [6]. However, the modern national and international laws/regulations regarding the textile flame-retardants have become more severe and inflexible in order to avoid toxicological issues related to these synthetic chemicals [7]. In this regard, the most significant are halogen-based compounds that can produce toxic corrosive gases during the burning process [8]. Phosphorus-based compositions such as tetrakis hydroxymethyl phosphonium chloride (THPC) and N-methylol dimethyl phosphono-propionamide (MDPA), which can release formaldehyde, were highly discouraged. To cope with these issues, a broad variety of research studies have been pursued, which mainly focused on surface modification techniques that can use chemical flame-retardant agents to impart flame retardancy to the fabric. The major surface treatment and modification techniques include layer-by-layer techniques [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17], the application of reactive monomeric or polymeric species [18,19,20,21], phosphorous-containing biomolecules such as DNA or casein [20,22,23], UV-curable [24,25] or plasma-curable systems [26,27,28,29,30,31] and coatings based on Sol–gel techniques [32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. For several reasons, interest in the Sol–gel processes in the textile field has grown in a remarkable manner. The Sol–gel approach has been recently used for several new functional properties and applications, such as antimicrobial or UV radiation protection [39,40,41,42,43,44], dye fastness, anti-wrinkle finishing, super-hydrophobicity, and immobilization of biomolecules, among other uses. In particular, it has been clearly demonstrated that Sol–gel-derived hybrid architectures are capable of protecting the polymer surface and acting as a thermal insulator, thus improving the flame retardancy of the treated substrates [45,46,47]. More specifically, referring to cellulosic substrates, these inorganic architectures absorb the heat from the surrounding area, and thus are able to protect the polymer substrate by creating a physical barrier to oxygen and heat transfer. In doing so, they hinder the formation of volatile species that fuel further degradation and, at the same time, favor the formation of a carbonaceous structure (char) [48,49]. One stage included simply doping flame-retardants physically into silica sol during the Sol–gel process, in which the treated fabrics possessed poor washing durability. Meanwhile, increasing attention has focused on the use of an alkoxysilane precursor bearing a flame-retardant atom such as phosphate, boron, and nitrogen to form chemically hybrid silica sol via the Sol–gel method [50,51]. Additionally, Alongi et al. [36] successfully used diethyl phosphatoethyl triethoxysi-lane (DPTES) as a monomer to synthesize hybrid phosphorus–silicon organic–inorganic coatings to enhance cotton flame-retardancy. This strategy sounds like a promising way to improve the washing durability of sol coating for the incorporation of hybrid element into the sol matrix via chemical bonding. However, it is difficult to obtain these precursors carrying phosphorus, boron, or nitrogen. It is reported that Yang Z.Y synthesized a novel flame-retardant precursor containing phosphorus and nitrogen using diphenylphosphinic chloride and (3–aminopropyl) trimethoxysilane as reactants for flame retardancy of cotton. It is well known that the inorganic borax and borate are not washing durable for finishing, and the drawback of organic boron compounds as flame retardants relates to their poor hydrolytic stability owing to the electron deficiency of boron atoms. Consequently, efforts have been made to replace boron composite flame retardants by introducing new elements such as nitrogen or silicon into the same structure system, with improved flame retardancy and washing durability. In the present work, a hybrid silica sol in combination with melamine (N–precursor; 99%) was obtained through the Sol–gel method. The precursor tetraethoxysilane (TEOS;99.0%) reacted with N-species, which played the role of flame retardant and catalyst via the cohydrolysis and condensation reaction at a relatively low temperature. Thus, a homogeneous hybrid sol system was obtained, in which the trigonal NO3 units would be incorporated into the siloxane network via Si–O–N bridges [37]. The coated samples were characterized through various techniques in order to assess the thermal stability and characterization of the microstructure of the coatings.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

Original Cotton fabric (100%, 180 g m−2) was used as an experimental substrate material. Before use, the fabric was divided carefully into sampling pieces (height/width ~ 230 mm/120 mm), cleaned, and dried. Ethanol and HCl were purchased from Samchun Chemical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea. Melamine and Tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, Burlington, MA, United States. The DI water used in the experiment was of 18.6 Ω∙cm.

2.2. Preparation of Sol

The sol was prepared using the chemical with the given rations of TEOS: ETHANOL: DI = 1:2:4. After complete mixing of these chemicals, 10 mL of HCl (37%) was added to the mixture and stirred to room temperature for 4 h until a clear transparent sol was formed. Meanwhile 10% melamine solution was prepared using Ethanol. The 10% melamine solution was mixed with the sol during the stirring process. The sol was then put in a 500 mL beaker for cotton impregnation.

2.3. Cotton Treatment

Ten pieces of cotton fabric samples (230 mm × 120 mm) numbered in sequence were used for the treatment. For each experimental condition, two samples were used. Sample 1 and 2 were control cotton fabric. Samples 3 and 4 (ET–0.5h–15) were treated in the melamine-based solution for 0.5 h under the condition of drying at 90 °C for 15 h and curing at 165 °C for 1.0 min. Samples 5 and 6 (ET–2h–15), were treated in the melamine-based solution for 2 h under the condition of drying at 90 °C for 15 h and curing at 165 °C for 1.0 min. Samples 7 and 8 (ET–14h–5), were treated in the melamine-based solution for 14 h under the condition of drying at 90 °C for 5h and curing at 165 °C for 1.0 min. Sample 9,10 (ET–5h–RT) were treated in the melamine-based solution for 5h under the condition of drying at RT and curing at 165 °C for 1.0 min.

2.4. Characterization Techniques

Using a low-voltage scanning electronic microscope (LV–SEM, Merlin compact, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), the surface morphologies of the coated and the untreated fabric samples were examined. EDS (energy-dispersive X-rays spectroscopy) was used as a combined means of characterization along with LV–SEM to help examine the elemental composition of the coating surfaces (vide infra). For effective surface microscopy, the as-coated fabric samples were Pt sputtered for short period of 3 min, subject to a high vacuum to help transmit conduction to the fabric surface. The coated samples were then analyzed through attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (ATR–FTIR) spectra (JASCO 6300, Easton, MD, United States), in the frequency range of 4000 to 400 cm−1. The spectra profiles were recorded after 32 scans at a resolution of 4 cm−1. The thermal stability of uncoated and coated fabrics was then analyzed in the nitrogen atmosphere (20 mL min−1) using Scinco Thermogravimetric Analyzer (N–1000/1500, SCINCO, Seoul, Republic of Korea) and in the temperature range of 50 to 600 °C, at a heating rate of 20 °C min−1. A quantity of each sample used for TGA count was taken ~ 8–10 mg. Macro-combustion tests such as the vertical flame test (VFT) was performed for each coated and the control sample, in conformity with documented ASTM D6413 standards. Accordingly, the samples were combusted in a lab-made vertical flammability box (300 mm/120 mm) using a Bunsen burner flame; the flame was applied for 10 s, exactly 20 mm below the fabric sample and the process was recorded using a high-speed optical camera.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Surface and Compositional Analysis

General images of the coated cotton processed under various conditions were taken and compared with the uncoated cotton fabric, as shown in Figure 1. The images were taken after completion of all steps, including coating, drying, curing, and then washing. Various conditions of the coating preparation and then post-coating conditions can be seen in Table 1. The typical images not only show color difference imparted to the cotton fabric during the coating process, but also the intensity and degree of self-rupturing of the cotton fabric due to the treatment process. It can be seen that the cotton heated for a long time, as shown in ET–0.5h–15 (15 h heating), ET–2h–15 (15 h heating) has a high degree of color difference and self-rupturing compared to the other samples. The inset table in Figure 1 shows the level of rupturing in all the coated fabric. Broken patches and parts caused by the self-rupturing can be easily seen in the images in ET–0.5h–15, ET–2h–15, suggesting the coated process has severely danged the cotton fabric to the extent that it could not afford shaking or transference from one place to other. Thus, in terms of initial practical observation, the condition is not feasible for the objective application of these coatings. In addition, it can be seen that as well as the self-rupturing, the colors of the cotton have been changed to a higher degree from initial un-coated fabric. It is believed that due to a longer duration of heating, the presence of acidic molecules was responsible for such adverse changes in the originality of the cotton fabric. As the heating time decreased from 15 h to 5 and 0 h, the cotton fabric regained its original color and ability to withstand self-rupturing. The heating process could cause the acidic and silica network to react in such a manner, possibly causing an exothermic reaction in the presence of a high-heat futile environment, and thus, it could damage the cellulosic network of the cotton fabric, as can be seen in the initial two samples. However, as the heating time has been reduced, the level of exothermic reaction and effects were reduced, and thus less color change and rupturing were observed.
The coated cotton samples were than observed through low-voltage scanning electron microscopy, as shown in Figure 2. Since the cotton fabric is cellulosic in nature, which is a green molecule that contains a combination of oxygen and carbon molecules, and thus, the high voltage can damage these molecular networks. The low-voltage SEM was able to observe the micro-details of the coatings deposited on the cotton fabric at the individual fiber level. From the SEM images, it can be seen that similar to macro-images, as discussed earlier, the rupturing process penetrated to the singular fibers. A portion of fibers can be seen as broken and torn apart, as shown in ET–0.5h–15, ET–2h–15. In addition, it can that the coating deposition performed uniformly on all the individual fibers, and thus covered the entire fabric matrix. Further, it can be seen that the coating process could not change the original and compact nature of the cotton fabric, and thus, the design and pattern of the cotton fabric is still in place, as found in the control cotton fabric. Coating microstructure found on ET–14h–5, ET–5h–RT can be seen as different compared to the initial two conditions. In case of ET–14h–5, the surface is completely covered, and thus the individual fabric cannot be seen clearly, while in the case of ET–5h–RT, the surface is compact and has no broken portions or parts, as found earlier, confirming the lesser extent of rupturing. Further, the original pattern of the fabric was found to be intact and compact. Surface morphology and microstructure as observed in the SEM can be helpful to discuss the results obtained in the next experiments.
To determine the compositional profile of the coatings deposited on the cotton fabric, EDS analysis was carried out and the elemental profiles for each coating were drawn as shown in Figure 3. It can be seen that C, O, Si, Pt, and Cl were obtained in the elemental profiles. C and O were obtained from the ethanol and cotton fabric, while the Si was obtained from the TEOS. Pt was obtained from the Pt sputtering, carried out before the SEM and EDS measurement to facilitate conductivity of the coated fabric. Si was obtained from the TEOS and Cl was obtained from the HCl. N was deposited in a lesser amount from the precursors and thus could not be found in the elemental profiles. The presence of an excessive amount of Si suggests the successful deposition of the Sol–gel to the individual fiber, and thus could help to protect the coated fabric against fire.
The FTIR analysis, which is used to explore the molecular composition of the coated species, can be seen in Figure 4. The obtained peaks in the FTIR profile can be attributed to various stretching and vibrational modes of the bonds between these species. Major stretching and vibrational modes were recorded as follows: OH stretching, CH stretching, H2O absorption, CH absorption, CH2 bending, C–O–C glycoside bend stretching and C–H rock vibration. The OH and CH stretching were obtained at above 2500 cm−1 wave number, suggesting lower energies for these resonations. It is believed that these vibrations have been caused by the C–H and O–H present in the ethanol and cotton fabric. Further, it can be seen that width of these two peaks has been altered significantly with coating conditions, suggesting OH is removed by a longer heating process. It is important to note that the peak shift and modification obtained at 1200 and 1135 cm−1 can be attributed to the stretching of the –Si–O– cellulose and –Si–O–Si– bonds, which suggests the successful deposition of the coating layers.

3.2. Thermal Analysis

To observe the thermal protection efficiency of the coated cotton, TGA analysis was carried out for all the coated samples. The TGA was carried out from 25 °C to 700 to 20 °/min, as shown in Figure 5. The TGA results were drawn as weight loss (%) on the y-axis and temperature increase on the x–axis. It can be seen that, apparently, 30% of residue was obtained for all the coatings. The higher residue obtained for ET–0.5h–15 and ET–2h–15 was because they all the low-temperature degradation components were lost during the longer heating process, and thus sustained the temperature during TGA. The results were further confirmed by the T5% values ~ 110.70 °C for ET–2h–15, which were higher than all other samples, as mentioned in Table 1. Various parameters obtained from the TGA can be seen in Table 1. The DTGA profile was obtained to determine the highest changes in the degradation and temperature where higher changes occurred, as shown in Figure 6. The highest temperature was recorded as 366.87 °C, while the lowest temperature was found to be ~ 334.56 °C, as mentioned in Table 1. The highest temperature suggests higher resistance to the flame provided by the coated materials deposited on the cotton fabric. To further analyze the thermal properties of the coated samples, a vertical flame test was carried out and the images were taken at intervals of 5 s, 10 s, and final burn in order to observe the flame spread properties. A VFT test was carried out in a lab-made chamber according to the ASTM D 6413 Standard Test Method for Flame Resistance of Textiles procedure. The coated samples with the specific dimensions stated earlier were exposed to the methane flame at 10 cm distance for 10 s. After the removal of flame at 10 s, images of burning samples and other parameters were calculated accordingly. It can be seen that at 5 s, as in Figure 7, the ET–5h–5 and ET–14h–RT samples were significantly resistant to the flame compared to other samples. However, no sample resisted the flame to the level of extinguishing. The images taken at 10 s can be seen in Figure 8, which shows that the flame spread has almost covered the sample area in vertical and horizontal directions. Compared to other samples, the ET–5h–5 and ET–14h–RT partially blocked the flame spread in the mid-region section, and thus, the obtained flame intensity was minimal compared to other samples. The final images obtained from the VFT analysis can be seen in Figure 9. The final images are important to observe because their mechanical stability prohibit the transfer of flame to other areas through disintegration, and the large amount of residue supports the efficient role of the coatings.
In case of ET–0.5h–15 and ET–2h–15, the char has been completely broken into parts and could not withstand alone, suggesting strain in the cotton matrix and conversion of the maximum portion of the char into ash. In comparison, the ET–5h–5 and ET–14h–RT can be seen as mechanically stable and thus could play a role to block the transfer of flame from one place to other, which could not be the case if the cotton broke into pieces and was thrown into a new area of flame-less zone [48]. Finally, the burning rate of the coatings was calculated from the VFT experiment as shown in Figure 10. The lowest burning rate was obtained as 4.1 cm2/s for ET–5h–5, which is quite a bit lower than the values obtained for other samples.

4. Conclusions

Sol–gel coatings were successfully deposited onto the cotton fabric for fire-retardant applications. It was found that under a longer heat-treatment time of 15 h, the original color and mechanical properties of the cotton were severely altered. However, for shorter treatment times of 5 h and 0 h, the color and mechanical properties of the cotton were found to be immune to the coating process. The highest degradation temperature was obtained for ET-5h-RT ~ 383.02 °C, with significant resistance to the degradation process in the initial stages. Likewise, the peak degradation temperature was at its highest ~ 366.87 °C for ET–5h–RT coupled with significant char residue ~ 28.86%. The results were further confirmed by the flame spread and burning rate profile, with the lowest flame spread obtained for ET–5h–RT.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.K. and B.H.K.; methodology, L.K. and J.S.K.; software, L.K. and J.S.K.; validation, L.K. and J.S.K.; formal analysis, L.K. and J.S.K.; investigation, L.K.; resources, S.-H.H. and B.H.K.; data curation, L.K.; writing—original draft preparation, L.K.; writing—review and editing, L.K. and B.H.K.; visualization, S.-H.H. and B.H.K.; supervision, S.-H.H. and B.H.K.; project administration, S.-H.H. and B.H.K.; funding acquisition, S.-H.H. and B.H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Korea National Research Foundation, grant number No. 2018R1A6A1A03024509.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Korea National Research Foundation grant funded by the Korean government endorsed this work (No. 2018R1A6A1A03024509) received by Bon Heun Koo. Additionally, the authors express thanks to the Brain Korea (BK) Project for Educational Research Changwon National University for the financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Barman, J.; Tirkey, A.; Batra, S.; Paul, A.; Panda, K.; Deka, R.; Babu, P. The role of nanotechnology based wearable electronic textiles in biomedical and healthcare applications. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 32, 104055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sinha, A.; Dhanjai; Stavrakis, A.; Stojanović, G. Textile-based electrochemical sensors and their applications. Talanta 2022, 244, 123425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Khadem, A.; Hasan, T.; Rahman, A.; Smriti, S.; Alimuzzaman, S. Fabrication, properties, and performance of graphene-based textile fabrics for supercapacitor applications: A review. J. Energy Storage 2022, 56, 105988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lu, S.-Y. Hamerton, Recent developments in the chemistry of halogen-free flame retardant polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2002, 27, 1661–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Horrocks, A.R. Flame-retardant Finishing of Textiles. Rev. Prog. Color. Relat. Top. 1986, 16, 62–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Horrocks, A.R. Flame retardant challenges for textiles and fibres: New chemistry versus innovatory solutions. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2011, 96, 377–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Birnbaum, L.; Staskal, D. Brominated flame retardants: Cause for concern? Environ. Health Perspect. 2004, 112, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. de Wit, C.A. An overview of brominated flame retardants in the environment. Chemosphere 2002, 46, 583–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Y.-C.; Schulz, J.; Mannen, S.; Delhom, C.; Condon, B.; Chang, S.; Zammarano, M.; Grunlan, J. Flame Retardant Behavior of Polyelectrolyte−Clay Thin Film Assemblies on Cotton Fabric. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3325–3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Y.-C.; Mannen, S.; Morgan, A.; Chang, S.; Yang, Y.-H.; Condon, B.; Grunlan, J. Intumescent All-Polymer Multilayer Nanocoating Capable of Extinguishing Flame on Fabric. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3926–3931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chang, S.; Slopek, R.; Condon, B.; Grunlan, J. Surface Coating for Flame-Retardant Behavior of Cotton Fabric Using a Continuous Layer-by-Layer Process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 3805–3812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Carosio, F.; Di Blasio, A.; Alongi, J.; Malucelli, G. Green DNA-based flame retardant coatings assembled through Layer by Layer. Polymer 2013, 54, 5148–5153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rehman, Z.; Niaz, A.; Song, J.-I.; Koo, B. Excellent Fire Retardant Properties of CNF/VMT Based LBL Coatings Deposited on Polypropylene and Wood-Ply. Polymers 2021, 13, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Song, K.; Hou, B.; Rehman, Z.U.; Pan, Y.-T.; He, J.; Wang, D.-Y.; Yang, R. “Sloughing” of metal-organic framework retaining nanodots via step-by-step carving and its flame-retardant effect in epoxy resin. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 448, 137666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hou, B.; Song, K.; Rehman, Z.U.; Song, T.; Lin, T.; Zhang, W.; Pan, Y.-T.; Yang, R. Precise Control of a Yolk-Double Shell Metal–Organic Framework-Based Nanostructure Provides Enhanced Fire Safety for Epoxy Nanocomposites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 14805–14816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Rehman, Z.U.; Kaseem, M.; Churchill, D.; Pan, Y.-T.; Koo, B.H. Macro and micro thermal investigation of nanoarchitectonics-based coatings on cotton fabric using new quaternized starch. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 2888–2900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rehman, Z.U.; Huh, S.-H.; Ullah, Z.; Pan, Y.-T.; Churchill, D.; Koo, B. LBL generated fire retardant nanocomposites on cotton fabric using cationized starch-clay-nanoparticles matrix. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 274, 118626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, C.; Wu, W. Combination of a hydroxy-functional organophosphorus oligomer and a multifunctional carboxylic acid as a flame retardant finishing system for cotton: Part, I. The chemical reactions. Fire Mater. 2003, 27, 223–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, W.; Yang, C. Comparison of different reactive organophosphorus flame retardant agents for cotton: Part, I. The bonding of the flame retardant agents to cotton. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2006, 91, 2541–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, C.; He, Q. Applications of micro-scale combustion calorimetry to the studies of cotton and nylon fabrics treated with organophosphorus flame retardants. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2011, 91, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chang, S.; Sachinvala, N.; Sawhney, P.; Parikh, D.; Jarrett, W.; Grimm, C. Epoxy phosphonate crosslinkers for providing flame resistance to cotton textiles. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2007, 18, 611–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alongi, J.; Milnes, J.; Malucelli, G.; Bourbigot, S.; Kandola, B. Thermal degradation of DNA-treated cotton fabrics under different heating conditions, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2014, 108, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Carosio, F.; Di Blasio, A.; Cuttica, F.; Alongi, J.; Malucelli, G. Flame Retardancy of Polyester and Polyester–Cotton Blends Treated with Caseins. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 3917–3923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xing, W.; Jie, G.; Song, L.; Hu, S.; Lv, X.; Wang, X.; Hu, Y. Flame retardancy and thermal degradation of cotton textiles based on UV-curable flame retardant coatings. Thermochim. Acta 2011, 513, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Opwis, K.; Wego, A.; Bahners, T.; Schollmeyer, E. Permanent flame retardant finishing of textile materials by a photochemical immobilization of vinyl phosphonic acid. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2011, 96, 393–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tsafack, M.; Levalois-Grützmacher, J. Flame retardancy of cotton textiles by plasma-induced graft-polymerization (PIGP). Surf. Coat. Technol. 2006, 201, 2599–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rehman, Z.U.; Choi, D. Investigation of ZrO2 nanoparticles concentration and processing time effect on the localized PEO coatings formed on AZ91 alloy. J. Magnes. Alloy. 2019, 7, 555–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rehman, Z.U.; Uzair, M.; Lim, H.; Koo, B. Structural and electrochemical properties of the catalytic CeO2 nanoparticles-based PEO ceramic coatings on AZ91 Mg alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 726, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rehman, Z.U.; Shin, S.H.; Lim, H.-T.; Koo, B.H. Transformation of plasma electrolytic oxidation coatings from crater to cluster–based structure with increase in DC voltage and the role of ZrO2 nanoparticles. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 311, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kaseem, M.; Hussain, T.; Rehman, Z.; Ko, Y. Stabilization of AZ31 Mg alloy in sea water via dual incorporation of MgO and WO3 during micro-arc oxidation. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 853, 157036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rehman, Z.; Shin, S.; Hussain, I.; Koo, B. Structure and corrosion properties of the two-step PEO coatings formed on AZ91D Mg alloy in K2ZrF6-based electrolyte solution. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 307, 484–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chapple, S.; Ferg, E. Influence of precursor ratios on the properties of cotton coated with a sol-gel flame retardant. AATCC Rev. 2006, 6, 36–40. [Google Scholar]
  33. Totolin, V.; Sarmadi, M.; Manolache, S.; Denes, F. Atmospheric pressure plasma enhanced synthesis of flame retardant cellulosic materials. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 117, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Brancatelli, G.; Colleoni, C.; Massafra, M.; Rosace, G. Stability, Effect of hybrid phosphorus-doped silica thin films produced by sol-gel method on the thermal behavior of cotton fabrics. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2011, 96, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Alongi, J.; Ciobanu, M.; Malucelli, G. Sol–gel treatments on cotton fabrics for improving thermal and flame stability: Effect of the structure of the alkoxysilane precursor. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 627–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Alongi, J.; Ciobanu, M.; Malucelli, G. Thermal stability, flame retardancy and mechanical properties of cotton fabrics treated with inorganic coatings synthesized through sol–gel processes. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 2093–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Alongi, J.; Colleoni, C.; Malucelli, G.; Rosace, G. Hybrid phosphorus-doped silica architectures derived from a multistep sol–gel process for improving thermal stability and flame retardancy of cotton fabrics. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2012, 97, 1334–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhou, T.; He, X.; Guo, C.; Yu, J.; Lu, D.; Yang, Q. Synthesis of a novel flame retardant phosphorus/nitrogen/siloxane and its application on cotton fabrics. Text. Res. J. 2015, 85, 701–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mahltig, B.; Haufe, H.; Böttcher, H. Functionalisation of textiles by inorganic sol–gel coatings. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 4385–4398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mahltig, B.; Böttcher, H.; Rauch, K.; Dieckmann, U.; Nitsche, R.; Fritz, T. Optimized UV protecting coatings by combination of organic and inorganic UV absorbers. Thin Solid Film. 2005, 485, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mahltig, B.; Fiedler, D.; Böttcher, H. Antimicrobial Sol–Gel Coatings. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2004, 32, 219–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xing, Y.; Ding, X. UV photo-stabilization of tetrabutyl titanate for aramid fibers via sol–gel surface modification. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 103, 3113–3119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xing, Y.; Yang, X.; Dai, J. Antimicrobial finishing of cotton textile based on water glass by sol–gel method. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2007, 43, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Abidi, N.; Hequet, E.; Tarimala, S.; Dai, L. Cotton fabric surface modification for improved UV radiation protection using sol–gel process. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 104, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kashiwagi, T.; Morgan, A.; Antonucci, J.; VanLandingham, M.; Harris, R.H., Jr.; Awad, W.; Shields, J. Thermal and flammability properties of a silica–poly(methylmethacrylate) nanocomposite. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 89, 2072–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, X.; Guo, W.; Cai, W.; Wang, J.; Song, L.; Hu, Y. Recent advances in construction of hybrid nano-structures for flame retardant polymers application. Appl. Mater. Today 2020, 20, 100762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Branda, F.; Bifulco, A.; Jehnichen, D.; Parida, D.; Pauer, R.; Passaro, J.; Gaan, S.; Pospiech, D.; Durante, M. Structure and Bottom-up Formation Mechanism of Multisheet Silica-Based Nanoparticles Formed in an Epoxy Matrix through an In Situ Process. Langmuir 2021, 37, 8886–8893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lazar, S.; Kolibaba, T.; Grunlan, J. Flame-retardant surface treatments. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 5, 259–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Davesne, A.-L.; Jimenez, M.; Samyn, F.; Bourbigot, S. Thin coatings for fire protection: An overview of the existing strategies, with an emphasis on layer-by-layer surface treatments and promising new solutions. Prog. Org. Coat. 2021, 154, 106217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bifulco, A.; Imparato, C.; Aronne, A.; Malucelli, G. Flame retarded polymer systems based on the sol-gel approach: Recent advances and future perspectives. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2022, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bentis, A.; Boukhriss, A.; Boyer, D.; Gmouh, S. Development of Flame Retardant Cotton Fabric Based on Ionic Liquids via Sol-Gel Technique. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2017; Volume 254, p. 122001. [Google Scholar]
Polymers 15 00258 g001 550
Figure 1. Typical images of the coated cotton fabric.
Figure 1. Typical images of the coated cotton fabric.
Polymers 15 00258 g001
Polymers 15 00258 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM iamges of the cotton fabric obtained under various conditions.
Figure 2. SEM iamges of the cotton fabric obtained under various conditions.
Polymers 15 00258 g002
Polymers 15 00258 g003 550
Figure 3. EDS profile of the coated fabrics.
Figure 3. EDS profile of the coated fabrics.
Polymers 15 00258 g003
Polymers 15 00258 g004 550
Figure 4. FTIR analysis profile of the coated cotton fabrics.
Figure 4. FTIR analysis profile of the coated cotton fabrics.
Polymers 15 00258 g004
Polymers 15 00258 g005 550
Figure 5. Thermogravimetric analysis curves of the coated fabric obtained under various conditions.
Figure 5. Thermogravimetric analysis curves of the coated fabric obtained under various conditions.
Polymers 15 00258 g005
Polymers 15 00258 g006 550
Figure 6. DTGA analysis curves of the coated fabrics obtained under various conditions.
Figure 6. DTGA analysis curves of the coated fabrics obtained under various conditions.
Polymers 15 00258 g006
Polymers 15 00258 g007 550
Figure 7. Images of the coated samples obtained after 5 s of flame initiation.
Figure 7. Images of the coated samples obtained after 5 s of flame initiation.
Polymers 15 00258 g007
Polymers 15 00258 g008 550
Figure 8. Images of the coated samples obtained after 10 s of flame initiation.
Figure 8. Images of the coated samples obtained after 10 s of flame initiation.
Polymers 15 00258 g008
Polymers 15 00258 g009 550
Figure 9. Final images of the coated sample completely converted to char as a result of VFT test.
Figure 9. Final images of the coated sample completely converted to char as a result of VFT test.
Polymers 15 00258 g009
Polymers 15 00258 g010 550
Figure 10. Burning rate of the coated cotton obtained from VFT analysis.
Figure 10. Burning rate of the coated cotton obtained from VFT analysis.
Polymers 15 00258 g010
Table
Table 1. Thermogravimetric analysis parameters of the coated samples.
Table 1. Thermogravimetric analysis parameters of the coated samples.
#T5%TonRonToffRoffTpeak1Tpeak2Total Decomposition
%
ET–0.5h–15102.02245.1693.26383.0238.61254.90364.1531.92
ET–2h–15110.70315.2293.30380.7535.13252.98364.1530.10
ET–14h–592.20312.9693.15338.0827.33–334.561.80
ET–5h–RT99.75328.2692.27383.0233.11–366.8728.86
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khan, L.; Kim, J.S.; Huh, S.-H.; Koo, B.H. N-Containing Hybrid Composites Coatings for Enhanced Fire-Retardant Properties of Cotton Fabric Using One-Pot Sol–Gel Process. Polymers 2023, 15, 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15020258

AMA Style

Khan L, Kim JS, Huh S-H, Koo BH. N-Containing Hybrid Composites Coatings for Enhanced Fire-Retardant Properties of Cotton Fabric Using One-Pot Sol–Gel Process. Polymers. 2023; 15(2):258. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15020258

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khan, Laila, Jong Seop Kim, Seok-Hwan Huh, and Bon Heun Koo. 2023. "N-Containing Hybrid Composites Coatings for Enhanced Fire-Retardant Properties of Cotton Fabric Using One-Pot Sol–Gel Process" Polymers 15, no. 2: 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15020258

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop