Next Article in Journal
Influence of Yarn and Fabric Properties on Mechanical Behavior of Polymer Materials and Its Retention over Time
Previous Article in Journal
Temperature-Dependent Viscosity Analysis of Powell–Eyring Fluid Model during a Roll-over Web Coating Process
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Preparation of Monodisperse Silica Mesoporous Microspheres with Narrow Pore Size Distribution

Polymers 2024, 16(12), 1724; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16121724
by Jiaqi Shan 1,2, Jia Liu 3, Jiahui Zhu 3, Lifei Chen 3, Ting Xu 4, Xingfa Ren 4 and Xingzhong Guo 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Polymers 2024, 16(12), 1724; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16121724
Submission received: 6 May 2024 / Revised: 11 June 2024 / Accepted: 13 June 2024 / Published: 17 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymeric Porous Materials for Advanced Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The manuscript numbered "polymers-3021640" is well written and presented in an appropriate manner. The subject of the manuscript aligns well with the journal's aims and scope.

The authors propose a new method for the preparation of monodisperse silica mesoporous particles with a narrow pore size distribution. These particles can be used for preparative chromatography due to their particle size of approximately 25 µm.

It should be noted that the manuscript lacks a discussion of the applicability of the proposed particles. Demonstrating the suitability of these particles for preparative purposes would be beneficial. This would not only advance the manuscript but also enhance its quality. Furthermore, the readers of the Polymers journal may be more inclined to engage with the manuscript following this application.

Author Response

Thank you very much for your constructive and valid comments, we have used silica microspheres as the stationary phase to fill the preparative liquid chromatography column, and the performance data of the preparative liquid chromatography column have been incorporated into section 3 of the manuscript.

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The paper "Preparation of monodisperse silica mesoporous microspheres with narrow pore size distribution" reports an improved emulsion method to prepare monodisperse mesoporous silica particles with application in liquid chromatography filed.

In the Introduction section the authors highlighted the importance of the mesoporous silica particles in chromatography, motivating the choice of the emulsion method in the absence of templates and surfactants to produce monodisperse silica microspheres. Here, the advantages of the chosen method over the existing ones must be presented!

In section 2, in the synthesis process, the description is too general, several information are need: amounts of reagents (molar ratio), alkali-heating reaction (what it consists of), the washing process (the solvents volume, the ratio, the repeating trial) to ensure a reproducible method.

In section 3.1. it seems that the temperature and the speed of the rotary evaporation play a fundamental role.

Why DMF was chosen as a porogen agent? Some information are required!

In Fig. 1- a histogram with the particle size distribution is required!

-It is not clear how many samples have been prepared. A table containing all samples and which parameter was varied must be added.

-TEM images highlighting the mesopores must be added.

-A schematic representation of the process would be very helpful!

Section 4. The application in liquid chomatography of the prepare silica particles was not discussed, the reusability of the particles after separation processes also must be discussed even if at the perspective level.

Based on these considerations I recommend the publication of this paper after Major revision.

 

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The manuscript has now reached the point where it is ready for publication in its current form.

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors have responded to all the suggestions and the paper has been improved accordingly so it can be accepted.

Back to TopTop