Next Article in Journal
Additive Manufacturing of Head Surrogates for Evaluation of Protection in Sports
Previous Article in Journal
Laser-Sintering of Cyclic Olefine Copolymer for Low Dielectric Loss Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Stable 3D Deep Convolutional Autoencoder Method for Ultrasonic Testing of Defects in Polymer Composites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Multi-Objective Optimization of Neural Networks for Predicting the Physical Properties of Textile Polymer Composite Materials

1
Artificial Intelligence Technology Scientific and Education Center, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005 Moscow, Russia
2
Scientific Department, Far Eastern Federal University, 690922 Vladivostok, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2024, 16(12), 1752; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16121752
Submission received: 13 May 2024 / Revised: 11 June 2024 / Accepted: 18 June 2024 / Published: 20 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Scientific Machine Learning for Polymeric Materials)

Abstract

:
This paper explores the application of multi-objective optimization techniques, including MOPSO, NSGA II, and SPEA2, to optimize the hyperparameters of artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector machines (SVMs) for predicting the physical properties of textile polymer composite materials (TPCMs). The optimization process utilizes data on the physical characteristics of the constituent fibers and fabrics used to manufacture these composites. By employing optimization algorithms, we aim to enhance the predictive accuracy of the ANN and SVM models, thereby facilitating the design and development of high-performance textile polymer composites. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated through comparative analyses and validation experiments, highlighting its potential for optimizing complex material systems.

1. Introduction

Polymer composite materials (PCMs) are composite materials consisting of two or more components, where the final mixture exhibits properties superior to those of each individual constituent material [1]. PCMs are indispensable in contemporary engineering and industrial applications owing to their exceptional characteristics, including but not limited to lightweight design [2], high strength [3], and resistance to corrosion [4,5]. However, the development of effective polymer composites necessitates the consideration of diverse factors [6], notably encompassing composition and structure.
Attaining the desired attributes of polymers mandates the application of multifaceted approaches, including choosing optimal raw components [7], with the necessary chemical and physical properties being a primary consideration. This may involve selecting different polymers [8], fillers [9], reinforcing materials [10], and additives [11]. Careful tuning of the composition and proportions [12] of components in the material can significantly impact its properties. This could involve altering the concentration of the polymer components [13,14]. Additionally, the chemical modification of the polymers [15,16] can be used to change their properties. This may involve introducing functional groups [17] and changing the molecular weight [18] and crystalline structure [19] of the polymer. Various treatments such as extrusion [20], injection molding [21], compression molding [22], and filament winding [23] can be used to shape and enhance the properties of polymer materials. Furthermore, the addition of nanoparticles [24] or nanotubes [25] to polymer composites can significantly improve their mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties [26].
The specific physical characteristics of polymers become imperative to meet precise functional requisites across various applications [27]. These characteristics may encompass mechanical properties such as tensile strength [28], flexibility [29], and impact resistance [30], alongside thermal attributes like heat resistance [31] and thermal conductivity [32]. Thus, a comprehensive understanding of the polymer composite composition and structure is pivotal, facilitating the customization of the properties to align with distinct application demands.
One of the modern approaches to achieving the desired properties of PCMs involves the application of machine learning (ML) techniques. ML algorithms, such as neural networks [33], support vector machines [34], and random forests [35], can analyze complex datasets comprising the material composition, processing parameters, and desired properties to identify intricate relationships and patterns. By leveraging these relationships, ML models can predict the properties of PCMs [36], optimize material formulations, and expedite the development process. This approach has been actively discussed and extensively researched in the scientific literature.
Fontes et al. [37] showcased the effectiveness of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) in crafting a data-driven failure model for Fiber-reinforced Polymer (FRP) composite materials. Using experimental failure data from the literature, a fully connected DNN with 20 input units and one output unit was trained. The inputs included the laminate layup sequence, the lamina properties, and the loading conditions, while the output was the failure vector length. Comparative analysis with conventional theories such as Tsai–Wu [38], Cuntze [39], and Pinho theory [40] indicated the superior performance of the DNN in fitting the experimental data. Its ability to handle higher order polynomials makes it a valuable tool for predicting FRP composite laminate failure.
Fahem et al. [41] investigated the impact of porosity on the mechanical properties of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) [42,43] through experimental and numerical analyses. The material characterization included a three-point bending test, while the finite-element modeling explored various air bubble scenarios. The results revealed a significant reduction in load as the bubble size increased. Additionally, an artificial neural network-Enhanced Jaya Algorithm (ANN-E JAYA) [44] predicted the tensile load reduction based on the crack lengths from an Extended finite-element method (XFEM) [45]. A comparison with other algorithms, including the Jaya Algorithm (JAYA) [46] and particle swarm optimization (PSO) [47], demonstrated the superior accuracy of ANN-E JAYA.
Nguen et al. [48] explored the impact of the cure-induced size effect on stress development and tensile transverse failure response in thermoset composite materials. Thick structures, combined with low polymer conductivity, may result in spatially varying temperature fields, affecting the property distribution and residual stress. The study employed a thermo-chemo-mechanical finite-element framework integrated with a crack band model. The cure model considered the kinetics and heat generation, while a neural network-based constitutive model captured the matrix mechanical property evolution.
Gupta et al. [49] proposed an ML model to precisely quantify the mechanical properties of FRP composites for optimal structural design. Using microstructural images as the input, the model visualizes the stress components, specifically S 11 , with high accuracy. The training data were obtained from the FEM analysis of short carbon fiber-filled specimens using a Representative Area Element (RAE) approach [50]. The study demonstrated the robustness of a pix2pix [51] deep learning Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model in predicting the stress fields. By focusing on the chronological development of the CNN model, the paper outlined a promising approach to efficiently predict full-field stress maps in fiber-reinforced composite specimens, reducing the time and cost associated with traditional methods.
El [52] used a Deep Recurrent CNN (DCRN) [53] to predict the full non-linear response of composite materials. The framework relies on a Representative Volume Element [54] (RVE) database, encompassing the composite layups, defects, and loading conditions. It incorporates various sources of material non-linearity, including matrix damage, delamination, fiber failure, and shear non-linearity. The proposed DCRN architecture combines convolutional layers for spatial feature detection with Long Short-Term Memory layers for the material loading history dependencies.
Zhang et al. [55] focused on enhancing the thermal protection performance of PCMs for re-entry vehicles. A thermal response model without surface recession was developed to simulate the ablation process. Using ML, the relationship between the piecewise porosity distribution and bondline temperature was explored based on simulated data. Optimal porosity distributions were obtained, leading to a reduction in the bondline temperature by 17.61 K, highlighting the potential of rational porosity optimization to improve material utilization rates.
Song et al. [56] presented an approach using digital material twins to analyze the mechanical performance of woven composites, particularly damage and failure behaviors. Addressing challenges in segmenting low-contrast digital images and reconstructing 3D braided structures, a ResL-U-Net CNN was proposed. The network incorporates the leaky-ReLU [57] activation function for efficiency and employs residual structures to enhance robustness and accuracy. The results demonstrated that the simulations accurately depicted the mechanical performance of GFRP, including the damage locations and material failure patterns.
Li et al. [58] introduced a DL fusion model for predicting the material properties of carbon fiber monofilaments [59] by simultaneously analyzing textual and visual data. Utilizing the greedy-based generation [60] (GBG) algorithm, 1200 stochastic microstructures were generated, and the statistical representations were determined using two-point statistics. The macroscopic properties were calculated via micro-scale finite-element simulation. The developed hybrid CNN-MLP fusion model achieved impressive average testing R 2 values for various mechanical properties of carbon fibers.
Doddashamachar et al. [61] predicted the dielectric properties of polypropylene composites reinforced with banana fiber using an ANN. Composites were prepared according to ASTM standards with varying banana fiber volume fractions [62]. The dielectric characteristics were determined using an impedance analyzer. The ANN, trained with the ReLU activation function, showed accurate prediction of the dielectric properties.
Amor at al. [63] provided an overview of computational intelligence (CI) modeling methods for lightweight composite materials (LWCMs). CI facilitates material data science tasks such as imaging, feature identification, prediction, and design optimization, enhancing LWCM quality through constituent optimization.
Mukhopadhyay [64] explored the use of an ANN in predicting the mechanical properties and behaviors of textile composite materials, including the static and dynamic mechanical properties, time-dependent properties like creep and stress relaxation, fatigue prediction, wear simulation, and crack detection. The discussion highlighted recent developments and applications of ANNs in the field of fiber-reinforced composites, emphasizing the importance of accurately modeling composite properties for engineering applications.
This article aims to bridge the existing gap in knowledge by predicting the physical characteristics of textile polymer composite materials (TPCMs) [65] based on a dataset encompassing the mechanical properties of fabrics and yarns in both the warp and weft directions, which constitute these fabrics. Through this analysis, the study delves into optimization methods aimed at fine-tuning the hyperparameters and selecting appropriate architectures for machine learning (ML) models. The primary focus is on exploring the effectiveness of optimization methods such as multi-objective particle swarm optimization [66] (MOPSO), Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II [67] (NSGA-II) [67], and Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm 2 [68] (SPEA2) in optimizing ML models like support vector machines [69] (SVMs) and ANNs to maximize accuracy and minimize inference time.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Dataset Description

To evaluate the tensile, compressive, and other properties of TPCMs, we prepared specially designed specimens in the form of strips measuring 10 × 20 cm. These specimens were securely mounted in a universal testing machine, the QUASAR 50 universal testing machine (Galdabini, Cardano al Campo, Italy), which applies mechanical forces to the material.
During a tensile test, the specimen was subjected to gradually increasing axial force until it ruptured, allowing us to assess its tensile strength and elongation properties. Conversely, in a compressive test, the specimen was compressed along its length by applying opposing forces at its ends, enabling the characterization of its compressive strength and modulus.
Figure 1 illustrates histograms depicting the distribution of the physical characteristics of textile PCMs to showcase key physical properties such as the tensile, compressive, and bending strengths, the percentage of elongation, and the modulus of elasticity in tension along the warp and weft directions, respectively, for each mentioned characteristic.
Figure 2 showcases histograms representing the spread of physical attributes like the interlaminar shear modulus, coefficient of linear thermal expansion along the warp direction, and density.
The study involved conducting a total of 420 measurements on samples to investigate 11 mentioned physical characteristics across various types of TPCMs and their corresponding constituents. Specifically, the materials under investigation included the following:
  • Basalt plastic, designated as TBK-100 [70,71], is a composite material comprising basalt fibers [72] as the reinforcement phase embedded in a polymer matrix. Basalt fibers are derived from natural volcanic rock [73] and have high tensile strength and resistance to temperature variations. TBK-100 finds application in construction [74]. The weave pattern of these samples is canvas.
  • Fiberglass-reinforced plastic, commonly known as fiberglass [75], is a composite material composed of fine glass fibers embedded in a polymer matrix, typically epoxy or polyester resin [76]. This material exhibits a high strength-to-weight ratio [77], excellent corrosion resistance [78,79], and dimensional stability [80], making it suitable for applications requiring durability and structural integrity [81]. We considered types such as T-10 [82], T-13 [83], T-11 [84], T-SU 8/3(VMP)-78 [85], and T-25 [86]. The fabric construction of these samples predominantly consisted of canvas [87] and satin weaves [88].
  • Carbon fiber-reinforced plastic, also known as carbon fiber composite or carbon composite [89], consists of carbon fibers infused in a polymer matrix, often epoxy resin. This material offers exceptional strength, stiffness, and lightweight properties, making it ideal for aerospace [90], automotive [91], and sporting goods [92] applications where weight reduction and high performance are critical. We considered CC245 [93], CC206 [94], T700SC [95], UMT49 [96], UT-900-3 [97], HTS45 [98], and IMS65 [99]. The weave pattern observed in these samples primarily included twill [100] and unidirectional [101] weaves.
  • Aramid fiber-reinforced plastic, or aramid composite [102], incorporates aramid fibers, such as Kevlar® [103], as the reinforcing component in a polymer matrix. Aramid fibers are known for their exceptional strength, stiffness, and resistance to impact and abrasion [104]. Aramid composites offer high tensile strength, heat resistance, and low weight, making them suitable for ballistic protection [105]. We considered varieties like T-43-76 [106], Satin 5/3 [107], Satin 8/3 [108], T-42-78 [109], and T-42/1-76 [110]. For this type of TPCM, the weave patterns also included canvas and satin.
To analyze the distribution of the key physical characteristics across various types of TPCMs, we utilized histograms. These materials were categorized into basalt plastic, fiberglass, carbon plastic, and aramid plastic. Each histogram in Figure 3 showcases the distribution of specific characteristics, such as the tensile strength [111], compression strength [112], bending strength [113], Young’s modulus [114], and ultimate elongation [115], along both the main axis and the warp direction.
Figure 4 illustrates the variations in the distribution of the interlaminar shear modulus [116], CTE [117], and density [118].
Unlike Figure 1 and Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 feature histograms with variable bar widths. This variation in bar thickness aims to highlight the distribution density of different data points. Thicker bars denote a higher number of TPCMs or the concentration of data within a range, while thinner bars represent a lower number of TPCMs. This method offers a more nuanced understanding of the data distribution compared to uniform bar widths.
Additionally, an analysis of the correlation matrix was conducted, reflecting the relationship between the physical characteristics of the TPCMs and the properties of the fabrics from which these samples are made (Figure 5). These relationships could be the basis for developing predictive models that estimate the behavior of composite materials based on the fabric properties and can aid in quality control during the manufacturing process. Figure 5 highlights the numerical input features of the dataset in green and the output features in red, as also depicted in Figure 6. From this correlation matrix, one can observe patterns such as the correlation between the parameters related to the yarns, such as the tensile strength along the base and warp, compression strength, bending strength, and Young’s modulus. These correlations exhibit a chessboard-like pattern, indicating that the values along the base correlate more strongly with each other than with the values along the warp. This pattern is similarly observed for the output parameters, such as those pertaining to finished TPCM products, with the same names, but for finished products.
To build a model for predicting the physical characteristics of polymer composite materials, we utilized neural networks, which allow modeling complex non-linear relationships between the material components and their properties. Neural networks consist of multiple layers of neurons that process input data and provide predictions.
To optimize the performance of neural networks, we applied hyperparameter optimization methods such as Grid Search, Random Search, and Bayesian Optimization. These methods enabled us to automatically find optimal values for the model hyperparameters such as the number of hidden layers, the number of neurons in each layer, the learning rate, and others.

2.2. Model Development

To predict the physical characteristics of the TPCMs, an SVM and ANN were selected as the optimization methods. The SVM is capable of handling both linearly and non-linearly separable data and is resistant to overfitting. Due to the small number of hyperparameters, this simplifies the optimization process and parameter tuning. The ANN possesses the ability to adapt to various types of data and tasks, achieving high accuracy when properly configured.
To further address the task at hand, it is necessary to determine the selected optimization methods. NSGA-2 is used for multi-objective optimization problems, aiming to find a set of optimal solutions known as the Pareto set [119,120]. NSGA-2 is designed for problems with multiple optimization criteria, ensuring diversity in the population to prevent premature convergence and achieve uniform coverage of the Pareto set.
SPEA-2 is an evolutionary algorithm also utilized for multi-criteria optimization. It ranks solutions based on their strength and distance from other solutions to effectively select the best solutions for constructing the Pareto set [121,122].
MOPSO is a variant of the particle swarm optimization (PSO) method, also applied to multi-criteria optimization. It iteratively updates the position and velocity of particles in the parameter space [123] based on the best solutions and information exchange between particles.
Python was chosen for implementing the algorithm due to its powerful capabilities in machine learning and optimization. We utilized the scikit-learn library for SVM model handling and PyGMO for the MOPSO algorithm. Data preprocessing was conducted using pandas and numpy, followed by splitting into training and testing sets. The optimization space encompassed the linear [124], polynomial [125], or RBF [124] kernel types and a regularization parameter [126] for the SVM. For multi-objective optimization, we defined minimizing the inference time and maximizing the model accuracy as the objectives. The inference time is computed as the average inference time on the test dataset for each SVM model. Accuracy is computed as the accuracy on the test dataset for each SVM model. The MOPSO algorithm was implemented using PyGMO [127], involving initialization, updating, and evaluating the solutions. The solution updating followed the principles of dominance and best solution selection. The algorithm continued until reaching a specified number of iterations or stopping criteria, after which the best solution was selected based on multi-objective optimization.
Figure 6 shows the schematic representation of a potential neural network architecture for predicting the physical properties of TPCMs.
The input features include the properties of both the fabric and thread. The fabric properties encompass parameters such as the elastic modulus of the fiber during tension (GPa), elongation at break (%), number of filaments (thousand pieces), filament diameter (μm), and density (tex). Additionally, thread properties include the tensile strength along the base and warp (N and MPa), Young’s modulus in tension along the base and warp (GPa), ultimate elongation along the base and warp (%), surface density (g/m2), and thickness (mm). Categorical features such as the TPCM type (like T-43-76, Satin 5/3, Satin 8/3, etc.), weaving pattern, formation technology, binder-to-reinforcement ratio, reinforcement filler type, number of warp/weft threads per 1 cm, yarn type for warp and weft, and binder type were also included as inputs. The network predicts the parameters of the final TPCM product, including the tensile strength, compression strength, bending strength, Young’s modulus, interlaminar shear modulus, ultimate elongation, and CTE.

3. Results

Our study investigates the efficacy of employing metaheuristic optimization algorithms, specifically MOPSO, SPEA2, and NSGA-II, for hyperparameter tuning in the ANN and SVM for predicting the physical properties of TPCM samples based on their fabricated components. In Figure 7, we present the dynamic evolution of the loss curves for the five best models for each optimization case alongside the exploration of the optimization parameter space.
This figure encapsulates the iterative optimization process, illustrating how these algorithms navigate the complex landscape of hyperparameters to achieve optimal performance in both the ANN and SVM models. Such analysis provides valuable insights into the comparative effectiveness of these optimization techniques, shedding light on their suitability for enhancing the predictive capabilities of machine learning models.
The ANN model architecture was constructed based on the genetic algorithm’s (GA) [128] individual representation for the optimizers NSGA-II and SPEA2. The architecture consisted of densely connected layers with leaky-ReLU [57] activation functions. The number of layers was dynamically determined, but capped at a predefined maximum. Each layer’s neuron count was constrained within specified bounds. The model was trained using k-fold cross-validation [129] to mitigate overfitting, and its performance was evaluated based on the root-mean-squared error (RMSE) [130] metric. Key parameters such as the population size [131] specified the number of individuals (ANN architectures) in each generation of the genetic algorithm. In our case, the population size was set to 50. The crossover probability [132] determined the likelihood of crossover occurring between two parent individuals during reproduction. We set a value of 0.7; there was a 70% chance of crossover. The mutation probability [133] represents the probability of mutation, which introduces small random changes to individual genomes. We set a value of 0.3, indicating a 30% chance of mutation. The number of generations [134] indicates how the GA will evolve the population. In our scenario, the algorithm ran for 30 generations. The number of training epochs [135] (iterations over the entire dataset) during the training of each ANN was 100 epochs. The minimum number of neurons allowed in a single layer of the ANN was set to 2 neuron, and the maximum was 32 neurons in increments of 2. We defined the minimum and maximum learning rates as 0.05 and 0.2, respectively, which control the step size during gradient descent optimization. The learning rate [136] typically falls within a predefined range to balance training stability and convergence speed. The maximum number of layers allowed in the ANN architecture was constrained to five.
For MOPSO, the fitness function evaluates a solution (particle position) using SVR and the ANN and calculates the RMSE for each target variable. The algorithm runs the MOPSO algorithm for a specified number of iterations as 50 with 20 particles each time, updating the particles’ positions and velocities based on their personal best and global best positions.
The predictive performance of the ANN and SVM, optimized using heuristic algorithms, in predicting the physical characteristics of the TPCMs is shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9 for all 13 output features highlighted in red in Figure 6. These Figure 8 and Figure 9 present the median values as whisker plots for some of the polymer grades, while the yellow (for the ANN) and cyan (for the SVM) markers indicate the values proposed by the best ML models, as summarized in Table 1. For convenience, we also provide a table summarizing the optimization parameters for the ANN and SVM using MOPSO, SPEA2, and NSGA-II.
The findings presented in Figure 9 are a continuation of those shown in Figure 8. Together, they form a series of 13 subfigures, each representing a numerical physical characteristic of the TPCMs distributed across different TPCM grades (types), like TBK-100, T-10 (92), CC245, T-13, T-SU 8/3, T-43-76, Satin 5-3, and Satin 8-3.
The boxplot whisker chart provides a visual representation of the distribution of the values for each physical characteristic across the selected grades of TPCMs for the real dataset. Each boxplot illustrates the median, shown as a line within the colored area of the whisker, and the quartiles, represented by the boundaries of the colored area. Additionally, the chart depicts potential outliers and extreme values as horizontal lines outside the colored area. These elements are presented for each physical characteristic based on the TPCM grade, enabling a detailed comparison of the data distribution across different polymer grades.
Specifically, these grades are those for which experiments were conducted more than 10 times. On each of the whisker plots, the predicted values generated by modeling with the ANN optimized using MOPSO are indicated in yellow digits, and for the SVM optimized using NSGA II represented in cyan digits. These predictions are based on the architecture hyperparameters provided in Table 1. Such analysis offers insights into the efficacy of different machine learning approaches in capturing the complex relationships inherent in the TPCM properties.

4. Discussion

For predicting the physical characteristics of TPCMs, we employed multi-objective optimization algorithms to develop predictive models for the TPCM properties based on the constituents that comprise these materials.
Our choice was motivated by several factors, among which the prominent one was the robustness and extensive application of MOPSO, NSGA II, and SPEA2 in optimization tasks. These algorithms exhibit efficient search capabilities and adeptly manage multiple conflicting objectives [137] concurrently. Furthermore, their evolutionary nature renders them well-suited for navigating high-dimensional parameter spaces. Iteratively exploring these spaces, they refine solutions progressively, converging towards optimal or near-optimal solutions. Also, these algorithms provide a diverse set of solutions, allowing us to explore the trade-offs between different objectives and select the most suitable model configurations based on the specific requirements of the application.
To address classical ML issues such as avoiding local optima [138], heuristic algorithms offer several advantages. They use a population of potential solutions, allowing the exploration of multiple regions of the parameter space simultaneously and reducing the likelihood of becoming stuck in local optima [139]. Additionally, they balance different aspects of model performance, such as accuracy and generalization [140], leading to more reliable solutions. Initializing particles with diverse positions helps cover a broader area of the search space, increasing the chances of finding global optima.
To ensure the robustness of our dataset, we conducted a validation using information obtained from open sources. Several of these sources are listed in Section 2.1. By comparing and verifying the information against established sources, we aimed to confirm the accuracy and reliability of our dataset. Leveraging information from open sources enhances the credibility of our findings and strengthens the validity of our analyses.
Utilizing multi-objective optimization is widely discussed in the scientific literature, as exemplified by Mannodi et al. [141], who developed two Monte Carlo algorithms to pinpoint the Pareto front in the chemical space of dielectric polymers, optimizing both the bandgap and dielectric constant. Using machine learning on a dataset from density functional theory calculations, they created surrogate models for four-block polymers and extended their applicability.
Garcia et al. [142] developed an ANN to predict thermal and electrical conductivity in HDPE–carbon particle composites. ANNs served as objective functions in a multi-objective GA to optimize composite design parameters. The GA generates Pareto-optimal solutions [143] for maximizing thermal conductivity and minimizing electrical conductivity. This approach offers a systematic framework for optimizing polymer composite properties efficiently.
The approach taken in this study showcases several novel aspects, particularly in the optimization of the predictive accuracy and inference time for the physical properties of TPCMs by analyzing the components they are produced from, like the properties of the yarns in the warp and weft directions, as well as the fabrics made from these yarns by utilizing MOPSO, SPEA2, and NSGA-II to achieve a more efficient exploration of the high-dimensional parameter space. This resulted in more accurate predictions and reduced inference times, which is a significant improvement over traditional optimization methods by reducing the need for time-consuming and expensive physical experiments. By accurately predicting the properties of new composite materials based on existing data, we can streamline the development process of new TPCM products.
This method also offers the potential for incorporating multiphysical computational methods, which can further enhance the accuracy and relevance of the predictions. This integration supports the development of comprehensive models that account for various physical phenomena simultaneously.
Despite the promising results, several challenges and limitations must be acknowledged. One notable limitation is the availability and quality of data. While efforts were made to collect comprehensive datasets, variations in the data sources and measurement techniques may introduce inconsistencies and biases.
A trade-off exists between model interpretability and predictive performance. While complex ANNs may achieve superior predictive accuracy, they often lack interpretability, hindering insights into the underlying physical mechanisms. Future research should explore techniques for enhancing model interpretability without compromising performance, such as layerwise relevance propagation [144] and feature attribution methods.
The generalization ability of predictive models is crucial for their practical applicability across diverse TPCM systems and processing conditions. Robust validation strategies, including cross-validation and out-of-sample testing [145], are essential for assessing model generalization and ensuring reliable predictions in real-world scenarios.
Various frameworks exist for multi-physics modeling. For instance, PERMIX [146] is an open-source framework designed for multiscale modeling and simulation of fractures in solids, utilizing the extended finite-element method (XFEM) and integrating with libraries like LAMMPS and ABAQUS. It accommodates both semi-concurrent and concurrent multiscale methods for detailed fracture simulations.
Alternatively, Liu et al. [147] introduced a hybrid ML approach employing an ANN and PSO to predict the thermal conductivity of polymeric nanocomposites (PNCs). By combining the ANN for modeling and PSO for optimization, they achieved superior predictive performance compared to traditional ANNs. Key input parameters included the thermal conductivity of fibers and matrix, Kapitza resistance, volume fraction, and the aspect ratio, with the output being the composite’s macroscopic thermal conductivity.
Moreover, N. Vu-Bac [148] integrated molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to examine the impact of the single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) radius, temperature, and pulling velocity on the interfacial shear stress (ISS) of PNCs by assessing the influence of uncertain input parameters on ISS prediction by computing partial derivatives via averaged local sensitivity analysis (SA) and employing surrogate models (polynomial regression, moving least squares, and hybrid models) for computational efficiency.
Ilyani Abu et al. [149] utilized unit cells and evolutionary algorithms to forecast the geometric characteristics and elastic properties of woven fabric composites, through optimizing elastic properties within these unit cells to accurately predict mechanical behavior. TexGen generated the weave patterns; ABAQUS was used to conduct the simulations; finite-element (FE) analysis estimated the effective elastic properties of the yarn. The parameter studies delved into the effects of various geometric parameters, facilitating the selection of an optimal parameter set for composite performance.
The Parametric Deep Energy Method (P-DEM) for elasticity problems incorporating strain gradient effects was suggested in [150]. Utilizing physics-informed neural networks [151] (PINNs), the authors optimized a cost function associated with potential energy, eliminating the need for classical discretization. By defining a parametric/reference space akin to isoparametric finite elements, and leveraging NURBS [152] basis functions, P-DEM achieves efficient computation of the total potential energy.
Accurate predictive models for TPCM properties offer significant implications for materials’ design, process optimization, and product performance prediction. By leveraging these models, engineers and designers can expedite material development cycles, optimize manufacturing processes, and tailor materials’ properties to meet specific application requirements.
Future research directions may include the incorporation of advanced feature engineering techniques, such as image-based analysis and spectral imaging, to extract rich structural and compositional information from TPCM samples. Additionally, the integration of physics-based models with machine learning approaches could enhance predictive accuracy and facilitate mechanistic understanding of material behavior.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study highlights the significant potential of ML and optimization techniques in advancing the predictive modeling of TPCM properties. By leveraging SVMs and ANNs as powerful modeling tools, we successfully optimized their hyperparameters using state-of-the-art optimization algorithms, including MOPSO, NSGA II, and SPEA 2. Through this approach, we have demonstrated the effectiveness of integrating advanced ML techniques with optimization methodologies to enhance the accuracy, robustness, and applicability of predictive models for TPCM properties. By addressing key challenges and exploring innovative methodologies, researchers can further propel advancements in material science and engineering, ultimately facilitating the development of high-performance textile polymer composites for diverse applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.M., V.T. and A.G.; data curation, A.G. and V.N.; funding acquisition, A.G., V.N. and A.B.; investigation, V.T. and V.N.; methodology, I.M.; project administration, A.G., V.N. and A.B.; resources, I.M.; software, I.M., V.T., V.N. and A.B.; supervision, V.T., A.G., V.N. and A.B.; validation, A.B.; visualization, I.M.; writing—original draft, I.M.; writing—review and editing, V.T. and A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data used in this study are available in the TPCM repository. The repository contains a comprehensive dataset comprising the properties of the TPCMs, meticulously compiled from experimental data. Researchers interested in accessing the data can find them in the provided repository.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hsissou, R.; Seghiri, R.; Benzekri, Z.; Hilali, M.; Rafik, M.; Elharfi, A. Polymer composite materials: A comprehensive review. Compos. Struct. 2021, 262, 113640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fan, J.; Njuguna, J. An introduction to lightweight composite materials and their use in transport structures. In Lightweight Composite Structures in Transport; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 3–34. [Google Scholar]
  3. Qian, D.; Bao, L.; Takatera, M.; Kemmochi, K.; Yamanaka, A. Fiber-reinforced polymer composite materials with high specific strength and excellent solid particle erosion resistance. Wear 2010, 268, 637–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bazli, L.; Yusuf, M.; Farahani, A.; Kiamarzi, M.; Seyedhosseini, Z.; Nezhadmansari, M.; Aliasghari, M.; Iranpoor, M. Application of composite conducting polymers for improving the corrosion behavior of various substrates: A Review. J. Compos. Compd. 2020, 2, 228–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dobrzański, L.; Drak, M.; Trzaska, J. Corrosion resistance of the polymer matrix hard magnetic composite materials Nd–Fe–B. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2005, 164, 795–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kangishwar, S.; Radhika, N.; Sheik, A.A.; Chavali, A.; Hariharan, S. A comprehensive review on polymer matrix composites: Material selection, fabrication, and application. Polym. Bull. 2023, 80, 47–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ali, B.A.; Sapuan, S.; Zainudin, E.; Othman, M. Implementation of the expert decision system for environmental assessment in composite materials selection for automotive components. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 107, 557–567. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sapuan, S.; Kho, J.; Zainudin, E.; Leman, Z.; Ali, B.; Hambali, A. Materials selection for natural fiber reinforced polymer composites using analytical hierarchy process. Indian J. Eng. Mater. Sci. 2011, 18, 255–267. [Google Scholar]
  9. DeArmitt, C.; Rothon, R. Particulate fillers, selection and use in polymer composites. In Encyclopedia of Polymers and Composites; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rajak, D.K.; Pagar, D.D.; Kumar, R.; Pruncu, C.I. Recent progress of reinforcement materials: A comprehensive overview of composite materials. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 6354–6374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kamath, S.S.; Chandrappa, R.K. Additives used in natural fibre reinforced polymer composites—A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 50, 1417–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lhamo, P.; Mahanty, B. Tuning material properties of microbially synthesized poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) and their composites for various applications. J. Polym. Environ. 2023, 31, 4641–4661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xue, T.; He, T.; Peng, L.; Syzgantseva, O.A.; Li, R.; Liu, C.; Sun, D.T.; Xu, G.; Qiu, R.; Wang, Y.; et al. A customized MOF-polymer composite for rapid gold extraction from water matrices. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadg4923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Krishnan, M.R.; Omar, H.; Almohsin, A.; Alsharaeh, E.H. An overview on nanosilica–polymer composites as high-performance functional materials in oil fields. Polym. Bull. 2024, 81, 3883–3933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yadav, R.; Singh, M.; Shekhawat, D.; Lee, S.Y.; Park, S.J. The role of fillers to enhance the mechanical, thermal, and wear characteristics of polymer composite materials: A review. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2023, 175, 107775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hasan, K.F.; Al Hasan, K.N.; Ahmed, T.; György, S.T.; Pervez, M.N.; Bejó, L.; Sándor, B.; Alpár, T. Sustainable bamboo fiber reinforced polymeric composites for structural applications: A mini review of recent advances and future prospects. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2023, 8, 100362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fu, X.; Lin, J.; Liang, Z.; Yao, R.; Wu, W.; Fang, Z.; Zou, W.; Wu, Z.; Ning, H.; Peng, J. Graphene oxide as a promising nanofiller for polymer composite. Surfaces Interfaces 2023, 37, 102747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, J.; Sun, J.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, J.; Xu, L.; Guo, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, D. Eco-friendly wood plastic composites with biomass-activated carbon-based form-stable phase change material for building energy conversion. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2023, 197, 116573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huseynov, O.; Hasanov, S.; Fidan, I. Influence of the matrix material on the thermal properties of the short carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites manufactured by material extrusion. J. Manuf. Process. 2023, 92, 521–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Al-Tamimi, A.A.; Tlija, M.; Abidi, M.H.; Anis, A.; Abd Elgawad, A.E.E. Material Extrusion of Multi-Polymer Structures Utilizing Design and Shrinkage Behaviors: A Design of Experiment Study. Polymers 2023, 15, 2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zou, W.; Zheng, X.; Hu, X.; Huang, J.; Wang, G.; Guo, Z. Recent advances in injection molding of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic polymer composites: A review. ES Gen. 2023, 1, 938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Barthod-Malat, B.; Hauguel, M.; Behlouli, K.; Grisel, M.; Savary, G. Influence of the Compression Molding Temperature on VOCs and Odors Produced from Natural Fiber Composite Materials. Coatings 2023, 13, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Błachut, A.; Wollmann, T.; Panek, M.; Vater, M.; Kaleta, J.; Detyna, J.; Hoschützky, S.; Gude, M. Influence of fiber tension during filament winding on the mechanical properties of composite pressure vessels. Compos. Struct. 2023, 304, 116337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mayakannan, S.; Raj, J.B.; Raja, V.; Nagaraj, M. Effectiveness of silicon nanoparticles on the mechanical, wear, and physical characteristics of PALF/sisal fiber–based polymer hybrid nanocomposites. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2023, 13, 13291–13305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ali, A.; Koloor, S.S.R.; Alshehri, A.H.; Arockiarajan, A. Carbon nanotube characteristics and enhancement effects on the mechanical features of polymer-based materials and structures—A review. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 24, 6495–6521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. dos Anjos, E.G.; Moura, N.K.; Antonelli, E.; Baldan, M.R.; Gomes, N.A.; Braga, N.F.; Santos, A.P.; Rezende, M.C.; Pessan, L.A.; Passador, F.R. Role of adding carbon nanotubes in the electric and electromagnetic shielding behaviors of three different types of graphene in hybrid nanocomposites. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2023, 36, 3209–3235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Low, K.O.; Wong, K.J. Influence of ball burnishing on surface quality and tribological characteristics of polymers under dry sliding conditions. Tribol. Int. 2011, 44, 144–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Feih, S.; Mouritz, A.; Mathys, Z.; Gibson, A. Tensile strength modeling of glass fiber—polymer composites in fire. J. Compos. Mater. 2007, 41, 2387–2410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chang, S.M.; Hur, S.; Park, J.; Lee, D.G.; Shin, J.; Kim, H.S.; Song, S.E.; Baik, J.M.; Kim, M.; Song, H.C.; et al. Optimization of piezoelectric polymer composites and 3D printing parameters for flexible tactile sensors. Addit. Manuf. 2023, 67, 103470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wen, S.M.; Chen, S.M.; Gao, W.; Zheng, Z.; Bao, J.Z.; Cui, C.; Liu, S.; Gao, H.L.; Yu, S.H. Biomimetic Gradient Bouligand Structure Enhances Impact Resistance of Ceramic-Polymer Composites. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2211175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. He, L.; Zhang, W.; Liu, X.; Tong, L. Substantial improvement of thermal conductivity and mechanical properties of polymer composites by incorporation of boron nitride nanosheets and modulation of thermal curing reaction. Polym. Compos. 2024, 45, 2215–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, Z.; Wu, Z.; Weng, L.; Ge, S.; Jiang, D.; Huang, M.; Mulvihill, D.M.; Chen, Q.; Guo, Z.; Jazzar, A.; et al. A roadmap review of thermally conductive polymer composites: Critical factors, progress, and prospects. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2301549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Taye, M.M. Theoretical understanding of convolutional neural network: Concepts, architectures, applications, future directions. Computation 2023, 11, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Roy, A.; Chakraborty, S. Support vector machine in structural reliability analysis: A review. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2023, 233, 109126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hu, J.; Szymczak, S. A review on longitudinal data analysis with random forest. Briefings Bioinform. 2023, 24, bbad002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gao, Y.; Shigidi, I.M.; Ali, M.A.; Homod, R.Z.; Safaei, M.R. Thermophysical properties prediction of carbon-based nano-enhanced phase change material’s using various machine learning methods. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2023, 148, 104662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fontes, A.; Shadmehri, F. Data-driven failure prediction of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer composite materials. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2023, 120, 105834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Groenwold, A.A.; Haftka, R.T. Optimization with non-homogeneous failure criteria like Tsai–Wu for composite laminates. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2006, 32, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rezasefat, M.; Gonzalez-Jimenez, A.; Giglio, M.; Manes, A. An evaluation of Cuntze and Puck inter fibre failure criteria in simulation of thin CFRP plates subjected to low velocity impact. Compos. Struct. 2021, 278, 114654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pimenta, S.; Pinho, S.T. Recycling carbon fibre reinforced polymers for structural applications: Technology review and market outlook. Waste Manag. 2011, 31, 378–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fahem, N.; Belaidi, I.; Brahim, A.O.; Noori, M.; Khatir, S.; Wahab, M.A. Prediction of resisting force and tensile load reduction in GFRP composite materials using Artificial Neural Network-Enhanced Jaya Algorithm. Compos. Struct. 2023, 304, 116326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sathishkumar, T.; Satheeshkumar, S.; Naveen, J. Glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites—A review. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2014, 33, 1258–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rajak, D.K.; Pagar, D.D.; Menezes, P.L.; Linul, E. Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites: Manufacturing, Properties, and Applications. Polymers 2019, 11, 1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhang, Y.; Chi, A.; Mirjalili, S. Enhanced Jaya algorithm: A simple but efficient optimization method for constrained engineering design problems. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2021, 233, 107555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cervera, M.; Barbat, G.; Chiumenti, M.; Wu, J.Y. A comparative review of XFEM, mixed FEM and phase-field models for quasi-brittle cracking. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2022, 29, 1009–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Houssein, E.H.; Gad, A.G.; Wazery, Y.M. Jaya algorithm and applications: A comprehensive review. In Metaheuristics and Optimization in Computer and Electrical Engineering; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 3–24. [Google Scholar]
  47. Nayak, J.; Swapnarekha, H.; Naik, B.; Dhiman, G.; Vimal, S. 25 years of particle swarm optimization: Flourishing voyage of two decades. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2023, 30, 1663–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nguyen, M.H.; D’Mello, R.J.; Waas, A.M. Use of a neural network constitutive model for the size-dependent effects of curing on the deformation response and failure of fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. Arch. Appl. Mech. 2023, 93, 369–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gupta, S.; Mukhopadhyay, T.; Kushvaha, V. Microstructural image based convolutional neural networks for efficient prediction of full-field stress maps in short fiber polymer composites. Def. Technol. 2023, 24, 58–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sharma, A.; Munde, Y.; Kushvaha, V. Representative volume element based micromechanical modelling of rod shaped glass filled epoxy composites. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kim, S.; Lee, J.; Jeong, K.; Lee, J.; Hong, T.; An, J. Automated door placement in architectural plans through combined deep-learning networks of ResNet-50 and Pix2Pix-GAN. Expert Syst. Appl. 2024, 244, 122932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. El Said, B. Predicting the non-linear response of composite materials using deep recurrent convolutional neural networks. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2023, 276, 112334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Koller, O.; Zargaran, S.; Ney, H. Re-sign: Re-aligned end-to-end sequence modelling with deep recurrent CNN-HMMs. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA, 21–26 July 2017; pp. 4297–4305. [Google Scholar]
  54. Reinaldo, A.A.; Javier, L.M.; Pablo, J.S. Multiscale formulation for saturated porous media preserving the representative volume element size objectivity. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2024, 125, e7381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, H.; Li, B. Improvement of thermal protection performance of polymer composites based on optimized piecewise porosity distribution using a neural network method. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2023, 43, 102010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Song, Y.; Qu, Z.; Liao, H.; Ai, S. Material twins generation of woven polymer composites based on ResL-U-Net convolutional neural networks. Compos. Struct. 2023, 307, 116672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xu, J.; Li, Z.; Du, B.; Zhang, M.; Liu, J. Reluplex made more practical: Leaky ReLU. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), Rennes, France, 7–10 July 2020; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  58. Li, M.; Li, S.; Tian, Y.; Fu, Y.; Pei, Y.; Zhu, W.; Ke, Y. A deep learning convolutional neural network and multi-layer perceptron hybrid fusion model for predicting the mechanical properties of carbon fiber. Mater. Des. 2023, 227, 111760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, L.; Hao, L.; Liu, S.; Ding, G.; Sun, X.; Zhang, W.; Li, F.; Jiao, W.; Yang, F.; Xu, Z.; et al. Modulus distribution in polyacrylonitrile-based carbon fiber monofilaments. Carbon 2020, 157, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, M.; Zhang, H.; Ma, J.; Li, S.; Zhu, W.; Ke, Y. Greedy-based approach for generating anisotropic random fiber distributions of unidirectional composites and transverse mechanical properties prediction. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2023, 218, 111966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Doddashamachar, M.; Sen, S.; Nama Vasudeva Setty, R. A novel Artificial Neural Network-based model for predicting dielectric properties of banana fiber filled with polypropylene composites. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2023, 36, 4106–4123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Arpitha, G.; Jain, N.; Verma, A. Banana biofiber and glass fiber reinforced hybrid composite for lightweight structural applications: Mechanical, thermal, and microstructural characterization. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2023, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Amor, N.; Noman, M.T.; Petru, M.; Sebastian, N.; Balram, D. A review on computational intelligence methods for modelling of light weight composite materials. Appl. Soft Comput. 2023, 147, 110812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mukhopadhyay, S. Artificial Neural Network Applications in Textile Composites; Soft Computing in Textile Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  65. Amor, N.; Noman, M.T.; Petru, M. Classification of textile polymer composites: Recent trends and challenges. Polymers 2021, 13, 2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Borhanazad, H.; Mekhilef, S.; Ganapathy, V.G.; Modiri-Delshad, M.; Mirtaheri, A. Optimization of micro-grid system using MOPSO. Renew. Energy 2014, 71, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Verma, S.; Pant, M.; Snasel, V. A comprehensive review on NSGA-II for multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 57757–57791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, X.; Zhang, D. An improved SPEA2 algorithm with local search for multi-objective investment decision-making. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cervantes, J.; Garcia-Lamont, F.; Rodríguez-Mazahua, L.; Lopez, A. A comprehensive survey on support vector machine classification: Applications, challenges and trends. Neurocomputing 2020, 408, 189–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sapozhnikov, S.; Kudryavtsev, O. Modeling of thermoplastic composites used in protective structures. Mech. Compos. Mater. 2015, 51, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kreutzer-Schmid, C.; Schmid, H.P. The prosomal protein of 27 kDa and a nuclear 38 kDa protein are immunologically related. FEBS Lett. 1990, 267, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Hashim, U.R.; Jumahat, A.; Jawaid, M.; Dungani, R.; Alamery, S. Effects of accelerated weathering on degradation behavior of basalt fiber reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Polymers 2020, 12, 2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Jamshaid, H.; Mishra, R. A green material from rock: Basalt fiber—A review. J. Text. Inst. 2016, 107, 923–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kozinets, G.L.; Chernov, P.V.; Kolotvina, N.S.; Zotov, D.K.; Kärki, T.; Lahtela, V. Optimization of wooden constructions with basalt-based materials. In Proceedings of the International Seminar, Saint Petersburg, Germany, 25 May 2021; pp. 7–20. [Google Scholar]
  75. Wallenberger, F.T.; Bingham, P.A. Fiberglass and Glass Technology. Energy-Friendly Compositions And Applications; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  76. Patel, A.; Kravchenko, O.; Manas-Zloczower, I. Effect of curing rate on the microstructure and macroscopic properties of epoxy fiberglass composites. Polymers 2018, 10, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Poopakdee, N.; Thammawichai, W. Improvement on cost-performance ratio of fiberglass/carbon fiber hybrid composite. J. Met. Mater. Miner. 2021, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhang, W.; Zhang, X.; Qin, Z.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Yang, R. High-transparency polysilsesquioxane/glycidyl-azide-polymer resin and its fiberglass-reinforced composites with excellent fire resistance, mechanical properties, and water resistance. Compos. Part B Eng. 2021, 219, 108913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Trentin, A.; Pakseresht, A.; Duran, A.; Castro, Y.; Galusek, D. Electrochemical characterization of polymeric coatings for corrosion protection: A review of advances and perspectives. Polymers 2022, 14, 2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Thomason, J.; Ali, J. The dimensional stability of glass–fibre reinforced polyamide 66 during hydrolysis conditioning. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2009, 40, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Stickel, J.M.; Nagarajan, M. Glass fiber-reinforced composites: From formulation to application. Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. 2012, 3, 122–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kalinin, Y.E.; Kudrin, A.; Ovdak, O.; Popov, I. Internal friction in an epoxy polymer and a fiberglass reinforced plastic based on it. Polym. Sci. Ser. A 2022, 64, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tusnin, A.; Nikolay, L.; Aleksandr, K. The Load-Bearing Capacity and Deformability of Connections of Wooden Elements with Composite Materials Based on Fiberglass. Buildings 2023, 13, 3063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bashkov, O.; Bryansky, A. Cluster analysis of the acoustic emission signals registered during bending deformation of FGRP. AIP Conf. Proc. 2023, 2899, 020013. [Google Scholar]
  85. Gorev, Y.A.; Rivkind, V. Polyester composites for shipbuilding. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2010, 80, 2098–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chermoshentseva, A.; Pokrovskiy, A.; Bokhoeva, L. The behavior of delaminations in composite materials-experimental results. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 116, 012005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Shmoilov, E.; Fedotov, M.; Sharutin, I.; Ilyukhin, R.; Stepanov, S.; Panina, N.; Gurenchuk, L.; Kapyrin, P.; Kabantsev, O.; Kornev, O. Polymer Composites for External Reinforcement of Building Structures. Int. J. Comput. Civ. Struct. Eng. 2024, 20, 21–34. [Google Scholar]
  88. Liang, B.; Zhao, Z.; Cheng, H.; Boisse, P.; Zhang, K.; Luo, B. A combined method for analyzing the effective thermal conductivity evolution of satin weave thermoset prepregs during preforming process. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2022, 177, 107574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, G. Carbon and carbon composites for thermoelectric applications. Carbon Energy 2020, 2, 408–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Srinivasan, V.; Kunjiappan, S.; Palanisamy, P. A brief review of carbon nanotube reinforced metal matrix composites for aerospace and defense applications. Int. Nano Lett. 2021, 11, 321–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ahmad, H.; Markina, A.; Porotnikov, M.; Ahmad, F. A review of carbon fiber materials in automotive industry. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 971, 032011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sharma, S.; Sudhakara, P.; Misra, S.; Singh, J. A comprehensive review of current developments on the waste-reinforced polymer-matrix composites for automotive, sports goods and construction applications: Materials, processes and properties. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 33, 1671–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Garifullin, A.; Krasina, I.; Skidchenko, E.; Shaekhov, M.; Tikhonova, N. Modification of carbon fabrics by radio-frequency capacitive discharge at low pressure to regulate mechanical properties of carbon fiber reinforced plastics based on it. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017, 789, 012014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ghiringhelli, G.; Terraneo, M.; Vigoni, E. Improvement of structures vibroacoustics by widespread embodiment of viscoelastic materials. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2013, 28, 227–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wang, Z.; Dong, S.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, H.; Yang, J.; Lu, B. Mechanical properties and microstructures of Cf/SiC–ZrC composites using T700SC carbon fibers as reinforcements. Ceram. Int. 2011, 37, 695–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Slovikov, S.; Babushkin, A.; Gusina, M. Nonlinearity of compression behavior of 3D-epoxy reinforced with carbon fibers composites. Frat. Integrità Strutt. 2023, 17, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gordeev, Y.I.; Binchurov, A.; Yasinskii, V.; Pikalov, Y.Y.; Vakulin, M.; Kazakov, I. Influence of Cutting Conditions and End Mill Geometry on the Surface Quality in High-Speed Machining of Carbon Composites. Russ. Eng. Res. 2023, 43, 592–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Käppler, I.; Hund, R.D.; Cherif, C. Surface modification of carbon fibres using plasma technique. Autex Res. J. 2014, 14, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kravchuk, L.; Buiskikh, K.; Derevyanko, I.; Potapov, O. Load-bearing capacity of elements of composite shell structures in rocket and space engineering made of composite materials. Strength Mater. 2022, 54, 613–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chairman, C.A.; Jayasathyakawin, S.; Babu, S.K.; Ravichandran, M. Mechanical properties of basalt fabric plain and twill weave reinforced epoxy composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 46, 9480–9483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ahmed, U.; Tariq, A.; Nawab, Y.; Shaker, K.; Khaliq, Z.; Umair, M. Comparison of mechanical behavior of biaxial, unidirectional and standard woven fabric reinforced composites. Fibers Polym. 2020, 21, 1308–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Fan, Y.; Li, Z.; Wei, J. Application of aramid nanofibers in nanocomposites: A brief review. Polymers 2021, 13, 3071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Zhao, Y.; Li, X.; Shen, J.; Gao, C.; Van der Bruggen, B. The potential of Kevlar aramid nanofiber composite membranes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 7548–7568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Bijwe, J.; Awtade, S.; Ghosh, A. Influence of orientation and volume fraction of Aramid fabric on abrasive wear performance of polyethersulfone composites. Wear 2006, 260, 401–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Farias-Aguilar, J.; Ramírez-Moreno, M.; Gonzalez-García, D.; Téllez-Jurado, L.; Balmori-Ramirez, H. Evaluation of the ballistic protection level of (glass-fiber reinforced polyamide 6)-aramid fabric sandwich composite panels. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 12, 1606–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Dos Santos, D.; Carbas, R.; Marques, E.; Da Silva, L. Reinforcement of CFRP joints with fibre metal laminates and additional adhesive layers. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 165, 386–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Xiaobo, Y.; Binjie, X.; Baciu, G.; Jinlian, H. Fourier-analysis based satin fabric density and weaving pattern extraction. Res. J. Text. Appar. 2007, 11, 71. [Google Scholar]
  108. Saiman, M.; Wahab, M.; Wahit, M. The effect of fabric weave on the tensile strength of woven kenaf reinforced unsaturated polyester composite. In Proceedings of the International Colloquium in Textile Engineering, Fashion, Apparel and Design 2014 (ICTEFAD 2014); Springer: Singapore, 2014; pp. 25–29. [Google Scholar]
  109. Lobkovskiy, S.; Shaydurova, G.; Zubarev, S. Study of waste utilization technology generated during the production of rocket engine casings from polymer composite materials. Ecol. Ind. Russ. 2016, 20, 10–15. [Google Scholar]
  110. Barannikov, A.A.; Veshkin, E.A.; Postnov, V.I.; Strelnikov, S.V. On the issue of producing PCM floor panels for aircraft (review article). Proc. Samara Sci. Cent. Russ. Acad. Sci. 2017, 19, 198–213. [Google Scholar]
  111. Karamzadeh, N.S.; Aliha, M.; Karimi, H.R. Investigation of the effect of components on tensile strength and mode-I fracture toughness of polymer concrete. Arab. J. Geosci. 2022, 15, 1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Mohammed, A.; Mahmood, W.; Ghafor, K. TGA, rheological properties with maximum shear stress and compressive strength of cement-based grout modified with polycarboxylate polymers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 235, 117534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Iqbal, M.; Aminanda, Y.; Firsa, T.; Nazaruddin, N.; Nasution, I.S.; Erawan, D.F.; Saputra, D.A.; Nasution, A.R. The effect of fiber content and fiber orientation on bending strength of abaca fiber reinforce polymer composite fabricated by press method. AIP Conf. Proc. 2023, 2643, 050055. [Google Scholar]
  114. Kim, S.; Lee, Y.; Lee, M.; An, S.; Cho, S.J. Quantitative visualization of the nanomechanical Young’s modulus of soft materials by atomic force microscopy. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Akagi, Y.; Katashima, T.; Sakurai, H.; Chung, U.i.; Sakai, T. Ultimate elongation of polymer gels with controlled network structure. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 13251–13258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Yavas, D.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Q.; Wu, D. Interlaminar shear behavior of continuous and short carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites fabricated by additive manufacturing. Compos. Part B Eng. 2021, 204, 108460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kamarian, S.; Bodaghi, M.; Isfahani, R.B.; Shakeri, M.; Yas, M. Influence of carbon nanotubes on thermal expansion coefficient and thermal buckling of polymer composite plates: Experimental and numerical investigations. Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach. 2021, 49, 217–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Wei, J.; Zhu, L. Intrinsic polymer dielectrics for high energy density and low loss electric energy storage. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2020, 106, 101254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zouambi, M.; Dhaenens, C.; Jacques, J. An Alternative Pareto-based Approach to Multi-objective Neural Architecture Search. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), Chicago, IL, USA, 1– 5 July 2023; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  120. Ngo, S.T.; Jaafar, J.; Aziz, I.A.; Tong, G.T.; Nguyen, G.H.; Bui, A.N. Different Approaches of Evolutionary Algorithms to Multiple Objective RCPSP. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Big Data and Computing, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 7–11 November 2022; pp. 58–66. [Google Scholar]
  121. Wan, L.; Deng, K.; Li, X.; Zhao, L.; Long, J. Multi-objective optimization strategy for industrial catalytic cracking units: Kinetic model and enhanced SPEA-2 algorithm with economic, CO2, and SO2 emission considerations. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2023, 282, 119331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Mohanty, R.; Das, S.K.; Mohanty, M. Shear Wave Velocity-Based Liquefaction Susceptibility of Soil Using Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) with Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm (SPEA 2). In Earthquake Geotechnics: Select Proceedings of 7th ICRAGEE 2021; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 33–44. [Google Scholar]
  123. Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, H.; Xie, N. A multi-objective optimization method for enclosed-space lighting design based on MOPSO. Build. Environ. 2024, 250, 111185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Liu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Liu, X.; Dan, H.; Xiong, W.; Ling, T.; Su, M. Weighting factor design based on SVR–MOPSO for finite set MPC operated power electronic converters. J. Power Electron. 2022, 22, 1085–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Guo, X.; Zhu, C.; Hao, J.; Zhang, S. Multi-step wind speed prediction based on an improved multi-objective seagull optimization algorithm and a multi-kernel extreme learning machine. Appl. Intell. 2023, 53, 16445–16472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Vapnik, V.; Izmailov, R. Reinforced SVM method and memorization mechanisms. Pattern Recognit. 2021, 119, 108018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Tettelaar, K. Towards Multi-Objective Bayesian Global Optimization for Space Missions. Master’s Thesis, Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science, Leiden, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  128. Hassanat, A.; Almohammadi, K.; Alkafaween, E.; Abunawas, E.; Hammouri, A.; Prasath, V.S. Choosing mutation and crossover ratios for genetic algorithms—A review with a new dynamic approach. Information 2019, 10, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Nti, I.K.; Nyarko-Boateng, O.; Aning, J. Performance of machine learning algorithms with different K values in K-fold cross-validation. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci. 2021, 13, 61–71. [Google Scholar]
  130. Hodson, T.O. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE): When to use them or not. Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. 2022, 15, 5481–5487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Abdul-Muneer, P. Application of microsatellite markers in conservation genetics and fisheries management: Recent advances in population structure analysis and conservation strategies. Genet. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 691759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Zhang, X. Differential Evolution without the Scale Factor and the Crossover Probability. J. Math. 2023, 2023, 8973912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Li, Q.; Ma, Z. A hybrid dynamic probability mutation particle swarm optimization for engineering structure design. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2021, 2021, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Angelova, M.; Pencheva, T. Tuning genetic algorithm parameters to improve convergence time. Int. J. Chem. Eng. 2011, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Manjula Devi, R.; Kuppuswami, S.; Suganthe, R. Fast linear adaptive skipping training algorithm for training artificial neural network. Math. Probl. Eng. 2013, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Johny, A.; Madhusoodanan, K. Dynamic learning rate in deep CNN model for metastasis detection and classification of histopathology images. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2021, 2021, 5557168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Lalwani, S.; Singhal, S.; Kumar, R.; Gupta, N. A comprehensive survey: Applications of multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm. Trans. Comb. 2013, 2, 39–101. [Google Scholar]
  138. Klincewicz, J.G. Avoiding local optima in the p-hub location problem using tabu search and GRASP. Ann. Oper. Res. 1992, 40, 283–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Lin, Q.; Li, J.; Du, Z.; Chen, J.; Ming, Z. A novel multi-objective particle swarm optimization with multiple search strategies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2015, 247, 732–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Qasem, S.; Shamsuddin, S. Generalization improvement of radial basis function network based on multi-objective particle swarm optimization. J. Artif. Intell 2010, 3, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A.; Pilania, G.; Ramprasad, R.; Lookman, T.; Gubernatis, J.E. Multi-objective optimization techniques to design the Pareto front of organic dielectric polymers. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2016, 125, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. García-Carrillo, M.; Espinoza-Martínez, A.B.; Ramos-de Valle, L.F.; Sánchez-Valdés, S. Simultaneous optimization of thermal and electrical conductivity of high density polyethylene-carbon particle composites by artificial neural networks and multi-objective genetic algorithm. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2022, 201, 110956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Kong, Y.; Mei, Y.; Wang, X.; Ben, Y. Solution selection from a pareto optimal set of multi-objective reservoir operation via clustering operation processes and objective values. Water 2021, 13, 1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Montavon, G.; Binder, A.; Lapuschkin, S.; Samek, W.; Müller, K.R. Layer-wise relevance propagation: An overview. In Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 193–209. [Google Scholar]
  145. Pickering, B.; Choudhary, R. Quantifying resilience in energy systems with out-of-sample testing. Appl. Energy 2021, 285, 116465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Talebi, H.; Silani, M.; Bordas, S.P.; Kerfriden, P.; Rabczuk, T. A computational library for multiscale modeling of material failure. Comput. Mech. 2014, 53, 1047–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Liu, B.; Vu-Bac, N.; Rabczuk, T. A stochastic multiscale method for the prediction of the thermal conductivity of Polymer nanocomposites through hybrid machine learning algorithms. Compos. Struct. 2021, 273, 114269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Vu-Bac, N.; Lahmer, T.; Zhang, Y.; Zhuang, X.; Rabczuk, T. Stochastic predictions of interfacial characteristic of polymeric nanocomposites (PNCs). Compos. Part B Eng. 2014, 59, 80–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Bakar, I.A.A.; Kramer, O.; Bordas, S.; Rabczuk, T. Optimization of elastic properties and weaving patterns of woven composites. Compos. Struct. 2013, 100, 575–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Nguyen-Thanh, V.M.; Anitescu, C.; Alajlan, N.; Rabczuk, T.; Zhuang, X. Parametric deep energy approach for elasticity accounting for strain gradient effects. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2021, 386, 114096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Cuomo, S.; Di Cola, V.S.; Giampaolo, F.; Rozza, G.; Raissi, M.; Piccialli, F. Scientific machine learning through physics–informed neural networks: Where we are and what’s next. J. Sci. Comput. 2022, 92, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Dimas, E.; Briassoulis, D. 3D geometric modelling based on NURBS: A review. Adv. Eng. Softw. 1999, 30, 741–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Physical properties of textile PCMs such as the tensile, compressive, and bending strengths and the modulus of elasticity in tension along the warp and weft directions, respectively, for the considered specimens.
Figure 1. Physical properties of textile PCMs such as the tensile, compressive, and bending strengths and the modulus of elasticity in tension along the warp and weft directions, respectively, for the considered specimens.
Polymers 16 01752 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of the interlaminar shear modulus, coefficient of linear thermal expansion (CTE) along the warp direction, and density for the considered specimens.
Figure 2. Distribution of the interlaminar shear modulus, coefficient of linear thermal expansion (CTE) along the warp direction, and density for the considered specimens.
Polymers 16 01752 g002
Figure 3. Histograms depicting the distribution of the physical characteristics for TPCMs grouped by type: basalt plastic, fiberglass, carbon plastic, and aramid plastic. Each subplot illustrates the distribution of the following characteristics along the main and warp directions: tensile strength, compression strength, bending strength, Young’s modulus, and ultimate elongation.
Figure 3. Histograms depicting the distribution of the physical characteristics for TPCMs grouped by type: basalt plastic, fiberglass, carbon plastic, and aramid plastic. Each subplot illustrates the distribution of the following characteristics along the main and warp directions: tensile strength, compression strength, bending strength, Young’s modulus, and ultimate elongation.
Polymers 16 01752 g003
Figure 4. Histograms of physical attributes for TPCMs grouped by type: basalt plastic, fiberglass, carbon plastic, and aramid plastic for the distributions of the interlaminar shear modulus, CTE, and density.
Figure 4. Histograms of physical attributes for TPCMs grouped by type: basalt plastic, fiberglass, carbon plastic, and aramid plastic for the distributions of the interlaminar shear modulus, CTE, and density.
Polymers 16 01752 g004
Figure 5. Correlation matrix of physical properties of TPMCs (highlighted in green) and fabric properties (highlighted in red), from which the samples are derived.
Figure 5. Correlation matrix of physical properties of TPMCs (highlighted in green) and fabric properties (highlighted in red), from which the samples are derived.
Polymers 16 01752 g005
Figure 6. Illustration of a hypothetical neural network architecture designed to predict the physical characteristics of TPCMs: blue dots as inputs, red dots as outputs.
Figure 6. Illustration of a hypothetical neural network architecture designed to predict the physical characteristics of TPCMs: blue dots as inputs, red dots as outputs.
Polymers 16 01752 g006
Figure 7. Evolution of loss curves and optimization parameter space for hyperparameter tuning in the ANN and SVM using the MOPSO (ad), SPEA2 (eh), and NGSA-II (il) optimization methods.
Figure 7. Evolution of loss curves and optimization parameter space for hyperparameter tuning in the ANN and SVM using the MOPSO (ad), SPEA2 (eh), and NGSA-II (il) optimization methods.
Polymers 16 01752 g007
Figure 8. Whisker charts for selected types of TPCMs depending on physical property: (a) Tensile strength along the base, (b) Tensile strength along the warp, (c) Compression strength along the base, (d) Compression strength along the warp, (e) Bending strength along the base, (f) Bending strength along the warp with predictions made by the best architectures of the ANN (digits in yellow) and SVM (digits in cyan), architectures optimized using the MOPSO and NSGA-II algorithms, respectively.
Figure 8. Whisker charts for selected types of TPCMs depending on physical property: (a) Tensile strength along the base, (b) Tensile strength along the warp, (c) Compression strength along the base, (d) Compression strength along the warp, (e) Bending strength along the base, (f) Bending strength along the warp with predictions made by the best architectures of the ANN (digits in yellow) and SVM (digits in cyan), architectures optimized using the MOPSO and NSGA-II algorithms, respectively.
Polymers 16 01752 g008
Figure 9. Whisker charts for selected types of TPCMs charts for selected types of TPCMs depending on physical property: (a) Tensile strength along the base depending on physical property: (a) Young’s modulus in tension along the base, (b) Young’s modulus in tension along the warp, (c) Interlaminar shear modulus, (d) Ultimate elongation along the base, (e) Ultimate elongation along the warp, (f) CTE, (g) Density with predictions made by the best architectures of the ANN (digits on yellow) and SVM (digits on cyan), architectures optimized using the MOPSO and NSGA-II algorithms, respectively.
Figure 9. Whisker charts for selected types of TPCMs charts for selected types of TPCMs depending on physical property: (a) Tensile strength along the base depending on physical property: (a) Young’s modulus in tension along the base, (b) Young’s modulus in tension along the warp, (c) Interlaminar shear modulus, (d) Ultimate elongation along the base, (e) Ultimate elongation along the warp, (f) CTE, (g) Density with predictions made by the best architectures of the ANN (digits on yellow) and SVM (digits on cyan), architectures optimized using the MOPSO and NSGA-II algorithms, respectively.
Polymers 16 01752 g009
Table 1. Comparison of optimized values for the SVM and ANN using MOPSO, SPEA2, and NSGA-II.
Table 1. Comparison of optimized values for the SVM and ANN using MOPSO, SPEA2, and NSGA-II.
ML ModelOptimized
Value
MOPSOSPEA2NSGA-II
SVMaccuracy0.8780.8760.899
inference time, ms0.880.850.78
Parameters
(C, γ )
(1.0, 0.1)(1.2, 0.08)(0.9, 0.15)
ANNaccuracy0.9020.9010.898
inference time, ms0.420.360.43
Architecture
(layers, neurons, activation)
(4, [4, 28, 20, 12],
ReLU)
(4, [2, 16, 8, 16],
sigmoid)
(3, [6, 4, 8],
tanh)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Malashin, I.; Tynchenko, V.; Gantimurov, A.; Nelyub, V.; Borodulin, A. A Multi-Objective Optimization of Neural Networks for Predicting the Physical Properties of Textile Polymer Composite Materials. Polymers 2024, 16, 1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16121752

AMA Style

Malashin I, Tynchenko V, Gantimurov A, Nelyub V, Borodulin A. A Multi-Objective Optimization of Neural Networks for Predicting the Physical Properties of Textile Polymer Composite Materials. Polymers. 2024; 16(12):1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16121752

Chicago/Turabian Style

Malashin, Ivan, Vadim Tynchenko, Andrei Gantimurov, Vladimir Nelyub, and Aleksei Borodulin. 2024. "A Multi-Objective Optimization of Neural Networks for Predicting the Physical Properties of Textile Polymer Composite Materials" Polymers 16, no. 12: 1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16121752

APA Style

Malashin, I., Tynchenko, V., Gantimurov, A., Nelyub, V., & Borodulin, A. (2024). A Multi-Objective Optimization of Neural Networks for Predicting the Physical Properties of Textile Polymer Composite Materials. Polymers, 16(12), 1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16121752

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop