Next Article in Journal
Influence of Electrospinning Setup Parameters on Properties of Polymer-Perovskite Nanofibers
Next Article in Special Issue
Biochemical and Microstructural Characteristics of Collagen Biopolymer from Unicornfish (Naso reticulatus Randall, 2001) Bone Prepared with Various Acid Types
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Pavement Material Using Crumb Rubber Modifier and Graphite Nanoplatelet for Pellet Asphalt Production
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Cellulose Nanofiber Loading and Processing Conditions during Melt Extrusion of Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) Bionanocomposites
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 15
Issue 3
10.3390/polym15030729
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation and Characterization of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Rubber Reinforced with Bio-Hydroxyapatite from Fish Scale

by
Namthip Bureewong
1,2,
Preeyaporn Injorhor
1,2,
Saifa Krasaekun
1,2,
Pawida Munchan
1,2,
Oatsaraphan Waengdongbang
1,2,
Jatuporn Wittayakun
3,
Chaiwat Ruksakulpiwat
1,2,* and
Yupaporn Ruksakulpiwat
1,2,*
1
School of Polymer Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
2
Research Center for Biocomposite Materials for Medical Industry and Agricultural and Food Industry, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
3
School of Chemistry, Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(3), 729; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030729
Submission received: 29 November 2022 / Revised: 25 January 2023 / Accepted: 28 January 2023 / Published: 31 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Biopolymer-Based Composites: Processing, Characterization, and Application)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This work aims to enhance the mechanical properties, oil resistance, and thermal properties of acrylonitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) by using the Nile tilapia fish scales as a filler and using bis(triethoxysilylpropyl)tetrasulfide (TESPT) as a coupling agent (CA). The prepared fish scale particles (FSp) are B-type hydroxyapatite and the particle shape is rod-like. The filled NBR with FSp at 10 phr increased tensile strength up to 180% (4.56 ± 0.48 MPa), reduced oil absorption up to 155%, and increased the decomposition temperature up to 4 °C, relative to the unfilled NBR. The addition of CA into filled NBR with FSp at 10 phr increased tensile strength up to 123% (5.62 ± 0.42 MPa) and percentage of elongation at break up to 122% relative to the filled NBR with FSp at 10 phr. This work demonstrated that the prepared FSp from the Nile tilapia fish scales can be used as a reinforcement filler to enhance the NBR properties for use in many high-performance applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nile tilapia is a freshwater fish that finds public favor in consumption, which makes it popular in aquaculture. About 140,000 tons of Nile tilapia fish were produced in Thailand, and 23% of those were processed into fillets. That left about 2% of the Nile tilapia fish scales as waste [1,2,3]. Generally, fish scales are considered discarded waste from the food processing industry and are often disposed of in landfills, which pollute both soil and water resources [4,5]. Therefore, the development of fish scales into functional materials is interesting because it could reduce the impact of environmental pollution and increase their value. Normally, the fish scales are rich in hydroxyapatite, collagen, polysaccharide, and chitin, which contain the mineral elements magnesium, calcium, fluoride, and phosphorus [6,7]. Recently, fish scales have been used to produce various products, such as fertilizer and fillers for plastic and rubber industrials. Additionally, it also has a wide use in tissue engineering for biomedical applications [3,4]. Hydroxyapatite from fish scales has gained the attention of many researchers. Majhool et al. [8] have prepared hydroxyapatite from tilapia fish scales. They expected that it can be used as a potential filler in polymers. Similar to Prasad et al. [9], they have used hydroxyapatite from fish scales as a filler in polylactic acid (PLA) composites for use as fixation devices. Their work revealed that hydroxyapatite can be improved the wettability and thermal stability of PLA/hydroxyapatite composites.
Acrylonitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) is a synthetic rubber that has excellent resistance to solvents and oils due to the presence of polar cyanide groups in the NBR backbone. In addition, NBR is convenient to use in various industrial applications because of its moderate cost, processability, and heat resistance. The majority of NBR applications are used in petroleum and automobile industrials, such as fuel hoses, gaskets, oil seals, radiator hoses, v-belts, etc. [10,11]. However, NBR has drawbacks in tensile strength, flexibility and flame resistance, etc., that restrict its potential to be used in many applications requiring high performance [10,11,12,13,14,15]. Several researchers have recently been fabricating elastic composites, especially NBR-based nanocomposites, not only to improve the mechanical properties of NBR but also to enhance the resistance to solvents, oils, and heat [13,16,17].
However, although the addition of nanofillers to NBR has several advantages, as mentioned, it also has some disadvantages, such as the ability to agglomerate due to the filler–filler interactions, which limits the potential of the filler to improve the performance of NBR vulcanizate. Therefore, the addition of coupling agents could be an alternative way to reduce these problems because it would reduce the filler–filler interactions and enhance the filler–rubber interactions, which would improve the overall polymer composite properties [18,19]. Normally, bis(triethoxysilylpropyl)tetrasulfide (TESPT) is typically the coupling agent (CA) that is widely used in the rubber industry due to its low cost, availability, and the simplicity of the process [20]. TESPT is a bifunctional compound which is composed of two functionally active end groups. It can act as a bridge between filler and rubber via chemical linkages in the sulfur vulcanization, so enhancing of the rubber–filler interaction occurred [21].
In this work, alkali heat treatment was used to prepare Nile tilapia fish scales as fish scale particles (FSp). The method was based on previous research [22]. The particle size of FSp was expected to decrease with increasing treatment time and can be used as a filler in NBR. The characteristics of FSp were characterized using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD), an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), a nitrogen adsorption–desorption analyzer, and a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM). The effects on the cure characteristics, mechanical properties, morphological properties, oil resistance, and thermal properties of the filled NBR with FSp at different contents (0, 5, and 10 phr) were investigated. Furthermore, the effects of CA on NBR samples with optimal FSp content were compared. NBR composites filled with FSp were expected to provide the oil resistance properties. This is a novelty of the work.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Nile tilapia fresh fish scales of approximately 3 kg were collected from the local market in Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand. Acrylonitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) with the trademark NANCAR® 3345 was supplied by NANTEX Industry Co., Ltd. (Kaohsiung, Taiwan). Bis(triethoxysilylpropyl)tetrasulfide (TESPT) with the product ID KBE-846 was supplied by Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Hydrochloric acid (HCl) with AR grade and 37% purity was supplied by RCI Labscan Co., Ltd. (Bangkok, Thailand). Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) with RPE grade and 99% purity was supplied by Carlo Erba (Milan, Italy). Stearic acid (SA), zinc oxide (ZnO), Di(benzothiazol-2-yl)disulfide (MBTS), N-Cyclohexylbenzothiazole-2-sulfenamide (CBS), and sulfur (S) were supported by Chemical Innovation Co., Ltd. (Bangkok, Thailand).

2.2. Preparation of Fish Scale Particles (FSp) from Fresh Fish Scales

The method for preparing FSp was adapted from Kongsri et al. and Injorhor et al. [22,23]. The collected fresh fish scales were washed with tap water several times to remove dirt, and dried using a hot-air oven at 60 °C for 12 h to obtain the dried fish scales. The protein and fat on the surface of the dried fish scales were removed using HCl solution at 0.1 M under stirring for 2 h at room temperature. Then, the removed fish scales were filtered, washed with DI water until they reached pH = 7, and dried at 60 °C using a hot-air oven. The prior removed fish scales were alkali heat treated with 50% (w/v) of NaOH solution at 70 °C for 7 h. Afterwards, the slurry of fish scales was filtered, washed with DI water until it reached pH = 7, and dried using a hot-air oven at 60 °C. The FSp were then obtained.

2.3. Characterizations of FSp

The crystalline phase compositions and diffraction lines of FSp were analyzed by an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, D2 PHASER, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) with Cu Kα radiation source operated at 30 kV and current 10 mA. The 2θ range carried out was between 10 and 60 degrees.
The elemental compositions of FSp were analyzed by an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS, EDAX Genesis 2000, AMETEK, Inc., Berwyn, PA, USA) in a scanning electron microscope (SEM-EDS, JSM-6010LV, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).
The functional groups of FSp were analyzed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, TENSOR 27, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). The sample was mixed with potassium bromide (KBr) using agate mortar and pressed into a disk to obtain the test specimen with a smooth surface for transmittance measurement. The wavenumber range of 4000 to 400 cm−1 with resolution of 4 cm−1 and number of scans of 64 were used to collect data.
The characteristics of FSp in terms of BET surface area, total pore volume and particle size were determined from nitrogen adsorption–desorption analysis, which was performed on BELSORP-mini II (MicrotracBEL, Osaka, Japan). The sample was degassed at 160 °C for 6 h before analysis. The microstructure of FSp was acquired using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, AURIGA, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at 3 kV. The samples were sputtered with gold for 3 min at 10 mA beforehand.

2.4. Preparation of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA Composites

The NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites were prepared by compounding using an internal mixer at 70 °C with roller speed at 40 rpm and vulcanizing using a compression molding machine at 160 °C with an optimal cure time of each compound that was determined using a moving die rheometer (MDR). First, the NBR was masticated for 4 min, followed by the addition of different FSp contents (0, 5, and 10 phr), CA, and vulcanizing agent for 2 min. Then, the accelerators and activators were added separately for 1 min. The sample codes and compositions of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites are listed in Table 1.

2.5. Characterizations of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA Composites

The cure characteristics, such as minimum torque, maximum torque, scorch time, and optimal cure time of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites, were determined using an MDR (M-2000AN, GOTECH, Taichung, Taiwan) according to ASTM D2084 with a temperature at 160 °C. The cure rate index of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites were calculated by following the equation:
Cure rate index = 100/(optimal cure time − scorch time)
The modulus at 100% elongation (M100), modulus at 300% elongation (M300), tensile strength, and percentage of elongation at break of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites were measured according to ASTM D412 using a universal testing machine (UTM, Model:5565, INSTRON, Norwood, MA, USA) with a load cell of 5 kN and crosshead speed of 500 mm/min.
The hardness of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites were measured according to ASTM D2240 using a hardness tester (HPE II, Bareiss, Stouffville, ON, Canada) with the Shore A test method.
The secondary electron images of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites were acquired using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, AURIGA, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The tensile fracture surfaces of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites were coated with gold before the SEM observation.
The oil resistance in terms of change in mass percentage of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites were performed according to ASTM D471 by immersing the standard specimens in toluene for 22 h. The equation that was used to calculate the change in mass percentage of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites is:
ΔM (%) = [(M2 − M1)/M1] × 100
where ΔM is the change in mass (%), M1 is the initial mass of the specimen in air (g), and M2 is the mass of specimen in air after immersion (g).
The thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA, TGA/DSC 1, METTLER TOLEDO, Greifensee, Switzerland) was used to analyze the thermal decompositions of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites. The specimens were placed in an alumina pan and heated from room temperature up to 650 °C under nitrogen with a heating rate of 10 °C/min and a gas flow rate of 20 mL/min.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterizations of FSp

The XRD pattern of FSp is represented in Figure 1. The sample consisted entirely of the hydroxyapatite phase with defined peaks following the Crystallography Open Database (COD 9001345) and similar to the standard of JCDPS 00-009-0432 [24] without other phases. The characteristic peaks of the FSp are similar to the synthetic hydroxyapatite of Pon-On et al. [25] and the fish scale nano-hydroxyapatite of Kongsri et al. [23]. It was confirmed that the obtained FSp are a type of hydroxyapatite, which is a bio-material.
The elemental compositions and EDS spectra of FSp are shown in Figure 2. It confirms that the major constituents are calcium (Ca), phosphorous (P), and oxygen (O). Moreover, the typical presence of sodium (Na) and magnesium (Mg) are significant factors in bone and tooth growth [26]. However, the Ca/P of FSp is 1.86, which is higher than the stoichiometric ratio of 1.67 for stoichiometric hydroxyapatite because of the presence of carbonate (CO32−) ions that substitute phosphate (PO43−) in the hydroxyapatite structure (B-type hydroxyapatite) [25].
The functional groups of FSp are shown in Figure 3. The broad band around 3500 cm−1 corresponds to the OH− stretching vibration of adsorbed water. The bands at 1471 and 1415 cm−1 correspond to the asymmetric stretching vibration of the CO32− band, and a band at 873 cm−1 corresponds to the bending vibration of CO32− [23,27]. The presence of CO32− bands indicated that some PO43− groups were replaced with CO32− groups. These results confirmed the FSp are B-type hydroxyapatite, which corresponds to the EDS result and with Kongsri et al. [23]. In addition, the strong band at 1043 cm−1 corresponds to the stretching vibration of PO43−, and the sharp bands at 601 and 563 cm−1 correspond to the degenerate bending vibrations of PO43− in a hydroxyapatite structure.
The adsorption–desorption isotherm of FSp is represented in Figure 4 and the information on FSp analysis in terms of BET surface area and total pore volume are listed in Table 2. The isotherm shape shows unrestricted monolayer–multilayer adsorption up to high P/P0 without the final saturation plateau. Therefore, the isotherm of FSp is fitted to the second (II) type of the IUPAC classification given by nonporous adsorbents [28,29]. The BET surface area of FSp shows a higher value as compared to the extracted hydroxyapatite from carp fish that was reported by Muhammad et al. [30]. In addition, the BET surface area of FSp shows a higher value than the commercial hydroxyapatite in these reports [23,30]. For use as filler in composite materials, the high surface area of FSp has an advantage in terms of greater interactions with the matrix. It was expected to be a bio-filler for improving NBR composites.
The microstructure of FSp is shown in Figure 5. The FE-SEM images show the FSp in a rod-like shape with some agglomerates of FSp due to the static force between the FSp. However, the particle size of the FSp is in the range of the nanoscale.

3.2. Characterizations of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA Composites

The cure characteristics such as minimum torque, maximum torque, scorch time, optimal cure time, and cure rate index of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites are listed in Table 3. Normally, the minimum torque is related to the viscosity of the rubber compound, while the maximum torque is related to the rigidity of the rubber vulcanizate. In the case of the addition of filler to rubber, these properties are also related to the nature of the filler. In addition, the scorch time is the time with no crosslinks in the rubber compound, which is an important parameter for the safe processing of rubber in molds. The optimal cure time is another important parameter that determines the time required to produce the rubber products [15,31,32,33,34,35]. The value of minimum torque of NBR-5FSp tends to increase as compared to unfilled NBR because the dispersion of FSp at 5 phr reduces the mobility of the macromolecular chains of NBR, which causes the viscosity of the compound to increase [15,32,34]. Meanwhile, the value of minimum torque of NBR-10FSp decreases as compared to unfilled NBR and NBR-5FSp because the addition of FSp at this amount has agglomerated in the NBR matrix. The values of maximum torque of the filled NBR with FSp are higher than unfilled NBR because the stiffness of the FSp increases the rigidity of composite vulcanizates. The values of scorch time and optimal cure time of filled NBR with FSp decrease as compared to unfilled NBR because the mineral content of FSp acts as an activator for composite vulcanizates [4,34]. Meanwhile, the NBR-10FSp slightly decreases the values of scorch time and optimal cure time as compared to NBR-5FSp because the system of filled NBR with increasing FSp content becomes more heated from the filler friction that affects the increased degree of curing. These results resemble the cure characteristics of filled rubbers with prepared hydroxyapatite that were reported by Nihmath and Ramesan [15,34]. Therefore, the use of FSp as a filler in NBR is an alternative idea for producing NBR composite because it can reduce the optimal cure time of NBR to obtain the product in a shorter time. However, the NBR-10FSp-CA shows the value of minimum torque decreasing as compared to filled NBR because the CA acts as a lubricant, which causes the viscosity of the compound to decrease. Moreover, the value of the optimal cure time of NBR-10FSp-CA tends to increase as compared to filled NBR because the CA coats on the surface of FSp, which reduces their activator activity, which causes the optimal cure time of the composite vulcanizate to increase.
Figure 6 represents the mechanical properties of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites, and Table 4 shows the values of the mechanical properties of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites in terms of M100, M300, tensile strength, percentage of elongation at break, and hardness. It is well known that the characteristics and dispersion of filler are directly related to the properties of the polymer composite. Additionally, the area under the stress–strain curves is related to the toughness of the polymer. In general, the mechanical properties depend on the nature of the filler, dispersion, and the interaction between the filler and polymer matrix [4,15,34,36]. The modulus and tensile strength of filled NBR with FSp show increased values as compared to unfilled NBR because of the interactions between FSp and the NBR matrix, which improve the fracture resistance of NBR composites. However, the percentage of elongation at the break of filled NBR with FSp shows decreased values as compared to unfilled NBR because the addition of FSp restricts the molecular motions of the NBR matrix, which reduces the elasticity of NBR. When compared to the filled NBR with FSp at 5 and 10 phr, the NBR-10FSp shows higher values of tensile strength and percentage of elongation at break that resemble the mechanical properties reported by Akbay et al. [4]. According to this research, the tensile strength and percentage of elongation at break of the rubber were increased by increasing the fish scale content, because the calcium oxide (CaO) content of fish scale acts as a vulcanizate activator that improved the mechanical strength and flexibility of the rubber composite. Meanwhile, the hardness values of filled NBR increase with increasing FSp content because the stiffness of FSp improves the resistance to indentation of NBR composite, which resembles the hardness results in these reports [15,34]. Moreover, the NBR-10FSp-CA shows increased values of tensile strength and percentage of elongation at break as compared to filled NBR because the CA enhances the chemical interaction between FSp and the NBR matrix, which assists the stress-transfer of NBR composite but has no effect on the modulus value. Figure 7a represents the schematic of NBR/FSp/CA interactions. The first step is CA hydrolysis, which generates the silanol groups (Si-OH) on the side chains of CA. The second step is that the Si-OH of CA and the Ca of FSp generate an ionic reaction together. In addition, the sulfur (S) of the CA and the carbon (C) on the NBR chains undergo a crosslinking reaction. Figure 7b represents a sketch of the interface interactions between FSp, CA, and NBR chains. These interactions are similar to these reports [19,37,38]. All results show that the modulus, tensile strength, and hardness of NBR are improved by adding the FSp with increasing contents. In addition, the tensile strength, percentage of elongation at break, and hardness of NBR composites are also improved by using a CA to obtain superior values.
Figure 8 presents the FE-SEM images of tensile fracture surfaces of the NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites. Generally, the morphological properties of the polymer composite are necessary to report in order to understand the dispersion, compatibility, and characteristics of the filler after the mixing and forming processes [13,32,39]. The unfilled NBR shows the smooth fracture surface without the particles on the surface (Figure 8a). On the other hand, the filled NBR with FSp shows the dispersion of FSp with some agglomerates on the rough fracture surface (Figure 8b,c). These characteristics tend to increase with increasing FSp content in NBR (Figure 8c). In general, the dispersion of the filler should be uniform with no agglomerates in a polymer composite. Nevertheless, the mechanical properties in terms of modulus, tensile strength, and hardness of filled NBR increase with increasing FSp content. This indicated that the FSp are effective reinforcement fillers for improving the mechanical properties of NBR, although the FSp exhibit non-uniform dispersion and have some agglomeration in the NBR matrix. Additionally, the roughness on the fracture surface indicates the resistance to fracture of the polymer composite due to the good mechanical interlocking between filler and matrix [32]. That corresponds to the results of tensile strength and percentage of elongation at break of filled NBR, which increase with increasing FSp content. In the case of the addition of CA, the NBR-10FSp-CA shows the image of fracture surface with similar characteristics as compared to the NBR-10FSp. However, the FSp on the fracture surface of NBR-10FSp-CA tend to be more embedded in the NBR matrix than the FSp on the fracture surface of NBR-10FSp (Figure 8d), which affects the increased tensile strength and the percentage of elongation at break of the NBR-10FSp-CA. This indicated that the CA increases the reinforcement efficiency of the FSp and NBR matrix.
Figure 9 depicts the oil resistance of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites in terms of change in mass percentage. The oil resistance is an important parameter for polymer products that are used in petroleum applications. In general, the oil resistance depends on the interactions between solvent and polymer, crosslink density, and crystallinity of polymer [15,34]. The oil resistance of NBR is enhanced by adding the FSp, because the intermolecular forces between FSp and NBR increase the energy required to separate the NBR molecules for the penetration of oil molecules, which affects the decreased swelling percentages of filled NBR with FSp. In addition, this result also depends on the content of FSp added, which shows a decrease in the swelling percentage with increasing FSp content in NBR. Meanwhile, the value of the swelling percentage of NBR-10FSp-CA is no different when compared to NBR-10FSp, which indicates that the CA has no effect on this property. The values of the swelling percentage of unfilled NBR, NBR-5FSp, NBR-10FSp, NBR-10FSp-CA are 93.91%, 64.33%, 60.73%, and 58.41%, respectively. Therefore, although it is well known that NBR is a synthetic rubber that has excellent resistance to solvents and oils, the filled NBR with increasing FSp content increases the oil resistance efficiency.
The TGA thermograms of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites are presented in Figure 10, and the thermal properties in terms of the initial degradation temperature (Tonset), temperature at maximum weight loss level (Tmax), final degradation temperature (Tendset), and residue percentages of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites are listed in Table 5, according to the TGA thermograms of NBR composites, which can divide the stages of weight loss into three stages: 35–350, 350–500, and 500–650 °C. The first stage shows a slightly decreased weight loss percentage in all samples, which is about 3% due to the volatile water. Meanwhile, the decomposition of organic compounds from filler and polymer is the reason for the maximum weight loss in all samples that is shown in the second stage. However, the values of Tonset of NBR tend to increase with increasing FSp content, and the results of Tmax and Tendset also show this tendency. The reason for these results is that the decomposition temperature of FSp is higher than the NBR matrix, so the FSp act as a heat barrier during the thermal decomposition process of NBR composites, which resembles the thermal properties reported in these reports [13,40,41]. According to these studies, the thermal stability of the polymer was increased by increasing the prepared hydroxyapatite content. Additionally, due to the incomplete decomposition of organic compounds in the second stage, all samples exhibit a slightly decreased weight loss percentage in the third stage. At a temperature of 650 °C, the values of residue percentage of NBR increased with increasing FSp content due to the remaining inorganic compounds from FSp in NBR composites. Nevertheless, the NBR-10FSp and NBR-10FSp-CA show similar results in their thermal properties. Therefore, the thermal properties of NBR are increased by adding FSp with increasing content, but the CA has no effect on these results.

4. Conclusions

FSp were successfully obtained from Nile tilapia fish scales biowaste and used to prepared NBR/FSp composites. The obtained FSp are B-type hydroxyapatite with a rod-like shape. The FSp were the effective reinforcement filler in the NBR matrix because it enhanced the tensile strength, oil resistance, and thermal properties of NBR. Moreover, the scorch time and optimal cure time of NBR also reduced with increasing FSp content, resulting in a shorter time to obtain the NBR product. The addition of CA gave the best properties, because the CA enhanced the tensile strength and percentage of elongation at break of NBR-10FSp. The obtained NBR composites filled with FSp are expected to be used in sealing gadgets that can resist oil. In the future, the NBR composites will compare with other bio-fillers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.R. and C.R.; methodology, N.B., Y.R. and C.R.; validation, J.W., Y.R. and C.R.; formal analysis, N.B., P.I., S.K., P.M. and O.W.; investigation, N.B., P.I., S.K., P.M. and O.W.; resources, Y.R. and C.R.; data curation, N.B., P.I., S.K., P.M. and O.W.; writing—original draft preparation, N.B. and P.I.; writing—review and editing, N.B., J.W., Y.R. and C.R.; visualization, Y.R. and C.R.; supervision, Y.R. and C.R.; project administration, Y.R. and C.R.; funding acquisition, Y.R. and C.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI), Grant No. 160344.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Suranaree University of Technology (SUT), to Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI), to the National Science, Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF), to the Research Center for Biocomposite Materials for Medical Industry and Agricultural and Food Industry for the financial support, and to the Chemical Innovation Co., Ltd. for supporting the chemicals.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. El-Sayed, A.-F.M. Tilapia Culture; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mohammad, A.W.; Kumar, A.G.; Basha, R.K. Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of tilapia (Oreochromis Spp.) scale gelatine. Int. Aquat. Res. 2015, 7, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Kittiphattanabawon, P.; Sriket, C.; Kishimura, H.; Benjakul, S. Characteristics of acid and pepsin solubilized collagens from Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) scale. Emir. J. Food. Agric. 2019, 31, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Akbay, İ.K.; Güngör, A.; Özdemir, T. Using fish scales (Sardina pilchardus) within ethylene-propylene-diene ter monomer rubber as bio-based filler. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Qin, D.; Bi, S.; You, X.; Wang, M.; Cong, X.; Yuan, C.; Yu, M.; Cheng, X.; Chen, X.-G. Development and application of fish scale wastes as versatile natural biomaterials. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 428, 131102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ikoma, T.; Kobayashi, H.; Tanaka, J.; Walsh, D.; Mann, S. Microstructure, mechanical, and biomimetic properties of fish scales from Pagrus major. J. Struct. Biol. 2003, 142, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, S.-K.; Dewapriya, P. Biologically active compounds form seafood processing by-products. In Biotransformation of Waste Biomass into High Value Biochemicals; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 299–311. [Google Scholar]
  8. Majhool, A.; Zainol, I.; Jaafar, C.; Jahil, M.; Ha, A.; Asaad, A.; Mezaal, F. Preparation of Fish Scales Hydroxyapatite (FsHAp) for Potential Use as Fillers in Polymer. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. 2019, 13, 97–104. [Google Scholar]
  9. Prasad, A.; Mohan Bhasney, S.; Sankar, M.R.; Katiyar, V. Fish Scale Derived Hydroxyapatite reinforced Poly (Lactic acid) Polymeric Bio-films: Possibilities for Sealing/locking the Internal Fixation Devices. Mater. Today Proc. 2017, 4, 1340–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yasin, T.; Ahmed, S.; Yoshii, F.; Makuuchi, K. Effect of acrylonitrile content on physical properties of electron beam irradiated acrylonitrile–butadiene rubber. React. Funct. Polym. 2003, 57, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Degrange, J.-M.; Thomine, M.; Kapsa, P.; Pelletier, J.-M.; Chazeau, L.; Vigier, G.; Dudragne, G.; Guerbé, L. Influence of viscoelasticity on the tribological behaviour of carbon black filled nitrile rubber (NBR) for lip seal application. Wear 2005, 259, 684–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, J.; Li, X.; Xu, L.; Zhang, P. Investigation of aging behavior and mechanism of nitrile-butadiene rubber (NBR) in the accelerated thermal aging environment. Polym. Test. 2016, 54, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nihmath, A.; Ramesan, M. Fabrication, characterization and dielectric studies of NBR/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2017, 27, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nihmath, A.; Ramesan, M. Synthesis, characterization, processability, mechanical properties, flame retardant, and oil resistance of chlorinated acrylonitrile butadiene rubber. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2018, 29, 2165–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nihmath, A.; Ramesan, M. Hydroxyapatite as a potential nanofiller in technologically useful chlorinated acrylonitrile butadiene rubber. Polym. Test. 2020, 91, 106837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hwang, W.G.; Wei, K.H.; Wu, C.M. Mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties of NBR/organosilicate nanocomposites. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2004, 44, 2117–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shchegolkov, A.V.; Nachtane, M.; Stanishevskiy, Y.M.; Dodina, E.P.; Rejepov, D.T.; Vetcher, A.A. The Effect of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes on the Heat-Release Properties of Elastic Nanocomposites. J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. He, S.; Xue, Y.; Lin, J.; Zhang, L.; Du, X.; Chen, L. Effect of silane coupling agent on the structure and mechanical properties of nano-dispersed clay filled styrene butadiene rubber. Polym. Compos. 2016, 37, 890–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yangthong, H.; Pichaiyut, S.; Jumrat, S.; Wisunthorn, S.; Nakason, C. Mechanical, thermal, morphological, and curing properties of geopolymer filled natural rubber composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kahavita, K.; Samarasekara, A.; Amarasinghe, D.; Karunanayake, L. Nanofibrillated cellulose reinforced polypropylene composites: Influence of silane (SI-69) surface modification. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2020, 54, 789–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sae-oui, P.; Sirisinha, C.; Thepsuwan, U.; Hatthapanit, K. Roles of silane coupling agents on properties of silica-filled polychloroprene. Eur. Polym. J. 2006, 42, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Injorhor, P.; Trongsatitkul, T.; Wittayakun, J.; Ruksakulpiwat, C.; Ruksakulpiwat, Y. Nano− Hydroxyapatite from White Seabass Scales as a Bio− Filler in Polylactic Acid Biocomposite: Preparation and Characterization. Polymers 2022, 14, 4158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kongsri, S.; Janpradit, K.; Buapa, K.; Techawongstien, S.; Chanthai, S. Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite from fish scale waste: Preparation, characterization and application for selenium adsorption in aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 215, 522–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Deb, P.; Deoghare, A.B. Effect of Acid, Alkali and Alkali–Acid Treatment on Physicochemical and Bioactive Properties of Hydroxyapatite Derived from Catla catla Fish Scales. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2019, 44, 7479–7490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pon-On, W.; Suntornsaratoon, P.; Charoenphandhu, N.; Thongbunchoo, J.; Krishnamra, N.; Tang, I.M. Hydroxyapatite from fish scale for potential use as bone scaffold or regenerative material. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2016, 62, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sathiskumar, S.; Vanaraj, S.; Sabarinathan, D.; Bharath, S.; Sivarasan, G.; Arulmani, S.; Preethi, K.; Ponnusamy, V.K. Green synthesis of biocompatible nanostructured hydroxyapatite from Cirrhinus mrigala fish scale–A biowaste to biomaterial. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 7804–7810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sricharoen, P.; Limchoowong, N.; Nuengmatcha, P.; Chanthai, S. Ultrasonic-assisted recycling of Nile tilapia fish scale biowaste into low-cost nano-hydroxyapatite: Ultrasonic-assisted adsorption for Hg2+ removal from aqueous solution followed by “turn-off” fluorescent sensor based on Hg2+-graphene quantum dots. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2020, 63, 104966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.V.; Olivier, J.P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K.S. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Chen, K.; Zhang, T.; Chen, X.; He, Y.; Liang, X. Model construction of micro-pores in shale: A case study of Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale in Dianqianbei area, SW China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2018, 45, 412–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Muhammad, N.; Gao, Y.; Iqbal, F.; Ahmad, P.; Ge, R.; Nishan, U.; Rahim, A.; Gonfa, G.; Ullah, Z. Extraction of biocompatible hydroxyapatite from fish scales using novel approach of ionic liquid pretreatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2016, 161, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rabiei, S.; Shojaei, A. Vulcanization kinetics and reversion behavior of natural rubber/styrene-butadiene rubber blend filled with nanodiamond–The role of sulfur curing system. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 81, 98–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Balan, A.K.; Mottakkunnu Parambil, S.; Vakyath, S.; Thulissery Velayudhan, J.; Naduparambath, S.; Etathil, P. Coconut shell powder reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane/natural rubber blend-composites: Effect of silane coupling agents on the mechanical and thermal properties of the composites. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 52, 6712–6725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Srisuwan, L.; Jarukumjorn, K.; Suppakarn, N. Effect of silane treatment methods on physical properties of rice husk flour/natural rubber composites. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 2018, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Nihmath, A.; Ramesan, M.T. Development of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles reinforced chlorinated acrylonitrile butadiene rubber/chlorinated ethylene propylene diene monomer rubber blends. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, 138, 50189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Inphonlek, S.; Bureewong, N.; Jarukumjorn, K.; Chumsamrong, P.; Ruksakulpiwat, C.; Ruksakulpiwat, Y. Preparation of Poly (Acrylic Acid-co-acrylamide)-Grafted Deproteinized Natural Rubber and Its Effect on the Properties of Natural Rubber/Silica Composites. Polymers 2022, 14, 4602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Keawkumay, C.; Jarukumjorn, K.; Wittayakun, J.; Suppakarn, N. Influences of surfactant content and type on physical properties of natural rubber/organoclay nanocomposites. J. Polym. Res. 2012, 19, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wu, W.; Zuo, H. Used tire rubber powder/plant cellulose composites treated with coupling agent. Cellulose. 2016, 23, 1939–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Oprea, M.; Voicu, S.I. Recent advances in applications of cellulose derivatives-based composite membranes with hydroxyapatite. Materials 2020, 13, 2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nihmath, A.; Ramesan, M. Preparation, characterization, thermal, and electrical properties of chlorinated ethylene propylene diene monomer/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. Polym. Compos. 2018, 39, 2093–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rakmae, S.; Lorprayoon, C.; Ekgasit, S.; Suppakarn, N. Influence of heat-treated bovine bone-derived hydroxyapatite on physical properties and in vitro degradation behavior of poly (lactic acid) composites. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2013, 52, 1043–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nihmath, A.; Ramesan, M. Fabrication, characterization, dielectric properties, thermal stability, flame retardancy and transport behavior of chlorinated nitrile rubber/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. Polym. Bull. 2021, 78, 6999–7018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 15 00729 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD pattern of FSp compared with COD 9001345.
Figure 1. XRD pattern of FSp compared with COD 9001345.
Polymers 15 00729 g001
Polymers 15 00729 g002 550
Figure 2. Elemental analysis by EDS of FSp.
Figure 2. Elemental analysis by EDS of FSp.
Polymers 15 00729 g002
Polymers 15 00729 g003 550
Figure 3. FTIR spectrum of FSp.
Figure 3. FTIR spectrum of FSp.
Polymers 15 00729 g003
Polymers 15 00729 g004 550
Figure 4. Physisorption isotherm of FSp.
Figure 4. Physisorption isotherm of FSp.
Polymers 15 00729 g004
Polymers 15 00729 g005 550
Figure 5. FE-SEM images of FSp at (a) ×50,000 and (b) ×100,000 magnification.
Figure 5. FE-SEM images of FSp at (a) ×50,000 and (b) ×100,000 magnification.
Polymers 15 00729 g005
Polymers 15 00729 g006 550
Figure 6. Mechanical properties of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites showing (a) Stress–strain curves and (b) Tensile strength and percentage of elongation at break.
Figure 6. Mechanical properties of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites showing (a) Stress–strain curves and (b) Tensile strength and percentage of elongation at break.
Polymers 15 00729 g006
Polymers 15 00729 g007a 550Polymers 15 00729 g007b 550
Figure 7. (a) Schematic representation of NBR/FSp/CA interactions and (b) Sketch of the interface interaction between FSp, CA, and NBR chains.
Figure 7. (a) Schematic representation of NBR/FSp/CA interactions and (b) Sketch of the interface interaction between FSp, CA, and NBR chains.
Polymers 15 00729 g007aPolymers 15 00729 g007b
Polymers 15 00729 g008 550
Figure 8. FE-SEM images of (a) Unfilled NBR, (b) NBR-5FSp, (c) NBR-10FSp, and (d) NBR-10FSp-CA composites.
Figure 8. FE-SEM images of (a) Unfilled NBR, (b) NBR-5FSp, (c) NBR-10FSp, and (d) NBR-10FSp-CA composites.
Polymers 15 00729 g008
Polymers 15 00729 g009 550
Figure 9. Oil resistance of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites.
Figure 9. Oil resistance of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites.
Polymers 15 00729 g009
Polymers 15 00729 g010 550
Figure 10. TGA thermograms of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites.
Figure 10. TGA thermograms of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites.
Polymers 15 00729 g010
Table
Table 1. Sample codes and compositions of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites.
Table 1. Sample codes and compositions of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites.
Materials (phr *)Unfilled NBRNBR-5FSpNBR-10FSpNBR-10FSp-CA
NBR100100100100
SA2222
ZnO5555
MBTS1.51.51.51.5
CBS0.50.50.50.5
S1.51.51.51.5
FSp-51010
TESPT---2
* phr = part per hundred of rubber.
Table
Table 2. Information on FSp analysis.
Table 2. Information on FSp analysis.
SampleBET Surface Area
(m2/g)		Total Pore Volume
(cm3/g)
FSp1040.50
Table
Table 3. Cure characteristics of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites.
Table 3. Cure characteristics of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites.
SamplesMinimum Torque
(dNm)		Maximum Torque
(dNm)		Scorch Time
(min)		Cure Time
(min)		Cure Rate Index
(min−1)
Unfilled NBR7.5023.123:3211:530.20
NBR-5FSp7.8630.251:322:381.52
NBR-10FSp6.4429.021:312:321.64
NBR-10FSp-CA5.9124.001:323:121.00
Table
Table 4. Mechanical properties of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites.
Table 4. Mechanical properties of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites.
SamplesM100
(MPa)		M300
(MPa)		Tensile Strength
(MPa)		Elongation at
Break (%)		Hardness
(Shore A)
Unfilled NBR0.73 ± 0.021.14 ± 0.062.54 ± 0.14655.35 ± 8.0735.40 ± 0.25
NBR-5FSp1.15 ± 0.042.39 ± 0.134.20 ± 0.36475.21 ± 24.3737.90 ± 0.30
NBR-10FSp1.14 ± 0.022.21 ± 0.064.56 ± 0.48515.81 ± 16.6838.33 ± 0.25
NBR-10FSp-CA1.13 ± 0.032.21 ± 0.085.62 ± 0.42627.56 ± 51.1041.40 ± 1.14
Table
Table 5. Thermal properties of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites.
Table 5. Thermal properties of NBR/FSp and NBR/FSp/CA composites.
SamplesTonset (°C)Tmax (°C)Tendset (°C)Residue (%)
Unfilled NBR41044547510.91
NBR-5FSp41144648214.04
NBR-10FSp41244948317.47
NBR-10FSp-CA41344948317.23
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bureewong, N.; Injorhor, P.; Krasaekun, S.; Munchan, P.; Waengdongbang, O.; Wittayakun, J.; Ruksakulpiwat, C.; Ruksakulpiwat, Y. Preparation and Characterization of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Rubber Reinforced with Bio-Hydroxyapatite from Fish Scale. Polymers 2023, 15, 729. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030729

AMA Style

Bureewong N, Injorhor P, Krasaekun S, Munchan P, Waengdongbang O, Wittayakun J, Ruksakulpiwat C, Ruksakulpiwat Y. Preparation and Characterization of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Rubber Reinforced with Bio-Hydroxyapatite from Fish Scale. Polymers. 2023; 15(3):729. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030729

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bureewong, Namthip, Preeyaporn Injorhor, Saifa Krasaekun, Pawida Munchan, Oatsaraphan Waengdongbang, Jatuporn Wittayakun, Chaiwat Ruksakulpiwat, and Yupaporn Ruksakulpiwat. 2023. "Preparation and Characterization of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Rubber Reinforced with Bio-Hydroxyapatite from Fish Scale" Polymers 15, no. 3: 729. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030729

APA Style

Bureewong, N., Injorhor, P., Krasaekun, S., Munchan, P., Waengdongbang, O., Wittayakun, J., Ruksakulpiwat, C., & Ruksakulpiwat, Y. (2023). Preparation and Characterization of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Rubber Reinforced with Bio-Hydroxyapatite from Fish Scale. Polymers, 15(3), 729. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030729

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop